On this episode of the Alex Jones Show, host Alex Jones talks about the Black Lives Matter movement and how it is nothing more than a globalist plot to create race riots in America. He talks about how the globalist agenda is to create riots and civil unrest in America and how the police are being used as a cover for the globalists to do just that.
00:00:06.000So, hey, that's just what's gonna happen, you know?
00:00:09.000So in the black community, which is the target of the globalist operation, and I'm not defending segregation, it was another evil, this was an even greater evil, you had less unemployment and less illegitimacy in the black community in the 1940s than in the white community.
00:00:28.000And now you've got almost 80% single parent homes in the black community.
00:00:32.000You've got about half the people in the black community on welfare.
00:00:36.000Well, after you burn down all the black stores, who's going to have jobs now?
00:00:41.000So see, he's saying, oh, well, we'll come to your neighborhood and burn it down.
00:01:42.000Get ready, they're gonna stomp your guts out in a gulag for decades!
00:01:47.000Because that's what they want, is to rape good people!
00:01:53.000The very same scum that did that in Russia are like literally just sitting there salivating over what they're about to do to you and your family.
00:02:02.000So, whatever energy you got, whatever it is you need to do, you need to decide, hey!
00:02:08.000You want to bend over and take it or you want to stand up and fight?
00:02:31.000And pull up all the clips in the last few months where I said, as the COVID-19 hoax, at least phase one, begins to dissipate, what are the globalists going to launch?
00:02:43.000And I said, they're going to launch war between China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong.
00:02:51.000And they're going to intensify economic warfare and try to trigger race riots in America.
00:03:22.000Trends of Democracy run by Alexander Soros.
00:03:28.000Trying to trigger with Antifa operatives, black Americans, rioting as the cover to overthrow major city governments so Obama would have a pretext to declare national martial law ahead of the election.
00:06:03.000You know, why would that black dude beat up old white men and all this stuff?
00:06:06.000I mean, I don't blame all black people, because there's some crazy black people out there.
00:06:09.000I don't blame all white people, because there's some crazy white people.
00:06:12.000And when the media says this inherently is the fault of all police, and police in Austin that I know are being threatened, and they're having letters put on their cars threatening them, saying you're all guilty for what this dude did, that's sick!
00:06:27.000You know, if my father had committed crimes, which he didn't, but hypothetically, am I to blame for the sins of the father?
00:06:33.000Or what if my great-grandfather was a bank robber?
00:06:39.000So, if a white cop does something wrong a thousand miles away from me, whether I'm a white guy or a cop or whatever I am, how am I to blame for that?
00:08:46.000Now, folks, when he went and said that in 2012, You're like, that's wild.
00:08:53.000Listen, if you were reading the Council on Foreign Relations, Foreign Affairs, or any big global publication, they said, it's the Chinese century.
00:10:37.000That's the headline in Reuters, headline Daily Mail.
00:10:41.000I mean, so while we're busy watching people loot AutoZone and Target, And then mainly black businesses, because these are black neighborhoods, and it's mainly black neighborhoods.
00:10:53.000These people are like, I own this liquor store, I own this gas station, I own this grocery store.
00:11:01.000Oh, well, a white cop did something wrong, so I'm gonna burn down this apartment building that an old black lady owned that her and her family had worked for decades to pay for.
00:11:12.000And then they burned down the police station.
00:11:14.000Turned out, half the cops I saw on the news that worked at that precinct were black.
00:11:23.000It'd be like if, again, God forbid, somebody did something to one of my daughters.
00:11:30.000And let's say the guy was white, did something to my daughter, and I just went and found a random white guy and hit him in the head with a hammer.
00:11:44.000But if, say, justice didn't play out and the cop didn't get in trouble, if somebody went to the cop's house and, you know, something happened, I wouldn't really agree with it, but I'd say, hey, at least you targeted who you thought was bad.
00:12:19.000Well, there was a Nazi jail guard that had the name Gruber.
00:12:22.000You probably aren't even related to him, but I'm going to shoot you in the head because you're an American German and Hitler did something wrong to Jews.
00:12:34.000But see, that's this craziness where a white cop... I could show you videos from WorldStarHipHop all day that are celebrating attacks on white people.
00:12:49.000Because there's 350 million people in this country.
00:12:52.000And I could sit there and show you horrible stuff happening to white people, and I don't do it very often, unless it's illustrative, because I'm not trying to create racism.
00:13:02.000I could show you a white lady getting attacked and stuff thrown in her face and hit with a bunch of stuff and all the rest of it, but what's the point?
00:13:12.000Oh my gosh, we've got an old white lady in a wheelchair.
00:13:46.000In the two years since we broke it, secret documents confirmed a family member got these out of their family member's house.
00:13:52.000They were a commander in Antifa working directly for Alexander Soros,
00:13:55.000trying to get blacks to riot so Obama could cancel the election.
00:13:59.000Soros back planned to incite civil unrest in the Baltimore area.
00:14:09.000Well, finally, Candace Owens has come out and said, these groups are paid to do this by white activists, communists, and that's exactly what this is.
00:14:19.000And with two, less than 200 days, 157 days left, you know the globalists are going to throw everything they've got now against the wall to see what is going to stick.
00:14:38.000Now, we've got the China sellout, and China expanding major wars.
00:14:43.000We've got Trump going after the internet censorship, and what that really means, finally.
00:14:58.000David Knight was on fire this morning with all these Supreme Court rulings that what Big Tech's doing is illegal and wrong, and so the idea that what Trump is doing is toothless is a lie.
00:15:09.000Robert Barnes, constitutional lawyer, is going to be in studio.
00:15:12.000Tim Inlow, who's a good friend of mine, also does security work for us, he's going to be in studio talking about his experience as local police, federal police, Army, Marine Corps, Blackwater, State Department, all of it.
00:15:27.000What he sees going on here, and with what happened with the case of this poor man that was killed, but how suspicious some of the different angles of the George Floyd death are, because none of it, none of it, none of it added up.
00:15:42.000People were like, they must have known each other.
00:16:26.000I'm your host Alex Jones, and I'm really happy that the Gateway Pundit is smart and they get it.
00:16:31.000They have a new article that just went live.
00:16:33.000Friendly reminder Soros funded violent Ferguson protest movement and paid Black Lives Matter protesters.
00:16:42.000And again, out of 350 million people in this country, you got black folks doing bad things.
00:16:47.000You got white people doing bad things.
00:16:48.000You got brown people doing bad things.
00:16:51.000But to say that That if one black person does something wrong or one white person does something wrong, we focus in and we say, well, because a white cop looks like he did something really bad.
00:17:05.000Turns out they worked together as bouncers at a nightclub for a couple of years.
00:17:10.000Before you burn down the city and the black businesses, how about you have a little bit of a discussion?
00:17:16.000Because, you know, before I'm going to go burn something down or kill somebody, I'm going to get my ducks in a row.
00:17:26.000But if I knew somebody did something to my family and they got away with it in court, well, let's just say I'm not going to be going around burning buildings down to random businesses.
00:17:37.000I'm gonna go find the person that did it, and I'm gonna take out justice.
00:17:41.000Because I can't sleep at night if I don't, but I'm sure as hell, again, not gonna run around burning stuff down, but the media hypes it, and the media says it's okay.
00:17:50.000CNN, MSNBC are up there going, they're angry, they deserve it, they're mad!
00:17:55.000And they beat up a bunch of white people.
00:17:59.000And who do you think's in those poor neighborhoods?
00:18:01.000It's a bunch of disabled, homeless white people, people in wheelchairs.
00:18:07.000You're a black teenager, and you saw a black guy killed on TV, and I get it.
00:18:10.000I don't like to watch the footage of anybody dying like that.
00:18:41.000And whites had slaves back then that were white.
00:18:45.000I mean, I can go back in my family tree and find out something like that and go, well, you know, because somebody enslaved me 300 years ago, I can do whatever I want.
00:18:57.000What does that even have to, imagine if I work with somebody and I go, let me check your genealogy to see if your ancestors did anything wrong.
00:19:03.000Cause I'm going to hold you accountable.
00:19:04.000You look at somebody like they were crazy.
00:19:07.000Truth is everybody wants to get into white countries.
00:19:14.000Because white countries went through a renaissance and became Christian.
00:19:18.000And said we want to treat people good.
00:19:22.000And so compared to other places, we've been really good.
00:19:26.000And that's why the globals want to overthrow the European ethos of Christianity, because if you can get rid of that, people won't stand up for each other, and it's the law of the jungle.
00:19:35.000It's not about race, it's about the spirit of the people.
00:21:39.000I mean, have you looked at the Chinese folks?
00:21:41.000I mean, man, they look just alike for a reason.
00:21:45.000So, you sit there in the belly of freedom, in the belly of Christianity.
00:21:49.000We got our own problems, but we climbed up the mountain towards God a lot, you know?
00:21:53.000We're still not there, but we're trying to be good, and you sit there and use the goodness and say that this is the crap hole and that we're the people that hate every- B.S.!
00:22:03.000We had a civil war that millions of people died in, in slavery!
00:22:41.000And that Nazi collaborator George Soros is funding every damn bit of it and laughing his way with his little degenerate demon son all the way to the bank.
00:22:51.000So I'm glad people are finally getting this because you talk about an FBI indictment.
00:22:55.000I mean if I was running around funding billions of dollars to burn stuff down and kill people and I mean I would expect to be SWAT teamed.
00:25:26.000And it's a perception that justice isn't being carried out.
00:25:30.000Now as I've said, the COVID-19, the Russia gate, the Ukraine gate, China trying to start a war with Hong Kong and Taiwan, this is modern warfare.
00:25:40.000Where you don't do it up front with tanks and planes and battleships and aircraft carriers, you do it through propaganda and internal manipulation.
00:25:48.000And so that's why I've told everybody, COVID-19 itself is hyped up, but the collapse is real.
00:25:56.000And the economic degradation that's going to happen in every community now, and the mass starvation in the third world, is going to put huge migrant wave pressure on the West.
00:26:15.000So the breakdown of society purposefully, so that we collapse and so we can be remade, the New Orleaner image is now happening.
00:26:23.000So, I'm here to tell you with 157 days out of the election, I believe we can win.
00:26:29.000I believe we can defeat the globalists.
00:26:31.000I believe if the President comes out against China and admits we're at war with China, economically and culturally and through intelligence agencies and through collaborator traders, if the President calls out the globalist minions as Chaicom operatives, which is now happening, if the President takes the gloves off and says it's a bait and switch, Section 230, that the big internet companies are violating our rights and involving election meddling, if he does all of that very boldly, We have a good chance of winning.
00:27:02.000But if he doesn't, if he falters, if he wavers, if we waver, things are going to really go downhill very, very quickly.
00:27:08.000So we are on a razor's edge, and that's why.
00:27:14.000I feel absolutely 100% moral and strong and proud and good to promote high quality storable foods.
00:27:22.000Because it's something with inflation that you're going to get your money back on.
00:27:25.000It's something that hopefully things don't go bad, you can eat your insurance.
00:27:29.000It's one of the few sure bets there is.
00:27:32.000Portable, well, excellently packaged, storable food that we actually have in stock, ready to get out to you and your family at MFULWARESTORE.COM.
00:27:41.000The full catalog of Ready Hour, MyPatriot Supply.
00:27:44.000They're full spectrum, the best deal you're going to find.
00:27:49.000We've been partners with them for many years.
00:27:51.000And so as the order comes in, you're ordering it from them.
00:27:53.000And then part of the money that comes in funds this operation, which again is a total win.
00:27:59.000Where can you check off one of the preparedness boxes, know you've done a good job, know you've got quality, and then know you're funding something that also stands up for your speech, your Second Amendment, for the right to life, for our sovereignty, and that just does it back down in the face of anything?
00:28:12.000And that's not with me, that's not courage.
00:28:16.000I've tried to explain this, it's total fight.
00:28:18.000Because I am so concerned and so upset by these people, I don't know how to run, I just know how to attack.
00:28:24.000And so all the desperateness and all the energy and all the scrabbling, and they're like, where the hell is it?
00:28:51.000The prayer, the word of mouth, and the funding.
00:28:54.000The funding actually is important, but compared to prayer, and compared to then your action in the universe, taking action with your voice, like lightning from Zeus.
00:29:06.000Prayer, and then your action, and then your financial support.
00:29:11.000I'll tell you, financial support is way below it.
00:29:47.000Because you may have a lot of problems, and Lord knows I got a lot of problems, but man, at the end of the day, the North Star is Jesus Christ, and we're like, Lord, we know we're not perfect, we love you, we want your help, get us out of this.
00:30:10.000The Rockefellers and the Rothschilds have been given trillions of dollars, but all their kids are mentally ill and insane.
00:30:16.000They're the most unhappy, crazy people.
00:30:18.000Almost all of them have to have butlers in the bedrooms with them at night, holding their hands.
00:30:23.000They're so scared of the demonic attacks.
00:30:26.000Let me tell you, I already ran into some of these people, and I already knew some of them.
00:30:30.000I got a guy I've been working with for eight years that grew up in Pennsylvania that was really good friends, and he actually later showed me with the DuPonts.
00:30:39.000And I didn't need to know what they were into, but it was the same.
00:34:01.000People living in America, they're like, that sounds crazy.
00:34:03.000Get ready, they're gonna stomp your guts out in a gulag for decades!
00:34:08.000Because that's what they want, is to rape good people!
00:34:14.000The very same scum that did that in Russia are like literally just sitting there salivating over what they're about to do to you and your family.
00:34:23.000So, whatever energy you got, whatever it is you need to do, you need to decide, hey!
00:34:29.000You want to bend over and take it or you want to stand up and fight?
00:34:48.000You ask why the police finally understand what's happening and the rest of the CNN reporters, the intel is they're operatives behind the scenes.
00:35:20.000I don't want to bash white people, but I mean, it is almost all white people that are trying to manipulate black people into rioting and doing this to get it to go nationwide to then stall the economy for the chi-comps.
00:35:33.000Here is the local police in Minnesota actually announcing this.
00:35:37.000We're hearing from our local community leaders that many of the people that were involved in the criminal conduct last night were not known Minneapolis to them.
00:35:45.000And so yes, there were certainly people who were involved in the activities last night that were certainly not recognized as being here from the city.
00:35:58.000You take our wounds, you take issues we've had, you exacerbate them, and you use a cop who deserves to be charged, in my view, putting this knee on somebody's carotid artery.
00:38:00.000It's all about taking that one thing when the media says, because Joe Biden, you know, is out there saying, you're not black if you don't vote for me.
00:38:42.000The point is, is that the police are just going to evacuate your area, and then you're going to have total crime.
00:38:49.000But Ice Cube, how many cops have to kill black Americans before we strike back?
00:38:53.000You know, it's funny Ice Cube, I have the statistics, I'll get to those next hour, but the fact that there's 10 to 1 black-on-white attacks, 10 to 1, it's still a low statistic, but compared, I mean, let me tell you, the IRCA limitation of a white person is pretty accurate.
00:39:11.000The average white person is not out there looking for trouble.
00:41:16.000What we've seen over the last two days and the emotion ridden conflict over last night is the result Of so much built-up anger and sadness.
00:41:34.000And sadness that has been ingrained in our black community, not just because of five minutes of horror, but 400 years.
00:41:47.000If you're feeling that sadness and that anger, it's not only understandable, it's right.
00:41:54.000Well listen son, you're not getting an Oscar for this.
00:41:57.000of the truth that our black community... Look at that little oily turd. While not from lived
00:42:04.000experience, that sadness must also be understood by our non-black communities. To ignore it,
00:42:12.000to toss it out, would be to ignore the values we all claim to have.
00:42:20.000You know, if black people found out that Planned Parenthood and the Democratic Party targeted them and killed 30 million black people or whatever, then I could see kind of burning down Democrat facilities.
00:43:37.000And why are you protecting this store?
00:43:39.000Well, I mean, this wasn't exactly a specified action.
00:43:41.000We need to get tobacco, so we just kind of ended up here.
00:43:44.000We've been moving around and just trying to see what's what without getting necessarily completely slapped by massive groups of people.
00:43:50.000And while we were walking, somebody mentioned that there were some guys at the back of the shop who wanted to know if they were over to go buy something.
00:43:57.000And they said that they're closed and they're defending their businesses.
00:44:01.000By the way, if you're going to burn something, I'm not saying burn anything, but Target's a good place to start.
00:45:41.000And yes, this is not a toothless attack.
00:45:44.000If we finally wake up to how far the scam and the abuse of big tech has gone.
00:45:47.000But first, President Trump yesterday signed an executive order in his first statements.
00:45:52.000The choices that Twitter makes when it chooses to suppress, edit, blacklist, shadow, ban
00:45:59.000are editorial decisions, pure and simple. They're editorial decisions.
00:46:04.000In those moments, Twitter ceases to be a neutral public platform and they become an editor with a viewpoint.
00:46:11.000And I think we can say that about others also, whether you're looking at Google, whether you're looking at Facebook and perhaps others.
00:46:19.000One egregious example is when they try to silence views that they disagree with by selectively applying a fact check, fact check, F-A-C-T, fact check.
00:46:30.000What they choose to fact-check and what they choose to ignore or even promote is nothing more than a political activism group or political activism.
00:47:52.000They're not going to have that shield.
00:47:54.000My executive order further instructs the Federal Trade Commission, FTC, to prohibit social media companies from engaging in any deceptive acts or practices affecting commerce.
00:48:06.000This authority resides in Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
00:48:14.000I would think you know it quite well, right?
00:48:18.000Additionally, I'm directing the Attorney General to work cooperatively with the states.
00:48:23.000He's going to be working very much and very closely in cooperation with the states to enforce their own laws against such deceptive business practices.
00:48:32.000The states have broad and powerful authority to regulate in this arena, and they'll be doing it also.
00:48:37.000And we encourage them to do it if they see exactly as we've been seeing It's what they're doing is tantamount to monopoly.
00:48:47.000You can say it's tantamount to taking over the airwaves.
00:50:32.000That's now major gateway pundit articles Candace Snowen's covering.
00:50:35.000We got the original documents that are just total smoking guns for the White House, where Soros is funding these plans going back years ago.
00:50:57.000So many questions, so many things surrounding Minneapolis arresting Officer Floyd.
00:51:03.000Worked together at a restaurant, at a nightclub as bouncers.
00:51:07.000A lot of weirdness, but without getting into that story up front, Just in general, the police evacuating, the mayor saying we deserve this.
00:51:16.000Clearly the left is trying to initiate this and incubate this in a leftist city, I think, for a larger event.
00:51:23.000So if you wonder what's after the COVID-19 hoax, I think it's burn, baby, burn, and replay the 60s.
00:51:31.000I think that if you follow this, the playbook is the exact same thing we saw with Michael Brown, with Trayvon Martin, with so many different incidences that have occurred.
00:51:41.000There's an initial narrative that's set.
00:51:43.000They want to keep that narrative going no matter how many news stories come out disputing that narrative afterwards.
00:51:49.000They go with the initial narrative and they stoke the fears, they stoke the hate, they try to create a racial divide.
00:52:03.000And in this case, there's absolutely zero proof or evidence that I've seen that would indicate that this case has anything to do with race.
00:52:14.000Well go over that because we talked last time this morning what the officer is doing is not a recognized normal technique.
00:52:20.000I mean it's obviously something's wrong there but the point is is that now we know they work together things really get weird from that point on.
00:53:19.000So a neck restraint is defined a non-deadly force option defined as compressing one or both sides of a person's neck with an arm or leg without applying direct pressure to the trachea or airway front of neck.
00:53:33.000Only sworn employees who have received training from the MPD training unit are authorized to use neck restraints.
00:53:40.000The MPD authorizes two types of neck restraints, conscious neck restraints and unconscious neck restraint.
00:53:48.000Which, I've never even heard of a police department teaching a unconscious neck restraint.
00:53:56.000Well, so that's, they go into the definition.
00:53:58.000A conscious neck restraint, the subject is placed in the neck restraint with intent to control and not to render the subject unconscious by only applying light to moderate pressure.
00:55:09.000And especially, you know, we talk about some of the things that we know come along with this, right?
00:55:14.000We know since the 1990s, police departments have been trained to look for the dangers of positional asphyxia, to look for the dangers of excited delirium, right?
00:55:25.000We know that when people use drugs, when people use alcohol, and they go through the stress of an arrest and the stress of being restrained, that excited delirium is a possibility.
00:56:07.000So, you see here, the officer is not placing his knee on the neck, but instead in the shoulder blade, right?
00:56:12.000Most agency would say, okay, that's acceptable, right?
00:56:16.000But, then the paramedics give him a sedative to try to calm him down.
00:56:20.000In, just like in this case with Mr. Floyd, this person was saying, I can't breathe, I'm having trouble breathing.
00:56:26.000The officers didn't take him serious, they laughed about it.
00:56:29.000But the coroner in the autopsy ruled that it was a homicide and that the victim died of a sudden cardiac death due to the toxic effects of cocaine and a stress associated with physical restraint, right?
00:56:52.000We've known that this is a possibility.
00:56:55.000And to me, the disturbing part of the George Floyd video is that the officer doesn't seem to recognize, wait a minute, this guy could be Experiencing the symptoms of excited delirium, even if he's not, we need to at least in law enforcement be on the lookout.
00:57:13.000Well the difference is, it's not hands pushing the guy down on his back.
00:57:18.000Sure, which exasperates the, and even let's say for a second, let's say that the pressure applied was that the blood flow wasn't cut off from the brain.
00:57:28.000Right, let's just say for a second that the pressure was light enough that it didn't stop the blood flow.
00:57:34.000But, what causes excited delirium is not just necessarily the actual physical actions of the officer, it's what that person who's handcuffed on his stomach is perceiving.
00:57:44.000So if he perceives that he is struggling for breath, and that's what I'm saying, that induces the panic, that increases the panic, and at that point, in my opinion, he should have been placed in a recovery position.
00:57:57.000But I ask the question, why do they just taser him?
00:58:02.000At least one officer that I saw on the scene did have a taser.
00:58:06.000You know, it's controversial and again, some people feel that tasers work in situations where people are in a rush.
00:58:13.000Well, I'd rather be tased than some cop with his knee on my neck.
00:58:16.000Sure, but again, we're talking about, if you look at the 9-1-1 call, right?
00:58:21.000The caller who made the 9-1-1 call requesting the police to come to the scene said specifically that they believe that George Floyd was drunk.
00:58:34.000The quote says we tell him to give us their phone to put things back and everything and he was also drunk and everything and returned to give us our cigarettes back so he can so he can go home but he doesn't want to do that and he's sitting on his car because he is awfully drunk and he's not in control of himself.
00:58:52.000This is what the 9-1-1 this is what the person called 9-1-1 told the dispatcher.
00:58:58.000It's possible in that case, if that information was relayed to police, that they felt perhaps maybe tasing him wouldn't be effective.
00:59:05.000Sometimes when people are on drugs or alcohol, they don't necessarily... Sure, I get all that.
00:59:09.000My whole point is, the cops didn't just randomly go grab this guy.
01:00:15.000By the way, the police officer that kneeled on George Floyd's neck and appears to have killed him was just taken into custody and is about to be charged.
01:01:23.000That was huge news at the time because they were having so many deaths during arrests.
01:01:29.000Like you said, the average healthy person is not going to die from being choked out, but if you've got heart problems, you're on drugs, you're dead.
01:01:43.000Well, the Minneapolis Police Department trains that.
01:01:46.000It's going to remain to be seen whether he took that training or specifically trained in that, but definitely that they train a number of their officers in this technique.
01:02:13.000Well, and again, with the guy already being handcuffed, right?
01:02:16.000If we're talking about he's just refusing transport, like he doesn't want to be allowed to be put in a police car or whatever the case may be.
01:02:24.000It appears, at least from the facts that I saw, that EMS had been called.
01:02:28.000So that at this point now the police are simply waiting for EMS to arrive to check this guy out.
01:02:35.000And why you would have to apply a neck pin this entire time while you're waiting for EMS to arrive is baffling to me.
01:02:42.000By the way, explain that to the average person out there that doesn't know.
01:02:45.000The average police don't want to kill people that have problems.
01:02:57.000Yeah, well, I mean, if you talk to any cop out there, if they're honest, they're the last person who want to do something that's going to get them thrown in jail because, quite frankly, they know they're not going to do well in jail.
01:03:06.000They're not the most popular people in jail.
01:03:09.000So, there's a big incentive to do things the right way, right?
01:03:13.000And I think that most people that come into law enforcement come into law enforcement with the right reasons.
01:04:22.000And that's why they're in a really, really difficult position right now, because quite frankly, if they react too harshly, it's going to increase the riots.
01:04:32.000If they don't react harshly enough, more properties burn down.
01:04:36.000So either way, it puts the police in a terrible position right now, and the leadership right now is failing the police.
01:04:41.000The Minneapolis leadership, the state leadership, is 100% failing those officers.
01:05:18.000Globalists, the Chinese government, it's in the news, are funding this to break us down.
01:05:23.000They're bad cops, great, go after them politically, whatever.
01:05:26.000This is a plan to bring us down, folks.
01:05:29.000Discredit the dollar, bring the whole stock market down.
01:05:32.000So the people that are involved in this, you're not fighting the man burning down an empty police department with a bunch of liberal police.
01:05:38.000This is happening because these are liberal cities where half the police believe you're BS.
01:06:24.000I'm hearing that they overlapped shifts for years, but then now the owner of that club apparently is backpedaling a little bit and saying, well, there was upwards of sometimes maybe 20 bouncers working there, so she's unsure if they actually knew each other in person or not.
01:06:40.000But it's hard for me to believe that if their shifts overlap for years at a time, that he wouldn't at least recognize them in passing.
01:06:49.000What about Austin Police Department actually hosting Justice for George Floyd events?
01:06:54.000I don't think this is going to go too well.
01:07:02.000They're trying to do damage control even here in Austin.
01:07:04.000Even though the incident didn't take place here, they want to do damage control.
01:07:08.000But I think, again, it's a mistake on the part of Austin's leadership, including the chief, To sit there and basically make insinuations that we don't have all the facts on yet.
01:07:40.000Two wrongs don't make a right and all the looting and robbery and everything else that's taking place right now is not going to bring George Floyd back.
01:07:48.000In fact, in my opinion, it dishonors his memory.
01:07:51.000Well, even his girlfriend says don't do this.
01:08:12.000Here's what the Attorney General just had to say yesterday about the move against Big Tech's bullying and suppression of speech in America.
01:08:22.000And again, we're going to be doing this.
01:08:26.000Well, as you mentioned, Mr. President, one of the things that I found has the broadest bipartisan support these days is the feeling that this provision, Section 230, has been stretched way beyond its original intention, and people feel that on both sides of the aisle.
01:08:44.000This was adopted 25 years ago to protect the fledgling industry, and its purpose was to allow websites that were serving As essentially bulletin boards for diverse third-party content coming on to say that you're not responsible for the content of that third-party information.
01:09:04.000And it also tried to encourage these companies to take down things like child pornography or human trafficking advertising and things by saying if you act to remove this kind of objectionable material you won't be liable for taking it down.
01:09:20.000Now it's been completely stretched to allow what have become really bohemoths who control a lot of the flow of information in our society to engage in censorship of that information and to act as editors and publishers of the material.
01:09:38.000So when they put on their own content like fact-checked content onto other people's content, and when they curate
01:09:46.000their collection, and when they start censoring particular content, including in many cases
01:09:53.000at the direction of foreign governments like Communist China, they become publishers
01:09:59.000and they shouldn't be entitled to the same kind of shield that was set up earlier.
01:10:05.000Now this executive order is a very strong step toward addressing this problem.
01:10:11.000It sets up a rulemaking procedure that will eventually be under the FCC to try to get back to the original interpretation and understanding of Section 230.
01:10:21.000It also empowers the Attorney General To work with state attorneys general to come up with model legislation that addresses this at the state level.
01:10:34.000And we're preparing federal legislation, which we will be sending over shortly for review at the Office of Management and Budget.
01:10:44.000So this is an important step to get back to the original understanding.
01:10:50.000I know there's a bit of a bait and switch that's occurred in our society.
01:10:54.000These companies grew because they held themselves out as public forums, as free public forums where a variety of voices and diverse voices could come on and be heard.
01:11:11.000But now that they have become these very powerful networks of eyeballs, now that they've grown by holding themselves out as free public forums, they've now switched.
01:11:20.000And they are using that market power to force particular viewpoints.
01:11:25.000And it has to be addressed not only through this executive order, but I think litigation going forward, and by further action on Capitol Hill.
01:11:39.000Mr. Attorney General, not only have you been against Section 230 and the President has been against Section 230, the Vice President has said he's against Section 230.
01:11:49.000Do you believe that the executive order that the President is about to sign in any way repeals or amends Section 230?
01:11:57.000No, it doesn't repeal Section 230, and I'm not against Section 230 if it was properly interpreted and properly applied, but it's been stretched, and I don't know of anyone on Capitol Hill who doesn't agree that it's been stretched beyond... Does that make me crazy?
01:12:13.000I think this will help get back to the right path.
01:12:22.000We've got Robert Barnes, famous constitutional lawyer, host of the specialty show we've been doing, that is American Countdown weeknights, 7 to 9 p.m.
01:12:31.000Central here at InfoWars.com on the radio and TV satellites as well.
01:12:35.000Huge attempts to cause racial division and race war.
01:13:40.000In other words, it's definitely not a toothless attack because it's more than the rhetoric that's come before, it's more than the promises that have come before.
01:13:47.000It has specific teeth in that it's going to defund aspects of, it could have gone further in its defunding attempts, but it's going to defund at least any government spending, any federal government spending that involves marketing on any social media engine that is not compliant with the purposes and policies laid out in the executive order.
01:14:06.000It does do a good job of explaining the legal history and what the intention of Section 230 was.
01:14:11.000It basically followed the same script we talked about a year ago on here.
01:14:15.000So it's basically almost identical to what we said.
01:14:18.000Even the cases you cited and David cited.
01:14:20.000I was watching David this morning and I was like...
01:14:21.000Wait, I remember we cited those very cases about Town Square.
01:14:26.000There's been a competing doctrine out there.
01:14:27.000There's been four or five different interpretations of Section 230.
01:14:30.000Four or five different arguments about how it should be approached.
01:14:33.000Ultimately, both Attorney General Barr and the President adopted the one that we made a year ago in various emergency broadcasts from InfoWars last summer.
01:14:42.000And it's almost an entire replication.
01:14:44.000Yeah, I don't want to take credit, but I actually had three law firms send him stuff two years ago.
01:14:49.000It's crazy how much it's in line with what we did, but it just shows he did the original research.
01:14:55.000It's the right argument from a policy perspective, right argument from a legal precedent perspective, right argument going forward in terms of a persuasion perspective with the public.
01:15:05.000So at all those levels, it's the right argument to make.
01:15:08.000They're explaining Section 230 was meant to be for if you're providing the platform in the public square, not controlling who it is that's publishing content in the public square.
01:15:17.000That's who is supposed to be given broad-scale ownership.
01:15:49.000Well, it's not just... I say that because Napolitano and Lee are making the same arguments that I've seen from the Cato Institute, from the Heritage Institute.
01:15:58.000A lot of these people are saying, look, this is a private corporation.
01:16:02.000They're saying this is a private corporation, they can do whatever they want.
01:16:05.000This is not a competition between their private rights and my private rights.
01:16:10.000Because when we start talking about Section 230, I think the best analogy I can think of is when we go back and we look at what happened in the Great Depression.
01:16:19.000When we came up with FDIC insurance to insure deposits.
01:16:23.000We also had restrictions on what the banks could do.
01:16:26.000And we said with the Glass-Steagall Act, you cannot then continue to participate in risky, speculative investments.
01:16:34.000You've got to diverse these two things, right?
01:16:37.000And so what we're allowing them to do is the same thing that we allowed the big banks to do when we removed the Glass-Steagall Act protection in 1993.
01:16:45.000And we know what happened with that, right?
01:17:09.000They wouldn't have gotten away with any of this if they hadn't grown slowly and given immunity.
01:17:15.000But now it's either the government is going to be ruled by big tech or the people are going to take control of the government and rule big tech.
01:17:21.000We're back with Robert Barnes, David Knight, I'm Alex Jones.
01:17:24.000This is historic information we're about to cover as Trump finally, hallelujah, takes on Big Tech.
01:17:38.000I remember about a year ago Atlantic Monthly put out by the leftist arm of the CIA said Trump's a joke, he'll never stand up against Ukrainegate, he's going down.
01:17:49.000And I remember Brennan and Clapper and all the rest of them being up on national TV saying, don't worry, he'll be gone in 2017.
01:18:43.000And what does Trump need to do right now on the day of the night?
01:18:46.000Well, it's very equivalent to what the big trust positions were in the late 19th, end of the 19th century, like the railroads were.
01:18:52.000These are companies that have grown up never being, never facing consequences ever.
01:18:56.000They've never faced any consequences in the court of public opinion, never faced any consequences in the court of law.
01:19:02.000And the net effect of that, as you're seeing there, arrogance is extraordinary.
01:19:06.000Because we were talking about it last year, that the president was sending the message that he intended to do this, he was starting to accelerate his... And they're like, you'll never do it!
01:19:40.000And he thinks because he's never faced consequences before, he won't face any consequences now.
01:19:45.000What you're just talking about, one of the most important parts of the executive order, was finally using the Federal Attorney General Department of Justice power, with the states, to go after them.
01:20:05.000And the goal is to go after them not just on antitrust grounds, but what I always thought was the best argument, I initiated this against Twitter two years ago, was to go after them on consumer protection grounds because they lied to get their monopoly power.
01:20:56.000They should be treated like every other private company that lied.
01:20:59.000You buy an ad in the phone book, you buy a phone number, that's yours.
01:21:03.000So all these companies, from restaurants to bars to cleaning places to salons to clothiers to farms, you buy ads, you run them, you think it's your URL.
01:21:31.000So one is, they're using the FCC for regulatory purposes to change the rules.
01:21:36.000They're using the FTC to go after him on consumer protection issues, but FTC is technically independent, so they can't really, the president can't really require them to take action.
01:22:01.000So part of the executive order is that the state attorney generals with the U.S.
01:22:04.000Attorney General will use their consumer protection laws of the states to go after big tech that's been violating their promises if they keep violating.
01:22:10.000And then Twitter responds by banning a bunch more of his tweets.
01:22:16.000And I think that's part of their strategy.
01:22:18.000I think that's probably the weakest thing about this is the fact that they're going to say this, and you know they're going to say this whether it's true or not.
01:22:24.000They're going to say, you're just doing this simply because you don't like me, right?
01:22:28.000And so I think they're trying to goad him into doing that to a greater extent by what they did today about the tweets about Minneapolis.
01:22:35.000You know, before they said, well, we're going to fact check you.
01:22:38.000Today what they did was they said, they completely covered it up and said, this is hateful, it's provoking violence and so forth.
01:22:43.000We'll let you see it in the public interest, but we're going to completely cover up his tweet.
01:22:48.000I think they're trying to poke him into even more things.
01:22:50.000But when we talk about this, these two Supreme Court decisions that they've got, and they're both unanimous decisions and they're fairly recent.
01:22:57.000And this second one that's out of California, the Pruneyard Shopping Center case.
01:23:01.000What they're talking about, laying the groundwork there, what the Supreme Court said was that the states must protect your individual liberties according to the Constitution, but they can go further.
01:23:11.000And that's where I'm going to shut up next segment.
01:23:17.000Literally in the control room drinking coffee, but it's kind of fun for me to bow out sometimes so I don't interrupt.
01:23:21.000Let's go into precedent, because I heard him mention a bunch of cases this morning when I was exercising on the bike trail, hiking for like an hour.
01:23:27.000I was listening to David, and everything was cases you brought up.
01:23:30.000And as a layperson, it's like this is fundamental.
01:23:35.000We're not like striking out here saying what they're doing they shouldn't be allowed to do.
01:23:38.000We know that this is Classically fraudulent what they're doing, but they try to bamboozle Trump and the media and the culture that what Trump's doing is outside of regular behavior, that they could somehow really set a precedent that this is allowed.
01:23:53.000So there's really two different sets of precedents.
01:23:55.000One's out of California, and all of these companies, of course, are based out of California.
01:23:58.000So that's the Pruneyard Doctrine that David was just mentioning.
01:24:01.000And what that is, it says, look, if you effectively control or monopolize a public square, then you're under the same requirements of First Amendment obligations as if a public entity controlled that public square.
01:24:13.000And so Pruneyard was a private mall, and they said the public parts of the private mall had become a public square in that local community.
01:24:22.000And even though a private mall owned that space, they could not discriminate on First Amendment grounds from political activities such as circulating petitions or circulating pamphlets inside the public part, the public square part of that private mall.
01:24:36.000They could ban it from the retail stores, but not from the public parts of it.
01:24:40.000Supreme Court approved the California court's ability to do so, and yesterday that was one of the two decisions recited by Attorney General Barr and the President inside their executive order.
01:24:55.000Originally they said if a company town owned the public square, then that company town was obligated to abide by First Amendment obligations.
01:25:03.000They were asked to similarly extend the First Amendment to private monopolies over the public square, and they backed off from doing so.
01:25:10.000Now the question has always been, in my view, the Pruneyard Doctrine is good doctrine.
01:25:13.000It would not apply to every little mom-and-pop company.
01:25:16.000So you have people like Ben and Shapiro.
01:25:17.000But anybody that sets up their own corporate town, where it's like a big building and it's got a big square and it's bringing you in as a human event.
01:25:25.000It's a string that attaches to you if you decide to seek and obtain monopoly power over part of the public square.
01:27:56.000I'm David Knight, and I'm here with Robert Barnes, and we want to talk a little bit about these cases that were referenced in President Trump's executive order, because, Robert, you know all about these.
01:28:43.000But it was a recognition that in today's world, when we first established the First Amendment,
01:28:48.000the idea that the public square could be privatized was simply inconceivable.
01:28:52.000That was not even in their thought process.
01:28:54.000The goal was, let's make sure that the public square, and there literally is a public square that's popular in the UK and London, that this whole concept of public square derives from.
01:29:55.000You can heckle, you can do this, it's all free.
01:29:58.000It's meant to be the truest, most honest expression of ideas.
01:30:03.000Because the idea is that ideas themselves need freedom to grow, need freedom to be nourished, need freedom to be able to find themselves, to find their truth.
01:30:12.000And in that context, and so that's where it comes from, and what the Peckingham case recognized is that in the modern age, the public square is now digitized.
01:30:21.000That very few people go down to the local public park to do their public discussion, debate, and dialogue.
01:30:26.000They do it in the digital space of Facebook, of Twitter, of YouTube, of Google.
01:30:33.000And the Supreme Court's recognition of that was very important because it meant, okay, there's now a judicial acknowledgement.
01:30:41.000That the digital, this digital social media space is a digital public square because from that flows a wide range of legal and political concepts that are important policy wise.
01:30:52.000And let's talk about this quote, the opinion of the court, and again it was unanimous, but this was the majority opinion that was the liberals, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, and so they said a fundamental principle of the First Amendment Is that all persons have access to places where they can speak and listen and then after reflection, speak and listen once more.
01:31:13.000And if you're prohibiting that, you know, this guy, as his lawyer pointed out, he can't even respond to statements that other people are making about him.
01:31:21.000Which is basically where we are with Alex Jones now.
01:31:24.000He's been banned off of all these different platforms and people can trash him.
01:31:27.000He's not even allowed to defend himself.
01:31:29.000And so, this particular case, this is a guy in North Carolina.
01:31:34.000He had been convicted of sex offense with a minor.
01:31:40.000And so, as part of that North Carolina statute, they said, you cannot get on the internet, period, to do anything.
01:31:45.000And they said, that's too restrictive.
01:31:46.000And that's what the conservatives of the court said.
01:31:49.000They said, well, We'll let them have the right to put some restrictions on, but certainly not here.
01:31:54.000So they had a unanimous opinion, and it was really about being able to get onto that digital public square, which is why I was kind of surprised that they didn't tie this back to the 1946 case, you know, Marsh v. Alabama, because that was one where you had a physical public square that was owned by a company town.
01:32:12.000You've talked about this many times, you know, we're getting into this company town aspect of the Internet.
01:32:16.000So we'll talk about this when we come back.
01:32:30.000Welcome back, David Knight here with Robert Barnes.
01:32:32.000We're going to be joined by Andrew Torba of Gab in just a little while here, but we're talking about the Supreme Court decisions that were referenced as part of the Trump executive order.
01:32:42.000We were talking about the decision that essentially was held three years ago, the Supreme Court unanimously said.
01:32:49.000That social media is the digital public square and as we're going to break I said I'm kind of surprised I didn't go back and tie this to the physical public square the 1946 case where the Supreme Court there said you can't kick a woman out who is handing out flyers even though you own the public square because it is the public square we're not gonna let you take away her individual rights and you know Robert we've gone full circle now to the extent that If we don't nip this in the bud, if we don't understand that government is there to protect the individual rights, the God-given rights, the natural rights, the human rights of us, then we're going to have these corporations rule us in every regard because now we've got Google, one of the worst of these censors, is now working on taking over the physical space, right?
01:33:30.000They're going from cyberspace to physical space with their smart cities.
01:33:34.000So this whole thing is going to go full circle if we don't nip it in the bud.
01:33:37.000And really what they've done is they've laundered liability and laundered control.
01:33:41.000So, like, I'll give an example in the nursing home context happening currently with COVID-19.
01:33:45.000What the government does is the government, or in the vaccine context, what the government does, they take some activity they want to occur, but don't want to be sued for.
01:33:54.000So they outsource it to either private nursing homes in the COVID-19 context to take infected patients or to Big Pharma to make vaccines.
01:34:05.000So that's the first part of the laundering and then that's the activity that they want to have occur where they want the government to not be liable.
01:34:12.000But then they turn around and grant immunity to a big pharma or immunity to nursing homes so that now
01:34:18.000that nobody can sue anybody for anything that goes wrong.
01:34:20.000Well, the same thing is happening now in the big tech context where they're effectively,
01:34:25.000"Hey, instead of us, the government, owning the public square, we're going to allow you
01:34:29.000big private monopolies, you effectively, like the big trust of the 19th century or the big
01:34:34.000railroads of the 19th century, we're going to let you control and own the public square
01:34:38.000and then we're going to grant you Section 230 immunity so that you can't be held responsible
01:34:42.000like any other private company or private person would.
01:34:45.000That's whenever you hear this argument, oh, these are private companies.
01:34:48.000No, these are private companies that are monopolies, and these are private companies that have been given special immunities.
01:34:54.000That makes them different and distinct from any ordinary mom-and-pop operation.
01:34:59.000And this is something that I've seen happen in the political sphere as well.
01:35:04.000Because when I was working with a third party back in North Carolina, we would go the extra mile to get on the ballot and then they would not allow us to participate in the debates because they would take the position that the people who were controlling the debate were private.
01:35:19.000And so those private individuals are going to be allowed to restrict who they want to have in their debate.
01:35:25.000We knew that they were operating, it was pretty obvious that they were operating on behalf of the two major parties, but they had the pretense that, no, we're going to, we have the sole, and of course it was the National Association, the North Carolina Association of Broadcasters.
01:35:38.000So it's the very news people who are now trying to push any other viewpoints off of social media that we're basically pushing off independents.
01:35:48.000So we've got Andrew Torba coming up with us for a couple of segments and we'll continue on with Robert Barnes and David Knight.
01:35:55.000We've already done the job, the listeners have done the job of getting Trump awake, getting the Justice Department awake, and so we're kind of analyzing here, which is good, why they've done wrong and what's happened, but let's talk about this before we go to Andrew Torb in the next segment.
01:36:08.000The head of Gab, who's been under total attack for just trying to create an alternative, which shows these monopolies aren't just like, oh, do your own thing.
01:36:16.000No, when you do your own thing, they jealously come after you.
01:36:20.000How are they going to strike back in their arguments in Yahoo News that, oh, don't worry, Trump will do nothing to Twitter, nothing to Facebook, nothing to Google?
01:36:30.000What do you see in the next 157 days of this election where they've taken our weakness as weakness, as they've taken our acquiescence as weakness?
01:36:37.000What do you expect is about to happen next?
01:36:40.000Well, their allies are in the judiciary and the press.
01:36:42.000So they'll fight back there first and within the legal academy.
01:36:46.000If you see some professor somewhere on TV or in the press saying, oh, you can't do this, this is not legal, this is a private company, First Amendment doesn't apply, da-da-da-da-da-da.
01:36:56.000Nine times out of ten, they either receive money, their law school receives money, their university receives money, or they personally receive money from big tech in some respect.
01:37:19.000So that's where they're going to resort to.
01:37:22.000I think their weakness right now, and it's also the barrier to being able to make meaningful change quickly, is their arrogance.
01:37:31.000So they're so arrogant they don't think any consequences will come.
01:37:34.000They've never faced it from the judiciary, from the press.
01:37:36.000They haven't faced it really from the political class, who's talked a lot but not done a lot.
01:37:40.000And so we're going to see whether that changes.
01:37:43.000And so they'll be pushed back on the legislative front to try to block any legislative changes that the president's going to push to implement this agenda.
01:37:50.000They'll try to fight it on the regulatory arena with a lot of lobbying money spent in Washington, D.C.
01:37:54.000They'll launch a counterattack in the press and with the legal economy.
01:37:58.000When you're at, I think the espionage angle of Twitter, Facebook, Google, working with foreign governments and taking money from foreign governments to cover up their crimes, I think that espionage is the quickest way to just swat team them down.
01:38:13.000So I think the, that is, I think their most personal exposure is the criminal exposure because of their in-depth relationship, in-bed relationship with the chi-coms in particular.
01:38:39.000The irony that someone like General Flynn gets targeted under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, but Big Tech is never even looked at when they are by far... I mean, Big Tech's also facilitated ISIS.
01:38:49.000This has been well known, well documented.
01:38:51.000They've been sued for it in a wide range of contexts.
01:38:54.000Got out of it because of Section 230 immunity.
01:38:57.000So they've been facilitating a wide range of foreign agency action, but I think the reason why the president, even within the executive order, laid out the problems with their relationship with the CHICOMs in particular... He laid out, I've got you by the balls.
01:39:11.000Exactly, put in there that you've been... So why did they respond, David Knight, the next day with FU?
01:39:16.000Well, I think they're trying to make this, I think they're trying to goad him into personal attacks so that they can use that to defend themselves, and I think that's why they stepped up the attacks today.
01:39:24.000But you know, there's another power center in this, just besides the media, besides the university professors and so forth, and that is the military-industrial complex.
01:39:35.000And we have to understand that one of the reasons why you have these big tech monopolies and why they've been allowed to run roughshod over people is because that's what they were created to do.
01:39:45.000Once the internet became practical, you had all these different venture capital firms.
01:40:01.000And if we go back and we look at October, November 2017, and remember we were pushed off in August of 2018, but in 2017, November 2007, actually October 2017, you had Clint Watts, a former U.S.
01:40:17.000Army officer, former FBI agent, he was saying civil wars don't start with gunshots, they start with words.
01:40:22.000America's war with itself has already begun.
01:41:03.000David Knight and Barbara Barnes, how do they strike back?
01:41:06.000Well, I think right now they've pretty much got us under a lockdown, obviously, and so all of this stuff, this is something, this is an argument that, frankly, we should have had a year ago.
01:41:15.000Right now, the argument is also what happens with lockdown.
01:41:19.000And I think one of the things that President Trump needs to do, as I've said before, besides firing Fauci and Birx, he needs to come out and have people who've been right about this from the very beginning, and they need to undo The panic that has been... No, I agree.
01:41:34.000He brought up all the real experts, all the real doctors.
01:41:42.000And the other thing he could do is use his power and go to another platform like Gab or something like that or create... Alright, Robert Barnes, stay there.
01:41:48.000You'll come back with your response on the other side.
01:42:04.000This provision, Section 230, has been stretched way beyond its original intention, and people feel that on both sides of the aisle.
01:42:13.000This was adopted 25 years ago to protect the fledgling industry, and its purpose was to allow websites that were serving as essentially bulletin boards for diverse third-party content coming on, to say that you're not responsible for the content of that third-party information.
01:42:34.000Now it's been completely stretched to allow what have become, really, bohemoths who control a lot of the flow of information in our society, to engage in censorship of that information, and to act as editors and publishers of the material.
01:42:51.000So when they put on their own content, like fact-checked content onto other people's content, and when they curate their collection... How did you decide to ban Alex Jones?
01:43:03.000What users want from us, and what we've always provided them, is a curated platform.
01:43:09.000We think that what the user wants is someone that does review these apps.
01:43:28.000We're not leaning one way or the other.
01:43:31.000You can tell that from the stuff on the App Store and in podcasts, etc.
01:43:36.000You'll see everything from very conservative to very liberal.
01:43:40.000And that's the way I think it should be.
01:43:42.000But at what point were you like, okay, that's it, Alex Jones has to go?
01:43:46.000You know, I don't want to get into a singular kind of event, but I think there's enough there.
01:43:52.000That reasonable people could agree that if you're going to Chirag camps, that that should be all.
01:43:59.000And when they start censoring particular content, including in many cases in the direction of foreign governments like Communist China, they become publishers.
01:44:11.000And they shouldn't be entitled to the same kind of shield that was set up earlier.
01:45:12.000So correct me if I'm wrong, isn't Trump talking about Section 230 on a case-by-case being stripped?
01:45:18.000Uh, yes, but I think focusing on that in general is the wrong approach.
01:45:22.000Section 230 not only protects the companies, it protects small website owners.
01:45:27.000It protects your own website with a comment section, for example.
01:45:29.000No, no, Andrew, I totally agree with you.
01:45:31.000You're a smart guy, smarter than I am when it comes to tech stuff, but this is what they're using to play both sides, so that's the enacting power.
01:45:38.000Well, I mean, we'll explain what the President should do then.
01:45:42.000Well, the president should get on Gab, Alex.
01:46:01.000Yeah, I mean, I think, well, I think as to that question as to how to protect small companies, It would have been good, I think, if there would have been one additional component in the executive order, which is simply to separate out those big tech companies that have a certain high, what's called a monopolistic market share.
01:46:17.000Yeah, those that have monopolies may lose $2.30.
01:46:23.000That was my problem with the EO, right?
01:46:24.000My problem with the EO was there was no protection for companies like Gab, like Bitchu.
01:46:29.000So the EO should have said something like, you know, you have to have over 100 million users in order for this type of action to be taken or this type of... Because if regulation comes down, right, how are they going to determine that a website is being held politically neutral, right?
01:47:30.000Well, I think, due to Orba's point, there is a way to protect small entities aside from requiring the monopoly component, which they can add in the process.
01:47:37.000The second is that what Trump is asking is the FCC to have any tech company propose rules for how they regulate their process that include due process and viewpoint neutrality.
01:47:48.000And the idea is that in the way they exercise editorial privileges, and you can correct me if I'm wrong, GAAB doesn't do editorial privileges outside of the Good Samaritan provisions of Section 230.
01:48:12.000I understand the concern of the small companies is that they don't want to get caught up in something that's supposed to target the attack.
01:48:33.000After five years of this stuff happening that we've all experienced, you know, InfoWars and Gab in particular, something is finally being done.
01:48:44.000But what nobody's really talking about is the App Store duopoly, because Apple and Google control 98% of the mobile app hardware and software distribution market.
01:49:14.000It's like someone who's stolen all the art, putting up something at an art show.
01:49:19.000Andrew, can you explain how it impacts Gab and the ability of what Gab can do by this antitrust app monopoly, this duopoly that's taken place?
01:49:30.000Right, so Apple and Google, like I said, they control 98% of the mobile app store distribution.
01:49:39.000And not only are they preventing apps like Gab, Bitchute, others from submitting apps into the app stores, but they're also propping up their own apps ahead of other competitors.
01:49:49.000So, for example, they prop up their Apple Music app ahead of Spotify and other music services.
01:49:54.000And actually, the New York Times, I'm not a big fan of them, but they did an excellent report on this where they highlighted all of the competitors that Apple pushes down in the search results in favor of their own apps.
01:50:19.000And that's why Big Tech can be sued by state attorney generals with the attorney general.
01:50:23.000That's the best part of this order is let's use consumer protection to go after these fraudsters and liars that Big Tech has been to get an economic advantage and edge over companies like GAAB and free up the free market.
01:51:57.000I mean, if I tried this, I'd be killed.
01:51:59.000But it's like, so where did the green light become that if it's Qaikom, we're just supposed to bend over?
01:52:05.000I guess it's about money, Alex, like everything else.
01:52:07.000It's about money, it's about power, it's about who's paying who.
01:52:09.000If you follow the money, I'm sure we can find the answer.
01:52:12.000Really, what I'm most concerned about is these apps like TikTok, you know, Chinese-controlled.
01:52:17.000Yeah, you were getting into the app monopolies.
01:52:19.000Let's talk about that, because you're right.
01:52:20.000They're trying to make the whole web about accessibility on a phone via an app, and then that's really where they're building the false paradigm.
01:52:54.000I mean, you see them censoring the President's tweet this morning, the same tweet from the actual White House account, which is absolutely incredible.
01:53:01.000And at the same time, you see, you know, dozens and dozens of people calling for violence, calling to burn down the country, calling to kill cops on Twitter, and Twitter does absolutely nothing about it.
01:53:11.000So, there's this double standard, there's this hypocrisy.
01:53:13.000Well, it's more that it's an informational human control arm.
01:53:18.000Where we don't allow people that don't want death to have a speech.
01:53:21.000Those that do want we allow to have speech.
01:53:25.000It is a big tech coup over information, over human communication.
01:53:31.000It is a giant Informational takeover, David Knight.
01:53:35.000You know, Alex, right after you were kicked off of all the social media places, and you went to the hearings that they had, and Marco Rubio was there, and Rubio said, uh, I don't know who you are, right?
01:53:47.000The only thing he was concerned about, I mean, here they're gonna have free speech hearings, and they've got the highest profile individual in the world who's been kicked off, just happened, and he pretends he doesn't know anything about that.
01:53:57.000But what he said in the hearings was he was only asked these people, Facebook, Twitter, and so forth.
01:54:02.000Now, if the Chinese government does X, you're going to stop that, right?
01:54:08.000As Robert Barnes was saying, they've gotten so arrogant now that they are allowing the Chinese to, essentially, they're playing ball for the Chinese.
01:54:18.000The military-industrial complex set these guys up.
01:54:20.000The military-industrial complex was behind a lot of the censorship.
01:54:24.000Two months after they moved against Infowars, they took out 100 other sites.
01:54:28.000So how are our intelligence agencies backing China and not Americans?
01:54:31.000Well, I think this is going to be an internal struggle with them.
01:54:34.000And I think when you look at what's happening, you look at the struggle with 5G, for example, right?
01:54:38.000Both the American government and the Chinese government want 5G.
01:56:02.000You know, I've asked a bunch of questions here, but in the time we have left Andrew Torbo of Gab, what else do you want to impart to the viewers and listeners?
01:58:15.000Robert, if you want to go off on that, because I don't want to, you know, toot my own horn here, but that, that is the ultimate, you know, F.U.
01:58:21.000to Silicon Valley is stop using these products, go over here.
01:58:24.000And it's not to say that he's going to quit Twitter or quit Facebook.
01:59:19.000Again, Alex, this is a problem that, you know, God blessed me to have the foresight and the vision, you know, almost four years ago to see this stuff coming.
02:00:27.000Alex Jones here back live on this Friday edition and I'm a father, I'm a human, I'm a patriot, I'm American, I love God and I'm just sitting here Watching truly evil forces try to bring down society.
02:00:44.000And so, in the final equation, we consider and analyze data points all day long, and talk about this factoid or that factoid, but it's really all about power, and those that decide to not care about anybody but themselves, even though it brings down the whole civilization beneath them, they believe they'll transcend it as being gods.
02:01:01.000Barnes, what is behind the New World Order?
02:01:03.000What is the real world political system?
02:01:05.000What is, I mean, when you go to sleep tonight, when you think about the power structure, what do you see?
02:01:25.000He is not the sole arbiter or provider of it.
02:01:29.000The Zuckerberg other people have the same kind of mindset, same kind of mentality, same kind of approach, and it's all about fighting for control.
02:01:36.000They want a monopolistic control over aspects of the economy, aspects of political life, aspects of social life, sort of lockdown economics and culture is very much sort of a big tech dystopian dream.
02:01:47.000And it's the same mindset mentality that pervades them throughout.
02:01:50.000So if we're going to resist that, it's allowing a little piece of freedom against this centralized concentrated control that these sort of oligopoly of the big tech giants want to impose in their cartel economics and view of politics and social life.
02:02:05.000And then these tech heads are just such disgusting people.
02:02:08.000You were saying before the break, it's been Zuckerberg, at least on the surface, that bucks it the most.
02:02:22.000Twitter decided for the first time ever to fact check one of President Trump's tweets.
02:02:26.000I wondered if you thought that Twitter may have made the wrong decision here.
02:02:30.000We have a different policy, I think, than Twitter on this.
02:02:33.000You know, I just believe strongly that Facebook shouldn't be the arbiter of truth of everything that people say online.
02:02:42.000I think in general, private companies probably shouldn't be, or especially these platform companies, shouldn't be in the position of doing that.
02:02:49.000He said last year, When I said that Biden had neurological problems, they said, you can only mention Alex Jones if it's a negative connotation.
02:02:57.000So they didn't just arbitrate what truth was.
02:02:59.000They said, in a cult two minutes of hate, you must say it's bad, David.
02:03:02.000Well, you know, he just banned a conversation from the president of Brazil who was talking about hydroxychloroquine.
02:03:09.000And so he's going to try to control every aspect of this.
02:03:12.000But, you know, Alex, when you talk about what's behind this, Look, it is a conspiracy, but it is a satanic conspiracy.
02:03:20.000I believe, like you do, that this is a spiritual battle.
02:03:23.000And this is why it's consistent, and this is why... Generation to generation, it's the same program.
02:04:03.000Well, we know who's pulling the strings.
02:04:06.000Well, the Bible calls it the mystery of evil, because you said it's generation after generation.
02:04:10.000Because I was never, I mean, I was a kid, and I loved God, and I believed God was real, but I hadn't really.
02:04:15.000When I got into politics and saw it face to face, I was like, my God, this is real.
02:04:19.000And it's why you see all these people like Epstein and all the rest, it's why there's all these pedophile connections, all these satanic rituals.
02:04:25.000Because they've got to commit evil to go against, they've got to, like, get in the club.
02:04:29.000And so when you look at people like Bill Gates who, you know, doesn't have any kids and he wants to kill everybody else's kids, I mean, he gets power from that.
02:04:37.000That's, that's, you know, he likes the power and he's willing to do this and he is basically, you know, these are the approaches that he's taken.
02:04:44.000But what I'm concerned about here as we look at it in the immediate standpoint here, how are How are they implementing this?
02:04:52.000And the thing that I still come back to, yeah, we should be having this discussion about free speech.
02:04:57.000One of the reasons that they were allowed to lock us down was because they had silenced everybody else.
02:05:02.000They had a monolithic narrative out there.
02:05:07.000And so we have to be able to push back against this.
02:05:09.000We have to do it from the local level, but this has to be rolled back.
02:05:13.000And even from the standpoint of President Trump, he's got to realize that if they, they are doing this for political purposes as well as to destroy us individually.
02:05:22.000And he's not going to win re-election if he's got a Great Depression on his hands.
02:05:38.000Well, the two key components to the announcement yesterday was that they're going to use not only the approach that they did with Microsoft, which did ultimately discipline Microsoft and anti-trust.
02:06:02.000Yeah, I mean there's nobody like him when it comes to Bill Gates.
02:06:04.000And then the second component of it is use the big tobacco strategy to go after big tech in the same way.
02:06:11.000Use the state attorney generals Going after their mass consumer deception of ordinary people whose assets... What happened is they said, hey, you come in and join Big Tech.
02:06:21.000You give us your personal and private information that we are going to turn around and monetize for our personal profit.
02:06:26.000And in exchange, we'll protect your speech.
02:07:37.000But even... We're not here to make money.
02:07:39.000But exactly, I spent all that money with big tech, and now they're going to say, oh, it doesn't matter you spent $20 million with us, you're nothing now.
02:07:46.000Well, and the thing is, if you look at it broadly, even if you hadn't spent a penny in advertising, you brought probably billions of dollars of revenue.
02:08:43.000Well, if you look at it conservative, probably you yourself helped contribute 10 million people to big tech platforms, which they value on average.
02:08:51.000And I paid them all the money we made.
02:08:56.000And then finally when we hit the zeitgeist, they said, no, I mean, it's like...
02:09:01.000And if you look at the monetary value of those people coming in and subscribing and supporting, and you providing that content free of charge to them, the net effect of it is billions of dollars.
02:09:09.000And the point is, whether you were a plumber or whatever, they took everybody's ads, they did it, and now they went, no, you don't matter.
02:09:16.000It's a combination of consumer deception and unjust enrichment.
02:09:19.000An old legal concept where somebody gets rich by some unjust mechanism and means by making a false promise to someone else.
02:09:26.000So the principles of equity require that they reimburse those funds.
02:09:30.000So you could completely, if the government wanted to, the attorney generals could completely bankrupt every big tech company tomorrow by simply pursuing legal theories that currently exist.
02:09:38.000And again, big tech is so big they believe they'd buy everyone off if government could Just do it right here in Texas.
02:09:43.000In Texas, there is a good Texas Supreme Court.
02:09:45.000There's a good Texas Attorney General.
02:09:47.000We need the vestigial government separation of power to stop them.
02:09:51.000The best test case would be right here in Texas.
02:10:34.000They're like the Rockefellers of the 19th century.
02:10:37.000You've got to spank them for them to wake up and do the right thing.
02:10:40.000I'm going to ask you both when we come back ahead of the guests taking over, then how does big tech strike back with David Knight, Robert Barnes.
02:11:09.000And if you want to wake up inside the Soviet Union, Americans, you're very close to that.
02:11:12.000We've got a clip coming up that's bone-chilling on Infowars.com.
02:11:17.000Rioters blast the purge message through loudspeakers.
02:11:20.000Any and all crime, including murder, Will be legal for 12 hours.
02:11:24.000So they're trying to trigger the Civil War.
02:11:28.000You're making some points, David Knight.
02:11:29.000Well, you know, Alex, when we look at pent-up demand, you know, you've got this mayor in Minneapolis who was saying, if you're within five hours, come here and protest.
02:11:40.000They're looting, they're burning, they're getting violent, and that's exactly what he wants because you've got a lot of pent-up frustration with a lot of people, and it's going to get worse as this Great Depression continues if the lockdown is not removed.
02:11:53.000And it's the mayor running the department that taught the cop how to choke somebody to death.
02:11:58.000Yeah, well, I mean, literally, the mob boss in charge is saying, come burn things down.
02:12:02.000They've had a lot of problems there in Minneapolis.
02:12:04.000I mean, you go back to Philando Castile, and I can't really... And the Somali police guy killing a lady.
02:12:07.000That's right, killing the lady from Australia.
02:12:09.000So, they've got a training issue, they've got an accountability issue, but then he is putting himself out, virtue signaling like he's going to be the savior.
02:12:18.000But again, He's talking about 400 years of pent-up frustration because of slavery and so forth.
02:12:23.000He is stoking this to try to get a race war because they don't want you to get upset about the lockdown.
02:12:29.000That's fundamentally the frustration that both sides are feeling right now, and they want to have both sides fighting each other, and they're doing a pretty good job of pitting black against white because, you know, it's happening.
02:12:43.000I mean, what is happening in Minneapolis is not staying there.
02:12:46.000And it's discrediting civil rights movements.
02:12:48.000So you remember from Seattle, the same thing.
02:12:50.000When you had legitimate organic civil protests, they came in with the NWO, brought in the black clad anarchist.
02:12:57.000Antifa's present in Minneapolis as well.
02:13:00.000It was Clinton's Delta Force that ran that.
02:13:03.000Remember, they were coming in and they were breaking windows and all the rest, and then they went and maced those kids in the eyes and all that stuff, and all those Seattle Frontline protests.
02:13:10.000The methodologies, and this goes all the way back to the 1920s, 1930s, when street violence became political theater in Europe.
02:13:18.000They learned, okay, this is how we can orchestrate political chaos.
02:14:22.000And you see the riots the next day, and the riots, there's outsiders on tape, outsiders involved in it, outsiders, and people that are going to be connected to politically motivated organizations, there to in effect discredit civil rights by increasing the divisiveness in the local community from a case that could otherwise be uniting in the public sphere.
02:14:41.000Yeah, the Australian lady who got killed there in Minneapolis had marched for reform after the Philando Castile situation.
02:14:49.000Yesterday, I went through a whole list of different cases right off the Free Thought Project because they focus on a lot of police brutality and so forth.
02:14:56.000I said, OK, here's this case, this case.
02:14:58.000You've got people who are innocent that are beaten or killed.
02:15:01.000And I said, guess which ones are white?
02:15:30.000Final segment straight ahead with both my guests and the next talk show host takes it over in the last three segments of the Alex Jones Show.
02:15:39.000But right now, Robert Barnes and David Niner with us.
02:15:42.000We've got a Trump clip straight ahead.
02:16:59.000Hundreds of billions of dollars a year were lost dealing with China.
02:17:03.000Especially over the years during the prior administration.
02:17:07.000China raided our factories, offshored our jobs, gutted our industries, stole our intellectual property, and violated their commitments under the World Trade Organization.
02:17:21.000To make matters worse, they are considered a developing nation, getting all sorts of benefits that others, including the United States, are not entitled to.
02:17:31.000But I have never solely blamed China for this.
02:17:35.000They were able to get away with the theft like no one was able to get away with before because of past politicians and frankly, past presidents.
02:17:46.000But unlike those who came before, my administration negotiated and fought for what was right.
02:17:53.000It's called fair and reciprocal treatment.
02:17:58.000China has also unlawfully claimed territory in the Pacific Ocean, threatening freedom of navigation and international trade.
02:18:07.000And they broke their word to the world on ensuring the autonomy of Hong Kong.
02:18:13.000The United States wants an open and constructive relationship with China, but achieving that relationship requires us to vigorously defend our national interests.
02:18:24.000The Chinese government has continually violated its promises to us and so many other nations.
02:18:32.000These plain facts cannot be overlooked or swept aside.
02:18:36.000The world is now suffering as a result of the malfeasance of the Chinese government.
02:18:42.000China's cover-up of the Wuhan virus allowed the disease to spread all over the world.
02:18:48.000By the way, I don't take any pleasure in this.
02:19:18.000So David Knight and of course Robert Barnes, you want to make any closing comments about where we are right now?
02:19:23.000Yeah, well, you know, when you look at the fourth turning, Strauss and Howe wrote in the early 90s, the same people who came up with the, you know, they'd look at it as a generational view, cyclical view of history.
02:19:33.000They were the ones who coined the term millennial.
02:19:36.000And they said in the early 90s, I think it was 93, they said sometime around the mid-2000s there'll be some kind of a global economic issue.
02:19:43.000It'll take a while for this to roll through.
02:19:45.000The fourth turning should be completed by 2029, and at that point we should have a Big change in society like we've seen 80 year cycles.
02:19:54.000The last one was the Great Depression and World War II.
02:19:57.000They're trying to hijack that turning.
02:19:59.000Well 2030 is what they've been focused on.
02:20:25.000And if we don't stop that, we have lost, because it's going to continue to go down into a greater depression, and then that's going to put more pressure on the politicians to start a greater war.
02:20:33.000No, no, I agree with you that the lockdown is their main assault.
02:20:37.000It's a non-military attack that is a military attack.
02:20:40.000Yeah, and the lockdown has established what the endpoint was going to look like.
02:20:44.000In other words, all the stuff that we've seen imposed on us... Exactly!
02:20:56.000Well, it's a real live Milgram experiment to see how people respond and react in these kind of circumstances, and they had far more success than they ever imagined.
02:21:03.000At the same time, the answer to evil people is always good people doing good things.
02:21:07.000So the fact, and people resisted, people pushed back, people protested, people took action, people engaged in civil disobedience, and we often saw them capitulate and fold when that happened and occurred.
02:21:17.000So it shows the power of the individual spirit is far from Well, exactly.
02:21:21.000Their attack, though, was so over the top and so reckless.
02:21:24.000We submitted up front because we weren't used to it, but we're getting a learning curve.
02:21:28.000I think it's very important that we get free speech back, because you look at how effective this has been to the people who simply look at CNN and Fox News.
02:21:36.000Oh, I think the establishment that isn't self-defeatist gets now, oh wow, this is a real takeover.
02:21:43.000I think they realize speech being cut out really was bad.
02:21:46.000Well, there's a lot of people who are willing to stand up and not comply, but there's a lot of people who are fully into this PSYOP.
02:21:57.000And so once the lockdown did not achieve the full success that they wanted it to, once they weren't able to push the Sort of new modern version of WMDs or incubator babies in exaggerating the scope and scale of the threat of this virus and weren't able to get people to believe the lockdown even had any relationship to it and large parts of the public refused and resisted.
02:22:17.000That's when now they've resorted to a backup strategy of other divisive form of politics where they have African-Americans scared of every white person in the world between the Ahmaud Arbery case and the Minneapolis case and now they're through the riots and making them appear to be race riots Make white America scared of African Americans.
02:22:34.000So, is their actions a sign of strength or weakness?
02:22:38.000A sign of weakness because they wouldn't be resorting to these kind of desperate, dangerous tactics.
02:22:42.000You don't unleash pandemics that you can't completely control.
02:22:51.000It's good to be truthful about how bad we've gotten.
02:22:55.000But I mean, let me tell you, I see a lot of positive signs.
02:22:58.000I think it's very imperative at this point that we pay attention to what the next phase is, and that is the rollout of testing and contact tracing.
02:23:31.000Yeah, there's all kinds of ways of civil disobedience that can be very effective when you're within your constitutional and legal rights to do so.
02:23:54.000I hope they've gone too quickly and too far.
02:23:56.000And that's the key thing, you know, doing it gradually.
02:23:58.000This is why I think it's even more dangerous.
02:24:00.000Well, let's remember, just because they get a bunch of sheeple, just because they get a bunch of people that howl Hitler doesn't mean it's... Yeah.
02:24:06.000Oh, well, I think it's even more dangerous when you have a situation like we got here in Texas, where the governor is putting $300 million into contact tracing, and yet I think that's more dangerous than what's happening with Whitmer or with Cuomo or these other people because it's obvious what's happening with them.
02:25:39.000I've been on Gab for a number of years now, and I just wanted to mention that if you haven't been there, say, in the last month, their platform has been just massively improved over the last couple of weeks.
02:25:52.000I mean, almost all the features that you'll find in Facebook or Twitter running just like that Very slick, very smooth operation.
02:26:05.000The engineers at Gab have done fantastic work.
02:26:10.000Parler is also good, and I do encourage the President to start parallel posting on Gab and on Parler, and possibly even just post links to his posts on Gab and elsewhere.
02:26:28.000So that people that look for him on Twitter are just going to get a link over to Gab or Parler.
02:26:34.000If this happened, this would be like a hundred foot tsunami hitting social media.
02:26:41.000And I think that Trump, the showman, you know, the master of ceremonies, the guy that really understands The ins and outs, I think, of American psychology better than maybe anybody.
02:26:54.000For all of his flaws, he is obviously a barroom brawler, throws a lot of wild punches, but he is a fighter.
02:27:01.000But he's the guy that was running The Apprentice.
02:27:08.000He knows how to tease an idea into being, and then pull the rug out from underneath his enemies.
02:27:15.000And I think that's what he was doing, picking this fight with Scarborough, and which, for whatever reason, instead of going after him on that, Dorsey at Twitter decided to start fact-checking his mail-in ballot tweets, which obviously is setting up this entire battle over censorship on Twitter and Facebook, or as they like to call it, their curatorship.
02:27:44.000They're just trying to pick the best ideas for us peons to see, not censorship.
02:28:05.000It's possible that George Floyd and Derek Chauvin, the police officer, actually knew each other.
02:28:11.000They were both security guards at a club called El Nuevo Rodeo Club, you know, a Spanish nightclub, which is like two blocks from the precinct that was burned.
02:28:26.000It's around the corner from the Target and the Wendy's that were burned.
02:28:30.000They both worked there in 2019 for a year.
02:28:33.000Officer Chauvin was an outside off-duty officer security guy, and George Floyd was inside security.
02:28:40.000It's hard for me to imagine that they didn't know each other, like a door bouncer and the outside officer.
02:28:48.000If these guys had a beef, and this took it took itself to the curbside justice level with the knee on the neck, I mean, just imagine This country is a tinderbox and any random spark, like what might have been a personal beef between a bad cop, I mean he had something like 20 complaints against him for excessive force violations, was never fired.
02:29:16.000He had 19 years, and I don't know how long he had to go to getting a pension, but I think he's going to be getting his pension in the hotel Graybar for a long time to come, and I don't envy his experience there.
02:29:29.000He'll probably have to be in protective custody.
02:29:33.000One of the things that's worrying me the most, now looking to tonight, Friday night in Minnesota, I watched the press conference with the governor and others today.
02:29:43.000The Minnesota National Guard Major General, he said that they are being issued weapons, which I assume means also live ammunition.
02:29:55.000And when questioned, said they, you know, he didn't want to get into their rules of engagement, but he said that they will be able to, you know, use themselves to use self-defense.
02:30:07.000Then it all comes down to where will they be positioned.
02:30:10.000If they're on the outskirts, not blocking looters, if they're just in force in trucks, you know, far away from the action, it won't make any difference.
02:30:19.000But if they station, you know, National Guard and Humvees in the areas where the looting and the burning has been taking place, then we might see a use of force incident.
02:30:32.000And what's worrying me, I'm harking back now to four years ago, In Dallas, there was, following Ferguson riots, there were riots in Dallas.
02:31:46.000They're going to want to see a stronger police reaction.
02:31:49.000And at the same time, you've got anarchists and antifas coming in from around the country, radicals.
02:31:56.000I've seen the graffiti spray-painted, the Anarchist A in the circle.
02:32:01.000So this is not just homegrown, you know, black people who are upset about the George Floyd death, but you've got people coming in from out of the state to take advantage of this movement, and it won't be very hard to see a situation where somebody shoots at police or shoots at rioters just to stoke A much larger explosion than what we've already seen.
02:32:31.000If you put a Dallas event on top of what's already happened, this is going to go completely out of control.
02:32:39.000In that case, they'll need to bring in a lot more than the Minnesota National Guard.
02:32:44.000You could see either a Kent State type of a situation where a National Guard troop does something stupid with a magazine load of ammo.
02:32:53.000I wouldn't expect anybody in the Minnesota National Guard to be issued a 30-round magazine with 30 rounds in it.
02:33:02.000I'll bet if they get issued live ammo at all, it's going to be maybe five rounds, one magazine each, and that's it.
02:33:11.000Enough for deterrence, but not really enough, you know, to cause total mayhem.
02:33:16.000But the potential for this going off the rails is enormous, because bad actors from all sides can just now lob a brick into this boiling cauldron, and it's going to explode all over the place.
02:33:30.000And when we come back, we'll talk about this some more.
02:33:34.000Yeah, I just saw a couple of my book covers up, so I'll mention my books are all available in printed, e-book on Kindle, and audio book on Amazon Audible, as well as you can get signed copies straight from me and cut Amazon out of the deal.
02:33:49.000You know, this situation in Minnesota, it really is like a bubbling cauldron, you know, with steam and little pops and explosions coming out of it.
02:33:59.000And this is when some really evil people can move in and for whatever reasons, whether they just, you know, want to see things burn.
02:34:08.000Some people just want to see things burn.
02:34:12.000Some people want to become famous in their own mind, even for like changing the course of history.
02:34:20.000You know, the first night of the riots, there was a group of, they were called the armed rednecks in the mainstream media.
02:34:28.000That were just like volunteers that kitted up with their hard plates and ARs and took up station.
02:34:35.000They even referenced the LA Riots rooftop Koreans.
02:34:40.000So you can see from the right and from the left, the left would be the Antifa and anarchists, the black block guys coming into town to break windows and throw Molotov cocktails and fire big fireworks into stores and at cops.
02:34:58.000This is a situation that is fraught with peril, to put it mildly.
02:35:03.000Then you've got the Minnesota National Guard on a very short leash, everybody very afraid of what would happen if there was some sort of a Kent State situation, particularly at night, you know, with somebody lighting off a magazine.
02:35:17.000And in a situation like this, it would be especially easy to do a false flag operation Something that would be blamed on the armed redneck vigilantes, for example.
02:35:30.000And, you know, the mainstream media, all they need is a pretext for a narrative.
02:35:35.000It doesn't really matter what the facts of a case are, as we saw from the Russian collusion hoax.
02:35:41.000They're willing to run with lies as long as there's a, you know, barely plausible hook for a narrative, they'll run with it.
02:35:51.000So if there's a shooting in Minnesota, It'll be blamed on, you know, the white vigilantes and be used as an excuse to crack down on the Second Amendment.
02:36:02.000Now, fortunately, we don't have an Eric Holder or a Loretta Lynch in charge of the Justice Department.
02:37:05.000You do it all you like 90% minimum, but there are people I think that are willing to do this and it's something that all sides have to be on alert for personally stay away from riots, you know, stay away from large crowds pandemic or not.
02:37:22.000I want to I want to switch gears from Minnesota a little bit and talk about the state of our country.
02:37:28.000I think that the deep state is extremely concerned now.
02:37:42.000attorney named Jensen, he's the one that was looking into the Flynn situation.
02:37:47.000Well, there's also Durham in Connecticut building the bigger case, and another U.S.
02:37:53.000attorney has been assigned to look into all the unmasking, which is going to be very embarrassing for a lot of Democrats and for some Republicans, because they're going to be seen as colluding in this coup, in this silent coup against Trump.
02:38:09.000All of these players now are going to be unmasked.
02:38:15.000Next week, Rod Rosenstein is going before the Senate.
02:38:20.000Some of the questioning is going to be very difficult.
02:38:22.000How many times did he talk to Mueller before naming Mueller as the special counsel?
02:38:31.000Not to get into this too deeply, but the deep state actors that were Perpetrating this coup before the election of Trump and for the three years after, trying to kneecap him and sabotage him.
02:38:48.000A lot of these people are not going to do a G. Gordon Liddy and go to jail quietly.
02:38:54.000They're going to say, I was following orders, and it's going to go up and up the chain of command to the Comey, Brennan, Clapper, and then Obama level.
02:39:02.000So these people are freaking out and they would absolutely love nothing more than to create conditions of total mayhem and chaos in this country.
02:39:12.000And they're also going to continue the lockdown as much as they can in the blue states.
02:39:18.000Hoping to continue to stifle the economy, thinking that this is going to hurt Trump in November.
02:39:24.000I think that's going to have a completely backwards effect.
02:39:28.000I think that all the, you know, the middle class, small entrepreneurs, they're blaming their Democrat politicians.
02:39:36.000They're blaming the Democrat politicians.
02:39:39.000But they're going to keep this The entire coronavirus panic going because what they really want, the big game here, is the mail-in national election.
02:39:51.000They want to do what they've been doing in California and mail ballots to every registered voter in the last century, living or dead, at every possible old address that they've got.
02:40:05.000Just flood the country with mail-in ballots.
02:40:30.000These are the globalists going for broke.
02:40:33.000Actually trying to discredit an American election.
02:40:36.000If they can't win it, they want to discredit it.
02:40:40.000And we see in Minnesota, the pot is being stirred to the point where we could have a hot summer of riots across the country.
02:40:50.000In 1968, when Martin Luther King was killed, it spread from city to city until about a dozen cities were burning the way we see in Minneapolis.
02:41:03.000And all it's going to take is somebody firing into a crowd of policemen or a crowd of protesters who wants this to go up an order of magnitude.
02:41:14.000And the globalists, the deep staters, they are in a panic about their high-ranking members literally going to prison for what they did against Trump before and after the election.
02:41:27.000And they would rather see this country in flames than go down like that.
02:41:33.000They would rather see this country in flames.
02:41:36.000This is the stage in the poker game where the lights go out and the table gets knocked over.
02:41:44.000We've got a pandemic going on, an economic lockdown that's just crippling people's businesses and livelihoods.
02:41:53.000We've got the country divided between the masks and the no masks, the lockdowns and the defying lockdown people, and it's going to come to a head.
02:42:04.000And Trump can't even have rallies because we can't put all the people into an arena that close at this point in our understanding of this virus.
02:42:14.000So now we're going for other options like these flotillas, the Trump-tillas, other ways of showing support.
02:42:23.000Where you don't have to get people that close together.
02:42:26.000But at least for the time being, all eyes are going to be on Minneapolis.
02:42:30.000Because you've got, you've got Minnesota, Minneapolis Police, State Police, National Guard, Antifa's, armed blacks, armed whites, and it's not going to take much to send this entire boiling pot, you know, right across the floor to burn everybody's feet.
02:42:51.000And, um, I'm going to get back to this just in the other side of this break.
02:42:57.000This is some momentous days that we're coming into.
02:43:00.000You know, when there's a crisis underway, it's easy to just focus down on it and just study Minnesota as if it's just a unique event or maybe a follow-on to Ferguson and Baltimore and other events like that, even going back to the L.A.
02:43:25.000But there's a, you know, you have to force yourself to focus, pull the focus back out and look even beyond national and look global because we're not the only country in the middle of a crisis right now.
02:43:42.000There is truly a global crisis right now, even before this pandemic.
02:44:04.000You know, it would be nice to say we're just past it.
02:44:07.000South Korea has tried to, has done about as good as any country could.
02:44:12.000They had breakouts after nightclubs were open.
02:44:15.000They opened schools back up and now they're closed again.
02:44:18.000So it's glib to just say, hey, you know, it's all a hoax and we can just ignore it.
02:44:23.000We can't ignore it, but nor can we allow this, you know, lockdown panic to keep us shut in our houses and turn us into slaves.
02:44:32.000We have to learn how to live with this thing that China unleashed.
02:44:37.000And China did unleash this thing, whether they did it intentionally or accidentally, or accidentally on purpose by having very lax and unprofessional standards In their Wuhan P4 Virological Institute, they let it out.
02:44:54.000And once they let it out, they let it spread to the rest of the world.
02:44:59.000They could have fallen on the hand grenade, so to speak, and the world would have been appreciative if they had said, we're locking down China and Wuhan and warned the country even back last December when they knew what was going on.
02:45:12.000They completely knew what was going on, but they didn't.
02:45:15.000So once they decided To lock down China, but allow the flights to the rest of the world.
02:45:21.000They turned the coronavirus, this COVID-19 into a bioweapon against the war.
02:45:28.000And I want to talk a little bit about parallels that I see between the 1930s and Japan and the 2020s in China.
02:45:40.000And you can even roll Nazi Germany into it because in my opinion, China China has turned from being a Marxist-Leninist country that it started out under Mao, it went through just an authoritarian phase, now it's going into a national socialist phase.
02:45:59.000Even Hong Kong Chinese and Taiwanese, they're saying what's happening in the mainland, they're not Chinese communists anymore, they're Chinese Nazis.
02:46:10.000They're building up their national racial Han Chinese identity as like a superman.
02:46:21.000And in some ways, this is worse than the 1930s.
02:46:25.000Yeah, in the 1930s, we had a lot of communist fifth columnists in the U.S.
02:46:31.000and in Europe, but nothing like today, where our universities have been basically turned into Into, you know, communist training grounds under the rubric of social justice warriors.
02:46:45.000You know, but it's hate America, America stands for evil, and so many of these colleges, to get the dollar from the Chai Kom government, who is paying for these students, we have our universities full of essentially Chinese communist agents.
02:47:03.000They come to learn the technology, but they also come to learn our country.
02:47:11.000They even have Chinese intel officers, in my opinion, and in the opinion of others, They actually have them do training exercises in our country knowing that we're such a non-serious country that there won't be any bad consequences.
02:47:29.000A couple of months ago they had a couple of quote-unquote Chinese students infiltrate the Navy base in Key West all the way into the communication site and knowing once they're caught They'd just be slapped on the wrist and sent home.
02:47:44.000And I'm sure when they got back to China, they went back to their Intel Officer Training Academy, had, you know, celebrations all around, high fives, you know, where they can tell all the other students in Intel Officer Training.
02:48:52.000While you can use these international organizations and force us to, like Alinsky, force us to obey the letter of the law of all of these international agreements, while they break them all.
02:49:07.000And even to the point where we've seen them use biological warfare, because that's what it is when they sent it to the world while they restricted it within China.
02:49:22.000And something that really upsets me is that we have this pandemic in our country, and instead of being angry at the people that launched it at us, the Chinese communists, We turn against each other.
02:49:36.000So from the Chinese perspective, think about how brilliant this is, how perfect this is.
02:49:42.000When the Japanese launched the Pearl Harbor attacks, it unified us against them.
02:49:49.000Four years later, we dropped an atom bomb on Hiroshima, utterly defeating them.
02:49:54.000The Chinese drop a biological bomb on America, and we attack each other.
02:50:04.000So, I mean, from their point of view, think about how brilliant that is.
02:50:09.000If you can divide your enemy, if you can cause your enemy to fight within itself, then you may not even have to go to war, a kinetic war, because your enemy is going to fall under its own weight.
02:50:23.000So, think about this all as unrestricted warfare, Sun Tzu for the 2020s.
02:50:31.000They are doing a full court press in every area, you know, all around the world.
02:50:36.000I wish I had a good map of this, but I haven't been able to find one because it's mostly written here and there.
02:50:41.000The Chinese have hundreds of major construction projects going on all around the world, particularly in Southeast Asia and in Africa.
02:50:52.000They have literally hundreds of thousands of quote-unquote construction workers spread all over Africa and Southeast Asia, working on giant projects, living in barracks under military conditions.
02:51:10.000And I can promise you, as a former special warfare officer, anywhere that there are 500 Chinese workers, there is a platoon of Chinese SEALs And there is a platoon of intel officers.
02:51:24.000They now have the ability across Africa.
02:51:26.000I mean, it's been in the news recently that they're building buildings out of the goodness of their heart for these African governments, but they're completely infested with bugs and eavesdropping equipment.
02:51:40.000Well, they're not only doing that, they are bribing and threatening politicians across the third world, and now with Now having spread their pandemic, having spread their bioweapon, they're coming into countries like the Philippines with rescue packages where they're going to help these third world countries recover from the biological weapon that they unleashed.
02:52:06.000And the help is going to come in the form of aid packages and loans that these countries will never be able to pay back.
02:52:15.000And if we ever do go into a kinetic war, the Chinese already have hundreds of thousands of troops distributed around the world, you know, in place.
02:52:26.000I mean, this is something that the Japanese could never have dreamed of in the 1930s.
02:52:31.000And meanwhile, our country is completely disunited, you know, at our throats, at each other's throats, and we can't even identify the enemy.
02:52:42.000So, and the globalists, they see China as a way of wrecking, you know, the USA and the West.
02:52:50.000China sees the globalists as useful idiots to help weaken and cripple the West.
02:52:57.000But together, they're formidable, the globalists and the Chinese communists.
02:53:01.000and we've got to see what's going on and get over our, get over our in-fighting and our own civil war
02:55:54.000Well, if you can get concentrated, high-quality versions of those key elements, that's what you do at InfoWarsaw.com, and it funds the InfoWar.
02:57:43.000Yeah, you know, as someone who's kind of Well, for free speech, I often get told that I'm bad because I have to defend people whose language I don't agree with.
02:58:07.000You write all the time about everything?
02:58:09.000But I have to defend the people who say things that are even atrocious and that I can't, I would never get on board with because that's what free speech is.
02:58:18.000Otherwise, and like you said, it is that slippery slope of who gets to be the arbiter of what is said.
02:59:29.000Like, why is it only acceptable if you have some kind of entertainment?
02:59:32.000Because there's so many rap videos that you could watch that I enjoy, but they're talking about shooting people and robbing people, and it's everywhere on YouTube!