00:00:00.000But one of the things that is also in jeopardy right now is our judicial branch, and it's our system of government itself.
00:00:08.680And I don't think we can say often enough here how much that has been abused under this administration and with local prosecutors, state prosecutors, and at the federal level who are using lawfare.
00:00:22.340They're using our judicial system to go after political opponents.
00:00:24.920The most obvious example of that, and I think the most egregious one in history, is what is being done to Donald Trump right now.
00:00:30.920This is yet another week where cable TV has a split-screen image, right?
00:00:35.320On one side, turn on any news station, you see the partisan prosecutors and the double-standard DOJ going after President Trump.
00:00:42.420And on the other side, college campuses being wrecked by anti-Semitic mobs.
00:00:47.220In Manhattan, in the New York case, I mean, it's play-by-play on all the stations, right?
00:00:51.280That case should never have been brought.
00:00:54.300If there's ever been an example of lawfare, everybody can look at that and see.
00:00:59.080The trial is being orchestrated by Democrat supporters of President Biden who are trying to make a name for themselves.
00:01:04.440I mean, they're pretty open about that.
00:01:05.960They used it in their campaign pledges.
00:01:08.540We've got a Democrat district attorney, a Biden donor judge, whose daughter is a Democratic political consultant
00:01:15.220and has clients that use the case in their solicitation emails to raise money.
00:01:19.400And now we've learned there's an assistant DA who was recently a top man at the DOJ
00:01:25.260and received over $10,000 in payments from the Democratic National Committee.
00:02:08.500But he's trying to override President Trump's constitutional right to defend himself against the constant smears of his political opponents in an election year.
00:02:19.980The election year that most everyone understands is the most fateful one of our lifetimes.
00:02:24.480You cannot call yourself a serious judge and threaten a presidential candidate with jail time when he defends his reputation in public in the middle of a campaign.
00:02:33.060And I think everybody of good conscience understands that.
00:02:36.640Then we have the classified documents case where President Trump is being treated completely differently from President Biden.
00:02:42.700Again, this is something that is just obvious that everybody can see.
00:02:46.240Biden, of course, willfully retained and disclosed classified material.
00:02:49.940But because he is, quote, an elderly man with a poor memory, unquote, it was decided the DOJ would not be bringing charges.
00:02:59.180What the American people see, and I mean this is across the country, this isn't just red states, it's blue states as well.
00:03:04.080They look at this and they see an incredible double standard.
00:03:16.620Why? Because in our system, in a constitutional republic, if the people do not believe that the justice system is fair, that you really do have equal justice under law, then they throw their hands up and they say, what is there to believe in?
00:04:18.100And you're going to see the United States Congress address this in every possible way that we can because we need accountability ultimately at the end of the day.
00:06:48.500What has happened with the judge in Florida about to bring Julie Kelly on for breaking news and what has gone on in this travesty, this travesty in Manhattan.
00:06:58.500First, Julie Kelly, the great Julie Kelly.
00:07:00.560Julie, you've got breaking news in the classified documents case.
00:07:17.020But she is now refusing to set a new trial date, calling it imprudent.
00:07:23.760And, Steve, in the meantime, though, she is setting key hearings that will make Jack Smith's—what should we say?
00:07:33.720Give him some sleepless nights, I believe.
00:07:35.920She is going to be holding hearings on Trump's co-defendant Walt Nauta's motion to dismiss based on selective and vindictive prosecution.
00:07:44.300She is going to hold a hearing on a motion to dismiss based on the unlawful appointment of Jack Smith.
00:07:51.820She is also going to hold a hearing, and this is something that DOJ and Jack Smith was really hoping to avoid.
00:07:57.620And that is a partial evidentiary hearing on the scope of the prosecution team.
00:08:03.480This is where we got all the bombshell revelations related to co-work collusion with the Biden White House, the DOJ, and the National Archives.
00:08:11.880She will be holding a partial evidentiary hearing to hear the defense team's argument as to why entities like the archives, the DOJ, FBI counterintelligence, and the Biden White House, including his general counsel, should be considered part of the prosecution team.
00:08:31.700Meaning then that all of their records related to this investigation from the very beginning would be considered discovery material that has to be produced to the defense.
00:08:44.120She is, in her own way, going on a scorched-earth campaign now against Jack Smith.
00:08:51.840Okay, let's go back for a couple—just pull the camera back.
00:08:54.840And a lot of times we have motions to dismiss, the judge just takes it and he rules on.
00:09:01.040Are you saying making it a hearing is raising it up in a more serious context?
00:09:07.240Yes, because there are several defense motions that are outstanding.
00:09:11.340So you've got three defendants, Trump and his two co-defendants.
00:09:14.520And they are filing really similar motions, but they're different in their own form.
00:09:20.580So this is motions to dismiss based on selective vindictive prosecution.
00:09:45.960She's already held some of these hearings.
00:09:47.860We've seen these hearings, Donald Trump, for his motion to dismiss based on the Presidential Records Act and the unconstitutional vagueness of the statutes against him.
00:10:00.200We had a similar hearing a few weeks ago for his co-defendants, the same sort of motion to dismiss.
00:10:06.680So what she's doing is very helpful and instructive and informative because she's telling both sides, you're going to come into my courtroom.
00:10:20.560And then I will make present my order.
00:10:22.580So with this May 20th trial date now officially vacated, she is going to hold these evidentiary hearings on these existing outstanding defense motions.
00:10:32.700And she is going to put Jack Smith and Jay Barrett, his lead prosecutor, their feet to the fire and have to explain publicly, defend the selective vindictive prosecution, the potentially unlawful appointment of Jack Smith.
00:10:47.100And now this bigger issue, I believe, will be a public vetting of the full scope of the prosecution team and all of these federal agencies and the Biden White House involved in this.
00:11:02.680So first off, people should understand, the May 20th trial, which we knew was going to be bumped, is now bumped, but there's no new trial date.
00:11:09.260She says, OK, we can't get it in May, but I think you can get it at the end of August or September.
00:11:16.800Is there a schedule that she's put these other either evidentiary hearings or hearings on motions to dismiss as she laid that out and given them dates?
00:11:44.760Another one, I believe the special counsel one is June 21st.
00:11:48.120And then the big one, the evidentiary hearing about the scope of the prosecution team.
00:11:53.260So all of those motions have already been filed.
00:11:55.980I've already reported on several of them.
00:11:59.360And she's also going to be holding a sealed hearing tomorrow on the grand jury materials that were not disclosed out of Washington, D.C., transferred to her court.
00:12:09.760She wants to see all of those materials and then see which ones she believes can also be made public on the docket for the American people to see.
00:12:18.840The evidentiary hearing, which to me is the most explosive, talking about the team and who's on the team, that is scheduled now.
00:12:43.520Andrew Weissman is going to literally, you know, may want to throw himself off a building tonight on MSNEC complete because they're going to say Judge Cannon ought to be removed.
00:12:53.000Given where she's laying out the schedule and not putting in a not putting in a trial date, is there any possibility that this really starts before the November 5th election?
00:13:06.260Well, her last date here for the CIPA, which is this Classified Information Procedures Act, which really has been driving really a lot of the grind to this because there are special rules related to how defendants can and their attorneys can access classified information in espionage cases.
00:13:26.080So this has helped really slow down the process.
00:13:29.340So the last hearing for it on her schedule that she just posted is July 10th.
00:13:35.260So, you know, after that, would she set a trial date?
00:13:50.520We're waiting now for a separate order related to her stay on one of these key hearings that she just issued last night.
00:13:58.480And she's going to be issuing another order.
00:14:01.180And this will relate to, Steve, what we've been talking about the last few days, what I've been reporting at my substack, is missing evidence, doctored evidence, tampering with evidence that these defense attorneys cannot access the materials that they need.
00:14:18.280And that the DOJ has intentionally misrepresented to both the defense attorneys and now Judge Cannon exactly the form of the contents of the boxes that were taken from Mar-a-Lago, how these cover sheets, which we'll talk about, were used as props and then as replacements.
00:14:35.760And not being able, believe it or not, Steve, in some instances, to match up the replacement cover sheet that they used to take out the classified documents and put that cover sheet in.
00:14:46.400They're saying in some instances they can't match up that cover sheet with the classified record that they took out of the box.
00:17:11.440They've got all kind of tax-deferred, tax-exempt instruments to talk to you about how you shift your 401ks and IRAs over to precious metals.
00:17:59.760This today was a throwdown to say, hey, look, tough guys, we're going to have some hearings here.
00:18:06.400You're going to have to roll out some evidence.
00:18:07.540We may have a three-day evidentiary hearing, but you're going to explain to me as a federal judge exactly what in the hell is going on here and what you guys have been doing.
00:18:26.640She has to endure not only serious death threats that resulted in the imprisonment of a woman who made such serious death threats that now she's in jail for three years for it, but the constant drumbeat.
00:18:38.500And you're going to hear this tonight.
00:18:39.720Everyone on MSNBC, CNN, Andrew Weissman, Barbara McQuaid, Joyce Vance, everyone is going to just be caterwauling.
00:18:53.140We know why they've wanted since the very beginning to get her off of this case because they suspected, and she continued to hint and suggest, and that has accelerated over the past few months,
00:19:04.720that she was going to use her position, do her job, actually, Steve, as a judge should, number one, make sure that the interests of both parties are balanced, that the rights of the defendants are protected,
00:19:17.160and that she prevents the government from abusing its authority and overreach.
00:19:22.160And so with this shot across the bow today, and there's more to come this week, as I said, vacating the trial date, saying she won't set a new one, but what looks like a steady drip of a mini trial where Jack Smith is going to be the defendant and not Donald Trump.
00:19:42.320He now, she, it appears, is in a way, and I'm not saying this is her motive, because I'm not in her head, I don't talk to her, I don't know her, but this is her way of putting the government, DOJ, Jack Smith, and Jay Brett on the hot seat.
00:19:57.480You have to explain to me, Judge Cannon, why I should not consider the National Archives, the Biden White House, including his general counsel, the counterintelligence unit of the FBI, other entities.
00:20:10.840You have to tell me why they're not part of the prosecution team, when we have records dating back from May of 2021, about how this was all coming together.
00:20:19.580She specifically asked, and this is why she is very good at what she does, she specifically asked Jay Brett at a hearing in March,
00:20:27.800can you tell me when the DOJ started their investigation into this?
00:20:32.020And Jay Brett said, February of 2022, that's not true, because the DOJ, now we know from this prosecution, the scope of prosecution team motion, that will, this is, will be the source of this hearing in June.
00:20:46.320We now know that the DOJ was involved beginning in the spring of 2021, that the National Archives General Counsel, Gary Stern, was already in informal talks with the DOJ,
00:20:57.860so they could concoct this case against Donald Trump before he even turned over boxes to the National Archives.
00:21:06.040So, now they have all these records, so he flat out, again, just like he did at the last hearing, lied to Judge Cannon.
00:21:50.020This is what the House Republicans should have been doing to the extent that they can.
00:21:54.220They have completely put this in Judge Cannon's lap.
00:21:56.980But she is, she's handling it as well as she can.
00:22:00.860But it does highlight the abdication of duty that House Republicans have been engaged in since, you know, they took power now a year and a half ago.
00:23:03.960Right. I mean, I know that now they have subpoenaed Dana Remus, the general counsel, who was meeting with National Archive officials through 2021.
00:23:23.520The DOJ is, of course, naturally in the Biden White House, is naturally objecting to that, refusing to allow these officials to sit for interviews or respond to a subpoena.
00:23:35.540But that seems to be the most of what what we get.
00:23:41.380Why is it defense attorneys who are uncovering and having to FOIA federal agencies to get some of these exhibits that were used in this motion, this this critical motion about the scope of the prosecution team?
00:23:53.700Why haven't Republicans forced that sort of information to be produced to investigative committees?
00:24:00.920Why is it Julie Kelly, Tom Fenton, Mike Davis, John Solomon, these independent investigators, they're doing it because they want to present the American people to what the actual facts are in the news is.
00:24:14.080But people have, you know, institutions talk about institutionalists.
00:24:19.360Institutions are supposed to do this to make sure that the institution goes forward and does its job.
00:24:55.120Declassified with Julie Kelly is my sub stack.
00:24:58.440I also have a very detailed report at Real Clear Investigations about the timeline in 2021 leading up to this classified documents case.
00:25:07.740And, of course, I'm on Twitter a lot, Julie underscore Kelly, too, where I post a lot of breaking news, like I just posted this new order by Judge Cannon.
00:25:14.960And we'll be waiting for her next order in response to Jack Smith's confession about tampered, tampered evidence and even in some cases missing evidence.
00:28:17.400Most emergencies come without warning.
00:28:22.740And when the next one comes, you won't have time to pack and to prepare.
00:28:27.540You need to get ready now before an emergency strikes.
00:28:30.700Your supplies should be ready to grab and go right away.
00:28:34.800Secure these supplies right now at MyPatriotSupply.com.
00:28:38.620Start with the four-week emergency food kits from MyPatriotSupply, helping millions of Americans, and I mean millions of Americans, prepare since 2008.
00:28:48.580MyPatriotSupply are experts in self-reliance and preparation.
00:28:53.240Their four-week emergency food kits offer over 2,000 calories every day, protected by heavy-duty, four-layer packaging.
00:29:54.960Look at the J6, and we're going to get Cash on here in the next hour to talk about the New York Times article about the National Guard.
00:30:03.860When you hear what Cash has to say, the whole J6 committee, everything on the insurrection, Trump's insurrection, is a joke, a sick joke.
00:30:10.920And what happened in Manhattan today may be the most perverted and sick of all because this is to destroy a man, one of the greatest presidents this country's ever had.
00:30:38.720Andrew, you're a New Yorker through and through.
00:30:41.800I never thought that a courtroom, particularly, forget that he's president of the United States, a courtroom would turn into basically a brawl because of what the prosecution is trying to do.
00:30:53.360They don't have a case, and they're trying to smear Trump in front of the nation.
00:31:01.680And that's actually right when the court resumed in the afternoon.
00:31:06.720That's exactly what Blanche said when he was asking for a mistrial.
00:31:11.300Steve, I rarely read, but I think this is very important.
00:31:14.640Blanche said that the alleged incident in 2006 is so far outside the realm of the case, has nothing to do with this case, is extraordinarily prejudicial.
00:31:24.780And the only reason the prosecution asked the question is to smear the defendant, Donald Trump.
00:31:48.440This is not what we heard today from Stormy Daniels.
00:31:51.020The prosecution has completely gone off the rails, and there is no remedy for the defense.
00:31:57.180The judge said that he agreed that Daniels had gone outside some of those guardrails that he had set, but disagreed that mistrial was warranted at this point, saying the cross-examination would be the best opportunity here for the defense to make their case.
00:32:14.640And I have to tell you, at the very end of the day, you had probably the best part of cross-examination that I've seen so far by Susan Necklace when she got Stormy Daniels to admit that Stormy Daniels, to be honest, if I could get the story out and make some money doing it, then yes, I would.
00:32:34.100It's the first time that Stormy Daniels showed a motive, a monetary motive.
00:32:38.340Steve, as soon as she said that, within 30 seconds, the judge said, we've had enough for today.
00:32:59.080The defense will have to sleep on that.
00:33:00.780And they'll continue to cross-examine Stormy Daniels tomorrow morning.
00:33:03.740I just want to, for the audience that doesn't follow this as closely as we do, is that this commercial transaction or this alleged business thing in the ledger, part of it has to do around Stormy Daniels.
00:33:16.160Obviously, part of it allegedly has to do with Stormy Daniels, allegedly has to do with the Playmate Bunny.
00:33:21.100But the judge actually told the – correct me if I'm wrong.
00:33:23.520The judge told the prosecution none of the details of the alleged event are actually mean anything to the – is he guilty or not, to actually the facts of the trial.
00:33:35.440She went out of her way, and the prosecution had to guard her way to try to put salacious detail in there.
00:33:41.260And the judge, even a couple of times, realizing this was heading to a mistrial, didn't he jump in a couple of times during the day and say, whoa, you can't say this, you can't do this?
00:33:49.920Yeah, he did. In the morning when the prosecution called Stormy Daniels, they basically went into all of the alleged salacious detail that Stormy Daniels claimed happened back in 2006,
00:34:01.840far beyond the guardrails that the judge immediately cited, the judge set, actually, for this case.
00:34:08.440And that was what Blanche's mistrial request was based off of right there, Steve.
00:34:14.280So the judge realized that Stormy Daniels went way beyond this.
00:34:17.800Blanche even said that we have no remedy for the jury right now.
00:34:22.960You would have to rule a mistrial, and if you were to have another trial, you'd have to exclude this witness.
00:34:28.120The judge agreed that they went outside those guardrails that he set, didn't think a mistrial was actually warranted.
00:34:34.940But, Steve, I have to tell you, in looking at all this in big picture, and while I keep my eye on this jury,
00:34:39.900hoping that there are a couple of unbiased jurors in there, if there are no unbiased jurors,
00:34:45.220and they've all made their decision before any fact was presented,
00:34:50.200I think what Blanche did today and Stormy Daniels' testimony to the prosecution speaks very, very strongly on appeal.
00:34:58.680Let me ask you, the prosecution's been working with Stormy Daniels for a year for this testimony.
00:35:06.700Do you believe, and I'm asking for a judgment call, that they wanted this to get in there,
00:35:11.620or do you think Stormy Daniels is just too hard to control?
00:35:15.120No, the prosecution absolutely wanted this to get in there.
00:35:18.020They want to, for lack of a better term, smut-shame Donald Trump.
00:35:22.520That's exactly what everything that the prosecution has basically asked at this point,
00:35:27.380outside of some of the records, some of the phone records that they asked Davidson.
00:35:32.520But with regards to Stormy Daniels, they want all the salacious details,
00:35:36.800and they want to present to the jury basically a sexual encounter,
00:35:41.660and instead of actually any type of a criminal case.
00:35:46.860And I think they want the jury to make a morality call rather than actually a call on the facts of the case here.
00:35:55.600And the truth is, the American people made a morality call on November 8th of 2016.
00:36:01.500Steve, I think you had a pretty darn good view, because I saw you standing right next to President Trump
00:36:05.540when he walked down the Hilton, or the Sheridan, I forget which one it was, as the 45th President of the United States.
00:36:11.880It was the Hilton, and people didn't care about this other stuff.
00:36:15.020They cared they were losing their country.
00:36:16.860Real quickly, I just want to repeat, because we're all over Mike Johnson, these guys, about these terrible trials.
00:39:39.820Tell me exactly what the Biden regime is trying to do in Gaza and to bring Gaza here to the United States of America, sir.
00:39:46.840They're pitching this idea to bring a bunch of Gaza war refugees into the United States.
00:39:52.200I'm thinking they're doing this because they're trying to appease this alienated, hard, progressive left wing that's mad at them right now over Israel's retaliatory war against Hamas.
00:40:06.660But my point in the article today in the editorial is that these are exactly the kind of population that you do not ever want to bring into the United States for any reason whatsoever.
00:40:20.420Because from cradle to grave, Hamas at every level of civil society in the strip has been indoctrinating them in murder, death, sub-dehumanizing Jews and Christians, U.S. hate, especially right now.
00:40:40.200This is a terrible time to be bringing in a population that has been so thoroughly for decades indoctrinated in the dark arts of murder and jihad.
00:40:53.460And I'm talking about children going to summer camps where they learn how to shoot weapons and prepare to be conscripted into Hamas' armed forces and watching children's television shows that feature big stuffed animals that are teaching them how to kill and murder and encouraging them to become suicide bombers.
00:41:19.220The whole society is structured to teach its population to kill.
00:41:26.900And that's just a huge problem, not to mention that all the polling of Gazans, and I mean independent good polling, shows that they absolutely hate America at huge, overwhelming majorities.
00:41:41.620I'm not saying that every Gazan is a terrible person.
00:41:45.240I say that it's just a matter of probabilities and numbers, and you have to consider those sort of things when you're assessing homeland security.
00:42:10.980How does he, because you're the one that's out of them on everything they've tried to do in advance.
00:42:15.660What are they going to try to do here?
00:42:18.180Well, they're going to bring, what they want to do is use a longstanding law, refugee law, to anoint individuals, mostly families, especially people who might have a relative already in the U.S.
00:42:35.900The way the White House spokesman put it a couple days ago was he framed it as we're going to be bringing sick Gazan children here for medical treatment, but not mentioning that they're also going to be bringing that little sick child's whole family in with them as a refugee.
00:42:55.500Now, refugees, when you get that status, qualify for a green card within a year, and then that counts towards citizenship, so they get four more years before they get U.S. citizenship.
00:43:10.980My argument is, you know, why do you have to do this?
00:47:18.040This is the whole reason that pier is being built.
00:47:20.440The pier is being built not just to get supplies in.
00:47:22.560It's to get people out away from the Israelis stopping it.
00:47:26.160But this is where you're going to start to see the refugees in Europe, and they're coming to the United States.
00:47:31.300So, Todd, what would you argue that the Republican House has to do immediately?
00:47:34.540They can't sit around and be feckless and hapless like they have been.
00:47:38.260They've underwritten all of this, all of the NGOs, all of it.
00:47:42.400As Todd Benzman has gone through time and time again, the invasion of the country is underwritten by the taxpayers, the very people it's set to destroy.
00:47:49.500What would be – if you got 30 seconds or a minute with Johnson, what would you tell him?
00:47:54.040Well, first of all, if it's a trial balloon and they're not already bringing in, fire at it.
00:48:01.600Let people know that this is going to be a problem.
00:48:04.420If you think it's a problem, then it's got to – you've got to let it be known that this is a national security problem on the one hand.
00:48:11.940And on the other hand, if people hate America, which all the polling – there's independent good polling that goes back years and years on that population – that the overwhelming majority hates America.
00:48:26.780Probably not 100 percent, but you can't vet for that sort of thing.
00:48:31.120People that hate you, you don't want to bring them in.
00:48:58.280They plan to bring in more and more refugees.
00:49:01.500Okay, this is another reason Biden should be turfed out.
00:49:05.760If you want any other reason for the African-American, the Hispanic community, the Asian-American community, these inner cities to bring these refugees in, it's going to be your problem, and they don't care.
00:49:14.220Todd, you wrote the number one book on jihad at the border.
00:49:17.440Walk me through, where do people get your writings?
00:49:19.340Where do they get this article that just came up, the editorial on the New York Post, and where do they get your social media?
00:49:23.640Well, the piece in the post just went up about an hour ago.
00:49:28.080It's fresh, so you can probably see it up there on their site.
00:50:01.840We always like to be the firstest with the mostest.
00:50:06.000Mike Lindell is going to join us in a second.
00:50:07.720I'm very serious about not just the end of the dollar empire and the new, to get the new free fifth installment, but you owe it to yourself and you owe it to your family to look at gold as a hedge.
00:50:21.320If you think times are turbulent now, you ain't seen nothing yet.
00:50:25.100It's going to get so much worse before it gets better, and it's only going to get better if you keep your shoulder to the wheel.
00:50:29.780Look at what you've just done in the last couple of days about getting the focus on the vast criminal conspiracy against President Trump.