On today's show, we discuss a new lawsuit that involves a man who voted twice on the same day as his wife, an ex-lawyer, and his wife's ex-husband. We also hear about Joe Biden breaking his ankle playing with his dog, and whether Tucker Carlson is a friend or foe.
00:01:16.000I need to read, uh, I need to somehow find out how to read these symbols that are apparently written in papyrus because the brief was, I don't know, I guess Sidney Powell didn't have a space bar, but I don't want to detract!
00:01:28.000From the message, we'll be talking about that.
00:01:31.000We will be talking about Tucker Carlson and whether he is friend or foe.
00:01:35.000I know there's been a lot of chirping from people.
00:02:34.000First off, I'm sure you guys have read about this, Joe Biden had a hairline fracture in his foot playing with his dog.
00:02:42.000And of course, listen, obviously, I think this is probably one of the greatest frauds perpetrated on the American public with the vote, but it doesn't mean that I want Joe Biden to twist an ankle.
00:02:50.000And unfortunately we do have exclusive footage of the incident.
00:03:22.000And by the way, another big thing for Joe Biden, before we move on to why this really is likely untrue, the media is reporting that he finally crossed the 80 million threshold for votes.
00:03:32.000That's the largest turnout in American election history, which makes sense because, you know, look at his social media following.
00:04:49.000So, by the way, follow me on Instagram here.
00:04:52.000We're going to be moving along the trail.
00:04:53.000If you are not following me, Lado with Crowder on Instagram.
00:04:56.000Of course, we'll be taking your live chat after this, playing Hipster or Hobo on Mug Club Exclusive.
00:05:02.000My question to you right now off the bat is what do you think is the most egregious example of the, I don't want to say election fraud, the election shenanigans at this point.
00:05:10.000Do you think it's the Dominion software issue that people have talked about?
00:05:13.000Do you think it's sending poll workers home and not allowing them to observe?
00:05:18.000Do you think it's the out-of-state ballots?
00:05:21.000What do you think is the example that is most definitive, that matters most?
00:05:25.000What do you think will end up in any of these situations being Being thrown out, I guess, kind of right off the bat.
00:06:17.000Now, I will allow, there's maybe a 99% chance that this is all an accident, including, by the way, with my grandmother, 96-year-old grandmother, who you saw at the Michigan rally, who also voted absentee.
00:06:26.000But the system just shows that she did not vote absentee.
00:07:04.000So, they started wanting to check the status of my wife's absentee vote.
00:07:08.000Because there's a lot going around where they're saying a lot of... You hear this rhetoric that many millions of Americans believe that their vote did not count.
00:07:44.000Michigan is one state that does give you the ability to track your absentee ballot, okay?
00:07:48.000But I don't want you to take my word for it, go to clip two.
00:07:52.000The most important tool that people need to know about is really the Michigan Voter Information Center, which can be found at michigan.gov slash vote.
00:08:00.000It's a service that's run by the Secretary of State Bureau of Elections and on that you can find if you're registered, your registration status, where you vote at, the contact information for your local clerk.
00:08:12.000On that, if you have voted absentee, you can see the date that your request was received by your local clerk, when your ballot was mailed out, when they received it.
00:08:20.000So that's a great tool to kind of hold the clerk accountable and to make sure that you know where your vote is at in the process.
00:08:30.000Because I will encourage everybody to check this out.
00:08:34.000And if you have the same anomalies that I found with every person I know who voted absentee in Michigan, I would encourage you to call your clerks and go through the process.
00:08:40.000Let me explain to you two really quickly.
00:08:51.000You go, you hit your registration, and you type in your information, and then if you have already voted absentee, this will show you right here what turns up for people who are listening on audio.
00:09:01.000Right here we, uh, uh, well this is actually, this is the wrong one.
00:09:04.000I think we have, uh, we have clip three first before that quarter black carrot.
00:09:13.000registered but there's an actual clip here that should show what it should
00:09:17.000look like that Reg sent in if not you can bring it up Steve Gallen really
00:09:21.000quickly so that was my wife who did vote absentee so you look at that and you say
00:09:25.000okay well that shows that she's registered yes look at the systems
00:09:28.000working but my wife voted no further already so this is not to check and see
00:09:34.000if you're registered this is supposed to be an ability to track your ballot
00:09:38.000Do we have that token on where we can bring that up from Reg, where we have a video that actually shows what it looks like if someone has voted absentee, and you should be able to track it?
00:10:57.000Before we go to my vote, this is what it should look like, and we'll just go through this all the way again so people can see it in sequential order because I don't want anyone to have any reason to doubt this.
00:11:06.000This is what it should look like if you go to that website and you vote, or sorry, and you vote at absentee and it tracks Your address.
00:11:14.000Audio, wait, it looks like you're panicking.
00:11:34.000Okay, Michigan.gov, vote, you go there, looks like what we did, okay, are you registered?
00:11:39.000You enter in your information to show if you are registered and if you vote by mail.
00:11:44.000This is the video right here, it shows you, okay, entering in your birth date, you can enter in your month, then you enter in your birth date, you don't need the exact day, you just need the year, and then you enter in your zip code.
00:11:55.000Now this should show you, look, you are registered, and it should show you the status of your absentee vote.
00:14:17.000My grandmother voted absentee, who lives in Michigan, 100% of the days of the year.
00:14:22.000And the information that we have on their absentee vote is the exact same information we have on my voter registration in Michigan, which is false.
00:14:31.000So, best case scenario, this is a broken system where you cannot check the status of your absentee ballot.
00:14:39.000Worst case scenario, it's the perfect system to try and remove any transparency for obvious fraud.
00:14:45.000And we will be making some calls to clerks.
00:14:46.000I want everyone who voted absentee in Michigan, everyone who voted absentee, period.
00:14:50.000If you have a state, and there's a database, we'll have it up at loudearthcracker.com, where you can check in your state if you have the ability to track your absentee vote.
00:15:07.000What it does is it really highlights the problem that people had already identified weeks and months ahead of time, which was if you move to a mandatory sending of absentee ballots to all registered voters, it completely ignores the fact that those systems and logs typically lag months or quarters behind people moving, They're address changes, dying, that kind of thing.
00:15:28.000And while certainly there are systems in place to check those things, but if you combine a rush to count them all, I mean in a normal election you would have a smaller number of issues.
00:15:39.000But there really aren't any systems for Michigan to check this right now.
00:16:32.000So this is what I'm saying, unless it's legal, unless it's constitutional, you have to throw them out!
00:16:36.000You have to throw them out if you cannot know that every legal vote is counted, because right now we are in a system where illegal votes are absolutely counted, and we'll get into the documents, we'll get into the briefs here, and the affidavits, and we don't know if legal votes are counted.
00:17:18.000But keep in mind too, the recounts didn't check signatures because there's a secrecy envelope, there's the ballot.
00:17:25.000They didn't check, they just recounted the numbers in the machines, which is a marvel to me that Georgia found 5,500 votes without actually auditing or checking signatures.
00:17:32.000So think about this, this scenario, we don't know what happened with my wife's absentee ballot despite the fact that we follow the exact instructions on following up as to whether the absentee
00:18:26.000No, it's not like it's a six month lag.
00:18:28.000By the way, speaking of which, CNN, before we get to the lawsuit, they're saying seven state certified results as Trump makes baseless fraud claims.
00:18:57.000Because if we actually follow the constitutional, both letter of the law and spirit of the law, to have a free and fair election, guess what?
00:19:05.000You're going to have violence and rioting in the streets because people have been told that Donald Trump is stealing it from them.
00:19:30.000You know what people are saying, they use this word disenfranchise, disenfranchise, but you can only disenfranchise someone who cast a legal vote.
00:19:37.000It's like saying, we've disenfranchised all of the voters in Singapore from casting their ballot in the American election.
00:19:43.000And you're like, well yes, we did not let them vote, but the point was they were never franchised to begin We disenfranchised the Crips in not letting them take old men's Gran Torino's at will.
00:19:54.000Oh, what a sad state of affairs in this country where Latin kings can't earn themselves a teardrop tattoo.
00:20:00.000This is unbelievable and it's happened to me.
00:20:04.000So by the way, everyone watching right now, please hit like this second.
00:20:19.000There's a lawsuit that's been filed by Sidney Powell.
00:20:21.000Can we just say the Kraken has been released?
00:20:23.000Because we were talking about, does she have some bombshells?
00:20:26.000I would say that this certainly would suffice.
00:20:29.000Doesn't mean that it's going to win, but certainly pretty thorough and certainly something that in the cumulative case that's being made, I don't see how you throw this out.
00:20:41.000I mean, look, even just over the course of the last couple of days, you had the city of Detroit have their own council move to intervene in the Michigan suit in order to defend the election itself in the process.
00:20:51.000Now that makes sense because Wayne County is the center of where a lot of the controversy was, which we covered all during the election.
00:20:58.000I mean, you know, I don't want to insult hell.
00:21:07.000So not even God would wish that on his worst enemy.
00:21:10.000So when you look at all the allegations that are brought, you really do see a lot of support for where those arguments are made.
00:21:17.000And what you're seeing as well is putting a lie to all of the coverage about, oh wait a minute, they're talking about Hugo Chavez and Hugo Chavez died years ago.
00:21:25.000And it's like, guys, no one's saying that Hugo Chavez came from beyond the grave to switch ballots in Wayne County.
00:21:31.000But what they're saying is, Follow the trail of where these systems are and the questions that are raised.
00:21:35.000And that's only one of multiple arguments.
00:21:49.000No, I agree 100% with what you're saying.
00:21:51.000I think what we still need, though, is a win.
00:21:53.000We need a very clear win, and I think a judge taking this and saying, hey, there's enough to go forward, like happened in Pennsylvania, was a very clear win.
00:22:00.000The only problem was the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania was like, well, this says we did something wrong, and I don't think we did anything wrong, so buh-bye with the lawsuit, right?
00:22:07.000So I hope that doesn't happen in Georgia or Michigan with anything that we've got going on.
00:22:11.000Eventually it goes to the Supreme Court, though.
00:22:27.000One, of course, is that the Dominion software was accessed by agents from China and Iran in order to manipulate elections, including the 2020 election.
00:22:35.000So this is a big one, the Dominion software issue.
00:22:39.000This is something that they do have, apparently whistleblowers, and they do have sworn testimony from people who are cybersecurity experts, and there are some independent analyses that you can look up right now.
00:22:49.000Now let's be clear, I want to be clear about something.
00:22:51.000Affidavits are considered admissible, correct?
00:22:54.000Most of the time, you have to evaluate the statements, but yes.
00:22:57.000Yes, you have to evaluate the statements.
00:22:58.000Statistical evidence by an expert correct by an expert correct now in tandem
00:23:04.000when you have affidavits from people saying hold on a second we were sent
00:23:07.000away because I said that a pipe burst and turns out that it didn't and there
00:23:10.000were all these vote dumps that don't make sense then you have an expert
00:23:13.000analysis say hold on there are these vote dumps that actually have never
00:23:17.000occurred anywhere in nature in a normal election in tandem that is serious evidence we
00:23:22.000don't just have affidavits and we don't just have circumstantial evidence
00:23:25.000There are affidavits which can be corroborated by statistical anomalies as well as potentially videographic evidence.
00:23:34.000There are 289,000 more ballots that were processed.
00:23:37.000This is in the Michigan brief that you can read.
00:23:39.000In four precincts or townships over what the capacity allows.
00:23:44.000Producing spikes that indicate manual adjustment, this is what it says, by those operating the system or by an attack from outside actors.
00:23:50.000And by the way, what's interesting about this, if you look it up in Michigan, and we have all these sources available at ladderwithpetter.com, the more conservative the county, the more abnormal the spikes in some cases.
00:23:59.000Like, you look at Kent County, now you have liberals in Grand Rapids, I'm from Michigan so I know the state pretty well, but there are some precincts in Kent County that are unbelievably conservative.
00:24:27.000And this is also the state that couldn't get their count done in a week, and they're like, well, maybe we just sprinted too hard in that one hour where we counted 289,000 more votes.
00:24:36.000We had to take a break after that or something.
00:24:38.000I mean, this is one of those things where, if there is an explanation, it's readily apparent.
00:24:43.000If there is an explanation, other than a manual switch of votes, if you reach the capacity of a certain system or a certain ability to do things, and you're well past that, we're not talking about, oh, you managed to squeeze in a couple because your thumbs were working real fast, right?
00:24:55.000I mean, when you get that many more, you have to be able to answer the question, and all we hear is crickets.
00:25:00.000I can just tell you today, we were over capacity, that's why we didn't have those clips ready.
00:25:04.000We do not have the budget of CNN, only they don't use it.
00:26:40.000If you look at the ratio, right, when you take a sample, the larger the sample, okay, there's an inverse relationship between the ratio, the margin that would occur between two votes.
00:26:50.000For example, if you were to take a poll, right, let's just say a precinct, we're just here in the Ladder with Crowder precinct, you might have 100% for Donald Trump.
00:26:56.000Maybe someone out there voted for Libertarian, hope you enjoy the downfall of Western civilization, but you feel good with your black tar heroin!
00:27:03.000But I'm pretty sure it'd be like 98% for Donald Trump.
00:27:06.000Then you go to the block of where we are here, and then, okay, maybe now you have a few hundred people, maybe you get a 90-10.
00:27:11.000Now you go to a few thousand people because you have a generally closer sampling to that of society at large, you end up with an 80-20.
00:27:18.000If you get into the many thousands, hundreds of thousands, that's where you get something more representative of the American public.
00:27:23.000Could be 50-50, could be 60-40, it would be considered a blowout in almost any precinct at a 70-30, including San Francisco.
00:27:30.000Okay, just to be clear, but in these huge data dumps with hundreds of thousands of votes in places like Michigan, you have some, percentages-wise for people to understand, like 96-4 for Biden?
00:27:43.000What we're seeing here is the larger the data dumps that occur, the more people, the greater the margin, the greater the ratio of Joe Biden to Donald Trump, which does not occur Anywhere else in nature.
00:27:55.000That is a statistical anomaly which, by the way, has only happened in these major swing states, namely a handful of major cities.
00:28:01.000Detroit, Philadelphia, Atlanta, and I can't remember, I think Milwaukee.
00:28:38.000All we're saying is, if we look at all of the data, 6,000 vote dumps, and you normalize the data to make sure you're comparing apples to apples, they said, this never happens.
00:28:58.000Donald Trump wins each of those Yeah, and he also won the Bellwether County, so there are a lot of things that would have to happen for the first time here in this election that have never happened before, and by the way, didn't happen in other counties.
00:29:10.000And those things just so happened to take place in the counties, or in the precincts, where we have hundreds of affidavits of people saying, by the way, they sent us away from poll watching, and we weren't allowed to see, and they boarded it up with Bristol boards, and they had ballots come in in coolers.
00:29:21.000Doesn't matter what CNN says, that the Red Wagon was just bringing in camera equipment, which by the way, is such horseshit!
00:30:14.000She could have filed a one-page document in Michigan and said, this doesn't happen in life, we have to dig here, and that would have been enough.
00:30:33.000Because even in counting, without checking signatures, the machine ballots twice, they found 5,500 votes, most of which were for Donald Trump.
00:30:41.000I don't know how that happens, if not that, what warrants an actual audit?
00:30:46.000If not that, we were told before this, well, there's no election fraud.
00:31:19.000But here's the thing, it doesn't have to be widespread and substantial.
00:31:22.000You don't have to commit voter fraud in California and Oregon and Montana and Utah and Massachusetts.
00:31:30.000You only have to find a couple of districts.
00:31:32.000You have to do a couple of things in a couple of precincts.
00:31:35.000Now, that's not the way you do it if you're really going to do a good job of hiding it, because this is the statistical analysis.
00:31:40.000Now, here's one thing I think will be interesting as we move forward.
00:31:43.000People are going, what's the next step?
00:31:45.000When you get into this evidence, you start going, okay, let's compare a 96-4 in these jurisdictions and these dumps to even the most liberal, Democrat, Biden-friendly jurisdictions that use the same software.
00:31:56.000And if you don't see those same dumps, Or let's even compare them to the liberal, most pro-Biden demographic counties that you could imagine.
00:32:22.000Also, we're going to move on to Georgia here, but first, L.A.
00:32:25.000Mayor Eric Garcetti, there's a name, he bent the knee to Black Lives Matter.
00:32:30.000Remember, he voted to cut the LAPD by $150 million this summer?
00:32:34.000Well, now here he is having the LAPD guard his home from Black Lives Matter protesters who apparently didn't get the memo that he's one of you.
00:32:44.000They're protesting because they don't want Biden to appoint him to the cabinet.
00:36:14.000So this is actually right here in the actual lawsuit.
00:36:17.000This, to me, is really big because it says, specifically, video from the State Farm Arena in Fulton County shows that on November 3rd, after the polls closed, election workers falsely claimed a water leak required the facility to close.
00:36:26.000All poll workers and challengers were evacuated for several hours.
00:36:28.000At about 10 p.m., however, several election workers remained unsupervised and unchallenged, working at the computers for the voting tabulation machines until after 1 a.m.
00:36:37.000And, of course, they failed Dominion That name keeps popping up.
00:36:41.000It's the Eddie Haskell of voting systems!
00:36:46.000We can't tabulate which votes took place during that time.
00:36:49.000Now again, the media has not acknowledged this.
00:36:52.000This is what would happen if you're watching CNN or Fox News, and we'll talk about Tucker Carlson in a little bit.
00:36:57.000I don't dislike the guy, but I think it's something that warrants being addressed, considering the Sidney Powell shenanigans, and I believe that the Kraken is... it's a Kraken.
00:37:06.000They just said a pipe burst on election night.
00:37:08.000We told you a pipe burst on election night.
00:37:10.000Then afterward, they said, by the way, there's no evidence.
00:37:12.000They said completely unfounded claims of voter fraud.
00:37:15.000There's no evidence of voter fraud or irregularities.
00:37:23.000There is videographic evidence, and it's filed in this suit under penalty of perjury that they have videographic evidence of those people sending folks away and still counting votes for three hours.
00:37:32.000You don't see that on the media right now.
00:37:34.000So you still think all of this is unfounded.
00:37:36.000And that coincides with the affidavits of people saying, we were sent home because a pipe burst and we didn't go back and then all of a sudden these votes were in there.
00:37:42.000Again, this is not just he said, she said.
00:37:45.000It's he said, video, and a few 10,000 extra votes beyond capacity.
00:37:50.000What do you want to bet that it's the same people who maintain the Epstein cameras?
00:37:54.000Like, yeah, the area where the pipe burst, that camera was down.
00:40:13.000So this is another one, more again, statistical evidence looking at the anomalies.
00:40:17.000So now we have, okay, affidavits, people saying we were turned away, people saying, all right, you know what, they continued counting votes, and them saying, no, no, no, there's no evidence.
00:40:24.000Now we have that evidence that they did continue counting votes with no poll watchers, no accountability, and they lied about a pipe bursting.
00:40:29.000And then we combine that with some crazy statistical anomalies that have happened in Georgia.
00:40:35.000Here we have Matt Brainerd of the Voter Integrity Project talking about it.
00:40:40.000All the analysis that we've done, I don't really require you to say trust me about a magical mathematical formula or some pattern we discovered or something that supposedly happened in the software of the voting machines.
00:40:52.000I can give you the list of the people who voted in this election, who filed national change of address cards in Georgia, moving themselves to another state.
00:41:00.000And I can also show you the subsequent state voter registrations of these individuals in other states who then cast earlier absentee ballots back in Georgia.
00:41:08.000I can show you the names of the people and the records of them having voted in multiple states and the raw data the states make available.
00:41:55.000By the way, this is something the lawsuit also calls for an emergency declaratory judgment that voting machines be seized and impounded immediately for a forensic audit.
00:42:04.000And to be clear, federal judge Timothy Batten, I want to make sure I get his name right, Timothy Batten Sr.
00:42:08.000re-approved a temporary restraining order late last night declaring that election officials were barred from wiping or altering Dominion voting machines using the November election.
00:42:32.000Just so some folks know, everyone needs to go read this, but this order came out last night at, I believe, 10 Eastern.
00:42:38.000There was a revised order that came out that said, no, you cannot go and delete these devices.
00:42:43.000Here's one of the things that's interesting.
00:42:45.000Before you file these kinds of motions, in almost every jurisdiction, you have to confer ahead of time, because courts want to know, like, is there really a fight here or not?
00:42:51.000So that means that most likely Sidney Powell and her legal team said, hey we want you to
00:42:56.000not wipe these devices tomorrow and they were like, nah, you gotta go make the report, tell
00:43:45.000Before you get to the rampant possible voter fraud, there's already enough in Georgia to just flip the margins as far as people voting out of state, as far as double-voting.
00:43:51.000There's already enough to completely evaporate Joe Biden's lead.
00:43:54.000Just to be clear about that, Georgia, if you're just counting legal votes and you're not even getting into statistical anomalies, It should flip.
00:45:25.000Could you imagine if in 2000, Al Gore came up and was like, look guys, before the count's over, we're just going to destroy all of the chads, hanging or otherwise.
00:45:35.000And in fact, we're just going to annihilate all of the records I invented the internet.
00:45:39.000Except for three counties, and I don't want to see any of those Cubano votes in there.
00:45:52.000Here's what I will say, because I think it's January 6th, this is going to go before the floor, right, when they confirm the election, I think January 6th.
00:45:58.000Any Republican at this point, any Republican who does not issue, they will all have their time to issue objections, who does not issue an objection to this election, I will say primary them, vote them out.
00:47:24.000Yeah, and the power actually—so you made a good point, primary those people out.
00:47:28.000Actually, in the states, the state legislatures are the ones that have the power.
00:47:31.000So if you're in Wisconsin and Michigan and Pennsylvania and Georgia right now, and your state legislature does not step forward and say, hey, if you're not willing to do an audit and investigate these claims, we will not certify this vote and send anybody to the—we'll just keep everybody home.
00:48:28.000Despite a formal address, I'm registered to vote and there is a 99% chance that someone received my ballot there because ballots are mailed out to anyone who's registered to vote.
00:48:38.000And that just takes place when they Bristol board up the precinct, tell all the poll watchers to go home and can fill in anything they want in the ballot.
00:48:45.000Why wouldn't my ballot be in there and why wouldn't they toss my wife's and my grandma's?
00:48:56.000We've gone through the statistical analysis, and then I said, you know what, on a hunch, anecdotally, let me see if there's some screwery going on with my vote.
00:49:11.000Bill, isn't that an illegal argument where once you've kind of crossed the line, isn't that like fruit of the poisonous tree?
00:49:17.000I've heard that term be thrown around a lot.
00:49:18.000Like once you've crossed the line and broken the law, you broke the law there and so we can't trust what you've said after this in that same voting process.
00:49:27.000Is there an argument to be made there?
00:49:30.000You're mixing legal analogies or metaphors.
00:49:33.000I'll be honest, I don't know. Or maladies. No, the point is about rotten fruit. Fruit of the poisonous tree is for
00:49:40.000Poisonous fruit and Joshua Tree album. Fruit of the womb.
00:49:43.000If you were to go and collect evidence of violation of the Fourth Amendment, fruit of the poisonous tree is any
00:49:49.000evidence that you would have obtained in an illegal search and seizure.
00:49:51.000What you're talking about is a weighing of the credibility of certain evidence, which is to say, if you've done this certain thing wrong, it can be used as evidence in some circumstances to show you continue to do wrong.
00:50:01.000The other principle I think you're talking about is if we cannot establish the legality that the processes were completed.
00:50:08.000For example, when Alito said, hey, back at the election, he goes, hold these ballots aside.
00:50:12.000We have to analyze these ballots that may have come in late.
00:50:15.000He's saying, as a group, we might have to consider these votes as not legally cast votes.
00:50:21.000And that means you can say the process was done incorrectly, and as a result there's legal grounds to say this entire batch of balance is out.
00:50:29.000So what we're saying here is that if the earlier points in the chain were all broken,
00:50:34.000they lead to a place where the election procedures were not followed, then there can be a scenario
00:50:39.000where large batches of ballots, coolers, whatever you're carrying them in, are all thrown out.
00:51:02.000You can look at the federal judges in two different states who are currently taking action, injunctive action, who are saying, please stop destroying the evidence.
00:52:07.000This is getting intense and then we're going to take your chat as to where you line up.
00:52:12.000And hit like by the way if you're watching right now like boom click like the like button We're just gonna be doing this for a couple days.
00:52:16.000Just click like we want to see Information through the YouTube algorithms despite us not being an authoritative source namely that we actually provide sources so Tucker Carlson a lot of people have been giving him some some crap and a lot of people are saying okay He's not a conservative.
00:52:32.000Let me let me Full disclosure here with Tucker Carlson, and this is the case with many people at Fox News or in media, I have had some personal interactions with him.
00:52:40.000So I want to be clear, and so I try and avoid talking about these subjects because of the inside baseball, and I know that I may be biased.
00:52:47.000Multiple personal interactions, and you guys have probably, you can even search.
00:52:53.000Now, that being said, I want to make sure that I'm going through the claims and Tucker Carlson's history on the merits.
00:53:00.000And I don't believe, Andrew Breitbart believed in Ronald Reagan's, you know, the 11th commandment, you don't attack your fellow conservatives.
00:53:06.000Right, and I certainly don't believe in just attacking people because they disagree with you slightly on an issue.
00:53:11.000That is different from fundamentally changing your worldview or throwing someone else under the bus who is also conservative and also on board with our cause because you may be throwing a temper tantrum.
00:53:22.000Now, I don't think that Tucker Carlson always does this.
00:53:25.000I think that Tucker Carlson has done a lot of good work.
00:53:27.000I agree with Tucker Carlson's views in a lot of ways.
00:53:30.000But anytime you have someone who has espoused views that change seemingly with whichever platform is afforded to them at that time, like we have Bowtie Version Tucker Carlson at CNN, Crossfire, then we have MSNBC Tucker Carlson, and then we have Fox News Tucker Carlson, we have Post Donald Trump Tucker Carlson.
00:53:52.000Okay, this is where you get into it, and let's start off with this.
00:53:55.000Tucker Carlson caught a lot of flak because he criticized Sidney Powell's lawsuits publicly, and also called her work ethic, or I guess you should say her legal ethic, into question before the suits were even filed.
00:54:06.000This is what pissed a lot of people off.
00:54:23.000But you never sent us any evidence, despite a lot of requests, polite requests.
00:54:29.000First off, Sidney Powell said that they were not polite requests.
00:54:31.000Now again, I will say, Inside Baseball, we've invited Sidney Powell on this show, and at that point in time, they were very clear, well, there are some things that we can't discuss because of legality until we file these, and we have to be careful.
00:54:41.000This was happening behind the scenes here.
00:54:49.000Half-Israeli Congressman told me, like, listen, we'll see if we can get Sidney Powell on, but if she can't, I understand because of the legal issues, maybe we can get her on afterwards.
00:54:55.000Why would I want to undercut her other than to highlight the fact that they didn't give us an exclusive scoop?
00:55:01.000We would have given her an entire hour.
00:55:37.000So that's the situation that happened there, and I say behind the scenes, this happens all the time, and you have to try and work with these people, especially when this could be one of the biggest lawsuits in American history, certainly as it relates to election fraud ever.
00:55:50.000And now we see the evidence that has been provided cumulatively And if there is not an apology issued, that's an issue.
00:55:56.000It doesn't mean that Tucker Carlson's voice should be discounted, and it doesn't mean that everyone should tune him out just because you don't like that he did that.
00:56:01.000But I do think it was a crappy thing to do.
00:56:02.000Here's something, too, that you need to know about Tucker Carlson.
00:56:04.000Tucker Carlson, you see this a lot with people on air.
00:56:06.000They present themselves as the everyman.
00:56:08.000You know, you had Bill O'Reilly doing this, like, just looking out for the folks.
00:56:11.000You haven't met a folk in 30 years, okay?
00:56:15.000You have someone go out and talk to the folks for you.
00:56:26.000So, Tucker Carlson was raised... he's kind of the definition when people talk about a wealthy elitist, okay?
00:56:32.000His dad married into the Swanson fortune, right?
00:56:34.000This is where he's basically married to the Swanson fortune.
00:56:36.000This is a guy who's been... That does not discount anybody's views, but for me it's if you go, hey, I'm now championing the working class because I understand it, and that's kind of your...
00:56:46.000Your brand, I think you need to be transparent about the fact that that's not really something that you would really have a whole lot in common with.
00:56:53.000I think Donald Trump does that very well.
00:56:54.000Donald Trump seems to care about the little guy in the United States, and he's very clear that he's not one of the little guys, as seen by his penthouse apartment entirely plated in gold.
00:57:05.000The only man with more gold is Ben Carson.
00:57:07.000I could not believe when I saw his bathroom in Florida.
00:57:15.000Again, the reason people have a problem with him as far as consistency.
00:57:18.000He was a pro-Iraq war Republican for a while before he became sort of what is seen as a quintessential sort of think tank libertarian, right?
00:57:25.000This means people who work at Cato, people who maybe work at some kind of Liberty Institute for Freedom, Prosperity, insert here, Foundation Fund.
00:57:41.000Now, when Tucker Carlson was asked in 2003 about the Iraq War,
00:57:44.000he gave a long list of reasons to invade, and then he ended with,
00:57:47.000I mean, what other evidence do we need?
00:57:50.000And to be fair, Tucker Carlson has been very clear about the fact that his views have changed.
00:57:54.000I'm not saying that people's views cannot change, but they have changed dramatically.
00:57:58.000He has made a one-eight, and he's done it several times, from CNN to MSNBC to Fox News to post-Trump Fox News, and I can say this because I was on Fox News pre-Trump with Tucker Carlson, and it's not the same guy who you're seeing right now.
00:58:10.000So consistency in this case does matter when you're looking at something that seems like it could actually irreparably harm this investigation from Sidney Powell, which it could.
00:58:28.000But he needed—at the time, everybody was talking about this story, and everybody was discarding this story and saying, there's no evidence.
00:58:41.000We'll present evidence once it happens.
00:58:42.000I think where he crossed the line with what you were saying is that he seemed to make a point of the fact that she would not come on the show.
00:59:48.000Again, these views change depending on where he is, like CNN, MSNBC, where he didn't have really great ratings, and he's been very open about that.
00:59:55.000I will say this, having worked at Fox News, there certainly is, they don't tell you exactly what to say, but they do tell you which third rails to avoid.
01:00:07.000As you see with what happened, just look at what happened in the election with Mitt Romney at that point.
01:00:12.000Rick Santorum was basically presented on grata when it came down to both of them.
01:00:14.000They had chosen Mitt Romney was basically a coronation at Fox News and I will tell you that behind the scenes it was well known that you were not welcome if you issued the criticisms of Mitt Romney that I think were very valid, namely that we know now he's a wiener.
01:00:31.000And Fox News, whenever you're with a network, it frames what you are allowed.
01:00:34.000I don't want to say, they don't come down and say, hey, Tucker, tell them you're a libertarian today.
01:00:38.000Then they go, hey, tell them you're a populist and hate libertarians today.
01:00:41.000What does happen is they say, hey, this is what's working with ratings.
01:00:58.000So these people, I'm not saying they're mouthpieces for someone else or for a network, but when you look at a track record over time and you go, the views did change based on where the check was coming from, that does give one pause, especially when combined with the fact that I don't know how many conservatives go out and attack Sidney Powell before this suit is filed.
01:01:17.000And when you combine that with a remarkable inconsistency, I can see why some people might be upset.
01:01:22.000Here's another one, by the way, some more information for people out there.
01:01:25.000It was only after taking over the Kelly slot at Fox News that he really did start going all in on Trump, because I remember when I used to appear on Fox News.
01:01:32.000And this was back, I think, Trump ran in the primary in the year there was Santorum and Mitt Romney.
01:02:02.000Here he is on the Ben Shapiro show at Daily Wire saying that if he were president, he
01:02:05.000would use absolute power to simply ban self-driving cars.
01:02:09.000Would you, Tucker Carlson, be in favor of restrictions on the ability of trucking companies to use this sort of technology specifically to, you know, sort of artificially maintain the number of jobs that are available in the trucking industry?
01:02:53.000I understand that that's a new sort of populist worldview.
01:02:56.000I don't think it's very consistent with a conservative worldview.
01:02:59.000However, I understand why people might maintain that position.
01:03:02.000However, there are other examples of big government I would Sort of, say, liberal, leftist, authoritarian tendencies.
01:03:12.000As you see, we talked about it on the show, which was pretty upsetting to me that at that time, no longer the number one conservative show, was advocating for COVID panic.
01:03:20.000Here you have him in February talking about predictions of over one million deaths in the United States.
01:03:27.000And he actually went on to brag that he had brought this information to Donald Trump and told him that he needed to take action sooner than he had.
01:03:41.000Currently, the coronavirus appears to kill about 2% of the people who have it.
01:03:46.000So, let's be generous for a moment and imagine that asymptomatic carriers are not detected, and the real death rate is only, say, half a percent.
01:03:53.000That would be one quarter of the current estimates.
01:03:56.000Even under that scenario, there would still be 27 million deaths from coronavirus globally.
01:04:02.000In this country, more than a million would die.
01:04:39.000And here's one thing, like, this is one thing that this is also why we mentioned that we'll
01:04:42.000never be doing rebuttals to the Young Turks because I, and I'm, this isn't really punching.
01:04:46.000I don't want to use this term, but I always believe in at least punching up.
01:04:48.000People have asked what my view is on Tucker Carlson.
01:04:51.000Obviously, Tucker Carlson is far more well-established than we've been, at least for a
01:04:55.000longer period of time with a network with far more firepower.
01:05:00.000Some inside baseball, there are people who have been blacklisted if they appear on Newsmax and Fox News.
01:05:04.000That's conjecture, but I can tell you what, there absolutely is a blacklisting with people at Fox News because I can tell you that from yours truly.
01:05:09.000Totally, I can tell you that from people here on our network over at The Blaze, people who are not allowed to appear on Fox News if it's seen as competitive.
01:05:15.000So this is not, you need to understand that Fox News is not in this for some ideology, it's in it for a profit and there was a niche market where they have a stranglehold and they're now starting to lose that stranglehold.
01:05:23.000But you may be asking yourself some questions, why isn't this guest on Fox News?
01:05:29.000Tucker does not have the ability to host any guests that he wants.
01:05:32.000He doesn't have the ability to appear anywhere that he wants.
01:05:35.000That's not his fault, that's the contract that he signed.
01:05:38.000Now, again, we look at this and you go, okay, maybe he's looking out for the working man when he talks about banning self-driving cars, but when combined with the fact that he was advocating, I don't necessarily know that you would call them draconian lockdowns, but certainly measures more severe than most of you, including Tucker Carlson, now are rebelling against, you would have to say there's remarkable inconsistency.
01:05:56.000When you look at someone and say, okay, he was pro-Iraq war until he was against the war in Iraq, you can say, okay, that's a change of opinion.
01:06:02.000But then when you take it again in tandem with what we've already gone over with COVID and banning self-driving cars and drugs and Sidney Powell and the situation of being a libertarian versus being a populist, you go, well, hold on a second.
01:06:13.000It just seems like this keeps changing from CNN to MSNBC to Fox News, pre-Trump to Fox News, post-Trump, and then it seems like his views have changed depending on whether he can get a scoop from Sidney Powell or not.
01:06:24.000Listen, we wanted to have Sidney Powell on the show.
01:06:53.000Listen, the ratings have gone down dramatically.
01:06:56.000People feel as though Fox News may not be in their corner.
01:06:59.000They don't feel as though they're getting a straight scoop from people.
01:07:02.000As someone who worked there for over four years, I think that there are a lot of great people there, but you can't just assume that some giant corporate entity and all of their personalities by default are on your side.
01:07:14.000Do a little digging and you'll see that they're not even consistent on which side they're on.
01:07:17.000Yeah and in that clip he actually said the reason that we're reporting on it is because it's true, right?
01:07:36.000And this happens with conservatives' virtue signaling where it's like, ah, look, I am better than you because I'm going to call you out even though you're a conservative.
01:07:43.000A good example would be, I am sure that, let's say we find out it was just some kind of a clerical error with the voter registration, my personal voter registration, which I've said, 99% chance I'm just doing it wrong like my grandmother with a VCR.
01:07:54.000But someone coming out going, actually that's just an accidental double count and I'm a professional analyst and you didn't get this right, therefore you're a fraud!
01:08:01.000That's what you see a lot of in the conservative movement because that wouldn't even be accurate.
01:08:04.000I've allowed room for myself to be incorrect.
01:08:08.000When someone does that like you do with Sidney Powell, like Tucker Carlson did, you undercut them, you undercut the movement, you undercut people who are fighting for constitutional freedoms of the United States.
01:08:15.000And I don't see how that benefits anyone, which is why I avoided doing this sub doing
01:08:19.000this very topic because I think that as a general rule, I like a world where Tucker
01:08:24.000Carlson exists more than where he doesn't.
01:08:26.000Same thing, I have disagreements with Ben Shapiro on a whole lot.
01:08:29.000People say, well, why haven't you voiced your disagreements with him?
01:08:33.000Listen, it's not always serenading with Ben, and I get that his dad was a composer.
01:08:38.000The point is, I prefer a world where there's Ben Shapiro versus no Ben Shapiro.
01:08:44.000I don't agree with Candace Owens, but I prefer a world where there's a Candace Owens as opposed to no Candace Owens.
01:08:48.000Good for her on winning that censorship issue with the fact checkers.
01:08:51.000I don't agree with Glenn Beck and everything, but I prefer a world where there is a Tucker Carlson, a Glenn Beck, a Mark Levin, a Candace Owens, a Ben Shapiro, and myself than without them.
01:08:58.000However, when you have some of those people, as we've seen with Tucker Carlson in several instances, taking potshots at other people who he too should want to see amongst our ranks, Combined with the intellectual inconsistency over time, it just rubs me the wrong way.
01:09:17.000Much like Al Gore rubs a masseuse the wrong way.
01:09:20.000Or if that's the wrong way, sign me up!
01:09:24.000We're going to go exclusively now, by the way, to Mug Club.
01:09:26.000Take your chat and play some Hipster or Hobo.
01:09:29.000Everyone watching on YouTube right now, the hundred-something thousand people, just click like.