Rebel News Podcast - October 25, 2019


America is now a net oil exporter — and Quebec is one of its major customers


Episode Stats

Length

46 minutes

Words per Minute

161.92358

Word Count

7,594

Sentence Count

596

Misogynist Sentences

25

Hate Speech Sentences

22


Summary

America is now a net oil exporter, and Quebec is one of its major customers. But the opposition to the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline from Alberta to the Pacific Coast is led by foreign-funded "anti-oil" lobby groups funded by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello, my friends. Today I tell you great news if you're an American, sad news if you're a Canadian.
00:00:06.720 Did you know that for four weeks in a row now, the United States has exported more crude oil
00:00:11.760 and petroleum products than they have imported? They are a net exporter, and they're only getting
00:00:17.760 started. They are our chief competitor now. They're going to sell oil to the world while
00:00:23.300 we can't even get a pipeline built. Oh, and they're selling oil to Quebec, 138,000 barrels
00:00:30.500 a day. I'll go through the details for you. Hey, before I do, please consider becoming a premium
00:00:36.920 subscriber. Sounds pretty fancy, premium, doesn't it? It's only eight bucks a month. You get the video
00:00:44.120 version of the podcast, and you support The Rebel. You get a few other baubles and trinkets, too. You
00:00:49.080 get access to Sheila Gunn-Reed's show, David Menzies' show, and you keep us afloat. So you can do that
00:00:56.500 at premium.rebelnews.com. Okay, here's the podcast.
00:01:05.280 You're listening to a Rebel News podcast.
00:01:07.600 Tonight, America is now a net oil exporter, and Quebec is one of its major customers. It's October 24th,
00:01:23.380 and this is the Ezra LeVant Show.
00:01:27.020 Why should others go to jail when you're a biggest carbon consumer I know?
00:01:30.400 There's 8,500 customers here, and you won't give them an answer. The only thing I have to say to the
00:01:36.260 government about why I'm publishing it is because it's my bloody right to do so.
00:01:45.780 I almost can't believe it. The United States is a net exporter of oil. When I wrote my book,
00:01:52.240 Ethical Oil, not even a decade ago, that seemed impossible. America was importing about half of
00:01:57.760 its oil needs every day. Canada was the biggest and best source, but after that and some oil from
00:02:03.800 Mexico, it was pretty much awful dictatorships all the way down. Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, just awful
00:02:11.260 places. Not only was that sending American money to those evil regimes, but it hobbled America's
00:02:18.880 political maneuverability. How can you ever get tough with Venezuela if you're buying a million barrels
00:02:25.640 of oil a day from them and, of course, sending them tens of millions of dollars a day for that
00:02:30.260 oil? How are you going to put sanctions on someone like that if that's what you wanted to do?
00:02:34.960 That's why I thought the oil stands were such a great solution to the U.S. energy problem.
00:02:39.940 Keep all that money here in North America with friends. And, of course, there are so many
00:02:43.860 American companies invested in the oil stands. It's really almost like paying themselves. Win,
00:02:48.440 win, win. But foreign-funded anti-oil lobby groups, well, they were the ones winning.
00:02:54.080 Those lobby groups included the World Wildlife Fund, whose president was Gerald Butts. You can
00:03:00.460 see the World Wildlife Fund on the list of front groups that were funded by the Rockefeller Brothers
00:03:07.180 Fund in this anti-oil sands campaign plan from 2008. This is one slide from the campaign plan.
00:03:14.340 Here's another slide. You can see their plans to block various Canadian pipelines.
00:03:19.320 And you remember the president of the World Wildlife Fund and what he had to say, right?
00:03:27.040 We think that the oil sands have been expanded too rapidly without a serious plan for environmental
00:03:33.380 remediation in the first place. So that's why we don't think it's up to us to decide whether there
00:03:39.100 should be another route for a pipeline. Because the real alternative is not an alternative route,
00:03:45.960 it's an alternative economy. Well, you know how that story ends. Gerald Butts went on to become
00:03:53.320 the principal secretary to Justin Trudeau, his Rasputin-like figure. Butts also hired a bunch of
00:04:00.240 other Rockefeller Brothers Fund lobbyists from that same tar sands campaign group to be the chiefs of
00:04:07.540 staff in Canadian Energy Department, the Canadian Environment Department. So there was no need for the
00:04:13.720 Rockefeller Brothers Fund to lobby the government anymore because they staffed the government now
00:04:20.040 with Gerald Butts at the top. And thus the Northern Gateway pipeline was killed by Trudeau, even though
00:04:25.800 it had already passed environmental reviews. The Energy East pipeline was killed because Trudeau changed
00:04:33.740 the rules governing the application. He killed it. Two big pipelines. And if that wasn't enough,
00:04:38.560 Bill C-48 banned tanker traffic off the coast of BC just for another layer of the blockade. But only
00:04:45.780 off the West Coast. Saudi oil tankers are still welcome to arrive on the East Coast sail right off
00:04:50.540 the St. Lawrence Seaway, right into Montreal. Oh, and any new oil sands facilities themselves must now pass
00:04:56.940 the gender tests in Bill C-69. So yeah, that's us in Canada. We elected a blackface,
00:05:05.680 drama teacher Groper as prime minister, and he handed over the keys to the American funded anti-oil sands
00:05:11.760 lobbyists. And it's still going. Get this, yesterday, Justin Trudeau pretended to be in listening mode
00:05:18.060 towards Alberta and Saskatchewan.
00:05:19.900 Why do you think that your party got totally wiped out in Alberta and Saskatchewan in this election?
00:05:25.340 I think there's a lot of thinking to do on that and a lot of listening to Albertans, as I have
00:05:33.140 endeavoured to do over the past number of years. But obviously, I'm going to have to do a lot more
00:05:37.120 to ensure that not, you know, why did this happen is not the central issue we have. The central issue
00:05:45.200 for me is, how do we move forward in a way that responds to the concerns that Albertans and
00:05:51.440 Saskatchewanians have clearly expressed?
00:05:57.180 Yeah, did you actually believe that? Here's what Trudeau's star candidate, his star MP
00:06:03.200 in Quebec, Stephen Gilbeau, tweeted today, a day after those crocodile tears. He says,
00:06:09.220 May I remind Premier Scott Moe of Saskatchewan that 70% of Canadians just voted for parties
00:06:14.880 that support carbon pricing. Oh, and by the way, you lost twice in the courts. Moe calls for Prime
00:06:21.620 Minister Justin Trudeau to cancel the federal carbon tax. In your face, Saskatchewan.
00:06:28.260 So I guess we know who's in charge of winning over Alberta and Saskatchewan in the new liberal
00:06:32.780 government. By the way, I've read the Bloc Québécois support for carbon pricing. I read their
00:06:38.520 policy platform. They actually use a different phrase in carbon tax. Do you see it at the top
00:06:43.960 there? Père question verte. That means green equalization. Now, I've read this in my weak
00:06:51.840 French, and then I translated it into English. And the Bloc Québécois, which is now the third
00:06:58.740 largest party in Parliament, they do believe that there should be a carbon tax. They sure do,
00:07:04.480 you bet. But only on other provinces. They say only above average emission provinces like Alberta
00:07:11.320 and Saskatchewan should pay the carbon tax, and the rest of the money should go to Quebec in green
00:07:17.400 equalization. I'm serious. So yeah, they support a carbon tax, but only on the West. And they want
00:07:24.680 all the revenue too. I'm not even kidding. You can check it out yourself. So that's us up here in
00:07:29.140 Canada. That's what became of our great opportunity. How about the United States? Well, here's a hint
00:07:35.940 of how their leader treats their oil and gas workers. Here he is talking in Pittsburgh, talking
00:07:41.780 to their booming fracking industry, which is primarily natural gas. It's created 200,000 jobs.
00:07:49.660 Huge source of natural gas. Take a look. American energy belongs to hardworking men and women like you
00:07:56.000 who get up every day and make this country run.
00:08:06.220 Today, I'm proud to declare that I've delivered on every single promise I made
00:08:10.960 to this conference three years ago and much, much more. Everyone.
00:08:17.240 Yeah, what a difference. It saved that state of Pennsylvania, by the way.
00:08:21.960 They were shutting down coal and steel. It was looking like a disaster. It was like right out
00:08:27.980 of one of those sad Springsteen songs about shutting down the old mill. But then fracking
00:08:34.020 and natural gas came right in the nick of time. 200,000 jobs in Pennsylvania alone. And by the
00:08:42.340 way, lower natural gas prices for everyone in the state too, which also means lower electricity
00:08:48.140 prices since their power plants use natural gas. I'm a bit jealous, aren't you? They're literally
00:08:54.600 building new factories in Pennsylvania. I've seen it with my own eyes. And factories are actually coming
00:09:00.260 home to America from foreign countries in part because the energy is so cheap.
00:09:08.400 But look at this. Look at this news here.
00:09:10.240 This is from an analyst in the Department of Energy.
00:09:15.340 For the first time ever, the U.S. became a net total petroleum exporter on a four-week average basis.
00:09:22.320 In the week ending October 18th, the era of U.S. net petroleum exports has begun,
00:09:29.480 or at least is highly likely to. And do you see that chart there?
00:09:32.820 What it means is that the U.S. didn't just have one special day where it exported more oil than it
00:09:40.040 imported. That's now normal now. That's happened four weeks in a row now. The United States, far
00:09:47.980 from importing half its oil as it did when I wrote Ethical Oil a few years back, it's now sending out
00:09:53.960 oil into the world on a net basis. As in, yeah, sure, it still imports some oil, especially from Canada.
00:10:00.180 I mean, wouldn't you? Because we have no pipelines to the sea, so we can't sell our oil to anyone else
00:10:06.160 except for the Americans. So that's called a monopsony when there's only one customer.
00:10:12.480 We have to sell our oil at a massive discount to world prices, sometimes as much as $35 a barrel,
00:10:19.500 less than the world price. So we sell oil to the United States at below world prices,
00:10:25.760 and they sell their oil to the world at world prices. They're smart. We're dumb. In fact,
00:10:33.000 and this is so incredible, we actually buy their oil at world prices. More of it all the time.
00:10:41.180 Look at this chart by the U.S. Department of Energy also. That's U.S. exports to Canada.
00:10:47.480 To Canada. To Canada. How is it possible that that's growing with the advent of our oil sands?
00:10:55.320 The oil sands really kicked into high gear around 2004. And I'd say they were sort of at maximum
00:11:01.680 velocity 10 years later, 2014. Can you put that chart up just for another second? But the pipelines
00:11:07.960 were delayed and delayed and delayed and banned and blocked. And look at that. Record oil imports
00:11:15.720 from America to Canada. While U.S. fracked oil got stronger and stronger and stronger. And they
00:11:24.080 took advantage of the market. Now they ship their oil up here by train primarily. That's what blew up
00:11:31.400 in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec. Look at those oil cars. There's a train full of fracked oil coming into Quebec
00:11:38.120 from the United States. I got nothing against America. I got nothing against trains. And I got
00:11:42.160 nothing against fracking. I love all three. I'm just telling you what it was that blew up.
00:11:47.400 I've never heard of a pipeline blowing up and certainly not in the middle of a city.
00:11:51.800 Hey, but that's Quebec's choice. They prefer American oil to Alberta oil. They're the biggest
00:11:59.040 importers of foreign oil in our country, by the way. Here's a report from Canada's energy regulator.
00:12:06.540 Scroll down a bit. You can see we import most of our oil imports from America. That's the dark blue.
00:12:15.040 But Saudi Arabia is next. That's the light blue. And then that orange is Azerbaijan,
00:12:21.380 if you can believe it. Can you imagine that Canada, with the third largest reserves in the world,
00:12:27.640 the oil sands, is importing any oil from Saudi Arabia and Azerbaijan? Can you find it on a map?
00:12:33.380 Do you know where Azerbaijan is? It's that obscure country. It's landlocked to the world. It's on the
00:12:41.400 Caspian Sea, but that's not part of the oceans. The Caspian Sea is actually a lake. It's a big salty
00:12:48.820 lake, but it's landlocked. How on earth is it easier and cheaper? And how does it even happen that oil
00:12:56.900 gets from Azerbaijan to the ocean? Well, because Quebec politicians and Ottawa politicians hate
00:13:16.980 Alberta oil, they don't hate oil. They don't hate oil. Just Alberta oil. Scroll down a little bit more
00:13:25.240 on that same chart. Scroll down to the importers of oil by province. Now, New Brunswick actually
00:13:33.380 imports the most, but just to the refinery. They then disperse that oil to the rest of the country.
00:13:40.880 That bar chart shows the total foreign oil imports by province. So you can see New Brunswick. That's
00:13:48.220 where the Irving refinery is. They love their Saudi oil and their Azeri oil. That's what you call oil
00:13:55.940 from Azerbaijan. Can't get enough of the stuff. The gray bars is the foreign stuff. The blue is U.S. oil.
00:14:02.820 Quebec is the biggest importer of U.S. oil. See that? 138,000 barrels a day, the dark blue. That's up
00:14:13.560 from 108,000 barrels a day the year earlier. They can't get enough of that Donald Trump oil. They
00:14:19.760 love American oil. And they love their Saudi oil too. Isn't that funny? The province that brought in
00:14:25.900 Bill 21, the province that's banning niqabs in the public service, they're buying Sharia oil from
00:14:31.700 Saudis and Azeris, as well as their Trump oil. Not Alberta. I mean, and America is not importing
00:14:45.360 Saudi oil that much. They still do import some foreign oil, including from us in Canada. Like I say,
00:14:54.480 they buy our Canadian oil at a discount and sell it right back to us at full price. They're not dumb,
00:14:59.920 but they're now competing against us for oil and exports around the world. I showed you a clip of
00:15:05.640 Trump in Pennsylvania. Look at this from the New York Times. Look what he's doing in Texas.
00:15:13.960 And look at this map in the Wall Street Journal. Look at the pipelines they're building in Texas.
00:15:19.200 Where are those pipelines going? They're going to the sea. They're going to the sea. They're exporting.
00:15:26.580 They're pumping as much oil in Texas as they are in Alberta now. You don't take oil to the sea if
00:15:34.240 you're planning to bring it to California or New York. That is oil that will be put on a tanker ship
00:15:39.380 and will go to Europe or India or Japan or maybe even China, wherever.
00:15:48.060 They'll be there first with their oil exports, just like they'll be there first with their fracked
00:15:52.320 natural gas, LNG, liquefied natural gas, while we're busy shutting it all down in Canada.
00:16:00.580 You know, you see sometimes some conspiracy theory shows on TV, who killed the Avro Aero?
00:16:07.380 That was going to be the Canadian fighter jet that would dominate the world. Or who killed the electric
00:16:13.060 car? Well, probably nobody did. We've got Teslas and they don't really work that great. But both of
00:16:20.180 those questions are rooted in head-scratchers. Why aren't these great ideas happening, right?
00:16:26.380 Probably good reasons for both. I'm not an expert, but I think I'm almost an expert on oil and pipelines
00:16:32.520 and politics. And I know this. The world used more oil today than it did last year.
00:16:39.140 And it's going to use more oil next year than it did today. And that's going to keep going for the
00:16:45.920 foreseeable future as China and India buy their cars. America is who's going to produce it and ship
00:16:53.460 it and get rich off it. While our blackface groper and his virtue signalers carbon tax our own oil
00:17:03.860 industry to death. Gee, why on earth would Alberta separatism be flourishing? Stay with us for more.
00:17:24.220 Welcome back. Well, deplatforming is the new approach of the left. They don't really believe in debating.
00:17:30.640 That's too hard. And, you know, you might not win a debate. So why not ban the other side from even
00:17:36.940 speaking? De-normalize them. De-platform them. Shut them up. Remove them from the Overton window of
00:17:45.720 possible ideas. Well, amazingly, that has come to the Toronto Public Libraries. And the Toronto Public
00:17:55.860 Libraries have stood for free speech. Now, 10 years ago, that would have been so obvious. But these
00:18:01.280 days, it's very refreshing. And here to tell us about the case that has put the Toronto Public Library
00:18:07.080 on the front lines of political free expression is our friend Barbara Kaye, who has a column about the
00:18:12.260 subject in today's National Post. Barbara, great to see you again on this very important subject.
00:18:17.300 Yes, thanks for having me, Ezra. It is an important subject for sure.
00:18:20.420 Well, I really enjoyed your article. Let me read the title and encourage our viewers to check it out.
00:18:24.980 It's called How Feminist Megan Murphy Fell Victim to Progressive's Double Standards. And that's the
00:18:33.840 thing. She is a pretty hardline feminist. I mean, not someone that I would normally see eye to eye with,
00:18:41.380 and I don't honestly think you would either if I know you. But the fact that she is now the one being
00:18:48.100 shot up by radical trans activists, I tell you, this free speech thing is very interesting.
00:18:54.980 It sure is. And I agree with you. Yes, I am totally on her side. But people like you and me would
00:19:00.960 normally not be, we would be have very different views. And I think this is maybe the only thing I
00:19:05.860 agree with her on. But I agree with her 500% on this one. And the fact that she is being
00:19:11.500 marginalized and made to feel like an enemy of the people for holding a view that is pure common
00:19:18.720 sense, is really quite scandalous.
00:19:22.620 Why don't you tell our viewers a little bit about her view? She's a feminist in the literal meaning
00:19:28.120 of the world. She's for women. And she objects to the biological fiction that a man who gets his
00:19:37.580 twig and berries removed and takes some hormones becomes a woman thereby. So she is what is called a
00:19:45.040 TERF by the trans radicals, a trans exclusionary radical feminist. That's just a fancy way of
00:19:53.500 saying a woman who believes that women are women and men aren't women, even if they say they're
00:19:58.860 women. For that, she's been thrown in the dust pile of political incorrectness.
00:20:03.940 Exactly. I'm told that, well, I've been told before that TERFs, the word, the acronym TERF is
00:20:10.460 considered derogatory. And what we're supposed to call people like Megan Murphy are gender crits.
00:20:17.420 So, okay, fair enough. She's a gender crit. And I'm a gender crit too. So what she's saying is
00:20:26.260 that definitions are important. And you can't define, you can't take the word woman and say that it means
00:20:34.060 a person with a vagina, also a person with a penis, if the person with a penis thinks that he is a
00:20:42.460 woman or wants to be a woman or would like to live his life as a woman. You know, if he has gender
00:20:49.380 dysphoria, that's a real thing. He's a trans woman then in that case, and then it's she. Trans women
00:20:56.580 are real. Most trans women live their lives in perfect harmony with everyone else. They are not
00:21:03.080 political. They are not trying to edge out females, actual females from their safe spaces. But the
00:21:11.920 trans activists are trying to run, take the definition and they have been successful in
00:21:18.980 implanting it into the culture to mean anybody who identifies a woman, not only presents as a woman,
00:21:25.140 but is literally a woman, which literally they cannot be. And all she's doing is saying,
00:21:31.660 you can't be something that you're literally not according to your DNA. And the reason she's so
00:21:40.740 adamant is because if the culture and if our elites and if our politicians and legislators say that that
00:21:47.920 is the case, that anybody who identifies as a woman is a woman, then there's consequences that flow from
00:21:53.500 that. Legal consequences and social consequences that flow from that. And it takes, it makes formerly
00:21:59.660 sex specific spaces like locker rooms and prisons, rape shelters and athletic categories. It opens them
00:22:08.880 up to male bodies with a mental idea that they are women. And it is, she is not transphobic. She is
00:22:18.420 defending female rights, women's rights. And I'm with her because I don't want to be in a locker room
00:22:25.540 with a male body. And I don't want my daughter, who's a great athlete to be up against, you know,
00:22:33.280 a six foot two, 200 pound athlete who thinks or wants to be a woman so that they can participate in
00:22:42.900 women's sports. So she's standing up for all the right things. I'm with her. Oh, so this library
00:22:48.160 thing is, she's supposed to be in a panel discussion October 29th at a branch of the Toronto
00:22:53.040 library. And of course, many people are protesting. There's women raiders that are protesting. There's
00:22:58.760 trans activists that are protesting. The union, the library union is not comfortable. They're
00:23:03.680 protesting and pride. Pride is protesting because they'll have to rethink their relationship with
00:23:09.820 the library if, if this terrible woman is allowed to give her opinion on gender in this panel discussion.
00:23:17.420 So that's the background of all the kerfuffle around Megan Murphy this time. Yeah, about five
00:23:23.500 minutes ago, historically speaking, Megan Murphy would have been the toast of the town, a young
00:23:28.180 feminist woman, you know, doing it for herself. But now she's being thrown aside because there's
00:23:33.880 something, you know, in the game of politically correct poker, there's a higher hand that was just
00:23:38.820 played. And it's, it's not, it's shocking, but it is not surprising that the library union wants to
00:23:45.800 silence her. I've recently lived through a little bit of that when the movie theaters, the art house
00:23:51.380 movie theaters in Calgary and Edmonton, who signed a contract to have a book launch with me, ripped up
00:23:57.080 that contract under pressure from their own staff as well. It is no longer surprising to de-platforming.
00:24:02.160 What is so surprising and encouraging is how firm the head librarian is. But let me first show you,
00:24:09.220 Barbara, and I'm not sure you've seen this. The mayor of Toronto, John Tory, a more spineless man
00:24:15.760 one could not find. Listen to him being asked about this case. Here's a video clip of him a few days ago.
00:24:24.940 And so the library has its own policy with respect to when people should and should not be able to
00:24:30.440 rent rooms on their premises. They have taken the decision in this case that this particular person
00:24:35.440 should be able to give their talk in a library building. I don't think it's appropriate for
00:24:40.340 politicians to substitute their judgment for actually making these decisions because we have
00:24:44.460 a duly appointed library board and we have library management who oversee a written policy in this
00:24:49.040 regard. I simply indicated I was disappointed in that decision. My office asked the library to
00:24:54.320 reconsider the decision. They indicated that they had carefully studied it and were not going to
00:24:58.880 reconsider it. Barbara, he just said, oh, it's not appropriate for politicians to meddle. And then
00:25:05.820 he said, oh, but I tried to meddle and she pushed me aside. What a terrible, terrible man he is.
00:25:12.380 That's bad. That's bad. Yeah. Since when does the mayor keep a list of what you can and can't say
00:25:18.240 in a public place? Does the mayor also have a list of books that he doesn't want in the library?
00:25:24.260 Does the mayor have a list of ideas that are or aren't acceptable to him? It's so gross that every
00:25:31.280 jumped up bureaucrat and low level politician, I'm sorry, the mayor of Toronto. Yeah, he's a mayor of
00:25:36.820 2.5 million people, but he's one of dozens on council. And frankly, in the scheme of things, he's a bit
00:25:41.820 of a nothing. For him to accrete unto himself the power of being censor in chief of all cultural debates
00:25:48.800 is a little bit gross and a little bit jumped up. Yeah, he's just look, he just wants to gain points
00:25:54.680 with the purity crats, you know, of the city and really the competition to be the purest,
00:26:03.500 most politically correct, the most with it politician is really pretty pathetic. And he had no business
00:26:11.880 getting involved with that and all. And as I pointed out in my column, oh, so John Tory, where
00:26:16.760 were you when the Toronto Reference Library hosted Max Blumenthal, which won't be a name that is
00:26:22.860 familiar to most of your viewers, perhaps, but this is a so-called journalist whose main thing in life
00:26:30.460 is to vilify Israel night and day and to call them Nazis and to say that every day for the Palestinians
00:26:39.300 is worse than Kristallnacht. And he's so odious, he's so disgusting that the European, the German
00:26:46.460 parliament barred him from taking part. They actually deplatformed him because they consider
00:26:52.860 him an anti-Semite. And of course, even though he's Jewish, he is an anti-Semite. They're the worst
00:26:57.520 kind, of course. Anyways, but John Tory didn't peep. He didn't make a peep then. And of course,
00:27:03.800 when I called the program director of the Toronto Reference Library, it was all about free speech,
00:27:07.980 free speech. I said, well, what about a debate between somebody, you know, who has responsible
00:27:13.240 views? Well, you know, free speech, free speech. So the only people that protested were a few Jews
00:27:18.780 and nobody else. And it went on as scheduled. It never made the news even. I mean, that it was
00:27:25.360 controversial. You know, the double standards are really pretty sickening. This gender issue
00:27:34.660 issue has just taken over our universe. And it's the only thing people want to be in on. And it's
00:27:43.280 such an incredible trend. Yeah. You know, it's funny, you made me think of, again, I'm sorry to
00:27:48.480 refer to it, but the deplatforming and libraries. It made me think of the other week when I was in
00:27:53.460 Calgary and for a book launch. And we were kicked out of the theater or not allowed in the theater that
00:28:00.720 we had a signed contract with. There was an independent bookstore literally next door. It's
00:28:07.100 called Page's Bookstore in Kensington. Two-story, huge bookstore. I can't understand how they're still
00:28:12.480 in business with Chapters and Amazon as their competitors. It was 100% empty. There was no one
00:28:18.820 in the entire store except for three staff. And we said to them, we'll give you all the profits from
00:28:25.540 the book sales. Just let us have the book signing in your office. So that would have meant thousands
00:28:31.400 of dollars in basically free money for them. And they said, no. I asked them. I went in there.
00:28:37.260 I said, do you sell Mein Kampf, Hitler's book? And they said, yes, we do. And I said, well, you should.
00:28:43.780 It's a historical work. We should know about it. We should understand it. We should read it. I mean,
00:28:48.720 I don't think it should be like a Bible for people, but we should understand why it's,
00:28:52.660 we should understand what it is. They would sell Mein Kampf, but they wouldn't sell my book.
00:28:59.860 That's where we are today. But let me show you one more thing. And I don't need to show you it. I
00:29:05.120 learned about this from reading your column. The head librarian, and her name is Vickery Bowles.
00:29:13.300 She has been so admirable on this. She's held the line. And you, I didn't know this because I don't
00:29:20.960 listen to the CBC. She was interviewed by Carol Off, an old communist battle axe of the CBC.
00:29:28.000 And I've dealt with Carol Off a few times over the half century I've been around.
00:29:34.100 And she's so woke and she's so feminist, but I guess she's found something more fun than being a
00:29:39.420 feminist. And it's being an anti-feminist on behalf of trans extremists. Let me play for you a couple of
00:29:46.820 clips from that interview. And I'd like your thoughts on it, Barbara. So here's the first
00:29:52.740 exchange. This is Carol Off, a Marxist interviewer at the CBC, and Vickery Bowles, the librarian who is
00:30:00.720 standing for free speech in Toronto. Take a look.
00:30:02.860 There are limits to free speech. I'm sure you know that. And when free speech is hurtful or harmful to
00:30:07.660 others, it is something that is shutting down the free speech of others. I'm sure you've heard that
00:30:13.220 argument before. Yes, I have. And you don't agree, obviously. No, I don't. I think that free speech
00:30:19.740 is important, especially when marginalized groups are being, people are trying to shut down marginalized
00:30:27.700 groups. The marginalized groups being those who would deny the rights of those trans people who
00:30:33.020 are feeling this is hurtful. So what about those minority rights? What consideration are you giving
00:30:40.220 to those minority rights? Well, we're giving everyone consideration in this situation. And
00:30:46.940 we've strongly value our relationship with all members of our communities here in Toronto and
00:30:53.040 elsewhere. But we have to, you know, if public institutions aren't going to stand up for free
00:30:59.080 speech and allow civil discourse to happen, then I don't know when, where that is going to happen.
00:31:06.200 There were so many strange things said by Carol Off that if Megan Murphy is allowed to speak, that
00:31:15.120 shuts down the speech of others. I don't even, that wasn't even supported. That was just stupid. That was
00:31:21.840 just stupid. But, you know, what the point of, it was quite a, you know, it was a fairly lengthy
00:31:26.760 interview and Carol Off was relentless. Like every single question, it wasn't a question, it was a
00:31:32.760 statement with a question at the end, a question mark at the end. She, I've never seen an interview
00:31:38.720 so obviously biased and so obviously meant to put the interviewee totally on the defense of totally
00:31:46.540 uncomfortable and not give them an opportunity really, or to imply in their own questions that the
00:31:56.020 person that they are interviewing is, is kind of not only wrong, but a bad person. And, you know,
00:32:04.660 as journalism goes, that was to me scandalous.
00:32:08.400 Well, we have one more clip from, actually we've got a bunch of clips, but I mean, you're right.
00:32:11.540 The whole thing was that battering ram. That's why it was doubly impressive that this Vickery
00:32:16.300 Bowles just held the line. I mean, it's just bizarre to say by giving Megan Murphy the right to rent a room
00:32:23.800 and say something in that room that denies rights to others. That just, there's just no connection
00:32:30.840 there. It's just saying words and Vickery Bowles wasn't having any of it. Here's another excerpt from
00:32:37.200 that radio debate. Take a listen. Sometimes what we call free speech is hurtful speech and we have
00:32:42.620 situation, as you know, that the numbers are that about 20% of trans people have been physically or
00:32:48.680 sexually assaulted due to their identity. I even more have been verbally threatened or harassed.
00:32:54.240 So how do you safeguard their, them physically and their rights if you feel that it's, it's within
00:33:00.980 others' rights to express, express ideas that deny those people their rights that actually
00:33:08.160 go the distance of making them feel more isolated?
00:33:11.840 Well, I am committed and the library is committed to offering safe and welcoming space
00:33:17.300 for everyone, including members of the trans community. And we are aware that the, you know,
00:33:23.540 the upcoming room rental has caused anger and concern and hurt among members of the trans
00:33:29.000 community and others. But as a public library and as a public institution, we have an obligation
00:33:35.700 to stand up for our democratic values and principles.
00:33:40.000 Again, this absurd, baseless, uncorroborated aspersion that there's a good chance of violence.
00:33:47.860 That's, that's practically defamatory of Megan Murphy.
00:33:50.800 Oh yeah.
00:33:51.420 Just absurd, but good for Vickery Bowles for just like, she's no Andrew Scheer. You're not going
00:33:58.480 to wear her down in 90 seconds and getting her to collapse as Andrew Scheer did in basically
00:34:04.020 every tough interview he ever gave. He just, he said, fine. He would just, to avoid the
00:34:08.740 discomfort of a, of a short-term interview, he would just collapse. I don't know where
00:34:13.740 this Vickery Bowles came from. I frankly never heard of her before this, but she was unmoved.
00:34:18.960 Yes. Yes. She was strong. She was strong and she kept her cool. Um, I was very impressed
00:34:25.020 with her.
00:34:25.960 And the, and the thing is when she said that she heard complaints from the trans community,
00:34:30.500 I'm sure she did. And I'm sure she was sympathetic. By the way, being for freedom of speech doesn't
00:34:36.400 mean you're not aware that some free speech inflicts some hurt feelings. Uh, it doesn't
00:34:42.620 mean you have a heart of ice. It just means you've made the decision that allowing free
00:34:47.960 speech is a higher societal value than being a bubble wrap blanket around everyone with
00:34:55.720 a thin skin. Sure. Well, listen, uh, when you can only see the, uh, the offense given to
00:35:02.460 one group, even though another group may be offended by that other group when they speak,
00:35:10.200 I mean, you know, we have a conflict of what people think are rights here. And, and it's
00:35:17.220 in this issue, uh, it hasn't been sorted out very well by our legislatures because they have
00:35:23.980 not taken the trouble to inquire into the definition of the word woman. So, uh, it was
00:35:31.180 very natural and very inevitable, uh, that all of these, this confusion would flow. Uh, but
00:35:37.680 the people on one side of this debate are taking the line that only trans people have rights that
00:35:46.260 have to be respected, uh, even if they impinge on the natural rights of women. And they just,
00:35:53.560 they won't agree that there's anybody else that has rights, uh, in this, you know, or, uh, interests
00:35:59.800 in this, in this issue. And that's terrible. Yeah. Well, listen, I have a question for you. I saw on
00:36:06.480 Twitter that you are giving a talk in my old hometown of Calgary, along with Kaylin Ford and
00:36:12.540 Lindsay Shepard, two young women who have been deplatformed in the past. Um, can you give us a few
00:36:19.120 details about that? When is that? We have a lot of viewers in Calgary, some might want to go.
00:36:23.140 And I must tell you that I am, uh, pessimistic and I am, uh, once bitten, twice shy, as they say,
00:36:33.580 when it comes to deplatforming. And I'm actually a little bit worried that you're going to be talking
00:36:37.420 about deplatforming, that you yourself might be deplatformed at the talk about deplatforming.
00:36:42.080 Well, I guess that's a risk we have to take. Um, I, uh, the event is on November 14th.
00:36:50.200 It's, uh, 6 30 PM. And I'm sorry, I can't remember the name. I believe it's at a tavern.
00:36:56.080 So perhaps these are people who are sympathetic and who are not going to be railroaded by
00:37:01.980 protesters or activists. Uh, I would hope so. I, I wouldn't want to get out there and
00:37:08.660 find out that the event had been canceled. It's going to be, I think, a lively event. I,
00:37:13.420 these are two young women who are dynamite. Uh, both Kaylin and Lindsay are young women. I admire
00:37:18.380 greatly. And we're going to talk about cancel culture, exactly the kind of thing we've just
00:37:23.280 been discussing. Uh, and we'll be bringing other, uh, examples in perhaps, uh, we'll bring in
00:37:29.120 Ezra LeVant's book, uh, signing. Well, I, uh, I, uh, I'd love to go, but I certainly don't want to
00:37:36.280 step on, uh, uh, your toes. You, you have a real theme going on there. And I think I
00:37:41.480 would just be a happy observer in the audience, happy to buy a ticket. I think we might send
00:37:45.700 a reporter, uh, to report on the event and God forbid, if there was an attempt to shutter
00:37:51.540 it. Um, I should tell you that the theater in Calgary and Edmonton, they both canceled
00:37:55.780 on us, even though we had a signed contract. And in the end, only literally one crank showed
00:38:01.620 up to protest each event, whereas hundreds of ticket buyers showed up. I'm, I'm a little
00:38:06.600 nervous. God forbid it happens. I hope we can talk again because my new approach and
00:38:11.480 forgive me for bringing this into an interview about your great op-ed. My new approach is
00:38:16.680 sue people for inducing a breach of contract. So if someone, if you have a contract with this
00:38:24.000 pub and it sounds like you do, and someone bullies them, pressures them, threatens them,
00:38:28.320 interferes with them to cause them to breach it with you, it's well settled law going back
00:38:34.520 more than a century that you have a cause of action against the threateners, the bullies.
00:38:40.380 And I, it's strange to think of your event as like a, like a bear trap or, or like fly paper
00:38:46.340 that would attract these malicious bullies to catch them. But I think either way, it's win-win.
00:38:53.520 If your event goes ahead, that's a great conversation that the world should hear.
00:38:57.420 God forbid, if your event is canceled, well, you've caught some bullies and let them have
00:39:02.220 them go before a judge and explain why they think in a free country, they can bully a bar
00:39:06.760 into canceling an event. And I'm getting off topic, but I'm really nervous for you. I got
00:39:10.560 to tell you, Barbara, I know the world we're in these days and they don't believe in debate
00:39:14.540 anymore. They believe in silencing people.
00:39:17.040 I do know that. Well, I'm going to assume, uh, this, uh, you know, Kaylin is organizing it
00:39:21.700 and she's a political person who's, who's quite savvy. So I assume, uh, she's arranging
00:39:27.300 appropriate security. Although I can't imagine, uh, that there would be a need for it. Although
00:39:34.800 people will say there's a need.
00:39:36.700 Oh, it's not the security. Yeah. My point about there only being one cranky protester is just
00:39:40.540 that, that none of these internet bullies actually show up. They just hop and puff, send an email,
00:39:46.040 send a tweet, but that's terrifying to a bar owner who's never had a critical word spoken to them
00:39:51.140 their whole lives. Sure. Yes, you're, you're absolutely right. Well, uh, I won't be looking
00:39:56.340 after that end of things. I, I imagine that, uh, uh, those who are organizing it are extremely,
00:40:01.980 uh, au courant with, uh, how people operate on social media and what, what are real threats and
00:40:08.060 what aren't. Uh, so I'll leave it to them to, uh, to do the smart thing. Fair enough. Listen,
00:40:12.320 I didn't mean to, to, uh, of course, but it's very relevant. I mean, uh, what I'm writing about
00:40:17.700 today, what I, what I had in my column today, uh, is absolutely relevant. And I'm sure obviously
00:40:22.820 as one of my examples that I'll be giving, uh, you know, Murphy's, uh, this particular protest is
00:40:29.700 one that I'll be using as an example for sure. So, well, uh, hopefully the venue owner will be as
00:40:35.680 courageous as Vickery Bowles was. And hopefully the mayor of that city won't be as foolish as
00:40:42.200 Toronto's is, but even. I don't know. He sometimes is a little foolish. I know. I know. He was my
00:40:46.860 debate partner way back in, uh, university for two years. Nahid Nenshi and I were debate partners.
00:40:52.640 So really? Yes. And we won the national debates two years running. Wow. And I would like to think
00:40:58.900 that based on that rambunctious experience, he has a little bit of free speech left in his bloodstream
00:41:04.620 because we certainly were troublemakers back in our youth. Uh, I've heard Nahid Nenshi weigh in on just
00:41:10.760 about every other subject under the sun. I haven't heard him on free speech. I hope he hasn't gone
00:41:15.000 woke left censor in his middle age, but I, I fear for the worst. Barbara, I won't keep you another
00:41:20.580 minute, but thank you for this. Let me one more time, read the headline of your column and invite
00:41:25.080 all our people to read it. It's called how feminist Megan Murphy fell victim to progressives,
00:41:30.360 double standards. And it's written of course, by our friend Barbara Kay in the national post.
00:41:35.760 Good luck, my friend. And, uh, you know what? I'm going to try and be there at your Calgary
00:41:39.440 event just to, to see how it goes. And I'm interested in all three of you speakers.
00:41:43.360 That would be so cool. All right. Take care. There you go. Our good friend, Barbara Kay,
00:41:48.480 a real freedom fighter, willing to talk about subjects that most journalists are just too
00:41:53.100 afraid to do. Stay with us more ahead on the rebel.
00:41:56.020 On my monologue yesterday about a Democrat in Massachusetts trying to ban the word
00:42:09.080 bitch, Debra writes,
00:42:11.440 maybe these sensitive souls need to grow up and stop trying to tell others what they can
00:42:15.100 and can't say. What an insane world we're living in.
00:42:17.860 It's such a quirky thing. I mean, banning any word is really weird. Like, you know, you've heard of
00:42:25.340 the Streisand effect. Have you heard of that? Barbara Streisand has this, um, house on, on Malibu,
00:42:31.680 right on the sea. Gorgeous house. And like every house in America, there's some aerial photo of it.
00:42:38.680 Look at Google maps, right? And someone took pictures of houses on Malibu. And one of the houses was
00:42:44.820 Barbara Streisand's. And it was no big deal. No one was clicking on it until she sued to get that photo
00:42:52.080 banned. And then all of a sudden, everyone was extremely curious about her house. They hadn't been
00:42:58.680 until she sued. In fact, evidence was almost no one looked at the photo other than Barbara Streisand
00:43:06.180 and her lawyer. But after she sued, everyone wanted to see what's Barbara Streisand's house all about.
00:43:11.680 Same thing with banning a word. What's the word that's banned? I want to know. Oh, I want to say
00:43:20.000 it now. It's so weird. And the bill, I read you the title of it yesterday. It was about banning words
00:43:26.760 plural, but he just wants to ban this one word. I mean, there are far worse words out there than
00:43:33.460 bitch. I, you know, it's, it's not a great word if you use it in a negative meaning. There's also a
00:43:39.480 scientific, biological, it's a female dog. That's legit meaning of the word. It's so weird that he
00:43:46.880 chose that word to ban. I think he's a weirdo. I think he's trying to like preempt some me too
00:43:53.700 thing or something. Maybe he's a male feminist. Is he trying to impress a girlfriend or something?
00:43:57.800 Oh, I agree with you, honey. The word bitch is so bad. I'll get a ban. Where, what? I just don't
00:44:05.620 didn't get him. Joe writes, the disturbing thing about all this is that an elected representative
00:44:11.280 in Massachusetts, the cradle of liberty and the American revolution would actually try to repeal
00:44:15.520 the first amendment. Yeah. I mean, it's weird. I mean, that's the thing that, you know, that the
00:44:20.780 Liberty Bell and all those America, it's the Boston Tea Party. I mean, it's, there really is. It's true.
00:44:26.820 Massachusetts, it is the place for so many American values to root.
00:44:32.560 But as I said yesterday, that's a universal story across the West, isn't it? I mean, how
00:44:38.320 it's not much stranger than the fact that in the United Kingdom, the home of the Magna
00:44:42.640 Carta and John Milton, they're banning things and Canada too.
00:44:48.400 On my interview with Derek Fildebrandt, Karen writes,
00:44:51.560 I think I like the Western Standard. I'll pop on by online and see what trouble I can cause
00:44:56.100 in the comment section. Yeah. I mean, I, um, I really enjoyed running that magazine when it
00:45:02.180 was a print magazine more than a dozen years ago. And, uh, it was really fun. And when I was looking
00:45:08.880 through those old issues yesterday, the number one thing that struck me was how that was in the
00:45:13.660 age before de-platforming. We had mainstream people writing for us. Even Andrew Coyne wrote for us once,
00:45:21.080 if you can believe it. We had mainstream advertisers. We had, uh,
00:45:26.180 Air Canada. How much more mainstream does it come than that? I can't remember all the advertisers,
00:45:33.240 but it was just a different time. And if you had a different opinion, people would say, oh yeah,
00:45:37.100 different opinion, but we got to have that market. And we got, but everyone's a customer and we're
00:45:41.840 all Canadians. It's all part of a debate. And those days are completely gone. Not only are corporations so
00:45:48.020 absolutely scared of their own shadow now, but there are these roving mobs of fanatical censors.
00:45:56.760 Maybe that's the thing. Maybe back a dozen years ago without Twitter and Facebook, there wasn't a way
00:46:03.880 for these virtual mobs to assemble. So you'd actually have to take a piece of paper and write
00:46:09.700 some letter of complaints and who had the energy to do that. I don't know. That's one of the things
00:46:14.780 that made me the saddest when I was looking at the old issues of Western Standard is how not just the
00:46:20.860 age of the magazine has passed, but the age of debate and allowing a range of opinion has passed
00:46:26.780 too. I'm so sorry to say. Well, that's our show for today. Until tomorrow, on behalf of all of us
00:46:33.140 here at Rebel World Headquarters, to you at home, good night. Keep fighting for freedom.
00:46:44.780 We'll see you next time.