ANDREW CHAPADOS ｜ Deconstructing Bias with Tarl Warwick (StyxHexenHammer666)
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
184.34161
Summary
In this episode, author Carl W. Warwick joins me to discuss his new book, Critical Race Theory Debunked. We talk about why he wrote it, why he started it, and why he thinks it's a great book.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Carl Warwick is a popular YouTuber and author who has amassed half a million subscribers on
00:00:10.680
YouTube for his honest and analytical takes on politics, culture, and religions. Warwick,
00:00:15.880
aka Sticks, Hexenhammer666, is no stranger to debate and goes up against some of the biggest
00:00:21.860
names out there. His latest book, Critical Race Theory Debunked, has already reached number one
00:00:26.880
new release status on Amazon. Today's episode is sponsored by Elevate Farms. Elevate Farms is a
00:00:32.200
technology and IP-based indoor farm that produces traditional farm-grown equivalent products at
00:00:37.600
wholesale market price with a global footprint. Go to elevate.farm for more information. Carl,
00:00:42.940
thanks for joining me. How have you been? I've been well, and I hope that you're well too.
00:00:48.020
Oh, thank you very much. I want to jump right into your book. It's on Critical Race Theory,
00:00:52.020
a hot topic, obviously. What compelled you to write a book about this? Was there one person
00:00:57.860
or thing that made you put a pen to the paper on this topic? Well, I had made a video debunking
00:01:03.320
critical race theory based on the five basic premises that were put forth by its academic
00:01:08.000
proponents, and I saw it on a Vox article, so I took it from a left-leaning site, actually.
00:01:12.960
And what I figured is a lot of times there's nothing that's really short for people to digest,
00:01:18.540
and not everyone has the time to read 400 or 500 pages, so I figured that I'd make a fairly short
00:01:24.960
booklet that, in a concise manner, just goes through the claims of critical race theories on
00:01:30.020
academic proponents, debunks them, and then adds a little bit on to the end, and it's more concise
00:01:36.140
for readers that they may be on the go, and they don't really have more than maybe a few minutes at a
00:01:41.800
time, actually, to read. Yeah, I mean, obviously this reflects with the reader because it's gone
00:01:48.460
so quickly up to number one, and I noticed that a lot of your books, they're pretty low price. Is
00:01:54.540
that because they're all fairly short? Is that why? No, I hold the price down artificially because
00:02:00.460
another thing that I understood years ago when I started editing books, this is one that I wrote,
00:02:06.120
but many of them I've edited, is that initially on Amazon years ago, I ran into this problem where
00:02:13.460
everything was either prohibitively expensive, it was a $40, $50 hardcover, which as a poor kid at the
00:02:20.220
time, what was, you know, out of my price range, unless it was something really interesting,
00:02:26.160
including for short works, or it was low price, but it wasn't in a proper modern format. And so what I
00:02:32.000
set out years ago to do is simply to format things properly, edit them line by line, get rid of all of
00:02:38.900
the mistakes, get rid of all the spelling errors, because people had been uploading primitive PDF
00:02:44.280
file scans from sometimes 10, 15 years ago, with their interior files. And the problem is that those
00:02:50.860
original manuscripts had all of the original mistakes and problems. Some of them even had like
00:02:55.560
writing in the margins and things like that. And I couldn't imagine why anyone would buy them.
00:03:00.540
That's definitely a good idea. Now, I've been talking to people a lot about CRT, as it's called
00:03:06.640
lately. And there's so much obfuscation on this topic. And I want to get your opinion on this. Joy
00:03:11.600
Reid, for example, she had on the woman who says she coined the term, they tried to completely separate
00:03:17.040
it from Marxism and intersectionality. Do you find that to be that what they're doing these days?
00:03:23.200
Yeah, they're trying that. Definitely. The problem for them is the critical race theories on academic
00:03:28.360
proponents in their fourth premise, openly admit to not only Marxist, but third wave feminist influence.
00:03:34.360
Now, they don't see a problem with that. I mean, in the academic sense, because they think that
00:03:39.000
Marxism is okay, or even a good thing. The problem is that a lot of people that are pushing critical
00:03:43.980
race theory aren't even aware of this. If they really believe that Marxism is fine, whatever,
00:03:49.660
that's their opinion. But they should be aware of the fact that that's actually an influence on
00:03:53.820
critical race theory. And the problem is that a lot of the corporate media sites, CNN, MSNBC,
00:04:00.740
even the Vox article, largely don't admit to that actual Marxism. One of the problems that I
00:04:06.100
identified in my own little booklet on the subject is really just the fact that people,
00:04:12.080
they're not even meaning to be disingenuous. They simply don't know. Nobody has told them
00:04:16.420
that Marxism is explicitly part of it. And I've noticed, and we can talk about this maybe a little bit,
00:04:23.020
is actually that if you take critical race theory and you look at it in the broader sense,
00:04:28.280
really it's Marxism in the purest sense. The only difference is that class theory has been replaced
00:04:34.300
with racial theory. So instead of poor versus the bourgeois or poor versus the rich or whatever,
00:04:40.280
the Kulak classic, it's purged. It's really about different racial groups or ethnic groups,
00:04:47.700
So do you think they're just, you know, muddying the waters to try to
00:04:51.160
use that as a method to push it as far as they can push it? Or is there some other
00:04:57.340
I think that the proponents of it at the top definitely are trying to muddy the waters.
00:05:02.340
I think that the 99% of people that would actually support critical race theory are simply,
00:05:07.600
they're not informed about it. They don't know exactly what they're promoting,
00:05:10.560
specifically because all of the trusted sources like we would have on YouTube or whatever,
00:05:15.880
all of the authoritative sources are telling them, no, no, no, it's barely even leftism.
00:05:21.460
It's certainly not socialism or communism or anything like that. No, no, no, no. They're just
00:05:25.560
paranoid. I've been called literally for calling out critical race theory, paranoid and far-right
00:05:32.260
extremist and things like that for suggesting that there's Marxist influence into it, even though
00:05:37.000
it's openly admitted by its academic proponents, some of the legal scholars that were involved in
00:05:41.980
shaping what critical race theory in the unified theory sense actually meant are self-proclaimedly
00:05:47.980
influenced by Marxism. They don't hide it. They just don't see the problem with it. And I think
00:05:52.360
the real big problem is the disconnect between the academic, like the ivory tower people that go
00:05:58.720
into critical race theory and the vast majority of people that are proposing it who will go out of
00:06:04.320
their way to vehemently deny the fact that there's any leftism involved there beyond the mundane
00:06:09.220
armchair liberal. For sure. And I see it a lot from Joy Reid, that Mark Lamont Hill guy. They really
00:06:16.420
want to say, oh, you haven't read the academic papers. You haven't talked to the woman who coined
00:06:21.080
the term, even though herself is also the, sees herself as the creator of intersectionality. So I think
00:06:28.560
what they're trying to do is like what along the lines of what you said is get it out to as many
00:06:33.220
people as possible. And the damage has already been done once they start indoctrinating people
00:06:37.780
with it. And if, if they have to learn that it's about communism down the line, well, then they're
00:06:41.840
already going to be like, oh, well, you know, it's got good points. It's, it's just about equality and
00:06:47.100
equity. I'm sure, I'm sure that goes along with it. Now you've been a YouTuber for a long time.
00:06:52.500
I've noticed you're grinding it out for like at least a decade from what I can see. Have your opinions
00:06:58.200
changed over the years and how much of that has been affected by different people's comments or
00:07:03.120
criticisms? Yeah, I've changed over the years. Initially, when I first got onto YouTube, it was
00:07:08.580
literally just as a joke because back in 2007, when I first arrived on YouTube, nobody was going to make
00:07:15.200
a living being a YouTuber or anything like that. It was just uploading cat videos or something like
00:07:20.460
that. Yeah, I didn't even cover politics. At first it was mainly spiritual issues, some philosophy.
00:07:27.040
I got into psychedelia and, and the drug war and things related to it. And that was sort of the
00:07:33.400
launching point into politics. And, and people can go and look this up if they want to. If you
00:07:39.140
sort my videos for the oldest first, you will quite clearly see I was essentially a leftist
00:07:44.860
many years ago, but then the left sold out, Obama sold out, liberals in general sold out. My views
00:07:52.380
didn't honestly change. It's just that the groups that were representing those views have morphed over
00:07:58.180
time. I fit in by 2012, more with the Ron Paul revolution than I had with the anti-war left,
00:08:05.100
not even a half a decade prior. I found that sad. And they're selling out as completed at this point,
00:08:11.100
because now they're, they're literally supporting political witch hunts and opposing the rights of the
00:08:17.460
accused. We see this with the January 6th earrings going on. I think possibly even live as we're
00:08:22.860
speaking now. Um, it's the most insane thing I've ever seen. I haven't seen anything like this since
00:08:28.700
just after nine 11, when the government was trying to justify rummaging through people's trash to find
00:08:33.900
out whether they were patriotic or not. I will get to that in a couple of minutes. Justin, I think we
00:08:38.980
have some B roll of sticks as a first oldest video, whatever the oldest video is on your channel.
00:08:44.880
I just want to, there you are. You look a lot like one of our editors, frankly, here to editor
00:08:49.840
Sid. Um, so do people have misconceptions about you? Do you think, uh, you're pretty, I'm confident
00:08:56.660
saying you're a Trump supporter now. Um, people probably wouldn't think that right away. When I
00:09:01.080
first saw your videos, I think it was probably around 2016. And you were one of the people who,
00:09:06.060
I don't know how much you agree with Tim Poole, but I would put you in the same camp of people who
00:09:11.000
have changed their opinion. I've watched change their opinions over the last four or five
00:09:15.880
years. Do people usually have a different conception about you when they meet you or first see you?
00:09:22.040
Uh, you mean in person, like on the street or something? Yeah. Well, I mean, uh, generally,
00:09:28.200
I mean, I've got the long hair, I've got the tie dye and stuff. So when I go out, if someone
00:09:32.220
is not familiar with who I am, probably think I'm a hippie or something like that. Uh, in all
00:09:37.740
honesty, the people that are, are, have recognized my work kind of get it. Um, but my views, honestly,
00:09:46.040
technically speaking, they haven't actually changed that much. Literally. It's the paradigm
00:09:51.260
of politics that changed more than anything that I was doing. I think that's the same with Tim
00:09:55.720
Poole, actually. Now that you've mentioned him, he's still a liberal individual. It's just that a lot
00:10:00.940
of self-proclaimed liberals. Now they're pro censorship. Uh, they don't, they believe in state power.
00:10:06.940
They believe in mollycoddling or even worshiping the state. And I don't think he quite understands
00:10:12.040
it because of course the left or liberals in general, even half a decade ago, weren't like
00:10:17.480
that. And I'm sort of in the same crowd. This even happened a little bit with libertarians,
00:10:22.400
with the libertarian party under Jorgensen praising Facebook censorship and things like that. And
00:10:29.240
I think it's also happened. The evolution of all the parties has completely changed up here. We have
00:10:35.960
the green party, which is of course, uh, an international party all uses the same platform
00:10:40.880
and, and, uh, logos and everything. And there was a time where they would just be, we're the straight,
00:10:46.880
uh, environmentalist party. We care about the environment and that's it. But now they sort of
00:10:51.620
represent a far left likened to the squad, for example, in terms of their policy. But what I was sort
00:10:57.520
of getting at with you is to me, you're just sort of a guy who isn't as afraid to speak honestly on
00:11:01.760
any of the topics. Now you, you mentioned that you were probably considered yourself a leftist
00:11:07.000
before. Um, didn't you also, you said you were a Christian, but you, then you, uh, identified as
00:11:14.220
a Satanist. Do you want to go through that a little bit for people? Because I'm sure people try to bring
00:11:17.680
this stuff, try to bring this stuff up on you and say, look what he used to say, you guys don't trust
00:11:22.620
them. They didn't, that happens constantly, especially among leftists who simply don't
00:11:28.580
like me and pretend to be religious. Yes. I was a, uh, basically my upbringing was as a liberal
00:11:34.460
Christian. You could say similar to like, uh, I don't know, Methodist or something like that,
00:11:39.080
like going to church on Christmas and Easter, basically. And then Christmas service basically
00:11:44.220
is like, I liked it because, you know, I could light the candle, put it in the snow and it's cool.
00:11:48.820
It's kind of relaxing. You get to sing songs and stuff. Um, that was my upbringing. And when I was
00:11:54.220
a teenager, actually like high school age, uh, I became more of a, if not a fundamentalist, a more
00:11:59.840
religious Christian, got baptized and so forth. Uh, but what I realized, and a lot of people would
00:12:05.500
chalk it up to Marxist indoctrination in college, but it was actually before that, uh, I, I stopped
00:12:11.140
believing in that. I started reading more about, uh, not just science because science doesn't
00:12:17.220
necessarily not mesh with Christianity in many ways. Uh, but the occult, I thought about my own
00:12:22.960
spiritual experiences. And for a while I was in sort of atheism. I had lost my faith, so to speak,
00:12:30.300
but I didn't like the vacuous nature, straight line atheism. And so Satanism in the sense that I
00:12:37.060
followed it was literally just atheism, but with the rituals, it's basically a mockery of Catholicism
00:12:43.320
more than anything. If you've read Anton LaVey's Satanic Bible, it's fairly straightforward. And
00:12:48.500
there is actually a proto-libertarian methodology behind it, uh, by design. What I realized after
00:12:56.060
that though, and I left Satanism behind, uh, God, I think almost a decade ago, uh, is that Satanism is
00:13:02.260
also vacuous. It's a great psychological stepping stone potentially, but it's not for everyone.
00:13:07.680
I don't encourage people to become, you know, members of the church of Satan. I certainly never
00:13:13.900
was, uh, or anything like that. And I've decided to just sort of be an occultist, which is to say
00:13:19.620
that I search for truth. And I think the search is more important than actually finding anything.
00:13:25.580
It's the entertainment behind it. The story, once you've fully read it, is no longer entertaining.
00:13:30.600
You can go back and read it again, but you know how it ends. Uh, I look at it as sort of like, uh,
00:13:35.460
reading an eternal story that doesn't have any end. And I think that there's something behind
00:13:40.720
spirituality. I've had spiritual experiences. Um, but I don't, uh, I don't belong to any organized
00:13:46.960
religion. No. Yeah. I think when I read some of the criticisms of you, I don't think people realize
00:13:53.300
that there is, you know, a 12 or 15 minute video about what you just said, where you talk about all
00:13:58.920
this. It's not just, uh, you're blowing with the wind here. You put a lot of time and effort. And like
00:14:04.480
you've mentioned, you've been doing these videos for a long time. You put a lot of thought into,
00:14:07.820
into all of these topics that you're talking about. Maybe not so much the cat videos in 2007,
00:14:13.080
but maybe you got updated cat videos. I shouldn't say that. Well, I mean, that becomes the problem,
00:14:17.620
which is when you've made videos for, as I have 12 years now, the problem is that you would have to
00:14:23.800
go back in, in order to prove someone wrong about your views, uh, or about the evolution of your views,
00:14:30.180
you have to manually go back through thousands and thousands of videos. It would be impossible,
00:14:35.540
uh, in order to link them in order to show one person that they're wrong. And at some point it
00:14:40.760
just is too kind of time consuming to do that. For sure. And I hear a lot of people like Joe Rogan
00:14:46.620
and Jordan Peterson talk about that. Whereas if you're talking for thousands of hours or hundreds
00:14:51.900
of hours, there's going to be something that somebody takes issue with that you said, but they
00:14:56.260
don't often want to show it in full context. I also want to talk about something you posted a video
00:15:01.000
about recently, um, where you said you would vote for Trump again in 2024. If he runs, I want to play
00:15:06.900
that and get your thoughts on the rest of that thought. All right, everyone, based on what I'm
00:15:12.620
seeing, like when he was speaking the other day, the fact that he's still holding large numbers of
00:15:18.380
rallies, you know, weather permitting and so forth. Um, I, I am inclined to believe that Donald Trump
00:15:24.480
leans heavily towards wanting to run in 2024, uh, link in the description. He's already menacing
00:15:31.120
Cuomo, who I think he's still envisions might have democratic party aspirations. Cuomo, by the way,
00:15:37.080
would technically be near the top of the list. Biden clearly won't be the candidate. If he is,
00:15:42.440
he loses automatically because he's, he's not going to be capable of campaigning. Kamala Harris
00:15:48.220
has a likability rating in the democratic party, probably lower than many Republicans would.
00:15:53.880
Uh, and Cuomo is a sleazebag, uh, but somehow he's managed to get away with killing 15,000 people,
00:16:02.400
writing a bestselling book about it and calling himself the COVID King while also having like a
00:16:07.280
dozen me too accusations against him. Somehow his career has been assured. He's the, he's another
00:16:13.020
Teflon die, sort of like Clinton-esque. Trump, I think will run, uh, or at least again, there are
00:16:19.700
several things that can stop that from happening. Number one, Biden resigns, uh, or is 25th.
00:16:24.700
So do you, you really think Trump's running again? Wouldn't that sort of put, uh, to the side,
00:16:29.260
all of their, you know, election meddling efforts right now, or do you think it's whichever is the
00:16:34.100
best outcome for him? I think that Trump is inclined to run, uh, not least of which the reason
00:16:41.600
would be for his ego. As I said, well, I've said, and this isn't a bad thing. I don't mean that in a
00:16:47.120
sense of, well, his ego and in a negative sense, years ago, I said, what Trump wanted was the triple
00:16:53.280
crown, which is he had, it's essentially money and, and power. And he had all the money in the world.
00:17:00.600
Uh, he had all the fame in the world. Those are two of them. He wanted power. And when you're Trump,
00:17:06.400
when you've got billions of dollars, you've been, you know, you're the host of the apprentice. You've
00:17:11.800
done the pageantry, you've done wrestling, you've done stern, you've done literally everything under
00:17:16.740
the sun for decades and decades. The only thing that would suffice, uh, would be the presidency.
00:17:21.620
I think he leaned towards trying to become the governor of New York initially and realized it
00:17:26.140
was beneath him. Uh, he wanted to be the president. There's only one thing left in his entire life
00:17:32.140
that he can possibly do, which is to become a two-term president. That is the pinnacle. It is
00:17:37.220
the only mountain left to climb. I think he'll run. I will vote for him if he does. I think he'll
00:17:43.620
probably win if he does, because I see the Republicans finally have their balls back,
00:17:48.160
which Trump gave back to them after two decades of not, uh, having them. Uh, and, and I think that
00:17:57.100
the Republicans are busy at the grassroots level. And you can see the alarm bells going off of the
00:18:02.560
DNC headquarters about this at the grassroots level. They're starting to take over housing
00:18:07.560
authorities, school boards, mayoral offices and stuff. They're targeting the lower level districts,
00:18:13.520
getting more precinct leaders in. And if they can do that groundwork, then they can fortify,
00:18:19.100
really fortify the election from the ground up, uh, and go to the state level as well.
00:18:23.700
Now, normally this portion of the show would be behind the paywall. So thanks to our sponsor at
00:18:29.640
elevate.farm for bringing this to you guys for free. Now, if you still want to watch without any
00:18:34.300
censorship or without any ads, you can go to rebelnewsplus.com for just $8 a month. You can
00:18:40.140
watch all of our shows behind the paywall, or you can sign up for a full year where you'll actually
00:18:45.120
save three months in total off your full price. You mentioned Biden. Do you, do you think he,
00:18:51.200
you don't think he makes it another, it's crazy to think about another three years and what,
00:18:55.920
four months of Biden? I mean, you, you take any clip of him and there's a large, you know,
00:19:02.740
brain fart as they call it happening. Uh, do you don't think he's going to make it? Do you not,
00:19:08.340
not living, but you don't think he's going to have the capacity to run again?
00:19:11.520
I think it's possible. I mean, you can't, you can't completely write him off. There are some
00:19:15.820
people that are in their eighties that are still with it and so forth. It's just that Biden is not
00:19:20.220
even 80 and he's not with it. Uh, they could probably prop him up. They prop up his half
00:19:26.280
vegetative body and, and make it animatronic or something like that. But I think there's a less
00:19:32.960
than 50, 50 chance that he makes it there without having a major health crisis, getting 25th or being
00:19:39.380
forced to resign. Problem for the Democrats is then they're left with a technical non-incumbent who
00:19:44.520
was never elected, who has considerably lower likability than Biden and who can't debate.
00:19:49.820
Can you imagine Kamala Harris debating Joe Biden? I mean, uh, Donald Trump. It'd be hilarious.
00:19:56.160
Just nothing but uncomfortable laughter is what she goes to, I think. What do you think are actual
00:20:00.960
voting issues for Democrat voters? Uh, I don't see anything other than, you know,
00:20:07.900
rainbow coalition, uh, identity politics being any, was there any, were there any voting issues
00:20:15.920
in 2020? What, what are they going to run on in 2024? Do you think? Well, the Dems are going to
00:20:21.640
focus on COVID, I think more than anything else. And you see this with the January 6th insurrection
00:20:27.540
claims. I use that term, of course, sarcastically. They're trying to draw that out because what they
00:20:33.100
want to do is cast Trump and the populace off. They were trying to commit treason. We defeated them
00:20:38.740
and they tried to take over and we stopped them because we're heroes. We're the rebel alliance.
00:20:43.160
And by the way, evil orange man, Drumfler bad, uh, did a bad job with COVID and Biden did better.
00:20:49.500
The latter is not going well for them though, because of the Delta variant. Uh, you've got new
00:20:53.680
cases coming up, which isn't going to stop because none of the methods seem to do anything about it and
00:20:59.580
having for more than a year. Uh, and Biden's going to eventually take flack for that. Even the legacy
00:21:04.440
media is actually warming to the idea of his, uh, approval cratering. And as soon as they start
00:21:09.860
reporting on that, which I'll be making a video fairly soon, actually on the subject, a few of them
00:21:15.340
have, um, it's, it's basically over for Biden, for Biden's, uh, party mentality, which is basically,
00:21:23.040
uh, he expects to have limited, I mean, limitless support. I think the problem with Joe
00:21:29.220
Biden is that he's surrounded by people that are sheltering him. They're not telling him the truth,
00:21:33.920
which is, Hey, uh, your approval has fallen. Well, your disapproval has risen almost 10 points in the
00:21:39.900
last six months. Maybe we should change what we're doing, but nobody's willing to tell him that they
00:21:45.640
even had, uh, tales about him from back in the primaries that he sort of lorded over things. And he
00:21:51.620
was very indecisive. That is, he wanted to make his own decisions. It was very forceful about it,
00:21:57.060
but at the same time, he was always biting his nails thinking, well, maybe I should do a,
00:22:02.220
maybe I should do B and it would be gridlock. And that seemed to be a problem during the primaries,
00:22:07.860
even when he had, you know, other opponents against him, he was having problems in charting
00:22:12.420
the actual destination, uh, of the ship of state that he wanted to pilot. And it seems like
00:22:18.060
indecisiveness might finally be his downfall. Pilot the ship of state. That sounds like a t-shirt
00:22:24.400
sticks that you might want to sell. Other than Biden though, you've got Harris who you mentioned,
00:22:28.740
uh, wasn't voted in. She didn't make it through the primaries. And then there's AOC who's not
00:22:34.720
around as much lately. I don't think she has national, uh, appeal. They don't really have it.
00:22:40.040
Pardon me? She won't run. Yeah, of course the, the Dems, they don't really have any popular faces.
00:22:45.220
And it seems like the people that they push out now with this, uh, the January 6th committee or hearing
00:22:50.420
or whatever they're calling it. It's just the same guys that are willing to say anything. I'm
00:22:55.500
talking about the Eric Swalwells, Adam Schiff, um, that Hirono lady, the Hawaii representative,
00:23:01.500
I think. And, uh, you're talking about the, the hearing they were having. And I saw this earlier
00:23:05.800
before we came on here and it's them literally trying to cry. And I want to show you this so I
00:23:11.500
can get your, uh, reaction to it. Go ahead, Justin.
00:23:13.800
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And, uh, thank you to my colleagues on the committee.
00:23:20.940
Thank you to our witnesses. Uh, I never expected a day to be quite as emotional for me as it
00:23:27.180
has been. Uh, I've talked to a number of you and gotten to know you. I think it's important
00:23:33.700
to tell you right now though, you guys may like individually feel a little broken. You
00:23:41.020
guys all talk about the effects you have to deal with. And, you know, you talk about the
00:23:45.320
impact of that day, but you guys want better the next time that God help us. And if we're
00:23:55.780
so driven by bigotry and hate that we attack our fellow citizens as traitors, if they're
00:24:01.420
born in another country where they don't look like us, God help us. But I have faith because
00:24:24.420
of folks like you and I, Adam, I didn't expect this would be quite so much later, but it must
00:24:30.640
be an Adam thing today. Uh, but I'm so grateful to all of you. With that, Mr. Chairman, I yield
00:24:38.720
So I was in the military sticks. None of this makes me cry at all. None of the events that
00:24:42.780
happened on January 6th makes me cry at all. And Adam Schiff, they're really attempting,
00:24:48.720
trying his hardest to cry. Wish I knew the name of the guy on Fox who does the impression of
00:24:52.620
them. It's, I don't know if you've seen that, but it's really good. We all pulled our money
00:25:07.400
What do you think this theater is all about? Because to me, they're sitting there saying,
00:25:11.620
how, how dare we treat people as the other and political opponents as non-citizens or whatever
00:25:17.800
he just said. But I feel like the end goal of all this stuff is to otherize Trump supporters
00:25:23.860
and possibly turn it into a situation where we demonize them based on their belief system so that
00:25:30.980
it becomes illegal. I don't know. What do you think is the end goal of all this?
00:25:34.160
Yeah. Well, that's been ongoing for half a decade now and it's been partially successful, but there's
00:25:38.960
a huge, uh, pushback against it. I just liked the fact that, uh, Adam Schiff was attempting to show
00:25:44.340
emotion. I, I liked his attempt to appear human. It's like watching Mark Zuckerberg get, uh, uh,
00:25:52.560
try to get teared up watching Benjamin Button or something. I was human once. I mean, I am human.
00:25:58.080
Yes. Yeah, no, I, I think definitely though, this is part of a push for censorship and everything like
00:26:04.320
that. It's, it's sort of like after nine 11, essentially what it is, is these morons are trying
00:26:10.900
to take an event that, that a lot of people have an emotional interest in. They blow it out of all
00:26:16.420
proportion, make it seem a thousand times scarier than it was because this was a fiery, but mostly
00:26:20.940
peaceful protest. CNN told me that, uh, you know, about Wendy's burning months before, uh, they're
00:26:27.000
trying to take that and use it as a justification to pass what Biden perceives of. And then the Democrats
00:26:33.040
at large is a panacea, which is mass spending, AKA higher inflation, more taxes. Um, they've already
00:26:39.780
weaponized the DOJ. They raided Rudy Giuliani, America's mayor, you know, just saying, uh, they've
00:26:46.940
been weaponizing. Uh, they were trying to actually partner with the private firms to look into people
00:26:52.520
as well. Now we have the ADL partnering with PayPal and we have the big tech giants working hand in hand
00:26:58.720
with the government to establish a key database, basically of dissidents and wrong thinkers. All of
00:27:04.600
these things go hand in hand. None of these things can be justified unless people are afraid,
00:27:08.700
much like we could only invade Afghanistan or Iraq because people were terrified.
00:27:14.320
Well, this is essentially the war of terror. It's not a war on terror at this point. Only this time,
00:27:20.020
instead of being predominantly foreign, it's predominantly domestic. Uh, they've gone even
00:27:25.160
one further instead of this being W saying those people over there need to be invaded because they're a
00:27:31.660
threat to us. Now it's these people in our own country, in your own neighborhoods are a threat,
00:27:36.340
rat out your neighbors, keep tabs on them. Don't trust your neighbors. Lord help us if we should
00:27:42.760
have some social cohesion in the country because people might trade amongst themselves and exempt
00:27:47.960
themselves from the globalist economy. That's basically what it is. I think people never thought
00:27:53.320
it would get to the point where certain businesses and companies were, you know, cutting people off
00:27:58.540
because of their ideology. I mean, PayPal de-platformed us based on absolutely zero things. They
00:28:03.720
didn't give a reason. They didn't point to anything. They just cut us off one day. And I know, um,
00:28:08.460
Patreon did that with people as well. They had reasons that weren't to do with their platform,
00:28:12.460
but I think people didn't think that that would be coming. How long, how far away do you think we
00:28:17.560
are from, you know, ideologies being illegal? Well, the ideologies won't be illegal, but what they'll do
00:28:24.140
is they'll, they'll say, uh, they'll keep stretching terms like bigotry or racism, sexism, homophobia,
00:28:30.880
extremism. They'll keep stretching them out further and further and further. The problem is
00:28:35.820
what they do when they do this is that they dilute them. So a Nazi proclaimed to be a Nazi in the year
00:28:43.340
2000 or 1995 was understood. It's a person they've shaved their head. They get a swastika tattoo on
00:28:49.060
their chest. They hate Jews. They hate blacks. They hate life itself. They get a baseball bat and
00:28:54.420
they're beating people down for the color of their skin. Now a Nazi is someone who opens their legs too
00:29:00.060
much on the subway train. So keeping that in mind, what they've done, uh, in their, their haste to
00:29:07.220
lambaste other people and censor them and destroy them, which is just, again, a power and money grab,
00:29:12.560
uh, is they've actually made the problem 10,000 times worse. And people who are actually still
00:29:18.260
independent minded and independently voiced have to fight against them. I think they'll be unsuccessful.
00:29:23.660
I think that new tech in part, uh, and the upswelling of populism, not just in the United States, but
00:29:30.240
elsewhere, uh, will eventually erode, uh, their hold over things, their totalitarianism, but it will
00:29:36.740
take time. Unfortunately, we find ourselves in the midst of a censorship dark age at the moment for
00:29:42.480
some years to come. Thanks a lot, Sticks. Hex and Hammer 666 on YouTube. And of course, you can catch
00:29:49.740
him on Twitter as well. And the number three guy on BitChute. And don't forget to buy his book.
00:30:00.480
Thanks for watching another episode of Andrew Says. If you want exclusive content, go to
00:30:04.620
rebelnewsplus.com where we talk about topics we're not allowed to show you on social media. Danger.