Another day, another loss for Canadian civil liberties
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
151.04874
Summary
Another day, another loss of civil liberties in Canada, and it's getting worse. Today, the government wants everyone returning to Canada from abroad to quarantine in a federal facility if they have the Ebola virus. And now they're turning hotels into quarantine facilities if they do.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hello, my friends. I have an update on two disasters for civil liberties in Canada today,
00:00:04.520
but I end with a little bit of hope for civil liberties in La Belle-Provence. That's next.
00:00:12.380
But first, let me invite you to become a subscriber to Rebel News Plus. It's just
00:00:16.700
eight bucks a month to get the video version of the show. Go to rebelnews.com and click subscribe.
00:00:22.780
It's eight bucks. We need the dough to keep paying the bills. And I think it's better TV
00:00:27.120
than you get on, say, Netflix. Okay, thanks, everybody.
00:00:36.380
Tonight, another day, another loss of civil liberties in Canada. It's January 29th, and this
00:00:52.160
Why should others go to jail when you're a biggest carbon consumer I know?
00:00:57.840
There's 8,500 customers here, and you won't give them an answer.
00:01:01.900
The only thing I have to say to the government about why I publish it is because it's my bloody
00:01:12.560
Hello, another very busy day at Rebel News. Obviously, the news keeps coming. We are in
00:01:18.120
a time of a lot of news, and that is not a good thing. It is not a good thing because the news
00:01:23.560
is overwhelmingly bad, and it's getting worse. Those who thought that the year 2020 was the
00:01:28.000
worst and 2021 would get better. No, I think it's the opposite. In 2020, there was genuine confusion
00:01:33.920
and fear about the pandemic. In 2021, we know better. We know that it primarily, overwhelmingly,
00:01:39.840
in fact, affects only the very elderly and the very sick. And so to justify the continued
00:01:45.600
existence of lockdowns, the continued power of social media companies and continuing borrowing
00:01:51.880
and spending power of politicians, I fear that the diminution of our civil liberties will
00:01:58.580
actually accelerate. We saw that today in two ways, and I'm going to show you that today.
00:02:03.200
First came Justin Trudeau, making a strange announcement out of the blue that anyone coming
00:02:11.380
back to Canada at one of four airports, Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Montreal, from an international
00:02:16.860
place, now has to quarantine in a federal quarantine facility. They're transforming hotels into these
00:02:26.360
if they have the virus. Here, take a look. Listen to him himself.
00:02:32.220
Starting next week, all international passenger flights must land only at the following four
00:02:40.080
airports, Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, and Montreal. In addition to the pre-boarding test we already
00:02:49.480
acquire, as soon as possible in the coming weeks, we will be introducing mandatory PCR testing
00:02:56.340
at the airport for people returning to Canada. Travellers will then have to wait for up to three
00:03:03.660
days at an approved hotel for their test results at their own expense, which is expected to be more
00:03:11.880
than $2,000. Those with negative test results will then be able to quarantine at home under
00:03:19.340
significantly increased surveillance and enforcement. Those with positive tests will be immediately
00:03:26.800
required to quarantine in designated government facilities to make sure they're not carrying
00:03:32.680
variants of potential concern. We will also, in the coming weeks, be requiring non-essential
00:03:40.200
travellers to show a negative test before entry at the land border with the U.S., and we're working to stand up
00:03:46.940
additional testing requirements for land travel. So I don't understand. If people take the quick
00:03:54.080
virus test, the quick test, are you sick, and it turns out they're healthy, why would they still have
00:04:02.320
to quarantine for two weeks? Can you help me with that one? So you're adding a new layer of a mandatory
00:04:07.840
test for everyone landing, so that's a new burden, a new invasion, and a new cost, but there's no upside for
00:04:15.820
passing that test. Why would you do that if there's no upside for finding out that someone's not sick?
00:04:22.840
Why are you insisting that people still quarantine if they are healthy and you know they're healthy?
00:04:29.000
But the other part is weird, too. If people arrive and they have the virus, or so says a test,
00:04:37.820
to make them go to a federal facility, now is that like a jail? Do they have to stay there? How will
00:04:47.980
they eat? What happens if they have to take care of kids? And even more bizarre, that three-day stay
00:04:57.340
will cost, I don't know if we even have all the details, $2,000 for the three-day stay at a federal
00:05:08.040
facility, and who will guard it, and when does this apply, and are these liberal hoteliers, and
00:05:14.460
there's so many, what if you're disabled? What if you need special care? There's so many unknown
00:05:20.500
things, and all I'm thinking of is, why now? Why weren't any strictures put in place from
00:05:27.160
flights from China almost a year ago? You might recall in the early days of the pandemic,
00:05:32.620
we sent our reporter, David Menzies, to Toronto Pearson Airport almost every day, and there were
00:05:37.780
flights arriving from China every day. No one was being tested. No one is being screened. It was an
00:05:43.740
audit system just saying, no, I didn't come. I don't feel sick, and I didn't come from Wuhan. It was
00:05:50.280
insane. Why are we doing this now? Well, we're doing it now to keep you in a state of fear, and
00:05:56.160
we're doing it now because Justin Trudeau has absolutely bungled the one job he has, which is
00:06:04.740
to distribute vaccines to the provinces. Now, I'm skeptical of vaccines. I think that now that we
00:06:10.020
know that the disease is not, it's a 99% plus recovery rate for people under 70, I'm less in panic to get a
00:06:19.600
vaccine, and the idea of rushing a vaccine to market makes me a little nervous. I'm glad I'm under 70
00:06:25.460
and healthy because I don't have to think too much about it, but for those who want the reassurance of
00:06:30.180
the vaccine, those who choose it, those who feel they have to have it, we're all waiting for Justin
00:06:36.280
Trudeau, and he bungled it. He's far behind the United States, the United Kingdom, far behind other
00:06:42.600
jurisdictions, and that was really his only job. You know, for weeks, he never even got his calls
00:06:48.960
returned by these vaccine makers. I think that part of Trudeau's shock and awe announcement today
00:06:55.760
of really penitentiaries, but you're staying in a hotel. Like, are you in jail? Can you leave?
00:07:04.580
We know so little. It was obviously hatched so quickly as a PR move, not a real policy move.
00:07:11.620
But while that was happening, another terrifying thing was happening that I'm afraid will be under
00:07:18.340
the radar. I think Justin Trudeau is appalling, and his talk about mandatory detention centers and
00:07:24.720
having to stay there even if you're, I mean, we don't even know all the details yet. It reminded me
00:07:29.520
of what Teresa Tam said in that National Film Forum documentary a few years back. Remember this?
00:07:34.000
I think the public has to know this is one of the worst case scenarios in terms of an infectious
00:07:39.280
disease outbreak in that their cooperation is sought. If there are people who are non-compliant,
00:07:45.520
there are definitely laws and public health powers that can quarantine people in mandatory
00:07:53.840
settings. It's potential. You could track people, put bracelets on their arms, have police and other
00:08:02.680
setups to ensure quarantine is undertaken. Yeah, that was supposed to be some hypothetical
00:08:08.880
situation that's coming true. But while that was happening as, I think, a distraction and more
00:08:13.900
conditioning us to think of, oh yeah, he's in the quarantine jail, he's in the quarantine jail.
00:08:18.640
Something else was happening under the radar. In parliament, Stephen Gilboa, the heritage minister,
00:08:26.360
was announcing his plans for a new official censor. He called it a new regulator. And it became quickly
00:08:34.420
clear that he chose today because it's the anniversary of when that mosque in Quebec City was attacked by a
00:08:43.600
mass shooter who murdered people who were there at prayer. That's why Stephen Gilboa was in parliament
00:08:50.380
today. And that was his peg, his news peg, to announce that he is going to censor the internet.
00:08:59.820
I am joining you from Montreal on the traditional territory of the Mohawk and other Odessa-Sani peoples.
00:09:07.040
Before I begin, I would like to highlight that four days ago, four years ago today, a shooter
00:09:37.960
During the pandemic, we saw that digital platforms are more than ever at the heart of communications
00:09:48.220
between Canadians and are keeping us connected and informed. Unfortunately, some internet users
00:09:54.720
are also exploiting these platforms maliciously to spread hate, racism, and child pornography.
00:10:01.200
There is currently illegal content being uploaded and shared online to the detriment of Canadians
00:10:09.460
So I heard that, and my spider senses started tingling. I said, this is exactly what he's been
00:10:15.620
working towards for months, is what we did our show about the other day. And then I thought,
00:10:21.200
who is the conservative critic again? I can't really remember. I can't really remember.
00:10:24.640
Okay, it's this guy. So here's the big moment. You've got Stephen Gilboa in Parliament saying
00:10:30.560
he's going to bring in a new regulator to regulate speech, especially what he calls hurtful speech,
00:10:36.320
people who have political opinions he says are dangerous. And what does the conservative critic
00:10:41.680
have to say? Well, can you make any sense of this?
00:10:45.520
Looking into the relationship between your government and Facebook, we're referring to an email
00:10:52.000
that was sent. It led to some confusion, and people are wondering about that. So today,
00:10:58.960
I'm sure we'll be able to clarify the situation. Since you're here, Mr. Minister, I would like to take the
00:11:04.880
time to make a comment about the last time you were at our committee on November 5th, when you asked
00:11:13.200
a simple question. Or rather, we asked you how you did the calculation at your department
00:11:22.960
regarding $830 million of additional investments by 2022. Today, your senior officials are with you again.
00:11:35.680
Here we're talking about information that you shared publicly, even on the Quebec talk show,
00:11:54.080
However, when I have met with major stakeholders in TV and digital sectors,
00:12:01.920
everyone seemed to be confused about how your calculation was done. After November, we did not
00:12:08.560
hear back from your department. And we tabled a resolution which was unanimously accepted
00:12:16.880
in the House, including by your Liberal colleagues, to gain access to that information. As you know,
00:12:24.240
we on our committee are working on a study. And I feel that this information is extremely important. First,
00:12:39.040
so that we can trust that we have access to all relevant information surrounding that project.
00:12:45.920
Next week marks three months since you were asked about that calculation.
00:12:57.680
And I want to ask you today if it is possible for us to have those details now.
00:13:01.680
What was he talking about? This is perhaps the greatest censorship of Canadians since the War Measures Act 50
00:13:11.520
years ago. There were censors in in Quebec newspapers during the War Measures Act. I think this is the
00:13:16.640
greatest censorship since then, probably even bigger than that. This is the probably the largest act of
00:13:22.080
censorship since the Second World War. A whole new position, a regulator for censoring. Did you even
00:13:31.120
understand what the conservative was saying? Well, there was another question. This was put by a Liberal MP.
00:13:36.880
And you can see she's reading. And it doesn't even matter what her name is because they're all
00:13:40.400
interchangeable. She's reading from a prepared script. So she has a question pre-written for her.
00:13:46.720
And Gilboa has an answer pre-written for him. Take a look at this exchange.
00:13:52.880
Thank you, Minister, for being with us today. As you explained in your speech, four years ago today,
00:14:00.800
six people lost their lives. So tonight there will be a prayer held at the Quebec City mosque. I extend
00:14:08.400
my condolences to all families affected. Xenophobia and Islamophobia motivated this attack.
00:14:16.160
The attacker had been radicalized using social media. We know that Canadians are often exposed to
00:14:24.160
hateful, extremist, or even radicalizing content on digital platforms.
00:14:35.120
In your mandate letter, regulating digital platforms is included. I would like for you to give us an
00:14:44.880
update on the essential work the government is carrying out to protect Canadians online.
00:14:57.840
We have discovered something. And to that end, on Radio Canada's website this morning,
00:15:03.040
there was an article about radicalization on online platforms.
00:15:09.920
In particular, the attacker from January 29th, four years ago.
00:15:20.800
Our initiative is a joint initiative between a number of departments, including Heritage Canada,
00:15:30.720
the Justice Department, Public Safety, and the Innovation Department. We're working together
00:15:36.560
to table a new bill, which will define a regulatory framework on hate speech, but also on child pornography
00:15:48.720
and content that incites people to violence. Currently,
00:15:54.560
we see that few countries in the world have tackled this problem. Some have.
00:16:06.960
We are having meetings in the public service and at government levels with those countries that are
00:16:13.280
acting to see what they are doing and see how we can adapt their approaches to the Canadian reality.
00:16:19.520
Recently, I had a conversation with Australia's e-safety commissioner to understand how they implemented their program,
00:16:37.120
For example, there are concerns surrounding freedom of expression,
00:16:50.880
which has been an important part of Canadian laws over history. So we will look at how to
00:16:58.720
reproduce the same framework in the physical world, in the virtual world. Thank you very much,
00:17:04.480
Mr. Minister, for all of this work that you are carrying out day in, day out to better protect
00:17:09.760
Canadians on digital platforms. So this whole thing was a stage-managed exercise to announce to the
00:17:15.440
world, while Trudeau's off distracting with some, you know, quarantine prisons, that Gilboa is bringing in
00:17:22.240
a new office of censorship. And it was all crafted, the messaging, the timing of the day,
00:17:27.440
the softball questions. And the conservative critic was like he was in another conversation, like he was
00:17:34.720
in another planet. It was not like he was in charge of criticizing for the official opposition on behalf
00:17:42.320
of every conservative voter, and indeed every voter of every stripe, who cares about our fundamental
00:17:47.040
freedoms of free speech. He just didn't talk about it. These are dangerous days.
00:17:53.040
Welcome back. Well, if you were with us on the evening of the U.S. presidential election, you'll remember
00:18:13.120
our key commentator that night was our friend Ben Weingarten of The Federalist. And there were moments
00:18:20.000
that night where I allowed my heart to hope when the results in key states, whether it's Georgia
00:18:27.520
or Pennsylvania, showed that Donald Trump was set to win. And then strange things started to happen,
00:18:34.240
including vote counting being stopped, huge caches of votes being found. You're not allowed to talk
00:18:39.600
about that or you'll be deplatformed by the social media companies. But that was the last time we had a
00:18:45.600
long chat with Ben. We've talked to him a couple times since. But I'm delighted to say that Ben has a
00:18:51.040
new show and the pilot episode was just released. He calls his show Bad News. And I'm depressed just
00:19:01.760
hearing the title. But joining us now via Skype is Bad News Benjamin. Ben, how you doing?
00:19:07.920
Ezra, I'm well. And while I know it sort of has a negative connotation to it, I promise it'll be
00:19:16.160
entertaining, enjoyable. And if the world is burning down around us, at least we'll be able to have a
00:19:20.400
few laughs about it. Well, I want to say thanks again for you staying up super late with us that
00:19:25.120
night on election night. And there was that moment. I remember we looked at how betting futures were
00:19:30.640
looking and how the stock market was looking. There was maybe an hour there where things looked like he
00:19:36.240
might pull it off. But alas. Now, I think that bad news is sort of a pun, isn't it? You're not saying,
00:19:42.000
hey, guys, I've got bad news. Is it more a media criticism? You're calling the mainstream media.
00:19:48.000
Oh, that news? No, no, no, that's bad. That's that's you can't rely on it. That's it's another way of saying
00:19:53.280
like unreliable news or the news itself. The news media is bad. Am I right in understanding the
00:20:00.560
the hidden meaning in your in your new show's title? Yeah, it's at least a double entendre,
00:20:05.920
maybe a triple entendre. And we had, of course, considered fake news as one potential show. But
00:20:12.160
I think this captures really the entirety of it, which is that it's not just the substance
00:20:17.760
of what our betters in the corporate media are portraying. But it is actually as well,
00:20:22.880
they're sort of malign ends. And I think sort of the meta narrative, at least that from my perspective,
00:20:28.960
that governs the show. And my co-host Emily Jashinsky has her own view on this as well. My
00:20:34.160
view is that the corporate media has essentially become the communications arm of the ruling class.
00:20:41.200
It is part of the ruling class. It's not adversarial to it. It's an accessory of it. It doesn't question
00:20:48.160
the powerful. It has become the mouthpiece for the powerful. And so what we hope to do with this show
00:20:54.000
is to expose it every single day. I think you're exactly right. I mean,
00:20:58.160
I often noted that one of the most beautiful women in the world, Melania Trump,
00:21:04.960
never was on a single cover of a women's magazine, a fashion magazine. Michelle Obama,
00:21:13.680
and I'm not going to criticize her looks, but she was on the cover of dozens, maybe hundreds of
00:21:20.480
women's magazines, fashion magazines. But not Melania, an actual model. There was an obvious
00:21:27.760
tactic of taking, let's say, a hundred photographs of Melania and capturing the one where she wasn't
00:21:35.120
smiling. So at the very least, it made her less attractive. And at most, it would imply, oh,
00:21:40.720
she's not happy with Donald Trump either. And I mention all that because that kind of coverage,
00:21:45.840
which we had for four years has been replaced with absolute hagiographies, absolute fangirl,
00:21:53.280
fanboy love letters. It's just incredible. And I think they're counting on most people not to notice
00:22:00.960
the 180 degree change. Yeah. And in the process, I think they're really discrediting themselves for
00:22:08.160
anyone who goes in with eyes open and looks at the media. And I grant, rightfully so, the American
00:22:14.480
people overwhelmingly do not trust the media with writ large, with good reason. And it's in no small
00:22:20.800
part because this is a media that, remember, said that the only scandal in the Obama administration
00:22:26.400
was the fact that he wore a tan suit to a press conference once. They're simply on one level,
00:22:32.560
they're unserious. On another level, they are deathly serious about protecting and preserving
00:22:38.080
the power of the people whose narratives they spin and propagate to the world. They want to maintain
00:22:44.560
access to the powerful. They want to be accepted at all the cool cocktail parties in D.C., New York,
00:22:50.560
L.A., and around the country. But ultimately, the American people suffer it as they foist effectively
00:22:56.880
these information operations on us that are all about, again, keeping the powerful
00:23:02.240
in power. There was a time where there truly was at least some percentage of the media that
00:23:06.720
was adversarial. And of course, there are always self-interested people in media who are not going
00:23:11.040
to pursue hard-hitting stories. They're just going to try to curry favor with those in the political
00:23:17.040
class and the business world and beyond. But now, everyone is on the same team. And as a consequence,
00:23:23.200
truth really does die. Democracy really does die in darkness, as the Washington Post likes to tell us.
00:23:28.880
But they've been engaging in projection over it for the last four years. What we're seeing right now
00:23:35.360
Mm-hmm. You're right. You know, I'm not... What's Joe Biden? Is Joe Biden 78, if I'm not mistaken?
00:23:43.440
I'm 48, so he's got 30 years on me. And I find myself sometimes pausing for one second before we're
00:23:51.680
calling a name that, you know, probably 10 years ago, I wouldn't have had a second's pause. And I
00:23:57.600
mention that because we all get old and we all get a little bit more forgetful. But I remember when
00:24:01.520
Donald Trump would host one, two-hour-long press conferences, especially in the early days of the
00:24:08.480
pandemic, he would seriously stand there for an hour or 90 minutes fielding questions from the most
00:24:17.360
adversarial... Like, he kept calling on his haters. It's not like... I mean, he expressed his
00:24:22.400
antipathy towards them. But he never stopped calling on Jim Acosta of CNN, for example. He just
00:24:28.000
never stopped. And the point I'm making now is he always called them by name, or at least quite often.
00:24:35.120
There was no doubt that Trump was fully in command of his faculties. And he would remember the names of
00:24:41.440
at least the leading lights. One tiny change that I think shows so much is that Joe Biden is not the
00:24:49.120
one calling the reporters by name. He has an assistant there, a staffer, who calls them by name.
00:24:58.880
And I really think, Ben, it's because Joe Biden doesn't remember the names. Maybe he doesn't even
00:25:05.600
remember who they are at all. Now, maybe I'm focusing on a tiny, minute point. But just like the
00:25:12.720
Melania Trump was never on a magazine cover, talking about a press aide calling people by name
00:25:20.080
shows that we have a president of a much lower cognitive level. His staff are covering it up,
00:25:27.760
and the media are going along with it. There was a question the other day about Biden and Putin,
00:25:33.760
and Biden's answer was chippy and chirpy and angry. If Trump would have had such an answer,
00:25:40.480
it would have never been accepted for a heartbeat. You can see it in the little things as much as the
00:25:45.040
big things. When does the Russian collusion investigation get started when it comes to Joe
00:25:50.640
and Hunter and the rest of the Mary Biden corrupt band? Look, I think that your point is very well
00:25:56.960
taken that sometimes these little insights have very big substantive significance. And you simply
00:26:04.160
have to ask the question, look, at every single turn in the Biden so-called quote unquote campaign,
00:26:10.960
and I say that because it was essentially like a 19th century campaign run from his porch,
00:26:15.920
except just in his basement via Zoom. At every point, it has been a hermetically sealed
00:26:22.640
campaigner and then president-elect and now president. And the archetype, or if you wanted
00:26:29.440
to describe kind of what the prototypical Biden press conference, if you can even call it that,
00:26:34.000
looks like today, it's about 10 minutes of prepared remarks, five minutes of which they're actually
00:26:39.360
intelligible, and the rest is sort of gobbledygook. One person asks a question. He says, come on,
00:26:44.720
man, in response. And then his team shoes everyone out of the room. So he never takes a question.
00:26:51.120
Everything is staged, managed. It's all prepared. Like you said, he's not the one calling the
00:26:55.360
reporters by name. Can he handle being pushed under questioning? Unclear. Are they protecting
00:27:02.400
him because it'd be embarrassing if he was able to go off script? That's probably an element of it as
00:27:06.480
well. But I actually think a couple media sources have dropped the mask a little bit on this. And I
00:27:11.440
believe Politico and maybe The Hill as well have at least quoted unnamed Democratic sources who have
00:27:17.440
said, look, there's real concern about can Joe Biden handle a 20 minute Rose Garden press conference
00:27:23.360
and going back and forth jousting with the press. The fact that that's even being leaked out and
00:27:30.640
filtered into publications, to me, indicates that while Joe Biden is being treated as God incarnated
00:27:37.680
today by the media, it's very clear that they are paving a path where down the road,
00:27:44.720
they may push him aside essentially in some sort of semi-dignified fashion. And there's been some talk
00:27:51.680
out there about the fact that if you look at the constitution, a vice president could technically
00:27:56.160
serve 10 years. If Joe Biden served as president two years and one day and then stepped down and Kamala
00:28:02.240
Harris assumed the seat, she could then run for the next two consecutive terms and potentially be
00:28:08.000
president for 10 years. So I think it's something to keep in mind as we watch the media engage in the
00:28:12.880
hagiography as you so aptly describe it. Let's see over time how much the questions of fitness, mental
00:28:20.880
acuity, health and the like start to become filter through the narratives. I'm not saying that it's going
00:28:27.040
to be the dominant part of media coverage because it's a love affair for now and for the foreseeable
00:28:31.760
future. But there's also a love affair going with Kamala Harris as well. And so I suspect as time
00:28:36.720
goes on, you'll see this transition from Biden to Harris in what he's referred to inaptly as the
00:28:44.080
Harris Biden or maybe aptly as the Harris Biden administration a couple of times. Now, with Donald
00:28:50.800
Trump, there were other forces resisting him. And that's not a conspiracy theory. I mean, so many of
00:28:56.640
his senior staff picks who turned out, personnel picks turned out to be awful. He had to fire them.
00:29:02.240
And later on, they made it very clear they were grudging appointees who were working to slow him
00:29:07.680
down, undermine him. That was particularly true in the military and in the intelligence and the security
00:29:13.640
communities. I mean, they didn't want to withdraw troops from Afghanistan or Syria or other places
00:29:19.920
around the world. And after they were no longer serving the president, they made that crystal clear.
00:29:26.400
So there were people who were resisting Trump from within the administration or the civil service.
00:29:33.120
But as far as the actual official administration, I don't think there was any doubt that Trump was the
00:29:40.800
boss. He would sack people like it was on The Apprentice. He would say dramatic things and take
00:29:46.800
dramatic courses of action that only Trump would or could do. He would handle those long
00:29:52.960
press scrums. And I'm not saying he would do them all perfectly, but you could tell he was engaged in
00:29:58.080
the files. It was like Stephen Harper in Canada. The man knew the file better than anyone else in
00:30:02.880
government. So whatever else you have to say about Trump, he was in charge. I don't think anyone
00:30:09.120
believes that about Joe Biden. He's not the master of any file. And so my question to you is,
00:30:14.560
and I'm guessing you don't know and no one knows, who's the real boss? No one actually asked during
00:30:23.120
Trump's administration who's the real boss. They knew it was Trump. He had mutineers, but he was the
00:30:27.760
boss. Who's the real decider in the White House today? I have two takes on that question. The first is
00:30:39.280
that to some extent, Joe Biden is merely a figurehead and he was always sort of a figurehead compromise
00:30:46.880
candidate who would put a quote unquote moderate veneer on all the raft of radical leftism that you
00:30:55.760
see if you just look at the Democrat platform or you look at the Biden-Sanders unity agenda, much of the
00:31:01.520
language of which, by the way, has been incorporated into this flurry of initial executive actions that the
00:31:08.560
Biden administration has undertaken. But I think part of foisting Joe Biden on the American people
00:31:14.400
in terms of clearing the field for him, which the Democratic establishment clearly was able to
00:31:18.720
execute during the primary, and then as we get to this point today, I think is all about the fact that
00:31:25.280
basically the establishment was showing we can beat you with anyone, anytime, anywhere. We control them.
00:31:32.240
It wouldn't matter if it was Joe Biden or any of five other figures that were in that primary or beyond.
00:31:38.560
This would be the slew of policies that would be put forth. So part of it is he is sort of an
00:31:42.960
inconsequential figure in some ways and purely a figurehead. My second response is personnel is
00:31:50.320
policy. And if you look at who he surrounded himself with, it's essentially all veterans of the
00:31:54.960
Obama Biden administration. It's my view that Barack Obama essentially pushed to, and it didn't have to
00:32:02.800
be something that was explicit, but I think he called the Kamala Harris selection as vice president,
00:32:08.320
you know, an inspired choice, an excellent choice. I think it was always Obama's push to get Kamala
00:32:14.400
Harris on that ticket. I think the fact that Biden is surrounded by Obama veterans speaks volumes.
00:32:20.480
And I do believe that this is essentially a continuation of his White House.
00:32:25.200
You know, I think that's right. I don't think Joe Biden was an important or effective vice president.
00:32:30.160
I don't think he ever had the trust or the love of Barack Obama. I think there's lots of apocryphal
00:32:36.560
and off the record and some on the record reports that Obama sort of sneered at and laughed at
00:32:47.600
Joe Biden, but kept him around because he was that goofy guy with that smile and saying,
00:32:51.200
come on, no malarkey. So I think that Obama never respected Biden. He waited till the last possible
00:32:58.960
moment to say, yeah, I'm for Biden. Like he wasn't an earlier booster. I think that Joe Biden was a
00:33:05.040
figurehead even as VP. And I think that really nothing has changed other than he's a figurehead
00:33:12.560
president. I think you're so right. It's the same administration as it was in the Obama years.
00:33:19.200
They've just moved the figurehead guy up a notch, but nothing's really changed. I think that's,
00:33:26.560
I appreciate that. And then it's a great point that Obama never really wanted to support Biden
00:33:31.680
until he absolutely had to at the end. And I think one other point that's worth making
00:33:37.280
is Biden is being portrayed as sort of a return to normalcy. But look, I think that the political
00:33:43.440
establishment has been in command to the maximum extent possible perpetually. And that's not in any
00:33:49.760
way to talk down about what President Trump was able to accomplish, because he accomplished an
00:33:55.920
incredible amount of elements of his agenda, in spite of the fact that, as you noted, he was essentially
00:34:01.920
sabotaged and undermined at every turn. And it's really a small coterie of people in government
00:34:06.960
who actually agreed with most of his agenda and actually helped him execute it. But I think the
00:34:11.280
entire time, the establishment that what I would call now the rolling class, because it really
00:34:17.040
extends beyond just the political elite to now woke capital and corporate media and beyond. Ultimately,
00:34:24.960
they really, they've been in power the whole time. They just did not have the top job, but they did
00:34:28.880
everything they possibly could to destroy the man who had the top job. And now they're fully back in
00:34:34.480
power. And that's there's sort of a depressing aspect to it, because it means that the administrative
00:34:39.440
state essentially really runs the show. Congress essentially is involved in political theater and
00:34:45.360
non-entities. And essentially, you don't really have consent of the governed. And that's one of the
00:34:50.400
disasters about the fact that the president didn't really have a second term to more fully implement
00:34:55.680
his agenda. I think you're right. There you have it, Ben Weingarten, who has a new show called
00:35:02.480
Bad News, along with his co-host, Emily Jashinsky. Great to see you again, Ben. Thanks for being here.
00:35:08.160
Thanks for having me. All right. There you have it. Stay with us for more.
00:35:10.720
My friends, I do want to tell you one more thing about what we've been working on. And I spent half
00:35:29.440
the day speaking all for all say, and I think you're going to get a kick out of it. You know,
00:35:35.920
we have a very strong Fight the Fines program throughout Canada. And we've done some in
00:35:41.040
Australia and the United Kingdom. I'm not ready to play you the video today. I will be on Monday.
00:35:47.680
But we spent the day making a video en Francais, because we are about to expand our Fight the Fines
00:35:55.600
project to Quebec. And as I said, en Francais. Well, let me read that part, if I may.
00:36:20.400
My French is pretty rough. It's sort of Preston Manning French. What that means is,
00:36:26.080
surely, if we will help people in other countries,
00:36:29.520
countries like Australia and the United Kingdom, surely when it comes to civil liberties,
00:36:35.280
we can help our brothers and sisters in Quebec. And so I'm very excited to tell you,
00:36:40.320
our super subscribers, that we are about to launch, and I recorded it en Francais today,
00:36:46.800
we are about to launch a French language Fight the Fines project with lawyers who speak French in the
00:36:53.120
great province of Quebec that has the brutal curfew and the brutal lockdowns.
00:36:58.880
My friends, we will help them. And I think it'll be a wonderful moment of national unity. I don't
00:37:04.000
care what language you speak, what race you are, what religion you are. I don't care anything other
00:37:07.920
than you believe in freedom and you have an innate right to be free. And I think this will be a wonderful
00:37:15.280
opportunity for a Toronto guy born in Alberta to work with people in Quebec. And I'm counting on all
00:37:21.600
our rebel viewers around Canada and the world to get into the spirit of helping other people with
00:37:28.480
civil liberties. I hope it works. Anyways, you'll see. I don't want to tell you the website right
00:37:31.920
now because we're still tinkering with it, but we've got a French language website too. All right. Well,
00:37:36.640
I'm interested in your thoughts on that, but also the rest of the bad news that we've had
00:37:41.200
for civil liberties today, both Trudeau sending people to quarantine jails and of course the big
00:37:45.920
one, Stephen Gilbo announcing the end of internet freedom and the conservative MP really asking where
00:37:53.680
he is and what time it is. My friends, that's the show for today. I'm sorry it was a little bit
00:37:58.240
truncated, but boy, we have a lot of things afoot until Monday. On behalf of all of us here at Rebel
00:38:03.600
World Headquarters to you and have a good night and keep fighting for freedom.