Rebel News Podcast - November 17, 2018


Canada’s largest journalism union announces it will campaign against the Conservative Party


Episode Stats

Length

32 minutes

Words per Minute

170.48674

Word Count

5,596

Sentence Count

193

Misogynist Sentences

11

Hate Speech Sentences

13


Summary

On this episode of the Ezra Levenant Show, Ezra takes a look at the latest front cover of Canadian conservative leader Andrew Scheer's campaign against the Conservatives. Plus, why is there no Canadian Prime Minister on the cover of a conservative magazine?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Tonight, Canada's largest journalism union announces it will campaign against the Conservatives.
00:00:06.160 I appreciate their honesty. It's November 16th and this is the Ezra LeVant Show.
00:00:16.400 Why should others go to jail when you're a biggest carbon consumer I know?
00:00:20.280 There's 8,500 customers here and you won't give them an answer.
00:00:24.000 You come here once a year with a sign and you feel morally superior.
00:00:26.980 The only thing I have to say to the government about why I publish it is because it's my bloody right to do so.
00:00:38.060 Here's the front cover of a recent copy of Maclean's magazine.
00:00:42.160 You might not know who they all are.
00:00:44.520 That's Andrew Scheer, the federal conservative leader in the middle there.
00:00:48.220 To his right is Jason Kenney, the Alberta opposition leader who will probably be Alberta's premier next year.
00:00:53.580 And the other is from left to right. Obviously, it's Doug Ford, premier of Ontario.
00:00:57.700 Then that's Brian Pallister of Manitoba.
00:01:00.380 And on the right there, that's Scott Moe of Saskatchewan.
00:01:04.240 They're against the carbon tax and that's the theme of the story.
00:01:07.400 Now, Maclean's magazine isn't really a thing anymore.
00:01:09.940 They used to be published weekly.
00:01:11.340 They were once the leading news magazine in Canada.
00:01:13.840 That's not even a thing anymore.
00:01:15.940 Now, Maclean's barely publishes once a month.
00:01:19.020 And most of its staff has just been let go.
00:01:21.900 And Rogers, which owns it, has put it up for sale.
00:01:24.880 I guess you could say it's sad, but that's what happened to a lot of magazines.
00:01:29.720 And Maclean's really lost its way.
00:01:30.940 This cover is an anomaly that they have any conservatives on it at all.
00:01:35.220 Normally, it's just liberal propaganda.
00:01:38.180 I mean, seriously, Donald Trump ate our lunch in an afternoon renegotiation.
00:01:43.000 But they called our disastrous negotiator God's gift to Canada.
00:01:47.660 It was so cringeworthy.
00:01:50.120 Yikes.
00:01:50.600 I've lost track of how many of their covers feature loving pictures of Trudeau on them.
00:01:56.140 I guess they thought that everyone in Canada just loves Trudeau as much as they do.
00:02:01.800 But the fact that they're being sold for scraps suggests otherwise.
00:02:04.920 Oh, well.
00:02:05.880 Back to the latest cover, the resistance with those five conservatives on the cover.
00:02:10.000 I'm not sure why those leaders posed for that picture the way they did.
00:02:14.540 Put it back up on the screen for a second.
00:02:16.280 Let's show it.
00:02:17.740 Does it look like a sign of strength?
00:02:20.240 Yeah, maybe.
00:02:20.880 I think it makes them look like a group of bankers or something.
00:02:23.760 Almost the Libranos looking tough, stiff, and angry.
00:02:27.500 Maybe that's what they want to telegraph?
00:02:29.140 To tap into voter anger at things?
00:02:31.760 I don't know.
00:02:32.440 My view is that you can never trust the mainstream media to be fair to you,
00:02:36.500 especially with photos.
00:02:38.820 Especially.
00:02:39.200 I mean, take the gorgeous Melania Trump.
00:02:44.900 These are covers of her before she was first lady.
00:02:49.820 She was a supermodel.
00:02:51.560 She graced every fashion magazine in her day.
00:02:55.300 You'd think that now that she's first lady,
00:02:58.340 the media would feast on her beauty and her style.
00:03:01.700 She's exotic, speaks many languages.
00:03:03.880 But she has not been on a single cover of a fashion magazine or a popular magazine in two years.
00:03:12.560 I mean, she's gorgeous, obviously.
00:03:14.900 The somewhat less compelling Michelle Obama was constantly on covers as first lady.
00:03:22.140 Every magazine thinkable.
00:03:24.140 Every magazine thinkable.
00:03:25.140 Why not Melania?
00:03:26.140 Melania.
00:03:28.620 And when Melania is photographed at all, the only pictures that ever make it to publication are those with her not smiling.
00:03:35.960 We all have moments in the day where we're not smiling.
00:03:38.560 Those are the only ones that are used.
00:03:39.960 There is a strong media narrative that Melania is deeply unhappy,
00:03:43.920 that she is somehow trapped in her marriage to Donald Trump or something.
00:03:47.400 It's pure fiction.
00:03:48.360 The media speculation went nuts when she wasn't seen with Trump for a few days,
00:03:52.480 only to have it revealed that she had been in the hospital with minor surgery.
00:03:56.680 If you go on Google, you can actually find plenty of happy pictures with Melania and Donald Trump smiling at each other.
00:04:04.800 But you have never seen them on CNN or CBC or the Globe and Mail, the Toronto Star.
00:04:09.820 The narrative is that she is either evil herself or that she is deeply happy and actually trapped by Donald Trump.
00:04:17.340 And will someone please free her or something?
00:04:19.820 Oh, by the way, has Sophie Trudeau been photographed within 10 feet of Justin Trudeau lately?
00:04:28.600 Not that I have seen.
00:04:29.580 Melania was out of the public eye for a week and the conspiracy theories went nuts.
00:04:34.900 They were getting a divorce.
00:04:36.500 No such curiosity about Sophie Trudeau's invisibility.
00:04:39.780 I think their grand family vacation to India at taxpayers' expense was really their last quality time together.
00:04:47.700 I'm not in the gossip business, but the rest of the media is.
00:04:51.320 They're quiet on Sophie Trudeau, though, aren't they?
00:04:54.320 All of those points are my long-witted tangents about McLean's and photo editing.
00:05:00.240 But really, I wanted to show you that resistance front cover that I think looked a bit daunting, a bit wrong.
00:05:08.460 I don't think it looks good, but I could be mistaken.
00:05:10.540 Maybe I'm wrong.
00:05:10.920 But what is not mistakable is how many people mocked that pose with satirical takes of their own.
00:05:21.800 Again, that goes to my theory that it was a bad picture to take, deliberately embarrassing and mockable.
00:05:28.860 I could be wrong.
00:05:30.520 But really, it is highly mockable.
00:05:32.880 It is.
00:05:33.760 Or memeable, as the kids say.
00:05:36.380 And one of those memes was made by a big union called Unifor.
00:05:43.320 And you can see the president of Unifor in the middle there.
00:05:47.320 His name is Jerry Diaz.
00:05:49.120 Other executives with him.
00:05:50.220 And you can see their caption, the resistance.
00:05:51.940 Same font as the cover of McLean's.
00:05:54.480 Welcome to Andrew Scheer's worst nightmare.
00:05:57.860 And that was tweeted on the official Unifor Twitter account.
00:06:01.080 So not a lot of doubt about whose side that union is on.
00:06:04.640 They will surely register as a third-party campaign group in the upcoming election to re-elect Trudeau.
00:06:10.900 You'll recall that Jerry Diaz was actually part of Justin Trudeau's disastrous advisory committee on the NAFTA deal.
00:06:17.760 So Trudeau and Diaz are already buddies.
00:06:19.860 But apparently, every single member of Unifor is now being conscripted into being a liberal, too, with their union dues, like it or not.
00:06:32.100 Now, I don't know how many conservatives are working for Unifor.
00:06:35.560 Probably a bunch, at least in Alberta, especially in the oil sands.
00:06:38.620 I don't know how many NDPers are in Unifor.
00:06:41.760 But whatever.
00:06:43.260 They have to pay their union dues so that Jerry Diaz can act out being Andrew Scheer's worst enemy.
00:06:50.260 And just in case it wasn't clear enough, Diaz retweeted it again.
00:06:54.260 Again, we will stop Scheer's stupidity.
00:06:58.120 Oh, that's a pun.
00:06:59.740 That's a pun, everybody.
00:07:02.540 But here's the thing.
00:07:04.980 Unifor represents thousands of Canadian journalists, as in reporters.
00:07:11.540 There's a reporters union.
00:07:12.660 Sort of weird, but there is one.
00:07:14.580 Those reporters cover Andrew Scheer professionally as a subject in the news.
00:07:21.340 News reporters on TV, news reporters in newspapers.
00:07:24.620 Here's the Unifor handbook to their reporters union.
00:07:29.460 If you skip ahead to page six, you'll see a list of some of the news reporters who are part of Unifor, the union.
00:07:37.960 I'm going to read three full paragraphs here, just so you see how widespread this is.
00:07:42.760 So don't get bored.
00:07:43.640 I just want to read it to you.
00:07:45.400 Local 87M represents the bulk of members at some of the largest national and provincial dailies,
00:07:52.780 including the Globe and Mail, Toronto Star, London Free Press, the Toronto Sun, and Hamilton Spectator.
00:07:57.020 On the West Coast, Local 2000 represents members of the Vancouver Sun in the province,
00:08:02.080 as well as at various Glacier, Black Press, and Continental-owned newspapers across B.C.
00:08:07.980 as well as some print shops.
00:08:10.740 Local 191 represents workers at five different newspapers,
00:08:13.960 including the Winnipeg Free Press, Brandon Sun, Thunder Bay Chronicle, Lethbridge Herald, and the Winnipeg Sun.
00:08:19.400 Local 145 represents members in Quebec, including Le Tribune newspaper in Sherbrooke.
00:08:24.600 In the broadcast sector, Unifor is best known as the Local TV Union Local M1,
00:08:30.040 represents global TV stations across Canada, as well as independent stations CHCH Hamilton and Check TV in Victoria.
00:08:35.680 A variety of other vocals represent local TV staff at Bell Media, CTV, Rogers, Patterson,
00:08:41.500 and other independent TV and radio stations.
00:08:43.960 I'll stop there.
00:08:44.920 But that's pretty much almost everybody.
00:08:48.160 I'll mention another union in a moment that's just as bad,
00:08:50.700 and they cover off a lot of the rest of the media, including the CBC.
00:08:54.020 But basically, the reporters of the Globe and Mail and CTV and the Toronto Star,
00:08:59.440 well, they have announced they're going to war.
00:09:04.400 They are campaigning against some of the people they claim they're reporting on neutrally,
00:09:09.800 the Conservatives.
00:09:10.460 And they're going to war on behalf of some of the people they claim they're reporting on neutrally,
00:09:16.620 the Liberals.
00:09:18.260 Now, obviously, they don't represent everyone in the Union.
00:09:21.920 I listed the Toronto Sun there.
00:09:23.660 I can't believe they're all Trudeau lovers there at the Sun.
00:09:26.740 But can you show me a single journalist anywhere in Canada
00:09:30.040 who is actually doing anything about this outrage,
00:09:33.280 moving a motion at a union meeting to vote against this, to rescind this,
00:09:37.460 I don't know, running to be a shop steward
00:09:40.860 or running to be the president of a union local
00:09:43.660 to put a stop to this politicization of the union,
00:09:46.960 maybe even suing or threatening to sue the union
00:09:49.780 for forcing them to campaign against someone they're reporting on,
00:09:53.520 even starting a new politically nonpartisan rival union for political journalists?
00:10:00.260 Not one.
00:10:01.800 Don't be silly.
00:10:02.620 I mean, you can't even imagine if they had done the opposite,
00:10:07.100 endorsed a conservative.
00:10:08.360 That's not even physically, scientifically possible.
00:10:11.700 It would never happen.
00:10:13.280 And if it did happen, there would be judicial inquiries
00:10:16.060 about the independence of the media and election meddling.
00:10:19.720 I mean, I just showed you in that little graphic by Jerry Diaz
00:10:23.020 more evidence of journalistic meddling in the Canadian election
00:10:26.840 than there is evidence of Russian meddling in the election, don't you think?
00:10:30.780 But this isn't even news.
00:10:33.600 Here's a list of the super PACs, to use a U.S. phrase,
00:10:37.600 the third-party campaign groups who registered with Elections Canada
00:10:40.840 to campaign against Stephen Harper in the 2015 election.
00:10:44.380 As you can see, there's over 100 here,
00:10:47.120 and it's a list of any groups who campaigned in the last election,
00:10:50.680 but I went through them, and all of them,
00:10:52.960 except for one that I could identify,
00:10:55.360 were against Harper.
00:10:56.360 There's too many to even list.
00:10:57.740 It's over 100.
00:10:59.660 You can see Unifor on there, of course.
00:11:02.280 They were obviously campaigning against Harper last time,
00:11:04.880 along with a ton of other public sector unions
00:11:07.360 and environmental groups.
00:11:08.780 Millions of dollars in dark money.
00:11:11.040 There's even some American groups in there.
00:11:13.140 You could also see another group on that list
00:11:15.720 of anti-Harper super PACs called the Canadian Media Guild.
00:11:20.420 That's the other big media union in Canada
00:11:22.860 that I alluded to earlier.
00:11:24.440 It mainly represents the CBC
00:11:26.660 and the Canadian Press Newswire service
00:11:30.200 and some fringe sites like Vice News.
00:11:32.660 So I shouldn't just blame Unifor.
00:11:35.360 The other big media union,
00:11:37.660 the Canadian Media Guild,
00:11:39.440 in some ways is even worse.
00:11:41.780 They're just not quite as stupid
00:11:44.160 about bragging about their partisanship
00:11:46.800 as mouthy Jerry Diaz is,
00:11:49.480 but I'm glad he's so mouthy now, I know.
00:11:52.620 But here's my point.
00:11:53.580 If you have a reporter from the CBC,
00:11:56.460 from Canadian Press, from CTV, from Global,
00:11:59.380 from the Global Mail, from the Toronto Star,
00:12:00.880 or any of a dozen others,
00:12:02.600 and if they are literally paying money
00:12:04.700 from their own pocket
00:12:05.900 to fight against the Conservatives in the election,
00:12:08.460 again, this isn't like some big media tycoon
00:12:10.540 editorially endorsing some candidate.
00:12:14.420 This is the ordinary working journalists themselves
00:12:17.320 spending their own personal money,
00:12:19.980 their union dues this way.
00:12:22.780 I'm sorry, how can you trust them
00:12:24.020 to report it straight on TV or in the papers?
00:12:27.480 It would be like someone who, I don't know,
00:12:29.300 worked for General Motors
00:12:31.120 or had a lot of stock in General Motors stock
00:12:34.020 doing an independent review
00:12:35.700 of the best cars and trucks out there.
00:12:37.160 If they hate Ford and love GM,
00:12:40.240 you can't really trust their reportage, can you?
00:12:42.540 And at the very least,
00:12:43.440 they should disclose their conflict of interest,
00:12:46.120 don't you think?
00:12:48.000 Don't you think journalists
00:12:49.060 who dip into their own wallet
00:12:50.220 to pay for a hate Harper campaign
00:12:52.900 or a hate Andrew Scheer campaign
00:12:54.840 or a hate Conservatives campaign,
00:12:57.180 don't you think they should have a little asterisk
00:12:59.040 with a footnote,
00:13:01.280 a little disclosure on TV
00:13:03.220 that they're actually part
00:13:05.840 of a political campaign themselves?
00:13:07.420 They're not neutral at all?
00:13:09.540 I think they should.
00:13:10.960 But then again,
00:13:11.460 I'm not part of a journalist union
00:13:12.860 and I'm not part of a political party.
00:13:16.280 You always suspected
00:13:17.520 you couldn't trust the mainstream media.
00:13:21.260 Now you have proof.
00:13:23.840 Stay with us for more.
00:13:24.900 Delivering Brexit involves difficult choices
00:13:43.820 for all of us.
00:13:44.940 We do not agree on all of those choices,
00:13:47.220 but I respect their views
00:13:48.580 and I would like to thank them sincerely
00:13:50.580 for all that they have done.
00:13:53.060 Mr Speaker,
00:13:53.900 yesterday we agreed
00:13:54.980 the provisional terms
00:13:56.020 of our exit from the European Union
00:13:57.680 set out in the draft withdrawal agreement.
00:14:00.540 We also agreed
00:14:01.380 the broad terms
00:14:02.200 of our future relationship
00:14:03.380 in an outline political declaration.
00:14:06.560 President Juncker
00:14:07.260 has now written
00:14:07.980 to the President of the European Council
00:14:09.740 to recommend
00:14:10.780 that decisive progress
00:14:12.000 has been made
00:14:12.800 in the negotiations
00:14:13.660 and a special European Council
00:14:15.800 will be called
00:14:16.480 for Sunday the 25th of November.
00:14:19.440 This puts us close
00:14:20.620 to a Brexit deal.
00:14:22.340 Well,
00:14:22.820 that is from the United Kingdom
00:14:24.240 which is going through
00:14:25.240 a political meltdown
00:14:26.840 over Brexit.
00:14:29.320 Brexit was a referendum.
00:14:31.140 In fact,
00:14:31.540 it was sort of a premonition
00:14:32.940 of the earthquake
00:14:34.120 that would put Donald Trump
00:14:35.280 into office.
00:14:35.840 It was designed
00:14:36.740 to get the United Kingdom
00:14:38.280 out of the European Union.
00:14:39.820 Well,
00:14:39.880 it's been more than two years
00:14:40.940 and they're still in
00:14:42.840 and the Tory party
00:14:44.360 is coming apart over it.
00:14:45.560 Joining us now via Skype
00:14:46.600 to help us understand
00:14:47.780 what's going on
00:14:48.620 is our reporter
00:14:49.840 in London,
00:14:50.580 Jack Buckby.
00:14:52.040 Jack,
00:14:52.560 what the heck
00:14:53.340 is going on
00:14:54.240 in the United Kingdom?
00:14:56.440 What's the latest
00:14:57.340 with Brexit?
00:14:58.340 What's going on
00:14:59.180 with Theresa May?
00:15:00.640 Is she going to be
00:15:01.540 Prime Minister
00:15:01.980 much longer?
00:15:02.660 Is there going to be
00:15:03.300 an election?
00:15:03.820 Just help us out here a bit.
00:15:05.880 Yeah,
00:15:06.380 I'll do my best
00:15:07.360 to summarize this
00:15:08.180 because it's pretty complicated.
00:15:09.620 Basically,
00:15:09.940 we're meant to be leaving
00:15:10.840 the European Union
00:15:11.720 in March of next year.
00:15:13.160 That requires a summit
00:15:14.960 in November
00:15:15.800 where the UK
00:15:17.960 and the EU
00:15:18.580 presents the withdrawal
00:15:19.680 agreement and says
00:15:20.520 this is what's happening.
00:15:22.100 Now,
00:15:22.300 Theresa May has come forward
00:15:23.640 with a draft agreement
00:15:24.680 that essentially
00:15:25.860 keeps us within
00:15:27.660 the customs union.
00:15:28.900 So,
00:15:29.400 that means we get
00:15:30.300 free trade within the EU
00:15:31.540 but we can't set
00:15:32.360 our own free trade deals
00:15:33.540 because we're bound
00:15:34.240 by EU regulation.
00:15:35.900 The reason we're staying in
00:15:37.200 is because of Ireland.
00:15:38.600 So,
00:15:38.800 we have this issue.
00:15:39.720 Northern Ireland
00:15:40.200 is a part of the UK.
00:15:41.760 The question is
00:15:42.520 where will the border go?
00:15:43.620 Because there has to be
00:15:44.180 a border at the edge
00:15:45.000 of the European Union
00:15:45.980 but we can't put
00:15:46.880 a border in Ireland
00:15:47.640 because that goes
00:15:48.280 against our agreements
00:15:49.240 with both islands.
00:15:51.500 So,
00:15:52.000 the issue is
00:15:52.460 do we put a border
00:15:53.120 down the Irish Sea
00:15:54.040 between Northern Ireland
00:15:54.980 and England?
00:15:55.960 So,
00:15:56.160 that's been causing
00:15:56.720 huge chaos
00:15:57.340 and what Theresa May has said,
00:15:58.600 well,
00:15:59.060 we can't agree
00:15:59.760 a free trade deal now.
00:16:01.260 What we'll do
00:16:01.940 is we'll have a backstop
00:16:03.120 which is essentially
00:16:03.980 a temporary solution
00:16:05.320 whereby the UK
00:16:06.220 including Northern Ireland
00:16:07.320 stays within this customs union
00:16:09.520 until we reach a deal.
00:16:11.500 So,
00:16:11.740 we'll leave
00:16:12.180 in March
00:16:12.860 technically
00:16:13.480 with no deal yet.
00:16:15.560 It's a withdrawal agreement
00:16:16.740 but no actual plans
00:16:18.160 for the future
00:16:19.360 and people aren't happy
00:16:21.240 about that
00:16:21.800 which is why people
00:16:22.620 have been submitting
00:16:23.340 something called
00:16:24.380 a no confidence letter
00:16:25.640 to the 1922 committee.
00:16:27.960 Once 48 of those
00:16:29.060 are submitted
00:16:29.600 there's going to be
00:16:30.280 a no confidence vote
00:16:31.400 or a confidence vote
00:16:32.860 in the Prime Minister
00:16:33.720 and 48 have now
00:16:35.460 been submitted
00:16:36.020 thanks to
00:16:37.140 Jacob Rees-Mogg's push
00:16:38.500 and by Tuesday
00:16:39.840 we could have a vote
00:16:40.720 of confidence
00:16:41.180 in the House of Commons
00:16:42.340 to decide whether
00:16:43.420 Theresa May stays on
00:16:44.400 as Prime Minister
00:16:44.940 or not.
00:16:46.380 Well,
00:16:46.880 it certainly looks bad.
00:16:48.600 I mean,
00:16:48.780 when you have
00:16:49.400 Cabinet ministers
00:16:50.440 resigning
00:16:51.280 it's one thing
00:16:51.880 for a backbencher
00:16:53.560 who really didn't have
00:16:54.740 anything to give up
00:16:56.240 but if you're in Cabinet
00:16:57.240 and you're saying
00:16:57.780 I can't
00:16:58.400 the perks of Cabinet
00:16:59.640 the prestige
00:17:00.240 the power
00:17:00.960 the opportunity
00:17:02.120 for advancement
00:17:03.000 is all these
00:17:05.120 wonderful things
00:17:05.840 I am voluntarily
00:17:06.760 giving them up
00:17:07.540 on a point of principle
00:17:08.260 when you're in Cabinet
00:17:09.500 and you're quitting
00:17:10.200 that's a pretty
00:17:11.460 serious thing.
00:17:13.360 Seven people
00:17:14.160 have resigned
00:17:14.700 so far
00:17:15.400 including Cabinet
00:17:16.360 ministers
00:17:17.000 others are
00:17:18.140 parliamentary
00:17:18.580 private secretaries
00:17:19.580 who are still
00:17:19.900 quite important
00:17:20.500 so there's been
00:17:21.020 seven resignations
00:17:22.060 including
00:17:22.560 the Brexit secretary
00:17:24.360 this is the second
00:17:25.580 Brexit secretary
00:17:26.440 that's resigned
00:17:27.120 and they've just
00:17:27.900 replaced him
00:17:28.480 with a guy
00:17:28.840 called Steve Barclay
00:17:29.940 who's known
00:17:30.700 as being ultra loyal
00:17:32.260 he's formerly
00:17:33.400 of Barclay's Bank
00:17:34.380 and he has never
00:17:35.220 ever rebelled
00:17:35.920 against the government
00:17:37.040 Theresa May
00:17:37.880 is trying to
00:17:38.620 push through
00:17:39.040 with this deal
00:17:39.960 which isn't Brexit
00:17:41.180 and I think
00:17:42.280 something like
00:17:42.800 13%
00:17:43.660 according to polls
00:17:44.540 of the population
00:17:45.180 actually support
00:17:46.100 1-3
00:17:47.340 not 3-0
00:17:48.120 and this new
00:17:49.920 Brexit secretary
00:17:50.560 is not going to
00:17:51.080 vote anything down
00:17:52.020 she's even got
00:17:52.980 some Brexiteers
00:17:53.920 like Liam Fox
00:17:54.760 to come forward
00:17:55.400 and say that
00:17:55.920 a deal
00:17:56.280 is better than
00:17:57.280 no deal
00:17:57.800 which is a huge
00:17:58.880 U-turn
00:17:59.360 from the narrative
00:18:00.540 a few months ago
00:18:01.480 when everybody
00:18:02.420 in government
00:18:03.380 was saying that
00:18:04.220 no deal
00:18:05.020 is better than
00:18:05.600 a bad deal
00:18:06.200 well I mean
00:18:07.720 listen I have not
00:18:09.280 got into the
00:18:09.860 minutiae of it
00:18:11.280 but what if
00:18:14.400 the deal just
00:18:15.800 expired
00:18:16.460 I mean it reminds
00:18:18.540 me of Canada
00:18:19.240 where we just
00:18:19.940 went through
00:18:20.520 our renegotiation
00:18:21.940 with Donald Trump
00:18:22.720 and with the Mexicans
00:18:23.900 of NAFTA
00:18:25.200 and Trump
00:18:26.260 served notice
00:18:28.100 that he was
00:18:28.680 pulling out of NAFTA
00:18:29.840 and he basically
00:18:30.820 said well
00:18:31.500 you could get
00:18:32.720 a deal or no deal
00:18:33.600 I'm fine either way
00:18:34.480 a deal is probably
00:18:35.300 in your interest
00:18:35.880 otherwise we'll just
00:18:36.580 slap tariffs on you
00:18:37.580 and at literally
00:18:39.200 the night before
00:18:39.980 the deadline
00:18:40.560 Trudeau signed a deal
00:18:41.600 but if he didn't
00:18:42.720 life would have
00:18:43.720 gone on
00:18:44.140 it just would have
00:18:44.740 been without that
00:18:45.660 trade deal
00:18:47.260 and so as a Canadian
00:18:48.820 who just went through
00:18:49.520 that experience
00:18:50.080 I'm thinking
00:18:50.560 okay so if you're
00:18:52.180 saying the UK
00:18:52.940 is getting out
00:18:53.640 in the spring
00:18:54.140 no matter what
00:18:55.120 if they can't
00:18:56.960 find some
00:18:57.780 interim
00:18:59.160 or replacement deal
00:19:00.280 how is that
00:19:01.740 really that bad
00:19:02.860 if
00:19:03.640 you know
00:19:04.960 suddenly the EU
00:19:06.100 deal
00:19:07.060 evaporates
00:19:08.560 and the UK
00:19:09.100 is still there
00:19:09.740 and Europe
00:19:10.080 is still there
00:19:10.640 and people will
00:19:11.640 still get up
00:19:12.360 in the morning
00:19:12.740 and drive to work
00:19:13.540 and you know
00:19:14.460 they'll have to
00:19:15.340 figure things out
00:19:16.020 but really
00:19:16.520 how is that
00:19:17.740 a bad thing
00:19:18.660 it's not
00:19:20.300 we'd leave
00:19:21.120 and we'd trade
00:19:21.960 on WTO
00:19:22.920 World Trade
00:19:23.440 Organization
00:19:23.940 rules
00:19:24.600 the question
00:19:25.160 then remains
00:19:26.280 what do we do
00:19:27.080 about the border
00:19:27.600 in Ireland
00:19:28.100 because there needs
00:19:28.740 to be a border
00:19:29.320 on the edge
00:19:29.760 of the EU
00:19:30.280 with the UK
00:19:31.440 which is Northern Ireland
00:19:32.500 so that question
00:19:33.180 will remain
00:19:33.700 but Jacob Rees-Mogg's
00:19:34.940 European Research Group
00:19:36.240 has put forward
00:19:37.420 multiple suggestions
00:19:38.380 of using technology
00:19:39.340 at the border
00:19:39.760 that can solve that
00:19:40.680 the real question
00:19:42.000 is what would happen
00:19:42.980 with regards
00:19:43.980 to customs arrangements
00:19:45.760 coming from Europe
00:19:47.040 to the UK
00:19:47.940 something like
00:19:49.960 six seconds
00:19:50.660 is all it takes
00:19:51.400 for things to pass
00:19:52.280 through customs
00:19:52.960 at the border
00:19:54.260 it really wouldn't
00:19:56.000 cause that much
00:19:56.540 of a problem
00:19:56.900 people say
00:19:57.380 it would cause
00:19:57.920 queues for miles
00:19:59.200 in the south
00:20:00.240 of England
00:20:00.580 which we just
00:20:01.460 know wouldn't
00:20:01.880 happen
00:20:02.260 and Project Fear
00:20:03.660 which is what
00:20:04.440 we call
00:20:04.840 the people
00:20:05.460 stirring up
00:20:06.220 all these
00:20:06.500 terrible ideas
00:20:07.220 about what
00:20:07.580 would happen
00:20:07.940 if we left
00:20:08.420 without a deal
00:20:09.500 have suggested
00:20:10.440 all sorts
00:20:10.920 of crazy stuff
00:20:11.540 they suggested
00:20:12.120 that planes
00:20:12.700 would be
00:20:13.240 stopped from
00:20:14.220 flying into
00:20:14.780 Europe
00:20:15.120 but we know
00:20:15.740 from people
00:20:16.680 within Europe
00:20:17.480 mayors of
00:20:18.240 the regions
00:20:20.000 in question
00:20:21.020 have said
00:20:21.640 no that's
00:20:22.060 just not
00:20:22.360 going to happen
00:20:23.020 there's all
00:20:23.600 these rumours
00:20:24.060 flying around
00:20:24.660 but there is
00:20:25.100 simply no way
00:20:26.360 that the EU
00:20:27.220 would cut
00:20:27.760 its nose
00:20:28.600 despite its
00:20:29.340 face
00:20:29.720 in this
00:20:30.740 instance
00:20:31.120 because they
00:20:31.480 need us
00:20:32.020 yeah
00:20:32.360 well all
00:20:33.220 these terrible
00:20:33.820 things that
00:20:34.260 were supposed
00:20:34.700 to have
00:20:35.080 happened
00:20:35.460 immediately
00:20:35.960 after the
00:20:36.520 Brexit vote
00:20:37.040 almost none
00:20:38.040 of them
00:20:38.220 have happened
00:20:38.800 all these
00:20:39.240 big banks
00:20:39.800 were saying
00:20:40.160 we're going
00:20:40.520 to move
00:20:40.860 to Frankfurt
00:20:41.400 listen I've
00:20:42.160 been to London
00:20:42.660 and I've
00:20:43.260 been to
00:20:43.500 Frankfurt
00:20:43.820 and I've
00:20:44.360 got nothing
00:20:44.640 against
00:20:44.920 Frankfurt
00:20:45.260 but don't
00:20:46.120 tell me
00:20:46.520 million dollar
00:20:47.520 a year
00:20:48.020 bankers
00:20:48.800 are going
00:20:49.340 to leave
00:20:49.680 the world's
00:20:50.280 most amazing
00:20:50.900 one of the
00:20:51.360 world's most
00:20:51.760 amazing cities
00:20:52.480 London
00:20:53.340 to go to
00:20:54.920 Frankfurt
00:20:55.240 that just
00:20:55.960 ain't happening
00:20:56.660 no
00:20:57.980 no way at all
00:20:59.140 they told us
00:20:59.940 that there'd be
00:21:00.300 an instant
00:21:00.680 recession
00:21:01.120 the minute
00:21:01.480 we even
00:21:01.880 voted
00:21:02.320 and by the
00:21:03.280 way one
00:21:03.620 thing that's
00:21:03.980 really bugged
00:21:04.480 me about this
00:21:05.020 people are now
00:21:05.540 talking about
00:21:06.200 a second
00:21:06.900 referendum
00:21:07.380 because people
00:21:08.020 who voted
00:21:08.460 Brexit
00:21:08.860 feel so terrible
00:21:09.800 about what
00:21:10.260 they've done
00:21:10.720 what Brexit's
00:21:11.600 done to this
00:21:12.040 country
00:21:12.380 and I just
00:21:12.960 need to remind
00:21:13.500 those people
00:21:13.960 Brexit hasn't
00:21:14.840 happened yet
00:21:15.500 it's been two
00:21:16.240 years we still
00:21:17.160 haven't left
00:21:18.080 all this turmoil
00:21:19.240 that we're
00:21:19.600 experiencing now
00:21:20.500 is not because
00:21:21.300 of Brexit
00:21:21.840 it's because of
00:21:22.560 the absolutely
00:21:23.220 terrible job
00:21:24.680 that Theresa May
00:21:25.640 and the government
00:21:26.120 have done so far
00:21:27.160 if we have
00:21:28.220 a real Brexit
00:21:29.100 we'll be fine
00:21:29.980 yeah I mean
00:21:31.160 you really do
00:21:32.020 need someone
00:21:32.940 to borrow a phrase
00:21:34.160 who knows the art
00:21:34.920 of the deal
00:21:35.520 a tough negotiator
00:21:37.560 who has actually
00:21:39.300 done that
00:21:39.960 in his or her
00:21:40.840 life
00:21:41.060 I don't
00:21:41.440 I get the
00:21:42.260 feeling that's
00:21:42.700 not Theresa May
00:21:43.500 okay I've just
00:21:44.680 two last questions
00:21:45.860 to you and I
00:21:46.400 know that I'm
00:21:46.980 being overly
00:21:47.580 simplistic
00:21:48.180 and I just
00:21:49.760 I just don't
00:21:50.400 know the details
00:21:51.220 and I know
00:21:51.600 you've been
00:21:51.880 following them
00:21:52.280 closely
00:21:52.560 I guess I have
00:21:53.380 two questions
00:21:53.900 one is
00:21:54.440 barring some
00:21:56.900 second do-over
00:21:59.280 referendum
00:21:59.740 which I really
00:22:00.360 sense won't
00:22:01.920 happen
00:22:02.280 is the exit
00:22:04.400 is the Brexit
00:22:05.140 really going to
00:22:06.600 happen in the
00:22:07.480 spring
00:22:07.700 is it like
00:22:08.220 is that
00:22:10.040 button already
00:22:10.880 pushed
00:22:11.340 and the
00:22:12.240 timer
00:22:12.920 counting down
00:22:13.940 is that
00:22:14.420 already afoot
00:22:15.540 yeah that's
00:22:16.980 already signed
00:22:17.500 into law
00:22:17.980 we have to
00:22:18.520 leave in
00:22:18.840 March
00:22:19.200 we can't
00:22:20.640 extend
00:22:20.920 article 50
00:22:21.760 which is
00:22:22.500 the process
00:22:23.860 of withdrawing
00:22:24.600 it is in
00:22:25.460 law that we
00:22:26.020 leave in
00:22:26.700 March
00:22:27.100 now the
00:22:27.740 question is
00:22:28.340 how we
00:22:28.920 do it
00:22:29.300 but what's
00:22:30.040 really
00:22:30.240 interesting
00:22:30.720 is if
00:22:31.340 this deal
00:22:32.200 that Theresa
00:22:32.620 May is
00:22:32.900 presenting
00:22:33.280 by the way
00:22:33.680 she has
00:22:34.140 to pass
00:22:34.520 it through
00:22:34.860 parliament
00:22:35.340 and right
00:22:36.280 now the
00:22:36.660 maths don't
00:22:37.360 add up
00:22:38.020 there's 80
00:22:38.820 to 100
00:22:39.380 MPs in
00:22:40.860 Jacob Rees-Mogg's
00:22:41.860 group that
00:22:42.480 leaves 200
00:22:43.180 other MPs in
00:22:44.120 the Tories
00:22:44.580 most Tories
00:22:45.500 don't support
00:22:46.940 her the
00:22:47.660 the vitriol
00:22:48.480 against her
00:22:49.080 in prime
00:22:49.420 minister's
00:22:49.760 questions time
00:22:50.460 in the
00:22:51.280 house of
00:22:51.600 commons is
00:22:52.140 remarkable
00:22:53.320 coming from
00:22:53.900 her own
00:22:54.220 party
00:22:54.580 she's now
00:22:55.520 looking for
00:22:56.100 votes from
00:22:56.740 Labour and
00:22:57.320 the Lib Dems
00:22:57.920 to pass
00:22:58.280 this through
00:22:58.680 if it
00:22:59.200 doesn't pass
00:22:59.860 I don't
00:23:00.600 know what
00:23:00.880 will happen
00:23:01.320 because I
00:23:02.180 can't see
00:23:02.560 parliament
00:23:02.920 allowing us
00:23:03.500 to go through
00:23:03.920 no deal
00:23:04.360 as well
00:23:04.660 so really
00:23:05.160 right now
00:23:06.040 nobody can
00:23:07.420 predict what
00:23:07.960 on earth
00:23:08.200 is going to
00:23:08.540 happen
00:23:08.840 it's possible
00:23:09.940 maybe that
00:23:10.580 she'll just
00:23:10.960 scrape through
00:23:11.620 and just
00:23:12.160 about get
00:23:12.600 the vote
00:23:12.920 she needs
00:23:13.500 yeah
00:23:13.800 I want to
00:23:14.380 show you
00:23:14.780 you mentioned
00:23:15.220 Jacob Rees-Mogg
00:23:15.960 a couple
00:23:16.440 of times
00:23:16.860 here's a
00:23:18.020 great little
00:23:18.500 exchange
00:23:19.020 he had
00:23:19.800 and I'm
00:23:20.200 jealous as
00:23:20.700 a Canadian
00:23:21.060 because we
00:23:21.380 never have
00:23:21.900 this kind
00:23:22.340 of free
00:23:24.700 debate and
00:23:25.480 speech in
00:23:26.000 our parliament
00:23:26.600 everyone is
00:23:27.180 whipped to
00:23:27.540 the end
00:23:27.720 here's
00:23:27.960 Jacob Rees-Mogg
00:23:28.740 going a couple
00:23:30.160 rounds with
00:23:31.060 his own
00:23:31.780 government
00:23:32.600 take a look
00:23:33.120 my right
00:23:34.040 honorable
00:23:34.340 friend
00:23:34.840 and she is
00:23:35.780 unquestionably
00:23:36.540 honorable
00:23:37.040 said that we
00:23:38.700 would leave
00:23:39.200 the customs
00:23:39.820 union
00:23:40.260 annex 2
00:23:42.140 says otherwise
00:23:43.440 my right
00:23:44.720 honorable friend
00:23:45.380 said that she
00:23:45.980 would maintain
00:23:46.680 the integrity
00:23:47.340 of the united
00:23:47.900 kingdom
00:23:48.380 a whole
00:23:49.540 protocol
00:23:50.000 says otherwise
00:23:51.380 my right
00:23:52.780 honorable
00:23:52.980 friend
00:23:53.500 said that we
00:23:54.740 would be out
00:23:55.280 of the
00:23:55.540 jurisdiction
00:23:55.980 of the
00:23:56.460 European
00:23:56.740 Court of
00:23:57.120 Justice
00:23:57.580 article 174
00:23:59.820 says otherwise
00:24:01.300 as what my
00:24:02.980 right honorable
00:24:03.400 friend says
00:24:04.260 and what my
00:24:05.180 right honorable
00:24:05.540 friend does
00:24:06.240 no longer
00:24:06.700 match
00:24:07.180 should I
00:24:08.240 not write
00:24:08.840 to my
00:24:09.640 right honorable
00:24:10.040 friend the
00:24:10.560 member for
00:24:11.100 Ultringham
00:24:11.660 and Sail
00:24:12.420 West
00:24:12.980 so he's a
00:24:16.220 conservative
00:24:17.260 and he's
00:24:17.880 challenging the
00:24:18.560 conservatives
00:24:18.920 I got a
00:24:19.300 question for you
00:24:19.840 what is Boris
00:24:21.340 Johnson figure
00:24:22.800 in all this
00:24:23.240 because he's
00:24:23.700 one of the
00:24:24.060 ones who
00:24:24.880 quit his
00:24:25.500 very high
00:24:26.160 I think he
00:24:26.540 was the
00:24:26.900 foreign secretary
00:24:27.920 that's about as
00:24:28.580 close to the
00:24:29.160 top as you get
00:24:29.700 he quit that
00:24:30.700 over Brexit
00:24:31.240 is he
00:24:31.900 what's he
00:24:33.260 doing and
00:24:34.040 and is it
00:24:35.520 almost a
00:24:36.280 certainty that
00:24:36.900 there will be
00:24:37.300 a leadership
00:24:37.820 race in the
00:24:39.000 conservative party
00:24:39.740 now and that
00:24:40.480 Theresa May's
00:24:41.280 days are
00:24:42.100 numbered
00:24:42.480 well David
00:24:44.080 Lidington
00:24:44.680 who's Theresa
00:24:45.540 May's de facto
00:24:46.280 deputy has said
00:24:47.320 he thinks that
00:24:47.960 she'll win a
00:24:48.540 confidence vote
00:24:49.200 handsomely
00:24:49.820 and I
00:24:50.500 agree with
00:24:51.040 him because
00:24:52.000 first off a
00:24:53.440 Brexiteer will
00:24:54.140 not become
00:24:54.600 prime minister
00:24:55.140 or leader of
00:24:55.940 the Tories
00:24:56.440 and that's
00:24:57.100 just a quirk
00:24:57.580 of the way
00:24:57.920 the system
00:24:58.380 works so
00:24:58.960 they need
00:25:00.240 in order to
00:25:00.920 create a
00:25:01.600 ballot of
00:25:02.180 two candidates
00:25:02.940 to go to
00:25:03.940 the members
00:25:04.320 of the
00:25:04.600 Tory party
00:25:05.100 to elect
00:25:05.540 a new
00:25:05.780 leader
00:25:06.040 the MPs
00:25:07.220 have to
00:25:07.780 decide who
00:25:08.560 those two
00:25:09.100 people are
00:25:09.760 given there's
00:25:10.660 only 80
00:25:11.280 Brexiteers in
00:25:12.240 the Tories
00:25:12.700 out of
00:25:13.100 something like
00:25:13.740 300 MPs
00:25:15.400 there's no way
00:25:16.220 in hell that a
00:25:16.700 Brexiteer will
00:25:17.260 end up on that
00:25:17.800 ballot paper
00:25:18.400 so there's no
00:25:19.600 way that Boris
00:25:20.160 Johnson can
00:25:21.020 become leader
00:25:22.080 I think she'll
00:25:23.360 win that vote
00:25:23.920 as well because
00:25:24.620 if you're a
00:25:25.800 Remainer you've
00:25:26.440 got to be mad
00:25:27.040 to think
00:25:27.440 A you've got to
00:25:28.120 be mad to
00:25:28.480 want the job
00:25:29.080 and B you've
00:25:29.680 got to be mad
00:25:30.180 to think that
00:25:30.620 you can do a
00:25:31.080 better job at
00:25:31.700 uniting the
00:25:32.280 country than
00:25:32.700 Theresa May
00:25:33.260 I think she'll
00:25:34.280 stay in the
00:25:35.120 job just
00:25:35.900 because people
00:25:36.440 are terrified
00:25:36.960 about what
00:25:37.460 will happen
00:25:37.820 if we throw
00:25:38.280 even more
00:25:38.800 chaos into
00:25:39.340 the mix
00:25:39.780 isn't that
00:25:40.400 interesting
00:25:40.780 I guess my
00:25:41.280 next question
00:25:41.840 is will
00:25:43.760 there be a
00:25:44.340 chance that
00:25:44.900 there will
00:25:45.540 be an election
00:25:47.060 soon on this
00:25:48.500 matter because
00:25:49.460 the only thing
00:25:50.020 that terrifies me
00:25:50.860 more than
00:25:51.180 Theresa May is
00:25:52.280 Jeremy Corbyn
00:25:52.940 and the Labour
00:25:53.360 Party is there
00:25:54.040 a chance that
00:25:54.540 the UK could
00:25:55.040 be heading to
00:25:55.440 the polls soon
00:25:56.080 maybe if she
00:25:58.400 loses the vote
00:25:59.200 of no confidence
00:25:59.880 maybe because
00:26:00.760 then we've got
00:26:01.760 the question of
00:26:02.360 who takes over
00:26:03.040 and if somebody
00:26:03.520 else takes over
00:26:04.380 I mean it's
00:26:06.400 hard to claim a
00:26:07.120 mandate at this
00:26:07.780 point because
00:26:08.240 the country is so
00:26:09.240 divided the polls
00:26:10.100 have shifted so
00:26:10.920 much they might
00:26:11.660 just have to take
00:26:12.360 it to a general
00:26:12.900 election and if
00:26:14.240 they do that I
00:26:15.000 suspect part of
00:26:15.800 that general
00:26:16.220 election will be
00:26:17.000 to include a
00:26:17.800 policy promise
00:26:19.600 a manifesto
00:26:20.280 promise of
00:26:20.740 delivering the
00:26:21.300 deal we already
00:26:21.840 have or going
00:26:23.920 for a second
00:26:24.340 referendum which I
00:26:25.340 think is actually
00:26:26.120 possible unfortunately
00:26:27.480 I guess my only
00:26:29.800 last question is
00:26:30.620 I've
00:26:31.300 met the new
00:26:32.960 leader of the
00:26:33.680 UKIP party
00:26:34.440 Gerard Batten
00:26:35.120 I like the guy
00:26:35.800 as a fellow but
00:26:36.360 he's low in the
00:26:37.520 polls and he seems
00:26:38.740 to me to be not
00:26:39.620 well known
00:26:40.780 Nigel Farage is
00:26:42.780 so personally
00:26:43.800 associated with
00:26:44.960 the UKIP and he
00:26:45.760 was the great
00:26:46.260 champion of the
00:26:47.760 independence the
00:26:48.660 Brexit referendum
00:26:49.780 what are his
00:26:51.220 plans he looks
00:26:52.600 like he's getting
00:26:53.140 friendly with
00:26:53.740 Boris Johnson
00:26:54.400 is he going to
00:26:55.440 dive back into
00:26:56.380 politics on the
00:26:57.760 national side as
00:26:58.560 opposed to the
00:26:59.080 European parliament
00:26:59.820 side what's Nigel up
00:27:01.280 too good
00:27:02.940 question
00:27:03.440 there's the
00:27:04.180 well UKIP has
00:27:05.340 to have a
00:27:06.040 leadership election
00:27:07.040 in March because
00:27:07.860 Gerard Batten
00:27:08.560 wasn't elected he
00:27:09.400 was appointed
00:27:09.920 because the party
00:27:10.560 was in crisis
00:27:11.260 and he's stepping
00:27:12.820 down in March
00:27:13.640 so then the
00:27:14.680 question is who's
00:27:15.240 the next leader
00:27:15.880 and Farage has
00:27:17.600 said he would
00:27:18.280 consider coming
00:27:19.640 back although
00:27:20.360 with the shift
00:27:21.280 that UKIP's had
00:27:22.000 towards a
00:27:22.740 Islamophobic sort
00:27:24.160 of policy I
00:27:25.480 suspect maybe
00:27:26.340 Farage doesn't
00:27:27.000 want to come
00:27:27.500 back I don't
00:27:29.080 know from the
00:27:29.660 sidelines it's
00:27:30.300 really hard to
00:27:30.920 tell if he
00:27:31.360 wants to come
00:27:31.800 back into
00:27:32.140 politics he'd
00:27:32.960 either have to
00:27:33.460 join the Tories
00:27:34.120 which I think
00:27:35.140 he'd struggle
00:27:35.540 getting into
00:27:36.260 because many
00:27:37.860 UKIP MEPs
00:27:38.660 who've tried to
00:27:39.120 join the Tories
00:27:39.680 recently have
00:27:40.160 been barred
00:27:41.000 he'd have to
00:27:42.100 come back as
00:27:42.520 UKIP leader
00:27:43.040 and I think
00:27:43.680 that's a big
00:27:44.240 step that he
00:27:44.980 doesn't seem
00:27:45.600 willing to take
00:27:46.200 at this point
00:27:46.740 what's very
00:27:48.300 interesting and I
00:27:49.220 can't say I
00:27:49.940 have a deep
00:27:51.360 command of the
00:27:51.940 subject I just
00:27:52.880 know that the
00:27:55.320 moves they're
00:27:56.100 pulling to stop
00:27:57.480 Brexit so
00:27:58.880 closely track the
00:28:00.680 attempts to
00:28:01.300 delegitimize Donald
00:28:03.300 Trump's election
00:28:04.240 they're really the
00:28:05.360 same tactics the
00:28:06.280 same people the
00:28:07.060 same arguments
00:28:07.740 oh you deplorables
00:28:09.200 didn't know what
00:28:09.860 you're doing you're
00:28:10.940 a disaster we're
00:28:11.780 going to lose all
00:28:12.340 our human rights
00:28:13.060 and so I'm
00:28:14.120 naturally sympathetic
00:28:15.200 to the Brexit
00:28:16.380 every time I
00:28:17.220 watch those
00:28:17.640 European Union
00:28:18.400 fools I think
00:28:19.120 Britain get out
00:28:19.880 I appreciate the
00:28:21.040 update Jack and
00:28:21.980 hopefully things
00:28:22.820 will be clearer in
00:28:23.440 the weeks ahead
00:28:23.980 although I get
00:28:24.640 the feeling they
00:28:25.060 won't be
00:28:25.400 yeah happy to
00:28:27.420 decode anything
00:28:28.120 else you need
00:28:28.800 with the
00:28:29.600 negotiations
00:28:30.240 cheers Ezra
00:28:30.960 all right thanks
00:28:31.640 so much Jack
00:28:32.140 that's Jack
00:28:32.780 Buckby our
00:28:33.440 London based
00:28:34.120 reporter and he
00:28:35.400 talks with great
00:28:36.380 expertise on Brexit
00:28:37.420 and I encourage
00:28:38.380 you to watch him
00:28:39.260 not me on the
00:28:40.820 subject because I'm
00:28:41.700 asking rather basic
00:28:42.720 and elementary
00:28:43.280 questions but I
00:28:44.460 know Jack goes
00:28:45.140 deep on the
00:28:45.660 subject from
00:28:46.180 time to time
00:28:46.760 in his videos
00:28:47.980 on our YouTube
00:28:48.540 channel
00:28:48.960 stay with us
00:28:49.960 more ahead on
00:28:50.720 The Rebel
00:28:51.000 hey welcome back
00:29:03.060 on my monologue
00:29:03.560 yesterday about the
00:29:04.280 CBC's pitiful attack
00:29:05.480 on Rex Murphy
00:29:06.100 Barb writes
00:29:07.020 Rex Murphy is an
00:29:08.860 icon of sanity in
00:29:10.060 the fake news
00:29:10.640 press kingdom
00:29:11.300 I love his
00:29:12.160 columns and
00:29:12.640 thoroughly enjoyed
00:29:13.280 his weekly
00:29:13.720 viewpoints on
00:29:14.280 CBC when they
00:29:15.320 were a wee bit
00:29:16.000 less the propaganda
00:29:16.980 arm of the
00:29:17.540 current regime
00:29:18.240 yeah you know
00:29:19.920 they don't have
00:29:20.600 Rex on that
00:29:21.560 often at the
00:29:22.140 CBC anymore
00:29:22.780 he does write
00:29:23.660 for the National
00:29:24.220 Post but the
00:29:24.840 National Post
00:29:25.480 I mean I don't
00:29:26.540 know if it's
00:29:26.900 going to be around
00:29:27.420 long there's
00:29:28.800 Rex Murphy
00:29:29.380 there's Conrad
00:29:30.020 Black there's
00:29:30.620 Terry Corcoran
00:29:31.280 and I think I've
00:29:32.780 just about listed
00:29:33.700 all the conservatives
00:29:34.880 left at the
00:29:35.820 National Post
00:29:36.440 that's actually
00:29:37.360 truly sad to me
00:29:38.520 how they become
00:29:39.440 just another
00:29:40.000 cheap knockoff
00:29:42.380 even to the
00:29:43.260 left of the
00:29:43.840 Globe and Mail
00:29:44.500 too many times
00:29:45.220 it makes me sad
00:29:46.060 I say that as an
00:29:46.960 alumnus of the
00:29:48.000 National Post
00:29:48.520 I was on their
00:29:49.000 editorial board
00:29:49.600 for two years
00:29:50.200 Jamie writes
00:29:52.580 I can't figure out
00:29:54.540 how Rex has
00:29:55.260 lasted as long
00:29:55.980 as he has
00:29:56.460 at the CBC
00:29:57.140 I don't think
00:29:59.720 he's actually
00:30:00.100 lasted very long
00:30:01.000 there by this
00:30:02.680 measure
00:30:03.020 I mean yes
00:30:03.760 he's been there
00:30:04.240 a long time
00:30:04.840 his first
00:30:06.420 appearance there
00:30:07.080 was more than
00:30:07.920 40 years ago
00:30:08.780 but he's not
00:30:10.940 on their weekly
00:30:12.560 he's not on
00:30:13.600 their daily
00:30:14.360 he's there
00:30:15.360 every other
00:30:16.460 month or so
00:30:16.960 Google it
00:30:17.420 I think he was
00:30:19.320 there two
00:30:20.500 months ago
00:30:21.000 like he's not
00:30:22.320 even on on a
00:30:22.900 monthly basis
00:30:23.420 so he's
00:30:24.740 is about as
00:30:25.580 tenuous a
00:30:26.240 connection to
00:30:27.140 the CBC as
00:30:28.140 can be and
00:30:28.700 still call
00:30:29.220 yourself a
00:30:29.700 CBC personality
00:30:30.680 they've got
00:30:31.240 rid of him
00:30:31.920 Susanna writes
00:30:34.040 maybe Rex
00:30:35.460 can join
00:30:36.020 the rebel
00:30:36.560 well of course
00:30:38.480 he would be
00:30:39.020 welcome here
00:30:39.720 to say and
00:30:40.400 write and do
00:30:41.300 anything
00:30:41.680 he's one of
00:30:42.540 the smartest
00:30:42.920 guys I know
00:30:43.560 and the most
00:30:43.920 independent
00:30:44.320 thinking
00:30:44.700 and he loves
00:30:45.280 the oil
00:30:45.620 sands
00:30:45.980 on my
00:30:47.540 interview with
00:30:48.060 Mark Morano
00:30:48.600 Liza writes
00:30:50.160 Mark Morano
00:30:51.300 is right
00:30:51.760 this junk
00:30:52.360 science is
00:30:52.840 what policy
00:30:53.420 is based
00:30:53.880 on
00:30:54.160 and what
00:30:54.640 climate
00:30:54.960 Barbie
00:30:55.300 preaches
00:30:55.760 it is a
00:30:56.420 vehicle for
00:30:56.900 societal
00:30:57.280 control
00:30:57.780 of the
00:30:58.320 masses
00:30:58.640 for the
00:30:59.100 benefit
00:30:59.380 of the
00:30:59.900 elite
00:31:00.260 well that's
00:31:01.700 the thing
00:31:02.020 I didn't
00:31:02.840 have the
00:31:03.200 time but
00:31:03.580 maybe I'll
00:31:03.900 do that
00:31:04.200 now is
00:31:04.740 I'll go
00:31:05.100 and search
00:31:05.680 which
00:31:06.420 federal
00:31:07.080 Canadian
00:31:07.620 liberals
00:31:08.180 tweeted
00:31:09.480 that original
00:31:11.220 false study
00:31:11.900 I bet
00:31:12.180 Catherine
00:31:12.520 McKenna
00:31:12.860 did I
00:31:13.160 haven't
00:31:13.480 checked
00:31:13.780 it yet
00:31:14.080 I'll check
00:31:14.720 it after
00:31:15.080 I tape
00:31:15.920 this broadcast
00:31:16.460 I bet
00:31:17.060 she tweeted
00:31:17.520 the error
00:31:18.940 filled
00:31:19.580 first report
00:31:20.740 and I
00:31:21.660 would bet
00:31:22.040 my life
00:31:22.820 I wouldn't
00:31:23.380 bet my
00:31:23.640 life I'd
00:31:24.020 bet almost
00:31:24.920 anything
00:31:25.360 that she
00:31:26.200 did not
00:31:26.600 tweet a
00:31:26.980 correction to
00:31:27.640 it why
00:31:27.880 would she
00:31:28.340 she's in
00:31:28.980 the propaganda
00:31:29.480 business
00:31:30.100 not the
00:31:30.500 facts
00:31:30.920 business
00:31:31.540 well that's
00:31:32.680 our show
00:31:33.060 for the
00:31:33.440 day
00:31:33.720 hope you
00:31:35.200 enjoyed the
00:31:35.620 week's worth
00:31:36.040 of shows
00:31:36.640 by the way
00:31:37.700 if you're in
00:31:38.140 the Toronto
00:31:38.600 area tomorrow
00:31:39.540 night
00:31:40.000 Saturday night
00:31:41.320 we're hosting
00:31:42.320 a hospitality
00:31:42.940 suite at the
00:31:44.180 Ontario PC
00:31:45.540 Party Convention
00:31:46.520 we're going
00:31:47.400 there as
00:31:47.960 journalists
00:31:48.400 we'll cover
00:31:49.120 the convention
00:31:49.640 unlike Andrew
00:31:51.060 Shear's
00:31:51.480 federal
00:31:51.860 conservatives
00:31:52.760 Doug Ford
00:31:53.560 hasn't banned
00:31:54.560 us from
00:31:55.180 his conservative
00:31:56.020 convention
00:31:56.520 so we're going
00:31:57.300 there David
00:31:57.700 Benzie's going
00:31:58.260 to be leading
00:31:58.660 our coverage
00:31:59.080 he's great
00:31:59.580 and then at
00:32:00.540 I think it's
00:32:01.720 9pm
00:32:02.540 just across the
00:32:05.540 street of the
00:32:05.820 hotel we're
00:32:06.140 having a
00:32:06.500 hospitality suite
00:32:07.160 so if you're
00:32:08.460 in the Toronto
00:32:08.800 area and I'll
00:32:10.040 buy you the
00:32:10.320 first drink
00:32:10.700 come on by
00:32:11.720 it's I think
00:32:12.380 it's the
00:32:12.680 Delta
00:32:12.940 right across
00:32:14.140 from the
00:32:14.400 Ontario
00:32:14.660 convention
00:32:15.060 at 9pm
00:32:15.620 see you there
00:32:16.340 if not I'll
00:32:17.640 see you on
00:32:18.120 Monday
00:32:18.340 until then
00:32:18.880 on behalf
00:32:19.260 of all of
00:32:19.620 us here at
00:32:20.000 Rebel World
00:32:20.360 Headquarters
00:32:20.840 to you at
00:32:21.580 home
00:32:21.720 good night
00:32:22.140 and keep
00:32:23.080 fighting for
00:32:23.500 freedom
00:32:23.780 so we'll
00:32:25.340 see you