Who's the bigger LIAR, the CBC or the UN? Or are they just two of the biggest carbon consumers in the world? Today, Ezra goes through the UN's latest panic report, which was dumb to begin with, but then the CBC managed to make it even dumber, and by dumb, I mean misleading.
00:01:17.500Why should others go to jail when you're a biggest carbon consumer I know?
00:01:21.080There's 8,500 customers here, and you won't give them an answer. The only thing I have
00:01:26.340to say to the government about why I'm publishing it is because it's my bloody right to do so.
00:01:36.680Hey, remember a few weeks ago when I did an expose into the CBC's global warming propaganda?
00:01:42.180They had claimed, like so many other media did, that 11,000 scientists had signed some big study
00:01:50.820about global warming and that the end was near. They really emphasized the 11,000 scientists part.
00:01:57.440Here's the first minute or so of the show we dissected.
00:02:01.480In recent months, climate emergencies have been declared by Canada and a number of other countries.
00:02:06.600I'm sure you've heard them. Cities have also sounded the alarm. Well, this morning in a brand new
00:02:12.900declaration, 11,000 scientists from 153 countries are bolstering that claim. Here are some of what's
00:02:22.520in that declaration published in the journal Bioscience. The Alliance of World Scientists says
00:02:29.280it has a moral obligation to warn humanity. It says greenhouse gas emissions are still rising
00:02:35.960and that recent efforts to reduce them are not enough. The declaration also says the climate crisis
00:02:44.380is accelerating faster than many scientists predicted, that it's caused even more damage
00:02:50.820than many had feared. The Alliance says it had to speak out. Why? Because climate change is threatening
00:02:57.360ecosystems and, get this, the fate of humanity. Scary words there. The fate of humanity.
00:03:06.200CBC senior science reporter Nicole Martellaro is going through this report. And, Nicole, I know it's a big
00:03:11.200one, lots of dense information, but 11,000 scientists signed on. That's got to mean something.
00:03:17.840Did you hear, I know it's a big one, lots of dense information. It wasn't a big one. It was just a few
00:03:23.340pages long. That whole thing turned out to be a fake. It was a hoax. It was disinformation, fake news.
00:03:30.480I don't know if you remember the video did. Unlike the CBC, I actually Googled the report and read it.
00:03:34.600It wasn't a study. It was an opinion column. And it was just a few pages long. And there weren't a
00:03:40.740thousand scientists who signed it. You see this? You could just click here and you just click the
00:03:45.740button, like, like on Facebook. That's it. Anyone, literally anyone could sign it. I went through all
00:03:51.880the Canadian names and I showed that it was lawyers and dentists and even scammers and schemers,
00:04:00.260authors. And my favorite guy was a wisecracking taxi driver from Hamilton, who I think is a rebel
00:04:08.460viewer because he had one of our hats, who called himself a BS detector and analyst. This guy. And
00:04:16.060then I came across this lad, Hans Weinhold from Mohawk College. And his expertise, as you can see,
00:04:25.880is listed as BS detection and analysis. Now I've gone through a few hundred of these now. So I'm
00:04:35.140thinking BS that could mean bachelor of science and detection and analysis. Sounds like something
00:04:41.400you might say if you're a global warming scientist, but maybe it's just what it looks like. BS as in
00:04:48.280bullshit. I was already all the way down to the W's now. So I was tired, but I Googled the guy
00:04:55.780guy. And I found his Facebook page. That's him in the mask there, I think. Is that him there? This
00:05:05.340is from his Facebook page. Is that him catching a fish? That's very environmental. But look at that
00:05:09.900hat. Is that, is that a Trump hat? Does that make America great again? And what's this? Look at this
00:05:15.480picture. Is that an Infowars shirt? And here he is in a yellow vest and he's wearing a make Canada
00:05:25.460great again hat. I think that's one of ours here from the rebel. And look at this from his Facebook
00:05:30.620page. I won't even read it. I'll just let you enjoy it. Yeah. So he was one of the 11,000 climate
00:05:39.720scientists who signed the paper. Boy, a lot of people watched that video debunking the fake
00:05:45.520news. But look, even though well over 100,000 people saw that, it was just a tiny fraction
00:05:50.100compared to how widely the original fake news was shared. That CBC host there was called Suhana
00:05:57.960Maharshan, typical liberal know-nothing. But the woman she was about to interview there calls
00:06:03.760herself CBC science expert. Her name is Nicole Mortallaro. Well, she's the science expert.
00:06:10.560You'd think that she might have done her due diligence, but that wouldn't have fit with
00:06:14.440the official CBC narrative. So she was a propagandist too. In fact, according to her resume posted on
00:06:25.480LinkedIn, Mortallaro isn't a scientist at all. At least no more than any of the 11,000 people
00:06:32.240who signed that letter or me. She has, according to her resume, a BAA degree in journalism from
00:06:41.000Ryerson. That means a Bachelor of Applied Arts. It's a vocational degree. I've got nothing against
00:06:47.680vocational schools. I think they're actually more useful than a degree at many universities
00:06:52.720in like vegetarian studies or something because it's more practical to go to a vocational school.
00:06:58.320I'm just saying Mortallaro is not a scientist. But she plays one on TV. I'm surprised she doesn't
00:07:05.400wear a fake white lab coat like Bill Nye the science guy. You know, he's science-y because he
00:07:12.060says so in a nickname. Here's Bill Nye the science guy singing a science-y song on his science show.
00:07:20.680Viewer discretion is advised here. So you guys, seriously, this next thing I feel is very special.
00:07:28.520This is a cool little segment. You know this woman from Crazy Ex-Girlfriend. Please give it up for Rachel Bloom.
00:07:35.580This world of arms is full of choice. But must I choose between only John or Joyce? All my options only.
00:07:52.400Harder voice. My vagina has its own voice. Not vocal voice. A metaphorical voice.
00:08:00.160Sometimes I do a voice for my vagina. Please don't tell me I'm the only one who does that.
00:08:04.560Cause my sex junk is so much more than either or. Power bottom or a top off. Versatile love may have some butt stuff.
00:08:19.300Yeah. Science. That's science, kids. Watch Bill Nye the science guy. Oh my god. Anyways, so the CBC's
00:08:32.880non-scientist science reporter has more news for you today. Oh, I can hardly wait. She was part of the
00:08:39.620propaganda the other day about those fake 11,000 signatures and she couldn't detect that they were
00:08:44.000fake. So here she is today with an equally insane political rant called Earth set to warm 3.2 degrees
00:08:53.600Celsius by 2100 unless efforts to cut emissions are tripled, new UN report finds. And then you see the
00:09:02.480sub-headline there, one expert calls findings of 3.2 degrees Celsius warming terrifying. Terrifying.
00:09:09.000That's one scientist says. Only later in the article do you find out that that expert was actually just a
00:09:15.560senior appointee in the Obama administration. But still, why not call him an expert so you can claim
00:09:21.220it's sciency to be terrified? I mean, if we're not careful and don't get terrified to pay more carbon
00:09:29.620taxes, you know, snowing, snow, winter, that could just be a thing of the past. At least that's what this
00:09:37.060prediction in the year 2000 by a very woke newspaper called The Independent. You see about
00:09:43.460two-thirds of the way down there, you can see their headline, snowfalls are now just a thing of the
00:09:48.500past. Our kids won't know what snow is. Now, if you click on the original page of The Independent,
00:09:55.440they've actually deleted it from their website because time has proven it to be so foolish,
00:10:00.200but not before a zillion people took a screenshot of it like I showed you there. Oh, and here is the
00:10:04.980same prediction again, though, made in the year 2016. Will snow become a thing in the past? Yeah, I'm sure
00:10:12.860this will be deleted in a few years, too, and then someone else will repeat the doomsday scenario. But
00:10:17.700look, that's not really nuts compared to the latest fad. We have only 12 years left to live. Or is it 10 years
00:10:27.460left to live? Or is it nine years left to live? I don't know.
00:10:32.860And I think that the part of it that is generational is that millennials and people and, you know, Gen Z
00:10:43.520and all these folks that come after us are looking up and we're like, the world is going to end in 12
00:10:50.120years if we don't address climate change. And your biggest issue is your biggest issue is how are we
00:10:59.880going to pay for it? That precision 12 years, not not 11, not 13. It's just gorgeous. That's just
00:11:09.180good. The thing about a good apocalyptic doomsday cult is that the moment of truth is close enough
00:11:14.880that you can scare people into giving you money or whatever, which she was after them. But it's far
00:11:20.900enough into the future that the cult leader or whoever is saying the sky's going to fall can fleece
00:11:26.360everybody before that moment of truth arrives. And when it does arrive, just delete the website where
00:11:32.640you made the prediction. Now look at that terrifying picture on the CBC's website. Wow, that's very
00:11:41.400global warming-ish, isn't it? But those are actually Australian wildfires, which apparently, by
00:11:48.880implication here, only started happening in recent years since Trump became president or something.
00:11:53.820They've never happened before. Now it's true there have been some bad Australian brush fires. So what
00:11:59.600caused them? Was it global warming? Well, according to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, that's
00:12:05.980Australia's CBC. They've actually all been caused by humans, or in some cases, lightning.
00:12:13.700Here's a story from the ABC. Last week, we learned that the Binnaburra Fire, which destroyed the
00:12:19.680historic Binnaburra Lodge in southeast Queensland, was started by a carelessly discarded cigarette.
00:12:26.960And the Gold Coast Hinderland, which fires the week before, may have been started by army live
00:12:31.940firing exercises at the Kokoda Barracks, a spokesman for the Australian Defence Force has conceded.
00:12:39.940We know that hot, dry and windy weather increases the risk of fire starting. But here's what we
00:12:47.020know about what actually provides a spark, the nine categories of bushfire ignition. You can see them
00:12:52.420smoking, arson, sparks from railroads, campfires, lightning. None of the nine are global warming.
00:13:03.760Sorry, the CBC's lying to you again. But let's get to the heart of the story today on the CBC,
00:13:10.680that one insane statistic that they're terrified about. They love those insane statistics. It makes
00:13:17.280it sciency when you could add a number. That Bill Nye gender dance was weird and gross. But I don't
00:13:25.280think it really worked because it wasn't convincing because it was just really bad singing and really
00:13:29.520bad dancing and just sort of gross. But there was no pretend science there, no number, no 10 years
00:13:35.980till we're dead, no 11,000 scientists say. So it wasn't sciency. So here's what today's CBC story
00:13:44.120by the CBC's non-scientist science reporter said. Without drastic action, our planet is headed
00:13:52.280towards warming of 3.2 degrees Celsius in less than 100 years, according to a new report.
00:13:58.300Jennifer Francis, a senior scientist at Woods Hole Research Center in Falmouth, Massachusetts,
00:14:04.660an independent research organization that studies climate change, said that a 3.2 degree Celsius
00:14:10.200warming world would cause untold suffering. Because that's science language too.
00:14:16.680So who is this Woods Hole Research Center that is so independent that the CBC felt obliged to call
00:14:23.800them independent? Well, I googled it. And I know you're not supposed to do things like ask questions
00:14:30.240as a reporter. You're not supposed to think for yourself. But shocker, do you see the names there,
00:14:35.460the board, the leadership of the Woods Hole Research Center? It's Obama's former global warming
00:14:42.980advisors. There's Philip Duffy there. I don't know if you can see his name. And former senior advisor
00:14:51.600to Barack Obama. And there's James Holdren, Obama's top science staffer for eight years.
00:14:58.100So yeah, why is the CBC lying to you again? Why are they saying they're independent researchers?
00:15:05.700They're Obama's staff. So back to the 3.2 degrees Celsius nightmare, terrifying thing. I don't believe
00:15:15.560it, just like I didn't believe it. In the year 2000, when some kook looking for a grant or a subsidy
00:15:21.080said all the snow would be gone by now. Or back to the fake scientist CBC reporter for a second here.
00:15:28.340She says, the good news. As is typical with any UN climate change report, there's a positive take.
00:15:35.460Hey guys, I'm a science reporter and I can tell you that. Countries committed to the Paris Agreement
00:15:40.460and NDCs, I'll explain that in a minute, are set to meet in Madrid on December 2nd for the United Nations
00:15:47.880Climate Change Conference and to meet in Glasgow in November 2020 to examine NDC efforts.
00:15:55.560But the new report says countries can't wait that long. Action needs to be taken immediately.
00:16:00.480So you don't have 12 years, people. Well, scientists said there's good news. The United Nations here to
00:16:07.340save us. That's the good news, people, according to the scientists. Action needs to be taken immediately.
00:16:12.860It's all agreed. The CBC, the UN, Obama's people, we all agree. Let me read a little bit
00:16:17.680more from the CBC science reporter, who's not a scientist. Renewables and energy efficiency is
00:16:22.780one of the key measures to effectively reduce emissions. And the electrification of heat and
00:16:27.220energy and even transportation could make measure headway. With that, however, comes a hefty price
00:16:32.620tag, roughly 1.6 to 3.8 trillion dollars annually over the next decade. Why don't you just say
00:16:41.720gazillion, guys? Why don't you just say gazillion? But it will be worth the cost,
00:16:49.260Ohlhoff says. That's some UN bureaucrat. This is definitely not a world we want to pass on to our
00:16:54.640children and grandchildren, she said. Speak for yourself. It's not a world we want. Speak for
00:17:01.900yourself. Hey, all you need, guys, is 2, 3, 4 trillion per year spent on us and we'll save you
00:17:10.920from this terrifying boogeyman. No big deal. Hey, by the way, you could get every single person in the
00:17:16.560world, everyone in the world, including Grassy Narrows, Canada, clean water for that. Everyone.
00:17:22.440You could end hunger for the entire world for that. You could build housing for, what, 100 million
00:17:31.740people a year? Easily. But no, no, no. Spend it on green schemes and wind turbines, guys. That's
00:17:39.600what Ohlhoff says. That's Ann Ohlhoff of the United Nations. So I guess it's settled, right? I mean,
00:17:44.520who are you to go up against the 11,000 scientists or the Woods Hole independent researchers?
00:17:52.440Scientists. Scientists. Scientists. Scientists. Scientists. Scientists. Yeah, they're not really
00:18:00.180scientists. They're lobbyists and politicians. And in the case of this CBC reporter, someone with
00:18:05.420a bachelor's vocational degree in storytelling, and she's doing a great job. But let's look at the
00:18:11.160UN report itself. Because I no longer trust a word I hear from the CBC about it. I don't trust
00:18:17.380the report. It's from the liars of the United Nations who want all your money. But let's see
00:18:24.180what the scientists at the CBC twisted. So here it is. Here's the UN report itself. Now let me tell
00:18:32.740you about one piece of jargon first. NDC. You saw that in the CBC story. Here's their official
00:18:37.900definition. Nationally determined contribution. Submissions by countries that have ratified the
00:18:44.180Paris Agreement, which presents their national efforts to reach the Paris Agreement's long-term
00:18:49.000temperature goal of limiting warming to well below two degrees Celsius. So it's all the promises
00:18:53.860that politicians make of the UN. That's an NDC. It's a promise. And by the way, no country,
00:18:59.400especially not Canada, has kept their promise. The point is to make the promise, get a lot of PR,
00:19:04.640get the CBC to say how good you are. It's not to actually destroy your economy. No one's keeping
00:19:10.240these promises, these NDCs. And there's just one more piece of jargon. Conditional NDCs. What a bunch
00:19:16.900of baloney, eh? But here's how they define that. Conditional NDC. NDC proposed by some countries that
00:19:25.740are contingent on a range of possible conditions, such as the ability of national legislatures to
00:19:31.320enact the necessary laws. Ambitious action from other countries. Realization of finance and technical
00:19:37.540support or other factors. So a conditional NDC is another way of saying a daydream, a stretch goal,
00:19:45.500something that will never happen given that the regular provinces aren't happening. This is just
00:19:51.040fantasy land now. The UN's good at that. So here's the part in the report about the 3.2 degrees. You
00:19:57.420remember that was sort of the terrifying part in the CBC story? Here's the report. If current
00:20:03.740conditions, unconditional NDCs are fully implemented, there's a 66% chance that warming will be limited
00:20:11.660to 3.2 degrees Celsius by the end of the century. If conditional NDCs, those are the fantasies,
00:20:18.740are also effectively implemented, warming will likely reduce by about 0.2 degrees Celsius.
00:20:28.200Is that it? So let me translate. If every country in the world were to do everything they promised to
00:20:37.840do to fight global warming, the UN says the world is still going to get 3.2 degrees warmer
00:20:44.780in the year 2100. Now, I don't believe it, of course. They'll always be wrong. Every single year,
00:20:51.920they're wrong. They're always wrong in the same direction. These are the people who said there
00:20:56.540will be no snow by now. But let's assume that these liars of the United Nations are actually
00:21:01.740telling the truth. So they're saying if every single country in the world keeps their global
00:21:07.240warming promise, the world will still warm by 3.2 degrees by the year 2100. But here's the good news,
00:21:16.480people. If every country in the world goes even further than their promises and does all their
00:21:24.520fantasy goals, which will never happen, of course, but even in that daydream scenario,
00:21:32.520the UN says the globe will still warm. It won't make a difference. It won't stop the warming.
00:21:39.440It will still be 3.0 degrees warmer in the year 2100. So even if we spent the trillions of dollars a year,
00:21:47.260instead of warming by 3.2 degrees in the year 2100, it'll just warm by 3.0 degrees by the year 2100.
00:21:56.300No difference to any impact. It's just the same thing. But we'll have to spend 2, 3, 4 trillion dollars a year per year
00:22:07.680for the next 80 years. Who would be that stupid? Well, CBC.
00:22:15.300Who would spend trillions of dollars a year on a global warming scheme when even the UN itself says
00:22:22.000it will not make a difference? The world will still warm. By the year 2100, if you spend trillions of
00:22:28.140dollars per year on their schemes, it will still get warmer. Spend trillions, and by the year 2100,
00:22:33.600you'll have a 3.0 degree warming, not a 3.2 degree warming. There's no practical difference. Yeah,
00:22:38.760no, no one's that dumb. That's the comedy here. That's what the CBC left out.
00:22:42.340Look at this chart in the report. Figure ES2. That's the one on the left there. You see that
00:22:48.000chart on the left? It's countries and the amount of the emissions. Most of the lines are sort of flat.
00:22:55.780But you see that skyrocketing line? That's China. That's China. The line that's flat, it's America.
00:23:04.780You can see that. Despite a massive increase in their economy in the last 30 years, their emissions
00:23:09.700are flat. Mainly fracking is to credit for the decrease in greenhouse gases. They burn natural
00:23:15.280gas now, not coal so much. Do you see the other line that's growing quickly? It's the fourth line
00:23:21.560down. That's India. And do you see the Canadian line on there? No, you don't. Because Canada is
00:23:31.440just, what, 1.6% of the world's emissions? We wouldn't even be on that chart. Let me show you
00:23:40.480just one last chart. Here's the UN's suggestions for how we're going to get there. Here's the
00:23:45.980big plan. You see that there? China. It's their to-do list for China. I'm just going to read three of
00:23:53.840these. Ban all new coal-fired power plants. Okay, just that. Continue governmental support
00:24:01.940for renewables, taking into account cost reductions and accelerate development towards a 100% carbon-free
00:24:08.600electricity system. Support the uptake of electric mobility, aiming for 100% CO2-free new vehicles.
00:24:18.000Hey, guys, just do those things. Just ban all new coal-fired power plants. Yeah. I love this story
00:24:26.460in the New York Times. I show it from time to time. It's just so great. As Beijing joins climate
00:24:31.900fight, Chinese companies build coal plants. Let me read just one line. It's from the New York Times.
00:24:38.100These Chinese corporations are planning or building or planning to build more than 700 new coal plants
00:24:44.140at home and around the world. Yeah, that's not going to stop. They're not going to stop that.
00:24:50.740They're not going to stop building hundreds of coal-fired power plants. People need power.
00:24:55.940They need electricity. Most of China's energy is from coal. It will be for decades. You don't build a
00:25:03.380coal-fired power plant for a few years. You build it for 50, maybe even 100 years. And so every electric
00:25:09.840vehicle in China, even if they could afford a Tesla, they would be running on coal, too, since that's where
00:25:18.080the electricity comes from to charge them. A Tesla in China burns coal like it does in California.
00:25:27.640What a joke. This whole thing is a joke. This whole thing is fake. Everything about this is fake.
00:25:32.720As fake as the 11,000 scientists, the CBC science reporter is not a scientist. She quotes an independent
00:25:40.040think tank that's actually run by Obama's staff. She claims that a 3.2 degree Celsius increase in the
00:25:47.680next century is terrifying. But hey, guys, good news. The United Nations is meeting. So if we do what
00:25:53.660they say and spend what they tell us to spend, we can get that down to 3.0 degrees 80 years from now,
00:25:59.980which is not going to happen because China isn't as stupid as Trudeau is or the CBC is.
00:26:06.660Who do you think is the bigger liar here? The UN or the CBC? Stay with us for more.
00:26:13.620Right now we're in the middle of the demonstration outside of Poly University. Poly University is the campus where 20 students are holed up following eight days of being blockaded inside of the campus.
00:26:37.420They're running out of food. Some say on Telegram that they've been contemplating suicide. Now, this crowd has gathered here in the aftermath of the election that happened on Sunday where there's an overwhelming Democratic win.
00:26:48.420Now, that means that the pro-Beijing loyalist parties lost a ton of seats here in Hong Kong. And in light of that, they've all of these Hong Kong students and graduates have come to the periphery of the Poly University campus and are chanting five demands, not one less.
00:27:06.560Liberate Hong Kong. And now, if you look up there, we'll just point the camera up there. I'm not sure if you'll be able to see them, but there's police officers pacing along this walkway that goes straight into the campus from over here from the street, from the main market area right next to the campus, into the campus.
00:27:28.580There's police walking along there, and what we're seeing is the crowd is heckling them. I've never seen anything like this. Thousands of people shining their phone lights.
00:27:40.860They're shining their phone lights at them, chanting at the police officers walking along that walkway. This is surreal.
00:27:49.160Well, how exciting is that? Our own Kian Bextie right in the thick of it at the university campus in Hong Kong that has been the focal point of so many of the democracy movement's protests.
00:28:03.280And the police, well, counter-protest isn't the right word. The preliminary steps to what I worried was going to be a Tiananmen Square-style massacre.
00:28:13.580Thank God that didn't happen. In fact, what did happen was a local municipal election throughout Hong Kong, although it didn't deal with grand issues, it was very much, you know, who picks up the garbage and low-level municipal affairs.
00:28:31.060It was a proxy for the larger fight. There were pro-Beijing parties and pro-Hong Kong parties.
00:28:37.820And the pro-Hong Kong parties slaughtered the Beijing side, and Kian was there.
00:28:43.540I shouldn't say the word slaughter when I'm talking about Hong Kong, because death is a threat from Beijing, for sure.
00:28:49.460Joining us now to talk about his days in Hong Kong is our friend Kian Bextie. Kian, great work.
00:28:55.880Thanks so much. Yeah, it's been surreal being here on the ground in Hong Kong.
00:29:00.440It's like nothing I've—every time I go to a new location for this job with Rebel News, I always say it's like nothing I've ever seen before.
00:29:10.300But this truly was just a surreal experience being on the ground where there's so many people fighting for their liberty in the true sense of the word.
00:35:07.240But we looked on the floor, and something I noticed was a little chip, and it was a SIM card.
00:35:12.080And I don't want to say too much about it because I'm sure – well, I still have the SIM card on me.
00:35:19.360We're going to be bringing it back to Canada to analyze it, but I have it on good authority that this is something from what looks like a burner phone,
00:35:27.020or it's something that could trace a phone if it was in a device.
00:35:44.600It seems like a phishing attempt where you drop a SIM card and hope that the people who find it will put it in their phone out of curiosity.
00:35:52.700And when they do that, it could compromise the device.
00:35:56.540We're going to bring it back to Canada and have our security guys analyze it.
00:35:59.780Hopefully, they can figure something out, figure out why it was there.
00:36:02.000But what's curious is that it's not mine, it's not my cameraman's, and it was certainly most definitely not on the floor when we took custody of the room.
00:36:13.040We had the room for about three days before we found it.
00:36:16.680And the Do Not Disturb sign was on the door the whole time.
00:36:19.340We didn't want any maids coming in and going through our stuff or anything like that.
00:36:22.540So there's no way this could have gotten here.
00:36:27.160We just don't understand why that SIM card would be in our room.
00:44:06.680I think if we are to be shut down, it's likely to come stealthily from the government through, to be laundered through, to be contracted out to something like you two.
00:44:19.100I mean, if the government were to take a frontal attack on us, we would see it coming.
00:44:23.820We could fight back, scream like hell, go to court, and it would be messy, and we might even win, like we won when Trudeau tried to ban us from the leaders' debates.
00:44:35.520But if they were just to make a phone call to Facebook or YouTube or Twitter and say, hey, shut that guy down.
00:44:43.640And if they were to obey, as they've obeyed to so many people on the right, how would we even know what happened there?
00:44:49.180So, yeah, I think there is a significant threat that we will be deplatformed in the next seven or eight years.
00:44:55.920It is a significant risk that it will come from Justin Trudeau, but we'll be masked through some cutout, some middleman like YouTube.
00:45:04.660Steve writes, isn't this the way of the left to spout off nasty slurs first?
00:45:10.880Guess it makes them feel good somehow.
00:45:12.980Later, some will recant what they said, but very few.