Rebel News Podcast - April 04, 2023


DAILY Roundup | Trump turns himself in, Trudeau's 'Digital Safety Commission', Freeland⧸Ukraine⧸WEF


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour

Words per Minute

158.9476

Word Count

9,638

Sentence Count

23

Misogynist Sentences

30

Hate Speech Sentences

2


Summary

Donald Trump has been charged with a felony for allegedly soliciting a stripper for $10,000 in exchange for sexual favors, and Tamara Yucalini and Ezra react to the news that he will be arrested and face criminal charges.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 oh hi everybody Ezra Levan here at our world headquarters in the greater Toronto area and
00:00:19.320 joining me via Skype is our friend Tamara Yucalini. Tamara how you doing today?
00:00:24.340 Hey Ezra I'm doing well and how about you? Oh I'm doing fine there's so much going on I can't
00:00:28.580 even believe it. Last I heard today is the day that Donald Trump was going to be arrested. Now I've
00:00:34.400 had my head down doing things for a couple hours. Has it happened? I understand they had a negotiated
00:00:41.700 arrangement that they're not going to handcuff him. They're not going to have the photograph you know
00:00:49.600 when you face the camera and then turn left like they're not going to do that to him. It would be
00:00:54.360 pretty much ridiculous if they did. Everyone knows his name. Everybody knows his face. He's not going
00:01:00.380 to run anywhere. But it's I think it's the end of an era of judicial independence in the United States.
00:01:07.400 The end of an era of the rule of law because if they can arrest and prosecute a former president
00:01:13.680 for something completely unrelated to his work as president for really an accounting issue
00:01:21.080 regarding a payment to a stripper who says signed a statement saying no I didn't sleep with him and
00:01:29.780 no the money didn't come from him you know even if that's false I don't even care if they can prosecute
00:01:35.880 a president for that they can prosecute a president for anything and why wouldn't Republican DAs go after
00:01:44.440 Hillary Clinton for real things like deleting tens of thousands of emails for having a private server for
00:01:50.160 having the Clinton Foundation where they pocket tens of millions of dollars from foreign government why
00:01:54.960 wouldn't they go after Hunter Biden and what they find there go after Joe Biden why wouldn't they go
00:01:59.840 after Obama for his dealings with the Russians remember when he said to Medvedev tell Vladimir that
00:02:07.760 I'll have more flexibility after the election I mean why wouldn't a Republican prosecute any and every
00:02:15.920 single Democrat and Democrats prosecute every Republican and soon we have a lawless kangaroo court America
00:02:22.880 and not surprisingly the Democrats started I'm worried that this will bring the the administration of
00:02:30.800 justice into disrepute but it's also going to start an arms race of prosecuting each other it's the other
00:02:38.180 side what do you think yeah I think you hit the nail on the head there Ezra that this is a very clear
00:02:44.660 weaponization of the judicial system to really use it against any sort of political opposition I mean this is the
00:02:53.880 non-disclosure agreement which is being touted in the media as as hush money right so it's funny the way that words can
00:03:00.280 also be weaponized against political opponents and they are very clearly doing so using the media as their sort of
00:03:07.180 state-backed lapdogs but there are so many details and nuances here that have just been hidden from the public not not
00:03:15.320 hidden but they will be unsealed today I suppose when the indictment happens and this so-called arrest which
00:03:22.080 sounds more like it's just going to be an appearance and I imagine that the Democrats are pretty upset that
00:03:29.620 they're not getting their mugshot I think that this whole debacle and spectacle was really generated to
00:03:38.140 get that mugshot to get that clickbait and look we have him he's cuffed he's getting his mugshot done
00:03:44.720 he's getting his prints um and they're not getting that satisfaction that I think was uh kind of par for
00:03:53.040 the course in this um in this witch hunt really this political witch hunt they couldn't find anything
00:03:59.060 else so here they are coming up with a bunch of misdemeanor charges trying to have it escalated
00:04:03.840 um and still we don't have all of the details on the indictment itself um and and all of the alleged
00:04:10.140 misdemeanors are really unclear so I guess we'll find it more hopefully today I mean this was supposed
00:04:15.280 this is going back last week and I think even prior to and so it's just been continually dragged on and out
00:04:21.640 and as that happens I think that the support for Trump just gains traction you know I I think that
00:04:30.220 the media has cried wolf so often oh Russiagate we've got the proof uh that he was in collusion
00:04:37.280 with the Russians oh his tax returns all we need is tax returns and we'll show that he broke the law
00:04:42.120 well at the end of after spending what 100 million dollars on the Mueller investigation to Russiagate
00:04:47.220 there was nothing there they leaked or they grabbed his tax returns after he fought that for years there
00:04:53.500 was nothing there how many times have they said the walls are closing in on him Michael Avenatti and
00:04:59.380 Stormy Daniels have him on the run well actually it's Michael Avenatti uh that's in jail now and I
00:05:05.160 and I think it's good that he didn't get a photograph of him in handcuffs because Donald Trump's
00:05:11.940 appeal to Republicans and to Americans in general is I'm a winner I'm going to win so much you're
00:05:17.300 going to be sick of winning we're going to win we're going to succeed I can get it done having
00:05:21.680 a picture of a man in handcuffs um would make the Democrats squeal with delight and would send a
00:05:27.600 shocking image around the world but uh it's not in Trump's interest I think that everyone knows that
00:05:34.600 he is being vilified and picked on by the system and that's a problem when you see FBI agents cheering
00:05:43.180 um like uh you know past FBI directors senior FBI officers like Peter Strzok um James Comey cheering all
00:05:54.520 this they they feel good cheering it but don't they know that half of Americans now think the FBI the
00:06:04.400 CIA the deep state the attorneys general and even the police don't they know that they no longer think
00:06:10.260 of those institutions as for all Americans or neutral but they now say okay so you're a cop
00:06:15.720 uh you're FBI you're a DA you are a hostile partisan enemy I can't pretend that you're on my side why should
00:06:24.280 I be on your side I think this has done I mean who knows maybe this will finish off Trump he already
00:06:30.600 lost the last election and he's getting a little long in the truth for a run in 2024
00:06:34.480 but hasn't the enduring damage here being damage to the institutions and I think it'll take a
00:06:42.780 generation for people to trust those institutions again what do you think the lack of impartiality
00:06:49.340 is something that we've kind of seen uh happen all across democratic nations but primarily in the west
00:06:55.400 and it's really been heightened and highlighted by the the COVID narrative and all of the nuances
00:07:01.840 that come have come along with that so um snap elections political interference electoral interference
00:07:09.640 all of these things are really starting to uh cause a groundswell of general public distrust in
00:07:17.600 all levels of government our institutions which are supposed to be impartial and neutral as you said
00:07:23.380 and um it's really starting to to boil to a head um and I think that this is just further evidenced by
00:07:30.940 this witch hunt against Donald Trump for something that many politicians engage regularly in and are
00:07:39.300 never prosecuted criminally for I mean look at Justin Trudeau himself he's supposed to have this
00:07:44.620 non-disclosure agreement with a minor um it's called a non-disclosure agreement no one's ever referred
00:07:49.620 to it as hush money which I mean maybe it's conflated I don't know uh you know I haven't seen a
00:07:55.540 Trudeau non-disclosure agreement but it's remarkable for example Rose Knight the woman Trudeau admits to
00:08:00.660 sexually assaulting in Creston BC um she hasn't said a word is that her own choice really or was she paid a
00:08:08.080 half a million dollars and a non and to sign a non-disclosure agreement we don't know and the media is
00:08:13.300 not very curious I want to show I mean in in the case of this New York DA the district attorney for
00:08:20.460 the uh for Manhattan um he's a hard left-wing woke progressive activist he sets all manner of actual
00:08:29.920 criminals go um and he prosecutes for example he prosecute a shopkeeper who used a gun to defend
00:08:36.720 himself against someone who shot him he uh um he's atrocious so you have embedded activists like him
00:08:46.460 and James Comey etc but then you just have woke people who were woke in college just sort of being
00:08:54.020 wafted up in life I want to show you a video I've shown this before on my show this is the lead juror
00:09:00.140 on the grand jury in Georgia because they were trying to get some indictment against Trump too I'm not
00:09:06.800 as familiar with how the American system works I'm I went to law school in Canada I practiced law
00:09:11.060 in Canada in the past we don't have this same system I think a DA has to convince a certain group of
00:09:18.980 jurors to press charge I don't know how it works but so this is a lay person but this was the lead
00:09:26.500 juror on the uh Georgia grand jury that was going to subpoena Trump I just want you to see and by
00:09:35.100 the way it's completely illegal uh for her to go public and yap about it but look at the kind of
00:09:40.640 person uh and I and I guess they had a grand jury in New York full of these people take a look at this
00:09:46.440 this is uh someone who said yep I want to prosecute Trump and here's why take a look personally want
00:09:52.700 to hear from the former president I wanted to hear from the former president but honestly I kind of
00:09:56.820 wanted to subpoena the former president because I got to swear everybody in and so I thought it'd be
00:10:01.220 really cool to get 60 seconds with President Trump of me looking at him and being like do you solemnly
00:10:06.460 swear and me getting to swear him in I just I kind of just thought that would be an awesome moment
00:10:11.020 personally that is literally the head of the grand jury in Georgia I mean having uh too much fun
00:10:20.980 yeah uh someone a tourist in the in the legal system yeah uh a pawn in a partisan DA's attempt
00:10:29.360 to get Trump well um in New York City they had a grand jury that said yeah let's go after Trump
00:10:34.460 that's the thing I think you have blue state justice and red state justice
00:10:38.900 if you are a Republican if you're a conservative don't get charged in Washington DC or Manhattan
00:10:46.580 or Chicago or LA you will not get justice how many January 6th rioters and we saw the imagery once they
00:10:55.220 were inside the the Capitol building they were actually meanderers who were being led around by
00:11:00.160 police they were you know how many of those people have been languishing in solitary confinement for
00:11:05.280 what two years now um and there's no no no chance of a fair trial there no jury no no judge
00:11:12.920 um I think that you you pump enough radicalism into law schools that's going to take 5 10 20 years
00:11:23.160 to work its way through the system but you now have radical woke judges let alone prosecutors
00:11:28.960 and I again I weep for the rule of law in America anyway I want to move on from the Trump thing
00:11:35.840 Tamara because I don't I don't know how much news there is other than I understand that he actually
00:11:42.540 did go through the process earlier today um and I don't propose that we attempt to give live coverage
00:11:49.240 to it I don't think we're equipped for that but I did want to talk about it because I see it as a
00:11:53.440 dangerous trend but there are other things I want to talk about um let's hop to the other side of the
00:12:03.440 world I Avi did a tiktok on this um Efron I don't know if you want to grab Avi's tiktok or if you just
00:12:10.600 want to use the um the New Zealand prime minister clip that we ran but Avi did a great banter back and
00:12:17.460 forth um that you can find on his uh tiktok um but I'll take whichever version yeah that's it right
00:12:28.980 there can you put that online this is just great this is a question that every single person knows
00:12:35.340 the answer to I think two-year-olds know the answer to this so if you're 30 or 40 or 50 and you don't
00:12:41.940 know the answer it's not you're lying so it becomes sort of a a lie detector test every single human
00:12:51.300 being knows what a woman is so when you don't answer or say you don't know you're not showing
00:12:57.560 you're smart you're showing that you're a liar and why would you lie because you are so scared of
00:13:05.440 telling the truth it's a fascinating lie detector test look at this and Avi does a great job here take a
00:13:09.900 you will not believe the toughest question New Zealand's caretaker prime minister has received
00:13:15.100 so far how do you and how does this government define a woman um
00:13:20.520 I to be honest Sean that's that that question's come slightly out of left field for me um the
00:13:30.540 well biology sex gender um
00:13:35.740 people define themselves people define their own genders that doesn't really answer the question
00:13:44.820 let's try that again I'd ask again how do you define what a woman is well as I've I think as I've just
00:13:52.020 indicated I wasn't expecting that question so it's not something that I've um you know formulated
00:13:56.440 pre-formulated an answer on if you need to pre-formulate an answer to what a woman is
00:14:01.520 you should be running a country try attending kindergarten
00:14:07.280 not kindergarten in today's schools though they are teaching them that you know gender is this
00:14:14.960 social construct and we have to denounce the stereotypes of them um if you go to kindergarten
00:14:21.020 here in certain provinces in Canada you may not be taught the difference between a man and a woman
00:14:27.080 and what constitutes a woman and um I don't think that it is a biologist that needs to define a woman
00:14:33.020 like like you said Ezra anyone can define what a woman is and it's an adult female um we have
00:14:39.800 you know various physical etc differences than men and um the the refusal to acknowledge that
00:14:50.100 is just absolutely absurd um I can't I every day I can't believe that we are here and that we have
00:14:58.800 people as Avi said running a country who is too afraid to simply define what a woman is yeah you know
00:15:08.540 you're so right here I am I'm 51 so I'm laughing haha everyone knows what everyone but you are so right
00:15:15.340 um that would be like saying everyone knows who um Jimmy Carson was no not if you're under 40
00:15:25.780 oh well everyone knows um Benny Hill no not if you're under 50 you know um so here I am laughing
00:15:34.860 about it and and Matt Walsh of the Daily Wire who's done important work on this he's got to be
00:15:39.460 late 40s if you are in school today
00:15:44.660 it wouldn't be a lie detector test it would be a memorization test can you regurgitate
00:15:52.380 the baffle gab that your teachers told you about what a woman is Chris Hipkins the the new New Zealand
00:16:00.500 prime minister is probably looks like he's around 40 would you say um so he knows and he's lying
00:16:07.560 but you are exactly right if you were to ask high school kids or college kids they would not get they
00:16:16.540 probably would know but they would be so terrified of giving the wrong answer they would just regurgitate
00:16:22.560 what the teachers told them and that's if the teachers would tell them at all the curriculums have
00:16:27.460 been so radicalized by these diversity inclusion radical social justice warriors because that's
00:16:34.720 what they are um for for some school boards I've been searching out who the policy advisors are on a
00:16:40.480 lot of the curriculum that's been coming down the pike in the last few years and namely in Ontario
00:16:45.600 because that's where I'm located but a lot of these diversity equity inclusion advisors self
00:16:53.280 describe themselves as social justice activists like they're not even hiding their political
00:17:00.400 leanings and these are the people who are advising entire school boards on policy how to institute human
00:17:08.800 resources change checks and balances uh bring in what are called supplementary materials so we see a lot
00:17:17.140 of very highly sexualized even at times pornographic content materials being readily accessible
00:17:23.180 the children in elementary school in their in their libraries in our public libraries um this is
00:17:30.280 going you know the the politicization of school and you know as we just talked about with trump the
00:17:36.260 politicization of the judicial system this is becoming a slippery slope of lack of neutrality lack of
00:17:43.440 impartiality and people with clear political agendas are infiltrating and arguably have been for decades
00:17:50.500 these systems and undermining that very neutrality that used to garner the trust of the public we are they're no
00:17:59.580 longer institutions that we can say oh you know that's where you go to learn your abcs and your one two threes no that's
00:18:06.160 where you can also go to learn radical ideologies that are based on theories instead of actual facts as the facts like
00:18:13.240 learning abcs and one two threes are completely disregarded for preference to this one-sided
00:18:19.980 narrative under the this umbrella of being inclusive and tolerant and as we see more and more protests and
00:18:26.120 and and public um sort of the silent majority as i like to call them coming forward and denouncing many of
00:18:32.280 these trends um these people who claim to be inclusive and tolerant are in fact the exact opposite right it's like
00:18:38.160 antifa being anti-fascism when in fact they use fascism to just silence any of their opponents and anyone
00:18:44.740 who may disagree with them i want to whip through a few more news stories i i mentioned that chris hipkins
00:18:49.480 because he's the at least the acting prime minister of new zealand the um there have been two uh young
00:18:56.480 world economic forum uh leaders uh who have recently exited politics and i think the world is a better
00:19:04.160 place for one is jacinda ardern the former prime minister of new zealand you just saw her successor
00:19:11.200 there who can't define a woman jacinda ardern was absolutely atrocious she probably had the most brutal
00:19:16.900 lockdown in the western world i don't think we properly covered it because new zealand was really
00:19:24.380 became a bit of a hermit kingdom you couldn't get in or out they were extremely censorious you might know
00:19:29.460 they kept our reporter aviamini out of the country um like they literally banned foreign reporters from
00:19:36.100 reporting on how bad things were so that's jacinda ardern i got something to say about what she's up to
00:19:40.340 next in a moment but i want to show you um one of the worst leaders in the world was another world
00:19:49.440 economic forum acolyte named sanna marin if i'm pronouncing that right and she was the prime minister
00:19:55.300 of finland and she just got booted with the biggest boot you ever did see
00:20:01.640 she was the worst she she was not woke like um like aoc she was much more controlled she was just a pure
00:20:13.620 world economic forum davos robot and um just trounced in the last election completely thrown out
00:20:22.860 i want to show you how i'll always remember her as a empty-headed irresponsible drunk raver and i'm not
00:20:36.940 saying you can't have fun in life if you're over 30 or you can't have fun in life if you're a prime
00:20:44.140 minister i am saying that if you're a serious person who for example is voting to ally your country with
00:20:52.220 nato i don't know how wise it is for finland to give up decades of neutrality and join nato when
00:21:01.280 it's right next to russia i don't know if that's wise i don't know enough about the subject i know
00:21:05.800 that finland has been invaded in the past by russia and by the way they fought russia very boldly but
00:21:11.780 i feel like this woman is not only reckless and unserious but open to blackmail take a look here's one of
00:21:21.060 many videos of her just at a rave take a look at this
00:21:25.500 so
00:21:28.060 well
00:21:39.100 um and that's just one part and i'm again i'm not saying you can't have fun she's 37 years old so
00:22:03.780 maybe it's time to to grow up when you're when you're almost on the wrong side of 40
00:22:07.800 um and she's an attractive young woman doing hitting the nightclubs uh going to raves and
00:22:14.960 in private residences there's other i won't get into all the party videos for her and this is not
00:22:21.220 my way of saying i don't like people having fun or i don't like parties but when you are the prime
00:22:27.380 minister of a country that is joining nato that is bellicose towards russia that's implementing
00:22:33.220 a very strident globalist agenda maybe come across as serious i think i wonder how many
00:22:41.680 fins kicked her out and put in place instead a conservative leaning government partly in response
00:22:48.360 to her total lack of seriousness and i don't think it's enough for a young woman to say oh you're
00:22:53.700 just against me having fun or you're just against me being a young woman i don't think so um golda
00:23:00.100 meir indira gandhi benazir buto margaret thatcher i suppose they weren't 37 well actually let me check
00:23:06.340 how old was margaret thatcher when she was first elected let me let me she was born in 1925
00:23:14.600 margaret thatcher let me write i'm gonna do some quick math here and she was in office as p.m
00:23:22.080 in 1979 so okay so it was she was 54 when she became p.m um but she was a leader of the conservative
00:23:35.420 party in 1975 so she was 50 and um where was she an mp um
00:23:45.080 um she member of parliament 1959 so she was 25 plus nine
00:24:02.140 she was 34 when she first became an mp sorry for the math by the time margaret thatcher was prime
00:24:11.860 minister of of the united kingdom she was in her 50s the united kingdom is a very serious country
00:24:17.440 a nuclear country um if i'm not mistaken it's on the um security council of the united nations as
00:24:23.500 part of the five eyes alliance it it's an incredibly important trading country it's an economic powerhouse
00:24:30.220 of course it's a former empire in the commonwealth so to become the prime minister of the united
00:24:35.300 kingdom is a much larger achievement than being becoming the prime minister of finland um a country
00:24:42.660 of five million people i mean london itself is twice the size of finland but i don't think margaret
00:24:49.280 thatcher was hitting the raves i think because she was so deeply gripped by the the the uh demands
00:24:58.540 and the responsibility of leading the united kingdom you know it's not just go ahead well i was just
00:25:06.940 going to say it's not just a lack of seriousness it's about upholding professionalism and being that
00:25:13.440 public a public leader right you're trying to lead a nation especially through some tumultuous times so
00:25:19.000 um i'm i'm relieved to hear that finland's you know taken that sway that they are doing away with
00:25:26.000 this woke nonsense that is more focused on you know having fun and being unserious and and lacking
00:25:32.660 that professionalism that's needed to be a reputable leader no one um had any good you know there's there's
00:25:40.220 not great historical context there for leaders that took to partying um well very primarily delegating
00:25:49.700 their duties or neglecting uh their their professional duties i mean i i just i think
00:25:56.860 the media party loved it the world economic reform loved it i think uh ideological fellow travelers liked
00:26:03.140 it and i think feminists said yes slay queen but um i just don't know if that's a serious um
00:26:10.840 if that's how the the head of a nato country should be in heavy times of war i don't know um
00:26:18.280 jacinda ardern is also out and she quit she wasn't thrown out by voters i think she was about to be
00:26:26.280 thrown out uh she is just as bad as uh santa maran in some ways worse new zealand i mentioned finland's
00:26:38.420 got about five and a half million uh people in it uh new zealand is um
00:26:45.140 let me just check the population in new zealand it can't be much bigger in fact it's a little bit
00:26:54.780 smaller um so being the prime minister of new zealand is is like being the mayor of toronto
00:27:02.540 looks like there's about five million souls in new zealand so so jacinda ardern and santa maran
00:27:10.640 were prime ministers of countries but if they were in north america it would be like the mayor of a
00:27:17.480 big city and i'm not downplaying it i mean it's it's an important job in that country and you you do
00:27:23.760 have a seat at the table of nations um in the case of new zealand they're part of the five eyes
00:27:28.380 alliance they they have a brave past militarily but i think they've marginalized themselves by
00:27:34.680 getting into china's orbit jacinda ardern quit before she was fired like santa maran she was the
00:27:42.240 darling of the world economic forum when she was young she was the president of the international union
00:27:49.000 of socialist youth so she was like a young pioneer and i think she really wreaked havoc on her own
00:27:58.060 country in a lot of ways extremely authoritarian so she is out but i see the news and that front i
00:28:04.280 don't know if you have it there that she is now uh i'm just good i'm reading from a ctv story i can
00:28:13.700 i'll pop that in uh slack if you want to put it on on the screen i just grabbed a random story here's
00:28:20.400 the story jacinda ardern to begin new role combating online extremism i'm just reading the ctv version
00:28:30.500 from the associated press it's probably the exact same story you've got on the screen there jacinda
00:28:35.560 ardern who stepped down as new zealand's prime minister in january will begin an unpaid role
00:28:39.220 this month combating online extremism um i i just put it in slack the version i'm quoting from
00:28:48.900 new zealand prime minister chris hipkins who took over as leader from ardern announced tuesday he'd
00:28:55.180 appointed ardern as special envoy for the christ church call that's the name of their censorship
00:29:02.280 project hipkins and ardern will begin the part-time said ardern will begin the part-time role this month
00:29:07.660 right after she leaves parliament and that she declined to accept any pay he said the role would
00:29:13.220 be reviewed at the end of the year ardern launched the christ church call with french president
00:29:18.600 emmanuel macron in 2019 two months after a white supremacist gunman killed 51 people at two mosques
00:29:24.100 in the new zealand city of christ church the gunman live streamed the slaughter for 17 minutes on
00:29:29.280 facebook before the video was taken down christ church calls goal is to eliminate terrorist and
00:29:36.120 violent extremist content online more than 50 countries have since signed up to the christ church
00:29:41.180 call including the united states britain germany and south korea tech companies to sign up including
00:29:45.120 include facebook parent company meta amazon google microsoft youtube zoom and twitter now let me stop
00:29:49.540 right there if the christ church call if this censorship project was truly as described by the
00:29:57.440 associated press here who on earth could possibly oppose it you i just read it to you
00:30:03.440 christ church calls goal is to eliminate terrorist and violent extremist content online
00:30:10.400 well who could possibly be against that do you think that that's all it is do you think that's really
00:30:19.140 all it is i'm on the christ church call go to christchurchcall.com
00:30:25.900 and then click about and then click text you want me to put that in the um in the slack for you
00:30:33.040 um supporters of the christ church call have made 25 commitments they say um
00:30:42.400 oh i thought it was just about one thing those commitment including um
00:30:49.900 it's censorship now obviously i'm i'm against terrorism i think terrorism should be censored
00:30:58.920 i mean i'm doing this in real time here um
00:31:09.120 you know what i should have prepared i just thought of this as we go but let me tell you it is much more
00:31:18.180 than just uh against terrorism if it was against terrorism it would be open and shut it would
00:31:24.580 already be done by now what it is against is political dissidents and contrarians it's it was
00:31:31.900 really the precursor to what is these days called misinformation and disinformation things that would
00:31:38.660 pit people against the establishment narrative if the christ church call were truly just about
00:31:44.360 shutting down terrorism you wouldn't need the former president of the international socialist youth
00:31:51.320 to lead it you would it would be led by interpol it would be led by by police by the new york police
00:31:57.640 department and other anti-terrorist groups that's not what it's about you don't have the most censorious
00:32:03.980 authoritarian prime minister of new zealand going to do a policing job she's doing a word policing job
00:32:11.120 i'm sorry i couldn't find it faster um as i was scrolling through it on the internet um so yeah
00:32:18.300 jacinda ardern uh she wrecked new zealand got out before they threw her out and uh now she seeks to
00:32:25.440 evangelize the world with her censorship justin trudeau doesn't need any lessons from her though
00:32:30.020 tamara does he i think he's well on the way to censor canadians on his own with or without the
00:32:34.640 christ church call that's right actually i think i i pulled up a point here on the christ church call and
00:32:39.920 one one part they say they want to develop effective interventions based on trusted information
00:32:45.780 sharing about the effects of algorithmic and other processes to redirect users from what they say are
00:32:52.120 terrorist and violent extremist content and so again this is all open to their interpretation and their
00:32:57.780 definition of what that means and what those words really constitute what they are um just recently
00:33:04.520 i listened to almost three full days of testimony at the national citizens inquiry this past weekend
00:33:11.360 in toronto it was part two i suppose of i think about a seven-part process where they'll the inquiry
00:33:17.680 which is citizen-led and citizen-funded will travel across the country to hear testimonies from citizens
00:33:23.640 negatively affected by covid related mandates and restrictions one of the testimonies was by
00:33:29.660 seasoned veteran journalist rodney palmer former cbc ctv news um he worked very heavily in the mainstream
00:33:37.460 investigative journalists you know many foreign missions including covering the sars um epidemic in
00:33:44.740 um in oh i can't remember where exactly i think it may have been china but anyway don't quote me on that
00:33:51.300 um and he shared a really compelling testimony about how the cbc so in canada our state broadcaster
00:33:57.760 essentially was what they've been turned into um how they have been part of this trusted news
00:34:04.680 initiative and it's a collective agreement between governments and their state broadcasters um and
00:34:10.320 they really focus on propaganda instead of news gathering right so it's no longer about gathering facts
00:34:16.580 and data and independent experts but it's rather about towing the line of whatever the government and
00:34:22.340 throughout the covid narrative what public health wanted you to believe and so it's about trust and
00:34:26.640 garnering trust not about truth and he for anyone who's interested you could go back and find his
00:34:32.820 testimony and i think they've clipped it down to be an individual uh video on their rumble channel the
00:34:37.600 national citizens inquiry very interesting stuff and so this is clearly what uh christ church call
00:34:43.040 is engaging in here is this trusted news initiative um where they're more vested in making sure that you
00:34:49.860 just trust what they say verbatim based on their experts and what they want you to believe
00:34:53.760 rather than following the facts and gathering news wherever it may lead you you know um sorry keep
00:35:00.980 going no yeah well and i was just going to say and that's what uh justin trudeau is instituting the
00:35:06.600 liberals have you know put forward bill c18 bill c11 um that keeps in the case of bill c11 is going back
00:35:13.840 and forth between the senate and the house of commons because they can't agree on what the reasonable
00:35:18.560 limitations are on user generated content and so what justin trudeau is trying to do through the
00:35:24.880 use of again weaponization of legislation and the the process by which we're supposed to engage in our
00:35:30.740 democratic um process he is going we're going to see sweeping censorship of online platforms and
00:35:37.700 specifically here at rebel news um a lot of what we do contradicts what the mainstream would have you
00:35:43.680 believe and what that state broadcaster has been uh engaging in over the past i mean several years
00:35:49.320 um and so they're they're doing this work now as a trusted news initiative and the governments
00:35:56.760 are are allowing this reign of censorship to infiltrate our online content what we can access produce
00:36:05.760 and otherwise find online um will all be defined by whatever the government says
00:36:13.560 is right or wrong thing or wrong speech let me show you some things i i i couldn't i did a whole
00:36:19.480 monologue on the christ church call and i'll have to dig it up because at least the way it's being
00:36:24.020 implemented in canada it goes into political dissidents not terrorists but people who simply
00:36:30.340 politically disagree with trudeau and you know trudeau is a big back booster of it i just put into
00:36:35.820 slack efron a couple of clips to show you where jacinda ardern is coming from when it comes to speech
00:36:41.360 one of the most astonishing things she said um yeah let's start with this clip um this this is one
00:36:48.020 i just thought i'd show people said oh she she was driven out of office by misogyny no no um she she
00:36:55.340 quit because she was atrociously unpopular because of how she abused new zealanders take a listen to this
00:37:01.200 i remain absolutely clear and i i really want to reinforce i i did not leave because i felt that i was
00:37:11.160 being given too much of a hard time and yet the woman who did this in 2020 the only pm to win a
00:37:19.680 majority government under mmp could also read the room and two years after this remarkable victory
00:37:26.360 the room was turning sitting in the back of my mind was this question of belief that
00:37:33.160 perhaps my departure might bring the tempo the heat the friction that had come into politics
00:37:44.420 that it might take it down a peg and if it did that would be good for new zealand
00:37:51.360 i remain absolutely so i i think nothing became her uh in office like the leaving of it um i think
00:38:00.540 the two things she said there were actually laudatory the first is she said no i wasn't
00:38:05.780 hounded out of there um i didn't leave the media said oh she was hounded out because of
00:38:11.080 misogyny she said no and then the second thing she did say is you know what i was becoming a bit toxic
00:38:16.480 i was becoming a bit radioactive and me leaving would probably be good for new zealand that's the
00:38:21.640 most honest that woman's ever been in her life now she got over that brief uh spate of humility and
00:38:27.440 now she's gonna be the envoy to the world bringing censorship around the globe i want to show you
00:38:32.340 a video of her early in the pandemic and you might think this is fake i assure you this is real
00:38:42.300 it was widely reported at the time she said listen to no one else believe no one else except the
00:38:53.140 government we are your only source of truth who who who who do you think you are are you jesus
00:39:02.000 if jesus christ was standing in front of me and said i am your only source of truth i would say
00:39:08.840 yes but there is no other person place or thing organization government or authority who would
00:39:17.240 say we are your only source of truth in fact by saying that she in the new zealand politicians were
00:39:23.700 your only source of truth she proves that's a lie in itself the very statement that they are your only
00:39:30.100 source of truth is a lie and thus proves it false and proves that she's a deceiver take a listen
00:39:35.040 to this and this is the person in charge of global censorship rules take a look daily you can trust
00:39:42.100 us as a source of that information you can also trust the director general of health and the ministry
00:39:48.240 of health for that information do feel free to visit at any time to clarify any rumor you may hear
00:39:54.740 covid19.govt.nz otherwise dismiss anything else we will continue to be your single source of truth
00:40:04.220 we will provide information frequently we will share everything we can everything you are else you
00:40:10.980 see a grain of salt and so i really ask people to focus on this example of that appears to be this
00:40:17.340 text which originated in malaysia and has kind of has become a viral hope from australia and in new
00:40:22.220 zealand how irresponsible is it the people that are sharing that news of a lockdown imminent in new
00:40:26.660 zealand yeah and look that's the kind of thing that adds um to the anxiety that people feel so i
00:40:32.440 continue to share the message new zealanders must prepare but do not panic prepare and and when you
00:40:39.240 see those messages remember that unless you hear it from us um it is not the truth and i really ask
00:40:46.420 people just visit um covid19.govt.nz it has all of the up-to-date information and we will continue to
00:40:55.140 provide everything you need to know oh my god
00:40:58.680 dismiss anything else unless you hear it from us it is not true we are your single source
00:41:07.760 we will tell you everything you need to know lord thundering jesus joseph and mary she actually said
00:41:16.100 those things and even there i think there was a question there about some foreign rumor about a
00:41:23.080 lockdown in new zealand and she said no no no no no if you don't hear it from us it's not true
00:41:27.240 well actually it became true didn't it they locked down extremely hard there imagine
00:41:32.700 the arrogance the hubris the god complex of someone who says if i don't say it it is not true
00:41:44.360 i'm pre i'm telling you in advance whatever you hear from someone else is a lie whatever you hear
00:41:50.180 from me is a truth no matter what i say no matter what someone else says imagine the audacity i mean
00:41:55.860 that there's a yiddish word chutzpah and one of the funny fake definitions of it is
00:42:02.120 an or a man who kills his parents and then says to the judge judge show mercy i'm an orphan
00:42:09.500 that's an example of chutzpah outrageous audacity gall temerity that's what chutzpah means
00:42:18.720 imagine the outrageous audacity the temerity the chutzpah to say in advance whatever anyone else says
00:42:27.640 is a lie in advance whatever i will say in the future is true you should not listen to anyone
00:42:33.920 else from me it's all lies everything i say is true dismiss anything else unless you hear it from
00:42:40.320 me it's not true i am your single source are you a cult leader because unless you are jesus himself
00:42:48.520 i and that woman was the prime minister of new zealand smaller than the city of toronto
00:42:56.920 ran that place abusively and the only thing about her tenure that was admirable was the way she left
00:43:06.860 it just outrageous what do you think of all that have you seen that clip before tomorrow i have yeah
00:43:14.500 you know it was nice to have that reminder because uh i think that was sometime in 2020 maybe even the
00:43:21.200 early months of 2021 but that's you know covid really paved the way for these governments to act
00:43:28.980 this way and to be the purveyors of information and anything else that you hear that counteracts any of
00:43:35.120 that is just blatant mis or disinformation and we should denounce those people we should um silence
00:43:42.680 them they need to be censored uh and now we're seeing in canada our government uh including you know
00:43:49.380 even as recently as parliamentarians being briefed on the liberals plans to create a digital safety
00:43:55.880 commission and this comes as the government is pushing through as i mentioned legislation like bill c18
00:44:01.200 and bill c11 that would see sweeping regulation of the internet uh subject largely to the canadian
00:44:07.840 radio radio television broadcasting corporation and it's so ambiguously worded that even they don't
00:44:14.040 know how they're going to largely enforce or uh withstand this type of legislation but this is an
00:44:21.340 article that came out of black locks and uh they're committed to web censors so cabinet in a letter to
00:44:27.600 mps said it is committed to appointing an internet censor board called a digital safety commission to
00:44:34.360 police legal content but set no deadline for the legislation prime minister justin trudeau earlier
00:44:40.960 described uncensored speech as destabilizing and i guess he's referring to the destabilization of
00:44:49.200 our democracy that we've seen under his government um who claims to be you know transparent open and
00:44:55.400 honest and then hides behind all you know blacked out freedom of information requests appoints people
00:45:01.600 that are politically aligned with him to investigate himself and uh a government who has the most ethics
00:45:07.740 breaches out of any other prime minister in canada's history and just says sorry maybe i'll take a slap
00:45:13.400 on the wrist and a couple of my mps will resign but i'll continue my reign of terror um the article here
00:45:20.820 goes on to say that the government of canada is considering the creation of a new digital safety commission
00:45:26.160 the agency would monitor internet content deemed hurtful through legal the government canada is committed
00:45:33.380 to developing new rules for platforms that are backed by strong enforcement mechanisms so in you know
00:45:39.340 in the sense of bill c11 which i imagine would probably be leaned on heavily if and when it passes which is
00:45:45.220 very close to um very broad heavy fines for anyone who's found to be in non-compliance with whatever
00:45:54.980 the government deems as myths or disinformation or content that is hurtful or hateful or harmful and
00:46:02.060 again those definitions are largely ambiguously worded and open to the interpretation of the government
00:46:06.940 itself um this isn't something that you see being upheld in a free and democratic nation where you have all
00:46:12.760 the information presented and accessible to you and the citizens are informed and intelligent enough
00:46:18.100 to make their own informed choices and decisions and come to their own conclusions and then robustly debate
00:46:24.360 and discuss them no instead we see that we need sweeping censorship and online content regulation
00:46:31.160 um arguably in order for a government like this to remain in power yeah you know um justin trudeau
00:46:41.660 has four bills either in the house of commons or the senate or about to be introduced
00:46:50.320 four to censor the internet he's obsessed with it like i say he doesn't need any lessons
00:46:56.760 from jacinda ardor and he's got bill c11 which regulates the internet gives puts it under control
00:47:02.000 of the crtc bill c18 uh called the online uh one's the online streaming act the other's the online news act
00:47:09.220 they will regulate facebook google youtube bill c36 which was introduced and died in the last
00:47:17.000 parliament which will be reintroduced has fines of up to 70 000 for people who say
00:47:21.940 hurty things online and then the final one called the online harms act which hasn't been introduced yet
00:47:27.740 but a backgrounder has been published would like you say um criminalize lawful but awful commentary
00:47:36.580 i um i want to show you uh something i was referring to with the christ church call i found it and
00:47:46.360 and i sent it to you in slack there efron it's a global news story called canada considering forcing
00:47:52.660 social media companies to remove extremist content and this was after the christ church terrorist attack
00:48:02.000 um but look at the difference in wording so they're quoting uh ralph goodale who was uh
00:48:13.380 still in government at the time i'm just going to read it let me read a bit i'm going to whip
00:48:17.840 through this really quickly so this is this is four years ago now three years ago canada is considering
00:48:24.620 whether to force social media companies to remove hateful and extremist content online okay hang on what
00:48:30.700 happened to the terrorist part the violent part when i read the christ church call it said violent
00:48:35.460 terrorism of course i'm for banning that but hateful and extremist what does that mean
00:48:40.220 this comes after a spate of terrorist attacks in new zealand quebec city etc
00:48:44.780 um we will look at that very very carefully said public minister public safety minister ralph goodale
00:48:52.820 um this has been a subject of discussion among ministers at the five eyes meetings that's
00:49:01.340 canada australia new zealand u.s uk where ample discussion has been held on how we encourage
00:49:09.220 the social media platforms to move quickly and efficiently to to deal with toxic communications
00:49:15.220 like this and that incite violence and hatred and obviously do great damage to social cohesion
00:49:20.620 okay so incite violence or incite hatred because you said this was about terrorism and now you're
00:49:27.780 just talking about hate which is a human emotion um if you go on you see this elision
00:49:37.060 routinely that they throw in two things that everyone hates every respectable person hates terrorism
00:49:47.060 and child pornography so whenever you see internet censorship they lead with
00:49:53.740 we're going to get rid of child pornography we're going to get rid of terrorism and i'm like all right
00:49:58.220 that sounds great but then when you look at the details and i won't go deeper into the story right now
00:50:04.660 you say oh but it includes extremist ideas
00:50:09.020 hatred hatred toxic well okay what's that what what what's who defines what toxic is disinformation
00:50:19.020 misinformation okay whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa you said this was about terrorism and child
00:50:26.900 pornography and i agree let's ban that but now you're sneaking in catch-all words that cover literally
00:50:33.300 everything you don't like you demonize anyone against you as misinformation disinformation
00:50:39.980 hateful bigoted toxic these are just insults they don't toxic that doesn't even have a meaning
00:50:45.080 like a toxic chemical maybe i would understand but a toxic what's what is the word toxic have to do with
00:50:51.060 word i know what terrorism is there's a legal definition of it i know what child pornography is
00:50:56.360 there's a legal definition of it what is hateful communication well that's easy actually it's anything
00:51:02.320 that justin trudeau hates so what you see there and i was trying to prove it and i was just doing
00:51:06.140 it on the fly is that the kind of censorship bills that jacinda ardern and justin trudeau were promoting
00:51:11.800 are they're stowaways they're they're they're sneaking in along with the kind of censorship that i think
00:51:21.620 most people would support terrorism and child porn they're sneaking in bands of ideas that are simply
00:51:28.260 peaceful political disagreement and i think that's what's so nerve-wracking here now tamara it's 153 we
00:51:33.600 got seven minutes more got a list of interesting things to talk about you go ahead well we have a
00:51:39.520 super chat uh so we'll just get to that before we move on and i know i think we had to wrap up just a
00:51:43.440 couple minutes early to make way for the studio space so we'll keep an eye on the time but uh we have
00:51:49.120 one super chat from fraser mcburney thanks fraser he gives six dollars uh the cops motto is quote we serve
00:51:55.980 and protect and quote it should be quote we pillage and plunder i know because i'm a victim of them
00:52:02.420 thank you rebel news and so fraser mcburney is one of our fight the fines clients um i can't recall the
00:52:08.200 details of his case exactly but he was being represented for fines that he received through
00:52:13.180 the covet hysteria um likely due to gathering restrictions and the inability to protest
00:52:19.300 peacefully and freely in what what was once our free and democratic nation um so thank you again
00:52:25.660 fraser i see another super chat just came in from maminka 10 bucks oh yeah the government will
00:52:32.800 protect us i'm sure well that's they call everything public safety and public health don't they i mean
00:52:38.840 the things they got away with in the name of public health were just as atrocious and outrageous public
00:52:43.640 safety is another um yeah i think that's the big uh front line in the battle for 2023 you know when rebel
00:52:52.160 news was started we started online deliberately to avoid the crtc regulator which shut down
00:52:57.760 sun news i was on a tv channel called sun news network uh it was despised by the bureaucrats
00:53:05.780 and politicians at the crtc regulator they had the power to remove the license they had the power to set
00:53:13.640 up uh the amount of um cable fees they had so much power over it as i watched them euthanize
00:53:20.440 the sun news network despite more than 20 million dollars having to be poured into the project by
00:53:25.080 a peer called peloto i thought why will i never get involved with that again so we set up rebel news
00:53:29.920 online only well eight years later trudeau has realized that online only is where the discussion is
00:53:37.580 and he's coming to censor us um you know i want to show one last thing it's 155 eastern 1155 mountain
00:53:44.300 and we do have to go really quick but i want to show one more clip and there's so many things i i like
00:53:50.400 about this um there is there's some very interesting republics started to talk about trump let's end with
00:53:59.460 some of the um politicians um in the congress i just want to get her name exactly right marjorie
00:54:09.600 taylor green marjorie taylor green is a congressman from georgia if i'm not mistaken and she's really
00:54:18.320 hard line she's really tough and she's tough physically i've seen her do pull-ups or chin-ups
00:54:23.960 those are hard to do by the way like she's a tough woman she's a tough talking she's very
00:54:31.660 pro-trump very america first and uh and by the way uh she doesn't care what people say about her
00:54:40.560 she's water off a duck's back she's so tough i mean um so anyways she was on 60 minutes
00:54:46.940 and 60 minutes is an iconic liberal show i think it's on cbs if memory serves
00:54:52.860 um i mean some of the most liberal journalists in america it really is like the new york times
00:54:57.760 of tv in terms of its pedigree and its reputation so she went on 60 minutes and um i forget the name
00:55:06.260 of the uh the interviewer um who yeah one of their longtime journalists their leslie stall
00:55:14.280 first of all kudos to leslie stall into 60 minutes for having her on maybe they thought it was going to
00:55:20.040 be a turkey shoot maybe they thought this will be fine but they actually to their credit let her
00:55:24.700 answer questions and she you know the worst thing conservatives do is when they're shy and afraid
00:55:31.880 and some liberal journalist says what did you really mean to say blah blah blah which the person just said
00:55:38.600 are you serious did you just say xyz and the journalist just reads the emotion of oh i said oh no no no i
00:55:46.340 i did you see i didn't mean it that that's the weak erin o'toole doug ford conservative approach
00:55:52.380 whereas the marjorie taylor green approach would be yeah good okay good you heard me yes that's exactly
00:55:57.260 what i believe and and it and what's the journalist to say other than what what what watch this watch
00:56:05.900 this beautiful exchange between leslie stall and marjorie taylor green and frankly um my esteem goes up
00:56:12.080 for both of them including for leslie stall for doing the interview and for letting this go to air
00:56:17.640 take a look and things she says that are over the top like the democrats are a party of pedophiles
00:56:26.040 i would definitely say so they support grooming children they are not pedophiles why would you say
00:56:33.400 that democrats democrats support even joe biden the president himself supports children being sexualized
00:56:41.340 and having transgender surgeries sexualizing children is what pedophiles do to children
00:56:45.920 100 okay and things yeah saying wow okay it's not really a rebuttal and i mean that was leslie
00:56:57.860 stall's way of telegraphing to her base i don't agree with this either that's outrageous but you'll
00:57:04.800 notice it's not a refutation or a rebuttal some of the best appearances by conservatives on 60 minutes
00:57:10.580 are the are the ones that leave the interviewer speechless and i think maybe the interviewers
00:57:15.960 say all my liberals will will say wow along with me but a lot of people will say yeah i guess that
00:57:22.360 is a definition of grooming to sexualized young children i guess maybe that is a way of looking
00:57:27.320 at them as pedophiles i don't know i mean i give credit to 60 minutes for actually airing that
00:57:31.940 and um one of the amazing things about the american system is that you have a wide spectrum
00:57:39.440 of republicans and you know i don't think you have the same spectrum of diversity of opinion
00:57:44.420 in the democrat side i think they're actually very fall in line uh whereas you have republican
00:57:50.500 congressmen who hate trump some who love trump some who are for war in ukraine some who are against it
00:57:56.780 some who are for vaccine some who are against it there's there's and they can't shut them up
00:58:02.120 like you can't fire marjorie taylor green you have to beat her in a primary um they don't have the
00:58:09.660 same control of the party party leaders don't have the same control and i think it's healthier
00:58:14.200 to have a spectrum of views allowed and by the way her seat uh her district in georgia is probably
00:58:20.900 more conservative than a district in uh new york or california so i i think it's great last word
00:58:27.320 to you to remember before we sign off yeah i mean and that's what uh upholding free democratic debate
00:58:34.140 is the cornerstone of having a free country this silencing of dissidents this suppression of
00:58:41.800 information of content of questioning simply just questioning what is happening here is it just is it
00:58:48.800 right um i think that it is a slippery slope into authoritarian bit abyss rather than upholding that
00:58:56.340 cornerstone of free and democratic nation we need to engage in robust debate and leave ideas and
00:59:02.060 thoughts to the public arena bring them and then we will debate them and decide um the other way is
00:59:08.640 you know we can just look to history to see how that ends up so um thank you ezra for your work on
00:59:15.500 this file and ensuring that we can continue to follow the facts wherever they lead and bring
00:59:22.480 independent media to our country and arguably also to the globe right on well thanks for those kind
00:59:28.620 words and it is a team effort and we will continue to fight for freedom and we will resist these four
00:59:34.900 censorship bills with every ounce of effort we can tamara great to see you thanks for taking the time
00:59:40.400 to our viewers at home thank you very much i'm gonna go and uh party like santa marina
00:59:45.140 i'm kidding around i've got i've got some uh other work i'm gonna do i'm gonna interview james lindsey
00:59:51.700 the anti um critical race theory guy the anti-woke guy i really like he's so smart i'm gonna interview
00:59:58.680 him and we've got some great interviews by the way folks if you don't know i have a show every night
01:00:02.780 at 8 p.m eastern time called the ezra levant show and uh it's eight bucks a month you can go to
01:00:07.620 rebelnewsplus.com sign up um and every weeknight i i do a monologue i interview a guest i read my
01:00:15.120 a viewer mail fan mail and hate mail and um you know a lot of people get a kick out of it and by
01:00:20.200 the way it's an important way to support rebel news because we don't take any money from trudeau
01:00:23.880 and we are completely demonetized by youtube so if you're interested go to rebelnewsplus.com
01:00:29.680 in any event until next time on behalf of tamara and myself and all of us here at rebel
01:00:34.580 world headquarters to you at home goodbye and keep fighting for freedom