After three days covering the World Economic Forum in Davos, a team of Rebel News reporters takes a look back at what they have learned from covering this elitist gathering. They discuss the lack of transparency, hypocrisy, and lack of trust.
00:03:57.760Certainly, we've learned a lot here. Jeremy, what about you?
00:04:01.760Yeah, I would like to follow up with Lewis said. The theme is working together to regain trust.
00:04:06.760And what have they done to lose our trust? They they locked us in our house for two years.
00:04:11.760They took away our jobs. They mandated dubious medical interventions.
00:04:14.760And after speaking to them, I learned how ignorant they are of this fact of why trust was lost.
00:04:20.760Not one time from speaking to all of these attendees that I spoke to did any of those things come up.
00:04:25.760They're clueless why the trust was lost. They don't know. So the clueless of the elites is definitely on display here at the World Economic Forum.
00:04:35.760Well, there you have it. And I guess what I learned most from being here is that the elites consider this a safe space for them.
00:04:44.760And they are absolutely shocked when independent journalists hit them with the tough questions.
00:04:51.760Well, folks, I think that three minute clip superbly sums up what occurred in Davos recently as the elites who comprise the World Economic Forum got together for their self-congratulatory party or so it would seem.
00:05:06.760And one of the rebels who attended that WEF powwow, he joins me right now.
00:05:12.760And that would be Lewis Brackpool. Lewis, thank you so much for coming on Rebel Roundup.
00:05:17.760And tell me, Lewis, for starters, what is the World Economic Forum to begin with and what is its true agenda?
00:05:30.760Give me the Reader's Digest version then.
00:05:34.760Right. OK, so the World Economic Forum is a conglomerate of many, many people that come together each year or an annual summit.
00:05:46.760And what it is, it has is a conglomerate of the most powerful people in the world.
00:05:51.760OK, and what they do, they get together and they essentially get together and rearrange the world or have ideas, visions, plans to rearrange society.
00:06:04.760And how that works for them is is getting together with the most powerful people and discussing ways in which they can reset areas.
00:06:20.760So, for example, environmentalism is a big thing, the World Economic Forum, societal is a big thing, technology.
00:06:28.760And they they get together all of these powerful people sitting many conferences in a place which is so remote that the normal or average person like me and yourself can't get to.
00:06:42.760And they basically discuss how we should live.
00:06:47.760And that's kind of the basic gist of it.
00:06:50.760I mean, if we had longer, I'd go really, really in depth.
00:07:59.760Now, if you would have asked me if this was happening two, maybe three years ago, I would have written it off.
00:08:06.760And I think a lot of people have been writing off this idea of a group of powerful people getting together and wanting to rearrange the world.
00:08:16.760I mean, it's now so clear as day and so open for anyone to access and look at.
00:08:23.760It's gotten to the point where you cannot refute it.
00:08:28.760And this idea of, you know, lots of things between implementing chips into people's heads.
00:08:37.760You know, from that to, of course, tracking your carbon footprint and then potentially stopping you from going over that limit through spending or through various things or adding so much technology to society where it almost becomes like some sort of science fiction novel.
00:08:59.760It gets to the point where, yeah, people should be worried.
00:09:03.760People should be waking up to this and go, do you know what?
00:09:07.760There's a there's a lot of questions that need answering.
00:09:10.760So I kind of guess that was the main purpose of going on this big trip.
00:09:15.760And tell me, Lewis, when I was observing the mainstream media coverage of what was going on in Davos at best, it was apologetic of the World Economic Forum.
00:09:28.760At worst, the mainstream media journalists were acting like cheerleaders.
00:10:13.760So how can it be fair for these reporters to be invited to a very significant summit with the most powerful people in the world?
00:10:23.760Do we trust someone or a reporter or a journalist or an organization that was invited, handpicked by this particular organization to write a fair report?
00:10:35.760So I think the fairest people that would come to these sort of events and cover them would be people that weren't invited.
00:10:44.760Someone like us, maybe not to toot our own horn.
00:10:47.760But I think people that aren't invited to these events that want to cover them and that aren't accredited have more to say than these reporters or mainstream journalists that, yeah, just jump in.
00:11:01.760I would also say, Lewis, that and you guys did report on this, if memory serves.
00:11:07.760It was almost a conflict of interest because there were media organizations that were sponsors of the World Economic Forum.
00:11:14.760So we know exactly where they they are weighing in when it comes to the WEF.
00:11:20.760But, you know, the other prevalent theme in your reports, which I did not see in mainstream media coverage, Lewis, is the outrageous hypocrisy, the double standards.
00:11:31.760It's almost as though the WEF was preaching, look, give up your car, eat bugs instead of steak and everything will get so much better.
00:11:44.760And yet these cats are living high on the hog.
00:11:48.760They're jet setting and private jets all over the globe.
00:12:00.760I mean, even going to that private airports was, you know, damning enough.
00:12:05.760Going to a private airport and having the air traffic controllers giving us the report on all the planes that flew in for even that day was it's pretty eye opening.
00:12:18.760And you think to yourself and, you know, the funny thing about that as well to add was is they said, well, unfortunately, they couldn't get their private helicopter transport over after they've just flew in private jet.
00:12:48.760If someone was to try and, you know, push out this climate alarmist nonsense, their message, I'd at least expect them to practice what they preach before they start, you know, ramming this down the public's throat.
00:13:49.760And the reason being is this has been in motion since 1971 and have had various dealings with many other organizations such as the European Commission funding Klaus Schwab's first ever annual summit in 1971 for the World Economic Forum.
00:14:09.760They've modeled off of other organizations such as the Club of Rome, which is very famous for talking about very spicy subjects such as overpopulation and things like that.
00:14:20.760They've modeled off of these types of organizations before and to add the young global leaders scheme where you've seen many, many young global leaders that are in power now.
00:14:32.760So they're old global leaders technically now.
00:14:34.760But at the time they were homegrown from this organization and now have sprouted into various cabinets.
00:14:41.760Klaus Schwab said that famous quote where he said, we penetrate the cabinets.
00:14:46.760And they was talking specifically, unfortunately, about your country, David, of Canada and saying that more than half of the cabinet are from the WEF, young global leaders.
00:14:59.760And there are various other of world leaders now that have stemmed from this organization.
00:15:07.760So, yes, I there is an immense amount of power.
00:15:11.760You can only look at what they are repeating, build back better and things like that.
00:15:16.760And, you know, Boris wants to phase out diesel and petrol by 2030.
00:15:21.760Coincidentally, the agenda 2030 and the sustainability development that the WEF are really pushing.
00:15:28.760And it's all what they're saying. It's not what I'm drawing conclusions from.
00:15:32.760It's what they are saying. So that's the key points.
00:15:35.760I'll tell you, Lewis, maybe this is unfair, but maybe it's the accent.
00:15:39.760Maybe it's how he comes across. But whenever I see Klaus Schwab speak, all I can think of is either a James Bond or an Austin Powers villain doing a monologue.
00:15:49.760One last question, because we're running late here.
00:17:35.760You got it. And that was Lewis Brackpool in London.
00:17:39.760Keep it here, folks. More Bravo Roundup to come right after this.
00:17:46.760We know that Health Canada has been paying influencers to push pro vaccine, pro lockdown messaging.
00:17:51.760Frankly, it's almost expected that when we see someone in pop culture pushing the official government line, that they're being paid for it.
00:17:59.760They're being paid to push us to submit to rules on our lives that they scarcely live by themselves.
00:18:04.760Millionaires taking tax money to convince the little guy to comply with lockdowns that could destroy the little guy financially.
00:18:11.760It's all transactional. It's gross. It's the Kardashian vacation of public health.
00:18:16.760But at least if you've been paying attention, you know what's happening.
00:18:19.760It's published in the CBC. Health Canada wants influencers to spread covid messaging.
00:18:24.760But what if the brainwashing is coming from people under the guise of government with the credibility of being part of the public health cabal?
00:18:33.760What if government bureaucrats were being paid to be influencers by private pharmaceutical companies on top of their current government salaries to tweet and Instagram the ways of the covid deep state?
00:18:45.760And because of social media rules, if you question their paid talking points, you could be canceled and banned.
00:18:51.760Let me show you this access to information filing we found as a proactive release on the government website.
00:18:58.760What this means is someone else filed for this information and the government has now released the documents to the public.
00:19:03.760I don't know who did this filing, but I think they know something we don't look at what they asked for.
00:19:09.760Any document Health Canada holds to see that civil servants or executives have received amounts of money or various gifts to act as influencers for private companies for the last year to January 8th, 2021.
00:19:23.760Now, the dates are important here. They're asking for the pandemic dates.
00:19:27.760This person, I think, is asking in a sneaky way if bureaucrats are getting paid by big pharma to push vaccines or by Amazon, for example, to tell people to stay at home and do all their shopping that way.
00:19:37.760The government returned documents. They don't deny that civil servants were getting cash and gifts from private companies to act as paid influencers to the public.
00:19:46.760In fact, we know they were doing it. There's an admission on page 17.
00:19:50.760What we see here is an email exchange from one bureaucrat to their superior regarding a potential conflict of interest stemming from being hired as a paid health influencer as an employee of Public Health Canada.
00:20:03.760Look at this subject. Conflict of Interest Declaration Form. Importance high. Yeah, I bet it is. You've got to get paid, don't you? Anyway.
00:20:12.760Hi, Randy. As promised, here is my conflict of interest declaration form along with a word document with information to be included in section C of the form.
00:20:23.760I appreciate you and your team expediting this review. Thank you.
00:20:28.760Thank you. And then it is all redacted. We don't know what company hired this public health bureaucrat.
00:20:33.760We don't know how much they were paid and we don't know who they are, but we do know that the team expedited this review.
00:20:41.760But the government won't tell us, the public, who is doing it. Was it Theresa Tam? Who?
00:20:47.760They won't tell us how frequently they were doing it. They won't tell us how much they were getting paid to do it, but we do know they were doing it.
00:20:54.760They won't say who hired them. It's all redacted.
00:20:57.760Now, this is where you can help me. We are appealing these redactions. These bureaucrats don't get to use their taxpayer-funded perch and the credibility of being a so-called trusted government source, at least according to social media and the mainstream media, to enrich themselves, manipulate the public, and then hide it all.
00:21:14.760If you can help fund our research and access to investigation appeals, please consider making a donation to our special fund at rebelinvestigates.com.
00:21:26.760So what, pray tell, is more egregious that there are millionaires taking taxpayer dollars to convince the great unwashed masses to comply with lockdowns?
00:21:38.760You know, lockdowns that could very well destroy them financially.
00:21:43.760Or the fact that there is essentially zero transparency from the federal government when it comes to this perverse scheme.
00:21:52.760And hey, so much for sunny ways yet again.
00:21:57.760And with more on this story is Rebel News chief reporter, Sheila Gunn-Reed.
00:22:08.760Sheila, the lack of transparency on this file is absolutely outrageous, I think, especially since government works for us, not vice versa.
00:22:19.760Why are they being so secretive about this scheme in the first place?
00:22:24.760Well, it's extra secretive because it's not just outside influencers that we're talking about here.
00:22:30.760I think most people know when a celebrity is telling them to run out and buy or do this certain thing that they're being paid for it.
00:22:39.760Now, are they being paid for it by the company or by the government?
00:22:43.760You generally know that if you see somebody that you follow on Instagram who's high profile pushing something that there's probably a financial incentive for them to do that.
00:22:56.760What makes what makes what the Public Health Agency of Canada was doing extra sinister was it was their own staff who were taking money and gifts.
00:23:09.760And we can't really know what they were taking.
00:23:12.760But we do know that they were reporting these things to their bosses.
00:23:18.760They were flagging these issues as potential conflicts of interest, basically saying, hey, this is what I've been offered, but that part's all redacted from our documents.
00:23:28.760Can you clear this as quick as possible so I can do this deal?
00:23:39.760We don't know the terms, but we do know that public health agency bureaucrats and staff were being paid as influencers by outside companies.
00:23:49.760And what's interesting here and what makes me suspicious is it was happening during the time of the pandemic during that time frame.
00:23:57.760So were they being paid by Health Canada to the Public Health Agency of Canada?
00:24:03.760Were they being paid by Moderna, Pfizer, some of these other companies?
00:24:09.760Were they being paid by Amazon, the lockdown beneficiaries?
00:24:13.760We don't know who they were being paid by or the agreements that they were getting, you know, the these payments and gifts around.
00:24:20.760We do know what was happening, though, because it's in the emails that they were flagging the potential conflicts of interest to their superiors.
00:24:27.760You know, Sheila, in the bigger picture, what do you think about this whole idea of influencers basically promoting an experimental vaccine?
00:24:37.760And I think back to late last year, Peel region here in the greater Toronto area, they had the chief medical health officer join forces with Brampton Batman in order to get kids on board with getting the jab in Toronto.
00:24:54.760Mayor John Tory teamed up with Polkaroo from Polkaroo from Polkaroo, which went off the air in 1993, I believe.
00:25:01.760Yeah, there's no young people that know who Polkaroo is.
00:25:04.760But the point I'm trying to make here in this case, the influencers were kid friendly icons to, I guess, get kids excited about getting jabbed.
00:25:16.760It gives me a queasy feeling. What about you?
00:25:19.760Yeah, it does me, too. For example, if I'm wearing a T-shirt or something of a company, I'm mostly I've never gotten paid for it.
00:25:28.760No one's ever paid me to promote anything ever.
00:25:32.760You know, if we're doing a sponsorship in one of our shows, for example, we've had sponsorships in the past with resistance coffee, we make that very clear.
00:25:42.760But there's low liability in, you know, promoting a coffee company or wearing the T-shirt of an archery store that stood up to the lockdown.
00:25:54.760There's low liability in that for the person doing it.
00:26:00.760And equally, there's low liability for these influencers.
00:26:04.760If they use their platform and, you know, their social clout, I guess is the right word, to incentivize other people and encourage other people to engage in things they otherwise wouldn't like vaccinating their little tiny children.
00:26:25.760They get paid and they get to go on with the rest of their lives.
00:26:28.760But who lives with the fallout if something goes wrong?
00:26:31.760Not them, but the people they encourage.
00:26:33.760And so there's more social consequences, I think, when they're pushing these medical initiatives, really, as opposed to just pushing a brand or a supplement company or whatever.
00:26:46.760That's, I think, a lot different for an influencer to do that than to encourage people to take, as you say, experimental vaccines where we are now learning a lot more about the consequences for certain people and injuries for certain people due to, you know, this push to vaccinate immediately as many people as possible.
00:27:11.760And, you know, Sheila, another issue, I think, is do celebrity endorsements work?
00:27:17.760I mean, I can't get myself into the mind of somebody who looks at a so-called influencer and says, oh, yeah, because he or she said that I'm going to purchase that good or service or, in this case, get vaccinated.
00:27:34.020I mean, you know, I see Wayne Gretzky on TV right now promoting a MGM gambling app.
00:27:40.400That doesn't mean I'm going to rush out and sign up.
00:27:43.600If I want to gamble, I'm going to do my research and I'm going to gamble on the merits of the odds and payouts and whatnot.
00:27:50.900So, again, I bring it back to does this kind of influencing from celebrities and so-called celebrities even work?
00:28:01.060And I think it depends on the mindset of the person that, you know, the media by which you're consuming it.
00:28:07.140For example, you know, when you see the Daily Wire promoting their brand of razors, their cancel-proof brand of razors, that's a little different because it's appealing to people like me who want to support brands who support freedom.
00:28:23.080Resistance Coffee is a great idea of this.
00:28:25.540In the past, Black Rifle Coffee, people supported Black Rifle Coffee because it was sort of a pro-Second Amendment company.
00:28:33.100And so I think when there's also a social issue behind the brand being promoted by the high-profile person, I hate to use the word influencer, that's a little different than Kim Kardashian wants me to buy these supplements that she promises will make my butt big.
00:28:51.920I think that's a little bit different.
00:28:53.900Now, on the flip side, there are people who are on social media for those reasons.
00:29:01.080They follow influencers because they want to follow the trends and jump on the trends and they have a very superficial sort of worldview.
00:29:18.680Given all the mystery on this file, where do we go from here in terms of getting the truth of the matter?
00:29:27.180You know, we're appealing those redactions.
00:29:29.560Again, this was not one of our access to information requests.
00:29:34.140We found this on the Proactive Release website and it came back redacted.
00:29:38.300So what we have to do is refile so that it's now our access to information request, which means after we refile and then naturally they send it to us completely redacted too, then we can refile and appeal.
00:29:52.820And that sort of stuff, as you can already tell, takes time and it takes money.
00:29:57.280We have a researcher who helps us because it's just impossible for us to do journalism and all those other things while dealing with the boring paperwork side of journalism.
00:30:05.820And so if people would like to support our continued access to information investigations, particularly in trying to find out who was paying public health bureaucrats to influence, but we don't even know on what.
00:30:21.500If you'd like to help us get that information, please consider making a donation at rebelinvestigates.com.
00:30:49.520More of Rebel Roundup to come right after this.
00:30:54.980The federal government has invoked the Emergencies Act to supplement provincial and territorial capacity to address the blockades and occupations.
00:31:07.220The government is issuing an order with immediate effect under the Emergencies Act authorizing Canadian financial institutions to temporarily cease providing financial services.
00:31:19.520Where the institution suspects that an account is being used to further the illegal blockades and occupations.
00:31:28.520The police wiretapped me under the criminal code, presumably for participating in the Freedom Convoy on Parliament Hill.
00:31:39.720When you have a criminal code warrant of this magnitude, you are talking about homicides.
00:31:45.980You are talking about high-level criminal activity, organized crime, etc.
00:31:52.760We need stewards who are going to be serving us, not dominating us.
00:31:56.420David Menzies for Rebel News here on Parliament Hill in Ottawa.
00:32:03.280Well, folks, going back to late January, when the Trucker Freedom Convoy first descended upon Parliament Hill, we witnessed so many examples of government overreach.
00:32:15.720I'm talking about the truckers and their allies being demonized and vilified all the way to the invocation of the Emergencies Act.
00:32:26.740Now, speaking of government overreach, I want to introduce you to my guest.
00:33:13.200Because the story of the Ontario government wiretapping political dissidents is so outrageous that if we don't have the proof, no one would ever believe it.
00:33:25.740Then we've got a petition that we will deliver to the Attorney General of Ontario and the Federal Public Safety Minister
00:33:33.840if we find out the federal government was involved in this also.
00:33:38.380Our petition calls on the AG to stop the wiretapping of Canadians whose only crime is peacefully opposing government policy.
00:33:50.440Our third plan of attack is as follows.
00:33:52.380We want to find out the scale and scope of this wiretapping operation.
00:33:57.800And we want to know who exactly was wiretapped.
00:34:01.800We have an anonymous intake form at the same website.
00:34:06.640And that is StopTheWireTapping.com where you can submit your information.
00:34:12.960And we promise you, you will remain anonymous.
00:34:16.780So Rob, thank you so much for joining me today.
00:34:20.280As I mentioned in the preamble, you recently received a letter from the Attorney General of Ontario's office dated May 18, 2022.
00:34:37.240First of all, David, thank you for having me on your show.
00:34:40.140And thank you for covering this very important story.
00:34:42.860It's very important that the public hears about what's going on because it is so egregious.
00:34:47.820On the 18th, I received a letter from the Attorney General of Ontario basically explaining I was actually the object of intercepted communications, which is a wiretap.
00:34:59.340So for people who aren't familiar with the language, the police wiretapped me under the criminal code, presumably for participating in the Freedom Convoy on Parliament Hill.
00:35:13.280And this was news to you that you were wiretapped.
00:35:16.900I understand, Rob, that after a certain period of time, the rules are that you have to inform the subject of the wiretapping that he or she was indeed wiretapped.
00:35:31.680What was the reason for the wiretapping of your phone?
00:35:35.180Well, if you look at the letter, which I provided, there is no reason to provide it.
00:35:39.620It just says that I was the subject of a wiretap from these two dates.
00:35:44.580And if you look at the actual section that I was wiretapped under, I was wiretapped under a section of exigent circumstances, meaning that the circumstances were so urgent and so worrisome about criminal activity that the government did not have time or the officers investigating did not have time to qualify all of the potential issues and reasoning why they're getting this wiretap.
00:36:13.840So this wiretap was not only an emergency type of wiretap, but it was also allowed to be done ex parte.