A group of eco-radicals in British Columbia flattened the tires on 34 SUVs, and they don t have any idea why they did it. But they do have a plan to do it, and it's a plan that has the potential to make things worse than they already are.
00:01:44.120I saw this tweet by a British Columbia journalist over the long weekend. It's a tweet and a picture.
00:01:50.700The words say, Environmental Activist Group says it flattened the tires on 34 SUVs in Victoria
00:01:59.080and Oak Bay, warning, this is just the beginning. It claims direct action works. This is not going
00:02:06.660to end well if one of these activists is caught in the act. So, that's in British Columbia. But can
00:02:12.760you find something odd about the piece of paper in that photograph? I'll read it.
00:02:17.820Attention! Your gas guzzler kills. We have deflated one or more of your tires.
00:02:28.120Do you see it yet? Tires, spelt with a Y. That's not how you spell tires, I don't think. Don't we spell
00:02:36.200it T-I-R-E? That Y spelling, that's British. That's how they spell it in the UK. I mean, they have some
00:02:44.940quirks. They say lorry instead of truck. They say torch instead of flashlight. It's one of those
00:02:52.780countless, tiny, wonderful differences between us and the mother country. You know, they don't say
00:02:57.960stop on a dime. They don't have dimes over there. This was written in London. London, England, not
00:03:04.280London, Ontario, and certainly not British Columbia. I'll read a bit more from the flyer.
00:03:10.520You'll be angry, but don't take it personally. It's not you. It's your car. We did this because
00:03:17.220driving around urban areas in your massive vehicle has huge consequences for others. And it goes on
00:03:23.800with a bunch of junk science claiming that your SUV kills people. Of course, a modern SUV has lower
00:03:29.820emissions than an older, even smaller car. Modern cars are so much more efficient and emit so much
00:03:35.860less than previous generations of cars do. And by the way, the car's already built. You're not going
00:03:40.500to turn your car back in because someone deflated your tires. But seriously, to go after SUVs of any
00:03:46.960size, rather than the source of real pollution in the world, China and India, Brazil, really all of
00:03:54.280Asia and OPEC and Russia, I guess you could add the US, although they have one of the lowest emissions
00:04:00.040per dollar GDP. It's absurd to talk about your car in British Columbia causing more emissions than
00:04:07.180the hundreds of coal-fired power plants that China is building right now. Give me a break.
00:04:14.200But look at how it ends, this pamphlet. The tire extinguishers, and that's their website too,
00:04:21.900tire extinguishers.com. They literally couldn't be bothered to buy a spelled-correct version,
00:04:31.640tire extinguishers with an I. That version was bought by someone who isn't using it, as you can
00:04:39.500see. And this afternoon, just for fun, I bought tire extinguishers.ca, T-I-R-E extinguishers.ca.
00:04:47.300And I have that website pointed to this video because I'm a Canadian, not a foreign meddler like
00:04:53.320these folks. Now, I don't know what they actually did in Victoria. I don't know if they did anything
00:04:59.220or if they just said they did. I suppose deflating a tire is different from slashing a tire where you
00:05:06.280destroy it, but it's not much different. Both immobilize a vehicle. And if you didn't notice
00:05:13.100notice when you got in your car and you wouldn't notice right away, would you? And you could start
00:05:19.300to drive and you would notice it soon, but maybe you would have an accident first. What if you drove
00:05:26.860and you didn't quickly realize what was wrong and you merged into a busy road and you had an accident
00:05:34.020or your car swerved or you wore quickly down to your rims in traffic? I can think of a whole bunch
00:05:41.040of things that could go wrong if you start to drive with your tire deflated and you didn't know.
00:05:46.720If you ran it down on the rims, your tire would indeed be ruined.
00:05:51.120This is exactly what the criminal code catches by the crime of mischief. Mischief is sort of a general
00:05:59.160catch-all for minor crimes that are nuisances that aren't the kind of thing you typically go to prison
00:06:05.160over. That's for sure. But things that actually ruin your community really make it awful. Vandalism,
00:06:10.740petty thefts, just generally being an antisocial abuser of your neighbors. This is classic mischief
00:06:19.080that could actually lead to harm, God forbid. And it's confessed to, and it's bragged about.
00:06:26.760Hey, didn't Tamara Leach, the peaceful grandma who inspired the truckers, didn't she get charged with
00:06:34.920mischief? Actually, I'm not sure if she did. If I recall, I think she was charged with inciting
00:06:40.200mischief, which is a degree weaker, isn't it? And what? She got 48 days in prison so far,
00:06:46.440she hasn't been convicted of anything. And she's subject to bizarre and abusive infringements on what
00:06:51.880she can say and do in public. Banned from even criticizing the government. Thrown in prison again
00:06:58.120for having a selfie photo with another trucker. That's what happened. So that's what a peaceful
00:07:04.400grandma did, who apparently encouraged some horn honking. She was charged with inciting mischief and
00:07:11.200thrown in jail. But deflating tires, T-I-R-E-S, well, that's just dandy. Now, I went on their website,
00:07:18.860T-Y-R-E, extinguishers.com. And they have some pretty bizarre opinions, as you could probably
00:07:25.500guess. They say, hybrids and electric cars are fair game. We cannot electrify our way out of the
00:07:32.560climate crisis. There are not enough rare earth metals to replace everyone's car. And the mining
00:07:38.160of these metals causes suffering. Okay, got it. So they're not really mad at SUVs. They're against
00:07:44.140all cars. At least ones with brakes on them. That's one of the things they're mad about. They're mad
00:07:51.300about brakes, apparently. Plus the danger to other road users stands, they say, as does the air
00:08:01.300pollution. PM 2.5 pollution is still produced from tires and brake pads. So they don't like anything with
00:08:08.920brake pads or tires, I guess. Then again, bicycles are made from metal, too, and they have brakes on
00:08:15.420them, too. And the thing about bicycles is they don't really work well in Canada in the winter or
00:08:19.900say for, I don't know, a family or a school bus or an ambulance or a firetruck. This is pure,
00:08:25.580stupid, malevolent mischief. And gee whiz,
00:08:29.080not a peep from any politician or police force. But my main point is this is going on. This is up on
00:08:41.240the internet right now. They have an instructional video on how to deflate tires. That's up on YouTube
00:08:47.480right now. YouTube will deplatform you if you question any fundamental narrative about the pandemic,
00:08:53.820about the vaccines, about the lockdowns, or even if Donald Trump won or lost. But they will let these
00:08:57.880criminals propagandize just how to deflate tires. That's no problem. These Brits are excited about
00:09:04.740their Canadian action. You got to read this. Look at this. This is a press release. First action in
00:09:10.920Western Canada, 34 SUVs disarmed in Victoria, British Columbia. But look at this. The state
00:09:17.700capital of British Columbia was hit last night by the new tire extinguishers of Victoria who deflated
00:09:24.16034 U.S. SUVs. Hey, did you know that British Columbia is a state and Victoria is its state
00:09:32.120capital? I learned so much about our country from foreign-funded eco-activists, don't you?
00:09:38.520They talk about one simple tactic, deflating the tires of these massive, unnecessary vehicles,
00:09:45.960causing inconvenience for their owners without endangering any lives in the process.
00:09:50.900That's dictionary definition mischief. But it absolutely does endanger lives.
00:09:58.260Tampering with a car's tires. I don't think that endangers lives. So where's the police response?
00:10:05.260Now, I'm not looking for riot police. I'm not looking for people to be shot like Trudeau's police shot
00:10:10.520our reporter, Alexa Levois. I'm not looking for a suspension of civil liberties. I'm not even looking
00:10:14.540for jail time unless some injury or death does arise from this mischief. But I am looking for a
00:10:21.480denunciation of this by police and by politicians. Maybe for crime stoppers to launch a campaign
00:10:28.180to catch the criminals. For a condemnation of it from, I don't know, the environment minister?
00:10:34.740Yeah, about that. Alas, Stephen Gilboa, the environment minister, he himself is a convicted criminal
00:10:44.240in the cause of environmentalist stunts. He would love these guys. For all we know, he funds
00:10:51.920these guys. Stephen Gilboa is not going to criticize these guys, is he? Stay with us for more.
00:11:01.600Well, I don't usually spend my time poring through health statistics, but I don't think any of us
00:11:14.720expected to until the last two years. What you see on the screen right now are the leading causes of
00:11:21.640death for the last 20 years in the province of Alberta, population four and a half million.
00:11:28.280And I went through all 20 years, by the way, and you can find this too online pretty quickly.
00:11:33.380And the top causes of death, they move around a little bit, but basically for the last 20 years,
00:11:39.540it won't surprise you to know that coronary heart disease, cancer, and dementia have been the top
00:11:48.080causes of death in Alberta for about the last 20 years. And even at its height,
00:11:54.560deaths from COVID in the year 2020 was in number six position. And in 2021, it was in the number three
00:12:04.840position. Of course, that's high, but it was never the leading cause of death in Alberta. But look at
00:12:10.560this. Isn't this unusual? Unknown. Unknown is now the number one cause of death in the province of Alberta.
00:12:20.700Number one, more than cancer, more than coronary heart disease, more than dementia,
00:12:26.140more than all those other things. Unknown. Is it really unknown? Or is it more they're not allowed
00:12:33.960to say, do you really believe with all the public health experts and the epidemiologists and all the
00:12:39.440studies that they just don't know why people are dying? Well, here's a viral video that our next guest
00:12:47.620put together that is full of that same sense of wonderment and curiosity and bafflement.
00:12:54.260Why are all these young, healthy people, people who are, you know, in the elite athlete stratum of
00:13:00.540health, why are they all dying? Take a look at this video. You'll see why it went viral immediately.
00:13:05.780It was brought to you by Pfizer. CBS Health Watch sponsored by Pfizer. Anderson Cooper 360.
00:13:13.820Brought to you by Pfizer. ABC News Nightline. Brought to you by Pfizer. Making a difference.
00:13:21.160Brought to you by Pfizer. CNN Tonight. Brought to you by Pfizer. Early start. Brought to you by Pfizer.
00:13:29.120Friday night on Aaron Burnett Out Front. Brought to you by Pfizer. This week with George Stephanopoulos
00:13:35.920is brought to you by Pfizer. This letter report brought to you by Pfizer. Today's countdown to
00:13:41.100the royal wedding is brought to you by Pfizer. And now a CBS Sports update brought to you by Pfizer.
00:13:46.940Meet the Press. Data download. Brought to you by Pfizer. This portion of CBS This Morning sponsored by
00:13:53.380Pfizer. On how to find the hidden sugars in the American family diet. Sponsored by Pfizer.
00:13:59.120Pfizer. You know, as I told you the other day, Pfizer paid the largest fine in American history
00:14:09.160until that point, $2.3 billion for misleading the public about their products. They've had a variety
00:14:15.880of fines. Would you rather pay $2.3 billion in fines or would you rather, as you heard in the audio
00:14:22.020track there, sponsor every journalist, every public affairs show in America?
00:14:27.220So it was a bit of a juxtaposition. The news brought to you by Pfizer and all these deaths
00:14:33.340of young athletes. And boy, we just can't figure out, we just don't know why the death toll in Alberta
00:14:40.380this year, the year after the COVID has receded, why it's just so darn high for those unknowns.
00:14:46.820Joining us now via Skype from San Diego, California is the brainchild between that viral video. And he's got
00:14:53.100an amazing story to tell behind it. I'm talking about Pearson Sharp. He's an author, journalist,
00:14:57.380traveler, and he's the host of One America News Network. Pearson, it's great to meet you and good
00:15:03.420work on that video. How many views has that thing got?
00:15:07.160Right now, it's got about 21,000 likes anyways. But I wanted to make it clear, I didn't put together
00:15:15.100that video. That was a compilation that someone else put together. And I shared it because I had
00:15:21.200done the story back in April that used a lot of those same videos and pointed out how many athletes
00:15:26.280were dying. And so as I commented in the post, you know, Reuters and actually Lead Stories, not AP,
00:15:33.320Lead Stories emailed me and tried to fact check me. And they said, hey, where'd you get this information?
00:15:38.280We want to, we're writing a fact check story about this right now. And we've came across your report.
00:15:43.820And so we wanted to investigate and see if you could share your sources with us. So I emailed
00:15:49.060them back. And I said, well, there's over 800 links at this point, I don't have time to send them all
00:15:55.020to you. And so I sent them like 20 or 30 links. And I said, you know, basically, the stats for these
00:16:01.940almost 800 athletes, healthy athletes, the average age was 23 years old, they were dying. The stats came
00:16:10.540from headlines, just straight from headlines, someone would die and a local news station
00:16:15.380would report it. And so we went through and collected all those headlines. And they're just,
00:16:20.160how do you argue with that? So when I sent them that their story disappeared, they never published
00:16:25.660it. Yesterday, I reached out to Reuters, I reached out to Reuters, and I asked them, I said, hey,
00:16:29.780did you guys ever do your story? They never responded.
00:16:32.000You know, I'm a little bit older than you, Pearson. And I remember when I was young,
00:16:37.660the shocking death of an NBA athlete named Len Bias. And it was shocking because he had a heart
00:16:44.340attack. And, and like people in their late teens, early 20s, or professional athletes are really the
00:16:50.580healthiest people amongst us. They're training, they're genetically probably a fine species to begin
00:16:57.580with a fine specimen. Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no. You're, you're wrong about that. They're actually
00:17:02.000very vulnerable. It's very common for them to just die. I mean, these are the finest specimen. I mean,
00:17:07.080these people, they walk in the room, they have an energy about them. They're, they're, and the reason
00:17:12.120this, I remember this sudden death of Len Bias, no one could understand. It's because he tried cocaine
00:17:17.300and had allergic reaction. That's how rare it was. Like if, if a young athlete died of a heart attack,
00:17:24.440it was so rare that everyone in the whole world want to know how did that happen? Because it's so
00:17:29.820unusual as you say, hundreds and hundreds of cases. And, um, I appreciate your correction that
00:17:37.800you just publicized that video and you wrote an accompanying news story. The fact that Reuters
00:17:43.100called you up, that's not even a real fact check. That's their way of saying, we're watching you
00:17:48.560and how dare you, and you better be careful because we'll defame you. That's what that is.
00:17:53.020Right. Well, it's, it's interesting. They didn't end up publishing it. And what that tells you is
00:17:57.080they weren't interested in fact checking. They were interested in discrediting because you'd think
00:18:02.300the point of a fact check was, Hey, is this true or not? Oh, it looks like it's true. We're sharing
00:18:06.300that. Nope. It's true. We're not going to report that. Yeah. It's, it's incredible. Um, I've had some
00:18:12.160experience with these fact checkers. They seldom fact check powerful people. They don't hold governments to
00:18:19.820account. They hold critics of governments to account. They don't speak truth to power,
00:18:24.460which is the conceit of journalists. We're the official opposition. We hold power to account.
00:18:30.780The fact that they're fact checking real journalists who do hold power to account
00:18:35.560tells you everything they know. And I have it all. Yeah. Go ahead.
00:18:39.580When the last time she was fact checked, I mean, he just came out and admitted that he was wrong
00:18:46.880about some of these things that, well, we knew that it didn't provide that much for protection
00:18:50.300against infection. He says that now no one's fact checking. No one came back and said, well,
00:18:55.040that's not what you said before. He came out and said, well, I was never for lockdowns. I never
00:18:59.980recommended that we do lockdowns after he repeatedly tried to lock down the whole world. Yeah.
00:19:05.600No one, you know, where's Reuters contacting him? Where's AP contacting him? They don't,
00:19:10.500they don't care. That's not part of the narrative. Yeah. You know, it's not just that I, um, I happen
00:19:15.880to know, and I think you know this too, that, that the laughing, it's such a laughable conflict of
00:19:22.700interest that a senior executive of Pfizer is on the board of Reuters. I mean, the, the fusion of those
00:19:31.620two companies, it's an enormous conflict of interest. It would be like, I don't know. I mean,
00:19:35.840I can just only imagine if there was a senior Exxon executive on a fact check that, that would
00:19:42.820try to discredit environmentalists. Um, the journalistic world would not accept that. They'd
00:19:49.240say you're run by an Exxon executive. If there was a senior tobacco executive that would debunk
00:19:55.340criticisms of cigarettes, people would say, well, that's laughable. He's a conflict of interest.
00:19:59.480Even if you happen to agree with tobacco and oil, here you have the big pharmacy, not even hiding
00:20:06.720their links to these fact checkers. And by the way, most of the fact checks are on the Pfizer big
00:20:13.860pharma narrative. It's just so weird of all the things in the world to check. They're obsessed with
00:20:18.920anyone who dares criticize. Yeah. It's so odd to me. What do you think of these facts? Go ahead.
00:20:27.380Well, I don't know. It's, it's absurd that we've gotten to a point that people are trusting this
00:20:36.060blindly. You mentioned earlier that, um, that Pfizer was the recipient of the largest lawsuit
00:20:42.400medical fraud in history. And that's not only because they were misleading people, but they were
00:20:48.580actually bribing doctors to prescribe their medication. That's part of the lawsuit. They were,
00:20:55.060they were fined for that. And now we're supposed to trust this company. And I understand,
00:21:00.540I can understand why the politicians push it. You know, they're all in bed together. I get that.
00:21:06.060But why do the average, the average person, I guess they're just misinformed, gullible, naive. They,
00:21:12.740they want to believe it's easier to believe that the government is actually looking out for you
00:21:17.100than it is to believe that, that they're conspiring against you. And we've had the last few years,
00:21:23.340the most monumental example that we've ever could have asked for that. Our governments,
00:21:29.380Canada's especially, Oh my God, I feel so bad for you guys up there that they hate the people.
00:21:34.740They hate us and they don't care how many of us they kill. They really don't. It's all about the
00:21:39.360profit. And if you want to go even darker, it might not even be just for the profit. They might
00:21:43.780actually be trying to depopulate us. So it's, it's the most sinister situation you can imagine.
00:21:49.540And we're in the middle of it and I don't know how to get out. Yeah. You know what, what you said
00:21:54.140there about depopulation, it sounds conspiratorial, but let me play for you a clip of Bill Gates
00:22:00.860at a Ted talk where he says, he comes up with this, uh, pseudo scientific formula. How do you
00:22:08.400save the world? Well, he, he comes up with a mathematical formula where he talks about the number
00:22:13.480of people multiplied by the amount of services per person and the carbon per service. And he says,
00:22:19.280you've got to get one of these factors in my human formula down to zero and listen to him say it.
00:22:26.920He says that we need to reduce population. If I mean, I'll let you listen to him directly.
00:22:31.760He says by 10 to 15%, that would mean by about a billion people. And really weirdly he says,
00:22:39.200and I don't understand this. He says vaccines are part of that. Take a listen.
00:22:43.940It's an average of about five tons for everyone on the planet. And somehow we have to make changes
00:22:49.760that will bring that down to zero. It's been constantly going up. It's only various economic
00:22:57.680changes that have even flattened it at all. So we have to go from rapidly rising to falling and
00:23:03.900falling all the way to zero. This equation has four factors, a little bit of multiplication.
00:23:09.980So you've got a thing on the left, CO2 that you want to get to zero. And that's going to be based
00:23:14.860on the number of people, the services each person's using on average, the energy on average for each
00:23:22.640service, and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy. So let's look at each one of these and see
00:23:30.380how we can get this down to zero. Probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty
00:23:35.500near to zero. That's back from high school algebra. But let's take a look. First, we've got population.
00:23:44.180The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about 9 billion. Now, if we do a really
00:23:50.180great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10
00:23:57.420or 15 percent. But there we see an increase of about 1.3. I mean, I don't know how a guy who says
00:24:05.860we have to get a billion fewer people in the world can also be the same guy who's the chief funder of
00:24:12.740vaccines and the chief protagonist of vaccines. I don't know if other people like Anthony Fauci share
00:24:19.420Bill Gates' explicit goal of reducing population by literally a billion people or more. But it is pretty
00:24:25.760creepy. Last word to you. Do you think these fact checks are here to stay? Do you think it was just
00:24:30.500a pandemic thing? Or do you think it's part of the whole denormalize and defame your opposition
00:24:35.620between the Joe Biden's proposed disinformation board and these, you know, pharmacy backed fact
00:24:42.920checkers? Really, I think it's a way of canceling anyone who has a different opinion. What do you think?
00:24:50.040Well, absolutely. I mean, that's obvious. This is it's not going away. It's here to stay. And I think
00:24:54.360it's going to get a lot worse. This is the only way they can keep us in line is by controlling the
00:24:59.620information. They know that if we figured out what they were doing, the game would be up. So
00:25:04.460this is going to be a lot like, you know, Soviet Russia, what's happening in China. They're going
00:25:09.760to control completely information. And soon enough, they're going to push through their social credit
00:25:14.280score. And not only are people going to get fact checked for posting wrong information, people are
00:25:20.720going to lose the ability to go shopping. They won't be able to buy a house. Their bank will close
00:25:24.580down their accounts. They won't be able to eat. So people are going to be too afraid of thinking the
00:25:29.580wrong thing or sharing the wrong post or meaning about something to even question what's being told
00:25:35.420to them. So we're getting into something really dark and sinister right now.
00:25:40.240Well, there is Pearson Sharp, author, a journalist and broadcaster with One American Network. Thanks so
00:25:45.860much for joining us today. Absolutely. Thank you very much. Good luck. Thanks. You two keep up the
00:25:50.660fight. Stay with us. More ahead. Hey, welcome back. Well, listen, it was interesting talking to
00:26:02.200Pearson Sharp. I was thinking about what he said at the end there, and I don't think I would go as far
00:26:07.440as him. He implies that a lot of the people pushing vaccines literally want to kill a vast swath of the
00:26:14.340population. I don't think that's a widespread belief at all. I think there are some people who
00:26:19.500positively talk about reducing the world's population, and it's terrifying that Bill Gates
00:26:24.800is one of them. I mean, that is absolutely true. And there are people who deeply believe in depopulation.
00:26:31.140That's true. But I think in most cases, people are just misguided or they just think it's so
00:26:36.740important we vaccinate people. We cannot risk any dissenters. I just think that Pearson overstates it when
00:26:43.160he describes a significant number of people who want to kill. I just have to believe that's not
00:26:52.300widespread at all. And I have to believe that Pfizer is not motivated by that either. They're
00:26:58.560just motivated by making money. I think Pfizer's motives are pretty clear. They just want to cash in
00:27:04.960on the biggest public health scare in history. I do not think that Pfizer wants to kill people.
00:27:09.620But that weirdo Bill Gates? Yeah, he's pretty plain about his desires, isn't he? Here's some
00:27:15.880letters. My Quill Black, if I'm saying that right, says Smith is wrong regarding global warming.
00:27:21.180And I just cannot support that. I assume you're talking about Danielle Smith, the candidate for
00:27:26.700the UCP party in Alberta. I think that anyone who in 2022 thinks that you can convince your way
00:27:39.260past the green pieces of the world to get their permission for you to pump boiler gas,
00:27:45.680I think is a fool's errand. They will never be appeased. As you saw by the tire extinguishers,
00:27:51.880they don't even believe in electric cars anymore. They don't even believe in cars with brakes anymore.
00:27:56.520You will never reason with these unreasonable people. So stop buying their junk science. Stop saying
00:28:03.500you believe in the theory of man-made global warming unless you truly do. And why would you believe in that
00:28:08.560except for based on sheer faith? Carol Brinton says we should have 30% less Trudeau, Schwab,
00:28:16.240World Economic Forum, etc. In other words, less foolish and suicidal ideas. Yeah, there's something
00:28:22.560very demoralizing about a society that is devouring itself morally, physically, that undermines good
00:28:30.160things and pumps up bad things. There's something deeply wrong with our education and our culture
00:28:36.020that's doing that. I don't understand it fully. Doug Gary says Alberta will never get a fair deal
00:28:42.100from Canada. Separation is the only answer. Well, let me put to you the case of Quebec. Quebec is not
00:28:48.900separated. In fact, they sort of run the show in a number of ways. They have another prime minister from
00:28:56.340Quebec right now, don't they? They have three out of the nine seats on the Supreme Court guaranteed to them.
00:29:01.740They have mandatory bilingualism across the country, including, say, Vancouver's International Airport,
00:29:07.260though, of course, Chinese is the second language there, not French. Quebec has a say over their
00:29:14.700policing, over their immigration, over their pension fund. They collect their taxes. All of that done
00:29:20.560without separating, but it was done with the threat of separatism, with the or else. One thing I think you
00:29:28.000could learn from great negotiators, Donald Trump being an example of that, is you have to be
00:29:32.800prepared to walk away from the deal to get a good deal. If people know you won't walk away, they'll
00:29:39.040just hold the line and they'll know you'll come to them. I think that Alberta has lacked that or else.
00:29:45.360Some people say it's time. That's our show for today. Until tomorrow, on behalf of all of us here
00:29:50.720at Rebel World Headquarters, to you at home, good night and keep fighting for freedom.
00:29:54.480Tamara Ugolini here with Rebel News. Now, some of you may recall the interview that I did last week
00:29:59.840with professional engineer Ken Drysdale. He has compiled an 89-page forensic report titled
00:30:06.400Investigation into Criminal Allegations Concerning the COVID-19 Response. In that interview, we discuss
00:30:12.880his initiative to present this report to police stations across Canada, urging them to initiate
00:30:18.080a criminal investigation into the COVID-19 response. In that interview, Ken also made an astonishing
00:30:24.160finding when he looked specifically into the risk of COVID to pregnant women and balanced it with the
00:30:30.240unknowns of the COVID injectables rolled out to that demographic by our government and medical officials
00:30:37.360as safe and effective. The effects that this injection is having on women's reproductive health
00:30:43.040is a phenomenon that is becoming increasingly difficult for even the mainstream media to ignore,
00:30:48.640as evidenced by this particular headline that validated the literally bloody suffering faced by an
00:30:55.120astronomical 42% of those with regular menstrual cycles. It's not new to me. I've discussed women's
00:31:02.880reproductive health several times before on the Rebel platform, twice with biochemist, microbiologist,
00:31:10.240and immunologist, Dr. Jessica Rose, and in other written pieces showing the evolution of science around the COVID
00:31:18.080injectables that began rolling out in December of 2020. Most recently, I interviewed Dr. Shoemaker, who made an
00:31:25.760alarming discovery that out of 29 documented pregnancy outcomes from Pfizer's own data, 28 of those
00:31:33.040pregnancies resulted in fetal death. Immunologist and virologist Dr. Byron Bridle, who I've also interviewed on the dangers of these injections, published a sub-stack paper that confirms this astounding 97%
00:31:45.360baby death rate. And Ken Drysdale takes an extremely pragmatic approach in that he doesn't question any of the data, he simply interprets it exactly as it is, and tries to hone in on the risk versus benefit profile for pregnant women.
00:32:05.040One of the things that really, really upset me when I saw it, and I just stumbled upon doing it because we had friends of ours who were pregnant at the time, and the gynecologist was constantly telling the lady, you've got to get shot, got to get the shot, and the husband didn't want them to because there were so many unknowns.
00:32:23.040So we looked at a bunch of statistics as to how many women in the childbearing years died of COVID. We looked at how many died of all kinds of other things. We also looked at exactly what Pfizer was saying about their own drugs.
00:32:41.040So we got the monograph. And the monograph, for those of you who don't know, is a little piece of paper that's inside the drug vial. When you leave the pharmacy, most people throw it away. It's a big document. We reproduced that in our report verbatim. We didn't change it.
00:32:55.040We didn't change it. And what we were after there was, you know, everything you do in life has risk associated with it.
00:33:03.040So we wanted to see what Pfizer knew or didn't know and what they told the government about their drug concerning pregnancies.
00:33:11.040And we wanted to examine what the risk to a pregnant woman was of actually contracting the disease and dying of it. And again, it was shocking to us what we found.
00:33:21.040You know, I'm old enough to remember the thalidomide crisis and what that did to people and what we should have learned about that.
00:33:30.040And so the first thing we did, again, we looked at the monograph and what Pfizer said in their monograph.
00:33:37.040And again, it's reproduced on page 41 of our report. Fertility. It is unknown whether comertity, comertity is Pfizer's name for their vaccine, has an impact on fertility.
00:33:49.040Pregnant women. The safety and efficacy of comertity in pregnant women has not been established.
00:33:55.040It is unknown whether comertity is excreted in human milk. Pediatrics. The safety and efficacy of comertity in children under five has not been established.
00:34:04.040They didn't look at toxicity. The carcinogenity. In other words, can it cause cancer? Carcinogenic potential was not assessed.
00:34:12.040This is what Pfizer said. And then if you looked at what the province of Manitoba were telling pregnant women, they were saying it was safe.
00:34:21.040They were monitoring it. The vaccines have been used for 50 years and they were one of the greatest things ever that ever occurred in medicine.
00:34:28.040And and don't be worried. We've done the greatest bit of science on this and it's safe and we're monitoring.
00:34:33.040We've got you. We've got your back is what they said. Keep in mind, this is what Pfizer said about their own drug.
00:34:39.040But then so we looked at that. There's a lot of unknowns there. What effect does it have on pregnant women?
00:34:44.040We don't know. What effect does it have on pregnant fertility? We don't know.
00:34:48.040So we looked at the odds of what were the odds of a woman who was pregnant, dying, getting COVID and dying.
00:34:56.040So we defined childbearing years as between 20 and 39.
00:35:01.040And Statistics Canada said the average was 31.2.
00:35:04.040And there were five million, almost 5.1 million women in Canada between the ages 20 and 39.
00:35:11.040Of that, in 2020, 2800 women died for whatever reason in that age group.
00:35:18.040That meant your chance of dying just because was about one in 1800.
00:35:23.040Now, Statistics Canada also reported that in that age group, 20 women contracted and died of COVID.
00:35:29.040That means your chance of contracting and dying of COVID was one in a quarter of a million.
00:35:35.040Your chance of just dying from murder, suicide, cancer, one in 1800.
00:35:40.040Your chance of dying from COVID, one in a quarter of a million.
00:35:44.040Now, to put that in perspective a little bit, we also looked at what the chances were of a woman dying just from being pregnant.
00:35:52.040And there were 24 of those in Canada that year.
00:35:55.040And when you looked at how many women had gotten pregnant and how many women died, the chances of you dying from just getting pregnant were one in 15,000.
00:36:04.040So, I just want to repeat that because it's important.
00:36:08.040Your chance of contracting COVID and dying was one in a quarter of a million.
00:36:13.040Your chance of dying from simply being pregnant was one in 15,000.
00:36:24.040There were 855 accidents, 341 suicides, and 39 murders.
00:36:30.040341 suicides compared to 20 COVID deaths.
00:36:35.040Can you imagine how many lives we could have saved if we would have spent those billions and billions of dollars on suicide prevention rather than COVID death prevention, which was questionable anyway?
00:36:46.040So, what that analysis told us was, I can only speak for myself, but I have a 50-50 chance of dying from something.
00:36:55.040And I have a 25% chance of dying from the solution.
00:37:01.040But when the risk of you dying from this is one and a quarter of a million, and you have no idea whether or not it's going to affect your baby, whether it's carcinogenic, whether you're going to breastfeed it into the baby, what effects it has on your fertility, who in the world would go ahead and take that?
00:37:18.040So, the question becomes, how did the gynecologists and pediatric doctors recommend this when they had this information long before I did?
00:37:27.040Sadly, as more information continues to trickle out, it appears that the cure, if we can even call it that, since it doesn't prevent infection or transmission and has questionable effects on severe outcomes, is far worse than the disease.
00:37:44.040A risk versus benefit calculation is crucial to informed consent, and yet Canadians have arguably been robbed of that fundamental component of medical ethics throughout the rollout of these injections on the entire population.