EZRA LEVANT ｜ A regime journalist asks Joe Biden to investigate Elon Musk for treason
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
163.3203
Summary
A reporter for Bloomberg asks Joe Biden if Elon Musk should be investigated for national security risk. It's an incredible question, and I'll show you the video of it on the Ezra Levant Show. Plus, a look at why Elon Musk is a threat to U.S. national security.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hello, my Rebels. Today, we're going to interview Ben Weingarten about the fact that they're still
00:00:03.640
not done counting the votes in different states in America. I think that's shocking.
00:00:08.940
But first, I want to talk about an even more shocking thing, a reporter for Mike Bloomberg
00:00:13.540
asking Joe Biden if he thinks Elon Musk should be investigated for a national security risk.
00:00:24.920
But first, let me invite you to become a subscriber to Rebel News Plus. I mentioned
00:00:27.540
videotape. You got to see the video. The show is really built for video.
00:00:33.220
And we call that Rebel News Plus. For $8 a month, you get all of my podcasts in video form. Plus,
00:00:39.140
we have other shows on a weekly basis by other talent here. $8. It's not a ton of money, but it
00:00:46.180
adds up for us. Because remember, we don't take any money from government. So we rely on you.
00:00:50.980
Please consider going to rebelnewsplus.com. All right. Thanks. Here's today's show.
00:00:57.540
Tonight, a regime journalist asked Joe Biden to investigate Elon Musk for treason.
00:01:16.440
It's November 10th, and this is The Ezra Levant Show.
00:01:19.220
You're fighting for freedom! Shame on you, you censorious bug!
00:01:34.080
Musk is a threat to U.S. national security, and should the U.S. and with the tools you have
00:01:40.180
investigate his joint acquisition of Twitter with foreign governments, which include the Saudis?
00:02:10.260
is worthy of being looked at. Whether or not he is doing anything inappropriate, I'm not suggesting
00:02:20.980
that. I'm suggesting that it's worth being looked at. But that's all I'll say.
00:02:31.020
That's a reporter named Jenny Leonard. She works for a news company called Bloomberg News, which is,
00:02:36.820
of course, named after its owner, Mike Bloomberg, the billionaire oligarch who bought his way into
00:02:42.260
being mayor of New York City and then tried to do the same with the presidency in 2020, but he failed.
00:02:48.340
Watch the video again. I've seen enough press conferences to know when a question is set up,
00:02:52.820
planned, orchestrated, choreographed. Take a look.
00:02:54.820
Musk is a threat to U.S. national security, and should the U.S. and with the tools you have
00:03:01.060
investigate his joint acquisition of Twitter with foreign governments, which include the Saudis?
00:03:32.140
is worthy of being looked at. Whether or not he is doing anything inappropriate, I'm not suggesting
00:03:41.860
that. I'm suggesting that it's worth being looked at. But that's all I'll say.
00:03:51.780
So Elon Musk bought Twitter, which is basically the town square for politicians and journalists.
00:03:57.140
And he made a tweet the other day endorsing the Republicans, which was a pretty tepid endorsement,
00:04:04.260
by the way. I don't think it moved a single vote. I think it was just Musk's way of signaling that he was
00:04:09.140
different from the rest of the Silicon Valley left wing mafia. He said to independent minded voters,
00:04:16.180
shared power curbs the worst excesses of both parties. Therefore, I recommend voting for a Republican Congress,
00:04:22.500
given that the presidency is Democratic. Boy, what a radical. But actually, it is radical. Other than Peter Thiel,
00:04:29.700
can you name a single Silicon Valley tycoon who isn't a left wing Democrat?
00:04:35.780
That's Musk's promise to Twitter users that it won't be biased to the left anymore, that it'll take a lighter touch
00:04:41.620
at censoring people, that it won't pander to private interests and hidden hands. I showed you the other day
00:04:47.300
and they had a whole team at Twitter dedicated to making the app compliant with the United Nations
00:04:52.020
political agenda. And they had a special portal for the FBI. Remember, Twitter is the place that banned
00:04:57.540
a sitting U.S. president because of mean tweets, but lets dictators from China and Iran publish their
00:05:02.900
threats with impunity. Musk has said he wants to ease up on the politics and the censorship and the
00:05:08.740
private agendas. Well, that can't be allowed. Now, at the same time, Musk committed a terrible sin in
00:05:14.740
the eyes of the regime. And I mean that in the sense that President Eisenhower did when he coined
00:05:19.620
the phrase the military industrial complex. Musk said that maybe getting into a proxy war with Russia
00:05:25.780
isn't quite risk free. He said, if Russia is faced with the choice of losing Crimea or using battlefield
00:05:33.300
nukes, they will choose the latter. We've already sanctioned, cut off Russia in every possible way.
00:05:39.540
So what more do they have left to lose? If we nuke Russia back, they will nuke us. And then
00:05:44.500
we have World War III. Well, how dare you be against nuclear war, sir, you Putin apologist.
00:05:50.900
By the way, Elon Musk, who runs a satellite internet company called Starlink, has provided
00:05:55.780
free internet satellite coverage to Ukraine to keep their internet working despite the disruption of
00:06:01.140
their infrastructure by the Russian invasion. And that's a donation, unlike arms dealers who are
00:06:06.980
charging for their weapon sales. I think Elon Musk is what he appears to be, a chatty public
00:06:13.460
intellectual who likes to brainstorm in public. He's not an enemy. He's actually quite charitable,
00:06:17.140
it seems. And he believes in freedom in an old fashioned way, even though he's in industries that
00:06:21.860
don't. And I think he obviously supports Ukraine. Well, that must be stopped. You can't let Twitter,
00:06:28.580
the marketplace of ideas of the modern age, you can't let it become uncensored and free. Imagine if
00:06:33.220
he lets Trump back on the platform and you can't have people questioning the war in Ukraine,
00:06:37.220
even though I think he really is the most generous person in the world in terms of his outright
00:06:42.340
donation to the Ukrainian cause. Well, we can't have his free thinking. Thus, the choreographed
00:06:47.060
question about investigating him as really a foreign spy, that's the implication. And that question,
00:06:52.340
Musk is a threat to national security, including because of his connection with the Saudis in Twitter.
00:06:59.060
Well, fair enough. I mean, here's a news story about the Saudis investing big time in Twitter. This is from
00:07:04.820
Forbes. The headline is, Billionaire Saudi Prince Al-Walid takes $300 million stake in Twitter.
00:07:11.860
I'll read a bit. Saudi Prince Al-Walid Bin Talal has added Twitter to his long list of investments,
00:07:18.580
putting $300 million into the social media company. The billionaire investor announced
00:07:23.140
the move in a statement saying the investment followed months of negotiation and due diligence.
00:07:28.260
Our investment in Twitter reaffirms our ability in identifying suitable opportunities
00:07:32.980
to invest in promising high growth businesses with a global impact. Al-Walid said in a statement,
00:07:37.860
it did not indicate the size of the prince's ownership stake in Twitter or the implied value
00:07:42.180
of Twitter given the new investment. Definitely worth investigating.
00:07:46.500
Except can I point out the date of that article? December 19th, 2011.
00:07:53.620
Saudi Arabia has been one of the biggest owners of Twitter for more than a decade. In fact, when Elon Musk
00:07:59.140
first made his bid to buy Twitter and take it private, the Saudis didn't want him. Here's that
00:08:04.660
same Prince Al-Walid when Elon Musk first offered to buy it. He said, I don't believe that the proposed
00:08:11.540
offer by Elon Musk, $54.20, comes close to the intrinsic value of Twitter given its growth prospects.
00:08:19.140
Being one of the largest and long-term shareholders of Twitter, Kingdom, that's his company, and I reject
00:08:25.700
this offer. And you can see the image appended to that tweet showing that the Saudis had actually
00:08:31.140
upped their stake in Twitter. And by the way, the Saudis used Twitter to spy on its users.
00:08:37.060
Here's one news story about it in the Guardian. Just a few months ago,
00:08:40.180
ex-Twitter employee found guilty of spying on Saudi dissidents. Ahmed Abu Amo found to have given
00:08:46.260
users personal information to Mohammed bin Salman's aide. So for more than a decade, the Saudis have owned a
00:08:52.020
huge chunk of Twitter and have used it to spy on users. But no problem. Twitter took out the real
00:08:59.300
enemy, Donald Trump. But now that Elon Musk wants free speech and endorses the Republicans, he's a
00:09:04.980
national security risk, especially for his links to Saudi Arabia. And Joe Biden says it's worth the
00:09:10.180
government looking into. And that Bloomberg reporter, eh? What a question. She never thought to ask that
00:09:16.980
question about Saudi Arabia before, even though it's owned a huge chunk of Twitter for a decade.
00:09:23.380
I don't think she's ever asked that question about TikTok, has she? TikTok, which is a huge app,
00:09:28.660
especially for young people, is run by China as spyware on millions of Westerners, or Huawei,
00:09:35.060
the Chinese telecom giant. None of that concerns Bloomberg or Joe Biden. Hey, I wonder if that has
00:09:42.420
anything to do with the Biden family's financial deals with China. This is a story from the Washington
00:09:47.540
Post. Hunter Biden, who is no discernible skill or experience, he landed huge business deals in China
00:09:54.100
and Ukraine and Russia. You know, his laptop, which has been verified as accurate by the mainstream media,
00:10:00.340
talks about all these deals giving 10% to the big guy. Gee, I wonder who that possibly could mean.
00:10:05.540
The whole world knows that Hunter Biden is for sale. He's a story in the BBC. You don't think
00:10:12.660
every Chinese or Ukrainian or Russian oligarch knows the entry point into the US administration?
00:10:18.260
For all the allegations of Donald Trump or his family somehow benefiting financially
00:10:22.260
from his presidency, there was nothing like this. Which perhaps explains why Chinese companies like
00:10:27.860
TikTok are not subject to investigations, but Elon Musk's Twitter is. Seriously, just today,
00:10:33.380
the White House confirmed it. Take a look at this video. The president yesterday said that it should
00:10:40.020
be, that Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter should be looked into as a potential threat to national
00:10:47.220
security. Can you offer anything about why? And he also said there are many ways to look into that.
00:10:55.300
How would you look into that? Well, you heard the president yesterday and the CFIUS process is the
00:10:59.940
normal process through which transactions that might have a national security nexus
00:11:04.500
get reviewed. And I will defer to the CFIUS process rather than comment on it further from this podium.
00:11:10.900
Yeah. CFIUS stands for the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US. It reviews national security
00:11:18.660
threats emanating from business deals. That's what they're talking about there. Now, CFIUS hasn't
00:11:23.060
investigated Hunter Biden because Hunter Biden is a good Democrat. So why would they? But who was
00:11:29.380
that reporter who asked the setup question? Like I say, she works for an oligarch named Mike Bloomberg.
00:11:34.660
He has some interesting views on China. Let's just say that. I wonder if it's related to the fact that
00:11:39.460
he's made huge investments in China. Take a listen to him. I'm going to play a full clip. This is just
00:11:45.300
incredible. Mike Bloomberg talking about China. So the United States currently accounts for about 15% of
00:11:51.060
global greenhouse gas emissions. China accounts for roughly 30% of greenhouse gas emissions.
00:11:57.060
How do we, even if we get to net zero, how do you get China, India, and the other countries to be
00:12:03.140
good partners? China is doing a lot. Yes, they're still building a bunch of coal-fired power plants.
00:12:07.060
And they're still burning coal. Yes, they are. But they are now moving plants away from the cities.
00:12:13.300
The Communist Party wants to stay in power in China. And they listen to the public. When the public says,
00:12:19.460
I can't breathe the air, Xi Jinping is not a dictator. He has to satisfy his constituents,
00:12:25.380
so he's not going to survive. He's not a dictator? No, he has to. He has a constituency to
00:12:34.660
answer to. He doesn't have a vote. He doesn't have a democracy. He's not held accountable by voters.
00:12:40.420
If his advisers gave him... Is they check on him just a revolution?
00:12:44.900
You're not going to have a revolution. No government survives without the will of the majority of its
00:12:50.180
people. Okay? It's just, he has to deliver services. The Chinese Communist Party looks at Russia,
00:12:58.500
and they look for where the Communist Party is. And they don't find it anymore. And they don't want
00:13:02.900
that to happen. I mean, the idea that the Chinese government is responsive to sort of a democratic
00:13:07.860
expression of fresh air, clean air. Oh, come on. Of course they are.
00:13:10.900
I mean, I'm looking at the people in Hong Kong who are protesting and wondering whether the Chinese
00:13:16.260
government cares what they have to say. Go back and read the press the days when you have big pollution
00:13:19.060
in Beijing, and they're doing something about it. That's ridiculous. The trouble is you can't
00:13:24.500
overnight move cement plants and power plants just outside the city that are polluting the air,
00:13:30.500
and you have to have their product. So some of it takes time. And there's always in government,
00:13:36.500
even governments that aren't what we would call a democracy, there's lots of stakeholders who have
00:13:41.220
vested interests. And they have an impact. And that's why, if you listen to the young millennials,
00:13:46.500
let's go in and solve the problem overnight. Yeah, that'd be great if you didn't have to fund it
00:13:51.140
and get it through legal things. So Xi Jinping, the dictator of China, is not actually a dictator.
00:13:56.260
And again and again, he says this. It isn't a gaffe. It wasn't a misspeak. He's adamant about it. I
00:14:03.300
mean, he wants more money. He doesn't have enough. And he'll say that Xi Jinping is a great Democrat,
00:14:09.620
a great man of the people, because he's got big investments in China. Huge shout out to that
00:14:14.420
reporter, by the way. Her name is Margaret Hoover, for pressing him on it. Good for her. You don't see
00:14:19.300
a lot of journalism like that. Now, why is this all relevant to us here in Canada?
00:14:22.980
Well, because most things in America are relevant to us, because Twitter and Facebook
00:14:28.820
and the rest of the big tech companies dominate Canada just as much as they dominate the US. And
00:14:33.380
because Justin Trudeau is doing the same thing. Accusing his political opponents of being in
00:14:38.580
league with foreign enemies. They've even accused us here at Rebel News of being Russian spies.
00:14:44.500
What a laugh. I remember when the media and the Democrats said that Donald Trump was the
00:14:49.140
fascist bully who was threatening free speech. No, that was just them projecting. It's Biden who's
00:14:58.340
taking on all the trappings of a fascist leader. And don't think Trudeau won't either,
00:15:04.260
as his invocation of martial law proves. Stay with us for more with Ben Weingarten.
00:15:17.540
Well, it's been two days since the US midterm elections and the mighty state of Florida,
00:15:26.980
which I have to Google it, but I've got over 20 million souls there. They counted all their votes
00:15:33.380
in about an hour. Same thing in Texas, another very large state. But for some reason, states where
00:15:42.580
Republican insurgents are challenging Democrat incumbents, well, two days into it, and they've
00:15:49.620
only counted half or 70 percent of the ballots. I'm not quite sure why. If developing countries like
00:15:55.940
Brazil can count an enormous number of votes, Brazil, I think it's the fourth most populous nation in the
00:16:02.100
world. If they can do it in one night, why can't the United States? Is it on purpose? Is it to allow
00:16:08.340
some wiggle room there for some jiggery poker? You're not even allowed to ask such a question.
00:16:14.820
You'll be called an election denier. But it remains undeniable that in places like Nevada and Arizona,
00:16:23.460
where you have Republican challengers that are on the hunt and are very close,
00:16:27.940
it looks like we won't have the result for days or maybe even a week. It's very bizarre to me.
00:16:33.460
But joining us now to help pick things over is our friend Benjamin Weingarten, the deputy editor of
00:16:40.020
Real Clear Investigations, who joins us now by Skype. Ben, great to see you again. I remember when we
00:16:45.140
stayed up very late talking with you on election night 2020, and I remember things were looking very
00:16:52.660
promising. And then suddenly, quirky things started to happen very late at night, and polls were delayed,
00:16:58.980
and poll workers said they were going home, and new tranches of votes were found. And I have that same
00:17:05.380
sinking feeling again when I look at the candidate for governor in Arizona, Kerry Lake. When I look across
00:17:14.100
the map, and there's some parts of America that are still counting, and it just strikes me as
00:17:19.780
as hard to believe. Yeah, there's a bit of deja vu all over again, and I'm probably only marginally
00:17:27.780
less bleary-eyed than I was during that 2020 election night and then the days that followed it. But there's
00:17:34.980
a reason, I think, that history to the present is rhyming in this instance. And that is that many of the
00:17:44.740
voting procedures, the rules and regulations that were temporarily put in under cover of Chinese
00:17:52.500
coronavirus in 2020, oftentimes unduly, in terms of not the legislatures making the laws that then impacted
00:18:00.740
the process, those have gone from temporary and emergency to permanent and normalized. And so, consequently,
00:18:10.740
what you see is that we don't have an election day and night in America anymore. We have elections for
00:18:17.460
weeks. And we don't have in-person voting with identification overseen by election workers with
00:18:27.860
then observers slash challengers there as well, watching the whole process for the vast majority of
00:18:34.500
voters. Instead, we've essentially gone to an increasingly remote voting model. And that is to
00:18:42.980
what election officials attribute these slowdowns to, this collection of votes over a series of days,
00:18:50.340
and these various tranches of votes, and the need to verify them, and all manner of complications
00:18:58.020
essentially layered into the system that we never had for pretty much the entirety of American history.
00:19:04.980
You talk about Florida, the fact that they were able to collect the votes and have results on
00:19:10.660
election night, the way it had pretty much always been here, with the exception of some very, very tight
00:19:15.620
races historically. Florida's population is over 20 million. Arizona and Nevada combined have a population
00:19:23.780
that's about half the size of Florida's. So when you ask the question, essentially, why can't
00:19:31.300
Arizona and Nevada do what Florida does? Well, Florida has gone out and had very restrictive,
00:19:36.740
so-called restrictive, i.e., secure, election integrity-focused, robust election rules and regulations
00:19:44.580
put on the books. Arizona and Nevada have not. And I would argue it's not a matter of can't.
00:19:51.140
It's not an inability to count the votes and have a result on election night. It is a willingness.
00:20:00.100
And that raises the question of why would you endorse a system that leaves it to we're counting
00:20:05.940
votes and we're finding new tranches, et cetera, and we're 60 or 70 percent through two days after
00:20:11.780
the election, and we don't know when we're going to be able to certify all these ballots. Why is it that
00:20:16.020
we have that system? Democrats and apparently some GOP establishment members who didn't push back
00:20:22.580
against those 2020 standards, apparently they're comfortable with a system that opens itself up to
00:20:29.860
insecure, unsafe, non-secret ballots, or at very minimum, the potentiality for it. And that raises
00:20:35.860
all manner of questions about the confidence of elections. I tweeted something about this before.
00:20:40.100
The further you get from having elections on an election day in a booth, the less confidence
00:20:46.660
you have in the vote. The longer it takes to count the votes after election day, the less confidence
00:20:52.340
you have in the outcomes. And that's not the case that Republicans across this country made,
00:20:57.780
even though it was on the ballot in certain instances. And what you see right now, particularly in
00:21:01.940
Arizona, is the remarkable instance where essentially the chief election officer in the state,
00:21:07.060
Katie Hobbs, is on the ballot and weighing through this process where the votes are being counted,
00:21:14.420
Hobbs versus Wake. And she's going to be responsible for certifying the vote at the end of the day.
00:21:19.700
There's a huge battle about all this across the country. I wrote an in-depth report on this
00:21:24.820
for RealClear investigations that we put out on election day. There's been a huge battle that's going
00:21:28.820
on, but as Republicans and conservatives see it, they are way behind in terms of setting the rules of
00:21:34.740
the game and being involved in the process, the election infrastructure. And when it's dominated
00:21:40.820
or appears to be dominated by one party, that obviously calls into question the outcomes.
00:21:46.180
You know, it's not by accident. More than a decade ago, George Soros and his Open Society Foundations
00:21:53.300
set up an attorney's general project. And their goal was to put attorneys general across America
00:21:58.100
with the very explicit rule of amnesty, amnesty for immigration, amnesty for crimes. And you see
00:22:04.740
those radical Soros attorneys general across the country. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is one
00:22:10.580
of their public projects. They also set up a secretaries of state project. And of course,
00:22:16.340
the secretary of state in Washington, that's what Americans call their foreign minister. But the secretaries
00:22:22.660
of state on the state level, they're not foreign ministers. They're in charge of running things like
00:22:26.180
we've just described, running elections. And it is not a conspiracy theory to say that these are
00:22:32.420
run by operatives. This was the campaign plan of George Soros, who was largely successful. And I
00:22:40.180
don't know. I mean, let me take it in a different context. Let's talk about other contexts, contests,
00:22:47.220
like prosecuting someone for a crime. You have a prosecution and you have a defense, and they both
00:22:52.660
are vying very hard for the positive outcome. And there's a concept in criminal law called the
00:23:00.180
chain of custody of evidence. Like if something is, if some piece of evidence, if a gun, if a bullet,
00:23:06.260
if a knife is seized, you have to know where that, and the debate will turn on that, the prosecution will
00:23:12.820
turn on that. Well, was that gun or fingerprint known every second of the journey from when it
00:23:21.220
was seized to when it appears in court? They call that chain of custody. Or was it allowed to be
00:23:25.940
tampered with? Was someone alone with the evidence? That's enough to get a prosecution of someone thrown
00:23:32.980
out. Well, an election is a kind of trial where millions of voters are the jury. But what happened,
00:23:43.780
I mean, maybe I'm stretching the analogy, but their ballots, really their verdict, that's not
00:23:50.180
subject to the chain of custody. When you say, I've just found thousands more ballots, or they were
00:23:54.820
mailed in, or they weren't dated, but we found them. I suppose it's a different thing that's subject
00:24:00.100
to the chain of custody. But you'd have to be a fool to believe there's no jiggery-pokery. So much
00:24:04.580
turns on it. So much money, so much power, so much influence turns on it. And if you simply say, well,
00:24:10.100
I don't know when it will be done, and I don't know where we found these, who could possibly
00:24:15.460
credit it as being accurate? I find it appalling that this is happening in a first-world country
00:24:20.580
like America. I agree with you. And by the way, Jimmy Carter and James Baker put together a
00:24:29.300
bipartisan report on federal election reform back in 2005. And what they said in that report is that
00:24:35.540
absentee ballots have the most potential associated with them for fraud. And it's just a matter of
00:24:41.380
logic. It's not to say that there's been evidence of widespread fraud in the range of tens of thousands
00:24:47.140
or hundreds of thousands of votes, but that's in part because it's really hard to detect fraud. So I
00:24:52.580
don't know that we would even know the size, the scale, the scope of the fraud, absent whistleblowers,
00:24:57.940
or some other means of catching it. But it's just by very nature of the system. If the ballot is being
00:25:03.940
delivered to someone's home, you don't know who they're interacting with. You don't know who's
00:25:07.860
filling it out. You don't know if they're being coerced, persuaded, induced to vote a certain way.
00:25:12.900
And now we have this concept of ballot harvesting that's also been normalized in this country where
00:25:17.220
essentially ballots can be collected en masse in certain states by law and in other states illegally
00:25:22.020
and cast. The ballots can be delivered and then taken and distributed. So there's just all manner
00:25:30.100
of opportunities, the potentiality for fraud. And that undermines confidence in the system,
00:25:36.980
a representative government. And by the way, all of that aside, the fact of the matter is that even
00:25:43.060
layering in whatever margin of fraud we might associate with the races, and I do think that this
00:25:49.460
system, the further you get away from a system in person voting with photo identification. I mean,
00:25:54.340
heck, I went to a comedy club in New York City two weeks ago, and I needed to show a photo ID,
00:25:58.820
and they were very strict about it. And it's not like I'm a child. I'm pretty sure they knew I was of
00:26:02.340
age. You didn't have to show a photo ID where I vote at my precinct in New Jersey. You say,
00:26:07.220
what's your name? What's your address? Okay, you're in the book, sign your signature here. That's it.
00:26:12.020
The fact that a comedy club arguably has more security associated with it than elections,
00:26:18.020
there's something very wrong there. And it's like that across this country in far too many places.
00:26:23.780
Now, all that said, I think there's another aspect of this election worth talking about,
00:26:28.900
and Democrat dominance of the machine is a vital aspect of it. Their get out the vote operation
00:26:34.180
is dominant. A Biden administration executive order that has been too little focused upon,
00:26:39.140
which called for every government agency to put resources in to registering and getting voters to
00:26:46.180
participate, potentially partnering with third-party groups purportedly nonpartisan. But as we know from
00:26:53.300
the Zuckerberg case, not the case in 2020 where you had private dollars to the tune of hundreds of
00:26:58.660
millions funding election administration and oversight and management, often in concert with
00:27:04.980
these third-party, putatively nonpartisan, but generally progressive groups who may have had the same
00:27:09.540
thing again en masse in this election. But the fact of the matter is, look, you had someone like
00:27:15.060
John Fetterman in Pennsylvania who literally was beyond compromise. So first we had Joe Biden,
00:27:20.980
now we have John Fetterman. It was exposed to the light of day that he couldn't form a coherent
00:27:25.860
sentence in a debate. That debate happened two weeks before the election when hundreds of thousands
00:27:31.140
of early votes had already been cast. But nevertheless, what does it say that Democrats can run someone
00:27:37.780
who's wholly compromised and literally not there, really, mentally capable of doing the job of a
00:27:44.580
senator, which is reading, thinking, persuading, debating, arguing, making a case for something?
00:27:50.740
And he still won. And I make it even bigger. Look, in this country, everything is directionally poor.
00:27:57.380
You had polls showing that 75 percent of people were very angry about or at least
00:28:01.540
unhappy with the performance of Joe Biden and the Democrat Party more broadly by proxy here.
00:28:08.500
You have people who are, we are poorer, we are less secure, and still Democrats turned out tens of
00:28:14.660
millions of people. They crushed people's jobs. They stunted the learning of their children. They
00:28:20.900
crippled us via gas prices. They imposed all the tyrannical COVID-ian
00:28:25.860
acts, decrees upon us. The list goes on and on. They still churned out tens of millions of people.
00:28:32.020
And I think in one side of things, you have to credit Democrats for that. That is how
00:28:36.900
disciplined and how much of a machine they've built and how well they've conditioned people
00:28:41.460
who are Democrats to vote Democrat. By the same token, the fact that Republicans,
00:28:46.500
we don't know what their message was, is a massive indictment. I said to friends of mine and family
00:28:53.700
before the election, you know, voters out there overwhelmingly rank inflation and the economy as
00:28:58.660
kind of their number one concern. Understandably so. I could not tell any of them what the Republican
00:29:04.260
message is on, here's what we're going to do to make your life better in the face of this inflation,
00:29:09.540
or to counter the policies the other side. So there are multiple levels here of failure. And I think
00:29:16.020
on the Democrat side, success, the one shining beacon of success in the Republican side beyond
00:29:21.220
knocking off the DCCC chair in New York, and I'd say the impressive performance of Lee Zeldin and for
00:29:28.500
governor in New York and others in New York, as well as J.D. Vance, for example, winning in Ohio,
00:29:34.340
and we'll see what happens with the Senate and gubernatorial races, Nevada, Arizona, etc.,
00:29:38.500
is obviously Florida, where Florida had a red wave of red waves. It was a massive win,
00:29:45.780
obviously, for Governor DeSantis and then all the way down ticket as well. But then also a red wave
00:29:51.140
relative to a country that did not have a red wave. And I think that stands as an example of the right
00:29:58.500
message, the right messenger. And not only that, but the proof was in the pudding of the fact that
00:30:03.700
Florida stood as a magnet for conservatives. And in fact, many of these states, including New York,
00:30:09.140
for example, you could say that potentially Lee Zeldin was the victim of Governor DeSantis' success,
00:30:14.340
with the New York transplants leaving New York, going down to Florida, and turning Florida into
00:30:19.540
a bright red state. You know, that's a great point. Florida had the largest in-migration from other U.S.
00:30:27.140
states in the Union. And California and New York had very high out-migration. And who would move
00:30:36.420
from a deep blue state, who would move from L.A. or New York to Florida? Well, maybe it would be a
00:30:42.740
Democrat, maybe, probably. I mean, listen, it's not a political strike that determines if you're happy
00:30:48.100
with the lockdown. But probably freedom-minded people went to the freedom refuge. And so you're
00:30:54.740
right. Maybe some of that DeSantis win, like he won by I think a million and a half vote margin or
00:31:01.300
something. You take a million of that and sprinkle it around America, you probably tip a few places
00:31:08.740
from blue to red. You're right. DeSantis was so successful. And it was amazing to me to see that not
00:31:16.100
only did he dominate Cuban Americans, but other Latinos, he won, I think, 55% of the Puerto Rican
00:31:22.740
vote, which I traditionally think of as Democrat voters. And I have to say that the combination of
00:31:32.580
his success, not just ideologically and in using the instruments of power, like I love watching him
00:31:39.460
fight with Disney, a fight that I would have thought was impossible. He just did it. And then not only is he
00:31:45.220
strong ideologically, but he's a winner. And Donald Trump's central brand as president and in the
00:31:52.820
private sector was I'm a winner. I can do things. I can get it done. I can build this. I can fix the
00:31:58.580
Central Park skating rink. I can have a hit TV show with top ratings. I host the funnest things like the
00:32:06.100
Miss America. Like I'm a winner, winner, winner, winner. I can win these trade deals. And he was a winner.
00:32:10.820
winner. And I think that offset the things about Trump that were sometimes irritating to people or
00:32:19.780
caused his allies to sort of cringe. Well, the guy was a winner. But the winner this week was Ron
00:32:26.780
DeSantis. And some of the Trump endorsed candidates did not win. I think that some of the Donald Trump
00:32:32.960
magnetism is gone. I like the guy. Don't get me wrong. I think he was a great president. I wish he
00:32:37.240
was reelected in 2020. But I think the case for DeSantis is stronger than ever. Look at that winner
00:32:42.020
win. Yeah, certainly there are many of those who are, I mean, almost timed to whatever the final
00:32:52.060
point in election night was before people tuned in, declaring Ron DeSantis essentially the odds-on
00:32:57.680
favorite for the nomination and wanting to discard Trump. My personal view is that Donald Trump should
00:33:07.060
never be underestimated. Both of these figures bring tremendous capabilities to the table. Donald
00:33:15.260
Trump put on the map places and peoples that were never on the map. Including DeSantis, by the way.
00:33:23.200
Yeah, of course. A huge ally of DeSantis and endorsed him for governor in Florida. I think that the demise
00:33:29.980
of Donald Trump and the rise of DeSantis that's being argued, I think we have to let the process play out
00:33:36.720
and we have to let both of them make their cases to the American people. Sort of the conventional wisdom
00:33:41.880
around DeSantis essentially is that he's Trump, but younger, without the baggage, hyper-competent,
00:33:48.920
and he can bring sort of all Trump's positives to the table and none of Trump's negatives to the tables.
00:33:53.240
On the other hand, Donald Trump, again, is someone who did lead a movement, who put places on the map
00:33:59.760
that had never been on the map in recent memory, certainly, for Republicans, and who has an intense
00:34:06.880
fan base and a large fan base that's unmatched, certainly in my lifetime, and maybe in the political
00:34:12.820
history of America. And that shouldn't be discounted. Still in polls prior to midterm election night,
00:34:20.900
Trump had a significant advantage over DeSantis. But obviously, this was a huge, resounding victory
00:34:25.940
for DeSantis. And this helps in building the case that he is essentially, he is the next Trump. He is
00:34:33.400
the person to inherit that mantle. I just think, I think it's way too early to call it one way or the
00:34:39.960
other. But absolutely, he's done an exceptional job in using executive power to put forth a policy
00:34:48.220
program that's broadly appealing. And that's one of the reasons why the left hates him so much. And if he
00:34:54.280
continues to do well, he'll be subjected to even more intense attacks, the likes of which we haven't
00:34:59.620
seen before. And it's going to be fascinating to see this dynamic play out. In fact, we're going to see a
00:35:04.400
proxy battle, presumably, between these two figures, when it comes to the runoff election in Georgia on
00:35:10.740
December 6th, where there's going to be calls for DeSantis to go to Georgia on Herschel Walker's behalf in
00:35:16.160
the Senate contest against Raphael Warnock. And there's going to be calls for Donald Trump to go
00:35:20.380
down there as well. It's going to be fascinating to see how it plays out. It gives me pause. The
00:35:25.100
establishment members who are out there saying it's DeSantis' time now, I don't think he can,
00:35:30.760
he will be co-opted by that establishment. But there are people out there who have hated Donald
00:35:35.260
Trump's guts forever. And they look for any excuse they can possibly use to say, now we have to discard
00:35:40.200
him. He's awful. He's the worst. It's time to move on. That, you know, it concerns me that they're
00:35:45.800
circling around here. But that said, I think these are two formidable figures in their own
00:35:50.820
right, each with remarkable track records of accomplishment and achievement. And it's going
00:35:57.100
to be fascinating. It's going to be historic to see how this plays out, to the extent there is a
00:36:01.180
struggle, essentially, for the soul of the Republican Party between these two men.
00:36:04.920
Well, I'm a fan of both, and it is a tough dilemma. I want to ask you about Joe Biden. I think that
00:36:12.280
the Democrats were putting on a brave face of unity until the midterms were done. Very few
00:36:18.480
local candidates invited Biden to campaign for them. I mean, he wasn't exactly a charismatic figure.
00:36:25.120
Even during his own campaign, he really didn't draw crowds. Now that the midterms are over,
00:36:31.320
do you think the knives will come out to replace him? Even for those who like Joe Biden, and I don't
00:36:37.320
know who such a person would be, just in terms of energy level and cognitive decline, the prospect
00:36:45.800
of him running again in two years for a four-year term, I mean, it's so unlikely. And you've got to
00:36:57.020
think that, I don't know, maybe Gavin Newsom wants to take a crack at it. Kamala Harris, I think, is just
00:37:01.240
an awful person, but she probably wants her chance. I don't know. There's got to be others
00:37:06.440
champing at the bit. Maybe Beto thinks he'll have better success nationally. Do you think that
00:37:12.040
the keepers of the Democratic Party, which are probably the New York Times and a few other
00:37:17.860
institutions like that, do you think they're going to say, all right, Biden, time to have a graceful
00:37:22.240
exit? I remember my friend Joel Pollack said to me he did not think that Biden would run again in 2024.
00:37:28.420
Do you share the same view? Well, first, let me just say, I think Republicans everywhere would
00:37:33.040
be cheering from the rooftops if Robert Francis O'Rourke, if the Democrats waste tens of millions
00:37:38.140
of dollars on him yet again, or Stacey Abrams, for that matter. You rightly note that there was
00:37:46.180
more than a whispering campaign of organs like the New York Times and the Washington Post before the
00:37:51.860
election, essentially calling Joe Biden a liar, pointing out, which we've known for decades, but they
00:37:58.320
were actually saying it out loud. They were talking about, you know, his myriad weaknesses and so-called
00:38:04.140
gaffes, which are really him not being cognitively sound, self-evidently, I think. But then he sort of
00:38:13.820
got the last laugh on election night because there wasn't this shellacking in spite of the widespread
00:38:18.160
disappointment with him as president. He himself said, or at least aides around him have leaked,
00:38:24.000
that he plans to run in 2024. He was asked essentially by reporters, handpicked, I believe,
00:38:30.820
and telegraphed, what do you, do you plan to change on anything going forward, given where the polls
00:38:37.840
were going into this race? And he essentially said, no, now that the people are learning about my agenda,
00:38:43.820
it's going to be even more popular. So he continues to put up a brave face and say essentially that I'm
00:38:50.000
full speed ahead, whatever speed the head is, and running. I can't imagine that, to your point,
00:38:56.520
and Newsom et al won't be running against him in 2024. I'm not sure what the benefit is for him to run
00:39:03.320
in 2024. He's made the case essentially before that if it's Trump, then he poses the best chance of anyone
00:39:08.660
among the Democrats. I don't know if that's true. So my thought had always been that, especially if there had been
00:39:15.500
a huge shellacking for Democrats this time around, that he would have been pushed out before 2024.
00:39:21.080
Now, he would probably make the case, how could you do that? Look, my agenda didn't kill us,
00:39:26.760
essentially, in a historically awful environment. And when the precedent for midterms is that the
00:39:33.500
incumbent party gets crushed. So I now am less convinced, I guess, that he won't be running.
00:39:41.700
That said, I could easily see him losing a primary if he is to be, if he is to throw his hat into that
00:39:48.500
race in 2024. I just don't see how Democrats could possibly feel confident with him at the helm.
00:39:54.660
But then again, all that said, imitation is the highest form of flattery. And you talked about
00:39:58.760
the fact that he literally ran a basement campaign in 2020. And other Democrats mimic that. John Fetterman
00:40:06.400
mimicked that this time around. Katie Hobbs refused to debate Carrie Lake the entire time. So that seemed
00:40:12.380
to work. So if nothing else, Democrats have emulated him to some extent. And progressives evidently view
00:40:18.600
him as a useful vassal for putting forth their agenda with, I guess, a purportedly moderate old
00:40:26.860
white male face to it. And I think they think it appears that that's effective. Now, all that said,
00:40:34.000
I expect things to markedly decline by any number of measures over the next two years. And that's
00:40:38.480
going to that's going to impact things as well. And I don't think that the American people by any
00:40:41.920
stretch resoundingly voted for high crime and being poorer in this election. So those trends continue.
00:40:48.780
And we'll see if there are Republicans who actually run with a compelling vision to combat that
00:40:52.820
going into 2024. Give me 30 seconds. Do you think Hillary Clinton wants to take another crack at
00:40:58.040
things? I absolutely do. She is she's she is out there. She cut a video right before the election
00:41:05.180
for the progressive group Indivisible talking about how Republicans are already poised to try to steal
00:41:10.380
the elections in 2024. Why would she be out there right now? Why would Democrats would not want her
00:41:16.120
out there right now? I think is the face of the party that she is. I think tells you all that you
00:41:20.940
need to know about Hillary's never ending aspirations for power. Well, imagine that Trump versus Hillary
00:41:25.840
second battle. Ben Weingarten, great to see you again. Thanks very much for bringing your smarts,
00:41:30.660
as you always do. What a pleasure to catch up with you. If you don't know Ben, you got to.
00:41:34.100
He's the deputy editor at Real Clear Investigations and the author of important books. Ben,
00:41:38.820
great to see you again. Thanks for your time. Thanks for having me.
00:41:41.100
Hey, welcome back. Your letters. Brenda Witt says, how are a million votes not being counted?
00:41:57.620
Tabulators conveniently not working. No paper. Voters turned away. One candidate won when he died
00:42:02.980
last month. Bags of ballots found in sewers. Voter fraud. Many strange things being investigated.
00:42:08.260
It is nuts. I mean, just have a piece of paper, have a pencil. And how do you add up tens of
00:42:16.400
millions of votes? Well, you don't have one person add them all up. It's in every state,
00:42:20.760
in every county, in every polling location. You probably, in a district, you could have 200
00:42:25.680
little areas where they're adding up 1,000 votes. You can count a pile of 1,000 votes in the course of
00:42:34.360
an hour or two. What's this whole business of taking weeks? Marco Darko says, Ezra, as an American,
00:42:41.740
I always enjoy your take and appreciate it very much listening to your point of view. I just found
00:42:45.220
your channel yesterday and subscribed. All of you at Rebel News do a fantastic job. Thanks again. Well,
00:42:49.360
that is very friendly. I appreciate that. We do have a couple of American reporters. We've got
00:42:53.400
Jeremy Lafredo in New York and Katie Davis Court in Seattle. But listen, we're very interested in
00:42:57.740
America because it affects what happens in Canada a lot too. Richard Short says,
00:43:03.400
Bernier is the only one who has had the courage to speak the truth, even though everyone knows it
00:43:07.360
and is silent. Well, I give Maxime Bernier that. During the worst of the pandemic and the lockdowns,
00:43:12.560
when Aaron O'Toole of the Conservatives was silent, when all the provincial premiers were gung-ho with
00:43:17.620
the lockdowns, Maxime Bernier spoke out. So you've got to give him that. And he's speaking at the Rebel
00:43:22.000
Live conferences in Toronto and Calgary. If you don't know about that, go to rebelnewslive.com,
00:43:27.320
rebelnewslive.com. We've got these great conventions coming up where we have about 15
00:43:31.860
speakers, each for about 20 minutes, just giving her all day. Keynote speakers include Tamera Leach,
00:43:38.660
the trucker hero. So that's coming up November 19th in Toronto, November 26th in Calgary. Go to
00:43:45.020
rebelnewslive.com. All right, that's the show for today. Until tomorrow, on behalf of all of us here
00:43:50.040
at Rebel World Headquarters, to you at home, good night and keep fighting for freedom.
00:43:53.980
Apparently taking a strong stance and invoking the notwithstanding clause and declaring a strike
00:44:00.520
illegal, that has all gone by the wayside in a matter of just 72 hours. It's not on brand anymore,
00:44:09.180
as Doug Ford would say. And you know, when it comes to being on brand, I think we have seen with the
00:44:14.860
passage of these last few days, what brand Doug Ford represents. That's right, Doug, stick this in your
00:44:25.260
cherry cheesecake. David Menzies for Rebel News here at Queen's Park in Toronto. And so it is that the
00:44:35.460
government's war with CUPE, the Canadian Union of Public Employees, ends not with a bang, but with a
00:44:42.720
whimper. You see, folks, on Monday, Doug Ford, well, he bent the knee. You know, folks, I just, I don't want
00:44:51.420
to fight. I just want the kids in school. That's what I want to do. You know, I'm past the stage of
00:44:57.900
fighting and it's not worth it. People don't want it. Parents don't want it. We thought when he invoked
00:45:04.460
the notwithstanding clause, this was going to be Doug Ford's 1981 Ronald Reagan moment. You remember
00:45:12.120
back in 81, Ronald Reagan told more than 11,000 air traffic controllers that if you don't get back
00:45:18.860
to work from your strike, you're fired. We cannot compare labor management relations in the private
00:45:24.800
sector with government. Government cannot close down the assembly line. It has to provide without
00:45:31.620
interruption the protective services which are government's reason for being. It was in recognition
00:45:37.120
of this that the Congress passed a law forbidding strikes by government employees against the public
00:45:43.760
safety. Let me read the solemn oath taken by each of these employees in a sworn affidavit when they
00:45:52.160
accepted their jobs. I am not participating in any strike against the government of the United States
00:45:58.960
or any agency thereof, and I will not so participate while an employee of the government of the United
00:46:06.580
States or any agency thereof. It is for this reason that I must tell those who fail to report for duty
00:46:14.540
this morning, they are in violation of the law, and if they do not report for work within 48 hours,
00:46:22.280
they have forfeited their jobs and will be terminated. Well, they thought Reagan was bluffing.
00:46:27.680
He wasn't. He fired them. And sure, for that summer, there was all kinds of delays at airports, but
00:46:34.420
eventually new air traffic controllers were hired. But imagine that from the moment the notwithstanding
00:46:40.880
clause was invoked on Friday, something changed by Monday. And on Monday, that's when Ford announced
00:46:49.320
he didn't want to fight anymore. Those were his words, folks, that he was bending the knee,
00:46:55.480
that he wanted QP to end their strike, and in return the government would revoke the notwithstanding
00:47:04.440
clause. And it's an outrage because who speaks for Ontarians? And by the way, just take a look
00:47:13.040
at the people that Doug Ford is acquiescing to. Cameraman Lincoln, Jay and I came to Queen's Park on
00:47:20.960
Friday when there was a big illegal strike on the grounds. Just check out some of the comments
00:47:42.880
Hi, sir. I'm just trying to make sense of your side.
00:47:46.180
Oh, really? You don't talk to fascists? Who would the fascists be here?
00:48:02.060
It's all, but turn the map upside down, and which way is up?
00:48:11.760
To your scab reactionary fascistic media, so get lost.
00:48:15.400
How am I a scab by doing journalism on the lawns of Queen's Park, sir?
00:48:52.740
Yeah, so in my book, that might have been the greatest advertisement for homeschooling ever broadcast.
00:49:00.800
And yet, here we are, just 72 hours later, and Doug Ford has called it quit.
00:49:17.880
Or, do you think, folks, it was his new best boyfriend, I'm talking Prime Minister Justin Trudeau,
00:49:25.160
who Doug Ford stands shoulder to shoulder with.
00:49:28.240
Was it Doug Ford, was it rather Prime Minister Trudeau, yeah, I know, it's hard to tell them apart these days.
00:49:34.620
Was it Prime Minister Trudeau admonishing Doug Ford for invoking the notwithstanding clause,
00:49:42.300
even though, of course, the Prime Minister invoked his heaviest hammer in the toolbox,
00:49:47.420
that being the Emergencies Act back in February when it came to dismantling the freedom convoy?
00:49:55.380
I think Doug Ford thrives on getting the approval of his new best friend,
00:50:02.240
and that is what made him revoke the notwithstanding clause.
00:50:07.820
And when asked in a press conference how the strike was going to get resolved,
00:50:12.500
because CUPI still want more pay, of course, and it's always for the kids, mind you,
00:50:20.260
Doug Ford said he wasn't privy to give that information.
00:50:27.160
Imagine if the province was a publicly traded corporation, folks, and there was some crisis.
00:50:33.260
Could you imagine the board of directors telling its shareholders,
00:50:36.300
no, we can't tell you anything about what's going on behind the scenes, that's private.
00:50:51.440
But apparently taking a strong stance and invoking the notwithstanding clause
00:50:56.720
and declaring a strike illegal, that has all gone by the wayside in a matter of just 72 hours.
00:51:04.040
It's not on brand anymore, as Doug Ford would say.
00:51:08.680
And, you know, when it comes to being on brand,
00:51:11.180
I think we have seen with the passage of these last few days