EZRA LEVANT ｜ Ireland's war on free speech — and the outlet that's fighting back
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
169.71252
Summary
In Ireland, the government is trying to crack down on free speech, and we're here to talk about it. We're joined by Ben Scallon, a reporter with the pro-activist website GRIPT.ie, to talk all things censorship in Ireland.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Tonight, perhaps the most terrifying plan for censorship I've heard yet.
00:00:30.000
Ireland is a country of about 5 million souls, and it has, I think, a disproportionate number
00:00:41.020
of people who use the English language as a weapon.
00:00:48.380
I think of Yeats and his incredible poem, The Second Coming, you know the one where he
00:00:53.860
talks about the best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity.
00:01:01.220
I think of that phrase a lot when I think of, well, for example, the pandemic, that the
00:01:05.980
worst people among us were motivated by the best were, well, they lacked all conviction.
00:01:11.440
I just can't imagine any of the hundreds of Irish poets and playwrights and lyricists and
00:01:23.560
I think of so many artists who marshal the English language in a way that is prickly.
00:01:30.660
I think there's something about the Irish personality.
00:01:32.780
And then for Ireland's government to say, we are now going to crack down on speech that
00:01:40.960
we, the politicians, find undesirable, I can't think of anything more un-Irish than that.
00:01:51.000
That's my view sitting over on this side of the pond.
00:01:53.700
But I have started to follow a news source in Ireland very closely.
00:02:01.160
In some ways, they remind me of what Rebel News is doing here in Canada.
00:02:05.640
The name of the organization, we've interviewed one or two of their reporters before, it's
00:02:12.160
I don't know exactly what it means, but that's the name, GRIPT.ie.
00:02:21.220
And one of the big projects they do is talk about the war on free speech in Ireland.
00:02:27.260
Joining us now from Dublin City is Ben Scallon, one of the reporters at GRIPT.ie.
00:02:38.320
I just, I've never been to Ireland other than passing through the airport.
00:02:41.820
But I, the idea of censorship and Ireland, that's like oil and water to me.
00:02:46.940
I just, I just can't imagine any self-respecting Irishman believes that someone else should tell
00:03:02.700
I mean, there's been a lot of laws that have been drafted and either passed or presented
00:03:08.740
for imminent passage by the government in the last couple of years in relation to censorship,
00:03:15.960
be it stamping out so-called misinformation and disinformation or so-called hate speech.
00:03:22.180
And there's really no evidence been provided by the government that there's any public outcry
00:03:29.580
All of the polling and their own public consultations, I think you guys might call it a comment period
00:03:35.240
in North America, all of the evidence we have available shows that the public are overwhelmingly
00:03:40.680
opposed to this stuff and yet they're driving ahead with it anyway.
00:03:43.980
So it's very inexplicable, at least insofar as what you would expect a politician to do,
00:03:50.160
which is to pursue, you know, one of the interesting things is people always say,
00:03:54.500
oh, sure, politicians, they're only in it for the votes.
00:03:59.260
It seems like the Irish government is determined to do everything that makes it unpopular and
00:04:03.420
do the exact opposite of what the general public is actually asking it to do.
00:04:07.640
You know, I just got back from New Zealand, which in some ways is similar to Ireland.
00:04:13.420
I mean, you might be thinking, what on earth could those two countries have in common?
00:04:17.140
Well, they're about the same size in terms of population.
00:04:20.160
They're both led, in the case of Jacinda Ardern, who just finished as the prime minister down
00:04:27.680
And if I'm not mistaken, if I'm pronouncing it right, Leo Varadkar in Ireland, both are
00:04:36.880
And both of them use identical language about misinformation and malinformation.
00:04:45.980
And then I suppose Trudeau, you could throw him in there.
00:04:47.820
I feel like I'm watching three triplets who are doing this as part of some higher ideological
00:04:55.840
There's no demand in any of the three countries, Canada, Ireland, or New Zealand for censorship.
00:05:00.740
In fact, I've never heard of any country in history call out for censorship.
00:05:05.040
But I feel like the three leaders I've just mentioned are sort of cut from the same cloth.
00:05:10.400
And this is their mission to enlighten their country by censoring it.
00:05:23.720
Yeah, I think that it's kind of amazing the uniformity of governments across the Western
00:05:31.740
world at this point and how all of these unrelated politicians are pushing almost identical policies
00:05:37.740
using almost identical language at the exact same time.
00:05:44.260
I think you guys probably do similar stuff in Canada and in the United States and other
00:05:49.300
places where we'll cut together compilations of politicians from different political parties,
00:05:56.620
parties who ostensibly oppose one another, all using the exact same language.
00:06:03.160
Like, for example, during the Ukrainian refugee crisis that's going on in Europe at the minute,
00:06:08.740
we've taken in an absolutely alarming amount of asylum seekers from abroad, from all over
00:06:14.820
Some towns and villages up and down the west coast of Ireland have literally had their
00:06:19.600
populations more than doubled overnight, where the town will have a population of 800
00:06:25.020
and suddenly there's a thousand asylum seekers there.
00:06:30.420
And when justifying the policy, politicians from across the political spectrum all have said
00:06:35.920
on loop like a beating drum that we need to abide by our international obligations.
00:06:41.360
You know, it's our international obligations that have required us to take in all of these
00:06:49.660
So I don't know what to make of that or what to infer from that.
00:06:53.040
I think if anything, it just shows the lack of imagination.
00:06:56.920
If you want to put it in a, you know, the most benign terms possible, that they are chronically
00:07:02.880
short on new ideas that that might be the culprit.
00:07:06.300
Well, I think that is too benign an explanation.
00:07:09.000
Reminds me of when all the leaders around the world on cue started using the phrase build
00:07:14.940
It was bizarre to see that that phrase just emanating from everywhere as if everyone just
00:07:22.060
I have a theory that, of course, there are local democracies and local parliaments and
00:07:28.060
But there is no denying that these masters of the universe do gather together without the
00:07:33.680
same scrutiny and disclosure that they have in their national parliaments in Davos, at
00:07:45.300
But, you know, the Jacinda Ardern's, the Leo Varadkar's, the Justin Trudeau's, they hammer
00:07:52.020
And without any opposition, without any disclosure of who's there, who's lobbying.
00:07:56.720
And then they go back to their lowly countries where the peasants don't like it.
00:08:02.740
I think it's identical how Leo Varadkar has pushed these things in Ireland and Justin Trudeau
00:08:17.300
These, this is from the Electoral Commission, if I'm not mistaken, including a member of
00:08:29.500
You were asking questions about how their Electoral Commission is now arrogating unto
00:08:34.100
itself the power to censor the debate during an election.
00:08:40.020
And I want to play a few minutes of it because it's astonishing to me.
00:08:52.500
So, yeah, the Electoral Commission was just established in February of this year, and
00:08:59.520
And it has a load of different functions that are most of which are mundane.
00:09:04.680
So it'll be things like redrawing new constituency boundaries as the population changes and,
00:09:10.640
you know, getting people on the electoral register.
00:09:12.400
Just kind of run of the mill, logistical stuff, nothing too controversial.
00:09:16.260
But one of their functions is also to regulate misinformation and disinformation during election
00:09:26.600
They do have the legal power to, if you post something during a campaign, let's say,
00:09:32.000
when you're running for public office, they can order Twitter.
00:09:35.660
They can order any publication they want to take it down and correct the quote-unquote error
00:09:41.000
if that is indeed what they determine it to be.
00:09:44.300
Now, of course, as any sensible person knows, there is no possible way to determine in an
00:09:53.720
It's, you know, these kinds of things are inevitably going to end up just being a matter of opinion.
00:09:59.440
And we've seen that so many times over the last couple of years.
00:10:02.600
I mean, COVID is the most prime example of that, where how many times did the establishment say that X was the truth?
00:10:12.200
And then it turns out it was the exact opposite.
00:10:14.460
And things that had been labeled as so-called misinformation turned out to be absolutely correct,
00:10:19.380
like the Wuhan lab leak theory, just to pull one example out of the hat.
00:10:23.920
So this kind of thing is absolutely just waiting to be abused.
00:10:30.940
And, I mean, it hasn't been in force yet for an Irish election.
00:10:34.660
We've got a local election coming up next year.
00:10:37.200
So it'll be very interesting to see how it plays out.
00:10:39.900
But that's basically who this group are, and that's their modus operandi going forward.
00:10:47.000
And here's the question he put to these high priests of the ultimate truth.
00:10:51.280
Now, by the way, Ben, I know that you believe that there are some objective truths,
00:10:55.760
especially if we were talking about things like mathematics.
00:11:00.600
But when we're talking about political differences of opinion,
00:11:06.160
because we don't all agree on what the truth is.
00:11:08.380
The thought that these commissioners would be the arbiters, it's terrifying.
00:11:14.200
Our work is focused on the protection enhancement of democracy in the broad sense.
00:11:20.660
And the main function purpose is so that we ensure that people have trust
00:11:26.060
and continue to have trust in the election system, our democratic system generally.
00:11:32.440
Mr. O'Leary, of course, one of your electoral commission's purposes
00:11:35.140
is shutting down alleged disinformation at election time.
00:11:38.300
And in June of this year, you told the media that the scale of disinformation
00:11:43.420
I'm just wondering if you could give an example of disinformation
00:11:46.000
that was spread during an Irish election that materially harmed that election in some way.
00:11:50.300
Okay, Ben, we're here to talk about the constituency review, but I'll make a brief remark,
00:11:56.520
and we will return to this subject into the future.
00:11:59.640
As you know, for anyone who heard me speak in June, what I actually said was having,
00:12:07.860
we spent 20 minutes with a panel of people who gave many, many examples of electoral
00:12:14.920
And what I actually said was, as well, as you have heard from the panel, the scale of
00:12:21.140
The commission was established in February, and our job is to look forward.
00:12:25.180
But we can't ignore the fact that there is weighty international evidence that electoral
00:12:32.040
misinformation, disinformation carries on online in a survey, or the research that was
00:12:48.240
And in 92% of those cases, there was found to be examples of misinformation, disinformation.
00:12:54.900
Ireland wasn't one of those countries, but I think there is no reason to assume that we'll
00:13:02.840
We're really looking forward to getting stuck into this part of our brief, and we will be
00:13:08.040
speaking to you all about our approach to misinformation and disinformation as we get to
00:13:16.360
Do you have a kind of a specific criteria for how you would determine whether something is
00:13:21.960
Like if you're presented with a piece of information, how do you distinguish something
00:13:25.100
that's disinformation as opposed to just a difference of opinion, let's say?
00:13:29.580
Well, they're defined very clearly in the legislation, Ben.
00:13:33.940
So if you go back and have a look at how they are both defined, that's the standard of which
00:13:38.440
the commission, or me as chief executive, will make a determination in that regard.
00:13:42.680
I should say to those of you who haven't read the very long Electoral Act, that we have very
00:13:48.540
extensive powers to, A, research the general topic of information and the way in which advertising
00:13:58.200
But also we have powers to require the correction or removal of information we believe to be
00:14:06.800
And they are very extensive powers, not found in fact in that many other European countries.
00:14:12.620
We're all going to have to become philosophers in a sense.
00:14:16.080
We're all going to have to learn how to test truth.
00:14:20.380
And the commission is going to have to learn, A, what the tools are and how to explain them
00:14:27.720
But we're also going to have to deal with the balance between the right of freedom of expression
00:14:33.180
on the one hand, and on the other hand, the right of persons not to be misinformed.
00:14:39.380
It will be a difficult exercise, but it's fundamental to the protection of democracy.
00:14:47.200
And it's regarded as such by all international bodies, I think.
00:14:52.920
I don't think I've seen a scarier three minutes in my life.
00:14:59.420
Such an enormous problem, he can't think of one example.
00:15:02.080
There are studies in other countries of which Ireland was not one.
00:15:06.900
I think the worst part was when your Supreme Court judge there was saying we're all going
00:15:14.000
We have an enormous power to determine the truth.
00:15:16.680
Well, but that's not quite true, because what I think and what you think as philosophers
00:15:22.820
Imagine a government agency saying we have an enormous power, and the law sets out how
00:15:29.340
Oh, that's all we have to do is write down a law, and then we can all just know the truth,
00:15:34.720
because it's right there in the law, Ben, don't you know?
00:15:39.220
She says at once that this is an almost unique legislation, and she says everyone's doing
00:15:46.160
it, and we're going to find out all together in this messy way.
00:16:00.900
Is this just, oh, okay, that's how it is, or are Irish people standing up?
00:16:06.000
I'm really confused by the fact that the media has not really even bothered to inquire about
00:16:14.540
In fact, we have this hate speech bill, which is coming down the tracks.
00:16:20.400
The government is yet to pass it, but it could really go either way at this point.
00:16:24.480
There is a substantial amount of backlash from the general public.
00:16:27.220
And would you believe that one of our biggest newspapers was actually writing submissions
00:16:32.680
to the government, urging them to implement it?
00:16:35.320
They were on the side of the censorship law, which to me, if you're a journalist who speaks
00:16:41.500
and thinks for a living, and that's your job, words, or your profession, then you supporting
00:16:47.040
a hate speech law is a bit like a butcher supporting a ban on meat.
00:16:51.580
You're literally shooting yourself in the foot, even aside from the moral questions that that
00:16:58.060
would raise as to, is it right for the government to be regulating what people can say and think?
00:17:03.960
Just from a self-preservation perspective, you would expect the media to be leading the
00:17:10.200
But at this press event, which just took place recently, I was the only journalist in the
00:17:17.800
And I don't think that's because I'm special or I'm Superman.
00:17:20.200
I just think there's a critical dereliction of duty on the part of the press here.
00:17:25.220
I mean, one of the things that the CEO of the organization said was, he goes, oh, yeah,
00:17:31.160
well, there was a study done and about 50-something countries were examined during the course of
00:17:37.160
this research, and they found that there was misinformation during their election.
00:17:41.360
OK, well, first of all, what are the 50 countries?
00:17:44.500
I mean, there's hundreds of countries in the world, so that's not meaningful in and of itself
00:17:48.200
if these are all in parts of the world where democracy is not particularly their strong
00:17:54.500
And also, what kind of disinformation, what impact did it have?
00:17:58.460
Like, you know, every single election in the history of humanity has had somebody talking
00:18:13.380
What I would want to know is, did any of this disinformation actually have a tangible impact
00:18:20.560
Can you show me an election in the Western world that was won on the basis of lies?
00:18:25.240
I mean, if anything, you could say that, for example, here in Ireland, we have a coalition
00:18:30.360
government of several different political parties.
00:18:32.960
And one of the parties, the leader of this party, said he would under no circumstances
00:18:42.620
And then he did exactly that as soon as he was elected.
00:18:44.900
He said that literally a couple of weeks before the election.
00:18:47.400
So I'd like to know, does that count as electoral misinformation?
00:18:50.540
I mean, there's probably people who voted for him and his party on the basis of that promise,
00:18:55.100
which didn't even last a few weeks after everybody's votes had been cast.
00:18:59.760
But when I asked the electoral commission via email, would something like that count as
00:19:04.140
misinformation, they refused to say, which I think kind of says it all as to what sort
00:19:10.160
Well, every single politician deals in misinformation because every single politician does not have
00:19:17.780
all of the information and has an opinion and makes a conclusion, just like every other
00:19:32.500
The idea and that and the most astonishing thing was the judge there, that lady who said,
00:19:40.860
We're all going to have to become philosophers.
00:19:43.300
She was embracing her role as the person to whom all Irish people would delegate their faculties.
00:19:51.740
The whole point of getting it out of the hands of experts and giving it back to the people
00:19:57.020
is because the whole system, including the judge, as if she has some unique insight into humanity,
00:20:05.520
as if she has some unique brain and heart and moral code and scientific knowledge that no other
00:20:13.040
people have, that she has more wisdom than the wisdom of the people.
00:20:17.280
I'm just blown away by this, but I got a question for you.
00:20:20.720
I was jealous of your ability to put those questions because in Canada, journalists like
00:20:29.180
I think some of them work at Rebel News are simply no longer allowed to attend government
00:20:34.280
press conferences because the questions you asked, you asked them very politely and they
00:20:45.600
Over here, those questions would either yield complete fog, like a fog machine with just
00:20:57.260
And if someone kept asking prickly questions, they would find themselves disinvited to press
00:21:03.600
You're not the first gripped journalist I've seen put really good questions to power.
00:21:09.940
I don't want to tempt fate by asking, but how is it that you're allowed to do that?
00:21:18.200
Well, we joined last year the Press Council of Ireland, which is like a big kind of media
00:21:25.880
And so that gave sort of a strength in numbers, I think, that while the government isn't obliged
00:21:31.920
by law to let us attend press conferences, if they wanted to, they could disinvite us tomorrow.
00:21:36.440
I think that it would be very difficult for them and it would cause more problems than
00:21:42.700
I think they've probably made a calculation and said, look, it's better, it's less dramatic
00:21:47.360
if we just let them do their thing and, you know, grin and bear it.
00:21:53.160
And I think that, you know, obviously being polite, being respectful, I always shake ministers'
00:21:58.800
hands, refer to them by their proper title and so on.
00:22:01.740
Make sure to comport myself with decorum, that kind of thing is, of course, I don't know
00:22:09.600
Maybe you guys are a little bit more, as in the government, are a little bit more capricious.
00:22:15.100
But at least here, my thinking is, obviously, one, you want to be a polite person in general,
00:22:19.800
but two, you don't want to give them any excuse that they could say, oh, well, we're kicking
00:22:23.660
him out because he's belligerent, not because we don't like his questions, you know, whereas
00:22:27.780
now it could only be because they're not happy with the line of questioning, because
00:22:33.360
Well, Ben, I'll tell you, the actual reason we're kept out of Parliament is because access
00:22:39.260
to our Parliament is controlled by the Parliamentary Press Gallery, which is other reporters.
00:22:45.500
And they are granted their power, delegated to them by the Speaker of the House.
00:22:49.860
So it's actually our fellow journalists, our competitors, you might say, who have blocked
00:22:57.520
us in the first instance, and they're given legal immunity because they are under the protection
00:23:04.200
So it's actually a merger between the politicians and other journalists to keep us out.
00:23:10.820
And I don't mean to be talking about us, but I want to ask you, how do other reporters in
00:23:19.780
And I know this is turning into an interview about Gript, not just your questions, but I'm
00:23:26.220
Do other journalists, do they harumph when they, oh, there's Gript again?
00:23:33.720
Do they say, are they, is there what I call a media party?
00:23:38.520
Is, are the journalists in Ireland part of the regime?
00:23:41.820
Or do they maybe even admire your critical questions?
00:23:49.240
I think there's a, there's a couple of them, obviously.
00:23:52.020
I mean, everybody knows that the press skews left in the Western world and that's just the
00:23:56.940
So I don't think many of them agree with us probably on a broad swath of issues, but I
00:24:03.220
do think there's a level of respect and it wasn't there at the beginning when we first
00:24:07.700
I remember a couple of years ago, we broke a big story and one of the other papers kind
00:24:12.740
of had to give us credit for it because it was just too big to ignore.
00:24:16.660
So they had to say, their way of kind of fobbing us off and dismissing us was saying, the story
00:24:21.800
came from Gript, a right-wing blog, and that was sort of their subtle distos.
00:24:27.860
Now, when I go to these things, they're friendly.
00:24:32.200
The other day we had audio issues with one of our videos and a journalist from another
00:24:36.800
mainstream publication agreed to send me her audio to help me out, you know?
00:24:42.140
So I think it's gotten to the point where they've sort of accepted we're part of the media ecosystem
00:24:49.260
and that even though they might not like it all the time and they don't agree with us on
00:24:53.900
certain issues, the fact of the matter is, you know, we are here to stay and we speak for
00:25:01.820
That's sort of what I try to do when I'm at these things is to ask the question that
00:25:06.060
ordinary people on the street who aren't convinced about all of this woke direction that society
00:25:12.840
is going, I want to ask what those people are thinking, you know, because so often those
00:25:17.820
questions just never get asked or addressed by anybody.
00:25:20.300
So I'm trying to be sort of a representative for that section of the public in the actual room.
00:25:29.720
And I hope you remain in the fray, in the arena.
00:25:37.420
I mean, we still manage to do creditable journalism from the outside.
00:25:42.540
In fact, in Canada, like I say, politicians are often fog machines.
00:25:47.240
You can put a great question, but you just hear blather.
00:25:50.960
You know, it's of no use to put a good question because they don't actually answer them.
00:25:57.620
And I'm glad that GRIPT is growing and is having a success.
00:26:07.120
This is a question that Matt Walsh of Daily Wire has perfected.
00:26:16.780
There's something so stupid only a PhD would believe them.
00:26:26.240
It's appalling as a woman and a woman as a female sports minister that's trying to promote women in sport.
00:26:36.140
Minister, an article in the Irish Times this week by Pat Leahy outlined some fears within government
00:26:40.560
that the so-called women in the home referendum might raise some uncomfortable questions for politicians.
00:26:45.800
For example, how do you define a family and what is a woman in the context of the gender debate?
00:26:50.220
So on foot of that article, I'm just wondering, what is a woman in your view?
00:26:53.240
This is something that the government are discussing, Ben.
00:27:00.280
It's very important that we get that wording correct.
00:27:04.140
So in relation to the actual wording of the referendum, I should hope that we'd come to agreement on that wording in the coming weeks.
00:27:15.460
It's something that I advocated for when I was chair of the Women's Caucus, that this would lead to a referendum.
00:27:21.780
But do you have a definition of what you referred earlier to being proud of being a female sport minister
00:27:28.780
and how important it is to promote women in sport and so on?
00:27:31.540
So I'm just wondering, do you have a personal definition of what a woman means?
00:27:34.800
I think, you know, the question is not relevant to the referendum itself
00:27:41.820
because as in the issue that is pressing at the minute in relation to the exact wording of a referendum
00:27:46.360
and having the referendum is absolutely essential for us in Ireland.
00:27:52.200
You know, if there's a referendum on a women's issue and if you're the minister of women's sport
00:27:56.680
but you refuse to answer what a woman is, that sort of answers it, doesn't it?
00:28:01.540
I mean, here in Canada, in the United States, you have biological men just crushing female athletes.
00:28:08.460
And with the approval, in fact, sometimes the support of born women,
00:28:17.380
I think that's an astonishing evasion, but better than some of the attempts we've seen lately to answer that question.
00:28:29.740
Yeah, I was kind of amazed by the whole thing because what my follow-up was going to be
00:28:35.460
before her press secretary jumped in and quickly went on to the next person
00:28:39.540
and said, like, we need to put the kibosh on this right now because he could tell which way it was going.
00:28:44.380
Because the referendum, I'm not going to bore people by going into detail,
00:28:47.360
but long story short, there's a clause in the Irish Constitution which says that, you know,
00:28:52.260
women have a very important role in society as mothers and homemakers.
00:28:56.780
And so no woman should be forced by economic necessity to have to work,
00:29:01.980
that the state should support women if they want to stay at home and be a stay-at-home mom,
00:29:10.120
And there was a push recently to get rid of this from the Constitution
00:29:15.800
Basically, the government's position is that it's almost like you're saying,
00:29:20.660
oh, women belong in the kitchen and they should stay home,
00:29:22.900
which is really not what it's saying if you read the actual text of it.
00:29:28.600
So naturally enough, if you're going to have a referendum on the role of women in society
00:29:34.520
and what is the proper role that women should fulfill,
00:29:38.180
you're probably going to want to know what a woman is.
00:29:40.500
So I thought it would be a pretty reasonable question.
00:29:42.940
And apparently, according to the minister, that's not relevant at all.
00:29:46.860
We're going to have legislation to remove a word from the Constitution
00:29:53.300
I read that Irish Constitution recently when I was going through some of the hate speech laws.
00:29:58.200
And it's quite incredible to see that hardwired right into the basic law of Ireland,
00:30:06.700
And I thought it was actually beautiful and poetic.
00:30:14.620
And I don't know, that's something that has to be ripped out, I guess.
00:30:23.880
And as you can see, I'm a super fan of gripped.ie.
00:30:28.080
And folks, if you want a news source, I mean, you might think you have no connection to Ireland.
00:30:34.400
But the issues they're facing are the same issues we're facing.
00:30:38.220
And the battles they're fighting are the same battles we're fighting.
00:30:43.720
And I see them having some of the same hallmarks that Rebel News does.
00:30:47.940
I think they're slightly better behaved, which, as we've heard from Ben.
00:31:24.640
I don't even know what that word gripped means.
00:31:45.100
And they're interested in a lot of the same things we are, including freedom.
00:31:50.600
And he made me chuckle when he said he's been watching me since he was in high school.
00:31:54.860
I thought he looked a little more grown up than that.
00:31:56.640
But maybe he's maybe he's pretty young or maybe I'm just getting old.
00:32:00.080
But I like him and I want to do more things with gripped.
00:32:03.080
I want to interview their journalists when they have interesting stories.
00:32:08.040
I don't think we'd ever be in a position where we would have a full-time reporter in Ireland.
00:32:14.260
But maybe we can have some sort of friendly partnership with gripped.
00:32:20.700
Until next time, on behalf of all of us here at Rebel World Headquarters.