Is it okay to force people to be sterilized against their will? Is it OK to make people unable to have children because they were deemed "insane" or "unfit"? Is it even OK to sterilize people because they could not have children?
00:01:30.840Hundreds of thousands were sterilized, as in they were made so they could not have children, so their genes would not be passed on.
00:01:38.900And in fact, hundreds of thousands were killed, too.
00:01:41.860A sort of Holocaust, based on the theory that they were inferior like the Jews were, and that it was the state's job to improve the race and get rid of them.
00:01:55.440Let me read the English translation of the German.
00:01:58.980It's an order from Hitler to medical doctors, not to soldiers, to doctors to kill people medically deemed inferior.
00:02:09.400Here, let me read it as a translation into English.
00:02:13.620Reich leader Bowler and Dr. Brandt are entrusted with the responsibility of extending the authority of physicians to be designated by name,
00:02:23.400so that patients who, after a most critical diagnosis, on the basis of human judgment, are considered incurable, can be granted mercy death.
00:03:02.580Oh, do you think it was just them, just the Nazis?
00:03:08.720Here's the master's thesis from no one less than Tommy Douglas, the Christian man, the progressive man, the great Canadian, the spiritual leader of the do-gooders in the NDP.
00:03:20.560His thesis is called The Problems of the Subnormal Family.
00:03:25.240It was his thesis, you can see, published in March of 1933.
00:03:30.080That's two months after Hitler became chancellor, by the way.
00:03:34.480Tommy Douglas was right in sync with the Nazis on this stuff.
00:06:40.520And as I read these, think about whether or not we're following these rules now in Canada in 2021 with regards to, oh, I don't know, vaccines?
00:07:21.600It says to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision, this latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment.
00:07:37.640The method and means by which it is to be conducted, all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected, and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
00:07:52.300The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment.
00:08:00.840It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
00:08:12.140The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
00:08:24.520The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
00:08:38.280The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
00:08:46.840No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur, except perhaps in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
00:09:00.900The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
00:09:11.740Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
00:09:22.020The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons.
00:09:26.120The highest degree of skill and care should be required throughout all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
00:09:35.280During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
00:09:46.800During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage if he is probable cause to believe in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
00:10:09.460That's from the Nazi trials in Nuremberg.
00:10:16.400That was in response to the Nazi doctors.
00:10:21.200Where are our doctors today upholding these values?
00:10:26.320There's not very many of them, but the few of them there are being silenced.
00:10:32.780Four doctors not cooperating with investigators into COVID practices, Ontario Medical Regulator.
00:10:40.280College alleges one doctor says any attempt to gather records will be resisted physically.
00:10:47.200Ontario's Medical Regulator says it is turning to the courts in an effort to compel four physicians to cooperate with its investigations into their practices regarding COVID-19, including the issuance of medical exemptions for vaccines.
00:10:59.120The College of Physicians and Surgeons and Surgeons of Ontario says it has launched legal action with the Superior Court against Dr. Mary Elizabeth O'Connor, Dr. Mark Raymond Trotze, Dr. Celeste Jean Thurwell, and Dr. Roshan Killian.
00:11:15.980The Regulator last week suspended Killian's medical license after previously barring her from issuing medical exemptions from COVID-19 vaccines.
00:11:48.260They're ferociously protecting the privacy of their patients, it sounds like.
00:11:52.700But they're being fired and prosecuted and demonized by the College of Physicians and Surgeons for providing medical exemptions to their patients from vaccines that are very much experimental, that have not been fully tested, that we know in some cases cause severe injury or even death.
00:12:12.980In fact, the FDA says these very vaccines must continue to be tested for many years to come, in the case of Pfizer, to the year 2027.
00:12:26.460These things are still experimental, and they can only be used on an emergency basis.
00:12:31.120So you're literally firing doctors and prosecuting them and shaming them.
00:12:37.320And, of course, the state broadcaster, the CBC, is loving this.
00:12:41.780You're prosecuting them for trying to protect people from medical procedures they don't understand or don't agree with or don't accept the risk from.
00:12:49.280You know, I don't want to throw around the word Nazi.
00:19:00.060And as far as I know, there have been no corrections made, no editing to those articles to indicate that this individual is receiving money from Pfizer.
00:19:09.580You know, I'm a little bit older than you, Cosman, and it wasn't long ago when big pharma was as demonized, especially by the left, as big tobacco or big anything.
00:19:23.220I mean, it was so easy to hate them, especially when you had drugs, life-saving drugs that were priced, you know, hundreds of dollars a dose.
00:19:34.820I mean, Martin Shkreli became a poster boy for predatory pricing for pharmaceutical companies.
00:19:42.720I'm not talking about things 20 years ago.
00:21:41.700I'm not positing a conspiracy theory that there's some central organization here.
00:21:46.900I don't know what it is about the madness of our times, Cosman, but how can—go ahead.
00:21:54.520Yeah, there definitely seems to be an alignment of narrative and tactics, in a way.
00:21:59.380Because I question, like, you have editorial boards on at least five, half a dozen major media outlets,
00:22:08.500and you would think that at least one of these outlets would say, hey, maybe we should mention this.
00:22:12.760So, you know, like you said, not to be conspiratorial, but there is some sort of, you know, working in concert to not reveal certain facts about what they're telling the general public.
00:22:27.840I could accept it as an oversight or sloppiness or laziness or hastiness if they made the mistake in the first place.
00:22:34.400Even if all, you know, CBC, CTV, Global, Toronto Star, Global, if they all made the same mistake, I'd say, boy, they sure look down their nose at grassroots citizen journalists like you and me, but fine, maybe they were in a rush.
00:22:47.380But you contacted all of them, and they ignored you, refused to change their stories.
00:22:56.060So that moves, removes any possibility that this was an oversight or a mistake, and it confirms the worst, which was that this is deliberate.