Rebel News Podcast - August 16, 2024


EZRA LEVANT | Minister Ya'ara Saks cancels speaking engagement after Rebel News received invite


Episode Stats

Length

37 minutes

Words per Minute

168.8869

Word Count

6,284

Sentence Count

438

Misogynist Sentences

17

Hate Speech Sentences

11


Summary

We try to catch a liberal cabinet minister in Toronto, but she runs away. You ve got to see the video version of this to hear the full story. It's August 16th, and this is The Ezra LeVant Show.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello, my friends. Interesting show today. We got a great chat with our friend Mark Morano
00:00:04.040 about Elon Musk. And what does he really think about global warming and carbon dioxide?
00:00:10.020 But I also want to show you what happened when David Menzies and I tried to track down a liberal
00:00:14.620 cabinet minister named Yaara Sachs. You got to see it. I really want you to see the video version
00:00:19.540 of this. So do yourself a favor and me a favor by signing up to what we call Rebel News Plus.
00:00:24.640 Just go to rebelnewsplus.com, click subscribe. It's eight bucks a month,
00:00:28.920 and you'll get the video version of this podcast. Eight bucks might not sound like a lot of money to
00:00:33.740 you, but it really adds up for us. So that's rebelnewsplus.com. All right, here's the podcast
00:00:38.600 version of the show. Tonight, we try and catch a liberal cabinet minister.
00:00:58.920 But she runs away. It's August 16th, and this is The Ezra LeVant Show.
00:01:05.740 Shame on you, you censorious bug.
00:01:09.400 Oh, hi, everybody. Yesterday, the funniest thing happened. We were told that a couple of cabinet
00:01:24.420 ministers were having an announcement in Toronto, not actually too far from our studio, and journalists
00:01:31.300 were invited to RSVP. And I thought, well, what the heck? I'm pretty sure they're going to block me,
00:01:36.780 but I just wrote a one-line email RSVPing. And I was absolutely shocked to receive an email back
00:01:43.220 saying, all right, you're confirmed. See you tomorrow. Here's the location. And that's another
00:01:48.740 interesting thing is that when the notice went out about this press conference by the cabinet ministers,
00:01:54.880 they said you will be told the location when you confirm. So I thought, wow, this is near my office.
00:02:02.580 I'm confirmed. I'm going to go because I have a few questions for Yara Sachs, an atrocious liberal
00:02:08.840 cabinet minister. Her official job is to be Trudeau's drug pusher. And by that, I mean she's the pro-drug
00:02:15.480 legalization cabinet minister. Absolutely disastrous. Nobody believes in that policy,
00:02:21.560 not even the drug addicts themselves. The ones who speak candidly say, please help me get out of this
00:02:26.840 mess. Don't subsidize keeping me here. But wouldn't you know it, as we were on our way,
00:02:32.220 I was going, my colleague David Menzies, a videographer, Lincoln Jay, as we were headed towards
00:02:36.980 the zone, we all got emails at the same time saying, canceled, canceled. Well, I didn't feel like
00:02:43.460 being canceled. That's quite rude, don't you think, to invite someone to a party. They confirm
00:02:47.980 everything is tickety-boo. And then just moments beforehand, you cancel. Well, she can't handle
00:02:53.260 Rebel News. But let me show you how it went. And I don't know. I think there's a larger story here.
00:03:01.860 I'll show it to you in a second because I went down there. I did the first part and then I had to leave
00:03:05.800 to come back here. But David did the second part. And I want to say that David Menzies, and if I
00:03:13.340 can say the same about myself, the questions we generally ask politicians, they're real questions.
00:03:18.720 But do you remember when we asked questions, when Avi Yamini and I asked questions of Albert
00:03:23.360 Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer? Here's just a quick snippet of that to refresh your memory.
00:03:28.460 Mr. Bourla, can I ask you, when did you know that the vaccines didn't stop transmission?
00:03:34.260 How long did you know that without saying it publicly?
00:03:37.140 Thank you very much.
00:03:37.840 Why don't you answer that question? I mean, we now know that the vaccines didn't stop
00:03:43.220 transmission. But why did you keep it secret?
00:03:47.700 You said it was 100% effective, then 90%, then 80%, then 70%. But we now know that the vaccines
00:03:54.760 do not stop transmission. Why did you keep that secret?
00:03:58.760 Have a nice day.
00:03:59.940 I won't have a nice day until I know the answer.
00:04:02.480 Why did you keep it a secret that your vaccine did not stop transmission?
00:04:09.920 Is it time to apologize to the world, sir, to give refunds back to the countries that
00:04:14.660 poured all their money into your vaccine that doesn't work, your ineffective vaccine?
00:04:19.160 Yeah, you have a little bit around here.
00:04:20.860 Are you not ashamed of what you've done in the last couple of years?
00:04:23.660 Do you have any apologies to the public, sir?
00:04:26.180 I remember to this day some of the questions I asked Bourla.
00:04:28.940 I asked him when he knew that the vaccine didn't actually stop the transmission of the
00:04:33.640 virus. It's a pretty basic question, very factual, wouldn't you say?
00:04:37.400 I asked him about the fact that Pfizer paid, at that point, what was the largest fine in
00:04:43.580 American history for deceitful advertising. I asked him about that.
00:04:49.080 I don't know. We asked some real questions. We had a few snarky questions, too. But those
00:04:53.340 are questions that you would think the president of Pfizer could answer. He could give a technical
00:04:57.760 answer. I mean, surely they weren't the first time he had heard them, but he just refused to
00:05:01.860 answer them. And I think that made him look very guilty. Same thing goes with Yara Sachs.
00:05:07.960 You don't have to be a pro-Rebel fan. You don't have to like Rebel to be able to handle
00:05:13.160 questions from Rebel News. And let me put it to you this way. If you can't handle questions from
00:05:17.380 Rebel News, maybe you're not fit to be part of a cabinet. And by the way, if you recall,
00:05:22.980 she was one of the cabinet ministers who went all the way to the Middle East to meet with the
00:05:27.400 terrorist leader, Mahmoud Abbas. She had no problem meeting with an actual terrorist leader,
00:05:33.060 but she can't answer a couple of fairly straightforward questions from Rebel News.
00:05:38.540 I think that you should have to, not have, not be forced to, but if you are unable to answer prickly
00:05:45.620 questions, don't go into public life. And yet, without further ado, here is our visit to Yara Sachs,
00:05:52.980 and her press conference that was canceled. Take a look.
00:05:59.440 Ezra Levant here for Rebel News. I am in a mall, a nondescript mall, where Yara Sachs,
00:06:07.600 perhaps the second stupidest cabinet minister in Trudeau's cabinet, had an event. And can you
00:06:13.460 believe it? She invited me. What are the odds? So I accepted the invitation immediately to come,
00:06:20.220 and so did my colleague David Menzies and others. And we were on our way here this morning when we
00:06:25.420 got the rudest email saying that the media invitation that we had received and answered
00:06:30.820 and were confirmed, that the whole thing was canceled. Well, that doesn't sound very friendly.
00:06:36.900 It's sort of like being invited to someone's Christmas party and then later being disinvited.
00:06:41.860 That's downright rude. Not the sort of thing you'd expect from a cabinet minister who met
00:06:48.660 with Mahmoud Abbas, the arch-terrorist leader. I guess what I mean by that is she's more scared
00:06:54.640 of Rebel News asking her questions than she is of a terrorist leader. We were parked outside here
00:07:01.940 for about half an hour, and we had my colleague David Menzies and Lincoln Jay outside, but she
00:07:08.680 pulled up in a little red mini, and she's sneaking in a door, and the door slammed shut behind her.
00:07:14.940 Here, take a look at the footage captured by my colleague Lincoln Jay.
00:07:18.380 She's a sneaky one that Yara sacks, but in some ways I can't blame her. When she allowed herself
00:07:33.300 to be scrutinized, not by the media, but by her own citizens, her own voters, a few weeks ago at the
00:07:41.000 Pride of Israel town hall meeting, she was roundly booed and heckled. It was astonishing. I think there
00:07:47.480 were about four or five hundred people there, and half of them were shouting her down. Remember this?
00:07:52.040 Please join me in welcoming Yara Sacks to share her thoughts.
00:08:00.740 Once again, I'm asking you to rise above it, put your sides down, or leave the room.
00:08:10.720 So that's her own voters, but just a couple of days ago, she went to, uh, I don't know,
00:08:18.100 some picnic, and the other side, the pro-Hamas types heard about her, and she got it from both
00:08:24.500 sides. Did you see this footage just from a couple of days ago?
00:08:27.060 You continue to remain silent. You have the opportunity to agree with you and your central
00:08:32.420 residents and constituents who are concerned about your silence and complicity in this genocide.
00:08:37.480 Your hands! Blood on your hands! Blood on your hands! Blood on your hands!
00:08:45.860 Blood on your hands!
00:08:46.860 I'm sorry, just for 10 months, Yara, 10 months even calling, emailing, showing up to your office.
00:08:53.780 Members of the York Center community have been calling, emailing, and showing up to her office daily.
00:09:00.540 Yeah, it's tough being Yara Sacks. It's tough being a liberal in Canada these days, because,
00:09:05.100 especially on foreign affairs, they'll say different things to different audiences. What I mean by that
00:09:10.300 is Yara Sacks will pretend to the Jewish community that she's in solidarity with them,
00:09:14.780 but then pretend, when she's with the liberal Hamas caucus, that she's in solidarity with Gaza.
00:09:20.220 You can't really have it both ways. Yara Sacks has some very specific questions, though,
00:09:25.980 that she refused to answer. Remember a few weeks ago, when my buddy David Menzies
00:09:30.620 was granted accreditation to another event she had? It did not go well for Yara Sacks. Take a look.
00:09:37.420 Good morning. David Menzies with Rebel News. My question is for Minister Sacks.
00:09:41.980 Why did you travel to the Middle East to shake hands with Mahmoud Abbas,
00:09:45.660 a terrorist who runs a pay-for-slay scheme?
00:09:49.660 Okay, so we're just going to be doing questions just strictly related to today's announcement.
00:09:54.060 I think this is a more important issue, given the state of the world, than what's happening now.
00:09:58.940 And the Minister has avoided these questions. Also, Minister, do you think it's a good idea that
00:10:04.300 your government is planning on bringing thousands of Gazans into our country? These are people even
00:10:10.940 Arab Middle East nations won't take in. Given what we've seen in the streets of Canada for the last
00:10:17.340 eight months of people chanting for genocide? Surely you, as a Canadian-Israeli Jew,
00:10:23.820 you should have some skin in the game. What do you say to this decision?
00:10:27.500 Well, I'm waiting for your answer. I know. We appreciate you're allowed to
00:10:35.260 state your question. But I think that, I don't know if there's going to be a response today,
00:10:40.780 but we really appreciate you coming. Ms. Sacks, I again ask you, why did you go to the
00:10:45.100 Middle East to shake hands with a terrorist, especially post-October 7th? Why were you even
00:10:50.380 in the Middle East? You're not the Prime Minister. You're not the Foreign Affairs Minister.
00:10:53.660 Mr. Sacks, your government invoked the Emergencies Act to shut down a peaceful protest in Ottawa.
00:11:00.460 You froze bank accounts of Canadians. We have chants of genocide and violence
00:11:06.380 in the streets of Canada. Why aren't you doing anything about that?
00:11:09.260 Let me emphasize something about what David did there.
00:11:13.100 Is that his questions were put politely. David's a polite person by nature. He always says,
00:11:18.140 Miss or ma'am. He doesn't swear. He doesn't get physical in any way. He just does old school
00:11:25.820 journalism. It's so rare to see it. We are sometimes startled by it. David Menzies asked real questions,
00:11:32.060 and Yara Sacks is incapable of answering them. Did you see her sneak in the back like some sort of
00:11:39.340 fugitive? It was actually quite undignified and beneath the station of a cabinet minister. I should tell
00:11:45.820 you, if she was scooting around outside, she must have seen our glorious truck with the
00:11:52.540 FireSacks.com billboard action on it. You know, of course, it's always going to be possible for a
00:12:00.700 sneaky liberal to sneak into a building and sneak out if they're dedicated enough to it. And I admit
00:12:07.260 that she got by us, although Lincoln spotted her. But I don't think that's a way to be a political
00:12:12.700 candidates. I mean, you're basically acknowledging that the public hates you. But I don't think that's
00:12:17.820 the way to be a cabinet minister either. Some of the folks from the social services agency behind me
00:12:23.180 were a little bit frustrated that our being here caused the minister to delay as she circled around
00:12:28.860 to sneak in. And I absolutely sympathize with them for this reason. A grown-up, a responsible adult who
00:12:36.780 is ready for the burdens of being a cabinet minister should have the mental, physical, and courage
00:12:43.900 abilities to take a question or two, even from critical media. What I mean by that is,
00:12:49.500 you saw David's questions. They must have an answer. She must have thought about the answers.
00:12:55.180 Ministers have legions of staff briefing them every day about what the issues of the day are and giving
00:13:01.180 suggested lines. She's not a private person. She's a public person, a powerful person. And part of her
00:13:08.060 job as cabinet minister is to answer legitimate questions from the public. That's my way of saying
00:13:14.380 that if she were more courageous, if she were more worthy of the position she's been entrusted with,
00:13:21.980 she would walk right in these doors, heard a question or two from me or David Menzies,
00:13:26.860 answered them without whatever answer she has, and walked right in to continue her event.
00:13:33.820 But I think she lacks the moral fiber to be able to do that. She lacks the confidence in her own
00:13:39.340 position. I think she genuinely is the kind of politician who will read whatever is put in front
00:13:45.740 of her. I have a tiny bit of sympathy for her because it's so pitiful to watch when she was booed in
00:13:53.020 her own community for a second. It sounded like she was going to cry. But there's no crying when
00:13:58.300 you're in the cabinet. Your job is to be on par with the other cabinet ministers, to go toe to toe
00:14:04.700 with people around the world. What I think she demonstrated is that she will spend more time
00:14:11.340 with a terrorist like Mahmoud Abbas. She will show more courtesy to a terrorist like Mahmoud Abbas
00:14:17.340 than she will to her own citizens. I'm a voter in her riding, by the way, or legitimate journalistic
00:14:23.580 questions such as those put by my colleague David. Now, I actually don't want to bring any discredit
00:14:30.220 to this worthy social services agency behind me. And they're not the reason we're here. We're here
00:14:37.580 because your RSX invited us to be here. And then when she saw our names RSVPing, she canceled in a panic.
00:14:45.340 I am looking to, looking forward to the voters of York Center indeed firing Yara Sachs.
00:14:53.500 Well, that's the first half. Here's the second half that David took over for me.
00:14:57.740 Well, folks, about an hour and a half ago, my boss, Ezra Levin, he had to
00:15:02.380 hustle back to the office for some important business. So my cameraman, Lincoln Jay and I,
00:15:07.580 we stayed behind to catch Yara Sachs and ask her some questions. But wouldn't you know it,
00:15:15.740 she once again snuck out this time. We were not fortunate enough to catch her.
00:15:22.620 But what does that say? I mean, this is supposed to be a parliamentarian. Why don't you just face the
00:15:30.620 music? Yeah, maybe our questions are impolite. Maybe they're insensitive. But you should have
00:15:39.500 a backbone. You should have the intestinal fortitude to take these kinds of questions
00:15:46.140 from the media. Yeah, I know Yara Sachs is probably used to softballs from the CBC and whatnot.
00:15:53.660 But we want to ask real questions. And what questions would they be? Well,
00:15:57.500 as our truck was demonstrating, what was the reason for Yara Sachs going to Ramallah
00:16:04.060 and shaking hands with Mahmoud Abbas? This is a guy that runs a pay for slay operation,
00:16:11.100 i.e. killing Israeli. You're going to get a check. If you die trying, no problem. Your family gets paid
00:16:16.380 out. And of all people to get cuddly with this terrorist, a Canadian Israeli Jewish woman?
00:16:26.780 Are you kidding me? And especially since she's not the prime minister, she's not the foreign affairs
00:16:33.580 minister. What in blue hell was she doing there in the first place? Another question, and it pertains to
00:16:41.340 this disastrous press conference that was quasi canceled. I mean, they said it was canceled, but
00:16:48.540 you know, they snuck Yara Sachs in. Is this how you're going to play out the remainder of your term?
00:16:55.820 You're going to be acting like some scared little mouse, just afraid of the independent press,
00:17:03.740 the glare of the camera, the sound of insensitive questions. That is pathetic.
00:17:11.500 And another thing I wanted to ask her, remember her most infamous statement, I think, in the House of
00:17:17.180 Commons, that honk honk is an acronym for Heil Hitler. Do you remember that? Let's throw to a clip of
00:17:25.100 Yara Sachs in action. How much vitriol do we have to see of honk honk, which is an acronym for
00:17:32.380 Hail Hitler. Do we need to see by these protesters on social media? Well, first of all, Ms. Sachs,
00:17:39.740 I want to educate you. A sonic outburst is not an acronym. An acronym is a combination of individual
00:17:50.300 letters that spell out a word, you know, like NASA. So you don't even know what an acronym is. But where
00:17:56.860 did you get that information? I mean, your government seems obsessed with misinformation
00:18:03.260 and disinformation. And somehow you came up with the crackpot idea that a car honking its horn twice
00:18:11.100 is Heil Hitler. Please don't go downtown during rush hour. You will see Nazis galore on the streets of
00:18:17.740 Hogtown. Let me tell you. But in any event, folks, we did give it the good old college try. We wanted to
00:18:24.620 pose these questions and others to Yara Sachs. But Yara Sachs, at the end of the day, and I don't
00:18:32.220 care where you sit in the political spectrum, Yara Sachs is a coward. She is a scaredy cat that will
00:18:41.660 not face the music. Let me ask you, if you live in York Centre, is this who you want to be,
00:18:49.260 your member of parliament? Well, what do you think? Here's what I think. And I said this to the local
00:18:54.380 social services group that said, hey, how come you're here? And I said, look, we have nothing
00:18:58.300 against you guys. It's the politician that's coming to talk to you. She invited us here.
00:19:04.140 And I said she makes, I forget exactly how much cabinet ministers make. I think she makes more
00:19:08.780 than a quarter million dollars a year. And part of her job description, by the way,
00:19:13.820 is talking to the press. We know that because she has an enormous staff designed to talk to the press.
00:19:19.820 So it's actually her duty, her obligation, to engage with the public and answer questions.
00:19:25.580 And the fact that she's a coward about it, well, I think she's not fit for purpose.
00:19:30.540 All right. Up next, our friend Mark Morano talking about Elon Musk. Stay with us.
00:19:35.900 Well, as I keep telling you, because I keep thinking about it, when I was in Davos,
00:19:52.060 Switzerland last January for the World Economic Forum, and when you're just on the streets and
00:19:56.300 you overhear people and you read what people are saying, the number one person they were talking
00:20:01.100 about was a guy who was not there, obviously. I'm referring to Donald Trump because his plans would
00:20:07.020 change the international order, politics, economics. He would smash a lot of the United
00:20:12.460 Nations and EU powers. He would absolutely be a bull in a China shop. But the number two
00:20:18.700 word that they kept saying was Elon Musk, because they knew that Elon Musk was a disruptor in his own
00:20:25.180 way, very specifically on the flow of information. The theme at last year's Davos get together,
00:20:32.380 there were several themes. One of them was misinformation and disinformation, which is a
00:20:36.620 way of saying opinions they don't like. I, as the left has grown to hate Elon Musk, I have grown
00:20:43.340 to love him. I believe that he is the single most important force in free speech in the world right
00:20:49.100 now. I think that's obvious. Who else is there even in the running? By making Twitter, or X as it's now
00:20:57.340 called, a free speech zone, he has allowed people to take control of the narrative and not simply
00:21:02.780 regurgitate what is shown to them through the narrow focus of the mainstream. He has brought back
00:21:10.460 from the dead people who were cancelled and banned. You don't have to like them, but people like my old
00:21:16.140 friend Alex Jones, who never did anything, never said anything illegal. He was just annoying to the
00:21:23.260 left and so he was banned to bring him back and others like Tommy Robinson. And so I have become
00:21:29.500 quite fond of Elon Musk and I love to see what he's doing and I'm delighted to see how don't give a
00:21:35.260 damn he is when he's fighting with people like Keir Starmer, the new Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.
00:21:39.580 And I hold on to the fact that although he is in the electric car business, I don't think he's a
00:21:47.420 radical environmentalist. In fact, he claims that he himself has never sought government handouts. It
00:21:54.220 was his rivals at GM and other places that called for them. And I think just judging by his words,
00:22:00.700 he is a fairly free market oriented guy. That said, in a recent enormous conversation that he had on
00:22:10.140 Twitter with Donald Trump, basically inviting Trump back onto the platform, he talked with Trump about
00:22:17.180 carbon dioxide and I think he said things that people like myself and our guests today know are
00:22:25.340 scientifically off a bit. And I hate to ever say that I'm in a position to try to correct Elon Musk.
00:22:31.980 The man is a whole quantum, you know, several standard deviations smarter and brighter than I ever
00:22:40.460 will be. But every once in a while, even a genius can get it wrong. And joining me now to talk about
00:22:44.940 this is our friend Mark Morano, who probably knows more about global warming than more than anybody else,
00:22:50.620 really. And he joins us now via Zoom. Mark, great to see you. I'm sure like me, you've come to admire
00:22:57.100 Elon Musk for the many things he's done to fight back against the censorship regime. But I think he
00:23:03.740 got something a little bit wrong in his conversation with Donald Trump, didn't he?
00:23:07.740 Yes, he did. Oh, just first of all, just Elon Musk, just to respond to what you were saying.
00:23:12.780 He's a complicated figure and I didn't like him until probably 2021, 22, when he started
00:23:19.980 speaking out on COVID. I never liked him because he did in the past, 2010, 2012, he would say a lot
00:23:27.020 of the standard global warming alarmism comments. If you go back and look at that, he definitely
00:23:32.780 pushed his business model and he had no problem allowing the climate fear mongering to help the
00:23:38.300 sales of the EV. He's also got government contracts with defense contracts. He's also got Neuralink,
00:23:46.060 brain stuff, which is kind of fascinating at the same time, but could also be misused.
00:23:51.100 But he really came into as an advocate for free speech, as an advocate for free markets,
00:23:56.300 as an advocate against the COVID tyranny. He won me over. But I still have, I guess you could say,
00:24:01.740 a natural historical distrust of him. And I think you should, because he's just a man,
00:24:07.020 flesh and bone. He's not a saint. He's not an angel. Like all of us, he has his flaws and he's
00:24:11.420 not perfect. So I tell you, I hear exactly what you're saying. You keep going. I interrupted.
00:24:18.620 Well, so when he said his comment about the CO2 causing headaches when they hit 1,000 parts per
00:24:24.940 million, we're currently at about 428 parts per million. And he's worried that if we get up to
00:24:31.500 3,000 parts per million, people are going to start having headaches. It's going to be bad for public health.
00:24:37.100 And even at one point when he was, he also advocates currently for a carbon tax, which is
00:24:42.540 kind of bizarre. But I think what he does here, he's got an increasingly larger foot in team reality.
00:24:50.380 And I mean, team reality, when it comes to COVID free speech, against the great reset,
00:24:55.980 but he still has a foot. Maybe it's maybe only a few toes in this climate fear promotion,
00:25:01.260 because that's his historic business model when it comes to EVs.
00:25:05.020 So I don't know where he's getting his source. When he came out for a carbon tax in July, he had a
00:25:08.860 chart, unsourced, and I've asked around scientists and others, no one can find the source, of some
00:25:15.020 chart claiming 1,000 can start headaches when you get to levels of CO2.
00:25:18.940 I know that's not true. I mean, I happen to know that your breath is 40,000 parts per million CO2.
00:25:27.340 And you wouldn't necessarily want to re-breathe someone else's breath all day.
00:25:32.780 But the idea that we aren't in situations where the CO2 is 1,000 or 2,000 parts per million all the time,
00:25:39.980 we don't even notice it.
00:25:41.100 No, you don't. And that's what I was just about to say. So I think he's saying these things because
00:25:46.140 he still, he just can't let go completely. Now, what he said, you know, in my book,
00:25:50.860 Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change, I had a whole section. Scientists like Will Happer,
00:25:54.860 200 peer-reviewed studies, considered the foremost expert on greenhouse gases,
00:25:58.780 has said the idea that CO2 is any kind of pollution is scientific nonsense. Richard Lindzen,
00:26:04.300 who I quote in the book, says you can go up to as high as 5,000 parts per million. That's
00:26:08.460 considered safe on submarine space stations. And our own Federal Occupational Safety Health
00:26:15.100 Administration says you can have 5,000 CO2 for eight hours with no problem whatsoever. And what's
00:26:23.100 interesting about this is this is all known and you can go much higher. As you mentioned, humans
00:26:27.580 inhale oxygen, we exhale carbon dioxide. What's fascinating about this, if you go back to COVID,
00:26:33.740 those are people who wore masks during COVID. And I just had to cite this study. This is from
00:26:39.100 British, I believe British Medical Journal, but it's infectious diseases talking about carbon
00:26:44.700 dioxide increases with face masks. And the concentrations with a mask, a KN95 mask when you're
00:26:51.420 breathing, CO2 concentrations of up to 26,000 parts per million. So anyone out there, and they're
00:26:57.100 usually the same people worried about carbon dioxide and telling you to wear a mask for a virus,
00:27:02.300 you are putting up almost 30,000 parts per million in your breath when you're walking around with that
00:27:07.580 mask on because you're exhaling your exhale, to put it mildly. And it gets even deeper. There's actually
00:27:15.260 even more deep analysis of this. And if you go to Climate Depot, I get into it. I don't want to go into
00:27:20.460 all of it right now. But essentially, it's a sign that the more CO2 in the air is usually a good sign
00:27:27.660 because it means the air is ventilating and you're moving. The higher the CO2 in an indoor air quality
00:27:34.460 is an indication that you need better ventilation. But it's not the CO2 that's causing problems. It's
00:27:40.060 other things in the air that we're breathing in. And this is, again, acknowledged by the federal
00:27:44.460 government, acknowledged by science journals, acknowledged by climate scientists. It's not
00:27:49.020 in dispute. Even the climate alarmists don't make this claim. So I don't know where Elon Musk
00:27:53.740 got this stat from on headaches and 1,000. But when it happened, we had a geologist who was at a
00:27:59.260 school conference, and he did a meeting, actually a portable meter in his briefcase. He took a
00:28:04.460 measurement and it was like 1,200 parts per million or 1,500 in the school conference with all these
00:28:09.340 children. And I asked, are any of the kids reporting headaches? And he said, yeah, yeah,
00:28:13.900 drop it over like flies, he said sarcastically. But there's just no there there. And that was a
00:28:18.860 bizarre thing for Elon Musk to say. But I do think it's because not only his business model,
00:28:24.540 but I still think he's surrounded. Like some of the people who work for Twitter are from the
00:28:28.380 World Economic Forum. So he's probably aware that he's got to have at least, if not a whole foot
00:28:33.980 in the climate promotion of the climate crisis, he's got to have at least many toes into it. And
00:28:39.580 I think that's where this 1,000 parts per million science-free claim from Elon Musk occurred.
00:28:45.180 You know, the world of science is infinite. You know, even a narrow field of study, biology,
00:28:52.540 chemistry, physics. There's no one man, even a genius, who can know everything about everything.
00:28:58.940 The man's a rocket scientist and an electric car scientist. And you mentioned some of his activities.
00:29:06.780 We can forgive a man for not knowing the details on your own exhalation, etc. I'm not overly worried
00:29:14.060 about it. In fact, my favorite thing about Elon Musk, I think it's my favorite thing about Twitter,
00:29:18.540 at least, is how easy it is now to fact check whomever. And the people get the right to fact check.
00:29:26.220 It's called community notes. And ordinary people get to rebut and vote on rebuttals that are tacked on
00:29:33.740 to anyone's Twitter posts. In the past, you had to be able to convince the New York Times or the
00:29:39.100 Washington Post or the CBC that they made a mistake, convince them to make a correction,
00:29:45.100 and they were often grudging and mealy-mouthed and they didn't want to lose face. Now, you don't need
00:29:51.420 their permission to make a community note stuck right on their post. And it's wonderful. And Elon
00:29:57.980 Musk himself has been the target of some of these community notes. And I mean, so the fact that a guy
00:30:05.260 gets things wrong doesn't make me alarmed, necessarily, especially if he is so dedicated to
00:30:11.820 proving, to correcting errors. I maintain my admiration for him, even though on this issue,
00:30:18.220 he got it wrong. And you give us some reasons why he may have it wrong. Let me raise one other thing
00:30:23.580 that is a back of mind worry for me about Musk. And that is, he has a lot of exposure in China.
00:30:31.100 And, you know, if you're doing a lot of business in China, billions of dollars of business in China,
00:30:36.220 you're there all the time. There's a lot of things that could go wrong, ranging from them spying on
00:30:40.620 you, trying to set you up in some way, perhaps, stealing your industrial secrets, but also stopping
00:30:48.220 you from speaking truth to power about various subjects, whether it's their crackdown on religious
00:30:53.180 minorities, their military expansionism. So actually, if you ask me what my number one worry about
00:30:59.020 Elon Musk is, it's not that he might be a global warmist. I really don't think he is.
00:31:04.620 It's that he could be at risk for his exposure to China.
00:31:10.220 Yes. And his, you know, contracts with Tesla. And the thing about this whole
00:31:16.540 Chinese thing is the whole EV market, he really, to win me over even more, I would like to see Elon
00:31:21.740 Musk vocally speak out bluntly about, you know, stopping any gas-powered car bans, which he has,
00:31:28.700 but he's still gentle with it. And he needs to start talking about owning up about what's happening
00:31:34.380 with him using China for cheap labor. And the same with all of the big tech firms.
00:31:39.580 I think we're at a point now where, you know, I don't know how much is myth versus reality with
00:31:45.740 Teddy Roosevelt as the trust buster and breaking up monopolies. But we're at a point now where a
00:31:50.460 candidate should run for office, at least in the United States, saying, I'm going to break up Google.
00:31:55.420 It's a monopoly. It's evil. It's suppressing freedom. It's suppressing economic competition.
00:31:59.980 It's the classic. I'm going to break up everything from Facebook, but particularly Google for the
00:32:04.860 search engine, go after even Apple. And I think this is what we need to start doing. And I think
00:32:10.540 Elon Musk is coming along. Now, he still has one foot. When I say this, he wants people to think,
00:32:17.820 yeah, we still have to get off fossil fuels, but not anytime soon. There's no crisis, but let's work.
00:32:23.340 So he's still, if you listen to the nuances of what he said. Now, Trump actually made the argument
00:32:27.900 back that EVs are not even, there's no business model for EVs because Trump is very blunt about
00:32:33.340 ending all the subsidies and mandates and going out, you know, and ending that for the automakers,
00:32:39.100 which again, Elon's okay with. So that's a good sign. But I don't know. I'd like to see more of
00:32:44.700 Elon talk about China. And I understand as a businessman, you got to go where the cheap labor is. And
00:32:49.820 obviously that's China. But at some point, we need to figure out a way that the whole world
00:32:56.300 isn't going to be groveling to China. And on EVs, we are. If we go down this path, even voluntarily,
00:33:02.700 China is going to be the global number one automaker and a monopoly on EVs for obvious
00:33:07.500 reasons. No one can say no because of the cheap labor.
00:33:09.820 Yeah. It was interesting. Just a few days ago, the American-ness of various automobiles was ranked.
00:33:17.340 How much of a Ford F-150 is made in America? And by America, they mean America and Canada,
00:33:22.860 because of course the auto-packed, the cars moved back and forth between Detroit and Windsor.
00:33:28.220 And I was slightly surprised to learn that Teslas are the most American-made vehicles in the market,
00:33:36.700 more than a Ford F-150, more than anything from Tesla or the others. And so I thought that was
00:33:46.620 encouraging. And the fact that Elon Musk was proud of that, again, made me feel good. I think he's more
00:33:51.180 It's true. Yeah. That's a whole different level of, I guess, definitions.
00:33:57.900 Right. It's just like, where did you make the mirror? Where did you make this panel?
00:34:01.660 Yes. And they're assembled in America, the American plant, but all the components and of course,
00:34:05.980 all the mining. So you get into much more nuance and there's all kinds of ways to present that
00:34:11.500 information. But overall, it's going to be, you know, I mean, we're headed globally to China being
00:34:17.580 the global superpower. It's terrifying. There's no, I mean, yeah, there's no, there's no way out of it
00:34:23.660 in our current trajectory. We need a radical shift. Yeah. Well, listen, great to catch up. And I'm glad that
00:34:29.820 we're having this candid conversation about a man we both admire. And it's a reminder not to put all
00:34:35.260 your faith in one man. Even the Bible says that, put not your trust in princes. And we can admire
00:34:41.420 him. He is a force for good. I believe he is the most important force for freedom of speech this
00:34:47.500 generation. He is. He deserves a medal of freedom. Yeah. But he'll never get it. Well, he might if Trump
00:34:53.340 wins, actually. Mark, great to catch up with you. Thanks for everything. Thank you, Ezra. Appreciate it.
00:34:58.380 There you have it. Mark Morano. He's the boss of ClimateDepot.com. Stay with us. Your letters to me
00:35:04.180 next. Hey, welcome back. Your letters to me. Kimberly says, I've always backed Danielle Smith and felt she
00:35:22.340 was really well grounded. I was shocked on her stance on immigration. And it makes me question
00:35:28.640 her now. This will shake her support. Yeah. You know what? I mean, I think you know that I've known
00:35:34.160 Danielle Smith since we were in university together. And I find she's very curious, very open-minded.
00:35:40.500 But every once in a while, a touch too open-minded, if I may. And if there's a novel or clever argument,
00:35:47.960 she might sort of be wooed by it perhaps too quickly. And I think that's what happened when
00:35:53.280 someone said, hey, let's double the population. Well, you're not doubling the population with
00:35:59.200 scientists and doctors and engineers. We can see what doubling the population in Canada looks like.
00:36:06.800 It's millions of low-skill, culturally misfit, military-age migrant men. That's what doubling
00:36:15.460 the population looks like. Sean C. says, apart from the other issues pertaining to this topic,
00:36:22.260 why is it that we're afraid to say that this country is losing its cultural identity due to
00:36:26.680 mass immigration? Is an opinion illegal now too? Well, to answer your question, that opinion is
00:36:33.000 illegal in the United Kingdom. We've been watching as hundreds of people have been arrested,
00:36:38.660 prosecuted, and jailed in the UK, not just for violent physical riots. And by the way, I think
00:36:44.760 rioters should be jailed. But people who simply tweet opinions, tweet memes, even put things on
00:36:51.180 social media just to tell their own friends. We've seen these people sent to prison. So to answer your
00:36:56.300 question, yeah, having an opinion can lead you to jail. On that somber note, let me call it quits for
00:37:04.060 the day and look forward to seeing you on Monday. Until then, on behalf of all of us here at Rebel
00:37:08.900 World Headquarters to you at home, good night, and keep fighting for freedom.