Rebel News Podcast - November 26, 2021


EZRA LEVANT ｜ Pfizer says it just doesn’t know if its drugs will harm young children. I’ll read to you from their official FDA submission.


Episode Stats

Length

23 minutes

Words per Minute

158.69904

Word Count

3,697

Sentence Count

268

Misogynist Sentences

1


Summary

Pfizer says it just doesn t know if its drugs will harm young children, and you will be shocked, but not surprised. That's in today's show from Ezra Levenoran, host of the Ezra Levin Show on the Rebel News Network.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello my Rebels, today I read to you a full page, not skipping a single word, of a Pfizer
00:00:21.200 report filed with the FDA, that's the drug regulator in America.
00:00:26.120 So I'm not reading what their critics say, I'm not reading what a right-wing or a left-wing
00:00:32.680 politician says, I am reading what Pfizer has to say for themselves, and you will be
00:00:38.200 shocked but not surprised.
00:00:41.000 That's in today's show.
00:00:42.860 Let me invite you to become a subscriber to the video version of this podcast, go to
00:00:46.620 rebelnewsplus.com, it's eight bucks a month, you know, that's half the price of Netflix
00:00:50.060 and I think you get more interesting content.
00:00:52.280 Listen, I have a Netflix, so I like to watch a good escapist movie these days.
00:00:56.580 But I think you've got to see the facts of the crisis we're living.
00:01:02.040 I think Rebel News is one of the few places you can get those.
00:01:04.520 Just go to rebelnewsplus.com, click subscribe, and there you have it.
00:01:09.000 And we depend on that, you know, because we don't take any dough from Justin Trudeau.
00:01:12.860 All right, here's today's show.
00:01:14.640 Tonight, Pfizer says it just doesn't know if its drugs will harm young children.
00:01:19.400 I'll read you from their official FDA submission.
00:01:23.000 It's November 25th, and this is the Ezra LeVant Show.
00:01:26.120 Why should others go to jail when you're a biggest carbon consumer I know?
00:01:31.340 There's 8,500 customers here, and you won't give them an answer.
00:01:35.440 The only thing I have to say to the government about why I'm publishing it is because it's
00:01:39.820 my bloody right to do so.
00:01:41.300 There's John Tory, the mayor of Toronto, posing with a children's character because he's trying
00:01:52.600 to market to children as young as five to push the Pfizer vaccine on them.
00:01:57.920 Advertising to children is heavily regulated in Canada.
00:02:02.600 So is advertising pharmaceuticals to anyone, but that only applies if you're a drug company
00:02:08.460 like Pfizer.
00:02:09.620 But politicians shilling for drug companies, they're A-OK.
00:02:14.200 It can be nuts.
00:02:15.380 Here's a CNN story that literally claims vaccines will reduce every cause of death.
00:02:23.760 How does that work?
00:02:24.940 People vaccinated against COVID-19 are less likely to die from any cause, study finds.
00:02:31.000 You're not so sure your math adds up there.
00:02:33.760 I mean, we're all going to die from something.
00:02:37.200 There's a 100% certainty we're going to die from something, from one thing or another.
00:02:41.280 But that's CNN, the most trusted name in news.
00:02:45.360 Just ask them or ask any other corporate media.
00:02:48.960 This week with George Stephanopoulos is brought to you by Pfizer.
00:02:52.800 This letter report brought to you by Pfizer.
00:02:54.820 Today's countdown to the royal wedding is brought to you by Pfizer.
00:02:59.100 And now a CBS Sports update brought to you by Pfizer.
00:03:01.780 Meet the press.
00:03:02.660 Data download brought to you by Pfizer.
00:03:05.420 By the way, kids are not immune to COVID-19, but it's almost as if they are.
00:03:10.260 It's so rare for them to get sick from the virus, even rarer for them to get seriously sick.
00:03:18.060 And children of tender years are more likely to be struck by lightning than to die from COVID-19.
00:03:23.760 That's not a figure of speech.
00:03:24.720 That is a statistical fact.
00:03:27.420 Even though John Tory won't stop selling pharmaceuticals, the city's own website tells a different story, thankfully.
00:03:33.280 Here it is.
00:03:36.140 There are a grand total of 18 people in the entire city of Toronto in the hospital.
00:03:41.080 It's a mighty city.
00:03:42.560 What, six and a half million people in the greater Toronto area?
00:03:45.440 18 of them in the hospital for COVID-19.
00:03:48.400 There's more than 40 hospitals in the city.
00:03:51.160 Literally four people are in intensive care for COVID-19.
00:03:55.920 So I guess they have like 10 hospitals each.
00:03:58.420 That's not a pandemic anymore, people.
00:04:00.920 But back to the kids.
00:04:02.720 The mayor wants the kids to be vaxxed.
00:04:05.240 So does every other politician in the country.
00:04:07.760 I think it's to please Pfizer shareholders.
00:04:10.340 I think it's to maintain the psychology of fear.
00:04:13.600 I think it's to keep the pressure on citizens, even as the facts recede, as I just told you, from Toronto hospitals.
00:04:20.000 And I think it's to remove the control group.
00:04:22.060 By that, I mean, we don't really know what these mRNA vaccines are going to do to people 5, 10, 25 years from now.
00:04:28.480 We just don't know to new technology.
00:04:32.100 We know that they don't stop people from getting sick, as we thought they might.
00:04:36.520 They don't stop people from passing on the virus or even dying.
00:04:40.280 Even Anthony Fauci has admitted that now.
00:04:42.480 So they're not as effective as promised.
00:04:44.300 But what about the side effects?
00:04:45.480 How can we know how this will affect young children when they grow up?
00:04:51.920 I mean, if you give an injection to a 5-year-old, I don't know, will it affect their reproductive system?
00:04:57.900 I don't know.
00:04:58.880 You really won't know for 20 years, will you?
00:05:01.560 But let me read to you from Pfizer's own report submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the FDA.
00:05:08.540 You can see it for yourself online.
00:05:10.160 It's called Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, October 26, 2021, meeting document.
00:05:18.460 So this is filed by Pfizer to the FDA.
00:05:21.820 You can find it online.
00:05:23.200 Let me show you page 11.
00:05:25.760 I'm going to read the whole thing to you.
00:05:26.660 Let's read it together slowly.
00:05:28.560 Overall risk-benefit conclusions.
00:05:30.980 COVID-19 continues to be a serious and potentially fatal or life-threatening infection for children.
00:05:36.660 And there is a significant unmet medical need in the 5 to 12 years of age population.
00:05:43.140 I simply disagree with that, but I suppose that's a matter of opinion, what serious is or whatever.
00:05:48.560 I'll read some more.
00:05:49.640 And by the way, BNT162B2 is just the technical name of the Pfizer vaccine, so don't be confused by that.
00:05:55.860 Two primary doses of the 10-microgram BNT162B2 vaccine, given three weeks apart in 5 to 12 years of age, have shown a favorable safety and tolerability profile, robust immune responses against all variants of concern, and high VE against symptomatic COVID-19 in a period where the Delta variant was predominant.
00:06:21.560 The number of participants in the current clinical development program is too small to detect any potential risks of myocarditis associated with vaccination.
00:06:35.280 Hang on, hang on.
00:06:37.840 You just said it was safe.
00:06:40.340 You said it has favorable safety.
00:06:43.000 You just said that.
00:06:44.300 And in the very next sentence, the next sentence, you said your test was actually too small to know.
00:06:52.980 There weren't enough people you tested it on yet.
00:06:55.680 You haven't done the test yet, but you want every child in the world to take this shot?
00:07:01.360 I guess they're part of your test now, eh?
00:07:04.720 I'll read some more.
00:07:05.540 Long-term safety of COVID-19 vaccine in participants 5 to 12 years of age will be studied in five post-authorization safety studies, including a five-year follow-up study to evaluate long-term sequelae of post-vaccination myocarditis and pericarditis.
00:07:22.600 Got it.
00:07:23.140 So you're starting five-year-long follow-up studies.
00:07:26.760 You're starting them now.
00:07:28.760 They'll be ready in five years.
00:07:30.820 But you're prescribing the drug to children.
00:07:32.740 They're not even prescribing it.
00:07:34.340 Doctors don't get the prescription.
00:07:35.420 You're just giving it to every child.
00:07:37.040 No prescription needed.
00:07:38.980 I'll read more.
00:07:40.240 Israeli safety surveillance databases suggest that incidence rates of rare post-vaccination myocarditis peaks in individuals 16 to 19 years of age, males, and declines in adolescents 12 to 15 years of age.
00:07:53.200 In addition, the dose for children 5 to 12 years of age is one-third the dose given to older vaccines, 10 micrograms versus 30 micrograms.
00:08:00.980 Based on this information, it is reasonable to predict that post-vaccine myocarditis rates are likely to be even lower in 5 to 12 years of age than those observed in adolescents 12 to 15 years of age.
00:08:12.220 Is your head spinning?
00:08:14.220 Is your head spinning?
00:08:14.780 Did you know that the most dangerous age for myocarditis from these vaccines was 16 and 19-year-olds?
00:08:22.100 Did anyone in Canada ever tell you that?
00:08:24.320 Did you know that?
00:08:26.040 Pfizer knows that and the FDA knows that.
00:08:28.740 Do you think John Tory knows that or Justin Trudeau or the bureaucrats who jabbed children?
00:08:33.680 Do you think they warn anybody?
00:08:35.020 Not just the babies, but 16 to 19-year-olds.
00:08:38.120 Did anyone tell them?
00:08:40.400 But did you catch the second part of that?
00:08:43.600 They're just guessing based on the teenagers in Israel.
00:08:47.000 They're saying, okay, we know that 16 to 19-year-old teenagers are the worst hit by myocarditis.
00:08:52.580 That's heart inflammation.
00:08:53.860 So they're making a reasonable prediction.
00:08:56.820 That's the language they use.
00:08:58.600 That younger kids will be just fine.
00:09:01.800 So they haven't tested it yet.
00:09:03.460 They said they don't have enough human guinea pigs yet.
00:09:07.580 They literally did not test it yet.
00:09:12.220 It's going to take five years, they say.
00:09:14.080 But for now, they think it's reasonable.
00:09:16.240 It's a reasonable guess.
00:09:18.200 It's a guesstimate.
00:09:20.000 That's what they said.
00:09:21.300 I'll read more.
00:09:23.480 Given post-authorization experience and assuming 90% efficacy as shown in the descriptive clinical study,
00:09:29.420 the estimated number of COVID-19 cases and associated hospitalizations presented over 120 days per million of fully vaccinated children,
00:09:38.180 5 to 12 years of age, is 33,600 and 170, respectively.
00:09:44.040 Okay.
00:09:44.600 So they're trying to predict how many children this vaccine will help.
00:09:48.180 And the first point is not many.
00:09:52.060 Literally, if you injected a million children, if you injected every young child in the country in that age group,
00:09:58.540 you'll save 170 kids from going to the hospital.
00:10:01.300 That's it.
00:10:02.020 That's it.
00:10:03.600 Because they don't get that sick to begin with.
00:10:06.880 But did you notice that's based on what they claim is a 90% effectiveness rate?
00:10:11.160 But we know that's not true.
00:10:13.420 They don't have a 90% effectiveness rate.
00:10:15.580 That's outdated.
00:10:16.580 It's less than that.
00:10:18.520 Here's Bill Gates complaining about their lack of effectiveness himself.
00:10:23.120 You know, we didn't have vaccines that block transmission.
00:10:26.360 We got vaccines that help you with your health, but they only slightly reduce the transmissions.
00:10:31.140 We need a new way of doing the vaccine.
00:10:34.320 So they're claiming that if you jab 1 million children, you'll save 170 of them from going to the hospital.
00:10:41.160 But look at this.
00:10:43.300 In contrast, the number of post-vaccination myocarditis cases, including myocarditis, pericarditis, and myopericarditis,
00:10:51.960 expected in the same period of time per million second doses is 21,
00:10:55.740 assuming that children 5 to 12 years of age experience the same rates of post-vaccination myocarditis
00:11:00.080 as adolescents 12 to 15 years of age in the U.S. Section 4.
00:11:05.680 So they're saying, here's the deal.
00:11:07.980 Keep 170 kids out of hospital and give 21 kids heart disease.
00:11:16.320 We, therefore, may expect substantially fewer post-vaccination myocarditis cases among 5 to 12 of age males and females
00:11:23.220 in COVID-19-associated hospitalizations given current age-specific COVID-19 cases and hospitalization rate estimates.
00:11:30.240 Again, they don't know, do they, because they haven't tested it yet.
00:11:34.500 They say they may expect this because they don't know.
00:11:38.240 They haven't tested it yet.
00:11:39.700 Prevention and potential long-term sequelae of COVID-19 illnesses as well as other societal impacts
00:11:46.940 would further increase the public health benefit of vaccination.
00:11:50.600 Given all of the above, the benefits of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine to prevent COVID-19,
00:11:56.000 given as a two-dose, 10-microgram dose level, primary series in children 5 to 12 years of age,
00:12:01.300 outweigh the known or potential risks.
00:12:03.640 No, no, no, no, no.
00:12:04.480 Potential risks?
00:12:05.320 No, no, no.
00:12:05.700 You just said what you guess, if we do say ourselves.
00:12:10.980 But they haven't tested it yet.
00:12:12.960 They're going to be testing it for five more years.
00:12:15.520 They're just making reasonable guesses now.
00:12:18.640 Reasonable for your child, really, or reasonable for their shareholders.
00:12:23.960 This is what they have disclosed.
00:12:27.040 Not just disclosed, they positively filed this with the FDA, with the government.
00:12:31.300 Now, imagine what they're hiding, what they're going to court in the United States to claim they don't have to disclose for 50 more years.
00:12:42.260 Stay with us for more.
00:12:43.140 Hey, welcome back.
00:12:56.440 One of my favorite things to do is to check in with one of Canada's most seasoned conservative columnists.
00:13:02.660 He's seen so many things.
00:13:04.700 In fact, he started his career, if you believe it, many decades ago as a liberal.
00:13:09.700 So he has been inside that beast.
00:13:12.640 But, of course, he's Edmonton's leading conservative columnist.
00:13:15.800 I refer, of course, to Lauren Gunter with the Edmonton Sun newspaper, who joins us now via Skype.
00:13:21.720 Lauren, great to see you.
00:13:23.100 I have in front of me your—and I hope you don't mind my introduction.
00:13:26.500 But I think the fact that you work within the liberals, I don't say that as an insult.
00:13:30.780 The opposite.
00:13:31.440 No, no.
00:13:31.760 You know how the creature thinks.
00:13:35.920 You know how the animal of the Liberal Party, which is a very survival-oriented animal, you know how it thinks.
00:13:41.700 And so I appreciate columns like this.
00:13:43.820 Let me just read the headline of this.
00:13:46.540 Liberals don't have a mandate to do much of anything.
00:13:49.780 And you talk about their throne speech and how they've got big plans, but how they really had one of the smallest election results in history.
00:13:57.000 I want you to put your thesis forward, and then I want to throw a slightly different way of looking at it at you.
00:14:03.220 But tell me—sum up this great column for us in a minute, if you please.
00:14:08.640 Well, you know, as I started off by saying in the column, I am going to mention every time they get up and talk about the mandate that they have for this massive change or that massive spending or, you know, turning Canadian society upside down, expanding the role of government.
00:14:25.560 And I'm going to mention that they received the lowest percentage of the popular vote of any government in the history of Canada.
00:14:35.200 So in more than 150 years, there's never been a government that has had a lower percentage of the popular vote than the current Trudeau government.
00:14:45.960 They have a mandate for nothing.
00:14:47.960 And, you know, they went to the people, as you well remember, in the summer and said, no, we must have this election.
00:14:54.600 Most important time since the end of the Second World War.
00:14:57.920 We need to settle all of these huge issues.
00:15:00.780 And not one thing was changed by the election.
00:15:05.980 The results didn't change a thing.
00:15:08.100 So I don't understand what it is that they think they have Canadians' permission for.
00:15:14.100 Yeah, well, I think that's an excellent way of looking at it, is how weak their mandate is, how pointless the election was, other than, you know, they saw an opportunistic moment and they took it.
00:15:27.920 But I want to read two quotes from your column.
00:15:31.960 And this is of Mark Holland, who's the government house leader, which, if I understand that position, his job is to take the prime minister's priorities and move it through parliament.
00:15:44.640 So, you know, there's the whip whose job is to make sure everyone is following the party line.
00:15:49.760 The house leader is, OK, how do we marshal parliament to get these bills passed?
00:15:54.380 Is that an accurate job description?
00:15:56.360 That's exactly what he does.
00:15:57.560 And the whip works for the house leader.
00:16:00.600 OK, so here's what Mark Holland, the liberal house leader, has to say.
00:16:06.600 He says, I am not looking to tolerate, I love that word, to tolerate a lot of obfuscation or political gains.
00:16:18.680 We've already had significant debate on these issues, both in and out of the chamber.
00:16:26.320 Now, there's a Jewish word, chutzpah.
00:16:30.020 You got to say the ch, Lord, which is sometimes tough.
00:16:33.100 Chutzpah means outrageous audacity, outlandish, over-the-top presumptuousness.
00:16:41.480 Like, you know, the story of the killer who murders his parents and then asks the court to go easy on him because he's an orphan.
00:16:48.460 But that's chutzpah.
00:16:51.420 Here's a guy who gets the lowest mandate of any government in history, and he's saying, I'm not looking to tolerate anyone disagreeing with me.
00:17:00.160 I'm the boss, and we're not going to tolerate anyone asking questions.
00:17:04.680 That's the new definition of chutzpah, Lorne.
00:17:06.520 Yeah, I think so, and I think that's an excellent point to make as well, and that here are the liberals who came in with this very low mandate, no mandate to do what they were doing before the election.
00:17:22.040 And now they're saying, yes, we talked about all this before the election.
00:17:24.700 Don't bother us with the details.
00:17:27.060 Don't stand up in the House of Commons and say you disagree with our internet censorship or with extending the pandemic benefits or with expanding the government by about 40% over pre-pandemic levels.
00:17:41.740 Don't come in and try and stop our changes to the Labour Code that will make all federally regulated businesses subject to having bilingual workplaces, even if they're in Merritt, B.C. or in Antigonish, Nova Scotia.
00:17:57.560 It doesn't matter.
00:17:58.880 We talked about these things before the election.
00:18:01.440 We also talked about them during the election, which I would dispute because I don't think they talked about much of substance during the election.
00:18:08.400 I think they mostly just slung insults at the Tories.
00:18:12.540 But nonetheless, they said, we've talked about these in the last Parliament.
00:18:15.860 We talked about them during the election.
00:18:17.820 We have 20 sitting days between now and – they're down to 18 now.
00:18:22.860 But they have 18 sitting days between now and Christmas.
00:18:26.840 Pass all of this stuff.
00:18:28.560 You must pass all of this stuff without debate because we said you should.
00:18:33.700 And that kind of disregard for democratic traditions – can you imagine – can you imagine what the Liberals would be doing?
00:18:42.540 They would be screaming and wringing their hands, and they would be gagging if Harper had ever done anything like that.
00:18:50.840 Oh, I remember getting into a discussion with a Liberal right after the 2015 election.
00:18:55.340 And this will give you an idea of how unbalanced they're thinking it.
00:18:59.420 After the 2015 election where Harper lost to Trudeau, I got in a discussion with a Liberal in Vancouver who said, oh, thank God we got rid of that dictator Harper.
00:19:11.820 Yeah.
00:19:12.280 Well, if he was a dictator, how come he held a free election?
00:19:14.720 Like, how did you win an election if the man was a dictator?
00:19:18.060 But that is how unhinged they are.
00:19:21.480 And they're unhinged now.
00:19:23.020 You know, we don't need any more debate because we've already talked about this a lot.
00:19:27.820 So you should just do what we tell you to.
00:19:30.100 Well, and here's the darker part.
00:19:31.560 I mean, your essay is, folks, they don't have a mandate.
00:19:36.320 They just don't.
00:19:37.140 My first point was, that's typical Liberal audacity to claim they have a mandate, an impatient mandate, even though they have the lowest result in history.
00:19:47.760 But let me look at it from a darker point of view.
00:19:51.900 For two years now, we have not had a fully functioning parliament.
00:19:56.720 Most of the health orders that have governed our lives far beyond the scope of health have not been debated, are not in legislation.
00:20:03.480 They're done either at the cabinet level, just written by the cabinet minister staff, or even worse, by public health officers who are not even part of cabinet, who have been delegated this power down the chain of command.
00:20:17.240 So we have a very weak parliamentary democracy right now.
00:20:22.040 Parliament has not sat as much as it ought to.
00:20:24.580 There are restrictions on who even can go into the building.
00:20:28.020 I believe the media has become more complacent than ever.
00:20:31.620 They're cheerleading on the key issues of the day.
00:20:34.740 I see that some media companies are positively cheering for this internet censorship.
00:20:40.200 I ascribe that to the media bailout.
00:20:42.680 So that's the dark context here.
00:20:45.160 You have, I think, a civil liberties crisis in Canada, a parliamentary democracy crisis.
00:20:51.820 No court has stood up to anything in the last two years.
00:20:55.100 The law professors who wouldn't stop assailing Stephen Harper on everything, including Omar Khadr, for example.
00:21:03.020 They're silent now.
00:21:04.260 The civil liberties associations are silent.
00:21:06.580 And in that backdrop of increasing authoritarianism, now you have a guy saying,
00:21:12.180 I will not tolerate that word.
00:21:14.620 I will not tolerate debate in the House of Debate as I bring in a censorship bill.
00:21:22.600 You should have more debate than ever on a censorship bill.
00:21:25.800 You should have more debate than ever in a minority government.
00:21:28.180 But he's saying, Lorne, as he brings in rules to reduce democracy even further, he will not tolerate debate.
00:21:35.420 That's a darker way of looking at it.
00:21:37.100 What do you think?
00:21:38.580 Yeah, it is.
00:21:39.020 And, you know, even when the Brits were in the midst of their worst peak in the pandemic,
00:21:45.880 and it was much worse than anything we ever had in Canada,
00:21:49.380 even when they were at the middle of their peak,
00:21:51.100 they never suspended in-person sitting of the British Parliament
00:21:55.960 because it was considered too core to the functioning of democracy to do it all by Skype.
00:22:04.180 So they never did that.
00:22:05.820 And these guys wouldn't allow it back.
00:22:08.580 You know, I think we're somewhere in between what I'm saying and what you're suggesting.
00:22:15.660 I would have more respect for them in a way if they were sitting down and plotting this all out,
00:22:21.860 that they were thinking, aha, how can we do this?
00:22:24.400 How can we restrict Canadian democracy and not make it look like that's what we're doing?
00:22:29.140 And, you know, if they were plotting to restrict civil liberties, if they were plotting to diminish parliament,
00:22:37.480 if they were plotting to restrict democracy, I think that they're just naive twits who are softly skipping into all of this.
00:22:47.940 And I think that a lot of the people in our business in the mainstream are just don't – they don't have the cynical point of view anymore.
00:23:00.200 I mean, one of the great things that I think about being a journalist – and, I mean, you and I used to work side by each across a desk from one another in a news magazine.
00:23:08.740 One of the fun things was being able to be a cynic, being able to say, hey, look, these guys are always trying to pull some –