EZRA LEVANT | Trudeau's tyrannical crackdown on the Freedom Convoy ruled 'unconstitutional'
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
162.61449
Summary
A federal court of Canada has struck down Justin Trudeau's emergency law as illegal and unconstitutional. The ruling is an enormous legal and constitutional rebuke of Justin Trudeau, Chrystia Freeland, and the entire thuggish liberal government.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hello, my friends. I'm back in Canada. Oh, it's good to be home. And wow, what a day I chose to
00:00:04.300
come back. The federal court of Canada has ruled that Justin Trudeau's invocation of the Emergencies
00:00:09.840
Act was illegal and unconstitutional. I'll take you through it. Wow, is all I have to say. Hey,
00:00:16.040
can you do me a favor and get the video version of this podcast? Go to rebelnewsplus.com,
00:00:21.300
click subscribe. It's eight bucks a month, but you get the video version. And more importantly,
00:00:25.480
you support Rebel News because, you know, we don't take a dime from Trudeau and it shows.
00:00:30.340
That's just rebelnewsplus.com. All right, here's today's podcast.
00:00:48.820
Tonight, the federal court of Canada strikes down Trudeau's Emergencies Act as illegal and
00:00:55.280
unconstitutional. It's January 23rd, and this is the Ezra LeVant Show.
00:01:15.280
Just incredible. I wouldn't have expected it. I wouldn't have thunk it. But the federal court of
00:01:19.660
Canada issued a ruling today declaring that the Emergencies Act invoked by Trudeau, that form of
00:01:25.120
martial law was illegal, that Trudeau exceeded the powers granted to him by that law, that he did
00:01:31.100
not meet the tests in that law required for martial law. And second of all, even if he was wrong on that,
00:01:37.600
said the judge, that the law violated Canadians' Charter of Rights. There's no pandemic exception
00:01:45.300
to the charter. Earlier today, I had an emergency live stream for about an hour and a half on the
00:01:50.820
subject. I thought that for today's Ezra LeVant Show, we would excerpt chunks of that. It was
00:01:56.920
actually a really fun live stream. We talked to three of the smartest lawyers in the country.
00:02:00.880
Chad Williamson, who represented the truckers down in Coots, Alberta, was actually down there
00:02:05.440
in the saloon during the blockade. Keith Wilson, who was the lead lawyer for the trucker convoy in
00:02:11.280
Ottawa, and the daily interface between the truckers and the government, including the city and the
00:02:16.180
police in Ottawa. And finally, with Lawrence Greenspon, the lawyer representing Tamera Leach,
00:02:21.640
the warrior princess of the truckers. And I've got my own thoughts on things too, including,
00:02:27.220
I'll take you through the CBC's lying coverage of the subject, as well as that awful, awful woman,
00:02:33.680
Chrystia Freeland. I'll show you some of her comments today. So without further ado, let me show
00:02:38.040
you some of the highlights from the live stream today on this momentous court ruling, because I think
00:02:42.960
it's certainly the story of the day. An enormous legal and constitutional rebuke of Justin Trudeau,
00:02:54.300
Chrystia Freeland, and the entire thuggish liberal government in a blast of a ruling. The federal
00:03:02.780
court of Canada has said that the Liberal Party's invocation of the Emergencies Act some two years
00:03:10.680
ago was illegal, unreasonable, unjustifiable, and finally, unconstitutional. The federal court of
00:03:22.680
Canada has ruled that Justin Trudeau and the Liberal Party broke the law and violated our civil rights
00:03:30.060
in an astonishing rebuke, speaking truth to power. I didn't know, I didn't think I would see it.
00:03:40.680
You might recall that about a year ago, slightly less than a year ago, Justin Trudeau handpicked a
00:03:50.640
reliable liberal judge named Paul Rolo, and handwrote a narrow mandate for that judge and set about a
00:03:58.960
whitewashing process that he controlled. And surprise, he exonerated himself. And the liberals dined out on
00:04:07.400
that for a few months, with every mainstream media journalist in the country clapping along like trained
00:04:12.940
seals. But today, it was an independent judge, not a handpicked judge by Trudeau, in a real court, not a
00:04:20.440
carefully scripted inquiry. A real judge, the Honorable Richard Mosley, let's put him on the screen, not one of
00:04:28.560
Trudeau's handpicked favorites. And he applied the rules of court, not the rules of Justin.
00:04:35.100
And he had a lengthy hearing. And he looked into the law, not just the politics. And he found what each
00:04:42.020
of us could have told you, whether or not we had a law degree. It was an improper suspension of civil
00:04:50.160
liberties. And let me say something very important that I want to say right at the top. And we're going
00:04:53.920
to go through this together. We're going to spend about an hour on this. And in about half an hour,
00:04:58.540
we're going to be joined by two senior lawyers, including Keith Wilson, the lawyer for the Freedom
00:05:03.280
Convoy truckers in Ottawa, and a Fred Chad Williamson, the lawyer for the truckers at the
00:05:08.280
Cooch blockade. We will have some serious legal firepower on this show in about half an hour.
00:05:14.960
But I want to point out a very important thing about the lawsuit. We're going to go through it.
00:05:18.440
It wasn't just Canadians who were suing. The government of Alberta, and I'll confirm this,
00:05:26.320
we'll go through the law to get with the ruling together. The government of Alberta intervened,
00:05:32.100
saying, we didn't need the Emergencies Act. We were able to solve any policing problems without
00:05:40.080
putting the country under martial law. This is an astounding ruling. And the timing of it is
00:05:48.020
absolutely perfect. Coming right in the middle of a Liberal Party retreat. They're having a lot of
00:05:54.900
these retreats and summits and luxury getaways where they try and script some language to bring
00:06:01.760
them back from the brink of oblivion in the polls. And what a delight to see them scupper all their plans
00:06:08.620
and put out twitchy Freeland. That's what I call Christia Freeland. She's got that irritating twitch.
00:06:16.500
I don't know if it's a medical condition or if she's just someone who has is a walking poker tell of
00:06:22.160
lies. You know what a poker tell is. It's when someone lies and they can't control something. They
00:06:26.820
have a wink or something or they make a face or their eyes look in a certain way. I think that's what
00:06:31.780
it is with Christia Freeland. She may have a form of Tourette's and if so, you know, it's a medical
00:06:36.700
condition beyond her reach. But I think it's a poker tell. The woman is a non-stop liar and I think
00:06:42.400
her body can't control being such a liar. Take a listen to Christia Freeland explaining that no,
00:06:48.480
no, no, no. Just because a judge heard the case and government lawyers were there but the judge
00:06:54.200
didn't agree with them. Just because, you know, what, 150 or so page ruling, page after page,
00:07:00.100
her law breaking was exposed. No, no, no. You see, with all due respect, she disagrees and so she's
00:07:07.400
going to appeal it because of course she is. Because if this law, if this ruling is upheld,
00:07:15.720
who's the biggest loser? Well, Justin Trudeau, but I don't know how much long Justin Trudeau is
00:07:20.900
going to be with us given the polling. But Christia Freeland actually thought, and maybe she still
00:07:26.100
thinks she can be prime minister, she was the one who seized the bank accounts. And if her legal
00:07:32.620
rationale for seizing the bank accounts is gone, then she's the one who will be sued by everyone
00:07:37.240
who had their bank accounts seized. Now, I don't think she'll be held personally responsible. The
00:07:41.920
government will bail out Christia Freeland for her illegal acts. But if I was Christia Freeland,
00:07:47.360
I would be saying, no, no, no, no, no. I'm innocent. No, no, no, no, no. Also, because what she did
00:07:52.520
was atrocious here, listen to this wicked twitcher, the twitchy witch, explaining, no, no, no, this judge,
00:07:59.240
don't listen to the judge. What we did was completely legal. Take a look at this.
00:08:03.000
So, we are aware of the court decision. We have discussed it with the prime minister,
00:08:12.100
with cabinet colleagues, with senior federal government officials and experts.
00:08:18.520
We respect very much Canada's independent judiciary. However, we do not agree with this decision.
00:08:34.080
And respectfully, we will be appealing it. I would just like to take a moment to remind Canadians
00:08:44.740
of how serious the situation was in our country when we took that decision. The public safety of Canadians
00:08:56.380
was under threat. Our national security, which includes our national economic security, was under threat.
00:09:07.840
It was a hard decision to take. We took it very seriously after a lot of hard work, after a lot of careful
00:09:19.560
deliberation. We were convinced at the time, I was convinced at the time, it was the right thing to do.
00:09:28.560
It was the necessary thing to do. I remain and we remain convinced of that. And I'll now turn it over
00:09:40.880
to my colleague, the Minister of Justice, and then we'll hear from my colleague, the Minister of Public Safety.
00:09:46.280
Hey, I got a question for you. Sorry to interrupt. Where's the coward Justin Trudeau?
00:09:51.320
I mean, I know he doesn't want to wear this. He sent out Twitchy to say how thoughtful she was,
00:09:58.400
and please don't arrest me because I seized bank accounts, and please don't destroy my future political career
00:10:03.760
just because I was the one who seized hundreds of bank accounts illegally.
00:10:08.620
Where's the coward? Like, at the end of the day, it was the Prime Minister who made the decision.
00:10:13.700
And he sends out Chrystia Freeland and some other no-name cabinet ministers. Seriously, can you name,
00:10:21.200
can you name, without looking it up, can you name the Justice Minister?
00:10:27.380
Can you name the Public Safety Minister? No Googling. It's, it really is Justin Trudeau and the Seven Dwarves.
00:10:37.700
I mean, I think people do know Chrystia Freeland. Can you name any other cabinet ministers?
00:10:43.700
Why did Trudeau send her out? Why didn't he go out and say this in his best drama teacher voice?
00:10:51.260
He wants her to wear it. I think they're going to try and blame a couple of cabinet ministers in the day,
00:10:57.260
like Marco Mendicino, who was the Public Safety Minister who was later sacked by Trudeau.
00:11:02.380
They're going to probably try and put some blame on him, but it won't work.
00:11:05.380
It was Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland in the end who made the call.
00:11:08.420
It was Freeland who seized the bank accounts. It was Trudeau who deployed the riot horses.
00:11:12.500
It was Trudeau who demanded that police arrest the peaceful protesters like Tamara Leach.
00:11:26.600
For two years, Justin Trudeau and his repeaters in the regime media
00:11:42.960
Tamara Leach has never been convicted of anything.
00:11:45.020
Justin Trudeau once again has been found to be a lawbreaker.
00:11:49.540
All right, without further ado, let's go through the ruling right now.
00:11:55.060
Now, it's a long ruling. Let's show the cover of it right here.
00:11:57.400
The Honorable Mr. Justice Mosley, I already showed that to you.
00:12:05.220
Now, I'm going to spend some time on the front page
00:12:07.400
just so we can understand what exactly was going on.
00:12:13.600
It's between Canadian frontline nurses and Kristen Nagel
00:12:21.160
So nurses who were against the Emergencies Act took the step
00:12:29.440
that finally woke up after three years of hitting the snooze button
00:13:00.720
Canadian citizens who were willing to put their names forward
00:13:06.960
And you can see the list of respondents or defendants
00:13:09.420
as they're sometimes called governor and council.
00:13:13.240
His Majesty and Right of Canada, the Attorney General,
00:13:16.120
the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
00:13:18.060
So they're just naming the members of cabinet who made the decisions.
00:13:24.060
Now, if you look at this judgment, it's over 100 pages long,
00:13:36.780
But let's look at that table of contents, introduction, overview.
00:13:39.840
They talk about the parties, that is, who was suing.
00:13:43.280
And then they go through, and you can see they describe,
00:13:45.480
who's Kristen Nagel, what's Canadian Frontline Nurses,
00:13:58.380
while I had not reached a decision on any of the four applications,
00:14:01.380
I was leaning to the view that the decision to invoke the Emergencies Act
00:14:07.280
I considered the events that occurred in Ottawa and other locations
00:14:14.340
and reflected an unacceptable breakdown of public order.
00:14:17.700
I had and continued to have considerable sympathy
00:14:20.880
for those in government who were confronted with this situation.
00:14:25.620
I may have agreed that it was necessary to invoke the Act.
00:14:29.180
And I acknowledge that in conducting judicial review of that decision,
00:14:32.020
I'm revisioning that time with the benefit of hindsight
00:14:34.200
and a more extensive record of the facts and law
00:14:36.320
than that which was before the governor in council.
00:14:47.360
My preliminary view of the reasonableness of the decision
00:14:54.640
due to excellent advocacy on the part of counsel
00:14:59.080
Had I not taken the time to carefully deliberate
00:15:04.460
particularly those of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association
00:15:15.080
especially in presenting informed legal argument.
00:15:17.340
This case may not have turned out the way it has
00:15:22.660
were not as capable of marshalling the evidence
00:15:28.580
If I was with those two civil liberties groups,
00:15:34.260
I have concluded the decision to issue the proclamation
00:15:42.460
justification, transparency, and intelligibility,
00:15:50.000
that were required to be taken into consideration.
00:15:52.500
In my view, there can be only one reasonable interpretation
00:16:04.900
on the discretion of the government and counsel
00:16:12.560
there has to be a very serious threat to the country,
00:16:24.820
that cannot be fixed with regular law and order.
00:16:44.380
It has to be a grave existential threat to the country.
00:16:52.600
Part two is, okay, so you've got an insurrection.
00:16:56.480
Okay, so you've got a terrible thing happening.
00:16:58.860
Is there any other lesser means to fix the problem?
00:17:08.380
And that's the value of Alberta's intervention.
00:17:11.640
Because Alberta had a blockade, you might recall,
00:17:14.320
at the Coutts border crossing between Alberta and Montana.
00:17:21.500
actually, if I recall, the day before martial law was applied.
00:17:25.520
And so my point is, this judge didn't like the convoy.
00:17:38.260
And this judge said, and I haven't read the whole thing,
00:17:44.040
The government did not pass that two-fold test.
00:18:05.720
The applicants have established that the legal constraints
00:18:09.720
to declare public order of emergency were not satisfied.
00:18:14.080
Now, I was skimming the ruling before we went on the live stream.
00:18:33.140
we're going to call in a couple of legal experts to help us.
00:18:47.780
and to the broad powers it grants to the federal executive,
00:19:07.220
This does not mean that every tool has to be used
00:19:10.860
and tried to determine that the situation exceeded
00:19:34.360
created a critical, urgent, temporary situation
00:19:50.920
and required an urgent resolution by governments,
00:19:57.460
that it could not have been effectively dealt with
00:20:06.980
That was demonstrated not to be the case in Quebec
00:20:18.360
I conclude that there was no national emergency
00:20:23.840
justifying the invocation of the Emergencies Act
00:20:27.320
and the decision to do so was therefore unreasonable
00:20:32.540
That's Latin for outside the power of the government.
00:20:43.140
So this was the government acting outside of its power,
00:20:52.980
should I be found to have erred in that conclusion,
00:20:55.860
I will proceed to discuss the threshold requirement
00:20:58.940
that for a public order emergency to be declared,
00:21:01.920
it must meet the definition set out in Section 16 of the Act,
00:21:06.820
was the threats to the security of Canada threshold met.
00:21:16.920
and tell you the importance of the paragraphs I just read.
00:21:27.240
They didn't like parking on the side of the road.
00:21:30.740
They didn't like people laughing when they got tickets.
00:21:44.320
I think it really was a bunch of traffic offenses.
00:22:06.720
if there is no other way of dealing with the problem.
00:22:26.700
by the fact that the truckers were defying him.
00:23:03.340
I remember the public order inquiry commission,