Rebel News Podcast - January 24, 2024


EZRA LEVANT | Trudeau's tyrannical crackdown on the Freedom Convoy ruled 'unconstitutional'


Episode Stats

Length

55 minutes

Words per Minute

162.61449

Word Count

9,007

Sentence Count

305

Misogynist Sentences

17

Hate Speech Sentences

8


Summary

A federal court of Canada has struck down Justin Trudeau's emergency law as illegal and unconstitutional. The ruling is an enormous legal and constitutional rebuke of Justin Trudeau, Chrystia Freeland, and the entire thuggish liberal government.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello, my friends. I'm back in Canada. Oh, it's good to be home. And wow, what a day I chose to
00:00:04.300 come back. The federal court of Canada has ruled that Justin Trudeau's invocation of the Emergencies
00:00:09.840 Act was illegal and unconstitutional. I'll take you through it. Wow, is all I have to say. Hey,
00:00:16.040 can you do me a favor and get the video version of this podcast? Go to rebelnewsplus.com,
00:00:21.300 click subscribe. It's eight bucks a month, but you get the video version. And more importantly,
00:00:25.480 you support Rebel News because, you know, we don't take a dime from Trudeau and it shows.
00:00:30.340 That's just rebelnewsplus.com. All right, here's today's podcast.
00:00:48.820 Tonight, the federal court of Canada strikes down Trudeau's Emergencies Act as illegal and
00:00:55.280 unconstitutional. It's January 23rd, and this is the Ezra LeVant Show.
00:01:03.080 Shame on you, you censorious bug.
00:01:15.280 Just incredible. I wouldn't have expected it. I wouldn't have thunk it. But the federal court of
00:01:19.660 Canada issued a ruling today declaring that the Emergencies Act invoked by Trudeau, that form of
00:01:25.120 martial law was illegal, that Trudeau exceeded the powers granted to him by that law, that he did
00:01:31.100 not meet the tests in that law required for martial law. And second of all, even if he was wrong on that,
00:01:37.600 said the judge, that the law violated Canadians' Charter of Rights. There's no pandemic exception
00:01:45.300 to the charter. Earlier today, I had an emergency live stream for about an hour and a half on the
00:01:50.820 subject. I thought that for today's Ezra LeVant Show, we would excerpt chunks of that. It was
00:01:56.920 actually a really fun live stream. We talked to three of the smartest lawyers in the country.
00:02:00.880 Chad Williamson, who represented the truckers down in Coots, Alberta, was actually down there
00:02:05.440 in the saloon during the blockade. Keith Wilson, who was the lead lawyer for the trucker convoy in
00:02:11.280 Ottawa, and the daily interface between the truckers and the government, including the city and the
00:02:16.180 police in Ottawa. And finally, with Lawrence Greenspon, the lawyer representing Tamera Leach,
00:02:21.640 the warrior princess of the truckers. And I've got my own thoughts on things too, including,
00:02:27.220 I'll take you through the CBC's lying coverage of the subject, as well as that awful, awful woman,
00:02:33.680 Chrystia Freeland. I'll show you some of her comments today. So without further ado, let me show
00:02:38.040 you some of the highlights from the live stream today on this momentous court ruling, because I think
00:02:42.960 it's certainly the story of the day. An enormous legal and constitutional rebuke of Justin Trudeau,
00:02:54.300 Chrystia Freeland, and the entire thuggish liberal government in a blast of a ruling. The federal
00:03:02.780 court of Canada has said that the Liberal Party's invocation of the Emergencies Act some two years
00:03:10.680 ago was illegal, unreasonable, unjustifiable, and finally, unconstitutional. The federal court of
00:03:22.680 Canada has ruled that Justin Trudeau and the Liberal Party broke the law and violated our civil rights
00:03:30.060 in an astonishing rebuke, speaking truth to power. I didn't know, I didn't think I would see it.
00:03:40.680 You might recall that about a year ago, slightly less than a year ago, Justin Trudeau handpicked a
00:03:50.640 reliable liberal judge named Paul Rolo, and handwrote a narrow mandate for that judge and set about a
00:03:58.960 whitewashing process that he controlled. And surprise, he exonerated himself. And the liberals dined out on
00:04:07.400 that for a few months, with every mainstream media journalist in the country clapping along like trained
00:04:12.940 seals. But today, it was an independent judge, not a handpicked judge by Trudeau, in a real court, not a
00:04:20.440 carefully scripted inquiry. A real judge, the Honorable Richard Mosley, let's put him on the screen, not one of
00:04:28.560 Trudeau's handpicked favorites. And he applied the rules of court, not the rules of Justin.
00:04:35.100 And he had a lengthy hearing. And he looked into the law, not just the politics. And he found what each
00:04:42.020 of us could have told you, whether or not we had a law degree. It was an improper suspension of civil
00:04:50.160 liberties. And let me say something very important that I want to say right at the top. And we're going
00:04:53.920 to go through this together. We're going to spend about an hour on this. And in about half an hour,
00:04:58.540 we're going to be joined by two senior lawyers, including Keith Wilson, the lawyer for the Freedom
00:05:03.280 Convoy truckers in Ottawa, and a Fred Chad Williamson, the lawyer for the truckers at the
00:05:08.280 Cooch blockade. We will have some serious legal firepower on this show in about half an hour.
00:05:14.960 But I want to point out a very important thing about the lawsuit. We're going to go through it.
00:05:18.440 It wasn't just Canadians who were suing. The government of Alberta, and I'll confirm this,
00:05:26.320 we'll go through the law to get with the ruling together. The government of Alberta intervened,
00:05:32.100 saying, we didn't need the Emergencies Act. We were able to solve any policing problems without
00:05:40.080 putting the country under martial law. This is an astounding ruling. And the timing of it is
00:05:48.020 absolutely perfect. Coming right in the middle of a Liberal Party retreat. They're having a lot of
00:05:54.900 these retreats and summits and luxury getaways where they try and script some language to bring
00:06:01.760 them back from the brink of oblivion in the polls. And what a delight to see them scupper all their plans
00:06:08.620 and put out twitchy Freeland. That's what I call Christia Freeland. She's got that irritating twitch.
00:06:16.500 I don't know if it's a medical condition or if she's just someone who has is a walking poker tell of
00:06:22.160 lies. You know what a poker tell is. It's when someone lies and they can't control something. They
00:06:26.820 have a wink or something or they make a face or their eyes look in a certain way. I think that's what
00:06:31.780 it is with Christia Freeland. She may have a form of Tourette's and if so, you know, it's a medical
00:06:36.700 condition beyond her reach. But I think it's a poker tell. The woman is a non-stop liar and I think
00:06:42.400 her body can't control being such a liar. Take a listen to Christia Freeland explaining that no,
00:06:48.480 no, no, no. Just because a judge heard the case and government lawyers were there but the judge
00:06:54.200 didn't agree with them. Just because, you know, what, 150 or so page ruling, page after page,
00:07:00.100 her law breaking was exposed. No, no, no. You see, with all due respect, she disagrees and so she's
00:07:07.400 going to appeal it because of course she is. Because if this law, if this ruling is upheld,
00:07:15.720 who's the biggest loser? Well, Justin Trudeau, but I don't know how much long Justin Trudeau is
00:07:20.900 going to be with us given the polling. But Christia Freeland actually thought, and maybe she still
00:07:26.100 thinks she can be prime minister, she was the one who seized the bank accounts. And if her legal
00:07:32.620 rationale for seizing the bank accounts is gone, then she's the one who will be sued by everyone
00:07:37.240 who had their bank accounts seized. Now, I don't think she'll be held personally responsible. The
00:07:41.920 government will bail out Christia Freeland for her illegal acts. But if I was Christia Freeland,
00:07:47.360 I would be saying, no, no, no, no, no. I'm innocent. No, no, no, no, no. Also, because what she did
00:07:52.520 was atrocious here, listen to this wicked twitcher, the twitchy witch, explaining, no, no, no, this judge,
00:07:59.240 don't listen to the judge. What we did was completely legal. Take a look at this.
00:08:03.000 So, we are aware of the court decision. We have discussed it with the prime minister,
00:08:12.100 with cabinet colleagues, with senior federal government officials and experts.
00:08:18.520 We respect very much Canada's independent judiciary. However, we do not agree with this decision.
00:08:34.080 And respectfully, we will be appealing it. I would just like to take a moment to remind Canadians
00:08:44.740 of how serious the situation was in our country when we took that decision. The public safety of Canadians
00:08:56.380 was under threat. Our national security, which includes our national economic security, was under threat.
00:09:07.840 It was a hard decision to take. We took it very seriously after a lot of hard work, after a lot of careful
00:09:19.560 deliberation. We were convinced at the time, I was convinced at the time, it was the right thing to do.
00:09:28.560 It was the necessary thing to do. I remain and we remain convinced of that. And I'll now turn it over
00:09:40.880 to my colleague, the Minister of Justice, and then we'll hear from my colleague, the Minister of Public Safety.
00:09:46.280 Hey, I got a question for you. Sorry to interrupt. Where's the coward Justin Trudeau?
00:09:51.320 I mean, I know he doesn't want to wear this. He sent out Twitchy to say how thoughtful she was,
00:09:58.400 and please don't arrest me because I seized bank accounts, and please don't destroy my future political career
00:10:03.760 just because I was the one who seized hundreds of bank accounts illegally.
00:10:08.620 Where's the coward? Like, at the end of the day, it was the Prime Minister who made the decision.
00:10:13.700 And he sends out Chrystia Freeland and some other no-name cabinet ministers. Seriously, can you name,
00:10:21.200 can you name, without looking it up, can you name the Justice Minister?
00:10:27.380 Can you name the Public Safety Minister? No Googling. It's, it really is Justin Trudeau and the Seven Dwarves.
00:10:37.700 I mean, I think people do know Chrystia Freeland. Can you name any other cabinet ministers?
00:10:43.700 Why did Trudeau send her out? Why didn't he go out and say this in his best drama teacher voice?
00:10:51.260 He wants her to wear it. I think they're going to try and blame a couple of cabinet ministers in the day,
00:10:57.260 like Marco Mendicino, who was the Public Safety Minister who was later sacked by Trudeau.
00:11:02.380 They're going to probably try and put some blame on him, but it won't work.
00:11:05.380 It was Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland in the end who made the call.
00:11:08.420 It was Freeland who seized the bank accounts. It was Trudeau who deployed the riot horses.
00:11:12.500 It was Trudeau who demanded that police arrest the peaceful protesters like Tamara Leach.
00:11:18.840 Isn't she looking good these days?
00:11:22.040 The Emergencies Act was illegally invoked.
00:11:26.600 For two years, Justin Trudeau and his repeaters in the regime media
00:11:31.480 have said that the convoy was illegal.
00:11:35.100 In fact, the convoy was legal.
00:11:38.400 It was the crackdown that was illegal.
00:11:42.960 Tamara Leach has never been convicted of anything.
00:11:45.020 Justin Trudeau once again has been found to be a lawbreaker.
00:11:49.540 All right, without further ado, let's go through the ruling right now.
00:11:52.900 I want to take you through the ruling.
00:11:55.060 Now, it's a long ruling. Let's show the cover of it right here.
00:11:57.400 The Honorable Mr. Justice Mosley, I already showed that to you.
00:12:05.220 Now, I'm going to spend some time on the front page
00:12:07.400 just so we can understand what exactly was going on.
00:12:12.600 Let's go down a little bit.
00:12:13.600 It's between Canadian frontline nurses and Kristen Nagel
00:12:17.760 and the Attorney General of Canada.
00:12:21.160 So nurses who were against the Emergencies Act took the step
00:12:25.060 and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association
00:12:29.440 that finally woke up after three years of hitting the snooze button
00:12:32.340 and the Canadian Constitution Foundation.
00:12:37.320 Those are good guys.
00:12:39.800 And the Attorney General of Canada was there
00:12:41.980 and the Attorney General of Alberta,
00:12:43.580 that is the Justice Department of Alberta,
00:12:45.540 intervened on behalf of the protesters,
00:12:49.040 on behalf of the people.
00:12:51.160 But there's more names yet.
00:12:53.380 Jeremiah Jost, Edward Cornell, Vincent Gerses,
00:12:57.060 and Harold Aristow.
00:13:00.720 Canadian citizens who were willing to put their names forward
00:13:03.320 as the official applicants.
00:13:04.840 Thank you to them.
00:13:06.960 And you can see the list of respondents or defendants
00:13:09.420 as they're sometimes called governor and council.
00:13:11.560 That means cabinet.
00:13:13.240 His Majesty and Right of Canada, the Attorney General,
00:13:16.120 the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
00:13:18.060 So they're just naming the members of cabinet who made the decisions.
00:13:24.060 Now, if you look at this judgment, it's over 100 pages long,
00:13:28.840 and so there's a table of contents.
00:13:30.580 I have not read this whole thing through.
00:13:32.680 It's only been out for about an hour or two.
00:13:35.520 Obviously, I haven't read it.
00:13:36.780 But let's look at that table of contents, introduction, overview.
00:13:39.840 They talk about the parties, that is, who was suing.
00:13:43.280 And then they go through, and you can see they describe,
00:13:45.480 who's Kristen Nagel, what's Canadian Frontline Nurses,
00:13:48.580 who are the different groups.
00:13:50.440 So this is like a mini book, isn't it?
00:13:53.680 I'm going to skip to the end of the movie.
00:13:54.940 At the outset of these proceedings,
00:13:58.380 while I had not reached a decision on any of the four applications,
00:14:01.380 I was leaning to the view that the decision to invoke the Emergencies Act
00:14:05.400 was reasonable.
00:14:07.280 I considered the events that occurred in Ottawa and other locations
00:14:10.100 in January and February 2022,
00:14:12.380 went beyond legitimate protest,
00:14:14.340 and reflected an unacceptable breakdown of public order.
00:14:17.700 I had and continued to have considerable sympathy
00:14:20.880 for those in government who were confronted with this situation.
00:14:23.520 Had I been at their tables at that time,
00:14:25.620 I may have agreed that it was necessary to invoke the Act.
00:14:29.180 And I acknowledge that in conducting judicial review of that decision,
00:14:32.020 I'm revisioning that time with the benefit of hindsight
00:14:34.200 and a more extensive record of the facts and law
00:14:36.320 than that which was before the governor in council.
00:14:40.800 So he's starting off by saying,
00:14:42.700 I didn't much like the trucker convoy.
00:14:45.020 Let's read a little bit more.
00:14:47.360 My preliminary view of the reasonableness of the decision
00:14:50.620 to invoke martial law
00:14:51.960 may have prevailed following the hearing
00:14:54.640 due to excellent advocacy on the part of counsel
00:14:56.980 for the Attorney General of Canada.
00:14:59.080 Had I not taken the time to carefully deliberate
00:15:02.200 about the evidence and submissions,
00:15:04.460 particularly those of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association
00:15:08.100 and the Canadian Constitutional Foundation,
00:15:10.020 their participation in these proceedings
00:15:11.600 has demonstrated again,
00:15:13.100 the value of public interest litigants,
00:15:15.080 especially in presenting informed legal argument.
00:15:17.340 This case may not have turned out the way it has
00:15:19.880 without their involvement
00:15:21.200 as the private interest litigants
00:15:22.660 were not as capable of marshalling the evidence
00:15:25.240 and argument in support of their applications.
00:15:27.040 Isn't that an interesting thing to say?
00:15:28.580 If I was with those two civil liberties groups,
00:15:30.580 I'd be feeling pretty good right now.
00:15:32.880 Let's keep reading.
00:15:33.740 We're almost done.
00:15:34.260 I have concluded the decision to issue the proclamation
00:15:38.500 does not bear the hallmarks of reasonableness,
00:15:42.460 justification, transparency, and intelligibility,
00:15:45.260 and was not justified in relation
00:15:48.040 to the relevant factual and legal constraints
00:15:50.000 that were required to be taken into consideration.
00:15:52.500 In my view, there can be only one reasonable interpretation
00:15:57.640 of Emergencies Act, Sections 3 and 17,
00:16:01.100 and the CESIS Act,
00:16:02.400 and the applicants have established
00:16:03.780 that the legal constraints
00:16:04.900 on the discretion of the government and counsel
00:16:06.280 to declare a public order emergency
00:16:07.640 were not satisfied.
00:16:09.440 And for those who remember,
00:16:12.560 there has to be a very serious threat to the country,
00:16:16.600 like a revolution or an invasion
00:16:19.140 or a serious insurrection,
00:16:21.320 that's part one and part two,
00:16:24.820 that cannot be fixed with regular law and order.
00:16:29.180 There's a two-part test
00:16:30.400 to putting the country under martial law.
00:16:32.340 Part one, is there a revolution?
00:16:36.060 Is there a war?
00:16:37.720 Is there a general, a serious insurrection?
00:16:40.060 Is there serious violence?
00:16:41.400 Can't just be a bank robbery.
00:16:42.820 Can't just be a blockade.
00:16:44.380 It has to be a grave existential threat to the country.
00:16:49.060 But that in itself is not enough.
00:16:52.600 Part two is, okay, so you've got an insurrection.
00:16:55.440 Okay, so you've got a war.
00:16:56.480 Okay, so you've got a terrible thing happening.
00:16:58.860 Is there any other lesser means to fix the problem?
00:17:02.360 Obviously, that test was not met.
00:17:08.380 And that's the value of Alberta's intervention.
00:17:10.820 We'll get there.
00:17:11.640 Because Alberta had a blockade, you might recall,
00:17:14.320 at the Coutts border crossing between Alberta and Montana.
00:17:17.660 And that blockade was resolved,
00:17:21.500 actually, if I recall, the day before martial law was applied.
00:17:25.520 And so my point is, this judge didn't like the convoy.
00:17:31.440 This judge sympathized with the government.
00:17:35.420 But this judge read the law.
00:17:38.260 And this judge said, and I haven't read the whole thing,
00:17:41.880 but I just hopped to the end here.
00:17:44.040 The government did not pass that two-fold test.
00:17:46.620 Here, let's keep reading.
00:17:47.220 Okay, I'm going to go to...
00:17:58.220 Well, I think I read the key part.
00:18:05.720 The applicants have established that the legal constraints
00:18:07.920 on the discretion of the governing in council
00:18:09.720 to declare public order of emergency were not satisfied.
00:18:12.080 That's sort of it right there.
00:18:14.080 Now, I was skimming the ruling before we went on the live stream.
00:18:16.980 I was skimming it.
00:18:17.940 And I want to go to paragraph 253.
00:18:20.960 Olivia, can you go to paragraph 253?
00:18:24.280 Because there was some interesting stuff there
00:18:26.780 that I just want to read out.
00:18:28.980 This is a...
00:18:29.520 You know what?
00:18:29.860 We're going to chew this over.
00:18:31.520 And in about 10 minutes,
00:18:33.140 we're going to call in a couple of legal experts to help us.
00:18:36.160 But I want to skim.
00:18:38.800 I want to go up to 253.
00:18:41.900 All right.
00:18:43.340 Let me know when you're there.
00:18:44.740 Yeah.
00:18:44.940 Due to its nature
00:18:47.780 and to the broad powers it grants to the federal executive,
00:18:51.180 the Emergencies Act is a tool of last resort.
00:18:56.040 The government and council
00:18:57.340 cannot invoke the Emergencies Act
00:19:00.040 because it is convenient
00:19:01.240 or because it may work better
00:19:04.520 than other tools at their disposal
00:19:05.960 or available to the provinces.
00:19:07.220 This does not mean that every tool has to be used
00:19:10.860 and tried to determine that the situation exceeded
00:19:12.980 the capacity or authority of the provinces.
00:19:15.400 And in this case, the evidence is clear
00:19:17.220 that the majority of the provinces
00:19:19.020 were able to deal with the situation
00:19:20.580 using other federal laws,
00:19:22.660 such as the criminal code
00:19:23.680 and their own legislation.
00:19:25.380 The Section 58 explanation concludes
00:19:31.220 that the ongoing protests had, quote,
00:19:34.360 created a critical, urgent, temporary situation
00:19:37.000 that is national in scope
00:19:38.140 and cannot effectively be dealt with
00:19:39.980 under any other law of Canada.
00:19:41.360 That was the excuse the liberals said.
00:19:44.540 And here's what the judge says in response.
00:19:46.820 While I agree that the evidence supports
00:19:48.300 the conclusion that the situation was critical
00:19:50.920 and required an urgent resolution by governments,
00:19:54.420 the evidence, in my view,
00:19:55.700 does not support the conclusion
00:19:57.460 that it could not have been effectively dealt with
00:19:59.820 under other laws of Canada
00:20:01.740 as it was in Alberta
00:20:02.940 or that it exceeded the capacity
00:20:05.400 or authority of a province to deal with it.
00:20:06.980 That was demonstrated not to be the case in Quebec
00:20:09.660 and other provinces and territories,
00:20:12.380 including Ontario, except in Ottawa.
00:20:16.340 For those, for these reasons,
00:20:18.360 I conclude that there was no national emergency
00:20:23.840 justifying the invocation of the Emergencies Act
00:20:27.320 and the decision to do so was therefore unreasonable
00:20:30.020 and ultra vides.
00:20:32.540 That's Latin for outside the power of the government.
00:20:35.080 The government can do certain things,
00:20:37.480 but it can't do everything.
00:20:38.540 It can only do those things passed in law
00:20:41.280 subject to the limits of the Constitution.
00:20:43.140 So this was the government acting outside of its power,
00:20:46.900 acting illegally.
00:20:50.120 Let me keep going.
00:20:51.180 The judge says,
00:20:52.980 should I be found to have erred in that conclusion,
00:20:55.860 I will proceed to discuss the threshold requirement
00:20:58.940 that for a public order emergency to be declared,
00:21:01.920 it must meet the definition set out in Section 16 of the Act,
00:21:06.820 was the threats to the security of Canada threshold met.
00:21:11.900 I'm going to read a little bit more.
00:21:14.600 But let me pause for a second
00:21:16.920 and tell you the importance of the paragraphs I just read.
00:21:20.700 Was there a problem in Canada
00:21:22.540 from the government's point of view?
00:21:24.160 Yeah.
00:21:24.420 They didn't like all that horn honking.
00:21:27.240 They didn't like parking on the side of the road.
00:21:30.740 They didn't like people laughing when they got tickets.
00:21:33.360 They didn't like the general middle finger
00:21:36.680 flipping the bird to Trudeau.
00:21:39.360 And there may have even been some laws broken.
00:21:44.320 I think it really was a bunch of traffic offenses.
00:21:47.100 But what this judge is saying
00:21:51.840 is that there was no need
00:21:55.360 to put the country under martial law
00:21:57.040 and that is a requirement
00:21:58.660 to put the country under martial law.
00:22:00.040 You can't simply do it because you want to
00:22:01.900 or because you hate the other guy.
00:22:03.640 You have to put the country under martial law
00:22:06.720 if there is no other way of dealing with the problem.
00:22:09.500 And the importance of that paragraph
00:22:11.280 is that the province of Alberta,
00:22:12.920 the province of Quebec,
00:22:13.780 the province of Ontario
00:22:14.800 all dealt with the same crisis
00:22:17.440 without the martial law.
00:22:21.240 Trudeau invoked martial law
00:22:22.640 because he wanted to
00:22:24.300 for political reasons
00:22:25.460 because he was embarrassed
00:22:26.700 by the fact that the truckers were defying him.
00:22:29.560 How dare they?
00:22:31.580 And that ain't enough, boss.
00:22:34.960 Here, I'm going to read a little bit more
00:22:36.120 in section 256.
00:22:37.180 But do you see what the judge just did?
00:22:38.320 The judge said,
00:22:38.960 if I'm wrong there,
00:22:40.860 I got some more arguments too
00:22:42.240 because this judge knew
00:22:43.860 that he was going to have his ruling appealed.
00:22:47.440 So he said,
00:22:48.680 you didn't meet the test.
00:22:53.820 This was not a law of last resort.
00:22:57.140 You went to this way too early.
00:22:58.740 You didn't need to go to this at all.
00:23:00.280 Alberta cleared the blockade of coups
00:23:01.620 before martial law was brought in.
00:23:03.340 I remember the public order inquiry commission,
00:23:06.720 the hand-scripted judicial inquiry
00:23:09.320 that Justin Trudeau chose the judge of.
00:23:11.140 Remember that?
00:23:11.600 We called it the trucker commission.
00:23:14.920 Police force after police force said
00:23:16.600 they didn't need martial law.
00:23:17.700 They were fine with it.
00:23:19.240 I remember the OPP,
00:23:20.340 the Ontario Provincial Police,
00:23:21.580 said, yeah, we didn't ask for this.
00:23:22.620 We were fine without it.
00:23:24.220 Let me keep reading section 256,
00:23:25.960 paragraph 256, okay?
00:23:27.360 In a general sense,
00:23:30.800 it was reasonable for the government
00:23:32.100 to be alarmed at the impact of the blockades
00:23:34.720 and the effects they were having
00:23:36.000 on cross-border trade.
00:23:37.200 Those effects could be said
00:23:38.380 to fall within a broader sense
00:23:39.600 of threats to the security of Canada
00:23:41.660 or more generally,
00:23:42.660 the concept of national security.
00:23:48.600 I'm going to skip ahead to 258.
00:23:51.180 In this court,
00:23:52.160 after an extensive review
00:23:53.220 of the authorities,
00:23:54.060 Justice Simon Noel concluded
00:23:55.440 that national security means at minimum
00:23:57.660 the preservation of the Canadian way of life,
00:24:00.220 including safeguarding
00:24:01.100 of the security of persons,
00:24:02.120 institutions, and freedoms in Canada.
00:24:05.700 259.
00:24:06.400 A broad and flexible interpretation
00:24:07.940 of the words
00:24:08.300 threats to the security of Canada
00:24:09.600 could encompass the concerns
00:24:11.280 which led the government
00:24:12.020 to issue the public order
00:24:13.100 emergency declaration.
00:24:14.940 Had the meaning of those words
00:24:16.080 not been limited
00:24:16.840 by reference to another statute
00:24:18.400 and applying a deferential standard review,
00:24:21.860 I would have found that
00:24:22.660 the threshold was satisfied.
00:24:24.120 And this is the point
00:24:24.820 I mentioned before.
00:24:25.940 However, the words
00:24:26.820 threats to the security of Canada
00:24:28.960 do not stand alone in the act
00:24:30.300 and must be interpreted
00:24:31.520 with reference to the meaning
00:24:32.520 of the terms
00:24:32.960 as it is defined
00:24:34.060 in Section 2 of the CECES Act.
00:24:35.860 And this is what I mentioned before.
00:24:39.380 Section 260.
00:24:41.340 Threats to the security of Canada
00:24:42.800 in Section 2 of the CECES Act
00:24:44.240 refers to four types of activities.
00:24:46.580 Only one of the four
00:24:47.400 is relevant to these proceedings.
00:24:48.960 Under paragraph 2c,
00:24:50.160 threats to the security of Canada
00:24:51.520 means this.
00:24:52.600 All right, are you ready?
00:24:53.380 We're just going to read this slowly here
00:24:56.360 because you have to understand
00:24:58.540 you can't push that martial law button.
00:25:01.520 You can't pull the fire alarm
00:25:03.160 for the whole country
00:25:04.100 and torch the chart of rights and freedoms
00:25:06.700 and seize bank accounts
00:25:08.420 and jail your political opponents.
00:25:10.020 You can't hit that panic button
00:25:12.360 unless it's a real panic.
00:25:14.000 You can't fake it.
00:25:15.300 You can't be the boy who cries wolf.
00:25:17.420 You can't be Justin Trudeau
00:25:19.100 looking for a dramatic,
00:25:20.700 you know, part-time drama teacher drama move.
00:25:24.660 You need to do what the CECES Act requires.
00:25:27.240 I'm going to read it now.
00:25:29.820 Under paragraph 2c,
00:25:31.220 threats to the security of Canada
00:25:32.520 means activities within
00:25:35.840 or relating to Canada
00:25:37.000 directed toward or in support of
00:25:39.300 the threat or use
00:25:42.520 of acts of serious violence
00:25:45.200 against persons or property
00:25:47.220 for the purpose of achieving
00:25:48.540 a political, religious,
00:25:50.380 or ideological objective
00:25:51.980 within Canada
00:25:52.860 or a foreign state.
00:25:56.620 And then the judge continues,
00:25:58.300 this definition excludes
00:26:00.000 lawful advocacy,
00:26:02.000 protest, or dissent
00:26:03.240 unless carried on in conjunction
00:26:05.140 with any of the activities
00:26:06.100 referred to in the four paragraphs,
00:26:08.600 including C.
00:26:09.360 Paragraph 262,
00:26:13.600 the proclamation
00:26:14.300 that was their calling
00:26:15.360 for martial law
00:26:16.140 specified five reasons
00:26:17.780 to justify the declaration
00:26:19.080 of a public order emergency.
00:26:20.800 The first draws directly
00:26:21.760 from the language
00:26:22.380 of the CECES Act.
00:26:23.580 The second, third, and fourth reasons
00:26:24.740 pertain to adverse effects
00:26:26.000 on the economy.
00:26:27.560 The fifth reason cites
00:26:28.700 the potential
00:26:29.460 for an increase
00:26:30.520 in the level of unrest
00:26:31.480 and violence
00:26:32.080 that would further threaten
00:26:33.280 the safety and security
00:26:34.140 of Canadians.
00:26:34.660 That's a giveaway right there,
00:26:35.740 isn't it?
00:26:37.140 It hadn't happened yet
00:26:38.420 and they were saying,
00:26:38.820 well, this could get worse, boss.
00:26:41.900 I'm just going to read one more
00:26:43.480 and then we're going to call
00:26:44.280 in our legal experts.
00:26:46.760 Here's one more paragraph
00:26:47.900 by this judge.
00:26:49.980 The first reason specified
00:26:51.400 in the proclamation
00:26:52.140 cites the threat
00:26:53.080 or use of serious violence
00:26:54.300 against persons or property.
00:26:56.800 And here's how they,
00:26:57.900 this is how the government
00:26:58.840 describes it.
00:26:59.900 The continuing blockades
00:27:01.180 by both persons
00:27:01.940 and motor vehicles
00:27:02.740 that is occurring
00:27:03.740 at various locations
00:27:04.600 throughout Canada
00:27:05.260 and the continuing threats
00:27:06.600 to oppose measures
00:27:07.780 to remove the blockades
00:27:08.900 including by force
00:27:10.200 which blockades
00:27:11.440 are being carried on
00:27:12.200 in conjunction
00:27:12.740 with activities
00:27:13.360 that are directed toward
00:27:14.260 or in support
00:27:15.160 of the threat
00:27:15.780 or use of acts
00:27:16.920 of serious violence
00:27:18.300 against persons
00:27:20.020 or property
00:27:20.560 including critical infrastructure
00:27:21.800 for the purpose
00:27:22.740 of achieving a political
00:27:23.740 or ideological objective
00:27:24.900 within Canada.
00:27:25.560 did that happen?
00:27:28.380 It's like they're talking
00:27:29.880 about some terrorist attack
00:27:31.660 or something
00:27:32.240 but we all knew
00:27:33.640 it was hot tubs
00:27:35.620 and bouncy castles.
00:27:37.680 All right, listen,
00:27:38.540 we could spend hours
00:27:40.080 going through this case
00:27:41.480 just reading it
00:27:43.800 but I haven't practiced law
00:27:46.720 in 20 years.
00:27:47.560 I want to go to two guys
00:27:50.380 who are up to their eyeballs
00:27:51.940 in this law
00:27:52.840 who have been fighting
00:27:54.760 for freedom
00:27:55.660 who have been with the truckers
00:27:57.200 since the convoy began.
00:27:59.460 I'm talking about
00:28:00.180 Keith Wilson
00:28:00.880 lawyer for the truckers
00:28:02.640 in Ottawa
00:28:03.040 and our friend
00:28:03.540 Chad Williamson
00:28:04.380 lawyer for the truckers
00:28:05.960 down in Cootes, Alberta
00:28:06.840 both of which are referenced
00:28:08.120 in this ruling.
00:28:09.400 May I introduce you
00:28:10.300 the legal dream team.
00:28:12.680 Chad Williamson
00:28:13.620 and Keith Wilson
00:28:14.720 great to see you fellas.
00:28:15.760 Thank you so much
00:28:16.520 for joining this
00:28:17.380 emergency live stream.
00:28:18.860 Boy, we got a lot
00:28:19.780 of brain power
00:28:20.320 on the show now.
00:28:21.400 Thank God you guys
00:28:22.580 have come to help out.
00:28:23.900 How are you guys doing?
00:28:24.640 Chad, how are you doing
00:28:25.240 down there in Calgary?
00:28:27.080 Doing awesome, Ezra.
00:28:29.160 Cam, I mean
00:28:29.840 I've been
00:28:30.720 I'm so busy
00:28:31.460 with other matters.
00:28:32.940 I had Marty
00:28:34.160 as you folks might know
00:28:35.920 as one of the guys
00:28:36.840 that's worked with me
00:28:37.480 on some of the crazier files
00:28:38.680 that we've done
00:28:39.220 like storm into my office
00:28:41.460 at 11 o'clock
00:28:42.320 this morning saying
00:28:43.140 hey, did you see
00:28:43.840 the new federal court decision?
00:28:45.160 So I've just been trying
00:28:47.060 to digest everything
00:28:48.660 as I imagine
00:28:49.440 Keith has already
00:28:50.420 had the opportunity
00:28:51.320 to do being a couple hours
00:28:53.560 ahead of us
00:28:54.380 out in Ottawa
00:28:55.600 but doing great.
00:28:57.560 What outstanding news
00:28:59.240 and just another dagger
00:29:00.580 into the heart
00:29:01.400 of the beast.
00:29:03.100 Yeah, well that's incredible.
00:29:04.020 Well thank you
00:29:04.520 and you were down there
00:29:05.540 at that border saloon
00:29:07.200 in Coots, Alberta
00:29:08.340 observing the blockade
00:29:09.920 firsthand
00:29:10.380 a peaceful blockade
00:29:12.240 not one of serious violence
00:29:14.060 to use the wording
00:29:14.980 of the law.
00:29:15.960 Keith Wilson
00:29:16.400 I'm not sure
00:29:16.960 if you're in Edmonton today
00:29:17.940 or in Ottawa
00:29:18.620 you've been between
00:29:19.760 those two cities
00:29:20.580 quite a lot
00:29:21.160 over the last two years.
00:29:22.720 You are a lawyer
00:29:23.700 not just for Tamara Leach
00:29:25.080 but you were
00:29:25.760 the interlocutor
00:29:27.020 you were the negotiator
00:29:28.440 out in Ottawa.
00:29:30.920 Tell me first
00:29:31.880 your reaction
00:29:32.580 to this ruling.
00:29:33.620 I'm pleasantly surprised
00:29:35.460 I didn't think
00:29:36.000 they had a hope.
00:29:37.220 I mean so many
00:29:37.840 court rulings
00:29:38.400 have gone against freedom
00:29:39.600 over the last two years.
00:29:41.160 I'm frankly stunned
00:29:42.540 by this
00:29:42.980 and I think the liberals
00:29:43.640 were too.
00:29:44.360 Let me ask you that first
00:29:45.480 did you expect this
00:29:46.660 or was this just
00:29:47.560 a hope too far
00:29:48.720 to hope?
00:29:50.140 I actually was
00:29:51.200 holding out hope.
00:29:52.500 I'm here in my office
00:29:53.720 in Edmonton
00:29:54.420 and
00:29:55.100 I have said
00:29:58.400 many times
00:29:59.380 when people
00:30:00.840 were expressing
00:30:01.620 dismay
00:30:02.200 about the Rouleau ruling
00:30:03.680 from the public inquiry
00:30:06.300 and the commission inquiry
00:30:07.860 that Justice Rouleau led
00:30:09.200 that I was like
00:30:10.440 you know
00:30:10.820 I thought
00:30:13.140 it was political theater
00:30:14.880 it became pretty clear
00:30:15.700 that's what it was
00:30:16.360 near the end
00:30:16.980 and I was holding out hope
00:30:19.820 that the court
00:30:20.900 would apply the facts
00:30:22.460 to the law
00:30:23.160 and conclude the obvious
00:30:25.100 which is
00:30:26.060 the legal test
00:30:27.860 for the invocation
00:30:28.960 wasn't met
00:30:29.760 the Coutts border
00:30:31.480 was opened
00:30:32.060 on the weekend
00:30:32.960 in that February
00:30:35.320 of 2022
00:30:36.240 the Windsor
00:30:37.320 and all the other blockades
00:30:38.360 were cleared
00:30:38.960 on the Saturday
00:30:40.420 and Sunday
00:30:41.060 the trucker leadership
00:30:42.160 in Ottawa
00:30:42.620 had negotiated
00:30:43.420 a deal
00:30:43.800 with the mayor
00:30:44.280 of Ottawa
00:30:44.700 to relocate
00:30:45.680 the trucks
00:30:46.220 out of the residential areas
00:30:47.600 and consolidate them
00:30:48.780 up onto Wellington
00:30:50.100 in front of the prime minister's office
00:30:51.780 and the parliament buildings
00:30:53.080 to give the protest
00:30:55.340 longer staying power
00:30:57.140 and so
00:30:58.840 there was no justification
00:31:00.580 there was no crisis
00:31:01.820 there was no insurrection
00:31:02.720 there was no interference
00:31:03.540 with international trade
00:31:04.500 none of the legal tests
00:31:05.300 were met
00:31:05.720 and the court
00:31:06.680 has confirmed
00:31:07.300 that that is in fact
00:31:08.180 the case
00:31:08.680 the legal test
00:31:09.640 wasn't met
00:31:10.180 but it went a step further
00:31:11.860 and this is great cause
00:31:13.180 for hope
00:31:13.680 is they also
00:31:15.140 the federal court
00:31:16.200 has said
00:31:16.800 that charter rights
00:31:19.460 were violated
00:31:20.040 so even if they met
00:31:21.300 the test
00:31:21.960 to invoke
00:31:23.660 which they didn't
00:31:24.180 the charter rights
00:31:26.140 for violence
00:31:26.520 section 8
00:31:27.060 in particular
00:31:27.700 you're right
00:31:28.100 against unlawful search
00:31:29.340 and seizure
00:31:29.700 relating specifically
00:31:31.200 to the outrageous
00:31:32.540 tyrannical act
00:31:33.660 of freezing
00:31:34.620 hundreds of Canadians
00:31:36.400 bank accounts
00:31:37.160 and cancelling
00:31:37.800 their credit cards
00:31:38.540 you know
00:31:39.220 Chrystia Freeland
00:31:40.080 was twitching
00:31:40.800 more than she normally does
00:31:42.180 when she was in front
00:31:43.120 of the mic today
00:31:43.860 and because she
00:31:45.260 as much as anyone
00:31:46.680 was the public face
00:31:47.760 of the martial law
00:31:49.620 yeah Marco Mendocino
00:31:50.680 but we learned
00:31:51.520 from the public order
00:31:52.280 inquiry commission
00:31:53.000 that he was just
00:31:54.120 a useful idiot
00:31:55.360 he wasn't even fully
00:31:56.540 briefed by his own staff
00:31:57.620 it was Chrystia Freeland
00:31:58.500 that was contacting
00:31:59.540 the banks
00:31:59.980 and saying
00:32:00.280 seize that account
00:32:01.760 seize this account
00:32:03.000 I want to ask you
00:32:04.720 one more thing
00:32:05.320 before we go back
00:32:05.980 to Chad for a second
00:32:07.180 Keith I know
00:32:08.420 you were negotiating
00:32:09.360 literally day by day
00:32:10.580 even hour by hour
00:32:11.920 out there in Ottawa
00:32:13.280 with the Ottawa police
00:32:14.800 and I want you to say
00:32:15.760 again what you've
00:32:16.520 told me before
00:32:17.580 which is that
00:32:18.620 you were in full
00:32:20.560 communication
00:32:21.680 open communication
00:32:22.920 with the city
00:32:24.160 and with the Ottawa police
00:32:25.720 managing
00:32:26.780 the convoy
00:32:28.780 keeping lanes open
00:32:30.120 moving away
00:32:31.000 from residential areas
00:32:32.320 moving these trucks
00:32:33.480 over there
00:32:34.040 and these trucks
00:32:34.600 over there
00:32:34.980 it was cooperative
00:32:36.040 there was some tension
00:32:37.020 for sure
00:32:37.620 but it was a relationship
00:32:39.460 building on trust
00:32:40.820 and it
00:32:41.800 and you were
00:32:42.640 sort of the official
00:32:43.980 negotiator
00:32:44.880 now I want you to
00:32:46.000 say it in your own words
00:32:46.780 because I don't want
00:32:47.320 to get a word wrong
00:32:48.160 but I believe
00:32:49.580 you've told me
00:32:50.360 that there was a deal
00:32:51.640 there was a deal
00:32:53.480 between the truckers
00:32:54.460 and the city of Ottawa
00:32:55.620 and instead of ratifying
00:32:57.860 that deal
00:32:58.480 Justin Trudeau
00:32:59.240 pulled the trigger
00:33:00.020 on martial law
00:33:00.940 because he didn't want
00:33:02.100 there to be a deal
00:33:02.840 because he wanted that
00:33:04.060 drama teacher
00:33:05.220 drama move
00:33:06.440 you and the truckers
00:33:08.540 in Ottawa
00:33:08.940 actually were in full
00:33:10.080 compliance with everything
00:33:10.980 the police wanted
00:33:11.840 but Trudeau was worried
00:33:13.600 he was going to lose
00:33:14.180 his moment
00:33:14.620 so he invoked
00:33:15.520 martial law
00:33:16.220 right when you guys
00:33:17.340 had a deal
00:33:17.700 can you tell me
00:33:18.440 if I got that right
00:33:19.360 and fill in any gaps
00:33:20.380 if I got it wrong
00:33:21.200 sure that's absolutely
00:33:23.180 what happened
00:33:23.740 we had the deal
00:33:24.580 on the Saturday
00:33:25.340 it was publicly
00:33:27.480 announced on the Sunday
00:33:28.580 we implemented the deal
00:33:30.840 with the cooperation
00:33:31.920 of the city police
00:33:32.640 you can see footage
00:33:33.480 out there
00:33:33.960 where the trucks
00:33:35.200 are being escorted
00:33:36.240 by police
00:33:36.960 with flashing lights
00:33:38.020 up onto Wellington
00:33:39.320 and we cleared
00:33:42.040 two city blocks
00:33:42.960 on the Monday
00:33:44.500 moved 123
00:33:46.200 vehicles out
00:33:47.280 in the residential
00:33:49.360 type areas
00:33:50.160 of downtown
00:33:50.640 and I was in
00:33:52.840 constant communication
00:33:53.920 with the mayor's
00:33:54.700 chief of staff
00:33:55.500 and the city manager
00:33:56.800 Steve Kanellakis
00:33:57.740 and I still remember
00:33:59.480 on the Tuesday
00:34:00.120 we got stopped
00:34:00.980 due to miscommunication
00:34:01.920 with the police
00:34:02.620 because they had
00:34:03.020 to move barricades
00:34:03.800 and we got
00:34:04.140 we're about to move
00:34:05.000 trucks again
00:34:05.620 and they apologized
00:34:07.680 for it
00:34:08.120 all of my text messages
00:34:09.340 have been used
00:34:10.460 in evidence
00:34:10.980 both in the criminal
00:34:11.780 trial for Chris
00:34:12.640 and Tamara
00:34:13.060 as well as
00:34:14.320 in the public inquiry
00:34:15.300 but the most crucial
00:34:16.840 moment
00:34:17.400 was on the Wednesday
00:34:18.500 morning
00:34:18.980 after the invocation
00:34:20.520 of the emergencies act
00:34:21.740 we were ready
00:34:22.480 to move trucks again
00:34:23.540 and I got a phone call
00:34:24.960 from Steve Kay
00:34:25.920 Steve Kanellakis
00:34:26.980 the city manager
00:34:27.680 for the city of Ottawa
00:34:28.600 and he confirmed
00:34:29.720 what I'm about to say
00:34:30.660 in his testimony
00:34:31.400 before the public inquiry
00:34:32.760 his tone
00:34:33.920 was so
00:34:34.400 like
00:34:35.060 sorrowful
00:34:36.600 and sad
00:34:38.100 and he's like
00:34:39.180 Keith
00:34:39.500 we gave it
00:34:40.040 our best shot
00:34:40.920 but the federal government
00:34:42.440 doesn't want this to happen
00:34:43.940 they're blocking
00:34:44.960 any further moves
00:34:46.160 so Trudeau
00:34:47.780 had figured out
00:34:48.340 what we were doing
00:34:49.060 in terms of de-escalating
00:34:50.420 the mayor's position
00:34:51.740 was
00:34:52.360 he communicated
00:34:53.500 to us
00:34:54.220 that he said
00:34:54.940 if you move up
00:34:55.660 into Wellington
00:34:56.220 and consolidate up there
00:34:57.540 I don't care
00:34:58.180 if you stay there
00:34:58.820 for months
00:34:59.360 because that's
00:34:59.880 where your grievance is
00:35:00.760 with the federal government
00:35:02.000 so that was our move
00:35:02.980 the federal government
00:35:04.340 the Trudeau liberals
00:35:05.400 wanted to
00:35:06.600 I think they wanted
00:35:07.220 to send a message
00:35:07.980 to Canadians Ezra
00:35:09.040 that don't you dare
00:35:10.240 challenge us
00:35:11.140 you'll regret it
00:35:12.200 yeah
00:35:12.540 I think you're so right
00:35:13.440 now Chad
00:35:14.020 I want to bring you in here
00:35:15.480 because you have
00:35:16.300 a similar story
00:35:18.160 I think
00:35:18.920 and again
00:35:19.660 I'm relying on you
00:35:20.600 to correct me
00:35:21.080 because you were
00:35:21.520 the guy down there
00:35:22.260 the Cooch blockade
00:35:23.140 you
00:35:23.380 and your partners
00:35:24.500 sort of
00:35:25.260 did rotating shifts
00:35:26.540 and what Keith
00:35:27.160 was doing
00:35:27.660 out in Ottawa
00:35:28.280 you were that same liaison
00:35:30.040 with the RCMP
00:35:31.140 down there in Cooch
00:35:32.020 and I'm really glad
00:35:32.580 you were
00:35:33.040 first of all
00:35:34.200 I'd like you to confirm
00:35:35.080 for me
00:35:35.400 that there was no
00:35:36.060 violence whatsoever
00:35:37.100 and in fact
00:35:38.140 your advice
00:35:38.840 to the truckers
00:35:40.280 was always
00:35:40.800 keep it lawful guys
00:35:41.760 civil disobedience
00:35:42.760 nothing more rambunctious
00:35:44.960 but suddenly
00:35:46.720 I remember
00:35:47.500 it was the day
00:35:48.260 before the invocation
00:35:49.340 of the martial law
00:35:50.440 you correct me
00:35:51.000 if my memory's wrong
00:35:51.920 that the Mounties
00:35:54.060 had a big press release
00:35:55.380 we found some shotguns
00:35:57.420 and some hunting rifles
00:35:58.460 not in the saloon
00:35:59.720 but we found them
00:36:00.640 somewhere else
00:36:01.460 and they laid them out
00:36:02.560 in a beautiful photo op
00:36:04.080 and I looked at
00:36:05.020 I said
00:36:05.360 you know
00:36:05.600 that's probably scary
00:36:06.360 to city slickers
00:36:07.040 in Toronto
00:36:07.640 or Vancouver
00:36:08.300 or Ottawa
00:36:08.740 but that's just
00:36:09.640 sort of regular
00:36:10.320 for down there
00:36:11.260 in Cooch
00:36:12.160 like that's hunting
00:36:12.880 that's duck hunting
00:36:13.760 and frankly
00:36:15.260 it's sort of weird
00:36:17.080 if you don't have a gun
00:36:17.980 if you're down in Cooch
00:36:19.160 I take
00:36:20.080 what Keith just said
00:36:21.700 in Ottawa
00:36:22.160 and that RCMP
00:36:23.420 photo op
00:36:25.880 as the liberals
00:36:26.960 panicky attempt
00:36:28.320 to rebrand
00:36:29.680 a completely peaceful movement
00:36:31.300 both in Ottawa
00:36:32.060 and in Cooch
00:36:32.880 to rebrand it as
00:36:34.020 quote
00:36:34.300 serious violence
00:36:35.740 that's the language
00:36:36.440 I just quoted
00:36:37.140 from the CSIS Act
00:36:38.540 that's the language
00:36:39.240 this judge
00:36:39.840 was leaning on
00:36:40.840 they needed evidence
00:36:42.380 of quote
00:36:42.900 serious violence
00:36:44.400 they had none
00:36:45.440 so they broke off
00:36:46.820 the peace deal
00:36:47.680 in Ottawa
00:36:48.320 and trumped up
00:36:50.060 oh we found a shotgun
00:36:51.300 guys
00:36:51.740 that'll scare you
00:36:52.760 Toronto liberals
00:36:53.560 Chad
00:36:54.540 what was it
00:36:55.140 was that
00:36:55.740 was that the feeling
00:36:57.080 you had there
00:36:57.880 in Cooch
00:36:58.460 look Ezra
00:37:00.620 so this is going
00:37:01.260 to be a little
00:37:02.000 bit more difficult
00:37:02.700 for me
00:37:03.260 than it might be
00:37:04.000 for Keith
00:37:04.500 as you know
00:37:05.100 there's the
00:37:05.760 proceedings against
00:37:06.960 who are kind of
00:37:08.080 collectively known
00:37:08.820 as the Cooch Four
00:37:10.000 now these are the
00:37:10.940 gents who were
00:37:11.860 charged with
00:37:13.200 among other things
00:37:14.160 conspiracy
00:37:14.740 to commit murder
00:37:15.840 obviously they're
00:37:16.560 the subject
00:37:17.220 of these
00:37:18.360 these
00:37:19.540 these
00:37:20.080 these
00:37:20.420 these alleged
00:37:21.220 gun charges
00:37:22.220 that's currently
00:37:23.520 before the court
00:37:24.640 we don't represent
00:37:25.820 them
00:37:26.180 and unfortunately
00:37:27.320 my knowledge
00:37:28.160 in respect
00:37:28.800 of that particular
00:37:29.480 case is
00:37:30.220 is really
00:37:31.220 quite limited
00:37:32.220 now as you
00:37:33.460 also might know
00:37:34.340 there's three
00:37:35.280 other gentlemen
00:37:35.940 colloquially known
00:37:38.300 as the Cooch Three
00:37:39.400 who are the
00:37:40.820 alleged organizers
00:37:42.020 of the Cooch
00:37:42.620 blockade
00:37:43.140 now this is also
00:37:44.180 coming before the
00:37:45.160 courts in a
00:37:45.860 three-week jury
00:37:47.080 trial coming up
00:37:48.600 later this spring
00:37:49.420 and we've got
00:37:50.060 another pretrial
00:37:51.220 pretrial applications
00:37:52.900 to be heard
00:37:53.620 close to the end
00:37:54.660 of February on this
00:37:55.500 so these issues
00:37:56.600 are before the
00:37:57.960 courts now
00:37:58.920 now my role
00:38:00.200 down in Cooch
00:38:00.940 I'm
00:38:01.260 I'm
00:38:01.740 I'm
00:38:02.020 I'm
00:38:02.960 I'm okay
00:38:03.560 to acknowledge
00:38:04.880 that we were
00:38:05.420 there to provide
00:38:06.340 your standard
00:38:07.640 criminal and
00:38:08.580 charter advice
00:38:09.840 to anybody
00:38:10.620 on the ground
00:38:11.720 piecemeal
00:38:12.580 as they'd come
00:38:13.260 so the way
00:38:13.700 that we always
00:38:14.220 looked at it
00:38:14.880 is there'd be
00:38:16.120 a retainer
00:38:17.000 when someone
00:38:17.380 came up
00:38:17.800 to ask us
00:38:18.400 for a question
00:38:19.040 that retain
00:38:19.980 retainer ended
00:38:20.780 after the provision
00:38:21.620 of summary advice
00:38:22.540 and obviously
00:38:23.160 those legal services
00:38:24.780 were crowdfunded
00:38:25.860 now we did
00:38:27.040 assist and
00:38:28.400 observe some
00:38:29.600 of the negotiations
00:38:30.680 again that was
00:38:32.680 whether that was
00:38:33.540 me or whether
00:38:34.260 that was Martin
00:38:35.040 it just depends
00:38:36.500 on the timing
00:38:37.780 what I will say
00:38:39.620 is everything
00:38:41.040 at least from
00:38:42.140 kind of an
00:38:42.760 outsider perspective
00:38:43.880 after the fact
00:38:45.020 because I was
00:38:45.600 not down there
00:38:46.860 at the
00:38:48.540 at the moment
00:38:49.500 when the
00:38:50.000 when the guns
00:38:51.180 were alleged
00:38:51.660 to have been
00:38:52.280 discovered
00:38:52.840 in I suppose
00:38:55.500 a trailer
00:38:56.180 but it
00:38:58.000 smacked
00:38:58.600 to me
00:38:58.940 Ezra
00:38:59.280 that this
00:38:59.720 was
00:39:00.080 politically
00:39:01.040 motivated
00:39:01.720 we know
00:39:02.100 that Jason
00:39:02.620 Kenny
00:39:02.940 was getting
00:39:03.440 a lot
00:39:03.740 of pushback
00:39:04.660 from the
00:39:05.440 grassroots
00:39:06.060 conservative
00:39:06.740 movement
00:39:07.160 in rural
00:39:07.660 Alberta
00:39:08.160 and what
00:39:09.860 we've seen
00:39:10.420 at least
00:39:10.920 and while
00:39:11.660 this might
00:39:12.040 be anecdotal
00:39:12.700 in other
00:39:13.240 cases
00:39:13.740 and we've
00:39:14.400 run a ton
00:39:14.880 of these
00:39:15.180 cases
00:39:15.540 whether it's
00:39:16.080 the COVID
00:39:16.860 kind of
00:39:17.500 restaurant
00:39:17.840 rebellion
00:39:18.260 cases
00:39:18.740 and the
00:39:19.700 lockdowns
00:39:20.900 you know
00:39:21.760 looking at
00:39:22.300 even
00:39:23.140 even
00:39:23.480 Minister
00:39:24.040 Gilbeau
00:39:24.520 blocking
00:39:25.200 rebel news
00:39:26.020 on Twitter
00:39:26.600 it's become
00:39:27.680 very apparent
00:39:28.460 to me
00:39:28.860 that so
00:39:29.500 many of
00:39:30.220 these
00:39:30.400 government
00:39:30.720 decisions
00:39:31.240 are almost
00:39:32.880 wholly
00:39:33.580 politically
00:39:34.260 motivated
00:39:35.040 and what's
00:39:36.700 even more
00:39:37.420 interesting
00:39:37.820 is they're
00:39:39.080 all getting
00:39:39.440 smacked down
00:39:40.020 by the court
00:39:40.540 and I suppose
00:39:41.100 that should
00:39:41.580 lend a degree
00:39:42.440 of confidence
00:39:43.900 to kind
00:39:44.800 of the
00:39:45.220 you know
00:39:45.540 the freedom
00:39:46.080 movement
00:39:46.580 but for
00:39:47.280 whatever reason
00:39:47.900 despite all
00:39:48.640 these
00:39:48.920 quite literally
00:39:50.100 hundreds of
00:39:51.040 victories against
00:39:52.000 the forces
00:39:53.000 of authoritarianism
00:39:54.320 and government
00:39:56.500 overreach
00:39:57.240 I'm still
00:39:58.220 gobsmacked
00:39:58.980 every time
00:39:59.900 there's a
00:40:00.360 victory in
00:40:01.020 the courtroom
00:40:01.700 what we've
00:40:03.260 seen though
00:40:03.940 is we've
00:40:04.500 seen at
00:40:05.380 least in
00:40:05.760 the case
00:40:06.120 of the
00:40:06.420 federal
00:40:06.760 government
00:40:07.300 a government
00:40:08.160 that has
00:40:08.880 at every
00:40:09.760 single turn
00:40:10.980 acted
00:40:11.780 politically
00:40:12.400 and
00:40:12.860 unconstitutionally
00:40:13.840 whether it's
00:40:14.280 the plastics
00:40:15.000 ban that got
00:40:15.960 overturned
00:40:16.640 and then have
00:40:17.040 the liberals
00:40:17.440 say
00:40:17.720 well
00:40:18.020 we don't
00:40:19.040 really care
00:40:19.500 about the
00:40:19.940 court's
00:40:20.380 decision
00:40:20.740 or we
00:40:21.080 don't agree
00:40:21.560 with it
00:40:21.940 and then try
00:40:22.380 to perhaps
00:40:23.060 find some
00:40:23.560 other mechanism
00:40:24.300 to try
00:40:25.480 to get
00:40:26.180 at the
00:40:26.480 ends
00:40:26.900 that they're
00:40:29.120 looking for
00:40:29.800 also
00:40:30.860 we've seen
00:40:31.840 this robust
00:40:32.940 blocking
00:40:33.480 of
00:40:33.780 journalists
00:40:35.120 on Twitter
00:40:35.780 we saw
00:40:36.400 an RCMP
00:40:37.700 member
00:40:38.240 slam
00:40:38.860 David Menzies
00:40:39.900 head into
00:40:40.920 a wall
00:40:41.420 when he was
00:40:41.820 just asking
00:40:42.400 some questions
00:40:43.120 if you compare
00:40:44.140 that to the
00:40:44.840 treatment
00:40:45.180 I suppose
00:40:45.920 of Rebel News
00:40:46.720 by the police
00:40:47.660 in Switzerland
00:40:48.640 during the
00:40:49.820 WEF
00:40:50.540 forum
00:40:50.940 it doesn't
00:40:53.600 take a rocket
00:40:54.400 scientist
00:40:54.920 with more
00:40:55.500 than a couple
00:40:55.940 IQ points
00:40:56.640 to rub
00:40:56.960 together
00:40:57.340 to understand
00:40:58.480 that a lot
00:40:59.400 of this stuff
00:41:00.040 is politically
00:41:00.660 motivated
00:41:01.320 and perhaps
00:41:01.980 a lot of this
00:41:02.840 stuff is just
00:41:03.400 coming from
00:41:04.080 the office
00:41:05.100 of the PMO
00:41:05.880 again
00:41:06.380 I'm a lawyer
00:41:07.200 and my
00:41:08.120 opinion
00:41:08.420 is mostly
00:41:09.020 based on
00:41:09.620 evidence
00:41:10.020 not necessarily
00:41:11.020 anecdotal
00:41:11.700 conclusions
00:41:12.340 but it seems
00:41:13.520 like the
00:41:13.820 writing to me
00:41:14.460 is on the
00:41:14.940 wall
00:41:15.200 by the time
00:41:16.240 that the
00:41:16.640 emergency
00:41:17.380 measures act
00:41:18.240 was invocated
00:41:19.300 the blockades
00:41:20.120 largely had
00:41:20.820 been cleared
00:41:21.500 I mean
00:41:22.720 freezing bank
00:41:23.980 accounts of
00:41:24.560 single mothers
00:41:25.360 for sending
00:41:26.080 20 bucks
00:41:27.000 to
00:41:27.340 GoFundMe
00:41:29.700 or to
00:41:30.340 a Bitcoin
00:41:31.120 address
00:41:31.860 that smacks
00:41:33.620 of
00:41:33.940 Stalinism
00:41:35.020 and
00:41:36.040 fascism
00:41:37.400 it's
00:41:38.240 absolutely
00:41:38.940 unacceptable
00:41:39.600 and I think
00:41:40.220 that the
00:41:41.300 court's decision
00:41:42.000 in this case
00:41:42.780 really was
00:41:43.460 a slap back
00:41:45.120 at the
00:41:45.360 government
00:41:45.640 obviously
00:41:46.480 the first
00:41:48.020 thing that
00:41:48.360 the liberals
00:41:48.780 come out
00:41:49.200 and say
00:41:49.520 is that
00:41:49.800 well
00:41:49.980 they're
00:41:50.140 going to
00:41:50.340 appeal it
00:41:50.900 so
00:41:51.200 I guess
00:41:52.160 my optimism
00:41:52.740 needs to
00:41:53.160 be tempered
00:41:53.720 to some
00:41:54.040 degree
00:41:54.320 because
00:41:54.580 we really
00:41:54.960 need to
00:41:55.360 see
00:41:55.520 if they
00:41:55.820 do
00:41:56.060 in fact
00:41:56.480 intend
00:41:56.840 on
00:41:57.040 appealing
00:41:57.340 this
00:41:57.600 decision
00:41:58.040 what an
00:41:58.640 appellate
00:41:59.080 panel
00:41:59.400 at the
00:41:59.720 federal
00:42:00.100 court
00:42:01.380 will
00:42:01.680 rule
00:42:02.700 it's
00:42:03.200 a lengthy
00:42:03.580 decision
00:42:04.120 and I
00:42:04.820 think
00:42:04.980 it's
00:42:05.140 a guarded
00:42:05.600 decision
00:42:06.140 and one
00:42:06.960 thing
00:42:07.140 that I
00:42:07.380 know
00:42:07.540 about
00:42:07.780 what they
00:42:08.400 call
00:42:08.580 first
00:42:09.020 instance
00:42:09.640 judges
00:42:10.200 or
00:42:10.760 justices
00:42:11.600 who
00:42:11.840 are
00:42:12.060 basically
00:42:12.660 the
00:42:12.920 first
00:42:13.320 court
00:42:13.700 to
00:42:13.920 hear
00:42:14.220 something
00:42:14.700 is
00:42:15.500 really
00:42:15.940 it's
00:42:16.400 their
00:42:16.560 job
00:42:16.900 to
00:42:17.080 try
00:42:17.360 to
00:42:17.780 render
00:42:18.380 a
00:42:18.780 robust
00:42:19.340 decision
00:42:19.940 that
00:42:20.960 can
00:42:21.160 potentially
00:42:21.680 have
00:42:22.780 as
00:42:23.140 limited
00:42:23.660 avenues
00:42:24.640 for
00:42:25.000 appeal
00:42:25.420 as
00:42:25.620 possible
00:42:26.040 so
00:42:26.340 it'll
00:42:26.900 take
00:42:27.080 some
00:42:27.280 creative
00:42:27.620 lawyering
00:42:28.100 I think
00:42:28.440 on the
00:42:28.700 part
00:42:28.980 of
00:42:29.220 the
00:42:30.300 liberal
00:42:30.560 government
00:42:31.000 to try
00:42:31.440 to overturn
00:42:31.860 this
00:42:32.160 decision
00:42:32.580 I
00:42:32.880 want to
00:42:33.220 see
00:42:33.500 how
00:42:33.880 the
00:42:34.120 CBC
00:42:34.580 is
00:42:35.340 handling
00:42:35.680 this
00:42:35.940 this
00:42:36.100 must
00:42:36.300 be a
00:42:36.580 very
00:42:36.820 dark
00:42:37.500 day
00:42:38.080 for
00:42:38.420 them
00:42:38.700 can
00:42:39.240 you
00:42:39.360 go to
00:42:39.640 the
00:42:39.820 CBC
00:42:40.260 and
00:42:41.260 can
00:42:44.860 you
00:42:45.200 let's
00:42:45.540 read it
00:42:45.880 together
00:42:46.180 I'm
00:42:46.520 laughing
00:42:47.080 in
00:42:47.280 advance
00:42:47.760 I'm
00:42:48.340 laughing
00:42:48.960 in
00:42:49.180 advance
00:42:49.620 federal
00:42:50.840 federal
00:42:50.860 government
00:42:51.280 decision
00:42:51.900 to invoke
00:42:52.680 emergency
00:42:53.120 act
00:42:53.540 against
00:42:53.840 convoy
00:42:54.340 protests
00:42:54.720 was
00:42:54.940 unreasonable
00:42:55.740 court
00:42:56.160 rules
00:42:56.520 government
00:42:57.200 says
00:42:57.500 it
00:42:57.640 plans
00:42:57.860 to
00:42:58.000 appeal
00:42:58.200 to
00:42:58.360 the
00:42:58.380 decision
00:42:58.600 so
00:42:58.760 let's
00:42:59.000 stop
00:42:59.220 right
00:42:59.440 there
00:42:59.800 it's
00:43:01.600 not
00:43:01.780 Justin
00:43:02.160 Trudeau's
00:43:02.620 decision
00:43:03.080 it's
00:43:04.000 not
00:43:04.160 Christian
00:43:04.460 Freeland's
00:43:04.960 decision
00:43:05.260 here's
00:43:05.860 how it
00:43:06.060 works
00:43:06.200 at the
00:43:06.440 CBC
00:43:06.780 if
00:43:07.400 there's
00:43:07.660 good
00:43:07.960 news
00:43:08.520 Trudeau
00:43:09.580 did
00:43:09.880 this
00:43:10.360 Freeland
00:43:10.920 did
00:43:11.180 that
00:43:11.440 if
00:43:11.600 it's
00:43:11.760 good
00:43:11.940 news
00:43:12.120 it's
00:43:12.260 very
00:43:12.420 personal
00:43:12.740 or
00:43:13.080 liberals
00:43:13.600 do
00:43:13.880 this
00:43:14.020 but
00:43:14.320 if
00:43:14.460 it's
00:43:19.620 decision
00:43:21.720 to invoke
00:43:22.120 emergency
00:43:22.440 act
00:43:22.820 against
00:43:23.100 convoy
00:43:23.560 protests
00:43:24.020 was
00:43:24.360 unreasonable
00:43:25.720 well
00:43:26.640 it did
00:43:27.320 say that
00:43:27.860 but it
00:43:28.160 said a lot
00:43:28.520 more than
00:43:28.840 that
00:43:29.020 didn't
00:43:29.240 it
00:43:29.400 it
00:43:29.540 said
00:43:29.700 it
00:43:29.800 was
00:43:30.000 illegal
00:43:31.240 unjustifiable
00:43:32.580 and
00:43:33.080 unconstitutional
00:43:33.860 isn't it funny
00:43:34.480 that the CBC
00:43:35.120 says it was
00:43:35.580 just unreasonable
00:43:36.240 yeah it wasn't
00:43:37.060 reasonable
00:43:37.580 guys
00:43:37.840 no
00:43:38.140 it was
00:43:38.900 it was
00:43:39.380 breaking
00:43:39.740 the law
00:43:40.380 you
00:43:41.000 government
00:43:41.780 hacks
00:43:42.460 you
00:43:42.700 paid
00:43:43.620 for
00:43:44.040 propagandas
00:43:44.940 I have
00:43:45.920 to tell
00:43:46.260 you again
00:43:46.780 that if
00:43:47.780 you need
00:43:48.120 an
00:43:48.280 adjective
00:43:48.800 next
00:43:49.240 to the
00:43:49.480 word
00:43:49.640 journalist
00:43:50.220 you're
00:43:50.640 not
00:43:50.840 a
00:43:51.040 journalist
00:43:51.480 so
00:43:52.600 these
00:43:52.860 government
00:43:53.440 journalists
00:43:54.000 of the
00:43:54.420 CBC
00:43:54.860 state
00:43:55.260 broadcaster
00:43:55.960 are
00:43:56.280 wicked
00:43:56.800 liars
00:43:57.680 never
00:43:58.240 trust
00:43:59.120 the
00:43:59.420 CBC
00:43:59.840 they were
00:44:00.540 the number
00:44:00.840 one
00:44:01.080 haters
00:44:01.700 during
00:44:02.340 the
00:44:02.500 convoy
00:44:02.900 they were
00:44:03.140 the ones
00:44:03.460 who compiled
00:44:04.120 the enemies
00:44:05.000 list
00:44:05.400 that was
00:44:06.140 blacklisted
00:44:07.400 and had
00:44:08.080 their
00:44:08.220 CBC
00:44:09.280 were the
00:44:10.100 running
00:44:10.380 dogs
00:44:10.760 the
00:44:10.980 stalking
00:44:11.480 horses
00:44:11.840 they were
00:44:12.600 the ones
00:44:13.120 that rounded
00:44:14.320 up the
00:44:14.720 truckers
00:44:15.080 by publishing
00:44:15.680 their names
00:44:16.220 that then
00:44:16.960 went
00:44:17.340 to have
00:44:19.360 their bank
00:44:19.680 accounts
00:44:20.020 seized
00:44:20.400 can you
00:44:21.980 put that
00:44:22.380 CBC
00:44:22.780 news story
00:44:23.300 up again
00:44:23.640 I want
00:44:23.920 to read
00:44:24.200 it
00:44:24.520 let's scroll
00:44:27.760 down a little
00:44:28.280 bit
00:44:28.540 I haven't
00:44:29.520 read this
00:44:29.840 yet but I
00:44:30.240 know it's
00:44:30.480 going to be
00:44:30.720 good
00:44:31.000 a federal
00:44:35.220 judge
00:44:35.760 says the
00:44:36.260 liberal
00:44:36.440 government's
00:44:36.840 use of
00:44:37.100 the
00:44:37.200 emergencies
00:44:37.500 act
00:44:37.780 in early
00:44:38.060 2022
00:44:38.500 to clear
00:44:38.920 convoy
00:44:39.280 protesters
00:44:39.740 was
00:44:40.360 unreasonable
00:44:40.940 and
00:44:41.140 infringed
00:44:41.480 on
00:44:41.600 protesters
00:44:42.060 charter
00:44:42.440 rights
00:44:42.880 I
00:44:44.780 concluded
00:44:45.120 there
00:44:45.320 was
00:44:45.460 no
00:44:45.700 national
00:44:46.200 emergency
00:44:46.560 justifying
00:44:47.080 the
00:44:47.200 invocation
00:44:47.600 of the
00:44:47.780 emergencies
00:44:48.080 act
00:44:48.400 and the
00:44:48.580 decision
00:44:48.860 to do
00:44:49.140 so
00:44:49.320 was
00:44:49.560 therefore
00:44:49.900 unreasonable
00:44:50.840 and
00:44:51.040 ultra
00:44:51.320 viris
00:44:51.760 federal
00:44:52.160 court
00:44:52.620 justice
00:44:53.060 richard
00:44:53.540 mostly
00:44:53.900 wrote
00:44:54.220 in a
00:44:54.860 tuesday
00:44:55.560 decision
00:44:56.040 ultra
00:44:56.640 viris
00:44:56.980 is a
00:44:57.240 latin
00:44:57.500 term
00:44:57.740 used
00:44:57.920 by
00:44:58.080 courts
00:44:58.320 to
00:44:58.460 refer
00:44:58.620 to
00:44:58.760 actions
00:44:59.060 beyond
00:44:59.340 the
00:44:59.540 scope
00:44:59.740 of
00:44:59.860 the
00:44:59.960 law
00:45:00.280 deputy
00:45:02.000 prime
00:45:02.240 minister
00:45:02.460 christian
00:45:02.820 freeland
00:45:03.040 told
00:45:03.260 reporters
00:45:03.740 at a
00:45:04.060 cabinet
00:45:04.300 retreat
00:45:04.600 in
00:45:04.760 montreal
00:45:05.040 that the
00:45:05.280 government
00:45:05.460 plans to
00:45:05.940 appeal
00:45:06.140 the
00:45:06.280 decision
00:45:06.620 where
00:45:07.440 is
00:45:08.280 trudeau
00:45:09.040 where
00:45:09.560 is
00:45:09.780 that
00:45:09.960 little
00:45:10.280 man
00:45:10.840 coward
00:45:11.280 why
00:45:11.920 is
00:45:12.180 he
00:45:12.340 not
00:45:12.700 owning
00:45:13.400 this
00:45:13.840 i
00:45:14.060 know
00:45:14.220 why
00:45:14.520 he
00:45:15.140 wants
00:45:15.300 to
00:45:15.420 push
00:45:15.600 it
00:45:15.720 off
00:45:15.860 on
00:45:16.000 twitchy
00:45:16.420 and
00:45:17.380 he
00:45:17.700 wants
00:45:18.020 headlines
00:45:18.440 like
00:45:18.700 the
00:45:18.960 federal
00:45:19.300 government
00:45:19.800 did
00:45:20.060 something
00:45:20.400 wrong
00:45:20.680 so
00:45:21.380 far
00:45:21.540 i
00:45:21.680 haven't
00:45:22.000 seen
00:45:22.220 justin
00:45:22.600 trudeau
00:45:22.880 name
00:45:23.220 in
00:45:23.360 this
00:45:23.580 report
00:45:23.980 yet
00:45:24.240 have
00:45:24.420 you
00:45:24.600 let's
00:45:25.400 keep
00:45:25.560 reading
00:45:25.880 the
00:45:28.280 federal
00:45:28.620 court
00:45:28.960 case
00:45:29.360 was
00:45:29.940 brought
00:45:30.140 by
00:45:30.280 two
00:45:30.440 national
00:45:30.760 groups
00:45:31.020 the
00:45:31.160 canadian
00:45:31.400 civil
00:45:31.640 liberty
00:45:31.820 association
00:45:32.340 and the
00:45:32.940 canadian
00:45:33.200 constitution
00:45:33.660 foundation
00:45:34.220 and two
00:45:35.480 people whose
00:45:35.900 bank accounts
00:45:36.380 were frozen
00:45:36.780 they argued
00:45:37.280 ottawa did not
00:45:37.960 meet the legal
00:45:38.440 threshold
00:45:38.900 when it invoked
00:45:39.760 the legislation
00:45:40.260 which had never
00:45:40.840 been used
00:45:41.240 before
00:45:41.620 that's a good
00:45:43.400 point to
00:45:43.720 remember right
00:45:44.620 there
00:45:44.960 not even
00:45:46.140 during 9-11
00:45:46.920 was this
00:45:47.360 used
00:45:47.760 trudeau
00:45:48.440 thought that
00:45:49.640 this was the
00:45:50.100 worst crisis
00:45:50.600 canada has
00:45:51.200 had
00:45:51.520 in a
00:45:52.440 generation
00:45:52.900 was it
00:45:53.420 really
00:45:53.620 some hot
00:45:54.120 tubs
00:45:54.460 and bouncy
00:45:54.940 castles
00:45:55.440 thousands of
00:45:57.700 protesters angry
00:45:58.600 with the
00:45:58.900 government's
00:45:59.220 response to
00:45:59.680 the covid-19
00:46:00.320 pandemic
00:46:00.740 including vaccine
00:46:01.540 requirements
00:46:02.000 descended on
00:46:02.960 ottawa in
00:46:03.440 january of
00:46:03.920 2022 and
00:46:05.000 blocked border
00:46:05.620 points elsewhere
00:46:06.340 the protesters
00:46:07.240 parked large
00:46:08.040 vehicles on
00:46:08.740 key arteries in
00:46:09.700 the capital city
00:46:10.300 for nearly a
00:46:10.820 month and
00:46:11.540 honked their
00:46:11.960 horns incessantly
00:46:12.740 for days
00:46:13.680 you okay
00:46:14.540 you guys okay
00:46:15.560 you heard some
00:46:16.020 horns honking
00:46:16.740 i hope you're
00:46:17.180 okay
00:46:17.580 the government
00:46:19.780 invoked the
00:46:20.260 emergencies act
00:46:20.900 on february
00:46:21.440 14th
00:46:21.960 2022
00:46:22.440 it gave law
00:46:24.780 enforcement
00:46:25.140 extraordinary
00:46:25.660 powers to
00:46:26.180 remove and
00:46:26.500 arrest protesters
00:46:27.200 and gave the
00:46:27.580 government the
00:46:27.860 power to freeze
00:46:28.460 the finances of
00:46:29.600 those connected
00:46:30.380 to the protesters
00:46:30.880 what does that
00:46:31.240 mean connected
00:46:31.820 to the temporary
00:46:34.280 emergency powers
00:46:35.000 also gave
00:46:35.420 authorities ability
00:46:36.100 to commandeer
00:46:36.820 tow trucks to
00:46:37.800 remove protesters
00:46:38.600 vehicles from the
00:46:39.320 streets of the
00:46:39.680 capital by the
00:46:40.500 way let me tell
00:46:41.060 you that the
00:46:42.080 criminal code gives
00:46:42.880 police that power
00:46:43.700 too i don't know
00:46:44.220 if you know that
00:46:44.840 you don't need an
00:46:45.740 emergencies act
00:46:46.620 to commandeer a
00:46:48.540 vehicle police can
00:46:49.300 commandeer a
00:46:49.880 vehicle of your
00:46:50.880 doors right now
00:46:51.680 under the criminal
00:46:52.780 code so that's
00:46:54.020 the cbc showing
00:46:54.820 their lack of
00:46:55.900 knowledge i see
00:46:57.900 on our series of
00:47:00.680 monitors that one
00:47:03.260 of my favorite
00:47:03.660 lawyers in the
00:47:04.160 country is now on
00:47:05.060 standby i've gotten
00:47:07.480 to know tamara
00:47:08.100 leach over the last
00:47:08.920 year i really didn't
00:47:09.520 know i hadn't met
00:47:10.480 her even spoken with
00:47:11.240 her before she was
00:47:12.400 arrested but over
00:47:13.100 the course of the
00:47:13.640 last year i've gotten
00:47:14.220 to know her fairly
00:47:14.880 well i've gone on
00:47:15.840 tour with her we
00:47:16.420 published her book
00:47:17.120 which is a national
00:47:18.680 bestseller just
00:47:19.480 outstanding and
00:47:21.000 over the course of
00:47:21.580 the last six months
00:47:22.200 or so i've had the
00:47:22.880 pleasure to meet
00:47:23.540 with and speak to
00:47:24.680 lawrence greenspawn
00:47:25.960 who's a leading
00:47:26.560 criminal lawyer in
00:47:27.600 the city of ottawa
00:47:28.360 who has taken what
00:47:29.740 we all thought would
00:47:30.380 be a case for a
00:47:31.160 couple of weeks
00:47:31.660 it's now stretching
00:47:32.400 on the better part
00:47:33.120 of the year and
00:47:34.240 i'm absolutely
00:47:34.740 delighted to bring
00:47:36.080 him on the show
00:47:36.700 now a man i
00:47:38.140 truly you know god
00:47:39.140 forbid i ever get
00:47:39.960 charged with the
00:47:40.540 crime myself and
00:47:41.260 may it never
00:47:41.720 happen and it
00:47:42.360 never has but god
00:47:43.760 forbid if it does
00:47:44.740 uh lawrence i uh i
00:47:46.880 hope you would take
00:47:47.520 me as a client
00:47:48.180 because i've been so
00:47:49.400 impressed with your
00:47:50.020 work for tamara leach
00:47:51.460 and thank god you're
00:47:52.360 there for her and by
00:47:54.080 the way thanks for
00:47:54.620 taking some time to
00:47:55.420 appear on our live
00:47:56.140 stream we have about
00:47:56.620 8 000 people watching
00:47:57.700 concurrently right now
00:47:58.840 give me your reaction
00:48:00.380 to this astonishing
00:48:01.920 ruling by the federal
00:48:03.140 court which caught me
00:48:04.200 by surprise maybe you
00:48:05.320 thought it was coming
00:48:06.420 but boy i'm
00:48:07.420 surprised give me
00:48:08.180 your reaction
00:48:08.780 well first off thanks
00:48:11.200 for the uh the very
00:48:12.240 kind words uh as
00:48:13.740 Ezra um you don't
00:48:15.660 want to need me but
00:48:16.620 if you ever do i'm
00:48:17.840 there for you okay
00:48:18.620 thank you um this
00:48:22.020 this is you know what
00:48:23.740 we've been saying all
00:48:24.680 along uh the those of
00:48:27.500 the various organizations
00:48:28.920 that appeared before uh
00:48:30.680 the ruleau commission
00:48:31.620 were saying just this
00:48:33.320 this is this was an
00:48:34.840 unnecessary overreaction
00:48:37.600 uh to uh what was
00:48:41.120 certainly in ottawa a
00:48:42.760 uh peaceful protest
00:48:44.680 and uh what uh mr
00:48:48.800 justice mosley who by
00:48:50.940 the way has has is a
00:48:52.400 very experienced federal
00:48:54.300 court judge and has been
00:48:55.580 there for oh 30 years
00:48:58.660 he's a former crown
00:48:59.900 attorney and uh he knows
00:49:02.920 of what he speaks he's
00:49:04.840 found that these uh
00:49:07.140 temporary incredibly uh
00:49:09.640 powerful measures were
00:49:12.100 unconstitutional and uh of
00:49:15.120 course the the knee-jerk
00:49:16.180 reaction of the government
00:49:17.400 is oh yeah we're going to
00:49:18.620 appeal but you know before
00:49:20.580 they appeal this judgment
00:49:22.480 from from it's 190 pages
00:49:24.880 it's thorough it's it's
00:49:27.380 damning and uh they come to
00:49:30.520 the conclusion that that we've
00:49:32.240 been saying all along which is
00:49:33.540 that these emergency measures
00:49:35.800 were completely unnecessary
00:49:37.700 i had a quick skim of the
00:49:40.540 judgment i don't even think
00:49:42.900 that there was the kind of
00:49:44.400 evidence that we've heard
00:49:45.600 in the uh tamara leach
00:49:48.340 chris barber trial about all
00:49:50.720 of the efforts by the
00:49:52.360 demonstrators to try and
00:49:54.300 reduce the footprint i mean
00:49:55.900 those were ongoing pursuance
00:49:57.540 to an agreement as you know
00:49:59.060 which was reached with the
00:50:00.380 mayor of ottawa on february the
00:50:01.900 12th and chris barber and
00:50:04.420 and many others had already
00:50:05.820 taken all kinds of steps
00:50:07.680 trying to reduce the
00:50:09.100 footprint of the impact of
00:50:11.400 the demonstrators on the
00:50:12.800 downtown core and the
00:50:14.200 residents of the downtown
00:50:15.040 core i don't even see any
00:50:17.020 mention of that in the
00:50:18.500 mosley decision uh but when
00:50:20.960 you when you look at that
00:50:22.160 and you look at what was
00:50:23.040 going on almost from the
00:50:25.640 start of the demonstration
00:50:27.220 the efforts to try and reduce
00:50:28.940 the footprint uh there was
00:50:31.060 absolutely no need uh for
00:50:34.100 trudeau to do what he did
00:50:35.520 and uh not only that that
00:50:38.400 there was some question
00:50:39.700 about did he even realize
00:50:41.500 did anybody actually tell
00:50:43.000 him about what was going on
00:50:44.720 in the streets right in front
00:50:45.980 of parliament because you
00:50:48.320 know there was a genuine
00:50:49.880 effort on a daily basis they
00:50:51.640 had actually already moved
00:50:53.320 40 of the big rigs uh had
00:50:56.640 been moved uh and and this
00:50:59.380 was part of the the agreement
00:51:01.320 that had been struck with
00:51:02.300 the mayor um there was
00:51:04.140 absolutely not not no need
00:51:06.420 for the emergencies act and
00:51:08.020 every reason not to use
00:51:09.980 these kinds of very powerful
00:51:12.920 measures yeah we spoke
00:51:15.000 earlier with keith wilson who
00:51:16.280 was a lawyer negotiator for the
00:51:17.960 truckers who was on in daily in
00:51:20.620 fact you could even say hourly
00:51:22.200 communication with city
00:51:24.100 officials police officials mayor's
00:51:25.900 office um he was to proactively
00:51:28.820 you're using the phrase reduce
00:51:31.500 the footprint i would say
00:51:33.580 reduce the temperature reduce the
00:51:35.540 friction and you said well it
00:51:38.380 sounds like trudeau didn't know
00:51:39.580 about it a darker interpretation
00:51:41.660 which i would choose is that
00:51:43.240 trudeau absolutely did know about
00:51:45.940 it and that's why he pulled the
00:51:47.420 trigger on february 14th because
00:51:49.600 he didn't want this peace deal that
00:51:51.920 the truckers had negotiated with the
00:51:53.300 city coming into effect i think he
00:51:55.140 realized whoa i'd better if i'm
00:51:56.780 going to use the emergencies act i
00:51:58.120 better do it now because
00:51:59.500 everything is getting calm and
00:52:01.220 calm remember the coots blockade
00:52:03.100 had ended in advance of this so
00:52:05.600 he was running out of
00:52:07.040 justification i think he pulled the
00:52:08.800 trigger because he wanted to be
00:52:10.140 to be dramatic like his father had
00:52:12.620 been during the flq crisis some 50
00:52:15.860 years ago and i think that and that
00:52:18.540 was you know a lot of people had
00:52:20.080 their doubts about that from a
00:52:21.260 civil liberties point of view but
00:52:22.820 trudeau didn't even follow the law
00:52:24.100 we were just going through the law it
00:52:25.880 had to have a serious violence in
00:52:28.140 the order of a revolution or a war
00:52:29.920 or or a true insurrection
00:52:31.720 lawrence was there any violence
00:52:34.500 whatsoever in ottawa that you know
00:52:38.080 of during the entire time the convoy
00:52:40.820 was there i i don't know of any
00:52:42.840 violence on the contrary i mean if
00:52:46.160 there had been uh the crown as you
00:52:49.040 know has now closed their case uh in
00:52:51.880 our in the lich barber uh trial they've
00:52:54.900 closed their case you can be sure
00:52:56.640 that if there was any violence um
00:53:00.080 they would have it would have been
00:53:01.620 front and center in the in the trial
00:53:03.180 uh it's there wasn't any i mean really
00:53:07.920 what the problem was uh with the
00:53:10.580 demonstrators uh is at least in ottawa
00:53:12.940 was ever and most canadians will say
00:53:15.440 this oh yeah i'm all in favor of the
00:53:17.780 freedom of expression and uh right to
00:53:20.880 peaceful assembly they're all in favor
00:53:22.620 of that uh but then unfortunately most
00:53:25.200 canadians will say yeah but it lasted
00:53:27.300 too long it was annoying it was
00:53:29.960 inconvenient well you know
00:53:31.720 constitutional i don't have to tell you
00:53:33.940 that constitutional rights there's no
00:53:35.780 time limit on them and uh there there's
00:53:39.220 a reason that they're called fundamental
00:53:40.680 freedoms and they're enshrined in our
00:53:42.760 constitution and they shouldn't be
00:53:44.980 messed with because the prime minister of
00:53:48.680 the day thinks it well it's i'm going to
00:53:51.100 look good if i come out tough like my
00:53:52.800 dad well when trudeau the senior said you
00:53:56.300 know in answer to the question what would
00:53:58.280 you do in response to uh what's going on
00:54:02.440 and and he turned on his heel and said just
00:54:05.140 watch me canadians across the country were
00:54:08.480 going wow that's great he's a tough guy and
00:54:10.680 he's going to deal with this situation
00:54:12.080 uh that was not the scenario in february of
00:54:16.760 2022 it just it was a completely different
00:54:19.900 non-violent scenario there were there are no
00:54:22.460 cabinet ministers that were being kidnapped or
00:54:24.660 killed um it's far from it and uh what this
00:54:29.060 judgment does is it basically says look this
00:54:31.120 was this was crushing a peanut with a with a
00:54:34.360 sledgehammer when you know the peanut was
00:54:36.660 just lying there there was no violence
00:54:38.460 well those are chunks of the live stream if
00:54:48.400 you want more it actually was about an
00:54:50.240 hour and a half hour and 45 minutes you
00:54:51.740 can go on our youtube channel or our rumble
00:54:54.680 channel and watch the whole thing if you
00:54:56.680 just can't get enough until tomorrow on
00:54:59.100 behalf of all of us here at our world
00:55:00.880 headquarters and around the world good
00:55:03.620 night and keep fighting for freedom
00:55:05.760 and we'll see you next time
00:55:21.820 you