Bill C-63 was reintroduced this week by the Justice Minister, whose title now includes Minister of State for Online Harms. This law is astonishing, if you ve been under a rock or haven t been watching my various shows on it. It creates a sentence of life in prison for hate, and has absurd rules like social media companies must take complaints down, complain about matter down within 24 hours, or face extraordinary fines.
00:01:11.460I can't get over Bill C63, the Online Harms Act. I sort of knew it was coming. This was
00:01:18.420introduced a few years ago by the Heritage Minister, believe it or not, when it was Stephen
00:01:23.540Gilboa. It was reintroduced this week by the Justice Minister, whose title now includes
00:01:28.780Minister of State for Online Harms. That's how important it is to Trudeau. Just a super quick
00:01:34.560summary, if you've been under a rock or haven't been watching my various shows on it. This law is
00:01:40.960astonishing. It creates a sentence of life in prison for hate. It has absurd rules, like social media
00:01:48.880companies must take complaints down, complain about matter down within 24 hours, or face extraordinary
00:01:55.320fines. You can be charged for anything that you write, including historical things. As long as
00:02:02.640they're still on the internet, and you have the ability to take them down, you are liable for those
00:02:07.260words. Words are being criminalized. In particular, if you say anything against people who are transgender,
00:02:13.880they identify as or express as a woman if they're a man, that's one of the particular things that is
00:02:21.900a characteristic you cannot criticize in a manner that would likely lead to hate.
00:02:28.700There's a bounty for nuisance complaints. It's not just going to be prosecutors out there on behalf of
00:02:34.060the government suing people. Anyone, even non-citizens, even secret complainants can file complaints
00:02:40.720against you or you or me and have a hearing and keep their secrecy the whole time. One of the most
00:02:46.560shocking things is preemptive restraining orders with extraordinary powers. For example, on the mere
00:02:53.360suspicion that you may say something hateful, preemptively, you can be put under house arrest.
00:02:59.000You can have to have an ankle brace at one of those monitors. You can be forced to give blood or
00:03:04.580alcohol, sorry, blood or urine tests. It's just very bizarre. It's so bizarre that really smart people
00:03:11.780who read the news a lot just said this can't be true. One of the smartest people I know is Jordan
00:03:18.980Peterson, the professor from Toronto who's actually world famous with his rules for life. I had written
00:03:25.700this little tweet in response to someone who asked a question. Here's what I said, and Jordan Peterson
00:03:31.620saw this. I said, the Online Harms Act specifically states that if there is an offensive publication
00:03:38.180that is still online and you have the ability to delete it, you are liable for it. Literally
00:03:42.940everything you've ever written online will now be actionable against you. Now that doesn't sound
00:03:50.080right. How can that be? Well, Jordan Peterson asked me that question. He said, where does it state that,
00:03:56.540Mr. Levant? He called me Mr. Levant. A genuine question. Well, I saw that a few
00:04:01.540hours later and I wrote back and I said, the bill would create a new section 13-2 of the Canadian
00:04:07.440Human Rights Act. It says you're liable for anything you've ever posted if you have the
00:04:12.740power to remove it now. And then I have a link, a clickable link there. And I say, screenshot below.
00:04:19.700I took a picture of it. And then I said, you can learn more at our website, stopthecensorship.ca. So
00:04:24.240there it is. I think he thought maybe I was exaggerating. And he wrote back cynically or
00:04:30.600sarcastically, he said, excellent, retroactive crime. Thanks, Justin Trudeau. That's an evil I
00:04:36.920hadn't considered before. Sincerely, Satan. His point being, of course, all criminal code
00:04:43.080prosecutions are for things that you have done. But I think he was astonished that anything you've done
00:04:48.220years or even decades ago, if it's online, you can be prosecuted for new rules for what you did
00:04:54.200then when it was legal then. Not only is that a novelty, but of course, the pre-crimes we were
00:05:01.240talking about is a novelty. This law is really about time travel, isn't it? Now, Scott Adams,
00:05:07.200who, as you may know, is the inventor of the Dilbert cartoon, and he's become quite a popular
00:05:12.160political commentator, he saw this exchange between Jordan Peterson and me. He saw my response
00:05:18.980where I had a link to the primary document, the bill itself, and I had a screenshot of it just so
00:05:24.580people didn't have to do the clicking themselves if they didn't want to. It's all that it's in plain
00:05:28.680English. In fact, it's a very short section. And he just didn't believe it. He said, it's too on the
00:05:36.200nose, he said. It's just, it's too crazy. Something's got to be amiss. Here's a clip of his popular
00:05:42.660live stream. Now, here's a story that I swear to God, I can't believe it's true. But, you know,
00:05:49.440Jordan Peterson was interacting with the story, and there was a source was shown. So maybe it's true.
00:05:57.100Canada is introducing the HARMS Act, where the government can put you under house arrest
00:06:04.840or make you wear an ankle bracelet if someone else believes that you might in the future write
00:06:11.360something hateful online. What? If somebody thinks you might in the future write something hateful
00:06:22.340online, Canada can put a bracelet on you and give you house arrest. How can that be true?
00:06:29.540I'm going to put a stake in the story and say it's not true.
00:06:34.840That there's something missing. Now, I saw the source, and it looked like an official bill.
00:06:43.500There's something wrong here. I'm going to say this is too on the nose,
00:06:48.000and that there's no way Canada is going to punish people for a crime they didn't do.
00:06:56.780I'm going to say no. Too on the nose. Now, I get that I saw the source.
00:07:01.840I get that I saw the source. Don't believe it.
00:07:07.000Yeah. I know why he's thinking that is because he's, I'm going to guess he's about 60 years old,
00:07:14.300and his whole life he's seen Canada maybe out of the corner of his eye. Maybe he's visited Canada.
00:07:20.980And he said Canada is sort of like a calmer, slightly more British, slightly more French America.
00:07:27.180They have the same civil liberties, civil democracy, rule of law. These things sound so crazy. It just can't be.
00:07:34.880It just can't be. And I know that instinct. I know that feeling.
00:07:39.620You don't want to give up on your theory of the world, even when an uncomfortable fact comes.
00:07:44.900And the truth is, C-63 is an uncomfortable fact. It is an un-Canadian, unfree, illiberal, authoritarian, tyrannical rule.
00:07:53.660And a lot of friends of Canada would rather just not want to see it or say you must have something wrong than to acknowledge that's the troublesome state we're in.
00:08:03.960I've been watching this issue very closely. I was staying up late just looking at reactions to it.
00:08:09.720And I have actually seen no supporters of C-63 other than paid activists or people who think they will get paid from it.
00:08:20.100But there is no demand for this. Canadians are talking about a lot of things out there.
00:08:25.100Grocery prices, rent prices, out-of-control immigration, carbon taxes, traffic, waiting lists for health care, waiting lines for schools.
00:08:35.320There's a lot of things people are upset about.
00:08:37.320I mean, have you ever heard anyone wandering around saying,
00:08:39.800what we need is for the government to set up, not one, not two, but three new censorship agencies and have a life in prison?
00:08:46.500Like, I've never heard any person say that.
00:08:49.520Bernie Farber, a grifter who is with the Anti-Hate Network, or used to be at least.
00:08:55.080He loves this because this is his business.
00:08:58.020Stephen Camp, who for years was with the Edmonton Police Hate Unit and is now on a Trudeau hate team.
00:09:06.020And to my great embarrassment, one of the official Jewish agencies in this country called CJA, which I think says for Council for Israel and Jewish Affairs, they came out big time for it.
00:09:17.940I was deeply embarrassed that they did so in my name.
00:14:17.940Let me read to you what I wrote online in response to CJ.
00:14:22.900I said, this is a disgrace and it is not supported by ordinary Jews.
00:14:27.880This is a statement by official Jews who happen to have been paid $250,000 by Trudeau.
00:14:33.280And I had a link that I showed you earlier.
00:14:36.040I said, they're Trudeau's house Jews, willing to sell out their own interests for a few bucks.
00:14:40.120They're the corporate equivalent of Anthony Housefather.
00:14:43.300He's a liberal cabinet minister who has decided.
00:14:45.300He said, keeping his cabinet minister's chauffeured limousine, an expense account, is more important to him than representing his conscience or his constituents.
00:14:57.160Philosophically, censorship is contrary to Jewish ethics of debate and dissent.
00:15:01.240Two Jews, three opinions, goes the same.
00:15:03.260Democratically, CJ has no mandate to say this on behalf of anyone.