When does the media say that speech is actually violence, and when do they say that violence is actually speech? It's October 4th, and this is The Ezra LeVant Show, where I'll show you an incredible video of Democratic Party activists stalking and harassing a female senator who happens to be a Democrat.
00:00:00.160Hello, my Rebels. I want to show you an incredible video of Democrat Party activists stalking and harassing a female senator who happens to be a Democrat, too, chasing her into a bathroom, hounding her, a U.S. senator, because she won't spend as much as they want her to. It's actually incredible. The most incredible part is that they published the video themselves. The stalkers did, I mean. I'll show you that and give you some thoughts on it.
00:00:27.980Before I do, let me invite you to become a subscriber to what we call Rebel News Plus. Just go to rebelnewsplus.com and click subscribe. It's eight bucks a month. You get the video version of this podcast.
00:00:44.580You're listening to a Rebel News Podcast.
00:00:47.080Tonight, when does the media say that speech is actually violence? And when do they say that violence is actually speech? It's October 4th, and this is The Ezra LeVant Show.
00:01:04.680Why should others go to jail when you're a biggest carbon consumer I know?
00:01:10.520There's 8,500 customers here, and you won't give them an answer.
00:01:14.580The only thing I have to say to the government about why I publish it is because it's my bloody right to do so.
00:01:25.880Look at this video. I'm going to show it to you in a moment.
00:01:28.260First, let me show you the form in which it was published to the world.
00:01:31.120It was in a tweet on the social media site Twitter with a blue checkmark, which means it's verified.
00:01:38.640It's an official, authoritative account approved by Twitter management.
00:01:42.760The Twitter account belongs to something spelled LUCA, which stands for Living United for Change in Arizona.
00:01:49.960They say they're fighting for social, racial, and economic transformation.
00:01:54.460And here's what they posted on their official Twitter account.
00:01:57.340We wouldn't have to resort to confronting Senator Sinema around Phoenix if she took meetings with the communities that elected her.
00:02:12.540So they're talking about a United States senator from Arizona named Kyrsten Sinema, who, although very woke and checking lots of politically correct boxes, she's a woman, she's young for a senator, she used to be in the Green Party, she's bisexual.
00:02:28.400I mean, that's a pretty good hand if you're playing woke poker.
00:02:30.840But she's surprisingly independent-minded, which maybe shouldn't be so surprising.
00:02:35.880And she doesn't really want to go along with the most aggressive spending and regulatory bill in American history.
00:02:41.060What are they up to now, $3.5 trillion?
00:02:43.560Nobody tell Joe Biden what number comes after a million, billion, trillion.
00:03:09.200Well, some LUCA activists, including an illegal immigrant who is illegally in America, let me repeat, illegal, well, they decided to stalk her, chase her, hound her, and follow her right into the bathroom.
00:04:04.720I was brought here to the United States when I was three years old.
00:04:07.860And in 2010, my grandparents both got deported because of SB 1070.
00:04:12.920And I'm here because I definitely believe that we need a pathway to citizenship.
00:04:17.640My grandfather passed away two weeks ago.
00:04:20.460And I was not able to go to Mexico and visit him because there is no pathway to citizenship.
00:04:25.480And if we have the opportunity to pass it right now, then we need to do it because there's millions of undocumented people just like me who share the same story or even worse things that happened to them because of SB 1070 and because of anti-immigrant legislation.
00:04:40.680And this is the opportunity to pass it right now.
00:04:42.760And we need you to hold you accountable to what you told us, what you promised us that you were going to pass when we knocked on doors for you.
00:05:20.040It is unlawful for any person to knowingly photograph, videotape, film, digitally record, or by any other means secretly view with or without a device, another person without that person's consent under either the following circumstances, one in the restroom, bathroom, locker room, bedroom, or other location where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy and the person is urinating, defecating, dressing, undressing, nude, or involved in sexual encourses.
00:06:00.340By the way, they're going to have justice and solutions that we need for immigration, labor.
00:06:12.980By the way, they've been doing this to her for days.
00:06:20.560I'm surprised they haven't physically battered her yet.
00:06:24.200Here's the same build back better Democrat operatives, excuse me, going after another Democratic senator who isn't left-wing enough for them.
00:06:43.540He apparently paid 220 grand for it, which I can tell you is much cheaper than a condo in D.C.
00:06:48.600And he's a Democrat, mind you, but because, you know, he represents West Virginia and not a hard left-wing state, he's not quite as enthused by Joe Biden's bill.
00:09:51.980The CBC and five subsidized press associations pledge to advocate for initiatives to reduce, if not prevent, online harm, according to a network statement.
00:10:00.860The advocacy comes ahead of Internet censorship bills by Heritage Minister Stephen Legault, including a proposal to block websites and appoint a chief censor called the Digital Safety Commissioner.
00:10:14.620We think industry-wide data will help us to advocate for initiatives to reduce, if not prevent, online harm, Claude Gallupo, CBC Executive Vice President, wrote in the statement.
00:10:23.540The network said it was commissioning a complaint-driven survey to document allegations of hurtful Internet content.
00:10:31.080Questions included, how often have you experienced any of the following as a result of the work you do in the field of journalism or media?
00:10:37.320Threats or harassment online, social media emails, websites, etc.
00:13:10.100I'd like another opinion because two doctors seeing the same set of facts and talking to the patient may come up with another point of view.
00:13:19.800It's something to be encouraged because each patient has different needs.
00:13:23.640How different treating individual patients than treating the mass as if we're ants in an ant colony?
00:13:30.840That's the difference between a doctor with patients and a, quote, public health doctor who's treating the body politic at large.
00:13:38.940Many of the people you see on TV, Dr. Teresa Tam, for example, are really bureaucrats and politicians who haven't seen a patient in years or even decades, but they have an MD behind their name.
00:13:50.900So that gives them an authoritativeness to make diagnoses and prescriptions for society at large.
00:13:58.240Well, what happens if there's an individual doctor who sees an individual patient and comes to the conclusion, based on his own judgment and experience and the questions asked, that maybe the public health prescription is not appropriate for a particular client?
00:14:15.960Well, we have precious few of those doctors in Canada.
00:14:20.520Those that do pop up are being singled out by the colleges of physicians and surgeons, the regulators for that profession, and threatened even with the loss of their livelihoods.
00:14:31.060One such doctor is named Dr. Patrick Phillips.
00:14:33.700He's an emergency room doctor in eastern Ontario, and he joins us now via Skype.
00:14:39.040Dr. Phillips, a pleasure to have you with us.
00:14:43.300Well, I think many institutions have failed over the last year and a half.
00:14:49.280There's no opposition party in the country that opposes the lockdowns.
00:14:54.400There's really no mainstream media that does.
00:14:58.400No judges have struck it down in any meaningful way.
00:15:01.220But I think one of the greatest failures, if I may, are the colleges of physicians and surgeons who have, rather than advocating for patients,
00:15:10.480have advocated for the government against the patients and against any doctors and told them to shut up.
00:15:16.620Can you tell us what happened to you when you dared to give your professional advice that was at odds to the government's advice?
00:15:24.700Yeah, so this is quite a troubling issue that's come up in Ontario.
00:15:33.540And it started, I think, last year when public health became very adamant about their policies and their not to be questioned.
00:15:43.680But surprisingly, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario came out with a very stark statement on April 30th,
00:15:50.840stating that physicians are banned from giving any advice to patients or the public that could be construed as anti-vaccine, anti-distancing, anti-masking,
00:16:03.960or promoting what they call unfounded treatments.
00:16:47.660So when it comes to COVID-19, it's even more egregious because this is an area, this is a disease, in fact, that's completely new.
00:16:56.640And so the science has been developing rapidly.
00:17:01.220But even more so, the whole scientific community of the world, because it's such a crisis, has kind of come together and created more scientific evidence on one disease, I think, than we've ever seen in history in such a short time.
00:17:17.600And so I started to follow some of that science.
00:17:23.260I started to see not only some of the harms of the lockdowns and that the science wasn't backing up any of the benefits of these lockdowns, but I started to follow some of the science on treatments for COVID-19.
00:17:36.440One of them being vitamin D, which drastically reduces mortality and hospitalization, and then ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, all of which in multiple randomized control trials have been shown to reduce mortality in COVID-19.
00:17:50.500And so, like I said, seeing some of these lockdowns, harms in my patients, including missed cancer diagnosis, suicidal children, I knew that I needed to speak out.
00:18:03.500And so I decided to put it on the line and to follow my oath to put patients first, to share my medical knowledge, and to speak freely, as all physicians should, to give informed consent to the public and my patients.
00:18:21.980They accused me of spreading misinformation and of being incompetent in my social media statements.
00:18:34.040So, yeah, they've launched an investigation.
00:18:35.840It's been since, I think, February is when they started.
00:18:38.600And just recently, they've come together to put restrictions on my practice and to make allegations against me that have yet to be proven in the tribunal, although the tribunal is run by the CPSO.
00:18:55.120I understand that some of those restrictions include forbidding you from making certain prescriptions, such as ivermectin, and forbidding you from writing any medical exemptions for people.
00:19:10.380Now, but here's what I don't understand.
00:19:13.800If you haven't had a hearing yet, I mean, if you haven't been put on trial within the College of Physicians and Surgeons, where accusations are put to you and you have a chance to reply, and you can make your case, you can say, well, look at these studies and look at these clinical trials and look at these other jurisdictions.
00:19:33.260If so far all it is, is political complaints, and maybe they'll be upheld, but so far they haven't had their day in court, how can they stop you from prescribing medicine just based on an accusation?
00:19:47.660Yeah, so they do have the right to be able to put preliminary restrictions prior to the trial.
00:19:57.040They think that it's your risk to patient safety.
00:20:02.600So I agree, it's overkill, but they do have the ability to do that prior to the trial.
00:20:14.200You know, you said one of the things that they're banning doctors from talking about is criticizing public policy orders like social distancing.
00:20:23.200I don't know if you saw this, but Scott Gottlieb, former FDA commissioner, now I understand.
00:20:28.640I think he's actually on the board of Pfizer.
00:20:30.080He admitted just the other day that the whole six-feet social distancing thing, no one knows where it came from.
00:20:41.160And I know in other jurisdictions around the world it's one and a half meters or some places it's one meter, so that's three feet, four and a half feet, six feet.
00:20:50.200Like, according to Scott Gottlieb, the former FDA commissioner, that was just all made up.
00:20:55.960Yeah, you know, so much of what was implemented by public health throughout this pandemic were things that were just made up.
00:21:05.820And actually, a lot of them actually contradicted well-known scientific studies that some of these measures were not helpful or could actually be harmful,
00:21:14.880such as wearing masks for people who are asymptomatic.
00:21:17.640There were studies prior to COVID that showed that actually cloth masks enhance the spread of influenza.
00:21:27.660And that was a randomized control trial.
00:21:30.100And so that's why you saw Fauci and others saying, no, there's no evidence this works and it might actually be harmful.