Facebook censors Friends of Science: See who's behind the deplatforming
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
139.40591
Summary
In this episode, Michelle Sterling from Friends of Science joins me to talk about how the company is censoring climate change deniers, why she thinks tech companies should pull the plug on the Keystone XL pipeline, and more.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hello Rebels, I'm Sheila Gunn-Reed and you're listening to a free audio-only recording of
00:00:08.880
My guest tonight is Michelle Sterling from Friends of Science.
00:00:13.340
Now if you like listening to the show then I promise you're going to love watching it
00:00:16.900
but in order to watch you need to be a subscriber to Rebel News Plus.
00:00:21.460
That's what we call our long form TV style shows here on Rebel News.
00:00:26.320
Subscribers get access to my show as well as other great TV style shows too
00:00:31.300
like Ezra's Nightly, Ezra Levant Show and David Menzies' fun Friday night show Rebel Roundup.
00:00:38.560
It's only eight bucks a month to subscribe or you can subscribe annually and get two months free.
00:00:43.260
And just for our podcast listeners you can save an extra 10% on a new Rebel News Plus membership
00:00:47.960
by using the coupon code PODCAST when you subscribe.
00:00:51.520
Just go to rebelnews.com slash subscribe to become a member.
00:00:59.720
And please leave a five-star review on this podcast and subscribe in iTunes or
00:01:03.720
wherever you listen to your podcast because those reviews are a great way to support Rebel News
00:01:10.120
and also help people find our podcast without ever having to spend a dime.
00:01:15.400
And now please enjoy this free audio-only version of my show.
00:01:21.520
Facebook is censoring our friends at Friends of Science.
00:01:37.560
I'm Sheila Gunn-Reed and you're watching The Gunn Show.
00:01:51.520
Facebook has recently announced, or rather Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has recently
00:02:02.900
announced that he's going to do less censoring of divergent viewpoints.
00:02:08.860
But it's a strange statement to make when his company is still censoring people who are skeptical,
00:02:14.560
not of climate change itself, but rather at the responsibility being allotted to humanity
00:02:23.520
That's exactly what's happening to our friends at Friends of Science.
00:02:26.920
So joining me tonight in an interview we recorded yesterday afternoon from her home in Calgary
00:02:32.740
is Michelle Sterling from Friends of Science to tell us about how they are being censored by Facebook,
00:02:38.560
but also to talk about the young German anti-Greta,
00:02:42.620
why Michelle thinks tech pulled the plug on its frontier oil sands mine,
00:02:46.400
and a whole host of other issues happening in the world of climate change.
00:03:20.440
We have a great new video out about Alberta's climate future,
00:03:27.680
and you dismantle meticulously this report done by a high-profile climate scientist,
00:03:38.620
the one that Catherine McKenna always runs to to back up all of her crazy claims.
00:03:43.920
She has this doomsday scenario out there for Alberta,
00:03:49.260
Well, we haven't quite gotten into the most meticulous part.
00:03:54.360
but certainly a foundational premise of any of these catastrophic reports
00:03:59.980
is to check and see if there's a thing in there referred to as the RCP 8.5,
00:04:06.360
which is the representative concentration pathway.
00:04:09.860
And these are referring to a set of climate models or simulations,
00:04:17.420
which the researchers use to try and determine what are the drivers of different climate scenarios.
00:04:26.440
Like, let's say with the 8.5, we go back to entirely using coal,
00:04:36.320
So, that makes it a very extreme response in the model.
00:04:42.600
But they never intended for people to use them as optional pathways.
00:04:55.020
Because the 2.6, RCP 2.6, is 3 billion less people.
00:05:01.620
So, you can see how some people have misunderstood these things
00:05:07.820
and are actually advocating for depopulating the planet.
00:05:24.200
And there's a climate policy analyst named Roger Pielke Jr. in the States.
00:05:29.820
His father is a very well-known climate scientist,
00:05:33.680
but Roger Pielke Jr. is a climate policy analyst.
00:05:42.660
and he's found that actually these two green billionaires in the States,
00:05:47.960
Thomas Steyer, who killed the Keystone XL pipeline,
00:05:52.000
and Michael Bloomberg, who recently was trying to run for president,
00:05:56.320
they and a group of activists have published this report,
00:06:04.440
And they used this, what he calls the climate porn scenario,
00:06:12.440
Now, they also funded the promotion of this Risky Business report.
00:06:17.360
So, it's become very, very popular in business circles, too.
00:06:20.920
So, when people tell you that they think there's a climate emergency
00:06:35.780
So, everybody can just calm down about climate change.
00:06:43.220
look at that paper and see if it uses the RCP 8.5,
00:06:48.680
And this stuff just gets repeated and repeated and repeated,
00:06:52.700
and it ends up in just about every single argument
00:06:55.760
for carbon taxes, for carbon trading, for carbon offsets.
00:07:07.080
And Roger Pielke Jr. has written a couple of good articles on Forbes,
00:07:17.940
at the annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union.
00:07:21.880
A 2016 paper published in the prestigious Journal of Science
00:07:29.760
introduced the erroneous notion of moving from one RCP scenario
00:07:36.600
And this is what Catherine Hayhoe does in her presentation.
00:07:43.820
that we shot at the University of Calgary when she was here,
00:07:47.220
I think it was in 2018, for the CITES conference.
00:07:56.160
we were going up here, but now we're reducing the curve,
00:07:59.560
we're bending the curve, and we're going to reduce our emissions.
00:08:11.560
She tells us that we're reducing our emissions because of China.
00:08:17.260
Because China's installed so much wind and solar,
00:08:20.460
which is absolute nonsense, because China puts out in a month
00:08:26.260
So, you know, just looking at that, you can say, okay, well,
00:08:30.740
if that's how much she knows about emissions in the world,
00:08:41.600
as, you know, the catastrophe of the climate is right around the corner
00:08:48.540
It's just, you know, it's a crazy, crazy thing.
00:09:04.840
based on the fact that there's 3 billion fewer people
00:09:13.040
And Friends of Science had a press release out,
00:09:19.480
that talks about this sort of depopulation idea,
00:09:29.740
Now, they don't mean that they are going to depopulate,
00:09:35.400
Well, yeah, you know, it is quite scary when you have, say,
00:09:38.500
Jane Goodall, very famous woman, done a lot for...
00:09:52.500
if we had a population like several hundred years ago,
00:10:00.460
it was like a population of about 500 million people,
00:10:12.200
and economic people of the world and world leaders.
00:10:16.120
So what conclusion are people to draw from that
00:10:20.240
and then add to it all of these scary scenarios,
00:10:28.200
as if it's a pathway, you know, to reducing emissions.
00:10:34.840
And, I mean, sadly, we've even seen this on Twitter
00:10:38.880
with the horrific sadness, the tragedy happening in China,
00:10:44.080
where some of these climate advocates are saying,
00:11:16.380
when he says stuff like the coronavirus or COVID-19
00:11:20.520
or the Wuhan flu, whatever they're calling it today,
00:11:44.380
I mean, it's just so crazy that they say these things
00:11:56.300
Well, you know, the other thing you should know
00:12:03.100
Canadian taxpayers are funding environmental defense
00:12:12.300
I did an investigation into the Pembina Institute,
00:12:28.840
over the 10 years that Harper was in government.