Rebel News Podcast - April 12, 2019


Muslim outreach： Andrew Scheer's “new friend” Omar Subedar publishes tips on beating your wife


Episode Stats

Length

47 minutes

Words per Minute

163.67583

Word Count

7,768

Sentence Count

528

Misogynist Sentences

23

Hate Speech Sentences

37


Summary

Andrew Scheer met with Muslims in the GTA, and he posted some pictures and comments to his Facebook account. Who did he meet with? What did he say? And what did they say? I go into it in some detail.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello, my rebels. Today, I look at Andrew Scheer's Muslim outreach. He met with some Muslims in the
00:00:07.800 GTA, and he posted some pictures and comments to his Facebook account. Well, who did he meet with?
00:00:15.640 What did he say? And these folks he met with, what did they say? I go into it in some detail.
00:00:22.220 I hope you'll find it interesting. Hey, before I get to it, can you do me a favor and go to
00:00:26.400 TheRebel.media slash shows and sign up to be a premium member. First of all, it's cool
00:00:32.300 to say you're a premium member of The Rebel. I mean, that's pretty cool. Second of all,
00:00:38.420 it supports us, helps pays the bills. Third of all, and perhaps most importantly,
00:00:42.640 it gives you access to the video version of my show. And that's going to be interesting because
00:00:46.640 today I show you what these Facebook photos look like, and I show you images from one of the
00:00:55.320 IMAM's own website. I can describe it to you on a podcast, but wouldn't you like to see it
00:01:00.820 with your own eyeballs? That's what the premium content subscription gets you. So go to TheRebel.media
00:01:05.840 slash shows, eight bucks a month, do it. Here is the show.
00:01:10.060 You're listening to The Rebel.media Podcast.
00:01:13.300 Tonight, Andrew Scheer does outreach to the Muslim community. What do liberals think about that?
00:01:19.080 What do conservatives think about that? It's April 11th, and this is The Ezra Levant Show.
00:01:25.320 Why should others go to jail when you're a biggest carbon consumer I know?
00:01:29.640 There's 8,500 customers here, and you won't give them an answer.
00:01:33.700 The only thing I have to say to the government, the wire publisher, is because it's my bloody right
00:01:38.860 to do so.
00:01:45.300 Here's a new tweet from a Muslim member of parliament named Salma Zahid.
00:01:49.960 She's a liberal. She says,
00:01:53.280 Yesterday, Andrew Scheer met with imams and Muslim leaders in Scarborough, but he didn't tweet about it,
00:01:59.800 and access to the Facebook post is restricted. Why is he hiding this outreach? Worried about his base?
00:02:05.520 Does he have different messages for different audiences?
00:02:07.700 Hmm. And as you can see by her tweet, it's a Facebook post. And Zahid took a screenshot of it.
00:02:17.440 And it doesn't look particularly secret to me, got to be honest with you.
00:02:20.660 Looks like a posed photo op that was obviously designed for circulation.
00:02:25.660 Sheer wrote, as you can see,
00:02:27.300 Today I visited with imams and others from Toronto's Muslim community to reaffirm my commitment to protecting religious freedom
00:02:34.540 and my condemnation of anti-Muslim hatred and bigotry.
00:02:38.020 Thank you for the important discussion.
00:02:41.180 Now there's a very interesting choice of words in there. I'll get back to that in a minute.
00:02:44.580 Something interesting. I don't know if you noticed it exactly. I'll come back.
00:02:47.500 But let me just finish up with this Salma Zahid, a Muslim liberal.
00:02:51.300 And she seems agitated by this whole thing, a bit paranoid, maybe even.
00:02:56.080 She did a series of tweets about it, although I'm not sure if she actually did any of this herself
00:03:00.620 or if the liberal war room just told her what to say, as they tend to do these days with women,
00:03:06.040 especially in the Liberal Party.
00:03:07.620 Anyways, here's a link to the Facebook. Sorry, this is her next tweet.
00:03:13.340 She says, so this is a series. She says,
00:03:16.540 Here's a link to the Facebook post.
00:03:20.320 The gear icon under his name means a customized audience.
00:03:25.200 His other posts have a globe icon for a global audience.
00:03:30.040 Who is he allowing to see this post and who is he hiding it from?
00:03:34.900 I don't think she wrote that herself, do you?
00:03:37.560 Now it sounds a bit weird because Facebook is all about sharing.
00:03:41.120 Andrew Scheer has almost a quarter million followers.
00:03:42.840 It's for propagating stories and pictures to his supporters.
00:03:46.440 I think she's a bit paranoid. I'm not quite sure.
00:03:50.120 I'll keep reading. She did one more tweet. Let me read her last tweet.
00:03:52.960 She said, looks like the Yellow Vestors found out anyway, and they're not happy.
00:03:58.760 And she links to an Antifa left-wing website that grabs a few random Facebook comments
00:04:04.180 from people who criticize Scheer's photo op.
00:04:07.320 Now I think that's odd because I think her earlier tweet was implying that it was a secret Facebook post.
00:04:12.200 I'm not even sure if that exists.
00:04:14.880 And when people later on pointed out, hey, Zama, this whole thing's public.
00:04:20.240 She writes one last tweet. She says,
00:04:23.360 To those pointing to the two public posts below,
00:04:27.060 the original one with the restricted view, mouse over the clock icon,
00:04:30.540 and you will see they were actually posted Wednesday afternoon and backdated.
00:04:34.160 Glad he's reaching out. Just unclear why his instinct was to hide it.
00:04:38.060 Okay, it's really getting lost in the weeds there.
00:04:41.560 But I think it's Fred asked, is she really glad that Andrew Scheer is reaching out to Muslims?
00:04:47.080 I doubt it. She's a liberal. The liberals have a lock on the Muslim vote.
00:04:51.160 Here's a poll suggesting that 65% of Canadian Muslims voted liberal last time.
00:05:00.340 This was from Enveronics.
00:05:02.600 Suggests only 2% voted conservative.
00:05:05.160 Now I'm not sure how statistically accurate that is,
00:05:07.460 but I believe it in general because Trudeau made a conscious decision in the 2015 election
00:05:13.520 not to even try and bother to win the Jewish vote.
00:05:16.160 I mean, look, Stephen Harper had pretty much locked that up by being so pro-Israel.
00:05:20.860 There really was no way to be more pro-Israel than Harper.
00:05:24.900 And there's never been a Trudeau instinct to be pro-Israel anyway.
00:05:29.520 Sorry, to out-Israel, Harper.
00:05:33.800 Trudeau's always been hostile to Israel and to Jews, frankly, a little bit.
00:05:37.340 Trudeau's brother, Alexandre, who was his policy advisor during Justin Trudeau's leadership campaign.
00:05:43.020 I don't know if you remember, but he actually made a propaganda film
00:05:45.600 in cooperation with the dictatorship of Iran called The New Great Game.
00:05:50.400 And from a sheer mathematical point of view, why bother trying to win over Jews
00:05:55.280 when there are only a few hundred thousand of them in the whole country
00:05:57.860 and there are now four or five times as many Muslims in Canada
00:06:01.380 because of open borders immigration?
00:06:04.400 So instead of trying to win the Jews,
00:06:08.700 Trudeau appointed as his right-hand campaign organizer
00:06:11.640 this guy, Omar al-Jabra,
00:06:13.700 the Saudi-born former head of the Canadian Arab Federation,
00:06:18.140 an anti-Semitic NGO that actually called for the terrorist groups,
00:06:22.560 Hamas and Hezbollah, to be legalized in Canada.
00:06:26.420 Al-Jabra would condemn Canadian officials even visiting Israel.
00:06:30.460 He's so extreme,
00:06:32.420 he had Trudeau go to even the most dangerous mosques in Canada to campaign,
00:06:37.920 including a mosque in Montreal called the Asuna Wahhabi Mosque
00:06:41.920 that the U.S. Pentagon says was a hot spot for recruiting terrorists.
00:06:49.460 Here's Trudeau bragging about campaigning there.
00:06:53.240 Because I spend a lot of time running from the Bangladeshi to the Pakistani
00:06:57.920 to the Maghreb to the Asuna Wahhabi Mosque.
00:07:03.200 I cover all the different communities.
00:07:08.360 It's clear now that the SNC-Lavalin thing has blown a hole
00:07:12.200 in the side of the Liberal Party's ship.
00:07:15.160 And now that the carbon tax is becoming more and more unpopular.
00:07:19.560 So what can liberals talk about these days?
00:07:21.520 They've decided
00:07:22.260 everyone who isn't a liberal is just a racist.
00:07:27.980 An Islamophobe.
00:07:28.200 An Islamophobe.
00:07:28.900 In the past 24 hours alone,
00:07:30.760 half of Trudeau's cabinet has repeated
00:07:32.480 the exact same talking points
00:07:34.280 about the threat of neo-Nazis
00:07:36.260 and white supremacists
00:07:37.320 and Islamophobes in Canada.
00:07:39.500 It's the number one issue to the liberals
00:07:41.740 just in the last 24 hours they've decided this.
00:07:44.620 If all else fails, call people racist.
00:07:47.000 Now they used to call Canadians sexist too,
00:07:49.520 but they can't really do that
00:07:50.640 now that Trudeau has proven himself to be a fake feminist.
00:07:53.280 But look at this.
00:07:53.960 They're all, all, all, all calling conservatives racist.
00:07:58.760 It's pitiful, but it's all they have left.
00:08:01.100 And the media party runs with it.
00:08:03.520 All right, enough about the liberals.
00:08:04.900 I just wanted to show you,
00:08:06.300 first of all, the weird messaging by Salma Zahid,
00:08:09.240 the liberal, or whoever wrote her tweets for her,
00:08:11.840 and how the liberals are making their desperate
00:08:14.900 last six months before the election
00:08:17.100 all about calling people racist.
00:08:18.780 But back to Andrew Scheer's actual visit,
00:08:21.960 and actually those Facebook images of it.
00:08:24.400 It's not hidden.
00:08:25.980 It's the first thing you see
00:08:27.460 when you go to his Facebook page.
00:08:29.940 At least it's the first thing I saw.
00:08:31.980 Doesn't look hidden to me.
00:08:33.600 And back to the message wording for a second.
00:08:36.040 Let me read that to you again.
00:08:38.300 Today I visited with imams and others
00:08:40.000 from Toronto's Muslim community
00:08:41.220 to reaffirm my commitment to protecting religious freedom
00:08:43.640 and my condemnation of anti-Muslim hatred and bigotry.
00:08:46.420 Thank you for the important discussion.
00:08:49.240 Now there are more than a million Muslims in Canada.
00:08:51.320 Many are citizens.
00:08:52.080 It is appropriate that the leader of the opposition
00:08:54.620 and a man who would be prime minister
00:08:56.320 meets with them,
00:08:57.440 meet with any group of Canadians.
00:08:59.760 He seeks to be the prime minister for the whole country.
00:09:02.220 He says he reaffirms his commitment to religious freedom.
00:09:05.180 That sounds good to me.
00:09:07.300 Of course, our Canadian ideas of religious freedom
00:09:09.580 are quite different than religious freedom
00:09:11.420 in Islamic countries,
00:09:13.480 like Pakistan or Saudi Arabia or Iran.
00:09:16.300 Omar al-Jabra is from Saudi Arabia.
00:09:18.060 In places like that, Islam is dominant and superior
00:09:21.800 and all other religions are either banned or submissive.
00:09:27.080 In fact, in Mecca, infidels aren't even allowed to visit the city.
00:09:32.700 So I'm sure Andrew Scheer meant the Canadian version
00:09:34.740 of freedom of religion.
00:09:36.600 And he says he condemns, quote,
00:09:38.260 anti-Muslim hatred and bigotry.
00:09:41.000 That's what I wanted to focus on a moment ago
00:09:43.020 because that's different than the leftist word Islamophobia.
00:09:47.940 Islamophobia is a made-up word, of course,
00:09:50.060 but it means people who are afraid of Islam.
00:09:54.020 But Islam is a religion, a doctrine, a set of ideas,
00:09:57.100 a political philosophy.
00:09:59.920 Muslims, by contrast, are individual people.
00:10:03.720 Some might be religious, some aren't.
00:10:05.580 Some are religious in different ways.
00:10:07.880 Some are political, some aren't.
00:10:09.040 So saying you're against anti-Muslim bigotry
00:10:12.680 means you're against the baseless hatred of someone
00:10:16.180 because they are a Muslim person.
00:10:19.000 Which is different than saying you're against
00:10:21.420 hatred or fear of Islam, the religion.
00:10:24.500 And that's a very important distinction
00:10:26.260 because that is the deliberate tactic of the left,
00:10:29.760 that vocabulary Islamophobia.
00:10:32.480 Because it calls you a bigot, a hater,
00:10:34.720 if you dissent from the Muslim religion of Islam
00:10:39.600 or the politics of Islam,
00:10:40.940 which you surely must do, by the way,
00:10:42.920 if you are a Christian or a Jew or a Hindu or Sikh
00:10:46.040 because it's incompatible.
00:10:47.560 You can't agree to the theology of Islam
00:10:50.680 and be a Christian or a Jew.
00:10:53.120 It's incompatible.
00:10:55.100 In fact, I know a number of Muslims
00:10:56.340 who are anti-Islam against the doctrine.
00:10:58.820 I know a number of ex-Muslims,
00:11:01.220 a number of Muslim reformers.
00:11:03.140 The phrase Islamophobia is used
00:11:05.780 to shut up any criticism of Islam as a religion.
00:11:10.060 Just to shut them down.
00:11:11.320 So I noticed the wording,
00:11:13.240 Shir didn't say Islamophobia,
00:11:14.600 and I'm glad he didn't.
00:11:16.840 And I immediately noticed,
00:11:18.360 as I am absolutely sure you did,
00:11:21.580 these two women,
00:11:24.380 these two young Muslim women
00:11:26.520 who are not wearing hijabs,
00:11:29.540 let alone niqabs.
00:11:31.600 In fact, as you can see,
00:11:33.180 he's making physical contact
00:11:35.580 with at least one of them,
00:11:36.980 and their pretty hair.
00:11:38.960 That's the main photo on his page,
00:11:41.100 as you saw.
00:11:41.680 There are only those two women
00:11:43.440 in all of the pictures
00:11:44.720 associated with this Muslim meetup.
00:11:47.340 The rest are men.
00:11:48.300 Look at this.
00:11:48.660 Look around the table there.
00:11:50.280 You can see,
00:11:51.880 yeah, there are the two women there.
00:11:53.200 Flip back to that last photo for a second.
00:11:55.520 Oh, go back a little bit.
00:11:56.800 You can see one of the women on the left,
00:11:59.060 the second one in,
00:11:59.820 and one of them you can just see
00:12:01.520 your hands on the right,
00:12:03.220 but there's one, two, three, four,
00:12:05.400 five, six, seven, eight, nine,
00:12:06.780 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 guys.
00:12:09.320 So it's just the two attractive women
00:12:11.380 and the guys.
00:12:13.080 So it's a very strategic choice,
00:12:15.200 only two women,
00:12:17.640 and it shows that Andrew Shira
00:12:19.080 is friendly with Muslims,
00:12:20.220 but not with Islamism
00:12:22.920 or symbols of political Islam,
00:12:25.280 which the niqab and the hijab are.
00:12:27.700 That's such a hot issue right now in Quebec,
00:12:30.160 especially because of the Bill 21 percopet.
00:12:33.240 But here's the photo,
00:12:34.320 and I flashed it for a second there.
00:12:36.020 Here's the photo
00:12:37.160 that Andrew Shira took
00:12:39.120 that is halal.
00:12:41.540 No women in this picture,
00:12:44.360 just the Muslim men
00:12:45.780 who will feel free to publish it
00:12:48.020 on their mosque websites
00:12:49.240 because those two uncovered girls
00:12:52.380 aren't in the shot.
00:12:54.140 Now, I don't know
00:12:56.620 who those two guys are
00:12:57.840 on the right,
00:12:58.660 the guy on the right
00:13:00.360 and the guy right next to Shira.
00:13:02.400 I'll dig into it more.
00:13:03.920 I'm doing some research on it,
00:13:05.040 but I absolutely
00:13:06.060 and immediately
00:13:07.300 recognize that guy
00:13:09.460 on the left.
00:13:11.220 His name is Omar Subedar.
00:13:15.240 That's his name.
00:13:17.300 Here's his Facebook page.
00:13:19.140 He's an Islamic teacher,
00:13:20.920 publisher,
00:13:21.240 unelected politician,
00:13:23.920 a big wheel.
00:13:25.460 He's a huge fan
00:13:27.140 of Justin Trudeau.
00:13:28.740 They've met so many times,
00:13:30.520 and Subedar
00:13:31.000 has promoted Trudeau so much.
00:13:34.820 He's also a huge fan
00:13:36.000 of Patrick Brown,
00:13:37.640 the disgraced former leader
00:13:39.480 of the Ontario BPCs
00:13:41.880 who was driven out
00:13:42.940 because of a sex scandal.
00:13:44.860 Now, I know Omar Subedar
00:13:46.300 because he has a lot to say.
00:13:49.300 Obviously, he's an anti-Israel extremist.
00:13:51.640 This is from his Facebook page,
00:13:53.660 a page saying Israel doesn't exist,
00:13:55.840 has never existed,
00:13:57.160 pro-PLO.
00:13:58.400 I mean, obviously,
00:13:58.940 it goes without saying.
00:14:00.420 He's obsessed with anti-Israel,
00:14:02.660 anti-PLO memes.
00:14:04.340 That's not even news these days.
00:14:06.500 He's cleaned up his Facebook page a bit
00:14:08.240 since I last did a report on him.
00:14:10.460 But just for example,
00:14:11.620 he shared a page called
00:14:13.620 There Is No Israel.
00:14:16.840 But in the word Israel,
00:14:18.040 the S was a dollar sign.
00:14:19.580 He calls Israel an apartheid state.
00:14:21.780 Of course he does.
00:14:22.760 He says it's a puppet of NATO
00:14:24.320 to colonize Muslim Arabia
00:14:26.600 and steal their oil.
00:14:28.340 He supports George Galloway,
00:14:29.880 the anti-Semitic British politician
00:14:31.260 who has publicly given money
00:14:32.820 to the Hamas terrorist group.
00:14:34.240 That's sort of gross
00:14:35.180 that that's one of Scheer's new friends.
00:14:38.860 But in addition to preaching
00:14:40.380 and Facebooking,
00:14:41.600 he's also a lecturer
00:14:43.320 and a publisher.
00:14:45.320 This is his company,
00:14:47.420 Bukhari Publications.
00:14:50.000 He now calls it Bukhari Academy.
00:14:53.660 And I know this from when I reported it
00:14:55.580 back at the Sun News
00:14:56.620 after Trudeau slithered up to this guy.
00:14:59.400 Subirat publishes books.
00:15:01.360 He publishes advice
00:15:02.680 to Canadian Muslims
00:15:03.940 on how to live.
00:15:04.720 He wants people to live
00:15:06.120 according to the laws of Islam.
00:15:08.000 That's Sharia law.
00:15:08.960 He believes in the theocracy.
00:15:11.460 And one of the things
00:15:12.320 that this Omar Subidar
00:15:14.440 is an expert about
00:15:16.020 is how to treat women.
00:15:19.700 He's a ladies' man,
00:15:20.900 so to speak,
00:15:21.480 an expert.
00:15:22.820 He's got lots of lady advice
00:15:24.140 and he shares it with the men
00:15:25.660 in his community.
00:15:27.920 Here's some advice he wrote
00:15:29.440 called maintaining a marriage.
00:15:34.660 Maintaining a marriage.
00:15:36.140 Andrew Scheer's new friend
00:15:38.200 starts off
00:15:39.120 by explaining
00:15:40.180 that in Islam
00:15:41.660 Allah has,
00:15:43.540 and I quote,
00:15:45.660 he has made the husband
00:15:47.160 officially in charge
00:15:48.400 of managing the relationship
00:15:50.060 by saying
00:15:50.680 men are in charge of women.
00:15:53.500 And he says
00:15:54.360 Allah has given precedence
00:15:56.380 to men over women.
00:15:58.580 And he says
00:15:59.380 the wives,
00:16:00.340 on the other hand,
00:16:01.100 have an obligation
00:16:01.940 to be obedient
00:16:02.960 to their husbands.
00:16:04.020 Now maybe he's just being
00:16:06.680 what we might call
00:16:07.280 old-fashioned.
00:16:08.480 I mean, no problem, right?
00:16:09.480 I mean, obedience,
00:16:10.660 I'm sure he doesn't mean
00:16:11.820 in the way
00:16:12.240 that a child
00:16:13.020 has to be obedient
00:16:13.940 or a pet
00:16:15.920 has to be obedient, right?
00:16:18.360 Well, let's let
00:16:19.260 Omar Subidar
00:16:19.880 speak for himself.
00:16:20.820 He says
00:16:21.260 if for some reason
00:16:23.380 the wife
00:16:24.360 becomes stubborn,
00:16:26.840 arrogant,
00:16:27.680 or disobedient
00:16:28.880 even after the husband
00:16:30.500 is doing his part,
00:16:31.600 then Allah has introduced
00:16:33.640 a three-point dispute
00:16:35.540 resolution plan.
00:16:37.080 Oh, did you know that?
00:16:39.440 The first,
00:16:40.720 says Omar Subidar,
00:16:41.920 is for the man
00:16:42.680 to give his wife
00:16:43.500 some advice,
00:16:45.520 to sit her down
00:16:46.720 and tell her
00:16:47.780 the way things
00:16:48.460 are going to go.
00:16:49.160 But what if that
00:16:50.940 doesn't go so well?
00:16:53.080 Well, the second point
00:16:54.320 in his three-point plan
00:16:55.480 is, and I quote,
00:16:57.900 forsake them in bed.
00:17:00.300 If the problem persists
00:17:01.560 after exercising
00:17:02.560 the first measure,
00:17:03.620 then the husband
00:17:04.060 should refrain
00:17:05.020 from having
00:17:05.720 sexual relations
00:17:06.680 with her.
00:17:08.180 I'm not making that up.
00:17:10.100 Now,
00:17:11.260 I'm not sure
00:17:11.880 how many women
00:17:12.620 watching my photo
00:17:13.860 would think
00:17:14.300 that refraining
00:17:15.140 from relations
00:17:16.380 with this fella
00:17:17.100 is a punishment.
00:17:18.820 But look,
00:17:19.280 shakuna sangu,
00:17:20.340 everyone's got
00:17:20.900 their taste.
00:17:21.640 There's someone
00:17:22.000 out there
00:17:22.440 for each of us.
00:17:23.460 Thank God.
00:17:24.820 Look, I'm just
00:17:25.240 joking around,
00:17:25.860 but it's step three
00:17:26.680 that is the real
00:17:27.920 cause for worry.
00:17:29.560 I mean,
00:17:29.800 Omar Subidar
00:17:30.340 going on a sex strike
00:17:31.440 is one thing,
00:17:32.200 but let me quote
00:17:33.060 to you point three.
00:17:34.480 This is Andrew
00:17:35.180 Scheer's new friend.
00:17:37.340 So just to recap,
00:17:38.040 step one
00:17:38.440 to a disobedient wife
00:17:40.060 is to give them
00:17:40.920 advice,
00:17:41.300 give them a lecture.
00:17:41.980 Step two
00:17:42.320 is to punish them
00:17:43.880 by not having
00:17:44.860 sex with them.
00:17:45.400 But here's step three,
00:17:46.760 and I quote verbatim
00:17:47.720 at length
00:17:48.560 so you'll see
00:17:49.240 the whole context.
00:17:50.420 This is Andrew Scheer's
00:17:51.160 new friend,
00:17:51.880 Omar Subidar,
00:17:52.740 who says,
00:17:54.660 strike them.
00:17:57.220 If the problem
00:17:57.680 still does not
00:17:58.260 get resolved,
00:17:59.160 then as a final resort,
00:18:00.220 Allah has permitted
00:18:00.960 the husband
00:18:01.380 to discipline his wife
00:18:02.680 by striking her.
00:18:04.760 However,
00:18:05.040 this does not imply
00:18:05.800 that Allah is promoting
00:18:06.660 domestic violence.
00:18:08.160 The prophet,
00:18:09.120 praise be unto him,
00:18:10.300 has made it very clear
00:18:11.340 that the beating
00:18:12.180 should not be agonizing
00:18:14.340 in any shape or form.
00:18:15.700 He mentioned
00:18:16.520 in the sermon
00:18:17.520 during his farewell
00:18:18.600 pilgrimage
00:18:19.580 and hit them lightly.
00:18:23.600 The objective
00:18:24.620 of striking her lightly
00:18:26.400 is to discipline her
00:18:28.020 and to make her realize
00:18:29.140 that what she's doing
00:18:29.880 is unwarranted.
00:18:33.460 So he's telling Canadians
00:18:34.880 in English
00:18:36.500 to beat their wives.
00:18:40.600 Now he's clearly
00:18:43.140 a moderate
00:18:43.780 because he said,
00:18:45.320 now don't make it
00:18:46.260 agonizing, fellas.
00:18:48.020 You just got to
00:18:48.940 hit them lightly.
00:18:49.840 You know,
00:18:50.840 light punch.
00:18:51.560 Don't break any bones, fellas.
00:18:53.320 Just a light slap, okay?
00:18:55.220 He actually goes on
00:18:56.360 to recommend
00:18:56.880 a foot-long heavy stick.
00:18:58.840 That's how they do it
00:18:59.640 in the old country.
00:19:00.860 But not agonizing, fellas.
00:19:02.780 All right?
00:19:03.180 I swear to God
00:19:06.240 this is what
00:19:06.720 this guy's publishing
00:19:07.500 here in Canada.
00:19:09.740 Not back in Pakistan.
00:19:10.960 Here in Canada.
00:19:12.100 In English.
00:19:13.340 It's what he does
00:19:13.880 for a living.
00:19:14.820 And he has thousands
00:19:15.940 in his flock.
00:19:18.180 His advice
00:19:19.040 on how to handle women
00:19:20.400 strike them.
00:19:22.240 Allah has permitted it.
00:19:23.540 Just don't make it agonizing.
00:19:25.720 Just hit her.
00:19:27.660 She deserves it.
00:19:29.820 Allah says.
00:19:30.780 Now, like many Canadians,
00:19:33.560 I have Muslim friends.
00:19:34.560 Like most Canadians,
00:19:35.800 I reject Islam,
00:19:36.700 the religion.
00:19:37.220 It's not incompatible
00:19:38.300 to have Muslim friends
00:19:39.400 to like Muslims,
00:19:40.320 to reject the religion.
00:19:42.600 We do that
00:19:43.200 with every religion.
00:19:44.620 Separation of church
00:19:45.800 and state.
00:19:46.280 Separation of mosque
00:19:47.220 and state.
00:19:47.660 In fact,
00:19:48.000 many Muslims
00:19:48.900 come to Canada
00:19:50.020 themselves
00:19:50.680 to get away
00:19:51.860 from Sharia law
00:19:52.820 and to get away
00:19:55.080 from Muslim imams
00:19:56.020 who tell men
00:19:56.800 that it's okay
00:19:57.860 to beat their wives.
00:20:00.780 Now, of course,
00:20:02.960 Justin Trudeau
00:20:03.760 loves this guy
00:20:04.960 and the feeling
00:20:06.140 is mutual.
00:20:08.400 But Andrew Scheer,
00:20:10.540 does he know
00:20:12.100 who Omar Subedar is
00:20:15.180 and what his views
00:20:17.060 on wife beating are?
00:20:19.560 I'm not sure
00:20:20.540 which is worse.
00:20:21.300 If Andrew Scheer
00:20:22.040 just doesn't know
00:20:23.900 or if he does know
00:20:26.960 and per Salma Zahid's
00:20:30.000 weird Twitter
00:20:30.700 conspiracy theory
00:20:31.700 somehow tried
00:20:33.240 to keep
00:20:33.620 his particular choice
00:20:35.280 of new friends
00:20:36.040 on the lowdown.
00:20:38.480 Which do you think
00:20:39.500 happened?
00:20:41.240 Stay with us
00:20:42.020 for more.
00:20:42.320 Welcome back.
00:20:57.300 Well, a funny thing
00:20:57.900 happened to me
00:20:58.960 yesterday
00:20:59.660 when I was making
00:21:00.800 my video
00:21:01.520 about things
00:21:02.880 Jason Kenney
00:21:03.720 could do
00:21:04.360 to stop
00:21:05.700 environmental extremists
00:21:07.220 in Alberta.
00:21:08.420 And one of the things
00:21:09.140 I wanted to show
00:21:10.080 was a new law
00:21:11.720 introduced in South Dakota
00:21:13.420 against riot boosting.
00:21:16.500 That's a new word
00:21:17.140 I'd never heard before.
00:21:18.480 It means people
00:21:19.200 who promote,
00:21:20.840 agitate,
00:21:21.600 fund,
00:21:22.060 organize riots.
00:21:23.400 They call it
00:21:23.780 riot boosting.
00:21:24.760 So I typed
00:21:25.480 into Google
00:21:26.420 as you can see here
00:21:28.480 riot boosting law
00:21:30.840 South Dakota.
00:21:32.760 It doesn't get
00:21:33.880 more precise
00:21:34.720 than that.
00:21:35.800 But look at the results
00:21:36.920 that came up.
00:21:37.540 The very first one
00:21:38.640 is a rebuttal
00:21:39.480 to the law
00:21:39.940 by the ACLU.
00:21:41.580 Then an environmental
00:21:42.960 condemnation of it.
00:21:44.340 Then another condemnation.
00:21:46.260 Then the ACLU
00:21:48.200 rebutting it again.
00:21:50.200 And then
00:21:50.660 again and again
00:21:52.640 left wing
00:21:53.400 or environmental groups
00:21:54.720 denouncing the bill.
00:21:58.060 The very last item
00:21:59.540 on the first page
00:22:00.200 is a Washington Post
00:22:01.120 story that's neutral.
00:22:02.300 But in that first list
00:22:03.920 of ten results,
00:22:06.240 you'd think I would have
00:22:07.660 the riot boosting law
00:22:09.540 South Dakota.
00:22:10.600 But in fact,
00:22:11.580 I did not.
00:22:12.140 I had to keep
00:22:12.780 searching more
00:22:14.340 and more and more
00:22:15.300 and clicking through
00:22:16.080 more and more and more
00:22:17.340 anti-riot boosting
00:22:19.280 commentary
00:22:20.140 before I could get
00:22:21.780 to the thing
00:22:22.300 that was being criticized.
00:22:23.260 You see what I'm saying?
00:22:24.640 I wanted to see
00:22:26.100 a document,
00:22:27.340 an official document,
00:22:28.700 so official
00:22:29.500 it's on the government's
00:22:30.540 own website.
00:22:31.620 But Google would not
00:22:33.580 let me get
00:22:34.380 to that document
00:22:35.320 even though I described
00:22:36.460 it perfectly
00:22:37.100 without first
00:22:38.640 making me look
00:22:40.200 at a dozen
00:22:41.560 rebuttals,
00:22:42.960 counterpoints
00:22:43.640 and denunciations.
00:22:45.580 Had I grown bored
00:22:47.000 or lost interest,
00:22:48.360 I never would have got
00:22:49.860 what I was searching for.
00:22:51.700 Now was that
00:22:52.340 the fact that
00:22:53.320 typing in
00:22:53.900 riot boosting law
00:22:55.040 South Dakota
00:22:55.660 wasn't clear enough?
00:22:57.680 Was there some reason
00:22:59.100 that that was pushed down?
00:23:01.180 And the criticisms
00:23:02.240 were pushed up?
00:23:04.000 Well, I'll never know.
00:23:05.420 But our next guest
00:23:06.480 says that there
00:23:07.760 are things afoot
00:23:09.100 that we don't know
00:23:10.460 that the U.S. Congress
00:23:11.740 is trying to find out.
00:23:13.420 I'm talking about
00:23:13.860 our friend Alan Bokhari,
00:23:15.500 the senior tech correspondent
00:23:17.060 for Breitbart.com.
00:23:18.520 Alan, great to see you again.
00:23:20.480 Good to see you, Ezra.
00:23:21.220 What do you think
00:23:21.760 of my little anecdote?
00:23:22.800 It's just a personal story,
00:23:24.320 but I found it quite odd
00:23:25.840 that I described a law
00:23:27.260 in a state perfectly
00:23:29.120 and yet it did not
00:23:31.120 show up
00:23:31.740 in the first dozen
00:23:32.680 or so hits,
00:23:33.360 but criticisms did.
00:23:34.500 I wanted to see it.
00:23:35.400 It wouldn't let me.
00:23:37.280 That is interesting
00:23:38.160 and we know
00:23:38.540 during the net neutrality debate
00:23:40.540 these tech companies
00:23:41.420 were artificially promoting,
00:23:43.460 well, it certainly looked
00:23:44.580 that they were pushing
00:23:45.440 pro-net neutrality posts
00:23:48.960 up their search results.
00:23:51.460 Now,
00:23:53.300 the idea of Google
00:23:54.520 search engine manipulation
00:23:55.520 has actually been
00:23:56.900 alleged by Donald Trump.
00:23:58.600 the mainstream media
00:24:00.240 called it a conspiracy theory,
00:24:01.600 of course,
00:24:02.340 but it's actually been
00:24:03.420 proven now
00:24:03.960 because a couple of months ago,
00:24:06.120 Breitbart released
00:24:06.740 an exclusive story
00:24:07.820 in which
00:24:08.520 a hidden blacklist
00:24:11.200 was found
00:24:11.920 within Google
00:24:14.460 that allowed the company
00:24:16.300 to manually
00:24:17.320 adjust search results
00:24:19.340 on YouTube
00:24:20.140 and in that same leak
00:24:21.980 a member of Google's
00:24:23.340 trust and safety team
00:24:24.260 admitted that they
00:24:25.080 occasionally do
00:24:26.140 the same thing
00:24:26.740 for so-called
00:24:27.280 controversial search results
00:24:28.560 on Google's
00:24:29.100 main search engine.
00:24:30.100 So it's now been confirmed
00:24:31.260 thanks to these Google leaks
00:24:32.420 that Google manipulated
00:24:34.520 search results
00:24:35.320 on YouTube
00:24:35.860 and on its main search engine
00:24:37.160 and they're doing so
00:24:38.160 for political topics
00:24:39.020 on YouTube.
00:24:39.700 They deliberately
00:24:40.440 adjusted their search algorithm
00:24:42.180 to kick pro-life videos
00:24:43.420 out of the top 10
00:24:44.140 search results.
00:24:45.420 We've now seen news
00:24:46.880 from other sources
00:24:48.040 that Google
00:24:49.080 pushes conservative websites
00:24:51.840 out of new search results.
00:24:53.120 So this is all confirmed now.
00:24:55.360 The Democrats, of course,
00:24:56.700 will still call it
00:24:57.260 a conspiracy theory
00:24:58.020 because it's in their
00:24:58.940 interest to do so,
00:24:59.900 but the facts speak
00:25:00.780 for themselves.
00:25:01.840 Yeah, I mean,
00:25:02.400 I, of course,
00:25:04.000 have been watching
00:25:04.660 the marginalization
00:25:05.920 of Tommy Robinson
00:25:07.480 in the United Kingdom.
00:25:08.720 We here at The Rebel
00:25:09.740 have tasted
00:25:10.900 some of that censorship,
00:25:11.940 but I would have thought
00:25:12.800 that something
00:25:13.920 as official
00:25:14.780 as a government,
00:25:16.360 a state legislature
00:25:17.640 of South Dakota
00:25:18.500 would be immune to this.
00:25:20.940 No, that actual
00:25:22.620 government legislature,
00:25:24.740 the Senate of South Dakota
00:25:26.340 was pushed below
00:25:28.680 a far left-wing activist group
00:25:30.720 called the ACAU.
00:25:31.840 It was just a little taste of it.
00:25:33.280 It's an example.
00:25:33.920 And I just,
00:25:34.940 I wonder how much
00:25:36.660 of the world around me
00:25:37.940 that I think I know
00:25:39.160 is not real
00:25:40.720 because if so much
00:25:42.760 of our world
00:25:43.160 comes from the internet
00:25:44.160 and what we search,
00:25:45.920 if someone's putting
00:25:47.140 their finger on the scale,
00:25:48.220 we start to lose touch
00:25:49.800 with reality,
00:25:50.780 don't we?
00:25:52.180 Because we,
00:25:52.940 I mean,
00:25:53.880 we walk around
00:25:54.820 in real life,
00:25:56.180 Alan,
00:25:56.460 and we try and observe things,
00:25:57.700 but we think
00:25:58.260 the internet
00:25:58.780 is a window,
00:26:00.080 but it's a very
00:26:00.840 contorted lens.
00:26:02.060 It's not a clear
00:26:03.320 glass window,
00:26:03.960 is it?
00:26:05.500 Not at all.
00:26:06.240 And it's an interesting
00:26:07.120 example that you use
00:26:08.040 because Google
00:26:09.360 and YouTube
00:26:10.160 maintain in public
00:26:11.200 that they're
00:26:12.240 non-political
00:26:13.280 in their approach
00:26:13.900 to search,
00:26:14.400 that they only,
00:26:15.520 if they promote
00:26:16.120 certain sources,
00:26:16.800 it's only to promote
00:26:17.660 so-called authoritative
00:26:19.100 sources.
00:26:20.080 But there's nothing
00:26:20.780 more authoritative
00:26:21.420 than a government website,
00:26:22.480 so it's very surprising
00:26:24.040 to me that
00:26:24.700 that government document
00:26:26.320 was so hard to find
00:26:27.320 on Google search,
00:26:28.120 whereas left-wing
00:26:29.680 advocacy organizations
00:26:30.680 were so easy to find.
00:26:32.520 Of course,
00:26:33.200 on YouTube,
00:26:33.760 with the re-ranking
00:26:34.520 of abortion results
00:26:35.460 that I mentioned,
00:26:36.420 the so-called
00:26:37.000 authoritative sources
00:26:37.840 were all left-wing
00:26:38.660 pro-abortion propaganda.
00:26:42.100 Now,
00:26:43.060 as you said,
00:26:44.320 this is quite insidious
00:26:45.280 and it's hard to discern.
00:26:47.100 In fact,
00:26:47.300 there's been research
00:26:48.000 showing that search engine
00:26:49.120 bias is a lot more
00:26:50.000 dangerous than media bias
00:26:51.220 because ordinary users
00:26:52.460 of Google search
00:26:53.380 and other similar services,
00:26:55.860 they just automatically
00:26:57.500 trust the first page
00:26:59.400 of search results.
00:27:00.140 They don't,
00:27:01.140 it hasn't,
00:27:02.180 you're registered with people
00:27:03.320 that these results
00:27:04.980 could be manipulated.
00:27:06.480 And the vast majority
00:27:07.440 of users,
00:27:08.340 I don't know the exact number,
00:27:09.540 but it's well over 70%,
00:27:10.700 possibly over 90%,
00:27:11.920 will not go past
00:27:13.100 the first two pages
00:27:15.020 of search results.
00:27:16.180 And more than half
00:27:17.740 will not go past
00:27:18.420 the first five search results.
00:27:20.400 So if you manipulate
00:27:21.260 those search results,
00:27:23.400 especially in a controversial,
00:27:24.960 politically charged topic
00:27:25.840 like abortion
00:27:26.460 or the environment,
00:27:27.640 then you can easily control
00:27:29.300 what people are seeing
00:27:31.140 and what information
00:27:33.140 they receive
00:27:33.800 in this supposedly
00:27:34.500 free internet.
00:27:35.460 Yeah.
00:27:35.840 Well,
00:27:36.420 forgive me for indulging
00:27:37.840 by telling you
00:27:39.180 that personal search experience,
00:27:40.480 but I use Google
00:27:41.440 probably 100 times a day
00:27:43.940 for trivia,
00:27:46.540 for a restaurant,
00:27:48.580 for a map.
00:27:50.040 And the fact that
00:27:51.100 I can no longer trust it
00:27:52.380 is deeply unsettling to me.
00:27:55.760 I think it is also
00:27:56.980 to some people
00:27:57.960 in the U.S. Senate,
00:27:59.940 not as many as it should,
00:28:01.860 but your reporting
00:28:03.180 in Breitbart.com
00:28:04.420 tells us that there's recently
00:28:06.500 been an inquiry
00:28:07.520 in the Senate
00:28:08.040 led by Ted Cruz
00:28:09.260 and other senators
00:28:10.600 have participated.
00:28:11.540 Tell us a little bit
00:28:12.460 about this latest
00:28:13.360 round of investigations.
00:28:15.900 Is it Twitter
00:28:16.460 that's in the hot seat now?
00:28:19.640 Well,
00:28:20.360 Twitter,
00:28:20.800 Facebook,
00:28:21.220 and Google
00:28:21.820 were all supposed
00:28:22.480 to send representatives
00:28:23.460 to this hearing
00:28:24.380 in the Senate
00:28:25.000 which took place yesterday.
00:28:26.600 Google once again
00:28:27.940 declined to send
00:28:28.840 a high-ranking member
00:28:29.980 of their team,
00:28:30.720 so the lower-ranking member
00:28:32.420 they wanted to send
00:28:33.240 was simply denied
00:28:34.120 by the senators.
00:28:37.720 And interestingly,
00:28:38.920 this hearing came
00:28:39.660 just one day
00:28:40.460 after a Democrat hearing
00:28:42.440 in the House,
00:28:43.060 the House Judiciary Committee,
00:28:44.880 now run by
00:28:45.860 Russiagate pusher
00:28:47.640 Jerry Nadler.
00:28:49.460 And it's interesting
00:28:50.440 to watch the contrast
00:28:51.420 between those two hearings.
00:28:52.480 And the first one,
00:28:53.200 the Democrat-controlled one,
00:28:54.280 it was all about
00:28:54.980 hate speech
00:28:55.700 and extremism online
00:28:57.460 and how the social media platform
00:28:59.760 needed to do more
00:29:00.360 to stop it.
00:29:00.940 So that hearing
00:29:01.520 was pressuring
00:29:02.100 the social media companies
00:29:03.000 to do more censorship
00:29:03.840 and be more politically biased.
00:29:05.880 Whereas the second one
00:29:06.820 in the Senate,
00:29:07.380 still controlled by Republicans,
00:29:08.400 was organized
00:29:10.220 by Ted Cruz,
00:29:11.140 who's been very vocally
00:29:12.520 opposed to Silicon Valley
00:29:13.560 bias.
00:29:14.520 One of the earliest
00:29:15.460 senators to speak out on it,
00:29:16.680 possibly the earliest.
00:29:19.340 And that really exposed
00:29:21.500 how Silicon Valley
00:29:23.240 actually is
00:29:23.900 censoring conservatives.
00:29:25.320 And what I found
00:29:26.480 interesting about it
00:29:27.140 was Ted Cruz
00:29:27.740 started the discussion
00:29:28.660 by framing it
00:29:29.500 around solutions.
00:29:30.660 So it's not
00:29:31.360 retreading old ground.
00:29:32.720 We already know
00:29:33.380 that they're biased.
00:29:34.480 So Cruz is outlining
00:29:35.520 how it could be tackled
00:29:36.420 with potentially antitrust law,
00:29:38.200 with reform of legislation
00:29:39.680 to strip their immunity
00:29:40.880 if they stop,
00:29:42.140 if they don't stop
00:29:43.480 acting in a biased,
00:29:44.540 non-neutral manner.
00:29:46.120 And there were
00:29:46.560 several key moments,
00:29:47.720 key standout moments
00:29:48.560 in the hearing.
00:29:49.460 You know,
00:29:49.900 Twitter was left,
00:29:50.720 Twitter's representatives
00:29:51.480 were left speechless
00:29:52.160 at one point
00:29:52.780 because they've consistently
00:29:54.420 avoided answer,
00:29:55.620 giving a straight answer
00:29:56.580 to the question,
00:29:57.280 are you a neutral platform?
00:29:59.120 But what Cruz did
00:29:59.800 would you call that?
00:30:01.000 I think we have a clip of that
00:30:01.740 that we've taken,
00:30:02.460 I think,
00:30:02.840 from Breitbart,
00:30:03.460 actually.
00:30:04.020 Let's play about
00:30:04.620 a minute or so.
00:30:05.980 This is Ted Cruz
00:30:06.760 pressing Twitter
00:30:07.800 on are you neutral
00:30:09.440 that all people have
00:30:10.820 like a stage
00:30:11.820 that any theater,
00:30:13.040 that any actor
00:30:14.020 could rent to put on a play?
00:30:15.360 Or are you a publisher
00:30:16.640 that chooses
00:30:17.420 and curates
00:30:18.280 and edits
00:30:18.800 and censors?
00:30:20.140 Let's run a bit
00:30:21.180 of that clip
00:30:21.700 and I think this is
00:30:22.400 taken directly
00:30:22.960 from Breitbart.
00:30:24.140 Gentlemen,
00:30:24.580 let me start
00:30:25.220 with a question
00:30:25.840 that I have asked
00:30:27.180 both of your companies
00:30:28.300 more than once,
00:30:29.280 which is a simple
00:30:31.280 and straightforward question
00:30:32.640 that I'd like to get
00:30:33.580 a simple and straightforward
00:30:34.440 answer to,
00:30:36.140 which is,
00:30:36.940 and let's start
00:30:37.480 with you,
00:30:37.860 Mr. Monge,
00:30:38.420 does Twitter consider
00:30:39.220 itself a neutral
00:30:39.940 public forum?
00:30:41.360 Twitter strives
00:30:42.100 every day
00:30:42.560 to be an impartial
00:30:43.420 platform
00:30:43.940 where all voices
00:30:45.400 can come and speak.
00:30:46.480 Mr. Monge,
00:30:47.080 you answered this
00:30:47.640 recently in the House
00:30:48.440 and gave an answer
00:30:49.240 that was a long paragraph
00:30:50.320 and it didn't answer it,
00:30:52.580 so I'm going to try.
00:30:53.780 I don't actually expect
00:30:54.500 to get an answer
00:30:55.180 because I've asked
00:30:55.900 you this before,
00:30:57.260 but are you able
00:30:59.040 to answer yes or no
00:31:00.820 whether you consider
00:31:01.460 yourself a neutral
00:31:02.160 public forum?
00:31:02.800 I didn't testify
00:31:03.400 in the House, sir.
00:31:05.340 I'll answer the same way.
00:31:06.400 Okay, please do that.
00:31:07.600 Which is that Twitter
00:31:08.880 is an open
00:31:09.740 internet platform
00:31:10.740 where people
00:31:11.560 from all stripes
00:31:12.280 and political affiliations
00:31:13.600 all around the globe
00:31:14.760 come and speak.
00:31:16.940 So recently,
00:31:17.800 the CEO of Twitter,
00:31:19.700 Jack Dorsey,
00:31:20.540 said, quote,
00:31:21.660 I don't believe
00:31:22.320 that we can afford
00:31:23.020 to take a neutral
00:31:23.720 stance anymore.
00:31:24.640 I don't believe
00:31:25.240 that we should optimize
00:31:26.140 for neutrality.
00:31:27.520 Does this represent
00:31:28.620 the policy of Twitter?
00:31:29.480 I have not seen
00:31:31.640 that quote, sir.
00:31:33.400 Do you agree with it?
00:31:37.600 That is not how
00:31:38.660 he is building
00:31:39.420 the platform
00:31:40.600 and how everybody
00:31:42.200 who comes to Twitter
00:31:42.940 every day.
00:31:44.340 I think it's important
00:31:45.320 to note, sir,
00:31:46.280 that three quarters
00:31:47.520 of our users
00:31:48.960 are overseas
00:31:49.760 and that we are
00:31:51.440 a global company
00:31:52.200 that is staffed
00:31:53.440 globally.
00:31:54.480 All right, mister.
00:31:55.580 Yeah, I don't know
00:31:56.120 what that answers
00:31:58.920 to questions
00:31:59.720 that were not asked.
00:32:01.180 No answers
00:32:01.780 to questions
00:32:02.460 that were asked.
00:32:03.620 That's got to be
00:32:04.380 frustrating for
00:32:05.460 Senator Cruz
00:32:06.620 or for anyone
00:32:07.400 who wants an answer
00:32:08.240 to that.
00:32:10.040 Yeah, Cruz said
00:32:10.920 at the start,
00:32:11.460 you know,
00:32:11.720 part of the hearing
00:32:12.220 was about transparency
00:32:13.400 and getting some answers
00:32:14.500 on how tech companies
00:32:16.140 actually enforce
00:32:17.840 their policies
00:32:18.420 and clearly that
00:32:19.380 wasn't happening
00:32:20.120 at that committee.
00:32:21.000 But it's important
00:32:21.680 that the questions
00:32:22.260 were asked
00:32:23.060 and as you all
00:32:25.360 saw in that clip,
00:32:26.280 there was one point
00:32:27.060 where Twitter's
00:32:28.580 representative couldn't
00:32:29.180 answer for about
00:32:29.700 10 seconds.
00:32:31.160 And it wasn't just Cruz
00:32:32.320 also, there were other
00:32:32.960 senators at the hearing.
00:32:34.500 What we're seeing
00:32:35.260 in the Senate now
00:32:36.300 is a sort of new group
00:32:37.440 of Republican firebrands
00:32:38.680 who are very,
00:32:40.180 very focused
00:32:42.120 on the tech issue.
00:32:43.080 You have Josh Hawley
00:32:44.060 as well,
00:32:45.040 who's been taking
00:32:46.000 Google to task
00:32:46.740 especially,
00:32:47.320 and he also had
00:32:47.700 Marsha Blackburn
00:32:48.820 on the same committee.
00:32:49.700 She herself was a target
00:32:50.720 of Silicon Valley censorship
00:32:51.960 during the 2018
00:32:54.040 midterm elections.
00:32:55.020 She had her ads
00:32:55.640 banned by Facebook
00:32:56.480 and Twitter.
00:32:58.840 So we are going
00:33:00.060 to see,
00:33:00.560 I think,
00:33:01.220 more attention
00:33:01.780 given to this issue
00:33:02.640 in the Republican
00:33:03.340 controlled Senate.
00:33:05.040 But at the same time,
00:33:05.960 the Democrats
00:33:06.340 in the House
00:33:06.880 are now using
00:33:07.980 their control
00:33:08.720 of committees
00:33:09.200 to pressure
00:33:09.620 Silicon Valley
00:33:10.320 to do more censorship.
00:33:11.620 So we're really
00:33:12.280 seeing this battle
00:33:13.140 emerging for control
00:33:14.480 of social media
00:33:15.240 with the Republicans
00:33:16.000 pushing for less censorship
00:33:17.180 and the Democrats
00:33:17.760 pushing for more.
00:33:19.200 And they're both
00:33:19.820 going to use
00:33:20.300 their political weight
00:33:22.780 to achieve that.
00:33:24.280 What worries me
00:33:25.140 is that when a Democrat
00:33:26.360 threatens a tech company,
00:33:29.440 the tech companies
00:33:30.120 know it's going to be
00:33:30.660 back with regulation
00:33:31.660 because the Democrats
00:33:32.280 won't hesitate
00:33:32.940 to legislate.
00:33:34.340 Whereas Republicans
00:33:35.600 still have this faction
00:33:37.100 of free market conservatives
00:33:38.460 who just want
00:33:38.840 a totally hands-off approach
00:33:40.260 despite the fact,
00:33:42.220 as I believe it was
00:33:43.180 Ted Cruz
00:33:43.680 who said on the committee
00:33:44.860 that these companies
00:33:47.260 are now bigger
00:33:47.940 and more powerful
00:33:48.820 than Standard Oil
00:33:49.740 than Bell Telephones
00:33:52.280 than all the other
00:33:53.140 monopolies
00:33:54.280 that have been broken up
00:33:55.160 and regulated
00:33:55.940 in America's history.
00:33:57.420 I have to say
00:33:58.480 that if I once thought
00:34:00.240 that Donald Trump
00:34:00.840 might be the man
00:34:01.840 like Teddy Roosevelt
00:34:03.620 to trust bust
00:34:04.500 the Silicon Valley giants,
00:34:06.760 I no longer believe
00:34:07.660 he has that zip in him.
00:34:10.520 I just don't see it.
00:34:11.960 If a guy won't build a wall,
00:34:13.180 I don't think he's going
00:34:13.980 to bust up
00:34:15.140 the social media trust.
00:34:16.660 Let me play a clip.
00:34:17.420 You mentioned Josh Hawley
00:34:18.520 from Missouri.
00:34:19.220 I am not familiar with him
00:34:20.420 and that's one of the good things
00:34:21.820 about these senators
00:34:23.100 who are taking a run at it.
00:34:24.200 They're younger,
00:34:24.940 they're more tech savvy.
00:34:26.840 In some earlier iterations
00:34:28.300 of these Capitol Hill grillings,
00:34:30.960 it's clear that the people
00:34:32.260 who are asking questions
00:34:33.380 maybe at most
00:34:35.520 have a Facebook page at home
00:34:37.360 that their kids
00:34:38.020 show them how to use.
00:34:39.580 So Ted Cruz
00:34:41.080 seems to know stuff
00:34:42.140 and here's a clip
00:34:42.780 of Josh Hawley
00:34:43.900 in the Senate
00:34:44.360 who I think clearly
00:34:46.300 knows it's tough.
00:34:47.020 Take a look.
00:34:48.900 ...that the review team follows.
00:34:50.400 Is there a protocol
00:34:51.060 that they follow?
00:34:52.140 There are protocols
00:34:53.420 on any number of issues,
00:34:54.500 yes, sir.
00:34:55.120 Including about
00:34:55.900 de-platforming.
00:34:57.540 Let me explain.
00:34:59.200 First, just answer
00:34:59.940 that question.
00:35:00.540 Is there a protocol?
00:35:01.740 There are many
00:35:02.520 workflows and protocols
00:35:03.580 and processes.
00:35:04.260 Will you make those public?
00:35:05.740 We make our terms
00:35:06.840 of service public.
00:35:07.680 Will you make
00:35:07.960 the protocols public
00:35:08.920 for the review
00:35:09.520 of when you ban people
00:35:10.520 like the unplanned movie
00:35:11.600 and Jesse Kelly?
00:35:12.620 Will you make those
00:35:13.160 protocols as it relates
00:35:14.480 to the human reviewers?
00:35:15.580 Will you make those public?
00:35:16.500 I think you're aiming
00:35:17.340 at a very important question
00:35:18.280 which is transparency.
00:35:19.440 Why don't you just
00:35:20.100 first answer my question.
00:35:21.420 Will you make those public?
00:35:22.360 Will you commit today to me?
00:35:23.240 You said earlier
00:35:23.740 that you are
00:35:24.200 a pro-transparency company,
00:35:26.200 that you want
00:35:26.820 to embrace transparency.
00:35:28.340 So you have your chance now.
00:35:29.820 Tell us you'll make
00:35:30.360 the protocols public.
00:35:31.240 Will you make them public?
00:35:32.080 It's not up to me
00:35:32.800 to make them public, sir.
00:35:33.660 I mean, again,
00:35:36.360 the reference there
00:35:37.100 for folks who don't understand,
00:35:38.360 there is a pro-life movie
00:35:39.740 that was simply deleted
00:35:41.600 from Twitter.
00:35:43.200 Their account,
00:35:44.060 Jesse Kelly,
00:35:44.920 a humorous conservative
00:35:46.620 commentator from Texas,
00:35:47.720 simply deleted
00:35:48.820 and it was later found out
00:35:51.180 it was done by humans,
00:35:52.700 obviously,
00:35:53.200 not just an algorithm
00:35:54.180 and they would not
00:35:55.320 explain the rationale.
00:35:56.940 All the errors,
00:35:58.180 Alam,
00:35:58.700 seem to go one way.
00:36:00.140 In fact,
00:36:00.480 I can't even ever remember
00:36:02.160 a liberal or a Democrat
00:36:03.660 being deplatformed at all,
00:36:05.380 let alone by mistake.
00:36:08.260 Just a quick note,
00:36:09.280 and I'm not sure
00:36:09.740 if you know this,
00:36:10.300 Alam,
00:36:10.640 one day we went
00:36:11.540 to our Facebook page
00:36:12.620 and it said,
00:36:13.820 you've broken the terms
00:36:14.760 of service in a post,
00:36:17.120 press the button
00:36:18.180 to unpublish
00:36:19.180 your whole page.
00:36:20.180 They didn't tell us
00:36:20.980 what we did wrong,
00:36:23.360 what post out of our thousands
00:36:24.860 did it,
00:36:25.420 and the only button
00:36:26.420 we pushed,
00:36:26.860 there wasn't a yes or no,
00:36:27.780 it was unpublish
00:36:29.140 your whole page or not.
00:36:31.200 And I got in touch
00:36:33.120 with senior Facebook executives
00:36:36.040 here in Canada
00:36:36.760 and they,
00:36:37.480 after hours,
00:36:38.240 said,
00:36:38.480 oh,
00:36:38.800 it was a glitch.
00:36:40.540 That was all they would say,
00:36:42.260 it was a glitch.
00:36:44.240 So,
00:36:45.400 the glitches only happen
00:36:46.840 one way,
00:36:47.320 don't they?
00:36:48.740 Absolutely,
00:36:49.480 and YouTube as well.
00:36:50.860 They recently
00:36:51.420 permanently banned
00:36:52.920 Hunter Avalon,
00:36:53.940 who's a very mainstream
00:36:54.960 conservative YouTuber
00:36:56.460 who had over
00:36:57.160 500,000 subscribers,
00:36:58.760 and then about an hour later
00:37:00.520 they reinstated him
00:37:01.380 saying it was all
00:37:01.920 a mistake and error.
00:37:02.880 So this always happens
00:37:03.580 to conservatives
00:37:04.120 and it always happens
00:37:04.960 one way.
00:37:06.240 And you also have to think
00:37:07.460 about Auden-Rig
00:37:08.320 grassroots conservatives
00:37:09.280 who aren't able
00:37:10.080 to get a response
00:37:11.000 from the press departments
00:37:13.120 of these massive companies.
00:37:14.920 They're probably being
00:37:15.960 banned by accident
00:37:17.180 every day
00:37:17.740 without any recourse.
00:37:19.640 And this is,
00:37:20.800 you know,
00:37:21.060 Josh Hawley
00:37:21.560 is really a center
00:37:22.480 to watch on this issue
00:37:23.740 because he really
00:37:24.500 understands it inside out
00:37:26.040 and he asks exactly
00:37:26.740 the right question.
00:37:27.920 Why aren't these
00:37:28.600 protocols public?
00:37:30.140 We know that Twitter
00:37:31.740 has an algorithm
00:37:32.480 that suspends people
00:37:33.440 and we know it goes
00:37:34.120 for manual review.
00:37:35.220 We don't know
00:37:35.820 who does the manual reviewing.
00:37:37.140 We need to know that
00:37:37.900 if we're going to
00:37:38.620 hold them accountable.
00:37:39.920 Yeah,
00:37:40.180 you're so right.
00:37:41.000 I mean,
00:37:41.180 I actually didn't have
00:37:42.340 a friend at Facebook.
00:37:43.260 I just went on to LinkedIn
00:37:44.220 and I spammed
00:37:45.360 every single person
00:37:46.600 on the Canadian
00:37:47.440 executive list
00:37:48.600 of Facebook.
00:37:49.940 I just,
00:37:50.780 I mean,
00:37:51.080 imagine just saying
00:37:52.180 you've done something wrong.
00:37:53.440 We're not going to tell you
00:37:54.420 what you did wrong.
00:37:55.600 We're not going to tell you
00:37:56.680 when you did it wrong.
00:37:58.580 But take our word for it.
00:38:00.060 You did something wrong
00:38:00.920 sometime
00:38:01.360 and therefore
00:38:02.720 push this button
00:38:04.420 and you will be the one
00:38:06.640 who deletes your own website.
00:38:08.200 That was the weirdest
00:38:09.320 part of it.
00:38:10.120 They didn't have the courage
00:38:11.440 or the intellectual honesty
00:38:12.500 to delete our website.
00:38:13.980 They said,
00:38:14.720 so push this button
00:38:16.560 and it was only one button.
00:38:17.860 Alan,
00:38:19.120 there wasn't a yes
00:38:19.880 or a no.
00:38:20.600 It was now
00:38:21.820 you destroy your own.
00:38:24.120 Now take the pill.
00:38:25.440 It was so,
00:38:26.560 so weird.
00:38:27.220 And again,
00:38:27.520 I find myself
00:38:28.180 talking about me
00:38:29.240 and the rebel.
00:38:29.780 I don't particularly mean to
00:38:31.140 other than
00:38:32.120 I think we are
00:38:34.120 like Breitbart is
00:38:35.540 in the United States.
00:38:36.280 We are the target
00:38:37.300 of this
00:38:37.700 in Canada
00:38:38.740 most acutely.
00:38:40.600 Are you optimistic
00:38:41.780 or are you pessimistic here?
00:38:43.560 Are things getting
00:38:44.500 better or worse?
00:38:45.220 Well,
00:38:47.200 I'm optimistic
00:38:48.240 about the Senate
00:38:49.000 because we've got
00:38:49.560 these new senators now
00:38:50.760 who really do understand
00:38:51.960 the tech issue.
00:38:53.020 But at the same time,
00:38:53.740 you've got Democrats
00:38:54.460 applying a press
00:38:57.120 from the other direction
00:38:58.100 from the House.
00:38:59.360 And as you said,
00:39:00.040 the executive branch,
00:39:01.000 Trump has talked a lot,
00:39:02.820 tweeted a lot about
00:39:03.680 social media censorship
00:39:05.240 and bias.
00:39:06.100 But at the same time,
00:39:07.060 he has people like
00:39:07.820 Jared and Ivanka
00:39:08.980 in the White House
00:39:10.200 who certainly Jared,
00:39:11.800 I think,
00:39:12.080 agrees with the liberals
00:39:12.880 on this
00:39:13.540 and is quite friendly
00:39:15.100 to Silicon Valley.
00:39:16.020 He gave them
00:39:16.400 extra protection
00:39:17.000 to the USNCA,
00:39:18.020 the new trade bill.
00:39:19.660 I think the point
00:39:21.280 about errors
00:39:22.180 and suspensions
00:39:23.020 highlights one of the points
00:39:24.620 Cruz made,
00:39:25.380 which is that
00:39:25.840 Section 230 reform
00:39:27.100 is absolutely essential
00:39:28.120 to solving this problem.
00:39:29.500 That's the piece
00:39:30.080 of legislation
00:39:30.700 that says tech companies
00:39:31.840 are allowed to censor
00:39:33.100 use generated content
00:39:34.160 without any recourse.
00:39:35.480 If that part of Section 230
00:39:37.000 came out,
00:39:37.640 suddenly the courts
00:39:40.660 would open up
00:39:41.420 to ordinary users
00:39:43.700 who want to actually
00:39:44.600 hold these companies
00:39:45.380 account for mistaken
00:39:46.360 suspensions.
00:39:47.580 And I think then
00:39:48.140 you'd see companies
00:39:49.080 becoming a lot more
00:39:49.880 cautious about
00:39:50.880 who they suspend
00:39:51.700 and why.
00:39:53.440 And hopefully,
00:39:54.440 the end goal,
00:39:55.780 I think,
00:39:56.100 for all users
00:39:56.840 should be acquiring,
00:39:58.560 winning back,
00:39:59.200 taking back control
00:40:00.320 from the social media giants.
00:40:01.740 Yeah.
00:40:02.400 Because if you go back...
00:40:05.180 Sorry, go ahead,
00:40:05.940 Alam.
00:40:06.060 I didn't mean to interrupt you.
00:40:07.120 Yeah, just to close the point,
00:40:08.900 it's all about
00:40:09.440 giving control
00:40:10.280 back to the users.
00:40:11.320 There's absolutely no reason
00:40:12.580 for any social media company
00:40:14.120 to ban lawful content.
00:40:16.360 If people don't want to see
00:40:17.520 certain types of lawful content
00:40:18.960 filter it out of their feed,
00:40:21.200 they should be given
00:40:21.820 their choice to do that,
00:40:22.840 but it shouldn't be imposed
00:40:23.740 on them by Silicon Valley.
00:40:25.020 There's no reason
00:40:25.820 to do that.
00:40:27.060 The same algorithms
00:40:28.240 used to suspend
00:40:29.120 certain types of content
00:40:30.200 can be turned
00:40:31.600 into optional filters
00:40:32.560 that users press a button
00:40:34.040 to turn on or off,
00:40:35.340 just like Google Safe Search.
00:40:36.440 The technology's already there.
00:40:38.080 They have it.
00:40:38.960 The reason they aren't doing it
00:40:40.000 is because they want
00:40:40.460 to keep that control
00:40:41.380 and because Democrats
00:40:42.240 in the media are pressuring them
00:40:43.460 to keep that control.
00:40:44.560 Yeah, it's just as bad
00:40:45.480 up here in Canada.
00:40:46.300 Another day,
00:40:46.720 we'll have to have you
00:40:47.360 help us analyze
00:40:48.200 the threatening moves
00:40:49.400 by Karina Gould,
00:40:51.160 the so-called
00:40:51.760 Democratic Reform Minister
00:40:53.240 up here,
00:40:54.100 or Democratic Institutions Minister
00:40:55.680 who is moving
00:40:56.320 to censor the Internet.
00:40:57.900 You know, Alam,
00:40:58.340 I was going to close
00:40:59.020 by saying the best thing
00:41:00.100 that could happen
00:41:00.740 would be for Twitter
00:41:02.080 to ban Donald Trump
00:41:04.620 in a fit of censorship
00:41:06.060 because finally
00:41:06.920 he would understand
00:41:08.180 how catastrophic
00:41:09.220 this will be
00:41:09.860 to his presidency.
00:41:10.660 But as soon as I was
00:41:11.340 formulating those words
00:41:14.320 in my mind,
00:41:14.960 I thought,
00:41:15.340 well, hang on,
00:41:16.420 they are banning him.
00:41:17.680 On several occasions now,
00:41:19.180 they've simply deleted
00:41:20.460 videos that he's tweeted.
00:41:23.080 So they're sort of
00:41:23.920 conditioning even him
00:41:25.380 that they will censor him
00:41:27.060 if they bloody well please.
00:41:28.120 Last word to you.
00:41:28.760 Yeah, and Facebook
00:41:29.760 banned his immigration video
00:41:31.620 during the 2018
00:41:32.380 election campaign.
00:41:33.440 That's open election
00:41:34.720 interference with a campaign
00:41:37.060 video from the president.
00:41:39.100 And Twitter actually did
00:41:40.320 delete his account.
00:41:42.260 They called it
00:41:42.960 a rogue employee,
00:41:43.780 another one of those mistakes.
00:41:45.120 So, you know,
00:41:45.840 it's already happened.
00:41:47.320 They're already suspending
00:41:48.280 all his supporters.
00:41:49.700 They're already suppressing
00:41:50.780 pro-Trump populist media
00:41:53.540 on Google search.
00:41:54.500 It's already happening.
00:41:55.680 It's just, you know,
00:41:56.200 the question is
00:41:56.640 what is he going to do about it?
00:41:58.000 Well, this is terrifying stuff.
00:42:00.640 Hopefully, neither you nor I
00:42:02.700 will simply be unpersoned,
00:42:04.680 deplatformed, and evaporated
00:42:06.360 like the South Dakota
00:42:07.800 riot-boosting law
00:42:09.640 is being thrown down
00:42:12.140 the memory hole.
00:42:12.720 That is so bizarre
00:42:13.480 because there is nothing
00:42:14.660 more official than
00:42:15.400 the legislature of South Dakota,
00:42:17.480 but apparently that's not
00:42:19.180 legit enough for Google.
00:42:21.380 Great to see you again, Alan.
00:42:22.320 Thanks for your time.
00:42:23.680 Thanks, Ezra.
00:42:24.420 All right.
00:42:24.800 There's our friend Alan Bokari,
00:42:26.080 the senior tech editor
00:42:27.400 of Breitbart.com.
00:42:29.040 Stay with us.
00:42:29.520 More ahead on The Rebel.
00:42:41.040 Hey, welcome back
00:42:41.840 to my monologue yesterday
00:42:42.720 about six things
00:42:43.540 Jason Kenney could do
00:42:44.540 to get Alberta's oil
00:42:45.360 and gas sector
00:42:45.960 back on his feet.
00:42:46.620 Mark writes,
00:42:47.100 Virtually every member
00:42:48.940 of the mainstream media
00:42:49.820 is a riot booster
00:42:51.280 and Trudeau and Obama
00:42:52.920 and Notley
00:42:53.480 and especially
00:42:54.180 the most prominent
00:42:54.920 CBC hosts.
00:42:56.720 Well, and you're not
00:42:58.280 speaking metaphorically,
00:42:59.840 David Suzuki,
00:43:01.400 perhaps the most prominent
00:43:02.640 CBC-er now that
00:43:03.940 Gian Gomeshi was cashiered,
00:43:06.380 he personally attended
00:43:09.340 the riots in Burnaby
00:43:12.400 against the Trans Mountain
00:43:13.520 pipeline or at least
00:43:15.160 the illegal blockade.
00:43:16.280 I'm not sure if he was there
00:43:17.200 when the rioting happened,
00:43:18.300 but I know he came
00:43:19.360 to give support
00:43:20.060 whether it was before
00:43:20.900 or after the riots.
00:43:21.640 So yeah, yeah,
00:43:22.660 they don't just do it
00:43:23.520 through the media,
00:43:24.420 they do it in person.
00:43:26.860 Henson writes,
00:43:28.280 Great recommendations, Ezra.
00:43:29.700 If those could be passed
00:43:30.500 in BC,
00:43:31.300 I'd be happy to see
00:43:32.220 David Suzuki get charged
00:43:33.340 and put away
00:43:33.820 for riot boosting.
00:43:37.460 Well, yeah,
00:43:38.600 I mean, riot boosting.
00:43:39.940 We have incitement
00:43:41.060 to riot.
00:43:41.660 We have conspiracy.
00:43:42.680 This just makes it
00:43:43.700 very particular
00:43:44.520 and it allows people
00:43:46.540 to sue civilly
00:43:48.000 and I think you get
00:43:49.040 triple damages.
00:43:49.960 So let's say
00:43:50.920 you're an oil company
00:43:51.840 and someone smashed up
00:43:53.360 your terminal
00:43:53.820 and cost you
00:43:54.720 $50,000 in damages.
00:43:56.540 You can sue
00:43:57.480 and get triple.
00:43:58.880 That would make
00:43:59.600 these environmental groups
00:44:00.640 avoid you.
00:44:03.040 Ron writes,
00:44:04.660 While what you propose
00:44:05.300 for Kenya is worth adopting,
00:44:06.420 I don't see how
00:44:07.000 it will get pipelines built.
00:44:08.240 You're correct.
00:44:11.580 It's not going to get
00:44:12.440 pipelines built
00:44:13.180 if there are
00:44:14.480 these three problems.
00:44:15.620 Number one,
00:44:16.140 Justin Trudeau.
00:44:17.440 Number two,
00:44:19.920 BC's Premier Horgan.
00:44:21.300 And number three,
00:44:21.880 the courts.
00:44:22.880 You're right.
00:44:23.700 Yeah, you're right.
00:44:26.000 I think we need
00:44:27.020 to change the culture
00:44:28.320 to demonize
00:44:30.320 and denormalize
00:44:31.680 the law-breaking
00:44:33.280 scofflaw
00:44:34.000 foreign lobbyists
00:44:35.240 and to normalize
00:44:36.880 working.
00:44:37.300 Trump is doing
00:44:38.760 that in America.
00:44:39.520 When he showed up
00:44:40.400 at that campaign rally
00:44:41.920 with a sign that said
00:44:42.740 Trump digs coal,
00:44:44.780 a decade worth
00:44:45.620 of coal demonization
00:44:46.820 was stopped
00:44:47.340 in its tracks.
00:44:48.420 Now,
00:44:48.740 there's still a lot
00:44:49.240 more work to do,
00:44:49.980 but Trump doesn't
00:44:51.040 demonize coal
00:44:51.700 like Obama did
00:44:52.720 and like Trudeau does.
00:44:55.200 Speaking of Trump,
00:44:55.960 I think he may be
00:44:56.700 the only pipeline
00:44:57.440 Albert he gets
00:44:58.040 in the next five years.
00:44:59.440 The keystone excel.
00:45:01.740 On my interview
00:45:02.520 with Mark Morano,
00:45:03.440 Anna writes,
00:45:05.400 Greta Thunberg
00:45:06.300 really creeps me out.
00:45:08.240 Also,
00:45:08.880 she has these
00:45:09.600 crazy eyes.
00:45:11.400 Reminds me of
00:45:12.520 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
00:45:16.440 You were so right
00:45:17.560 about it on your show
00:45:18.500 last night.
00:45:19.540 I have the same feeling
00:45:20.700 she has successfully
00:45:21.940 started a mass psychosis
00:45:23.680 among her peers
00:45:24.900 which spreads
00:45:25.680 like a wildfire.
00:45:26.900 It reminds me
00:45:27.420 of the Children's Crusade
00:45:28.840 from 1212.
00:45:30.480 She does have
00:45:33.640 crazy eyes
00:45:34.160 and I'm not
00:45:34.940 saying like,
00:45:36.740 you know,
00:45:36.960 some people are cross-eyed.
00:45:37.920 I'm not making fun
00:45:38.660 like that.
00:45:40.140 I'm not even making fun
00:45:41.320 of how she looks.
00:45:42.100 I'm talking about
00:45:42.980 what she does.
00:45:44.060 She styles her hair
00:45:45.140 with the pigtails
00:45:45.980 and she dresses
00:45:46.700 like a child
00:45:48.040 of tender years
00:45:48.740 although Mark told me
00:45:50.120 yesterday,
00:45:50.760 I think,
00:45:51.000 that she's 16.
00:45:53.060 And the way
00:45:53.880 she looks
00:45:54.720 like that,
00:45:55.520 that's not a mannerism
00:45:56.700 or a tick.
00:45:59.020 That is dramatic acting
00:46:01.280 and it's super creepy.
00:46:04.960 I think it really
00:46:05.840 is creepy.
00:46:06.960 I have to look
00:46:07.560 into the Child's Crusade
00:46:09.200 of 1212
00:46:09.760 because even just
00:46:10.920 hearing those words
00:46:11.820 is creepy
00:46:13.740 but I want to learn
00:46:15.060 because surely
00:46:16.400 there's nothing new
00:46:17.540 under the sun
00:46:18.180 and if there was
00:46:19.280 some childish cult
00:46:20.260 800 years ago,
00:46:23.000 perhaps what we're seeing
00:46:25.320 in this global warming mania
00:46:26.900 is an echo of that.
00:46:29.000 Thanks for the tip.
00:46:31.120 Well, what do you think
00:46:31.800 about my review
00:46:32.520 of Omar Subadar?
00:46:35.900 If you were Andrew Scheer,
00:46:37.040 would you meet with him?
00:46:38.420 Do you think
00:46:38.760 he did his due diligence
00:46:39.820 on that guy
00:46:41.020 and said,
00:46:41.900 look, I just got
00:46:42.560 to meet with him.
00:46:43.180 I just got to meet
00:46:43.720 with somebody.
00:46:45.200 I can tell
00:46:46.000 he put some thought
00:46:46.680 into it.
00:46:47.660 There were two
00:46:48.280 uncovered,
00:46:49.460 attractive Muslim women
00:46:50.920 who were prominent
00:46:53.060 in the photos.
00:46:54.040 That sends
00:46:54.540 a different message
00:46:55.240 and covered hijabis.
00:46:57.900 He did not use
00:46:58.960 the word Islamophobia.
00:47:00.380 He said
00:47:00.760 anti-Muslim bigotry
00:47:02.500 which is more precise
00:47:04.220 and therefore
00:47:04.820 doesn't sweep up
00:47:06.320 legitimate criticism
00:47:07.600 of Islam.
00:47:09.260 I don't know
00:47:10.320 if he vetted
00:47:11.100 his guest list
00:47:12.380 and if he did,
00:47:13.960 I wonder why
00:47:14.800 he decided
00:47:15.540 it was okay.
00:47:17.940 We'll have to ask him
00:47:18.920 one day.
00:47:19.320 I'm sure he'll sit down
00:47:20.160 for an interview
00:47:20.680 with us any day now.
00:47:22.180 Until next time,
00:47:23.100 on behalf of all us
00:47:23.900 here at Rebel World
00:47:24.540 Headquarters,
00:47:25.040 see you at home.
00:47:25.460 Good night.
00:47:26.420 Keep fighting for freedom.
00:47:27.380 Good night.
00:47:27.520 Keep fighting for freedom.