Rebel News Podcast - January 04, 2020


Rebel Roundup： Abagail Hamman and Sheila Gunn Reid


Episode Stats

Length

35 minutes

Words per Minute

157.4481

Word Count

5,529

Sentence Count

292

Misogynist Sentences

11

Hate Speech Sentences

9


Summary

Sheila Gunn-Reed and Abigail Hammond join host David Menzies to discuss the government's plan for a $600 million bailout for Canadian media outlets. They also discuss the latest in the Samuel Opoku case, and the reaction to it.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hello, Rebels. You're listening to a free audio-only recording of my show, Rebel Roundup.
00:00:06.920 Tonight, my guests are Sheila Gunn-Reed and Abigail Hammond.
00:00:10.920 If you like listening to this podcast, then you would love watching it.
00:00:15.460 But in order to watch, you need to be a subscriber to premium content.
00:00:20.520 That's what we call our long-format TV-style shows here on The Rebel.
00:00:25.380 Subscribers get access to watching my weekly show as well as other great TV-style shows too.
00:00:32.260 It's only $8 a month to subscribe or you can subscribe annually and get two months free.
00:00:39.020 And just for podcast listeners, you can save an extra 10% on a new premium membership
00:00:45.640 by using the coupon code PODCAST when you subscribe.
00:00:50.800 Just go to premium.rebelnews.com to become a member.
00:00:57.100 And please leave a five-star review on this podcast and subscribe in iTunes or wherever you listen to podcasts.
00:01:04.320 Those reviews are a great way to support The Rebel without having to spend a dime.
00:01:09.800 And now, enjoy this free audio-only version of my show.
00:01:13.920 Welcome to Rebel Roundup, ladies and gentlemen, and the rest of you.
00:01:32.680 The show in which we look back at some of the very best commentaries of the week by your favourite rebels.
00:01:37.920 I'm your host, David Menzies.
00:01:39.680 Remember that $600 million newspaper bailout announced last year by the Trudeau Liberals?
00:01:46.260 Well, shockers!
00:01:48.140 There are apparently some strings attached.
00:01:51.600 Namely, those papers now getting taxpayer-funded welfare better say nice things about the Liberals or else.
00:01:59.180 Sheila Gunn-Reed will have all the news that is unfit to broadcast.
00:02:03.240 And did you catch the most recent Democratic Party debate from Lotusland?
00:02:10.080 If not, I'm sorry to say you might have missed the most unintentionally funny GabFest of 2019.
00:02:15.960 But not to worry, Abigail Hammond has all the knee-slapping highlights.
00:02:21.320 And finally, letters.
00:02:22.680 We get your letters.
00:02:23.460 We get them every minute of every day.
00:02:25.180 And I'll share some of your responses regarding my encounter with Samuel Opoku outside the courthouse of Toronto's Old City Hall.
00:02:33.780 Opoku is the individual who stands accused of pouring buckets of liquefied human feces over the heads of five individuals on three separate occasions.
00:02:44.940 But as you'll see, when he's confronted by a camera and microphone, Opoku, he's not so brazen.
00:02:51.360 Those are your rebels.
00:02:52.480 Now let's round them up.
00:02:55.180 The media, all over, is overwhelmingly liberal.
00:03:02.460 And people are force-fed liberalism every night on their TVs.
00:03:06.580 And LeBoutelier, unfortunately, she ran into people in her riding who rejected it.
00:03:11.100 And it appears she was startled by these free thinkers in Quebec who reject Ottawa's paternalism.
00:03:17.940 I mean, think about the last time you saw a balanced panel on the state broadcaster that reflected you or your community.
00:03:24.140 Or that didn't treat generally mainstream ideas supported by the majority of Canadians.
00:03:30.080 Ideas like reduced immigration rates or freedom of speech like some sort of white supremacist plot.
00:03:36.700 Yeah, exactly.
00:03:37.720 It's basically never, right?
00:03:39.000 And who could forget how Unifor, the National Media Party Union, declared themselves the resistance to the Conservatives, with little or nearly no pushback from their own membership.
00:03:52.500 Gosh, what a surly-looking bunch, by the way.
00:03:55.340 But LeBoutelier is implying the media was not liberal-friendly enough to her?
00:04:00.020 Well, not to worry.
00:04:01.520 LeBoutelier has a plan for this.
00:04:04.320 Guess what liberal minister is picking the recipients of the $600 million media party bailout?
00:04:10.900 The revenue minister, LeBoutelier herself.
00:04:14.240 Blackflocs has the details.
00:04:15.800 And just like us, Blackflocs says they won't take any of that bailout cash either.
00:04:21.160 It reads,
00:04:21.820 Tax officials in a document called Guidance on the Income Tax Measures to Support Journalism said Minister LeBoutelier would have final veto over which newspapers would qualify for aid.
00:04:35.240 So how does that old saying go again?
00:04:37.640 If you make a deal with the devil, it's probably a good idea to read the fine print.
00:04:41.900 Because when it comes to those print outlets accepting filthy lucre from the federal liberals,
00:04:48.440 well, what if the fine print basically suggests that if your newspaper is critical of the feds,
00:04:54.640 space must be provided so that the libs can spin their fibs to the readership?
00:05:00.640 Oh my.
00:05:01.320 With more on this story is the host of The Gun Show, Sheila Gunn-Reed,
00:05:05.000 a journalist that could never be bought and paid for.
00:05:08.380 Welcome to Rebel Roundup, my friend.
00:05:09.800 Hey, David. Happy New Year.
00:05:12.200 Happy New Year to you, Sheila.
00:05:14.000 So, my friend, can any media outlet right now in Canada claim to be objective
00:05:20.200 when they are accepting this sort of bailout dough given all these inherent strings attached?
00:05:28.000 Well, no. I mean, but what's the difference?
00:05:30.740 I mean, for so many of these journalistic outlets,
00:05:35.220 normally they would be shouting from the rooftops
00:05:39.040 if conservatives had attached this sort of caveat to their funding.
00:05:45.620 But you're not hearing any outrage about the fact that the liberals are requiring
00:05:50.920 journalistic outlets, be they print or broadcast,
00:05:55.100 to allow the government space for rebuttal if you write an article critical of the government
00:06:04.160 or do a broadcast critical of the government.
00:06:07.300 You're not hearing anything from the journalists.
00:06:09.080 You'd think that there would be extreme pushback because, you know,
00:06:14.300 they basically are required to publish liberal propaganda in the form of a balanced rebuttal.
00:06:21.520 Well, but the journalists are all but quiet.
00:06:25.120 I mean, I think I'm the only person talking about this.
00:06:27.160 You know, you're absolutely right, Sheila.
00:06:28.660 And I can tell you, I remember once going to a journalism seminar in the 80s,
00:06:33.020 and there was this example.
00:06:34.720 It was about, remember the Exxon Valdez tragedy where there was the oil spill in Alaska?
00:06:40.660 And it was about how there was a Toronto Star journalism photographer.
00:06:44.540 They had to get to the scene.
00:06:46.040 And the only way to get to it was by Exxon's corporate helicopter.
00:06:50.040 And the star actually, to their credit, in the aftermath,
00:06:55.340 worked out how much that would have cost and sent a check to Exxon
00:06:59.840 because they didn't want any freebies.
00:07:02.520 There was this absolute separation of church and state, you know,
00:07:06.160 and we're not going to be bought for.
00:07:07.520 Now they can hardly get their mitts on this taxpayer grub.
00:07:12.580 They must be desperate, Sheila.
00:07:15.440 Well, of course they're desperate.
00:07:16.620 Every week is another round of layoffs.
00:07:18.320 I mean, we've been hearing about the demise of the rebel for, well, pretty close to five years now.
00:07:24.340 And in the meantime, we watch everybody else get laid off.
00:07:28.300 The most astounding thing, and you and I were talking about this off air,
00:07:32.160 is the Alberta government under, they called him Bible Bill Eberhardt.
00:07:36.440 He was the premier of Alberta, social credit premier.
00:07:38.700 He passed a law that basically said that newspapers had to publish a rebuttal from the government
00:07:48.360 if they were critical of the government.
00:07:51.740 And that law was ruled unconstitutional because the Edmonton Journal challenged it.
00:07:58.220 And the Edmonton Journal was the first foreign newspaper to ever win a Pulitzer Prize
00:08:02.960 because they challenged this law, had it ruled unconstitutional,
00:08:08.240 and defended their own journalistic independence and integrity.
00:08:11.880 And yet, I've heard nothing from former Edmonton Journal columnist,
00:08:17.760 now so-called independent, liberal-appointed Senator Paula Simons about this.
00:08:23.140 And you'd think that she would be somebody who is shouting about this from the rooftops again,
00:08:28.180 complete and utter silence from the journalists,
00:08:30.560 and now the former journalists who call themselves independent senators.
00:08:35.480 No, you're absolutely right, Sheila.
00:08:39.480 What's the term?
00:08:41.020 They've gone native, I guess, when it comes to getting some payola on the side.
00:08:47.580 And, I mean, listen, I understand their business model,
00:08:50.980 which was conceived before the internet, it doesn't work anymore.
00:08:55.760 Newspapers that were, you know, weekend editions that were once the size of a town's phone book
00:09:00.720 are now the size of pamphlets.
00:09:02.580 But still, A, it is not the government's mandate to bail out media outlets
00:09:10.160 or any corporations as far as I'm concerned in the auto sector,
00:09:14.040 Chrysler, GM, which are always coming up to the trough.
00:09:17.140 And B, I don't see how any journalist, how any publisher or newspaper owner
00:09:22.500 can say we are completely independent and unbiased
00:09:27.820 when you've got a political party, essentially, paying for your existence?
00:09:34.980 What are your thoughts on that, Sheila?
00:09:36.840 Well, I think this does something else, too.
00:09:41.200 It actually makes journalism far worse,
00:09:44.420 because we've figured out that there's a different way to do it,
00:09:48.700 that you need to innovate, you need to be ahead of technology
00:09:52.520 and embrace technology and embrace new ways of doing things.
00:09:56.480 But the other legacy media outlets and the mainstream media,
00:10:01.880 they aren't doing any of that.
00:10:03.480 They aren't changing their business model.
00:10:05.220 They aren't adapting to what their readership or viewership wants.
00:10:09.700 They aren't responsive to the consumer at all.
00:10:13.060 And the liberals are giving them money under the guise of protecting journalism
00:10:19.060 because they value journalism, but actually they're making it worse.
00:10:22.660 And it's only going to get worse.
00:10:24.740 And there will come a time where they, even the liberals, I think,
00:10:28.800 are going to come to a realization that they're throwing good money after bad.
00:10:32.800 And all these news outlets who failed to innovate
00:10:35.760 and failed to respond to the consumer,
00:10:37.620 I think they are in for a very rude awakening.
00:10:39.960 And this bailout, I think, will play a part
00:10:42.660 in completely collapsing the news industry in Canada at some point
00:10:45.960 because it will be a bubble that will eventually burst.
00:10:48.940 No, you know, I think you're absolutely right, Sheila.
00:10:51.520 And, you know, most of my life in the journalism business, I was in print.
00:10:55.600 And I can tell you this, you know,
00:10:57.520 sometimes I'd work for an organization
00:11:00.360 which the publisher was somewhat delusional
00:11:03.680 in terms of putting out content
00:11:06.120 in order to fool or mislead the reader.
00:11:09.240 And what I've always said, Sheila,
00:11:11.760 is the reader is a lot smarter
00:11:13.300 than you're giving him or her credit for.
00:11:15.980 They can smell it when something stinks
00:11:18.740 or something's being covered up
00:11:20.400 or something's being spun a certain way.
00:11:22.940 And certainly in your piece,
00:11:24.660 you exposed the numbers
00:11:28.060 in terms of the sheer volume of readers out there
00:11:31.400 that simply aren't buying
00:11:33.680 what a lot of the mainstream media is selling.
00:11:36.120 Yeah, CBC's viewership, I think, is at the lowest ever.
00:11:40.740 And, you know, even they have layoffs.
00:11:44.740 Now, think about CBC for a second.
00:11:46.740 A billion and a half in taxpayer subsidy.
00:11:49.600 Mandatory carriage on cable and satellite.
00:11:52.600 They get to sell ads.
00:11:54.980 So they compete with the private sector news organizations
00:11:58.740 and entertainment organizations for ads.
00:12:02.000 And yet they still can't make a go of it.
00:12:04.080 They have layoffs.
00:12:05.400 And now everybody's outraged down at the CBC
00:12:07.980 because they aren't insulated from reality anymore.
00:12:11.600 And the thing is, I think,
00:12:13.820 with a lot of these news agencies,
00:12:15.040 and you just pointed it out,
00:12:16.960 back when it was just print and just news,
00:12:20.260 the consumer was smart enough to figure out
00:12:22.560 when they were being sold a line.
00:12:24.260 But it's even worse now
00:12:25.860 with the advent of the internet.
00:12:28.520 People can fact check
00:12:30.160 what's being reported to them in real time
00:12:33.720 by going on the internet,
00:12:34.820 by going on Twitter,
00:12:35.720 by going on Facebook
00:12:36.620 and seeing the posts themselves.
00:12:38.760 And every time the media takes for granted
00:12:42.900 just how smart their readership is
00:12:45.160 and the consumer is,
00:12:46.220 they hurt their own credibility
00:12:47.480 and it just leads to more and more layoffs.
00:12:50.180 Oh, 100%, Sheila.
00:12:51.040 And I can tell our viewers,
00:12:52.320 if you're ever in downtown Toronto,
00:12:53.580 please go visit the CBC headquarters.
00:12:58.240 It's right across the street
00:12:59.200 from the convention center in the Sky Dome.
00:13:01.580 It is a Taj Mahal broadcast temple.
00:13:04.940 It is obscene,
00:13:06.880 the amount of money that's being spent.
00:13:08.200 In fact, given the footprint of that building,
00:13:10.360 the best thing, Sheila,
00:13:11.560 the CBC could do for the Canadian public
00:13:13.460 would be to raise that studio
00:13:16.000 and have a 90-story condo office tower go up
00:13:20.760 because that land is priceless.
00:13:23.240 But they're too entitled to do that.
00:13:25.660 One last question, Sheila.
00:13:27.600 And it's this.
00:13:28.720 You know, maybe, you know,
00:13:30.560 you alluded to this,
00:13:31.520 that, you know,
00:13:32.060 the liberals probably didn't even have to do this
00:13:34.900 in the first place
00:13:35.660 because we see time and time again
00:13:39.180 self-censorship happening.
00:13:41.380 And I've always said, Sheila,
00:13:42.740 if there's anything worse
00:13:43.600 than government-mandated censorship,
00:13:46.520 it's when a journalist self-censors him or herself.
00:13:50.600 And we see it all the time
00:13:53.300 because they realize that, you know,
00:13:55.880 rattling the cage,
00:13:57.520 stirring the pot
00:13:58.340 might not be in their financial best interest,
00:14:01.560 especially given the media landscape
00:14:03.960 because there's so few opportunities out there.
00:14:07.200 What do you have to say, my friend?
00:14:08.520 Well, like I said off the top,
00:14:11.560 I don't understand what difference this makes.
00:14:15.300 The media outlets are going to print government spin
00:14:18.520 as though it were fact anyway.
00:14:20.180 I mean, during the NDP time in office,
00:14:23.900 I, of course, got their press releases.
00:14:26.460 And I would see those about four hours later
00:14:30.440 printed verbatim,
00:14:33.340 almost precisely by the CBC
00:14:36.160 or the Edmonton Journal or Global News,
00:14:38.700 just as though it were fact,
00:14:41.340 as though it were, you know,
00:14:42.500 first-person journalism,
00:14:44.020 that they went out there
00:14:44.940 and gathered the news themselves
00:14:46.480 when all they did was just rework,
00:14:49.200 nearly word for word,
00:14:51.180 an NDP press release.
00:14:52.640 And we see it all the time.
00:14:54.080 So, you know,
00:14:54.880 and I know the same thing happens
00:14:57.260 at the federal level.
00:14:58.180 So this requirement
00:15:00.000 that news outlets have to allow space
00:15:04.760 for the liberals
00:15:05.400 to write their own rebuttal,
00:15:07.620 I think it's redundant.
00:15:08.700 They would and do do it anyway.
00:15:11.980 And, you know,
00:15:12.620 they're not even shy about it.
00:15:13.860 I mean, as you alluded to
00:15:14.660 in your commentary, Sheila,
00:15:16.440 that Unifor,
00:15:18.020 you know,
00:15:19.080 press release
00:15:20.000 of We Are The Resistance,
00:15:21.400 We Are The Resistance,
00:15:21.960 I mean,
00:15:22.520 they're blamed about it.
00:15:23.840 And Unifor, of course,
00:15:24.780 for the viewers
00:15:25.540 who might not know,
00:15:26.440 that they represent
00:15:27.380 so many of the unionized journalists
00:15:28.840 in Canada.
00:15:29.700 Unbelievable.
00:15:30.420 Well, let's see where this goes.
00:15:33.100 And I think this is something
00:15:35.740 whoever the next leader
00:15:37.220 of the Conservative Party is
00:15:39.000 must stand against
00:15:41.240 because it's not right
00:15:42.840 in terms of a moral,
00:15:44.960 ethical,
00:15:45.640 and physical point of view.
00:15:47.340 Sheila, thank you once again
00:15:48.420 for another superb commentary
00:15:50.100 and all the best to you in 2020.
00:15:52.580 You too, David.
00:15:53.300 Have a great weekend.
00:15:54.080 Thank you so much.
00:15:54.900 And that was Sheila Gunn-Reed
00:15:56.960 somewhere in Alberta.
00:15:59.100 Keep it here, folks.
00:16:00.000 More of Rebel Roundup
00:16:00.900 to come right after this.
00:16:07.240 But my favorite part of the night
00:16:08.980 was when Mayor Pete Buttigieg
00:16:10.580 called the Elizabeth Warren out
00:16:12.260 after she went after him
00:16:13.720 for his Crystal Cave fundraiser.
00:16:16.000 You know,
00:16:16.780 according to Forest Magazine,
00:16:18.480 I am literally the only person
00:16:20.060 on this stage
00:16:20.840 who's not a millionaire
00:16:22.140 or a billionaire.
00:16:23.080 So if...
00:16:25.140 This is important.
00:16:27.300 This is the problem
00:16:28.600 with issuing purity tests
00:16:30.340 you cannot yourself pass.
00:16:34.140 If I pledged...
00:16:35.140 If I pledged never to be
00:16:38.600 in the company
00:16:39.460 of a progressive,
00:16:41.200 Democratic donor,
00:16:42.180 I couldn't be up here.
00:16:43.840 Senator, your net worth
00:16:44.760 is 100 times mine.
00:16:46.160 Remember, Elizabeth Warren
00:16:48.220 used to get her campaign funds
00:16:49.680 from big-ticket fundraisers.
00:16:51.380 And she made millions
00:16:52.740 from defending large corporations
00:16:54.500 whom she now despises.
00:16:56.720 Your presidential campaign
00:16:58.520 right now,
00:16:59.560 as we speak,
00:17:00.800 is funded in part
00:17:01.840 by money you transferred,
00:17:03.960 having raised it
00:17:04.780 at those exact same
00:17:06.200 big-ticket fundraisers
00:17:07.680 you now denounce.
00:17:08.520 At least we got
00:17:09.900 to close the night,
00:17:11.140 knowing the candidates
00:17:11.940 completely understand
00:17:13.740 what the greatest threat
00:17:14.820 is to the United States.
00:17:16.580 People of colour,
00:17:18.340 in fact,
00:17:18.980 are going to be
00:17:19.580 the people
00:17:20.280 suffering most
00:17:21.640 if we do not deal
00:17:22.840 with climate change.
00:17:24.140 I'm the only one
00:17:24.860 on this stage
00:17:25.320 who said
00:17:25.700 climate is my
00:17:26.740 number one priority.
00:17:28.880 That climate change
00:17:29.880 threatens every living thing
00:17:31.780 on this planet.
00:17:33.540 If I'm still here,
00:17:34.620 I'll see you next time.
00:17:35.640 Well, those were just
00:17:36.820 some of the highlights,
00:17:38.120 or is the proper term
00:17:39.340 lowlights,
00:17:40.340 at the most recent
00:17:41.460 Democratic debate
00:17:42.480 in Los Angeles.
00:17:43.780 Oh my,
00:17:44.600 so many Democrats
00:17:45.740 on stage espousing
00:17:46.980 so much hypocrisy,
00:17:49.040 so much imaginary
00:17:50.060 fear-mongering.
00:17:51.620 Indeed,
00:17:52.140 at certain points,
00:17:53.200 it began to resemble
00:17:54.220 a Saturday Night Live sketch,
00:17:56.480 assuming the writers
00:17:57.380 at SNL
00:17:58.340 would ever dare
00:17:59.240 skewer the Dems
00:18:00.340 as much as they
00:18:01.060 skewer President Trump.
00:18:02.800 But in the final analysis,
00:18:04.360 the takeaway
00:18:04.880 of this debate
00:18:05.680 was simply this.
00:18:07.140 Regardless of who wins
00:18:08.300 the Democratic nomination,
00:18:10.260 let's be honest, folks,
00:18:11.320 we're probably looking
00:18:12.440 at four more years
00:18:13.680 of Donald Trump
00:18:14.380 in the White House
00:18:15.100 come November.
00:18:16.680 And with more
00:18:17.660 on this debacle
00:18:18.960 of a debate
00:18:19.580 is our Hawaii-based
00:18:21.060 correspondent,
00:18:21.920 Abigail Hammond.
00:18:22.880 Welcome to Rebel Roundup
00:18:24.040 for the first time,
00:18:25.120 Abigail.
00:18:26.360 Hey,
00:18:26.960 thanks for having me.
00:18:28.020 It is a pleasure.
00:18:29.060 So, you know,
00:18:29.480 Abigail,
00:18:30.100 there are many types
00:18:31.380 of comedy out there
00:18:32.480 in the world.
00:18:33.040 Black humor,
00:18:33.760 slapstick,
00:18:34.920 double entendres,
00:18:36.180 the list goes on.
00:18:37.020 But I think
00:18:37.420 my favorite kind
00:18:38.300 of comedy
00:18:38.800 is unintentional humor.
00:18:41.020 And I found
00:18:41.820 this debate
00:18:42.560 to be so
00:18:44.300 unintentionally funny
00:18:45.640 on so many occasions,
00:18:47.240 like Bernie Saunders
00:18:48.700 fretting that
00:18:49.660 people of color,
00:18:50.860 for whatever reason,
00:18:52.060 stand to be
00:18:52.540 the most victimized
00:18:53.580 group due to
00:18:54.460 climate change.
00:18:55.820 What was your
00:18:56.840 overall assessment
00:18:57.780 of this debate?
00:18:58.560 It was hilarious.
00:19:02.280 I mean,
00:19:03.100 first of all,
00:19:03.860 you come into this debate
00:19:05.080 and you're looking
00:19:06.020 on stage
00:19:07.060 and you go,
00:19:07.800 for the party
00:19:08.380 that's supposed
00:19:08.880 to be representing
00:19:09.600 diversity,
00:19:10.940 and really,
00:19:11.480 in their eyes,
00:19:12.020 diversity should be
00:19:13.020 just of color
00:19:13.860 and not of thought.
00:19:15.160 All the people
00:19:15.820 on stage,
00:19:16.560 you know,
00:19:16.820 besides Andrew Yang,
00:19:18.500 are white.
00:19:19.160 And, you know,
00:19:19.640 you have these
00:19:20.080 old white men
00:19:20.940 who are,
00:19:21.680 you know,
00:19:22.040 definitely,
00:19:22.940 that's what's
00:19:23.520 despised by,
00:19:24.720 supposedly despised
00:19:25.720 by the Democrats,
00:19:26.500 but they're up there
00:19:27.260 representing the
00:19:28.000 Democratic Party
00:19:28.800 and they're high
00:19:29.400 up there in the polls.
00:19:30.880 And it's just
00:19:32.080 so hypocritical.
00:19:33.120 It's hilarious.
00:19:35.620 That was one of my
00:19:36.700 favorite highlights
00:19:37.420 of it,
00:19:37.740 to be honest,
00:19:38.380 just from the start.
00:19:40.120 Oh, no,
00:19:40.500 there were so many
00:19:41.240 and my goodness,
00:19:42.240 we are,
00:19:42.580 this is going to be
00:19:43.280 the year of identity
00:19:45.320 politics for sure.
00:19:46.560 You know,
00:19:46.700 Abigail,
00:19:47.140 I was,
00:19:48.420 I wondered about
00:19:49.320 that quote
00:19:49.920 that was given
00:19:50.560 by the moderator
00:19:51.360 attributed to Barack Obama
00:19:53.680 and he said,
00:19:54.980 quote,
00:19:55.200 if women were in charge,
00:19:56.760 you'd see a significant
00:19:58.160 improvement on just
00:19:59.600 about everything.
00:20:00.940 Two questions for you,
00:20:01.960 Abigail.
00:20:02.380 One,
00:20:02.700 as a woman yourself,
00:20:04.620 do you feel like
00:20:05.860 these kind of statements
00:20:06.980 is just so much
00:20:08.080 unnecessary pandering?
00:20:09.740 And two,
00:20:10.680 if Mr. Obama
00:20:11.720 really believed that,
00:20:13.280 then why did he get
00:20:14.340 in Hillary Clinton's way
00:20:15.660 in 2008?
00:20:18.400 Yeah,
00:20:19.260 well,
00:20:19.560 it's definitely pandering.
00:20:21.020 What actually is funny
00:20:22.000 about that quote,
00:20:22.660 to be honest,
00:20:23.860 first of all,
00:20:24.320 if that's true,
00:20:25.700 then the person
00:20:26.260 who really should be
00:20:27.300 up on stage right now
00:20:28.460 and the person
00:20:28.900 who should win
00:20:29.840 the nominee,
00:20:31.180 nomination,
00:20:32.160 is going to be
00:20:32.920 Tulsi Gabbard
00:20:33.620 because she is the only
00:20:34.940 one who is a woman
00:20:35.820 of color
00:20:36.360 who's left in the race,
00:20:37.780 if I'm correct about that.
00:20:39.380 You know,
00:20:39.600 and so,
00:20:40.380 what's funny about that,
00:20:41.560 so that's,
00:20:42.160 you know,
00:20:42.500 that's where that stands
00:20:43.580 right there
00:20:44.200 and it's definitely pandering
00:20:47.640 and it's definitely,
00:20:48.200 it's not helpful
00:20:49.040 because it goes,
00:20:50.120 it's not looking
00:20:50.840 at the policies,
00:20:51.560 it's not looking
00:20:52.180 at who they are
00:20:53.260 and what they've done,
00:20:54.240 it's just another example
00:20:55.800 of identity politics.
00:20:57.780 So,
00:20:58.200 to me,
00:20:58.600 that's where that stands,
00:21:00.120 it's just,
00:21:00.560 it's not useful
00:21:01.380 and,
00:21:02.040 you know,
00:21:02.240 it's just another sign,
00:21:03.260 I love the part
00:21:03.900 when Joe Biden said,
00:21:05.360 well,
00:21:05.760 you know,
00:21:06.320 when he was talking
00:21:06.860 about answering
00:21:08.700 Barack Obama
00:21:09.420 and he goes,
00:21:10.060 well,
00:21:10.160 I don't think
00:21:10.460 he was talking
00:21:10.880 about me
00:21:11.380 and he goes,
00:21:12.160 I thought to myself,
00:21:12.920 well,
00:21:13.080 what about the time
00:21:13.700 where he told you,
00:21:14.820 Joe,
00:21:15.040 you don't have to do this,
00:21:16.060 you know,
00:21:16.320 you can step out
00:21:17.240 of the way essentially
00:21:17.940 and this is just
00:21:18.600 another reinforcement
00:21:19.900 of that.
00:21:20.880 Oh,
00:21:21.080 you know,
00:21:21.280 that was hilarious
00:21:21.960 too,
00:21:22.300 Abigail,
00:21:22.660 because I think,
00:21:23.580 no,
00:21:23.860 Joe,
00:21:24.240 he's especially
00:21:24.900 talking about you,
00:21:26.140 he spent eight years
00:21:27.480 with you in the White House,
00:21:29.540 he knows you better
00:21:30.340 than anyone.
00:21:31.460 Talk about such a damning
00:21:33.260 non-endorsement,
00:21:34.020 but I'm just tired
00:21:35.480 of this narrative,
00:21:36.760 Abigail,
00:21:37.560 of,
00:21:38.360 yeah,
00:21:38.480 what we need
00:21:39.140 is a,
00:21:39.780 you know,
00:21:40.100 a woman of color
00:21:41.280 who is perhaps
00:21:42.720 a lesbian
00:21:43.360 and disabled,
00:21:44.360 I mean,
00:21:44.760 what about merit?
00:21:45.960 I don't care
00:21:47.260 who you are
00:21:48.220 as an individual,
00:21:49.100 I care about
00:21:50.300 your brain power,
00:21:51.860 I care about
00:21:52.460 the ideas
00:21:53.180 you represent
00:21:53.940 and I just see
00:21:55.820 this idea
00:21:56.540 of bringing
00:21:57.420 affirmative action
00:21:58.520 and employment equity
00:21:59.560 to the White House
00:22:00.380 to be the wrong course
00:22:01.700 to go down
00:22:02.460 in the first place.
00:22:04.300 Yeah,
00:22:04.880 and it's pretty,
00:22:05.520 I mean,
00:22:06.140 it's pretty sexist
00:22:07.260 as well because,
00:22:08.000 I mean,
00:22:08.360 so you're just saying
00:22:09.320 we need some woman
00:22:10.800 to come in
00:22:11.520 and,
00:22:12.240 you know,
00:22:12.440 take the role.
00:22:13.020 Okay,
00:22:13.220 so what is,
00:22:14.420 you know,
00:22:14.760 what is Elizabeth Warren
00:22:15.700 really done,
00:22:16.480 you know,
00:22:16.820 and what is
00:22:17.440 Amy Klobuchar
00:22:18.260 really done,
00:22:18.900 what are these,
00:22:19.540 are these women
00:22:20.580 really successful?
00:22:21.980 So it's just,
00:22:23.060 they're always playing
00:22:23.760 the part of the identity
00:22:25.920 rather than who
00:22:26.760 these people are
00:22:27.720 and their accomplishments
00:22:28.520 and I look at
00:22:29.980 Elizabeth Warren
00:22:30.800 and she's somebody
00:22:31.740 who's lied
00:22:32.300 countless times
00:22:33.200 about her ancestry
00:22:34.380 and she's used that
00:22:35.420 for affirmative action
00:22:36.480 purposes
00:22:37.000 in order to,
00:22:38.500 you know,
00:22:39.520 progress
00:22:40.060 and so she's done
00:22:41.560 that on the
00:22:42.160 Texas State Bar,
00:22:43.600 she did that
00:22:44.080 for the University
00:22:44.740 of Pennsylvania
00:22:45.600 and she won
00:22:46.580 a minority status reward
00:22:48.040 and of course
00:22:48.660 she's apologized
00:22:49.320 to the Cherokee
00:22:50.200 Indian community
00:22:51.540 for lying
00:22:52.660 because she believes
00:22:53.380 that they get to decide
00:22:54.400 who is,
00:22:55.060 you know,
00:22:55.880 of Native American descent
00:22:57.000 but she never apologized
00:22:58.380 for benefiting
00:22:59.220 from those claims
00:23:00.740 and,
00:23:01.960 you know,
00:23:02.280 also,
00:23:03.260 you know,
00:23:03.560 so she's lied,
00:23:05.640 you know,
00:23:06.000 she's done exactly
00:23:06.940 what goes against,
00:23:08.460 supposedly against the left,
00:23:09.800 she's lied
00:23:10.360 and claimed this minority
00:23:11.300 status,
00:23:12.420 you know,
00:23:12.640 how many of these
00:23:13.280 individuals,
00:23:14.440 you know,
00:23:14.740 it's just funny in politics,
00:23:15.760 all of the leftists
00:23:16.640 who either,
00:23:17.460 you know,
00:23:17.760 dressed up in blackface
00:23:18.920 or,
00:23:19.700 you know,
00:23:20.080 lied about their status
00:23:21.540 as a minority
00:23:22.820 and took benefits
00:23:24.280 from that,
00:23:25.100 yet they're still praised,
00:23:26.940 they're still praised
00:23:27.980 by the left,
00:23:29.040 you know,
00:23:29.400 and so she's just
00:23:30.960 not effective at all,
00:23:32.240 you know,
00:23:32.460 she hasn't really worked
00:23:33.460 in a business,
00:23:34.040 she doesn't,
00:23:35.040 you know,
00:23:35.280 she worked as a corporate
00:23:36.420 lawyer defending
00:23:37.340 big corporations
00:23:38.540 who were not helping
00:23:40.180 innocent victims,
00:23:41.800 you know,
00:23:42.040 they were standing,
00:23:42.620 like Dow,
00:23:43.980 there was a company,
00:23:45.380 Dow Chemical,
00:23:46.380 that was,
00:23:47.620 had poisoned women
00:23:48.740 with these
00:23:49.420 faulty breast implants
00:23:50.780 and she was trying
00:23:51.780 to limit their liability
00:23:52.920 and she lied later on
00:23:54.400 about that,
00:23:54.860 trying to say she was there
00:23:55.800 helping protect the victims,
00:23:57.700 so,
00:23:58.060 you know,
00:23:58.420 these are ineffective
00:23:59.400 politicians
00:24:00.900 and they're also
00:24:03.000 just liars,
00:24:03.880 most of them on stage,
00:24:04.860 they all have,
00:24:05.660 you know,
00:24:06.000 countless lies there,
00:24:06.820 they've told to
00:24:07.760 the American public
00:24:08.640 in trying to paint
00:24:09.700 themselves in,
00:24:11.180 in trying to paint
00:24:12.340 themselves as individuals
00:24:14.340 who are for the people
00:24:15.180 when they really have
00:24:16.080 stood against the people
00:24:17.180 in many ways.
00:24:18.260 No,
00:24:18.400 no,
00:24:18.560 you're right,
00:24:18.940 Abigail,
00:24:19.220 when you say rhetorically
00:24:20.660 what does Elizabeth Warren
00:24:21.940 stand for,
00:24:22.620 I say she stands
00:24:23.500 for gaming the system
00:24:24.660 and given her resume,
00:24:26.460 her background,
00:24:27.600 I,
00:24:27.900 I simply can't believe
00:24:29.380 we,
00:24:30.040 we are taking this woman
00:24:31.500 seriously as a candidate
00:24:33.500 potentially for president
00:24:35.360 and sticking to the issue
00:24:36.800 of the day
00:24:37.360 here and now,
00:24:38.280 one of the moderators
00:24:39.460 asked her the question
00:24:40.680 that under her plan
00:24:42.780 of raising taxes
00:24:44.020 over the decade
00:24:44.960 of eight trillion,
00:24:47.520 trillion with a T,
00:24:48.900 folks,
00:24:49.600 eight trillion U.S.
00:24:50.720 dollars,
00:24:51.300 that would stifle
00:24:53.020 the economy
00:24:54.040 and discourage investment,
00:24:57.200 what do you have to say
00:24:58.420 about that,
00:24:59.040 Ms. Warren?
00:24:59.420 and she said,
00:25:00.980 well,
00:25:01.360 they,
00:25:01.760 meaning the top economists
00:25:02.920 in the world,
00:25:03.840 are simply wrong.
00:25:05.020 But she doesn't give up
00:25:06.000 any kind of factual background
00:25:08.240 why these economists
00:25:09.680 are wrong.
00:25:10.440 I mean,
00:25:10.700 Abigail,
00:25:11.240 I think this is staggering.
00:25:12.640 Yeah,
00:25:14.720 it's staggering
00:25:15.580 just every time she talks
00:25:17.360 and she does,
00:25:18.400 she talks about everything
00:25:19.180 she's going to do
00:25:19.960 and it's just millions
00:25:21.220 and billions of dollars
00:25:22.680 coming from the American people
00:25:24.060 all for her plans
00:25:25.520 for,
00:25:26.100 you know,
00:25:26.540 essentially wealth redistribution,
00:25:28.660 you know,
00:25:28.980 helping,
00:25:29.640 helping teachers,
00:25:30.580 helping all these people
00:25:31.360 and I look at it
00:25:32.060 and I go,
00:25:32.860 where,
00:25:33.240 you know,
00:25:33.760 how are you really going
00:25:34.660 to get all of this money?
00:25:35.720 I mean,
00:25:36.000 anybody who's,
00:25:37.000 anybody who's wealthy,
00:25:38.080 who's smart,
00:25:39.380 once the day that she comes,
00:25:40.900 the day she becomes president,
00:25:42.620 they're going to leave
00:25:43.280 this country.
00:25:44.320 You know,
00:25:44.540 they're going to leave
00:25:45.060 and she says
00:25:45.560 she's going to try
00:25:46.180 and do an exit wealth tax
00:25:47.660 or whatever,
00:25:48.120 but,
00:25:48.580 you know,
00:25:48.900 they're going to evade her
00:25:50.240 and really,
00:25:51.240 these are just all policies
00:25:52.600 that have never worked
00:25:54.060 and it is truly funny
00:25:55.480 that they praise
00:25:56.600 all of these socialist countries
00:25:58.380 and they want,
00:25:59.740 they want America
00:26:00.500 to be like that,
00:26:01.240 but they won't,
00:26:01.840 you know,
00:26:02.140 they won't live there.
00:26:03.020 I mean,
00:26:03.240 think of Bernie in general even.
00:26:05.100 Bernie went and praised
00:26:06.520 the Soviet Union.
00:26:07.760 He praised them
00:26:08.260 for their housing
00:26:09.040 and for how cheap
00:26:11.200 their housing was
00:26:12.220 and their health care.
00:26:13.240 This was back in 1989
00:26:14.300 and two years later,
00:26:16.400 the Soviet Union collapsed
00:26:17.800 and in large part
00:26:19.060 due to economic failings
00:26:20.720 and,
00:26:21.380 you know,
00:26:21.500 it's funny,
00:26:21.980 really,
00:26:22.300 it's truly funny
00:26:22.980 if you look at Bernie Sanders
00:26:23.900 because he also,
00:26:25.540 he praised Venezuela
00:26:26.340 as well
00:26:27.360 and I'm pretty sure
00:26:28.200 that during his first,
00:26:30.140 back in 2016
00:26:31.280 when he was running,
00:26:32.140 still on his campaign website,
00:26:33.700 he was promoting Venezuela
00:26:34.840 as a successful socialist country.
00:26:39.300 I'm pretty sure about that
00:26:40.260 and it was failing.
00:26:44.220 It's completely failing
00:26:45.200 and also his wife,
00:26:47.280 just another sign
00:26:48.620 of bad management
00:26:49.680 in that family,
00:26:50.940 she was the head of,
00:26:51.900 she was,
00:26:52.880 she was a leader
00:26:54.280 in Burlington College
00:26:55.560 and she was responsible
00:26:56.560 for them buying property
00:26:58.620 on Lake Champlain
00:26:59.820 and she was responsible
00:27:02.440 for that
00:27:02.940 and it was so expensive
00:27:04.860 that the school
00:27:06.300 and they couldn't afford it
00:27:07.420 so essentially,
00:27:08.340 they had to,
00:27:08.980 you know,
00:27:09.280 get her out of the way.
00:27:10.220 They paid her off $200,000
00:27:11.700 and by 2016,
00:27:13.720 they had to close down
00:27:14.540 from that bad investment
00:27:16.200 so this is a family
00:27:17.680 that is not,
00:27:18.700 you know,
00:27:18.980 they don't know
00:27:19.640 how to think business-wise.
00:27:21.340 You know,
00:27:21.540 they can buy big properties
00:27:22.740 and, you know,
00:27:23.900 sell books
00:27:24.540 but they,
00:27:25.880 you know,
00:27:26.240 they don't know
00:27:26.780 how to help people
00:27:27.580 and they don't know
00:27:28.620 what it means
00:27:29.260 to be a successful country.
00:27:30.920 They don't know
00:27:31.220 what it looks like
00:27:31.740 to be successful.
00:27:32.360 And let's not forget,
00:27:33.440 Abigail,
00:27:34.100 socialism isn't
00:27:35.320 for the socialists.
00:27:36.620 We're almost out of time.
00:27:37.920 One very quick question
00:27:39.520 for you, Abigail.
00:27:40.160 When I look at the roster
00:27:41.320 of Democrats
00:27:41.940 vying for president,
00:27:43.380 I don't think
00:27:43.940 there's any there there
00:27:45.140 and I'm wondering
00:27:46.060 if in the 11th hour
00:27:47.560 somebody is going to
00:27:48.680 come out of the woodwork
00:27:49.660 and the name
00:27:50.320 that springs to mind,
00:27:51.100 believe it or not,
00:27:51.940 is Hillary Clinton.
00:27:52.940 I mean,
00:27:53.140 she's become more
00:27:54.720 into the media
00:27:55.500 in the last several weeks.
00:27:56.780 She did like
00:27:57.160 an almost two-hour long
00:27:58.280 interview with Howard Stern
00:27:59.360 last month.
00:28:00.300 You've got to wonder why.
00:28:01.380 She doesn't have a new book
00:28:02.220 to promote or anything.
00:28:03.880 Is it possible
00:28:05.140 that we might see her return
00:28:07.580 or do you have
00:28:08.300 any kind of
00:28:09.180 dark horse candidate
00:28:10.600 that might come in
00:28:12.400 and surprise us all
00:28:13.380 in the months ahead?
00:28:15.440 You know,
00:28:16.200 I don't think Hillary's
00:28:17.300 going to come back in.
00:28:18.520 I think she's doing this
00:28:19.820 all for the purpose
00:28:21.040 of fame
00:28:21.720 and, you know,
00:28:23.080 getting her voice in there,
00:28:24.340 trying to stir things,
00:28:25.380 you know,
00:28:25.760 stir the pot around,
00:28:26.860 distract us
00:28:27.700 from, you know,
00:28:28.720 what's really going on
00:28:29.940 and what's, you know,
00:28:31.120 what's really being
00:28:31.720 accomplished
00:28:32.220 under President Trump's
00:28:33.860 leadership.
00:28:35.640 But it's possible,
00:28:37.260 it's possible
00:28:37.880 that Michelle Obama
00:28:38.720 comes in.
00:28:39.340 Well, maybe not Michelle,
00:28:40.100 I should say.
00:28:40.640 But, you know,
00:28:41.700 I don't,
00:28:42.820 I don't know
00:28:43.640 of somebody
00:28:44.340 who could jump in
00:28:45.180 at the last minute.
00:28:46.120 It's definitely possible,
00:28:47.220 but it's hard
00:28:47.800 to make a prediction.
00:28:48.980 You know,
00:28:49.200 I am even wary
00:28:50.600 of predicting
00:28:51.640 who's going to drop
00:28:52.500 out of the race
00:28:53.200 at what point in time,
00:28:54.180 you know,
00:28:54.440 because people
00:28:55.460 can have turnarounds.
00:28:57.540 You know,
00:28:57.740 Julian Castro,
00:28:58.540 I think he dropped
00:28:59.280 out of the race
00:28:59.780 today or yesterday.
00:29:01.200 And so that's nice.
00:29:02.360 We got one more
00:29:02.960 out of the way.
00:29:03.960 But anything's possible.
00:29:05.600 Anything's definitely possible.
00:29:07.380 Well, you know,
00:29:08.340 11 months
00:29:09.760 is an eternity
00:29:10.540 in politics.
00:29:12.000 Abigail will obviously
00:29:13.360 be watching this file closely,
00:29:15.040 especially you
00:29:15.740 since you are stateside.
00:29:17.060 So thank you so much.
00:29:18.200 It was a wonderful commentary
00:29:19.360 and all the best
00:29:20.560 to you, Abigail,
00:29:21.200 in 2020.
00:29:23.000 Yeah,
00:29:23.460 thanks for talking to you.
00:29:24.600 Thanks for talking to me.
00:29:25.560 Thank you so much.
00:29:26.540 And that was Abigail Haman,
00:29:27.840 our newest rebel
00:29:28.600 from Hawaii.
00:29:30.260 Keep it here, folks.
00:29:31.040 More of Rebel Roundup
00:29:31.880 to come right after this.
00:29:38.420 Why did you pour
00:29:39.440 liquefied human feces
00:29:40.900 over people?
00:29:45.300 What was your agenda
00:29:46.340 in doing that, sir?
00:29:47.100 Mr. Opoku?
00:29:58.280 Mr. Opoku,
00:29:59.100 why would anyone
00:29:59.620 do something
00:30:00.140 so disgusting as that?
00:30:01.740 You won't please.
00:30:07.140 Mr. Opoku,
00:30:07.960 have you apologized
00:30:08.640 to the victims yet?
00:30:12.180 Mr. Opoku?
00:30:15.260 Mr. Opoku,
00:30:15.980 now that you're free
00:30:16.720 on bail,
00:30:17.720 what guarantee
00:30:18.620 do we have
00:30:19.260 that you won't
00:30:20.480 do this again, sir?
00:30:25.940 Mr. Opoku?
00:30:27.900 Well,
00:30:28.380 that was our attempt
00:30:29.320 to get Samuel Opoku
00:30:30.580 on the record
00:30:31.460 regarding his
00:30:32.280 alleged disgusting
00:30:33.540 and deplorable crimes.
00:30:35.560 Namely,
00:30:36.000 Opoku
00:30:36.400 is accused
00:30:37.040 of pouring
00:30:37.580 liquefied human feces
00:30:39.320 over the heads
00:30:40.480 of five individuals
00:30:41.480 on three
00:30:42.260 separate occasions.
00:30:43.320 The thing is,
00:30:44.640 folks,
00:30:44.880 a publication ban
00:30:46.040 severely hampers me
00:30:47.200 from reporting
00:30:47.960 what is actually
00:30:48.760 said in court.
00:30:50.480 But outside the courthouse,
00:30:51.800 well,
00:30:52.120 that's a different story.
00:30:53.880 Yet,
00:30:54.120 as you saw,
00:30:54.840 Opoku
00:30:55.240 gave us
00:30:55.820 a silent treatment
00:30:56.720 before he eventually
00:30:58.120 retreated
00:30:58.900 into the Eaton Center
00:31:00.420 with his legal eagles.
00:31:03.100 Maybe he's shy,
00:31:04.480 maybe he's well-coached
00:31:05.860 by his lawyers,
00:31:06.780 or maybe he only likes
00:31:08.440 to do his communicating
00:31:09.740 by pouring a bucketful
00:31:11.620 of shite
00:31:12.220 over his victim's head.
00:31:14.200 If that's the case,
00:31:15.920 maybe I should be thankful
00:31:17.080 that the cat
00:31:18.100 got his tongue
00:31:19.000 on that day.
00:31:20.480 In any event,
00:31:21.660 here's what some of you
00:31:22.920 had to say.
00:31:23.940 Michael Creasa writes,
00:31:25.860 Not so brave
00:31:26.800 when confronted
00:31:27.440 by a camera
00:31:28.240 and a mic.
00:31:29.400 Indeed, Michael,
00:31:30.160 but then again,
00:31:31.100 how in the world
00:31:32.140 does one defend
00:31:33.240 the indefensible?
00:31:35.160 Just imagine, folks,
00:31:36.520 being doused
00:31:37.160 with human waste.
00:31:38.200 I saw one victim
00:31:39.820 endure that attack
00:31:40.820 thanks to surveillance video
00:31:42.300 that was presented
00:31:43.040 in court.
00:31:44.220 That footage was
00:31:45.180 unforgettable
00:31:45.960 in a truly horrific way.
00:31:49.300 Chimindo Seven writes,
00:31:51.420 Love how the Canadian
00:31:52.480 media covers this.
00:31:53.900 Oh, wait,
00:31:54.420 Rebel is the only media
00:31:55.520 with integrity
00:31:56.260 showing us the whole truth
00:31:58.120 of things going on
00:31:59.540 in Canada.
00:32:00.540 Well, I can tell you,
00:32:01.920 Chimindo Seven,
00:32:02.840 there were plenty
00:32:03.740 of other media types
00:32:04.840 at the courthouse
00:32:05.560 on that day.
00:32:06.800 They could have scrummed
00:32:07.860 Mopoku too.
00:32:08.920 After all,
00:32:09.480 given the publication ban,
00:32:11.300 they too were prevented
00:32:12.420 from reporting
00:32:13.140 most of what is presented
00:32:14.380 in court.
00:32:15.400 So why didn't they
00:32:17.200 try to scrum
00:32:17.860 Mopoku as we did?
00:32:19.500 Is it laziness?
00:32:21.220 Or is it considered
00:32:22.200 impolite to ask questions
00:32:23.800 to someone
00:32:24.300 who stands accused
00:32:25.740 of committing
00:32:26.760 absolutely disgusting
00:32:28.660 acts of terror?
00:32:30.320 Who knows?
00:32:32.020 Lou Winkler writes,
00:32:33.200 Amazing coverage.
00:32:34.240 Way to go after him.
00:32:35.160 He deserves
00:32:35.640 all the embarrassment
00:32:36.740 he gets.
00:32:38.460 I agree, Lou,
00:32:39.220 given that the justice system
00:32:40.740 is multicoddling
00:32:41.740 this individual
00:32:42.500 due to a publication ban.
00:32:44.100 And for the life of me,
00:32:45.520 I have no idea
00:32:46.840 why there is a publication ban
00:32:48.720 in effect
00:32:49.300 in the first place.
00:32:51.360 And Eugene Denny writes,
00:32:52.900 Who is paying
00:32:53.920 for his legal defense?
00:32:55.920 You know,
00:32:56.220 that's a great question, Eugene.
00:32:57.440 I believe there are
00:32:58.280 three lawyers on this file
00:32:59.820 and a couple of
00:33:00.660 social workers too.
00:33:02.120 I don't know
00:33:02.780 who's picking up the tab,
00:33:04.000 but how much
00:33:05.100 you want to bet
00:33:05.760 the taxpayer
00:33:06.520 is somehow on the hook
00:33:07.980 for this particular
00:33:09.220 shite show.
00:33:10.760 But folks,
00:33:11.460 it appears that
00:33:12.080 Samuel Opoku
00:33:12.940 does have some supporters
00:33:15.240 in his corner.
00:33:16.240 Just consider this
00:33:17.280 from Nick Loss
00:33:18.280 who writes,
00:33:19.000 What exactly
00:33:20.440 was this fake journalist
00:33:21.700 trying to accomplish?
00:33:23.000 If the guy answered,
00:33:24.340 he'd have to cut it
00:33:25.280 from this clip.
00:33:26.820 Either that
00:33:27.340 or he doesn't understand
00:33:28.440 the concept
00:33:29.040 of a publication ban.
00:33:30.320 Ooh,
00:33:31.480 he's just putting on
00:33:32.480 a show
00:33:32.900 for the hilariously
00:33:33.980 gullible
00:33:34.540 and just downright
00:33:35.900 adorable
00:33:36.400 Canadian version
00:33:37.480 of the alt-white
00:33:38.620 er,
00:33:39.120 I mean alt-right.
00:33:40.680 Yay,
00:33:41.240 rebel,
00:33:41.880 sometimes news.
00:33:43.340 Keep up the useless work,
00:33:45.240 SMH.
00:33:47.080 Gee,
00:33:47.500 where do I begin, Nick?
00:33:48.680 Because you disagree
00:33:49.660 with the video,
00:33:51.040 it had been made
00:33:51.980 by a fake journalist?
00:33:53.560 You know,
00:33:53.860 I went to university
00:33:55.040 for journalism
00:33:55.700 and I've been working
00:33:56.520 as a journalist
00:33:57.740 since 1985,
00:33:58.940 but who knows?
00:34:01.020 By the way,
00:34:01.500 I'm afraid
00:34:02.220 it is you
00:34:03.120 who doesn't understand
00:34:04.240 the concept
00:34:05.200 of a publication ban.
00:34:06.780 Then again,
00:34:07.460 you kind of strike me
00:34:08.860 as the kind of guy
00:34:10.100 who isn't too keen
00:34:11.660 on transparency
00:34:12.980 and as for the
00:34:15.080 alt-white reference,
00:34:16.680 why are you bringing
00:34:17.680 race into this story?
00:34:19.780 It has nothing
00:34:20.280 to do with it.
00:34:21.540 Talk about an SMH
00:34:23.640 that's shaken my head
00:34:25.500 moment.
00:34:26.200 Well,
00:34:27.640 that wraps up
00:34:28.480 another edition
00:34:29.120 of Rebel Roundup.
00:34:30.300 Thanks so much
00:34:30.820 for joining us.
00:34:31.660 See you next week.
00:34:32.680 And hey folks,
00:34:33.380 never forget,
00:34:34.440 without risk,
00:34:35.260 there can be no glory.
00:34:36.600 Good night.
00:34:37.000 We'll see you next week.