Rebel News Podcast - December 21, 2019


Rebel Roundup: Keean Bexte & Sheila Gunn Reid


Summary

The province of Alberta is sending someone to a climate conference who is anti-oil sands and pro-carbon tax. Sheila Gunn-Reed shall attempt to explain the seemingly unexplainable. And Kian Bexty goes to Andrew Scheer s stomping grounds of Regina with a photo of himself.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Welcome to Rebel Roundup, ladies and gentlemen, and the rest of you, in which we look back
00:00:19.240 at some of the very best commentaries of the week by your favourite rebels.
00:00:22.880 I'm your host, David Menzies.
00:00:24.400 Well, say it ain't so. The province of Alberta is sending someone to a climate conference who is anti-oil sands and pro-carbon tax.
00:00:35.280 Sheila Gunn-Reed shall attempt to explain the seemingly unexplainable.
00:00:40.660 And Kian Bexty goes to Andrew Scheer's Stomping Grounds of Regina with a photo of Mr. Charisma himself.
00:00:47.380 Why? Well, Kian just wanted to find out if Regina locals would be able to recognise Scheer.
00:00:53.060 Spoiler alert, most did not.
00:00:56.900 And finally, letters. We get your letters. We get them every minute of every day.
00:01:00.960 And I'll share some of your responses regarding my report about a Toronto United Church nativity display
00:01:07.060 that depicts the baby Jesus as a caged illegal migrant.
00:01:13.080 Oh, Merry Christmas indeed.
00:01:15.140 Those are your rebels. Now, let's round them up.
00:01:17.480 And I see the Eurasia Group is also there.
00:01:24.940 As you'll recall, they are Gerald Butt's new employers.
00:01:28.080 Oh, and Gerald Butt's old employer is also there too.
00:01:31.960 That's the Anti-Oil World Wildlife Fund.
00:01:35.280 Also on the list of attendees of this greenwashing summit is Ed Whittingham,
00:01:40.240 formerly of the Pembina Institute.
00:01:41.920 You'll recall they're a group referenced in the Rockefeller Tar Sands campaign documents
00:01:46.860 as the point group in Alberta to help landlock our oil and gas.
00:01:51.380 He's a man the Kenny team made a big stink about the Notley government appointing to the Alberta energy regulator.
00:01:58.720 And yet now, the Alberta government legitimises him by sending an official envoy to meet with him.
00:02:04.300 Why did the Alberta government, currently busy fighting the carbon tax in federal court this very week,
00:02:11.540 send pro-carbon tax bureaucrat, a senior policy analyst named Mark Cameron,
00:02:17.280 to join this league of subversives?
00:02:20.400 Cameron was hired by Jason Kenney after spending years advocating for carbon taxes
00:02:26.100 from within the conservative movement as the head of Clean Prosperity.
00:02:30.680 Yeah, I know what you're thinking, folks.
00:02:32.440 When there was regime change big time in Alberta last year,
00:02:36.520 wasn't the UCP and Jason Kenney supposed to be pro-oil sands?
00:02:42.540 So how is it even possible that someone such as Mark Cameron is representing the province
00:02:48.780 at what is essentially a gathering that is meant to denounce the energy sector?
00:02:54.900 And joining me now with more on a story that is downright inexplicable
00:03:00.260 is the host of The Gun Show, Sheila Gunn-Reed.
00:03:03.160 Welcome to Rebel Roundup, my friend.
00:03:05.680 Hey, David. Thanks for having me on the show.
00:03:07.300 Always a pleasure.
00:03:08.240 So, Sheila, assuming the buck stops at Premier Kenney's office,
00:03:13.320 how in blazes is someone with Cameron's CV
00:03:16.360 being sent to this awful conference in the first place?
00:03:19.760 Let's go back a step.
00:03:22.060 How is someone like Mark Cameron employed by Jason Kenney
00:03:25.180 with this gravy bureaucratic position?
00:03:29.220 Mark Cameron, by all accounts, is a genuinely nice human being,
00:03:34.220 from what I understand.
00:03:35.420 I've never met him personally, but I understand that he's a very nice man,
00:03:40.360 good family man.
00:03:41.760 That's great.
00:03:42.580 But that doesn't mean that he should have a job with Jason Kenney's government.
00:03:46.220 When Jason Kenney's government was elected to repeal the carbon tax,
00:03:51.260 but not just to repeal it, but to fight it
00:03:54.160 when the federal government tries to impose it on us,
00:03:57.100 and then to go after the enemies of Alberta's oil and gas sector.
00:04:01.880 That's why Jason Kenney was elected.
00:04:04.440 And yet, he has appointed Mark Cameron,
00:04:08.720 who used to be the head of something called Clean Prosperity,
00:04:12.180 which was a front group to push carbon taxes within the conservative movement.
00:04:18.880 Like, conservatives are generally against taxes to start with,
00:04:22.380 but especially carbon taxes.
00:04:24.440 But that was his job,
00:04:25.540 to sort of move the needle forward on carbon taxes
00:04:28.500 within the conservative movement.
00:04:30.880 And once Jason Kenney got elected,
00:04:32.920 he became this, you know, policy,
00:04:35.060 senior policy analyst for Jason Kenney's government.
00:04:38.500 So, Sheila, though, what is the unspoken story here?
00:04:43.860 Yeah, Mr. Cameron might be a nicer guy than Santa Claus on Christmas Eve.
00:04:47.300 I get that.
00:04:48.460 But the thing is,
00:04:49.760 why would somebody with his background
00:04:52.540 and his political viewpoints be appointed?
00:04:55.760 In other words, I'm asking,
00:04:56.720 if you were to ask Jason Kenney that
00:04:58.700 and get an honest answer,
00:05:00.480 what do you think it would be?
00:05:02.260 I don't know what Jason Kenney would say,
00:05:04.040 but I know what I'll say,
00:05:04.960 and I'll say it's cronyism.
00:05:06.100 Good old-fashioned cronyism.
00:05:08.500 He's, you know, I think,
00:05:11.240 you know, he's been,
00:05:12.000 Mark Cameron's been around the conservative movement a long time.
00:05:15.240 And from what I understand,
00:05:16.720 he's sort of friendly with Jason Kenney.
00:05:18.260 And, you know, get on the gravy train with biscuit wheels.
00:05:21.520 And this is exactly what we unelected
00:05:24.640 the former Redford Tories because of.
00:05:28.260 Because there was so much entrenched cronyism,
00:05:31.060 that backlash against cronyism left us with Rachel Notley.
00:05:35.540 We don't want to see it starting again.
00:05:37.660 And this, you know,
00:05:38.780 Jason Kenney has had a lot of really great appointments,
00:05:41.340 and he's done a lot in the short time that he has been elected.
00:05:45.820 But this one appointment has really left a lot of conservatives
00:05:49.760 with a bad taste in their mouth
00:05:51.660 because it harkens back to the conservatives
00:05:53.580 we threw out of office a few years back.
00:05:56.060 You know, it's absolutely stunning.
00:05:58.780 And I don't know why, if it is indeed cronyism, Sheila,
00:06:03.980 why is it needed in this case?
00:06:05.640 Jason Kenney has a super majority in Alberta.
00:06:08.160 He promised to say it loud,
00:06:12.340 say it proud that he was pro-oil sands,
00:06:14.820 that he was against the carbon tax.
00:06:16.440 So this kind of policy is,
00:06:19.500 it's kind of like this policy and this person is a holdover
00:06:22.900 from the old Notley regime.
00:06:26.460 And I just can't connect the dots here, Sheila.
00:06:30.600 And there must be a feeling of people in Alberta,
00:06:34.800 especially those who are swelling the unemployment lines,
00:06:38.840 that this is a betrayal.
00:06:40.540 Yeah, well, it certainly is.
00:06:43.560 If Mark Cameron were appointed by Rachel Notley,
00:06:46.380 we'd all be lighting our hair on fire.
00:06:48.320 But because he's appointed by Jason Kenney,
00:06:50.060 we're just supposed to defer to Jason Kenney's wisdom
00:06:53.340 on the subject.
00:06:54.280 And I'm just not, I'm not going to do it.
00:06:57.800 And even worse still, okay,
00:07:00.320 let's just say Mark Cameron is a cronyism appointment.
00:07:04.540 Great, fine.
00:07:05.960 Keep him in a position where he's not doing any damage.
00:07:08.280 Just, you know, give him some busy work.
00:07:10.600 I don't like it, but if he's going to have a job,
00:07:12.920 keep him out of places where he can make trouble
00:07:15.340 for the rest of us.
00:07:16.640 But no, he's been sent to this soiree
00:07:21.020 of anti-oil activists,
00:07:24.940 fraidy cat oil companies
00:07:27.560 who are still working on the idea of social license,
00:07:31.180 appeasing your enemy to hope
00:07:32.560 that you can get some pipelines done,
00:07:35.360 and big banksters.
00:07:37.040 I mean, we sent Mark Cameron,
00:07:39.860 we as the Alberta government,
00:07:41.920 sent Mark Cameron to this conference,
00:07:45.700 the Energy Futures Forum,
00:07:48.300 with Gerald Butts' former employer,
00:07:51.720 the World Wildlife Fund,
00:07:53.260 and his new employer, the Eurasia Group,
00:07:56.260 as well as the Pembina Institute,
00:07:58.380 which was listed in the Rockefeller Tar Sands Campaign
00:08:01.980 as the point NGO in Alberta to go to
00:08:06.420 if you're looking to block oil and gas development here.
00:08:10.280 I mean, it is crazy that we have somebody
00:08:13.020 who's even sitting at this forum
00:08:17.000 when back at home,
00:08:19.660 Jason Kenney has just opened up
00:08:21.400 what they're calling the War Room.
00:08:23.320 It's the Energy Center,
00:08:25.100 and it's there to dispel the myths
00:08:27.180 by the antis against Alberta oil.
00:08:30.180 It's a $30 million project
00:08:32.320 to combat the lies from the likes of
00:08:35.980 the World Wildlife Fund and Pembina Institute,
00:08:39.560 and we didn't send a War Room representative
00:08:42.280 to this forum.
00:08:44.100 We sent a sympathizer, Mark Cameron.
00:08:46.540 It is absolutely staggering.
00:08:49.020 But, you know, the conference itself, Sheila,
00:08:50.980 will anything tangible come out of this
00:08:53.580 that will further affect, in a bad way,
00:08:57.120 the Alberta gas and energy industry?
00:09:00.500 Or is this just, I don't know,
00:09:02.860 a bunch of executives and so-called do-gooders,
00:09:07.260 virtue signaling, and taking stances like that,
00:09:10.380 that at the end of the day,
00:09:11.580 it doesn't mean the proverbial hill of beans?
00:09:14.880 Well, the federal government
00:09:16.920 has representatives there,
00:09:18.280 so that should tell you
00:09:19.160 just how serious this thing could get.
00:09:21.760 But also the banksters.
00:09:23.920 There's this movement
00:09:25.200 within the international banking establishment
00:09:28.400 to divest from coal
00:09:31.560 and divest from oil and gas
00:09:34.140 to stop financing these things.
00:09:36.340 So when we have organizations like RBC
00:09:39.200 meeting with these, you know,
00:09:42.240 activist NGOs
00:09:43.340 who are pushing the kinds of divestment
00:09:46.680 and sanctions against oil and gas,
00:09:49.680 we should all be very worried
00:09:51.640 because these mega projects,
00:09:54.660 like the ones that we need to go forward
00:09:56.760 to get Alberta working,
00:09:58.280 they require a lot of financial backing.
00:10:01.220 And if the banks have been convinced
00:10:03.660 to pull out of financing these things,
00:10:06.240 it doesn't matter if they get approval
00:10:07.960 because they'll never get financing.
00:10:09.500 You know, how shameful.
00:10:11.360 I mean, Alberta needs someone
00:10:13.260 that is a champion
00:10:14.520 for the energy industry there.
00:10:16.520 Instead, there looks like
00:10:17.980 they're sending somebody
00:10:18.720 that's going to take the knee.
00:10:20.460 Sheila, one last thing.
00:10:23.120 We're not taking the knee on this.
00:10:24.800 In fact, you've got a new campaign
00:10:26.840 to engage people
00:10:28.900 when it comes to Mr. Cameron.
00:10:30.340 Tell us about that.
00:10:31.880 Well, it's a new old campaign.
00:10:33.700 When Cameron was first appointed
00:10:36.460 to this policy analyst position,
00:10:40.000 I started a campaign
00:10:41.240 calling on Jason Kenney to fire him.
00:10:43.540 You know, there are a lot of good people
00:10:45.120 in Alberta
00:10:45.700 who are ideologically in line
00:10:49.120 with repealing the carbon tax,
00:10:51.260 smart people who are capable people
00:10:53.620 who would be better suited for the job.
00:10:56.700 And, you know, I don't think
00:10:59.120 Mark Cameron's that guy.
00:11:00.140 So back then, I started a campaign
00:11:02.960 to fire Mark Cameron.
00:11:05.460 And people can sign that petition
00:11:07.120 and see my first video
00:11:08.660 at firecameron.com.
00:11:10.680 And, you know, when I saw
00:11:12.980 that Mark Cameron now
00:11:14.320 is actually, you know,
00:11:15.800 going to these sorts of forums
00:11:17.420 as a sympathizer
00:11:19.080 instead of an adversary,
00:11:21.080 I thought, what a great time
00:11:22.420 to remind people
00:11:23.380 exactly who Mark Cameron is.
00:11:25.220 And again, they can do that
00:11:26.900 at firecameron.com.
00:11:29.000 Well, good for you, Sheila.
00:11:31.080 And listen, again,
00:11:32.620 it's a staggering story.
00:11:34.020 I almost can't believe it.
00:11:37.040 And but listen,
00:11:38.880 have a Merry Christmas, nonetheless,
00:11:40.860 and all the best to you
00:11:41.940 in 2020, my friend.
00:11:44.000 Same to you and yours, David.
00:11:45.340 You got it.
00:11:46.120 And that was Sheila Gunn-Reed
00:11:48.120 with folks,
00:11:49.520 what is just an incredible story
00:11:51.180 of this guy
00:11:52.140 going to this conference.
00:11:54.240 Keep it here.
00:11:54.960 More of Rebel Roundup to come
00:11:56.140 right after this.
00:11:56.940 Now, Andrew Scheer announced
00:12:03.220 his resignation,
00:12:04.080 but perhaps it was just like
00:12:05.320 what Pierre Trudeau did
00:12:06.520 to keep the heat off of him
00:12:07.860 in a time of scandal
00:12:09.280 so he could bide his time
00:12:10.480 and wait for the government
00:12:11.940 of the day to collapse.
00:12:13.400 That could happen.
00:12:14.400 Trudeau's in a minority position
00:12:15.600 with parties biting at his heels,
00:12:17.840 hoping for the government
00:12:18.820 to collapse.
00:12:19.500 Now, you might be wondering
00:12:20.180 why I'm walking around
00:12:21.160 with a picture of Andrew Scheer.
00:12:22.560 Well, I'm in Regina
00:12:23.440 at his stomping grounds,
00:12:24.660 at his alma mater,
00:12:25.960 the University of Virginia,
00:12:27.000 and I'm going to ask
00:12:27.920 the folks who would be voting
00:12:29.420 for Andrew Scheer
00:12:30.320 if they even know who he is
00:12:32.420 and if they do,
00:12:34.020 if they still think he's leader.
00:12:35.880 We're doing a story
00:12:36.780 on this man here
00:12:38.020 and we're wondering
00:12:38.540 if you could tell us
00:12:39.300 who he is.
00:12:40.080 I don't know.
00:12:44.320 Never heard of him?
00:12:45.160 No.
00:12:45.960 Would you be able
00:12:46.360 to identify who this is?
00:12:48.700 No.
00:12:49.700 Do you recognize this man?
00:12:50.980 No.
00:12:51.520 No?
00:12:51.900 He just fought
00:12:52.580 a federal election
00:12:53.400 and he's actually from Regina.
00:12:56.360 Really?
00:12:57.000 Yes.
00:12:57.740 Yeah, no.
00:12:58.420 No idea about this.
00:12:59.360 Okay.
00:12:59.960 Just asking folks
00:13:00.780 if they can identify
00:13:01.540 who this is.
00:13:02.220 I can't.
00:13:05.720 Sorry.
00:13:06.780 Stephen Harper.
00:13:07.680 Stephen Harper.
00:13:08.300 Would you be able
00:13:09.600 to identify
00:13:10.140 who this man is?
00:13:11.700 No.
00:13:13.900 Milk drinker.
00:13:14.920 There you go.
00:13:15.920 Would you be able
00:13:16.340 to identify
00:13:16.880 who this man is?
00:13:19.040 Boris Johnson.
00:13:20.420 Boris Johnson.
00:13:21.180 I don't know.
00:13:21.580 Close.
00:13:22.360 Close.
00:13:22.860 Ouch.
00:13:23.520 Now, that's embarrassing.
00:13:25.600 Yet, by the same token,
00:13:26.980 it speaks volumes
00:13:28.140 when you're the leader
00:13:29.760 of the official opposition party
00:13:31.580 and you're a man
00:13:32.660 that could have been
00:13:34.120 prime minister.
00:13:35.580 How is it even possible
00:13:36.860 that most people
00:13:37.940 interviewed
00:13:38.400 at a university campus
00:13:40.140 couldn't put a name
00:13:41.680 to that milk-chugging face?
00:13:44.640 And joining us now
00:13:45.780 is our roving reporter,
00:13:47.520 Kian Bexte.
00:13:48.260 Welcome to Rebel Roundup, Kian.
00:13:50.360 Thanks for having me, David.
00:13:51.840 Always a pleasure.
00:13:52.680 So, Kian,
00:13:53.560 looks like Andrew Scheer
00:13:55.320 still lives up
00:13:56.600 to his facetious nickname
00:13:58.320 of Mr. Charisma, eh?
00:14:01.980 That's exactly
00:14:02.920 what we found in Regina.
00:14:04.400 I, you know,
00:14:05.220 we went there to,
00:14:06.800 it was kind of
00:14:07.460 a fact-finding mission
00:14:08.520 to figure out
00:14:09.240 exactly how well
00:14:10.460 he is known.
00:14:12.640 You know,
00:14:13.240 people just went
00:14:14.480 to the ballot boxes
00:14:15.260 across the entire country
00:14:17.100 and there's three names
00:14:18.580 at least people should know.
00:14:20.300 So, Justin Trudeau,
00:14:21.420 Andrew Scheer,
00:14:22.040 and maybe Jagmeet Singh.
00:14:25.160 You'd think
00:14:26.000 at least
00:14:27.400 Justin Trudeau
00:14:28.260 and Andrew Scheer
00:14:28.880 would have
00:14:29.320 nationwide name recognition
00:14:31.180 as the two major parties.
00:14:32.820 One of them
00:14:33.460 was going to be
00:14:33.980 prime minister.
00:14:35.020 One of them
00:14:35.620 actually came from Regina,
00:14:37.540 went to school
00:14:38.320 at the University of Regina,
00:14:40.120 yet it was a crapshoot
00:14:42.340 as to whether or not
00:14:43.220 someone could identify them.
00:14:44.860 Some people thought
00:14:45.500 he was Boris Johnson.
00:14:46.620 Some people thought
00:14:47.220 maybe he was Stephen Harper.
00:14:48.360 One person said,
00:14:49.580 oh, is that Andrew Sharp?
00:14:53.300 Sorry, Andrew.
00:14:54.760 You know, Kian,
00:14:56.320 it brought on
00:14:57.880 a feeling of deja vu
00:14:59.120 for me.
00:14:59.660 Last year,
00:15:00.760 I went to
00:15:01.700 Yonge-Dundas Square
00:15:02.700 in Toronto
00:15:03.480 and it was almost surreal.
00:15:05.240 By this point,
00:15:06.380 Mr. Scheer had been
00:15:07.440 the leader of the party
00:15:08.580 for a solid 18 months
00:15:10.240 and we were asking
00:15:11.620 people there
00:15:12.360 and there was actually
00:15:13.520 a huge jumbotron
00:15:15.500 in the square
00:15:16.680 where Andrew Scheer
00:15:18.340 was addressing people.
00:15:19.380 I think it was during
00:15:19.900 the Halifax convention
00:15:21.540 with his name
00:15:22.960 and everything
00:15:23.380 and even with that,
00:15:25.420 spoiler if you want
00:15:26.940 to call it,
00:15:28.620 I think only maybe
00:15:30.040 two or three people
00:15:31.580 out of more than
00:15:33.560 two dozen
00:15:34.280 got his name.
00:15:35.220 In fact,
00:15:35.420 the most embarrassing
00:15:36.180 guess was
00:15:37.520 one lady thought
00:15:38.960 he was Paul Bernardo,
00:15:40.660 Canada's most
00:15:41.480 notorious serial killer.
00:15:43.580 But the thing is,
00:15:45.920 you know,
00:15:47.420 Kian,
00:15:47.980 is this part
00:15:49.660 of the problem
00:15:50.320 in that
00:15:51.360 if you can't even
00:15:52.720 recognize the guy
00:15:54.060 and these are people
00:15:54.820 in his own backyard,
00:15:56.580 is this indicative
00:15:57.700 of what Peter McKay
00:15:59.160 said post-election
00:16:00.660 that when he likened
00:16:02.540 Mr. Scheer
00:16:03.160 to a hockey player
00:16:04.620 on a breakaway
00:16:05.520 that, you know,
00:16:06.620 missed on an open net,
00:16:08.180 was there just
00:16:10.400 a failure to resonate
00:16:12.500 with people out there
00:16:13.880 for whatever reason?
00:16:15.560 That's exactly it.
00:16:16.480 It's not just
00:16:17.120 that he failed
00:16:17.620 to score on the goal.
00:16:18.640 It's like he went
00:16:20.320 onto the ice
00:16:20.940 with the blades
00:16:21.480 broken off of his skate
00:16:22.500 already.
00:16:23.840 I mean,
00:16:24.160 he couldn't get
00:16:24.840 any traction
00:16:25.680 whatsoever
00:16:26.500 with anyone
00:16:27.880 across this country,
00:16:29.660 least of all
00:16:31.000 at Regina,
00:16:32.260 his hometown,
00:16:33.460 that's where he's
00:16:34.760 elected as an MP.
00:16:36.020 That's where people
00:16:36.460 actually scratch his name
00:16:37.680 on the ballot.
00:16:38.960 People still
00:16:39.720 couldn't recognize him.
00:16:40.860 It just goes to talk
00:16:42.880 about his failure,
00:16:44.320 his entire leadership tenure
00:16:46.440 and it makes me question
00:16:47.620 why the conservatives
00:16:49.100 are so comfortable
00:16:50.020 keeping basically
00:16:51.660 no-name conservative
00:16:53.060 on his leader
00:16:54.180 for however many months,
00:16:56.380 perhaps even over a year
00:16:57.660 while they try
00:16:58.280 and find a new one.
00:16:59.500 Would it not be
00:17:00.440 maybe a little bit better
00:17:02.360 to replace him
00:17:03.640 with someone in caucus
00:17:04.660 who can be effective
00:17:06.780 and can actually
00:17:07.900 start moving on
00:17:10.680 from this failed past,
00:17:12.680 this blip
00:17:13.480 in the conservative
00:17:14.220 party
00:17:15.740 where nobody
00:17:17.020 could figure out
00:17:17.920 what was going on,
00:17:19.000 no one could figure out
00:17:19.860 what the direction
00:17:20.500 of the party was,
00:17:21.560 what the platform
00:17:22.320 of the party was even.
00:17:23.880 I mean,
00:17:24.260 think about it yourself.
00:17:25.640 In the election,
00:17:26.460 what was the actual platform
00:17:28.480 that the conservatives
00:17:29.220 were running on?
00:17:31.020 Nobody can really tell me,
00:17:33.140 least of all people
00:17:35.540 who aren't really engaged
00:17:36.660 in politics.
00:17:37.200 They can tell you
00:17:37.840 what Justin Trudeau ran on.
00:17:39.320 They'll tell you
00:17:39.960 that Justin Trudeau ran on,
00:17:41.460 oh, he's going to cut
00:17:42.260 my cell phone bill
00:17:43.160 down by some amount
00:17:45.440 with 25%, 50%.
00:17:46.800 I forget what he promised.
00:17:48.620 But Justin Trudeau
00:17:49.520 had promises.
00:17:50.340 Justin Trudeau
00:17:50.880 resonated with people
00:17:51.860 and that's why
00:17:52.440 he's prime minister right now.
00:17:54.460 Indeed.
00:17:55.100 And you know,
00:17:55.940 Kian,
00:17:56.280 in light of last week's
00:17:57.900 announcement
00:17:58.340 where Mr. Scheer
00:17:59.220 was saying
00:17:59.540 he was going to step down,
00:18:00.460 I don't know about you,
00:18:02.100 but with the conservatives
00:18:03.720 I know,
00:18:04.900 certainly there was
00:18:06.240 no outpouring of grief
00:18:09.120 like,
00:18:09.560 oh, please don't go.
00:18:11.200 No, no.
00:18:11.940 Like you're watching
00:18:12.900 your cat being run over
00:18:14.040 by a tractor.
00:18:15.620 It was quite the opposite.
00:18:17.100 But I want to get on
00:18:18.200 the other part
00:18:18.820 of your commentary,
00:18:20.380 which was very interesting,
00:18:21.940 which was you have
00:18:23.620 this suspicion
00:18:24.320 and some others share it
00:18:25.960 that maybe Andrew Scheer
00:18:29.120 is really not going.
00:18:30.660 Maybe he's pulling
00:18:31.560 a Pierre Elliott Trudeau
00:18:33.000 circa 1980
00:18:33.980 where he's going to have
00:18:36.040 a comeback
00:18:37.040 and still be leader
00:18:38.020 of the party.
00:18:38.540 Personally,
00:18:39.280 I think the kindest thing
00:18:40.440 I can say about Andrew Scheer
00:18:42.200 is I don't think
00:18:43.220 he's that devious,
00:18:44.680 but what do you make
00:18:46.140 of the comparisons
00:18:47.740 to Pierre Trudeau
00:18:49.620 in 1980?
00:18:51.640 Well,
00:18:52.040 his staff are smart.
00:18:52.900 His staff want to be
00:18:54.140 in the PMO one day
00:18:55.180 and his staff
00:18:56.620 will know exactly
00:18:57.740 what Pierre Trudeau did
00:18:58.900 when he orchestrated
00:19:00.380 that vote of non-confidence
00:19:01.700 of Joe Clark's government
00:19:02.920 so early.
00:19:04.840 Andrew Scheer's hand
00:19:05.900 is a little bit
00:19:06.660 restricted right now
00:19:07.680 because when it was
00:19:09.920 Pierre Trudeau,
00:19:11.100 he was bartering with
00:19:12.740 two parties
00:19:15.360 who were possibly
00:19:17.500 going to support
00:19:18.560 Justin Trudeau's budget.
00:19:20.740 Andrew Scheer
00:19:21.280 pretty much
00:19:22.280 is in a position
00:19:22.900 as a conservative
00:19:23.600 party leader
00:19:24.740 that any budget
00:19:25.820 he has to vote against.
00:19:27.400 and the NDP
00:19:29.100 maybe they'll support it.
00:19:30.660 The Bloc Quebecois
00:19:31.380 maybe they'll support it,
00:19:32.600 but the NDP
00:19:33.920 and Bloc
00:19:34.480 aren't assuredly
00:19:35.520 no votes
00:19:36.100 on the budget.
00:19:37.060 Andrew Scheer
00:19:37.480 should be
00:19:38.180 pretty much
00:19:38.660 all the time
00:19:39.260 assuredly no vote.
00:19:40.880 But that's
00:19:41.760 this is what
00:19:42.680 Pierre Trudeau did.
00:19:44.020 He orchestrated
00:19:44.500 this vote
00:19:44.840 in non-confidence
00:19:45.460 and then
00:19:46.240 even after
00:19:47.940 he announced
00:19:48.520 his resignation
00:19:49.100 as leader
00:19:49.640 he orchestrated
00:19:50.560 this vote
00:19:50.960 and then
00:19:51.380 he ran the election
00:19:52.260 but his party
00:19:53.760 sort of
00:19:54.140 kept him
00:19:54.620 in the background.
00:19:55.400 His party
00:19:55.740 didn't put
00:19:56.240 Pierre Trudeau
00:19:57.120 running for
00:19:57.600 prime minister
00:19:58.100 on the masthead
00:19:58.860 of all of the
00:19:59.580 party posters
00:20:00.260 and on the
00:20:01.460 lawn signs
00:20:02.020 they just
00:20:03.020 pretended like
00:20:03.580 he didn't exist
00:20:04.320 but
00:20:04.760 that was
00:20:05.500 really effective
00:20:06.260 against
00:20:06.880 an ineffective
00:20:07.640 leader
00:20:08.040 and that
00:20:08.340 ineffective
00:20:08.760 leader
00:20:09.080 is Joe Clark
00:20:09.740 and that
00:20:10.380 ineffective
00:20:10.760 leader
00:20:11.080 also could
00:20:11.700 be
00:20:12.260 Justin Trudeau
00:20:13.580 so when
00:20:14.540 he got
00:20:15.860 elected
00:20:16.500 and this
00:20:17.260 could be
00:20:17.900 easily
00:20:18.580 something
00:20:18.980 that Andrew
00:20:19.580 Scheer's
00:20:19.880 staff
00:20:20.080 are looking
00:20:20.460 at
00:20:20.760 as a
00:20:21.740 possibility
00:20:22.240 at least.
00:20:23.400 But surely
00:20:23.980 Kian the
00:20:24.760 chances of
00:20:25.400 success
00:20:25.980 in such
00:20:26.840 a scenario
00:20:27.320 I mean
00:20:28.000 given
00:20:28.640 what the
00:20:29.680 Justin Trudeau
00:20:30.400 liberals
00:20:30.920 were
00:20:32.740 responsible
00:20:33.420 for
00:20:33.920 in the
00:20:34.800 last
00:20:35.060 several
00:20:35.360 months
00:20:35.640 and I'm
00:20:35.880 talking
00:20:36.280 blackface
00:20:37.440 the
00:20:37.920 SNC
00:20:38.600 Lavalin
00:20:39.060 affair
00:20:39.380 the
00:20:39.600 disastrous
00:20:40.240 India
00:20:40.800 trip
00:20:41.240 Gropegate
00:20:42.640 his
00:20:43.580 treatment
00:20:43.980 of
00:20:44.300 some
00:20:44.540 female
00:20:45.020 MPs
00:20:46.080 I mean
00:20:47.180 it was
00:20:48.420 like a
00:20:49.060 silver
00:20:49.460 platter
00:20:50.160 of
00:20:51.040 negatives
00:20:52.220 that were
00:20:53.060 handed
00:20:53.500 to the
00:20:54.600 Andrew
00:20:55.000 Scheer
00:20:55.260 conservatives
00:20:55.860 and they
00:20:56.580 couldn't
00:20:56.800 close the
00:20:57.340 deal
00:20:57.580 moving
00:20:58.760 who knows
00:20:59.380 when the
00:20:59.640 next election
00:21:00.140 is going
00:21:00.380 to be
00:21:00.580 called
00:21:00.880 but moving
00:21:01.780 forward
00:21:02.160 I don't
00:21:02.740 see that
00:21:03.260 kind of
00:21:03.720 opportunity
00:21:04.260 existing
00:21:05.080 as what
00:21:05.980 Mr.
00:21:06.340 Scheer had
00:21:07.040 on his
00:21:07.700 plate
00:21:08.060 in late
00:21:08.760 October
00:21:09.260 don't get
00:21:10.860 me wrong
00:21:11.220 I'm not
00:21:11.520 saying that
00:21:11.900 this would
00:21:12.240 be a
00:21:12.540 successful
00:21:13.060 bid
00:21:13.480 this is
00:21:14.920 more
00:21:15.160 a warning
00:21:16.580 to people
00:21:17.180 that
00:21:17.960 Andrew
00:21:18.420 Scheer
00:21:18.680 might be
00:21:19.320 trying to
00:21:20.020 take another
00:21:20.740 stab at
00:21:21.440 it
00:21:21.620 just as
00:21:22.580 unsuccessfully
00:21:23.580 as the
00:21:24.060 first one
00:21:24.540 was
00:21:24.820 because
00:21:25.240 there's
00:21:25.860 something
00:21:26.160 in him
00:21:26.760 that makes
00:21:27.800 him believe
00:21:28.440 like his
00:21:28.960 campaign
00:21:29.440 did nothing
00:21:30.040 wrong
00:21:30.460 there's
00:21:31.040 something
00:21:31.260 in him
00:21:31.720 that believes
00:21:32.400 that treating
00:21:33.080 conservatives
00:21:34.300 so contemptuously
00:21:35.660 like he did
00:21:36.980 with you
00:21:37.440 David
00:21:38.140 outside of
00:21:38.760 his campaign
00:21:39.300 stop
00:21:39.660 Andrew
00:21:40.680 Scheer
00:21:40.920 was
00:21:41.120 he wasn't
00:21:42.420 governing
00:21:42.800 he was
00:21:43.120 leading the
00:21:43.700 party
00:21:44.080 for centrists
00:21:45.300 and you
00:21:46.620 know what
00:21:46.900 it was
00:21:47.140 Pierre
00:21:47.440 Pollyev
00:21:48.000 who said
00:21:48.440 this to
00:21:48.880 me
00:21:49.080 when I
00:21:49.380 was a
00:21:49.620 conservative
00:21:50.040 intern
00:21:50.480 back in
00:21:51.240 2014
00:21:51.980 he told
00:21:53.200 the entire
00:21:53.680 intern class
00:21:54.520 you know
00:21:56.440 voters will
00:21:57.760 never
00:21:58.080 respect someone
00:21:59.420 who runs
00:22:00.720 a party
00:22:01.260 as liberal
00:22:02.220 light
00:22:02.580 they will
00:22:03.680 just vote
00:22:04.080 for the
00:22:04.340 real thing
00:22:04.740 they'll vote
00:22:05.080 for the
00:22:05.340 real liberals
00:22:05.960 and you
00:22:06.860 and your
00:22:07.560 party
00:22:07.860 will be
00:22:08.200 decimated
00:22:08.720 and that
00:22:09.200 was about
00:22:10.060 seven years
00:22:11.380 ahead of
00:22:11.740 its time
00:22:12.340 when he
00:22:13.100 predicted
00:22:13.460 that Andrew
00:22:14.400 Scheer was
00:22:14.760 going to
00:22:15.000 catastrophically
00:22:15.900 lose
00:22:16.560 because he
00:22:18.140 was running
00:22:18.900 for the
00:22:19.320 center
00:22:19.540 rather than
00:22:20.180 running
00:22:20.480 as a
00:22:21.520 defined
00:22:21.900 alternative
00:22:22.460 to
00:22:22.940 Justin
00:22:23.300 Schroes
00:22:23.560 government
00:22:23.980 from the
00:22:24.700 right
00:22:24.880 for the
00:22:25.240 right
00:22:25.500 to do
00:22:26.520 the right
00:22:26.840 things
00:22:27.180 oh I
00:22:28.040 completely
00:22:28.540 agree with
00:22:29.040 you
00:22:29.160 Kian
00:22:29.400 I mean
00:22:30.080 his
00:22:30.500 stance
00:22:31.060 towards
00:22:31.500 the
00:22:31.700 rebel
00:22:32.000 I mean
00:22:32.340 we've
00:22:32.580 got almost
00:22:33.120 1.3
00:22:33.900 million
00:22:34.360 YouTube
00:22:34.780 subscribers
00:22:35.540 who are
00:22:36.320 presumably
00:22:37.180 most of
00:22:38.140 whom
00:22:38.360 are
00:22:38.760 red
00:22:39.160 meat
00:22:39.360 conservatives
00:22:39.980 didn't
00:22:41.160 want to
00:22:41.540 deal
00:22:41.800 with us
00:22:42.120 wanted to
00:22:42.560 go to
00:22:42.780 the
00:22:42.900 mean
00:22:43.120 girls
00:22:43.440 of the
00:22:43.720 media
00:22:43.940 party
00:22:44.260 then
00:22:44.800 that
00:22:45.040 story
00:22:45.380 came out
00:22:45.960 in the
00:22:46.580 final days
00:22:47.680 of the
00:22:47.880 election
00:22:48.220 where he
00:22:48.580 had
00:22:48.740 hired
00:22:49.500 Warren
00:22:50.160 Kinsella
00:22:50.720 the
00:22:50.940 liberal
00:22:51.280 the
00:22:51.580 master
00:22:52.400 of
00:22:52.700 smear
00:22:53.560 and
00:22:53.780 fear
00:22:54.100 to
00:22:55.320 dig
00:22:55.880 up
00:22:56.080 stuff
00:22:56.500 on
00:22:57.140 the
00:22:58.540 People's
00:22:58.940 Party
00:22:59.200 of
00:22:59.400 Canada
00:22:59.820 it
00:23:01.740 just
00:23:03.380 rubbed
00:23:04.260 so
00:23:04.640 many
00:23:04.960 people
00:23:05.620 on
00:23:06.620 the
00:23:06.780 right
00:23:06.960 the
00:23:07.100 wrong
00:23:07.280 way
00:23:07.460 and
00:23:07.580 also
00:23:07.920 I
00:23:08.380 should
00:23:08.600 say
00:23:08.940 Kian
00:23:09.480 they're
00:23:09.660 saying
00:23:09.900 it's
00:23:10.100 not
00:23:10.260 related
00:23:10.620 to
00:23:10.880 his
00:23:11.020 announcement
00:23:11.380 but
00:23:11.700 the
00:23:12.140 story
00:23:12.360 came out
00:23:12.800 where
00:23:13.040 party
00:23:13.560 funds
00:23:13.920 were
00:23:14.280 being
00:23:14.760 used
00:23:15.220 to
00:23:15.680 fund
00:23:16.080 his
00:23:16.420 kids
00:23:16.980 private
00:23:17.480 school
00:23:17.880 education
00:23:18.500 and
00:23:18.700 this
00:23:19.060 kind
00:23:19.260 of
00:23:19.360 stuff
00:23:19.640 does
00:23:20.160 happen
00:23:20.580 in
00:23:20.760 politics
00:23:21.100 but
00:23:21.380 Mr.
00:23:22.280 Scheer
00:23:22.560 was
00:23:22.720 trying
00:23:22.940 to
00:23:23.080 portray
00:23:23.340 himself
00:23:23.800 as
00:23:24.140 the
00:23:24.420 common
00:23:25.160 everyday
00:23:25.860 man
00:23:26.280 the
00:23:26.540 common
00:23:26.900 man
00:23:27.220 driving
00:23:27.540 the
00:23:27.740 common
00:23:28.040 van
00:23:28.360 the
00:23:28.540 guy
00:23:28.740 you
00:23:28.880 see
00:23:29.020 down
00:23:34.960 why
00:23:36.100 is
00:23:36.400 the
00:23:36.580 party
00:23:36.860 paying
00:23:37.460 for
00:23:38.060 his
00:23:38.260 children
00:23:38.660 to
00:23:38.900 go
00:23:39.040 to
00:23:39.220 a
00:23:39.560 private
00:23:40.100 education
00:23:40.720 facility
00:23:42.580 I
00:23:43.200 think
00:23:43.500 that
00:23:43.800 hurt
00:23:44.060 him
00:23:44.220 too
00:23:44.400 and
00:23:44.540 smeared
00:23:45.840 his
00:23:46.080 image
00:23:46.400 yeah
00:23:47.740 I
00:23:47.860 think
00:23:48.020 that
00:23:48.200 did
00:23:48.380 as
00:23:48.560 well
00:23:48.760 and
00:23:48.980 we
00:23:49.240 don't
00:23:49.420 exactly
00:23:49.840 know
00:23:50.120 what
00:23:50.320 the
00:23:50.480 outcome
00:23:50.800 of
00:23:51.140 those
00:23:51.520 deliberations
00:23:52.300 were
00:23:52.500 that
00:23:52.600 were
00:23:52.720 happening
00:23:52.980 on
00:23:53.180 Wednesday
00:23:53.620 with
00:23:53.920 the
00:23:54.100 party
00:23:54.380 national
00:23:55.880 council
00:23:56.280 they're
00:23:56.560 kind
00:23:56.780 of
00:23:56.940 sorting
00:23:57.520 through
00:23:57.740 papers
00:23:58.100 trying
00:23:58.320 to
00:23:58.440 figure
00:23:58.600 out
00:23:58.820 how
00:23:59.180 on
00:23:59.420 earth
00:23:59.640 could
00:23:59.820 Andrew
00:24:00.120 Scheer
00:24:00.380 have
00:24:00.580 spent
00:24:01.020 more
00:24:01.840 than
00:24:02.220 well
00:24:03.380 he
00:24:03.540 spent
00:24:03.780 $900,000
00:24:04.700 that's
00:24:05.140 $700,000
00:24:05.980 more
00:24:06.420 than
00:24:06.720 the
00:24:06.900 typical
00:24:07.220 leader
00:24:07.620 over
00:24:08.520 the
00:24:08.720 year
00:24:08.980 would
00:24:09.160 spend
00:24:09.520 Ron
00:24:09.940 Ambrose
00:24:10.460 Stephen
00:24:11.380 Harper
00:24:11.680 all
00:24:11.940 them
00:24:12.160 they're
00:24:12.600 spending
00:24:12.840 about
00:24:13.080 $200,000
00:24:14.040 a year
00:24:14.680 to
00:24:14.920 operate
00:24:15.660 and
00:24:16.560 that's
00:24:17.160 you know
00:24:17.560 makeup
00:24:18.280 wardrobe
00:24:19.320 flights
00:24:20.240 speech
00:24:21.100 writers
00:24:21.420 media
00:24:21.800 training
00:24:22.180 that
00:24:22.400 kind
00:24:22.580 of
00:24:22.680 thing
00:24:22.860 actually
00:24:23.220 speech
00:24:23.500 writers
00:24:23.700 are
00:24:23.840 probably
00:24:24.060 separate
00:24:24.440 media
00:24:25.000 training
00:24:25.320 is
00:24:25.440 definitely
00:24:25.700 in
00:24:25.900 there
00:24:26.040 and
00:24:26.500 somehow
00:24:26.820 Andrew
00:24:27.600 Scheer
00:24:28.020 spent
00:24:28.520 4.5
00:24:29.960 times
00:24:30.580 450%
00:24:31.840 more
00:24:32.400 than
00:24:32.960 the
00:24:33.120 average
00:24:33.400 leader
00:24:33.740 and
00:24:33.900 that's
00:24:34.220 not
00:24:34.480 I
00:24:34.820 mean
00:24:34.980 if
00:24:35.640 you
00:24:36.020 how
00:24:36.700 you
00:24:37.220 campaign
00:24:37.580 is
00:24:38.120 how
00:24:38.320 you
00:24:38.500 govern
00:24:38.860 that's
00:24:39.420 one
00:24:39.560 of
00:24:39.700 Morton
00:24:39.980 Blackwell's
00:24:40.640 rules
00:24:40.820 for
00:24:41.020 public
00:24:41.280 policy
00:24:41.740 how
00:24:42.440 you
00:24:42.600 campaign
00:24:42.860 is
00:24:43.000 how
00:24:43.140 you
00:24:43.280 govern
00:24:43.580 and
00:24:43.840 if
00:24:44.020 you
00:24:44.380 are
00:24:45.020 spending
00:24:45.700 more
00:24:46.200 than
00:24:46.560 you
00:24:46.780 can
00:24:47.060 even
00:24:47.960 afford
00:24:48.460 before
00:24:49.520 you're
00:24:49.780 even
00:24:49.940 campaigning
00:24:50.460 keep
00:24:50.720 in
00:24:50.840 mind
00:24:50.960 this
00:24:51.140 was
00:24:51.320 money
00:24:51.860 spent
00:24:52.080 before
00:24:52.360 the
00:24:52.540 election
00:24:52.840 this
00:24:53.080 wasn't
00:24:53.300 even
00:24:53.480 writ
00:24:53.720 money
00:24:53.980 this
00:24:54.540 was
00:24:54.680 before
00:24:54.960 the
00:24:55.140 election
00:25:00.580 and
00:25:01.180 contrary
00:25:01.960 to
00:25:02.220 the
00:25:02.340 image
00:25:02.600 he
00:25:02.700 was
00:25:02.800 trying
00:25:03.020 to
00:25:03.160 convey
00:25:03.400 and
00:25:03.500 I
00:25:03.600 have
00:25:03.740 to
00:25:03.840 ask
00:25:04.040 you
00:25:04.180 this
00:25:04.840 is
00:25:05.000 a
00:25:05.140 completely
00:25:05.540 hypothetical
00:25:06.080 question
00:25:06.740 but
00:25:07.020 I
00:25:07.560 think
00:25:07.740 it
00:25:07.880 needs
00:25:08.200 to
00:25:08.320 be
00:25:08.440 asked
00:25:08.680 when
00:25:09.120 Mr.
00:25:09.500 Scheer
00:25:09.680 of
00:25:09.860 course
00:25:10.100 won
00:25:10.980 the
00:25:11.520 nomination
00:25:12.360 to become
00:25:12.800 leader
00:25:13.040 of the
00:25:13.280 Conservative
00:25:13.600 Party
00:25:13.960 it
00:25:14.580 was
00:25:14.700 on
00:25:14.860 the
00:25:14.980 13th
00:25:15.540 ballot
00:25:15.800 it
00:25:16.080 was
00:25:16.200 by
00:25:16.360 less
00:25:16.640 than
00:25:16.820 2%
00:25:17.560 it
00:25:19.400 was
00:25:19.560 often
00:25:19.860 said
00:25:20.260 that
00:25:20.660 he
00:25:20.900 was
00:25:21.120 nobody's
00:25:21.740 first
00:25:22.000 choice
00:25:22.360 but
00:25:22.540 he
00:25:22.620 was
00:25:22.760 everybody's
00:25:23.320 second
00:25:23.560 and
00:25:23.780 third
00:25:24.020 choice
00:25:24.400 he
00:25:25.840 edged
00:25:26.320 out
00:25:26.700 Mr.
00:25:27.300 Bernier
00:25:27.560 by
00:25:28.040 the
00:25:28.700 thinnest
00:25:30.060 of
00:25:30.260 margins
00:25:30.680 had
00:25:31.420 Mr.
00:25:31.900 Bernier
00:25:32.240 prevailed
00:25:32.920 do you
00:25:33.540 think
00:25:33.980 things
00:25:35.160 would have
00:25:35.420 turned out
00:25:35.780 differently
00:25:36.160 on
00:25:36.400 October
00:25:36.680 21st
00:25:38.280 I
00:25:39.180 without
00:25:40.360 a doubt
00:25:40.840 know
00:25:41.440 that they
00:25:41.820 would have
00:25:42.040 turned out
00:25:42.420 differently
00:25:42.900 how much
00:25:43.440 better
00:25:43.760 that would
00:25:44.980 have been
00:25:45.240 I don't
00:25:45.600 know
00:25:45.940 I think
00:25:46.540 that if
00:25:47.080 Maxime
00:25:47.480 Bernier
00:25:47.760 stayed
00:25:48.240 with the
00:25:48.600 CBC
00:25:48.980 he wouldn't
00:25:50.500 have been
00:25:50.780 seen as
00:25:51.460 so much
00:25:51.860 more
00:25:52.060 radical
00:25:52.460 he
00:25:53.980 certainly
00:25:54.400 wouldn't
00:25:54.640 have had
00:25:54.880 the same
00:25:55.580 gotcha
00:25:56.960 moments
00:25:57.380 that Andrew
00:25:57.880 Scheer
00:25:58.220 had
00:25:58.800 that
00:25:59.300 took him
00:26:00.040 down
00:26:00.360 in the
00:26:00.760 mainstream
00:26:01.020 media
00:26:01.360 I don't
00:26:02.140 think
00:26:02.360 Maxime
00:26:02.840 Bernier
00:26:03.080 was ever
00:26:03.680 running
00:26:05.200 around
00:26:05.600 talking
00:26:06.100 about
00:26:06.460 how
00:26:06.840 gay
00:26:08.140 people
00:26:08.440 are
00:26:08.640 dogs
00:26:09.160 and
00:26:09.480 that
00:26:09.860 kind
00:26:10.060 of
00:26:10.160 thing
00:26:10.360 which
00:26:11.020 keep
00:26:11.280 in
00:26:11.380 mind
00:26:11.520 is
00:26:11.620 something
00:26:11.780 that
00:26:11.940 Andrew
00:26:12.180 Scheer
00:26:12.380 said
00:26:12.720 for
00:26:13.520 better
00:26:13.720 or
00:26:13.860 for
00:26:13.980 worse
00:26:14.300 that's
00:26:14.640 something
00:26:14.820 that
00:26:15.000 the
00:26:15.140 mainstream
00:26:15.400 media
00:26:15.700 didn't
00:26:16.060 find
00:26:16.300 acceptable
00:26:16.800 and
00:26:17.840 that's
00:26:18.060 something
00:26:18.280 that
00:26:18.620 they
00:26:19.020 were
00:26:19.180 able
00:26:19.340 to
00:26:19.580 translate
00:26:20.060 into
00:26:21.060 his
00:26:22.480 inelectability
00:26:23.340 with the
00:26:23.740 masses
00:26:24.040 so
00:26:24.420 I think
00:26:24.860 Maxime
00:26:25.220 Bernier
00:26:25.460 would have
00:26:25.720 been
00:26:25.840 better
00:26:26.040 on that
00:26:26.420 but
00:26:26.940 they
00:26:27.320 probably
00:26:27.940 would have
00:26:28.280 grilled him
00:26:28.780 in the
00:26:29.120 same way
00:26:29.580 with his
00:26:30.180 support
00:26:31.180 for reducing
00:26:31.820 immigration
00:26:32.380 unashamedly
00:26:33.220 I mean
00:26:34.420 that's
00:26:34.940 that's
00:26:35.600 one of
00:26:36.000 the
00:26:36.260 no-go
00:26:37.160 points
00:26:37.500 for the
00:26:37.760 mainstream
00:26:37.980 media
00:26:38.260 as well
00:26:38.560 so
00:26:38.860 who knows
00:26:40.380 and
00:26:41.580 Kian
00:26:41.900 excellent
00:26:42.320 question
00:26:42.780 assuming
00:26:44.840 Mr.
00:26:45.340 Scheer
00:26:45.580 is indeed
00:26:46.340 going to
00:26:47.220 step down
00:26:48.260 as leader
00:26:49.060 and not
00:26:50.160 have a
00:26:50.780 walk in
00:26:51.640 the snow
00:26:51.980 moment
00:26:52.460 and come
00:26:52.880 back
00:26:53.180 is there
00:26:55.160 anybody
00:26:55.620 on your
00:26:56.700 radar
00:26:57.040 that you
00:26:58.000 would
00:26:58.200 personally
00:26:58.580 like to
00:26:58.960 see
00:26:59.220 as the
00:26:59.780 leader
00:27:00.000 of the
00:27:00.320 Conservative
00:27:00.700 Party
00:27:01.080 I like
00:27:03.500 Pierre
00:27:04.260 Polyev
00:27:04.820 I think
00:27:05.560 that he
00:27:06.100 I mean
00:27:06.540 what he
00:27:06.780 said
00:27:06.940 really
00:27:07.180 resonated
00:27:07.640 with me
00:27:08.080 you gotta
00:27:08.320 lead a
00:27:09.400 Conservative
00:27:09.800 Party
00:27:10.100 as a
00:27:10.380 Conservative
00:27:10.760 he's
00:27:12.560 treated me
00:27:12.980 well
00:27:13.200 in the
00:27:13.620 past
00:27:14.000 which
00:27:15.080 is more
00:27:15.540 than I
00:27:15.780 can say
00:27:16.100 for
00:27:16.360 most
00:27:17.700 political
00:27:18.140 leaders
00:27:18.600 especially
00:27:20.320 when they're
00:27:20.660 Conservatives
00:27:21.140 they try
00:27:21.560 and duck
00:27:22.200 and cover
00:27:22.620 when
00:27:22.980 Rebel
00:27:23.540 comes
00:27:23.800 along
00:27:24.180 people
00:27:25.840 are
00:27:26.080 saying
00:27:27.300 Rona
00:27:27.600 Ambrose
00:27:27.980 would be
00:27:28.260 great
00:27:28.560 but I
00:27:29.100 have to
00:27:29.860 say
00:27:30.160 people
00:27:30.780 think
00:27:31.080 Rona
00:27:31.340 Ambrose
00:27:31.780 is good
00:27:32.340 because
00:27:33.020 she was
00:27:33.540 interim
00:27:33.880 leader
00:27:34.100 and she
00:27:34.420 didn't
00:27:34.640 do
00:27:34.840 anything
00:27:35.200 wrong
00:27:36.940 so she
00:27:37.640 has this
00:27:38.020 warm
00:27:38.360 glow
00:27:38.660 of
00:27:38.840 nostalgia
00:27:39.380 around
00:27:39.860 her
00:27:40.060 she's
00:27:40.680 a bit
00:27:40.880 of a
00:27:41.120 red
00:27:42.100 Tory
00:27:42.420 she's
00:27:44.080 a woman
00:27:44.420 so she
00:27:44.820 would do
00:27:45.120 better
00:27:45.500 optically
00:27:46.740 maybe
00:27:47.120 but
00:27:47.860 that's
00:27:48.740 not
00:27:48.920 what
00:27:49.420 Conservatives
00:27:50.060 should be
00:27:50.380 concerned
00:27:50.720 about
00:27:50.880 they
00:27:51.040 shouldn't
00:27:51.220 be
00:27:51.340 concerned
00:27:51.640 about
00:27:51.820 how
00:27:51.940 the
00:27:52.060 mainstream
00:27:52.300 media
00:27:52.540 is
00:27:52.640 going
00:27:52.740 to
00:27:52.800 receive
00:27:53.080 them
00:27:53.340 Rona
00:27:56.140 Ambrose
00:27:56.560 she
00:27:57.840 didn't
00:27:58.780 have
00:27:58.940 the
00:27:59.100 opportunity
00:27:59.560 to do
00:28:00.040 anything
00:28:00.240 wrong
00:28:00.480 because
00:28:00.700 she
00:28:00.880 did
00:28:01.000 her
00:28:01.760 job
00:28:02.040 as
00:28:02.180 interim
00:28:02.460 leader
00:28:02.660 well
00:28:02.980 and that
00:28:03.640 is
00:28:03.880 to
00:28:04.060 not
00:28:04.320 really
00:28:04.780 make
00:28:05.040 a
00:28:05.180 fuss
00:28:05.380 that's
00:28:05.540 not
00:28:05.720 really
00:28:06.040 to
00:28:06.420 do
00:28:07.400 anything
00:28:07.780 substantial
00:28:08.340 but
00:28:09.020 people
00:28:09.260 think
00:28:09.520 that
00:28:09.760 would
00:28:10.920 translate
00:28:11.360 into
00:28:11.700 a
00:28:11.920 successful
00:28:12.460 permanent
00:28:13.820 leadership
00:28:14.360 I don't
00:28:15.140 know
00:28:15.300 maybe
00:28:15.540 she
00:28:15.740 would
00:28:15.840 be
00:28:15.940 a
00:28:16.040 good
00:28:16.140 leader
00:28:16.360 but
00:28:16.540 I
00:28:16.660 don't
00:28:16.820 think
00:28:17.040 that
00:28:17.340 her
00:28:17.800 being
00:28:18.020 a
00:28:18.220 good
00:28:18.380 interim
00:28:18.800 leader
00:28:19.080 is
00:28:19.400 what
00:28:19.580 qualifies
00:28:20.080 someone
00:28:20.360 as
00:28:21.020 a
00:28:21.140 good
00:28:21.360 long
00:28:21.840 term
00:28:22.040 leader
00:28:22.300 well
00:28:23.440 we
00:28:23.680 shall
00:28:23.920 see
00:28:24.200 time
00:28:24.540 will
00:28:24.700 tell
00:28:24.940 as
00:28:25.120 the
00:28:25.240 cliche
00:28:25.520 goes
00:28:25.920 and
00:28:26.120 one
00:28:26.300 thing
00:28:26.480 is
00:28:26.620 for
00:28:26.780 certain
00:28:27.060 the
00:28:27.360 convention
00:28:28.020 in
00:28:28.360 Toronto
00:28:28.680 in April
00:28:29.180 should be
00:28:30.340 an exciting
00:28:31.200 affair
00:28:31.560 indeed
00:28:32.340 Kian thank
00:28:33.480 you so
00:28:33.880 much
00:28:34.140 and I
00:28:34.480 wish you
00:28:35.400 and yours
00:28:35.820 a very
00:28:36.360 Merry
00:28:36.560 Christmas
00:28:36.940 and all
00:28:37.280 the best
00:28:37.620 in 2020
00:28:38.180 my friend
00:28:38.760 Merry
00:28:39.700 Christmas
00:28:40.000 David
00:28:40.280 thank you
00:28:41.060 and that
00:28:41.980 was
00:28:42.280 Kian Bexty
00:28:43.240 in Calgary
00:28:44.240 keep it
00:28:45.080 here folks
00:28:45.500 more of
00:28:45.860 Rebel Roundup
00:28:46.380 to come
00:28:46.740 right after
00:28:47.480 this
00:28:48.280 David
00:28:53.640 Menzies
00:28:53.980 for the
00:28:54.280 Rebel
00:28:54.500 News
00:28:54.880 here
00:28:55.300 outside
00:28:55.720 the
00:28:56.100 Eastminster
00:28:56.740 United
00:28:57.220 Church
00:28:57.660 in
00:28:58.400 Toronto
00:28:58.940 well
00:29:00.020 folks
00:29:00.480 sometimes
00:29:01.300 the question
00:29:01.980 arises
00:29:02.460 is
00:29:03.260 nothing
00:29:03.680 sacred
00:29:04.180 and I
00:29:05.120 think
00:29:05.240 the answer
00:29:05.700 to that
00:29:06.020 query
00:29:06.340 is
00:29:06.700 yeah
00:29:07.140 nothing
00:29:07.580 is
00:29:07.820 sacred
00:29:08.100 indeed
00:29:08.880 check out
00:29:09.840 the
00:29:10.280 nativity
00:29:10.800 scene
00:29:11.280 here
00:29:11.680 at
00:29:12.020 the
00:29:12.260 Eastminster
00:29:12.840 Church
00:29:13.380 instead
00:29:14.200 of the
00:29:14.620 traditional
00:29:15.180 baby
00:29:15.580 Jesus
00:29:16.000 in the
00:29:16.400 manger
00:29:16.740 this
00:29:17.980 scene
00:29:18.340 depicts
00:29:18.900 Jesus
00:29:19.500 as a
00:29:20.300 refugee
00:29:20.860 claimant
00:29:21.720 at a
00:29:22.400 detention
00:29:22.840 center
00:29:23.380 as you
00:29:24.120 can see
00:29:24.600 the
00:29:24.960 baby
00:29:25.520 is
00:29:26.420 behind
00:29:27.100 bars
00:29:28.140 and
00:29:29.200 it is
00:29:29.900 wrapped
00:29:30.120 in a
00:29:30.540 solar
00:29:31.140 blanket
00:29:31.620 which
00:29:32.520 is
00:29:32.900 supposedly
00:29:33.380 how
00:29:33.840 the
00:29:34.080 refugees
00:29:34.460 are
00:29:34.940 detained
00:29:35.540 in
00:29:36.340 U.S.
00:29:36.980 migration
00:29:38.100 centers
00:29:38.940 now
00:29:39.700 I
00:29:39.960 did
00:29:40.220 reach
00:29:40.520 out
00:29:40.940 to
00:29:41.300 the
00:29:41.460 people
00:29:41.840 behind
00:29:42.280 the
00:29:42.480 display
00:29:42.800 at
00:29:43.160 the
00:29:43.300 church
00:29:43.540 they
00:29:43.700 weren't
00:29:43.940 here
00:29:44.200 and
00:29:44.360 there
00:29:44.500 was
00:29:44.640 no
00:29:45.100 one
00:29:45.260 else
00:29:45.500 available
00:29:45.820 to
00:29:46.160 come
00:29:46.400 on
00:29:46.620 camera
00:29:47.480 but
00:29:48.300 apparently
00:29:48.900 the
00:29:49.300 whole
00:29:49.860 idea
00:29:50.380 of
00:29:51.260 this
00:29:51.660 makeshift
00:29:52.720 nativity
00:29:53.160 display
00:29:53.580 is to
00:29:54.180 raise
00:29:54.760 awareness
00:29:55.360 indeed
00:29:56.340 the
00:29:56.920 name
00:29:57.620 of
00:29:58.220 the
00:29:58.560 display
00:29:59.160 is
00:30:00.180 the
00:30:00.700 detained
00:30:01.300 Christ
00:30:02.000 and
00:30:02.940 there
00:30:03.320 is
00:30:03.620 some
00:30:03.880 copy
00:30:04.340 that
00:30:04.600 accompanies
00:30:05.180 the
00:30:05.360 display
00:30:05.780 it
00:30:06.580 says
00:30:06.940 in
00:30:07.140 recent
00:30:07.440 years
00:30:07.820 there
00:30:08.020 has
00:30:08.180 been
00:30:08.360 growing
00:30:08.860 awareness
00:30:09.380 of
00:30:09.640 the
00:30:09.760 ways
00:30:10.020 in
00:30:10.160 which
00:30:10.320 migrants
00:30:10.860 and
00:30:11.500 refugees
00:30:11.960 face
00:30:12.640 detainment
00:30:13.500 deportation
00:30:14.440 and
00:30:15.080 separation
00:30:15.640 from
00:30:15.940 their
00:30:16.140 families
00:30:16.680 the
00:30:17.460 actions
00:30:17.900 from
00:30:18.160 North
00:30:18.360 American
00:30:18.700 governments
00:30:19.180 has
00:30:19.420 led
00:30:19.640 to
00:30:19.840 increase
00:30:20.360 policing
00:30:20.960 and
00:30:21.720 incarceration
00:30:22.360 of
00:30:22.860 migrants
00:30:23.280 and
00:30:23.500 refugees
00:30:23.920 especially
00:30:25.180 those
00:30:25.800 who
00:30:26.040 are
00:30:26.240 racialized
00:30:27.120 at
00:30:27.940 the
00:30:28.100 US
00:30:28.360 Mexico
00:30:28.740 border
00:30:29.120 it
00:30:29.380 has
00:30:29.540 become
00:30:29.900 commonplace
00:30:30.640 to
00:30:30.820 see
00:30:31.020 children
00:30:31.440 separated
00:30:31.980 from
00:30:32.240 parents
00:30:32.700 and
00:30:33.380 for
00:30:33.580 refugee
00:30:34.000 claimants
00:30:34.660 to be
00:30:34.960 held
00:30:35.260 in
00:30:35.480 detention
00:30:36.000 centers
00:30:36.580 in
00:30:37.420 inhumane
00:30:38.360 conditions
00:30:39.280 as a
00:30:40.280 signatory
00:30:40.800 to the
00:30:41.320 safe
00:30:41.640 third
00:30:41.940 party
00:30:42.300 agreement
00:30:42.820 Canada
00:30:43.740 is
00:30:44.060 complicit
00:30:44.640 in
00:30:45.360 the
00:30:45.520 actions
00:30:45.980 of
00:30:46.560 the
00:30:46.740 United
00:30:47.060 States
00:30:47.600 yeah
00:30:48.180 nothing
00:30:48.700 quite conveys
00:30:49.680 the meaning
00:30:50.080 of Christmas
00:30:50.700 more so
00:30:51.360 than the
00:30:51.980 reimagining
00:30:52.920 of the
00:30:53.420 nativity
00:30:53.920 scene
00:30:54.440 to look
00:30:55.540 more like
00:30:56.120 something
00:30:56.500 lifted
00:30:56.900 from a
00:30:57.560 concentration
00:30:58.260 camp
00:30:58.880 in any
00:30:59.900 event
00:31:00.140 here's what
00:31:00.620 some of
00:31:01.060 you had
00:31:01.440 to say
00:31:01.760 about
00:31:02.080 this
00:31:02.360 bizarre
00:31:02.920 and
00:31:03.240 downright
00:31:03.880 disrespectful
00:31:04.600 display
00:31:05.300 courtesy
00:31:05.880 of the
00:31:06.780 United
00:31:07.080 Church
00:31:07.560 ironically
00:31:08.900 vague
00:31:09.360 writes
00:31:09.720 Jesus
00:31:10.460 Jesus
00:31:10.480 would
00:31:10.760 have
00:31:10.860 obeyed
00:31:11.240 the
00:31:11.380 law
00:31:11.620 wow
00:31:12.320 what
00:31:12.600 a
00:31:12.740 concept
00:31:13.140 imagine
00:31:13.560 that
00:31:13.800 folks
00:31:14.100 being
00:31:14.380 a
00:31:14.580 law
00:31:14.800 abiding
00:31:15.160 citizen
00:31:15.760 and yes
00:31:16.520 I
00:31:16.660 agree
00:31:16.960 I
00:31:17.320 think
00:31:17.480 Jesus
00:31:17.800 would
00:31:18.080 have
00:31:18.200 obeyed
00:31:18.520 the
00:31:18.640 law
00:31:18.820 but
00:31:19.040 many
00:31:19.720 of
00:31:19.920 the
00:31:20.080 irregulars
00:31:21.060 waltzing
00:31:21.580 into
00:31:21.820 Canada
00:31:22.200 via
00:31:22.560 Roxham
00:31:23.100 Road
00:31:23.400 simply
00:31:24.400 can't
00:31:24.840 be
00:31:24.980 bothered
00:31:25.300 to
00:31:25.540 fill
00:31:25.800 out
00:31:25.960 all
00:31:26.120 that
00:31:26.340 boring
00:31:26.800 paperwork
00:31:27.400 when
00:31:27.760 it
00:31:27.900 comes
00:31:28.160 to
00:31:28.380 immigrating
00:31:28.900 to
00:31:29.160 Canada
00:31:29.560 it
00:31:29.760 would
00:31:29.880 seem
00:31:30.120 Benny
00:31:31.260 Crout
00:31:31.700 writes
00:31:32.260 don't
00:31:33.240 you
00:31:33.380 love
00:31:33.760 it
00:31:33.920 when
00:31:34.160 your
00:31:34.360 church
00:31:34.740 is
00:31:35.020 forced
00:31:35.380 into
00:31:35.580 a
00:31:35.780 political
00:31:36.120 statement
00:31:36.620 by
00:31:36.940 a
00:31:37.100 bunch
00:31:37.340 of
00:31:37.520 heathens
00:31:37.980 who
00:31:38.160 disguise
00:31:38.640 themselves
00:31:39.180 as
00:31:39.800 a
00:31:39.980 legitimate
00:31:40.560 church
00:31:41.060 SMFH
00:31:42.980 yeah
00:31:43.940 but
00:31:44.180 Benny
00:31:44.580 the
00:31:45.080 really
00:31:45.340 sad
00:31:45.740 part
00:31:45.980 of
00:31:46.100 this
00:31:46.280 story
00:31:46.520 is
00:31:46.680 that
00:31:46.880 nobody
00:31:47.260 is
00:31:47.480 actually
00:31:47.780 forcing
00:31:48.280 them
00:31:48.580 this
00:31:49.520 is
00:31:49.720 a
00:31:49.940 self
00:31:50.500 inflicted
00:31:51.140 wound
00:31:51.460 and
00:31:52.080 me
00:31:52.300 myself
00:31:52.740 and
00:31:52.920 I
00:31:53.120 writes
00:31:53.560 real
00:31:54.640 edgy
00:31:55.280 now
00:31:55.740 draw
00:31:56.120 a
00:31:56.320 cartoon
00:31:56.740 of
00:31:56.940 Mohammed
00:31:57.380 you
00:31:57.760 cowards
00:31:58.340 oh
00:31:58.860 hold on
00:31:59.440 just a
00:31:59.780 second
00:32:00.040 there
00:32:00.260 me
00:32:00.440 myself
00:32:00.840 and
00:32:01.000 I
00:32:01.200 remember
00:32:01.980 how I
00:32:02.340 speculated
00:32:02.900 that
00:32:03.220 nothing
00:32:03.560 is
00:32:03.780 sacred
00:32:04.140 um
00:32:05.140 when it
00:32:05.740 comes to
00:32:06.200 depictions
00:32:06.680 of the
00:32:06.980 prophet
00:32:07.260 Mohammed
00:32:07.740 that is
00:32:09.100 still
00:32:09.440 sacred
00:32:10.040 because
00:32:10.920 even
00:32:11.240 drawing
00:32:11.620 Mohammed
00:32:12.080 in a
00:32:12.560 respectful
00:32:13.160 fashion
00:32:13.700 is
00:32:14.120 how
00:32:15.060 shall
00:32:15.240 I
00:32:15.360 put
00:32:15.520 this
00:32:15.840 well
00:32:16.460 it's
00:32:17.060 potentially
00:32:17.840 harmful
00:32:18.380 to
00:32:18.720 one's
00:32:19.060 well-being
00:32:19.520 well
00:32:20.600 that
00:32:20.820 wraps up
00:32:21.300 another
00:32:21.540 edition
00:32:21.900 of
00:32:22.080 Rebel
00:32:22.280 Rundup
00:32:22.720 in fact
00:32:23.120 the
00:32:23.300 last
00:32:23.500 Rebel
00:32:23.760 Rundup
00:32:24.180 of the
00:32:24.600 decade
00:32:25.020 no less
00:32:25.580 thanks
00:32:26.380 so much
00:32:26.700 for joining
00:32:27.100 us
00:32:27.360 see you
00:32:27.780 next
00:32:28.040 year
00:32:28.360 and
00:32:28.640 hey
00:32:28.880 folks
00:32:29.260 never
00:32:29.540 forget
00:32:30.040 without
00:32:30.820 risk
00:32:31.200 there
00:32:31.420 can
00:32:31.560 be
00:32:31.700 no
00:32:31.880 glory
00:32:32.240 good
00:32:32.840 night