Rebel News Podcast - November 30, 2023


SHEILA GUNN REID | The Annual UN Climate Change prom is upon us once again


Episode Stats

Length

38 minutes

Words per Minute

142.18396

Word Count

5,411

Sentence Count

293

Misogynist Sentences

3

Hate Speech Sentences

4


Summary

In this episode, I chat with Robert Lyman, a contributor to the International Climate Science Coalition and a regular contributor at the Financial Post, about his views on climate change and global warming. We talk about what it means to be a climate skeptic, and why we should all be worried about climate change.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hang on to your wallets, my fellow Canadians.
00:00:02.040 It's time again for the United Nations Climate Change Conference.
00:00:05.200 I'm Sheila Gunn-Reed, and you're watching The Gunn Show.
00:00:24.380 You know, when the weather turns cold and you need a break,
00:00:27.920 well, if you're an activist, bureaucrat, or politician,
00:00:31.960 November through to the beginning of December,
00:00:34.760 it's the best time of year for you.
00:00:36.740 It's Christmas come early, honestly,
00:00:38.660 because you get to go to the United Nations Annual Climate Change Conference.
00:00:43.480 You get to hop on a jet and fly halfway around the world
00:00:48.940 and enjoy a little party for a couple of weeks in a city you may never get to.
00:00:57.420 In the before times, in your other life,
00:01:00.240 before you turn to scolding normal people about using fossil fuels to stay alive.
00:01:05.680 That's what these UN Climate Change Conferences are all about.
00:01:09.520 I've been to a few of them myself.
00:01:11.200 I'm not going to this one this year, held in the United Arab Emirates,
00:01:16.600 one of the most expensive, exotic, and energy-intensive cities on the entire face of the earth
00:01:23.920 because of their onerous reporting restrictions.
00:01:27.960 I'm not allowed inside the conference because a few years ago,
00:01:32.320 I asked a prickly question to a Canadian delegate when the conference was held in Morocco
00:01:37.440 and I got, well, the entire company banned from the conferences in perpetuity.
00:01:44.740 And that ban came at the request of the Canadian delegation.
00:01:48.900 Yeah, they're censoring me in other countries now.
00:01:52.580 But because I'm not going to the conference,
00:01:55.180 I thought I would call in an expert on climate economics and policies.
00:01:59.900 And so joining me today in an interview I recorded earlier is Robert Lyman.
00:02:04.020 He's a contributor to the International Climate Science Coalition
00:02:07.240 and he's also a contributor at Friends of Science.
00:02:11.240 And he is a careful watcher of these sorts of things.
00:02:15.700 And he is able to break down just how much these bad ideas from these globalists
00:02:22.680 are going to cost your family.
00:02:25.200 Take a listen.
00:02:33.760 So joining me now is someone that I've never actually interviewed,
00:02:37.320 but I follow his work very closely through his roles with Friends of Science
00:02:41.680 and the International Climate Science Coalition.
00:02:44.260 So joining me now is Robert Lyman, also frequently published in the Financial Post.
00:02:50.820 Robert, thanks for joining me.
00:02:52.900 Usually around this time of the year, I check in with my fellow travelers
00:02:57.480 in this climate skeptic movement as we approach the UN Climate Change Summit.
00:03:04.220 Robert, how would you describe yourself?
00:03:08.580 Because, you know, as I was saying before we started rolling,
00:03:11.860 some of your greatest critics are people who watched Greta Thunberg
00:03:14.580 and decided the world was going to end.
00:03:16.660 But you actually have, I would say, a generation's worth of knowledge
00:03:21.180 on the issue of climate and economics.
00:03:24.620 So tell us a little bit about who and what you are.
00:03:28.780 Well, I'm a retired energy economist
00:03:30.720 and I'm also the chief economic advisor
00:03:34.880 for the International Climate Science Coalition Canada.
00:03:38.860 Over a 27-year career in the federal government,
00:03:45.880 I provided a great deal of analysis and policy advice to ministers
00:03:52.500 regarding climate issues and other energy and environmental issues.
00:03:58.000 I'm someone who cares deeply about the need for a fair and open public dialogue
00:04:09.460 on climate issues in Canada.
00:04:12.100 You know, and that really is the problem in all of this,
00:04:15.640 is that there's just this approved homogeneity of opinions
00:04:20.600 on issues around climate change, climate science.
00:04:24.200 Do taxes change the weather?
00:04:25.900 Are my emissions in my comfortable SUV going to kill all life on Earth as we know it?
00:04:32.260 It seems to be that hyperbole on issues of climate change,
00:04:37.360 as in, you know, we're on a doomsday clock,
00:04:39.980 those are the only accepted viewpoints.
00:04:43.680 And, you know, people like yourself,
00:04:45.860 people like my friend Tom Harris from the International Climate Science Coalition,
00:04:49.740 people like my friend Michelle Sterling from Friends of Science,
00:04:54.300 you are trying to take the hyperbole and hysteria out of the conversation
00:04:59.240 and being treated like heretics for it.
00:05:02.540 Well, that's right.
00:05:03.580 And my particular niche in that regard is the information and analysis
00:05:09.360 that I offer on climate policy,
00:05:12.680 that is how the government of Canada makes its decisions on climate,
00:05:15.740 and on the economics of climate.
00:05:20.300 That includes following the international developments,
00:05:25.100 such as those that are about to take place in Dubai,
00:05:29.660 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
00:05:34.300 So it's really all about bringing some facts and analysis to bear
00:05:40.760 on what is a highly politicized subject.
00:05:42.880 You know, and I'm so glad that you do,
00:05:46.020 because, yeah, there's just so much hysteria and feelings.
00:05:50.140 But, you know, the energy companies, you know, the natural gas company,
00:05:55.140 they don't take hysteria in the form of payment these days.
00:06:00.000 Now, you just wrote an article,
00:06:02.820 it was published this morning in the Financial Post,
00:06:06.360 breaking down the big numbers of what's called COP28,
00:06:09.940 that's government and global summit parlance for the annual meeting of the UN,
00:06:19.000 wherein they talk about their plans to control your life through climate policy.
00:06:24.900 Tell us a little bit about what we can find in your article.
00:06:29.200 I don't want to give too much away,
00:06:31.100 but you really tried to put into context
00:06:34.540 the scope of the dollars and cents of some of the bad ideas
00:06:38.020 that come out of the United Nations.
00:06:41.060 Well, my article was, in a sense,
00:06:44.640 a glimpse at one of the key issues that will be dealt with
00:06:48.140 during this climate conference,
00:06:50.440 which will start tomorrow
00:06:53.220 and will go till the 12th of December.
00:06:55.860 In trying to portray to people what's actually going on there,
00:07:01.980 I frequently find that people get confused by large numbers.
00:07:07.080 You know, they don't know what's the,
00:07:09.320 basically, what's the difference between a million, a billion, and a trillion.
00:07:14.220 And yet, understanding those differences are particularly important
00:07:18.160 to understand what this conference will talk about
00:07:21.160 in terms of the funding that is being asked by the developing countries
00:07:26.660 of the developed countries like Canada
00:07:29.440 to pay for their climate measures in the period from 2025 to 2030.
00:07:36.740 In short summary,
00:07:41.900 the developing countries are asking for $2 trillion per year
00:07:46.260 from the OECD countries.
00:07:50.300 And if you break that down in terms of the percentages
00:07:53.320 that would probably be asked from Canada,
00:07:56.760 that's about $78 billion a year
00:08:01.340 that Canada would be required to pay.
00:08:04.240 And that works out to just under $5,000 per Canadian household
00:08:10.880 that would be asked of us.
00:08:13.160 Now, and I thought getting the big numbers down
00:08:17.240 to a single number like that,
00:08:18.740 that a Canadian can grasp, was important.
00:08:23.880 And shocking.
00:08:25.300 I mean, we're in the middle of an inflationary crisis.
00:08:27.500 People can't afford food.
00:08:28.900 More people are using food banks than in recent history.
00:08:33.500 Housing prices are out of control.
00:08:37.600 People are, as my friend Michelle Sterling says,
00:08:40.040 faced in some instances with heat or eat poverty.
00:08:42.780 And the government is expecting us to pay $5,000 per household
00:08:46.820 to meet their arbitrary climate goals.
00:08:49.000 It's outrageous.
00:08:50.480 Well, that's what's being asked by the developing countries.
00:08:53.980 In fact, I think that it's almost impossible to imagine
00:08:59.160 that the governments of the OECD countries would agree to do that.
00:09:03.860 Because if they did, the reaction of their citizens,
00:09:07.660 as in Canada, would be to basically throw out of office
00:09:12.040 those who would agree to that.
00:09:14.800 You know, so that's the ask.
00:09:17.080 And it's an interesting question as to whether,
00:09:22.260 to tell you the truth, they're really serious about it.
00:09:24.940 Because it's so far beyond the pale that it may well be
00:09:30.080 that what they're doing is using that as a negotiating tactic
00:09:33.560 in the hopes that maybe they won't get $2 trillion,
00:09:37.960 but they'll get $1 trillion,
00:09:39.420 or they'll get some other extraordinarily large number.
00:09:41.900 So there's another possibility.
00:09:46.440 And that is that the developing countries
00:09:51.460 are under the terms of the UN agreement,
00:09:53.460 are not required to reduce their emissions
00:09:56.560 unless they get funded by the developed countries.
00:10:00.600 And so if, as is highly likely,
00:10:03.760 the developed countries refuse to provide that funding,
00:10:07.120 then that basically lets them off the hook.
00:10:09.400 They don't have to do any things to reduce emissions.
00:10:12.540 They really didn't want to do anyway.
00:10:15.900 Right, right.
00:10:18.080 Yes.
00:10:18.580 So make the ask so great that nobody's going to pay it.
00:10:21.660 So you just get to keep doing whatever you're doing.
00:10:24.080 And that's fine.
00:10:25.760 Now, I like how your answer presupposes
00:10:28.760 that Justin Trudeau would ask us
00:10:30.500 before he did anything to us.
00:10:33.060 Well, you may be aware that I recently spoke
00:10:38.860 at one of the Friends of Sciences annual conferences
00:10:42.040 in which I spoke on the theme of
00:10:44.420 when will climate policy hit the wall?
00:10:47.520 In other words, when will the costs
00:10:50.680 of the present federal government's climate policies
00:10:54.580 become so onerous
00:10:56.060 that Canadians will simply react against it
00:11:00.180 and vote out of office to whatever government
00:11:02.560 is responsible for that.
00:11:04.600 And that's a very long story.
00:11:06.460 But as I'm sure you're aware,
00:11:08.100 the costs that are being imposed on Canadians
00:11:10.980 are very high indeed.
00:11:14.100 Yeah, and I think we might almost be there.
00:11:17.520 And I think that has to do with,
00:11:19.660 you know, that would explain
00:11:21.000 Justin Trudeau's carve out
00:11:22.560 of home heating oil
00:11:24.060 in Atlantic Canada from the carbon tax.
00:11:26.840 Because I think that was going to be
00:11:29.580 what might break the liberal stronghold
00:11:32.700 on Atlantic Canada,
00:11:33.980 just the cost of living.
00:11:36.240 But getting back to this climate conference
00:11:39.280 in the UAE,
00:11:40.460 I've gone to some of these things.
00:11:42.360 I've run into Tom Harris
00:11:43.600 while I was there a couple of times.
00:11:45.520 This year, I'm unable to go
00:11:47.500 because I'm banned from the UN
00:11:49.040 from reporting inside of their conferences.
00:11:52.820 Thanks to the Canadian government
00:11:54.940 complaining about my prickly,
00:11:56.820 skeptical questions back in Morocco.
00:12:00.800 But, and the UAE has some strong restrictions
00:12:06.200 on reporting,
00:12:08.460 unauthorized reporting inside their country.
00:12:11.240 So I just didn't think it was worth risking
00:12:13.200 an Emirati prison sentence
00:12:15.820 to report on Stephen Gilbeau.
00:12:19.240 However, some interesting developments
00:12:21.380 are coming out of the UAE already.
00:12:22.980 And Alberta is doing something similar.
00:12:26.300 I saw yesterday.
00:12:28.120 They are happy to take
00:12:31.080 the United Nations money
00:12:33.760 and all that goes along with it
00:12:36.100 to host one of these conferences
00:12:37.780 that can bring in up to like
00:12:39.340 100,000 people into a city.
00:12:42.720 But they're also
00:12:44.000 considering making oil and gas deals
00:12:47.180 on the side.
00:12:48.000 Since all the countries are there
00:12:50.320 and all the diplomats are there,
00:12:51.880 why not take advantage of it
00:12:53.020 and pursue some oil and gas deals,
00:12:54.920 including LNG with China?
00:12:56.560 I thought, pretty cheeky
00:12:58.720 what they're up to
00:12:59.980 undermining their own conference.
00:13:03.980 Well, that's right.
00:13:05.320 I mean, I estimate that
00:13:07.460 the cost that will be incurred
00:13:10.160 by all of the 70,000 participants
00:13:13.820 at this conference
00:13:14.960 will be something in the order
00:13:17.200 of $460 million.
00:13:19.480 You know, that's spent
00:13:20.580 on hotels and restaurants
00:13:23.660 and other expenses
00:13:25.740 that they have getting there
00:13:27.700 and so on.
00:13:28.760 So there is a real financial benefit
00:13:31.700 to Dubai
00:13:32.920 and having the conference held there.
00:13:34.520 But the conference organizers
00:13:37.900 are very shrewd people.
00:13:41.200 They know where their economic interest lies.
00:13:45.340 And while they are nominally
00:13:47.740 on the side of phasing out
00:13:51.040 oil production,
00:13:55.160 they have no intention of doing that
00:13:57.740 within the United Arab Emirates.
00:13:59.760 That is one of their most important assets
00:14:03.100 for the future economic development
00:14:04.840 of their people.
00:14:06.180 And they don't plan to give that up.
00:14:09.640 You know, it's nice to see.
00:14:11.100 It's something Poland did,
00:14:14.380 something similarly
00:14:15.380 when they held the conference
00:14:16.460 in Katowice.
00:14:18.600 They put the,
00:14:20.420 I mean, again,
00:14:21.380 you're happy to take the UN's money,
00:14:23.180 take the tourism dollars,
00:14:24.520 but they put the conference
00:14:25.640 right next door
00:14:26.260 to the Coal Miners Museum.
00:14:27.780 And then they opened the conference
00:14:29.400 with the Coal Miners Marching Band.
00:14:30.960 And I thought, you know what?
00:14:32.460 That's some high-level trolling.
00:14:33.960 I kind of admire that.
00:14:35.980 And I know the Alberta government
00:14:37.960 is doing something similar
00:14:39.280 to what the Trump administration did
00:14:42.020 at the Bonn Germany conference.
00:14:44.880 So the Trump administration
00:14:46.080 sent a very pro-oil and gas delegation,
00:14:49.720 set up a pro-oil and gas pavilion
00:14:51.540 at the United Nations Climate Change Conference.
00:14:54.620 This year, it sounds like
00:14:55.480 the Alberta government
00:14:56.260 is doing much the same thing,
00:14:58.520 saying that innovation
00:15:00.100 is the way forward
00:15:01.040 to reduced emissions
00:15:02.140 and through cleaner extraction
00:15:05.860 of oil and gas,
00:15:07.600 through natural gas.
00:15:10.440 And so it sounds like
00:15:11.580 they're sending
00:15:12.060 a 100-person delegation,
00:15:13.540 which frightens me
00:15:14.400 as a fiscal conservative.
00:15:16.340 But if they're going there
00:15:17.600 to promote Alberta oil and gas,
00:15:19.620 I'm not as upset about it
00:15:21.260 as I normally would be.
00:15:22.240 Well, that's right.
00:15:24.340 It's a wise move.
00:15:25.520 I mean, you have to remember
00:15:26.760 that this is supposedly
00:15:29.820 an international conference
00:15:31.580 of diplomats and government leaders
00:15:35.080 that are there to negotiate an agreement.
00:15:39.160 I spent 10 years
00:15:40.440 in the Canadian Foreign Service,
00:15:41.760 and I can tell you
00:15:42.580 that most international conferences
00:15:44.200 do not have 70,000 people
00:15:46.660 involved in them.
00:15:48.020 What is involved here
00:15:49.500 is more theater
00:15:51.420 than international climate conferences.
00:15:55.540 And every one of the literally thousands
00:15:59.580 of organizations that are there
00:16:01.400 is there to put on a show
00:16:04.220 and to tell their own story
00:16:05.980 and how appropriate it is
00:16:08.300 that Alberta is there
00:16:09.520 to tell its story
00:16:10.720 and hopefully get a little bit
00:16:13.160 of media attention as well.
00:16:14.580 I hope they make
00:16:16.980 all kinds of enemies
00:16:18.280 while they're there.
00:16:20.700 Daniel Smith already is,
00:16:22.160 and I just can't get enough of it.
00:16:24.740 Now, as is always the case
00:16:26.740 at these things,
00:16:27.620 there's lots of talk
00:16:28.520 about renewables,
00:16:29.880 which I think makes sense
00:16:31.800 if you live
00:16:32.560 in some equatorial place,
00:16:34.720 but it gets dark
00:16:36.060 where I live before 4 p.m.
00:16:38.600 And yet there's this constant push
00:16:40.260 for renewables
00:16:40.900 coming out of these
00:16:41.760 United Nations
00:16:42.460 climate change conferences.
00:16:43.540 What can we expect
00:16:45.100 from this latest one?
00:16:48.080 Well, the goal of the conference
00:16:50.300 with respect to renewables
00:16:51.640 is to double the share
00:16:55.500 that renewables have
00:16:56.860 of electricity generation
00:16:58.320 in the world.
00:17:00.080 And ideally to triple it.
00:17:06.580 the, and of course,
00:17:10.020 the ways that they want
00:17:10.900 to do that
00:17:11.460 is through increasing
00:17:13.620 yet again
00:17:15.020 the subsidies
00:17:15.900 that the member countries
00:17:17.220 provide for renewable
00:17:18.840 energy production
00:17:19.660 and to ensure
00:17:23.520 that the,
00:17:25.520 all the countries
00:17:26.340 of the world
00:17:27.060 begin through regulatory
00:17:28.880 and taxation measures
00:17:30.100 to reduce the use
00:17:31.440 of coal and natural gas
00:17:32.640 and electricity.
00:17:33.220 So it's a carrot
00:17:34.800 and a stick
00:17:35.340 type of approach
00:17:36.460 that they're adopting.
00:17:39.760 I think that
00:17:40.860 as is so much
00:17:41.940 the case
00:17:42.400 with these sorts
00:17:43.000 of conferences,
00:17:43.560 there will be a lot
00:17:44.340 of lip service
00:17:45.080 paid to that goal.
00:17:46.820 But in the real world,
00:17:51.780 although some $2 trillion
00:17:56.480 has been spent
00:17:58.180 on renewable energy
00:17:59.220 investments
00:17:59.700 over the course
00:18:00.360 of the last eight years
00:18:02.320 in the world,
00:18:03.500 it still only represents
00:18:05.480 about 4% to 5%
00:18:08.380 of the world's
00:18:09.420 energy consumption.
00:18:11.540 So it's not going
00:18:13.480 to replace hydrocarbons.
00:18:16.880 And the countries
00:18:19.500 of the world
00:18:20.260 that are most quickly
00:18:23.260 growing their greenhouse
00:18:24.420 gas emissions
00:18:25.220 are basically
00:18:26.020 the countries
00:18:26.680 of Asia
00:18:27.740 and so on.
00:18:28.700 And they know
00:18:30.940 that their economic
00:18:32.860 development,
00:18:33.640 the welfare
00:18:34.200 and standard
00:18:35.060 of living
00:18:35.500 of their people
00:18:36.580 is dependent
00:18:37.640 upon them
00:18:38.520 having access
00:18:39.280 to cheap,
00:18:40.300 affordable,
00:18:40.900 and secure
00:18:41.480 energy supplies.
00:18:42.860 And that's
00:18:43.560 not renewables.
00:18:45.900 That is a uniform
00:18:47.720 statement.
00:18:48.500 That's an evergreen
00:18:49.320 statement.
00:18:49.760 You can say that
00:18:50.400 about Asia,
00:18:51.160 but you can say
00:18:51.720 that about Canada too.
00:18:53.400 There's also
00:18:54.360 a push for,
00:18:56.760 in your note
00:18:57.400 you sent me,
00:18:58.440 scaling up accountability.
00:18:59.760 That horrifies me
00:19:01.200 because that means
00:19:02.320 that someone
00:19:02.780 is going to be
00:19:03.500 the watchdog
00:19:04.620 making sure
00:19:06.800 that sovereign nations
00:19:08.820 impose these
00:19:09.800 UN targets
00:19:10.500 on their people.
00:19:11.180 Yes,
00:19:12.700 it's that
00:19:13.320 scaling up
00:19:14.940 accountability
00:19:15.400 is code.
00:19:16.400 It's a code
00:19:16.900 for having
00:19:18.420 the United Nations
00:19:19.520 as an organization
00:19:21.080 have a much
00:19:22.900 more intrusive
00:19:24.020 role
00:19:24.480 in its ability
00:19:25.600 to what they
00:19:26.940 call coordinate
00:19:27.740 and regulate
00:19:28.800 the global
00:19:29.680 climate change
00:19:31.100 effort.
00:19:32.480 What they would
00:19:36.060 like to do
00:19:36.600 ideally
00:19:37.100 is to create
00:19:38.280 a situation
00:19:38.960 where,
00:19:40.180 as is done
00:19:41.120 in the case
00:19:41.560 of the International
00:19:42.140 Energy Agency,
00:19:44.280 the countries
00:19:45.960 of the world
00:19:46.600 would be subject
00:19:47.940 to being
00:19:48.820 reviewed
00:19:49.760 every five years
00:19:51.140 as to their
00:19:51.760 performance
00:19:52.460 in attaining
00:19:53.380 the greenhouse
00:19:54.660 gas emissions.
00:19:56.220 The review
00:19:57.540 would be done
00:19:58.300 by a delegation
00:19:59.900 of what they
00:20:01.240 would call
00:20:01.580 energy experts,
00:20:02.700 which are mainly
00:20:04.440 guided by
00:20:05.640 the officials
00:20:08.000 of the United
00:20:08.840 Nations.
00:20:09.900 They produced
00:20:10.760 these reports
00:20:11.400 and they would
00:20:11.800 inevitably,
00:20:13.000 in the case
00:20:13.620 of a country
00:20:14.160 like Canada,
00:20:15.260 be a very
00:20:15.820 damning
00:20:16.360 condemnation
00:20:17.220 of what
00:20:17.620 our efforts
00:20:18.140 are.
00:20:19.020 That would
00:20:19.700 be intended
00:20:20.220 essentially
00:20:20.800 to embarrass
00:20:21.440 the Canadian
00:20:22.060 government
00:20:22.540 and to urge
00:20:23.540 it to do
00:20:23.980 more.
00:20:25.420 Part of what
00:20:26.140 they're also
00:20:26.700 proposing
00:20:27.180 is to have
00:20:27.780 more frequent
00:20:28.800 conferences
00:20:29.780 at the summit
00:20:31.060 level.
00:20:31.480 Now,
00:20:31.600 they already
00:20:31.940 have one a
00:20:32.520 year,
00:20:32.920 as you know,
00:20:34.180 but what people
00:20:34.840 generally don't
00:20:35.840 know is that
00:20:36.960 between those
00:20:38.020 major annual
00:20:39.000 conferences,
00:20:39.560 there are over
00:20:40.380 1,000 other
00:20:41.900 conferences that
00:20:43.140 are held by
00:20:43.740 the United
00:20:44.120 Nations in
00:20:45.160 order to try
00:20:45.780 to generate
00:20:47.920 as much
00:20:48.620 climate-related
00:20:50.240 activity as
00:20:50.960 they can.
00:20:51.660 And they want
00:20:52.060 to do more
00:20:52.540 of that,
00:20:53.640 amazingly.
00:20:55.380 Yeah,
00:20:56.200 if it were
00:20:56.860 possible,
00:20:57.740 just sending
00:20:58.300 bureaucrats all
00:20:59.280 over the world
00:21:00.060 to these opulent
00:21:01.600 climate shindigs.
00:21:02.800 They never hold
00:21:03.240 this stuff in
00:21:03.740 red deer.
00:21:04.220 That's for
00:21:05.860 sure.
00:21:07.920 Well,
00:21:08.360 my son lives
00:21:09.880 in Yellowknife,
00:21:10.620 so I'm kind of
00:21:11.320 encouraging them
00:21:12.240 to go there
00:21:12.760 sometime.
00:21:14.800 Same,
00:21:15.180 same,
00:21:15.620 yeah.
00:21:18.040 And,
00:21:18.540 you know,
00:21:19.220 there's also
00:21:20.200 this,
00:21:20.900 to use the
00:21:21.520 language of the
00:21:22.040 left,
00:21:22.340 and I loathe
00:21:23.140 to do so,
00:21:23.780 but intersectionality
00:21:25.420 of all these
00:21:26.020 other issues
00:21:26.860 that the UN
00:21:28.000 has their
00:21:28.580 tentacles in
00:21:29.400 and linking
00:21:30.800 it back to
00:21:31.340 climate change.
00:21:32.580 One of the
00:21:33.320 key subjects
00:21:35.600 of the
00:21:36.260 most recent
00:21:36.940 biodiversity
00:21:37.520 conference that
00:21:38.760 was held
00:21:39.080 in Quebec,
00:21:40.660 it was all
00:21:41.840 about climate
00:21:42.420 change.
00:21:42.920 You know,
00:21:43.060 you go there
00:21:43.500 to learn about
00:21:44.080 biodiversity
00:21:44.640 and address,
00:21:45.520 you know,
00:21:45.800 dwindling species
00:21:46.580 or habitat
00:21:47.620 preservation,
00:21:48.080 and it's all
00:21:49.180 climate change.
00:21:49.880 That's all they
00:21:50.420 want to talk
00:21:50.920 about.
00:21:51.580 So it's not
00:21:52.680 just the
00:21:53.300 in-between
00:21:53.980 climate change
00:21:55.260 conferences,
00:21:55.700 it's all the
00:21:56.300 other conferences
00:21:57.000 that they make
00:21:57.660 about climate
00:21:58.120 change,
00:21:58.580 too.
00:21:59.180 Yeah,
00:21:59.440 for a number
00:22:00.200 of years,
00:22:00.880 the United
00:22:01.740 Nations has
00:22:02.860 been trying
00:22:03.520 to draw
00:22:04.080 a direct
00:22:04.680 linkage between
00:22:06.160 what they call
00:22:07.520 the biodiversity
00:22:08.220 or the nature
00:22:09.620 issues and
00:22:10.980 those of climate
00:22:11.700 change.
00:22:12.700 And I think
00:22:13.280 the reason for
00:22:14.020 that is that
00:22:14.940 the climate
00:22:16.040 change issue
00:22:16.820 has been
00:22:17.220 remarkably
00:22:17.780 successful in
00:22:19.220 garnering
00:22:20.140 financial support
00:22:21.880 from governments
00:22:22.740 around the world,
00:22:23.700 while the
00:22:24.800 biodiversity issues
00:22:26.080 has basically
00:22:27.620 not been able
00:22:29.240 to raise that
00:22:29.760 much money
00:22:30.180 at all.
00:22:30.920 Once you
00:22:31.560 draw this
00:22:32.180 link between
00:22:33.200 improving
00:22:35.300 or reducing
00:22:37.640 greenhouse gas
00:22:38.300 emissions and
00:22:38.980 improving the
00:22:39.820 quality of the
00:22:42.040 natural environment,
00:22:43.520 you open the
00:22:44.180 door to a much
00:22:44.780 higher level of
00:22:45.620 funding for that.
00:22:47.920 Unfortunately,
00:22:48.620 this really hasn't
00:22:49.300 worked for them
00:22:49.920 all that well in
00:22:50.540 the past,
00:22:51.020 because as you
00:22:51.960 know,
00:22:52.180 for many years,
00:22:52.980 the polar bears
00:22:54.300 were the poster
00:22:55.760 child of climate
00:22:56.920 issues.
00:22:57.520 The problem
00:22:57.820 with the polar
00:22:58.360 bears is their
00:22:59.120 population is
00:22:59.920 constantly growing.
00:23:01.760 And so it's
00:23:03.120 just not
00:23:03.620 working.
00:23:05.480 And it will
00:23:07.960 remain to be
00:23:11.020 seen how far
00:23:12.140 they get in
00:23:12.700 actually getting
00:23:14.100 people to put
00:23:15.060 more funding
00:23:15.640 into biodiversity
00:23:18.020 issues.
00:23:18.940 I doubt that it
00:23:19.720 will be very
00:23:20.180 much at all.
00:23:22.320 Yeah, I've
00:23:22.880 seen them do
00:23:23.400 this too with
00:23:24.100 migration and
00:23:25.280 wars.
00:23:25.980 They say,
00:23:26.460 you know,
00:23:26.720 like these
00:23:27.080 things,
00:23:27.540 the underlying
00:23:27.940 cause of
00:23:28.720 these things
00:23:29.380 is climate
00:23:30.280 change.
00:23:30.700 So give us
00:23:31.220 more money.
00:23:31.620 If you don't
00:23:32.260 want to see
00:23:33.000 children starve
00:23:34.340 to death
00:23:34.940 or, you
00:23:36.440 know,
00:23:36.700 kids in refugee
00:23:37.580 camps,
00:23:38.060 then you have
00:23:38.380 to give us
00:23:38.720 more money
00:23:39.160 to combat
00:23:39.680 climate change.
00:23:40.640 That's always
00:23:41.400 what it comes
00:23:42.060 down to.
00:23:43.260 Robert,
00:23:43.900 is there
00:23:44.500 anything new
00:23:45.620 that is going
00:23:46.420 to come out
00:23:47.000 of this
00:23:47.420 climate change
00:23:48.340 conference?
00:23:48.720 Is it going
00:23:49.000 to be like
00:23:49.400 the Paris
00:23:49.820 Accord
00:23:50.220 where it's
00:23:50.820 this big,
00:23:51.440 you know,
00:23:53.080 agreement that
00:23:53.780 we all sign
00:23:54.280 on to and
00:23:54.820 then all
00:23:55.860 of a sudden
00:23:56.220 I have
00:23:57.380 to have
00:23:58.040 a net
00:23:58.940 zero car
00:23:59.500 by 2035
00:24:00.560 according to
00:24:01.560 Justin Trudeau or
00:24:02.280 is it just
00:24:02.680 going to be
00:24:03.020 more of the
00:24:03.580 same,
00:24:04.180 just an
00:24:04.480 expensive party
00:24:05.360 that bureaucrats
00:24:06.640 and government
00:24:07.260 officials throw
00:24:08.100 for themselves?
00:24:10.440 Well,
00:24:10.940 I think you
00:24:11.360 have to
00:24:11.720 distinguish
00:24:12.140 between what
00:24:12.880 happens at
00:24:14.120 the conference
00:24:14.800 and what
00:24:16.240 happens on
00:24:17.800 the margins
00:24:18.280 of the
00:24:18.660 conference and
00:24:19.560 in the
00:24:20.120 national
00:24:20.980 capitals.
00:24:22.620 I don't
00:24:23.400 think that
00:24:24.080 there will
00:24:24.560 be any
00:24:25.200 dramatic
00:24:26.380 new
00:24:26.700 breakthroughs
00:24:27.380 at the
00:24:27.660 conference.
00:24:28.340 There will
00:24:28.740 be a
00:24:29.780 number of
00:24:30.260 countries
00:24:30.620 that will
00:24:31.300 announce
00:24:32.240 new
00:24:32.500 initiatives,
00:24:33.260 new targets
00:24:34.280 that they
00:24:35.400 will propose
00:24:36.200 to adopt.
00:24:37.140 They've been
00:24:37.540 doing that
00:24:38.080 for years
00:24:38.740 and no
00:24:39.420 country
00:24:40.420 apart from
00:24:41.040 a few
00:24:41.340 in Europe
00:24:41.680 has ever
00:24:42.160 retained
00:24:42.540 the targets.
00:24:43.360 So there's
00:24:43.540 no political
00:24:44.080 downside to
00:24:44.960 announcing
00:24:45.360 new targets.
00:24:48.080 But as
00:24:50.080 I said
00:24:50.480 earlier,
00:24:50.980 this is
00:24:51.600 all
00:24:51.820 theatre and
00:24:52.640 the audience
00:24:54.060 for the
00:24:54.460 theatre is
00:24:55.000 not the
00:24:55.440 people who
00:24:55.880 live in
00:24:56.220 Dubai.
00:24:56.600 The audience
00:24:57.100 for this
00:24:57.500 theatre are
00:24:57.940 the people
00:24:58.320 who live
00:24:58.720 in the
00:24:59.420 OECD
00:25:00.020 countries.
00:25:01.140 So what
00:25:01.880 they basically
00:25:02.980 hope to do
00:25:03.580 is to raise
00:25:04.340 the profile
00:25:05.180 of climate
00:25:06.540 alarmism and
00:25:08.180 to put across
00:25:09.740 the case that
00:25:10.580 you see the
00:25:11.340 whole world is
00:25:12.260 concerned about
00:25:12.900 this and
00:25:13.680 therefore countries
00:25:15.160 like Canada
00:25:15.800 must do
00:25:16.540 more.
00:25:17.480 And it'll
00:25:17.960 support the
00:25:18.600 case that the
00:25:19.540 Trudeau
00:25:19.880 government and
00:25:20.760 many provincial
00:25:21.380 governments are
00:25:22.100 already trying
00:25:22.800 to make
00:25:23.180 that more
00:25:25.380 action is
00:25:25.980 needed, more
00:25:26.500 expenditures are
00:25:27.560 needed.
00:25:29.040 And one
00:25:30.540 particular issue
00:25:31.600 is that
00:25:32.660 with respect
00:25:34.520 to emissions
00:25:37.460 from oil
00:25:38.640 and gas,
00:25:40.300 the conference
00:25:43.040 will try to
00:25:43.720 achieve agreement
00:25:44.560 on the
00:25:45.100 notion that
00:25:45.920 there should
00:25:48.660 be a phasing
00:25:49.380 out of oil
00:25:50.440 and gas.
00:25:51.540 Now,
00:25:51.800 countries like
00:25:52.660 Russia,
00:25:54.720 Saudi Arabia,
00:25:55.760 and others
00:25:56.040 may agree
00:25:57.720 to phase
00:25:58.920 down oil
00:25:59.920 and gas
00:26:00.260 production.
00:26:01.260 But other
00:26:01.640 countries will
00:26:02.240 say, well,
00:26:02.840 no, really,
00:26:03.500 there is a way
00:26:04.160 to go on
00:26:04.700 producing oil
00:26:05.320 and gas
00:26:05.720 while reducing
00:26:06.620 the emissions
00:26:07.260 and things
00:26:08.400 like carbon
00:26:09.160 dioxide capture
00:26:10.000 and storage.
00:26:10.620 The United
00:26:12.540 Nations staff
00:26:13.720 is 100%
00:26:14.840 opposed to
00:26:15.380 that.
00:26:16.040 Then they
00:26:16.400 will do
00:26:16.800 everything that
00:26:17.420 they can to
00:26:18.000 discredit the
00:26:18.840 notion that
00:26:19.780 carbon dioxide
00:26:20.380 capture and
00:26:21.060 storage is a
00:26:21.680 viable way of
00:26:23.040 proceeding with
00:26:23.680 respect to
00:26:24.280 hydrocarbon
00:26:25.140 related emissions.
00:26:26.380 that won't
00:26:28.680 play at all
00:26:29.400 in other
00:26:29.860 countries,
00:26:30.380 but it
00:26:30.600 might play
00:26:31.360 well in
00:26:31.880 Canada.
00:26:32.840 And the
00:26:34.160 Trudeau government
00:26:34.960 has still not
00:26:35.760 finalized its
00:26:37.120 taxation regime
00:26:38.520 that applies,
00:26:39.260 the incentives
00:26:39.900 that they had
00:26:40.420 promised they
00:26:41.220 would give
00:26:41.580 for carbon
00:26:42.000 dioxide
00:26:42.340 capture and
00:26:43.020 storage.
00:26:43.940 And depending
00:26:44.340 what comes
00:26:44.820 out of the
00:26:45.160 conference,
00:26:45.700 it may make
00:26:46.300 them move
00:26:47.880 even more
00:26:48.940 slowly or
00:26:49.880 perhaps not
00:26:50.640 proceed that way
00:26:51.580 at all.
00:26:52.220 So that's
00:26:52.580 the thing I'm
00:26:53.120 worried about
00:26:53.660 coming out of
00:26:54.200 the conference.
00:26:56.380 Robert, tell
00:26:58.560 us where
00:26:58.920 people can
00:26:59.520 see some of
00:27:00.280 the very
00:27:00.680 important work
00:27:01.640 you do.
00:27:02.380 If people
00:27:02.860 will go on
00:27:03.620 to the
00:27:04.080 website of
00:27:05.400 the Friends
00:27:06.220 of Science
00:27:06.760 Society and
00:27:08.260 particularly look
00:27:09.040 at their
00:27:09.340 blog, they
00:27:11.060 will be able
00:27:11.720 to find
00:27:12.160 almost 300
00:27:13.300 articles that
00:27:14.300 I've published
00:27:15.280 there over the
00:27:15.980 course of the
00:27:16.640 last five
00:27:17.780 years.
00:27:19.340 And I
00:27:20.540 also have
00:27:22.500 published a
00:27:23.520 number of
00:27:24.480 papers with
00:27:26.220 the Global
00:27:27.020 Warming Policy
00:27:28.120 Foundation in
00:27:28.940 the United
00:27:29.260 Kingdom.
00:27:31.660 They have
00:27:32.440 a special
00:27:34.100 edition that
00:27:35.220 they call
00:27:35.540 Net Zero
00:27:36.120 Watch.
00:27:36.900 And if
00:27:37.940 people look
00:27:38.460 up those
00:27:38.820 terms, Global
00:27:39.400 Warming Policy
00:27:40.140 Foundation or
00:27:40.920 Net Zero
00:27:41.360 Watch, they'll
00:27:42.540 see some of
00:27:43.280 the longer
00:27:43.780 and more
00:27:45.020 analytical
00:27:45.400 pieces that
00:27:46.080 I provide.
00:27:47.900 Yeah, I
00:27:48.720 really do
00:27:49.120 appreciate your
00:27:51.240 work because
00:27:51.940 you arm
00:27:52.720 people with
00:27:53.660 facts that
00:27:54.740 they can take
00:27:55.280 out into the
00:27:55.840 world.
00:27:56.600 People are
00:27:57.420 too busy
00:27:58.000 just trying
00:27:58.680 to pay
00:27:58.940 their bills
00:27:59.480 to become
00:28:00.800 experts in
00:28:02.180 climate
00:28:02.840 economics and
00:28:03.780 you really
00:28:04.560 distill things
00:28:05.260 down to the
00:28:05.680 key points so
00:28:06.640 you can really
00:28:07.080 understand what
00:28:07.840 these bad
00:28:08.700 ideas mean for
00:28:09.540 your family's
00:28:10.080 bottom line.
00:28:11.200 Robert, I
00:28:11.620 really appreciate
00:28:12.320 it.
00:28:12.540 Thanks so much
00:28:13.060 for coming on
00:28:13.600 the show and
00:28:14.260 will you agree
00:28:15.520 to come back
00:28:16.060 on again very
00:28:16.680 soon?
00:28:17.340 I'd be
00:28:17.740 delighted.
00:28:18.760 And thank
00:28:19.200 you.
00:28:19.800 Thanks,
00:28:20.240 Rob.
00:28:20.340 So we've
00:28:27.920 come to the
00:28:28.300 portion of the
00:28:28.720 show where I
00:28:29.320 invite your
00:28:29.860 viewer feedback.
00:28:30.800 I say it
00:28:31.120 every week so
00:28:31.700 I know this
00:28:32.600 is getting old
00:28:33.340 for the regular
00:28:34.000 viewers but we
00:28:34.740 are getting new
00:28:35.540 people watching
00:28:37.040 the show all
00:28:37.580 the time so
00:28:38.100 just bear with
00:28:38.780 me as I
00:28:39.400 say we rely
00:28:41.240 on our
00:28:41.880 viewers because
00:28:42.600 we'll never
00:28:43.060 take a penny
00:28:43.600 from Justin
00:28:44.200 Trudeau and
00:28:45.060 that's why I
00:28:45.980 invite you to
00:28:46.880 let me know
00:28:47.480 what you think
00:28:48.160 about the work
00:28:48.760 that we do
00:28:49.220 here at
00:28:49.560 Rebel News.
00:28:50.480 One of the
00:28:50.840 ways you can
00:28:51.260 do that is
00:28:51.820 to send me
00:28:52.260 an email.
00:28:53.100 It's
00:28:53.200 sheila at
00:28:53.680 rebelnews.com
00:28:54.780 put gun show
00:28:55.420 letters in the
00:28:56.000 subject line so
00:28:57.480 it's easier for
00:28:58.140 me to find I'm
00:28:58.720 not being lazy.
00:28:59.580 I just get a
00:29:00.060 bunch of
00:29:00.320 emails every
00:29:00.880 single day like
00:29:01.740 dozens if not
00:29:04.140 like a hundred
00:29:05.000 or so depending
00:29:06.100 on what sort of
00:29:06.820 controversial thing
00:29:07.600 I've said that
00:29:08.100 day to make the
00:29:08.840 entire internet
00:29:09.480 angry with me.
00:29:11.480 Or you could
00:29:12.680 leave a comment
00:29:14.320 on one of the
00:29:16.080 platforms wherein
00:29:16.940 you are watching
00:29:17.660 us here at
00:29:18.520 Rebel News.
00:29:18.960 For example
00:29:19.620 if you are
00:29:20.340 watching a free
00:29:21.140 version of the
00:29:21.880 show and you're
00:29:23.080 willing to sit
00:29:23.540 through a couple
00:29:24.280 of ads I
00:29:24.900 appreciate you
00:29:25.560 for that on
00:29:27.120 YouTube or
00:29:28.480 Rumble leave a
00:29:30.040 comment over
00:29:30.580 there.
00:29:31.180 I frequently go
00:29:32.300 looking over
00:29:32.880 there for your
00:29:34.980 thoughtful and
00:29:36.600 concise commentary
00:29:38.400 on my work
00:29:39.920 here at Rebel
00:29:40.780 News.
00:29:41.380 Now today's
00:29:42.160 letter comes to
00:29:43.720 us on last
00:29:45.320 week's show with
00:29:46.420 my friend
00:29:47.200 oil sands
00:29:48.380 activist and
00:29:50.540 the man
00:29:53.200 behind oil
00:29:54.900 and gas
00:29:55.400 world magazine
00:29:56.760 and oil
00:29:57.760 sands strong
00:29:58.700 Robbie
00:29:59.260 Picard and
00:30:01.380 the letter is
00:30:02.880 from Vince who
00:30:03.760 offers a
00:30:04.600 correction and
00:30:05.240 I'm glad he
00:30:06.800 sent this to me
00:30:07.540 because it is a
00:30:08.560 good lesson for
00:30:09.140 me to be a
00:30:09.720 little bit more
00:30:10.440 precise in my
00:30:11.860 language.
00:30:12.300 The outcome
00:30:13.560 is still the
00:30:14.360 same but I
00:30:14.780 should I
00:30:15.280 should frankly
00:30:16.180 be precise in
00:30:17.700 my language and
00:30:18.260 I'm glad that
00:30:19.540 Vince sent this
00:30:20.220 correction because
00:30:21.080 I want to make
00:30:22.500 sure that you
00:30:22.960 are all using
00:30:23.920 the same
00:30:24.620 appropriate
00:30:26.260 facts here.
00:30:29.160 So Vince
00:30:29.620 writes,
00:30:30.340 Hi Sheila,
00:30:30.740 just listened to
00:30:31.220 your excellent
00:30:31.700 show with
00:30:32.160 Robbie Picard and
00:30:34.000 would like to
00:30:34.540 correct you on a
00:30:35.220 few comments
00:30:35.660 you made regarding
00:30:36.300 Saskatchewan's
00:30:36.960 plans for the
00:30:37.500 carbon tax.
00:30:39.300 Vince, thank
00:30:40.360 you for putting
00:30:40.880 the criticism in
00:30:42.160 a compliment
00:30:42.680 sandwich.
00:30:44.780 I see you
00:30:45.620 maybe have
00:30:46.040 worked in
00:30:46.380 HR before.
00:30:48.660 Several times
00:30:49.460 you mentioned
00:30:49.840 that the
00:30:50.180 Saskatchewan
00:30:50.620 government won't
00:30:51.300 remit the
00:30:52.040 carbon tax to
00:30:52.820 Ottawa.
00:30:54.280 What the
00:30:54.860 Saskatchewan
00:30:55.320 government plans
00:30:55.980 to do is not
00:30:56.660 collect the
00:30:57.500 tax on natural
00:30:58.400 gas which will
00:30:59.180 reduce costs for
00:31:00.020 Saskatchewan
00:31:00.500 residents.
00:31:01.380 Thank you,
00:31:02.040 that is right.
00:31:02.920 So Saskatchewan
00:31:03.720 is not collecting
00:31:05.740 the carbon tax on
00:31:07.500 home heating
00:31:08.020 through their
00:31:08.740 crown corporation
00:31:09.680 Sask Power.
00:31:12.160 They're not
00:31:12.440 collecting it
00:31:12.940 which of
00:31:13.280 course is the
00:31:14.500 whole plan.
00:31:15.220 They don't want
00:31:15.500 to collect the
00:31:16.100 carbon tax
00:31:16.700 because to
00:31:17.780 collect it and
00:31:18.320 not remit it
00:31:19.000 doesn't save the
00:31:20.180 consumer any
00:31:20.840 money.
00:31:22.440 I should have
00:31:23.220 been more
00:31:23.620 exacting in my
00:31:24.480 language and I'm
00:31:25.120 happy for the
00:31:26.060 correction.
00:31:27.220 And then he
00:31:27.580 advised me to
00:31:28.120 see the Reuters
00:31:28.700 article titled
00:31:29.940 Saskatchewan vows to
00:31:30.900 stop collecting and
00:31:31.860 submitting the carbon
00:31:32.600 tax on natural
00:31:33.660 gas dated October
00:31:34.560 30th, 2023,
00:31:36.100 among others.
00:31:36.600 Your comments
00:31:38.060 could lead the
00:31:38.520 audience to
00:31:38.980 believe that the
00:31:39.400 government will
00:31:39.880 continue to
00:31:40.440 collect the tax
00:31:41.000 but not remit
00:31:41.640 the funds to
00:31:42.180 Ottawa.
00:31:42.620 Yes, you're
00:31:43.680 right.
00:31:44.220 I take the
00:31:44.780 correction.
00:31:45.240 I'm glad to
00:31:45.720 have it.
00:31:46.100 You see that?
00:31:47.300 Send me a
00:31:48.080 thoughtful correction
00:31:48.880 and I'm happy to
00:31:50.460 set the record
00:31:51.080 straight on air.
00:31:52.920 I get some less
00:31:55.280 than thoughtful
00:31:55.920 corrections sometimes
00:31:56.880 that are actually
00:31:57.540 not corrections at
00:31:58.300 all but just
00:31:58.780 basically people
00:32:00.080 telling me to
00:32:00.600 shut up because
00:32:01.100 they disagree with
00:32:01.820 me.
00:32:02.640 Good argument,
00:32:03.680 guys.
00:32:04.060 Anyway, this was a
00:32:05.720 great correction.
00:32:06.400 I'm happy to
00:32:06.840 read it on air.
00:32:07.700 Let's keep going
00:32:08.680 regarding the
00:32:09.680 plastic issue.
00:32:10.720 As you know, the
00:32:11.660 federal government's
00:32:12.720 ban on single-use
00:32:14.220 plastics was
00:32:15.780 overturned by the
00:32:18.440 federal court.
00:32:19.300 However, Stephen
00:32:20.920 Gilboa, not one to
00:32:21.800 listen to a judge,
00:32:23.560 has decided that he's
00:32:25.300 just going to carry
00:32:26.420 on with it anyway.
00:32:27.300 So Canadians still
00:32:28.460 have to suffer with
00:32:29.460 reusable plastic bags
00:32:31.240 that they constantly
00:32:31.800 forget if you're
00:32:32.620 like me or paper
00:32:34.920 straws.
00:32:35.300 We also have to
00:32:35.960 suffer with those
00:32:36.600 paper straws in
00:32:37.560 our plastic cups.
00:32:39.060 Saving those sea
00:32:40.360 turtles.
00:32:41.360 Anyway, regarding the
00:32:42.640 plastics issue, in my
00:32:43.680 view, the biggest
00:32:44.460 plastic waste is
00:32:46.140 around small single-use
00:32:47.520 water bottles along
00:32:49.120 with the plastic
00:32:50.320 grocery bags.
00:32:51.660 We've made great
00:32:52.580 strides in reducing
00:32:53.380 or even eliminating
00:32:54.240 plastic grocery bags
00:32:55.440 which have now been
00:32:56.080 replaced by reusable
00:32:57.020 bags.
00:32:58.260 Yes, it's a pain
00:32:59.280 when you check out
00:33:00.180 and you forgot the
00:33:02.740 reusable bags in the
00:33:03.580 car, but over time
00:33:04.480 society will change
00:33:05.320 their habits and
00:33:05.860 remember to bring
00:33:06.440 the reusable bags
00:33:07.220 with you into the
00:33:08.580 store.
00:33:09.540 A great step forward.
00:33:11.220 I'm going to push
00:33:11.760 back here.
00:33:14.940 On what planet do the
00:33:19.020 people banning plastic
00:33:20.160 grocery bags think that
00:33:21.180 we don't use them in
00:33:22.400 another form?
00:33:23.120 I now have to go out
00:33:26.960 and buy small garbage
00:33:30.060 bags for my office,
00:33:32.320 for the bathroom,
00:33:33.860 when normally I would
00:33:35.060 just use my single-use
00:33:37.360 plastic bag.
00:33:38.340 I'm not made of money.
00:33:40.360 I don't throw out
00:33:41.340 things unless I have to
00:33:42.580 throw them out and I
00:33:43.600 definitely was not
00:33:44.800 throwing out my plastic
00:33:47.220 grocery bags.
00:33:48.040 I was using them.
00:33:48.900 I was using them to
00:33:49.720 bring my groceries home
00:33:50.740 and then using them
00:33:52.320 in other forms.
00:33:53.020 So, really, the ban
00:33:54.400 on plastic grocery
00:33:55.280 bags has not stopped
00:33:56.960 me from using little
00:33:58.120 tiny plastic bags or
00:33:59.200 at least mid-sized
00:33:59.820 plastic bags.
00:34:00.640 I just now have to go
00:34:01.640 buy them instead of
00:34:03.720 reusing the ones that
00:34:04.860 I just used.
00:34:06.680 So, did we really save
00:34:08.880 anything?
00:34:09.360 Did we really stop
00:34:10.280 plastic?
00:34:11.420 I don't think so.
00:34:12.820 Anyway, let's keep
00:34:13.900 going.
00:34:14.240 But, the single-use
00:34:17.380 smaller water bottles
00:34:18.800 are a huge problem.
00:34:20.160 What should be
00:34:20.480 encouraged or even
00:34:21.180 incentivized are in-home
00:34:22.840 water filtration systems
00:34:24.240 and reusable metal
00:34:25.720 personal water bottles.
00:34:27.540 Let's support the
00:34:28.280 elimination of single-use
00:34:29.740 small water bottles,
00:34:32.300 the 350 milliliters
00:34:34.100 to one liter size,
00:34:35.200 as the next step.
00:34:36.540 Keep up the great work.
00:34:37.320 We're proud to be
00:34:37.780 supporters of Rebel News.
00:34:39.020 You know what?
00:34:40.680 Just recycle your plastic
00:34:42.200 water bottles if you
00:34:43.100 want to.
00:34:44.240 I just, I don't like
00:34:45.360 the idea of a ban.
00:34:46.980 Because sometimes you
00:34:47.800 want to run into the
00:34:48.620 store if you're out on,
00:34:50.440 like, if you work away
00:34:51.440 from home, you forget.
00:34:55.060 And you need to buy a
00:34:56.680 water bottle because
00:34:58.060 you're thirsty and you
00:34:59.000 don't want to put your
00:34:59.560 mouth on a disgusting
00:35:00.640 fountain.
00:35:02.300 Okay.
00:35:04.560 Of course, you know,
00:35:05.620 like, make it easier
00:35:06.340 for people to refill their
00:35:07.340 water bottles when they're
00:35:08.920 out in the world.
00:35:10.900 But I'm just against
00:35:12.360 banning things.
00:35:14.220 for the sake of banning
00:35:15.320 things, especially when
00:35:16.020 they're recyclable.
00:35:17.380 Okay.
00:35:19.020 I was recycling my
00:35:20.240 plastic bags.
00:35:21.360 I, look, I don't, I,
00:35:22.900 I use a soda stream.
00:35:25.580 Like, I don't really buy
00:35:27.580 water bottles.
00:35:28.580 I don't.
00:35:29.240 Um, but there are people
00:35:31.320 who do, and I think they
00:35:32.420 should have that, that
00:35:33.500 right.
00:35:35.320 I don't think plastic is
00:35:36.640 the pollution the left
00:35:37.900 says it is.
00:35:38.580 And as I said with
00:35:39.520 Robbie, we can just
00:35:40.700 incinerate it and make
00:35:41.560 electricity and look at
00:35:42.820 that.
00:35:43.140 We're recycling, right?
00:35:45.860 Anyway, I love letters
00:35:47.480 like this because, um, a,
00:35:49.340 I'm happy for the
00:35:50.240 correction and B, uh, we
00:35:53.560 can, uh, exchange ideas
00:35:55.660 and, uh, that's how
00:35:57.200 things move forward,
00:35:57.920 which, um, which is
00:36:00.820 something the left
00:36:01.440 doesn't want us to do
00:36:02.280 anymore.
00:36:02.860 And even conservatives,
00:36:04.020 we can disagree on
00:36:05.380 plastic and look at us
00:36:06.420 having a conversation
00:36:08.060 instead of just fighting
00:36:09.720 with each other.
00:36:10.660 You know, uh, there's a
00:36:12.860 diversity of viewpoints
00:36:13.760 on all things.
00:36:14.520 I don't think that there
00:36:15.340 is one acceptable way to
00:36:16.880 think about any single
00:36:18.440 issue, which, um, is an
00:36:21.340 attitude I think separates
00:36:22.520 conservatives from the
00:36:23.480 left.
00:36:24.340 And, uh, we can, as
00:36:26.540 Vince says, um, we're
00:36:29.620 agreeing to disagree and
00:36:30.880 he still remains a fan of
00:36:31.960 Rebel News as he signs
00:36:33.140 his letter off.
00:36:34.280 Keep up the great work
00:36:34.980 and we're proud to be
00:36:35.620 supporters of Rebel
00:36:36.260 News.
00:36:36.640 Yeah.
00:36:36.920 So we, I can, I can get
00:36:38.800 something wrong.
00:36:39.660 We can disagree on
00:36:40.440 plastic and we're still
00:36:41.980 friends, which I love
00:36:43.440 about the right.
00:36:44.520 I wish the left were
00:36:45.340 more like that.
00:36:45.960 What a, it's got to be a
00:36:47.080 miserable ideology where
00:36:48.300 you just throw people
00:36:50.500 out of your movement
00:36:51.740 because they disagree
00:36:52.580 with you on one single
00:36:53.540 thing.
00:36:54.500 Well, everybody, that's
00:36:55.460 the show for tonight.
00:36:56.340 Thank you so much for
00:36:57.160 tuning in.
00:36:57.740 I'll see everybody back
00:36:58.580 here in the same time,
00:37:00.320 perhaps in the same place
00:37:01.240 next week.
00:37:01.820 And as always, remember,
00:37:03.960 don't let the government
00:37:04.800 tell you that you've had
00:37:05.640 too much to think.
00:37:14.520 We'll be right back.
00:37:29.800 Don't we?
00:37:30.420 Don't we?
00:37:31.000 We'll be rape.
00:37:31.900 We'll be right back.
00:37:32.460 We'll be right back.
00:37:32.840 We'll be right.
00:37:33.040 We'll be right back.
00:37:33.400 Thank you.