The future of Teck Mine and Calgary's accountability problem
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
154.64328
Summary
William MacBeth from Save Calgary joins me to talk about the tech resources protests, the Conservative Party Leadership Race, and the Green Line LRT boondoggle in Calgary, and out of control council travel expenses in the city.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hello Rebels, I'm Sheila Gunn-Reed and you're listening to a free audio-only recording of my
00:00:04.980
Wednesday night show, The Gunn Show. My guest tonight is William Macbeth and we are talking
00:00:10.160
about, well, just about everything from the tech resources protests to the conservative party
00:00:17.440
leadership race to Calgary City Council expenses and how the NDP have suddenly gotten themselves
00:00:25.320
involved in all of that. Now, if you like listening to the show, then I promise you,
00:00:30.620
you'll love watching it. But you need to be a subscriber to premium content to do that. That's
00:00:35.640
what we call our long-form TV style shows here on Rebel News. Subscribers get access to my show
00:00:42.080
as well as Ezra's nightly Ezra Levant show and David Menzies' fun unscripted Friday night show
00:00:50.640
where he interviews his fellow Rebels. It's called Rebel Roundup. It's only $8 a month to subscribe
00:00:56.100
or you can subscribe annually and get two months free. And just for my podcast listeners, you can
00:01:02.440
save an extra 10% on a new premium membership by using the coupon code PODCAST when you subscribe.
00:01:08.040
Just go to premium.rebelnews.com to become a member. And please leave a five-star review on
00:01:14.380
this podcast and subscribe in iTunes or wherever you find your podcasts. Those reviews are a great
00:01:20.000
way to support Rebel News without ever having to spend a dime. And those reviews actually help
00:01:24.840
other people find our podcasts. And now, please enjoy this free audio-only version of my show.
00:01:31.240
What happens if Tech's Frontier Oil Sands Mine doesn't get approval from Justin Trudeau's
00:01:51.480
Liberal Cabinet? I'm Sheila Gunn-Reed and you're watching The Gunn Show.
00:02:01.240
Tech's Frontier Oil Sands Mine is a $21 billion project that has been wandering through
00:02:19.040
the regulatory process hell in Canada for 10 years. Tech meets every single requirement to
00:02:27.500
be approved currently under the Liberals' legislation. And yet, Justin Trudeau's Federal
00:02:32.300
Cabinet is unsure if they're going to approve the project at all. The Liberals seem to be having an
00:02:37.580
internal civil war about what's going to happen to Tech. The more radical environmentalist wing of the
00:02:43.680
Liberal Party says, nuke it. The more pragmatic side of the party wants to build it. The fight for
00:02:50.740
Tech just isn't a fight for Alberta jobs, thousands of them. It's actually a fight for the future of the
00:02:56.060
Liberal Party. And the Liberals are having it right now in Battleground Alberta. Isn't that ironic?
00:03:03.200
My guest on the show tonight is William Macbeth from Save Calgary. We are going to be talking about
00:03:08.400
Tech's Frontier Oil Sands Mine, the Conservative Party leadership race, and some more local issues
00:03:14.020
in Calgary. The Green Line LRT boondoggle and out-of-control council travel expenses coming from a
00:03:21.120
somewhat unlikely place. A conservative city councilor. Here's the interview we recorded yesterday afternoon.
00:03:28.260
Joining me now is my friend William Macbeth from Save Calgary. We have so many things to discuss
00:03:49.160
today. But first, let's talk about tech resources. Tech's Frontier Oil Sands Mine has been in
00:03:59.160
regulatory hell for 10 years. They've really done everything that they can do. They've met every
00:04:06.880
obligation that they can meet. And now it seems like the Liberals are injecting more into the process
00:04:13.640
that aren't actually there. And this is a $21 billion project. It's got signed agreements with
00:04:20.560
every First Nation that it even comes close to. And yet, the environment minister, the new environment
00:04:27.120
minister, says that he's not going to rule out deferring a decision on the Tech Oil Sands Mine. I think this
00:04:37.040
has less to do with all these new excuses the Liberals are coming up with about climate change and getting to
00:04:43.060
net zero by 2050 and more to do with hanging on to power. I think if they approve tech, they're going
00:04:51.260
to lose the NDP support and their minority government is going to fall. That's what I think is going on
00:04:59.120
here. I think it is, as much as the Liberals like to beat the climate change drum, I think this is just
00:05:06.560
petty politics and they're holding Alberta's future at stake. But what do you think? Because you've been
00:05:12.820
around for a while, you've been examining this too, much like I have. What do you think?
00:05:17.640
I think you're right, Sheila, that this was a project that played by the many, many, many rules
00:05:24.280
that groups put on it. It went out of its way to work with First Nations groups to develop a real
00:05:31.100
partnership between industry and First Nations so that both groups would profit. I actually think
00:05:38.180
it's an example of a project, the exact kind of project we want built right here in Canada that
00:05:44.880
adds, you know, will add so much to our economy and create so many jobs. But you're absolutely right.
00:05:50.740
What you're seeing now, and I think there's a bunch of different things at play, but politics is
00:05:56.080
definitely at the heart of it. The Liberal cabinet ultimately will decide whether or not this project
00:06:01.800
gets to go through. I'm told that cabinet is divided. And on one side, you've got, say,
00:06:09.520
Chrystia Freeland, who has been spending most of her time, it seems, out in this end of the country,
00:06:15.860
trying to repair some of the damage done by her boss over the past four years. And then on the other
00:06:22.240
side, you've got a lot of Quebec and Ontario MPs who frankly think this is a terrible thing. They don't
00:06:30.560
want it to go ahead at all. So why, you know, where's an actual debate is happening? Is it not
00:06:38.240
wanting to lose the NDP support for their minority government? Is it two nascent liberal leadership
00:06:45.300
campaigns, one for Chrystia Freeland and one for some more left-wing liberal candidates that's actually
00:06:52.140
dividing the Liberal cabinet? We don't know. I think an important question, though, is where is the
00:06:58.260
Prime Minister? This is a national project, national in scope, that will have a Canada-wide impact. And our
00:07:05.140
Prime Minister is nowhere to be seen. I think he might be in Africa, cozying up to dictators to try and get
00:07:12.760
Canada a seat on the UN Security Council. But he's certainly not here at home making the case for Alberta
00:07:18.860
and Canadian industry. Yeah, I think if this project doesn't get approved, there is going to be no
00:07:26.060
extinguishing or containing the separatist sentiment. Because, you know, as Shannon Stubbs, Conservative MP
00:07:33.260
Shannon Stubbs rightly put, stated, and I'm paraphrasing here that this is Canada leaving Alberta behind.
00:07:40.860
And I think the Liberals are also, I mean, they're experiencing their own version of the Northern Gateway
00:07:50.980
pipeline protests that we experienced, you know, I suppose it was in the last decade, when the left rallied against
00:08:00.680
the Northern Gateway pipeline, and that pipeline was approved. However, the Liberals cancelled it.
00:08:05.800
I don't think the Liberals want to draw attention to the fact that there are these protests, I guess,
00:08:14.120
I suppose, it's by lefties against the Liberals all across the country. Because I think the Liberals took
00:08:23.060
great pleasure in the fact that that happened to Stephen Harper.
00:08:27.280
No, and it's, you know, I, of course, would prefer every single project to get swift and overwhelming
00:08:35.040
approval and support. So we can get, you know, shovels in the ground and Albertans and Canadians
00:08:39.900
back to work. But it is funny to watch the Liberal talking point change, because it used to be all
00:08:46.000
Stephen Harper's fault. That's why we didn't get pipelines. He didn't consult. He didn't address
00:08:51.260
concerns from environmentalists or First Nations groups. All of that would be different under this
00:08:56.820
new, shiny, sunny ways Liberal government. And then, of course, they've just discovered that there's
00:09:02.760
no pleasing the zealots and extremists whose business every day is to try and shut down Canada's
00:09:10.780
oil and gas sector and Canadian industry in general. So now you get the Liberals in a rock
00:09:17.640
and a hard place between they're pleasing nobody. They're not pleasing the far left who think they
00:09:22.800
should just leave every drop of oil and gas in the ground. And they're certainly not pleasing those of
00:09:27.760
us in the middle and on the right, who think that actually Canadian oil is produced to the very
00:09:32.760
highest environmental and ethical standards, and the world could deeply benefit from having more
00:09:37.920
Canadian energy powering countries right across the planet. So I guess we're going to find out how
00:09:45.080
strong will these Liberals are about actually getting some of these projects finished. But I would say,
00:09:52.180
because I think Shannon made a very good point. If they allow the Tech Frontier Mind project to fail,
00:09:58.920
if they allow vocal special interests within the Liberal Party and without to stop a project that
00:10:06.540
went through 10 years of rigorous, regulatory, nonpartisan approvals with consultations with
00:10:14.380
environmental groups and First Nations, if they allow that project to fail, they are taking a lip match
00:10:18.900
and holding it up to the fuse of an Alberta independent bomb that will detonate and possibly
00:10:26.560
blow this country apart. Well, and that might be the only thing that ever saves Alberta is to separate
00:10:33.360
itself, unfortunately, from the rest of the country in that, look at what Tech has done in the last 10
00:10:41.940
years. If Tech can go through all that and still not meet these peculiar social justice demands being put
00:10:50.240
forward by the Liberals, no company would ever opt to invest in Alberta again. None. I mean, how do you ever get
00:11:01.600
You won't. There will never be another large scale energy project built in this country. No, at least not by the
00:11:09.260
private sector. We'll enter a new era of government pipelines being built to transfer oil possibly, you know, if
00:11:17.840
they decide they want to do that at all. But there won't be a private sector case to be made because a company that played by the
00:11:24.260
rules and did everything right, so let's say the exact opposite of SNC-Lavalin, so a company that played by the
00:11:30.860
rules and did everything right, can't get a project clearly in the national interest built, then there is no hope for a
00:11:39.460
private sector energy infrastructure construction in this country.
00:11:44.020
Well, and just a quick side note, I was thinking, I really haven't seen much from the NDP in support of this. In fact, I've actually
00:11:52.440
seen some former, thankfully unelected NDP MLAs expressing, you know, opposition to tech going forward. It was four
00:12:03.600
years of Rachel Notley pretending to be pro-oil and gas, and right now, when she could lend her voice to the
00:12:09.640
conversation to say that this is a bipartisan issue here in Alberta, I'm not hearing much from them, have you?
00:12:16.480
No, no, you're absolutely right. Now, the federal NDP have never made any bones about it. They do not like our
00:12:23.640
oil and gas sector, they do not like pipelines, and in their mind, we should not be in the oil and gas
00:12:29.120
business as a province or as a country. But Rachel Notley and her former government, they tried to tell us that
00:12:35.620
they were both environmentally conscious and pro-Alberta, you know, responsible resource development.
00:12:41.560
However, they aren't being particularly vocally supportive of the Tech Frontier Mind project right
00:12:48.080
now. And some of them are lending maybe not overt support, but certainly, you know, sending friendly
00:12:56.000
ways to the people who are opposed to this project. Why is it Rachel Notley standing shoulder to shoulder
00:13:01.760
with Premier Kenney jointly demanding that Ottawa approve this project for all Albertans? That's, I think,
00:13:08.540
what she said she would do when she was Premier. Always stand up for our energy sector. She has an
00:13:14.520
opportunity to do it right now, and so far, you're right, it's been just silence from her.
00:13:19.000
Yep. Now, that's a great way for us to segue into this next story. I read it, and I couldn't
00:13:27.520
believe what I was reading. I had to read it a couple times. The NDP's Joe Ceci. The NDP's Joe Ceci.
00:13:34.480
Canada's worst finance minister. Alberta's definitely worst finance minister ever. Joe Ceci wants the
00:13:42.780
province to look into city councillor Joe Magliocca's Quebec expenses. Please explain to me why Joe Ceci
00:13:52.660
is pretending to be a fiscal conservative all of a sudden, and why is the NDP weighing in?
00:14:01.040
Well, he was certainly never bothered about fiscal conservatism when he was a city councillor or a
00:14:07.580
finance minister, I can tell you that. This is just plain politics. I think most people know that
00:14:13.100
Joe Magliocca is a small city conservative. He did, I think, really disappoint us when he went on that
00:14:20.480
trip to Quebec for the Federation of Canadian Municipalities meeting and spent really quite a
00:14:26.560
large amount of money on hospitality. It turns out that the people he said he was eating and
00:14:32.280
drinking with, well, they weren't there. They've issued statements saying they weren't there. But
00:14:36.400
why this is now the cause celebra of the provincial NDP? Well, I think it's because they're just trying
00:14:42.880
to hurt conservatives in general and help their lefty friends trying to get elected to city council
00:14:48.500
next year. Now, Jeremy Farkas, great councillor, has a motion today that would try and fix some of
00:14:55.540
these issues, limit how many people go to the Schmooze Fest that is the Federation of Canadian
00:15:01.120
Municipalities meeting, which are always held in the very nicest high-end hotels. They don't spare any
00:15:08.680
expense when they travel on our tax dollars. But Calgary, you know, we sent 10 of our 15 councillors
00:15:15.360
to that meeting. What did we get out of it? Well, nobody knows. We got a big bill, that's for sure.
00:15:20.640
I don't see why we send any more than one or even none, because I frankly think the Federation of
00:15:26.960
Canadian Municipalities doesn't actually achieve very much for cities because cities have so many
00:15:32.000
different and competing values. I do think, actually, though, the issue of councillor expenses
00:15:36.880
extends well beyond just going to FCM meetings. I talked about a little bit on the radio earlier today
00:15:43.760
about if you look through council expense reports, which is always a fun way to spend your time,
00:15:49.520
I can tell you there are councillors expensing meals, expensing goodbye gifts to their staff that
00:15:56.160
are worth hundreds and hundreds of dollars. You know, when I give a gift, I use my own money to
00:16:02.720
give a gift to someone because I want to show my personal appreciation. Calgary City councillors are the
00:16:07.040
highest paid in the entire country. I assure you they can afford to pay for their own gifts.
00:16:11.600
And one councillor, even through a party, celebrated the opening of Calgary's bike lane.
00:16:17.360
So, to me, there's lots of opportunity to find cost savings, and I think we need to take,
00:16:23.520
we really need to clip council's wings when it comes to what they can and cannot expense,
00:16:28.960
Yeah, you know, I was thinking about, I think this is the same meeting that the
00:16:37.600
City of Medicine Hat boycotted. They didn't send anybody to this
00:16:43.040
Council of Municipalities meeting, in particular because it was held in Quebec and they felt that
00:16:48.080
Quebec was opposing basically everything that Medicine Hat is about with oil and gas. And
00:16:54.880
and Medicine Hat has its own oil and gas company, so they weren't about to send their councillors
00:17:00.880
there. They thought it was a bad idea. It didn't show fiscal prudence in a time when they're calling
00:17:06.960
for, I suppose the right word is austerity across the board. And so they didn't send in anybody. Now,
00:17:15.040
Calgary is not known for taking strong stances in that manner.
00:17:19.520
So yeah, like you, I'm shocked to see that Councillor Meg Leoca went there and blew a bunch of money,
00:17:26.880
because yeah, he is known as one of the fiscal conservatives on council, and I thought maybe
00:17:31.760
he would be somebody who we might consider to be the next mayor. You know, someone who would throw his
00:17:39.520
hat into the ring, and I just don't see that now. This one trip might have nuked any future aspirations for
00:17:45.600
him. I can tell you, on behalf of Safe Calgary, who we are a fiscal watchdog, we spent a lot of time
00:17:52.880
fighting on behalf of taxpayers to keep more money in their pocket. We were disappointed in Joe, because
00:17:58.960
we considered him to be one of the very few who actually have a voting record that is mostly
00:18:06.240
fiscally conservative and responsible. I'm hoping that it's a one-time aberration. He, of course,
00:18:12.800
was council's designate to the FCM sitting on their board. So he probably should have been the only
00:18:20.160
councillor going to that FCM meeting, and he didn't need nine of his colleagues, including Mayor Nancy
00:18:25.920
there. But we hope that this is a one-time thing, and that he once again gets back to his fiscally
00:18:31.280
conservative roots in the future. Yeah, here's hoping. Now let's stay in Calgary and talk about
00:18:38.640
the never-ending debacle that is the green line. Now, I saw you tweet earlier today that you want
00:18:45.120
to flatline the green line. This is never-ending, just money pit that nobody can seem to sort out. Am I
00:18:53.760
right? Yeah, you know, usually you have to build a train before there's a train wreck. But in this case,
00:19:00.160
this train wreck started before a single piece of track was ever laid in it. It's been 10 years
00:19:06.080
since we first started looking at this green line plan. When it was first proposed, it was going to
00:19:11.600
be this massive 46-kilometer north fell through the downtown core route. It was going to have this
00:19:17.840
underground tunnel through the downtown core. It was going to go under the river. And then year by year,
00:19:23.840
it has just been plagued with problem after problem. Senior managers have walked off the project team.
00:19:28.560
They're now only proposing a line half the size of the original, but for the same, in fact, even more
00:19:35.200
money than what was originally promised. So half the route for more money. And even as of today,
00:19:42.080
past council's deadline to administration to come up with a concrete achievable plan, there is still no
00:19:49.120
green line plan that is technically feasible. So I don't understand why city council has put all of its
00:19:56.560
eggs in this green line baskets. It could bankrupt our city. It could cripple our ability to have city
00:20:04.800
services for years and years to come. But council's unwilling to look at any other alternative other
00:20:12.320
than this full LRT line right through the heart of downtown core and across the boat river.
00:20:18.400
What is the cost that it's at? Where did it start and what is it getting to, I guess is the right question.
00:20:25.040
So the original plan was $4.5 billion to run from the southest of south communities in Calgary,
00:20:35.040
right to the northern edge of the city, a length of 46 kilometers. When they cut the project in half,
00:20:41.280
it's now going from kind of south to really just on the other side of the Bo River. That is now going to
00:20:49.120
cost $5 billion. And as I said, only go half the distance for what they propose. So I don't understand
00:20:57.200
how you can get half the track for the same money or even more money in this case. And to us, it's just
00:21:04.080
yet another example of why this is the wrong approach for transiting Calgary.
00:21:07.760
Well, and when government builds something, you can routinely see 70% cost overruns, like the Trans Mountain
00:21:19.120
pipeline. It's, you know, approaching $12 billion to build the thing 70% more than what was estimated by Kinder
00:21:30.200
Morgan when it was their project. Um, because taxpayers are just that never ending money pit
00:21:35.880
that the government can reach into when they don't feel like making the hard decisions. Um,
00:21:41.880
I wanted to ask you, um, before we wrap up, uh, the interview, um, you've been a conservative
00:21:49.320
activist for a long, long time. You've run campaigns, um, and you really sort of have your
00:21:58.440
finger on the issues. I want to ask you about the conservative party of Canada race before I let you go.
00:22:04.920
We've got, uh, Peter McKay, who I thought would blow my hair back, but he's having the opposite
00:22:11.640
effect. Like I, I, I appreciate how bad his campaign is because I, it's providing a lot of
00:22:19.800
comedic material for me on Twitter. On the flip side, O'Toole didn't impress me in the last leadership
00:22:28.200
race. I thought he would, and he didn't, but he's impressing me now. And he's saying all the right
00:22:32.920
conservative things and he's leading on all the issues. He's not waiting for a CBC reaction to find
00:22:39.080
out where he needs to stand on the issues. And we also have John Baird who is musing about coming
00:22:44.920
into the race and he hasn't said anything yet, but it seems to be that he's being pushed in
00:22:50.440
or invited in by Jason Kenney. Um, I wanted to get your opinion on, um, what's unfolding in the
00:22:57.320
conservative leadership right now. No, I think your assessment is spot on. It's so interesting.
00:23:04.040
Peter McKay, of course, ran to be leader of the PC party quite a long time ago, back in 2003.
00:23:10.520
And I think he's always held leadership ambitions for the new conservative party. So since he's had
00:23:18.040
more than 15 years to get a potential run ready, you'd think it'd be going a little bit better than
00:23:24.520
it has been. And I honestly can't tell really what he stands for on those things because all we're
00:23:31.480
getting are platitudes and, um, sort of slubs campaign gaps, which certainly aren't inspiring
00:23:41.240
me to put an X next to his name on the ballot. Um, I really hope John Baird decides to get in.
00:23:47.800
I think we could use, uh, some excitement, a good and exciting leadership race. Um, I don't know
00:23:53.880
Aaron O'Toole that well, but so far, um, you know, he does, has been putting out some, some decent
00:24:00.520
policy. I do think what's missing though, from the race so far are big ideas, you know, like what,
00:24:07.800
what does a 21st century conservative party, what do we stand for and how do we really shake up
00:24:15.400
people's perceptions of what we are? And if you look, and, and I'm certainly not suggesting that
00:24:21.720
we need a Donald Trump type character in our race. I am. Well, you're very entitled to your
00:24:29.880
opinion. I say this, what Donald Trump brought to his party, to the Republicans was shaking off
00:24:36.840
the status quo and building an entirely new, bigger coalition of voters who voted Republican and
00:24:43.640
hence helped them win elections. If you look in England, you've seen Boris Johnson win the conservative
00:24:48.920
seats in ridings that have never, ever voted conservative by talking about issues that are,
00:24:55.320
that matter to, to working people, to, to middle income, lower middle income workers who felt abandoned
00:25:02.360
by the left, uh, when they became obsessed with climate change and, and, and those, and identity
00:25:08.280
politics. So I'd love to see someone who really turns people's opinions around and, and makes people
00:25:16.120
say, well, I share those values. I share values of standing up for hard work, of paying less tax,
00:25:22.520
of having a government that actually understands the issues I'm facing. Certainly as an Albertan,
00:25:28.680
I want someone unapologetically pro our oil and gas sector, who will see the jobs and employment crisis
00:25:36.040
in our province as a crisis and do things to try and help them. And beyond that, I think we just need
00:25:41.720
to make the conservative party a party that appeals to enough Canadians with great policy so that we
00:25:49.080
just don't eat out a majority government once in a while. We routinely win conservative majority
00:25:55.480
governments and start changing the nature of our country. Yeah, I agree with you. I think we
00:26:00.680
need someone who appeals to the Dan McTeagues of the world. You know, the former liberals who are fed up
00:26:10.360
with Justin Trudeau. They're pro oil and gas. They care about making sure that families have more
00:26:16.280
money in their pockets. They've been left behind by the liberals. And why don't we start rounding them
00:26:22.680
up? And we really don't have to move the party in any direction to convince people that the values
00:26:28.600
they hold are conservative values. We're just not all that great at communicating them, or we haven't
00:26:34.200
been in the past. Trump did this with what I would call the Reagan Democrats in some of those purple
00:26:41.080
states. And like you say, it helped build this broad pro free enterprise coalition that is really
00:26:51.160
changing the face of the United States. And I think it's great. It's bold. It's appeals to the young and the
00:26:57.640
old, which I think is really great. William, I wanted to give you a chance to tell everybody
00:27:03.400
where they can find and support the great work that you do at Save Calgary.
00:27:09.080
Well, thank you. We always appreciate you giving us a chance to talk about how people can find us
00:27:14.600
and get in touch. So you can find us online at savecalgary.com. Certainly, if you feel so moved,
00:27:21.400
we'd love any donation you'd like to give us. We are entirely funded by grassroots donors.
00:27:26.760
Later today, we'll be releasing a video about the green line, talking in more detail about some of the
00:27:33.000
things you and I talked about today and laying out the risks that have come with it. Again,
00:27:38.040
our campaign to flatline the green line. And you can check us out on social media, on Twitter,
00:27:43.080
and on Facebook, both Save Calgary. And certainly, we urge you to please sign up to our mailing list
00:27:49.560
and to share those newsletters with your friends and family and get them to sign up too,
00:27:53.800
because city council's biggest weapon is people not paying attention to the issues and letting them
00:28:01.080
get away with their big government, big tech, every decision made behind closed doors agenda.
00:28:07.240
And they can't do it if Calgarians are aware of it and pushing back. So we really want people to focus,
00:28:13.000
not just once every four years for a couple weeks in the lead up to an election, but what council's
00:28:18.280
doing right now that could cost you and your family thousands of dollars?
00:28:23.240
You know, that's a really great point, William. We know that our city councils are the farm team
00:28:29.720
for progressive politics. That's how Joe Cece became the finance minister. He started off
00:28:36.280
at Calgary city council. He didn't have accountability there and he just failed upwards.
00:28:41.240
So it's really important for conservatives in particular to hold their city councils to account,
00:28:48.040
because these politicians need to know that we're always watching how they're spending our money.
00:28:53.480
William, thank you so much for coming on the show. We'll have you back on real soon. And thank you so
00:28:57.720
much for being so generous with your time today. Thanks, Sheila. Happy to be here. Thanks.
00:29:03.320
Thanks. You know, I think William is so right when he says the conservative party needs a disruption
00:29:17.000
and it needs a disruptor as its leader. It needs to reset, reevaluate and define itself because just
00:29:27.720
not being Justin Trudeau, it's not enough. It's disaffecting long-term conservatives and it's not
00:29:34.760
giving young people a reason to get involved in the party. And that's got to change or the
00:29:42.040
conservatives will never ever even get close to power again. Well, everybody, that's the show for
00:29:47.960
tonight. Thank you so much as always for tuning in. I'll see everybody back here in the same time,
00:29:53.320
in the same place next week. And remember, don't let the government tell you that you've had too much to think.