Why does the left always resort to violence against anyone who dare express a contrary opinion? And why does it seem to be necessary to resort to physical violence to silence dissenters who dare dare speak out against the "pro-life" agenda?
00:21:09.160You know, I would agree with that statement if this were, oh, say, 1939, we were at war with Nazi Germany at the time.
00:21:16.160After all, Hitler was bent on world domination via war that took the lives of more than 70 million people.
00:21:23.160And then there was Hitler's evil and inexplicable obsession with the genocide of the Jewish people and others.
00:21:29.160So, yeah, Nazis are about as vile and wicked as you can get and very punchable indeed.
00:21:36.160But the thing is, Nazis haven't been in a position of power for 75 years now.
00:21:41.160But that doesn't matter to those on the far left because their definition of Nazi has radically changed.
00:21:48.160A Nazi is no longer someone bent on world dominance and engineering a genocide.
00:21:54.160Rather, a Nazi is someone who holds an opinion that is merely disagreeable.
00:22:00.160And a disagreement no longer means passionate debate but rather the tossing of rocks or Molotov cocktails or anything else that might draw blood.
00:22:10.160We see it so often, certain cities where, quote, mostly peaceful protests, end quote, are carried out in the middle of the night by violent mobs.
00:22:22.160But then again, as Nancy Pelosi would say...
00:23:38.160And as you saw, when leftists are triggered, they feel entitled to get violent with those they disagree with.
00:23:44.160And how perversely ironic that this is being done in the name of anti-fascism, given that the so-called anti-fascists make use of the exact same tactics of fascist classic.
00:23:57.160Aless these New Age thugs would appear to be the only ones oblivious to this irony, they are not anti-fa, as in a contraction of the words anti and fascism.
00:24:10.160They are simply merely fa for fascism.
00:24:19.160As far as I can tell, it is due to an infiltration of so-called progressivism in all areas of our lives.
00:24:26.160Government, the bureaucracy, the judicial system, and of course education.
00:24:30.160Marxism, after all, embraces the same kind of mission statement as advertising, get them young, get them forever.
00:24:38.160This became abundantly clear a couple of years ago when my cameraman Efren and I were doing streeters on Toronto's Danforth Avenue in the aftermath of a massacre that occurred,
00:24:50.160potentially by someone who had been influenced by the dogma of ISIS.
00:24:55.160Now, keep in mind, the person who approached us is a high school teacher, Katya Berdachevsky, who is gainfully employed by the Toronto District School Board.
00:25:06.160Just check out her geopolitical mindset and ask yourselves, folks, would you want this person teaching your children?
00:25:16.160The rebel is not okay. That does not represent Canadian values.
00:25:20.160Why are you so mad, ma'am? This is a news report that broke today.
00:25:23.160Can I call you back? This is not what we're about. I'm sorry. This is not what Canada is about. Canada is not about racism.
00:28:55.160Well, this just in, York Region in the province of Ontario is now going to go under stage 2 lockdown as of Monday,
00:29:16.160joining the City of Toronto, Ottawa and Peel Region.
00:29:20.160I'm especially miffed at this, folks, because I live in York Region, so it's goodbye to the movie theatres,
00:29:27.160adios to the fitness facilities, farewell to sit-down restaurants.
00:29:31.160But it's all based on the science, you see.
00:29:33.160Yet, isn't it kind of weird that the science that is apparently dictating these economic smackdowns
00:29:41.160is in dispute by none other than the World Health Organization.
00:29:46.160It is saying going the economic lockdown route is not the appropriate way to go indeed.
00:29:54.160And joining me with more on this story is Andrew Lawton of True North.
00:29:59.160Andrew, thank you so much for joining me today, sir.
00:30:02.160Hey, happy to be here. Thanks very much.
00:30:04.160Well, Andrew, what do you make of this?
00:30:06.160First of all, the breaking news of earlier today that York Region is going to join those other regions in Ontario
00:30:15.160in terms of going into the stage 2 lockdown.
00:30:19.160Something I find very distressing given that so many of these restaurants, pubs, fitness facilities are only hanging on by their fingernails.
00:30:27.160And like I said, if this is being directed by medical science as opposed to what's good for the economy of the province,
00:30:35.160how do you square it that the province of Ontario seems to be contravening the advice of the World Health Organization?
00:30:44.160Well, I mean, I should say first off that shutting down fitness centres is actually the one effect of lockdown that generally doesn't affect me at all.
00:30:51.160So I would say keep them locked down longer so I have an excuse to not go to them.
00:30:56.160But on a more serious note, there is a big problem in this and that the first case that we saw,
00:31:03.160the first, I guess, go round with the lockdowns showed that all you're really doing is delaying the inevitable.
00:31:10.160You're not actually preventing the virus from ever existing, from ever getting transmitted.
00:31:15.160And this was actually the crux of what a lot of studies have said,
00:31:19.160one in particular that was just in the British Medical Journal about a week ago,
00:31:23.160is that all you're going to do when you do these aggressive lockdowns is delay what everyone is going to basically have to confront at some point,
00:37:05.160I take it more as if even the WHO is saying this, then surely there's a discussion to be had.
00:37:12.160I mean, generally speaking, my view is that if you want to know if you want the WHO to say what you agree with,
00:37:18.160just give it a couple of days and eventually they'll change and get around to your position.
00:37:22.160So, I mean, they're against lockdowns now in two days.
00:37:25.160They might be for them again, just like with masks, with border shutdowns, with travel restrictions.
00:37:30.160But now they're saying, you know, don't do travel restrictions.
00:37:33.160They were saying don't shut down the border.
00:37:35.160Generally speaking, the WHO has not been on the right side of this, which is why governments should not be deferring to the WHO.
00:37:43.160But at the same time, when, yeah, when even the WHO is saying no lockdown, surely we could kind of accept and understand that, hey, perhaps there's something to that.
00:37:53.160You know, Andrew, I think also there's a mindset that we don't have any kind of success or victory until we get zero COVID-19 positive test results every day.
00:38:05.160And I think that might be unrealistic for months, maybe even years to come.
00:38:09.160And yet it's all being driven through the prism of health.
00:38:39.160And one of the prevailing themes of the nanny state is trying to protect people from themselves.
00:38:43.160Whereas I always take their approach, which is kind of what you just indicated, that, yes, we're surrounded by risk in our lives.
00:38:49.160We have to assess our own willingness to embrace risk and also make the decisions that best align with us.
00:38:56.160And I think with that, we need to, as a society and as a country, very much protect the vulnerable.
00:39:01.160That means protecting long term care homes, nursing homes, people in hospitals, people with weakened immune systems.
00:39:07.160But remember, a lot of these people have already sort of adapted their lives to protect against these other things.
00:39:14.160And I'm not saying that people should do the whole chicken pox party thing and, you know, all go to a house party to get COVID.
00:39:20.160I think there are still questions about reinfection, about building up immunity.
00:39:25.160And I think those questions are going to take a lot of time.
00:39:27.160I think the idea, though, that we should be locking down everyone to protect the vulnerable doesn't fly.
00:39:34.160And Sweden, which the mainstream media and a lot of people on the left were actually deriding in the early days because they kind of took a laissez-faire approach.
00:39:42.160Sweden, it looks like, and again, we can't say this for certain, it looks like Sweden is on track to be somewhat vindicated because they may have avoided the second wave by having one larger first wave.
00:39:53.160And I guess the question is, does the mega first wave come at a higher damage level or lower damage level than two smaller waves?
00:40:02.160And that's what we're still trying to see here.
00:40:04.160But if in Ontario we were told, no, no, no, we have to protect everyone and lock everyone down and that's how we're going to beat it.
00:40:11.160And then the second they pull the foot off the brake just a little bit, we're back into what they are saying is a worse situation than we were in before.
00:40:19.160Clearly our approach hasn't been working.
00:40:21.160You know, I think you're dead on with the Swedish example, Andrew.
00:40:25.160That seems to have been the Swedish strategy, endure a bigger first wave and, you know, ride out the second wave.
00:40:31.160And also you mentioned long-term care facilities.
00:40:33.160This is the other maddening thing about the Wuhan virus is that when you look at the demographics,
00:40:39.160and the last time I looked at the numbers in Canada, it was something like more than 80% of the deaths are seniors in long-term care facilities.
00:40:50.160The fact is, if you're young, relatively young, relatively healthy,
00:40:53.160I believe the figure was you have a six times higher chance of getting killed crossing your neighborhood street by a car than you do of contracting the Wuhan virus and dying.
00:41:03.160So I think this idea of one size fits all and this economic lockdown is a terrible way in which to go.