Stay Free - Russel Brand - November 24, 2023


Moderna Working With The FBI To SPY On You?! You Won’t Believe THIS!!- Stay Free #253


Episode Stats

Length

51 minutes

Words per Minute

148.53065

Word Count

7,632

Sentence Count

423

Misogynist Sentences

12

Hate Speech Sentences

9


Summary

In this episode, journalist Lee Fang talks to Russell Brand about why pharmaceutical giant Moderna spied on Elon Musk, Novak Djokovic and the rest of the world, and why they have a sinister agenda to delegitimize and destroy people who speak out against their agenda. Lee talks to us about how a corporate giant like Pfizer conspired with former FBI employees to spy on its own employees, and the tactics they used to do so, and how they got their hands on the documents. We also discuss how the pharmaceutical giant is using their own employees to fight back against criticism of their own products and practices, and to counter the criticism they receive from the media and the general public. Stay tuned for Part 2 of Lee's interview with Russell Brand on this episode of Stay Free With Russell Brand, which will be available exclusively on Rumble after the first 15 minutes of the show. In the meantime, you can catch up with the first part of our conversation with Lee's piece on Moderna's spying campaign here. Stay free with a holiday special from our sponsor, Become an Awakened Wonder! Get in on the holiday special by becoming a supporter of this holiday special, and you'll get access to the next 24 hours of holiday special limited-edition holiday episodes only available on Rumble starting December 20th, 2019. Stay tuned to our new Holiday Special, Stay Free with a brand new holiday offer, Becoming An AwakenED Wonder, available only 24/7! and a chance to become a supporter starting on January 1st, 2020. Stay woke with a member of the podcast, and receive access to all new holiday special offers, limited to 24-hour access to new episodes throughout the month of January 2020! Stay free and receive a 20% off the entire year, plus a discount code to receive an additional $50 off your first month of the second year of the third year of Becoming an AWakenEDWondered Wonder, and access to a second year, and a FREE PRICING offer, plus all other offers throughout the year, starting January 2020, and all other options available throughout the world from then on that starts on May 1st and May 25th, 2020, only $50, and May 31st, and July, 2020 Get all the best deals available on all other places that offer, including VIP access starts on Dec 31st and July 4th, stay tuned for the last day, and more!


Transcript

00:00:00.000 I'm a real bitch. I'm your bitch. You don't know how to get around me. You're a bitch. You're a bitch.
00:00:28.000 I'm a real bitch. I'm your bitch. You don't know how to get around me. You're a bitch.
00:01:58.000 Nevertheless, they could not understand I'm a black man and I could never be a veteran.
00:02:04.000 Brought to you by Pfizer.
00:02:08.000 In this video, you're going to see the future.
00:02:19.000 We've got a live shot there.
00:02:27.000 Hello there, you Awakening Wonders.
00:02:28.000 Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
00:02:31.000 We've got an amazing show for you today.
00:02:33.000 I'm talking to the journalist Lee Fang, who rose to prominence during the Twitterphile era, who recently wrote a piece about how Moderna have philed extraordinarily and has some peculiar agenda, it seems, to discredit and destroy people as varied as Elon Musk, Novak Djokovic, and myself.
00:02:53.000 What do we all have in common?
00:02:55.000 Well, it's that we've publicly criticised the pharmaceutical industry and in particular their profiteering during the pandemic era.
00:03:02.000 Wherever you're watching this, we will be exclusively available on Rumble after the first 15 minutes.
00:03:08.000 Why?
00:03:09.000 Because we're talking about a range of complex issues like Moderna's spying, weird story, censorship obviously, the escalating global forever wars, and a variety of other subjects which I know you're gonna love.
00:03:23.000 The first part's available on YouTube, then will just be exclusively available on Rumble.
00:03:26.000 Remember, download the app, then you'll get told every time we're streaming.
00:03:30.000 And if you want access to more content, click the red button and you get some fantastic stuff.
00:03:34.000 Meditations, Bible readings, Conversation about solutions, communities that we may build all over the world, and a movement to challenge this global hegemony that seeks to destroy us all.
00:03:46.000 We've got this brilliant new holiday offer.
00:03:49.000 You can become an Awakened Wonder exclusively for the next 24 hours only.
00:03:53.000 Hit the unique link in the descriptions to become an Awakened Wonder and get in on this holiday special.
00:03:59.000 If you haven't become a supporter yet, become one Now, as part of that, you get exclusive access to podcast recordings, insightful readings, community building.
00:04:08.000 You even get more access to my dog, Bear, and loads more coming in 2024.
00:04:14.000 Now it's time for our conversation with a fantastic real-life journalist and some would say eye candy, Lee Fang.
00:04:21.000 Thanks for joining us, Lee.
00:04:22.000 Hey, good to see you.
00:04:24.000 It's lovely to see you, as always.
00:04:26.000 You are regarded as something as a heartthrob on this channel, you know that, as well as a much-admired journalist.
00:04:32.000 We're obviously really interested in your recent Moderna piece.
00:04:36.000 I was really astonished, and even though we've made content about it already, I'm still not sure that I entirely understand why Moderna have former FBI employees, why they spend money spying on people.
00:04:49.000 Can you Explain this to us, because it's not really typically what we understand as the role of a pharmaceutical company.
00:04:57.000 One might imagine would have as their priority the manufacture of medicines.
00:05:02.000 Tell us exactly what this story is and how you came by it, please.
00:05:08.000 Well, this is a pretty rare look behind the curtain.
00:05:11.000 This is a story about how a large corporation is really manipulating concerns around public health and public discourse to its own benefit.
00:05:22.000 Moderna essentially classifies in its own internal documents uh all legitimate criticism of the vaccine industry as quote-unquote dangerous misinformation and that includes categorizing any criticism of the effectiveness of the vaccines criticism of policies that coerce individuals to inject the vaccine even the pandemic profiteering you know this massive effort to make as much money as possible during the pandemic you know they were
00:05:56.000 Actually fingering you in some of these reports for your criticism of the amount of money made by these large corporations.
00:06:04.000 So this is really, the documents show the blurring of the lines between misinformation, disinformation, and corporate marketing.
00:06:15.000 You know, it seems like there's no distinction between those two categories.
00:06:19.000 You know, there's, of course, dangerous misinformation out there in terms of lies and, you know, bad information that spreads on social media, sure.
00:06:28.000 But they're taking basically any criticism of corporations that benefit from the vaccines, of any of these policies around the pandemic, and attempting to say, hey, you should ignore these stories, potentially these social medias, Platforms should censor these stories.
00:06:45.000 And they're also equipping healthcare professionals with some of their partners to rebut some of these claims.
00:06:52.000 So they're basically recruiting the medical profession to fight any criticism of these corporations.
00:07:00.000 And, you know, I should say that we obtained these documents.
00:07:04.000 We also, I'm using some of the documents that I obtained from doing the Twitter files reporting.
00:07:10.000 There's a couple of different sources I'm using here.
00:07:12.000 Um, but Moderna is different than Pfizer.
00:07:15.000 You know, Pfizer is a mega.
00:07:17.000 Pharmaceutical Corporation.
00:07:18.000 They have dozens and dozens of products.
00:07:20.000 Moderna is unique because this is a company that was essentially a startup for a very long time.
00:07:26.000 The COVID vaccines, their only approved product.
00:07:29.000 So this is a company that went from complete obscurity to becoming a, you know, worth of evaluation of over a hundred billion dollars almost overnight because of the vaccine.
00:07:38.000 Now that the pandemic is waning, it's kind of in the rear view mirror, Um, there's less, there are less people buying their products, so they're even more concerned with using and really manipulating these public discourse debates to get people to continue buying their product.
00:07:56.000 They are really dependent on more governments and individuals buying their product.
00:08:02.000 Terrified by this, Lee.
00:08:05.000 As you say, a company can come from nowhere.
00:08:08.000 Obviously being British, we know that our current Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was part
00:08:13.000 of a hedge fund, I think invested $500 million in Moderna just prior to 2019.
00:08:21.000 The UK government had several officials that subsequently went on to work for Moderna.
00:08:28.000 Moderna have received funding for a sort of a 10-year project from the UK government,
00:08:35.000 as well as, I know you're aware of this, like various, or at least two FDA officials have
00:08:41.000 gone on to work for Moderna.
00:08:43.000 This is a company that has a single product.
00:08:47.000 Of course, you know, in the last couple of months I've experienced some unprecedented
00:08:54.000 levels of attacks that were generated in media by media.
00:09:00.000 So to hear of something this nefarious is concerning and intriguing so what do you think is this a sort of a pretty unique situation or do other corporations of this size as do you imagine behave in this way do you how far do you think they would go to discredit and attack their critics and
00:09:24.000 I'm very surprised that a company can, as you say, emerge from nowhere and now have a valuation of $100 billion on the basis of a single product employ people from the deep state.
00:09:34.000 It just seems like a very unusual business model, Lee.
00:09:39.000 Well, look, you know, there's a long history of powerful corporations harnessing a public crisis to their own benefit.
00:09:48.000 You know, after September 11th, a number of corporations lobbied to enact laws that criminalize public reporting at At farms, at factory farms.
00:10:01.000 They said that, look, after September 11th happened, we could have a biological terror attack.
00:10:08.000 That means we need to criminalize anyone taking pictures at laboratories, or at farms, or at factory farms.
00:10:15.000 And, you know, it's clear that those laws were passed by lobbyists for the big agribusiness sector.
00:10:22.000 You know, so there's a long pattern of businesses taking advantage of crises.
00:10:29.000 The pandemic was a crisis.
00:10:32.000 It's clear that in this case pharmaceutical companies took advantage of this crisis and blended the concern around public discourse around disinformation to their own benefit.
00:10:43.000 Now we just don't know the extent of this because you know we got very fortunate in terms of getting access to these files We don't know what Pfizer's doing behind closed doors.
00:10:53.000 We don't know what the other big corporations are doing because this is pretty much a black box.
00:10:57.000 If it wasn't for the Twitter files and other disclosures, we wouldn't know a lot of this information.
00:11:02.000 How these content decisions are made, how they formulate these policies, It's incredibly opaque, but it's clear that Moderna works closely with NGOs that brand themselves as independent, as neutral arbiters of the truth.
00:11:19.000 They're just there to advise the CDC, to advise Facebook and Twitter on content decisions.
00:11:25.000 What they don't tell you is that they're working hand-in-glove with corporations that benefit from these decisions.
00:11:31.000 Lee, before the next question where we will stray into the territory that only free speech can service, we're going to have to leave YouTube.
00:11:38.000 If you're watching us on YouTube, click the link in the description now.
00:11:41.000 Join the Rumble chat.
00:11:43.000 Join the locals chat, where people speak freely and beautifully.
00:11:46.000 Much as we love you, we can only continue this on Rumble.
00:11:49.000 Click the link in the description and join us there.
00:11:52.000 It seems to you, Lee, that the fact that they are taking these unusual steps when it comes to monitoring dissenting voices, that independent media has had a meaningful impact on the, well not only their business, but Perhaps their agenda more broadly in the pandemic period.
00:12:15.000 Do you think that independent media reporting disrupted a shared agenda between, say, certain government agencies, government more broadly and the pharmaceutical industry in the pandemic period?
00:12:29.000 I don't want that to sound too sort of cloak and dagger.
00:12:32.000 But say, for example, in this country, there's a You know, an inquiry now, a COVID-19 inquiry taking place, and while it seems at points to be pretty shallow and particular, it's still surprising that it's taking place.
00:12:45.000 And, you know, now there's very low uptake, only 7% of people taking sort of booster shots at the moment.
00:12:50.000 Do you think that's because of the impact of independent media?
00:12:54.000 Yeah, absolutely.
00:12:54.000 I mean, there's a couple dynamics at play here.
00:12:57.000 One, the mainstream media, you know, they're dependent on advertising dollars.
00:13:01.000 They have relationships with these big corporations.
00:13:04.000 Two, there's just a cultural problem in media these days.
00:13:08.000 You know, it doesn't take nefarious actions by a special interest to promote a culture of conformism.
00:13:14.000 You know, I was at a left-wing outlet for the last eight years, including much of the pandemic.
00:13:20.000 There wasn't any influence from Moderna or Pfizer in terms of advertising or anything of that nature.
00:13:26.000 But there was a culture of, hey, you know, we've got to support public health.
00:13:31.000 So, you know, we can't publish any stories that might discourage people from taking the vaccine.
00:13:37.000 It's just it's a cultural problem in journalism today.
00:13:40.000 You really have to look outside.
00:13:42.000 to independent content creators to independent media platforms that are willing to go against the grain both in terms of pushing back and not being dependent on big corporate advertisers but also pushing back on the culture of journalism you know a lot of a lot of the journalists and editors out there simply for whatever reason They act as a herd and work in one direction.
00:14:06.000 You need people who say, stop, let's wait a second, let's be skeptical of these trends, let's be skeptical of these policies.
00:14:12.000 And, you know, I wrote this story as a partnership with a good friend, Jack Polson, for the media outlet UnHerd.
00:14:22.000 But, you know, I have a follow-up on my Substack coming out next week that looks at more of these files, and it really shows that Moderna was particularly Concerned with independent voices with people like you, people like Megyn Kelly, Jimmy Dore, many other independent voices that have been critical of these policies because they see that these independent voices are gaining a huge following and they're shaping the way people see these vaccines and see these vaccine policies.
00:14:51.000 Is it possible without significant changes to the law or other say, anomalous events, to even countenance silencing voices
00:15:04.000 as significant as Tucker Carlson's and more particularly, I suppose still, Elon Musk.
00:15:10.000 Isn't that beyond the reach of an organisation like Moderna?
00:15:16.000 I mean, what other interests would they have to be working with to even be able to consider shutting?
00:15:22.000 Because these are not like, you know, sort of little online vloggers or whatever.
00:15:25.000 These are sort of like, you know, pretty powerful voices at this point.
00:15:29.000 What kind of, what kind of, um, you know, what kind of, kind of cooperation would they require from other interests or other institutions to be able to challenge voices like Tucker's or Elon's?
00:15:42.000 Well, look, we are in a benefit.
00:15:44.000 You're in the UK.
00:15:45.000 I'm in San Francisco.
00:15:45.000 I'm in the US.
00:15:47.000 We live in an open society.
00:15:48.000 You know, to varying degrees, we have free speech.
00:15:52.000 We have the First Amendment.
00:15:53.000 We have similar laws and provisions around the West, around Open discourse.
00:16:00.000 So it's not like a totalitarian state like Saudi Arabia or China, where a single government actor can shut down dissenting voices, but instead we see this effort to change the algorithms on these social media platforms to demonetize and soft censor critical voices.
00:16:20.000 And at the same time, we see very prominent voices stigmatizing independent reporting.
00:16:26.000 They say, you know, people like you are dangerous.
00:16:28.000 They say, you know, you're crazy.
00:16:30.000 You're someone who's endangering the public health.
00:16:32.000 And so even when they're not technically censoring, they're marginalizing you to a degree that your voice is not heard or not believed.
00:16:41.000 And that's the kind of strategy of shaping public opinion.
00:16:45.000 and manufacturing consent that we see in the West.
00:16:47.000 It's not the command and control system that we see in totalitarian states, but it still can be very effective in terms of controlling the information that people see and what they believe.
00:16:57.000 Do you think that without the Twitter files, without Musk's acquisition of that platform, I suppose we just wouldn't know a great deal of this?
00:17:06.000 And do you think the attempts to discredit and smear Elon Musk are a result of losing control of even a small portion of that space?
00:17:17.000 Yeah, I think that's a big part of it.
00:17:21.000 Elon Musk is incredibly impulsive.
00:17:23.000 He makes a lot of wild decisions.
00:17:26.000 I've reported on dozens of leaked and hacked and various internal documents over the last 12 years.
00:17:33.000 It's very rare to have a source like Elon Musk.
00:17:36.000 It's basically, you know, having a billionaire open up the vaults and say, come in and take anything you want.
00:17:41.000 I mean, that's kind of unprecedented.
00:17:44.000 I've heard from whistleblowers and from people who have left companies and want to speak out against public wrongdoing.
00:17:52.000 But for Elon Musk, I think he's a A danger to the system because he's willing to point out these problems, whether they're in social media or in government, and he can't really be controlled by anyone, perhaps because of his wealth.
00:18:07.000 And that's for better and worse.
00:18:08.000 I don't agree with all the decisions he's made at Twitter and elsewhere, but I am grateful for this opportunity to report on these documents because they tell a multifaceted story.
00:18:20.000 It's not just the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security that's been leaning on these
00:18:24.000 social media companies to shape these content decisions.
00:18:27.000 Here it shows that powerful corporations like Moderna and like Pfizer through these NGOs
00:18:34.000 and other organizations that they work with, we're attempting to shape the public discourse
00:18:38.000 and to really control the information that we saw.
00:18:41.000 Yeah, and beyond that, deep state agencies, of course.
00:18:43.000 I know you did the reporting.
00:18:45.000 Can you tell me a little bit more about what NewsGuard is and what their censorship model is and how they're merging corporate and state power?
00:18:53.000 And can you tell me what you know about the Trusted News Initiative as well and these other global organizations that seem to incorporate state-funded media and appear to have an agenda to impose narratives and shut down counter-narratives?
00:19:07.000 Can you tell me about the power that they have?
00:19:10.000 Well, yeah, there's this, this is, you know, there's some overlap with this story.
00:19:15.000 But there's a cottage industry of NGOs, some of them privately funded, some government funded.
00:19:21.000 Most of them are nonprofits, and they go out and they say, hey, we've got this misinformation, disinformation problem.
00:19:29.000 You know, foreign influence problem, we need to shut down websites, or we need to warn people about dangerous information on the internet.
00:19:39.000 Well, that's all fine and well, but, you know, a lot of these organizations essentially have their own biases.
00:19:44.000 They're basically using their own subjective reading of the truth and then claiming that they're neutral arbiters of what's real and what's not, what's fair and what's not.
00:19:55.000 And what NewsGuard does, this is a startup that was founded in 2018.
00:19:58.000 They're actually a for-profit company, so they're slightly different.
00:20:01.000 They're trying to monetize efforts to control what people see on the internet and where advertising dollars go.
00:20:08.000 So they rate websites on a 1 to 100 scale of trustability, but they have their own criteria.
00:20:16.000 And I've talked to a lot of the websites that they've been targeting, and they say that there's A clear conflict of interest.
00:20:23.000 There are many issues at play here.
00:20:25.000 News Guard received a $750,000 contract from the Pentagon, from the Air Force in terms of looking at misinformation.
00:20:35.000 Well, who do they target after receiving that contract?
00:20:37.000 of the left-wing sites that have been incredibly critical of the war between Ukraine and Russia.
00:20:44.000 They've been pointing out issues in terms of neo-Nazis in the Ukrainian military, stories
00:20:50.000 around U.S. influence over Ukraine's politicians. These are areas of legitimate public debate.
00:20:56.000 These are stories that have been confirmed by other news outlets. This isn't misinformation.
00:21:02.000 Nonetheless, NewsGuard, after receiving this Pentagon contract, has classified sites like
00:21:07.000 Consortium News, a site that's been around for 30 years, that's published 20,000 articles.
00:21:12.000 Just because of five or six articles that are critical of Ukraine, they brand the entire site as dangerous misinformation.
00:21:21.000 Now, another example is the Daily Skeptic, a libertarian site in the UK that's been very critical of COVID policies of vaccine policies like the mandate.
00:21:33.000 They tried to respond in good faith and go back and forth with NewsGuard and
00:21:37.000 respond to their criticism when they were being labeled as dangerous misinformation.
00:21:41.000 They even updated all of their articles with an appendix of showing the criticism
00:21:47.000 of their articles and showing their homework of all the studies that they use
00:21:51.000 to report their articles.
00:21:53.000 After engaging with NewsGuard and promising to engage in good faith,
00:21:58.000 NewsGuard downgraded their rating and rated them as even more dangerous misinformation.
00:22:03.000 So this is a for profit company that is working with big advertising
00:22:09.000 conglomerates, including the advertising conglomerate that places the ads for
00:22:14.000 Pfizer and other large healthcare companies that has a Pentagon contract.
00:22:19.000 But is going out and shaping what people read on the Internet because their
00:22:24.000 plugin which is coming standard if you're reading the news and public libraries in
00:22:29.000 the US and they have partnerships in the UK, it's automatically logged in to
00:22:34.000 certain public browsers and it's basically relegating advertising dollars and
00:22:39.000 what you see on the Internet.
00:22:40.000 What a...
00:22:42.000 Thanks.
00:22:43.000 In your article in which you talked about me and Novak Djokovic, you talk about a group called Public Good Projects that are funded by the drug industry.
00:22:55.000 And what are they?
00:22:59.000 They sound pretty weird.
00:23:01.000 Some of the stuff that I was doing was difficult for me to understand.
00:23:06.000 Well, again, this is the same cottage industry.
00:23:09.000 This is just one of another Uh, groups that say, Hey, we're out there to fight misinformation.
00:23:16.000 We're here to help improve public health outcomes by shaping the type of news and social media that people read.
00:23:25.000 And so they, they were big players early in the pandemic.
00:23:28.000 They were advising the CDC and the Biden administration.
00:23:32.000 Um, they were working closely with Twitter executives.
00:23:36.000 They had backdoor access.
00:23:38.000 To the Twitter firehose data.
00:23:41.000 And they were sending regular emails to Twitter executives saying, hey, these are the accounts that are spreading dangerous misinformation, i.e., you should be censoring these accounts.
00:23:50.000 And indeed, many of the accounts that they flagged for Twitter got demonetized and shadow banned and blocked.
00:23:57.000 And these are some of the other accounts, the public health accounts, that you should verify and amplify.
00:24:03.000 So they have a very close relationship with the social media platforms.
00:24:07.000 They were also advising Facebook.
00:24:10.000 And all the while, they were funded by Moderna, Pfizer, and other major biopharmaceutical companies.
00:24:17.000 They were providing over a million dollars in funding.
00:24:19.000 So, if you look at this Moderna story, this relationship is continuing.
00:24:25.000 They've been quietly working with Moderna over the last few months to create a whole new training program for healthcare professionals to rebut dangerous misinformation.
00:24:35.000 So this is a nonprofit group, PGP, that casts itself as independent, as simply interested in promoting good public health outcomes by shaping the information that you read on the internet.
00:24:48.000 But they're working quietly with Moderna and other health care companies.
00:24:53.000 Lee, this ability to control and shape narratives I suppose is perhaps the defining media issue of our time, the inability to have any kind of objective perspective, and can be partnered with our new ability to diagnose and discern where certain narratives might be emerging from.
00:25:20.000 With escalating tensions across the Middle East, we're seeing now a shift in the previous partisan divide between Republicans who were sort of generally developing a kind of anti-war position with the exception of, you know, events in the South Pacific or, you know, the China and Taiwan situation.
00:25:40.000 We're seeing more Republicans for war.
00:25:45.000 Can you tell me how this perspective is shifting and how it's being presented to us and how it's altering the censorship issues that we've been discussing up till now?
00:25:57.000 Well, I think it's to be determined around the censorship issues.
00:26:00.000 I've seen some reports that people who have posted very benign, banal messages on Facebook have seen their messages disappear or their accounts seemingly being censored.
00:26:13.000 You know, they're posting things like just free Palestine and a hashtag and then suddenly seeing their posts disappear.
00:26:19.000 But, you know, we need more reporting on this.
00:26:22.000 We don't have a congressional investigation. We haven't seen any leaks.
00:26:26.000 We don't have the owners of any of the social media platforms revealing anything yet. We don't
00:26:32.000 know how the disinformation, misinformation industry is shaping this yet, but what we do know is that
00:26:38.000 there's a rush to war, and every time there's a rush to war, a rush to conflict,
00:26:43.000 you have powerful voices attempting to shape the public discourse around this conflict.
00:26:49.000 There are very powerful voices in Washington, D.C.
00:26:52.000 that are demanding more U.S.
00:26:54.000 involvement.
00:26:55.000 They're demanding that the U.S.
00:26:57.000 arm Israel to the teeth and support whatever policy that Israel pursues in their pursuit of Hamas.
00:27:04.000 And that there are even more extreme voices that say, hey look, given Iran's support of Hamas historically, even though there's no evidence yet, of Iran directing or having any knowledge of the October 7th
00:27:16.000 attack, this should be the cause beli for war.
00:27:19.000 We should be striking Iran right now.
00:27:22.000 There are many prominent voices in the Republican Party, even a few in the Democratic Party,
00:27:26.000 and powerful interest groups in Washington, the same folks who got us into the Iraq war,
00:27:30.000 who are demanding and beating that drum for war every day in Washington.
00:27:37.000 So we're seeing this escalation in violence very rapidly.
00:27:41.000 Nikki Haley's one of those voices, I suppose.
00:27:43.000 I feel like you've reported recently on Nikki Haley and her financial interest and its connection to the military-industrial complex, I feel.
00:27:55.000 Can you tell me a bit more about that, mate?
00:27:56.000 And is Nikki Haley a real person?
00:27:58.000 She's not going to be president.
00:27:59.000 She's too crazy, isn't she?
00:28:03.000 She's capturing the never Trump vote.
00:28:06.000 You know, there's a lot of powerful interests that are, you know, for lack of a better term, very right-wing, very neoconservative.
00:28:15.000 They hate Trump because Trump has promised to end the conflict between Ukraine and Russia.
00:28:21.000 They hate Trump because he's not a big supporter of the NATO alliance.
00:28:25.000 They want a different Republican for 2024.
00:28:28.000 They want a Republican that is more in the mold of George W. Bush.
00:28:33.000 And they think they found the person in Nikki Haley.
00:28:37.000 And Nikki Haley is interesting because, yes, she's a neoconservative voice, but she's also entwined with the military-industrial complex.
00:28:44.000 She was, of course, Trump's ambassador to the UN.
00:28:47.000 When she left office, as a public official, she had to file ethics disclosures.
00:28:54.000 Her family was bankrupt.
00:28:56.000 They were facing foreclosure in South Carolina.
00:29:00.000 She did not have much money when she was leaving public office.
00:29:03.000 During the Trump administration.
00:29:05.000 Now that she's running for president, she has to file a new public disclosure.
00:29:08.000 What does it show?
00:29:10.000 She's worth millions upon millions of dollars.
00:29:13.000 She's raking in over $10 million a year.
00:29:15.000 And a lot of that money's coming from opaque defense interests.
00:29:19.000 There are a number of defense firms.
00:29:21.000 It's not clear what they do or who are their clients.
00:29:24.000 They're paying her and her husband.
00:29:26.000 She, of course, joined the board of Boeing.
00:29:28.000 Boeing makes a number of military vehicles, including an aerospace that is used by the U.S.
00:29:36.000 military and the U.S.
00:29:37.000 allies.
00:29:38.000 And she was a very highly paid board member for them up until recently.
00:29:44.000 She has many relationships that suddenly created this newfound wealth that she has as she goes into this presidential campaign.
00:29:53.000 And she's using incredibly extreme and dangerous rhetoric.
00:29:56.000 She's cheerleading Israel to use whatever force necessary, no matter how many civilian lives are lost.
00:30:03.000 She's also talking about escalating this war into a war with Iran.
00:30:08.000 I mean, this is incredibly reckless discourse, but this is the voice that the neocons want.
00:30:13.000 This is what people in DC who are demanding escalation, that want forever wars in the Middle East, She's their avatar, and if you look at where her campaign is getting money, we'll see it in the next disclosure over the next, I believe, month from her super PAC, but she seems to have just unlimited financial resources, and they've kind of materialized out of the blue.
00:30:33.000 She's dominating the airwaves in Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina, and she's solidifying support.
00:30:40.000 We can't continue to deliver this groundbreaking, world-shaking content without you, who we love, obviously, and our partners.
00:30:48.000 Today, it's Bioptimizers.
00:30:50.000 Magnesium breakthrough in particular from Bioptimizers, a true game-changer in the quest for a better night's sleep.
00:30:57.000 You sleeping okay?
00:30:58.000 Unbelievably, I'm sleeping fantastically well.
00:31:00.000 Prophetic dreams, clear visions, Can all of that be due to Bio-Optimizers Magnesium Breakthrough?
00:31:07.000 Well, they've got a Black Friday Mega Sale right now.
00:31:10.000 It's lasting throughout the entire month of November.
00:31:13.000 The biggest discount you can get and amazing gifts with purchase are available only on my page bio-optimizers.com forward slash brand with a code brand, the code brand.
00:31:25.000 This Black Friday, choose your health and wellness over unnecessary, frivolous objects.
00:31:31.000 Head over to biooptimizers.com forward slash brand and end of the code brand at the checkout.
00:31:37.000 25% off.
00:31:38.000 Simple as that.
00:31:38.000 Right.
00:31:39.000 Let's get back to this, shall we?
00:31:41.000 So it's not the end of the road for those kind of party apartheid politicians.
00:31:49.000 the political establishment can still put forward and succeed with those kind of candidates
00:31:55.000 because it feels like the Republican Party, in particular post-Trump, has now yielded
00:32:00.000 to the kind of populism that can herald the power of independent media.
00:32:05.000 It seems like the Democrat Party is still institutionalised and still captured by unseen
00:32:12.000 hierarchies that a figure like RFK would have to run as an independent, would have no chance
00:32:19.000 of success.
00:32:20.000 But it seems to me like, this is just intuition and guesswork really, that I've
00:32:24.000 I find it difficult to envisage a figure like Nikki Haley as the candidate for the Republican Party, particularly with Vivek Ramaswamy gaining popularity.
00:32:37.000 And it seems to me that in this independent media age, those kind of political figures don't really have a chance anymore.
00:32:46.000 But I guess you're saying that that diagnosis is kind of Wrong.
00:32:50.000 These kind of institutional figures can still be pushed forward by the Republicans and the Democrats because it seems to me that sort of one of the things that I'm more broadly observing, Lee, is an attempt to shut down independent media because independent media facilitates independent political movements and is in itself a threat to hegemony, even a bipartisan hegemony.
00:33:12.000 But do you think that That that isn't true.
00:33:16.000 That the Democrats can march on with Joe Biden, that the Republicans can find a comparable figure and stop this seeming rise of libertarian or progressive or populist voices.
00:33:30.000 That's what I'm trying to get to.
00:33:32.000 Well, I don't want to be contrite, but I do want to thread the needle a little bit.
00:33:37.000 You look back in 2020 at the Democratic primary there, there were populist voices.
00:33:42.000 There were people like Bernie Sanders that had significant support, but the Voices for populism on the left in the Democratic Party were extinguished really with COVID.
00:33:54.000 As this pandemic kind of exploded into the public mind, I think there was a retraction.
00:34:01.000 There was a kind of a demand for normalcy, a trusting of the establishment, a kind of return to the moderate corporate kind of establishment voices within the Democratic Party, and people fell in line behind Joe Biden.
00:34:18.000 Now we're seeing something parallel happening in the Republican Party.
00:34:21.000 We've had many years of very unique Republican populism, people like Vivek and Donald Trump, who are outside voices criticizing the deep state, criticizing these forever wars, criticizing the grip of Silicon Valley and Wall Street over Washington.
00:34:37.000 But now with the October 7th terror attack and this escalating violence across the Middle East, it's just like, you know, I kind of grew up in the shadow of 9-11.
00:34:47.000 I grew up in the D.C.
00:34:48.000 area.
00:34:48.000 I saw the pillowing smoke coming out of the Pentagon.
00:34:53.000 I grew up very close to D.C.
00:34:55.000 And it shaped all the politics.
00:34:57.000 The War on Terror just shut down everything in the Republican Party.
00:35:00.000 Everyone kind of fell in line.
00:35:01.000 You're either with us or against us.
00:35:03.000 Very pro-corporate, very pro-war.
00:35:05.000 We're seeing something simultaneous happen with the Republican Party.
00:35:08.000 Just as COVID strengthened the power of the establishment in the Democratic Party, I'm seeing the post-October 7th moment strengthening the neoconservative pro-establishment voice in the Republican Party.
00:35:25.000 People are falling in line with a pro-corporate, pro-war voice.
00:35:30.000 And these establishment voices that have been on the margins recently are coming back to the center and they're having more power than ever in the Republican Party.
00:35:38.000 Now, I don't hope that's the case.
00:35:40.000 I hope there's a lively debate within the Republican Party That there are populist voices that criticize organized power, that criticize centralized power, that criticize these forever wars, but on the
00:35:55.000 Public opinion within Republican Party, uh, primary debates is just, it's shifting.
00:36:01.000 I mean, I think with the next Republican debate, we're going to see just question after question.
00:36:06.000 Do you, do you support, uh, uh, more war?
00:36:09.000 Do you support, um, arming Israel?
00:36:11.000 I mean, I think the tenor of the debate is fundamentally changing within the Republican Party.
00:36:16.000 It's returning back to the kind of establishment, uh, establishment voice that has demanded war and demanded corporate, uh, bailouts and corporate giveaways.
00:36:25.000 That seems to be at odds with what most ordinary people want and it felt to me hugely to the detriment of the Democrat Party that they were somehow nurturing the disjunct between a kind of public appetite for peace and diplomacy, a loss of enthusiasm for foreign wars.
00:36:49.000 It seemed like it was Difficult for them to jazz people up and keep it up for the conflict, you know, in particular between Ukraine and Russia, and that the events in the Middle East have kind of served as a kind of a much-needed defibrillation of that hawkishness.
00:37:09.000 And you're saying that's true on both parties, even if it's starting to seem clear That Americans in general don't support foreign wars.
00:37:19.000 It's a perspective that has to be cultivated and even in that recent piece, Lee, you know, that was a sort of the Time magazine piece that was celebrating Zelensky, it seems that like people around him are saying, oh no, this war is unwinnable.
00:37:32.000 So do you think that, can both parties continue to put forward candidates that are generally speaking pro-war when it seems obvious now that American people are getting cynical about it?
00:37:45.000 People are getting cynical and, you know, it's a tragedy that we've gone over.
00:37:51.000 We've had this last year of the Ukraine war where we, you know, we had the Discord leaks last winter that showed that the internal Pentagon intelligence report said that the counteroffensive was unwinnable, that Ukraine had no real chance of gaining significant territory.
00:38:08.000 Well, we had tens of thousands of people die over the last year for what?
00:38:13.000 For basically a stalemate that the Pentagon knew would happen?
00:38:17.000 It's an absolute tragedy, and I am comforted by the voices like Vivek and others who have criticized this conflict and called it what it is.
00:38:27.000 That being said, we're entering a new moment of fear, a new moment of, you know, People being terrified about terrorism, terrified about the spread of conflict in the Middle East, and in a climate of fear, that's where you see kind of the neoconservative voice rise, where you see kind of the crushing of dissent
00:38:50.000 and the move towards the establishment.
00:38:53.000 That's at least my, you know, that's my read of the current politics of, you know, right now in late November.
00:38:59.000 I hope that changes but, you know, just watching as an observer the elements of the Republican Party shift since October 7th, I think this is a monumental event and it's headed in a very bad direction.
00:39:12.000 Do you think that if both of the main American political parties continue to close ranks, shut down the emergence of populist figures, it's likely that there will be some success at least for independent presidential candidates?
00:39:28.000 Is it likely to be a significant election?
00:39:31.000 The way that the media has changed in recent years certainly seems to posit, or sorry, afford that possibility.
00:39:39.000 What do you think about that, mate?
00:39:41.000 You know, it's really hard to diagnose because, you know, the UK system and the US system is actually very similar.
00:39:48.000 Even though you have a parliamentary system, you know, we've got this congressional presidential division of power, essentially in elections, you know, we, we both have first past the post elections, winner take all elections.
00:39:58.000 So, you know, you have, you have a lot of spoiler candidates in your constituencies across the UK that can be manipulated by the two larger parties.
00:40:06.000 That's just how it works.
00:40:07.000 And that's very similar here where we have a winner take all system of, Very unusual electoral college.
00:40:14.000 The powerful two parties will manipulate and use third parties to their own advantage.
00:40:20.000 If we had a more democratic system, if we had a more open proportional system that actually promoted true political competition, I think there would be a true opening For third party voices like RFK and many others because people are yearning for different choices.
00:40:38.000 Our system is closed off, even though we're a Western democratic country.
00:40:43.000 We don't give people meaningful choice in our elections.
00:40:46.000 It's incredibly limiting.
00:40:48.000 The few choices that people receive.
00:40:50.000 Many of them can be deceiving because, again, we have a winner-take-all system.
00:40:56.000 The system is basically rigged for the two parties, one of those to win, and when independent voices emerge, they're often abused or manipulated by the establishment to benefit The two-party system.
00:41:11.000 So I'm not hopeful in terms of independent candidates as long as we have this first-past-the-post, winner-take-all electoral college.
00:41:21.000 We need fundamental reform in the U.S.
00:41:24.000 We need a proportional system or something of that nature to actually give people meaningful choice because until we have that fundamental reform, It's very hard to see a third party having a meaningful impact, but we'll see.
00:41:38.000 At least in the discourse, it's very helpful to have outside voices because they're bringing up topics that the two-party candidates will not discuss.
00:41:47.000 They'll talk about interesting public policy issues, corporate issues, foreign policy issues that the mainstream media will not touch.
00:41:56.000 That's a benefit, but in terms of you know, a viable, you know, path to the presidency, our
00:42:03.000 system is designed to prevent that for third-party candidates. Feels like the way that
00:42:09.000 the Occupy movement dissipated in your country in particular and the way that, you know, leftist
00:42:16.000 populist movements like Podemos in Spain and Syriza in Greece were kind of annihilated and
00:42:22.000 crushed after the financial crash.
00:42:24.000 Both of those movements, I suppose, are responses to the financial crash, has led to this kind of, you know, broadly presumed to be right-wing populism that's succeeding across the world, whether in Argentina or in the Netherlands.
00:42:39.000 And I suppose what I'm sensing is that unless there is the facilitation and reform that you're describing, unless there is the ability for more localised power, one of the ways that people can protest and reject what might be characterised as globalist, neo-liberal politics is through to a return to more
00:43:07.000 Demonstrably nationalist politics.
00:43:10.000 Understandably.
00:43:11.000 It doesn't seem like there's anywhere else to go.
00:43:13.000 Again, you know, because that kind of Occupy moment was so deftly crushed, ignored.
00:43:21.000 So do you feel, Lee, that the only sort of pathway out of this is via these kind of populist libertarian movements, if both parties are going to crush any attempt to evolve, to evolve or reform?
00:43:39.000 I think there's a yearning throughout the world for populist movements.
00:43:44.000 But the big problem that we've seen, at least in my eyes, in the last decade since Occupy, is that the major parties around the world have refused to really champion left populism, to really challenge the neoliberal world order.
00:44:02.000 You have corporations that don't pay their taxes, that shift money in factories around the world to avoid Labor regulations to avoid paying people a decent wage, to avoid a decent pension for their retirees, to make sure that they can pollute without any accountability.
00:44:18.000 Now, instead of taking on that kind of populism, the left globally in the U.S.
00:44:25.000 and many other countries have forced upon us culture war.
00:44:28.000 They say instead of talking about these multinational corporations and these billionaires that jet across the world on their yachts and their private jets, Let's talk about race.
00:44:39.000 Let's argue about the pandemic.
00:44:41.000 Let's fight each other around gender ideology.
00:44:44.000 That's what we've received.
00:44:46.000 Now, that hasn't removed the issue of populism.
00:44:49.000 People are still angry at the establishment.
00:44:51.000 They're angry at these foreign policies.
00:44:53.000 They're angry at You know, the fact that they can't afford eggs, that they can't get by in society today, that we have this inflation crisis, we have deteriorating infrastructure.
00:45:06.000 And in the vacuum there, where there's no left populism, we're going to see right populism.
00:45:12.000 We're going to see more nationalistic movements.
00:45:14.000 We're going to see efforts, whether that's in Argentina or the Netherlands or elsewhere, to take up that space where there is no left populism.
00:45:22.000 We don't see left populism.
00:45:24.000 So, yes, there's an innate anger at the system.
00:45:29.000 There's an anger at the global order that does not work for the working class or for the middle class.
00:45:36.000 And in the absence of any kind of voice that champions reform, I'm sorry, the sun's starting to hit my face here.
00:45:45.000 We're going to see more of these movements, I think, because no one else is speaking to this problem.
00:45:50.000 And you see like the various agricultural movements across the world immediately characterized as right-wing and racist.
00:45:57.000 There's such an appetite to condemn these movements even when they're in countries like Sri Lanka and India and sort of you know where white nationalism would surely have limited success.
00:46:06.000 Like they're sort of characterized in the in the same way.
00:46:10.000 I wonder like if the pandemic era That was a kind of window into a globalist agenda and I wonder if we're going to see, even with these limited inquiries into Covid as we've seen in this country and the beginning of lawsuits like the AstraZeneca one in our country, a kind of emergence of real anti-authoritarianism that
00:46:32.000 Whether it's expressed through right-wing populism or left-wing populism, and you've described how it's unlikely to be the latter, will lead to a genuine anti-establishment movement.
00:46:42.000 And in fact, that's what all of these new censorial measures are kind of about.
00:46:48.000 And in fact, maybe even these escalating crises and the concomitant fear that it generates is about Preventing the emergence of these various anti-establishment movements.
00:46:59.000 Do you agree with that?
00:47:00.000 And how do you think that these various, the reckonings around Covid and the lawsuits around in particular AstraZeneca, but you know there might be more stuff like that to follow.
00:47:09.000 Do you think that this might somehow boost anti-establishment movements?
00:47:18.000 Well, in this crisis of COVID and this pandemic, we were told we all have to sacrifice.
00:47:25.000 We can't go to the funerals of our loved ones.
00:47:27.000 We can't leave our homes.
00:47:29.000 You know, if you were a small business, you had to shut down.
00:47:33.000 We all had to tighten our belts.
00:47:35.000 Meanwhile, What they told us for justifying these extreme policies turned out not to be true, right?
00:47:43.000 Like the vaccine that was supposed to end transmission of the virus did not do that.
00:47:49.000 A lot of these COVID lockdowns did not work in terms of stopping the spread of the virus.
00:47:56.000 There was just a cornucopia of lies.
00:47:58.000 Meanwhile, while they told working-class people to tighten their belts and to sacrifice, The rich never got more rich.
00:48:06.000 Moderna alone minted five new billionaires.
00:48:09.000 We had this explosion of wealth, you know, low interest rates and bailouts that benefited big corporations.
00:48:16.000 It just kind of expanded this wealth inequality we see globally.
00:48:21.000 So, you know, in previous crises during the Great War and World War II, in the U.S., we created special taxes to make sure that the big arms contractors that were making a ton of money paid more back to the public coffers.
00:48:34.000 We kind of set price controls to say, hey, look, in this time of extreme measures to win this war, we're going to make sure that the rich don't Don't exploit this crisis for their own benefit.
00:48:48.000 Did we do that for the pandemic?
00:48:49.000 No, we made only working class and middle class people pay the ultimate sacrifice.
00:48:55.000 We didn't make the corporations.
00:48:56.000 So, I think in this moment, looking back at it, there's just a complete lack of trust in the establishment.
00:49:05.000 There's anger at the establishment, lingering anger at At powerful elites, whether those are government elites or corporate elites, that benefited from this pandemic, that lied to us about this pandemic, we still have this inflation crisis that's downstream from a lot of these policies.
00:49:27.000 Whether that's in the US or globally, there's going to be a lot of lingering anger, and I think that's going to be a big factor going into the 2024 election, just as it's been a big factor in these recent elections in Argentina and the Netherlands.
00:49:40.000 Ah, Lee.
00:49:41.000 Thank you very much.
00:49:41.000 Even in times of fracture and confusion, you are able to bring us, now literally, great illumination and light.
00:49:49.000 And with that Thanksgiving light cascading across your much-adored, according to the chat, face, I'll thank you for joining us.
00:49:57.000 And thanks for doing reporting that appeared to establish that there is indeed an agenda to destroy me in the pharmaceutical industry, which seems to be playing out in the wider public.
00:50:08.000 Thanks, man.
00:50:08.000 Thanks for your work, Lee.
00:50:10.000 Hey, thank you so much for having me.
00:50:11.000 Appreciate you, Russell.
00:50:12.000 You can follow Lee Fang over on Substack.
00:50:14.000 We will post a link in the description so that you can get access to his incredible work, including his recent report on how I've been targeted by Moderna in an extraordinary way.
00:50:25.000 Next week, we've got fantastic guests, including Matt Taibbi, who will be talking to us about the UK files, which is another story that shows that peculiar, nefarious interests have been targeting me, it seems.
00:50:37.000 In order to, I don't know, push censorship, shut down free speech.
00:50:41.000 We'll learn more about that with Matt Taibbi next week.
00:50:44.000 Also, this is perhaps the best time ever to become an Awakened Wonder, a member of our community.
00:50:50.000 Do you know what we do?
00:50:51.000 We do Bible readings.
00:50:52.000 We read the Bhagavad Gita.
00:50:53.000 We read the holy scriptures that we may become awakened and enlightened and create a movement to oppose advancing globalist interests that seek to disempower you individually, destroy your communities, offer you no connection to the sublime and the divine.
00:51:08.000 Join us.
00:51:09.000 Hit the unique link in the description now to become an awakened wonder.
00:51:13.000 For the next 24 hours, you'll get 50% off.
00:51:16.000 Join us next week, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
00:51:19.000 Until then, if you can, stay free.
00:51:21.000 Many switching, switching, switching.