The Ben Shapiro Show - November 05, 2019


Afghanistan On The Border | Ep. 890


Episode Stats

Length

50 minutes

Words per Minute

202.50496

Word Count

10,213

Sentence Count

697

Misogynist Sentences

29

Hate Speech Sentences

9


Summary

A horrific massacre of American citizens takes place in the Mexican border state of Sonora, new polls undercut Elizabeth Warren s case for the nomination, and the Washington Nationals show Trump some love. This is The Ben Shapiro Show, and it's sponsored by Honey. Honey is a free browser extension that automatically finds the best promo codes wherever you shop online. You just load it up and then it runs in the background of your computer. Every time you shop, Honey will provide you with discounts that you can t get anywhere else.So what exactly do you have to lose? And the answer is nothing except for you can lower your bill. If you re not, you probably know somebody who is, so do them a solid and tell them about Honey. It installs in just 2 clicks and installs in your background in just two clicks. Get Honey for FREE at joinhoney.com/BenShapiroShow and you ll be getting hundreds of dollars in savings. And it s free! Check them out right now at Joinhoney, and you can get the best discount code you ve ever heard of! Ben Shapiro is the host of the show where you get 20% off your first month with discount codes, plus free shipping throughout the entire month of the year. So go check them out and get the discount codes you ve been promised by Ben Shapiro. The show is going to be giving you a chance to save $5,000 and get 10% off the entire year, and they get it all that they re going to get, plus they get a whole $5 promo code, plus you get it, they ll get a VIP discount, they get that chance to get a course that gets a whole set of Ben Shapiro will get a chance they get, she gets that chance, they also gets it, and she gets it all they say it s all that she gets, they say that she s gonna get, they will get that s she s a whole place, she s getting a whole she s that s a chance she s she s all she s not even a promo code and she s she gets a promo card, she also gets that s that s that place, they s she says she s actually gets that whole place too she s at that s not she s even she s whole place she s just she s, she she s also she s entire she s chance, she says it s she will she s really she s s , she s got it she s finally she s n she s truly she s t that she also she will be that s just that seeded, she has that s actually she s little bit of it, she really s , they s not that s really that s , she really is that s at it s really .


Transcript

00:00:00.000 A horrific massacre of American citizens takes place in the Mexican border state of Sonora, new polls undercut Elizabeth Warren's case for the nomination, and the Washington Nationals show Trump some love.
00:00:09.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:10.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:16.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is sponsored by ExpressVPN.
00:00:18.000 Stop putting your online data at risk.
00:00:20.000 Get protected at expressvpn.com slash Ben.
00:00:23.000 Okay, so the big news of the morning is really horrific news from the Mexican border state of Sonora.
00:00:30.000 Mexico has been, for a very, very long time, a deeply hellacious and violent place, at least in certain segments of the country.
00:00:38.000 There was just a couple of years ago a massive controversy over a study, it was in 2017, showing that Mexico is the second deadliest country in the world, like more deadly than every country other than Syria.
00:00:50.000 That was an annual survey by the International Institute for Strategic Studies that showed that Mexico's death toll was surpassed only by that in Syria.
00:00:58.000 President Trump at the time retweeted a link to a CNN article on the report.
00:01:03.000 Parts of Mexico, according to the UK Guardian, have suffered horrific violence since the then-president Felipe Calderón declared war on organized crime a decade ago.
00:01:10.000 The struggle, as of 2017, had claimed an estimated 200,000 lives and left more than 30,000 people missing.
00:01:15.000 That was as of two years ago, so the numbers are much larger now.
00:01:19.000 Mexico claims that large swathes of the country are unaffected by drug violence.
00:01:23.000 And he said, well, it's not like Syria, because the whole country there is engulfed.
00:01:25.000 But the fact is that the country of Mexico has been plagued by severe corruption issues, Extraordinary acts of violence in which you will actually see mobile gangs of cartels actually take over entire areas of the country.
00:01:41.000 The country is so poorly governed that there have been serious questions about the relationship between various administrations in Mexico and the drug cartels.
00:01:50.000 Are the drug cartels paying for those administrations?
00:01:52.000 Are they the ones really in control of the government?
00:01:54.000 Can Mexico actually control all of this?
00:01:56.000 It makes a pretty solid case for why there should be a border wall for President Trump.
00:02:00.000 Well, that case burst back out into the open today.
00:02:03.000 After a horrific massacre of nine Americans in Mexico, we'll get to that story in just one second.
00:02:10.000 First, let's talk about saving some money on a brighter note.
00:02:13.000 The fact is that the holidays are approaching.
00:02:15.000 And because the holidays are approaching, it's time for you to do a little bit of holiday shopping.
00:02:19.000 But the fact is that you can look for all the discount codes you want, and you probably aren't going to find all of them.
00:02:24.000 This is why you ought to be using Honey.
00:02:26.000 Honey is a free browser extension that automatically finds the best promo codes wherever you shop online.
00:02:31.000 You just load it up, and then it runs in the background of your computer.
00:02:34.000 Every time you shop, Honey will provide you with discounts.
00:02:36.000 I mean, like, almost literally every time you shop.
00:02:38.000 I've saved probably hundreds of dollars using Honey already.
00:02:41.000 Honey has found it's over 10 million members, over a billion dollars in savings.
00:02:45.000 Honey has over 100,000 plus five-star reviews on the Google Chrome store.
00:02:48.000 It works with all the sites, including Amazon.com.
00:02:51.000 If you're buying gifts this holiday season, you need Honey.
00:02:53.000 If you're not, you probably know somebody who is, so do them a solid and tell them about Honey.
00:02:56.000 It's free to use.
00:02:57.000 It installs in just two clicks.
00:02:58.000 Get Honey for free at joinhoney.com slash Ben.
00:03:01.000 That's joinhoney.com slash Ben.
00:03:04.000 Again, Honey can make sure that you are getting the best price for any item that you purchase.
00:03:07.000 Check them out right now at joinhoney.com slash Ben.
00:03:10.000 And it's free!
00:03:10.000 So what exactly do you have to lose?
00:03:12.000 And the answer is nothing except for you can lower your bill.
00:03:14.000 So go check them out again right now.
00:03:16.000 Joinhoney.com.
00:03:18.000 Okay, so here's the story.
00:03:20.000 In the UK, babies were burned alive after ruthless cartel killers slaughtered nine U.S.
00:03:25.000 Mormons in a targeted hit in Mexico.
00:03:27.000 The victims were ambushed by the merciless gunmen as they drove to a wedding in the border state of Sonora on Monday.
00:03:34.000 17 members of the LeBaron and Langford families were traveling in three cars when gunmen sprayed their vehicles with bullets.
00:03:40.000 Some of the victims, including babies, were then reportedly burned alive amid fears female victims were raped, according to the UK Daily Mail.
00:03:47.000 Alex LeBaron, who said he lost family members in the attack, told CNN, women and children were massacred, burnt alive.
00:03:52.000 Mothers were screaming for the fire to stop.
00:03:54.000 Several family members have now told how gunmen opened fire on one child running away and revealed how others burned to death inside a car that was torched.
00:04:01.000 Other young children managed to escape and hide by the roadside, while one of the mothers was shot in the chest as she put her hands up to surrender, according to the UK Sun.
00:04:08.000 Survivors described how one boy managed to hide his wounded siblings, some less than a year old, in bushes before he ran back to the nearby town to get help.
00:04:16.000 Others are still missing, sparking genuine concerns the death toll in the wake of the atrocity will go up.
00:04:20.000 It's unclear what motivated the killings.
00:04:22.000 They took place on a dirt road between Chihuahua and Sonora States.
00:04:24.000 But this is not the first time that members of the Breakaway Church have been attacked in northern Mexico, where their forebears settled decades ago.
00:04:31.000 In 2009, Benjamin LeBaron, an anti-crime activist related to those killed in Monday's attack, was murdered in neighboring Chihuahua State.
00:04:37.000 The authorities are even investigating whether the large family were mistaken for a rival cartel gang.
00:04:42.000 Security Minister Alfonso Durazo said that the attack could have been a case of mistaken identity between conflicting groups in the area.
00:04:49.000 Family members believe it was a targeted kidnapping after one relative reported receiving a phone call hearing screams before they were executed.
00:04:56.000 So this is just an absolute horror show.
00:04:58.000 It was revealed that one mother died saving her baby during the bloodshed.
00:05:01.000 Her name is Christina Langford Johnson, 31.
00:05:03.000 She was among the three mothers and at least six kids, including twin babies, who were killed when the gunmen ambushed their vehicles as they drove to a wedding in northern Mexico.
00:05:11.000 Christina's seven-month-old baby, Faith, was found alive on the floor in the back of the Chevy Suburban.
00:05:16.000 Relatives say the infant was rescued after spending hours inside the car with her mother's body.
00:05:20.000 It's just horrific, horrific.
00:05:23.000 Ronita LeBaron, 33, had broken down in her SUV when gunmen opened fire, torching the vehicle, causing the gas tank to explode.
00:05:29.000 She was found dead inside the bullet-ridden car along with her six-month-old babies, Titus and Tiana.
00:05:33.000 There's a video that was posted on social media.
00:05:34.000 from Crystal 10 and Howard 12, were also reportedly killed in the attack.
00:05:38.000 Eight miles ahead, Christina and Donna Langford, 43, and two of Donna's children, Trevor and Rogan, three, Trevor was 11, Rogan was three, were also killed in other SUVs.
00:05:46.000 Donna's seven other children were shot but survived, according to claims.
00:05:49.000 And further, children are understood to be missing after they escaped from the flames and fled.
00:05:54.000 There's a video that was posted on social media.
00:05:56.000 We did pull it, but we can't show it because it's just too graphic for Facebook or any of the other places that air this show.
00:06:01.000 A male voice in an American accent who's a reported relative.
00:06:05.000 He says, this is for the record, Nita and four of my grandchildren are burnt and shot up.
00:06:10.000 All the victims lived in a Mormon community in Lemoore, about 70 miles south of Douglas, Arizona.
00:06:13.000 They had dual U.S.
00:06:14.000 and Mexican citizenship.
00:06:16.000 Some of their community worship with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Mormon.
00:06:20.000 Others are from polygamous offshoots of the Mormon church.
00:06:24.000 Leah Staden, who grew up in the same Mormon community, said her brother found one of the bullet-written cars with charred bodies inside.
00:06:30.000 Absolutely horrific.
00:06:32.000 Horrific.
00:06:34.000 One of the relatives said the victims were innocent and were caught up in a war involving rival drug cartels.
00:06:38.000 When President Trump immediately got involved, he suggested that it may be time for the United States to get involved.
00:06:47.000 He tweeted out, A wonderful family and friends from Utah got caught between two vicious drug cartels who were shooting at each other, with the result being many great American people killed, including young children and some missing.
00:06:57.000 If Mexico needs or requests help in cleaning out these monsters, the United States stands ready, willing, and able to get involved and do the job quickly and effectively.
00:07:05.000 The great new president of Mexico has made this a big issue, but the cartels have become so large and powerful, you sometimes need an army to defeat an army.
00:07:12.000 This is the time for Mexico, with the help of the United States, to wage war on the drug cartels and wipe them off the face of the earth.
00:07:17.000 We merely await a call from your great new president.
00:07:21.000 Now, the response from the media has obviously been somewhat subdued, because on the one hand, they don't want Trump to build a wall.
00:07:27.000 On the other hand, they don't want Trump to get involved in fighting the Mexican drug cartels, and you really cannot have it both ways.
00:07:32.000 There's a third solution that some in the libertarian movement have proposed, which is legalizing drugs on the American side of the border, thus Quashing the demand for drug cartels on the Mexican side of the border.
00:07:43.000 You legalize it, all this becomes mainstream.
00:07:45.000 You can have actual legal farms that produce all of this stuff.
00:07:48.000 But the fact is that people who are in the drug industry in Mexico are not going to turn to banking if things change in the United States.
00:07:55.000 They're going to continue to find other ways of involving themselves in lucrative illegal activity.
00:08:00.000 That's why they moved from, for example, marijuana over to harder drugs as the United States became more accustomed to marijuana.
00:08:06.000 Wherever the profit is, is where the drug cartels are going to move.
00:08:09.000 The bigger issue in Mexico is the fact that the administration in Mexico, and this has been true for decades at this point, they're stuck between a little bit of a rock and a hard place.
00:08:16.000 On the one hand, Some of these presidents presumably would like to see the drug cartels go.
00:08:21.000 On the other hand, if they call on the United States to help them, which really is maybe the only option here, then they could immediately be ousted by the people of Mexico, who are not particularly fond of America getting involved in Mexican politics.
00:08:33.000 The last time the United States got militarily involved in Mexico was 1914, when the United States invaded Veracruz, and that didn't go particularly well for either the United States or Mexico.
00:08:43.000 So, what exactly is the solution to this?
00:08:44.000 Well, the first solution, obviously, is yes, there needs to be a wall.
00:08:48.000 We do not want this stuff crossing America's southern border, leaving broad swaths of the American southern border open to drug cartels who are using those borders as thoroughfares for guns, drugs, human trafficking.
00:09:00.000 It's unthinkable.
00:09:01.000 I mean, if Trump cannot make the case for a border wall in the aftermath of an attack like this, Then it's very difficult to imagine how he could make the case for a border wall.
00:09:01.000 Really, it's unthinkable.
00:09:09.000 And if Democrats can make a case against a border wall in the aftermath of an attack like this, they're going to have to explain why.
00:09:15.000 And if they say, well, all this is just happening in Mexico.
00:09:17.000 It's not crossing the border.
00:09:18.000 Talk to people who are living in some of the border cities where there is no barrier.
00:09:18.000 Yeah.
00:09:22.000 It's easy to say El Paso is doing well.
00:09:24.000 Right.
00:09:24.000 El Paso has a wall.
00:09:26.000 If you look at some of the border areas in Mexico, rates of violence have skyrocketed thanks to the involvement of the drug cartels.
00:09:32.000 Now, the fact is that the United States has long considered the possibility of having to get involved militarily to help out the Mexican government.
00:09:41.000 But as I said, the Mexican government has proved itself unwilling to actually move forward with anything remotely like that.
00:09:47.000 In fact, the current president of Mexico, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who is a member of the political left there, Well, that isn't working either.
00:09:57.000 It turns out that the only way to wipe out actual criminal cartels is to kill members of the actual criminal cartels.
00:10:01.000 you try to work with them, you don't try to get violent with them, that merely escalates the situation.
00:10:06.000 Well, that isn't working either.
00:10:08.000 It turns out that the only way to wipe out actual criminal cartels is to kill members of the actual criminal cartels.
00:10:15.000 As I say, a case to be made for legalization of drugs in the United States that would presumably lower the market for these drug cartels in the first place and lower their power by extension, But that's not going to happen anytime soon, particularly with some of the harder drugs that we're talking about in the middle of an opioid epidemic.
00:10:31.000 And the fact is that a lot of these drug cartels are trafficking in precisely the kinds of opioids, particularly heroin, lactar heroin, that have caused the opioid epidemic to break out with such viciousness in the United States, leading to tens of thousands of lost lives in the United States.
00:10:46.000 Just a few days ago, just a few days ago, the UK Guardian reported that Manuel Lopez Obrador is under sustained pressure to rethink his non-confrontational security strategy amid lingering questions over the botched arrest of the son of El Chapo Guzman.
00:11:01.000 We'll get to that in just one second.
00:11:03.000 First, let's talk for a second about political coverage.
00:11:06.000 There's a world of fake news out there.
00:11:08.000 Controversy is just constant all the time.
00:11:11.000 But in politics, here's the reality.
00:11:12.000 When everybody says, well, things have never been as bad as this before, it's like, well, Just take a look at America's history.
00:11:18.000 Follow along from ballot to fallout in Podcast Network's sizzling new podcast, Political Scandals, which will remind you that, yeah, we've had some scandals before.
00:11:25.000 Every Tuesday leading up to the 2020 election, Political Scandals will count down the 52 most scandalous events in American history, uncovering the ugly truth behind some of our most infamous elected officials.
00:11:35.000 Each episode will dive into a different rise and fall, exploring the impact it had on the careers involved and the lasting effects on American history.
00:11:41.000 From Watergate and Lewinsky to Chappaquiddick and the 2000 recount, dig deeper into the stories you thought you knew or had no idea had changed the state of American politics.
00:11:50.000 Red state, blue state, left or right, none of these scandals are off limits on the new podcast series, Political Scandals.
00:11:55.000 It's free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts or visit podcast.com slash political scandals to listen now.
00:12:02.000 So I just want to remind yourself that things can always be worse.
00:12:04.000 Listen to this podcast, Political Scandals.
00:12:06.000 Remind yourself that America, we've had these issues before.
00:12:08.000 Podcast.com slash political scandals.
00:12:11.000 As I say, the UK Guardian is reporting that Obrador is already under serious pressure to rethink his strategy with regard to the cartels.
00:12:19.000 Ovidio Guzman was briefly held in the northern city of Culiacan last month, but was freed after hundreds of gunmen launched a wave of attacks on security forces and blocked roads with burning vehicles.
00:12:29.000 The show of strength shocked even the most hardened observers of organized crime in Mexico.
00:12:33.000 Ismael Borges, editor of the investigative Sinaloa Weekly, Rio Doce described the moment as a watershed.
00:12:38.000 He said, life goes on, yes, but not in the same way.
00:12:40.000 We don't know if this will now be the reaction every time criminal groups feel threatened.
00:12:44.000 We know even less what the federal government intends to do about it.
00:12:47.000 The president of Mexico insists the incident marks a turning point away from the punitive policies of his two predecessors.
00:12:52.000 He says this is no longer a war.
00:12:54.000 It is no longer about forced confrontation, annihilation, extermination, or killing in the heat of the moment.
00:12:59.000 He said this is about thinking how to save lives and achieve peace and tranquility in the country using other methods.
00:13:05.000 He says those other methods are social programs to alleviate extreme poverty.
00:13:08.000 Yeah, good luck with that.
00:13:10.000 I'm sorry, but if you think that social programs are going to alleviate the fact that the most profitable enterprises in Mexico right now are these drug cartels... Yeah, sure.
00:13:19.000 Sure.
00:13:21.000 He says that exhortations toward good behavior and the insistence he has now banned corruption will help.
00:13:25.000 He has also pledged to offer what he calls abrazos no brazos, hugs not bullets.
00:13:31.000 Yeah, hugs for the people who are shooting down tens of thousands of Mexican citizens, and who just shot nine American citizens as well, and burned them to death, and maybe raped them.
00:13:41.000 He's also created a new militarized national police force, though this has not yet taken a significant role in operations against organized crimes.
00:13:48.000 The problem, according to security experts, again, this is the UK Guardian reporting, is that nothing in Obrador's strategy directly addresses the terrifying power of the country's criminal underworld, which was brazenly displayed on October 17th.
00:13:59.000 Even before troops detained Guzman, convoys of heavily armed cartel gunmen were speeding to strategic positions in and around the city.
00:14:05.000 The effort to rescue Guzman held the city hostage, but also targeted the military's weakest points, such as buildings where soldiers' families live.
00:14:13.000 What we saw in Culiacan was the parallel state showing itself, said Edgardo Buscalia, an expert on organized crime at Columbia University.
00:14:20.000 Euskalia broadly agreed with Obrador's critique of his predecessors, but argued that fighting poverty cannot alone end criminality.
00:14:25.000 Many countries far poorer than Mexico suffer far less from organized crime.
00:14:30.000 Instead, the government has to start with a concerted strategy to dismantle the entrenched political and business interests which protect and profit from organized crime.
00:14:38.000 What Lopez Obrador needs is not a security strategy.
00:14:40.000 He said what he needs is an anti-mafia strategy.
00:14:43.000 But again, the problem is that there may not be the institutional power necessary at the level of the federal government in Mexico to actually take care of this problem.
00:14:49.000 A lot of the federal institutions have been honeycombed with With advocates for the cartels, with people who work with the cartels.
00:14:57.000 Police forces in Mexico have long been plagued with serious corruption problems.
00:15:00.000 People are working for the cartels while simultaneously supposedly working for the police.
00:15:07.000 There are a lot of people who are, of course, again, suggesting American involvement, but it's difficult to imagine Obrador actually calling for America to get involved at this point, which, again, leaves Trump with virtually no alternative to the building of the wall, right?
00:15:21.000 I mean, this is the point.
00:15:23.000 You can't let that violence spread north into the United States.
00:15:29.000 A horrifying, horrifying story.
00:15:31.000 There's no easy solution, and I'm waiting for solutions from the left that don't involve building a wall.
00:15:36.000 And if you say just send more money to the Mexican government, we have been sending billions of dollars to the Mexican government.
00:15:41.000 We do enormous amounts of trade with the Mexican government, presumably designed to actually strengthen the federal government in their capacity to fight all of this.
00:15:52.000 But that hasn't helped, and it's going to continue not helping so long as the Mexican drug cartels maintain this enormous sort of power.
00:16:00.000 In the United States, when we had a mafia problem, we had to activate the federal government on a massive level to destroy the mafia in the United States, and to destroy the various alcohol cartels that existed during Prohibition.
00:16:11.000 We really, really activated every resource at our disposal.
00:16:17.000 The Mexican government may not actually have those resources at their disposal, so I'm waiting to hear solutions.
00:16:23.000 People can rip on Trump for being, for going off half-cocked with regard to these tweets, but I'm not seeing any other solutions.
00:16:30.000 I really am not.
00:16:31.000 A wall, or answering Mexico's call for aid.
00:16:34.000 Those would be the only two solutions that are truly on the table at this point.
00:16:38.000 Now meanwhile, There are a bunch of brand new polls, some good for Trump, some bad for Trump.
00:16:43.000 The national polling is not particularly good for Trump.
00:16:45.000 The state polling, however, is actually quite good for Trump.
00:16:49.000 And that radically reshifts the nature of the 2020 presidential race.
00:16:55.000 This attack in Mexico should remind people that it's a cruel world out there, a cold world out there, and that the sort of open borders policy of the Democratic Party is not something the United States should be accepting under any circumstances.
00:17:06.000 The same Democratic Party saying they want to decriminalize border crossing, not at ports of entry.
00:17:10.000 They want to decriminalize that and make that not a crime anymore.
00:17:13.000 The same party that says we don't need a wall with Mexico?
00:17:16.000 Do you want to give them power?
00:17:17.000 Is that truthfully something that you want to do?
00:17:19.000 Like, this is where Trump really should be pushing.
00:17:21.000 Okay, but in the new national polling, according to the Washington Post, Dan Balz and Scott Clement reporting, one year from the 2020 election, President Trump trails some potential Democratic rivals in head-to-head matchups.
00:17:32.000 His national support level is fixed at about 40%, according to a Washington Post-ABC News poll.
00:17:37.000 The new poll highlights the degree to which most of the country already has made a judgment about the president's performance and his voting preferences next year.
00:17:44.000 Among the 39% of registered voters who approve of Trump's job performance, Trump is winning at least 95% support against each of five possible Democratic opponents.
00:17:54.000 But among the 58% of voters who disapprove of Trump, he receives no more than 7% of support.
00:18:00.000 Biden, Sanders, and Warren run strongest against the president nationally, according to this new poll.
00:18:05.000 The new poll has Biden up 17 points, 56 to 39, Warren 15 points, 55 to 40, and Sanders up 55 to 41.
00:18:13.000 Pete Buttigieg leads 52 to 41, Harris 51 to 42.
00:18:17.000 Again, in all of these numbers, Trump's stuck somewhere between 39 and 42%, but those were the same numbers that we saw in the run-up to the 2016 election as well.
00:18:24.000 We kept seeing Trump stuck in the low 40s, and then he performed at about 47% in the national election, which was enough to win him the presidency.
00:18:33.000 The poll reflects national findings, but other state surveys have shown tighter races, particularly in the swing states.
00:18:41.000 Republicans and Democrats are mostly locked into their voting intentions, but what these polls tend to show is that independents are moving away from Trump.
00:18:47.000 But that may not be the case in the near future if, again, Democrats continue to be as radical as they are.
00:18:55.000 And this is what we are seeing in the swing states.
00:18:57.000 We'll get to the swing state poll that came out from the New York Times.
00:18:59.000 It's devastating for Elizabeth Warren's case for being the presidential nominee.
00:19:03.000 We'll get to that in just one second.
00:19:05.000 First, let's talk about your sleep quality.
00:19:07.000 So I am back from Israel.
00:19:08.000 I'm back in the United States.
00:19:09.000 Not only does that mean that I'm on a better mattress than I was in Israel, not only does it mean I'm back home, which is awesome, it also means that My sleep quality is getting better thanks to the fact that I am now back on the softest sheets available.
00:19:19.000 I'm talking about Bull and Branch sheets.
00:19:21.000 Everything Bull and Branch makes, from bedding to blankets, is made from pure 100% organic cotton.
00:19:26.000 They start out super soft.
00:19:27.000 They get even softer over time.
00:19:28.000 You buy directly from them, so you're essentially paying wholesale prices.
00:19:31.000 Luxury sheets can cost up to $1,000 in the store, but Bull and Branch sheets are only a couple of hundred bucks.
00:19:36.000 Shipping is free.
00:19:37.000 You can try them for 30 nights.
00:19:38.000 There's no risk and no reason not to give them a try.
00:19:40.000 Try Bull & Branch sheets today.
00:19:42.000 I promise you'll love them.
00:19:42.000 They're so good that my wife and I, we got the Bull & Branch sheets, then we threw out all of our other sheets.
00:19:46.000 It made it almost impossible to sleep on those crap sheets that we got at the local retailer.
00:19:51.000 To get you started right now, my listeners, get $50 off your first set of sheets at bullandbranch.com, promo code Ben.
00:19:56.000 Go to bullandbranch.com today for $50 off your first set of sheets.
00:19:59.000 That's B-O-L-L and branch.com, promo code Ben, bullandbranch.com.
00:20:03.000 promo code Ben, go check them out right now.
00:20:05.000 And when you use that promo code Ben, you get 50 bucks off your first set of sheets, which is an awesome deal.
00:20:09.000 Bullandbranch.com, promo code Ben.
00:20:11.000 So as I say, the national polls for Trump are not looking particularly good.
00:20:15.000 The state polls for Trump are a different story.
00:20:17.000 So among likely voters, there was a poll came out from the New York Times yesterday, the New York Times and Siena College, and here is what it found.
00:20:23.000 It found that Joe Biden was up very slightly in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Florida, and Arizona, and down slightly in North Carolina.
00:20:30.000 All of this within the margin of error.
00:20:33.000 It shows that Bernie Sanders was ahead in Michigan by three, but behind Trump in all of those other swing states.
00:20:38.000 And here's the kicker.
00:20:39.000 It shows that Elizabeth Warren is down to Trump in every single swing state.
00:20:45.000 All of them, according to the New York Times, Siena College poll.
00:20:48.000 It shows Warren down four in Michigan, down two in Pennsylvania, down two in Wisconsin, down four in Florida, even in Arizona, down four in North Carolina.
00:20:56.000 Which shows, again, that the national polling numbers are less indicative of where this race is going than those state polling numbers.
00:21:02.000 People can say this thing is over, Trump's done, he's toast, but that's not the reality.
00:21:07.000 And Elizabeth Warren, I think she's set up for a fall here.
00:21:10.000 I think she is.
00:21:11.000 I mean, remember, at the same time that we are seeing American citizens being slaughtered just south of the American border and Democrats are trying to say that there shouldn't be a wall.
00:21:21.000 The Democrats are also trying to claim that America's foreign policy is deeply egregious.
00:21:28.000 For example, just to give an example, why is Elizabeth Warren set up for a fall?
00:21:32.000 Again, her case has to be that she is electable, but if she's not perceived as electable, then she's basically toast.
00:21:37.000 Right now, she is coasting on months of positive media coverage.
00:21:41.000 But I don't know how long that's gonna last as the American people see her.
00:21:43.000 I mean, for example, yesterday, Elizabeth Warren was doing a Q&A, and some radical leftist got up and suggested that the American government supports genocide.
00:21:52.000 And Elizabeth Warren nodded along with this.
00:21:54.000 Here is this bizarre exchange.
00:21:55.000 Right now, the United States is bombing at least seven countries.
00:21:58.000 We support genocides in Palestine and in Yemen.
00:22:02.000 Um, as president, will you stop U.S. support of murder, whether it's intersections, or in support, or in support?
00:22:10.000 I'd like to refrain on this.
00:22:13.000 Um, you know, here's how I see it.
00:22:17.000 We want to be a great nation, lead the world.
00:22:22.000 Then we need to live our values every single day.
00:22:27.000 And that means we don't support, for example, what's going on in Yemen.
00:22:33.000 I like your take on this.
00:22:34.000 He literally said that America supports genocide in not only Yemen but quote-unquote Palestine.
00:22:38.000 By the way, if you think there's a genocide in Palestine, I urge you to go visit Palestine.
00:22:42.000 Okay, a state that does not exist.
00:22:43.000 It's like Narnia.
00:22:44.000 But I urge you to go visit the Palestinian territories where the population has been growing hand over fist.
00:22:49.000 I mean, rapidly.
00:22:51.000 There's some five to six million Palestinians who are now living in the so-called West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
00:22:57.000 That's the worst genocide of all time.
00:22:58.000 But Elizabeth Warren just humors that kind of stuff.
00:23:00.000 So in a threatening world, in a world of actual threats, are people going to turn to Elizabeth Warren?
00:23:05.000 And as it turns out, Elizabeth Warren's plans are garbage too.
00:23:09.000 So if she is not perceived as likable, if she is not perceived as credible, If she's not perceived as able to beat Trump, you could start to see the media turn away from her.
00:23:19.000 And again, the hits keep on coming with regard to the Medicare for All plan that she released over the weekend.
00:23:23.000 I mean, even other Democrats are looking at her and crossing their eyes.
00:23:28.000 For example, Stephen Ratner was a counselor to the Treasury Secretary in the Obama administration.
00:23:32.000 He's a lifelong Democrat.
00:23:34.000 He has a piece in the New York Times today called, The Warren Way is the Wrong Way.
00:23:38.000 He says Senator Elizabeth Warren has unveiled her vision for how to pay for Medicare for All, a daunting mountain of new taxes and fees.
00:23:44.000 Thanks for providing us, Ms.
00:23:45.000 Warren, with yet more evidence that a Warren presidency is a terrifying prospect, one brought closer by your surge in the polls.
00:23:52.000 Left to her own devices, she would extend the reach and weight of the federal government far further into the economy than anything even President Franklin Roosevelt imagined, effectively abandoning the limited government model that has mostly served us well.
00:24:03.000 Ms.
00:24:04.000 Warren may call herself a capitalist, but her panoply of minutely detailed plans suggests otherwise.
00:24:08.000 Again, this is an Obama official.
00:24:10.000 She would turn America's uniquely successful public-private relationship into a dirigiste European-style system.
00:24:17.000 If you want to live in France, economically, Elizabeth Warren should be your candidate.
00:24:21.000 He says, as a lifelong Democrat, I freely acknowledge that substantial reforms are much needed, both to achieve a more equitable distribution of income and wealth, and to make good on Donald Trump's failed pledge to raise the economy's growth rate.
00:24:32.000 But the Warren way would be, quite simply, the wrong way.
00:24:35.000 To date, public attention has understandably focused on Ms.
00:24:37.000 Warren's support for Medicare for All, as well as her long list of other new social programs like the Green New Deal, free college tuition, universal childcare, student debt forgiveness, and on and on.
00:24:46.000 Her armada of changes would be highly disruptive, for example, to the 156 million Americans who have private health insurance, and expensive, at least $23 trillion over the next decade.
00:24:55.000 By the way, it's not $23 trillion over the next decade.
00:24:58.000 It is more like 50 trillion dollars over the next decade if you're including the already present spending with regard to healthcare in the United States.
00:25:07.000 She wants to expand new taxes, increasing federal revenues by more than 50%.
00:25:12.000 Plus, she wants to impose vast new regulatory burdens, and she's also lying about all of this.
00:25:17.000 She's also lying.
00:25:18.000 I mean, her proposals are fully insane.
00:25:21.000 And Stephen Ratner points out that workers would occupy 40% of board seats, another page out of the failed European playbook.
00:25:27.000 Even Germany has had a significantly slower growth rate than ours for many years because of this sort of stuff.
00:25:33.000 And then she wants the Department of Economic Development charged with creating and defending good American jobs.
00:25:38.000 But really, this is the government trying to pick winners and losers and raise tariffs.
00:25:43.000 And then she wants new committees to allow consumers and rural areas to delay trade deals that worry them.
00:25:49.000 It's just a disaster.
00:25:50.000 So Ratner going after her.
00:25:52.000 Okay, the fact is, by the way, that her, again, her Medicare for All plan is just a perfect window into the bizarre mind of Elizabeth Warren.
00:26:03.000 According to Reason.com, her plan to finance Medicare for All at a total price tag of nearly $52 trillion, including about $20 trillion of new government spending, an estimate that is probably low.
00:26:15.000 She keeps saying that she's not going to increase middle class taxes.
00:26:18.000 But that's obviously false.
00:26:20.000 For example, the chief trick that she plays when she proposes Medicare for All is that she says that the employee-based insurance program, so your employer pays in and then you pay in.
00:26:31.000 Your employer pays in maybe 8%, you pay in maybe 7%, and that pays for your healthcare.
00:26:35.000 She's just gonna take all of that and turn that into a tax that goes to the federal government.
00:26:39.000 That's called a tax.
00:26:40.000 Now, people may say, well, it doesn't come out of my bottom line.
00:26:43.000 Well, it does because, see, here's the thing, your employer-based healthcare insurance is actually good.
00:26:47.000 Medicare?
00:26:48.000 Not nearly as good.
00:26:49.000 So, she's just converting private expenditures into a tax and then not calling it a tax.
00:26:55.000 She refers to it as an employer Medicare contribution.
00:26:58.000 Oh, it's voluntary now.
00:27:00.000 Sure, that is, in fact, a tax, obviously speaking.
00:27:04.000 Also, she is counting on insane statistics.
00:27:07.000 So for example, she says that we are going to increase IRS enforcement on billionaires.
00:27:14.000 And she says that would generate $55 billion in revenue over a decade.
00:27:18.000 Okay, she says that it would generate, I'm sorry, wrong.
00:27:21.000 $550 billion in revenue over the decade.
00:27:24.000 Maybe $2.3 trillion.
00:27:26.000 I'm getting this wrong again.
00:27:28.000 $2.3 trillion in additional federal revenue just by staffing up the IRS.
00:27:32.000 That is 40 times the estimate by the Congressional Budget Office.
00:27:35.000 So she's just falsifying all of this stuff.
00:27:38.000 It's just sheer, absolute nonsense.
00:27:40.000 The Wall Street Journal editorial board points this out.
00:27:43.000 They say she has $30 trillion to finance, but Warren waves her wand and says the bill will really be $21 trillion.
00:27:50.000 She makes the rest vanish by positing magical savings from things like comprehensive payment reform.
00:27:55.000 She says hospitals would be reimbursed at an average of 110% of current Medicare rates, but hospitals now rely on private insurance, which would be gone in the future.
00:28:04.000 Also, she said she's going to restore healthcare competition by, what, abolishing healthcare competition?
00:28:10.000 In a word, she wants rationing, which is not a shock.
00:28:13.000 That is where all of this is going.
00:28:14.000 So, as we see these polls in the swing states that show Warren trailing Trump, You could see a move away from Elizabeth Warren and back to, wait for it, Joe Biden.
00:28:23.000 I'll get to a new poll in Nevada that shows that's exactly what is happening in just one second.
00:28:28.000 First, let's talk about staying in shape.
00:28:30.000 Now, you may have noticed that Shapiro, lately you look like you've lost a little bit of weight.
00:28:35.000 I've been getting comments around the office.
00:28:37.000 But, just bear with me.
00:28:37.000 Me too.
00:28:40.000 The fact is that if you want to lose weight, if you want to look better, there is a great way to do it.
00:28:43.000 And that is to use the Noom app.
00:28:45.000 Noom is just fantastic.
00:28:47.000 Noom gives you specific goals you want to achieve, and it's not just losing weight.
00:28:51.000 It helps you achieve an actual proper balance of exercise and diet.
00:28:56.000 It teaches you information about how you can break your habits.
00:28:58.000 Noom is all about changing your habit structure, and when you're talking about losing weight or being more healthy, it is changing that habit structure that actually matters.
00:29:05.000 It's based in psychology.
00:29:06.000 Noom teaches you why you do the things you do and arms you with the tools to break the bad habits and replace them with better ones.
00:29:12.000 It's a healthy, easy-to-stick-to way of life.
00:29:14.000 Instead of making food good or bad or off-limits, Noom teaches moderation, which actually makes it livable and can be used in conjunction with many pre-existing popular diets if you actually want.
00:29:23.000 You don't have to change it all in one day.
00:29:25.000 Noom makes it easy to do this day-by-day and make your life better.
00:29:27.000 Go check them out right now at noom.com slash Shapiro.
00:29:31.000 You have nothing to lose except the weight.
00:29:32.000 Visit noom.com slash Shapiro to start that trial today.
00:29:35.000 Again, that's noom.com slash Shapiro.
00:29:37.000 It's the last weight loss program you will ever need.
00:29:40.000 More on the on the possible fading of Elizabeth Warren.
00:29:44.000 We'll get to that in just one second.
00:29:47.000 But first, you're gonna have to go and subscribe over at DailyWire.com.
00:29:50.000 $9.99 a month gets you the subscription.
00:29:51.000 $99 a year gets you the annual subscription.
00:29:54.000 If you're not already a subscriber, you're really missing out, head on over to DailyWire.com slash subscribe.
00:29:58.000 For as little as 10 bucks a month, you get our articles, ad free, access to all of our live broadcasts, our full show library, select bonus content, our exclusive DailyWire app, which is a pretty great feature.
00:30:06.000 If you haven't checked it out yet, you can chat with me.
00:30:08.000 If you choose the all-new, all-access plan, you'll get that, plus the legendary Leftist Tears Tumblr.
00:30:14.000 Ooh.
00:30:15.000 And our brand new Ask Me Anything style discussion feature that allows you to engage our hosts, writers, and special guests on a weekly basis.
00:30:20.000 So, stop depriving yourself.
00:30:22.000 Come join the fun today over at dailywire.com.
00:30:24.000 We always appreciate it.
00:30:25.000 We are the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast and radio show in the nation.
00:30:28.000 OK, so as I say, when it comes to Elizabeth Warren, what you may see in the near future is Joe Biden starting to recover in some of the in some of the early states.
00:30:44.000 So, her entire campaign right now is staked on Iowa and New Hampshire.
00:30:47.000 Buttigieg is making some serious moves in Iowa.
00:30:50.000 If he takes Iowa, and Warren takes New Hampshire, Biden is still very much in the race.
00:30:54.000 Because, at that point, it's sort of a split.
00:30:56.000 And a three-way race benefits the person who's the biggest name.
00:30:59.000 Right now, Biden is continuing to hold a 10-point lead over Warren and Bernie Sanders among likely Democratic presidential caucus-goers in Nevada.
00:31:07.000 And that is buoyed by the fact that people want somebody who can beat Trump.
00:31:12.000 The poll found that the former vice president's lead narrows to between 3 and 4 points among respondents who described themselves as being strongly committed to their first-choice candidate and identified either Warren or Sanders as their top second-choice pick for the presidency, indicating that the race is far from settled.
00:31:26.000 But again, the more people see of Elizabeth Warren, the less they like Elizabeth Warren.
00:31:30.000 And I think that is a trend that is likely to continue over time.
00:31:35.000 She's pretty terrible.
00:31:36.000 She's pretty terrible.
00:31:37.000 And Bernie Sanders is going to go at Elizabeth Warren, right?
00:31:38.000 Now she's the front runner, and she's the front runner early.
00:31:41.000 That means that Bernie Sanders is going to turn his guns on her.
00:31:43.000 It means Pete Buttigieg is going to turn his guns on her.
00:31:45.000 It means Biden will turn his guns on her.
00:31:46.000 It means Kamala Harris will turn her guns on her.
00:31:48.000 So things are going to get ugly for Warren here pretty quickly.
00:31:51.000 Take, for example, Bernie Sanders.
00:31:52.000 Sanders is looking at Warren and saying, why is she getting all the attention?
00:31:55.000 She steals my ideas.
00:31:57.000 And then she lies about my ideas.
00:31:59.000 And here I am, guys.
00:32:00.000 You want the real deal?
00:32:01.000 You want the real deal?
00:32:02.000 You want some pudding?
00:32:03.000 Come to me.
00:32:04.000 Free pudding and also socialism.
00:32:07.000 Here at the Bernie Sanders headquarters.
00:32:09.000 But at least Sanders is honest.
00:32:10.000 He says, listen, I'm not going to lie to you and tell you Medicare for All is going to be free.
00:32:13.000 Because we are getting rid of the profiteering and the corruption in the healthcare industry, the drug companies and the insurance companies, we'll be able to provide all of that to people at a fraction of the cost they are paying right now.
00:32:31.000 Not here to tell you it's going to be free, you're going to have to pay something, but it's going to be a heck of a lot less than what you're currently paying.
00:32:37.000 So, I mean, there's Bernie at least being more honest about all of this.
00:32:40.000 I think that Elizabeth Warren, who's a media creation, there's a possibility she starts to fall apart somewhere in here.
00:32:45.000 Okay, other big news of the day.
00:32:47.000 So, a couple of pieces of big news.
00:32:49.000 So, our friend James O'Keefe, the undercover journalist over Project Veritas, he has now gotten hold of tape of an ABC News anchor saying on an open mic, her name is Amy Robach, and she was caught on camera slamming her own network for allegedly sitting on the Jeffrey Epstein story three years ago.
00:33:06.000 Here's a little bit of what that sounded like.
00:33:07.000 It's pretty incredible, actually.
00:33:09.000 She had pictures.
00:33:10.000 She had everything.
00:33:11.000 She was in hiding for 12 years.
00:33:12.000 We convinced her to come out.
00:33:13.000 We convinced her to talk to us.
00:33:16.000 It was unbelievable what we had.
00:33:17.000 Clinton.
00:33:18.000 We had everything.
00:33:22.000 I tried for three years to get it on to no avail, and now it's all coming out, and it's like these new revelations, and I freaking had all of it.
00:33:30.000 I'm so pissed right now.
00:33:33.000 Okay, and she's talking off-air about the fact that now all these revelations were coming out about Jeffrey Epstein.
00:33:37.000 She says, I had this years ago and ABC News quashed it and sat on it.
00:33:41.000 And now she has issued a statement.
00:33:43.000 Robotch, I mean, this just shows you how the media works.
00:33:45.000 Bad look for the media, right?
00:33:46.000 In the aftermath of NBC News basically quashing the Harvey Weinstein story for years until Ronan Farrow broke it.
00:33:52.000 And now it appears that ABC News was sitting on the Jeffrey Epstein stuff for years.
00:33:56.000 These are the media you are going to trust?
00:33:59.000 The public trust in the media is already at an all-time low.
00:34:02.000 This is certainly not going to help, nor should it.
00:34:03.000 Robach said her comments were made, quote, in a private moment of frustration.
00:34:07.000 I was upset that an important interview I'd conducted with Virginia Roberts didn't air because it could not obtain corroborating evidence to meet ABC's editorial standards about her allegations regarding Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew, and Bill Clinton.
00:34:17.000 She added that in the years since the 2015 interview, no one ever told me or the team to stop reporting on Jeffrey Epstein, and we have continued to aggressively pursue this important story.
00:34:26.000 An ABC News statement issued says, at the time, not all of our reporting met our standards to air, but we have never stopped investigating the story.
00:34:33.000 Well, you kind of did, didn't you?
00:34:35.000 I mean, just a little bit?
00:34:37.000 I mean, the fact is that if it didn't meet your standards to air, well then, presumably, you should have kept digging.
00:34:47.000 Presumably you should have kept digging.
00:34:49.000 So that is a pretty damning indictment of ABC News.
00:34:55.000 That's not what she's saying there, right?
00:34:56.000 I mean, what she is saying in that clip is that she had the interview, she had the goods, she says she has pictures there.
00:35:03.000 So it's different than what she is saying in her statement.
00:35:05.000 In her statement, she's like, oh, well, we didn't have all the goods.
00:35:07.000 But in that tape, she's saying, yeah, we pretty much had all of the goods.
00:35:12.000 If the media was involved in covering up or at least neglecting to investigate Jeffrey Epstein because they thought that it was going to hurt the Clintons, that's a massive, massive story, obviously.
00:35:23.000 And goes again to the level of media bias that is involved in all of this.
00:35:29.000 Pretty astonishing.
00:35:31.000 Mollie Hemingway over at the Federalist, she tweets, in addition to these statements not actually being responsive to what the initial hot mic claims were, mostly what this shows is that ABC News has an indefensibly different standard for e.g.
00:35:41.000 the Kavanaugh allegations or for the Covington boys than it does for Clinton-connected pedophiles, which is of course exactly right.
00:35:47.000 They're willing to run with any level of speculation, including false speculation, about anything.
00:35:52.000 About anything.
00:35:56.000 That hurts Republicans, but if it could possibly damn the Clintons, then all of a sudden they run away from this stuff, like wholesale.
00:36:02.000 And then you wonder why the American people have trouble trusting the media?
00:36:05.000 That would be the reason.
00:36:06.000 Speaking of the media, by the way, they went nuts yesterday because President Trump hosted the Washington Nationals at the White House, and obviously, this was a disaster.
00:36:14.000 I mean, the media only likes sports teams that boycott Trump's White House.
00:36:18.000 Yesterday, at the White House, Trump hosted the Washington National.
00:36:21.000 It turns out that a bunch of members of the Nationals are actually Trump fans, which is not really a shock.
00:36:26.000 If you look at sort of the political breakdown of various sports leagues, the NBA is obviously the most anti-Trump.
00:36:33.000 The NFL is somewhere in the middle.
00:36:35.000 The MLB, Major League Baseball, tends to be...
00:36:39.000 Where's Kurt?
00:36:40.000 majority pro-Trump, more of a Republican league, more of a conservative league, at least in terms of the players.
00:36:44.000 And the NHL, I believe, tends to be overwhelmingly, overwhelmingly more conservative.
00:36:49.000 And that's none of that is a particular shock given the polarized racial politics of the country right now.
00:36:54.000 But the media went nuts because some of the Washington Nationals players were committing the great and evil sin of wearing MAGA hats.
00:37:01.000 So Kurt Suzuki, who's the catcher for the Washington Nationals, he put on a MAGA hat.
00:37:05.000 Here is what that looked like.
00:37:07.000 Where's Kurt?
00:37:08.000 Where is he? - Come on.
00:37:11.000 It's coming.
00:37:13.000 Come here.
00:37:13.000 Say a couple words.
00:37:14.000 Come on.
00:37:27.000 I love you all.
00:37:29.000 I love you all.
00:37:30.000 Thank you.
00:37:34.000 What a job he did!
00:37:36.000 I didn't know that was going to happen.
00:37:38.000 How dare he wear a MAGA hat?
00:37:39.000 The media went nuts over all of this.
00:37:41.000 Ryan Zimmerman, who plays third base for the Washington Nationals, he also got up there and he thanked President Trump, which, of course, is terrible.
00:37:47.000 It's one thing if you go to the White House and you praise Barack Obama.
00:37:49.000 If you praise Trump, this is obviously a terrible, terrible thing.
00:37:51.000 Here's Ryan Zimmerman thanking Trump yesterday.
00:37:53.000 Mr. President, me and my teammates, first of all, I'd like to thank you for having us here.
00:37:58.000 This is an incredible honor that I think all of us will never forget.
00:38:03.000 And we'd also like to thank you for keeping everyone here safe in our country and continuing to make America the greatest country to live in the world.
00:38:16.000 That's right.
00:38:18.000 Thank you, man.
00:38:18.000 That's so nice of you.
00:38:19.000 Thank you very much.
00:38:22.000 Terrible, terrible, terrible.
00:38:23.000 This prompted a spasm of stupidity from a left-wing outlet called Poma Report on Twitter, talking about how wearing a MAGA hat is basically like being a Nazi.
00:38:33.000 This Palmer Report person said, putting on a MAGA hat is a form of racist hate speech and an implicit threat of violence.
00:38:39.000 Implicit threat of violence.
00:38:40.000 Kurt Suzuki should be banned from baseball.
00:38:42.000 If you don't like this tweet, F you.
00:38:43.000 So, just to be straight, if you wear a MAGA hat, you should be banned from baseball entirely.
00:38:48.000 My favorite was Matt Iglesias tweeted out about this.
00:38:50.000 He's like, well, there are a lot of white non-college educated players in the MLB.
00:38:54.000 Ryan Zimmerman went to University of Virginia and Kurt Suzuki is not white.
00:38:57.000 So, you're making a couple of basic category errors in all of this.
00:39:03.000 Now the fact is that Democrats are not taking into account the backlash that is going to attend to the insanity of the radical left, to the insanity of Elizabeth Warren, to the insanity of Bernie Sanders.
00:39:15.000 President Trump held a rally last night, and his basic point is going to play well.
00:39:19.000 As I keep saying, if President Trump simply campaigns, simply campaigns on pointing his finger at the Democrats, he'll probably be okay.
00:39:29.000 He'll probably be okay.
00:39:31.000 I mean, here was President Trump yesterday at a rally explaining the Democratic agenda with regard to indoctrinating American kids.
00:39:36.000 They want to indoctrinate your children, you know this?
00:39:40.000 Destroy anyone who holds traditional American values.
00:39:44.000 All you have to do is ask the boys from Covington Catholic High School, some of whom are here tonight.
00:39:55.000 The far left wants to impose their authoritarian ideology on the nation, telling you what to think, what to believe, and how you should live.
00:40:05.000 Okay, and he's exactly right about all this.
00:40:07.000 And then they lie about it, right?
00:40:08.000 Joy Behar let the cat out of the bag yesterday on The View.
00:40:11.000 She said, yeah, that's kind of what we want to do, all those things, but we have to keep it kind of a secret, guys.
00:40:15.000 That's really what we have to do, is keep it a secret.
00:40:18.000 They should not tell everything they're going to do.
00:40:19.000 Like, if you're going to take people's guns away, wait until you get elected, then take the guns away.
00:40:23.000 Don't tell them ahead of time.
00:40:26.000 By the way, that's what people like me think you're going to do.
00:40:30.000 That's what people like me think is going to happen, so I appreciate his honesty.
00:40:34.000 OK, with all of that said, I mean, this is the reason.
00:40:37.000 I mean, Meghan McCain is right over there.
00:40:38.000 We can read between the lines, guys.
00:40:40.000 We know exactly what it is that you are doing.
00:40:42.000 And so Democrats have been forced, as I keep saying over and over, and this is this is the feeling I think the American people additional are increasingly getting the feeling.
00:40:49.000 that the reason Democrats are so focused in on impeachment is not because they believe that Trump did anything extraordinarily vile or terrible in Ukraine, anything so beyond the pale.
00:40:57.000 It's because they think that if they don't impeach Trump and sully him in some new and unforeseen way, then he will win re-election.
00:41:04.000 That is obviously what is in Democrats' minds.
00:41:08.000 Now, with that said, there are some updates on the progression of the investigation.
00:41:13.000 The Democrats have been releasing the transcript of some of the conversations that have been had in the Intelligence Committee yesterday.
00:41:19.000 They released House transcripts with former Ambassador to Ukraine Mary Ivanovich, as well as Ambassador Michael McKinley, who is a senior aide to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.
00:41:28.000 So.
00:41:29.000 And none of these transcripts look good for Trump, but none of them actually uncover criminal activity.
00:41:33.000 And none of these transcripts are wonderful looking, but none of them actually suggest that Trump was involved in the sort of criminal impeachable activity that Democrats have been claiming.
00:41:43.000 And so, Democrats are looking for new sources.
00:41:45.000 One of the sources they're counting on, and they're very excited about this, is Lev Parnas.
00:41:49.000 He's an indicted Ukrainian-American businessman who has ties to President Trump's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani.
00:41:55.000 According to Reuters, he is now prepared to comply with requests for records and testimony from congressional impeachment investigators, according to his lawyer.
00:42:02.000 Parnas helped Giuliani look for dirt on Trump's political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden.
00:42:07.000 And he's a key figure in this impeachment inquiry because presumably Parnas could theoretically testify that Giuliani wasn't concerned about overwhelming corruption in Ukraine.
00:42:15.000 He wasn't interested in Burisma.
00:42:16.000 He wasn't interested in generalized Ukrainian corruption.
00:42:20.000 Parnas could say, maybe secondhand, that Giuliani had said, Trump wants to get Biden, help me out.
00:42:24.000 So Parnas could be a difficult witness against Trump.
00:42:28.000 Now, it is also true that Parnas is currently under indictment.
00:42:32.000 So that means that he is not the most trustworthy witness.
00:42:34.000 You could end up with a Michael Cohen problem for Democrats, which is Michael Cohen is indicted, he's going to go to jail, and suddenly he swivels and he starts singing like a bird.
00:42:42.000 And everybody's like, well, can we believe him now?
00:42:44.000 Because it seems like he has something to gain out of all this.
00:42:47.000 According to Reuters, Parnas's apparent decision to work with the congressional committees represents a change of heart.
00:42:52.000 Parnas rebuffed a request from three House of Representatives committees last month to provide documents and testimony.
00:42:58.000 His lawyer said, quote, we will honor and not avoid the committee's requests to the extent they are legally proper while scrupulously protecting Mr. Parnas's privileges, including that of the Fifth Amendment.
00:43:07.000 Giuliani has not immediately responded to requests for comment on Capitol Hill.
00:43:11.000 The White House, the House leadership and a spokesperson for the House Intelligence Committee declined comment as well.
00:43:17.000 But juxtapose all of that with a new report from John Solomon.
00:43:21.000 I mean, all of this is turning into a mess, as you would predict.
00:43:25.000 John Solomon, who's done a heavy amount of lifting over at the Hill.
00:43:29.000 Democrats hate him.
00:43:29.000 The media hate him because he keeps pointing out that there may have actually been some there there with regard to Biden corruption.
00:43:34.000 He has a story today over at JohnSolomonReports.com.
00:43:39.000 The headline is, Hunter Biden's Ukraine gas firm pressed Obama administration to end corruption allegations memos show.
00:43:46.000 In other words, it sounds like maybe something really did corrupt and investigatable was happening in Ukraine.
00:43:51.000 According to John Solomon, Hunter Biden and his Ukrainian gas firm colleagues had multiple contacts with the Obama State Department during the 2016 election cycle, including one just a month before VP Joe Biden forced Ukraine to fire the prosecutor investigating his son's company for corruption.
00:44:05.000 Newly released memos show.
00:44:07.000 During that February 2016 contact, a U.S.
00:44:09.000 representative for Burisma Holdings sought a meeting with the Undersecretary of State Catherine Novelli to discuss ending the corruption allegations against the Ukrainian firm where Hunter Biden worked as a board member, according to memos obtained under a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.
00:44:23.000 Just three weeks before Burisma's overture to state, Ukrainian authorities raided the home of the oligarch who owned the gas firm and employed Hunter Biden, a signal the long-running corruption probe was escalating in the middle of the U.S.
00:44:33.000 presidential election.
00:44:35.000 Hunter Biden's name, in fact, was specifically invoked by the Burisma representative as a reason the State Department should help, according to a series of email exchanges among U.S.
00:44:42.000 officials trying to arrange the meeting.
00:44:45.000 The subject line for the email exchanges read simply, Burisma, quote, per our conversation, Karen Tramontano of Blue Star Strategies requested a meeting to discuss with U.S.
00:44:54.000 Novelli, USG remarks alleging Burisma of corruption.
00:44:59.000 So, all of this stinks.
00:45:00.000 24th 2016 email between state officials.
00:45:02.000 She noted that two high-profile U.S. citizens are affiliated with the company, including Hunter Biden as a board member.
00:45:08.000 Tramontano would like to talk with the U.S. about getting a better understanding of how the U.S. came to the determination that the company is corrupt.
00:45:14.000 According to Tramontano, there is no evidence of corruption, has been no hearing of process, and evidence to the contrary has been considered.
00:45:20.000 So all of this stinks, at least a little bit.
00:45:25.000 The emails show that this person Tramontano was scheduled to meet with Novelli on March 1st, 2016, and its State Department officials were scrambling to get answers ahead of time from the U.S. administration.
00:45:35.000 Embassy in Kiev.
00:45:35.000 So if it appears that Hunter Biden's company, Burismo, is pressuring the Obama administration to drop the investigation in the months leading up to Joe Biden pressuring Ukraine to dump its prosecutor, it's not a great look right there.
00:45:51.000 Not a great look.
00:45:52.000 So if all of this ends up basically coming down to a partisan fight, this isn't going to damage Trump in the end at all.
00:45:58.000 And it will come back to the electability of President Trump versus the electability of Joe Biden or Elizabeth Warren.
00:46:03.000 Okay, time for a quick thing that I like and then a quick thing that I hate.
00:46:07.000 So, things that I like today.
00:46:09.000 Paul Johnson is one of my favorite historians.
00:46:11.000 He's a wonderful historian.
00:46:12.000 His book, Modern Times, is one of the great sort of Comprehensive histories of the early 20th century and late 19th century.
00:46:22.000 He has another book that's not quite as well read called The Birth of the Modern World Society 1815 to 1830.
00:46:26.000 And you think to yourself, what the hell happened 1815 to 1830?
00:46:28.000 It turns out, a lot.
00:46:30.000 And the book also covers sort of the period slightly before 1815 and the period slightly after 1830.
00:46:35.000 But it is amazing how many of the arguments we're having today do have roots in this period.
00:46:40.000 The book is really first-rate.
00:46:42.000 I really enjoy, as I say, Paul Johnson's work.
00:46:44.000 I think he's terrific.
00:46:45.000 Check it out, The Birth of the Modern.
00:46:46.000 It is a heavy read, okay?
00:46:47.000 This thing is like a thousand pages, but come on, you have time.
00:46:50.000 Go check it out, The Birth of the Modern by Paul Johnson.
00:46:52.000 Okay, time for a quick thing that I hate.
00:46:54.000 One of the reasons why so many Americans think the Democrats are radical is because on issues like abortion, they've gotten more radical over time.
00:47:05.000 And their language has gotten more radical over time.
00:47:07.000 Take, for example, this Pennsylvania state representative.
00:47:11.000 Her name is Wendy Ullman.
00:47:14.000 She's a Democrat from Bucks, Pennsylvania, and she was making a speech about anti-abortion laws when she dropped this bizarre line about miscarriage.
00:47:24.000 We're also talking about a woman who comes into a facility and is having cramps.
00:47:32.000 And not to be concrete, an early miscarriage is just some mess on a napkin.
00:47:47.000 And I'm not sure people would agree that this is something that we want to take to the point of ritual.
00:47:54.000 Okay, an early miscarriage is just a mess on a napkin?
00:47:57.000 Really?
00:47:58.000 That sort of language is what Democrats want to run on?
00:48:01.000 She's come forward now and she's apologized.
00:48:02.000 She said, many women and family find tremendous comfort and solace in ritual burial or cremation in the case of early miscarriages.
00:48:08.000 Others do not.
00:48:09.000 Some would choose donation for medical research, like my family friend, who I quoted in a committee meeting saying, so my loss can have meaning.
00:48:14.000 What she was speaking against was a Pennsylvania house bill that would require abortion clinics and healthcare facilities to bury or cremate Lost unborn children, as opposed to tossing out the kids like routine medical waste.
00:48:25.000 So she uses that sort of language.
00:48:26.000 She's not the only Democratic representative who's using that sort of language.
00:48:29.000 A Virginia senator is also using language that is quite bizarre, saying, don't worry guys, you know, the real reason that men care about abortion is because women are the ones who have abortions.
00:48:39.000 This Virginia state senator says, if men were the ones having abortion, this sort of stuff is so irritating, if men were the ones having abortion, then there would be an abortion clinic on every street corner.
00:48:49.000 Reproductive health.
00:48:51.000 It is nobody's business.
00:48:53.000 Nobody's business who has to access the abortion process other than that woman.
00:48:59.000 And I have told audience after audience, if men could get pregnant, you'd see more abortion clinics in this country than Starbucks.
00:49:07.000 Okay, and that got big cheers.
00:49:08.000 His name is Dick Saslaw, that state representative.
00:49:11.000 Which, doesn't that undercut his argument?
00:49:12.000 Isn't the argument that men are terrible and bad?
00:49:14.000 And men are terrible and bad, and thus they would be having more abortions than women.
00:49:18.000 Okay, well, that's sort of a pro-life argument.
00:49:22.000 Maybe that's true.
00:49:23.000 Maybe if men could get abortions, they would be pushing for more abortion.
00:49:26.000 But that sort of suggests the immorality of abortion, doesn't it?
00:49:28.000 Not the wonderful, the sort of wonderful, generous nature of abortion.
00:49:34.000 Okay, we'll be back here later today with all the additional updates on the situation over in Mexico, on the presidential race.
00:49:40.000 We have a lot more news to cover a little bit later today, so stick around for that.
00:49:43.000 Two additional hours coming up a little bit later today, or we'll see you here tomorrow with all the latest.
00:49:46.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:49:47.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:49:52.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Robert Sterling.
00:49:55.000 Directed by Mike Joyner.
00:49:56.000 Executive producer, Jeremy Boring.
00:49:58.000 Senior producer, Jonathan Hay.
00:50:00.000 Our supervising producer is Mathis Glover.
00:50:02.000 And our technical producer is Austin Stevens.
00:50:05.000 Assistant director, Paweł Wydowski.
00:50:07.000 Edited by Adam Sajewicz.
00:50:09.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Koromina.
00:50:10.000 Hair and makeup is by Jesua Olvera.
00:50:12.000 Production assistant, Nick Sheehan.
00:50:14.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire production.
00:50:16.000 Copyright Daily Wire 2019.
00:50:18.000 On The Matt Walsh Show, we're not just discussing politics.
00:50:22.000 We're talking culture, faith, family, all of the things that are really important to you.