The Ben Shapiro Show - March 07, 2018


As The Globalists Turn | Ep. 490


Episode Stats

Length

54 minutes

Words per Minute

199.41231

Word Count

10,858

Sentence Count

818

Misogynist Sentences

10

Hate Speech Sentences

9


Summary

Gary Cohn is out. Tariffs are in. And Republicans look for a second special counsel, this time to investigate the FBI. We ll get to the bottom of all of it on The Ben Shapiro Show with Ben Shapiro ( )! Subscribe to Ben Shapiro: The Hourglass Is Empty. Learn more about your ad choices. If you like what you hear, please HIT SUBSCRIBE and also, consider leaving us a five star rating on Apple Podcasts! It helps us to keep bringing you high quality, diverse and inspirational episodes every single day. Thanks for listening and share the podcast with your fellow podcasting friends! Also, don t forget to tell your friends about this podcast by using the hashtag on social media and tagging to let us know what you thought of it! Thank you so much for all your support and stay tuned for more episodes in the future! Ben Shapiro Music: Fair Weather Fans by The Baseball Project, recorded live at WFMU and produced by DIVE Studios, Los Angeles, CA. Copyright 2019 by Dee McDonnell and the Vigil Project, LLC. All rights reserved. This episode was produced for Gimlet Media, Inc. and distributed by Sober is Dope by Pondels, Inc., a proud affiliate of VaynerMedia, LLC, and other clients everywhere else. Thank you for all the support and support is due to the grace and support given out by the good people in the good work done by Mr. Ben Shapiro, Jr., etc., and all of his good work, etc., etc. - Thank you to all of the hard work and good thanks out to Mr. Goodness, etc. etc., good thanks really out to good chance, good chance really out here, really out out out truly, good thanks to good support, good out out chance out out really out chance to good luck, good love, good luck out out to all out out away out out, good good chance out truly out out ) etc., really really, truly, really, really good, really appreciate it, really thanks, really really out, really truly, truly out here really out of chance, truly appreciate it really out really, good really out away, good night, really said it out here really really really good out really truly out of luck, really outeeeeeeeedeedeeeeeeeeedeee) <________


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Gary Cohn is out.
00:00:01.000 Tariffs are in.
00:00:03.000 And Republicans look for a second special counsel, this time to investigate the FBI.
00:00:06.000 We'll get to the bottom of all of it.
00:00:07.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:08.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:14.000 As the hourglass empties, so are the days of our lives.
00:00:17.000 As the staffing turnover at the White House continues, apparently the only person who's going to come back, Jared Kushner apparently just went to Mexico.
00:00:25.000 By the time he gets back, it's going to be like Donald Glover in that scene from Community.
00:00:28.000 He's just going to walk in, everything's on fire, people are hitting each other with baseball bats.
00:00:33.000 That's basically what's happening over at the White House.
00:00:35.000 We'll discuss all of those things.
00:00:36.000 First, I want to say thank you to our sponsors over at Ring.com.
00:00:40.000 Hey, sorry, we're in the middle of dinner.
00:00:41.000 Can I help you?
00:00:41.000 Yes, how are you?
00:00:41.000 Good, how are you?
00:00:42.000 Good, I haven't seen you in a while.
00:00:43.000 I don't know who you are.
00:01:09.000 I'm Justin.
00:01:10.000 I don't know you, Justin.
00:01:13.000 I met you a long time ago when I was younger.
00:01:15.000 No, I'm sorry.
00:01:17.000 You're in the wrong place.
00:01:18.000 I'm okay.
00:01:19.000 Much love and God bless for both gods.
00:01:23.000 Well then, so, Justin apparently, do we know he was a criminal?
00:01:27.000 No, maybe he was just a crazy creeper.
00:01:28.000 You know, the gloves and the hoodie are not a good indicator, but this is the beauty of Ring.com.
00:01:33.000 You know who's at your front door.
00:01:34.000 There's a spotlight cam now that they have that allows you to illuminate your property as well.
00:01:40.000 Use all of these and let
00:01:41.000 Let Ring help build a Ring of Security around your entire property.
00:01:44.000 We have Ring.com at the Shapiro household.
00:01:46.000 It ensures that my kids are safe.
00:01:47.000 It ensures that I don't have to worry about who's at the doorbell even when I'm away on business because it rings through to my phone so I can see who it is at my gate.
00:01:54.000 Stop crime before it happens.
00:01:56.000 Help make your neighborhood safer with Ring.
00:01:58.000 Save up to $150 on a Ring of Security kit at Ring.com slash Ben.
00:02:02.000 That's Ring.com slash Ben.
00:02:05.000 Again, Ring makes the best
00:02:07.000 Absolutely.
00:02:29.000 Make sure that it wasn't a creepy person trying to break into the house.
00:02:32.000 Ring.com slash Ben.
00:02:33.000 Make sure that your house is safe and get $150 off as well.
00:02:36.000 Use that slash Ben so they know that we sent you.
00:02:38.000 Okay, so the big news of the day, of course, is that Gary Cohn, that globalist cuck, is out.
00:02:43.000 Breitbart, of course, is celebrating with pictures of globes popping all over the place.
00:02:46.000 All of it is very, very exciting.
00:02:49.000 Here's the story about Gary Cohn.
00:02:50.000 Gary Cohn was Trump's top economic advisor about three weeks ago.
00:02:54.000 Three weeks ago, people were suggesting that Gary Cohn was about to take over for John Kelly as Chief of Staff, that Kelly was on the out, and Gary Cohn was about to enter.
00:03:02.000 Now, Gary Cohn has been shoved aside in favor of Peter Navarro.
00:03:05.000 Gary Cohn is a Democrat, but he's a free-trade Democrat.
00:03:08.000 Peter Navarro is also a Democrat, but he is a non-free-trade Democrat.
00:03:11.000 So, Peter Navarro has a bunch of kooky theories about why 17th century mercantilism is actually genius economic policy.
00:03:17.000 He's wrong.
00:03:18.000 But Trump believes all that stuff because Trump
00:03:20.000 has this 1950s-era vision of the United States in which smelters are working full bore, and Pittsburgh is the center of steel production.
00:03:28.000 Now, never mind that when Pittsburgh was the center of steel production, the environment was really not nice, and that pretty much every film about blue-collar America in the 1960s and 70s featured people being miserable in steel production in Pittsburgh.
00:03:42.000 All of that is irrelevant to President Trump.
00:03:44.000 He thinks, as the steel industry goes, so goes the United States economy.
00:03:48.000 Now, that isn't true.
00:03:49.000 The steel industry has been the same percentage of the American economy approximately since about 1983.
00:03:56.000 We've produced about the same amount of steel since then.
00:03:58.000 We've just done it with 25% as many employees because technology has gotten a lot better.
00:04:03.000 But Trump says he wants tariffs, and tariffs there shall be.
00:04:06.000 So, Gary Cohn yesterday submitted his resignation.
00:04:09.000 He said, I am out.
00:04:10.000 So, the New York Times reports, White House officials insisted there was no single factor behind the departure of Mr. Cohn, who heads the National Economic Council.
00:04:17.000 But his decision to leave came as he seemed poised to lose an internal struggle over Mr. Trump's plan to impose large tariffs on steel and aluminum imports.
00:04:24.000 Now, remember,
00:04:25.000 Trump really doesn't know what he's talking about on these tariffs.
00:04:27.000 Trump is arbitrarily setting the numbers.
00:04:29.000 Even Peter Navarro had suggested a 25% import tariff on steel.
00:04:33.000 And Trump said, why don't we—a 24% import tariff on steel.
00:04:36.000 Trump has said, why don't we make it 25?
00:04:38.000 Let's make it 25 because it's a nice round number, which is just a great way to do economic policy.
00:04:42.000 Cohen had warned last week he might resign if Trump followed through with the tariffs.
00:04:45.000 Cohn had lobbied against them internally.
00:04:47.000 The biggest problem here was not that Cohn lost a policy battle.
00:04:50.000 Because when you're in the administration, of course sometimes you're going to lose policy battles.
00:04:53.000 That's just the way that it goes.
00:04:55.000 The President of the United States makes the final call.
00:04:57.000 Everybody else works for him.
00:04:58.000 But the problem here is that Trump was having meetings off the books with Wilbur Ross, the Commerce Secretary, as well as with Peter Navarro.
00:05:05.000 He wasn't actually letting his National Economic Advisor know.
00:05:08.000 And then he went directly around him and announced a tariff without any supporting structure in place.
00:05:12.000 So he's talking about tariffs.
00:05:14.000 There's not a single executive order, not a single piece of legislation, not a single policy paper that's been put out explaining what exactly Trump wants here.
00:05:21.000 He just went out there and said, I want tariffs, and tariffs there shall be.
00:05:24.000 And suddenly, Gary Cohn was out in the dark.
00:05:26.000 So, Gary Cohn has his authority entirely undercut, which is the real reason that he's leaving.
00:05:31.000 Trump gave a statement to The New York Times, said, Gary has been my chief economic advisor and did a superb job in driving our agenda, helping to deliver historic tax cuts and reforms, and unleashing the American economy once again.
00:05:41.000 He's a rare talent, and I thank him for his dedicated service to the American people.
00:05:45.000 He's expected to leave in coming weeks.
00:05:46.000 That means that in the past few weeks, Rob Porter is gone.
00:05:48.000 Hope Hicks is gone.
00:05:50.000 Josh Urfell in comms is gone.
00:05:52.000 Gary Cohn is gone.
00:05:54.000 McMaster is apparently on his way out as well.
00:05:56.000 So the turnover in the Trump administration is extraordinarily high, and this is having a pretty marked impact on the market.
00:06:02.000 So the markets right now are responding with a lot of trepidation to how this is going.
00:06:08.000 And it is amazing.
00:06:08.000 If you look at the pictures of the Trump administration in its early iteration, and you see all the people who are standing next to Trump, virtually everyone is gone.
00:06:15.000 Mike Flynn is gone.
00:06:16.000 Katie Walsh is gone.
00:06:17.000 Sean Spicer is gone.
00:06:18.000 Hope Hicks is gone.
00:06:19.000 Reince Priebus is gone.
00:06:20.000 Steve Bannon is gone.
00:06:21.000 And now Gary Cohn is gone.
00:06:23.000 Everybody is basically gone at this point.
00:06:25.000 And not only that, because Trump likes governing through chaos, because he likes that, apparently, according to a number of sources, President Trump was freeing up Anthony Scaramucci to go on cable news and take shot after shot at John Kelly, the White House chief of staff.
00:06:38.000 According to CNN, the president has emboldened Scaramucci, the former communications director, another guy who was in the administration and was there for five seconds, he was fired after 10 days, to continue attacking John Kelly during his cable news appearances, a source familiar with the situation told CNN.
00:06:53.000 So Trump has basically operated the White House like Joaquin Phoenix in Gladiator.
00:06:58.000 He's just sitting there watching people fight each other.
00:07:00.000 Let them fight.
00:07:02.000 It's the new Godzilla movie.
00:07:05.000 Let them fight.
00:07:06.000 He's just enjoying watching the carnage as his top advisors savage one another and people outside the White House beat the crap out of one another because Trump likes the reality TV feel.
00:07:14.000 He likes the feeling of chaos.
00:07:17.000 Bad news.
00:07:18.000 It's hard to get good staffers into a chaotic White House.
00:07:20.000 Why would you give up a good-paying job somewhere else to enter into an administration where the chances that you're going to be ripped by your boss publicly are 1 in 2, the chances that somebody else in the administration is going to rip you publicly are 2 in 3, and the chances that you will leave in ignominious disgrace are probably 85%.
00:07:38.000 Does that sound like a really good bet for you?
00:07:41.000 Now, listen, there are a lot of people in the White House who are thinking about leaving and have been thinking about leaving for a long time.
00:07:47.000 This is common knowledge in Washington, D.C.
00:07:49.000 circles.
00:07:49.000 Because they don't like Trump's chaotic moves here, again, the swiveling is so fast and so problematic that it's hard to imagine how Trump is either hemmed in by anyone with
00:08:02.000 How his advisors hem him in from making bad decisions.
00:08:05.000 It's also hard to imagine how he's going to get top staffers anymore.
00:08:07.000 Remember, Sam Nunberg was fired and Sam Nunberg went on TV the other day and made a fool of himself.
00:08:13.000 This administration, the turnover rate is really rapid and not everybody is being replaced by better people.
00:08:18.000 So here is Donald Trump praising Gary Cohn two months ago.
00:08:22.000 Okay, this is not five years ago.
00:08:24.000 This is two months ago praising Gary Cohn.
00:08:26.000 They said, will Gary Cohn continue or remain in the administration?
00:08:30.000 I said, I hope so.
00:08:32.000 Now, if he leaves, I'm going to say I'm very happy that he left, OK?
00:08:36.000 Come here, Gary.
00:08:39.000 Everybody's laughing.
00:08:41.000 Yes, a very big deal.
00:08:42.000 I think he's pretty happy.
00:08:43.000 Yes, I'm happy.
00:08:45.000 He's so happy he's leaving five seconds later.
00:08:47.000 And so, well done, President Trump.
00:08:50.000 And then President Trump came out yesterday at a press conference, and he said that everyone wants to work in his administration.
00:08:55.000 He came out and he said, no, no, no, you don't understand.
00:08:58.000 It's not that we have staff turnover here.
00:08:59.000 It's that everyone wants to be here.
00:09:01.000 This is the place to be.
00:09:03.000 The White House has tremendous energy.
00:09:05.000 It has tremendous spirit.
00:09:07.000 It is a great place to be working.
00:09:09.000 Many, many people want every single job.
00:09:11.000 You know, I read where, oh, gee, maybe people don't want to work for Trump.
00:09:14.000 And believe me, everybody wants to work in the White House.
00:09:18.000 They all want a piece of that Oval Office.
00:09:20.000 They want a piece of the West Wing.
00:09:22.000 No.
00:09:24.000 No, this is not a true statement.
00:09:25.000 OK?
00:09:27.000 Sorry to break it to you, Mr. President, but nobody wants to work for you.
00:09:31.000 Okay?
00:09:31.000 No one wants to work for you.
00:09:32.000 The turnover rate at this White House is extraordinary.
00:09:35.000 And it's extraordinary not because you disagree with your top advisors or because your top advisors feel they've gotten the job done.
00:09:41.000 The turnover is extraordinary because people, again, feel like they're being backstabbed every second of the day.
00:09:47.000 You've got to feel like your boss has your back.
00:09:48.000 Okay, you do.
00:09:49.000 We have pretty good staff retention here at The Daily Wire, and that's because the people who work here know that in the end, I'll take the hit rather than having my employees take the hit.
00:09:57.000 I rip on my employees on the air sometimes, but they know that I'm joking, right?
00:10:00.000 Mathis knows that I think he does a really good job and that I have a lot of appreciation for his skill.
00:10:04.000 That's the nicest thing I'm ever going to say publicly about you, Mathis.
00:10:06.000 Everybody else here knows that's the case as well.
00:10:08.000 That's why we're able to retain staff and we have good staff loyalty.
00:10:12.000 Because we all feel like we're pushing in the same direction.
00:10:13.000 We all have the same general principles about American politics.
00:10:16.000 And because people know that we're not going to stand for employees stabbing each other in the back.
00:10:20.000 But Trump likes that style of management.
00:10:22.000 He thinks somehow that this strengthens him.
00:10:24.000 He thinks somehow that this makes his administration better and stronger.
00:10:27.000 It doesn't.
00:10:28.000 And what's worse, it makes the policy worse, because then he brings in people who are able to bend his ear.
00:10:32.000 So if you kiss Trump's ass, there's a very good shot that his policy is going to become your policy.
00:10:39.000 I said right after Anthony Scaramucci left that if I wanted to be White House comms director, I probably could do it just by appearing on Fox and Friends every other morning and praising Trump to the skies.
00:10:47.000 And I guarantee you that within three weeks, I get a call from Trump or somebody close to the administration asking if I wanted a job in comms.
00:10:54.000 That's not how you ought to run an administration, particularly if you're supposed to have things that you want to do.
00:10:58.000 And this is part of the problem.
00:10:59.000 The Trump administration ran through large elements of its agenda in the first year.
00:11:03.000 And those agenda elements were quite good.
00:11:05.000 A lot of those agenda items were things that I agreed with, things that I liked.
00:11:08.000 And now Trump is born, and idle hands are the devil's playground.
00:11:13.000 The fact is that the president doesn't have a lot to do right now, and so he's sticking his thumb into pies that he has long wanted to stick his thumb into.
00:11:21.000 He's always had this bizarre notion that America's trade is thwarting American growth, which is just not true.
00:11:26.000 He's always had this very weird idea that trade is a zero-sum game, that when you and I make a voluntary transaction that we've both lost, or that one of us has gained more than the other, or that one of us has gained at the expense of the other,
00:11:37.000 None of that is true.
00:11:39.000 And so you're seeing it in the markets today.
00:11:40.000 You're seeing that the markets are responding to these indicators from the president with a lot of trepidation.
00:11:46.000 The Dow Jones Industrial Average today is down 338 points already.
00:11:51.000 A lot of the commodities markets are down significantly because people understand that Trump is now, on principle, going to raise tariffs.
00:11:57.000 Now, there are a lot of people who are saying today that when it comes to tariffs, everything will be fine, this is not going to have a major impact on the economy.
00:12:04.000 Wilbur Ross was out saying that yesterday.
00:12:06.000 He held up a Campbell's Soup can on Sunday and claimed that if your price of Campbell's Soup goes up only three cents, it's not a big deal.
00:12:13.000 Wilbur Ross, what would he know about drinking from a Campbell's soup can?
00:12:16.000 He's literally a billionaire.
00:12:17.000 And he was on national TV holding up Campbell's soup cans.
00:12:20.000 He was talking about tariffs a little bit more yesterday and trying to defend Trump's tariff regime, even though there really is no economic basis for it.
00:12:27.000 Again, the industries that are supposed to be protected here are already dominant in American life.
00:12:30.000 They produce 70% of American steel.
00:12:32.000 Their stock has been up for the past several years.
00:12:34.000 Their production was up 5% on average last year.
00:12:37.000 Doesn't matter.
00:12:37.000 Trump has this vision.
00:12:38.000 He has this bizarre utopian notion that we're going to shut down Google and ramp up Nucor.
00:12:45.000 That all the people who are currently working in tech are going to suddenly be working in the smelting industry.
00:12:52.000 It's just not true.
00:12:53.000 It's just silly.
00:12:54.000 I'm going to explain why this is silly in just a second.
00:12:57.000 First, I want to say thank you to our sponsors over at zeal.com.
00:12:59.000 So March is National Sleep Awareness Week.
00:13:02.000 Well, it's hard to sleep when your back is all racked up, when you've got pain in your shoulders and your neck, and that's why you need to talk
00:13:08.000 We're good to go.
00:13:30.000 All the masseuses are licensed and they're all terrific.
00:13:32.000 We've had several masseuses there, all wonderful.
00:13:35.000 One of the things I say about living in the United States is it's possible to feel like a rich person living in the United States without actually having to be rich.
00:13:42.000 Zeal is one of those apps that makes that possible because there's nothing like having a spa directly in your home, affordably, on demand, and you can do it simply with the press of a button.
00:13:51.000 Zeal is offering you $20 off your first sleep massage with promo code BEN now through March 31st.
00:13:56.000 I think so.
00:14:23.000 Wilbur Ross, the Commerce Secretary, who is one of the driving forces behind the new tariff regime, he was on CNBC yesterday trying to defend how this is all going to work.
00:14:32.000 And his defense is, shall we, how shall we say, lackluster at best.
00:14:36.000 He's already indicated a degree of flexibility.
00:14:40.000 I think a very sensible, very balanced degree of flexibility.
00:14:45.000 And I think that you're going to see, as you understand the details of what actually is going to happen, that we're not trying to blow up the world.
00:14:55.000 There's no intention of that.
00:14:57.000 We want to balance our needs to fix the trade deficit with the needs of the economy and the needs of the global economy itself.
00:15:07.000 Oh, well, that thrilling tale right there from Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, the most charismatic man outside of Mitch McConnell in Washington, D.C.
00:15:16.000 He must be just fun at parties, Wilbur Ross.
00:15:18.000 And I love that he starts his case by, we're not trying to destroy the world.
00:15:22.000 Oh, that's comforting.
00:15:24.000 Thanks.
00:15:25.000 That's always how I lead off my policy suggestions.
00:15:27.000 I always say, you know, the thing is, you think we're going to destroy the world.
00:15:30.000 I'm not really trying to destroy the world.
00:15:32.000 And then when he talks about trade deficits, again, this is just economic ignorance.
00:15:35.000 Trade deficits mean nothing.
00:15:36.000 Venezuela has a trade surplus.
00:15:38.000 It is a very, very poor country.
00:15:40.000 In fact, if you look up the countries that have trade surpluses right now, it is a pretty good mix
00:15:44.000 I don't know.
00:16:04.000 Ireland, Taiwan, Singapore.
00:16:06.000 Some of this makes sense because some of these are places where you generate really, really cheap product.
00:16:10.000 China is number one.
00:16:10.000 They have the highest trade surplus.
00:16:12.000 And China's economy has suffered two major stock market collapses in the last four years.
00:16:17.000 United Arab Emirates, Japan, Saudi Arabia.
00:16:21.000 Are any of these economies comparable to the United States?
00:16:23.000 Are any of these economies really beating the United States?
00:16:25.000 Is Malaysia beating the United States?
00:16:28.000 Is the Czech Republic beating the United States?
00:16:30.000 Of course not.
00:16:31.000 Venezuela, by the way, as I say, also has this.
00:16:34.000 Italy's basically bankrupt as a country.
00:16:36.000 Brazil is having significant economic troubles.
00:16:38.000 They have a trade surplus.
00:16:39.000 Trade surplus means nothing.
00:16:41.000 Trade surplus does not mean anything.
00:16:43.000 The reason being, if you trade and then somebody, you spend more dollars than they do on your product, those dollars come back in the form of capital surplus investment.
00:16:52.000 Can they invest in American businesses?
00:16:53.000 They buy real estate.
00:16:54.000 Somebody's saying, what if they come in and buy up the entire country?
00:16:56.000 This was the fear that Japan was going to buy up tons of real estate in America in the early 1990s, late 1980s.
00:17:03.000 And it turns out that Japan's economic program was completely busted because they were focused on the trade deficit.
00:17:08.000 In the 1990s, they suffered a significant depression.
00:17:12.000 So, again, it's really, really foolish to make economic policy based on these issues.
00:17:17.000 The United States has had trade deficits.
00:17:19.000 It's had trade surplus in our history.
00:17:21.000 There is no correlation between trade deficit with a particular country and that country doing better than we are.
00:17:26.000 That's just not the way any of this works.
00:17:29.000 But the Trump administration is not doing this for economic reasons.
00:17:32.000 They're doing it for cultural reasons.
00:17:34.000 So, here, let me explain why they're doing this for cultural reasons.
00:17:37.000 Again, there's a picture.
00:17:39.000 Politics is about pictures.
00:17:40.000 Politics is about stories.
00:17:42.000 Politics is about narratives.
00:17:43.000 When I say trade deficit doesn't matter, it's true, but Trump is telling a different story.
00:17:48.000 And the story that President Trump is telling is a story that goes something like this.
00:17:51.000 Once upon a time, there were booming industries in the United States.
00:17:54.000 Large-scale factories.
00:17:56.000 These big buildings located in Detroit, where people worked on employment lines, where they worked on manufacturing lines, and they worked there for 50 years, and they got the gold watch, and then they went home.
00:18:06.000 And they had enough money, based on that one salary, to support their families.
00:18:10.000 Why can't we go back to something like that?
00:18:12.000 And the answer is, because America's economy is much more developed.
00:18:15.000 You have better stuff now.
00:18:16.000 You have cheaper stuff now.
00:18:17.000 The businesses that we work in are better to work in than those businesses.
00:18:20.000 If you had a choice between working in a Pittsburgh smelter and working in the Pittsburgh healthcare industry, you would choose to work in the Pittsburgh healthcare industry.
00:18:27.000 Pittsburgh, by the way, is doing quite well.
00:18:29.000 The Pittsburgh unemployment statistic right now, the Pittsburgh unemployment rate currently is 4.6% as of September 2017.
00:18:37.000 That is lower than Pennsylvania as a whole.
00:18:39.000 It's lower than Philadelphia at 6.0%.
00:18:41.000 That's because Pittsburgh has totally shifted how it works.
00:18:44.000 Pittsburgh has become one of the more beautiful cities in the Union.
00:18:47.000 Pittsburgh is clean now.
00:18:50.000 It is a service industry.
00:18:51.000 It is a healthcare industry driven city.
00:18:53.000 But Trump doesn't like that.
00:18:54.000 He wants to go back to the pictures from the deer hunter where you've got
00:18:57.000 Where you've got Christopher Walken working in giant gloves.
00:19:01.000 He wants to go back to the pictures from Breaking Away, where you've got the father working in a quarry.
00:19:07.000 That's what Trump thinks industry looks like.
00:19:10.000 It's just ridiculous.
00:19:11.000 It's just ridiculous.
00:19:12.000 Iran, by the way, has a trade surplus.
00:19:14.000 Iran is number 15 in the world in trade surplus.
00:19:16.000 Is their economy something that you'd like?
00:19:18.000 Is that something that you think makes any sense?
00:19:20.000 Here are the countries with the largest trade deficits, by contrast.
00:19:23.000 The three largest trade deficits in the world, United States, UK, Canada.
00:19:28.000 Do those economies sound pretty good to you?
00:19:30.000 Because they are pretty good.
00:19:32.000 India is a growing economy.
00:19:33.000 They have a trade deficit.
00:19:36.000 France has a pretty significant trade deficit.
00:19:38.000 Australia has a significant trade deficit.
00:19:40.000 Again, no correlation between having a trade deficit and having a poor economy.
00:19:45.000 But again, it's not about that.
00:19:47.000 It's about Trump thinking he's going to win politically because he promised a bunch of people in manufacturing industries he's going to bring their jobs back.
00:19:52.000 I said at the time, that's a lie.
00:19:54.000 Those jobs aren't coming back.
00:19:55.000 Those jobs left because of technology, they did not leave because of global competition, and they certainly are not going to be protected by killing jobs in other industries.
00:20:02.000 Because all a surplus is, I mean, all a tariff is, is a tax that is being placed on everyone else for the benefit of some.
00:20:09.000 So if you think that, for example, the ethanol industry needs to be subsidized by the federal government, I don't think so.
00:20:16.000 I think that it's nasty to tax me to pay off a bunch of farmers in Iowa.
00:20:20.000 I don't see why that's useful.
00:20:22.000 And Ted Cruz said the same thing, and he actually won the Iowa caucuses, so I think a lot of farmers in Iowa believe the same thing.
00:20:26.000 They think they can compete on the global scale without subsidies from the federal government.
00:20:31.000 If you believe that the steel industry needs payoffs from me, this is just a form of corporate welfare.
00:20:35.000 That's all this is.
00:20:36.000 But Trump has assured us, don't worry, tariffs will be done in a loving way.
00:20:40.000 They'll be done lovingly, you know, like with love.
00:20:42.000 So not only do we lose on trade, we lose on military.
00:20:47.000 So, and hence we have these massive deficit numbers in our country.
00:20:51.000 We're going to straighten it out.
00:20:53.000 And we'll do it in a very loving way.
00:20:56.000 It'll be a loving, loving way.
00:20:58.000 They'll like us better.
00:20:59.000 And they will respect us much more.
00:21:01.000 Bring back that loving feeling.
00:21:05.000 Four are still tariffs.
00:21:07.000 The Righteous Brothers making their entry in a loving way.
00:21:11.000 He says the same thing about immigration.
00:21:12.000 He's always been doing it with love.
00:21:14.000 I remember when we laughed at Jeb Bush for saying the same sort of thing.
00:21:17.000 But now Donald Trump says it and we're supposed to pretend that this makes any sense.
00:21:20.000 Of course it doesn't.
00:21:21.000 Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, both of them came out and said this is silly.
00:21:25.000 Cruz was the first to say it.
00:21:27.000 He said these tariffs concern me as well they should because they are stupid.
00:21:30.000 The tariffs that were announced, did they surprise you?
00:21:33.000 They did not surprise me, but they concern me.
00:21:37.000 When it comes to trade, I support the president and the administration.
00:21:43.000 Okay, well, I'm glad that that's what Ted Cruz says, but the reality is that if Trump—look, if Trump were designing these measures in order to attempt to drive some sort of lowered trade barrier on the other side, that'd be one thing.
00:22:01.000 But Trump is doing this on principle.
00:22:02.000 Trump thinks that we can shaft other country into trade war.
00:22:05.000 That's what he wants.
00:22:06.000 Rand Paul says the same thing, by the way.
00:22:07.000 He says the United States will lose a trade war because no one wins in a trade war.
00:22:10.000 If you look at steel use in our country, there are 60 people purchasing steel for every person making steel in the country.
00:22:16.000 So there's a lot of people who purchase steel that are going to be hurt by this.
00:22:20.000 My state alone exports $20 billion worth of products, including a lot of farm agricultural products.
00:22:27.000 And if there's a trade war, we stand to lose in a big way.
00:22:30.000 And really, the United States will lose in a trade war.
00:22:32.000 OK, so let's, in a second, I'm going to explain why it is that I don't trust Congress on this stuff, why they're a bunch of gutless panderers, in one second.
00:22:40.000 But first, on that happy note, I want to say thank you to our sponsors over at Tommy John.
00:22:44.000 It would be nice if members of our Congress had stones.
00:22:47.000 If they did, they would certainly want to use Tommy John's underwear.
00:22:49.000 Because Tommy John's underwear are the most comfortable underwear it is possible to have.
00:22:54.000 It's time for a little spring cleaning.
00:22:55.000 Start with your underwear drawer because you have a bunch of shot underwear where the elastic is just gone and there are holes in them.
00:23:01.000 You don't need that anymore.
00:23:02.000 You need Tommy John.
00:23:03.000 These things last forever.
00:23:04.000 They are supremely comfortable.
00:23:06.000 They're the best you'll ever wear or it's free guarantee.
00:23:09.000 If you don't like the underwear, then it's free.
00:23:12.000 If it's not the most comfortable underwear that you have ever worn, Tommy John will actually foot the bill.
00:23:16.000 It's a revolutionary clothing company for the modern man.
00:23:18.000 And again, they make the greatest underwear on the planet.
00:23:21.000 It is just fantastic.
00:23:23.000 It makes sure that you never have to worry about picking a wedgie.
00:23:26.000 It makes sure that everything is comfortably loose and yet secure.
00:23:29.000 It is basically, it is like the brinks of your junk.
00:23:34.000 They make sure that everything
00:23:36.000 Everything is protected, and everything is comfortable.
00:23:38.000 So check out Tommy John.
00:23:39.000 They've also completely reimagined t-shirts with their silky soft second skin tees, and they are wrinkle resistant, and they never shrink either.
00:23:45.000 So they have vibrant colors, a modern fit, premium fabrics, and they make these second skin tees.
00:23:49.000 They must have.
00:23:50.000 They even have socks that stay up all day, lightweight undershirts that never come untucked.
00:23:53.000 Tommy John is just fantastic.
00:23:55.000 They make the best undergarments that you could possibly want.
00:23:58.000 Tommyjohn.com slash Shapiro, and you get 20% off your first order.
00:24:01.000 That's tommyjohn.com slash Shapiro for 20% off the most comfortable clothing items imaginable.
00:24:06.000 Again, tommyjohn.com slash Shapiro.
00:24:09.000 Use slash Shapiro to ensure that you get that 20% off and also lets them know that we sent you.
00:24:15.000 Again, it's what I use every single day.
00:24:17.000 Not the same pair.
00:24:18.000 I change them out.
00:24:19.000 Tommy John is fantastic.
00:24:20.000 Tommyjohn.com slash Shapiro.
00:24:22.000 Let them know that we sent you.
00:24:23.000 Okay, so here is why I don't trust Congress.
00:24:25.000 So Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, they come forward and they say, this is bad policy.
00:24:29.000 And indeed it is!
00:24:30.000 Indeed it is garbage policy.
00:24:32.000 If I have not made that clear, I think this tariff policy is stupid.
00:24:35.000 I think it is counterproductive.
00:24:36.000 I think it's going to hurt the economy.
00:24:37.000 I think we just passed some really good tax plans.
00:24:40.000 And I think that the economic impact of those tax plans are going to be walked back down.
00:24:44.000 The one good thing that may come from this is that so much of the country is anti-Trump that maybe it'll turn into a free trade country again.
00:24:50.000 But Republicans are following Trump down the primrose path.
00:24:53.000 There was a poll yesterday showing that 65% of Republicans say that it will be easy for America to win a trade war.
00:24:59.000 No, that's just stupid.
00:25:01.000 You know, when I've talked about the possible soul suck of the Republican Party and the concerns that I have that Trump would lead Republicans to embrace bad policy just because he said them, this is one example of that.
00:25:12.000 That said, I think that a powerful leader on the Republican side who comes forward and says no, if they can outshine Trump, will convince Americans of the opposite.
00:25:21.000 But what you're hearing from Congress is that they're very resistant to this.
00:25:23.000 So Paul Ryan says he's extremely worried about the consequences of a trade war, and he urged Trump to take a surgical approach rather than imposing penalties on all imported steel and aluminum.
00:25:33.000 But this is weird, because it seems to me the Constitution of the United States gives Congress the power under Article 1 to lay and collect taxes and duties.
00:25:41.000 And a tariff is a duty.
00:25:43.000 So why is it that Trump can do this unilaterally?
00:25:45.000 Well, the answer is because there's a law on the books that was passed in 1962, the Trade Expansion Act.
00:25:51.000 And Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act gives the President of the United States the ability to go around Congress.
00:25:57.000 And he says that it's for security reasons.
00:25:59.000 So according to CNN.com, the law says the president can impose tariffs on all other countries if imports pose a risk to U.S.
00:26:05.000 national security.
00:26:06.000 In this case, Trump is arguing that steel and aluminum imported from Canada, Mexico, and all other countries meets that standard.
00:26:12.000 That justification makes no sense.
00:26:14.000 Maybe you could challenge it in court by saying there is no real national security need, but the courts are probably going to toss that.
00:26:18.000 They're going to say it's a political question.
00:26:20.000 There's something called political question doctrine, and the courts have generally held that when there's conflict between the branches, between the legislature and the executive, that this should be hashed out through legislation.
00:26:29.000 Not through appealing to the judiciary.
00:26:32.000 If the tariffs are imposed, they'll probably be challenged at the WTO, the World Trade Organization.
00:26:37.000 But that could take two years to walk back.
00:26:40.000 Remember, the last time there were steel tariffs, that was Bush implementing them from 2001 to 2003.
00:26:44.000 Something like 200,000 American jobs were lost during that period.
00:26:47.000 And the President of the United States then was forced to back down off those steel tariffs.
00:26:51.000 What Trump is talking about is a lot harsher.
00:26:52.000 So, the question becomes, where are those stones, Congress?
00:26:57.000 The responsibility lies with you.
00:26:58.000 And this brings up a broader problem with American government.
00:27:01.000 It was a problem when Bush was president, when Obama was president, when Trump was president.
00:27:05.000 The problem is that our legislature is full of corrupt actors.
00:27:09.000 And when I say they're corrupt, I don't mean they're taking pay.
00:27:11.000 They're taking pay to do things.
00:27:13.000 What I'm saying is that they think their job is to sit there.
00:27:16.000 They're like Sidney Pollack and Tootsie.
00:27:17.000 Their job is just to field calls.
00:27:20.000 And they think that their job is to sit there and delegate authority to the executive branch.
00:27:23.000 The executive branch has grown in size and scope over the course of time.
00:27:27.000 The number of federal employees in the executive branch at the beginning of the 20th century was extraordinarily low.
00:27:33.000 And the number of federal employees over time has grown in the executive branch massively.
00:27:38.000 So right now, in the executive branch, there are literally 2 million people, apparently, working in some capacity for the executive branch.
00:27:46.000 At the beginning of the republic, you could fit the executive branch in a water closet.
00:27:50.000 The executive branch was like 15 people, because that's how the government was supposed to operate.
00:27:53.000 It was supposed to be small.
00:27:55.000 Now the executive branch has grown just in outsized ways.
00:28:00.000 It's pretty astonishing.
00:28:01.000 I'm looking up the statistics right now.
00:28:02.000 Right now, as of 2015, there are 1.8 million people working for the federal executive branch.
00:28:10.000 That's an astonishing statistic.
00:28:12.000 That's even up from 2006 when it was 1.6 million.
00:28:14.000 Trump is cutting some of those people.
00:28:16.000 But, I mean, look at these numbers.
00:28:18.000 Look at these numbers.
00:28:19.000 When you talk about the executive branch, these numbers are insane.
00:28:21.000 There are 200, let's see, there are 325,000 people working for the VA.
00:28:23.000 There are 233,000 people working for the Department of the Army.
00:28:25.000 There are 196,000 people working for the Department of the Navy.
00:28:33.000 There are 54,000 people who work for DOT, the Department of Transportation.
00:28:37.000 There are 74,000 people working for the Department of Agriculture.
00:28:41.000 There are almost 4,000 people working for the Department of Education.
00:28:44.000 There are 15,000 people working for the Department of Energy.
00:28:47.000 Nobody even knows what the Department of Energy does.
00:28:49.000 Okay?
00:28:49.000 When Rick Perry took over that job, he legitimately had no idea what it did.
00:28:53.000 He thought that it was about oil.
00:28:54.000 It turns out it was about protecting our nuclear weapons.
00:28:57.000 If you look at the executive branch civilian employment since 1940, it has grown enormously.
00:29:02.000 Enormously.
00:29:03.000 I'm looking at the Office of Personnel Management right now, and the chart looks like this.
00:29:08.000 1940 now.
00:29:09.000 The statistics are just...
00:29:13.000 Incredible.
00:29:13.000 And that's disturbing.
00:29:14.000 And the reason for that is because the founders were wrong about something.
00:29:17.000 By the way, you want to know something crazy?
00:29:19.000 Okay, so this is in thousands.
00:29:22.000 In 1940, a grand total of 700,000 people were working for the executive branch in 1940.
00:29:27.000 Today, there are 1.8 million people working for the executive branch.
00:29:33.000 Maybe more.
00:29:33.000 Maybe over 2 million people.
00:29:34.000 So we have tripled the size of the executive branch in the last 80 years.
00:29:38.000 And before 1940, it was way less than that.
00:29:40.000 But in the early 20th century, it was really, really, really low.
00:29:44.000 So, what happened again?
00:29:46.000 The founders were wrong.
00:29:46.000 So the founders thought, if you read the Federalist Papers, which we go through every Monday here, when you read the Federalist Papers, what you see is that the founders were deeply concerned with the idea that there would be ambitious people in every branch.
00:29:56.000 There would be ambitious people in the legislature trying to grab power, and there are ambitious people in the executive trying to grab power.
00:30:01.000 There are ambitious people in the judiciary trying to grab power.
00:30:04.000 And so what we needed were a bunch of checks and balances that would prevent anyone from centralizing too much power.
00:30:08.000 And so if the president wanted to usurp power, the legislature would step in and defund him, or not give him the power to do so.
00:30:15.000 If the president overrode his constitutional authority, the judiciary would step in.
00:30:18.000 If the judiciary overrode its constitutional authority, the legislature would defund the judiciary.
00:30:23.000 If the legislature overrode its authority, the president would veto.
00:30:27.000 In other words, all of this was predicated on an assumption about human nature, and the nature particularly of people in politics, which is people in politics want power.
00:30:35.000 It turns out that what people in politics really want is adoration without responsibility.
00:30:40.000 What people in politics truly want is to be loved without actually having to do anything, and without being held responsible for anything.
00:30:46.000 They want all of the plaudits with none of the accountability.
00:30:50.000 That's what they want.
00:30:51.000 And so the legislative branch has kicked everything over to the president.
00:30:54.000 Now, the president typically is somebody who wants power.
00:30:57.000 Because if you run for the president of the United States, you're typically not doing so to avoid responsibility, you're typically doing so because you want to be the guy.
00:31:05.000 The president is basically like an elected king in the American system at this point because of the federal bureaucracy.
00:31:09.000 Bureaucracy didn't exist in the 19th century.
00:31:12.000 The federal bureaucracy was minimal.
00:31:14.000 It was only at the beginning of the 20th century with Woodrow Wilson and the progressives and Teddy Roosevelt that there was this weird idea that happened that experts in the executive branch were better qualified to write the regulations under which we live than the people we elect.
00:31:26.000 So unelected bureaucrats will take over all the real regulatory and lawmaking authority and the legislature will just kick everything over there.
00:31:32.000 So now we have a system of perverse incentives.
00:31:34.000 We have a set of people in the legislature who will bitch and moan about stuff that's happening in the executive branch, but they don't actually want to do anything.
00:31:41.000 Because if they do anything, they're going to be held responsible for doing something.
00:31:45.000 Let's say that Congress came along and they said to President Trump, we hate your trade program, we're removing the authority for you to do what you're doing.
00:31:51.000 And then the economy went south.
00:31:52.000 Well, those legislatures get punished at the office.
00:31:55.000 They get punished at the ballot box.
00:31:57.000 What if they just bitch and moan about it, and then the economy goes south?
00:32:00.000 Well, then they get to say, I told you so, without actually having to take responsibility.
00:32:03.000 The legislature could tomorrow revoke the authority of the President of the United States to unilaterally impose tariffs this way.
00:32:10.000 They could.
00:32:11.000 They're not.
00:32:12.000 The reason they're not is, again, because no one in the legislature has the stones to stand by the decisions they want to make, which is why the executive branch continues to grow.
00:32:20.000 They write these vague, omnibus packages that nobody knows how to implement, except the bureaucrats in the executive branch who wrote them.
00:32:26.000 You know who writes bills?
00:32:27.000 The people who write bills are bureaucrats in the executive branch working with bureaucrats in the legislative branch, as well as lobbyists.
00:32:33.000 That's who actually writes the bills.
00:32:34.000 Do you actually think that Senator Chuck Schumer is sitting there writing bills?
00:32:37.000 Do you think Nancy Pelosi has ever written a bill?
00:32:40.000 She has never written a bill.
00:32:41.000 Nancy Pelosi has never written a single bill.
00:32:43.000 Okay, Nancy Pelosi's staffers may have written a bill in coordination with lobbyists and people in the executive branch, but she has never written probably a sentence of a bill.
00:32:52.000 At least beyond the preamble, which is where you talk about how wonderful you are.
00:32:56.000 The legislature has failed.
00:32:58.000 The legislature has failed and failed in dramatic fashion.
00:33:01.000 And the reason that the legislature continues to kick authority over is because they're attempting to avoid responsibility.
00:33:06.000 The judiciary is happy to centralize authority in the executive branch because the judiciary is, again, a federal institution.
00:33:12.000 And the way the judiciary gains power is by enjoying the privileges of being part of a federal government over which it gets to preside.
00:33:20.000 And the executive always wants to grab power.
00:33:21.000 So the constitutional structure has been completely inverted here in a serious way.
00:33:27.000 Article I of the Constitution was the legislature.
00:33:30.000 Article 2 of the Constitution was the presidency.
00:33:32.000 Article 3 was the judiciary.
00:33:34.000 Now it's almost backwards in terms of importance.
00:33:37.000 Now it's almost judiciary, presidency, legislative branch.
00:33:40.000 The legislative branch has become a defunct institution.
00:33:43.000 The legislative branch has unfortunately become a vestigial organ of American governance.
00:33:49.000 And that's a real problem.
00:33:50.000 It's a real problem because President Trump is not ambitious enough to overthrow the constitutional order by just running roughshod over the legislature.
00:33:59.000 Plus he has a Republican Congress, so it's not really an issue.
00:34:02.000 But there are presidents who have and presidents who would like to.
00:34:05.000 President Obama's executive amnesty being the most obvious example.
00:34:08.000 So you think this policy is bad?
00:34:10.000 Blame Trump, but blame the Congress more, because Congress could do what it should do right now about stopping this, but they don't have the stones to do it, which is really sad.
00:34:18.000 OK, so I want to talk a little bit more about some of the scandals that are plaguing the Trump administration, unfortunately, and a scandal that continues to plague the Obama administration.
00:34:27.000 First, you're going to have to go over to dailywire.com.
00:34:28.000 So for $9.99 a month, you can get a subscription to dailywire.com.
00:34:31.000 That means you get the rest of this show live.
00:34:32.000 It means you get the rest of the Andrew Klavan show live, the rest of the Michael Knowles show live.
00:34:37.000 It also means that you get to ask questions in our mailbag.
00:34:40.000 Our next episode of The Conversation is coming up on Tuesday, March 13th.
00:34:45.000 At 5.30 p.m., 2.30 p.m.
00:34:46.000 Pacific, featuring your favorite human, me.
00:34:49.000 Coincidentally, also my favorite human.
00:34:51.000 Subscribe today!
00:34:52.000 Be a part of the conversation so I can answer your questions in this hour-long live Q&A.
00:34:56.000 The conversation will stream live on Ben Shapiro's Facebook page and Daily Wire YouTube channel.
00:35:00.000 It'll be free for everyone to watch.
00:35:01.000 Only subscribers can ask the questions.
00:35:04.000 Ah, yes.
00:35:30.000 The leftist here is hot or cold, mug, tumbler, it's not a mug, it's a tumbler, I've been informed.
00:35:35.000 So, it is just, I have to drink from the right side of it though in order for it to work.
00:35:41.000 It is spectacular, ah, the refreshing nature of this tumbler.
00:35:44.000 You get that with the annual subscription, 99 bucks a year.
00:35:47.000 Cheaper than the monthly subscription, check it out.
00:35:50.000 Or, check us out later, YouTube, iTunes, please subscribe, please leave us a review, it always helps us.
00:35:54.000 We are the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast in the nation.
00:36:02.000 So, a couple of more pieces of news on the Trump front, and then we'll get to some other elements, including social media crackdowns on conservatives.
00:36:09.000 So, the Trump administration had—I did a lot of bad Trump there.
00:36:14.000 Now it's time for a little bit of good Trump.
00:36:16.000 So, Trump was commenting on foreign affairs.
00:36:18.000 He had the Swedish prime minister at the White House yesterday, and he said to the Swedish prime minister, by the way, I was right, you have an immigration problem.
00:36:25.000 This is true.
00:36:27.000 Certainly you have a problem with the immigration.
00:36:29.000 It's caused problems in Sweden.
00:36:31.000 I was one of the first ones to say it.
00:36:33.000 I took a little heat, but that was okay because I proved to be right.
00:36:38.000 But you do have a problem and I know the problem will slowly disappear, hopefully rapidly disappear.
00:36:45.000 Pretty spectacular.
00:36:46.000 You know, the truth is that this is right.
00:36:48.000 You know, I remember back during the campaign, Trump said that Sweden was having severe problems with particularly unvetted Muslim immigration, and that it was raising the crime rates in places like Malmo.
00:36:56.000 And the media went nuts.
00:36:57.000 How dare he say such a thing?
00:36:59.000 How dare he suggest such a thing?
00:37:01.000 And they said this on a broad level, right?
00:37:03.000 I pointed out at the time that Trump's specific claim was not true, but his broader claim that there was a crime problem in Sweden because of immigration, that was true.
00:37:09.000 And the media jumped to, there's no problem in Sweden, everything is great.
00:37:12.000 Trump was right on that.
00:37:13.000 He is still right on that.
00:37:14.000 And what's hilarious is that the New York Times has now been forced to write pieces about why they're having a severe crime problem in Sweden.
00:37:19.000 It turns out that part of that is because when you import an entire population of people coming from countries with higher crime rates and significant cultural differences, you may, in fact, increase the crime rate in your country.
00:37:29.000 It's one of the reasons, by the way, why whenever you compare crime rates in particular countries, particular states, when you check the gun homicide rates in particular countries, you actually have to look at the people and not look at the location.
00:37:40.000 So, there's this common thing that's done by advocates of gun control, where they say, look at the murder rate in Norway versus the murder rate in the United States.
00:37:47.000 Look how the murder rate in Norway is way lower than the murder rate in the United States.
00:37:49.000 That's probably because there are more guns in the United States.
00:37:51.000 Well, as Milton Friedman once said about the economic status of Norwegians, people were saying, if you look at the economy in Norway, it's stronger in some ways than the economy in the United States.
00:38:00.000 He said, not among Norwegians, meaning that
00:38:03.000 Norwegians in the United States earn significantly more than Norwegians in Norway.
00:38:06.000 Swedes in the United States are living in lower crime areas and commit fewer crimes probably than Swedes in Sweden.
00:38:12.000 And so you actually have to look at the people who you're talking about if you want to compare apples to apples and not apples to oranges because it's people who are picking up guns and committing crimes.
00:38:19.000 This is why population matters.
00:38:21.000 This is why you actually have to treat everybody as an individual.
00:38:25.000 But if you are assessing whether a group of people generally
00:38:29.000 Is more or less likely to commit crimes, then you have to look at the statistical variability there and you have to look at cultural differentiation.
00:38:36.000 It's not an ethnic thing, it's not a racial thing.
00:38:38.000 This is about cultures, it's about religions, it's about the assimilability of particular people who are from different cultures.
00:38:46.000 Okay, so Trump said that to the Swedish Prime Minister.
00:38:48.000 Other things that he said, so yesterday he said,
00:38:50.000 We are looking at sanctions on Russia.
00:38:52.000 He said, we're not going to allow Russia to influence 2018.
00:38:54.000 This made the press very upset because, of course, their theory has been that Trump is working hand-in-glove with Russia and that in 2018, Vladimir Putin will come and personally stuff the ballot box for Devin Nunes in his district, which is, of course, very silly.
00:39:05.000 Here's Trump saying this.
00:39:07.000 But are you worried about Russia trying to meddle in the midterm election?
00:39:11.000 No, because we'll counteract whatever they do.
00:39:13.000 We'll counteract it very strongly.
00:39:15.000 And we are having strong backup systems.
00:39:17.000 And we've been working, actually, we haven't been given credit for this, but we've actually been working very hard on the 18 election and the 20 election coming up.
00:39:26.000 Thank you very much.
00:39:27.000 Okay, so good for Trump for saying this, and again, they are talking about leveraging harsher sanctions on Russia as well.
00:39:33.000 So that's the good news for Trump.
00:39:34.000 The bad news for Trump is that Stormy Daniels, a porn star, is suing him, so that's awesome.
00:39:38.000 So I will say that Black Lives Matter had the stupidest tweet I've seen in a long time yesterday.
00:39:42.000 They said that,
00:39:48.000 And I thought to myself, the name of your group is Black Lives Matter.
00:39:51.000 You might have thought maybe slavery was the low point in American history.
00:39:55.000 Like, if you're going to go with low points in American history, president paying off Pornstar, not good.
00:40:00.000 Slavery, kind of worse.
00:40:02.000 Internment of the Japanese?
00:40:03.000 Pretty bad.
00:40:05.000 Jim Crow?
00:40:05.000 Kind of crappy.
00:40:07.000 Lots of really bad things have happened in this country.
00:40:09.000 The Trail of Tears.
00:40:11.000 Few bad things have happened that are worse than the President paying off a porn star.
00:40:14.000 That said, is it a useful thing?
00:40:16.000 Is it a good thing that the President of the United States has been profligate with his member?
00:40:20.000 Is it a good thing that the President of the United States has shtooped half the porn stars in Hollywood?
00:40:24.000 Probably not.
00:40:24.000 And the fact that Stormy Daniels is now suing him means another round of stupid headlines that are going to be annoying and irritating.
00:40:30.000 And it is not good that the president, when it comes to his sexual character, has none.
00:40:34.000 So that is obviously a problem.
00:40:36.000 Okay, so meanwhile, speaking of scandal...
00:40:39.000 Top Republicans are now calling for a second special counsel, this time not to investigate Trump-Russia collusion, but to investigate FISA abuses.
00:40:46.000 So, yesterday, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte and Representative Trey Gowdy demanded the appointment of a special counsel to investigate conflicts of interest and decisions made and not made by current and former Justice Department officials in 2016 and 2017.
00:41:00.000 Noting that the public interest requires the action.
00:41:02.000 Gowdy, who is, I think, an honest guy, and Goodlatte, who I also think is honest, penned a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.
00:41:10.000 They say,
00:41:17.000 So what they say is that they now know that there are two dozen witnesses that Michael Horowitz, the DOJ Inspector General, did not have access to, and these witnesses apparently have information about FISA abuses.
00:41:28.000 That list of witnesses includes FBI Director—former FBI Director James Comey.
00:41:33.000 So, Sessions announced that Horowitz would investigate allegations of government surveillance abuse in light of memos that the dossier—that suggested that the dossier compiled by Christopher Steele was used to obtain a FISA warrant to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.
00:41:48.000 Gowdy says this whole FISA warrant was on Carter Page, and all of them agree that this is suspect.
00:41:53.000 This is controversial as to how suspect that FISA warrant was, but there is a pattern of FISA warrants being given out without proper evidence.
00:42:00.000 That's not a particular shock.
00:42:03.000 And Gowdy says, Congress does not have the tools to investigate, plus we leak like the gossip girls.
00:42:07.000 So they're asking for a special counsel to be appointed on this.
00:42:10.000 There should be a special counsel appointed on this, because if Jeff Sessions were to either let the FISA system off the hook or to condemn the FISA system, he'd be accused of political bias.
00:42:20.000 A special counsel on this is probably something useful.
00:42:23.000 Again, the Obama malfeasance with regard to the corruption inside the executive branch was continuous throughout his tenure.
00:42:29.000 Obama has said that he led
00:42:30.000 A very clean administration.
00:42:32.000 That, of course, was not true.
00:42:33.000 He did not lead a clean administration.
00:42:35.000 In fact, his administration was replete with corruption.
00:42:37.000 Eric Holder was a corrupt actor.
00:42:39.000 Eric Holder, who is now trying to run for president, apparently, in 2020, which is just unbelievable, considering that he was held in contempt by Congress for his own corruption.
00:42:47.000 He corrupted the ATF, the ITF.
00:42:50.000 The IRS was corrupted by the Obama administration, the IRS scandal.
00:42:54.000 The DHS was corrupted under Kathleen Sebelius.
00:42:56.000 The VA was corrupted under President Obama.
00:42:58.000 Virtually every
00:43:00.000 Every agency with initials was corrupted under the Obama administration, and all of that deserves thorough investigation.
00:43:07.000 The American people were lied to about that.
00:43:08.000 The media did not do their jobs when Obama was in office.
00:43:10.000 They are doing their jobs when Trump is in office, but they will not again when a Democrat is in office.
00:43:14.000 So special counsel would probably be fair game here.
00:43:17.000 Chelsea Clinton came out yesterday, though, and she says that President Trump should lay off her mom.
00:43:21.000 I thought this was amusing.
00:43:23.000 Back to back, she said that Ivanka Trump was fair game, and then she said that Trump should lay off Hillary.
00:43:27.000 What troubles you the most about the state of the country right now, and what would you say to the president about it?
00:43:34.000 Please do your job.
00:43:38.000 Focus on your job.
00:43:44.000 Please don't worry about the Oscar ratings or how my mom's doing, although thank you, she's doing great.
00:43:51.000 So, don't worry about her or Mom's doing.
00:43:53.000 The reason people are worried about how Hillary's doing is because, again, there was unprosecuted corruption that went on during the Obama administration, and now the Republicans are in charge.
00:44:00.000 They're investigating.
00:44:01.000 It's sad that they had to do it now.
00:44:03.000 They should have done it more when Obama was president.
00:44:05.000 It's sad that it takes another attorney general to actually appoint the special counsels necessary to look into these issues.
00:44:10.000 But that's because Obama corrupted these agencies first.
00:44:13.000 If the Attorney General had done his job when Obama was president, it wouldn't be left to Republicans to do that job.
00:44:18.000 I like Chelsea saying to Trump, lay off Hillary, but then she says, well, it's fine to launch into Ivanka.
00:44:22.000 Do you have any sympathy for her?
00:44:23.000 Because she's an adult who has taken on an official role in the White House.
00:44:28.000 Do you think she's fair game for criticism, or is she just another presidential child?
00:44:33.000 I think anyone who works for the President certainly should expect to be scrutinized for whatever decisions not only she or he is making, but whatever decisions the White House is making on any given day.
00:44:47.000 OK, how about people who work for the Clinton Foundation, which was alleged to be involved in corruption while your name was on it?
00:44:52.000 It's the Bill Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation.
00:44:55.000 How about people who work for their mom's campaign and speak at the DNC?
00:44:59.000 Again, the hypocrisy here is pretty astonishing.
00:45:01.000 Chelsea has barely been asked any questions about the corruption of her parents because she's been seen as off-limits, but Ivanka apparently is within limits.
00:45:09.000 I think both of them should not be off-limits.
00:45:10.000 I think questions should be asked of both of them, and all of that is fine.
00:45:13.000 But the hypocrisy of the media there is pretty astonishing.
00:45:16.000 Okay, so, I want to—let's get to some things I like and some things I hate.
00:45:20.000 So, things that I like.
00:45:23.000 So, I've been doing heaven-related art this week.
00:45:26.000 So, one of those pieces of art is the movie that launched a whole spate of movies in Hollywood in the 1930s and 40s about life after death.
00:45:34.000 So, there's a movie called Heaven Can Wait that came out much later in 1978 with Warren Beatty.
00:45:38.000 It's a remake of this film.
00:45:39.000 The film is called Here Comes Mr. Jordan, and it's about a prizefighter who is supposed to not die in a plane accident, but the angel of death thinks that he's supposed to die and takes him too early.
00:45:49.000 So they take the soul out of his body, but his body is destroyed.
00:45:52.000 And so the soul is supposed to be put back down on Earth, and so it's about his soul inhabiting other bodies, and him trying to make a life for himself doing that.
00:46:00.000 The movie is Here Comes Mr. Jordan.
00:46:02.000 It stars Claude Rains and Robert Montgomery.
00:46:04.000 Here's a little bit of the trailer for it.
00:46:09.000 A murder!
00:46:09.000 Is it going on right now?
00:46:12.000 Yes.
00:46:13.000 Right here in this house?
00:46:16.000 Who's doing it?
00:46:17.000 His wife, and the man she's in love with.
00:46:19.000 They're drowning him in the bathtub.
00:46:21.000 Holy cow!
00:46:22.000 No, Joe Pendleton, Robert Montgomery to you, wants no part of that setup.
00:46:27.000 That is, he thinks he doesn't, until he sees a girl named Betty.
00:46:32.000 I didn't come here so much to thank you as to... because I had to see you again.
00:46:36.000 But that's wonderful.
00:46:38.000 That's wonderful.
00:46:39.000 And here comes Max Korko, Joe's lifetime friend and ex-manager, who thinks Joe cracked up in his plane.
00:46:45.000 Joe is having a hard time convincing him he's wrong.
00:46:48.000 Okay, so the movie's kind of a comedy, it's kind of a drama.
00:46:51.000 It's much better than the 1978 version, and this led to a bunch of other movies, like The Bishop's Wife, about people who come back from the dead and are trying to make a life on Earth, or trying to communicate with people on Earth.
00:47:03.000 It's well worth the watch.
00:47:05.000 And again, this was a time when Americans were, I think, when you watch old movies, there's a certain nostalgia, not just because they're in black and white, but because there's a certain set of values there, right?
00:47:13.000 There's a certain baseline religiosity to movies like this, that there is an afterlife, and that what you do in this world matters, and that the incorporeal soul is a thing.
00:47:25.000 Yeah, that was sort of the commonplace assumption.
00:47:27.000 Now all those assumptions, of course, have been ripped away, and in a materialist world, you can't make this movie.
00:47:31.000 In a materialist world, you can sort of make Bruce Almighty, and that's the best that you can do.
00:47:35.000 But Bruce Almighty is a really watered-down version of Here Comes Mr. Jordan.
00:47:39.000 This idea that God is imminent in the universe is played for laughs, but there's a certain reverence for it in the old movies that doesn't take place in some of the new movies.
00:47:46.000 Okay, time for a couple of things that I hate.
00:47:53.000 So, number one, there is apparently an ISIS-inspired teen who tried to bomb a school yesterday in Utah.
00:47:59.000 Here's a piece of the news story on it.
00:48:00.000 David Morse is relieved after three weeks of waiting for the person who desecrated an American flag and vandalized Hurricane High School to be found.
00:48:09.000 I was totally surprised that I haven't heard anybody say anything about who's done it.
00:48:13.000 No suspect had been reported until today, when a 17-year-old Pineview High School student found a suspicious bag in the hallway.
00:48:20.000 A backpack that was smoking.
00:48:22.000 The entire school was evacuated because of it.
00:48:24.000 Follow the instructions of the officers.
00:48:27.000 Now, a student who, according to police, was authorized to be on Pineview's campus for coursework is the alleged suspect in both of these cases.
00:48:34.000 You got a mentally ill young person that needs some help.
00:48:38.000 Okay, so the reason that I point this out is because there's a guy who set off a bomb that didn't go off on a school campus.
00:48:45.000 Have you heard this story?
00:48:46.000 Has this been at the top of the news anywhere?
00:48:47.000 Okay, now maybe it's because the bomb was unsuccessful.
00:48:49.000 Maybe it's because it was with a bomb.
00:48:51.000 If a student had walked into school with a gun and fired a bunch of shots and nobody had been killed, but then it turned out that the person was a member of the NRA, you think it might lead the news?
00:48:59.000 You think maybe there's an agenda to the news?
00:49:01.000 Yeah, this sort of demonstrates that there's a pretty significant agenda to the news.
00:49:04.000 Okay, other things that I hate.
00:49:05.000 So, speaking of the news and bias in the news, one of the things that's been very irritating for people in conservative media
00:49:11.000 We're good.
00:49:26.000 Which is just ridiculous, because people will find ways to buy guns anyway.
00:49:30.000 I mean, there are plenty of stores online where you can buy a gun and it ships to a federally licensed firearm dealer.
00:49:34.000 Facebook has been slammed for ignoring conservative stories and outlets in its trending news.
00:49:38.000 They shifted their algorithm, but now they've shifted their algorithm again, supposedly to downgrade partisan news, saying that instead they want to push news that is going to
00:49:46.000 Thank you.
00:50:02.000 That's the way that they figured this out.
00:50:03.000 So, that means that sites that are openly partisan, like Daily Wire, are going to be downgraded.
00:50:08.000 But sites that are fake, non-partisan, like the New York Times and CNN, are going to be upgraded.
00:50:12.000 Which stands in favor of legacy media.
00:50:14.000 So it cuts out the traffic base for a lot of people.
00:50:16.000 It means that even though you're a follower of the Daily Wire, even though you're a follower of my show, my stuff may not show up in your feed if you don't actually set it specifically to show up in your feed.
00:50:25.000 Because Facebook is trying to downgrade my content for you, even though you enjoy my content and you voluntarily clicked into following me.
00:50:31.000 This stuff is really bad, and all the algorithms are being set by a bunch of leftists in Silicon Valley, which is why Peter Thiel just left Silicon Valley.
00:50:38.000 The irony here, of course, is that conservatives like me have been making the case against regulation of these industries.
00:50:43.000 I don't think these industries ought to be regulated.
00:50:45.000 I think they're free market industries.
00:50:46.000 But the people who are being slapped are the deregulators.
00:50:49.000 The people who want to regulate the industry are being flattered by all of this.
00:50:52.000 All of this really is an attempt to reinstate the dominance of the mainstream media, to restate the power structure, because if you get rid of the ad-supported
00:51:01.000 We're good to go.
00:51:23.000 I don't know if that's conscious, but it's certainly a bias that is present on Twitter, on Facebook, on YouTube, on Google.
00:51:29.000 There's a reason, PragerU, you just filed a lawsuit against YouTube.
00:51:32.000 Okay.
00:51:33.000 Final thing that I hate, Neil deGrasse Tyson tweeting out stupid things again.
00:51:37.000 So he tweeted on Art, quote, No, that's an idiotic definition.
00:51:47.000 Creativity that satisfies and affirms your worldview is everything Hollywood made this year.
00:51:52.000 Everything Hollywood makes satisfies and affirms its own worldview.
00:51:56.000 The idea that you have to be challenged by art in order for it to be art is ridiculous.
00:51:59.000 I'm not challenged by St.
00:52:00.000 Matthew Passion by Bach because I don't find that it challenges me religiously with regard to Jesus, for example.
00:52:07.000 I just enjoy it.
00:52:07.000 I think it reaffirms the religious nature of the world.
00:52:10.000 I don't feel challenged, particularly, by a lot of artistic works.
00:52:15.000 I think that a lot of artistic works are just wonderful art in and of themselves.
00:52:18.000 Basically, what Tyson is saying is that if it's propaganda, it's art, and if it's not propaganda, it's entertainment.
00:52:22.000 That's just insane and ridiculous.
00:52:24.000 But, again, that's sort of Neil Tyson's stock and trade on Twitter at this point.
00:52:30.000 Okay, final note.
00:52:32.000 We haven't done Bible in a while, so this is a very quick biblical note here.
00:52:35.000 So last week was Purim.
00:52:36.000 I didn't explain what that was.
00:52:36.000 That's the story of Esther in the palace of Ahasuerus, who's probably Xerxes in real history.
00:52:43.000 The story there is that Xerxes' top advisor, Haman, was planning a genocide of the Jews, and meanwhile, Ahasuerus, Xerxes, was looking for a new wife.
00:52:53.000 He'd killed his first wife, Vashti, and he settled on, in a beauty contest, he settled on Melania Trump.
00:52:58.000 No, he settled instead
00:53:00.000 I think so.
00:53:24.000 It's a long scroll that tells the story.
00:53:27.000 It never once mentions the name of God.
00:53:29.000 It's a Jewish religious holiday, but it doesn't mention the name of God once.
00:53:32.000 Why?
00:53:32.000 Because it's the most modern Jewish holiday.
00:53:34.000 God is imminent in the universe if you're there looking for Him.
00:53:37.000 If you see Him behind the curtain.
00:53:39.000 If you see, in Judaism it's called Hester Ponim, God hiding His face.
00:53:43.000 Hester comes from the same root.
00:53:45.000 The idea is that God hides His face in history.
00:53:47.000 God hides His face in your life.
00:53:48.000 But if you look closely enough, you can identify godly patterns in your own life
00:53:53.000 If you don't look close enough, however, it's God hiding behind nature in order to provide you a semblance of free will.
00:53:57.000 So, in many ways, it's the most religious holiday while being overtly one of the least religious holidays in the Jewish canon.
00:54:03.000 Okay, we will be back here tomorrow with all the latest.
00:54:05.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:54:06.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:54:11.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Mathis Blover.
00:54:13.000 Executive producer, Jeremy Boring.
00:54:15.000 Senior producer, Jonathan Hay.
00:54:17.000 Our technical producer is Austin Stevens.
00:54:19.000 Edited by Alex Zingaro.
00:54:20.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Coromina.
00:54:21.000 Hair and makeup is by Jesua Alvera.
00:54:23.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire Forward Publishing production.
00:54:26.000 Copyright Forward Publishing 2018.