The Ben Shapiro Show - March 05, 2019


Being Alive | Ep. 730


Episode Stats

Length

54 minutes

Words per Minute

203.34358

Word Count

11,028

Sentence Count

747

Misogynist Sentences

47

Hate Speech Sentences

19


Summary

AOC jumps on every rake in sight, Google uncovers some inconvenient data about the wage gap, and British women panic about global warming. Today's episode of The Ben Shapiro Show is all about AOC, and why she is the perfect example of why you should never trust a politician with your money, no matter who they are or what they say. If you don't think that we're sitting on a bit of a house of cards here, you're living with your head in the sand. But since you're listening to my podcast, that means you are clearly smarter than the average American. So what is your plan? Can you afford another hit to your retirement like the last downturn when the S&P dropped 50%? Hedge against inflation and instability with precious metals. Gold is a safe haven against uncertainty. When the bottom falls out of everything else, gold tends to safeguard your savings. Go check them out right now by texting "ELT" to 474747. That's to get your no-cost, no-obligation kit. You'll get a 16-page kit that includes a FREE information kit on physical precious metals! See if diversifying into gold and silver makes some sense for you! Go check out Birch Gold Group and get your No-Cost, No-Obligation Kit! That's it, a FREE info kit that helps you get started on your savings and get the most out of your investment in the world's most precious metal! Ben Shapiro's show that can help you get the best deal on everything you can t get it anywhere else. It s all about gold and everything you need it in the best place you can do it, anywhere you can get it, even better than you can be a good deal, no less than $5, no more than that, it s gonna help you, a whole world, a free guide on it, and more, a guide that s a whole place to help you s a guide to it, right in the whole place, a place that s not even it s not a real deal, a bunch of it s a real thing, a podcast like that a whole story, right like it s $5-free, a real story, a story like it's not even a whole thing, and more of it, so much more, real things like that s really it, really that s it really is it really it s really that thing, right really it's really it really , and more like that, really really ...


Transcript

00:00:00.000 AOC jumps on every rake in sight, Google uncovers some inconvenient data about the wage gap, and British women panic about global warming.
00:00:07.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:08.000 This is the Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:09.000 I have to admit there are some days when I have to rejigger the entire show schedule because of breaking news in the morning.
00:00:20.000 And this was one of those days.
00:00:22.000 I didn't really want to talk about AOC, but now AOC has decided that she is just going to let all of the silly flow free.
00:00:28.000 Just all of the silly and the malice and the animus flow free.
00:00:31.000 We'll talk about it in just one second.
00:00:34.000 Let's talk about the national debt.
00:00:35.000 In 2008, the national debt was $10 trillion.
00:00:37.000 Today, the debt is $22 trillion and it is rising like a hockey stick.
00:00:41.000 If you don't think that we're sitting on a bit of a house of cards here, you're living with your head in the sand.
00:00:45.000 But since you're listening to my podcast, that means you are clearly smarter than the average American.
00:00:49.000 So what is your plan?
00:00:50.000 Can you afford another hit to your retirement like the last downturn when the S&P dropped 50%?
00:00:54.000 Hedge against inflation and hedge against uncertainty and instability with precious metals.
00:00:58.000 Gold is a safe haven against uncertainty.
00:01:00.000 My savings plan is diversified and yours should be as well.
00:01:03.000 The company I trust with precious metal purchases, Birch Gold Group.
00:01:06.000 And right now, thanks to a little-known IRS tax law, you can even move that IRA or eligible 401k into an IRA backed by physical gold and silver.
00:01:14.000 Perfect for people who want to protect their hard-earned retirement savings from any future geopolitical uncertainty.
00:01:19.000 Look back historically.
00:01:20.000 When the bottom falls out of everything else, gold tends to safeguard savings.
00:01:23.000 Birch Gold Group has thousands of satisfied customers, countless five-star reviews, and A-plus rating with the Better Business Bureau.
00:01:29.000 Contact Birch Gold Group and get a free information kit on physical precious metals.
00:01:33.000 See if diversifying into gold and silver, at least a little, makes some sense for you.
00:01:36.000 This comprehensive 16-page kit shows how gold and silver can protect your savings.
00:01:39.000 Go check them out right now by texting BEN to 474747.
00:01:44.000 That's to get your no-cost, no-obligation kit.
00:01:46.000 Text BEN to 474747.
00:01:47.000 Again, text BEN to 474747.
00:01:47.000 474747 again text ben to 474747 alrighty so as i was saying the fact is that every evening i put together the schedule for this show the sort of preliminary schedule and then it very often changes Rarely does it get completely overhauled.
00:02:03.000 This morning was one of those mornings, because AOC decides that she is going to be aggressively awful about everything in the world at the same time.
00:02:12.000 Now, listen, I understand that we now live in a political time.
00:02:17.000 When aggressive ignorance is actually a benefit in politics.
00:02:20.000 Aggressive ignorance.
00:02:20.000 Because here's the thing.
00:02:21.000 The more you know about various issues, the more nuanced your thinking tends to be.
00:02:25.000 Or at the very least, the more you tend to understand the ins and outs of the opposing side's thinking.
00:02:30.000 When you don't know things, you tend to speak in Easy bumper stickers.
00:02:34.000 You tend to say things that are bumper sticker slogans, and then people who don't know much cheer you on.
00:02:39.000 And the nice thing about easy bumper sticker slogans is that when they are revealed to be aggressively ignorant, then you can always backfill the ignorance.
00:02:46.000 You can always create a nuanced backstory to try and backfill the fact that you didn't know what you were talking about in the first place.
00:02:53.000 When you add on to this the benefit of being an intersectional leftist, the soft bigotry of low expectations that attends being a minority or a woman or ranking high on the intersectional scale, people are willing to let you off the hook, people are willing to attribute aggressive ignorance to different viewpoints, That makes it pretty easy to be a popular politician like an AOC.
00:03:17.000 She's getting the benefit of the doubt every which way and she simply does not deserve it because she continues to make mistakes and not just make mistakes, say things that are aggressively bad.
00:03:26.000 Aggressively morally bad.
00:03:28.000 So let's start today with her take on the Afghanistan war.
00:03:32.000 So she has decided that she is going to defend, obviously, Ilhan Omar.
00:03:36.000 So you'll recall that Ilhan Omar is an anti-Semite, that she has repeatedly said anti-Semitic things over and over and over again.
00:03:44.000 She has apologized no less than three times in the last six weeks for anti-Semitic remarks because she is, in fact, saying things that reflect her underlying worldview, which is that the Jews are a nefarious force in the world and particularly in United States politics with regard to support for Israel.
00:03:59.000 Well, AOC, who is one of the fresh faces, incredibly fresh as well as face, of the New Democratic Congress, along with Ilhan Omar.
00:04:06.000 Remember, they both appear on the cover of this month's Rolling Stone with Nancy Pelosi.
00:04:12.000 She has decided to come out and defend Ilhan Omar against her fellow Democrats, by the way.
00:04:16.000 So, for example, Representative Juan Vargas.
00:04:19.000 He said it is disturbing that Representative Omar continues to perpetuate hurtful anti-Semitic stereotypes that misrepresent our Jewish community.
00:04:27.000 And the response from AOC was, Now that, right off the bat, is a lie.
00:04:30.000 if Representative Vargas will further explain his stance here that it's unacceptable to even question U.S. foreign policy.
00:04:36.000 Now that, right off the bat, is a lie.
00:04:38.000 He is not saying that he can't question America's foreign policy.
00:04:41.000 What he says is that questioning support for the U.S.-Israel relationship on the basis of conspiracy theories about Jews is unacceptable.
00:04:48.000 That's what he is talking about.
00:04:50.000 But AOC is going to deliberately mischaracterize Vargas' statements so she can defend Ilhan Omar.
00:04:54.000 Now, let's be real about this.
00:04:55.000 Ilhan Omar is an anti-Semite.
00:04:56.000 Rashida Tlaib, the congresswoman from Michigan, is an anti-Semite.
00:05:00.000 And AOC is perfectly comfortable with anti-Semitism.
00:05:03.000 I don't mean a little comfortable.
00:05:04.000 I mean obviously and perfectly comfortable with it.
00:05:07.000 No less than two weeks ago, she tweeted out her joy at speaking with open anti-Semite Jeremy Corbyn, who's the head of the British Labour Party.
00:05:13.000 So she is fine with anti-Semitism.
00:05:16.000 She hangs out with anti-Semites on a regular basis and defends them on a regular basis.
00:05:21.000 Meanwhile, you see folks on the political left, particularly Jewish folks on the political left, some of whom happen to be pro-Israel, Ringing their hands and clutching their pearls and, oh, isn't it sad, isn't it terrible that AOC just doesn't know things?
00:05:36.000 This is where aggressive ignorance really helps you.
00:05:38.000 Because, again, this isn't a matter of aggressive ignorance.
00:05:41.000 She knows what she's saying, she just doesn't care very much.
00:05:43.000 Anyway, AOC continues.
00:05:44.000 She says, plenty of Democratic members have asserted that discussion and debate on this issue is fair and merited.
00:05:49.000 Is this stance a departure from that?
00:05:51.000 No, it isn't.
00:05:52.000 You're just deliberately mischaracterizing Vargas's statement so that you can pretend this is about free speech when it really is about embracing antisemitism.
00:05:59.000 And then she continues, and here's where she veers from the defense of antisemites into ridiculously ignorant territory, for which she will be excused by the media.
00:06:07.000 She says, All of Congress was wrong, including both GOP and Dem Party, and led my generation into a disastrous and wrong war that virtually all would come to regret, except for the one member who stood up, Barbara Lee.
00:06:22.000 Well, Barbara Lee was basically a communist who actually stood against the authorization for use of military force in Afghanistan, not Iraq.
00:06:30.000 When corrected on her aggressive ignorance, AOC then said, Or now, even with a disastrous choice like Elliott Abrams at the helm, a man guilty of crimes related to Iran-Contra, including misleading Congress, it still seems like critiquing U.S. interventionism is taboo.
00:06:43.000 History shows that making some questions unacceptable is a mistake, which is a hilarious take from AOC, who wants to make all questions about her Green New Deal unacceptable.
00:06:53.000 Right, she's the boss.
00:06:54.000 She declared it.
00:06:55.000 She is the boss of the Green New Deal, unless somebody else presents a plan that she gets on board with, which she won't.
00:07:00.000 So she's the boss, and if you question her, you're a climate denier.
00:07:04.000 But then it gets even better.
00:07:05.000 So, she says all of this, and then she corrects herself about Barbara Lee.
00:07:08.000 She says, oops, the Afghanistan War.
00:07:10.000 She means the Afghanistan War was bad.
00:07:13.000 She says, honestly, we shouldn't have been in either, and we should end the AUMF now while we're at it.
00:07:18.000 Okay, that's...
00:07:21.000 Ridiculous.
00:07:22.000 That is ridiculous.
00:07:23.000 We shouldn't have been in the Afghanistan war, and we should end the AUMF now while we're at it.
00:07:27.000 And then she's questioned about that.
00:07:29.000 And people are like, wait, hold up.
00:07:30.000 Are you saying that after 9-11, we should not have gone into Afghanistan?
00:07:34.000 Is that your actual contention, AOC?
00:07:37.000 And she's like, yeah, maybe.
00:07:39.000 Sure, why not?
00:07:41.000 I mean, really, it's pretty astonishing.
00:07:45.000 So she tweets out, following some blowback about this, that what she really means, Jake Tapper asks her a question about it.
00:07:52.000 Jake Tapper asks her, so what exactly do you mean by this?
00:07:56.000 And she immediately responds by saying, well, perhaps, perhaps what we should have done, she says, I think our decision to enter unlimited engagement in Afghanistan, particularly through the AMF, AUMF, the Authorization for Use of Military Force, and Congress's abdication of power and decision-making with the passage of the AUMF, was a mistake.
00:08:14.000 And she says other options.
00:08:16.000 Targeting the network itself, limited engagement, and non-intervention.
00:08:20.000 So she literally was saying non-intervention in the aftermath of 9-11 was another option.
00:08:25.000 And then she says limited engagement or targeting the network itself.
00:08:28.000 This is aggressively fatuous.
00:08:29.000 Aggressively fatuous.
00:08:31.000 Because again, you have to be ignorant of history to say this.
00:08:34.000 You could not target Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan without entering Afghanistan in the first place.
00:08:39.000 She says target terrorist networks.
00:08:40.000 Where does she think Al-Qaeda was located?
00:08:44.000 I'm old enough to remember 9-11.
00:08:45.000 So is she, by the way.
00:08:47.000 And I'm old enough to remember when President Bush asked the Taliban to turn over Osama bin Laden and the Al Qaeda network, and Mullah Omar refused, which led directly to the use of force in Afghanistan.
00:08:58.000 Secondly, she criticizes the AUMF.
00:09:01.000 She obviously has not read the AUMF.
00:09:04.000 It gave the president the power to target terrorists specifically.
00:09:06.000 It does not say a word about invading Afghanistan, and it reserves the powers of Congress under the War Powers Act.
00:09:12.000 It was not an unlimited AUMF.
00:09:14.000 Now, Congress may have later abdicated its responsibility.
00:09:17.000 But the AUMF itself was actually limited.
00:09:21.000 And not only that, you're gonna say in the aftermath of the most devastating terror attack in the history of the United States, that you would not have authorized the president to take action against terrorists?
00:09:31.000 How does she think that the president actually targeted terror finance networks?
00:09:34.000 It was under the AUMF.
00:09:35.000 The AUMF was the legal authority for that.
00:09:38.000 So again, this is just her being aggressively stupid.
00:09:41.000 Her saying aggressively incorrect things.
00:09:43.000 But that's no shock, because this is what she does.
00:09:47.000 And she's not just aggressively incorrect and aggressively wrong about Afghanistan, obviously.
00:09:51.000 She's also aggressively defending anti-Semitism, as I mentioned.
00:09:56.000 So she is now engaging in obvious whataboutism.
00:09:58.000 So whataboutism is this term that has come about in the aftermath of President Trump, really, which suggests that when someone says something bad about Trump, people say, yeah, well, what about Hillary?
00:10:08.000 And it's dumb.
00:10:08.000 It's dumb.
00:10:09.000 Because when Trump does something bad, it's bad.
00:10:10.000 And when Hillary does something bad, it's bad.
00:10:13.000 Now, what you can do is say that.
00:10:14.000 That's not whataboutism.
00:10:15.000 So if, for example, you say it's bad when Trump does it, and also it was bad when Hillary Clinton did it.
00:10:20.000 That's not whataboutism.
00:10:22.000 That is pointing out consistent standards.
00:10:24.000 But AOC engages us in full-on whataboutism with regard to antisemitism, essentially suggesting that we should let Ilhan Omar off the hook for her antisemitism, because in her view, other bigotry has not been excoriated harshly enough.
00:10:39.000 And even in the process of making this defense, she's aggressively ignorant.
00:10:42.000 So she tweets out, She's not even right about this.
00:10:44.000 the extent to which reprimand is sought of Ilhan is that no one seeks this level of reprimand when members make statements about Latinx and other communities.
00:10:52.000 During the shutdown, a GOP member yelled, go back to Puerto Rico on the floor.
00:10:56.000 She's not even right about this.
00:10:58.000 During the shutdown, Republicans yelled at Democrats, go back to Puerto Rico, not because the Democrats were Puerto Rican, but because Democrats were vacationing in Puerto Rico during the government shutdown.
00:11:09.000 So she's just wrong about this.
00:11:12.000 And I'm old enough to remember when the House, including Republicans, voted to censure Steve King on the floor of the House, and they stripped him of his House assignments.
00:11:22.000 And yet here she is saying that Ilhan Omar should undergo nothing.
00:11:25.000 That is classic Whataboutism.
00:11:27.000 She says, it's not my position to tell people how to feel, or that their hurt is invalid, which is of course exactly what she is doing, but incidents like these do beg the question, where are the resolutions against homophobic statements?
00:11:37.000 For anti-blackness?
00:11:39.000 For xenophobia?
00:11:40.000 For a member saying he'll send Obama home to Kenya?
00:11:43.000 And I assume she's talking about Mark Meadows now, who said in a rally back in 2012 something about this, which nobody even remembered or knew anything about until now, basically.
00:11:53.000 But Steve King is the best available comp, and she just ignores the fact that Steve King was just stripped of all of his committee assignments.
00:12:00.000 She says, It's the difference between calling in and calling out.
00:12:01.000 others we should actively check anti-semitism anti-blackness homophobia racism and all other forms of bigotry and the most productive end goal when we see it is to educate and heal it's the difference between calling in and calling out this is where we get into her her minority studies classes at boston university where she starts lecturing people like a psychologist like she knows anything about what she's talking about Calling out is one of the measures of last resort, not first or second resort.
00:12:25.000 We do it when repeated attempts to call in are disrespected or ignored.
00:12:28.000 And I believe that Ilhan, in her statement a few weeks ago, has demonstrated a willingness to work and listen with impacted communities, which is absolute sheer horse nonsense.
00:12:38.000 She has legitimately dropped three anti-Semitic slurs in the course of six weeks.
00:12:43.000 And here is AOC saying, well, you know, we just need to educate Ilhan.
00:12:46.000 That's really what it's about.
00:12:47.000 Lady, you need some education.
00:12:48.000 You're the one who's hanging out with Jeremy Corbyn and defending open anti-Semitism.
00:12:52.000 Even Batya Unger-Sargon, who's the editor of the far left newspaper, The Forward, she says, how exactly is it hurtful when the right thing is done for Jews just because it wasn't done elsewhere?
00:13:01.000 Shouldn't that mean we work harder to condemn other forms of hurtful speech?
00:13:04.000 Not that we refrain when it's Jews?
00:13:06.000 It's not a zero-sum game.
00:13:07.000 It's so disappointing to see it cast as such.
00:13:10.000 And then AOC says it's not zero-sum and we have a serious responsibility to listen to communities when they feel pain.
00:13:16.000 Where I struggle is how we deal with that pain.
00:13:17.000 The how after the what.
00:13:19.000 I also fear brooding resentment because people of color are always promised that people will work harder without commitment.
00:13:24.000 What in the world is she talking about?
00:13:26.000 So she immediately swivels back into, I'm going to ignore the anti-Semitism because maybe it'll upset people of color.
00:13:31.000 What is she even talking about?
00:13:32.000 We'll get to more of AOC's aggressive, aggressive ignorance and the painful excuses being made for her and for Ilhan Omar and for Rashida Tlaib in just one second.
00:13:41.000 First, let's talk about something we can all agree on, saving money.
00:13:45.000 Opinions aren't like smartphones.
00:13:46.000 Everybody has them, but we can all agree that getting the best deal is important when shopping online.
00:13:50.000 You probably heard me talk about Honey.
00:13:52.000 It's an amazing free browser extension that automatically helps me save money on all my favorite sites.
00:13:56.000 I wouldn't be doing this my job if I didn't tell you about how Honey makes even Amazon better.
00:14:00.000 I love Amazon.com.
00:14:01.000 I buy an enormous number of products from Amazon, and I save money nearly every time because I am using Honey.
00:14:06.000 With millions of sellers on Amazon selling the same products, how do you know you're really getting the best price?
00:14:10.000 You don't unless you're using Honey.
00:14:11.000 As you shop on Amazon, Honey's Best Price Finder automatically compares the prices of millions of sellers that carry the item you want.
00:14:18.000 Honey even factors in shipping, sales tax, and Amazon Prime status to make sure you're getting the lowest total price.
00:14:23.000 It shows you the best deal every time, even if Amazon doesn't.
00:14:25.000 It's like having your very own smart shopping assistant.
00:14:28.000 I've bought on Honey recently.
00:14:30.000 I bought some weights for my wife.
00:14:31.000 She started working out and Honey saved us a bunch of money on that.
00:14:34.000 It saves us a bunch of money pretty much every week.
00:14:36.000 More than 10 million people are using Honey to save money right now.
00:14:39.000 So next time you're shopping on Amazon, treat yourself to the free upgrade that guarantees you always get the absolute best price.
00:14:44.000 Add Honey for free at joinhoney.com slash Ben.
00:14:47.000 That is joinhoney.com slash Ben.
00:14:50.000 Honey, the smart shopping assistant that helps you save time and money.
00:14:53.000 Go check them out right now.
00:14:55.000 Okay, so AOC's aggressive ignorance doesn't stop there, believe it or not.
00:14:59.000 So, she also is aggressively ignorant when it comes to her own policies.
00:15:03.000 So, AOC, for example, suggests that she's upset when she gets 10 plastic bags at the store.
00:15:11.000 She's trying to make excuses for the fact that she is a consumerist, the way that most Americans are.
00:15:16.000 She says that she gets upset at how many plastic bags she is handed at the store.
00:15:21.000 I wouldn't be upset that I get ten plastic bags at the grocery store and then have to toss out my plastic bags because the recycling program in the area is tough and that's okay.
00:15:35.000 All of these are not reasons to stop fighting.
00:15:38.000 All of these are reasons to keep fighting.
00:15:41.000 And these are all reasons and pieces of evidence to say, hey, we need to make it easier to recycle.
00:15:46.000 Okay, well, again, you know it's one solution to people handing you ten plastic bags at the grocery?
00:15:51.000 Not taking them.
00:15:53.000 I know, unbelievable, right?
00:15:54.000 Personal choice.
00:15:55.000 I love that according to folks on the left, personal choice, at least on the radical left, personal choice is not something you engage in.
00:16:02.000 The only time you should make a choice is when government forces you to do it.
00:16:04.000 So AOC will continue taking the 10 plastic bags and then throwing them away in the garbage to be flushed away into the ocean and kill the dolphins or something until the government tells her not to do it.
00:16:14.000 But she's going to stump for the government to tell her not to do it.
00:16:16.000 Until then, she just won't do any of it.
00:16:18.000 I legitimately— I live in L.A.
00:16:20.000 In L.A., they don't give you bags unless you ask for the bags, and sometimes they make you pay for the bags.
00:16:25.000 And very often, I will say no to the bags.
00:16:27.000 I believe New York has the same rules.
00:16:29.000 So I'm not sure what she's whining about, but nonetheless, she is indeed whining about All of that.
00:16:34.000 Also, AOC says that we should be talking about investigating President Trump.
00:16:38.000 So add to the to the ignorance and hypocrisy bandwagon for AOC.
00:16:42.000 She says that the real issue in American politics right now is that we are not aggressive enough about talking about President Trump's money.
00:16:48.000 So here she is going off on President Trump and his lack of transparency.
00:16:52.000 Well, he's talking collusion, collusion, collusion.
00:16:54.000 I think in oversight, we should be talking about taxes, taxes, taxes and his bank account, his bank account, his bank account, his financial statements.
00:17:03.000 Statement statements.
00:17:04.000 Because that's where I think actually some of the most troubling practices are with direct relevance to the American people under the scope of oversight.
00:17:15.000 Okay, all of that is fine and dandy, unless it turns out that your chief of staff was funneling a million dollars in slush funds from the campaign to LLCs run by him with no actual transparency as to where the money went.
00:17:27.000 That's according to Ilana Goodman over at the Washington Examiner.
00:17:30.000 Two political action committees founded by AOC's top aide funneled over $1 million in political donations into two of his own private companies, according to a complaint filed with the FEC on Monday.
00:17:40.000 The cash transfers from the PACs, overseen by Saikat Chakrabarty, the freshman Socialist Democrat's chief of staff, run counter to her pledges to increase transparency and reduce the influence of dark money in politics.
00:17:52.000 Chakrabarty's companies appear to have been set up for the sole purpose of obscuring how the political donations were used.
00:17:58.000 The arrangement skirted reporting requirements and may have violated the $5,000 limit on contributions from federal PACs to candidates, according to a complaint filed by the National Legal and Policy Center, a government watchdog group.
00:18:10.000 Campaign finance attorneys described the arrangement as really weird and an indication there is something amiss.
00:18:16.000 They said there was no way of telling where the political donations went, meaning they could have been pocketed or used by the company to pay for off-the-books campaign operations.
00:18:23.000 In other words, what happened is that AOC's campaign basically funneled, or a super PAC associated with AOC, funneled a million dollars, a million dollars to two shell companies controlled by her chief of staff, and then no one knows where the money went.
00:18:39.000 And FEC lawyers are looking into this now.
00:18:41.000 This may be a violation of law.
00:18:43.000 Adav Noti is a senior director for the Campaign Legal Center and a former FEC lawyer.
00:18:47.000 He said the arrangement was highly unusual and seemed intended to obscure the destination of the funds.
00:18:52.000 He said, none of this makes any sense.
00:18:53.000 I can't even begin to disentangle that.
00:18:55.000 They're either confused or they're trying to conceal something.
00:18:58.000 He says it does seem like there's something amiss.
00:19:00.000 I can only think of really two likely possibilities for this sort of pattern of disbursements.
00:19:04.000 One is a scam pack possibility.
00:19:06.000 They're really just paying themselves and they're concealing it by using the LLC.
00:19:09.000 The other is that there's actually another recipient that the money is going to the LLC and then being dispersed in some other way that they want to conceal.
00:19:17.000 So none of this is very good for AOC, but here's the thing, none of it matters for AOC because in the end, the Democratic Party is going to continue to defend its fresh faces.
00:19:24.000 Why do they continue to defend the fresh faces?
00:19:27.000 Because the higher ups in politics understand that at this point in time, it is better to have a bunch of aggressively ignorant but attractive faces at the head of your party than it is to have somebody who knows what the hell they're talking about.
00:19:39.000 Nancy Pelosi is happy to have AOC out there pushing the envelope, broadening the Overton window, raising the issues, even if it means that she's going to say dumb things every once in a while, because the Democrats are fully aware that they can walk this stuff back.
00:19:53.000 This is one of the benefits to having a media that is willing to cover for any amount of insanity on your side of the political aisle.
00:20:00.000 The media bias that allows Democrats to get away with legitimately everything is pretty amazing.
00:20:06.000 It's really, truly amazing.
00:20:07.000 So, for example, the Democrats right now have been engaging in a cover-up of open anti-Semitism, and Politico is covering for them.
00:20:14.000 Politico has an article today, says House Dems will take floor action to confront Omar's latest Israel comments.
00:20:19.000 And their big question here is not whether Ilhan Omar should be personally called out, of course, because we can't personally call out Ilhan Omar the same way that Steve King was personally centered on the floor of the House.
00:20:32.000 No, Ilhan Omar shouldn't be personally called out.
00:20:35.000 The real issue here, according to Politico, is that GOP leaders have begun to pounce.
00:20:41.000 It's the GOP leaders pouncing.
00:20:43.000 And it's not just Politico.
00:20:44.000 The New York Times headlined about all of this.
00:20:45.000 Ilhan Omar's criticism raises the question, is AIPAC too powerful?
00:20:51.000 What in the living hell is that headline?
00:20:53.000 So her anti-Semitism did not raise the question, is her anti-Semitism correct?
00:20:57.000 When Steve King said what he said about white nationalism, the New York Times did not ask the question.
00:21:02.000 Steve King's comments raised the question, is white nationalism stigmatized?
00:21:07.000 Like what in the hell are they talking about?
00:21:09.000 The answer is the New York Times is fine with sliding over into anti-Semitism because they are so radically anti-Israel they don't even see the line.
00:21:17.000 And here's the truth.
00:21:18.000 You can criticize Israel, of course.
00:21:19.000 You can criticize AIPAC.
00:21:20.000 I've criticized AIPAC.
00:21:21.000 I thought AIPAC did a garbage job when it came to stumping against the Iran deal.
00:21:25.000 You can criticize the state of Israel.
00:21:26.000 I've criticized a bunch of administrations, including Bibi's.
00:21:30.000 But there is a distinction between that and claiming that general support for Israel is pushed by Jewish money and Jewish dual loyalty, which is what Ilhan Omar actually said.
00:21:38.000 It's what Ilhan Omar actually... It must be beautiful to have the media on your side to this extent.
00:21:43.000 It must make life so incredibly easy.
00:21:47.000 Now, what it does lead to when the media are constantly parroting talking points is these awkward moments when reality breaks through.
00:21:54.000 I'm gonna get to that in just one second.
00:21:56.000 First, let's talk about how you protect your online activity.
00:21:59.000 Admit it, you think cybercrime is something that happens to other people.
00:22:02.000 You may think that no one wants your data or that hackers can't grab your passwords or credit card details, but you would be wrong.
00:22:08.000 Stealing data from unsuspecting people on public Wi-Fi is one of the simplest and cheapest ways for hackers to make money.
00:22:13.000 When you leave your internet connection unencrypted, you might as well be writing your passwords and credit card numbers on a huge billboard for the rest of the world to see.
00:22:20.000 That's why I decided to take action.
00:22:21.000 To protect myself from cybercriminals, I use ExpressVPN.
00:22:24.000 ExpressVPN secures and anonymizes your internet browsing by encrypting your data and hiding your public IP address.
00:22:30.000 ExpressVPN has easy-to-use apps that run seamlessly in the background of your computer, phone, and tablet.
00:22:35.000 Turning on ExpressVPN protection?
00:22:36.000 That only takes one click.
00:22:37.000 Using ExpressVPN, I can safely surf on public Wi-Fi without being snooped on or having my personal data stolen.
00:22:43.000 For less than $7 a month, you can get the same ExpressVPN protection that I have.
00:22:47.000 ExpressVPN is rated the number one VPN service by TechRadar.
00:22:50.000 It comes with a 30-day money-back guarantee.
00:22:52.000 Protect your online activity today.
00:22:54.000 Find out how you can get three months for free at ExpressVPN.com slash Ben.
00:22:58.000 That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S-V-P-N.com slash Ben for three months free with a one-year package.
00:23:03.000 Visit ExpressVPN.com slash Ben to learn more.
00:23:07.000 Well, as I say, the media's willingness to cover for virtually any left-wing narrative benefits the left, not only in allowing them to defend against the insane things that so many folks on the radical left say, But it also pushes a narrative that benefits the left.
00:23:21.000 A narrative of impending doom and crisis.
00:23:23.000 A narrative that America is a terrible place that requires deep-seated change in the nature of the American bargain in order for justice to be done.
00:23:33.000 And every so often, this media experience runs up against reality.
00:23:37.000 First, it convinces a lot of people.
00:23:39.000 You want to know one of the reasons why politics feels so critical today?
00:23:42.000 You want to know one of the reasons why people are so polarized?
00:23:44.000 It's because our amygdalas light up every time there's a headline.
00:23:47.000 Because the media make a lot of money off crisis thinking.
00:23:50.000 Off the idea that this is the end of the world.
00:23:52.000 That being alive is, in essence, a dangerous bargain.
00:23:57.000 And none of that is true.
00:23:59.000 So the impact of media coverage on stuff like this is a constant feeling of crisis, which of course would require constant government intervention, bigger government intervention, more cover for people like AOC, who after all are just trying to do the right thing.
00:24:13.000 In the end, the defense that the media make of people like Ilhan Omar and AOC and Rashida Tlaib and Jeremy Corbyn, the defense that they are constantly making of these folks, is heavily reliant on the fact that they think that if you have to break a few eggs to make an omelette, you break a few eggs to make an omelette, because the world is in peril.
00:24:28.000 And this leads millions of people into a certain crisis mentality about the state of the world that simply is not accurate.
00:24:34.000 So, indicator of that crisis mentality, there's amazing video from the BBC of this crazy group of women who are now suggesting that they are not going to have children because of the danger of global warming.
00:24:46.000 And listen to the rhetoric these women are spouting.
00:24:47.000 And the BBC humoring it, patting them on the head, basically suggesting that maybe they're right.
00:24:52.000 AOC has said the same thing, right?
00:24:53.000 AOC said last week, maybe people shouldn't have kids because of climate change.
00:24:57.000 Now this has become a thing.
00:24:59.000 In Britain, women pledging not to have children because of climate change.
00:25:02.000 Our planet is in a kind of collapse.
00:25:06.000 The natural world is collapsing around us and that's actually happening right now.
00:25:11.000 And I'm so disappointed by the response by authorities to this crisis.
00:25:18.000 And so freaked out by it.
00:25:21.000 Everything I've read.
00:25:23.000 Um, that I've, basically last year I came to the decision that I couldn't bring a child into that.
00:25:30.000 If we're in this situation now, you know, even since my parents had me, we've destroyed 60% of life on this planet.
00:25:37.000 What would that be like when my child's my age?
00:25:40.000 Will there be 10% left?
00:25:42.000 Okay, this is just sheer craziness.
00:25:45.000 Okay, so she's suggesting humanity's wiped out 60% of animal population since 1970.
00:25:49.000 That is according to a particular environmental report.
00:25:53.000 It is very questionable as to whether this is actually true.
00:25:58.000 Ed Young over at The Atlantic says that that finding has been widely mischaracterized.
00:26:03.000 The team behind Living Planet Index relied on previous studies in which researchers estimated the size of different animal populations, whether through direct counts, camera traps, satellites, or proxies, like the presence of nests or tracks.
00:26:13.000 The teams collated such estimates for 16,700 populations of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish across 4,000 species.
00:26:21.000 That covers just 6.4% of the 63,000 or so species of vertebrates, that is backbone animals that are thought to exist.
00:26:29.000 And then they calculated that the size of vertebrate populations has declined by 60% on average, which does not mean that humans have culled 60% of animals.
00:26:38.000 The report itself says that's not true, but the media covered it as though 60% of animals were dying.
00:26:43.000 That is simply not the case.
00:26:45.000 The media have an interest in promoting the idea that the world is in grave danger so that we hand more power over to ignorant people who pledge to fix everything because the media agrees with their general agenda.
00:26:56.000 Now, here's the reality about the world we live in.
00:26:58.000 It's a pretty unbelievable place.
00:27:00.000 It's a truly incredible place.
00:27:02.000 Here's an article from the New York Times.
00:27:03.000 You want to know about the ingenuity of humankind?
00:27:06.000 You want to know about the incredible innovativeness and adaptiveness of human beings?
00:27:10.000 This is an unbelievable story.
00:27:12.000 It's from the New York Times today.
00:27:14.000 Today, and this will get a lot less coverage than the idea that we are on the verge of a meltdown in terms of human life and that we must give all control of government to government because of great inequality and burgeoning civil war and all this.
00:27:25.000 It's just not true.
00:27:28.000 Apoorva Mantavilla reporting.
00:27:30.000 HIV reported cured in a second patient.
00:27:33.000 Scientists have long tried to duplicate the procedure that led to the first long-term remission 12 years ago.
00:27:38.000 With the so-called London patient, they seem to have succeeded.
00:27:40.000 For the second time since the global epidemic began, a patient appears to have been cured of infection with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.
00:27:48.000 The news comes nearly 12 years to the day after the first patient known to be cured, a feat that researchers have long tried and failed to duplicate.
00:27:55.000 The surprise success now confirms that a cure for HIV infection is possible, if difficult, researchers said.
00:28:01.000 Publicly, the scientists are describing the case as a long-term remission.
00:28:04.000 In interviews, most experts are calling it a cure, with the caveat that it is hard to know how to define the word when there are only two known instances.
00:28:12.000 We live in a time when we are developing toward cures for diseases that have wiped thousands of people, and in Africa, tens of thousands of people off planet Earth.
00:28:21.000 We live in a time when we have wiped out some of the gravest diseases that have ever threatened mankind.
00:28:25.000 We live in a time with more prosperity and more freedom than any time in human history.
00:28:29.000 And we are being told by the media at every turn that everything is a crisis.
00:28:32.000 And if everything is a crisis, then we look for an easy solution.
00:28:35.000 And the easy solution comes in the form of a bumper sticker.
00:28:38.000 The truth is, there are very few easy solutions.
00:28:40.000 The only easy solution is to let people live.
00:28:43.000 To leave people alone.
00:28:45.000 To let innovativeness sprout.
00:28:47.000 To treat other people with a generalized level of tolerance, even if you disagree with them.
00:28:51.000 That's the actual solution.
00:28:52.000 But when the media are constantly promoting the idea of doom and gloom, it's the end of the world, we're all gonna die, The natural instinct is to turn to people who share radical solutions.
00:29:04.000 And that aggressive ignorance, again, is not only promoted by media.
00:29:07.000 Anybody who cuts against the aggressive ignorance, anybody who cuts against that narrative is deemed not sufficiently woke.
00:29:14.000 So for example, best story of the day along these lines, Google has done a study.
00:29:18.000 They studied their own pay.
00:29:19.000 And here's what the study found.
00:29:21.000 They found that men were being systematically underpaid as compared with women.
00:29:25.000 Why does that matter?
00:29:27.000 Because then Google tried to walk back the results of its own studies so as to agree with the generalized narrative that America is sexist, including Google.
00:29:33.000 It's unbelievable.
00:29:35.000 Wokeness, this belief that America is naturally bad, that the West is naturally filled with inequality and poverty and cruelty and malice and that the Earth is dying because of the West, This belief has been so inculcated into the media and by the media, That we are willing to buy sheer nonsense from politicians who mirror that belief, even as they say crazy things on every other score.
00:30:00.000 And we're willing to overlook all of the worst things they say, because after all, they are morally right.
00:30:05.000 As AOC has said before, factually wrong doesn't matter.
00:30:07.000 Only morally right matters.
00:30:09.000 In a second, I'm going to tell you more about this Google study, which, again, we have known this stuff for years.
00:30:14.000 There is nothing new here.
00:30:15.000 Women are treated unbelievably well in the United States.
00:30:18.000 Women actually have the upper hand when it comes to college degrees.
00:30:21.000 Women have an upper hand when it comes to many life choices?
00:30:25.000 Seriously, in the United States?
00:30:27.000 Let's not pretend that women are a victim class in the United States.
00:30:29.000 They simply are not.
00:30:31.000 That's not to say there aren't individual victimized women.
00:30:33.000 Of course there are.
00:30:35.000 But that is not the same as saying that females, who represent a majority of the voting population and a majority of college-degreed people, Are a victim class in the United States.
00:30:44.000 That's a ridiculous contention.
00:30:46.000 But we can't say that.
00:30:47.000 If we say that, we're undercutting the narrative of cataclysmic horror that apparently is overrunning the American bargain.
00:30:53.000 We'll talk about that in just a second.
00:30:55.000 We'll talk about how the media have convinced themselves that reporting fiction is more important than reporting fact, simply to maintain the woke bargain.
00:31:03.000 In just a second.
00:31:03.000 First, let's talk about how you can get out of that credit card debt.
00:31:07.000 For decades, credit cards have been telling us to buy it now, pay for it later with interest.
00:31:11.000 Despite your best intentions, that interest can get out of control pretty quickly.
00:31:14.000 With Lending Club, you can consolidate your debt or pay off credit cards with one fixed monthly payment.
00:31:18.000 Since 2007, Lending Club has helped millions of people regain control of their finances with affordable fixed-rate personal loans.
00:31:24.000 That means no trips to a bank, no high-interest credit cards.
00:31:26.000 Just go to LendingClub.com, tell them about yourself and how much you want to borrow, Pick the terms that are right for you.
00:31:31.000 If you're approved, your loan is automatically deposited into your bank account in as little as a few days.
00:31:36.000 LendingClub is the number one peer-to-peer lending platform with over $35 billion in loans issued.
00:31:41.000 Go to LendingClub.com slash Ben.
00:31:43.000 Check your rate in minutes.
00:31:44.000 Borrow up to 40 grand.
00:31:46.000 That is LendingClub.com slash Ben.
00:31:48.000 LendingClub.com slash Ben.
00:31:49.000 All loans made by WebBank, Member FDIC, Equal Housing Lender.
00:31:52.000 Be responsible.
00:31:53.000 Make sure that you handle your credit card debt.
00:31:55.000 Make sure that you can consolidate all of that and get out of the kind of debt that could cripple you for life.
00:31:59.000 Go check them out at LendingClub.com slash Ben.
00:32:02.000 Check that rate in minutes.
00:32:02.000 Borrow up to 40 grand.
00:32:04.000 That's LendingClub.com slash Ben.
00:32:06.000 LendingClub.com slash Ben.
00:32:08.000 Okay, in just a second, I'm gonna get to some more of the media.
00:32:11.000 Just absolutely pushing a particular line that results in the victory of the most ignorant among us and the people who are lying about the state of the West, the state of the world, at this point in time.
00:32:24.000 We'll get to that in just a second.
00:32:24.000 First, you're going to have to go subscribe.
00:32:26.000 At Daily Wire, $9.99 a month.
00:32:28.000 That makes sure that you can get a subscription.
00:32:29.000 And two hours of the show later, later on today, for example, we are having on the incredible Adam Carolla.
00:32:35.000 The godfather of all podcasting.
00:32:37.000 We're having Adam on a little bit later, so check that out.
00:32:40.000 For $9.99 a month, you too can be part of the Daily Wire.
00:32:44.000 For $99 a year, you get all of that and more.
00:32:45.000 You also get this.
00:32:46.000 The Daily Wire Leftist Tears Hot or Cold Tumbler, the finest in all beverage vessels.
00:32:51.000 Curing disease the world over.
00:32:53.000 I can't actually make that claim.
00:32:55.000 Maybe curing disease.
00:32:56.000 The world over.
00:32:57.000 Go check that out right now.
00:32:59.000 Also, we have Sunday specials coming up that are just going to be awesome.
00:33:02.000 We have a couple of Sunday specials that are coming up.
00:33:04.000 I know who the guests are, but you don't.
00:33:05.000 But you will if you subscribe and you get the Sunday specials a day early.
00:33:09.000 You can be part of our mailbag.
00:33:10.000 I answer questions from our subscribers during breaks on the radio every afternoon.
00:33:14.000 So you can be part of that as well.
00:33:15.000 We have so many goodies for you.
00:33:16.000 Go check us out over there.
00:33:17.000 Also, subscribe over at YouTube or iTunes.
00:33:19.000 Leave us a review.
00:33:20.000 We always appreciate it.
00:33:21.000 it.
00:33:21.000 We are the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast and radio show in America.
00:33:24.000 So as I say, the victory of people like AOC, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and to a certain extent, Donald Trump relies on the media pushing this notion of crisis that we are constantly And that notion of crisis is simply not true.
00:33:41.000 And when reality butts up against that narrative of crisis, the media don't know what to do.
00:33:48.000 Neither do our big tech overlords who want to push that narrative.
00:33:52.000 So Google has been pushing the narrative that women are victimized in American society.
00:33:55.000 Then, it turns out, they conducted a study to determine whether the company was underpaying women and members of minority groups.
00:34:01.000 Instead, Google found, to the surprise of just about everyone, that men were paid less money than women for doing similar work.
00:34:08.000 The study is done every year, but the latest findings arrived as Google and other companies in Silicon Valley face increasing pressure to deal with gender issues in the workplace, from sexual harassment to wage discrimination.
00:34:18.000 Where is that pressure coming from?
00:34:20.000 To a large extent, that pressure is coming from outside woke groups that are interested in promulgating a narrative that counters the facts.
00:34:26.000 Women are treated better in Western civilization, and yes, in places like Silicon Valley, than pretty much anywhere else on Earth.
00:34:32.000 That, again, does not mean that there are not evil men who do evil things.
00:34:35.000 It does not mean that there are individual women who are not deeply mistreated and preyed upon by men.
00:34:39.000 It does mean that if we are going to say that, generally, women are victimized in American society, that is a load of crap.
00:34:46.000 It is a load of nonsense.
00:34:48.000 Gender inequality is a radioactive topic at Google, says the New York Times.
00:34:52.000 Yeah, you know why?
00:34:53.000 Because the New York Times will rip Google if Google even suggests that gender inequality is not a massive problem at Google.
00:34:59.000 Critics say the result of the pay study could give a false impression.
00:35:03.000 Yeah, who are those critics?
00:35:04.000 Presumably the experts at the New York Times.
00:35:06.000 Company officials acknowledged it did not address whether women were hired at a lower pay grade than men with similar qualifications.
00:35:13.000 Okay, well, then how about some proof?
00:35:16.000 How about some proof as opposed to simply the suggestion?
00:35:19.000 But again, a result that finds that women are not discriminated against is very upsetting to people on the woke-skulled left.
00:35:25.000 Here is the truth.
00:35:26.000 Here's the truth.
00:35:27.000 As early as 2010, there was a study reported in Time magazine, and it found that in 147 out of the 150 biggest cities in the United States, the median full-time salaries of young women were 8% higher than those of guys in their peer group.
00:35:43.000 In 147 out of 150 of the biggest cities in the United States.
00:35:48.000 And that figure, by the way, has not budged.
00:35:52.000 The gap is huge in places like New York City, LA, and San Diego.
00:35:57.000 17%, 12%, 15% as of 2010.
00:35:58.000 That applies to unmarried, childless women under 30 who live in cities.
00:36:04.000 Right, because women who have children end up having other obligations.
00:36:06.000 Women who get married tend to change their priorities.
00:36:10.000 That is not the fault of employers.
00:36:12.000 But to point out these facts is to undercut the consensus woke view of the world.
00:36:19.000 And that cannot be allowed by the media.
00:36:21.000 I'll give you a great example of this.
00:36:22.000 So Robin Roberts of Good Morning America did just a ridiculous interview, you'll recall, with Jussie Smollett.
00:36:28.000 Jussie Smollett, of course, was the star of Empire who now has been charged with a racial hoax.
00:36:33.000 He claims that he went out at 2 a.m.
00:36:35.000 in Chicago and was accosted by two MAGA-hatted Trump fans, who then garroted him with a noose, poured bleach on him while shouting, this is MAGA country, again, at 2 a.m.
00:36:47.000 in the middle of a polar vortex in the city of Chicago.
00:36:50.000 It was a ridiculous story on its face.
00:36:52.000 Everybody took it seriously, including Robin Roberts, who did a full interview with Jussie Smollett, where she basically allowed Smollett to claim that half the country, at least, was racist, sexist, bigoted, and homophobic.
00:37:02.000 And then Robin Roberts was asked about this.
00:37:04.000 So Robin Roberts did an interview.
00:37:05.000 And this just shows you where the media's heads are at.
00:37:08.000 For the media, the woke narrative must trump everything else.
00:37:12.000 It must trump everything else.
00:37:13.000 And if the woke narrative does trump everything else, that means it trumps ignorance, it means it trumps stupidity, it means it trumps the fact that people don't know what they're talking about very often.
00:37:22.000 Because as long as the narrative is preserved, nothing else matters.
00:37:24.000 And the narrative right now, when it comes to Congress, is that the fresh faces of the Democratic Party have something new and exciting to say, that they are the leaders who are going to change the future, that America is a deep, dark, terrible place, that the West is a deep, dark, terrible, racist, bigoted place, and that we need brash newcomers, even if they're a little bit on the Jew-hating side, we need those brash newcomers to come forth and lead us to a better future.
00:37:48.000 So here's Robin Roberts on Chelsea Smollett.
00:37:50.000 You'll notice that what she says, it's truly amazing.
00:37:52.000 She says it was a no-win situation doing the interview.
00:37:55.000 So what she says is, quote, I'll be completely honest.
00:37:59.000 I was like, I don't know if I want to do the interview or not.
00:38:03.000 I said, I don't want to sit down with him if he's going to lawyer up.
00:38:06.000 And then I was told he wants to speak with you because he was outraged by people making assumptions about whether it had happened or not.
00:38:11.000 And then she finally agreed to do the interview, she said, after being told she'd be able to ask Smollett about all the red flags that were surrounding his story and perhaps shed some light with new information.
00:38:21.000 She said she was hoping to remain neutral, but as a gay black woman interviewing a gay black man, she felt like she was put in a tight spot.
00:38:27.000 Here is the key line.
00:38:28.000 He's saying there's a hate crime.
00:38:29.000 So if I'm too hard, then my LGBT community is going to say, you don't believe a brother.
00:38:34.000 If I'm too light on him, it's like, oh, because you are in the community, you're giving him a pass.
00:38:38.000 It was a no-win situation for me.
00:38:40.000 How is that a no-win situation for Robin Roberts?
00:38:43.000 She's a journalist.
00:38:44.000 It is her job to ask the questions.
00:38:46.000 But she is admitting openly that if she was too hard on Jussie Smollett, she was afraid of the blowback she was going to get from her own community for not being woke enough.
00:38:55.000 The media are invested in these narratives.
00:38:57.000 These narratives of social inequality and tremendous American injustice and tremendous American bigotry.
00:39:02.000 So invested that they're willing to overlook blatantly false stories.
00:39:06.000 They're willing to overlook the anti-Semitism of some of the members of their own caucus.
00:39:09.000 Because in the end, the only thing that matters is the preservation of the narrative.
00:39:14.000 That's all that matters.
00:39:16.000 That's all that matters.
00:39:17.000 It's vile and it's why the most aggressively ignorant and bigoted among us are probably going to have an upper hand in politics for some time to come.
00:39:26.000 Speaking of which, coming up, I'll talk in a second about that sort of aggressive ignorance.
00:39:30.000 So, Cynthia Nixon.
00:39:31.000 I'll give you another example of this.
00:39:33.000 Cynthia Nixon is an actress.
00:39:34.000 She ran for governor of New York against Andrew Cuomo and she got shellacked.
00:39:37.000 Now, when you get beat by Andrew Cuomo, like a rug, when you get beat like a rug by Andrew Cuomo, that means you're a bad politician.
00:39:43.000 It means people don't like what you have to say.
00:39:45.000 I mean, Andrew Cuomo has about as charisma as a stump, a tree stump.
00:39:51.000 And Cynthia Nixon, She lost to him, but now she pressured Joe Biden.
00:39:55.000 So here is the woke narrative suggests that people on the other side of the aisle are inherently bad.
00:40:02.000 They're inherently bad for disagreeing about mainstream political issues.
00:40:05.000 It's not bad to be an anti-Semite if you're on the right side of the woke.
00:40:07.000 But if you're on the wrong side of the woke, then it is very bad to take political positions like, say, traditional marriage is a good thing.
00:40:15.000 and that traditional marriage is superior on a social level to same-sex marriage.
00:40:18.000 To take such a position, which was officially the position of the Democratic Party until, what, six years ago?
00:40:23.000 To take that position makes you a vile, bad human being.
00:40:26.000 So Cynthia Nixon went after Joe Biden, Why?
00:40:31.000 Because Joe Biden said that Mike Pence was a decent human.
00:40:34.000 And then she was like, no, Mike Pence is not a decent human because he disagrees with me on LGBT issues.
00:40:40.000 And Joe Biden, caving to the woke scolds, immediately surrendered and said, you're right.
00:40:44.000 You know what?
00:40:44.000 I changed my mind.
00:40:46.000 I changed my mind.
00:40:47.000 It turns out that Mike Pence is no longer a decent human being because he disagrees with me.
00:40:52.000 So Cynthia Nixon duplast Mike Pence.
00:40:57.000 So, Duplass is a verb meaning to cowardly stab somebody in the back who you have no relationship to.
00:41:03.000 It was coined after Mark Duplass, an actor-director, did the same thing to me.
00:41:06.000 He said I was a decent guy online, people attacked him, he took down his tweet, and then suggested that I was a racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe.
00:41:12.000 He had run afoul of the woke scolds.
00:41:15.000 So Cynthia Nixon is then given space in the Washington Post.
00:41:18.000 This is our media, the Washington Post, to sort of blow up her claim, to fully claim that Mike Pence is actually a bigot.
00:41:29.000 And in the process of her column in the Washington Post, she makes a variety of false claims about Mike Pence personally.
00:41:34.000 This op-ed in the Washington Post, she says that Pence was insidious— And she just lies about Pence's record.
00:41:41.000 She says he signed a religious freedom bill that would have allowed LGBTQ discrimination.
00:41:45.000 That is false.
00:41:46.000 He actually called for changes to the bill that, quote, make it clear discrimination won't be allowed.
00:41:50.000 That Mike Pence, quote, refused to lift a ban on needle exchange programs until a preventable HIV outbreak reached epidemic levels.
00:41:56.000 That is, again, false.
00:41:57.000 He issued an executive order in March 2015 allowing distribution of needles, while also acknowledging that there are serious public health concerns about needle exchanges.
00:42:06.000 She said he suggested support for so-called conversion therapy.
00:42:08.000 Again, that is a lie.
00:42:09.000 There is no mention of conversion therapy on his website, the one that she cites.
00:42:13.000 She says that he published an article urging businesses not to hire gay people.
00:42:16.000 That's utterly false outright.
00:42:17.000 She just made all of these false claims in the pages of the Washington Post.
00:42:21.000 Totally fine.
00:42:22.000 You can lie about the Vice President of the United States because it supports the narrative.
00:42:26.000 And that narrative will continue to be supported because it is unfalsifiable.
00:42:30.000 This is the beautiful thing about the woke narrative.
00:42:32.000 If you say, hey, wait a second, you don't have any evidence.
00:42:35.000 That Mike Pence is a bigot?
00:42:36.000 You don't have evidence that America is a terribly bigoted, homophobic, racist, sexist place?
00:42:41.000 You don't have any evidence that America is a terrible place?
00:42:43.000 Or that it requires the solutions of full-on socialists?
00:42:47.000 Then the left will say, well, that's because your eyes have not been opened because you don't see the truth.
00:42:53.000 But once you see the truth, you can't unsee the truth.
00:42:56.000 And this is how you end up with the ridiculous spectacle, the ridiculous, insane spectacle of Brie Larson, an actress who does not know things, speaking at the Women in Film Festival.
00:43:09.000 About her new movie, Captain Marvel.
00:43:10.000 Now, the execs over at Disney have just got to be beside themselves.
00:43:14.000 Because it turns out that a lot of the people who like to go watch comic book movies are young men.
00:43:20.000 And Captain Marvel was already a little bit outside the box in the sense that it is a female superhero.
00:43:26.000 Now, young men will go see a female superhero.
00:43:28.000 They will.
00:43:29.000 Wonder Woman made a boatload of money at the office, at the box office.
00:43:33.000 But Brie Larson suggests that America is a sexist, bigoted, terrible, homophobic place.
00:43:38.000 And then she goes even further.
00:43:39.000 She says that she doesn't care if white people go to see her movies because she's not going to take criticism from white people.
00:43:44.000 She is a white woman.
00:43:46.000 Here she is going off, again, backing the woke narrative.
00:43:49.000 And what this is really meant to do, seriously, what this is meant to do is provide cover.
00:43:54.000 Because for people who are at least half clever, if they understand that the media is willing to provide cover for anyone who echoes the woke narrative, then the best thing to do is to echo the woke narrative, right?
00:44:04.000 That way, if your movie is a bomb and it sucks, then they can just blame all of those terrible, no good, very bad boys.
00:44:10.000 It's all those boys who wouldn't go see the movie because they were sexist.
00:44:12.000 It's not that your movie was garbage.
00:44:14.000 It's that these evil, terrible boys... You remember, we did this with Lady Ghostbusters.
00:44:20.000 Lady Ghostbusters is not a good movie.
00:44:23.000 I'm not even a fan of the original Ghostbusters.
00:44:24.000 Lady Ghostbusters is not a good movie.
00:44:27.000 But because it was made with women, and because it didn't do well at the box office, it turned into... Its non-success was not a referendum on the filmmakers.
00:44:34.000 It was a referendum on America's deep sexism.
00:44:38.000 Well, Brie Larson is playing right into that.
00:44:40.000 Here is Brie Larson actively alienating her chief audience so that I guess later she can claim that it's not her fault if and when the movie bombs.
00:44:47.000 Our industry has gone through a major growth.
00:44:50.000 We are expanding to make films that better reflect the people that buy movie tickets.
00:44:56.000 But they are not allowed enough chances to read public discourse on these films by the people that these films were made for.
00:45:03.000 I do not need a 40-year-old white dude to tell me what didn't work for him about A Wrinkle in Time.
00:45:09.000 It wasn't made for him.
00:45:11.000 I want to know what that film meant to women of color, to biracial women, to teen women of color, to teens that are biracial.
00:45:23.000 Oh, really?
00:45:23.000 Who does she think buys tickets in this country?
00:45:26.000 Does she think that when Disney sunk $100 million into A Wrinkle in Time, that they were looking to actively alienate 40-year-old men who, by the way, who do you think is bringing their daughters to these movies?
00:45:36.000 It's a bunch of 40-year-old guys.
00:45:38.000 When I'm 40, my daughter is going to be 10.
00:45:42.000 I'm going to be the one bringing her to movies with people like Brie Larson.
00:45:46.000 Does she actually think that alienating people like me is going to be big box office?
00:45:50.000 Of course not.
00:45:50.000 She knows that.
00:45:51.000 She's not completely dumb.
00:45:53.000 But she also knows that the media are now going to lay the groundwork for the failure of her film.
00:45:57.000 So if her film falls apart, if it's just a mediocrity, it's going to turn into, America's a deeply terrible place.
00:46:02.000 Now, what's hilariously unfalsifiable about this is that if Black Panther does unbelievable business, that is not proof that America is not racist.
00:46:09.000 America's still racist even if Black Panther does a bajillion at the box office and gets nominated for Best Picture despite being, in my opinion, the fourth best comic book movie of the last year.
00:46:18.000 America's still racist even if Black Panther does well, but if Captain Marvel fails, it'll be because of American sexism, therefore we need more women empowerment, therefore AOC.
00:46:27.000 That's how this math works.
00:46:29.000 It's ridiculous, it's insipid, America's a pretty wonderful place, and ignorance should not be excused simply because the ignorant tends to support the woke narrative.
00:46:38.000 Okay, time for some things I like, and then some things that I hate.
00:46:41.000 So, things that I like.
00:46:44.000 So, I had heard a lot about this Marie Kondo thing, and I actually went out and got her book, The Life-Changing Magic of Tidying Up, and I have been going through it, and I will admit, I like this thing.
00:46:55.000 I do.
00:46:55.000 Now, I know, it's a little touchy-feely.
00:46:58.000 There's a lot of stuff in there about thanking objects before you throw them out, but contrary to popular opinion, I actually do have feelings, particularly about the stuff in my house, and She is not wrong that thanking objects before throwing them away, for example, is not about the objects, obviously, taking account of your feelings, but it is about you recognizing that your memories are going to remain even if you throw away a particular item of clothing that you haven't worn for 30 years.
00:47:23.000 There's a lot of good advice in this book.
00:47:25.000 Really?
00:47:26.000 Listen, I have young kids.
00:47:27.000 That means my house is constantly a mess.
00:47:29.000 Like, all the time.
00:47:29.000 Because they take out their toys, I tell them to put them away, they argue with me, they put away three quarters of the toys, and then the other quarter of the toys are left until I have time to actually put them away.
00:47:39.000 But, she is correct that going through one large spate of cleaning your house is significantly better than constantly cleaning.
00:47:46.000 I just went through my wardrobe a couple of days ago.
00:47:48.000 And I gave away like half the stuff in there to goodwill.
00:47:52.000 My closet is cleaner.
00:47:53.000 I feel better about it.
00:47:55.000 So give it a try.
00:47:56.000 Seriously.
00:47:57.000 I know, really off-brand, right?
00:47:58.000 But go check it out.
00:47:59.000 The Life-Changing Magic of Tidying Up by Marie Kondo.
00:48:02.000 Kind of a fun book.
00:48:03.000 Okay, other things that I like.
00:48:05.000 So I have to acknowledge, when we're talking about the woke media and the woke narrative, there are certain questions that the woke media can ask that nobody else is allowed to ask because these questions are actually racist.
00:48:14.000 So Bernie Sanders was asked by Charlemagne Tha God on one of these podcasts, About, Charlamagne Tha God is what, a rapper?
00:48:21.000 Yes, okay, thank you.
00:48:22.000 So Bernie Sanders, the leading Democratic presidential candidate, a near-octogenarian socialist who has never done a productive thing in his life, he was asked about whether America needs another white president.
00:48:32.000 Now, let's just stop there for a second.
00:48:35.000 You know how wildly and insanely inappropriate that is?
00:48:38.000 Why wouldn't America need another white president?
00:48:40.000 Can you imagine anybody saying, listen, we had Barack Obama, dude, suck, do we really need another black president?
00:48:44.000 That'd be ridiculous.
00:48:45.000 It depends on who the black person is.
00:48:48.000 I said this when Obama was elected.
00:48:49.000 I didn't want Obama to be president because I wanted a better qualified black person.
00:48:54.000 Because I wanted a better qualified person.
00:48:57.000 I wanted someone who agreed with my principles.
00:48:59.000 I didn't care about his race.
00:49:01.000 I'm more than fine with having a black president.
00:49:03.000 I would just like that black president to agree with all of my principles on politics.
00:49:07.000 Well, folks on the left though, for them that's not enough.
00:49:10.000 So they're asking Bernie Sanders whether he is too white to be president.
00:49:13.000 Bernie Sanders' answer is pretty much spot on here.
00:49:17.000 So Bernie, 44 out of 45 presidents in this country have been white men.
00:49:20.000 Do you think we need another one?
00:49:23.000 I think you need this one.
00:49:26.000 Look, we are living in an unprecedented time.
00:49:30.000 We have the most dangerous president in the modern history of this country.
00:49:34.000 Somebody who is a pathological liar, a fraud, a racist, a sexist, a homophobe, a xenophobe.
00:49:40.000 A racist, a con man, a cheat.
00:49:43.000 Now you're just getting warmed up here, man.
00:49:45.000 Now this is a bad news guy, and the most important thing that has got to happen is that this dangerous president is defeated.
00:49:52.000 Okay, so his rip on Trump is obviously inane, and it's in sort of typical rote.
00:49:56.000 He just has the list in his head, he flips through the Rolodex.
00:49:58.000 That's not the good part of the answer.
00:49:59.000 The part of the answer that is good is he says, listen, you should just look at me as a candidate.
00:50:03.000 Stop looking at my race.
00:50:05.000 Now, this has pissed off the woke left.
00:50:07.000 The woke left is upset about this, because in their view, Bernie Sanders is too post-racial.
00:50:12.000 You need someone who's going to back the idea that we need a black president to fix a country that is historically racist, even though we just had a black president for eight years, and the country actually got more racially polarized as a result of his deliberate stoking of racial flames.
00:50:26.000 Good for Bernie Sanders for refusing to back down on this issue.
00:50:29.000 Honestly, I would rather have Bernie Sanders' view on race than Kamala Harris' views on race.
00:50:35.000 And I think that Bernie Sanders' views on class are actually less dangerous to the country than Kamala Harris' views on race.
00:50:41.000 Because America is not going to be divided by class.
00:50:44.000 We won't.
00:50:44.000 There's too much income mobility in the United States.
00:50:47.000 The vast majority of people who earn inside the 1% this year will not earn inside the 1% in 10 years, and have not earned inside the 1% 10 years before.
00:50:54.000 Class distinctions in the United States are largely artificial.
00:50:58.000 The attempt to tribalize people by race is much more dangerous to American politics.
00:51:02.000 That's what I like about burning inside the Democratic Party.
00:51:06.000 So, alright, time for a couple of things that I hate.
00:51:13.000 Well, there comes a point with the woke when you're so woke that your brains fall out.
00:51:17.000 One of these incidents comes courtesy of the Daily Mirror today.
00:51:20.000 So the Daily Mirror is a newspaper in London.
00:51:23.000 And here is the title of their piece.
00:51:25.000 Married lesbian couple are now husband and wife after one became a man.
00:51:30.000 And then it says, Ty and Anaya Kennedy from Florida say they don't care about genders as they are madly in love.
00:51:37.000 I'm gonna go with that's not what happened.
00:51:39.000 That a married lesbian couple are now husband and wife after one became a man.
00:51:42.000 I'm fairly certain that the husband is still a woman.
00:51:46.000 But it's gonna make things real awkward for the left if they continue along these lines.
00:51:50.000 Because they're going to have to decide whether sex is innate or whether sexual orientation is innate.
00:51:57.000 They can't have it both ways.
00:51:59.000 If sex is not innate, and you can simply change your sex, well then sexual orientation is also malleable, and you can actually just change your sexual orientation.
00:52:08.000 I mean, this is the first line of the article.
00:52:10.000 Childhood sweethearts Ty and Aniyah Kennedy were both females when they started dating five years ago, but they now identify as husband and wife in a straight relationship after Tay began to undergo the transitioning process to become a man.
00:52:23.000 So, it was funny.
00:52:24.000 Folks on the left were trying to get out of this rather illogical conundrum by suggesting that they're both bisexual, but they don't consider themselves bisexual.
00:52:31.000 The girl, apparently, the one who actually stayed a woman, according to the left's logic, became straight.
00:52:38.000 She said it, not me.
00:52:39.000 So you want to argue with her about her sexual orientation?
00:52:41.000 Have at it, man.
00:52:43.000 But apparently, her sexual orientation was malleable, which is not allowed.
00:52:47.000 But sex was also malleable, which is allowed.
00:52:52.000 Or it could be that male and female are innate categories and that sexual orientation is not nearly as malleable because a lot of this stuff is innate.
00:53:00.000 Maybe all of that is true, but again, the left is so confused they don't even know how to characterize this stuff anymore.
00:53:06.000 So well done, folks on the left.
00:53:07.000 This has always been puzzling.
00:53:10.000 You know, the kind of grouping together of LGBT has always been kind of weird because the truth is that T tends to overrule LGB.
00:53:17.000 Once you obliterate the distinction between the sexes, then what's the need for categories like LGB anymore?
00:53:23.000 Sexuality simply becomes fluid.
00:53:25.000 You don't need lesbianism, the idea that you prefer women to men.
00:53:30.000 Why would that exactly be a category if women can be men and men can be women?
00:53:35.000 Obviously, there's some rather deep illogic here, but the left doesn't need logic.
00:53:39.000 All they need is a narrative.
00:53:40.000 All right.
00:53:40.000 Well, we'll be back here a little bit later today.
00:53:42.000 Adam Carolla will be stopping by.
00:53:43.000 We'll have much more to talk about.
00:53:44.000 So this is why you should subscribe.
00:53:46.000 You can get two hours of our show later today, commercial free.
00:53:48.000 Go check us out then.
00:53:49.000 If not, we'll see you back here tomorrow.
00:53:50.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:53:51.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:53:56.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Senya Villarreal.
00:53:59.000 Executive producer, Jeremy Boring.
00:54:00.000 Senior producer, Jonathan Hay.
00:54:02.000 Our supervising producer is Mathis Glover.
00:54:04.000 And our technical producer is Austin Stevens.
00:54:06.000 Edited by Adam Sajovic.
00:54:07.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Karamina.
00:54:09.000 Hair and makeup is by Jesua Olvera.
00:54:11.000 Production assistant, Nick Sheehan.
00:54:12.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire production.