The Ben Shapiro Show - July 20, 2023


Bombshell Whistleblower Testimony Exposes Biden Double-Standard


Episode Stats

Length

51 minutes

Words per Minute

201.72514

Word Count

10,446

Sentence Count

732

Misogynist Sentences

9

Hate Speech Sentences

7


Summary

In this episode, we discuss the Democratic response to a Democratic whistleblower's testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee. We also discuss the implications for the Biden family, Hunter Biden, and Joe Biden's attorney, Jill Harthorne, as well as the Democratic reaction to the testimony. And we take a look at why a gay Democratic whistleblower is a hero and why a conservative Republican should be scared of coming forward with information that could have a negative impact on the Biden's family. Guests: Former IRS whistleblower Joseph Ziegler and IRS whistleblower Gary Shakhley. Special guest: Former Justice Department lawyer David Weiss. Thanks to callers and for the questions, and thanks to our sponsor, VaynerSpeakers for sponsoring this episode. Thanks also to caller who called in with the question, "What would you do if Joe Biden and Hunter Biden were involved in a bribery scheme?" and to our friend, Joe Biden s attorney, David Weiss, for the response to the whistleblower s testimony. Thanks to all the calls and texts and support we've gotten so far, and we'll see you next week with our next episode! Thank you for all the love, bye! - Your continued support is so appreciated, bye, bye. - Tom, Amy, Caitlyn, and Jordan, and Good Morning America. Cheers, Sarah, Amy and Sarah, - Caitlyn and Sarah Caitlyn's Dad and Sarah's Dad, Sarah's Mom, Sarah and Sarah & Sarah's Brother, Joe, and Sarah. . Sarah's Houseclearence, and her Dad, Kristy, and all the work she does so much work, and she's so much love and support, and so much support, too! . . . and Sarah szn, Sarah s , Sarah s, and much more. Thank you so much, Sarah is so much & Sarah s , and we're so much more! , and Sarah loves you, too, thank you for being a hero, and thank you, so much Thank you, Sarah & Joe s - Sarah, and you can do so much. Sarah, you're amazing, and I'm so much thanks you, Thank you all so much for all of you, you are so much of the love and all of your support, thanks you're so good, you can see it, so please give it out, so thank you.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 So most of the legacy media did not touch the big story of the day yesterday.
00:00:03.000 They pretended there was really no big news yesterday.
00:00:06.000 They covered other things like sex in space, or they covered what is going on with the possible looming Trump indictment, which we'll discuss in a little bit.
00:00:13.000 Leaked information about what is actually in the indictment suggests that they really do not have much against President Trump.
00:00:18.000 Shock of shocks.
00:00:19.000 But the big news of the day was this whistleblower testimony that happened on the Hill.
00:00:24.000 Now, just let's play the game.
00:00:26.000 Imagine that the roles were reversed.
00:00:27.000 Imagine that Democrats had brought forward an IRS whistleblower who had suggested open corruption inside the Trump family and then had suggested that Trump militarized the DOJ to protect his kids.
00:00:37.000 Do you think that might lead the news?
00:00:38.000 Do you think that might actually serve as the predicate for impeachment?
00:00:41.000 I'm gonna go with yes on that.
00:00:42.000 But if it's Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, then not only are we supposed to pretend that nothing bad happened, we're supposed to chastise people for speaking about it.
00:00:49.000 The whistleblowers themselves are now considered bad.
00:00:51.000 Whistleblowing is bad if it's against Democrats.
00:00:53.000 This is the way that all of this works.
00:00:54.000 This is how you get through the entire Obama administration, which was a scandal-ridden administration.
00:00:58.000 Everything from the IRS targeting political opposition to Benghazi.
00:01:01.000 You get through that entire administration with the entire media proclaiming that the only scandal Barack Obama ever had is that he wore a tan suit at a press conference once.
00:01:08.000 Hey, this is the game.
00:01:09.000 Well, here's the thing.
00:01:10.000 What the whistleblower said yesterday is pretty damning.
00:01:13.000 They said a bunch of things.
00:01:14.000 There were two separate whistleblowers.
00:01:16.000 One is a guy named Joseph Ziegler.
00:01:18.000 He is one of the whistleblowers from the IRS.
00:01:20.000 The other one we've met already, that was Gary Shapley, also an IRS whistleblower.
00:01:23.000 And they testified to a few things.
00:01:25.000 One, they testified that it's pretty obvious that Hunter and Joe Biden spoke about business.
00:01:29.000 Two, they testified about the amount of money that was passing within the Biden family, the Biden so-called crime family, from a wide variety of sources ranging from Romania to China to Ukraine.
00:01:39.000 Burisma alone is responsible for paying the Biden family business $7.3 million over the course of several years, including when Joe Biden was vice president, according to that IRS agent, Joseph Ziegler.
00:01:50.000 The IRS whistleblowers also suggested that the prosecutors who were supposed to be going after Hunter Biden were basically stopped from doing so by Joe Biden's DOJ.
00:02:00.000 So Was there a bribery crime?
00:02:03.000 Perhaps.
00:02:03.000 Was there a cover-up?
00:02:05.000 It appears to be that the DOJ used its leverage and its power in order to prevent harsher sentencing from being brought against Hunter Biden and also from certain questions being asked in the first place.
00:02:16.000 So let's go through some of the testimony.
00:02:17.000 So first of all, let us introduce IRS whistleblower Joseph Ziegler.
00:02:22.000 So in an attempt to get ahead of the smearing that inevitably was going to come his way, Joseph Ziegler pointed out that he's a gay Democrat.
00:02:28.000 Now, identity politics doesn't work in this way for Democrats.
00:02:31.000 The way that it works for Democrats is that if he's a gay Democrat, no, you're not.
00:02:34.000 That is the typical response, that he's a bad person nonetheless, which means probably he's a straight Republican.
00:02:39.000 But here is Joseph Ziegler talking about his personal life as sort of a shield against the fact that Democrats presumably would claim that whoever makes a report against the Biden family must inherently be some sort of conservative Republican.
00:02:51.000 Here's Ziegler.
00:02:52.000 I hope that I am an example to other LGBTQ people out there who are questioning doing the right thing at the potential cost to themselves and others.
00:03:01.000 We should always do the right thing, no matter how painful the process might be.
00:03:06.000 I kind of equate this to the experience and feelings I encountered when coming out.
00:03:10.000 It was honestly one of the hardest things I ever had to go through.
00:03:13.000 I contemplated scenarios that would have been highly regrettable, but I did what is right and I'm sitting here in front of you today.
00:03:21.000 Okay, Ziegler does not seem like an uncredible source, right?
00:03:23.000 All you have to do is gauge the credibility of the sources by looking at their testimony or by the contemporaneous documentation brought forward, as Shapley is going to explain in just a minute.
00:03:31.000 The other whistleblower, he's the only one who has any sort of corroborated reports.
00:03:35.000 Everything that David Weiss, the U.S.
00:03:36.000 attorney who is going after Hunter Biden in very soft, cushy fashion, was saying has not been corroborated by anybody.
00:03:42.000 Everything Shapley has said was being corroborated by other sources.
00:03:45.000 In any case, Ziegler also pointed out that he's risking his career and his reputation by coming forward on this sort of stuff.
00:03:51.000 Members of the Committee, today I sit here before you not as a hero or a victim, but as a whistleblower compelled to disclose the truth.
00:04:00.000 That said, in coming forward, I believe I am risking my career, my reputation, and my casework outside of the investigation we are here to discuss.
00:04:09.000 I ultimately made the decision to come forward after what I believe were multiple attempts at blowing the whistle Okay, so Ziegler then testified that he was stopped during this entire investigation from interviewing Joe Biden's adult children, that there was an attempt made by his superiors to prevent there from being any serious questioning of Hunter Biden about all of his corrupt foreign affairs.
00:04:41.000 Why did you want to interview Hunter Biden's adult children?
00:04:45.000 So a lot of the business deductions, expenses, related to the adult children.
00:04:50.000 Did you get the approvals?
00:04:52.000 So we never received the approvals to talk to those people.
00:04:57.000 What did the Assistant U.S.
00:04:58.000 Attorney tell you?
00:04:59.000 That that's going to get us into hot water.
00:05:02.000 Is that in the IRS handbook?
00:05:04.000 Avoiding hot water?
00:05:05.000 No, but I mean, I was asking to do these certain things, and roadblock after roadblock was put up in front of me.
00:05:14.000 In his opening statement, Ziegler testified, quote, I have reason to believe there was gross mismanagement present throughout this investigation, that there was a gross waste of funds relating to the tax dollars spent on investigating this case, and that there was an abuse of authority with DOJ tax and Delaware United States Attorney's offices.
00:05:27.000 So Democratic members tried to rebut all of this by pointing out that David Weiss was originally a Trump-appointed U.S.
00:05:32.000 attorney who had been appointed by AG Bill Barr.
00:05:35.000 And the idea here is that these People were somehow overseeing all of this.
00:05:42.000 But here is the problem with that particular theory.
00:05:44.000 That assumes there's not institutional capture.
00:05:47.000 Meaning, David Weiss, at what point was he actually preventing these investigations from going forward?
00:05:52.000 If it was in 2021 or 2022, obviously that is under Joe Biden.
00:05:55.000 There's also the broader concern that has now taken root in all of the DOJ, which is this bizarre space that's been created largely by James Comey, which is we can't be involved in quote-unquote election interference.
00:06:07.000 And what that typically means is that they are going to overlook criminality unless your name is Donald Trump.
00:06:11.000 If you're Donald Trump, then the DOJ will go after you with the hammer and the tongs.
00:06:15.000 And if you are anybody else, meaning a Democrat, then even Republicans inside the DOJ are not going to go after you.
00:06:21.000 Well, there's got to be one standard for everybody.
00:06:22.000 Either it's election interference or it's not election interference.
00:06:24.000 If it's election interference to deeply investigate the Biden family in the run-up to the 2020 election, Even if it was Republicans doing it.
00:06:31.000 If that's the rule, can't get involved in election interference.
00:06:33.000 James Comey's not going to get involved in election interference because if he indicts Hillary Clinton in 2016, then somehow it prevents the election from going forward fairly.
00:06:41.000 And what exactly would you call it when prosecutions are brought over and over and over against Donald Trump when he is the leading candidate for the Republican nomination?
00:06:49.000 What would you call it?
00:06:50.000 It's either election interference or it's not election interference.
00:06:52.000 If the idea is we can't investigate too deeply, and this is a sort of bipartisan consensus inside DOJ, can't investigate too deeply, can't ask serious questions, because obviously it might interfere with the American people's choice.
00:07:04.000 Well, then how do you get to do it with Trump?
00:07:07.000 Like, everyone can see the double standard and you wonder why institutional credibility with the DOJ is absolutely in the toilet?
00:07:12.000 This would be the reason.
00:07:13.000 In one second, we'll get to the other IRS whistleblower, Gary Shapley.
00:07:16.000 First, we are days away from the Durbin Accords, the greatest threat to the U.S.
00:07:20.000 dollar's global dominance in the past 80 years.
00:07:22.000 On August 22nd, The BRICS nations, that's Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, they are expected to announce the launch of a new international super currency backed by gold or other commodities.
00:07:30.000 Part of their long-term plan is to plant the United States and the dollar as cornerstones of the global financial system.
00:07:35.000 Here's the thing, as America continues to spend at unprecedented rates as our national debt Is now past 30 trillion dollars.
00:07:41.000 At a certain point, we're going to have to have either higher taxes or we're going to have to inflate the currency.
00:07:45.000 Either way, you're going to want to diversify into precious metals.
00:07:47.000 You can protect your IRA or 401k from the fallout from this landmark announcement by diversifying with gold from Birch Gold.
00:07:53.000 Historically, gold has been a safe haven in times of high uncertainty.
00:07:55.000 That would be like right now.
00:07:57.000 Birch Gold, they're the people I buy my gold from, so do thousands of other concerned savers.
00:08:01.000 When currencies fail, gold is a safe haven.
00:08:03.000 How much more time does the dollar have?
00:08:04.000 Well, I don't know.
00:08:05.000 Neither do you.
00:08:06.000 It's a good reason to diversify.
00:08:07.000 Birch Gold has an A-plus rating with the Better Business Bureau and thousands of happy customers.
00:08:10.000 Text Ben to 989898.
00:08:11.000 Get your free info kit on gold.
00:08:14.000 If a central bank digital currency becomes a reality, it'll be nice to have some gold to depend on.
00:08:18.000 Again, text Ben to 989898 today to get started with my friends over at Birch Gold.
00:08:23.000 Okay, so the other IRS whistleblower is, of course, Gary Shapley.
00:08:27.000 And he points out, you know, you guys keep suggesting that I'm some sort of partisan actor.
00:08:31.000 That is not true.
00:08:32.000 No matter your party, I am not your opposition.
00:08:36.000 I am here with information for you to examine, investigate, and determine whether more action is warranted on your part.
00:08:42.000 I am on your team, whether we agree on every politically sensitive issue or not.
00:08:48.000 There is no benefit for me blowing the whistle on this case, absolutely none.
00:08:51.000 I have no book deal, and the only money that goes into my bank account every two weeks is from my employment for the federal government.
00:09:01.000 Okay, Shapley also pointed out that every single decision that was made during the course of this investigation benefited the Bidens.
00:09:07.000 What are the decisions that treated the Bidens adversarially?
00:09:10.000 The answer is, he can't name any.
00:09:13.000 Investigators were not allowed to follow up on WhatsApp messages from Hunter Biden's Apple iCloud backup, where he suggested he was sitting next to his father.
00:09:22.000 Assistant United States Attorney Leslie Wolf cited the optics of executing a search warrant at President Biden's residence as a deciding factor for not allowing it, even though she agreed that probable cause existed.
00:09:33.000 Prosecutors instructed investigators not to ask about the big guy or dad when conducting interviews.
00:09:40.000 The Biden transition team was tipped off about interviews the night before the investigation went over.
00:09:46.000 A fact my FBI counterpart confirmed to this committee in a recent testimony, where the result was that only one witness spoke to investigators that day.
00:09:55.000 These are just some of the examples of how our investigation was stymied.
00:10:00.000 Again, not wrong, and he is the only one who has corroborated documents, a point that he makes here.
00:10:05.000 He says, listen, David Weiss told us, like straight up, he just told us that he had been denied special counsel status by Merrick Garland's DOJ, which would have allowed him to charge in a wide variety of jurisdictions.
00:10:15.000 And I'm the only one who has that story corroborated, says Shapley.
00:10:18.000 Meanwhile, you have David Weiss saying things that are rebutted by other testimony from other witnesses.
00:10:23.000 Mr. Weiss was consistent with the investigators up until this October 7th meeting, and then he changed.
00:10:28.000 What do you think happened, Mr. Shapley?
00:10:32.000 I don't know what happened internal at Department of Justice, but what I can say is that the story has been changing from Department of Justice and U.S.
00:10:43.000 Attorney Weiss, and I think the only person that's really had any documents that have been corroborated are my own.
00:10:49.000 Now, here's the thing.
00:10:50.000 Is there a partisan aspect to this?
00:10:52.000 Of course.
00:10:53.000 and your tax dollars to put out carefully crafted, narrow non-denials that have confused rather than
00:10:56.000 clarified for the public, all without being subject to cross-examination on the facts.
00:11:00.000 Now, here's the thing. Is there a partisan aspect to this?
00:11:02.000 Of course. Merrick Garland is a Democrat. Merrick Garland is going to be protective of
00:11:05.000 Joe Biden.
00:11:06.000 But many of the accusations that are being made by these IRS whistleblowers suggest that the DOJ under the Trump administration was actually acting in this way.
00:11:13.000 Now, again, that may go to this sort of broader, quote unquote, good faith attempt by the DOJ not to interfere in elections because a lot of these decisions were being made in 2020.
00:11:23.000 But if that only applies to one side, it is not fair, as everyone knows.
00:11:26.000 The original sin here, as I've said a thousand times, the original sin is that James Comey should have charged Hillary Clinton.
00:11:31.000 Hillary Clinton clearly violated the law when it came to her handling of classified documents.
00:11:35.000 If she had been charged in 2016, that would have set the predicate for the idea that charges would be appropriate for anyone who violates the law going forward.
00:11:42.000 Because here's the thing that's so stupid about this logic that you can't interfere in the election.
00:11:46.000 If you don't prosecute, you are interfering in the election.
00:11:50.000 A sin of omission when it comes to prosecutorial discretion is very often just as grave as a sin of commission.
00:11:57.000 James Comey's failure to prosecute Hillary Clinton is just as damaging against the Republicans, for example, as the Democratic attempt to now prosecute Donald Trump in advance of an election.
00:12:08.000 And that is particularly true when you're talking about a double standard where it appears that election worries just don't exist, I suppose, with regard to Republican candidates for the presidency of the United States.
00:12:17.000 Now, the media have decided the big scandal here is not anything the IRS whistleblowers are saying.
00:12:21.000 The systemic corruption, the attempts to cover up for Hunter and Joe Biden.
00:12:25.000 They're not even willing to point out some fairly obvious points that were admitted in some of the cross-examination.
00:12:32.000 Dan Goldman, Democratic representative and one of the lawyers in the impeachment hearing, Dan Goldman accidentally confirmed in the middle of this hearing that Joe Biden did discuss Hunter's foreign business dealings with Hunter.
00:12:43.000 Here was Dan Goldman doing that.
00:12:44.000 It was a big oopsie moment.
00:12:46.000 And you testified that he said to that Hunter told his dad, according to Rob Walker, quote, I may be trying to start a company or try to do something with these guys.
00:12:59.000 Now let me ask you something.
00:13:01.000 That doesn't sound much like Joe Biden was involved in whatever Hunter Biden was doing with the CEFC if Hunter Biden is telling him that he's trying to do business with them, does it?
00:13:14.000 No, but it does show that he told his father he was trying to do business.
00:13:19.000 Okay, well that is true.
00:13:20.000 Hunter Biden does try to do business, that's correct.
00:13:24.000 So you not only have no direct evidence connecting Joe Biden to any of Hunter Biden's business deal, you actually had proof that he wasn't involved.
00:13:36.000 That is the proof that you had.
00:13:39.000 Well, actually, no.
00:13:40.000 What you just admitted, Dan Goldman, is that Joe Biden and Hunter talked about his business dealings.
00:13:46.000 And maybe the sort of wink-wink, nod-nod arrangement was that you go and you do your stuff and money just magically appears in my account, and every so often I take a meeting, and that's sort of the way that we play this game.
00:13:56.000 By the way, this would not be a giant surprise.
00:13:57.000 Apparently, the way, particularly with the Chinese, that you do business, and this is true in a lot of foreign countries, because so many countries are deeply corrupt and deeply political, including China.
00:14:08.000 Many Chinese business people who are working hand-in-glove with the government, they believe that politics works the same way in the United States.
00:14:13.000 That if you get a meeting with the Vice President of the United States, for example, that this like magically greenlights your business project and means billions of dollars flow into your coffers.
00:14:21.000 And this is true for a lot of foreign countries.
00:14:22.000 And it's exactly this impression that the Biden family has traded on for Joe Biden's entire political career.
00:14:27.000 Is that if you meet with a senator, then this means that somehow something good is going to happen for the business.
00:14:31.000 So Americans can look at that and even be like, okay, so you met with the Senator, who cares?
00:14:34.000 But if you're from a country where meeting with a Senator very often involves that Senator now being your friend and that friend now cramming through a bunch of stuff that you like, you can see why the Chinese were deeply invested in Hunter Biden hooking up with Joe Biden.
00:14:46.000 And that doesn't require Joe Biden to be like deeply invested in every aspect of Hunter's business.
00:14:50.000 I don't think there's an accusation that Joe Biden is sitting there and like going over the books with Hunter.
00:14:55.000 All he cares about is does that money appear in his bank account?
00:14:58.000 And Joe Biden is a lot richer than normal vice presidents who have been on a senator's salary for most of their career typically are.
00:15:05.000 Well, the media have decided, of course, that this is not the story.
00:15:07.000 The real story is, of course, of course, of course, how evil Donald Trump and the Republicans are during a whistleblower hearing about the Bidens.
00:15:13.000 Clearly.
00:15:14.000 We'll get to that momentarily first.
00:15:15.000 Our friends over at Genucel sold out of their dark spot corrector.
00:15:18.000 Our listeners have been begging for a restock.
00:15:19.000 Well, I have some good news for you.
00:15:21.000 Just in time for summer.
00:15:22.000 It is back in stock.
00:15:23.000 Genucel's famous dark spot corrector has not one, but three cutting edge ingredients.
00:15:27.000 And it goes to work fast to target sunspots, dark spots, liver spots, even old discoloration, both on your face and on your hands.
00:15:33.000 You can now enjoy your summer sun beach and barbecues without those embarrassing spots.
00:15:36.000 GenuCell's most popular package also features their summer essentials, like the best-selling Ultra Retinol Moisturizer with a powerful retinol alternative for safe use in the sun.
00:15:43.000 You'll be amazed how quickly you see results or 100% of your money back, guaranteed.
00:15:48.000 Go to GenuCell.com slash Shapiro right now.
00:15:50.000 Get your Dark Spot Corrector in the GenuCell Most Popular Package.
00:15:53.000 That's GenuCell.com slash Shapiro right now.
00:15:56.000 Save over 70% off GenuCell's Most Popular Package.
00:15:59.000 All orders will include a mystery luxury gift.
00:16:01.000 Well, supplies last.
00:16:02.000 Genucel.com slash Shapiro.
00:16:04.000 Go check them out right now.
00:16:05.000 That is Genucel.com slash Shapiro.
00:16:08.000 Save over 70% off Genucel's most popular package.
00:16:11.000 Okay, so...
00:16:12.000 Democrats, of course, in the media, but I repeat myself.
00:16:15.000 They have decided, the big story here is that Marjorie Taylor Greene showed photos of Hunter Biden's laptop.
00:16:20.000 So here is what it looked like when Marjorie Taylor Greene decided to ask some questions about Hunter Biden's laptop and decided that it would be a good idea, I think, frankly, this is hilarious, to show all of the pictures of Hunter Biden unclothed on his laptop and doing the drugs.
00:16:38.000 So when Hunter Biden paid for this woman To do this with him, to travel across state lines from California to Washington D.C.
00:16:51.000 on June 15th.
00:16:53.000 This is a violation of the Mann Act.
00:16:56.000 This was prostitution.
00:16:58.000 Mr. Shapley, you started an investigation into Hunter Biden, codenamed Sportsman, which opened in November of 2018.
00:17:05.000 It was an offshoot of an investigation the IRS was conducting into a foreign-based amateur online pornography platform.
00:17:16.000 This is evidence.
00:17:18.000 Okay, so the media's take on this was, Marjorie Taylor Greene, this is Daily Beast, inflicts Hunter Biden nudes on Congress.
00:17:23.000 Inflicts.
00:17:23.000 Oh, you are so wounded, aren't you?
00:17:26.000 Oh, I mean, oh my God, you can't.
00:17:27.000 Did the committee of the ladies' times expire?
00:17:29.000 Okay, so the media's take on this was Marjorie Taylor Greene, this is Daily Beast, inflicts
00:17:37.000 Hunter Biden nudes on Congress, inflicts.
00:17:39.000 Oh, you are so wounded, aren't you?
00:17:41.000 Oh, I mean, oh my God, you can't, oh, be still your Puritan beating hearts.
00:17:46.000 Oh, yes, I believe you.
00:17:48.000 I believe you, all you Democrats who believe that we need to read genderqueer to our seven-year-olds.
00:17:53.000 I totally believe you.
00:17:54.000 I think that you are deeply concerned about graphic nudity in Congress in front of a bunch of adults.
00:18:00.000 By the way, it's blacked out.
00:18:02.000 I think that I totally believe you.
00:18:04.000 I think that you guys are just the sensibilities of Congress have been offended.
00:18:08.000 Yes, I believe you.
00:18:09.000 I believe you.
00:18:11.000 I love the faux outrage from these people.
00:18:14.000 Jared Moskowitz, Democrat of Florida, said, in an effort to own Hunter Biden, they're assembling nude photos of him, having some intern have to sit in a room and blow up these photos and put it on poster boards and figure out, oh, which ones are beyond the pale.
00:18:24.000 And then AOC acted really offended.
00:18:27.000 She called the images pornographic and accused Republicans of reaching a new low.
00:18:30.000 They should make a kid's book out of it and put in school libraries, and then Democrats would all be out front protesting in favor of it.
00:18:35.000 Animate Hunter Biden's porn from his laptop and stick it in a school library for 6th graders and Democrats would be like, How dare you try to take that out of the library, you censorious bastards, you!
00:18:46.000 You're so tiresome!
00:18:48.000 You're so tiresome.
00:18:49.000 Okay, if you don't like Hunter Biden's nudes on his laptop, then I have a few recommendations.
00:18:53.000 One, Hunter Biden is a scuzzbag.
00:18:55.000 You should stop defending Hunter Biden.
00:18:56.000 Two, Hunter Biden shouldn't have left his laptop being a drug-addicted derelict who's in his 50s at a stupid computer repair shop.
00:19:04.000 Three, you guys shouldn't have all claimed that it was Russian disinformation.
00:19:07.000 And four, maybe you should let him be prosecuted when he commits crimes like transporting prostitutes across state lines, apparently, and then allegedly taking tax write-offs for them.
00:19:16.000 Maybe it's a you problem, in other words.
00:19:19.000 I'm so tired of this crap.
00:19:21.000 Democrats do this with regard to so many issues.
00:19:24.000 If you show a picture of what an aborted fetus looks like, they're like, that's so offensive.
00:19:28.000 Yes, that's our point.
00:19:29.000 That's our point, not your point.
00:19:31.000 You don't get to act offended.
00:19:33.000 Your tender sensibilities have been bruised by all of it.
00:19:38.000 Shut up.
00:19:39.000 You're ridiculous.
00:19:40.000 But that wasn't it.
00:19:41.000 That wasn't it.
00:19:41.000 The Democrats also decided that it was very important during this hearing to ignore all of the whistleblower revelations and of course talk about Donald Trump and Slam.
00:19:49.000 How are we even doing?
00:19:50.000 We'll get to that momentarily first.
00:19:52.000 You may have seen the CEO of Innovation Refunds, Howard Mackler, on TV explaining how they've helped so many small businesses with their ERC tax refunds.
00:19:58.000 The ERC is the Employee Retention Credit.
00:20:00.000 Every year, the U.S.
00:20:01.000 government sets aside over a billion bucks for economic incentives, but it's reported only about 4% is claimed.
00:20:06.000 If you own a business, you could have money just waiting to be claimed if you have more than four employees.
00:20:09.000 Innovation Refunds' independent tax attorneys are dedicated to helping business owners navigate the complex filing process for different companies.
00:20:15.000 They can help companies figure out deductions based on industries.
00:20:17.000 In fact, Innovation Refunds is teaming up with John Taffer, the host of Bar Rescue.
00:20:22.000 To help restaurant and bar owners find out if they're eligible for the tax credit.
00:20:25.000 Innovation Refunds has been helping eligible businesses claim their ERC tax refunds since 2021.
00:20:30.000 They might be able to help your business as well.
00:20:33.000 Go to GetRefunds.com to determine your eligibility.
00:20:36.000 If you qualify, you could be on your way to receiving cash for your business.
00:20:39.000 There's no upfront charge since they don't get paid unless you get paid.
00:20:42.000 Go to GetRefunds.com or dial 1-843-REFUNDS That is GetRefunds.com or dial 1-843-R-E-F-U-N-D-S, GetRefunds.com and go check them out right now.
00:20:55.000 OK, so naturally, Democrats tried to pretend that this was all ludicrous and terrible.
00:20:59.000 So Representative Jamie Raskin, he's one of the people you hear shouting at Marjorie Taylor Greene, why is this happening?
00:21:04.000 Oh, no.
00:21:05.000 Oh, oh.
00:21:08.000 He slammed the House hearing as a theater of the absurd.
00:21:11.000 A theater of the absurd.
00:21:12.000 Again, I can't... Can I just point out that all of Congress is a damned joke at this point?
00:21:17.000 You guys are a joke.
00:21:18.000 There's a reason why you're in single digit approval ratings.
00:21:21.000 No one likes you and we all think you're a theater of the absurd.
00:21:24.000 So I don't want to hear about how you are very serious people.
00:21:26.000 Top men handling Congress.
00:21:28.000 From Jamie Raskin.
00:21:29.000 Give me a break.
00:21:31.000 I thought we might be here today on the matter that the chairman declared his top priority, the crusade to find evidence of wrongdoing by President Biden.
00:21:39.000 But now the majority's long-promised star witness turns out to be a fugitive from American justice, an arms trafficker indicted on eight federal criminal felony counts and an unregistered foreign agent for China who tried to trade Chinese arms for Iranian oil.
00:21:56.000 So I guess he's not going to be a witness for the majority anytime soon.
00:21:59.000 Well, after the failed SARS reports, bank records, Form 1023, we can conclude that this Inspector Clouseau-style quest for something that doesn't exist has turned our committee into a theater of the absurd, an exercise in futility and embarrassment.
00:22:17.000 Yes, our honor has been offended.
00:22:21.000 Meanwhile, Representative Kweisi Mfume, he is a Democrat from Maryland.
00:22:26.000 He says that we need the DOJ and the FBI and the IRS because they're keeping this democracy in check, which is an admission against interest, I think.
00:22:35.000 Here's what goals mean.
00:22:37.000 I don't like these attacks on the Department of Justice, the FBI, the IRS, as if they are somehow anti-US agencies.
00:22:47.000 Those agencies keep this democracy in check.
00:22:51.000 It keeps them in float.
00:22:52.000 They provide the checks and they provide the balances.
00:22:58.000 Wait, the IRS and the DOJ and the FBI provide the checks and balances against the American people?
00:23:02.000 I don't think that means what you think it means.
00:23:04.000 That is actively not their job.
00:23:06.000 It is not the job of the DOJ, the FBI, or the IRS to keep democracy in check.
00:23:10.000 They have statutory authority to do certain tasks.
00:23:14.000 If they move beyond those tasks, then they actually are going into directions they should not be going into.
00:23:20.000 I love that the Democrats want to overrule the Supreme Court are suddenly about checks and balances when it comes to executive branch agencies, which are not a check or a balance.
00:23:29.000 It's absolutely incredible.
00:23:30.000 So apparently the DOJ is just a check and a balance when it lets Hunter Biden skate without any serious questions, but goes after Donald Trump.
00:23:37.000 That's a check and that's a balance.
00:23:38.000 I notice how much you love the checks and balances when you guys are actually in control of the levers of power.
00:23:43.000 Representative Chantelle Brown of Ohio, she just dismissed all of this.
00:23:47.000 Nothing about the Bidens has any merit.
00:23:48.000 They're the nicest, most gracious, most wonderful people.
00:23:53.000 We can't even follow which investigation we're discussing today as if the FBI, the IRS, XXX, or something new.
00:24:01.000 I know the American people are confused because we're all confused what we're doing here.
00:24:07.000 Nothing this majority has claimed about the president or his family has merit.
00:24:13.000 No wonder the folks back home are tuning out all this confused mess.
00:24:21.000 Oh, yeah, nothing has merit.
00:24:24.000 Really, nothing.
00:24:25.000 Which is why Hunter Biden pled guilty to a bevy of crimes.
00:24:27.000 Would that be the reason?
00:24:28.000 Well, Joe Biden was claiming he was innocent as the driven snow.
00:24:31.000 Ro Khanna from California.
00:24:32.000 He says, you know what the problem is with you guys, you IRS agents, you checks on democracy?
00:24:37.000 You know what's wrong with you guys?
00:24:38.000 You're sticklers for the law.
00:24:42.000 Isn't that literally their job?
00:24:43.000 Here's Ro Khanna.
00:24:45.000 And I'm not questioning.
00:24:46.000 I mean, you are a stickler for the law.
00:24:48.000 You know, it reminds me of That is the worst description of the plot of Les Mis I've ever heard.
00:25:01.000 It's like Les Mis, like the famous person who wanted to get the sandwich?
00:25:05.000 Okay, so first of all, let me point out that in Les Mis, Jean Valjean steals a loaf of bread to feed hungry children.
00:25:12.000 In the Hunter Biden story, Hunter Biden takes a bunch of foreign money so that he can bang hookers and do crack.
00:25:20.000 And then takes a tax write-off.
00:25:22.000 I'm sensing not Jean Valjean in that story.
00:25:24.000 You have to go a long way from Jean Valjean to get all the way over here to Hunter Biden.
00:25:31.000 Again, steals a loaf of bread to feed hungry children.
00:25:33.000 Ro Khanna's like, it just reminds me of that.
00:25:34.000 It's like that.
00:25:35.000 Except over here, he's snorting crack off a hooker's ass and taking a tax write-off.
00:25:39.000 Exactly the same.
00:25:40.000 And you, my friend, you, my friend, are just the villain in that story.
00:25:45.000 That's you.
00:25:47.000 You're Javert.
00:25:48.000 The guy who steals the sandwich.
00:25:49.000 Oh my God.
00:25:50.000 These people.
00:25:51.000 But here's the thing.
00:25:52.000 They're all for sticklers of the law when it comes to Donald Trump.
00:25:54.000 When it comes to Trump, then... The law must... No one is above the law.
00:25:59.000 And that's why Donald Trump must be prosecuted.
00:26:01.000 On every offense.
00:26:03.000 Forever.
00:26:05.000 Now, I noticed again that you guys are perfectly happy to dismiss charges against the Bidens or Hillary Clinton or anybody else because it might be election interference.
00:26:11.000 But the minute that Donald Trump is the guy, then it's not election interference anymore.
00:26:14.000 It's just the law kicks into place.
00:26:17.000 Now again, there are two arguments there.
00:26:18.000 One is the election interference argument, and one is you guys are really Javert.
00:26:23.000 But you're not even Javert.
00:26:24.000 You're just misinterpreting the law in order to get Trump.
00:26:26.000 And Javert, you can at least make the case, was actually correctly interpreting the law.
00:26:31.000 He was just not applying mercy.
00:26:32.000 I mean, I think that's Victor Hugo's entire point.
00:26:34.000 In this particular story, the claim that you are making is that it's okay to misinterpret law to get Trump.
00:26:42.000 Which is what's actively happening, for example, in the Alvin Bragg case, the Manhattan DA case, prosecuting Trump for campaign finance violations that clearly are not covered by the law.
00:26:51.000 And it appears more and more clear that that may be the case with regard to the charges that are now being brought against Donald Trump or will be brought by Jack Smith against Donald Trump with regard to the January 6th events.
00:27:07.000 So according to the New York Times, federal prosecutors have introduced a new twist into the January 6th investigation by suggesting in a target letter they could charge former President Trump with violating a civil rights statute that dates back to the post-Civil War reconstruction era, according to three people familiar with the matter.
00:27:21.000 So they know they don't really have Trump on anything is what it sounds like, and so what they are actively attempting to do now...
00:27:26.000 is stretch the definition of charges to get Trump.
00:27:29.000 I said yesterday I was going to withhold opinion until I saw more about the indictment.
00:27:32.000 Well, now there's more about the indictment being leaked to the New York Times, so I can make a judgment as to the merits of the indictment as that sort of stuff rolls out.
00:27:39.000 Again, two things can also be true at once, as they are in the classified documents case, that Donald Trump may have fulfilled the elements of a crime, but it's also a political prosecution.
00:27:46.000 Both those things can be true.
00:27:47.000 When it comes to this particular charge they're talking about on January 6th, if this ends up being in the indictment, this is a stretch beyond a stretch.
00:27:55.000 According to the New York Times, the letter to Trump from the Special Counsel referred to three criminal statutes as part of the grand jury investigation into Trump's efforts to reverse his 2020 election loss, according to two people with knowledge of the content.
00:28:05.000 Two of the statutes were familiar from the criminal referral by the House January 6th Committee and months of discussion by legal experts.
00:28:11.000 That'd be conspiracy to defraud the government and obstruction of an official proceeding.
00:28:14.000 We'll get to those in just one second because those both appear to be weak as well.
00:28:17.000 The third criminal law cited in the letter was a surprise.
00:28:19.000 That'd be Section 241 of Title 18 of the U.S.
00:28:20.000 Code.
00:28:22.000 Which makes it a crime for people to, quote, conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
00:28:32.000 Originally, this was directed in order to shut down the Ku Klux Klan in the aftermath of the Civil War.
00:28:37.000 The idea was we're going to have federal agents go prevent the Ku Klux Klan from engaging in terrorism to stop black people from voting, for example.
00:28:44.000 In the modern era, it's been used really with like voting fraud conspiracies, like actually stuffing ballot boxes, for example.
00:28:51.000 So a 1950 opinion by the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit wrote that applying Section 241 in a ballot box stuffing case could be correct because we all have a right to vote.
00:29:01.000 And if that right to vote is somehow overturned by somebody who's engaging in fraud, then it may violate the statute.
00:29:07.000 Same thing in a 1974 Supreme Court opinion, which allowed Section 241 to be applied to West Virginians who cast fake votes on a voting machine.
00:29:15.000 But it's going to be very difficult to stretch that to cover Trump.
00:29:20.000 Presumably, they would have to suggest that Trump was attempting to overthrow an honest count of votes or something.
00:29:27.000 Norm Eisen, who's a Democrat and worked for the House Judiciary Committee on behalf of the Democrats during Trump's first impeachment, he says, it seems like under 241, there's at least a right to an honest counting of the votes.
00:29:36.000 Submitting an alternate electoral certificate to Congress is a novel scenario.
00:29:39.000 It seems like it would violate this right.
00:29:41.000 I don't see how.
00:29:42.000 I really don't see how.
00:29:43.000 Because Congress can just reject that.
00:29:45.000 That's not the same thing as stuffing ballot boxes.
00:29:47.000 That's saying, I don't like your interpretation of this law.
00:29:49.000 Here's my alternative interpretation of the law.
00:29:51.000 Maybe you'll go for it, which is actually what happened, right?
00:29:53.000 John Eastman provided Trump with this gussied-up, ridiculous version of how the law works, which it doesn't, as John Eastman kind of acknowledged.
00:30:00.000 And Trump then just presented that.
00:30:01.000 That seems like that falls pretty clearly under free speech, not under violation of Section 241.
00:30:07.000 The other two crimes, theoretically, that Trump could be charged with are Section 371 of Title 18 that makes it a crime to conspire to defraud the United States.
00:30:14.000 The other, Section 1512, includes a provision that makes it a crime to corruptly obstruct an official proceeding.
00:30:21.000 Now, Andy McCarthy has an excellent rundown on those potential charges.
00:30:26.000 In national review.
00:30:28.000 And here's what he says.
00:30:28.000 He says, quote, I do not believe the charge of conspiracy to defraud the United States
00:30:32.000 can survive this admonition unless the government can prove a defendant was trying to bilk the
00:30:35.000 government out of money or tangible assets.
00:30:38.000 Is there any evidence that Trump was trying to bilk the country out of money or tangible
00:30:43.000 assets?
00:30:44.000 I don't see how.
00:30:45.000 So that particular section shouldn't apply.
00:30:47.000 as far as corruptly obstructing Congress.
00:30:49.000 He says, I don't think a charge of corruptly obstructing Congress can survive
00:30:52.000 if the alleged corruption does not involve patently lawless behavior,
00:30:55.000 such as evidence tampering or threats to use force against witnesses or Congress itself.
00:30:59.000 Since Trump has not been implicated criminally in the violence of the Capitol riot, Jack Smith
00:31:03.000 will almost certainly have to argue that the corruption lay in 1. Trump's awareness he lost
00:31:06.000 the election and b. John Eastman's nonsensical legal theory that Vice President Pence had the
00:31:10.000 authority to discount electoral votes.
00:31:12.000 He said, I'd be surprised if prosecutors can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew he'd lost the election.
00:31:16.000 Again, this is my point yesterday is that proving intent in a Trump case, very, very difficult because Trump's intent changes moment to moment.
00:31:22.000 And he's absolutely chimerical.
00:31:24.000 So how exactly do you prove that Donald Trump, like today, do you think Donald Trump today thinks he lost the election?
00:31:29.000 I don't.
00:31:30.000 I think Donald Trump today thinks he won the election.
00:31:32.000 Donald Trump has a unique capacity to convince himself of things, both for good and for bad.
00:31:37.000 However, says Annie McCarthy, keep your eye on an episode that appears to have gotten a lot of Smith's attention.
00:31:42.000 It is said that the Trump campaign raised tens of millions of dollars on the representation, that the money would go to a legal fund that would fight the election fraud, by which Trump claimed the election was being stolen.
00:31:50.000 But according to the January 6th committee, there was no such fund.
00:31:52.000 At least some of the money was diverted to other purposes.
00:31:55.000 The New York Times says $200,000 was spent at Trump hotel properties.
00:31:58.000 So that would look more like traditional fraud.
00:32:00.000 Okay, so we'll see what the charges come down.
00:32:02.000 But if the three charges that people are discussing are the ones that are brought, those are super weak.
00:32:08.000 And listen, even if they weren't super weak, pretty clearly politically motivated.
00:32:12.000 But if they're weak and politically motivated, it looks like Alvin Bragg, the case for political prosecution becomes even stronger, obviously.
00:32:21.000 Well, the Biden administration was asked yesterday about whether they're weaponizing government.
00:32:25.000 And here is Karine Jean-Pierre's response.
00:32:28.000 Lastly, former President Trump received a letter from the special counsel that he's
00:32:32.000 being investigated for his role in efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
00:32:36.000 House Speaker Kevin McCarthy says the Biden administration has decided to, quote,
00:32:41.000 weaponize government to go after their number one opponent, end quote.
00:32:45.000 Here's what we have done.
00:32:48.000 The president respects the Department of Justice, their independence.
00:32:52.000 He has been very, very steadfast on making sure that the rule of law comes back in this administration, comes back in the White House and clearly the administration more broadly.
00:33:04.000 And that's what you have seen.
00:33:05.000 I'm just not going to comment on this.
00:33:09.000 Amazing, amazing stuff there from the White House.
00:33:11.000 Now, why is all of this happening?
00:33:13.000 I think we know the reason why all of this is happening.
00:33:15.000 It's twofold.
00:33:16.000 One, Democrats have decided that Donald Trump is a threat to everything.
00:33:19.000 And two, they know that Joe Biden is super vulnerable.
00:33:21.000 We'll get to that momentarily.
00:33:22.000 First, are you tired of feeling uncomfortable in your underwear and loungewear, especially when it's this hot and humid and sticky outside?
00:33:28.000 Well, thanks to my friends at Tommy Chong, you can have the perfect blend of comfort and breathability.
00:33:32.000 When you wear Tommy John, you're so much more comfortable, you can do everything better.
00:33:35.000 Their underwear has dozens of comfort innovations.
00:33:37.000 We're talking breathable, lightweight, moisture-wicking fabric with four times the stretch of competing brands that can keep you seven degrees cooler than cotton.
00:33:43.000 Tommy John's also sells loungewear with a level of softness I've never felt before.
00:33:47.000 Their incredibly soft loungewear is designed to envelop you in a world of pure luxury.
00:33:49.000 Their stuff is great.
00:33:50.000 I mean, truly terrific.
00:33:51.000 I took all of my other underwear.
00:33:52.000 I threw it out.
00:33:53.000 I only wear Tommy John's.
00:33:54.000 Their loungewear is similarly awesome.
00:33:56.000 Every purchase is backed by Tommy John's.
00:33:57.000 Best pair you'll ever wear, or it's free.
00:33:58.000 Guarantee.
00:33:59.000 Shop Tommy John's Summer Collection.
00:34:01.000 Get 20% off your first purchase at TommyJohn.com slash Ben.
00:34:04.000 That's 20% off at TommyJohn.com slash Ben.
00:34:08.000 TommyJohn.com slash Ben.
00:34:09.000 See site for details.
00:34:10.000 Again, they're really durable.
00:34:12.000 They're breathable and lightweight.
00:34:13.000 Underwear that moves with you.
00:34:14.000 They have great product for men and for women.
00:34:16.000 My wife loves Tommy John product.
00:34:17.000 Go check them out right now.
00:34:18.000 Tommyjohn.com slash Ben.
00:34:20.000 When you use that slash Ben, you get 20% off their product today.
00:34:24.000 Also, despite the Joe Biden lackluster economy, the daily wear continues to thrive and to grow.
00:34:28.000 We are also hiring.
00:34:29.000 We're currently looking for a graphic designer to join our fast growing creative department.
00:34:33.000 As a graphic designer, you will collaborate with copywriters, creative directors, and other designers under the guidance of the executive creative director to craft, show assets, and thumbnails for a variety of media.
00:34:41.000 To excel in this role, you'll need proficiency in Adobe Creative Cloud, experience creating engaging web graphics, keen attention to detail, and excellent communication and collaboration skills.
00:34:49.000 The position is based in Nashville, Tennessee.
00:34:51.000 If you're interested in joining our team, visit dailywire.com slash careers.
00:34:55.000 That's dailywire.com slash careers today.
00:34:59.000 Okay, meanwhile, So if the material in the Trump indictment looks this week, why exactly are they doing it?
00:35:03.000 Well, I think that we all know the answer.
00:35:05.000 Democrats have to do whatever they can to stop Donald Trump.
00:35:08.000 They have to do whatever they can to prop up Joe Biden.
00:35:11.000 Now, there's also a dynamic where Democrats are perfectly happy to elevate Donald Trump in the primaries.
00:35:15.000 They think that he's the most beautiful candidate.
00:35:16.000 If you ask Democrats about this, they're basically pretty obvious about it.
00:35:19.000 But they have built up in their minds this idea, this Mutually exclusive idea that one, it's good if Donald Trump gets nominated because Joe Biden can beat him.
00:35:27.000 And two, Donald Trump is the greatest threat to the Republic ever.
00:35:29.000 So how do you achieve both those things at the same time?
00:35:32.000 That Donald Trump is a huge threat to the Republic and that also he needs to be the nominee so that Joe Biden can beat him.
00:35:37.000 Well, the answer is you indict him.
00:35:39.000 You indict him because by indicting him, you make sure that he can't be president.
00:35:43.000 And also you elevate him in the primaries.
00:35:45.000 So you've done all the things.
00:35:47.000 And then you wonder why people are very suspicious of how these investigations are run, how these prosecutions are run.
00:35:53.000 Here's the thing.
00:35:53.000 When Democrats keep saying over and over and over that everything is justified in pursuit of Donald Trump, it makes us think that you will justify anything in pursuit of Donald Trump.
00:36:02.000 Eddie Glaude from MSNBC, he says self-governance itself is on the table if Donald Trump wins the presidency.
00:36:07.000 Now, first of all, I gotta say, I hate this language on all sides.
00:36:09.000 I really hate it.
00:36:10.000 I thought Barack Obama was a terrible president.
00:36:12.000 I hated his presidency.
00:36:13.000 I think Joe Biden is an awful president.
00:36:15.000 I hate his presidency.
00:36:16.000 I can't wait for him to not be president of the United States anymore.
00:36:19.000 Do I think that self-governance itself is on the table in the United States right now?
00:36:22.000 Like with every single election?
00:36:24.000 I think you want to break up the country.
00:36:25.000 It's a great way to do it.
00:36:26.000 But that's exactly... Democrats are perfectly happy to do that.
00:36:28.000 Here is Eddie Cloud.
00:36:30.000 We're in this inflection point.
00:36:32.000 Will we be a nation?
00:36:34.000 Defined by the rule of law?
00:36:36.000 Will we hold all of these folk accountable?
00:36:40.000 Or will our political passions overrun?
00:36:43.000 Will those passions then deny the legitimacy of the court?
00:36:46.000 Will those passions deny the legitimacy of the decisions?
00:36:49.000 Will it undermine the very foundation of the polity?
00:36:53.000 So, we're in this moment where it seems as if the question of whether or not everyday ordinary people can engage in self-governance is on the table.
00:37:05.000 Will we respect the decisions of the court?
00:37:06.000 MSNBC hates the court since the Roe versus Wade overturning.
00:37:10.000 Will we respect elections?
00:37:12.000 I mean, you spent five years saying that Donald Trump was not the elected president of the United States.
00:37:18.000 It's just, it's absurd.
00:37:20.000 And you're doing all of this, by the way, in cover for a radical democratic agenda.
00:37:24.000 Fascinating piece by Thomas Edsel, he writes a really good data-driven piece over at the New York Times fairly often.
00:37:31.000 I disagree with him on a lot, but he at least brings the data.
00:37:33.000 And he points out in this piece that while at the end of the 20th century the Republican Party moved rightward, since then, Democrats have moved far, far, far to the left.
00:37:42.000 And this has opened a gap for Republicans if the Republicans will take advantage of it and Democrats are freaking out about it.
00:37:48.000 Bill McInturff, a founding partner of the Republican polling firm Public Opinion Strategies, released a study in June, says Edsel.
00:37:54.000 It documents the shifting views of Democratic and Republican voters.
00:37:56.000 Among the findings, from 2012 to 2022, the percentage of Democrats who described themselves as very liberal grew from 29% from 19%.
00:38:02.000 In 2013, when asked their religion, only 10% of Democrats said none.
00:38:05.000 In 2013, when asked their religion, only 10% of Democrats said none.
00:38:09.000 In 2023, that number was 38%.
00:38:12.000 The percentage of Democrats who agreed that governments should do more to solve problems
00:38:15.000 and help meet the needs of people grew from only 45% in 2013 to 45% in 2020.
00:38:18.000 82% of Democrats believe government needs to do more to help solve problems and help meet the needs of people.
00:38:22.000 82% in 2021.
00:38:24.000 82% of Democrats believe government needs to do more to help solve problems and help meet the needs of people.
00:38:29.000 We're spending $7 trillion a year, and we need to do more, according to 82% of Democrats.
00:38:35.000 The most stable finding over a decade, says McInturff, is that Republicans barely budge on a host of issues,
00:38:40.000 while Democrats' positions on abortion, climate change, immigration, and affirmative action
00:38:44.000 have all fundamentally shifted.
00:38:46.000 This, by the way, is driving additional fundraising for the GOP House.
00:38:48.000 People aren't watching the GOP fundraising.
00:38:51.000 Politico is.
00:38:51.000 They point out that Republicans are dominating the cash dash so far in the cutthroat battle for the House in 2024.
00:38:58.000 GOP leaders are continuing to reap the rewards of a successful years-long strategy to erase the massive small-dollar fundraising advantage Democrats enjoyed since Trump took office in 2017.
00:39:08.000 Some 65 Republican candidates raised half a million dollars or more in the second quarter compared to just 40 Democrats, according to a political analysis of campaign finance filings.
00:39:16.000 In 2019, only 30 Republicans crossed that threshold compared to 50 Democrats.
00:39:19.000 So Republicans are out-raising Democrats on the House level.
00:39:22.000 Joe Biden is innately vulnerable.
00:39:24.000 I mean, when they have to try out Nancy Pelosi to defend Joe Biden, you know you're in trouble.
00:39:29.000 In probably the most hilarious clip of the day, Nancy Pelosi, because she is extremely old and also not with it, she testified that Joe Biden is actually a spring chicken.
00:39:40.000 Man, this is like the night at the end of Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade talking about how basically Methuselah is a spring chicken here.
00:39:51.000 Here is Nancy Pelosi.
00:39:55.000 We have to be hopeful.
00:39:56.000 That's just the way it is.
00:39:58.000 We're an optimistic country.
00:39:59.000 We'll be hopeful that as we go forward, we can do this in a unifying way.
00:40:03.000 And we couldn't be better served in that regard than by President Joe Biden.
00:40:07.000 This is a person who respects other points of view, a person who has a vision about our country that is consistent with the vision of our founders, that respects the sacrifice of our men and women in uniform to keep our freedom intact and, again, Look at the lies.
00:40:27.000 I mean, he's a traditionalist.
00:40:29.000 He's a traditionalist.
00:40:29.000 First of all, I don't know when Nancy Pelosi got two pairs of eyebrows, but in any case, it's an amazing thing.
00:40:34.000 So apparently, Joe Biden, not only does he respect the vision of our founders, he's just a kid.
00:40:38.000 He's a kid.
00:40:39.000 He's a spring chicken, as I say.
00:40:42.000 Age is relative.
00:40:44.000 I was in L.A.
00:40:46.000 for some Democratic stuff recently, and I met with Norman Lear, who's 100, going on 101.
00:40:50.000 He was telling me some new shows he was involved in.
00:40:54.000 I was meeting with Frank Gehry, a 90-something architect, showing me new buildings.
00:41:00.000 He's building throughout the world.
00:41:02.000 And they were like, 80?
00:41:04.000 He's a kid!
00:41:08.000 It is.
00:41:09.000 It's relative.
00:41:10.000 He's younger than I am, so he'll get to me as well, the president is.
00:41:17.000 Uh-huh.
00:41:17.000 Uh-huh.
00:41:18.000 Guys, 80 is the new 20.
00:41:20.000 Did you know that?
00:41:22.000 It's not weird.
00:41:23.000 At all.
00:41:24.000 Meanwhile, what is Nancy Pelosi actually pushing?
00:41:26.000 As I say, the Democratic Party continues to move steadily to the left.
00:41:29.000 They have to protect Biden.
00:41:30.000 They have to protect the precious.
00:41:31.000 The only way to do that is to continue to set a double standard via the Department of Justice.
00:41:35.000 I mean, here's Nancy Pelosi suggesting that we have to have a military policy that funds transgender surgeries or it's a tragedy.
00:41:43.000 The Democrats have lost their minds.
00:41:45.000 This is why I say all it would take for the Republicans to win is probably a sane Republican, but here's Nancy Pelosi doing the thing.
00:41:51.000 The bill that came out of the Armed Services Committee, a committee you served on, was very bipartisan.
00:41:56.000 I think it had one no vote.
00:41:58.000 It was just about 100% bipartisan until they came to the floor and started really messing with it.
00:42:08.000 It's a tragedy.
00:42:09.000 It's really sad.
00:42:13.000 This is the Democratic Party.
00:42:14.000 And so, of course, they have to protect the geriatric daughter in charge.
00:42:17.000 Of course they have to.
00:42:18.000 And that means they need to simultaneously elevate Trump and they need to stop Trump simultaneously.
00:42:22.000 And that's what a lot of these indictments are very much about.
00:42:25.000 Meanwhile, I have to say the Biden administration is doing a stellar job, as always, with regard to foreign policy.
00:42:32.000 It is amazing to watch as Xi Jinping just runs circles around people like John Kerry.
00:42:37.000 So, Xi, the dictator of China, He was asked specifically by John Kerry to do more on climate.
00:42:44.000 And he's like, nope, not interested.
00:42:46.000 According to the New York Times, Chinese leaders rebuffed attempts by John Kerry, Joe Biden's climate envoy, to persuade them to commit to tougher climate action during three days of talks in Beijing.
00:42:54.000 Kerry emerged late Wednesday from lengthy negotiations in Beijing with no new agreements.
00:42:58.000 In fact, the Chinese president, Xi Jinping, existed in a speech that China would pursue its goals to phase out carbon dioxide pollution at their own pace, in their own way.
00:43:06.000 So what exactly happened here?
00:43:09.000 This is really funny.
00:43:09.000 So John Kerry was then asked about this, the fact that Xi Jinping and the rest of the Chinese, who are responsible, by the way, they in India are responsible for the bulk of the world's carbon emissions at this point.
00:43:18.000 Kerry was asked about the fact that Xi just rejected him to his face, like Dikembe Mutombo.
00:43:22.000 And John Kerry's answer here was, no, no, no, that's not what he said.
00:43:29.000 Are you sure he rejected me to my face?
00:43:33.000 But that's never stopped me before!
00:43:35.000 From anything!
00:43:36.000 I'm John Kerry!
00:43:40.000 Well, I think we all agree that nobody should be, quote, dictated to.
00:43:45.000 And we're not doing that.
00:43:47.000 That's why we had three days of intensive discussions.
00:43:51.000 And I think if you ask Xi Jinping, he'll tell you there was zero dictation.
00:43:57.000 Nor, I think if you asked Director Wang Yi and Oh my god, he's such a joke.
00:44:03.000 in Han as well as, you know, any of the interlocutors we were talking to, they would tell you that
00:44:13.000 there was no dictation here.
00:44:15.000 There was a clear exchange of ideas.
00:44:18.000 If anything is dictating, it is the science.
00:44:24.000 Oh my God, he's such a joke.
00:44:25.000 The science is dictating, he's not dictating, and nobody's not dictating, no dictation here,
00:44:30.000 dicta-da-da-do.
00:44:31.000 Ah, what a genius John Kerry is.
00:44:34.000 I'm so glad we have him on the Climate Beat.
00:44:36.000 By the way, can I point out that there are a lot of headlines right now about how hot it is outside?
00:44:40.000 I know.
00:44:40.000 It's hot outside.
00:44:42.000 You know what I can do about that?
00:44:43.000 Zero things.
00:44:44.000 Thank God we have this thing called air conditioning.
00:44:46.000 It's awesome.
00:44:47.000 You know it's a great cure for being super duper hot outside?
00:44:51.000 Being a first world country.
00:44:52.000 Amazing.
00:44:53.000 It works out tremendously well.
00:44:55.000 Because it turns out that if you have a really solid energy grid, and you have the capacity to turn on that AC, you're living quite comfortably these days.
00:45:02.000 You know what sucks?
00:45:03.000 Global poverty.
00:45:04.000 You know what brings global poverty?
00:45:05.000 Decarbonization.
00:45:07.000 Let me also point out that the media always do this routine when it's very, very hot outside.
00:45:11.000 They never ever cover it when it's cold.
00:45:13.000 So it's funny.
00:45:13.000 The media will say, well, you know, it's not global warming, it's now climate change.
00:45:16.000 And the reason they changed the term from global warming to climate change is because the climate in many cases is colder during the winters than it was before.
00:45:25.000 So it's hotter during the summers and it's colder during the winters.
00:45:27.000 They've called this climate weirding.
00:45:29.000 But that doesn't really seem to go over all that way.
00:45:30.000 So now they call it climate change.
00:45:33.000 Which, of course, is an incredibly vague term because the climate is always changing.
00:45:35.000 However, it is worth noting at this point that all of this focus— millions will die of the heat waves that are occurring on planet— Oh my god, the ocean is so hot during the summer in Florida.
00:45:45.000 Okay, so first of all, it is hot this summer in Florida.
00:45:48.000 Also, it's hot like every summer in Florida.
00:45:50.000 You been to Florida?
00:45:51.000 It's really, really hot and humid.
00:45:53.000 Like, I noticed when I first visited here several years ago, and we moved anyway, because air conditioning exists.
00:45:59.000 I just want to point out at this point that many, many, many more people die of cold than heat.
00:46:07.000 I know that we're all very enamored of all of the pictures of it being hot outside and everything.
00:46:11.000 And that the media have decided that when it's hot outside, this is just evidence that it's our fault or whatever.
00:46:15.000 But lots more cold death than heat death.
00:46:19.000 And so, if indeed the world is getting warmer on average, maybe it means that the winters are a little milder.
00:46:26.000 And that might mean relief from death.
00:46:28.000 So, according to the Lancet, there is more cold death than heat death literally everywhere.
00:46:32.000 Literally everywhere on Earth.
00:46:35.000 Here is a chart.
00:46:36.000 Across the period 2000 to 2019, Asia experienced over 2 million cold deaths compared to less than half a million heat deaths.
00:46:45.000 Africa experienced over a million cold deaths compared to a very low number of heat deaths, which is shocking because Africa is located in Africa.
00:46:51.000 Europe, you're talking about 600,000 cold deaths as opposed to Less than 200,000 heat deaths over the course of two decades?
00:46:58.000 North America, Latin America, same deal.
00:47:01.000 Cold death?
00:47:02.000 Way, way, way more prevalent than heat death.
00:47:04.000 You don't hear about that because it's sort of inconvenient.
00:47:07.000 Not only that, if you look overall, each year heat kills about half a million people.
00:47:12.000 Cold kills 4.5 million people.
00:47:17.000 I know that these are all inconvenient facts, but they are reality.
00:47:20.000 And you can see it country by country.
00:47:23.000 We have a chart, country by country, actually, showing the wild disproportion between cold death and heat death.
00:47:28.000 I point this out just because, again, if you follow how the media cover science, this is what they do.
00:47:33.000 Instead, you would imagine this chart was exactly reversed.
00:47:37.000 There are 10 times more cold deaths than heat deaths in Europe.
00:47:39.000 10 times.
00:47:41.000 So, I guess that means that we obviously need to focus like a laser beam on how hot it is outside.
00:47:47.000 Okay, time for a couple of quick things I like and then a thing that I hate.
00:47:49.000 So, things that I like today.
00:47:51.000 There is a good old book written in the 1920s written by José Ortega y Gasset.
00:47:56.000 It is a book called Revolt of the Masses.
00:47:59.000 It's sort of a classic in sort of conservative circles.
00:48:04.000 The basic premise of the book is that when you have mass man, in other words, when the mass becomes the only thing that matters, as opposed to principles, you end up falling down the road to populism and fascism.
00:48:19.000 Here's one of the things he says, the fascist and cynical species were characterized by the
00:48:22.000 first appearance of a type of man who did not care to give reasons or even to be right, but
00:48:26.000 who simply resolved to impose his opinions.
00:48:28.000 That was the novelty, the right not to be right, not to be reasonable, the reason of unreason.
00:48:32.000 The idea here being that if enough people say a thing, then it magically becomes true.
00:48:38.000 It's something the founders very much opposed.
00:48:39.000 This is why when you hear people talk about pure democracy, they are wrong.
00:48:42.000 Pure democracy is a bad thing.
00:48:43.000 The founders feared mob rule, quite properly so.
00:48:47.000 Pure democracy was never supposed to be the way that governments work.
00:48:50.000 This is why you need checks and balances.
00:48:52.000 Unfortunately, we've moved more in the direction of a populist politics in which a pure majority gets to cram down its opinions on everybody else in really brutal fashion without appeal to reason.
00:49:02.000 at the top of the federal government, for example, and that is very, very bad thing.
00:49:05.000 Okay, other things that I like today.
00:49:07.000 So there is this really charming story out of Britain.
00:49:10.000 The Kingsguard.
00:49:12.000 These are the folks with the funny hats who stand outside of Buckingham Palace.
00:49:15.000 They're not supposed to move, right?
00:49:18.000 They're statue-like.
00:49:19.000 If you go and you visit Buckingham Palace, they just stand there.
00:49:21.000 And now there is a video of Mike Van Erp, who's 50, who's better known by his YouTube name Cycling Mikey, and a youngster posing for a photo.
00:49:30.000 It's caused a stir because it is, again, their job to basically stand there absolutely still, but footage shows how there is a member of the guard who moved closer to Mike and a boy trying to get a photo to remember their trip to the Horse Guards Parade.
00:49:44.000 Here's what the video looked like.
00:49:47.000 So the reason he did that, you can't see the kid's face in here, the kid has Down Syndrome.
00:50:11.000 So because the kid has Down Syndrome, he was standing too far away and he's a little scared,
00:50:15.000 so the guy moved just a little bit closer so he could be in the photo
00:50:17.000 and then he moved back to his place.
00:50:19.000 Classy.
00:50:20.000 And, uh, and really, really nice.
00:50:22.000 So, uh, good for that.
00:50:23.000 Good for that, uh, uniformed soldier.
00:50:25.000 That's, that's awesome.
00:50:27.000 Alrighty.
00:50:27.000 Uh, time for a quick thing that I hate.
00:50:33.000 So, um, the Barbie movie, but we'll get to a full review of that on YouTube in very, very short order.
00:50:38.000 So you're going to want to stick around for that because, uh, wow, what a piece of dreck.
00:50:42.000 But the thing that I hate today, now you're seeing all the old country stars feel the necessity to dissociate from Jason Aldean because Jason Aldean had the temerity to make a music video about a song in which he said that in a small town they don't allow riots because people actually care about each other and like each other and don't want their city burned down.
00:50:59.000 And this apparently is racist in some sort of a weird way.
00:51:02.000 I mean, he's against violence.
00:51:03.000 That's his whole point.
00:51:04.000 He doesn't like looting.
00:51:05.000 He doesn't like burning.
00:51:06.000 And he thinks that in a small town, people in a small town don't stand for that sort of thing.
00:51:09.000 There's nothing small town or American about promoting violence.
00:51:11.000 You should know that better than anyone, having survived a mass shooting.
00:51:13.000 This is not American or small town-like.
00:51:15.000 It's just lame.
00:51:16.000 I mean, he's against violence.
00:51:19.000 That's his whole point.
00:51:20.000 He doesn't like looting.
00:51:21.000 He doesn't like burning.
00:51:22.000 And he thinks that in a small town, people in a small town don't stand for that sort
00:51:25.000 of thing, which is true.
00:51:27.000 Cheryl Crow feeling the necessity to go out of her way to swipe just so that she can be
00:51:31.000 in the good graces of her liberal cohorts is really quite ridiculous.
00:51:35.000 Again, this is a manufactured controversy.
00:51:36.000 Good for Aldean for not stepping down from his positions.
00:51:40.000 Alrighty guys, the rest of the show continues right now.
00:51:41.000 You're not going to want to miss it.
00:51:42.000 We'll be getting into the vaunted Ben Shapiro show mailbag.
00:51:44.000 If you're not a member, become a member.
00:51:45.000 Use code SHAPIRO.
00:51:46.000 Check out for two months free on all annual plans.