The Ben Shapiro Show - December 23, 2020


Covid Relief Chaos | Ep. 1163


Episode Stats

Length

47 minutes

Words per Minute

216.08833

Word Count

10,275

Sentence Count

663

Misogynist Sentences

12

Hate Speech Sentences

4


Summary

After congressional Republicans vote for the COVID Relief bill, Trump signals he ll oppose it, Joe Biden continues to call Hunter Biden s legal troubles Russian disinformation, and the Georgia Senate race will go down to the wire. Today's show is sponsored by ExpressVPN. I protect my data with a VPN. You should too. Visit ExpressVpn.com/ProtectYourData to protect your data, too. You should also visit expressvpn.org/Protect Your Data to get free, secure, and secure copies of your hard-drive and hard drive data. If you don't already have a hard drive, you can get a free, high-performance hard drive with a $99 annual fee, which includes a 3-piece cleaning set and a free hard drive cleaning set! You can get all of this for free when you sign up for ExpressVPN, too! You'll get $5 off your first month, and you'll get an additional $50 off your second month when you upgrade your membership when you become a patron! Want to become a supporter of The Ben Shapiro Show? Just go to bit.ly/support-the-ben-showing and get 5% off the entire six-month membership plan? And we'll get you an ad-free version of the show, plus an additional discount on the next month's ad, plus a FREE VIP membership, when you get the choice of the Ben Shapiro show starts shipping in the first week, starting on the second week of the ad is available in the second place, starting in the third place, starts starts starts, starts get $99, she gets $49, gets an ad gets $99 gets $2, she starts gets $4, she pays $ she gets a choice of $ she pays her choice of VIP she gets her $4 she gets that she gets 3 she gets is she gets 2 she gets she gets 4 she gets choices she gets VIP, she also gets a deal she gets europal at she gets an ESTING AND she gets 5 she gets it she gets 7 euro at she s she she gets? She gets a promo code she gets at $ she meets at she she s a rock and she gets all she she meets in her ad she gets in the deal she she she also she gets?) Thanks, Ben Shapiro! And thanks, Thank you for listening, Ben Shapiro and much more! -- Subscribe to my show?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 After congressional Republicans vote for the COVID relief bill, Trump signals he'll oppose it, Joe Biden continues to call Hunter Biden's legal troubles Russian disinformation, and the Georgia Senate races will go down to the wire.
00:00:10.000 This is the Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:10.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:12.000 Today's show is sponsored by ExpressVPN.
00:00:15.000 Today's show is sponsored by ExpressVPN.
00:00:20.000 I protect my data with a VPN.
00:00:21.000 You should too.
00:00:22.000 Visit expressvpn.com.
00:00:25.000 Don't get to all the news of the day in just one second.
00:00:27.000 First, quick reminder, you're spending too much money on your cell phone bill, like you are.
00:00:31.000 The reason for that is because your coverage provider is probably not telling you the truth about all of what you actually need versus what you are actually getting.
00:00:40.000 They're telling you that what you need is unlimited talk, text, and unlimited data.
00:00:42.000 You don't need unlimited data.
00:00:43.000 You need like 2 gigs of data.
00:00:45.000 Because if you actually got the Pure Talk USA version of cell phone coverage, you'd have the exact same towers, the exact same coverage, and you'd be spending like half of what you're spending with a big cell phone coverage provider.
00:00:55.000 Right now, you can get unlimited talk, text, and 2 gigs of data for just $20 a month.
00:00:58.000 And, if you go over on that data usage, Pure Talk USA will not charge you for it.
00:01:02.000 So, why exactly are you spending as much money as you are on your cell phone coverage Right now, there is no reason to do so.
00:01:08.000 Save a bundle of money.
00:01:09.000 I'm talking like hundreds of dollars a year.
00:01:11.000 By grabbing your mobile phone, dial pound 250 and say, Ben Shapiro.
00:01:14.000 When you do, you save 50% off your first month.
00:01:16.000 Dial pound 250, say keyword Ben Shapiro to get started.
00:01:20.000 Pure Talk is simply smarter wireless.
00:01:22.000 You're not gonna sacrifice customer service.
00:01:24.000 You're not gonna sacrifice coverage.
00:01:25.000 It's really easy and it's smart and you're gonna save yourself a bundle.
00:01:28.000 Go check out Pure Talk USA right now.
00:01:30.000 Grab your mobile phone, dial pound 250, say Ben Shapiro to get started and get 50% off your first month.
00:01:35.000 Okay, so it seemed like yesterday morning all was, if not well with the world, then at least somewhat more stable because a COVID relief bill had passed over the weekend, and it had passed with massive numbers.
00:01:46.000 I mean, we're talking like only six Republican senators voted against the COVID relief bill, and in the House, It was like low double digits of people who had actually voted against the COVID relief bill.
00:01:56.000 So finally, the checks were out the door.
00:01:58.000 Everything looked like it was fairly solid.
00:02:00.000 And as I went through yesterday on the program, there were some things that I think were wrong with the bill, like many things that were wrong with the bill.
00:02:07.000 The biggest thing that was wrong with the bill is that, as always, every giant bill from Congress is a crap sandwich.
00:02:13.000 And for ease of passage, what had happened is that the federal government, the legislature, they had actually put together the omnibus budget bill, which is $1.4 trillion.
00:02:22.000 They put that together in one giant package with the COVID relief bill.
00:02:26.000 So many of the complaints you were hearing about money going to Israel, for example, or about money being spent on the Kennedy Center, all of that was in the omnibus package.
00:02:33.000 It wasn't necessarily in the COVID relief bill as it was originally constituted, right?
00:02:38.000 They were passed together, but they're actually two separate bills.
00:02:41.000 So last night, President Trump decided that now that the thing had been passed, now that it had been negotiated, now that it had been passed, and this was a better version of the bill than what Democrats had proposed earlier, or even than Steve Mnuchin had been proposing to Nancy Pelosi months ago.
00:02:54.000 Remember, Democrats turned down a $1.8 trillion deal just a few months ago, and in return, they get a $900 billion deal over the weekend.
00:03:03.000 And Mitch McConnell, the Senate Majority Leader, put out an actual graph showing how much he had moved Democrats in his own direction.
00:03:09.000 The HEROES bill, which was proposed by Democrats back in May, was $3.4 trillion.
00:03:14.000 The HEALS bill, which was proposed by Republicans back in July, was $950 billion.
00:03:19.000 The final agreement in December was $900 billion, so even lower than the HEALS bill in July.
00:03:25.000 Which is a good thing.
00:03:26.000 If you're a conservative, this is what is baffling me this morning.
00:03:31.000 If you're a conservative, You can take one of two positions, but you cannot take both.
00:03:35.000 And I'm seeing people take both, and it makes no sense to me.
00:03:38.000 Position number one is the Rand Paul position on this, which is, we should not really be doing relief right now.
00:03:43.000 What we should be doing is pushing reopening.
00:03:45.000 In fact, if you want to have a relief bill, you should do it in states.
00:03:49.000 You should have a California relief bill, since you're mandating that everything be shut down.
00:03:52.000 You should have a New York relief bill, since you're mandating that everything be shut down.
00:03:54.000 There's no reason that Florida, which is fairly open, should be paying the bills of New York.
00:03:58.000 There's no reason that North Dakota, which is wide open, ought to be paying the bills of California.
00:04:03.000 What we actually need to do is get people back to work.
00:04:05.000 We don't need to keep signing endless checks here.
00:04:07.000 And even if you are somebody who believes that the federal government ought to be signing some checks right now to get people through a hard time, and because the federal government has taken measures that make it harder to work, even if you believe that, you want to restrict the amount of money that is going out the door so that you don't have an unlimited willingness for people to stay home.
00:04:23.000 And this was one of the big battles here, is there are actual disincentives.
00:04:26.000 Once you start using the federal government to bail people out, to a large extent, you are creating what is called moral hazard.
00:04:32.000 You're encouraging people to stay home and not go back to work, even if they are healthy, or even if they've had COVID and recovered, or even if they are young and not particularly vulnerable to the disease.
00:04:41.000 And this is the point that Rand Paul is making, and this is the most conservative slash libertarian point, which is the federal government really should not be doing any of this stuff.
00:04:49.000 And so that is one perspective.
00:04:50.000 Here's Rand Paul making that argument yesterday.
00:04:54.000 There is no free money that can get us out of this situation.
00:04:57.000 The only thing that can save us is to open the economy.
00:05:01.000 If we give these tin-pot dictators, these governors, more money, they're less likely to open the economy.
00:05:07.000 The answer's not printing up and distributing free money.
00:05:11.000 It's opening the economy.
00:05:13.000 We're not even debating the real answer to this.
00:05:15.000 We're like, just print up the money and shovel it out the door.
00:05:19.000 The deficit be damned.
00:05:21.000 Okay, he happens to be correct about this.
00:05:23.000 And any conservative worth his salt would say this.
00:05:25.000 Would say that the fact that we are even considering pushing this money out the door is a breach of principle in certain respects.
00:05:31.000 Now, you can say that the breach of principle is somewhat necessary under these circumstances, and I'll probably agree.
00:05:36.000 But if you want to say that what we should really be focused on is pushing more money out the door, when what we are looking at is by March, the end of the pandemic, and right now we have tons of people who should be working who are not working.
00:05:47.000 I'm talking about you, teachers unions.
00:05:48.000 People who are saying you should not be back in school because it's unsafe for a 20-year-old teacher to be in a class of five-year-old kids.
00:05:53.000 That is not true.
00:05:55.000 Okay, so what Rand Paul is saying is one conservative perspective, and you can hold it, and I do hold that.
00:06:00.000 The other conservative perspective, right, is that the federal government is spending too much money on crap and they should be spending more money on other things.
00:06:05.000 You can't hold these two perspectives at the same time.
00:06:07.000 And the second one is not a particularly conservative perspective.
00:06:09.000 You can say that the federal government is wasting money on pork.
00:06:12.000 Well, what you can't do is sit around and say, you know what would be great?
00:06:15.000 Is if the federal government, which is pushing $600 checks out the door to everyone, right?
00:06:19.000 And that goes alongside unemployment insurance, which is still going out the door at $300 per week.
00:06:25.000 That is alongside state unemployment insurance.
00:06:27.000 That is alongside federal food programs and federal welfare programs.
00:06:31.000 Okay, the fact is that right now, normally, unemployment insurance will cover you up to like 50 or 60% of your salary.
00:06:37.000 Right now, people are getting like 85% of their salary.
00:06:39.000 Plus, on top of that, they're now gonna be getting these $600 checks.
00:06:43.000 If you're a Republican, if you're a conservative, your goal was to negotiate enough aid to get people through the pandemic, but not so much aid that you're just signing people willy-nilly checks.
00:06:51.000 Okay, but now I'm seeing people who are, oh, well, it's so stingy.
00:06:54.000 If you're a Republican or a conservative, and your point is that the federal government is not spending enough money, enough money, I'm just wondering, What sort of principled argument you are using?
00:07:04.000 The best that you can say about this bill, seriously, from a conservative perspective, the best you can say is that it is a necessary evil.
00:07:10.000 But instead, what I'm hearing from a lot of conservatives and Republicans this morning is, well, why aren't we spending more?
00:07:14.000 Why aren't we throwing thousands of dollars out the door from the federal level?
00:07:17.000 Again, there's a difference between the states and the federal government.
00:07:19.000 I get it.
00:07:20.000 If the state of California told you you need to shut down your restaurant, the state of California ought to be repaying you in kind.
00:07:25.000 But the federal government is not responsible at this point for California shutting down your business.
00:07:30.000 California is responsible for shutting down your business.
00:07:33.000 And nonetheless, last night, so McConnell negotiated this deal, right?
00:07:36.000 There was gonna get a deal done because the fact is the political incentive structure is such that if no deal gets done, whoever stands in the way of a deal is going to be perceived as unsympathetic to people who are suffering out there.
00:07:47.000 And I get the political incentives for people in Congress.
00:07:49.000 By the way, quick note, If you're looking to members of Congress, to legislators, for the purest exposition of principles, you're looking in the wrong place.
00:07:57.000 I have an easy job.
00:07:58.000 I get to say what it is that I think every day.
00:08:00.000 I get to speak in terms of pure principle every day because I am not responsible to voters.
00:08:04.000 I'm responsible only for telling the truth to my listeners.
00:08:07.000 From my own perspective.
00:08:07.000 That's it.
00:08:09.000 Right, through the lens of conservatism.
00:08:11.000 But if you're a legislator, you are responsible to your voters, and you are going to have to win election battles.
00:08:16.000 And so looking to Congress as a place for principle is a very weird place to look for principle.
00:08:21.000 But, putting that aside, the fact is that what we are seeing right now is that Mitch McConnell, the Republicans in Congress, they cut a deal with the Democrats that is significantly better than anything that the Democrats were pushing for.
00:08:33.000 And now, President Trump comes out of the woodwork, and he says, you know what, we're gonna blow up the deal.
00:08:37.000 The deal's already done.
00:08:38.000 But I'm going to blow it up.
00:08:39.000 And the reason I'm going to blow it up is because I read a bunch of stuff on Twitter that mostly is not true.
00:08:44.000 He was getting a lot of plaudits from people on both sides of the aisle for a speech that he made last night, President Trump.
00:08:49.000 And the speech that he made last night was basically tearing into the omnibus bill.
00:08:54.000 And he ripped into a bunch of provisions of the Omnibus Bill, a lot of the spending.
00:08:57.000 He conflated it with the COVID Relief Bill, which is not correct.
00:09:00.000 Again, it is a separate bill.
00:09:01.000 It was passed together with the COVID Relief Bill.
00:09:03.000 But when he talks about, you're gonna hear him talk about a bunch of foreign aid issues here.
00:09:08.000 The foreign aid is not in the COVID Relief Bill.
00:09:10.000 It is in the Omnibus Package.
00:09:10.000 It is not.
00:09:12.000 It passes every single year.
00:09:14.000 So if you don't like it in there, we can have that discussion.
00:09:15.000 That's fine.
00:09:16.000 But to pretend that it has to do with COVID Relief, per se, is not particularly honest.
00:09:20.000 Okay, and then you're gonna hear Trump talk about how he wants more relief.
00:09:24.000 His own administration negotiated this deal, right?
00:09:27.000 He was working.
00:09:28.000 His people were working with McConnell.
00:09:30.000 They were working with Schumer and Pelosi.
00:09:32.000 They were working with, like, this deal was hammered out.
00:09:34.000 This deal was done.
00:09:36.000 And then Trump comes back in, and you're going to see from the reaction, particularly from the left, that they are overjoyed with this.
00:09:43.000 Now there are a lot of people out there who say this is smart for Trump politically.
00:09:46.000 And maybe in the run up to the election it would have been smart for Trump politically because he can always run as the outsider.
00:09:50.000 He can push against Congress people.
00:09:53.000 He can suggest that he is willing to do more than they are.
00:09:56.000 But on a principled conservative level saying I want to shove more money out the door without any real eye toward who is getting paid or what the amounts are and to propagate the lie that the only thing that is in here to help people is $600.
00:10:08.000 In checks, that is not true.
00:10:10.000 The United States has spent literally trillions of dollars to help people during this.
00:10:15.000 We are one of the Western nations that poured the most money out the door.
00:10:17.000 Okay, well, we're spending $900 billion in this bill.
00:10:21.000 That is not just $600 checks for everybody.
00:10:23.000 Anyway, here was President Trump yesterday.
00:10:26.000 He made some good points, right?
00:10:27.000 He said, you took too long to pass the bill.
00:10:28.000 That obviously is true, and that is because of Democrats.
00:10:31.000 Throughout the summer, Democrats cruelly blocked COVID relief legislation in an effort to advance their extreme left-wing agenda and influence the election.
00:10:42.000 Then, a few months ago, Congress started negotiations on a new package to get urgently needed help To the American people.
00:10:50.000 It's taken forever.
00:10:52.000 However, the bill they are now planning to send back to my desk is much different than anticipated.
00:11:00.000 It really is a disgrace.
00:11:02.000 Okay, it is not totally different than anticipated.
00:11:04.000 His administration was in.
00:11:05.000 I mean, I don't mean to undercut Trump here, but the fact is, everyone in his administration knew exactly what was in this bill.
00:11:13.000 They knew exactly what was in this bill.
00:11:14.000 They helped negotiate the bill.
00:11:16.000 The reason I'm upset today is because two things.
00:11:18.000 One, I don't, on a fundamental level, like the dishonesty of claiming that you don't know what's in a bill after you negotiated it.
00:11:24.000 Okay, if Mitch McConnell came around this morning, he was like, you know what, I never knew what was in that bill that I negotiated.
00:11:28.000 We'd all be like, that's weird.
00:11:30.000 That's a strange thing.
00:11:31.000 Two, It's hard to get Republicans and Democrats on board for anything.
00:11:36.000 And on a conservative principle level, again, you don't want to be pushing willy-nilly giant checks out the door without any sort of eye as to, number one, the incentive structure that you're creating in terms of getting people back to work.
00:11:48.000 And number two, yes, there is such a thing as a federal debt.
00:11:51.000 Yes, there is such a thing as a deficit.
00:11:52.000 I understand that for a lot of Republicans, when a Republican's in office, they're like, ah, debt, deficit, who cares?
00:11:57.000 And then a Democrat comes in, they're like, ah, well, now I really care about the debt and the deficit.
00:12:01.000 That's not the way it works.
00:12:01.000 Either you care about it or you don't.
00:12:03.000 I'm with Rand Paul on this one.
00:12:04.000 I really am.
00:12:05.000 I think that the fact that there even is a COVID relief bill ought to be up for debate.
00:12:10.000 But if there's going to be one, then you want it to be restricted to the amount of actual need out there.
00:12:14.000 There's still hundreds of billions of dollars, apparently, unspent from the original Paycheck Protection Program.
00:12:20.000 A bunch of that money went to waste and fraud.
00:12:22.000 I understand that the easiest thing in Washington, D.C.
00:12:24.000 is just to shovel money out the door in giant bags, but that's actually not good policy.
00:12:29.000 Okay, so here is President Trump yesterday saying that he wants $2,000 in relief.
00:12:33.000 Where is he coming up with $2,000?
00:12:34.000 I mean, seriously, nobody knows.
00:12:34.000 Nobody knows.
00:12:36.000 It was just something that was going around on Twitter yesterday.
00:12:38.000 There's no actual rationale why it would be $2,000.
00:12:41.000 There's $600 in relief.
00:12:42.000 That is not the only thing.
00:12:43.000 I keep saying this over and over because people are just not telling you the truth.
00:12:46.000 That is not the only thing in the COVID relief package.
00:12:49.000 There is extended unemployment insurance.
00:12:52.000 There's paycheck protection programs that are designed to allow your employer to continue to pay you.
00:12:56.000 Their grants are not forgivable unless they use the money to pay their employees.
00:13:01.000 Anyway, here's President Trump blowing up the deal, basically, and saying, okay, now I want $2,000 in relief.
00:13:07.000 Despite all of this wasteful spending and much more, the $900 billion package provides hardworking taxpayers with only $600 each in relief payments, and not enough money is given to small businesses And in particular, restaurants whose owners have suffered so grievously.
00:13:28.000 I am asking Congress to amend this bill and increase the ridiculously low $600 to $2,000 or $4,000 for a couple.
00:13:39.000 Okay, I mean, I'm sorry, but this is so not conservative.
00:13:43.000 It makes the heads been.
00:13:45.000 This has nothing to do with conservatism.
00:13:47.000 It really does not.
00:13:49.000 And by the way, the administration was celebrating this earlier on Monday.
00:13:52.000 Steve Mnuchin, his own Treasury Secretary, he said earlier, Yesterday, on Tuesday actually, he thanked Trump for his leadership.
00:13:59.000 He said, we are fully committed to ensuring that hardworking Americans get this vital support as quickly as possible and to further strengthening our economic recovery.
00:14:06.000 He said, hundreds of dollars in direct payments authorized by the bill could begin reaching individual Americans as early as next week. Now, how can you tell that this is a bad idea?
00:14:15.000 The reason that you can tell that this is a particularly bad idea, is this giant increase in $2,000 relief checks, is because Democrats are like, this is amazing.
00:14:25.000 Let's do this thing.
00:14:26.000 It's very reminiscent of that point when Dianne Feinstein was sitting across from Trump during some negotiation over guns.
00:14:32.000 And Trump said something and Dianne Feinstein started actually cackling in the room.
00:14:36.000 She started laughing in the room because suddenly he was mirroring her policy priorities.
00:14:40.000 In a second, I'm going to show you what the Democrats are saying about this.
00:14:44.000 And guess what?
00:14:44.000 They're super excited about it.
00:14:46.000 So, conservatives, I have a question.
00:14:47.000 If Democrats are ever super excited about a thing, should you be saying to yourself, that's a great idea?
00:14:51.000 Like really, when's the last time Democrats said, you know what?
00:14:53.000 Amazing, let's do it.
00:14:55.000 That it turned out great for America and great for conservatives.
00:14:58.000 We'll get to this in just one second.
00:15:00.000 First, let's talk about the reality.
00:15:02.000 As we get older, we tend to lose our hair, gentlemen.
00:15:05.000 That is the way that it works.
00:15:06.000 Unfortunately, male pattern baldness does run in my family, and that is why I am a regular user of Keeps.
00:15:11.000 When we dudes get into our 20s and 30s and start noticing the first signs of hair loss, it's kind of freaky because no one is ever really ready to go bald.
00:15:18.000 I mean, how many of us can pull off like the Bruce Willis look?
00:15:20.000 I mean, aside from me, I mean, I would just be shockingly masculine.
00:15:23.000 Thankfully, now there is keeps.
00:15:24.000 The simple and easy way to keep your hair.
00:15:26.000 Two out of three dudes will experience some form of male pattern baldness by the time they're 35.
00:15:30.000 The best way to prevent hair loss is to do something about it while you still have hair left.
00:15:34.000 You used to have to go to a doctor's office for hair loss prescriptions.
00:15:36.000 Now, thanks to Keeps, you can visit a doctor online and get hair loss medication delivered right to your home.
00:15:41.000 They make it easy.
00:15:42.000 They deliver your medication every three months, so you can say goodbye to pharmacy checkout lines and awkward doctor visits.
00:15:46.000 Keeps offers generic versions of the only two FDA-approved hair loss products out there.
00:15:50.000 You may have tried them before, probably never for this price.
00:15:52.000 Prevention is key.
00:15:53.000 Keeps treatments typically take between four to six months to see results.
00:15:56.000 It's important to act fast.
00:15:57.000 The sooner you start using Keeps, the more hair you will save.
00:16:00.000 Find out why Keeps has more five-star reviews Okay, so President Trump concludes his speech last night.
00:16:04.000 100,000 men trust Keeps for their hair loss prevention medication.
00:16:07.000 Keeps treatments start at just 10 bucks a month plus for a limited time you can get your first month for free.
00:16:11.000 If you're ready to take action, prevent hair loss, go to keeps.com slash Ben to receive your first month of treatment for free.
00:16:16.000 That is K E E P S dot com slash Ben to get started and preserve that beautiful head of hair.
00:16:22.000 OK, so President Trump concludes his speech last night.
00:16:24.000 He says, I want a better package or the next administration will have to negotiate one.
00:16:28.000 And for all of those in the media who are immediately jumping to, well, it looks like he's finally accepting that this election is over, and not so fast.
00:16:33.000 He says, the next administration might be me.
00:16:36.000 I'm also asking Congress to immediately get rid of the wasteful and unnecessary items from this legislation, and to send me a suitable bill, or else the next administration will have to deliver a COVID relief package, and maybe that administration will be me, and we will get it done.
00:16:56.000 Thank you very much.
00:16:57.000 So everybody is obviously honing in on that last line.
00:17:00.000 Maybe the next administration will be me.
00:17:02.000 Barring some sort of cataclysmic event, obviously that's not going to be true.
00:17:05.000 The Electoral College has voted January 6th.
00:17:06.000 The House will vote to confirm.
00:17:07.000 There's nobody in the Senate who has yet joined on to a challenge in the House to the Electoral College vote.
00:17:13.000 Okay, but putting aside that, the simple fact of the matter is that what Trump is doing here is very pleasing to Democrats because he has now set up a political Basically, a vice for Republicans.
00:17:27.000 If Republicans don't go along with his call for massive expenditures, then Democrats will now get to claim that Republicans are ungenerous because Trump himself has called for a massive increase in expenditure.
00:17:37.000 And if Republicans do go along with that massive increase in expenditure, then a lot of conservatives are gonna say, hold up a second, you guys are just blowing through this money like it's nobody's business.
00:17:46.000 Like, what exactly are you doing?
00:17:48.000 Plus, if you voted for this bill, and now Democrats hold up the works, You, like, whatever victory you won from this bill is actually not a victory.
00:17:56.000 Like, here's the thing, a lot of Republicans were immediately out there touting the bill.
00:17:59.000 They were saying, listen, we finally got this done, bipartisan bill, we're bringing relief to the American people.
00:18:03.000 Now Democrats, who were claiming all along that Republicans were ungenerous, have Trump on their side, saying that Republicans, like Mitch McConnell, are ungenerous.
00:18:11.000 On a political level, this is really not good for Republicans.
00:18:14.000 It is quite damaging for Republicans.
00:18:16.000 And you can see how this is playing out, right?
00:18:18.000 You can see how happy the Democrats are.
00:18:20.000 So Chuck Schumer, again, as a conservative, as an American, whenever Chuck Schumer is happy, I am not a happy camper.
00:18:26.000 Chuck Schumer immediately tweeted out, I'm in, what do you say Mitch?
00:18:29.000 Let's not get bogged down with ideological offsets and unrelated items and just do this.
00:18:33.000 The American people deserve it.
00:18:35.000 Alexander Ocasio-Cortez immediately tweeted out, let's do it.
00:18:38.000 Rashida Tlaib and I already co-wrote the COVID amendment for $2,000 checks.
00:18:41.000 So it's ready to go.
00:18:42.000 And naturally Lindsey Graham, who has really tied himself very closely to Trump, he tweeted out, appreciate the fact that Speaker Pelosi supports President Trump's idea to increase direct payments to $2,000 per person.
00:18:53.000 The American people are hurting and deserve relief.
00:18:55.000 I know there is much bipartisan support for this idea. Let's go further.
00:19:00.000 He says, I hope Speaker Pelosi will agree with President Trump.
00:19:02.000 Big tech needs to be reined in by winding down Section 230 liability protections.
00:19:05.000 I have reason to believe this combination will lead to President Trump supporting the NDAA, that's the National Defense Authorization Act, and COVID-19 omnibus packages.
00:19:12.000 So that is Lindsey Graham playing a little bit there.
00:19:15.000 I mean, what he's saying right there is, sounds great.
00:19:17.000 We'll do these checks.
00:19:18.000 Also, I'm going to put in a bunch of poison pills Democrats don't want to actually kill the bill.
00:19:21.000 But again, you can see the Democrats are very enthusiastic about all of this.
00:19:24.000 Joe Biden is already calling for more spending.
00:19:27.000 The day after Congress approved a hard-fought $900 billion stimulus package, Joe Biden, according to the New York Times, called the measure a down payment on Tuesday and vowed to enter office next month, asking lawmakers to return to the negotiating table.
00:19:39.000 He said, Congress did its job this week.
00:19:41.000 I can and I must ask them to do it again next year.
00:19:43.000 Unending aid, unending spending, right?
00:19:46.000 Not tied to the actual changing circumstances of COVID, not tied to how states are treating this thing differentially, not tied to the future fiscal circumstances of the country.
00:19:57.000 But simply because blowing money out the door is always an easy political win.
00:20:01.000 It's always an easy political win.
00:20:03.000 Meanwhile, Nancy Pelosi in Congress, she was worried apparently the COVID relief package would not pass the House, so she split the $900 billion aid bill off of a $1.4 trillion ombust bill after progressives objected to millions in spending to buoy corporations and large-scale industries about $600 checks for most individuals.
00:20:20.000 So one of the things that is worthwhile noting is that that omnibus package, which again is a crap sandwich, it did include some good things like funding of the military.
00:20:24.000 Congress split the COVID relief and government funding legislation past Monday into two separate votes, allowing members to vote against the part that includes military and Homeland Security funding without putting the package carrying the economic stimulus money in jeopardy.
00:20:35.000 So one of the things that is worthwhile noting is that that omnibus package, which again is a crap sandwich, it did include some good things like funding of the military. Democrats wanted to vote against some of those things. So they separated off the two bills after they were packaged together in the Senate to allow Democrats to vote in favor of that bill.
00:20:50.000 Meanwhile, President Trump continues to militate against members of the Republican Senate.
00:20:56.000 He's going after John Thune, who's the number two in the Senate.
00:20:59.000 He tweeted out last night, Republicans in the Senate, so quickly forget, right now they would be down eight seats without my backing them in the last election.
00:21:05.000 RINO JOHN THUNE, MITCH'S BOY, SHOULD JUST LET IT PLAY OUT.
00:21:09.000 SOUTH DAKOTA DOESN'T LIKE WEAKNESS.
00:21:10.000 HE WILL BE PRIMARIED IN 2022.
00:21:12.000 POLITICAL CAREER OVER.
00:21:13.000 THIS COMES SHORTLY AFTER TRUMP TWEETED OUT THAT MITCH MCCONNELL, THE SENATE MAJORITY LEADER, ONLY WON HIS SEAT IN KENTUCKY BECAUSE TRUMP DID LIKE A ROBOCALL FOR HIM, WHICH OBVIOUSLY IS NOT TRUE.
00:21:20.000 AND MITCH MCCONNELL WON BY 1,000 POINTS.
00:21:22.000 HE WON BY 1,000 POINTS IN THE ELECTION BEFORE THAT.
00:21:25.000 IF YOU LOOK AT THE POLLS, IT BUDGED THE POLLS BY LIKE A POINT MAYBE.
00:21:28.000 IF YOU ATTRIBUTE All of that change to Trump's intervention in that particular race.
00:21:33.000 So here is sort of the situation as it currently stands.
00:21:37.000 Going forward, one of the things that I care very much about, and you should care very much about if you are a conservative or Republican, or if you're just an American who would like to see stability and decent policy going forward, is Republicans maintaining the Senate.
00:21:49.000 If Republicans don't maintain the Senate, then you'll have an unchecked Democratic majority, high on its own woke farts, pushing forward with all of its radical policy.
00:21:57.000 So it's kind of important that Kelly Loeffler win her race in Georgia and that David Perdue win his race in Georgia.
00:22:02.000 One of the things that was going to allow them to win their races in Georgia is championing the fact that they were part of this COVID relief bill.
00:22:07.000 In fact, David Perdue released an ad as soon as the bill passed championing the bill, right?
00:22:12.000 Here is David Perdue's ad backing the bill.
00:22:14.000 This came out like literally within like an hour of this bill actually passing.
00:22:20.000 John Ossoff opposed past COVID relief and encouraged Democrats to block additional aid for months.
00:22:26.000 But Senator Perdue never gave up.
00:22:29.000 Perdue again delivered real, meaningful help for Georgians.
00:22:33.000 $900 billion in new COVID relief, direct checks to Georgians, critical funding for vaccine distribution, small businesses, public schools, and help for folks out of work.
00:22:43.000 Ossoff obstructed.
00:22:45.000 Perdue delivered.
00:22:47.000 I'm David Perdue, and I approve this message.
00:22:50.000 Okay, so he pushed that message, like, as soon as the bill was out, right?
00:22:53.000 Ossoff opposed the bill, I'm in favor of the bill, I wanted to help people, Ossoff didn't.
00:22:56.000 Okay, and suddenly, here comes Trump, jumping into the middle with just a giant sign reading, ignore everything that David Perdue just said, the bill sucks.
00:23:05.000 How is that in any way politically helpful?
00:23:07.000 Putting aside the policy, which again, I think the policy is deeply flawed.
00:23:10.000 I think that there is no reason at all that North Dakotans, via their taxpayer dollars, should be subsidizing California in lockdown policy that has been a complete failure.
00:23:18.000 I think it is simply ridiculous that we are going to have states that have taken more rational policies with regard to COVID paying for states that did not do that.
00:23:27.000 And when the federal government is not the one responsible for the lockdowns, I'm wondering how you justify the federal government shelling out future taxpayer bucks for lockdown policy in particular states.
00:23:35.000 It is a subsidy to states that are locking down more tightly.
00:23:39.000 Even if you want to make the argument it ought to exist, it ought to be as carefully tailored as possible to not create the moral disincentive to work and to get back to work and to end the lockdowns.
00:23:48.000 But no, apparently everybody is just so excited about the possibility of getting a check in the mail that they're just like, okay, well, make it $2,000.
00:23:54.000 By the way, if I were the Democrats, strategically speaking, I'd say $5,000.
00:23:58.000 Why the hell not?
00:23:59.000 Make it UBI.
00:24:00.000 Seriously, like, go for broke.
00:24:01.000 Because Trump obviously is going to say whatever you want him to say at this point on this particular subject.
00:24:06.000 I think if Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer came back right now and they said $10,000 a person, Do you think Trump would go for it?
00:24:12.000 He might.
00:24:13.000 He might.
00:24:14.000 And that would put down Republicans between a rock and a hard place.
00:24:16.000 Strategically speaking, frankly, I'm shocked that Democrats aren't doing exactly that.
00:24:20.000 In just a second, we'll get to how this impacts the Georgia race.
00:24:23.000 Because if all this unenthuses Republican voters in Georgia and Democrats pick up the Senate, there's gonna be a lot of hurt on the way for Americans and for Republicans in general.
00:24:32.000 OK, so meanwhile, the polls are showing that in Georgia, these things, these are really, really tight races.
00:24:38.000 There has not been a lot of poll data coming out of Georgia because everybody is so skittish about these polling numbers.
00:24:43.000 And they should be skittish about these particular polling numbers because, I mean, they got it wrong last time.
00:24:49.000 But, according to a new SurveyUSA election poll, both Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff are leading the Republican incumbents in Georgia's upcoming runoff.
00:24:57.000 This week's survey showed Ossoff increasing his lead over David Perdue from an identical survey taken three weeks ago—this is Breitbart reporting—jumping from a 2-point lead to a 5-point lead, 51-46.
00:25:08.000 Warnock leads Kelly Loeffler by 7 percentage points, with the results remaining the same way they did in the same poll released three weeks ago.
00:25:14.000 Now, there is a margin of error of 5%.
00:25:17.000 There's also an RMG research survey that came out recently, which pointed to tight races in Georgia with the GOP incumbents and Democratic challengers statistically tied.
00:25:26.000 These are very, very tight races, very tight races.
00:25:29.000 And basically taking away a win from Georgia Republicans at the last minute.
00:25:34.000 Makes no political sense whatsoever.
00:25:37.000 I mean, the Democrats can taste this thing.
00:25:39.000 They can taste control of the Senate.
00:25:41.000 Kamala Harris was down in Georgia campaigning, and she's making pretty clear what she wants here.
00:25:45.000 Here's Kamala Harris saying Georgia can change the course of the country.
00:25:47.000 That is correct.
00:25:48.000 She is not wrong about this.
00:25:49.000 The problem is she wants to change the course of the country radically.
00:25:52.000 I was just in Georgia, in Columbus, and talking with folks about our candidates, Reverend Warnock, Raphael Warnock, and John Ossoff, and just reminding folks, you know, 2020's been a rough year, and I know we're all going to be happy to say goodbye, but 2020 won't be over until January 5th.
00:26:11.000 Amen, amen.
00:26:13.000 Because that's the day Georgia votes that can change the course of our country.
00:26:17.000 The good news about Kamala Harris is everything is hilarious to Kamala Harris.
00:26:19.000 All the things.
00:26:20.000 There are no clips of her not laughing awkwardly.
00:26:22.000 So that's that's exciting stuff.
00:26:23.000 But she's right that the Georgia races matter an awful lot.
00:26:26.000 Well, one piece of news in the Georgia race that is going to go wildly underreported by the mainstream media, your establishment media, apparently.
00:26:33.000 According to the Washington Times, Jessica Chasma reporting.
00:26:36.000 Oluye Ndoye, now the ex-wife of Democratic Senate candidate, Raphael Warnock, told police officers following a March dispute in Atlanta that he is a quote unquote, great actor, and that she's been trying to hide his behavior from the public for a long time, according to newly aired body cam footage.
00:26:49.000 Fox News host, Tucker Carlson, aired footage of the incident late Tuesday, Ndoye tearfully telling a police officer, this man's running for United States Senate.
00:26:56.000 All he cares about right now is his reputation.
00:26:59.000 I work at the mayor's office.
00:27:00.000 This is a big problem.
00:27:01.000 I've been trying to be very quiet about the way he is for the sake of my kids and his reputation.
00:27:05.000 I've been trying to keep the way that he acts under wraps for a long time.
00:27:07.000 Today he crossed the line.
00:27:08.000 So that is what is going on here.
00:27:09.000 He's a great actor.
00:27:10.000 He's phenomenal at putting on a really good show.
00:27:13.000 Apparently, Warnock was not charged with the crime in the March incident.
00:27:15.000 His then-wife accused him of deliberately running over her foot with his car.
00:27:19.000 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported the couple were amid divorce negotiations at the time, finalized their split about two months later.
00:27:24.000 It is true that an officer said in a police report there were no visible signs of injury to her foot.
00:27:29.000 In the video, Warnock told the officers his wife was lying.
00:27:32.000 He said, The footage aired about two weeks, of course, before the election.
00:27:34.000 Kelly Loeffler put out a statement saying, It'll be fun to watch as the Democrats run directly away from Believe All Women as soon as it puts this Georgia Senate race in danger.
00:27:42.000 We have to have the Marxist Raphael Warnock in the Senate.
00:27:43.000 watch. Georgians deserve answers to these very serious allegations. His ex-wife's voice deserves to be heard. It'll be fun to watch as the Democrats run directly away from believe all women as soon as it puts this Georgia Senate race in danger. We have to have the Marxist Raphael Warnock in the Senate, the anti-Semitic Marxist Raphael Warnock in the Senate, even if it means ignoring our own believe all women supposed principle.
00:28:04.000 And meanwhile, remember that time that we were told that talking about voter fraud and voter irregularity was real bad?
00:28:09.000 That you're not allowed to talk about that sort of stuff without evidence?
00:28:11.000 Well, James Clyburn is now saying that basically Georgia is going to be all about voter suppression.
00:28:17.000 This is how the left plays the game.
00:28:19.000 It really is amazing.
00:28:20.000 Whatever the right says, even if they're saying the exact same thing as the left, is wrong.
00:28:24.000 If the left says it, however, it is completely right.
00:28:26.000 So five minutes before the election, Donald Trump was burning mailboxes in order to pervert the vote.
00:28:31.000 Five minutes after the election, it was the cleanest election that ever was run.
00:28:34.000 Five minutes after the election, Republicans were like, maybe there's some questions about voting procedures here.
00:28:38.000 And Democrats were like, how dare you question these voter procedures?
00:28:43.000 And then when there's a Georgia election coming up, all of a sudden it's back to, Republicans are engaged in voter suppression.
00:28:49.000 James Clyburn, Democrat House Majority Whip from South Carolina, has a big piece in the Washington Post today suggesting that racism in Georgia, of course, is going to prevent Raphael Warnock from winning.
00:29:00.000 He says, Some of the most pernicious devices in favor of racism historically, which included racialized campaigning, numbered posts, full slate voting, and the 50% plus one voting requirement, purposefully diluted black votes and helped produce decades of white-only elected officials.
00:29:14.000 This led my home state, which had eight black members of Congress in the 19th century, to go 95 years, from 1897 to 1992, without black representation in Congress.
00:29:22.000 Although the 1965 Voting Rights Act outlawed some of these devices, several remain, including the 50% plus one requirement, known today as the runoff election.
00:29:29.000 So hilariously enough, You have now James Clyburn suggesting that runoff elections are themselves racist.
00:29:37.000 The goal of runoff elections is to be racist.
00:29:39.000 He says the recent results in Georgia demonstrate the continued effectiveness of the 50 plus one runoff requirement in keeping black candidates from reaching elected office.
00:29:46.000 If the candidate who got the most votes in the November 3rd US Senate special election in Georgia had been declared the winner, we would be preparing to swear in the Reverend Raphael Warnock to the upper chamber of Congress.
00:29:56.000 Instead, he's in runoff with the candidate who finished seven points behind him.
00:29:59.000 And people think the 19th century is ancient history.
00:30:03.000 Okay, first of all, According to the certified results in Georgia, Joe Biden just won the state.
00:30:09.000 OK, so on the back of supposedly Stacey Abrams organizing efforts, that's a questionable contention, but that's what the Democrats are claiming.
00:30:16.000 And yet here's James Clyburn saying that Georgia is basically the same now as it was in 1882, which is totally crazy.
00:30:23.000 I mean, patently insane.
00:30:25.000 Also worth noting, if Georgia did not have the 50 percent plus one requirement, You know who'd also be in the center right now?
00:30:31.000 David Perdue.
00:30:32.000 The two senators who were elected would have been Raphael Warnock and David Perdue, who beat John Ossoff by two full percentage points in the last election.
00:30:39.000 He barely missed that 50% plus one.
00:30:41.000 He got in like 49.6% or something in that election.
00:30:42.000 49.6% or something in that election.
00:30:46.000 But according to James Clyburn, the 50% plus one thing is racist.
00:30:51.000 Says James Clyburn, voter participation is always a challenge in runoffs, a challenge made worse this year amid rising cases of COVID-19.
00:30:57.000 There's the fact that Georgia purged tens of thousands of African-Americans from its voter rolls before this election cycle.
00:31:01.000 Okay, is there an allegation that Georgia purged somebody who's a legit voter?
00:31:05.000 Seriously, when people talk about purging the voter rolls, who showed up wanting to vote and was rejected from being able to vote despite being a legitimate voter?
00:31:13.000 Can you show those people?
00:31:14.000 Can those people talk?
00:31:15.000 Let's hear about those people, because I'm not hearing a lot of evidence of that.
00:31:19.000 I don't see Twitter, however, notifying everybody at the bottom of James Clyburn's post that these facts are in dispute.
00:31:26.000 James Clyburn is very angry, says the 50% plus one runoff requirement is a relic of our difficult past.
00:31:31.000 I've long argued for a proportional and cumulative voting, counting mechanisms that are fairer and more representational and used effectively in other countries.
00:31:39.000 And in some local elections here in the United States, yada, yada, yada, it's all racism.
00:31:42.000 All the way down, it's all racism.
00:31:44.000 So Democrats preemptively declaring that no matter what happens in the Georgia elections, unless they win, then that is obviously indicative of deeper American racism.
00:31:53.000 The consequences of what happens in Georgia are going to reverberate.
00:31:55.000 They do matter an awful lot.
00:31:56.000 Those elections are happening January 5th.
00:31:58.000 So if you are a Republican in Georgia, go out and vote.
00:32:01.000 Go out and vote.
00:32:02.000 Do not be disheartened.
00:32:03.000 Do not give in to whatever the chaos of the day is because it really does not matter as much as what's going to happen over the next few years if Democrats should grab control of the United States Senate now that Joe Biden has been elected by the Electoral College.
00:32:14.000 You do not want Kamala Harris as the tiebreaker in the United States Senate.
00:32:18.000 That is not something that you want.
00:32:19.000 So please, get out and vote.
00:32:22.000 In just a second, we're gonna get into the consequences of democratic rule, because it turns out that wokeism is extraordinarily dangerous.
00:32:29.000 It's not just bad for the country.
00:32:30.000 It's not just divisive.
00:32:31.000 It is extraordinarily dangerous.
00:32:33.000 We'll get to that in just one second.
00:32:34.000 First...
00:32:36.000 Let's talk about the fact that when you get in bed at night and you can't fall asleep, it's just a pain in the butt.
00:32:40.000 It's just the worst.
00:32:41.000 I mean, I've been in places like the other night I was in a hotel, nice hotel, but the mattress was not my Helix Sleep mattress.
00:32:46.000 And so I was tossing and turning.
00:32:47.000 It was just a garbage evening of sleep.
00:32:49.000 You don't need that.
00:32:50.000 What you need is a mattress made just for you.
00:32:52.000 Helix Sleep has a quiz.
00:32:53.000 That takes just two minutes to complete, and matches your body type and sleep preferences to the perfect mattress for you.
00:32:58.000 Why would you buy a mattress made for someone else?
00:33:00.000 With Helix, you're getting a mattress that you know will be perfect for the way you sleep.
00:33:03.000 Everybody's unique.
00:33:04.000 Helix knows that, so they have several different mattress models to choose from.
00:33:06.000 They have soft, medium, and firm mattresses, mattresses great for cooling you down if you sleep hot, even a Helix Plus mattress for plus-sized folks.
00:33:13.000 So, if you're looking for a mattress, you take the quiz, you order the mattress you're matched to, the mattress comes right to your door, shipped for free.
00:33:19.000 You don't ever need to go to a mattress store again.
00:33:20.000 Helix was awarded the number one best overall mattress pick of 2020 by GQ and Wired Magazine.
00:33:24.000 There's a reason for that.
00:33:25.000 Just go to helixsleep.com slash Ben.
00:33:27.000 Take their two-minute sleep quiz.
00:33:29.000 They will match you to a customized mattress that will give you the best sleep of your life.
00:33:32.000 10-year warranty.
00:33:33.000 You can try it out for 100 nights.
00:33:34.000 Risk-free.
00:33:34.000 They'll even pick it up for you if you don't love it, but you will.
00:33:36.000 Helix is offering up to 200 bucks off all mattress orders.
00:33:40.000 And two, free pillows for our listeners.
00:33:42.000 There's a reason why I love my Helix Sleep Mattress.
00:33:44.000 You'll love yours as well.
00:33:45.000 Okay, coming up, we're going to get into how wokeness kills, because it really, really does.
00:33:50.000 We'll get to that in a second.
00:33:50.000 First, DailyWire is excited to announce that the historical docuseries, Apollo 11, What We Saw, is now available exclusively for DailyWire members.
00:33:58.000 Originally released as an audio podcast for Apple and Spotify, What We Saw takes a detailed look at the Apollo 11 mission to land a man on the moon.
00:34:04.000 It was the culmination of a heated, decades-long space race between Cold War rivals the U.S.
00:34:09.000 and the Soviet Union.
00:34:10.000 The podcast explores one of America's greatest accomplishments through the eyes of millions of Americans who lived through it.
00:34:15.000 Now, Apollo 11 What We Saw is available to watch as well as listen over at dailywire.com or on our Apple TV or Roku app.
00:34:21.000 The series is just one piece of all the new content we have coming down the pipeline.
00:34:24.000 We have Tons of amazing content.
00:34:26.000 I could not be more pumped to tell you about all of it.
00:34:29.000 We have a brand new show with Candid Tones.
00:34:30.000 It's coming next year.
00:34:31.000 The entire PragerU library.
00:34:33.000 A new entertainment channel.
00:34:34.000 Guys, we have like a premium piece of entertainment.
00:34:36.000 It's coming out early next year.
00:34:37.000 I'm pumped about this one.
00:34:38.000 And we have a new investigative journalism team.
00:34:40.000 Become a Daily Wire insider or above member for 20% off with code WATCH.
00:34:44.000 Over at dailywire.com slash subscribe, make sure to download our Apple TV or Roku app to get all of our content on your big screen, including our podcasts and special live streams.
00:34:52.000 That's dailywire.com slash subscribe to get 20% off your membership with code WATCH and access to all of our new and existing content.
00:34:59.000 you're listening to the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast and radio show in the nation.
00:35:02.000 The consequences for those Georgia runoff races, those are dire.
00:35:10.000 Because if the Democrats gain control of all auspices of government, look the hell out.
00:35:14.000 Wokism is a mind virus.
00:35:16.000 It is a virus that will infect you, as Gad Saad has said, the author.
00:35:20.000 It is in fact a mental virus.
00:35:21.000 And it is really, really bad and has serious consequences.
00:35:25.000 There's an excellent investigation over at the Washington Free Beacon today about where exactly these CDC standards came from.
00:35:31.000 Remember, we've been talking for a week and a half here about the COVID standards for vaccine distribution being used by the CDC, which prioritized race above age, which is nuts, right?
00:35:42.000 They were saying that essential workers who are of color ought to be getting the vaccine before 75-year-old white people, which is, I'm sorry, insane and racist and horrific on every level.
00:35:55.000 on every level.
00:35:56.000 The Washington Free Beacon did a deep dive into exactly where this garbage policy came from.
00:36:00.000 Here's what Erin Siberian reports, quote, In 2015, Dana Bowen Matthew, the dean of George Washington University Law School, published a paper concerning racial disparities in healthcare.
00:36:09.000 She traced those disparities back to the founding fathers and argued their persistence today reflects the structural violence of American society Matthew was one of 11 people who helped draft the Center for Disease Control's ethical framework for allocating COVID-19 vaccines.
00:36:22.000 She is also listed as a health equity consultant to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which voted in November to vaccinate essential workers before the elderly, partially on the grounds that the elderly skew white, only to pull back on Sunday in the face of outrage from across the political spectrum.
00:36:36.000 The committee openly acknowledged its initial plan would result in more deaths than vaccinating older adults first.
00:36:41.000 But, said the panel, the plan would reduce racial disparities, something they deemed more important than saving lives because essential workers, unlike adults over 65, are disproportionately Black and Hispanic, the two groups that have borne the brunt of the pandemic.
00:36:52.000 So how exactly did the committee reach that conclusion?
00:36:55.000 According to meeting minutes, presentation slides, public statements, and even civil rights directives, the now-scuttled plan didn't come out of thin air.
00:37:01.000 Rather, it reflects the reductive racialist worldview that is rapidly gaining ground in education, media, nonprofits, and now the U.S.
00:37:08.000 federal government, a worldview with concrete policy implications and concrete human costs.
00:37:12.000 That policy agenda was seeded by outside consultants like Matthew, who told the New York Times that racial inequality, quote, requires us to prioritize by race.
00:37:20.000 But it was also ceded by the CDC itself, which in September hosted a series of trainings on racism, sexism, and other systems of structured inequality in direct violation of President Trump's executive order barring such programs from government agencies.
00:37:32.000 It was even ceded by the chairman of the CDC committee, Jose Romero, who said in July that minorities, quote, need to be moved to the forefront of the vaccination line.
00:37:40.000 The result was an explicitly race-conscious plan that would have prioritized shrinking the case gap between races over saving the most lives.
00:37:47.000 The plan contained glaring double standards, such as the assumption that age-based policies would be discriminatory but that race-based ones wouldn't be.
00:37:53.000 It relied on omission, distortion, and equivocation to make a highly contentious judgment seem self-evident, building bureaucratic consensus upon shaky foundations that were anything but apolitical or science-based.
00:38:03.000 The consensus coalesced in September when committee members met to discuss their framework for vaccine equity and prioritization.
00:38:08.000 At the meeting, Sarah Oliver, an epidemiologist with the CDC, delivered a presentation on the criteria the government should consider when developing a plan for rolling out a coronavirus vaccine.
00:38:17.000 She began by reviewing three other frameworks from the WHO, Johns Hopkins, and the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, on which her working group had drawn.
00:38:25.000 Equity, said Oliver, was a cross-cutting consideration for all three frameworks, suggesting the CDC would be in good company if it prioritized that value.
00:38:33.000 But all three frameworks considered harm reduction to be an important goal.
00:38:35.000 In fact, they prioritized saving lives over reducing disparities.
00:38:38.000 Oliver just ignored that.
00:38:40.000 So, for example, the Hopkins framework talks about structural racism, but concluded by suggesting adults 65 and older get vaccinated before most essential workers because their prioritization would likely avert the greatest overall harm.
00:38:51.000 The CDC framework, however, adopted different priorities.
00:38:54.000 Of its five proposed principles, maximize benefits and minimize harms, equity, justice, fairness, and transparency.
00:39:00.000 Two explicitly mentioned racial health disparities.
00:39:03.000 The equity principle, said Oliver, will make sure that vaccine allocation reduces rather than increases health disparities.
00:39:08.000 And fairness includes a commitment to not exacerbating existing disparities in health outcomes.
00:39:14.000 It's amazing.
00:39:16.000 It's just amazing that this was rammed through and it just took public scrutiny for people to say, hold up, you're actually going to end up killing more black and brown people on an absolute level, even if they, as a percentage of the population, represent fewer deaths on the relative level.
00:39:29.000 It's insane that this is pushed through, but the consequences of wokeness are death.
00:39:34.000 The wages of wokeness are death, for sure.
00:39:37.000 And now speaking of COVID policy, Democrats continue to push forward with this sort of stuff.
00:39:41.000 Ayanna Pressley, the Democrat from Massachusetts and the adjunct member of the squad, the Ringo star of the squad, she said yesterday that we ought to prioritize prisoners for the vaccine.
00:39:51.000 That's right.
00:39:52.000 Don't focus on the elderly.
00:39:53.000 Focus on people who have committed crimes and are in prison.
00:39:55.000 I do want to acknowledge that I had to overcome some of those distrust issues myself.
00:40:02.000 The medical community exacting ostensibly medical apartheid on black Americans, on indigenous people, on Guatemalans, on our most marginalized communities.
00:40:14.000 They have violated the trust, and that is very real.
00:40:18.000 And I'm going to continue to fight for our most vulnerable communities who have been disproportionately impacted by the virus, for our healthcare workers, for our essential workers, for incarcerated men and women to be prioritized in the distribution of the vaccine.
00:40:33.000 And why in the world should incarcerated men and women be prioritized for distribution?
00:40:37.000 If they are more vulnerable on a health level, then they should be prioritized.
00:40:41.000 If they're not more vulnerable on a health level, what the hell are you talking about?
00:40:44.000 You're gonna prioritize a fairly healthy 25-year-old rapist above grandma?
00:40:48.000 Explain.
00:40:50.000 Explain.
00:40:50.000 But there is no explanation other than group justice matters significantly more than individual justice.
00:40:56.000 And saving lives takes a backseat to wokeness in the democratic priority structure.
00:41:00.000 Meanwhile, Joe Biden, remember Captain Optimism over here?
00:41:03.000 So Joe Biden came out yesterday.
00:41:04.000 He did a big speech about COVID and he said, our darkest days are ahead of us, which is exciting news from Joe Biden, who declared that he was going to crush the virus.
00:41:10.000 I look forward to him crushing the virus by literally doing nothing.
00:41:12.000 He's going to sit in his basement and then there's going to be the parade of vaccine.
00:41:15.000 It's going to trot out and then he's going to hobble out to the front of the parade, grab a baton and pretend he's leading the parade.
00:41:19.000 That's his actual plan.
00:41:20.000 Here is Joe Biden talking about how it's going to get it's going to get really, really bad now.
00:41:24.000 One thing I promise you about my leadership during this crisis.
00:41:29.000 I'm going to tell it to you straight.
00:41:31.000 I'm going to tell you the truth.
00:41:33.000 And here's the simple truth.
00:41:36.000 Our darkest days in the battle against COVID are ahead of us, not behind us.
00:41:42.000 So we need to prepare ourselves to steal our spines.
00:41:46.000 As frustrating as it is to hear It's going to take patience, persistence, and determination to beat this virus.
00:41:54.000 He's always going to tell you the truth, meaning that every death in America, Donald Trump is responsible for it.
00:41:59.000 Also, he's telling you the truth, which is that we all need to wear masks until the end of time.
00:42:04.000 If I think of a truth teller on COVID, Joe Biden is definitely not the first name that comes to mind.
00:42:08.000 But the good news is that George Clooney is excited about it.
00:42:11.000 He says America is in better shape on COVID thanks to Joe Biden.
00:42:13.000 And if George Clooney says it, I definitely believe it because George Clooney is a handsome man.
00:42:18.000 I feel like we're in so much better shape because I do think this, you know, moments meet the man or woman.
00:42:26.000 And this moment is Joe Biden's moment.
00:42:29.000 He is a compassionate, kind man.
00:42:33.000 And we're going to need that after we've lost probably, it'll be close to 400,000 people by the time we get this under, you know, under our, in our rear view mirror.
00:42:45.000 Okay, the compassion, right?
00:42:47.000 That's what's necessary.
00:42:48.000 Now, how about vaccine prioritization in proper order?
00:42:51.000 How about you don't staff up your COVID relief team and your COVID team with a bunch of people who agree with the woke standards the CDC tried to promulgate?
00:42:58.000 How about that?
00:42:59.000 Meanwhile, Chris Hayes, really bringing America together also over on MSNBC, says, this is all Trump's fault.
00:43:04.000 He's gonna have almost another 3,000 deaths today.
00:43:06.000 Just another day in the slow motion preventable catastrophe that unfolded the way everyone knew it would because the person with the most important job was a manifestly venal narcissist.
00:43:13.000 Okay, I have a question.
00:43:14.000 There is a continent called Europe.
00:43:14.000 Has he?
00:43:16.000 So that's exciting.
00:43:18.000 There's a continent called Europe, and hundreds of thousands of people have died in Europe as well.
00:43:22.000 The United States is not number one in deaths per million.
00:43:24.000 In fact, the United States trails a bunch of European countries in deaths per million.
00:43:27.000 But according to Chris Hayes, Donald Trump was out there basically with an aerosolizer, like an Acme pump from an old Warner Brothers cartoon, just seeding the air with COVID.
00:43:37.000 Just really well done there.
00:43:38.000 Speaking of Joe Biden, by the way, worth noting that Joe Biden continues to claim randomly that all the Hunter Biden stuff is Russian disinformation.
00:43:45.000 So that's again, he's so honest, right?
00:43:48.000 He's honest that you can trust him to tell you the truth.
00:43:50.000 Also, if you point out that his son has been under investigation for presumed tax fraud since 2019, he will tell you that's Russian disinformation.
00:43:57.000 Captain Honesty over here.
00:43:59.000 You still think that the stories from the fall about your son Hunter were Russian disinformation and a sneer campaign, like you said?
00:44:07.000 Yes, yes, yes.
00:44:10.000 God love you, man.
00:44:11.000 You're a one-horse pony.
00:44:13.000 I tell you.
00:44:14.000 Thank you.
00:44:15.000 Thank you.
00:44:16.000 I promise you, my Justice Department will be totally on its own making its judgments about how they should proceed.
00:44:22.000 Thank you.
00:44:23.000 Um, what is a one-horse pony?
00:44:26.000 Is there such a thing as a two-horse pony?
00:44:28.000 He meant a one-trick pony, obviously, but a one-horse, a two-horse pony would be something to see.
00:44:33.000 Like a circus act.
00:44:34.000 That sounds amazing, a two-horse pony.
00:44:35.000 In any case, there is Joe Biden lecturing the media that they should not ask him particularly difficult questions.
00:44:40.000 Now, I will say, That Joe Biden did not pick the worst person he could have picked for his education secretary.
00:44:44.000 So that is other news from Team Biden.
00:44:47.000 So all of his picks were going to suck.
00:44:49.000 This one sucks slightly less than some of the people he could have chosen otherwise.
00:44:52.000 So apparently he's going to nominate Miguel Cardona, the commissioner of public schools in Connecticut, as his education secretary, according to the Washington Post.
00:44:58.000 Settling on a low-profile candidate who has pushed to reopen pandemic-shuttered schools and is not aligned with either side in the education policy battles of recent years.
00:45:07.000 He was named Connecticut's top school official last year.
00:45:09.000 If confirmed, it will have achieved a meteoric rise.
00:45:12.000 Obviously, some of this has to do with Biden's deep desire for the quote-unquote racially diverse cabinet.
00:45:18.000 This, of course, is always in the first line of these reports.
00:45:21.000 The bottom line is that because Because Miguel Cardona is Latino, this means that he is no longer subject to any sort of scrutiny.
00:45:28.000 But the good news is that he's not picking Randy Weingarten of like the American Federation of Teachers.
00:45:33.000 So one good thing about Cardona is that Cardona, he did want to reopen schools in Connecticut.
00:45:38.000 So that is definitely a good thing.
00:45:42.000 It's likely he will be confirmed probably because of that.
00:45:45.000 Now, he has been not great on school choice.
00:45:48.000 He has not been excellent with regard to charter schools either.
00:45:53.000 But he has repeatedly stated the need for in-person schooling and equity terms.
00:45:56.000 So that is a good thing.
00:45:57.000 At least he is in favor of reopening the schools.
00:45:59.000 One final ironic note here.
00:46:01.000 So remember that time when we were told that Joe Biden was going to walk back all of Donald Trump's immigration policies because Donald Trump is a horrible racist?
00:46:08.000 It turns out that Joe Biden is going to keep a lot of Donald Trump's immigration policies.
00:46:12.000 Apparently, according to Hot Air, The Joe Biden promised that on day one he was going to roll back all of Trump's policies with regard to asylum.
00:46:21.000 It turns out, nope.
00:46:22.000 Top advisors to President-elect Joe Biden said Monday they will not immediately roll back asylum restrictions at the Mexico border and other restrictive Trump administration policies, walking back some of Biden's campaign promises for day one changes.
00:46:33.000 Yeah, because it turns out that Trump is responsible for an awful lot of good policy, even if Democrats don't like the way that he talked.
00:46:39.000 So, you know, that's better than the alternative, I suppose.
00:46:43.000 Alrighty, later on today, Michael Knowles, host of The Michael Knowles Show, will be guest hosting the two additional hours of content on The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:46:48.000 Make sure that you are subscribed for that.
00:46:50.000 Otherwise, I will see you here tomorrow in the run-up to Christmas.
00:46:52.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:46:53.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:46:54.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Colton Haas.
00:46:57.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Colton Haas.
00:47:02.000 Executive Producer, Jeremy Boring.
00:47:03.000 Our Supervising Producers are Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling.
00:47:07.000 Production Manager, Paweł Lajdowski.
00:47:09.000 Our Associate Producers are Rebecca Doyle and Savannah Dominguez.
00:47:11.000 The show is edited by Adam Sajewicz.
00:47:13.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Koromina.
00:47:16.000 Hair and Makeup is by Fabiola Cristina.
00:47:18.000 Production Assistant, Jessica Crand.
00:47:20.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire production.
00:47:22.000 Copyright 2020.
00:47:24.000 Dr. Fauci gets the vaccine, Joe Biden promises that our darkest days are ahead, and President Trump smacks down Congress' crooked coronavirus relief package.