The Ben Shapiro Show - December 17, 2018


Down The Rat Hole | Ep. 681


Episode Stats

Length

54 minutes

Words per Minute

216.96413

Word Count

11,792

Sentence Count

822

Misogynist Sentences

11

Hate Speech Sentences

8


Summary

Trump attacks his former personal attorney Michael Cohen, a battle breaks out over border funding, and Obamacare takes a hit in the courts. President Trump calls Michael Cohen a "dirty rat" and suggests that the FBI should have broken into his office. Why not Hillary Clinton's office? Today's After Show Was Hosted By: Ben Shapiro Ben Shapiro is the host of the Ben Shapiro Show on the FiveThirtyEight Radio Network. He is also a regular contributor to the Financial Times and the Wall Street Journal. His articles have been featured in the New York Times, USA Today, and USA Today Magazine, and he is one of the funniest people in the world. If you like what you hear here, please HIT SUBSCRIBE and leave us a rating and review on Apple Podcasts and other major podcasting platforms. You can also join our FB group, and use the hashtag on the Apple App Store and other social media platforms, and join the FB group to join the conversation and become a supporter of the show! You'll get access to all the latest news and discussion on all things financial and investing related to Bitcoin, Bitcoin, Gold, and other precious metals! Subscribe, rate, and much more! Learn more about your ad choices! at the links below. The opinions stated here are our own personal recommendations. We are not affiliated with the Bitcoin and other financial news and information provided by Bitcoin. We provide independent Bitcoin and financial institutions. We do not make any responsibility for the accuracy. We make no matter what you access or review of the information provided here. We are a neutral source of that is provided by the Bitcoin or financial media. We respect your feedback. We thank you for your feedback and we do not own any responsibility to provide accurate and fair use of this information. Thank you for all your feedback, review and review of Bitcoin, credit and access to our posts, reviews and comments received by Bitcoin or any other third-party services. We appreciate your feedback is appreciated by Bitcoin, we appreciate your support is appreciated. . Bitcoin is a valuable, not less than $5,000, $5 stars, $10, $20,000 in the air or $50, $12,000 more than that is better than that, $25,000 is $16,000 gets you a cup of coffee, $15,000 a day, and so much more.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 President Trump attacks his former personal attorney Michael Cohen, battle breaks out over border funding, and Obamacare takes a hit in the courts.
00:00:07.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:07.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:13.000 OK, so many exciting things happening today.
00:00:14.000 Number one, we started on time.
00:00:15.000 Unbelievable.
00:00:16.000 Number two, this is the last week, in fact, before we actually go on vacation.
00:00:21.000 So get in all of your knowledge now, because otherwise you're just going to be out of it.
00:00:26.000 But before we get to any of the news of the day, and there's a lot of news today.
00:00:30.000 First, I want to mention to you the number 1.2 trillion.
00:00:33.000 That's how much we owe other countries and to our own unfunded debt.
00:00:38.000 This year, as of 2018, economists say that by the end of 2019, we'll be spending more on the interest on our national debt than we spend on Medicare.
00:00:46.000 By 2023, we're going to be spending more than we do on our national defense.
00:00:50.000 Well, if all of this makes you feel a little bit insecure, then you need to make a plan.
00:00:53.000 You need to diversify because what's your plan in case, God forbid, the S&P takes a topple of 50% like it did a few years back?
00:01:00.000 This is why you need some gold.
00:01:01.000 This is why you need some precious metals.
00:01:03.000 I diversify my portfolio.
00:01:04.000 You should diversify your portfolio too.
00:01:06.000 And the folks that I trust to do that are the folks over at Birch Gold Group.
00:01:10.000 Birch Gold Group is a hedge against inflation.
00:01:12.000 It's a hedge against uncertainty.
00:01:14.000 The company I trust with precious metals.
00:01:18.000 It's the holidays.
00:01:21.000 You can get gifts for everyone.
00:01:22.000 Get yourself a gift for free.
00:01:24.000 This is their comprehensive 16 page kit revealing how gold and silver can protect your savings.
00:01:28.000 It can legally move your IRA or 401k out of risky stocks and bonds into a precious metals IRA.
00:01:33.000 If that is something that you choose to get your no cost, no obligation kit.
00:01:36.000 Go to birchgold.com slash ben.
00:01:38.000 That is birchgold.com slash ben.
00:01:40.000 See if diversifying into precious metals makes some sense for you.
00:01:43.000 Birchgold.com slash ben.
00:01:45.000 They're the folks that I trust with precious metals diversification.
00:01:48.000 Alrighty, so we begin today with all of the continuing hubbub surrounding Michael Cohen.
00:01:52.000 So as we mentioned last week, the president is in a bit of a legal trouble.
00:01:56.000 He's got a bit of he's got a bit of legal trouble here.
00:01:58.000 His legal trouble Basically consists of Michael Cohen.
00:02:03.000 I don't think the Russia investigation, as I've said for a while, is going to come up with anything major on the president.
00:02:07.000 Maybe I'm wrong.
00:02:07.000 We'll find out.
00:02:08.000 But when it comes to Michael Cohen, Cohen has basically made an accusation that President Trump violated campaign finance law, that he instructed him to violate disclosure law and also personal giving limits by giving a bunch of money to American Media Inc.
00:02:22.000 to lock up Stormy Daniels' story, or that he intended to do that for Karen McDougal, and then he actually did it without American Media Inc.
00:02:30.000 He just paid off Stormy Daniels, and that was an in-kind contribution that was illegal, and President Trump had instructed him to go ahead and do all of that.
00:02:37.000 Well, President Trump responded over the weekend by calling Michael Cohen a dirty rat.
00:02:41.000 So he tweeted out, remember, Michael Cohen only became a rat, in quotation marks, after the FBI did something which was absolutely unthinkable and unheard of until the witch hunt was illegally started.
00:02:51.000 They broke into an attorney's office, all caps.
00:02:53.000 Why didn't they break into the DNC to get the server?
00:02:56.000 Or Crooked's office?
00:02:58.000 Well, a couple of things.
00:02:59.000 First of all, I do love that Crooked Hillary has now just become crooked.
00:03:02.000 So we all know what that means, which is the man's an expert at branding.
00:03:06.000 I mean, you got to give that to him.
00:03:07.000 Right.
00:03:07.000 He just says crook and we're like, oh, yeah, he's talking about Clinton.
00:03:10.000 But the but when it comes to this tweet.
00:03:13.000 A couple of problems.
00:03:14.000 Number one, it is not illegal to get a warrant to search a lawyer's office.
00:03:18.000 They went through the DOJ.
00:03:20.000 They went through procedures.
00:03:21.000 They didn't break into Michael Cohen's office.
00:03:23.000 It wasn't like they went in there with a pry bar, like this is Watergate, and then just broke into Michael Cohen's office.
00:03:29.000 Also, if he thinks that's bad, then why is he recommending that they should have broken into the DNC?
00:03:36.000 If it's bad to break into Michael Cohen's office, it's like, it's so bad they did that.
00:03:38.000 It's criminal.
00:03:39.000 Why didn't they do it to the DNC?
00:03:43.000 Okay.
00:03:44.000 Some Galaxy Brain stuff right there.
00:03:45.000 And he says that they should have broken into Hillary Clinton's office.
00:03:48.000 First of all, they did get a copy of the server.
00:03:50.000 We've talked about this on the show before.
00:03:52.000 I don't like when non-factual information is put out there.
00:03:56.000 One of the pieces of non-factual information you have heard over and over and over again from people on the right side of the aisle is that the FBI did not get copies of Hillary Clinton's servers, that they should have just seized the servers.
00:04:07.000 That's not how any of this works.
00:04:08.000 They made a copy of the server.
00:04:10.000 That's normal procedure.
00:04:12.000 And as far as, quote-unquote, breaking into Hillary Clinton's office, they did actually dig up a lot of her old emails, they did subpoena all of these materials.
00:04:21.000 By the time they got there, she'd already drilled holes in her stuff, so I'm not sure what breaking into her office would have done or anything.
00:04:26.000 In any case, the big headline of this suite is him calling Michael Cohen a rat.
00:04:31.000 You dirty rat!
00:04:34.000 Note to the President of the United States.
00:04:36.000 A couple notes.
00:04:36.000 Number one.
00:04:37.000 Listen to your attorneys.
00:04:39.000 Stop it.
00:04:41.000 Please stop it.
00:04:42.000 Just as a lawyer, it is painful to watch his clients like, I'm gonna defend myself.
00:04:47.000 Don't do it.
00:04:48.000 Don't do it.
00:04:48.000 You're not a good lawyer.
00:04:49.000 If you're a good lawyer, then you wouldn't have needed Michael Cohen, because Michael Cohen's not even a good lawyer.
00:04:53.000 No, just stop.
00:04:57.000 I feel like Willy Wonka in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.
00:05:00.000 Stop.
00:05:01.000 Wait.
00:05:01.000 Come back.
00:05:01.000 Don't.
00:05:02.000 I mean, what is he doing?
00:05:03.000 Second, when he says that Michael Cohen only became a rat after the FBI did something, normally, if you watch mob movies, which I am fond of, if you like mob movies, then when someone is called a rat, it is not because they are lying.
00:05:16.000 Usually they're called a rat because they're telling the truth.
00:05:18.000 And when you have Jimmy Cagney going, oh, you dirty rat, usually what he's talking about is somebody in his orbit who's now talking to the police in order to secure a better deal for himself, but not lying.
00:05:28.000 And in fact, it is in fact a crime.
00:05:31.000 So if federal prosecutors were to put out evidence that turns out to be false, if they were to pressure people into making false statements for use in court, then they would be criminally liable for that.
00:05:42.000 So Trump here, in this tweet, is doing about 10 different things, none of them good.
00:05:47.000 Including calling Michael Cohen a rat, which makes him look like he's a mobster.
00:05:50.000 It's just dumb.
00:05:52.000 His basic case is very simple.
00:05:54.000 He should have just said, Michael Cohen is my lawyer.
00:05:57.000 Michael Cohen's job is to make sure that everything we did was according to the law.
00:06:02.000 End of story.
00:06:03.000 Now we're done.
00:06:04.000 Instead, he didn't do that.
00:06:06.000 And one of the reasons he didn't do that is because he doesn't know, I think, what evidence the FBI and the DOJ now have with regard to what Michael Cohen said to President Trump.
00:06:15.000 So President Trump continues to fulminate over these investigations.
00:06:20.000 He ripped into Jeff Sessions over the hoax Russia probe.
00:06:23.000 So there's that.
00:06:24.000 He says it looks here as though General Flynn's defenses are incidental to something larger, which is for the prosecution to figure out if it can find a path to Donald Trump without quite knowing what that crime might be.
00:06:32.000 It stops looking like prosecution and more looking like a persecution of the president.
00:06:37.000 That's Daniel Henninger over at the Wall Street Journal, which is true.
00:06:40.000 He says, thank you, people are starting to see and understand what this witch hunt is all about.
00:06:43.000 Jeff Sessions should be ashamed of himself for allowing this total hoax to get started in the first place.
00:06:47.000 Note, the quote-unquote hoax did not get started under Jeff Sessions.
00:06:51.000 This investigation began in 2016.
00:06:52.000 In the middle of the investigation, Sessions just recused himself because Sessions had been implicated in talking with people in Russia, right, during the transition, and he was part of the campaign itself.
00:07:03.000 Rudy Giuliani is the president's personal attorney.
00:07:05.000 And there are three really terrible jobs right now in America.
00:07:08.000 I mean, worse than any septic worker.
00:07:10.000 There are three really awful jobs.
00:07:11.000 President's personal attorney, president's press secretary, chief of staff.
00:07:16.000 All jobs that no sane human being would really want.
00:07:20.000 Well, Rudy Giuliani has jumped right in the middle of that.
00:07:22.000 So, the former mayor of New York, former 2008 presidential candidate, He was out there defending President Trump, and he's basically skipping to the end.
00:07:31.000 OK, what he's basically skipping to is that President Trump didn't do anything criminal, even if he did bad stuff, even if he talked to Michael Cohen.
00:07:37.000 It's not really a big deal.
00:07:39.000 And so we are skipping all the way to where I am already, which is I'm assuming that President Trump probably told Michael Cohen to spend money on Stormy Daniels.
00:07:47.000 I'm assuming that probably happened because I think it did.
00:07:50.000 I'm assuming that President Trump talked with Michael Cohen and American Media Inc.
00:07:54.000 about picking up the stories of these various women.
00:07:58.000 All of that can be true, and he still didn't necessarily commit a crime.
00:08:01.000 And that's what Giuliani is saying.
00:08:02.000 So Giuliani is skipping all of the middle steps.
00:08:04.000 And frankly, I don't think that's terrible.
00:08:06.000 I think there are a lot of folks in the administration who don't understand that when you're constantly moving the goalposts as to guilt and innocence, it actually looks worse.
00:08:15.000 If you just say, yeah, president does a lot of stuff, not illegal.
00:08:18.000 That's probably a better answer than, the president didn't do it.
00:08:21.000 Well, the president might have done it, but not what you're saying he did.
00:08:25.000 Well, the president might have done what you said he did, but it's not that bad.
00:08:28.000 Well, it might not be that bad.
00:08:29.000 It might be kind of bad, but it's not criminal.
00:08:31.000 Why don't you just go to, you know what, president does a lot of stuff, not criminal.
00:08:34.000 Right, that's actually a better line, but instead we've gotten this constantly receding line of goalposts into the infinite distance, and I think that that's actually pretty bad.
00:08:42.000 P.R.
00:08:42.000 Giuliani's cutting through all that to his credit.
00:08:44.000 He's saying, with regard to the Russia stuff, that collusion is not a crime, which is true.
00:08:50.000 He's saying that nothing the president did, maybe it looks bad to you, but it's not actually criminal.
00:08:54.000 True.
00:08:54.000 And then he adds, it was over by election time, which is a weird kind of qualifier.
00:08:58.000 I know.
00:08:59.000 That collusion is not a crime.
00:09:03.000 It was over with by the time of the election.
00:09:06.000 OK, well, the it, it depends what the it is, right?
00:09:09.000 If he was colluding with Russia to affect the outcome of the election, then that would be a crime.
00:09:14.000 Collusion itself is not a crime.
00:09:15.000 Conspiracy is a crime.
00:09:16.000 So it depends on what activity we are talking about here.
00:09:18.000 But he's not wrong.
00:09:19.000 He's not wrong.
00:09:20.000 And that's why there's a poll today from CNN that shows about half of Americans are not interested in impeachment at this point, which is actually up a little bit over what it was a couple of weeks ago.
00:09:29.000 And then Giuliani makes what is a pretty good legal point.
00:09:32.000 He says, you know, when President Trump wanted to keep Stormy Daniels silent, The entire case against Michael Cohen and President Trump on this score rests on the idea that President Trump wanted to silence these women before the election.
00:09:42.000 This is the case that's been made by former FEC commissioners who have said that President Trump paying off women is not a crime.
00:09:49.000 Because people do this every day in public life.
00:09:51.000 They pay off women all the time.
00:09:53.000 That doesn't make it criminal.
00:09:54.000 Signing hush agreements is a well-accepted part of the legal profession.
00:10:00.000 The only question is whether this particular hush money was paid off with an eye toward the election.
00:10:05.000 And this raises a legal question.
00:10:06.000 What if it's both?
00:10:08.000 What if the president paid off these women, partially because of the election, but partially because he wanted to keep it secret from his wife?
00:10:15.000 Because he didn't want Melania finding out all about it and then throwing lamps at him or something.
00:10:18.000 What if it's both?
00:10:19.000 And that's the case Giuliani makes.
00:10:20.000 He says, listen, I can produce witnesses.
00:10:23.000 Who say that President Trump was just silencing these women, not because of the election only, but because these women were ready to come forward and that was going to harm his personal life.
00:10:31.000 Here's Giuliani saying that.
00:10:32.000 I can produce an enormous number of witnesses that say the president was very concerned about how this was going to affect his children, his marriage, not just this one but similar.
00:10:41.000 All those women came forward at that point in time.
00:10:43.000 That tape with Billy Bush and all of that.
00:10:46.000 It's all part of the same thing.
00:10:48.000 And I know what he was concerned about and I can produce 20 witnesses to tell you what he was concerned about.
00:10:52.000 Two weeks before the campaign.
00:10:53.000 You're damn right.
00:10:54.000 And he was concerned about all of it.
00:10:56.000 OK, and that's not actually implausible.
00:10:58.000 You know, Stephanopoulos is kind of looking at that askance like, well, this is happening right before the end of the campaign.
00:11:03.000 When do you think these women were coming forward?
00:11:05.000 In other words, maybe part of the factor here is not that Trump wanted to pay these women off before the election.
00:11:09.000 Maybe part of the factor here is these women knew that their payday was coming before the election.
00:11:13.000 And so Trump now has a limited amount of time to silence these women before his family finds out about that, if that's something that President Trump is deeply concerned about.
00:11:20.000 And by the way, the evidence is pretty good that Trump likes silencing these women regardless.
00:11:24.000 of whether there's an election going on.
00:11:25.000 Remember, he worked with AMI to silence Stormy Daniels back in 2011, having nothing to do with the election.
00:11:30.000 So again, as I've been saying for two weeks here, the president's defense rents on a couple of points.
00:11:35.000 Point number one is the idea that this had nothing to do with the election.
00:11:38.000 Point number two is that even if it had something to do with the election, that's Michael Cohen's fault.
00:11:42.000 That's his lawyer's fault.
00:11:43.000 I don't think that case is particularly bad, but the evidence is going to have to emerge.
00:11:46.000 There's one piece of evidence we're going to talk about in a second that sort of cuts against the president on that first score.
00:11:51.000 First, Let's talk about your impending doom.
00:11:54.000 So I know you don't want to talk about the fact that you're going to die someday.
00:11:58.000 You don't like to think about the fact that they're going to put your body in the ground.
00:12:01.000 We don't have to get all gruesome about it or anything.
00:12:03.000 I mean, it's the Christmas season, folks.
00:12:04.000 But if you are preparing for that eventuality, well, at the very least, be a responsible human being.
00:12:09.000 Don't think about it again by going to Policy Genius and getting yourself some life insurance.
00:12:13.000 Actually, having life insurance feels pretty good because getting peace of mind doesn't need to be complicated.
00:12:17.000 PolicyGenius is the easy way to get life insurance in minutes.
00:12:20.000 You can compare quotes from top insurers to find the coverage you need at a price you can afford.
00:12:24.000 From there, you can apply online.
00:12:25.000 The unbiased advisors at PolicyGenius will handle all the red tape, leaving you free to do the things you actually enjoy.
00:12:31.000 And PolicyGenius doesn't make life insurance easy only.
00:12:33.000 Whether you're shopping for disability insurance to protect your income, homeowners insurance, auto insurance, they can help you get covered fast.
00:12:39.000 So, If you have been intimidated or frustrated by insurance in the past, give PolicyGenius a try.
00:12:43.000 Just go to PolicyGenius.com to get your quotes and apply in minutes.
00:12:47.000 You can do the whole thing on your phone right this minute.
00:12:49.000 PolicyGenius, the easy way to compare and buy life insurance.
00:12:51.000 Go check them out right now.
00:12:53.000 So there's one piece of evidence that is cutting against the contention of President Trump, and that is this old tape of President Trump talking with Michael Cohen.
00:13:01.000 This was revealed back in July by CNN.
00:13:03.000 In which President Trump is talking with Michael Cohen about paying hush money for David Pecker's stories.
00:13:08.000 The reason that this cuts against the president's case that he just wants to silence these women for the sake of his family is because why is he talking about this now?
00:13:15.000 In other words, what he is afraid of on this tape is that David Pecker, who is the CEO of American Media at the National Enquirer, that he has basically a safe full of scandalous material on the president.
00:13:26.000 And Trump is afraid that Pecker is going to die like now because the election is coming up.
00:13:30.000 Now, maybe there's an ancillary reason for that, but this cuts against the president's case that he's not worried at all about the timing.
00:13:36.000 That still doesn't answer the legal question as to, could the president be worried about both?
00:13:40.000 Could he be worried about the timing?
00:13:42.000 And also, could he be worried about the impact on his family?
00:13:44.000 And if it is both, does it have to be exclusively one or the other?
00:13:49.000 That's really not clear from the law.
00:13:50.000 Let's say that he's concerned that Melania is going to find out and get mad at him, but he's also concerned that the election is coming up.
00:13:55.000 People do lots of things for a variety of reasons.
00:13:59.000 You may do something for two reasons.
00:14:02.000 Is it that you have to do it exclusively because of the election, or could you also have done it in order to protect your family?
00:14:07.000 In any case, here's, if you recall, some of the tape from President Trump talking to Michael Cohen about this, revealed back in July.
00:14:12.000 I need to open up a company for the transfer of all of that info regarding our friend David, you know, so that I'm going to do that right away.
00:14:22.000 I've actually come up and I've spoken to Allen Weisselberg about how to set the whole thing up with funding.
00:14:30.000 Yes.
00:14:34.000 Um, and it's all the stuff.
00:14:37.000 All the stuff.
00:14:37.000 Because, you know, you never know where that company, you never know where he's going to be.
00:14:41.000 Correct.
00:14:41.000 So, I'm all over that.
00:14:43.000 And I spoke to Alan about it.
00:14:45.000 When it comes time for the financing, which will be... Listen.
00:14:48.000 We're financing.
00:14:49.000 We'll have to pay you, so... No, no, no, no, no.
00:14:53.000 I got...
00:14:54.000 Okay, so again, this is the president talking in detail with Cohen about all this, but there is something about this tape that people are missing, and that is that Cohen keeps saying to Trump, I'll take care of it, I'll take care of it, I'll take care of it.
00:15:03.000 That's Trump's best defense.
00:15:04.000 And Trump's best defense is Michael Cohen said he'd take care of it.
00:15:06.000 He's my lawyer.
00:15:08.000 The reason I keep discussing all this stuff.
00:15:10.000 And this is important.
00:15:11.000 The reason that this stuff is important is because in the end, the calculus is going to be about whether the president is impeached or not.
00:15:17.000 It's really not about whether he did anything criminal.
00:15:19.000 President Clinton did criminal things.
00:15:21.000 The question is whether this is impeachable.
00:15:23.000 I think by the standards of 1999, the answer has to be no.
00:15:26.000 And that's why we're going to run through the 2020 election with this in the back of the public's mind.
00:15:31.000 But I don't think that he ends up being removed from office for any reason, nor do I think that based on the standards set by the American public, he should be.
00:15:38.000 Based on what happened in the Clinton impeachment, which has lowered the bar for all impeachments for all the future.
00:15:43.000 Okay, so, meanwhile, we've got Hubbub breaking out over border funding.
00:15:48.000 The Democrats say that they are not interested in funding the border wall in any way, shape, or form.
00:15:53.000 This should be a win for the President of the United States.
00:15:55.000 Somehow the administration seems to be Seizing defeat from the draws of victory on what should be a pretty obvious PR campaign that the Democrats are willing to allow us to be insecure simply so that they can pander to a particular base.
00:16:08.000 Here's Chuck Schumer, the Senate minority leader, saying that there will be no wall in any form.
00:16:12.000 We're not paying for any wall at all for no reason.
00:16:14.000 No, not happening.
00:16:16.000 President Trump should understand there are not the votes for the wall in the House or the Senate.
00:16:22.000 He is not going to get the wall in any form.
00:16:26.000 Okay, so when he says that, Trump's response should be, well, if you won't give me the wall, then I'm not going to sign a bill without the funding for the wall.
00:16:34.000 Instead, Stephen Miller, who is one of the president's top advisors, particularly on immigration, He went on TV, and he decided to parrot what the president wants him to say.
00:16:43.000 This is why personality matters in the presidency.
00:16:46.000 The president of the United States would be significantly better served if he allowed PR professionals to do their job, as opposed to him watching the shows and then deciding whether he likes what people are saying and how it makes him feel on the inside of his heart.
00:16:59.000 Stephen Miller says a lot of stuff President Trump wants to hear, but it's not good for the president's PR campaign.
00:17:03.000 I'll explain why in a second.
00:17:04.000 Here's Miller explaining that Trump will, in fact, shut down the government.
00:17:07.000 What is the president's plan and will he shut it down to get this $5 billion in border wall funding?
00:17:12.000 We're going to do whatever is necessary to build the border wall to stop this ongoing crisis of illegal immigration.
00:17:18.000 And that means shutdown?
00:17:19.000 This is a very, if it comes to it, absolutely.
00:17:22.000 This is a very fundamental issue.
00:17:23.000 At stake is the question of whether or not the United States remains a sovereign country, whether or not we can establish and enforce rules for entrance into our country.
00:17:31.000 The Democrat Party is a simple choice.
00:17:33.000 They can either choose to fight for America's working class or to promote illegal immigration.
00:17:38.000 You can't do both.
00:17:39.000 Okay, so he is totally right about all of this, but when he says Trump will absolutely shut the government down over the border wall fight, when he says that, he shouldn't be owning it.
00:17:48.000 Trump wants to say that because Trump likes feeling aggressive, but the point here is the Democrats are shutting down the government by not giving the funding that is necessary, and this is a winning battle for Republicans.
00:17:57.000 It is a winning battle for Republicans.
00:17:59.000 Again, it's being blown on the back of bad PR, but it is a winning battle.
00:18:03.000 I'll give you another example.
00:18:05.000 Last week, there was a case we talked about on Friday of a seven-year-old girl who died while she was in Border Patrol custody of dehydration.
00:18:12.000 She was flown by helicopter to a medical center to take care of her.
00:18:15.000 They didn't even know she was in dehydration until shortly before she started seizing up, basically.
00:18:20.000 And that was the fault of her father, who brought her over thousands of miles without giving her any food or any water, and then she dies in American custody.
00:18:26.000 And this leads the left to suggest that it is President Trump's fault.
00:18:30.000 Stephen Miller is asked about this.
00:18:32.000 And here is Stephen Miller's response to the seven-year-old girl's death.
00:18:34.000 Now, the answer is, why did the seven-year-old girl die?
00:18:37.000 Well, the seven-year-old girl died because her father didn't take care of her.
00:18:41.000 And he didn't take care of her because he thought he could get in illegally.
00:18:44.000 Listen to Miller's answer, because it's kind of a problem.
00:18:46.000 Our hearts break for the tragic death of the seven-year-old girl.
00:18:50.000 The loss of that precious life is horrifying.
00:18:54.000 Last year, 100,000 unaccompanied alien children or children traveling with adults showed up at our southern border.
00:19:02.000 President Trump took dramatic action, issued an executive order directing illegal traffic to the ports of entry.
00:19:09.000 But a left-wing activist judge issued a reckless nationwide injunction on the president's order, putting thousands of lives at risk and further enriching these grotesque, heinous, smuggling organizations.
00:19:22.000 Okay, so again, this sort of charged language with regard to left-wing courts are responsible for all of this.
00:19:27.000 The reality is that the person responsible for this is the girl's dad, right?
00:19:30.000 The person responsible for all of this is the father who didn't feed the child.
00:19:34.000 And he's not... Again, a lot of this is about tone.
00:19:37.000 A lot of this is about presentation.
00:19:38.000 But the problem with this is then the president tweets out about this sort of stuff.
00:19:41.000 So the president tweets out about child separations.
00:19:43.000 Now, his answer on child separations Should be that child separations are bad.
00:19:47.000 That child separations are being mandated by the courts of the United States, which is true.
00:19:51.000 Instead, the president tweets out, the Democrats' policy of child separation on the border during the Obama administration was far worse than the way we handle it now.
00:19:58.000 Remember the 2014 picture of children in cages the Obama years.
00:20:01.000 So far so good.
00:20:02.000 But then, he says this, however, if you don't separate, far more people will come.
00:20:07.000 Smugglers use the kids.
00:20:08.000 It's that sentence, however, if you don't separate, far more people will come.
00:20:12.000 Now the implication is that he wants to separate children from their parents when they get to the border, which he doesn't want to do.
00:20:18.000 So this is where a little bit of forethought when it comes to messaging would be very, very useful.
00:20:24.000 Because I think that it's quite possible for Republicans to win both this battle and win the war when it comes to immigration, but they're going to need to do a little bit better job on the PR.
00:20:32.000 Now in just a second, I'm going to get to the other big story that happened over the weekend, and that was a big ruling against Obamacare, basically striking down Obamacare in its entirety from Texas.
00:20:41.000 Now, this didn't end with an injunction against Obamacare, but we'll explain all the details coming up in just one second.
00:20:47.000 So selling your home, it's one of the biggest decisions you're going to make.
00:20:50.000 Hiring the wrong real estate agent can cost you thousands of dollars.
00:20:52.000 I know.
00:20:52.000 I've done it before, and it's a real problem.
00:20:54.000 I've had to fire real estate agents and get new real estate agents.
00:20:57.000 Because some agents are just better at selling than others.
00:20:59.000 Some are great at buying.
00:21:00.000 But the way that you can tell who is good and who is not is use HomeLite.
00:21:05.000 HomeLite.com.
00:21:05.000 It's the innovative solution that makes it easy to find the best real estate agent for you.
00:21:08.000 Why do you need a top real estate agent?
00:21:10.000 Well, because on average, top agents sell homes in eight days, eight days faster and 9% above asking price, which could mean thousands of dollars back in your pocket.
00:21:18.000 HomeLight is 100% free.
00:21:19.000 It's unbiased.
00:21:20.000 It takes less than two minutes.
00:21:21.000 Unlike some other real estate sites, agents actually can't pay to advertise on HomeLight.
00:21:25.000 Instead, HomeLight uses data from over 38 million home sales and 2 million agents to recommend top real estate agents for you.
00:21:31.000 HomeLight brings trust and transparency to the real estate space, so you can buy or sell with confidence, knowing that you are working with the best agent For your needs, they've actually introduced over 247,000 buyers and sellers to top local real estate agents and facilitated over $6 billion in real estate transactions.
00:21:46.000 So if you're planning to sell your home this spring, now is the best time to find a great real estate agent.
00:21:51.000 And to make it even better, HomeLight has a special offer to listeners.
00:21:54.000 Get started today.
00:21:55.000 You can earn up to 500 bucks when you buy or sell your home using a HomeLight referred real estate agent.
00:21:59.000 Go to HomeLight.com slash Shapiro today.
00:22:02.000 That's HomeLight.com slash Shapiro, H-O-M-E-L-I-G-H-T, HomeLight.com slash Shapiro.
00:22:08.000 And go check that out for up to $500 when you find the best real estate agent and buy or sell your home with HomeLite.
00:22:13.000 Terms and conditions apply.
00:22:14.000 Really, that's a pretty solid deal, so go check that out.
00:22:16.000 Okay, over the weekend, big news.
00:22:19.000 A court ruled that Obamacare was not constitutional.
00:22:23.000 So what made Obamacare not constitutional this time, considering that it had already been held constitutional by the ridiculous decision of Chief Justice Roberts?
00:22:31.000 You'll recall that back when Obamacare was passed, there was a lawsuit went all the way to the Supreme Court saying that it was essentially a fine on the American people for not buying something, which you can't do.
00:22:41.000 There is nothing in the Constitution that gives the federal government power to do that.
00:22:45.000 And Judge Roberts, Chief Justice Roberts completely rewrote Obamacare to suggest that it was merely a tax.
00:22:50.000 Well, there's a problem with that now, according to a Texas judge.
00:22:55.000 The problem is that when Republicans got rid of the penalty for failing to pay the tax, what they actually did was they reverted the entire quote-unquote tax back into being merely a penalty itself.
00:23:07.000 And that's unconstitutional, and that makes the entire law unconstitutional.
00:23:10.000 So here's the way this works.
00:23:11.000 Chief Justice Roberts' rewriting of the law essentially suggested that the way that this works is that you were forced to buy Obamacare If you didn't, you paid a penalty.
00:23:20.000 We said, right, that's a penalty.
00:23:21.000 That's not a tax.
00:23:23.000 Robert said, no, it's a tax.
00:23:24.000 It's just like any other tax.
00:23:26.000 And if you don't pay a tax, then you are penalized because you violated the law.
00:23:31.000 Well, what happens when you get rid of the penalty?
00:23:32.000 If you get rid of the penalty, then it's no longer a tax because there's no penalty attached to it.
00:23:37.000 So that means that it's just a rule that you must buy something, and that is in and of itself unconstitutional.
00:23:42.000 That is what this Texas judge found.
00:23:44.000 Judge Reed Conard, according to the Wall Street Journal editorial board, ruled for some 20 state plaintiffs that the Affordable Care Act individual mandate is no longer legal because Republicans repealed its financial penalty as part of the 2017 tax reform.
00:23:56.000 Recall that Chief Justice Roberts joined four justices to say Obamacare's mandate was illegal as a command to individuals to buy insurance under the Commerce Clause.
00:24:04.000 The framers gave Congress the power to regulate commerce, not to compel it, he wrote.
00:24:08.000 Yet the chief famously salvaged Obamacare by unilaterally rewriting the mandate to be a tax.
00:24:12.000 Enter Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who argues in Texas vs. United States that since Congress has repealed the individual mandate, the tax is no longer a tax and Obamacare is thus illegal.
00:24:22.000 Judge O'Connor agreed with that logic.
00:24:23.000 He went further, in ruling that since Congress said the mandate is crucial to the structure of Obamacare, all of Obamacare must fall along with the mandate.
00:24:31.000 Well, first of all, the original decision was bad, but that doesn't mean that this particular decision is legally good.
00:24:36.000 There are a couple of problems with this particular legal decision.
00:24:39.000 One legal complication, as the Wall Street Journal correctly points out, is that Congress in 2017 repealed the financial part of the individual mandate, but not the structure of the mandate itself.
00:24:47.000 So the structure of the mandate didn't change.
00:24:49.000 If it was a tax, it's still a tax.
00:24:51.000 Just because you reduce the amount of penalty to zero doesn't mean that, legally speaking, a penalty doesn't apply.
00:24:56.000 Republicans used budget rules to pass tax reform So they couldn't actually repeal the mandate to express language.
00:25:02.000 Also, the Affordable Care Act has been up and running since 2014, which means so-called reliance interests come into play when considering a precedent.
00:25:08.000 Millions of people now rely on Obamacare subsidies and rules, which argues against judges repealing the law by fiat.
00:25:13.000 Here's where I disagree with the Wall Street Journal.
00:25:15.000 If it is unconstitutional, it's unconstitutional.
00:25:18.000 But the Wall Street Journal correctly says that Judge O'Connor is right.
00:25:22.000 The Democrats claim the individual mandate was essential to the Affordable Care Act, but when Congress killed the financial penalty in 2017, it didn't kill Obamacare.
00:25:30.000 It left Obamacare intact.
00:25:32.000 So if you're deciding congressional intent, whether it's to kill Obamacare or not, well, the severability provision of Obamacare still applies.
00:25:39.000 In other words, the decision may be psychologically satisfying, but it's not legally great.
00:25:44.000 What's more important Is that the decision itself actually cuts against Republicans politically, because in the end, this decision is not going to stand.
00:25:50.000 In all likelihood, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals strikes it down.
00:25:53.000 If not, the Supreme Court probably strikes it down.
00:25:56.000 And here's the problem.
00:25:57.000 President Trump tweeted out, very excited, that Obamacare had been struck down by this court.
00:26:00.000 He tweeted up, As I predicted all along, Obamacare has been struck down as an unconstitutional disaster.
00:26:05.000 Now Congress must pass a strong law that provides great health care and protects pre-existing conditions.
00:26:09.000 Mitch and Nancy, get it done!
00:26:12.000 Okay, this is not great.
00:26:14.000 I will explain in a second.
00:26:15.000 And then he continues along these lines.
00:26:17.000 He says, Wow, but not surprisingly, Obamacare was just ruled unconstitutional by a highly respected judge in Texas.
00:26:22.000 Great news for America.
00:26:25.000 Here's why it's not great news for America.
00:26:27.000 Because there is no actual plan to replace Obamacare.
00:26:31.000 There's no bipartisan plan on the table.
00:26:33.000 Democrats are immediately going to say that if people lose their quote-unquote Obamacare coverage, if they lose their Medicaid coverage via Obamacare, if all the rates go up because a bunch of people withdraw from the individual mandate on the basis of Obamacare disappearing, then they're going to say, oh look, the healthcare system has failed, let's nationalize healthcare.
00:26:50.000 This was always the plan.
00:26:52.000 From day one, this was the plan.
00:26:54.000 Go back and listen to things that I said back in 2012, 2013, 2010, when they were passing this.
00:26:59.000 This was always a step-by-step design-for-failure program so that Democrats could claim that when prices went up, it's because the market was not regulated enough.
00:27:07.000 Because where Democrats come from, the answer is always more cowbell.
00:27:10.000 If regulation fails, the answer is always more regulation.
00:27:13.000 Always.
00:27:14.000 And so if Obamacare fails, even though they say it was going to cure the system, Obama in 2010.
00:27:18.000 This is going to make things more affordable.
00:27:20.000 You like your doctor?
00:27:21.000 You get to keep your doctor.
00:27:23.000 You like your medicine?
00:27:24.000 You get to keep your medicine.
00:27:25.000 You like your insurance?
00:27:26.000 You get to keep your insurance.
00:27:27.000 None of it was true.
00:27:28.000 None of it was true.
00:27:28.000 But when it failed, the plan was for him to say, well, didn't see that one coming.
00:27:33.000 Guess we got to nationalize health care now.
00:27:34.000 And that was always the plan for Democrats.
00:27:36.000 It's why they are now pushing single payer health care.
00:27:38.000 It's why they've embraced the full Bernie Sanders Strategy when it comes to healthcare.
00:27:43.000 This is why Chuck Schumer is gleeful about this decision.
00:27:46.000 Chuck Schumer is happy about the decision.
00:27:47.000 Why?
00:27:48.000 Because now he gets to try and force Republicans to expand government to cover all the gaps left by the crappy Obamacare system that was put in place back in 2010.
00:27:55.000 Here is Schumer.
00:27:57.000 You can hear the glee in his voice.
00:27:58.000 We're gonna fight this tooth and nail.
00:28:01.000 And the first thing we're gonna do when we get back there in the Senate is urge, put a vote on the floor, Urging an intervention in the case the judge a lot of this depends on congressional intent and if a majority of the house and a majority of the Senate Say that this case should be overturned.
00:28:20.000 It'll have a tremendous effect on the appeal Okay, so what he's saying is that, basically, he's gonna get all of these Democrats and Republicans to stand up for Obamacare.
00:28:28.000 He wants people on the record standing against this judge's decision.
00:28:32.000 Why?
00:28:33.000 Because if he can get people on the record standing in favor of the judge's decision, and then it turns out that a bunch of people, quote-unquote, lose their healthcare, or their healthcare costs go up, then he can blame Republicans for this.
00:28:43.000 It's fascinating.
00:28:44.000 When you look at Americans' opinions on healthcare, basically, Americans are always in favor of the status quo.
00:28:48.000 Before Obamacare, they hated Obamacare.
00:28:51.000 Now that Obamacare is in place, whenever there are major changes made to Obamacare, people say they don't want it.
00:28:56.000 People just want to be left alone.
00:28:57.000 This is the basic rule of American life.
00:28:59.000 People mostly want to be left alone, and that means that once the status quo has changed, they don't actually want the status quo changed more.
00:29:05.000 The problem is that President Obama and the Democrats put America on a path towards single-payer health care, and Republicans, by accepting the premises of all of the Democratic arguments, that we have to create a government-structured system where people with pre-existing conditions are covered, for example.
00:29:19.000 By doing all of that, what they have actually done is placed us on the same pathway.
00:29:24.000 Because now Republicans are arguing about how we get there, they're not arguing about what the end goal is.
00:29:29.000 When it comes to the role of government in healthcare, the role of government in healthcare should be minimal.
00:29:33.000 It should not be high levels of regulation.
00:29:36.000 It should not be that we are going to quote-unquote provide healthcare to the ends of the earth for everyone because no one can do that.
00:29:43.000 There's so many lies told about the healthcare system in America and abroad, it's pretty astonishing.
00:29:47.000 One of the great lies told about America's healthcare system is that it is unbelievably crappy.
00:29:51.000 There are problems with America's healthcare system for sure, but when you actually remove car accident deaths and suicide and gun homicide from America's national death statistics, and you look at our life expectancy under the American health system, it is number one among all industrialized countries.
00:30:06.000 People don't like to point that out because it cuts against the convenient argument that America's health care system is dramatically awful and people are dying in the streets.
00:30:13.000 That's not true.
00:30:14.000 And when it comes to the idea that we are spending inordinate sums of cash on our health care system, that is also not true in the sense that if you look at as a percentage of GDP per capita in the United States, what we spend, we are directly along the trend line of the rest of the industrialized world.
00:30:28.000 That is not to say we have the ideal system.
00:30:29.000 We don't.
00:30:30.000 Our system can be made better with more deregulation, more capacity to sell over state lines, less Cram downs from the federal and state governments on insurance companies.
00:30:39.000 More movement toward early buying of catastrophic health care insurance.
00:30:43.000 But instead of focusing on actual solutions, it turns into a fight over pre-existing conditions.
00:30:48.000 And that's a fight Democrats are destined to win because the reality is that no one is going to insure someone with a pre-existing condition unless somebody else is subsidizing that care.
00:30:56.000 In just a second, I want to get to the media malfeasance over the weekend.
00:31:01.000 Plus, I got to get to the story that is just insane and speaks to what a lot of folks on the radical green left think about humanity as a whole.
00:31:08.000 We're going to get to that in just one second.
00:31:09.000 First, I want to talk about how you can defend your life.
00:31:12.000 When the Founders created the Constitution, they protected your rights.
00:31:15.000 But when they protected your rights, one of the things that they did was make sure that you could protect your rights with another right, right?
00:31:21.000 The right to Keep and bear arms.
00:31:23.000 I strongly believe in that principle, as you know, and that is why I really am excited to be endorsing Bravo Company Manufacturing.
00:31:29.000 They were started in a garage by a Marine vet more than two decades ago to build a professional-grade product that meets combat standards.
00:31:35.000 BCM believes the same level of protection should be provided to every American regardless of whether they are a private citizen or a professional.
00:31:41.000 BCM is not a sporting arms company.
00:31:43.000 They design, engineer, manufacture life-saving equipment.
00:31:45.000 They assume that each rifle leaving their shop will be used in a life-or-death situation By a responsible citizen, law enforcement officer, or a soldier overseas, each component of a BCM rifle is hand-assembled and tested by Americans to a life-saving standard.
00:31:57.000 BCM feels a moral responsibility to know that when they provide you a tool that it is going to work when, God forbid, something real is at stake.
00:32:04.000 To learn more about Bravo Company manufacturing, head on over to BravoCompanyMFG.com.
00:32:08.000 You can discover more about their products, special offers, and upcoming news.
00:32:11.000 That's BravoCompanyMFG.com.
00:32:13.000 You need more convincing?
00:32:14.000 Find out even more about BCM and the awesome people who make their products.
00:32:17.000 They really are great.
00:32:17.000 I've met them.
00:32:18.000 YouTube.com slash Bravo Company USA.
00:32:21.000 That's YouTube.com slash Bravo Company USA.
00:32:23.000 Check them out again at Bravo Company MFG.com.
00:32:26.000 Okay.
00:32:26.000 Well, I want to get to the craziest editorial of the day in just one second.
00:32:31.000 Plus, an insane story about antisemitism openly being endorsed by the New York Times.
00:32:36.000 We'll get to that.
00:32:38.000 In just one second.
00:32:39.000 But first, you're going to have to go over to Daily Wire and subscribe because we have so much good stuff coming up.
00:32:45.000 Coming up in 2019, the Ben Shapiro radio show will be extending to three hours.
00:32:49.000 That is right.
00:32:50.000 That's right.
00:32:51.000 The Ben Shapiro radio show will be now adding a full two hours with all of the great content that you have come to enjoy and expect.
00:32:59.000 Well, unless you listen to it live on radio, you're not gonna be able to hear it.
00:33:02.000 Unless you subscribe.
00:33:03.000 If you subscribe, then you get it, right?
00:33:04.000 You get the rest of it.
00:33:06.000 We are going to be taking some questions during the breaks, so you'll be able to actually interact with me on a daily basis, which is awesome.
00:33:13.000 Also, it's almost time for the next episode of The Conversation, which I could not be less excited about.
00:33:17.000 I will be wasting my time taking your questions and answering them to the best of my abilities, live on air.
00:33:25.000 So make them good.
00:33:26.000 Make the questions good.
00:33:27.000 Make sure that you show up.
00:33:27.000 I mean, if I'm going to be miserable here sitting with Alicia Krauss, then you may as well be here.
00:33:31.000 I mean, I don't know what to expect of you.
00:33:33.000 Like, look, I know that you've been forced to listen to answers from idiots like Michael Knowles in the past, but I'll be here providing real answers.
00:33:39.000 So if I'm here, I expect you to be here.
00:33:40.000 Once again, subscribers get to ask the questions.
00:33:42.000 Everybody gets to watch.
00:33:43.000 Also, that's all the subscribership, $9.99 a month.
00:33:46.000 For $99 a year, you get this as, you know, a whole routine.
00:33:49.000 Greatest in beverage vessels.
00:33:50.000 It's awesome.
00:33:51.000 You'll love it.
00:33:52.000 Keeps hot.
00:33:52.000 Drinks hot, and cold drinks cold.
00:33:54.000 How do it know?
00:33:55.000 It's spectacular.
00:33:56.000 Go check all of that out, and subscribe over at YouTube or iTunes.
00:33:58.000 Also, the iHeartRadio awards, podcast awards, are coming up, so go over to iHeartRadio.com, and then vote for us in the best news category so that we don't have to watch Pod Save America win stuff.
00:34:08.000 That's just, that would be inappropriate.
00:34:09.000 Go check that out right now.
00:34:10.000 You can vote like five times.
00:34:12.000 So it's, as I say, just like an election in Cuba.
00:34:16.000 Go check that out right now.
00:34:18.000 at iheartradio.com.
00:34:20.000 And again, subscribe, iTunes, leave us a review.
00:34:22.000 We always appreciate it.
00:34:23.000 We are the largest, fastest-growing conservative podcast in the nation.
00:34:25.000 So whenever we talk about politics, one of the issues that comes up is the fact that the media are wildly biased against the right.
00:34:38.000 The latest example comes courtesy of the Washington Post.
00:34:42.000 It's an opinion piece by Max Boot.
00:34:43.000 So, Max Boot is one of the actual Never Trumpers, meaning people who not only did not vote for President Trump in 2016, But also think that everything that President Trump does is evil.
00:34:53.000 It doesn't matter that Max Boot agreed with half this stuff before President Trump was president.
00:34:57.000 Now he has reversed his positions on everything.
00:34:59.000 Everything that President Trump does is bad, and terrible, and no good, and garbage.
00:35:05.000 This is Max Boot's perspective.
00:35:06.000 And it's kind of sad to watch that, honestly, because I've read a bunch of Max Boot's books, particularly on foreign policy, and I find them really interesting.
00:35:13.000 I think he's a good historian.
00:35:15.000 He now has a piece about the Weekly Standard.
00:35:17.000 Now, as you'll recall, late last week, the Weekly Standard, which is a long-time kind of legacy conservative publication, it's been around for about a quarter century, and it was very anti-Trump during 2016 and has remained pretty anti-Trump since then, they went out of business.
00:35:30.000 The Washington Examiner, which owns them, or the parent company of the Washington Examiner, shut them down.
00:35:34.000 Well, President Trump celebrated that, which Frankly, was untoward.
00:35:39.000 I mean, it's what we've come to expect from a president who just does not know when to keep his mouth shut.
00:35:44.000 He tweeted out the pathetic and dishonest weekly standard run by failed prognosticator Bill Kristol, who, like many others, never had a clue is flat broken out of business.
00:35:52.000 Too bad.
00:35:52.000 May it rest in peace.
00:35:53.000 You may agree with him about Bill Kristol.
00:35:55.000 You may agree with him about the weekly standard.
00:35:57.000 But celebrating a bunch of people getting thrown out of their jobs two weeks before Christmas is probably not a great strategy.
00:36:02.000 In any case, that's not what I'm commenting on right now.
00:36:05.000 What I'm commenting on right now is this piece by Max Boot.
00:36:08.000 Max Boot says...
00:36:10.000 That in the Washington Post, conservatism needs a new weekly standard, untainted by Trump.
00:36:14.000 And the entire piece is about how conservatism requires a new magazine that is not going to deal with Trump, it's just going to deal with ideas.
00:36:21.000 And conservatives can talk about ideas without having to deal with Trump, and yada yada yada.
00:36:25.000 Now, I agree with a lot of that sentiment.
00:36:28.000 I agree that the battle over conservative ideas is much more important and much more long-lasting than the battle over whatever President Trump is doing today.
00:36:37.000 I think it's important.
00:36:37.000 It's why we talk about ideas on the show on a regular basis.
00:36:40.000 Why we do the Sunday special.
00:36:42.000 It's why I write books on Plato and Aristotle and Judeo-Christian values.
00:36:45.000 It's why I talk about the social fabric.
00:36:47.000 I agree with all of this.
00:36:48.000 The problem is, writing this in the pages of the Washington Post is a lie.
00:36:54.000 And the reason I say that it is a lie is because the Washington Post cannot print pieces, or should not print pieces, talking about the lack of good conservative content when it will not hire a conservative.
00:37:05.000 Will not hire a conservative.
00:37:07.000 Now, there are people who say, well, you at Daily Wire, you're not hiring people who are on the left.
00:37:10.000 Number one, I'm sure that we have employees here who don't agree with my politics.
00:37:13.000 But second of all, We are open about our political biases.
00:37:17.000 This is a right-wing site.
00:37:18.000 Daily Wire is a right-wing site.
00:37:20.000 I am a conservative.
00:37:22.000 I'm very open about this.
00:37:23.000 I have never hidden it, and I think it's unethical to hide your own political proclivities when you're writing news, because people can then take what you're saying with the particular grain of salt necessary.
00:37:32.000 The Washington Post, when it prints pieces in which it says things like, conservatives ought to do X, or conservatives ought to do Y, The Washington Post is a supposedly nonpartisan paper.
00:37:42.000 There is not one major conservative working for the Washington Post.
00:37:46.000 Not a major conservative working for the Washington Post.
00:37:50.000 At least the New York Times can say that it's got people like Brett Stevens or people like Ross Douthat.
00:37:56.000 Like, these are folks who actually are conservative thinkers, even if they are anti-Trump.
00:38:01.000 The Washington Post can't name a conservative thinker.
00:38:03.000 How do I know this?
00:38:04.000 Because I personally know a person who was interviewed by the Washington Post, not me, and I'm only not mentioning his name because I think that he would be upset if I did, and he's asked me not to.
00:38:14.000 He was interviewed by the heads of the Washington Post to join their editorial page, to be one of the columnists on the editorial page.
00:38:21.000 He went through the entire process.
00:38:23.000 He went through a bunch of meetings, and it was indicated to him that he was going to be hired on the editorial page as a regular columnist to sort of fill the Charles Krauthammer role after Charles Krauthammer's passing.
00:38:35.000 And they went through all the interview processes.
00:38:36.000 He got to the final interview.
00:38:38.000 They were basically ready to offer him the job.
00:38:39.000 And then he was called in.
00:38:40.000 They canceled the meeting, apparently, where he was going to be offered.
00:38:43.000 And he was brought into the offices of the higher-ups at the Washington Post, where he was told in no uncertain terms that staffers at the Washington Post were very upset at him.
00:38:52.000 Why were they upset at him?
00:38:53.000 They were upset at him because of his opinions on transgenderism.
00:38:56.000 Because he believes that male and female are biological categories.
00:38:59.000 And so, and they asked him about it, he said, no, I'm not going to change my opinion, nor am I going to apologize for the statements I've made on this particular score, and I don't think it makes me an unsympathetic person to say that male and female are biological categories.
00:39:10.000 This was too much for the Washington Post, which quickly ended any flirtation it had with him job-wise.
00:39:16.000 When the mainstream media laments the death of true conservatism, but they will not hire anyone who, really, they won't, and they, listen, Ross Duhat could not get hired today by the New York Times.
00:39:26.000 Bari Weiss would not be hired today by the New York Times.
00:39:28.000 She's not even conservative, Bari, right?
00:39:29.000 I mean, I know Bari.
00:39:30.000 Bari is, if she's conservative, she's at the far left of conservatism, right?
00:39:34.000 And Bari would say that.
00:39:35.000 She's more of a centrist.
00:39:36.000 They would not hire these people.
00:39:38.000 And then they complain that there's not a real conservatism?
00:39:40.000 Right, because you ghettoize the conservative movement, and then you're surprised when it acts like a ghetto.
00:39:45.000 All of that is just plain garbage.
00:39:46.000 But, you know who does get space?
00:39:48.000 On the editorial pages of these various publications are the most radical leftists.
00:39:53.000 This is something that is shocking to me.
00:39:56.000 I've said before, I think the conservative movement is significantly better at policing itself than the people on the left.
00:40:01.000 And I've had long drawn out arguments with folks with whom I'm friends on the left.
00:40:05.000 You say, no, no, no.
00:40:06.000 The right is constantly having to throw people out.
00:40:07.000 And my answer is right.
00:40:08.000 But the right does constantly throw people out.
00:40:11.000 When is the last time you saw someone on the left say something so radical that the left said, you know what?
00:40:16.000 Can't be associated with that person.
00:40:18.000 When is the last time that happened?
00:40:20.000 Has it ever happened?
00:40:21.000 I cannot name a example, like one.
00:40:24.000 Can you name one example of a person who said something so radically, so radical politically?
00:40:28.000 Not just, you know, said something gross or something, but somebody who said something so radical politically that the left went, you know what?
00:40:34.000 Don't want to touch that person with a 10 foot pole.
00:40:36.000 We're done here.
00:40:37.000 We can't have this person associated with us.
00:40:39.000 I've never heard that happen to anyone.
00:40:42.000 And that's why the right looks at the left and they say, you guys have no standards.
00:40:45.000 You're going to police us?
00:40:47.000 You're going to tell us how to police?
00:40:48.000 And then you're going to tell us what we should tolerate and what we shouldn't tolerate?
00:40:52.000 You guys won't police yourselves.
00:40:54.000 How do we know this?
00:40:54.000 Because if you're on the left, you can get away with just about any freaking thing.
00:40:58.000 There's an amazing story from Tablet today about the author of The Color of Purple, Alice Walker.
00:41:06.000 So she was asked in his New York Times book review, which published a full length interview with her.
00:41:12.000 She was asked a question.
00:41:12.000 What books are on your nightstand?
00:41:14.000 She replied with four.
00:41:15.000 The second book was And the Truth Shall Set You Free by David Icke.
00:41:18.000 In Icke's book, she says, there is the whole of existence on this planet and several others to think about.
00:41:22.000 A curious person's dream come true.
00:41:25.000 Now, as the tablet writes about, Gary Rosenberg caught it.
00:41:28.000 He says this passed without comment from the New York Times interviewer and the publication passed it on to readers without qualification.
00:41:33.000 This is rather remarkable because the book is an unhinged anti-Semitic conspiracy tract written by one of Britain's most notorious anti-Semites.
00:41:41.000 In the book, the word Jewish appears 241 times.
00:41:44.000 The name Rothschild is mentioned 374 times.
00:41:47.000 These references are not compliments.
00:41:49.000 Indeed, the book was so obviously antisemitic that Icky's publisher refused to publish it, and he had to print it himself.
00:41:54.000 In the book and elsewhere, Icky draws liberally upon the infamous antisemitic pamphlet, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a Russian forgery about an alleged Jewish global cabal that is widely considered one of the most influential antisemitic works in history.
00:42:07.000 Magnanimously, Icky calls the hate track by a different name.
00:42:10.000 As he writes in the book promoted by Alice Walker, in the very late 1800s, a controversial document came to light called the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
00:42:18.000 I call them the Illuminati Protocols, and I quote many extracts from them in the Robot's Rebellion.
00:42:22.000 Some say they were a forgery made public only to discredit Jews, and I use the term Illuminati Protocols to get away from the Jewish emphasis.
00:42:28.000 If they were a forgery, something that is quite possible, what were they a forgery of and by whom?
00:42:33.000 The authors of the bestselling book, Holy Blood, Holy Grail, conclude that the original protocols were indeed authentic.
00:42:41.000 So...
00:42:42.000 I mean, Alice Walker is allowed to get away with this, and she is lauded as a great thinker of our times.
00:42:48.000 Just the same way that James Baldwin, who was lauded as a great thinker back in the 1960s and 1970s, routinely engaged in anti-Semitic writing.
00:42:55.000 He actually did.
00:42:56.000 Go back and read his writing.
00:42:57.000 There are a bunch of anti-Semitic references throughout it.
00:43:00.000 He wrote an entire essay about why the Jews were part of the white supremacist movement in the United States, etc, etc.
00:43:08.000 Bottom line is, again, just like the Women's March, if you are on the left and you are anti-Semitic, you can get away with it.
00:43:13.000 And if you are radical, just politically radical, there is nothing too politically radical for the left.
00:43:18.000 The same people who say, oh, how dare the right police the weekly standard.
00:43:22.000 Listen, I disagree with how the weekly standard was treated.
00:43:25.000 But I'm not going to sit here and listen to how the right should police itself from the left, which refuses to police itself and refuses to hire mainstream conservatives and ghettoizes those conservatives while simultaneously accepting the worst of the worst.
00:43:37.000 There's an article today by a guy named Todd May, a professor of philosophy at Clemson University.
00:43:43.000 And apparently a professional useless person.
00:43:45.000 The title of his piece in the New York Times, would human extinction be a tragedy?
00:43:51.000 This is fit for print.
00:43:52.000 He says, there are stirrings of discussions these days in philosophical circles about the prospect of human extinction.
00:43:58.000 This should not be surprising given the increasingly threatening predations of climate change.
00:44:01.000 And reflecting on this question, I want to suggest an answer to a single question, one that hardly covers the whole philosophical territory, but is an important aspect of it.
00:44:09.000 Would human extinction be a tragedy?
00:44:11.000 And he says, well, it'd be a tragedy, but it wouldn't be a bad thing.
00:44:14.000 Because we're mean to animals.
00:44:16.000 Right?
00:44:17.000 If this were, if, he says, the elimination of the human species, if all that it were were just people being mean to animals, then it would be a good thing, full stop.
00:44:24.000 But, we bring things to the planet other animals can't, we bring an advanced level of reason, we engage in arts and scientists, for our species to go extinct, all of that might be lost.
00:44:34.000 He says, in many dramatic tragedies, the suffering of the protagonist is brought about through his or her own actions.
00:44:39.000 In Oedipus's killing of the father, it starts the train of events that leads to his tragic realization.
00:44:43.000 It's Lear's high-handedness toward Cordelia that leads to his demise.
00:44:46.000 It may also turn out that it is through our own actions that we human beings bring about our extinction, or at least something near it, contributing to our own practices, to our own tragic end.
00:44:54.000 So he says that maybe the extinction of humanity would make the world better off, and yet would be a tragedy.
00:45:00.000 Writing in the New York Times, better if humans didn't exist.
00:45:03.000 Strong case to be made that if you think that, you know, you have a solution, but it's nothing too radical for the left.
00:45:11.000 Nothing too radical for the left, but then they will lament the death of true conservatism.
00:45:15.000 Pretty, pretty astonishing stuff.
00:45:16.000 Okay.
00:45:17.000 Time for some things I like and then some things that I hate.
00:45:19.000 So, things that I like.
00:45:21.000 This week is Ludwig von Beethoven's birthday.
00:45:23.000 Yeah.
00:45:25.000 Love me some Beethoven?
00:45:27.000 The Beethoven Violin Concerto is a truly great work of art.
00:45:31.000 One of the great violinists of our time, Hilary Hahn, who is fantastic.
00:45:33.000 I once saw her perform live in, where was it?
00:45:37.000 It was Upper Wisconsin.
00:45:39.000 It was Door County, Wisconsin.
00:45:41.000 And she is just terrific.
00:45:42.000 Here she is playing the Beethoven Violin Concerto, which was not truly appreciated at the time.
00:45:47.000 It was only later that it became sort of part of the great canon.
00:45:50.000 There are a bunch of great cadenzas to this concerto.
00:45:52.000 I love playing this concerto.
00:45:54.000 One of the great cadenzas to this concerto is by Fritz Kreisler.
00:45:57.000 That's the one that I usually play.
00:45:58.000 But here is Hilary Hahn playing with... I'm trying to remember which symphony this is.
00:46:02.000 She's playing the Beethoven Violin Concerto.
00:46:03.000 We're going to do Beethoven all week, thanks to his birthday.
00:46:06.000 The End
00:46:36.000 The End It's just great music.
00:46:55.000 Go listen to the Beethoven Violin Concerto.
00:46:56.000 Beautiful music.
00:46:57.000 The second movement is incredible.
00:46:59.000 The third movement is fun.
00:47:00.000 It's just... Beethoven's fantastic.
00:47:02.000 So, thank you to Ludwig van Beethoven for giving us some of the reason why human beings should continue to exist on the planet, you idiots.
00:47:08.000 Just... Okay.
00:47:10.000 Meanwhile, other things that I like.
00:47:11.000 Good for Sam Harris.
00:47:12.000 So Sam Harris, who is... I'm friends with Sam, and Sam is a principled guy.
00:47:17.000 We disagree on religion, we disagree on some aspects of our politics, for sure.
00:47:21.000 But Sam has now closed his Patreon account.
00:47:23.000 Why?
00:47:24.000 Because Patreon has not been clear in its standards for what allows you to keep Patreon open.
00:47:28.000 He tweeted out today, and this is a personal financial sacrifice for Sam, because a lot of people give him money on Patreon.
00:47:33.000 He says, Dear Patreon supporters, As many of you know, the crowdfunding site Patreon has banned several prominent content creators from its platform.
00:47:41.000 While the company insists each was in violation of its terms of service, these recent expulsions seem more readily explained by political bias.
00:47:47.000 Although I don't share the politics of the band members, I consider it no longer tenable to expose any part of my podcast funding to the whims of Patreon's Trust and Safety Committee.
00:47:55.000 I will be deleting my Patreon account tomorrow.
00:47:57.000 If you want to continue sponsoring my work, I encourage you to open a subscription at samharris.org slash subscribe.
00:48:02.000 As always, I remain deeply grateful for your support.
00:48:04.000 Wishing you all a very happy New Year, Sam.
00:48:06.000 Good for Sam Harris!
00:48:07.000 And I think this is increasingly the model you're gonna be seeing used.
00:48:10.000 You know, we here at Daily Wire have subscriptions specifically for this purpose.
00:48:13.000 It's why we don't have a Patreon account.
00:48:15.000 Because we are, as Adam Carolla likes to say, a pirate ship.
00:48:18.000 And if you want to join the pirate ship, then you should join us over here.
00:48:20.000 Good for Sam.
00:48:21.000 I think you're gonna see other content creators, I would assume other members of the Intellectual Dark Web, it's why I'm proud to be a member of the Intellectual Dark Web, do this sort of stuff because there has to be some stand against the arbitrary and capricious nature of social media.
00:48:34.000 Good for Sam Harris.
00:48:36.000 Really well done.
00:48:36.000 Okay, time for a couple of things that I hate.
00:48:42.000 So this is a pretty amazing piece by a person named Luciano Guerra, who is a nature photographer and outreach coordinator and educator for the National Butterfly Center in Mission, Texas.
00:48:51.000 Here is his piece in the Washington Post.
00:48:53.000 I voted for Trump.
00:48:55.000 Now his wall may destroy my butterfly paradise.
00:48:58.000 I kid you not, that's the title of an actual piece.
00:49:01.000 He talks about how he works at the National Butterfly Center, which is along the U.S.-Mexico border, documenting wildlife and leading educational tours.
00:49:07.000 He says, Many of our visitors are young students from the Rio Grande Valley.
00:49:09.000 When they first arrive, some of the children are scared of everything, from snakes to pill bugs.
00:49:13.000 Here, we can show them animals that roam free and teach them not to be afraid.
00:49:16.000 He talks about how great the butterfly paradise is.
00:49:18.000 Okay, into it.
00:49:19.000 Then he says, President Trump's new border wall, which has threatened to shut down the government's fund, will teach them what it takes to destroy a home for all kinds of animals.
00:49:27.000 He says it will cut through the 100-acre refuge, sealing off 70 acres bordering the banks of the Rio Grande.
00:49:32.000 He says on the south side of the barrier, flooding will worsen.
00:49:35.000 On the north side, animals, including threatened species like the Texas tortoise and the Texas horned lizard, will be cut off from ranging beyond the wall for feeding and breeding.
00:49:43.000 He says all of this will be super terrible.
00:49:45.000 He says he voted for President Trump in 2016.
00:49:47.000 I want our immigration laws to be enforced, and I don't want open borders, but Mission is not a dangerous place.
00:49:51.000 I've lived here all my life.
00:49:53.000 Here at the National Butterfly Center, 6,000 school children visit.
00:49:56.000 Every year, when the president says there's a crisis at the border that requires an action as drastic as building a massive concrete wall, he either knows it's not true, or he's living an alternative reality.
00:50:05.000 He says that he didn't take Trump seriously about the wall, but now that he sees that it's going to affect the butterfly paradise, now he's not going to back President Trump.
00:50:12.000 Now, one thing that is obviously not seen in this piece from the Washington Post, right?
00:50:17.000 By the way, again, the Washington Post's happy to print anybody who is quote-unquote conservative, as long as they're saying things that please the Washington Post.
00:50:24.000 One thing it does not say is how many people crossed this area of the border illegally.
00:50:28.000 There's no actual statistics on how many people crossed the border in this area or how many people would cross the border in this area if it were left unprotected while building a wall along other areas of the border.
00:50:41.000 So it's just more media.
00:50:44.000 But again, I think the title of the article itself sort of discredits the article.
00:50:48.000 OK, other things that I hate today.
00:50:49.000 So I have been saying for years that I really, really dislike political pandering.
00:50:54.000 Political pandering to me is mostly summed up in our modern day and age by politicians going to a purportedly victimized group and saying to that purportedly victimized group, you are indeed victimized and now I am here to protect you.
00:51:06.000 You see it from President Trump when it comes to people who are living in dying towns.
00:51:10.000 He goes there and he says, well, it's China and it's Mexico and I'm going to save your job and your town's going to bloom again.
00:51:16.000 Tucker Carlson, when we had a Sunday conversation, says some of this sort of stuff as well because he's more of a protectionist on economic policy.
00:51:23.000 And on the left, you see this in racial terms.
00:51:25.000 So Senator Elizabeth Warren, who is just dying in the polls.
00:51:28.000 I mean, she's falling apart.
00:51:29.000 There's a poll in Iowa over the weekend.
00:51:31.000 It shows her at 3% in Iowa.
00:51:32.000 She had 84% name recognition and 3% in Iowa.
00:51:35.000 Put a fork in her, she's done.
00:51:38.000 In The New York Times, they report Senator Elizabeth Warren in a commencement speech Friday at historically black Morgan State University mixed her trademark language denouncing economic equality with more explicit indictments of racial discrimination, giving what could be a preview of a possible appeal to black voters should she run for president.
00:51:53.000 She says the system is rigged.
00:51:55.000 She says, under the rules of commencement speakers, I'm required to say work hard, and you should.
00:52:00.000 But I'm here with a bolder message.
00:52:01.000 It's time to change the rules.
00:52:02.000 Let me say that again for those in the back.
00:52:04.000 Change.
00:52:05.000 The.
00:52:06.000 Rules.
00:52:06.000 I'm not a person of color, and I haven't lived your life or experienced anything like the subtle prejudice or moral overt harm that you may have experienced just because of the color of your skin.
00:52:14.000 Rules matter, and our government has systematically discriminated against black people in this country.
00:52:19.000 So, this is her way of working toward an intersectional audience by basically saying to them that you are all victims.
00:52:26.000 All these kids are graduating.
00:52:28.000 It's amazing.
00:52:28.000 She's telling a bunch of people who are graduating from college with degrees from an excellent university that they are victims in the freest society in world history.
00:52:35.000 She says, in Morgan State on Friday, Ms.
00:52:36.000 Warren revives her pitch surrounding housing, telling a story about her mother's struggles to keep her home, and contrasting that with the barriers Americans face today.
00:52:42.000 She says, the rules are rigged, because the rich and powerful have bought and paid for too many politicians.
00:52:47.000 And she says, there are two sets of rules.
00:52:49.000 One for the wealthy and the well-connected, and one for everybody else.
00:52:51.000 Two sets of rules.
00:52:52.000 One for white families, and one for everybody else.
00:52:54.000 That's how a rigged system works.
00:52:56.000 Does she really think that there's a set of rules for white families and one for everybody else?
00:53:00.000 Does she really believe that?
00:53:01.000 Because if so, I'd like for her to point to me to those rules that maintain that system so we can talk about them.
00:53:06.000 Otherwise, this is just her going to particular communities and saying, you guys are victims, vote for me.
00:53:12.000 I don't like it when it's done by anyone on any side of the political aisle.
00:53:15.000 It is identity politics, and identity politics that is unsupportable by the evidence is just gross pandering.
00:53:21.000 So, provide the evidence lady, or sit down.
00:53:24.000 Because this isn't because, this is, and that holds true for everyone.
00:53:28.000 It holds true for President Trump, doing the, the reason you're being victimized is because you are living in the boondocks, and because you're being victimized by foreigners, and it holds true for Elizabeth Warren, going into black communities, where people are graduating from college, and telling them that your hard work won't make a dime's bit of difference, because America's a racist country.
00:53:45.000 Just yuck.
00:53:46.000 Just yuck.
00:53:46.000 You want to make the country worse, this is a pretty solid way of doing it.
00:53:49.000 All so that she can gain power, which presumably she will then use to destroy the free system that has created the prosperity with which we live.
00:53:55.000 Okay, well we'll be back here tomorrow with all the latest.
00:53:57.000 I'm Ben Shapiro, this is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:54:03.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Senya Villareal, executive producer Jeremy Boring, senior producer Jonathan Hay.
00:54:09.000 Our supervising producer is Mathis Glover, and our technical producer is Austin Stevens.
00:54:13.000 Edited by Alex Zingaro.
00:54:15.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Karamina.
00:54:17.000 Hair and makeup is by Jesua Alvera.
00:54:18.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire Ford Publishing production.