The Ben Shapiro Show - March 20, 2019


Eat The Press | Ep. 741


Episode Stats

Length

50 minutes

Words per Minute

204.86594

Word Count

10,315

Sentence Count

695

Misogynist Sentences

22

Hate Speech Sentences

7


Summary

Ben Shapiro is back with breaking news and a new book. President Trump takes on the press, the 2020 Democrats compete for attention, and radical leftists decide the problem is guns and white people in New Zealand. Ben Shapiro is a conservative commentator and host of the podcast "The Ben Shapiro Show." He is also the author of the book, "The Right Side of History," which has risen to No. 1 on Amazon's bestseller list and is the number 1 nonfiction political book in the world, making it the number one nonfiction book on planet earth! He's a regular contributor to the New York Times, CNN, CBS, NPR, and other media outlets. His latest book, The Right Side Of History, is available for pre-order now. It's also available in Kindle, iBook, Paperback, Hardcover, and Audio Book format. You can also get a copy of "The Devil Next Door" for only $19.99. If you don't have a Kindle device, you can get a free eReader device with a $99.99 annual membership from Amazon so you can read the book and access all of the latest eReader bestsellers, too! You won't want to miss it! Links From This Episode: Free Training From Amazon: Kindle: Kindle $9.99 iBook Free eReader $99 Audio Book: 4900 All Previous Podcast Epilog $49.99, All Previous Books Free Training from Amazon Freebie: 4999 Kindle Freebie $99, or buy it for 4999.00, or Watch it on Audible Freebie, or become a Member of the Audible Prime $99 and get a 7-day trial, and get 7-months of the service for 7-years of Prime Video + 7-tracks, 7-rates, and 7-inches for a limited edition course starting at $99/month, plus 3-tracks from Audible Places like Audible, Vimeo Free, and Vimeo is also available for $99 or Vimeo gets you get a discount on the service, and gets full access to the service? Learn more about the entire service for the ultimate edition of the show, Prime Video $29.99/Vimeo FREE Subscribe to the show on the show starts on July 1st, starting July 5th, 2019 and gets an ad-only version starting July 4th, 2020.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 President Trump takes on the press, the 2020 Democrats compete for attention, and radical leftists decide the problem is guns and white people in New Zealand.
00:00:07.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:08.000 This is the Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:09.000 Well, we do have a lot to get to on today's show.
00:00:16.000 A lot of breaking news.
00:00:17.000 We'll get to all of it in just one second.
00:00:19.000 First, let me remind you that cybercrime is something that happens to people like you.
00:00:23.000 It is not just something that happens to other people.
00:00:25.000 You might think that no one wants your data or that hackers can't grab your passwords or credit card details, but you would be wrong.
00:00:31.000 Stealing data from unsuspecting people on public Wi-Fi is one of the simplest and cheapest ways for hackers to make money.
00:00:36.000 When you leave your internet connection unencrypted, you may as well be writing your passwords and credit card numbers on a huge billboard for the rest of the world to see, which is why I decided to take action.
00:00:44.000 To protect myself from cybercriminals, I use ExpressVPN.
00:00:48.000 ExpressVPN secures and anonymizes your internet browsing by encrypting your data and hiding your public IP address.
00:00:53.000 ExpressVPN has easy-to-use apps that run seamlessly in the background of your computer, phone, and tablet.
00:00:58.000 Turning on ExpressVPN protection, that only takes one click.
00:01:01.000 And using ExpressVPN, I can successfully surf on public Wi-Fi without being snooped on or having my personal data stolen.
00:01:07.000 It costs less than seven bucks a month, and you can get the same ExpressVPN protection that I have myself.
00:01:12.000 Protect your online activity today.
00:01:14.000 Find out how you can get three months for free at expressvpn.com slash ben.
00:01:18.000 That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S-V-P-N.com slash ben for three months free with a one-year package.
00:01:23.000 Visit expressvpn.com slash ben to learn more.
00:01:26.000 Go check it out right now.
00:01:28.000 All right, well, we have a lot to get to today.
00:01:29.000 First, I want to thank you all who went out and had a chance to purchase a copy of my book, The Right Side of History, which has soared up the bestseller charts.
00:01:36.000 It is the number one nonfiction book on planet Earth on Amazon.com.
00:01:40.000 Outside of the health category, there's one health book that's doing better and one fiction book that's doing better.
00:01:44.000 It is number three overall on Amazon.
00:01:46.000 It is the number one nonfiction political book In the world.
00:01:49.000 And so thank you for going out and spending your hard-earned money on a book that I think is quite meaningful.
00:01:54.000 And if you want to help us succeed, buy a couple more copies for your friends.
00:01:57.000 Because I think that not only is it good to make the New York Times make it number one on their bestseller list, but I think that also it is a worthwhile book.
00:02:05.000 It's something that I think is actually important.
00:02:07.000 So you can go check that out right now.
00:02:09.000 All right.
00:02:10.000 Meanwhile, when it comes to the news, Both Republicans and Democrats are sort of sitting around waiting for the Mueller report.
00:02:15.000 And what's shocking about that is that there are no real indicators that Mueller's got anything.
00:02:20.000 Mueller, so far, has filed a bunch of cases against people in Trump's orbit for ancillary crimes.
00:02:25.000 There's been no direct implication that President Trump was directly involved in any sort of collusion with Russia, which, as you will recall, was the original purpose of the Mueller hearings in the first place.
00:02:36.000 Well, now everyone is sort of sitting around waiting.
00:02:38.000 Democrats are waiting for the other shoe to drop.
00:02:40.000 Republicans are waiting for this thing to come out so they can move it to the back burner for 2020.
00:02:44.000 And Mueller is just taking his sweet time.
00:02:46.000 We still don't know when this is going to actually be released.
00:02:49.000 Actually, at Amazon, there's a placeholder date for the release of the Mueller report.
00:02:52.000 The Mueller report's already selling hot on Amazon.
00:02:56.000 The release date there lists March 26th, but it says that's a placeholder date.
00:03:00.000 We have no idea when this thing is going to drop.
00:03:02.000 The Associated Press says, with Robert Mueller's findings expected any day, the president has grown increasingly confident the report will produce what he insisted all along, no clear evidence of a conspiracy between Russia and his 2016 campaign.
00:03:14.000 Trump and his advisers are considering how to weaponize those possible findings for the 2020 race, according to current and former White House officials and presidential confidants who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations.
00:03:25.000 Well, that's one of the things I love.
00:03:26.000 It's all about how Trump is going to weaponize the report.
00:03:28.000 So we've spent two and a half years investigating what may turn out to be a giant nothing.
00:03:34.000 And the question is, how is Trump going to weaponize it, according to members of the press?
00:03:38.000 How is Trump going to turn this to his advantage?
00:03:39.000 Republicans pounce.
00:03:41.000 Much pouncing.
00:03:42.000 A change is underway as well among congressional Democrats, says the AP, who have long believed the report would offer damning evidence against the president.
00:03:49.000 The Democrats are busy building new avenues for evidence to come out, opening a broad array of investigations of Trump's White House and businesses that go far beyond Mueller's focus on Russian interference to help Trump beat Democrat Hillary Clinton.
00:04:00.000 It is a striking role reversal.
00:04:02.000 No one knows exactly what Mueller will say, but Trump, his allies, and members of Congress are trying to map out post-probe political dynamics.
00:04:08.000 One scenario would have seemed downright implausible until recently, says the Associated Press.
00:04:13.000 The president will take the findings and run on them, rather than against them, by painting the special counsel as an example of failed government overreach and Trump himself as the victim who managed to prove his innocence.
00:04:23.000 Trump has been tweeting all of this stuff out.
00:04:26.000 He's been tweeting out that the Democrats' House investigative committees are, quote, stone-cold crazy.
00:04:31.000 You gotta love President Trump.
00:04:32.000 On Twitter, meanwhile, Adam Schiff, the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, says there's a lot more to look into.
00:04:38.000 And the American people, I think, have basically made up their mind here, which is that President Trump is President Trump.
00:04:42.000 He's done what he's done, and nobody really cares.
00:04:44.000 I think virtually all of this is baked into the cake.
00:04:46.000 Most of the people who spend their time fulminating over President Trump's supposed crimes are people who really, really dislike President Trump in the first place.
00:04:53.000 Everybody else keeps saying, okay, where's the meat?
00:04:56.000 Where's the beef?
00:04:57.000 Yeah, he was surrounded by unsavory characters.
00:04:59.000 He spent his entire career surrounded by unsavory characters.
00:05:03.000 But unless you can actually show me some crimes he's committed, you're gonna have to take a backseat here.
00:05:08.000 Democrats, however, have made promises to their base that will largely go unfulfilled.
00:05:12.000 Now, all of this is good for Trump.
00:05:14.000 You would figure that Trump having the upper hand when it comes to the Mueller report is a big win for him.
00:05:19.000 It takes the issue off the table.
00:05:21.000 If it had gone the other way, then he would have had to run against the implication that he cheated the first time around.
00:05:26.000 But if the report comes out and basically says nothing incredibly damning about him, he's going to be able to say, and rightly so, that the media have spent two full years running chyrons about how he was a Russian tool.
00:05:38.000 I mean, that's every chyron over at CNN.
00:05:41.000 Unfortunately, the president has other agenda items that he is worried about, namely John McCain and George Conway.
00:05:48.000 That's funny, I spoke at the Reagan Library last night for the book launch, and it was great.
00:05:52.000 A thousand people showed up, more than a thousand people showed up, most of them young people, and people were asking me about President Trump's re-election prospects, and I said, well, the first thing he has to do is stop saying things.
00:06:03.000 Like, just stop your face from opening and sounds from coming out, dude, because none of this is helpful.
00:06:08.000 The truth is, when people think about Democrats, they don't want them in the White House.
00:06:12.000 And then when people think about Trump, they generally don't want him in the White House.
00:06:15.000 So, if you're Trump, you'd rather people think about Democrats.
00:06:19.000 Well, the only way they're going to do that is if you just suck the oxygen out of the room for the press.
00:06:23.000 Just don't give them any fodder.
00:06:25.000 But that's not what President Trump does.
00:06:27.000 So here's President Trump yesterday slamming John McCain.
00:06:29.000 Why?
00:06:29.000 I mean, John McCain has been dead for six months and somehow is still occupying President Trump's headspace for free.
00:06:37.000 It's pretty astonishing.
00:06:38.000 Here's President Trump going after John McCain.
00:06:40.000 I'm very unhappy that he didn't repeal and replace Obamacare, as you know.
00:06:46.000 He campaigned on repealing and replacing Obamacare for years, and then he got to a vote and he said, thumbs down, and our country would have saved a trillion dollars and we would have had great healthcare.
00:06:58.000 So he campaigned, he told us, Hours before that he was going to repeal and replace, and then for some reason, I think I understand the reason, he ended up going thumbs up.
00:07:07.000 And frankly, had we even known that, I think we would have gotten a vote because we could have gotten somebody else.
00:07:12.000 So I think that's disgraceful.
00:07:14.000 Plus, there are other things.
00:07:16.000 I was never a fan of John McCain, and I never will be.
00:07:18.000 Okay, so him going after John McCain again, this is just providing a headline.
00:07:22.000 Now, is his assessment of John McCain's behavior on Obamacare correct?
00:07:25.000 Yeah, it actually is.
00:07:26.000 John McCain's behavior on Obamacare was egregious.
00:07:29.000 He basically killed the Republican attempt to repeal the individual mandate, and he did so at least partially out of personal pique with President Trump, which is bad behavior.
00:07:37.000 But President Trump doesn't need to feed into this.
00:07:39.000 Unfortunately, he's feeding into a number of storylines that are not helpful to him.
00:07:44.000 He has decided to punch back, for example, at Kellyanne Conway's husband, because this is the real Housewives over here.
00:07:49.000 I mean, it's just, this is a reality TV show.
00:07:51.000 And listen, President Trump knows reality TV, so he should know that reality TV is not necessarily a way to gain popularity, unless you are the host and you can preside over the chaos.
00:08:02.000 President Trump raised the temperature on Wednesday on his feud with lawyer George Conway, according to the Daily Mail, calling him a, quote, husband from hell.
00:08:10.000 George Conway, often referred to as Mr. Kellyanne Conway by those who know him, is very jealous of his wife's success and angry that I, with her help, didn't give him the job he so desperately wanted.
00:08:29.000 I barely know him, but just take a look.
00:08:30.000 A stone-cold loser and husband from hell.
00:08:35.000 Okay, so that is a thing.
00:08:38.000 So the president going after George Conway.
00:08:40.000 Now, who is George Conway?
00:08:42.000 He's just Kellyanne's loudmouth husband who feels the necessity to go on Twitter and sound off a lot.
00:08:47.000 So what?
00:08:48.000 Why is Trump punching down?
00:08:49.000 Because George Conway called him a crazy person.
00:08:51.000 Because George Conway has suggested that the president suffers from narcissistic personality disorder.
00:08:56.000 Now, here is the thing about narcissistic personality disorder.
00:08:59.000 There are very few politicians who run for high office who do not suffer from a mild form of this condition.
00:09:05.000 Narcissistic personality disorder is basically you are just obsessed with yourself and think you're very important.
00:09:10.000 I thought that it was true of Barack Obama.
00:09:12.000 People think that it's true of President Trump.
00:09:14.000 Who cares?
00:09:15.000 And mostly, why should Trump be punching down at Kellyanne's husband?
00:09:19.000 And if you're Kellyanne Conway, I mean, I don't even know how you make that marriage work, when you've got your boss calling your husband a husband from hell.
00:09:28.000 I can tell you that we have female employees here.
00:09:30.000 I have not insulted their husbands this way.
00:09:32.000 This is not the way to run an administration, no matter what their husbands do.
00:09:37.000 The Washington Post apparently has released a May 31st, 2017 letter from Kellyanne Conway's husband to the President, in which he turned down the position of Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division of the DOJ.
00:09:47.000 So Trump was claiming that Conway was trying to get a job with him, and that turned out not to be true.
00:09:52.000 It turns out that Conway actually turned down a job from the Trump administration.
00:09:57.000 He wrote at the time, "Kellian and I continue to support you and your administration.
00:10:01.000 I look forward to doing so in whatever way I can from outside the government." That did not obviously end up happening.
00:10:07.000 So this sort of drama continues to play out.
00:10:10.000 Is any of this stuff useful?
00:10:11.000 Is any of this stuff good for President Trump?
00:10:13.000 Of course not.
00:10:14.000 Of course not.
00:10:15.000 And now, Kellyanne Conway's husband, George Conway, is much more famous than he was even a week ago.
00:10:21.000 Conway has said that he withdrew his consideration after Trump fired FBI Director James Comey.
00:10:26.000 He said, I'm thinking to myself, this guy's going to be at war with the Justice Department for the next two years.
00:10:30.000 I'm not doing this.
00:10:32.000 Conway had launched a barrage of insults at the president Monday evening, tweeting medical definitions of personality disorders, including deceitfulness and grandiosity as symptoms, and saying they apply to the 45th president.
00:10:42.000 And that, of course, follows on President Trump slamming John McCain and then Saturday Night Live.
00:10:46.000 Over the weekend, President Trump had some extra time and just decided to tweet from the Oval Office a bunch of stuff, a lot of it really dumb, including Some nonsense about how SNL should be federally regulated, or something.
00:10:59.000 And Kellyanne Conway's husband decided to jump into the fray, and now President Trump has decided to jump into the fray.
00:11:03.000 If you're a Republican, if you're a conservative, if you're an American, you do have to be wondering, what is the President of the United States thinking?
00:11:09.000 Like, you are the President, dude.
00:11:11.000 Like, this is an office that does have, I know, I know we're done with decorum, I know we've decided that we don't want that as the American people, that we want selfie-stick Presidents, and Presidents who tweet their innermost thoughts from the Oval Office, but, Is this really forwarding even your political goals?
00:11:26.000 I gotta wonder.
00:11:27.000 In just a second, we're going to get to a new study that shows that trigger warnings are effectively useless.
00:11:33.000 We will also get to the Trump The Trump attacks on the press and the press attacking President Trump, because while Trump's attacks on Kellyanne Conway's husband are worthless and his attacks on McCain are counterproductive, his attacks on the press are somewhat called for.
00:11:47.000 We'll talk about that in just one second.
00:11:48.000 First, let's talk about how you send your packages.
00:11:51.000 No one really has the time to go to the post office.
00:11:53.000 In fact, the last time I went to the post office, I got a $96 parking ticket.
00:11:57.000 $96.
00:11:58.000 Welcome to Los Angeles.
00:11:59.000 Who's got time for the traffic, the parking, lugging all your mail and packages?
00:12:02.000 It is a hassle, which is why you need Stamps.com.
00:12:05.000 It is one of the most popular time-saving tools for small businesses.
00:12:08.000 Stamps.com eliminates trips to the post office and saves you money with discounts you can't get, even at the post office.
00:12:14.000 Stamps.com brings all the amazing services of the postal service direct to your computer.
00:12:19.000 Whether you're a small office sending invoices, or an online seller shipping out products, or even a warehouse sending thousands of packages a day, Stamps.com can handle it all with ease.
00:12:26.000 Simply use your computer to print official U.S.
00:12:28.000 postage 24-7 for any letter, any package, any class of mail, anywhere you want to send it.
00:12:33.000 Once your mail is ready, just hand it to your mail carrier or drop it in a mailbox.
00:12:36.000 It is indeed that simple.
00:12:37.000 With stamps.com, you get 5 cents off every first class stamp and up to 40% off priority mail.
00:12:42.000 Not to mention, it's a fraction of the cost of those expensive postage meters.
00:12:45.000 Stamps.com is a no-brainer.
00:12:47.000 They save you time and they save you money.
00:12:48.000 It is no wonder over 700,000 small businesses already use stamps.com.
00:12:52.000 My listeners get a special offer right now.
00:12:54.000 It includes a four-week trial, plus free postage and a digital scale.
00:12:57.000 No long-term commitment.
00:12:58.000 Just go to stamps.com, click on the microphone at the top of the homepage, type in Shapiro.
00:13:02.000 That is stamps.com, enter Shapiro at the top of the homepage for that fantastic deal.
00:13:07.000 Stamps.com, code Shapiro.
00:13:09.000 Alrighty, so President Trump Has been expending energy on George Conway.
00:13:14.000 He's been expending energy on John McCain.
00:13:15.000 He's also been expending energy on the press.
00:13:18.000 And here's where the president is correct.
00:13:20.000 There is no question that the press are stacked against the president.
00:13:23.000 The best case in point that I can name is this insane story.
00:13:28.000 This wild story.
00:13:30.000 In which CNN just won an award, the Walter Cronkite Award, from USC's Norman Lear Center, announced by the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism.
00:13:40.000 They give an award to CNN for what?
00:13:42.000 For that awful, terrible, 15 minutes hate, Parkland Town Hall shooting, in which Dana Lash was booed and called a murderer, in which Marco Rubio was compared to a school shooter.
00:13:55.000 CNN just won an award from USC for journalism for that.
00:14:00.000 Unbelievably, the Norman Lear Center titled its press release announcing the award, Cronkite Award Proves That Facts Matter, it stated, CNN Parkland Town Hall, a two-hour special aired for only seven days after 17 students and teachers were murdered by a gunman at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.
00:14:14.000 In this compelling and powerful forum, moderator Jake Tapper deftly gave generous space to speak to gun control advocates, politicians, Parkland students, parents, and a representative from the NRA.
00:14:24.000 The program helped, quote, advance the national conversation on gun control and violence, the jury said.
00:14:30.000 I watched that thing.
00:14:30.000 It was a monstrosity.
00:14:32.000 Everybody who watched it was made dumber for having watched it.
00:14:35.000 It was a terrible media event.
00:14:37.000 That media event was specifically designed to allow the targeting of pro-gun people and allow really deplorable human beings like Sheriff Scott Israel of the Broward County Police Department, Sheriff's Department, to allow him to shirk his responsibility and blame others for his own failures.
00:14:53.000 It was an egregious, egregious event.
00:14:56.000 And yet CNN was championing itself, winning an award for that sort of thing because the press are indeed incredibly biased.
00:15:02.000 When President Trump smacks the press around, Sometimes it is justified.
00:15:06.000 Now, does that mean President Trump should call the press enemies of the people?
00:15:10.000 No, that is Stalinist language.
00:15:11.000 You should never call people enemies of the people unless they are actively engaged in terrorism, for example.
00:15:17.000 But, is President Trump right to hit the press?
00:15:20.000 Absolutely.
00:15:20.000 So, here's the example.
00:15:21.000 President Trump, yesterday at the White House, he was railing against the discrimination against conservatives between social media censorship and fake news.
00:15:29.000 He is not wrong about any of this stuff.
00:15:31.000 When you get the back scene, back office statements made by executives of the various companies, and you see the level of, in many cases, hatred they have for a certain group of people that happened to be in power, that happened to have won the election.
00:15:48.000 You say that's really unfair.
00:15:49.000 So something's happening with those groups of folks that are running Facebook and Google and Twitter.
00:15:57.000 And I do think we have to get to the bottom of it.
00:15:59.000 It's very fair.
00:16:00.000 You know, the incredible thing is that we can win an election and we have such a stacked deck.
00:16:06.000 Okay, well, there is truth to this.
00:16:08.000 He is correct that the media have been attacking him, that the media are in fact stacked to the left.
00:16:13.000 There is no question that the heads of the social media companies are to the left.
00:16:16.000 Now, their algorithms may not always spit out results that are to the left, because maybe it turns out that conservatives are kind of good at business, and that we spend a lot of time and effort trying to figure out how we can best reach audiences on these platforms.
00:16:28.000 Maybe it turns out that our content is good and people want to engage with it.
00:16:31.000 But it is true that the social media companies have never had a discussion about how to downplay the traffic to Huffington Post.
00:16:37.000 They certainly have had discussions about how to do so to Fox News or to Daily Wire.
00:16:41.000 There's no... When was somebody last asked... When did someone last ask the head of YouTube whether they ought to be censoring material from the Young Turks?
00:16:50.000 The answer is never.
00:16:52.000 When did somebody who is in a prominent position last ask whether YouTube might think about how to change the algorithms to censor me?
00:16:59.000 Last week.
00:16:59.000 Kara Swisher did it to the head of YouTube.
00:17:02.000 So President Trump is not wrong about the bias in the media.
00:17:06.000 And it's always astonishing to me that people on the left find this controversial.
00:17:09.000 Why is it controversial that the media are generally biased to the left?
00:17:12.000 Now the media are not monolithic, of course.
00:17:14.000 There are many media outlets.
00:17:15.000 We are a successful one here at Daily Wire.
00:17:17.000 There are plenty of successful right-wing media outlets.
00:17:20.000 If you agglomerate all of them, and you stack them up against CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Chicago Tribune, The Los Angeles Times, virtually every major newspaper in the country, does that even play a minute role?
00:17:36.000 I mean, it's hard to suggest that right-wing media are on even par with everybody else in the left-wing media.
00:17:42.000 It simply is not true.
00:17:43.000 Even Ted Koppel acknowledges as much.
00:17:44.000 Ted Koppel is no raving right-winger.
00:17:46.000 He was speaking at the Carnegie Endowment, and he said, listen, when President Trump says the press are out to get him, they kind of are.
00:17:53.000 His perception that the establishment press is out to get him doesn't mean that great journalism is not being done.
00:18:04.000 It is.
00:18:05.000 But the notion that most of us look upon Donald Trump as being an absolute fiasco, he's not mistaken in that perception.
00:18:15.000 And he's not mistaken when so many of the liberal media, for example, describe themselves as belonging to the resistance.
00:18:27.000 Okay, so Koppel is acknowledging a basic truth.
00:18:30.000 Good for him for at least being honest enough to acknowledge it.
00:18:32.000 This is one of the reasons people don't trust CNN.
00:18:34.000 They trust MSNBC more than they trust CNN.
00:18:36.000 They are not the most trusted name in news, and that is because CNN has always hidden its opinions behind the facade of objective journalism.
00:18:43.000 They are not objective journalists over there.
00:18:46.000 And by the way, neither are the members of the Washington Post editorial board.
00:18:50.000 The folks over at the Washington Post, these are not objective journalists either.
00:18:53.000 The same people at the Washington Post who changed the slogan of their paper to Democracy Dies in Darkness and slapped it on their masthead as soon as President Trump became president because the press was so much under attack.
00:19:04.000 Yesterday, they ran an op-ed from the dictator of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who is an Islamist who has jailed legitimately tens of thousands of dissenters, including vast numbers of members of the press.
00:19:16.000 These are the same members of the press who will claim that President Trump is participating in a grave crackdown on freedom.
00:19:21.000 That doesn't mean that President Trump's language with regard to the press is good.
00:19:24.000 It isn't.
00:19:25.000 It's not tempered.
00:19:26.000 It's not accurate.
00:19:27.000 When the President Trump says fake news is the enemy of the people, that would make a little more sense if, number one, he didn't use the phrase enemy of the people, and number two, if he defined fake news as made-up stories or faux objectivity.
00:19:39.000 But very often, fake news to President Trump just means something that he doesn't like.
00:19:43.000 That is an overreach.
00:19:45.000 With that said, does President Trump have a right to complain about media bias in this environment?
00:19:50.000 He absolutely does.
00:19:51.000 Because the media bias is absolutely 100% obvious.
00:19:55.000 It is absolutely obvious.
00:19:57.000 And you can see how obvious it is.
00:20:00.000 When you look at when you look at, for example, the coverage and the narratives that are driven by the Christchurch massacre.
00:20:06.000 So the narratives driven by the Christchurch massacre on the left and pushed by the media have been that white supremacy is driven by President Trump, despite the fact that the number of white supremacist attacks In the West, over the past 10 years, has fluctuated up and down, and there's no real solid evidence that it has fluctuated up in any permanent direction in the last two years.
00:20:26.000 It was actually quite high in 2015.
00:20:29.000 They've suggested President Trump is at fault for everything.
00:20:32.000 They've suggested that guns are at fault for everything.
00:20:35.000 I mean, these narratives are narratives that the media are driving.
00:20:39.000 You can always tell where the media stand by whatever the topic of the news is today.
00:20:43.000 There's two types of bias in the media.
00:20:44.000 I think it's important to point this out.
00:20:46.000 Two types of bias that are worth pointing out.
00:20:48.000 Point of bias number one is how you actually cover a story.
00:20:53.000 So there's a shooting in New Zealand, a white supremacist terrorist attack at a mosque in New Zealand.
00:20:57.000 How is that covered?
00:20:58.000 What are the topics that we talk about?
00:21:00.000 Do we talk about the rise of tribalism in the West?
00:21:03.000 Do we talk about the rise of white supremacy on its own?
00:21:06.000 Do we talk about, for example, the role of social media as the first order?
00:21:11.000 Or do we immediately jump to this is President Trump's fault on cable news?
00:21:15.000 So we immediately jump to this is everybody on the right's fault, and anybody like Sam Harris or Bill Maher or me, who has discussed radical Islam, that those people are somehow to fault for a white supremacist shooting up a mosque, even though that white supremacist presumably likes none of the people that I just mentioned.
00:21:28.000 That's one type of bias.
00:21:29.000 The other type of bias is selection bias.
00:21:31.000 What the media choose to cover.
00:21:32.000 The media do not choose to cover certain shootings.
00:21:35.000 They do choose to cover other shootings.
00:21:36.000 They'll choose to cover a mass shooting at a school in Parkland.
00:21:40.000 They will not choose to cover the shootings in Chicago.
00:21:43.000 There's an obvious agenda that is attached to that.
00:21:46.000 Calling out media bias is important.
00:21:47.000 I know people think that it's just a way for President Trump to deflect from the issues, but if people can't see how the narrative is being driven by motivated people, they are more likely to believe the narrative than if they see the motivations that undergird the narrative that is being driven.
00:21:59.000 Okay, in just a second, I want to get to a fascinating study that suggests that trigger warnings are a giant fail on college campuses.
00:22:06.000 We'll talk about that in just a second.
00:22:07.000 First, let's talk about how you can save money.
00:22:09.000 So we can disagree about a wide variety of issues, and we do.
00:22:13.000 But there is one thing that we should all agree on, and that is, let's try to save some money, gang.
00:22:17.000 And that's where Honey comes in.
00:22:19.000 Honey is great because what they do is they have a best price finder.
00:22:22.000 It automatically compares the prices of millions of sellers that carry an item you want on sites like Amazon.
00:22:28.000 Honey even factors in shipping, sales tax, Amazon Prime status to make sure that you are getting the lowest total price.
00:22:34.000 It shows you the best deal every time even if Amazon does not.
00:22:36.000 It is like having your very own smart shopping assistant.
00:22:39.000 Every time I buy something on Amazon, I'm saving money.
00:22:41.000 And I shop on Amazon incessantly.
00:22:43.000 Amazon is my jam.
00:22:45.000 And Honey makes it so that I am saving all sorts of money.
00:22:48.000 Bought some soccer equipment for my kids.
00:22:49.000 I know, I'm a commie.
00:22:50.000 I bought some soccer equipment for my very young children the other day from Amazon.
00:22:54.000 Saved some money thanks to Honey.
00:22:55.000 More than 10 million people are using Honey to save money.
00:22:58.000 Honey has over 100,000 five-star reviews on the Google Chrome store.
00:23:01.000 Time Magazine says it's basically free money.
00:23:03.000 So next time you're shopping on Amazon, Treat yourself to the free upgrade that guarantees you always get the absolute best price.
00:23:10.000 Add Honey for free at joinhoney.com slash ben.
00:23:13.000 That is joinhoney.com slash ben.
00:23:15.000 Honey is the smart shopping assistant that helps you save time and money.
00:23:19.000 Alright, so there's this fascinating new study out today that I think is actually more important than is being led on.
00:23:24.000 It's a study that suggests As we all suspected, that trigger warnings are generally useless.
00:23:30.000 So what exactly is a trigger warning?
00:23:32.000 If you do not have a son or daughter in college, or if you're not a college student yourself, you probably don't know what a trigger warning is.
00:23:38.000 Because you live in the real world, where people say things that offend you sometimes, and then you get over it.
00:23:43.000 But on college campuses, trigger warnings have become a thing.
00:23:46.000 This is where you're about to discuss a controversial topic, and you're afraid that by doing so, you're going to trigger someone's emotions.
00:23:52.000 And so you are expected to issue a trigger warning.
00:23:55.000 So, if you are going to talk about the issue of rape, for example, then you are expected to say, here's a trigger warning to anyone who has been victimized by rape, or anybody who knows anybody who's been victimized by rape.
00:24:07.000 And if you don't issue that trigger warning, you are considered insensitive and gauche, and as though you are doing psychological damage to somebody.
00:24:14.000 And this is taken to the logical extreme at university campuses, where any controversial topic must be accompanied by a trigger warning, lest you offend somebody, lest you micro-aggress them.
00:24:23.000 And if you micro-aggress them, right, if you say these things without a trigger warning, then you participate in a micro-aggression, and that micro-aggression is a real damage.
00:24:33.000 It is the equivalent of violence, is how many on the radical left and in mainstream academia see it.
00:24:38.000 Now, all of that is crap.
00:24:39.000 It is not true.
00:24:40.000 A microaggression is not actually damaging in the same way physical aggression is.
00:24:44.000 And trigger warnings are absolutely ineffective.
00:24:46.000 There's a new study.
00:24:47.000 It recently appeared in Clinical Psychological Science, and it pushes back against the findings of Harvard University researchers who suggested that trigger warnings might actually be a net negative.
00:24:57.000 It could make some people less resilient to trauma.
00:25:00.000 Trigger warnings don't really leave anyone worse off, according to a newer research conducted by a team of researchers from the University of Waikato and the City University of New York, but they don't help matters either.
00:25:09.000 Study participants who received a trigger warning were just as bothered by traumatic words and images as participants who saw words and images without any forewarning.
00:25:18.000 These results suggest a trigger warning is neither meaningfully helpful nor harmful.
00:25:22.000 So we now have a study from Harvard that says the trigger warnings are effectively harmful because they essentially raise your radar.
00:25:28.000 For stuff that is going to offend you.
00:25:30.000 And now we have a new study that says they're useless.
00:25:32.000 So trigger warnings fall somewhere between harmful and useless on the scale of things, and yet they are the expected mode of communication at university campuses.
00:25:41.000 This study involves six experiments and exposure to both disturbing written materials and video clips.
00:25:46.000 Researchers also asked participants about their previous experiences with traumatic episodes, but determined that trigger warnings were effectively useless even for people with a history of trauma.
00:25:57.000 So, this stuff is not only useless, in many cases it's counterproductive.
00:26:01.000 Why?
00:26:01.000 Because if you are ready to be offended, you're more likely to be offended.
00:26:06.000 Unfortunately, this sort of nonsense is now being written not just into campus politics, it is being written into law.
00:26:14.000 It's being written into law.
00:26:15.000 Here is the case from the Spectator in the UK.
00:26:19.000 Quote, here we go again.
00:26:20.000 Another woman is facing a police investigation and potentially a jail sentence because she wrote things online about sex, gender and a person who changed gender.
00:26:29.000 The woman is a journalist.
00:26:31.000 Her name is Carolyn Farrow, she's 44, and she's the subject of an investigation by Surrey Police over tweets she sent referring to the adult child of Susie Green, head of Mermaids, a charity concerned with transgender children.
00:26:43.000 Farrow said the investigation arises because she quote-unquote misgendered the child, who was born male, but now identifies as female.
00:26:50.000 Farrow is a columnist and occasional TV commentator.
00:26:53.000 She writes and speaks from a Catholic perspective, so she's Catholic, about a number of issues including education, Family policy, euthanasia, and gender.
00:27:00.000 Her political and religious stance makes her relatively unusual among women who question transgender orthodoxy.
00:27:07.000 And the columnist for the spectator says, I point this out here because some people are keen to suggest anyone who challenges the trans rights agenda is automatically a right wing culture warrior, possibly in league with U.S. Christian conservatives.
00:27:16.000 There will no doubt be those who cite Farrow's faith as proof of this thesis.
00:27:20.000 In fact, I'd suggest it proves the opposite.
00:27:22.000 It shows you can find women and men who worry about gender issues right across the political and social spectrum.
00:27:28.000 Farrow tweeted out, I'm being interviewed under caution for misgendering Susie Green's It's all rather Orwellian and rather scary.
00:27:35.000 The thing is, I can't even remember what I said.
00:27:38.000 My tweets automatically delete after two weeks, so they are investigating me for tweets which have been deleted, but which cause offense to Suzy Green.
00:27:45.000 She believes that she is being investigated by the police for potential malicious communications, which would be a breach of the Communications Act of 2003.
00:27:53.000 Section 127 of that act in Britain relates to the improper use of public electronic communications networks and says a person is guilty of an offense if he, quote, sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene, or menacing character, or B, causes any such message or matter or menacing character, or B, causes any such message or matter to be
00:28:13.000 A person can also offend if for purposes of causing annoyance, inconvenience, or needless anxiety to another, he sends by means of a public electronic communication a message he knows to be false, causes such message to be sent, or persistently makes use of a public electronic communications network.
00:28:28.000 You could theoretically be fined or jailed up to six months.
00:28:32.000 Up to six months.
00:28:33.000 This is absurdity.
00:28:35.000 The height of absurdity.
00:28:37.000 In a rational society, we should be able to point out that biological males are biological males.
00:28:44.000 But, apparently, this is no longer a thing.
00:28:46.000 And we say that we're making our society better because of this?
00:28:49.000 That taking offense at basic biological truths is making our society more tolerant, and more wonderful, and more accepting?
00:28:56.000 You're talking about jailing your political opponents, folks.
00:28:58.000 And this is really, really dangerous stuff.
00:29:01.000 And yet the left continues to push it and claim that they're making society better.
00:29:06.000 Nothing could be further from the truth.
00:29:08.000 Okay, now let's check out what's going on on the Democratic side of the aisle.
00:29:11.000 So there's a brand new CNN poll out and it shows that there is serious movement in the poll for really one candidate and one candidate only.
00:29:19.000 That candidate?
00:29:21.000 Would be Kamala Harris, Senator Kamala Harris.
00:29:23.000 She has picked up an enormous amount of support.
00:29:25.000 She is now at 12% support among Democrats and Democratic-leading independents.
00:29:29.000 Beto O'Rourke is at 11%.
00:29:32.000 Harris's rise is across the board, according to CNN.
00:29:34.000 Her gains are more pronounced among Democrats.
00:29:36.000 She's gained 10 points among Democrats.
00:29:37.000 She's gained 10 points among liberals.
00:29:39.000 She's gained 9 points among women.
00:29:41.000 And she's gained 10 points among ethnic minorities.
00:29:43.000 And she's pushing hard to the left.
00:29:46.000 So, Kamala actually came out and said last night, Kamala Harris did, in her quest for the nomination, that she wants to jail President Trump, that she would try to prosecute President Trump.
00:29:55.000 So we are now back to lock him up.
00:29:57.000 Remember when it was really bad, that President Trump was saying, lock her up, and people were chanting, lock her up, about Hillary Clinton, because she committed a crime?
00:30:05.000 Well now, Kamala Harris is pledging that she will prosecute President Trump for crimes unspecified.
00:30:11.000 Which is a great thing to do.
00:30:12.000 It's always great when you have a former prosecutor pledging to use the full power of the executive branch to go after somebody for a crime that she can't even name.
00:30:20.000 Here's Kamala Harris pledging to do just that.
00:30:22.000 I also believe that what voters are going to want is they are going to want that there is someone who has the proven ability to prosecute the case against this administration.
00:30:35.000 Yeah.
00:30:35.000 And this president.
00:30:36.000 Yeah.
00:30:36.000 And that is going to be about having an ability and a proven ability to be able to articulate the evidence that makes the case for why we need new leadership in this country.
00:30:51.000 You're saying if you are president and Donald Trump is out of the White House, you will then continue to prosecute him and his various hench characters.
00:31:02.000 I am very supportive of Bob Mueller being able to finish his process and do his job.
00:31:08.000 Okay, so she won't rule that out.
00:31:10.000 She won't rule that out.
00:31:11.000 Now, I will say that she's obviously talking about prosecuting the case against the president.
00:31:16.000 She's not talking about prosecuting the president right now.
00:31:17.000 But it's funny that she won't just say, I'm not talking about prosecuting him once he's out of office.
00:31:22.000 We have to see what kind of lawbreaking happens.
00:31:24.000 Kind of fascinating.
00:31:25.000 Obviously, the Democrats are racing to the left at the speed of light.
00:31:28.000 We'll get to more of that in just one second.
00:31:30.000 First, you're going to have to go over to dailywire.com and subscribe.
00:31:32.000 For $9.99 a month, you can get a subscription to Daily Wire.
00:31:35.000 When you do, you get the rest of this show live.
00:31:37.000 You get two additional hours of the show every single day.
00:31:40.000 And when you spend $99, you get the very greatest in beverage vessels, the Leftist Tears hot or cold tumbler.
00:31:45.000 Now, I desperately wish I could drink from this hot or cold tumbler today.
00:31:48.000 I cannot.
00:31:48.000 It is Jewish fast day, sadly.
00:31:50.000 But you can!
00:31:51.000 If you subscribe right now, go check it out right now.
00:31:53.000 Also, my latest book, The Right Side of History, was released yesterday.
00:31:56.000 If you have not yet picked up a copy, please head on over to Amazon, Barnes & Noble, or rightsideofhistorybook.com and grab one while they're still in the stores.
00:32:04.000 I mean, they are flying off the shelves right now.
00:32:06.000 It is the number one non-fiction book on planet Earth, according to Amazon, at least not in the health category.
00:32:10.000 And today only, you can catch me doing a live book signing on today's episode of The Conversation at 7 p.m.
00:32:16.000 Eastern to get a signed copy and a chance to have your question answered Head on over to PremierCollectibles.com slash Ben Shapiro.
00:32:23.000 Tune in.
00:32:23.000 It should be a lot of fun.
00:32:24.000 PremierCollectibles.com slash Ben Shapiro if you still want to get a signed copy of my brand new book.
00:32:29.000 Also, when you subscribe over at Daily Wire, you get all of the aforementioned wonders that we've talked about.
00:32:33.000 Plus, you get special access to our Sunday special.
00:32:36.000 Our Sunday special comes out on Saturday for you, if you are actually a subscriber.
00:32:40.000 Our Sunday special this week features Stephen Meyer, author of Darwin's Doubt and Signature in the Cell.
00:32:46.000 He makes the case for intelligent design.
00:32:48.000 You can see what you think.
00:32:48.000 Here's what it sounded like.
00:32:49.000 Hi, I'm Stephen Meyer.
00:32:51.000 I'm talking with Ben Shapiro on the Ben Shapiro Show Sunday special, and we're talking about the theory of intelligent design, God, science, and the universe.
00:33:00.000 Okay, it's really worth a listen.
00:33:01.000 I think that you'll find it fascinating whether you agree or disagree, so go check that out.
00:33:05.000 Also, make sure that you subscribe over YouTube and iTunes.
00:33:07.000 Leave us a review.
00:33:08.000 We always appreciate it.
00:33:08.000 We are the largest, fastest-growing conservative podcast and radio show in the nation.
00:33:12.000 So with Senator Kamala Harris picking up steam, Cory Booker is very angry.
00:33:22.000 And when Cory Booker is angry, Cory Booker gets his angry face.
00:33:26.000 He was doing a town hall last night and he slammed Kamala Harris over her laughing over her use of pot because he was saying correctly that she was prosecuting people for use of pot back when she was using it herself or laughing about it.
00:33:39.000 Here's what he had to say.
00:33:41.000 We have presidential candidates and congresspeople and senators that now talk about their marijuana use almost as if it's funny.
00:33:48.000 But meanwhile, in 2017, we had more arrests for marijuana possession in this country than all the violent crime arrests combined.
00:33:56.000 Do not talk to me about legalizing marijuana unless in the same breath you talk to me about expunging the records of the millions of people that are suffering with not being able to find a job.
00:34:07.000 Okay, so, you know, that is not a criticism that is ill-aimed.
00:34:12.000 He is correct.
00:34:12.000 You know, slamming Kamala Harris for laughing about pot use while she was in favor of jailing pot dealers is kind of a fascinating take.
00:34:20.000 Now, the truth is that Booker and Harris are trying to compete inside one lane of the Democratic Party.
00:34:26.000 They're trying to compete inside that intersectional lane of the Democratic Party.
00:34:30.000 And apparently they're doing so somewhat successfully, because it turns out that right now, inside the Democratic Party, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are not actually gaining any sort of support among black populations.
00:34:41.000 This is according to the Washington Post.
00:34:42.000 Quote, The crowd packed into the gym of a century-old black church every time Senator Bernie Sanders attacked inequities that hit disadvantaged African-Americans especially hard, applauding his ideas to address the disparity within the disparity.
00:34:56.000 But the problem Sanders faces in appealing to black voters was staring at him as he spoke for an hour recently at the gym of the Royal Missionary Baptist Church.
00:35:03.000 Of the more than 1,600 people who came to see the candidate, fewer than 40 were black.
00:35:08.000 Last month, Senator Elizabeth Warren faced a similar dynamic in Greenville, South Carolina.
00:35:12.000 More than 800 people filled the community center of a politically active church to hear her speak.
00:35:16.000 But only about a dozen black faces were visible in a state where about 60% of the Democratic electorate is African American.
00:35:23.000 Sanders and Warren share a liberal philosophy focused on helping those who have been hurt by the prevailing system, a message both say should resonate in black households.
00:35:30.000 But both are older white candidates hailing from New England, and they often confront skepticism, if not ambivalence or indifference, from black voters who have been noticeably absent from their campaign events.
00:35:41.000 Their challenges provide a preview of hurdles likely to confront other white candidates, including former Congressman Beto O'Rourke and former Vice President Joe Biden should he join the race.
00:35:49.000 The Democratic field for the first time includes two well-known black U.S.
00:35:52.000 politicians, both of whom are attracting more diverse crowds and interest from the black community.
00:35:57.000 A month before Sanders spoke at Royal Missionary Baptist Church, Kamala Harris held a rally in the same room.
00:36:02.000 Her crowd was much more racially varied, including a group of black women who showed up in church hats.
00:36:06.000 The crowds showing up for Senator Cory Booker also have included far more voters of color.
00:36:10.000 If Sanders or Warren hope to extend their primary campaigns beyond Iowa and New Hampshire, they must find ways to forge stronger connections with black voters, strategists from both campaigns say privately.
00:36:21.000 And I wonder if that's going to be an actual option here.
00:36:25.000 This is the unspoken strength, perhaps, of Joe Biden.
00:36:28.000 If you look at that CNN poll, what it shows is Joe Biden up at 28%, Bernie Sanders at 20%, and then Kamala Harris at 12%.
00:36:33.000 In a Democratic party that is so divided by race, it is quite possible that somebody like Kamala Harris runs the table in a lot of the southern states where black voters provide a plurality or majority of the Democratic vote.
00:36:47.000 And if that's the case, then Kamala Harris has to be considered the frontrunner.
00:36:49.000 Betting markets right now, by the way, do have her as the frontrunner in this race, even though in the national polling, she's only at about 12%.
00:36:56.000 That's why Cory Booker is going after Kamala Harris.
00:36:59.000 And that's why maybe, maybe the focus on Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders is overlooking the actual frontrunner, Kamala Harris.
00:37:07.000 And you can see that a lot of the more woke liberals are quite upset with the fact that the generalized polls are showing Biden and Sanders and Beto atop the pack.
00:37:18.000 The Huffington Post headlined yesterday.
00:37:19.000 Their giant headline was the hot new thing in the Democratic Party.
00:37:23.000 White men.
00:37:25.000 They say last week in a profile of Democratic presidential hopeful Beto O'Rourke, Vanity Fair reporter Joe Hagan wrote that being a white man in a party longing for a woman or a person of color is perhaps O'Rourke's biggest vulnerability.
00:37:35.000 NBC's Chuck Todd also raised this possibility in an interview with O'Rourke last weekend.
00:37:39.000 But the former Texas congressman dismissed the idea and rightfully so.
00:37:44.000 It's white men who are getting an early boost in the Democratic campaigns.
00:37:46.000 O'Rourke announced Monday he had raised $6.1 million for his presidential bid in just 24 hours, the most of any of the candidates who have publicly disclosed their numbers.
00:37:54.000 He narrowly beat Bernie Sanders, who announced a $5.9 million haul in his first day.
00:37:59.000 And polls show that the most popular Democrat is Vice President Joe Biden, all white men at the top of the ticket.
00:38:03.000 But again, it is quite possible.
00:38:07.000 It is quite possible.
00:38:08.000 That all of this is overblown.
00:38:11.000 And that once the Democratic primaries start, if Kamala Harris shows any sort of serious strength in Iowa and New Hampshire, then maybe she surges out to the lead.
00:38:21.000 And that's particularly true if it turns out that, for example, Beta O'Rourke is an empty vessel.
00:38:27.000 If he's doing well at the beginning, but then he is exposed as the empty vessel he is, that's a problem for him.
00:38:31.000 Speaking of which, Beta O'Rourke continues to be hit with profiles that demonstrate that the dude is just weird.
00:38:38.000 That he's just a weird guy.
00:38:40.000 There's a story in the Washington Post called The Politics of Beto and Amy O'Rourke's Marriage.
00:38:44.000 Now, as I've said before, I don't really care about the marriages of candidates.
00:38:47.000 I don't think they're particularly important.
00:38:48.000 I don't see why that's relevant to a person's candidacy unless it speaks to moral character in some way.
00:38:55.000 But as far as how they divide up household duties or who works or who doesn't, that seems to me an internal matter for the married people to decide themselves.
00:39:03.000 But this Washington Post story does underscore the idea that Beto is kind of a weirdo.
00:39:08.000 And when I say kind of a weirdo, I mean he's really a giant weirdo.
00:39:12.000 Like, there's this.
00:39:13.000 Okay, quote.
00:39:15.000 He proposed on April Fool's Day, four months after they'd first met.
00:39:18.000 It seemed appropriate.
00:39:19.000 That's how Amy knew him then and even now.
00:39:21.000 Impulsive and puckish.
00:39:22.000 He told her on one of their first dates that he planned to name his first son Ulysses, which they did about a year after marrying, followed by a Molly and a Henry.
00:39:28.000 He dubbed their dog Roosevelt before realizing that the dog was a girl who now goes by Rosie.
00:39:33.000 And then there were the pranks.
00:39:34.000 The remote-controlled cockroach in the kitchen.
00:39:37.000 The psycho-style scares in the shower.
00:39:40.000 Nothing says romance quite like popping open that curtain and brandishing a knife at your spouse.
00:39:44.000 One time, according to a friend, Beto collected an especially verdant turd from one of their kid's diapers and put it in a bowl, telling Amy it was avocado.
00:39:53.000 Man, the millennials are not going to stand for this.
00:39:55.000 You can't treat avocado this way with the millennials.
00:39:58.000 They'll lose their minds.
00:39:59.000 That's not even the weirdest thing in this particular profile, by the way.
00:40:02.000 The weirdest thing in this particular profile is that apparently he ate dirt Like, really.
00:40:09.000 Quote, Whatever post-defeat sadness Amy felt, they're talking about Beto's Senate race against Ted Cruz, she was able to kick quickly.
00:40:15.000 She's always been the stable one.
00:40:16.000 Beto, on the other hand, more prone to higher highs and lower lows, was in a funk.
00:40:20.000 In January, Beto hit the road, much as his father had done before him, and drew energy from the people he met.
00:40:25.000 And on one stop in New Mexico, he didn't write about in his blog, by eating New Mexican dirt said to have regenerative powers.
00:40:32.000 He brought some home for the family to eat, too.
00:40:36.000 What in the actual?
00:40:38.000 What?
00:40:39.000 He's eating dirt?
00:40:41.000 I mean, I guess that could be his campaign slogan.
00:40:44.000 Beto 2020.
00:40:45.000 We love dirt.
00:40:48.000 All right, man.
00:40:49.000 So it is possible that when the rubber hits the road for Beto O'Rourke, that all of this falls apart.
00:40:55.000 This is the thing for Kamala Harris.
00:40:56.000 She does actually have a pretty impressive resume, even if I think that her politics really stink.
00:41:02.000 Even though I think her politics are completely wrong and are really bad, she does have a more impressive resume than somebody like Beto O'Rourke.
00:41:08.000 And Bernie Sanders, he is increasingly stuck in his own lane.
00:41:13.000 He can't expand that lane.
00:41:14.000 Now, Bernie is sort of running a Trump campaign circa 2016, which is, I've got my base, my base is solid, if everybody else divvies up to vote, I win the nomination.
00:41:22.000 Maybe that'll work.
00:41:23.000 But Kamala Harris may continue to grow her brand.
00:41:26.000 If she continues to grow, if she continues to take over not only the intersectional wing of the Democratic Party, but but starts to make inroads into the mainstream wing of the Democratic Party, then Bernie Sanders could be in some trouble because he's not changing his ways at all in any way.
00:41:42.000 I mean, he's a hardcore socialist who is not going to change any time down the line.
00:41:47.000 He thinks that's going to carry him to victory.
00:41:48.000 I got to wonder whether he's got enough there.
00:41:51.000 I think the answer is probably not.
00:41:54.000 I think the answer is probably he does not have enough there to actually get him over the finish line unless the field just shatters, unless it fragments.
00:42:03.000 Elizabeth Warren, meanwhile, she continues to...
00:42:06.000 To throw out crazy solutions to America's problems in the hopes that she will gain attention.
00:42:12.000 Yesterday she suggested we should dump the Electoral College, which is the new Democratic hot thing, is undermining key American institutions like the Senate and the Electoral College.
00:42:20.000 Here was Warren yesterday saying that it was time for the Electoral College to go.
00:42:24.000 I believe we need a constitutional amendment to guarantee the right to vote to every single citizen and to guarantee that that vote gets counted.
00:42:33.000 Nobody comes to Alabama in the general presidential election or to Massachusetts because they figure we're not in the game because of the Electoral College.
00:42:44.000 So my view on this is that we ought to get rid of the Electoral College.
00:42:49.000 A vote counts for everyone.
00:42:51.000 Okay, so first of all, she is just lying when she says that people will show up in Alabama to campaign if the Electoral College is no longer a thing.
00:42:58.000 Alabama is not populous enough.
00:42:59.000 People will just skip Alabama completely.
00:43:01.000 The entire campaign will take place in New York and Boston.
00:43:04.000 And Los Angeles and Chicago and Dallas, all wonderful cities.
00:43:07.000 But the reason for the Electoral College was because the founders specifically wanted there to be coalition building in American politics.
00:43:15.000 They were not big fans of the popular vote, which is why every single institution in America was militated by a bunch of checks and balances.
00:43:24.000 But Elizabeth Warren, Pete Buttigieg, all the Democratic candidates now are coming out against the Electoral College.
00:43:31.000 Funny, they weren't against the Electoral College when they were winning massive electoral victories.
00:43:35.000 Only after they lose do they start whining about the Electoral College.
00:43:37.000 Meanwhile, Elizabeth Warren's still having trouble shaking all the questions about her lies about her Native American heritage.
00:43:43.000 She was asked about this on a CNN town hall, and she basically just said, yeah, my family lied to me.
00:43:48.000 How do you respond to people who think that, regardless of the underlying facts, the way you handled the question of your Native American heritage was tone-deaf, offensive, and indicative of a lack of presidential tact?
00:44:00.000 I grew up in Oklahoma.
00:44:02.000 I learned about my family from my family.
00:44:06.000 That's just kind of who I am.
00:44:08.000 And I do the best I can with it.
00:44:10.000 You know, there was an investigation.
00:44:13.000 Nothing I ever did or my family played any role in any job I ever got.
00:44:20.000 So she was told about it, she was lied to by her family, and that's why you should ignore the fact that she was lying about her heritage in official U.S.
00:44:27.000 documents.
00:44:28.000 By the way, there's a brand new poll from Emerson Polling that is out, and it is very similar to that CNN poll, except that it shows Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden running exactly even.
00:44:36.000 It shows Bernie Sanders at 26 and Joe Biden at 26.
00:44:39.000 So that 8-point advantage in the CNN poll for Biden is gone.
00:44:42.000 It is at 26-26 according to the Emerson poll.
00:44:45.000 Now Biden hasn't announced yet.
00:44:46.000 Presumably he would get a small bump from doing so.
00:44:48.000 It goes 26 Sanders, 26 Biden, 12 Kamala Harris, 11 Beto O'Rourke, 8 Elizabeth Warren, and then everybody else below that.
00:44:57.000 Pete Buttigieg is at 3%.
00:44:58.000 Good for him.
00:44:59.000 Andrew Yang is at the same level as Julian Castro and Jay Inslee.
00:45:03.000 He's got 1%.
00:45:03.000 So it's...
00:45:05.000 You know, it's all up for grabs.
00:45:06.000 I think Kamala Harris is the one who is slowly but steadily building support.
00:45:09.000 Bernie Sanders is banking on the field fragmenting.
00:45:12.000 Joe Biden better jump in soon and he better start with some momentum or I think he's toast.
00:45:16.000 I really do not see a great path here for Joe Biden to win the nomination.
00:45:20.000 Alrighty, time for some things I like and then a thing that I hate.
00:45:23.000 So, things that I like today.
00:45:24.000 It was funny, yesterday I was speaking at the Reagan Library.
00:45:26.000 It was a wonderful event.
00:45:28.000 I mean, I love the Reagan Library.
00:45:29.000 It's a spectacular place.
00:45:30.000 Actually, when I turned, I believe, 17, my dad got me a jacket from the Reagan Library for my birthday.
00:45:35.000 So it's an amazing thing to be a fan of a place and a president your entire life and then get to speak at his presidential library for the launch of your book, which it was an amazing thing.
00:45:45.000 And I couldn't be more grateful to the folks over at the Reagan Library for organizing the event.
00:45:49.000 It was really fantastic.
00:45:50.000 Anyway, I Skyped with my daughter right before the event because I hadn't had a chance to see her much yesterday.
00:45:56.000 And she was walking around with a book.
00:45:58.000 I didn't know what this book was.
00:46:00.000 And then I saw what it was.
00:46:02.000 She was carrying around a history of political philosophy third edition from Leo Strauss and Joseph Cropsey.
00:46:08.000 I thought this might be a little heavy for her, like physically heavy as well as intellectually heavy.
00:46:11.000 It's about an 800-page book.
00:46:13.000 But if you enjoy my book, The Right Side of History, and you want a deeper dive into many of the great philosophers that I talk about in The Right Side of History, this is a great place to start.
00:46:22.000 A history of political philosophy.
00:46:24.000 It's edited by Strauss and Cropsey.
00:46:26.000 Not every essay is by Strauss or Cropsey.
00:46:27.000 It's by a bunch of different professors.
00:46:29.000 It really is fascinating, deep stuff.
00:46:31.000 It's a great resource.
00:46:33.000 I highly recommend it.
00:46:34.000 I'm a big fan of Leo Strauss.
00:46:35.000 I'm not as much a fan of his esoteric, exoteric distinctions as I am of his kind of generalized political philosophy.
00:46:42.000 He's one of the big believers in this sort of dichotomy between Jerusalem and Athens and the tension between them that I talk about in Right Side of History.
00:46:48.000 Go check it out if you have time and if you have the inclination.
00:46:51.000 History of Political Philosophy from Leo Strauss and Joseph Cropsey.
00:46:55.000 All right, time for a thing that I hate.
00:47:01.000 So yesterday, there's a big story in the New York Times about how only seven black students got into New York's most selective high school out of 895 spots.
00:47:09.000 It's a public school.
00:47:10.000 It's Stuyvesant High School.
00:47:12.000 There are 895 slots in the freshman class.
00:47:14.000 Only seven were offered to black students.
00:47:15.000 This is apparently a very, very terrible, no good, very bad thing.
00:47:18.000 Alexander Ocasio-Cortez came out and she tweeted about it.
00:47:21.000 She said this demonstrated the unfairness of our public school system.
00:47:24.000 Bill de Blasio has suggested that testing be dispensed with so that more black kids will get into the school.
00:47:31.000 Because here's the way the school works.
00:47:32.000 They have an entrance exam.
00:47:33.000 It's a specialized, high-performing school.
00:47:36.000 That entrance exam determines whether you get in or not.
00:47:39.000 Now, I guess that the argument here is not enough black students are getting in because of white privilege.
00:47:44.000 There's only one problem.
00:47:45.000 It ain't white privilege.
00:47:47.000 Stuyvesant High School is 66% Asian.
00:47:50.000 Bronx High School of Science is 58% Asian.
00:47:53.000 Brooklyn Technical High School is 48% Asian.
00:47:56.000 Virtually every selective public high school in New York City is plurality or majority Asian.
00:48:02.000 So unless you want to make the argument that the system is stacked in favor of Asian Americans in the United States, and that it has nothing to do with the fact that single motherhood in the Asian community is exorbitantly low, that Asian families place extraordinarily high value on education, If you want to say that the system is built for Asians by Asians or something, you're going to have to make that case a little bit more apparent.
00:48:22.000 The fact that folks in the New York City school system are discussing destroying these schools in the name of melanin levels, in the name of racial diversity, without recognizing that what makes these schools good in the first place is the fact that they have admission standards that require students to perform.
00:48:40.000 It's pretty astonishing.
00:48:42.000 And it's, again, another way for Democrats to escape responsibility for the fact that the non-elite schools in New York City suck, just as they do in Los Angeles and in Washington D.C.
00:48:50.000 When you make yourself When you make yourself subject to the whims of teachers' unions, your schools are not going to be all that great.
00:48:58.000 And you've seen this in the LAUSD system, where we keep signing bad deals with the teachers' unions and kowtowing to them so that they will pay off all of our politicians.
00:49:06.000 Here's how this corrupt deal works.
00:49:08.000 You have to be a member of a teachers' union to teach in the LAUSD system.
00:49:11.000 And then the state will actually collect the union dues out of your paycheck for the LAUSD, for the Teachers Federation, the Teachers Union out here.
00:49:20.000 And then the Teachers Union will take those dues and pay off politicians with them to make new deals with the politicians.
00:49:26.000 With the union.
00:49:27.000 It's really, it's a deeply corrupt system.
00:49:30.000 There's a good book called Shadow Bosses by Mallory Factor that's worth reading about, that's worth reading all about this.
00:49:35.000 Maybe I'll make it my thing I like tomorrow.
00:49:37.000 It is disturbing, beyond all measure, that Democrats in major cities would rather destroy the working public high schools than build up the ones that aren't working simply out of fealty to unions that are putting money in their pocket.
00:49:48.000 Alrighty, well we'll be back here later today with a couple more hours of programming, or we'll see you here tomorrow.
00:49:53.000 Make sure to pick up my book, The Right Side of History, which continues to do really well.
00:49:56.000 Thank you so much if you already have.
00:49:57.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:49:58.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:50:04.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:50:05.000 Executive Producer, Jeremy Boring.
00:50:07.000 Senior Producer, Jonathan Hay.
00:50:09.000 Our Supervising Producer is Mathis Glover.
00:50:11.000 And our Technical Producer is Austin Stevens.
00:50:13.000 Edited by Adam Sajevitz.
00:50:14.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Karamina.
00:50:16.000 Hair and makeup is by Jesua Olvera.
00:50:17.000 Production Assistant, Nick Sheehan.
00:50:19.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire production.