The Ben Shapiro Show - March 03, 2017


Ep. 263 - Can Oprah Be President?


Episode Stats

Length

18 minutes

Words per Minute

191.45757

Word Count

3,459

Sentence Count

222

Misogynist Sentences

6

Hate Speech Sentences

4


Summary

In yet another indicator that the mainstream media is rife with corruption and conflicts of interest, CNN has now hired Laura Jarrett, daughter of Valerie Jarrett, to cover President Trump's Department of Justice, as The Blaze reports. According to Vanity Fair, Laura Jarrett is dedicated to, " ... promoting civil rights and social equality for women and minorities." So she's probably going to be completely objective about the Trump administration, right? Well, not exactly. The media claim that such relationships have no bearing on their coverage, but there is something wrong with pretending objectivity when it is clearer every single day that such objectivity is a figment of the media's imagination. Today's After Show Was Hosted By: Alex Blumberg, Senior Editor, The Weekly Standard, and Editor-in-Chief, Ben Shapiro. Our theme song is Come Alone by Suneaters, courtesy of Lotuspool Records. The album art for this episode was done by Micah Vellian and Haley Shaw, and the music for the episode was written and performed by Mark Phillips, and produced by Bobby Lord, and was edited by Matthew Boll, and additional selections were done by Matthew Keyser, and Matt Knost. Additional engineering and mastering assistance was provided by Matthew McConaughey, and Matthew Kuchins, and Ben Koppel, and Bobby Lord. Thank you to Rachel Ward for his excellent mixing and mastering skills, and to our excellent sound design, and our thanks to our sponsors, and thanks to all of our supporters, and everyone who helped us out on this week's effort to make this episode a beautiful listenable listening experience. Thank you so much to everyone who submitted their support and review and review, and all of your support and effort is worth it, and we really appreciate it, it really really is a lot of effort, and it really means it's worth it. - Thank you, you really really really gets it out there, really really good, it's really really, really, we really really can do it, too much of it, thanks really, good, really can really, and you really can say it, good it really, Thank you really, thanks, good n it, thank you, and really, truly, and good luck, good night, good morning, and thank you... - The Eighty-five Centuries, Good Morning, Thank You, Good Night, and Thank You Again, Again, Thanks, Thank Me, Again Again, and Again, & More, and Eff Effie, -- -- Thank You & Effie & Thank You... -- -- -


Transcript

00:00:00.000 In yet another indicator that the mainstream media is rife with corruption and conflicts of interest, CNN has now hired Laura Jarrett, daughter of Valerie Jarrett, to cover President Trump's Department of Justice.
00:00:10.000 As The Blaze reports, CNN touted Jarrett's background defending companies and individuals in government investigations brought by the Justice Department.
00:00:17.000 Valerie Jarrett wasn't just President Obama's top advisor.
00:00:19.000 She's also personally close to the Obamas, to the extent that she's reportedly moving in with them in their new Washington, D.C.
00:00:25.000 digs.
00:00:25.000 Jarrett called Trump's election a punch in the stomach, soul-crushing.
00:00:29.000 According to Vanity Fair, Laura Jarrett is dedicated to, quote, promoting civil rights and social equality for women and minorities.
00:00:35.000 So she's probably going to be completely objective about the Trump administration, you'd think, right?
00:00:39.000 Look, this is nothing new from the mainstream media Democratic Party complex.
00:00:42.000 Ben Rhodes, the national security advisor to President Obama who actively lied to the entire media about the Iran deal, is brother to David Rhodes, president of CBS.
00:00:50.000 ABC News correspondent Claire Shipman, she's the wife of Jake Harney, former Obama press secretary.
00:00:54.000 George Stephanopoulos, ABC News' leading anchor, he's a former Clinton staffer.
00:00:58.000 Ben Sherwood, president of Disney-ABC television group, is brother to former Obama special assistant Elizabeth Sherwood Randall.
00:01:04.000 The media claim that such relationships have no bearing on coverage.
00:01:07.000 Maybe.
00:01:07.000 Or maybe.
00:01:08.000 People with close relationships to those in power tend to favor those people in their coverage.
00:01:13.000 After all, that's the entire basis of the rumors about President Trump's conflicts of interest with regard to his businesses, which are now supposedly run by his kids.
00:01:20.000 Their relationship makes him more likely to act in corrupt fashion to benefit those businesses.
00:01:25.000 Why wouldn't that same logic apply to the media?
00:01:27.000 There's nothing wrong with assigning Valerie Jarrett's kid to cover the DOJ, but there is something wrong with pretending objectivity when it is clearer every single day that such objectivity is a figment of the media's imagination.
00:01:38.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:01:39.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:01:46.000 Okay, lots to talk about today.
00:01:47.000 We'll start with everything going on with Jeff Sessions in just a moment.
00:01:50.000 But before we do that, we have to say thank you to our advertisers over at Wink.
00:01:54.000 So, if you are somebody who doesn't know what a sommelier is, doesn't know what a good wine is, doesn't know what wine goes with what food, you need to go over to my friends at Wink.com.
00:02:05.000 This is formerly Club W.
00:02:06.000 It's W-I-N-C, W-I-N-C dot com, and what they do is you go there and they give you the survey and they ask you what kind of foods you like, what kind of tastes you like, and then they recommend a wine that is specifically for you, a wine that is personalized to your taste buds, and it's great if you
00:02:21.000 No, we're good to go.
00:02:48.000 Thank you.
00:03:10.000 Okay, so we begin the day with the story of the day.
00:03:14.000 And the story of the day is supposedly, supposedly that Jeff Sessions is the most nefarious character that ever was.
00:03:19.000 So the Attorney General for the Trump administration.
00:03:23.000 is supposedly this guy who is just awful, awful, awful.
00:03:27.000 Why is he so awful?
00:03:28.000 Because he met with the Russkies.
00:03:30.000 He met with the Russkies, just like everybody else in the Trump administration.
00:03:34.000 Apparently he met with the evil, evil, evil Russkies.
00:03:37.000 And that means that he has to be stopped, right?
00:03:40.000 I mean, the fact is that the Russkies have been trying to get the Trump administration in their pocket.
00:03:46.000 And now here comes Jeff Sessions trying to explain, you know, trying to work the back room, basically.
00:03:54.000 Here is the problem with all of that, okay?
00:03:56.000 So there are a bunch of problems with this particular set of nonsense.
00:04:02.000 I'll go through the entire story from the beginning because it's a little bit confusing.
00:04:04.000 So here it is.
00:04:05.000 He's the latest figure to come under heavy fire.
00:04:07.000 Here's what you need to know.
00:04:08.000 He testified back in January, I guess, that he hadn't met with the Russians when he was just a senator.
00:04:13.000 He was not yet AG.
00:04:15.000 And it was unclear whether he testified he hadn't met the Russians in his capacity as somebody on the Trump campaign or whether he hadn't met the Russians in his capacity at all.
00:04:23.000 What he said, Al Franken asked Sessions what he would do if he learned of communications with the Russians from the Trump campaign, and Sessions said, I've been called a surrogate a time or two in that campaign.
00:04:31.000 I did not have communications with the Russians.
00:04:33.000 So is that a denial of any contact, or is it a denial of contact as a surrogate?
00:04:38.000 Not really clear.
00:04:39.000 Because he could say, look, as a senator, yeah, I met with the Russian ambassador, but we didn't discuss the campaign, so it didn't have anything to do with Trump.
00:04:45.000 Senator Pat Leahy asked Sessions in writing, quote, Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after Election Day?
00:04:54.000 And Sessions said no.
00:04:55.000 And Sessions issued a statement saying he did not meet with any Russian officials now to discuss issues of the campaign.
00:05:00.000 So now he's changing his story a little bit.
00:05:01.000 So this sort of back and forth has really hurt Sessions because it now turns out that Sessions met twice.
00:05:07.000 That Sessions met with the Russians two times.
00:05:10.000 So what does that mean?
00:05:11.000 Did anything nefarious happen?
00:05:12.000 No evidence that anything nefarious happened.
00:05:13.000 He could have met with them.
00:05:14.000 He's on the Armed Services Committee.
00:05:16.000 He could have met with them to talk about that sort of stuff.
00:05:19.000 Is it possible he talked to them about the campaign?
00:05:21.000 Sure.
00:05:21.000 But the problem is that now that he testified in front of Congress that he didn't,
00:05:25.000 Or at least he didn't in a certain capacity, and the language is a little bit vague.
00:05:27.000 There are a lot of people calling for his recusal.
00:05:30.000 There are a bunch of people in the Senate who have said that they don't routinely meet with the Russians.
00:05:34.000 Twenty lawmakers from the Armed Services Committee told the Washington Post they didn't meet with the Russian ambassador last year, but a bunch of senators have also said it's not out of the realm of possibility or out of the realm of normalcy.
00:05:44.000 We're good to go.
00:06:08.000 Of course.
00:06:30.000 That's a fair argument.
00:06:31.000 It's a fair argument.
00:06:31.000 I don't think it's a great argument, but it's a fair argument.
00:06:34.000 But instead, they're saying he should resign.
00:06:35.000 So you have people like Nancy Pelosi saying, after lying under oath to Congress about his communications with the Russians, the Attorney General must resign.
00:06:43.000 And then she was joined in that call by Elizabeth Warren, among others.
00:06:46.000 Listen, Eric Holder, the Obama Attorney General, he didn't resign despite a scandal-plagued career ranging from Fast and Furious to overseeing journalists and attempting to prosecute journalists.
00:06:57.000 He was actually held in contempt of Congress and he didn't resign.
00:07:00.000 Loretta Lynch, as you recall, the Attorney General under President Obama after Holder, she refused to recuse herself from the investigation of Hillary Clinton.
00:07:08.000 She said she wasn't going to interfere unless it went the way she didn't want, in which case she would interfere.
00:07:12.000 So for Democrats to suddenly say that Sessions has to recuse himself based on he once met with the Russian ambassador is really over the top.
00:07:19.000 But saying that he should resign is super duper duper over the top.
00:07:22.000 Trump says it's a partisan hit job and he's basically right.
00:07:24.000 The White House Deputy Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, she says this is the latest attack against the Trump administration by partisan Democrats.
00:07:31.000 Here's my deal.
00:07:31.000 Okay folks, here's my deal.
00:07:47.000 I am always going to call balls and strikes.
00:07:49.000 I'm always going to call balls and strikes no matter who's at bat.
00:07:52.000 Because that's all that matters is the balls and the strikes.
00:07:54.000 What is right and what is wrong.
00:07:55.000 Not the person at bat.
00:07:56.000 If Trump's at bat, I'm going to call balls and strikes.
00:07:58.000 If the Democrats are at bat, I'm going to call balls and strikes.
00:08:00.000 Okay, so this one is a ball.
00:08:01.000 I'm sorry, this is not a major story.
00:08:03.000 There's no evidence that Sessions is deliberately lying about meeting with the Russian ambassador for some nefarious reason.
00:08:09.000 Should he recuse himself is the second question.
00:08:11.000 And that second question is basically,
00:08:13.000 Is he so compromised at this point that any investigation he does will be compromised?
00:08:17.000 That's possible.
00:08:18.000 That is possible.
00:08:19.000 And there are good arguments both ways.
00:08:21.000 On the one hand, there's that argument.
00:08:22.000 On the other hand, there's the argument that if anybody can basically be prevented from doing their job by a media and a Democratic Party that insists that every minor problem is a major problem, then nothing's ever going to get done.
00:08:34.000 If you're accusing yourself over, I once met the Russian ambassador at my office, then what won't you recuse yourself over?
00:08:41.000 What can you actually do?
00:08:43.000 That's
00:09:04.000 Not be able to have control over the investigation is just not true.
00:09:07.000 As an example, the Deputy Attorney General for Loretta Lynch was that lady who refused to prosecute Donald Trump's executive order and ended up being fired.
00:09:14.000 So the Deputy Attorney General ends up looking a lot like the Attorney General under whom they serve.
00:09:19.000 But here's my bottom line.
00:09:20.000 This thing looks way overblown.
00:09:22.000 Even for people like me who are suspicious of Donald Trump's relations with the Russians, because there's a lot of smoke, a lot of smoke, but we haven't seen any real fire yet.
00:09:30.000 Even for somebody like me who looks at Paul Manafort and says, that's kind of weird, and looks at Donald Trump constantly praising Putin and says, well, that's kind of weird, and looks at the fact that Michael Flynn was so warm with Vladimir Putin and said, that's kind of weird.
00:09:40.000 Even for me, this is a nothing burger of a story.
00:09:43.000 And again,
00:09:44.000 Balls and strikes are all that matters.
00:09:45.000 I'm not going to rip Trump for doing something I don't think is particularly wrong.
00:09:48.000 That said, it's pretty clear that the Democrats are losing their minds.
00:09:51.000 And they're particularly losing their minds over this moment with Karen Owens.
00:09:55.000 And I want to talk about this briefly because we ran a story a couple of days ago in which we talked about the Democrats not standing up for Karen Owens.
00:10:03.000 And people took that to mean that we were saying that they had never stood up for Karen Owens.
00:10:06.000 We never claimed that they never stood up for Karen Owens.
00:10:08.000 What we said, as I said on the podcast yesterday, was that the Democrats stood at the beginning and then they sat down.
00:10:14.000 And then they sat down.
00:10:14.000 And when people say, well, they sat down, it's not a big deal, then why is it that in all the pictures you can see that half the room is sitting and half the room is standing?
00:10:21.000 If it wasn't coordinated, if it wasn't a matter of partisanship, then why is it that half the room is standing and half the room is sitting?
00:10:27.000 Why wouldn't it just be a bunch of randos who are kind of standing and sitting together?
00:10:30.000 Why wouldn't some Republicans have sit and some Democrats sit?
00:10:32.000 Everybody just got tired and bored and so they sat down.
00:10:35.000 But that's not what it looks like.
00:10:36.000 You can see the pictures.
00:10:37.000 Half the room is sitting, half the room is standing during the second ovation.
00:10:40.000 Not the initial ovation.
00:10:41.000 Everybody stands for the initial ovation.
00:10:43.000 Here's what I actually wrote, okay?
00:10:44.000 Democrats initially stood for the widow, but then they sat.
00:10:47.000 Trump didn't.
00:10:48.000 Okay, so I was very clear about this.
00:10:49.000 Nonetheless, Snopes and PolitiFact, instead of ranking as half true or totally true the claim that Democrats sat down for the video, they said that it was completely false.
00:10:59.000 Which, um, I have pictures.
00:11:01.000 And so does Benny Johnson.
00:11:02.000 Benny Johnson is the guy who initially reported this from IJ Review, and he tweeted out pictures of Keith Ellison and Debbie Wasserman Schultz sitting down in the middle of the second ovation.
00:11:12.000 And you can see it in his picture.
00:11:14.000 I mean, I'm looking at the picture right now, right before me, and he's not the only one.
00:11:17.000 I mean, they're sitting down, an entire body of the Democratic Party is sitting down.
00:11:20.000 Bernie Sanders and Nancy Pelosi, by the end, are sitting down, which is exactly what we wrote in the piece.
00:11:25.000 But again, PolitiFact and Snopes and the rest of these fact-checkers are lefties, and so they feel the need to overreach because they're desperate to disprove the idea that Democrats
00:11:34.000 Made a boo-boo by not standing up the whole time, which they obviously should have.
00:11:37.000 Okay, that's just one indicator of how the Democrats are overplaying their hand.
00:11:41.000 But they're losing their minds in general because any time Trump does something good and isn't a universal crap show, they begin to go crazy.
00:11:48.000 So Michael Moore, you know, again, going off on this whole Karen Owens thing, he's suggesting that Donald Trump used the seal widow.
00:11:55.000 So here's what he had to say.
00:11:56.000 Of course, and that's why she's there.
00:11:59.000 As a sort of a f-you to the people who are criticizing him for this.
00:12:03.000 And this poor woman, this widow who has lost her husband, she is in desperate grief right now.
00:12:08.000 She's in love with her husband still.
00:12:09.000 And in love with her husband.
00:12:10.000 And what did you think of that?
00:12:12.000 And to use that as just put another notch on his belt.
00:12:14.000 And what's he thinking about?
00:12:15.000 My ratings!
00:12:17.000 Okay, and so Moore is very upset.
00:12:19.000 Okay, as I said yesterday, two things can be true at once.
00:12:22.000 One can be that Trump wanted to honor her.
00:12:24.000 The second can be that Donald Trump was using her as a political prop.
00:12:28.000 Okay, I'm just gonna be perfectly frank about this.
00:12:29.000 Politicians use people as political props all the time.
00:12:32.000 Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton stood in front of the flag-draped coffins from Benghazi and lied to the families of Benghazi for political gain.
00:12:39.000 Barack Obama in 2014 invited a wounded warrior to the State of the Union.
00:12:42.000 Did he do so because he was so respectful of the troops or did he do so as a political prop?
00:12:47.000 And the answer is, maybe both.
00:12:49.000 Right?
00:12:49.000 It can be both.
00:12:49.000 You know, Barack Obama, he did the same, he's done the same routine multiple times.
00:12:54.000 Hillary Clinton trotted out Kaiser Kahn, right?
00:12:56.000 Gold Star family, and this became a major issue in the campaign.
00:12:58.000 She trotted out Kaiser Kahn to rip into Donald Trump over Kaiser Kahn's son being killed in Iraq.
00:13:04.000 Great.
00:13:05.000 And Kaiser Con rips into Trump.
00:13:07.000 Was that Hillary Clinton using them as a prop?
00:13:10.000 It's really funny.
00:13:10.000 Every time somebody on the right brings out a family member of somebody who's been slain in the line of duty, then they're a political prop, according to the Democrats.
00:13:18.000 So when Republicans talk about Pat Smith, who's the mother of Sean Smith, who was killed in Benghazi, then she was just a political prop.
00:13:23.000 But every time the Democrats tried out a Cindy Sheehan,
00:13:26.000 We're good to go.
00:13:47.000 This woman wanted to be there, and I thought Mary Catherine Hamm of CNN had the exact right take on this, which was, you know, Ryan Owens' widow, Karen Owens, she has every right to be there, she has every right to feel the applause of the entire nation shower down upon her in thanks, and one day she'll be able to show her kids the tape of when their father was cheered by the entire nation at a State of the Union address.
00:14:06.000 So, you know, the Democrats are losing their minds over this.
00:14:09.000 Jake Tapper at CNN, who's reporting I generally like, he also went after Trump because Trump at one point apparently had said about the Yemen raid, they lost Ryan, meaning the military, meaning the generals, and Jake Tapper objected to this, meaning you authorized the raid, why don't you say we lost Ryan, why do you make it about they?
00:14:26.000 It's nitpicky.
00:14:28.000 They lost Ryan.
00:14:30.000 Quote, they lost Ryan.
00:14:33.000 But they didn't lose him.
00:14:36.000 We did.
00:14:37.000 We all did, as a nation.
00:14:39.000 And one might think that the commander-in-chief who signed off on that raid would also think in terms of we lost Ryan.
00:14:47.000 Accountability and responsibility, these are important principles.
00:14:51.000 Okay, so this is a little bit of an overstate by Tapper.
00:14:56.000 Let's see what comes out about this Yemen raid, whether there was actual intelligence gathered.
00:14:59.000 There's a lot of controversy over that, but trying to say that Trump is somehow disrespecting the memory of this guy, I think that's an overstatement.
00:15:07.000 Mike Pence, I think, hits this right on the head.
00:15:08.000 He says all of this is a great disservice to the family.
00:15:10.000 Doesn't that make you angry?
00:15:12.000 You seem like a calm guy.
00:15:13.000 That made me angry.
00:15:16.000 Doesn't that make you angry?
00:15:18.000 It does a great disservice to a great American family.
00:15:22.000 And I think that that's totally fair.
00:15:24.000 I mean, ripping her... And there are people who ripped her, saying that she was used and she allowed herself to be used.
00:15:29.000 Again, it's her choice to be there.
00:15:30.000 If you're going to rip Trump for using her...
00:15:33.000 Then you have to show that he used her and didn't honor her, and I'm not sure that that happened.
00:15:37.000 I think that's, again, a wild overstatement by desperate Democrats.
00:15:40.000 How desperate are the Democrats at this point?
00:15:42.000 They're so desperate that they're thinking toward 2020, and they're looking at their field, and they're realizing that their field is barren.
00:15:47.000 There is nothing there, right?
00:15:49.000 Their field is just totally empty.
00:15:51.000 So the question becomes, okay, well, if their field is totally empty, who will they go for?
00:15:56.000 They have an idea.
00:15:57.000 Their idea.
00:16:01.000 Oprah Winfrey, oh yes, here she goes.
00:16:04.000 Have you ever thought that given the popularity you have, we haven't broken the glass ceiling yet for women, that you could actually run for president and actually be elected?
00:16:14.000 I...
00:16:28.000 I actually never thought that that was, I never considered the question even a possibility.
00:16:34.000 I just thought, oh, oh.
00:16:38.000 Right, because it's clear that you don't need government experience to be elected President of the United States.
00:16:42.000 That's what I thought.
00:16:44.000 I thought, oh gee, I don't have the experience, I don't know enough, I don't know, and now I'm thinking, oh.
00:16:54.000 Okay, so now they're talking about Oprah's going to run for president.
00:16:56.000 And you knew that this is the lesson the Democrats were going to take away.
00:16:58.000 They're not going to take away the lesson that they failed to appeal to blue-collar people.
00:17:01.000 They're not going to take away the lesson that they had the world's crappiest candidate in Hillary Clinton.
00:17:05.000 Because here's the reality.
00:17:06.000 If Joe Biden runs in that election cycle, very high probability that Joe Biden is president of the United States right now.
00:17:11.000 They're not going to take away the right lessons from this.
00:17:13.000 Instead, they're going to take away Donald Trump as a celebrity, and now we need our own celebrity.
00:17:17.000 Because this is how political parties think, because political parties are parties of groupthink and stupidity.
00:17:21.000 So, it'll be Tom Hanks or Oprah Winfrey, and the Democrats are over the moon about this.
00:17:25.000 And we'll get to Chris Matthews, I'll be like, Stay!
00:17:27.000 Stay by Oprah!
00:17:28.000 We'll get to that in a second.
00:17:29.000 But for that, you have to go over to dailywire.com and become a subscriber if you want to watch it live.
00:17:33.000 You can be part of the mailbag today.
00:17:34.000 We're going to do a lot of live questions from the mailbag.
00:17:37.000 So finally, your opportunity to sound off.
00:17:39.000 At dailywire.com.
00:17:40.000 Eight bucks a month gets you access to dailywire.com.
00:17:43.000 You can watch this show live.
00:17:44.000 You can also watch Clavin's show live, where you're going to have, right now we're giving away free copies of the DVD of The Arroyo, which is the fictional film set on the southern border, about the drug cartels taking over the southern border and using it for illegal immigration and such.
00:17:58.000 It's a very good film, and you can check it out over our Facebook page as well, but if you want a copy of it,
00:18:03.000 We're good to go.