The Ben Shapiro Show - April 19, 2019


Fallout Day | Ep. 763


Episode Stats

Length

52 minutes

Words per Minute

208.11363

Word Count

10,867

Sentence Count

795

Misogynist Sentences

8

Hate Speech Sentences

7


Summary

Ben Shapiro reacts to the Mueller report, calls for impeachment, and calls for the media to change its tune from "collusion" to "obstruction" in the wake of the bombshell report that was supposed to shake the earth and make the trees tremble. He also points out that the Mueller Report does not prove that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians in any way, and that President Trump is not guilty of any crime. Ben Shapiro is the host of the conservative podcast "The Weekly Standard" and host of "The Ben Shapiro Show" on Fox News Radio. He is a regular contributor to the New York Times, CNN, CBS, NBC, CNN and other media outlets. He is also a frequent contributor to The Weekly Standard, and has been featured on CNN, ABC, CBS and NBC. His articles have been syndicated in The Daily Caller, The Hill, and The Hill Magazine, and he is a frequent guest on CNN and NPR. If you like what you hear, please HIT SUBSCRIBE and tell a friend about what you think of the show! You can also join our FB group, and join the conversation by using the hashtag on that hashtag , and find him on Insta if you're looking for a free copy of his newest book, . or tweet him to let him know what you thought of the latest episode of his new novel, The Dark Side Of . or his book, He's Good Mythology? Thank you for listening to The Ben Shapiro's new book Good Morning Joe? Good morning, Ben Shapiro, Good morning! Good evening, Ben, I'm listening to you! and Good night, and Good Night, Mr. Ben Shapiro! Thanks for listening, and thanks for listening and Good Morning, and God Blessings, God Bless You, Blessings Blessings! Timestamps: Thanks, Kristy, Tims, Cheers, Tims and Cheers! - Your Day Off? - Jonothans, Jonothan, Jake, Kristian, Glynch, Sarah, and Saje, and Ackerman, Sarah, - Sarah, Rachael, Johnathan, and Joseph, and the Crews, and Sarah, Caitie, and Jaxon, and Jack, Jr., - Rachel, and Jake, and Jacob, and Rachel, etc.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 We recap the Mueller report, Democrats call for impeachment, and the media change their tune from collusion to obstruction.
00:00:06.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:06.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:07.000 Well, it's the day after and the radiation is wafting in the wind, the ashes falling from the sky.
00:00:18.000 And we're going to recap exactly where we stand in the aftermath of the bombshell Mueller report that was supposed to shake the earth and make the trees tremble.
00:00:27.000 We'll get to all that in just a second.
00:00:28.000 First, can you believe it's already April?
00:00:30.000 Time has a habit of getting away.
00:00:31.000 But if you have a mortgage, kids or anyone depending on your income, you're going to have to spend some of that precious time getting life insurance.
00:00:37.000 If you need life insurance but you don't want to spend a lot of time comparing it, you know, like a normal human, you should give PolicyGenius a try.
00:00:43.000 PolicyGenius is the easy way to buy life insurance online.
00:00:45.000 In just two minutes, you can compare quotes from the top insurers and find your best price.
00:00:49.000 Once you apply, the PolicyGenius team will handle all the paperwork and the red tape.
00:00:53.000 No commissions, no hidden fees, just more time saved for you.
00:00:56.000 When PolicyGenius doesn't just make life insurance easy, they also make it easy to find the right home insurance, auto insurance, disability insurance.
00:01:02.000 They're your one-stop shop for financial protection.
00:01:04.000 So, if you need life insurance but you're short on time, head on over to PolicyGenius.com and compare quotes.
00:01:10.000 PolicyGenius is easy, it saves you money, and not to belabor the point, but it's fast.
00:01:14.000 PolicyGenius.
00:01:14.000 Spend less time comparing life insurance, more time doing literally anything else.
00:01:19.000 Be a responsible adult, be a responsible human.
00:01:21.000 You don't want to be buried in a pauper's grave if something happens to you, and you want to make sure that your family is taken care of, and PolicyGenius can help you with all of those things.
00:01:28.000 Go check them out.
00:01:29.000 PolicyGenius.com.
00:01:31.000 Okay, so.
00:01:32.000 We have now all had a chance to sit and think and digest with regard to the Mueller Report.
00:01:38.000 And last night, I was sitting and thinking and digesting after doing 1,000 hours on air about the Mueller Report, and I came to a few conclusions about the Mueller Report that I think are worthy of note.
00:01:49.000 And it's funny, I got a lot of flack from everybody yesterday because I thought Attorney General William Barr was correct not to push prosecution on obstruction of justice.
00:02:00.000 I also think that the Mueller report shows that President Trump lies a lot and that he is dishonest in his dealings with others.
00:02:06.000 These two statements piss off pretty much everybody on the left.
00:02:10.000 The idea is that if Trump lies sometimes, but not illegally, then he should go to prison.
00:02:15.000 And on the right, the idea is that if Trump was exonerated on obstruction, meaning that he wasn't really exonerated on obstruction, but at least he wasn't prosecuted on obstruction, if he was acquitted of obstruction or non-prosecuted on obstruction, if that's the case, then he is a grand and glorious man who has never lied ever.
00:02:30.000 None of these things are true.
00:02:32.000 Two things can be true at once.
00:02:33.000 Trump is who Trump is.
00:02:34.000 We all know who Trump is.
00:02:35.000 Trump is not world's most honest guy.
00:02:37.000 He will tell you this himself.
00:02:38.000 I mean, he is honest about his dishonesty.
00:02:40.000 It's one of the charming things about the man.
00:02:42.000 That is true.
00:02:43.000 It is also true that the offenses that he committed here are not criminally prosecutable offenses.
00:02:49.000 No prosecutor in their right mind would take up the case as placed before them by Robert Mueller.
00:02:55.000 So we'll get to that in just one second, kind of what Mueller was doing here.
00:02:58.000 But there are a bunch of points that I want to make about the Mueller investigation and about the Mueller report in totality.
00:03:05.000 So point number one, and this is where we always have to start, is that the Trump-Russia collusion claims were farcically overblown.
00:03:10.000 Farcically so.
00:03:12.000 What's amazing is that the first half of the report does not actually deliver the goods on anything remotely resembling Trump campaign collusion with the Russians.
00:03:20.000 Even the stuff that the press really blew up.
00:03:23.000 I'm talking about the stuff where they suggested that the RNC had rewritten its own platform with regard to providing lethal aid to Ukraine in service to Vladimir Putin and the Trump campaign.
00:03:33.000 That turns out not to be true.
00:03:34.000 It was a low-level aide who thought that President Trump was friendlier to Russia than other candidates had been.
00:03:39.000 And so he suggested the change.
00:03:40.000 The change was made.
00:03:41.000 That was that.
00:03:42.000 All the talk about Paul Manafort providing early polling to Russian oligarchs and Ukrainian oligarchs.
00:03:49.000 That's true, but it had nothing to do with the campaign per se.
00:03:53.000 There's no evidence it had anything to do with the campaign.
00:03:55.000 So there are a bunch of these kind of little narratives that have been strewn about by the media over the past couple of years.
00:04:01.000 Michael Cohen going to Prague.
00:04:02.000 No evidence he ever went to Prague.
00:04:04.000 President Trump supposedly facilitating meetings with Natalia Veselnitskaya, knowing about the Trump Tower meeting.
00:04:11.000 No evidence that he knew in advance about the Veselnitskaya meeting.
00:04:14.000 Donald Jr.
00:04:15.000 knowing in advance about WikiLeaks hacks.
00:04:17.000 None of that is true.
00:04:18.000 So a lot of the media narratives that were put out there were simply overblown or untrue.
00:04:23.000 BuzzFeed's big report saying that Michael Cohen had been instructed to lie to investigators by President Trump, which would constitute subordination of perjury.
00:04:30.000 That would be an actual crime.
00:04:32.000 The crime for which President Clinton was impeached in the House.
00:04:36.000 That turned out not to be true either.
00:04:37.000 None of that was in the Mueller report.
00:04:38.000 So all of the talk about Trump-Russia collusion, that was really, really overblown.
00:04:42.000 The Mueller report itself states, quote, although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.
00:05:05.000 Period.
00:05:06.000 End of story.
00:05:07.000 The report makes a bunch of statements that are just like that repeatedly.
00:05:10.000 It turns out that when it comes to Russian collusion, there was some smoke and no fire.
00:05:15.000 There was no actual fire.
00:05:16.000 And the people who were even prosecuted, people like George Papadopoulos, were basically dupes, not active agents of the Kremlin.
00:05:23.000 People who were prosecuted, like, like, Papadopoulos, who else was prosecuted?
00:05:29.000 So Manafort was prosecuted, but he was prosecuted for crimes involving his kinship with the Ukrainian oligarchs based on activity back in like 2013-2014.
00:05:40.000 So the idea that the campaign itself was involved in collusion was just wrong.
00:05:44.000 Now, the media are not totally ready to let this go.
00:05:46.000 John Carl, over at ABC News, doing a terrible job covering this, actually, he said, listen, the evidence shows that while there wasn't actual conspiracy, there was certainly collusion.
00:05:56.000 OK, well, if you're not shifting the goalposts to the point that collusion is not conspiracy, that collusion is somebody received information from a Russian source that was public already and then used it in OPPO research, That ain't what you were talking about.
00:06:10.000 You were talking about the election being skewed because of cooperation between the Trump campaign and the Russians.
00:06:14.000 That is not what happened.
00:06:15.000 Jonathan Karl still tried to push that one yesterday.
00:06:17.000 There's significant material in here that we did not know on the question of collusion.
00:06:23.000 Now, of course, there's no finding that anybody in the Trump campaign was guilty of a criminal conspiracy in terms of dealing with the Russians on this.
00:06:31.000 But the chapter on collusion shows significant contact between people on the Trump campaign Oh, you might say collusion, might you?
00:06:41.000 Well, no.
00:06:41.000 the conclusion here in the special counsel was it did not rise to the level of a violation of the law, but there is significant contact here.
00:06:49.000 You might even say collusion.
00:06:51.000 Oh, you might say collusion, might you?
00:06:53.000 Well, no, you wouldn't say collusion because there wasn't actual collusion.
00:06:56.000 Adam Schiff is still going around trying to promote the idea that collusion occurred because he spent years lying to the American public that he had secret knowledge, secret inside information about the level of conspiracy between Trump and Russia.
00:07:08.000 The man had set up a pump tent outside the CNN headquarters and he basically left his job in Congress so he could hang out at CNN full-time and be best friends with Wolf Blitzer.
00:07:17.000 Well, now he's back on CNN yesterday trying to cover his butt after it turns out that his entire claim fell apart yesterday.
00:07:24.000 Many of us do think the president's unfit for office, but unless that's a bipartisan conclusion, an impeachment would be doomed to failure.
00:07:33.000 I continue to think that a failed impeachment is not in the national interest.
00:07:37.000 Whether these acts are criminal or not.
00:07:40.000 Whether the obstruction of justice was criminal or not, or whether these contacts were sufficiently illicit or not to rise to the level of a criminal conspiracy, they are unquestionably dishonest, unethical, immoral, and unpatriotic, and should be condemned by every American.
00:07:58.000 That is not the subject of vindication.
00:08:00.000 That is the subject of condemnation.
00:08:03.000 And that is how I think we should view the Mueller Report.
00:08:05.000 Okay, that is moving those goalposts.
00:08:07.000 We should view the Mueller Report as moral condemnation of President Trump.
00:08:11.000 Really?
00:08:11.000 Because that's not what you promised, dude.
00:08:13.000 You promised criminal conspiracy.
00:08:15.000 You promised that President Trump was hanging out with Vladimir Putin down by the pool, figuring out how to shift those votes in Wisconsin.
00:08:22.000 You said you had inside information to that effect.
00:08:24.000 So Adam Schiff has lost all credibility on this.
00:08:27.000 So the collusion stuff was wildly overblown, the media wildly overplayed it, and they deserve all the criticism that they are receiving today.
00:08:34.000 Second.
00:08:35.000 Second point about this report.
00:08:37.000 The original suspicions regarding the Trump team might not have been unreasonable.
00:08:40.000 Now, I know this one is controversial with a lot of people on the right who believe that the investigation was initiated in bad faith, that the Obama team and its intelligence team decided, you know what?
00:08:49.000 We don't like Donald Trump.
00:08:51.000 We're going to come up with an excuse to target him and his team.
00:08:53.000 And so on the basis of skimpy evidence, they decided to launch an internal investigation that would eventually take down the president and provide fire insurance against the possibility of him winning.
00:09:03.000 Now, I'm open to the argument based on the evidence that is already out there.
00:09:06.000 That the investigation became that, because Peter Strzok was in fact a politically motivated player.
00:09:11.000 James Clapper was a politically motivated player.
00:09:13.000 John Brennan was a politically motivated player.
00:09:15.000 I'm fully willing to hear the case, based on the evidence that is already public, that the investigation became something bad, and became something corrupt, as people fell into a habit of listening to everyone in their echo chamber, fell into confirmation bias.
00:09:32.000 There is still not enough evidence for me to believe the case that the investigation was initiated originally under false pretenses.
00:09:41.000 Because that has been one of the popular talking points.
00:09:43.000 There was plenty of smoke in the early days of the investigation.
00:09:45.000 George Papadopoulos meeting with Joseph Mifsud, a suspected Russian asset who allegedly bragged that he had access to Hillary Clinton's emails and then Papadopoulos trying to pass that up the chain.
00:09:53.000 Roger Stone bringing WikiLeaks promises to the attention of the Trump campaign.
00:09:57.000 Trump's dishonesty regarding the continuation of Trump Tower Moscow negotiations.
00:10:01.000 His open commentary in which he continued to praise Vladimir Putin puzzling pretty much everyone.
00:10:05.000 Now we know, by the way.
00:10:06.000 That that praise of Vladimir Putin?
00:10:07.000 That's just the way that Trump does business.
00:10:09.000 When he's dealing with other people who he thinks are strong men, he likes to deal with them by flattering them, right?
00:10:14.000 He does this with Kim Jong-un.
00:10:15.000 He's done this with Erdogan.
00:10:16.000 He's done this with a bunch of people who are sort of bad actors on the world stage.
00:10:21.000 President Trump, though, was involved in dishonesty regarding the Trump Tower Moscow negotiations.
00:10:25.000 He lied to the public about it.
00:10:27.000 The June 2016 Trump Tower meeting, of course.
00:10:29.000 Carter Page's coordination with Russian fronts while working for the Trump campaign.
00:10:34.000 Paul Manafort's involvement in the campaign while simultaneously doing the dirty work of Ukrainian oligarchs, right?
00:10:38.000 All of that stuff was happening.
00:10:40.000 And so it's not totally unreasonable for people inside the intel community to say, well, Trump is surrounding himself with a lot of bad people.
00:10:48.000 This looks a little suspicious.
00:10:50.000 Is it possible that it was launched under false pretenses?
00:10:53.000 Sure, Annie McCarthy at National Review makes that case.
00:10:56.000 I know Devin Nunes makes that case.
00:10:57.000 Both of them we had on the radio show yesterday and made that case.
00:11:01.000 I'm willing to hear the case.
00:11:02.000 I need more evidence on the case before I take it super seriously.
00:11:06.000 So that is point number two with regard to the Mueller report.
00:11:09.000 I'm trying to just be as fair about this as I possibly can be.
00:11:11.000 We'll get to some more commentary on the Mueller report and then the reaction In one second.
00:11:16.000 But first, if you've been listening to this show, you've heard me talk about FrameBridge.
00:11:19.000 They make it super easy and affordable to frame your favorite things, from art prints and posters to the travel photos, sitting on your phone.
00:11:25.000 FrameBridge is fantastic.
00:11:27.000 I normally had to go down to the frame shop, it's really expensive, and then you have to wait for weeks while they custom frame things for you.
00:11:34.000 Not at FrameBridge.
00:11:34.000 Here's how it works.
00:11:35.000 You go to framebridge.com, you upload your photo, or they send you packaging to safely mail in your physical pieces, you preview your item online in any frame style, You choose your favorite, or you get free recommendations from their talented designers.
00:11:47.000 The expert team at FrameBridge then custom frames your item, delivers your finished piece directly to your door, ready to hang.
00:11:52.000 Instead of paying hundreds of bucks at a framing store, their prices start at $39.
00:11:56.000 All shipping is free.
00:11:57.000 You know how much money I've spent on frames over the years?
00:11:59.000 A lot of money.
00:12:00.000 But you don't have to anymore with FrameBridge, which is why I use it.
00:12:03.000 My listeners get 15% off their first order at Framebridge.com when they use my code SHAPIRO.
00:12:09.000 Again, that's Framebridge.com.
00:12:10.000 Use code SHAPIRO.
00:12:11.000 Get started today.
00:12:11.000 Frame those photos.
00:12:12.000 Send the perfect gift for weddings, birthdays, special events.
00:12:15.000 Go to Framebridge.com.
00:12:16.000 Use promo code SHAPIRO.
00:12:17.000 You'll save an additional 15% off your first order.
00:12:19.000 Just go to Framebridge.com.
00:12:21.000 Promo code SHAPIRO.
00:12:22.000 That's Framebridge.com.
00:12:23.000 Promo code SHAPIRO.
00:12:24.000 Fantastic service.
00:12:25.000 Okay, so back to the Mueller report.
00:12:27.000 Point number three.
00:12:28.000 Point number three.
00:12:29.000 So point number one, you'll recall, is that the Trump-Russia collusion claims were farcically overblown by the media, which they were.
00:12:34.000 The press humiliated themselves here.
00:12:36.000 That does not mean that every individual report about Trump fulminating on obstruction was false.
00:12:41.000 A lot of those reports were true, and a lot of that reporting was good.
00:12:45.000 But the reports on Trump-Russia collusion Almost all of that blew up in the faces of the media.
00:12:51.000 Point number two is that the original suspicions regarding the Trump team might not have been unreasonable.
00:12:55.000 Point number three, the Steele dossier is nowhere to be found.
00:12:58.000 And this is where I say I think the investigation went wrong.
00:13:01.000 I think that Peter Strzok and other politically motivated actors inside the intelligence apparatus hated President Trump and were willing to use overblown information, scanty information, Thin information, easily debunkable information in order to target Trump and his team.
00:13:16.000 I do think that's what this investigation eventually became under the auspices of people like Peter Strzok.
00:13:21.000 Why?
00:13:22.000 Well, because they used the Steele dossier over and over in the original investigation to get FISA warrants against people like Carter Page.
00:13:29.000 That Steele dossier is the intelligence mishmash that was funneled to the Obama intelligence agencies, the Effusion GPS and Oppo research firm working on behalf of Hillary Clinton.
00:13:39.000 But the Steele dossier barely comes up in the Mueller report.
00:13:41.000 So you would figure that if that Steele dossier were so important, if it were so filled with golden nuggets of information that provided the basis for further investigation and deeper digging, that that would appear, you know, like, Three times?
00:13:54.000 Maybe?
00:13:54.000 Maybe in the Mueller report.
00:13:55.000 Instead, it appears, I think, twice in the course of 448 pages.
00:13:58.000 Yet it was repeatedly used as the basis for a FISA warrant against Carter Page.
00:14:02.000 It was presented directly to President Trump by former FBI director James Comey and then broadly reported on by the press.
00:14:08.000 There's a theory that I don't find implausible that James Clapper was working to release the Steele dossier in public.
00:14:16.000 And so James Comey went to President Trump and that provided the news hook for BuzzFeed to print the Steele dossier in the first place.
00:14:22.000 It does raise serious questions as to how much that investigation morphed over time.
00:14:25.000 Okay, in just a second, we're going to get to more of the analysis of the Mueller report.
00:14:29.000 Okay, point four on the Mueller report.
00:14:32.000 This one really is important.
00:14:34.000 Team Mueller has a very, very broad definition of obstruction of justice.
00:14:38.000 So obstruction of justice statutes are extraordinarily broad in how they are drawn.
00:14:42.000 There is a what they call a catch-all provision in 18 section 1512.
00:14:48.000 That catch-all provision is really broad.
00:14:50.000 It basically says anybody who attempts to impede the process of justice is guilty of a crime.
00:14:55.000 Well, there are a thousand ways to read that.
00:14:57.000 It's a badly written law.
00:14:58.000 One of the things you learn as a lawyer is that you try to draw laws as specifically as possible, you try to draw contracts as specifically as possible, so you know what applies and what does not apply.
00:15:07.000 That is not really present in the obstruction statutes and that creates a lot of play in the joints and it creates enough room for there to be controversy between T. Mueller and Attorney General William Barr on whether President Trump's activity actually constituted obstruction of justice.
00:15:22.000 Under Barr's analysis, he says, To obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, this is in his March 24th four-page letter, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person acting with corrupt intent engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding.
00:15:39.000 And then Barr clarified his standard in his press conference yesterday.
00:15:43.000 And this standard, I think, is correct.
00:15:45.000 He says, Although the Deputy Attorney General and I disagreed with some of the Special Counsel's legal theories and felt that some of the episodes examined did not amount to obstruction as a matter of law, we did not rely solely on that in making our decision.
00:15:56.000 Instead, we accepted the Special Counsel's legal framework for purposes of our analysis and evaluated the evidence as presented by the Special Counsel in reaching our conclusion.
00:16:04.000 So Barr is trying to argue that he used the standard that Mueller was using for obstruction of justice, and even under that standard, it wasn't obstruction.
00:16:10.000 I think that's a slightly dicey case for Barr.
00:16:13.000 I think if you use Mueller's standard for obstruction, then some of what Trump did looks like obstruction.
00:16:17.000 But I don't think that Mueller's standard is correct, which is why you see Barr say here, we had some disagreements about the theory.
00:16:23.000 In assessing the president's actions discussed in the report, it is important to bear in mind the context.
00:16:28.000 President Trump faced an unprecedented situation as he entered into office and sought to perform his responsibilities as president.
00:16:34.000 Federal agents and prosecutors were scrutinizing his conduct before and after taking office And the conduct of some of his associates.
00:16:41.000 At the same time, there is relentless speculation in the news media about the president's personal culpability.
00:16:46.000 Yet, as he said from the beginning, there was in fact no collusion.
00:16:49.000 And as the special counsel's report acknowledges, there is substantial evidence to show that the president was frustrated and angered by his sincere belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency, propelled by his political opponents, fueled by illegal leaks.
00:17:02.000 Nonetheless, the White House fully cooperated with the special counsel's investigation, providing unfettered access to the campaign and White House documents, directing senior aides to testify freely, asserting no privilege claims.
00:17:11.000 Now, that one line is being taken out of context, the one where he says, the White House fully cooperated with the special counsel's investigation.
00:17:17.000 People are rightly pointing out, well, Trump didn't sit down for an interview, did he?
00:17:20.000 That's not exactly full cooperation.
00:17:22.000 And Trump was constantly fulminating publicly and privately about the Mueller investigation, and President Trump was creating these incentives for people not to talk to the Mueller investigation by tweeting out things to Michael Cohen and Paul Manafort.
00:17:36.000 All of that is true.
00:17:37.000 And so Barr is wrong in that language.
00:17:39.000 The White House did not, quote unquote, fully cooperate with the special counsel investigation.
00:17:43.000 But the truth is they mostly did.
00:17:45.000 They mostly did.
00:17:46.000 They didn't insert executive privilege.
00:17:47.000 They did allow everybody inside the White House to talk to the special counsel's office.
00:17:51.000 I know this because I've talked to many people who have talked to the special counsel's office.
00:17:55.000 At the same time, the president took no act that in fact deprived the special counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation.
00:18:02.000 And this is true too.
00:18:03.000 The president did not simply say, you can't talk to this guy because this guy over here, I'm asserting executive privilege.
00:18:08.000 He didn't do that.
00:18:10.000 Apart from whether the acts were obstructive, this evidence of non-corrupt motives weighs heavily against any allegation that the president had a corrupt intent to obstruct the investigation.
00:18:18.000 And that last phrase is the one that matters because the crime of obstruction requires corrupt intent.
00:18:23.000 I noted this yesterday with regard to contrasting Hillary Clinton's behaviors with President Trump's behaviors.
00:18:28.000 Hillary Clinton taking classified material and storing it on a homebrew server was de facto just facially illegal.
00:18:36.000 It's facially illegal because there is no element of intent in the crime.
00:18:39.000 If I take classified material from the VA and I accidentally leave it on the front seat of my car and someone smashes the car window and takes the data, I am guilty of a crime.
00:18:48.000 It doesn't matter if I just accidentally left it in my backpack or something.
00:18:52.000 None of that matters.
00:18:53.000 Intent is not an element of the crime for Hillary.
00:18:56.000 The FBI did this bizarre trick where they read back into the law intent in order to let Hillary Clinton off.
00:19:04.000 Intent, however, with obstruction of justice is an element of the crime.
00:19:07.000 You have to have corrupt intent.
00:19:08.000 So what Barr is saying is it's not corrupt intent for President Trump to fulminate publicly about the Mueller report.
00:19:14.000 That doesn't demonstrate that he was trying to stop it.
00:19:17.000 It doesn't demonstrate that he was trying to end the investigation, and it certainly doesn't demonstrate that he was trying to do all of this with an intent toward thwarting finding out of underlying crime, because there was no underlying crime.
00:19:27.000 So those are the two facts that Barr keeps relying on in saying no prosecution is available here.
00:19:32.000 One, no underlying collusion for Trump to hide, and two, no corrupt intent to hide something that was not really there.
00:19:39.000 Right?
00:19:39.000 You can't suggest that this is Al Capone's vault here, that President Trump was throwing up obstacles to you finding nothing.
00:19:46.000 So that is Barr's standard.
00:19:47.000 I think that's the correct standard.
00:19:48.000 That is not the standard that the Mueller report suggests for obstruction.
00:19:51.000 According to their broader standard, obstruction of justice law reaches all corrupt conduct capable of producing an effect that prevents justice from being duly administered regardless of the means employed.
00:20:01.000 That is a quote from a particular circuit court case.
00:20:04.000 That's an extraordinarily broad standard.
00:20:06.000 All corrupt conduct capable of producing an effect that prevents justice from being duly administered.
00:20:12.000 So now we have to analyze every term there.
00:20:14.000 Corrupt conduct.
00:20:15.000 What makes conduct corrupt per se?
00:20:18.000 Presumably intent.
00:20:19.000 So Barr would say, OK, well, the intent still wasn't there.
00:20:21.000 Capable of producing an effect that prevents justice from being duly administered.
00:20:26.000 OK, well, if Barack Obama said about the Trayvon Martin case that Trayvon could have been his son, was that obstruction of justice?
00:20:31.000 I don't think so.
00:20:32.000 But it could theoretically fall under that rubric here.
00:20:35.000 The Mueller report says an improper motive can render an actor's conduct criminal even when the conduct would otherwise be lawful and within the actor's authority.
00:20:42.000 So in other words, President Trump fires somebody within his office.
00:20:46.000 That would be criminal conduct if the intent is wrong?
00:20:49.000 Well, that's an insanely broad standard.
00:20:51.000 That means the prosecutors are now mind readers and it is their job to go through and read minds.
00:20:56.000 A defendant need not directly impede the proceeding.
00:20:58.000 The requisite showing of motive is made when a person acted with an intent to obtain an improper advantage for himself or someone else inconsistent with official duty and the rights of others.
00:21:06.000 Again, the question is, did Trump violate his official duty or the rights of others here?
00:21:10.000 I don't think he did.
00:21:11.000 But still, this is incredibly broad.
00:21:13.000 It's incredibly broad.
00:21:14.000 While mere abstract talk does not suffice to create the crime of attempt, any concrete and specific acts that corroborate the defendant's intent can constitute a substantial step.
00:21:22.000 The Omnibus Clause of 18 U.S.C.
00:21:25.000 1503 prohibits an endeavor to obstruct justice, which sweeps more broadly than Section 1512's attempt provision.
00:21:30.000 In a second, I'll explain why all of this is important.
00:21:32.000 First, we talk a lot about colleges being overrun with SJWs who can't handle me or Michael Knowles or Candace Owens or anybody else.
00:21:40.000 Anywhere right of center, going there to speak.
00:21:42.000 I mean, Charles Murray, Heather McDonald, anyone.
00:21:44.000 We assume that these kids become radicalized in college, but actually it starts a lot sooner than that.
00:21:49.000 I've been saying this for years.
00:21:50.000 The foundations are being set in elementary school.
00:21:52.000 Right now, there are 50 million kids attending America's public schools.
00:21:55.000 They're poised to be the next generation of college radicals.
00:21:58.000 That means that we need to start fighting this battle sooner.
00:22:00.000 Like now.
00:22:01.000 Thankfully, you have a choice.
00:22:02.000 This is why Freedom Project Academy was created.
00:22:05.000 Freedom Project Academy is an accredited classical online school built on Judeo-Christian values for students in kindergarten through high school.
00:22:11.000 They focus on real-world skills like reading, writing, arithmetic, and American history.
00:22:15.000 Freedom Project Academy has created an interactive online atmosphere where students across the country are instructed by live teachers in small classes who teach students how to think, not what to think.
00:22:25.000 Go check them out right now.
00:22:26.000 Go to freedomforschool.com.
00:22:29.000 That's freedomforschool.com.
00:22:31.000 Request your free information packet today.
00:22:32.000 Take back control of your kid's education.
00:22:34.000 That's freedomforschool.com.
00:22:36.000 Freedomforschool.com.
00:22:37.000 Super important project.
00:22:39.000 Please go check them out.
00:22:40.000 Great alternative to sending your kid to a public school that may be in the process of indoctrinating them rather than teaching them.
00:22:46.000 Freedomforschool.com.
00:22:47.000 Okay, so as I say, when it comes to the Mueller Report, two separate definitions of obstruction.
00:22:51.000 One from Barr is fairly clear.
00:22:54.000 That you need to have corrupt intent and that means that you have to have intended to obstruct the investigation because what you were trying to do was stop the investigation from finding underlying crime.
00:23:04.000 And so there's no underlying crime, therefore no corrupt intent.
00:23:07.000 Trump was just mad.
00:23:08.000 Trump's emotional state comes into play here.
00:23:11.000 The Mueller report provides an obstruction of justice definition that encompasses pretty much everything.
00:23:15.000 Now, that is a plausible read inside the statute, but as I say, the statutes are broadly drawn, too broadly drawn, particularly 1503, 18 U.S.C.
00:23:22.000 1503.
00:23:22.000 I mentioned 1512 because that defines attempt earlier.
00:23:28.000 This broadly defined version of obstruction, where the president could undertake an otherwise legal act so long as it is capable of producing an effect, even if it does not directly impede a proceeding, so long as the person acts with an intent to obtain improper advantage, allows the Mueller report to consider whether Trump tweeting about Michael Cohen being a rat or Paul Manafort being a solid citizen amounts to obstruction of justice.
00:23:49.000 The report even says that.
00:23:50.000 I mean, directly.
00:23:51.000 They say, quote, Well, that's an overbroad reading.
00:23:53.000 To my mind, that is an extraordinarily broad reading of obstruction of justice and it is non-prosecutable.
00:23:57.000 to influence the jury.
00:23:58.000 Well, that's an overbroad reading.
00:24:00.000 To my mind, that is an extraordinarily broad reading of obstruction of justice, and it is non-prosecutable.
00:24:05.000 No prosecutor would be able to get that through a court.
00:24:07.000 The president still has First Amendment rights.
00:24:10.000 To suggest that the president publicly criticizing Robert Mueller, which comes up a lot in the report, every time Trump tweeted about Mueller, it's basically named in the report, or publicly praising Paul Manafort, or ripping into Michael Cohen, to say that that amounts to criminal obstruction of justice, that does require an extraordinarily broad reading of obstruction of justice statutes.
00:24:28.000 That's also true of the presidential pardon power and the presidential power to fire.
00:24:32.000 So if the president just fired Mueller, would that be a criminal offense?
00:24:35.000 Probably not.
00:24:35.000 It's impeachable.
00:24:36.000 Certainly, but it's not criminal.
00:24:38.000 We'll get to the impeachment stuff in just a second.
00:24:40.000 Trump has constitutional powers.
00:24:42.000 Simply applying an intent test to those powers turns prosecutors into all-powerful mind readers, which was not what the statutes were designed to do in the first place.
00:24:50.000 A fifth point to be made about the Mueller report, and this one is very controversial.
00:24:54.000 I know for folks on the right, many of whom want to believe that President Trump is as honest as the day is long.
00:25:00.000 Honestly, I would find it difficult to believe that even President Trump would make that argument, but there are people who defend President Trump who suggest that this report really suggests his honesty.
00:25:09.000 There is no way to read the second half of the Mueller Report, Volume 2 of Kill Bill.
00:25:14.000 There is no way to read it.
00:25:16.000 And that is the nexus of obstruction of justice.
00:25:18.000 Urging people to fib to the public.
00:25:19.000 That's something that all presidents do.
00:25:20.000 Now, this is the other point.
00:25:21.000 There is no evidence that he urged other people to lie to investigators.
00:25:24.000 And that is the nexus of obstruction of justice, urging people to fib to the public.
00:25:28.000 That's something that all presidents do.
00:25:30.000 Now, this is the other point.
00:25:32.000 Trump is not unique in this capacity.
00:25:33.000 Barack Obama spent years maintaining he did not have the legal authority to actually do DACA, to just legalize the dreamers.
00:25:41.000 President Obama spent years assuring Americans that if they liked their plan and their doctor, they could keep their plan and their doctor.
00:25:47.000 That was a blatant, overt lie.
00:25:49.000 President Obama and his administration lied for years, that the Iranian government was moderating, and that he had not in fact cut a secret deal with the Iranians to send them pallets of cash.
00:25:58.000 All of this stuff was blatant bullcrap.
00:26:00.000 So all administrations lie, but to pretend that Trump is somehow more honest than other administrations, he's only more honest in the sense that he's pretty open about the fact he does this stuff.
00:26:09.000 And President Trump is extraordinarily cynical about politics.
00:26:12.000 He always has been.
00:26:13.000 It's one of the charms of the man.
00:26:14.000 It's why he used to say during the campaign, Yeah, you know, when I was looking into politics, I used to bribe politicians.
00:26:20.000 I mean, he basically said that straight out.
00:26:21.000 He said, they can't pay me off.
00:26:24.000 I know, because I used to pay them off.
00:26:26.000 That was one of his talking points.
00:26:27.000 So Trump doesn't hide the ball here, but still you have to be kind of stunned by the level of the activity that he was attempting to push down on other members of his team.
00:26:39.000 If the other members of his team had not stopped him, if they'd gone forward with this sort of activity, much, much better case for obstruction of justice.
00:26:45.000 The fact that they did not go forward with it suggests that obstruction of justice is harder to prove.
00:26:50.000 What are some of the activities that I'm talking about?
00:26:52.000 Well, first of all, he acted embarrassingly.
00:26:55.000 Repeatedly with regard to Russia during the 2016 campaign.
00:26:58.000 Now, let me be clear.
00:26:59.000 I'm not saying that President Trump is an embarrassment as president because of this.
00:27:03.000 I'm not saying that President Trump is embarrassing because, like, a lot of his policy is good.
00:27:09.000 Is his activity here immoral?
00:27:12.000 Is his activity here embarrassing?
00:27:13.000 Yes, and he knew it was immoral and embarrassing because then he tried to cover it up with more embarrassing and immoral but non-criminal behavior.
00:27:20.000 This is true for all of his scandals.
00:27:22.000 All of President Trump's scandals begin with President Trump doing something immoral and unethical and very bad and very embarrassing.
00:27:29.000 And then him trying to cover that up with something immoral and bad and very embarrassing.
00:27:33.000 With Stormy Daniels, he strips a porn star while his wife is pregnant.
00:27:37.000 And then he lies about it to the public.
00:27:39.000 He says, I don't even know who Stormy Daniels is.
00:27:41.000 And then it comes out that he paid her.
00:27:42.000 So he did two immoral things.
00:27:43.000 He lied to her, and then he paid her off to shut up.
00:27:46.000 And then he lied about paying her off to shut her up.
00:27:49.000 I mean, so, like, this is what Trump does.
00:27:51.000 He lies, he does a bad thing, and then he lies about the bad thing, and then he lies about the lie, and then it's turtles all the way down.
00:27:56.000 Well, this is sort of the same thing.
00:27:58.000 That doesn't mean that the lies are illegal.
00:27:59.000 It does mean that as moral human beings, we should point out that the president seems to lie a lot, which is true.
00:28:06.000 He acted embarrassingly a lot during the 2016 campaign.
00:28:09.000 He lied about Trump Tower in Moscow to the American public for months.
00:28:13.000 He was praising WikiLeaks, he was suggesting that WikiLeaks was not a Russian friend, he didn't know anything about WikiLeaks, all of that.
00:28:18.000 And then he acted even more embarrassingly and immorally in order to avoid the consequences of his original activity.
00:28:23.000 So, for example, he instructed his own son, Donald Trump Jr., to lie to the press in his statement about the Trump Tower meeting.
00:28:29.000 And Donald Trump Jr.
00:28:31.000 wrote a statement.
00:28:32.000 Trump personally edited the statement and urged him to remove a line That made more clear what the meeting was about.
00:28:39.000 And then, when his press team was queried about it, then President Trump ran away from it and said, I had nothing to do with it.
00:28:44.000 And his press team went out there and repeated the lie.
00:28:46.000 That's bad, right?
00:28:47.000 Can we just say it's bad?
00:28:49.000 Okay, it's not criminal, but just as moral humans, we should be able to say that things are bad.
00:28:54.000 He tried to push his White House counsel, Don McGahn, to lie to the press regarding his desire to fire James Comey and Robert Mueller.
00:29:03.000 He tried via Corey Lewandowski, To push Attorney General Sessions to talk about his innocence and constrict the scope of the Mueller investigation.
00:29:10.000 He tried to have Corey Lewandowski send a letter from him to Sessions trying to dictate what Sessions said.
00:29:16.000 He tried to pressure Sessions to unrecuse himself and publicly browbeat him to do so.
00:29:21.000 A lot of this stuff was happening and we knew about it.
00:29:23.000 He tried to get Don McGahn to fire Mueller based on nonsensical accusations of conflict of interest.
00:29:28.000 All of this is immoral and bad and terrible behavior.
00:29:31.000 He encouraged Sarah Huckabee Sanders to lie about the firing of Comey.
00:29:35.000 Flashback, here's Sarah Huckabee Sanders talking about how the reason that Comey was fired is because he was unpopular inside the FBI and then she admitted in the Mueller report to the Mueller team she had no evidence of this.
00:29:47.000 I've heard from countless members of the FBI that are grateful and thankful for the President's decision.
00:29:53.000 I've certainly heard from a large number of individuals, and that's just myself, and I don't even know that many people in the FBI.
00:29:59.000 You said now today, and I think you said again yesterday, that you personally have talked to countless FBI officials, employees, since this happened.
00:30:10.000 Correct.
00:30:11.000 I mean, really?
00:30:13.000 Between like email, text messages, absolutely.
00:30:18.000 Look, we're not going to get into a numbers game.
00:30:22.000 I mean, I have heard from a large number of individuals that work at the FBI that said that they're very happy with the president's decision.
00:30:30.000 OK, according to the Mueller report, this was nonsense.
00:30:32.000 She told the Mueller report, she told the Mueller team that this was completely baseless, that it was not true.
00:30:37.000 So she was asked about that today.
00:30:38.000 And then she says, well, I'm sorry I wasn't a robot or something.
00:30:41.000 Okay, come on guys.
00:30:42.000 Come on.
00:30:44.000 Why can't you acknowledge that what you said then was not true?
00:30:49.000 I said that the word I used countless, and I also said if you look at what's in quotations for me, it's that, and it's that it was in the heat of the moment, meaning that it wasn't a scripted talking point.
00:31:01.000 I'm sorry that I wasn't a robot like the Democrat Party.
00:31:05.000 Okay, so again, this is not a good defense.
00:31:07.000 President Trump was encouraging his people to lie for him, as I've said before.
00:31:10.000 Obama also encouraged his team to lie for him.
00:31:12.000 I mean, this is something that happened.
00:31:13.000 He asserted executive privilege to protect his own attorney general from a contempt charge from Congress.
00:31:18.000 But we do have to note immorality when it occurs, or we are morally compromised.
00:31:23.000 And this is true for everyone.
00:31:25.000 You can still like his tax cuts.
00:31:27.000 You can still like his foreign policy.
00:31:29.000 You can still like his tweets.
00:31:31.000 You can still like a lot of stuff about President Trump.
00:31:34.000 This report does not reflect well on the president's character.
00:31:36.000 End of story.
00:31:37.000 Okay, now, a couple more points that I want to make about the Mueller report, and then we'll get to all the blowback on the Mueller report.
00:31:42.000 First, running a small business is a lot of work.
00:31:43.000 It takes time, it takes money.
00:31:45.000 You want all the time and money you have to go toward growing your business.
00:31:47.000 But what happens when legal hurdles pop up along the way?
00:31:50.000 LegalZoom is there to help.
00:31:51.000 Nearly 2 million Americans have used LegalZoom to start their businesses, with LLCs, incorporation, and more.
00:31:56.000 Even after your business is set up, LegalZoom can still help you out.
00:31:59.000 Things like lease agreements, changing tax laws, contract reviews, All are part of running your business.
00:32:04.000 And these are precisely the kinds of costly hurdles that can take time away from growing that business, which is why LegalZoom created their business legal plan.
00:32:11.000 Get advice for running your business from legal vet from vetted independent attorneys and tax professionals available in all 50 states.
00:32:18.000 The best part is you're not going to get charged by the hour because LegalZoom is not, in fact, a law firm.
00:32:22.000 Make your time and money work for you.
00:32:25.000 Check out LegalZoom's business legal plan at LegalZoom.com right now.
00:32:28.000 Get special savings when you enter Ben at checkout.
00:32:30.000 That's LegalZoom, where life meets legal.
00:32:32.000 LegalZoom.com, go check them out right now.
00:32:35.000 LegalZoom is great.
00:32:36.000 I mean, I've been using LegalZoom myself for years.
00:32:37.000 As a lawyer, LegalZoom has fantastic, fantastic resources.
00:32:41.000 If you're a non-lawyer, it's even better.
00:32:42.000 Go check them out right now.
00:32:43.000 Check out their business legal plan at LegalZoom.com and get special savings when you enter Ben at checkout.
00:32:48.000 Okay, so I have more to say about the Mueller report, obviously, and more on the blowback, and more on the talk of impeachment.
00:32:55.000 But first, you're going to have to go subscribe.
00:32:56.000 So go check us out right now, Daily Wire, $9.99 a month, $99 a year.
00:33:00.000 And when you spend $99 a year, you get this, the very greatest in beverage vessels.
00:33:03.000 Check it out, the leftist year's hot or cold Tumblr.
00:33:06.000 Now we have something that we do every Friday here on the program.
00:33:09.000 We give a shout out to one of our Daily Wire subscribers today, MSSR Walter on Instagram.
00:33:14.000 There's a lot going on in this picture.
00:33:15.000 For one, Brian does not look happy about his situation.
00:33:17.000 Sorry, Brian.
00:33:17.000 I think he'd rather be drinking from the bottle that is probably next to him.
00:33:19.000 tumblr he will grow to be big and strong with tremendous brain power there's a lot going on in this picture for one brian does not look happy about his situation sorry brian i think he'd rather be drinking from the bottle that is probably next to him second move brian away from the knives I mean, that's true.
00:33:35.000 Childproofing, probably a good idea here.
00:33:37.000 But really, thank you for being a subscriber all the way from Paris too, which is pretty awesome.
00:33:41.000 Certainly Paris is on our mind this week, so this is really great.
00:33:44.000 And you too can enjoy the Leftist Tears Tumblr when you subscribe.
00:33:47.000 And if you send us a photo like this and you hashtag it LeftistTearsTumblr, then you may be featured next week.
00:33:53.000 On the Ben Shapiro show, so who knows?
00:33:55.000 That's pretty awesome.
00:33:56.000 Also, when this kid grows up, this is going to be a treasured possession, I think.
00:33:59.000 I think he's going to hold this in high esteem.
00:34:02.000 So this is very exciting stuff.
00:34:03.000 Also, there's a reason that you should subscribe.
00:34:06.000 Not only do you get two additional hours of the show every day, and yesterday's show was great because we had a bunch of legal experts who were breaking down the Mueller report all day, every day.
00:34:13.000 It was great.
00:34:14.000 You can go check that out.
00:34:15.000 Plus, Get access to Ask Us Questions on Daily Wire backstage, which we did last night to break down the Mueller Report even more, as though you weren't Mueller'd out already.
00:34:25.000 And you get our Sunday special on Saturday.
00:34:27.000 So this week it's Dennis Miller.
00:34:28.000 You get that on Saturday.
00:34:30.000 You get extra segments on the Sunday special.
00:34:32.000 Like, all sorts of goodies for you when you subscribe, so please go do subscribe.
00:34:35.000 It really helps us out, become part of our team.
00:34:37.000 It also helps proof us against the vicissitudes of the left and their attempts to destroy the show, which is pretty ongoing.
00:34:45.000 So, please help us out by joining the team over at dailywire.com.
00:34:48.000 Also, make sure you leave us a review if you subscribe over at YouTube or iTunes.
00:34:51.000 We are the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast and radio show in the nation.
00:34:55.000 All right, a few more points with regard to President Trump and the Mueller report.
00:35:06.000 So, President Trump's team repeatedly stopped him from following through on his worst instincts.
00:35:10.000 And this matters, because the president expressing stupid thoughts, and then people on his team just going, nah.
00:35:16.000 That's not obstruction.
00:35:18.000 Him saying, you know what would be awesome?
00:35:19.000 If you fired Mueller.
00:35:20.000 And then Don McGahn going, you know what?
00:35:22.000 Not doing that.
00:35:22.000 And if you want to do that, you're going to have to fire me too.
00:35:24.000 We're not doing the Saturday Night Massacre here.
00:35:25.000 No.
00:35:27.000 That was good.
00:35:28.000 McGann stopped Trump from firing both Sessions and Mueller.
00:35:31.000 He refused to comply with Trump's order to lie about the Mueller incident in a statement to the public.
00:35:36.000 Jeff Sessions refused to unrecuse himself and fire Mueller.
00:35:38.000 Chris Christie, even Chris Christie, refused to facilitate bizarre phone calls with James Comey.
00:35:43.000 When Chris Christie is saying, dude, you're going too far, you may be going too far.
00:35:47.000 Rick Dearborn refused to threaten Jeff Sessions.
00:35:50.000 Corey Lewandowski refused to directly carry a letter.
00:35:52.000 I mean, when Corey Lewandowski is the angel on your shoulder, you're doing things wrong.
00:35:58.000 James Comey didn't end his investigation of Mike Flynn and Trump didn't pressure him to continue to do so.
00:36:03.000 As the report notes, quote, the president's efforts to influence the investigation were mostly unsuccessful, but that is largely because the persons who surrounded the president declined to carry out orders or accede to his requests.
00:36:14.000 So what that statement is basically saying there for Mueller is, you know, we wish we could charge him with obstruction, but he didn't actually obstruct.
00:36:22.000 And one of the reasons he didn't obstruct is because his team prevented him from doing that, which, good for them.
00:36:27.000 Also, Trump doesn't know what obstruction of justice is.
00:36:30.000 Also, Trump doesn't understand how many things work inside the government, and so he says lots of stuff.
00:36:34.000 There's an upside to that, which is that he violates long-held taboos that happen to be stupid.
00:36:39.000 The downside of that is that he gets himself in trouble an awful lot by violating taboos that are there for a reason.
00:36:44.000 Okay, point number seven on the Mueller report.
00:36:47.000 Trump probably was not trying to cover anything up.
00:36:49.000 He was just correctly pissed off.
00:36:51.000 Okay, this one is absolutely true.
00:36:53.000 I've been saying this since the day he fired James Comey.
00:36:55.000 Go back and listen to the podcast.
00:36:57.000 I've been saying this for absolutely years at this point.
00:37:01.000 This was William Barr's point.
00:37:03.000 It is true.
00:37:04.000 Take, for example, Trump's reaction to Mueller's appointment.
00:37:08.000 Now, the media are taking this wildly out of context.
00:37:10.000 According to the report, Trump apparently, quote, slumped in his chair and then shouted, Oh my God, this is terrible.
00:37:17.000 This is the end of my presidency.
00:37:19.000 I'm...
00:37:19.000 Trump then added, Everyone tells me if you get one of these independent councils, it ruins your presidency.
00:37:26.000 It takes years and years, and I won't be able to do anything.
00:37:29.000 This is the worst thing that ever happened to me.
00:37:32.000 The worst.
00:37:33.000 And I've been through two divorces, man.
00:37:35.000 So, you know, that last line right there, that's the one that matters.
00:37:39.000 So the press took that first line out of context, the one where it says that he is effed, this is the end of my presidency.
00:37:45.000 They took that out of context to suggest that the president of the United States was saying he's guilty of something and now Mueller is going to uncover the guilt and now he is obstructing because Mueller is going to uncover the guilt.
00:37:54.000 But that's not what he's saying at all.
00:37:56.000 What Trump is saying rightly is that this entire investigation is stupid.
00:38:00.000 There's no reason for the collusion investigation because there's nothing there.
00:38:03.000 And now this is going to drag out.
00:38:05.000 It's going to cost everybody millions of dollars.
00:38:06.000 I'm going to lose staff because you have to pay your own lawyers.
00:38:09.000 I'm going to lose people.
00:38:10.000 I'm not going to be able to get anything through.
00:38:11.000 The media are going to spend all their days fulminating over nonsense.
00:38:14.000 It's going to be the end of my presidency.
00:38:16.000 That's what Trump was saying.
00:38:17.000 That is not only not unreasonable, that is factually true.
00:38:20.000 So when Trump said that, and then the media doing what the media do, take that out of context to suggest this was some sort of admission of guilt.
00:38:28.000 It's an absurdity on its face.
00:38:30.000 Again, note Trump didn't say he was upset Mueller might find something.
00:38:33.000 He was worried about the time suck.
00:38:35.000 Trump routinely expressed his anger that the Mueller investigation kept going.
00:38:38.000 He was pissed at James Comey for failing to publicly declare he wasn't under investigation, which would have been true.
00:38:44.000 He was enraged at Jeff Session for failing to limit the scope of the investigation, which is also true.
00:38:49.000 Again, no underlying collusion to cover up.
00:38:51.000 This was Trump lashing out.
00:38:53.000 End of story.
00:38:53.000 His aides stopped him and Trump tweeting his rage at the universe.
00:38:56.000 That's not corrupt intent.
00:38:57.000 It's immature.
00:38:58.000 It's bad, but it is totally understandable rage combined with ignorance about the nature of the presidency and his job description.
00:39:05.000 Just a second.
00:39:06.000 A little bit more on the Mueller report.
00:39:08.000 And here we get to the crux of the matter.
00:39:09.000 What is Mueller doing with this report?
00:39:12.000 This is the crux of the matter.
00:39:13.000 What is Mueller actually doing with the report?
00:39:16.000 So the first half of the report, Mueller does his job.
00:39:19.000 He checks into collusion, and then he says, not evidence sufficient to prosecute, effectively exoneration.
00:39:26.000 Second half of the report is him naming incident after incident after incident in which Trump acted badly, but borderline non-criminally, meaning that President Trump told people to lie to the media.
00:39:38.000 Bad, not criminal.
00:39:39.000 President Trump told Katie McFarland he wanted her to write a memo.
00:39:43.000 That was false.
00:39:44.000 She refused.
00:39:45.000 Borderline criminal, not actually criminal, because no corrupt intent and no actual work product.
00:39:51.000 And this sort of thing runs through.
00:39:54.000 I mean, this is the common thread that runs through here.
00:39:56.000 So Mueller had basically four choices here.
00:39:59.000 He had four choices after looking at all the material.
00:40:01.000 Choice number one, recommend obstruction of justice charges against the president.
00:40:05.000 Now, there are some burdens that prevent him from doing that.
00:40:08.000 One, an obstruction of justice charge is very difficult to prove.
00:40:11.000 Two, an obstruction of justice charge against the president of the United States exercising his lawful authority under the executive branch is very difficult to prove and the president's own branch indicting him.
00:40:22.000 for obstruction of justice is questionable at best.
00:40:26.000 It's a kind of weird legal theory.
00:40:28.000 And Mueller even says that.
00:40:29.000 He says, we could recommend that obstruction of justice charges be brought against him, but they may not be able to be brought until after he is no longer president.
00:40:37.000 If he's in the White House, then that provides him with a certain level of immunity.
00:40:40.000 So there are a bunch of problems with option number one, recommend obstruction of justice charges.
00:40:45.000 Option number two, say not evidence-sufficient to prosecute.
00:40:49.000 Now, this is the one that actually applies.
00:40:52.000 Because there is not evidence sufficient to prosecute.
00:40:54.000 I've talked to several prosecutors over the last 24 hours.
00:40:57.000 I don't know a prosecutor who would have been able to successfully prosecute this case or even would have taken this case.
00:41:03.000 There is just too much reasonable doubt.
00:41:05.000 In fact, this is basically a 50-50 coin flip at best for the prosecution.
00:41:09.000 I think it's more like a 20-80 coin flip for the prosecution.
00:41:12.000 It's a weighted coin.
00:41:15.000 Because the most plausible explanation for all of Trump's behavior is not corrupt intent, it's dude's pissed off and immature, and so he does pissed off immature things.
00:41:23.000 And that's, that's the best explanation.
00:41:25.000 So that was option number two.
00:41:26.000 And Mueller didn't take it.
00:41:28.000 Which brings us to option number three.
00:41:30.000 Him just saying, there's nothing here, acquittal, exonerated, be on your way.
00:41:35.000 He wasn't going to say that, because Mueller uncovered all of this activity and he didn't like the activity, and so he wasn't just going to say there's nothing here.
00:41:42.000 So again, of the three options stated so far, number two was the best.
00:41:45.000 The second option was the best.
00:41:47.000 That option that stated that there was not sufficient evidence to prosecute.
00:41:51.000 Because not sufficient evidence to prosecute is accurate.
00:41:54.000 It doesn't mean there's no evidence.
00:41:55.000 It doesn't mean that Trump did everything right.
00:41:57.000 It just means you can't prosecute this because there's not enough evidence to win a conviction.
00:42:02.000 That's the right answer.
00:42:03.000 That is not what Mueller did.
00:42:04.000 What Mueller did instead, as Andy McCarthy has pointed out at New York Post, instead what Mueller did is something different.
00:42:10.000 Mueller said, you know what?
00:42:12.000 Here's all the evidence.
00:42:13.000 Go with God.
00:42:14.000 Up to you, man.
00:42:15.000 You do what you're going to do.
00:42:17.000 That's not his job.
00:42:18.000 His job is to recommend either a thumbs up or a thumbs down.
00:42:21.000 That's it.
00:42:21.000 That is his job.
00:42:23.000 Which means that what Mueller is actually doing here, and pretty much everybody is onto the game, what Mueller and his team are doing here is they don't like Trump very much.
00:42:31.000 They think that Trump is corrupt.
00:42:32.000 They think that Trump is a liar.
00:42:34.000 They think that Trump was, in fact, attempting to obstruct justice, but they don't have evidence sufficient to prosecute.
00:42:38.000 So instead of just saying, no evidence sufficient to prosecute, they say, it's on you.
00:42:43.000 Which means, here's the grounds for impeachment.
00:42:46.000 If you wish to move forward with an impeachment, this is the way to do it.
00:42:50.000 That's what Mueller is doing here.
00:42:52.000 Andy McCarthy correctly writes, if special counsel Mueller believed there was an obstruction offense, he should have had the courage of his convictions and recommended charging the president.
00:42:59.000 Since he wasn't convinced there was enough evidence to charge, he should have said he wasn't recommending charges.
00:43:04.000 But he didn't do either of those things, which means he copped out because what he actually wants is an impeachment hearing on all of these things.
00:43:12.000 So the question is, did Mueller abdicate his responsibility here?
00:43:17.000 What is his actual responsibility here?
00:43:18.000 So the case in favor of Mueller, to be fair to him, is that the immense public scrutiny on this investigation meant that his report was going to be public.
00:43:27.000 And because his report was going to be public, he did not want to be in a position of acquitting the president on charges.
00:43:33.000 He felt that his job here was not, in fact, to recommend an up or down.
00:43:38.000 It was to provide the information to the American public.
00:43:40.000 That was half his job.
00:43:41.000 Now, that really should not be his job.
00:43:43.000 Remember, this started off as a counterintelligence investigation, trying to uncover nefarious activities by foreigners interfering in American elections, and it morphed into a criminal investigation.
00:43:53.000 Under the auspices of a criminal investigation, as McCarthy says, this should be an up-or-down thing.
00:43:59.000 This should be up or down.
00:44:01.000 But it is not up or down.
00:44:02.000 Why isn't it up or down?
00:44:03.000 Why is it that both James Comey and now Robert Mueller are playing the same game?
00:44:08.000 Really, the same game.
00:44:09.000 James Comey, in 2016, famously went out there and laid forth all the grounds for Hillary Clinton's guilt and then said, not recommending prosecution.
00:44:17.000 And people went, wait, what the hell?
00:44:20.000 And there are people who are fighting mad on the left at Comey saying, why did you lay out all the grounds?
00:44:25.000 If you're not recommending prosecution, just say no prosecution recommended.
00:44:29.000 Why are you laying out all the reasons she's guilty?
00:44:31.000 Mueller basically does the same thing here, except kind of in reverse.
00:44:34.000 He says, here are all the reasons that Trump is guilty and I'm not going to let him off the hook.
00:44:39.000 Right?
00:44:39.000 That is what Mueller is doing here.
00:44:40.000 Why is that the job of the FBI?
00:44:43.000 The answer is it's not the job of the FBI.
00:44:45.000 The job of the FBI is not to do this.
00:44:48.000 Now, maybe the FBI feels a newfound public responsibility to be the public relations branch of every investigation.
00:44:55.000 But the problem is that because this investigation was run that way, that's one of the things that led President Trump to be as obstructive and thwarting In his attitude as he was.
00:45:08.000 It's what led to his antagonism.
00:45:09.000 Because Trump felt correctly throughout the entire investigation that every five minutes somebody was leaking something about Trump-Russia collusion or obstruction to the press.
00:45:18.000 And then he got even more upset.
00:45:20.000 And he got more paranoid.
00:45:21.000 And this led him to be more antagonistic.
00:45:24.000 If the FBI did its job, they would have just recommended an up or down.
00:45:27.000 This is true for both Hillary, and it's true for Trump as well.
00:45:29.000 They did not.
00:45:30.000 They came out publicly, and they exposed all of this information.
00:45:33.000 Now, I thought that that was a good idea, and I still think it's a good idea for all the information to be in the public eye, because this is what we expect.
00:45:38.000 But, as a balance of powers question, this is inside Congress's purview.
00:45:42.000 It is not the job of the FBI to provide the grounds for impeachment.
00:45:46.000 It is up to the FBI to provide the grounds for a criminal indictment.
00:45:48.000 If that is not forthcoming, Then they were really supposed to shut up.
00:45:52.000 The fact the process works the way it works is not on Mueller.
00:45:55.000 It is an indictment of the entire system, which should not work this way.
00:45:58.000 If Congress wants to subpoena people and create grounds for impeachment, that is their job.
00:46:03.000 It's not up to the executive branch to do the dirty work of providing the grid work for getting rid of other members of the executive branch on behalf of the legislature.
00:46:10.000 It's a serious balance of powers problem.
00:46:12.000 Okay, time for some things I like and then some things that I hate.
00:46:16.000 So, things that I like today.
00:46:18.000 So, starting tonight, it is Pesach, it is Passover.
00:46:22.000 Obviously, this is a rich and worthwhile holiday.
00:46:26.000 It's, I think, my favorite holiday.
00:46:27.000 There are two that compete for it in Judaism.
00:46:30.000 One is Sukkot, which is the festival of booths, and the other one is Passover.
00:46:34.000 Passover is great because the kids really, really get into it.
00:46:37.000 The whole night is really about getting kids to and getting kids to engage and ask questions and learn the story of their heritage.
00:46:45.000 And it's really fantastic.
00:46:46.000 So you can go get, you should go, honestly, everybody should own a copy of a Haggadah.
00:46:50.000 Or a Haggadah, as the Ashkenazim say Haggadah and the Sephardim say Haggadah.
00:46:55.000 So in any case, you should go get a Haggadah.
00:46:58.000 It's really cool.
00:46:59.000 It tells you the whole story of the Exodus in a really creative and interesting way.
00:47:03.000 If you've never been to a Seder, you should go to a Seder, whether you are a Jew or a non-Jew.
00:47:07.000 We've had non-Jews to our Seder for many years, and it's really great.
00:47:10.000 People want to engage with their heritage.
00:47:12.000 By the way, the reason that Good Friday happens to usually coincide with Passover is because the Last Supper was presumably a Passover meal.
00:47:21.000 It was supposed to be a Pesach Seder.
00:47:24.000 It's really cool.
00:47:24.000 So if you're trying to reacquaint yourself with your roots, go check it out right now.
00:47:27.000 Also, today happens to be the, let's see, 1943.
00:47:31.000 1943.
00:47:33.000 So it happens to be the 70...
00:47:35.000 Why am I not able to do math today?
00:47:39.000 I'm out of it.
00:47:41.000 The 76th anniversary of the beginning of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, which took place on the second night of Passover.
00:47:50.000 Great story of heroism.
00:47:51.000 Very cool thing happening this year.
00:47:52.000 The first Seder is being held in the Warsaw Ghetto area.
00:47:56.000 Since the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising in the middle of World War II.
00:48:02.000 One of the great stories of Jewish heroism in history.
00:48:05.000 People standing up to the Nazis and fighting them.
00:48:08.000 The fact that Jews have clung to the Haggadah, they've clung to their story for thousands of years despite enormous persecution.
00:48:14.000 It is one of the great stories of human history.
00:48:16.000 So go check it out.
00:48:17.000 It's really cool.
00:48:18.000 Okay, time for a quick thing that I hate.
00:48:24.000 Okay, so a quick thing that I hate today.
00:48:27.000 Well, first of all, the entire media is suggesting that impeachment should be on the table when they really don't have the grounds for impeachment.
00:48:34.000 But the other kind of silly thing that I hate today is we now have to retroactively go back and dig up people's bodies to yell at them.
00:48:42.000 This is the new thing.
00:48:43.000 So the Yankees have decided they are no longer going to play Kate Smith's rendition of God Bless America.
00:48:49.000 After learning her history of racist song lyrics.
00:48:52.000 She was a famous singer during World War II and usually they play her version of God Bless America.
00:48:58.000 But apparently, she was a famous singer and previously recorded a song titled, Piccaninny Heaven.
00:49:03.000 The tune was directed at colored children who had fantasized about an amazing place with great big watermelons.
00:49:08.000 And the video that accompanied the song was shot in an orphanage for black kids and included imagery that was startlingly racist.
00:49:15.000 Smith also reportedly recorded a tune called, That's Why Darkies Were Born, which includes the lyric, someone had to pick the cotton, that's why darkies were born.
00:49:21.000 So that is indeed super racist.
00:49:24.000 Also, this lady's been dead for half a century.
00:49:27.000 So, are we just looking for excuses to be pissed off right now?
00:49:30.000 Like, if we're really going to spend all of our time digging up old bodies and yelling at them, and then wiping away the contributions that we like from history, we do have to, to a certain extent, separate the art from the artist.
00:49:42.000 There are lots of bad people who have been artists.
00:49:44.000 Lots of people who believe terrible things.
00:49:47.000 Who have provided art that we really enjoy.
00:49:49.000 Is the idea that we are no longer allowed to enjoy their art because they said bad things in the past?
00:49:53.000 I enjoy a lot of the art created by open communists during the 1950s.
00:49:58.000 Do I have to not enjoy the music of Dmitry Tyomkin anymore?
00:50:02.000 Am I supposed to pretend that I hate John Wayne movies because he gave a bad Playboy interview in 1972?
00:50:06.000 Is that the way this is going to go?
00:50:10.000 And are you really angry at Kate Smith?
00:50:11.000 I mean, really, are you angry at Kate Smith today?
00:50:14.000 You can say that she was bad, because that sounds like pretty bad stuff to me.
00:50:18.000 You can say that that was immoral stuff at the time, which it sounds like it was.
00:50:22.000 Are you really angry at her?
00:50:23.000 Like, is this what you're going to spend your day doing?
00:50:24.000 And every time you hear her sing that song, do you think, aw, there's that vicious, racist Kate Smith?
00:50:28.000 Or do you think, oh, listen, somebody's singing God Bless America in a nice way.
00:50:32.000 Cool.
00:50:33.000 The fact that we are now going through history to dig up all the bad things of the past?
00:50:37.000 Why don't we start with the songwriters?
00:50:38.000 There are plenty of songwriters who have done terrible, terrible things over the course of history.
00:50:42.000 Virtually every composer, many composers, were not very nice human beings.
00:50:47.000 At what level do we stop doing this?
00:50:50.000 It makes for a worse world.
00:50:51.000 If you are looking for reasons to be offended, you will certainly find them, but I would suggest that you're not gonna live a very happy life if you do.
00:50:57.000 Alrighty, so we will be back here next week with much more.
00:51:01.000 So I'm not doing the radio show next week because of Passover.
00:51:03.000 I will still be here every week that is not a Yom Tov for the podcast, Yom Tov, meaning a holiday.
00:51:08.000 And so we will see you here next week.
00:51:10.000 If you're celebrating Passover, have a wonderful Passover.
00:51:12.000 If you are celebrating Easter in the upcoming future, have a wonderful Easter.
00:51:16.000 Really, it's a great time of the year.
00:51:19.000 Enjoy your weekend, and we'll be back here to tell you about everything that's happening on Monday.
00:51:23.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:51:24.000 This is the Ben Shapiro Show.
00:51:26.000 This is the Ben Shapiro Show.
00:51:33.000 Executive producer, Jeremy Boring.
00:51:35.000 Senior producer, Jonathan Hay.
00:51:36.000 Our supervising producer is Mathis Glover.
00:51:38.000 And our technical producer is Austin Stevens.
00:51:40.000 Edited by Adam Sajovic.
00:51:42.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Karamina.
00:51:43.000 Hair and makeup is by Jesua Olvera.
00:51:45.000 Production assistant, Nick Sheehan.
00:51:46.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire production.
00:51:49.000 Copyright, Daily Wire 2019.
00:51:52.000 Hey guys, over on the Matt Wall Show today, the media has coincidentally, magically, stopped suddenly talking about collusion.
00:51:58.000 Now that Trump has been vindicated of the charge, they're not talking about it anymore.
00:52:02.000 So we'll discuss that.
00:52:03.000 Also, a truly horrific story out of Bangladesh that I think proves, yet again, that we should not engage in cultural relativism.