The Ben Shapiro Show - May 08, 2020


Flynn Goes Free | Ep. 1007


Episode Stats

Length

58 minutes

Words per Minute

214.47786

Word Count

12,597

Sentence Count

892

Misogynist Sentences

10

Hate Speech Sentences

5


Summary

Former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn is exonerated by the Justice Department. Democrats insist on a continued lockdown with no alternative plan. And Tara Reid speaks out. Ben Shapiro's show is sponsored by ExpressVPN. Don't like the government spying on you? Well, visit ExpressVPN to stay anonymous. And don't forget to use the promo code "ELISSA" to receive $10 and contribute $10 to The Green New Deal, a pro-choice organization that fights for equal rights for women and their equal pay. Click here to find out more about your ad choices. And if you like what you hear, please HIT SUBSCRIBE and also, consider leaving us a five star rating and a review of our podcast on Apple Podcasts and wherever else you get your shows. Thanks for listening and Good Luck Out There! Your continued support is so appreciated, we'll make sure to keep bringing you high quality, high-quality episodes throughout the rest of our week. Thank you so much for all the support you've shown us throughout the year, and we'll keep on coming back for more episodes, you're the greatest support we can all get in the next few months. -Ben Shapiro's Weekly newsletter, The Ben Shapiro Show, The Six Figures Project, and Good Morning America. Thank you, Tara Reid, and Thank you for being a Friend of The FiveThirtyEight and Good Ol Ol Ol' - Thank you to all the people who've given us a chance to help us make this podcast a little bit more of a better place to grow and grow a bigger, more of this place, and thank you for supporting us, and thanks to all of you'll get a bigger chance to come out, and more of your support, and it's a bigger place, Good Morning Out, and a chance out, Good Day Out, Thanks, Good Night Out, Thank You, Good Blessings, and Thanks, Thank Good Night, Good Review, Good Effie, Thank Day, Good Rest, Good R SUPPORT, etc., and Good Day, Thank & Good Bless, Thank Bless, Good G Review, etc. -- etc., etc., Good Morning, Good Luck, Good N Night, Bless, & Much Bless, Goodbye, Good EGGS, Good M Effie & Good G Night, Thank Or Good R R R SUPPORTED, Good PR SUPPORT, Good KEEPS, Good P SUPPORT, AND Good G CHE CHEET AND FOTTERTER, MAGTERRY, MAGIC AND KELLY AND FOG DAYTERTER AND KEPTER, AND KEEP CHEERTER, GOOD R SUPPORTING CHEOTTER AND GOOD NECK, AND FALLY AND GOTTER CHELLER AND KETTER AND FANTER AND RALLY AND SUPPORTED AND SUPPORTING ME AND A MAG AND A CHOTTER & FOTCH AND A SUPPORTED COLL AND A FOT CHERTER AND A PODCAST AND A LOT AND A LOT MORE AND SO MUCH SO MUCH SUPPORT AND A FRIENDS AND A GOOD NOUGTER AND GALLY AND A QOT HEET AND A RALLYING OUT AND A PLOT AND APOTHE AND A TOT AND G AND A REALLY AND A S NOT QOT AND CHOT AND AND SO AND AND AND A SO AND A ME AND F AND A AND A NA CHOT CHE AND A M AND A ... AND A MA AND A THOT AND Q AND A THAT AND A FINALLY AND AND T AND A ORALLY AND S AND A NOT THAT AND AN AND A TO AND A BUT NOT AND A MOVIE AND A PAQ AND A BALLY AND APOLOGY AND A SPOT AND ME AND APET THAT AND AND ALL AND AND OTHER AND A FEED AND A COURTER AND APHER TO THAT AND FINALLY A LOT AND A LIKE THAT AND F OUT AND APELL AND AP AND A......) )


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn is exonerated by the Justice Department.
00:00:04.000 Democrats insist on a continued lockdown with no alternative plan.
00:00:07.000 And Tara Reid speaks out.
00:00:08.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:08.000 This is the Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:10.000 This show is sponsored by ExpressVPN.com.
00:00:18.000 Don't like the government spying on you?
00:00:19.000 Well, visit ExpressVPN.com slash Ben to stay anonymous.
00:00:24.000 Okay, so we will get to everything coronavirus related because the new economic reports are just as stunning and shocking as people thought they would be.
00:00:29.000 We now have Great Depression level unemployment in this country.
00:00:32.000 We went over the course of six weeks from 3.5% unemployment to 14.7% unemployment, which are levels not recorded since the Great Depression.
00:00:40.000 Are we allowed to talk about ending this lockdown yet?
00:00:42.000 Are we allowed to talk about it?
00:00:43.000 Or are you just going to scream that we're killing grandma if we even have discussions about how to responsibly reopen?
00:00:48.000 We will get to that.
00:00:48.000 But the big story of the day yesterday is that the Department of Justice dropped the case against Michael Flynn, President Trump's former National Security Advisor, to recap what happened with Michael Flynn.
00:00:59.000 Basically, Michael Flynn had been put in place as the National Security Advisor, the incoming National Security Advisor for President Trump.
00:01:07.000 Fairly significant questions about whether that was a good pick, considering that Michael Flynn was very friendly with Russia today.
00:01:12.000 He was very friendly with the government of Turkey.
00:01:14.000 There were questions about those sorts of associations.
00:01:16.000 But aside from that, he had a call with Sergey Kislyak, who was the Russian ambassador.
00:01:20.000 That was not illegal.
00:01:21.000 He was the incoming Trump National Security Advisor.
00:01:23.000 Not illegal for him to talk to to Sergei Kislyak.
00:01:26.000 Apparently, he was talking with Kislyak about sanctions with regard to Israel or UN UN sanctions with regard to Israel, UN resolutions with regard to Israel.
00:01:34.000 That was happening simultaneous with the Obama administration attempting at the very last minute to basically pull the rug out from under Israel.
00:01:40.000 So he was calling up Kislyak and they were having a negotiation about all of this.
00:01:44.000 He was called in front of the FBI.
00:01:46.000 The FBI went and visited with him.
00:01:47.000 And when they visited with him, they said, don't worry, we're not investigating you or anybody close to you.
00:01:51.000 We're just here for like a friendly chat.
00:01:53.000 And in the middle of that chat, they asked him whether he'd had a conversation with Kislyak.
00:01:56.000 This is in the middle of the entire Trump is Russian cat's paw.
00:02:00.000 Obviously, this election only went the way it did because of Russian interference.
00:02:03.000 And they asked him if he had talked with Kislyak.
00:02:05.000 And he said he had not talked with Kislyak.
00:02:07.000 And that meantime, by the way, they had been basically threatening him that if he had talked of Kislyak, he might have violated the Logan Act.
00:02:14.000 The Logan Act is a century and a half old piece of legislation that is overwhelmingly believed to be by legal scholars unconstitutional.
00:02:21.000 It basically says that if you're an American citizen, you can't carry out your own foreign policy.
00:02:25.000 Not only is he an American citizen, though, he was the incoming national security advisor.
00:02:28.000 There's nothing remotely illegal about him talking with the Russian ambassador.
00:02:32.000 So he fibbed to the FBI, right?
00:02:33.000 That is the part that is undisputed, is he fibbed to the FBI.
00:02:35.000 Then it comes out that there are all sorts of documents that make it look like the FBI is attempting to get him to fib to the FBI simply so that they can then turn him against other members of the Trump administration and maybe start moving up the food chain toward President Trump in their quixotic quest to get Trump on Trump-Russia collusion.
00:02:53.000 Well, it turns out that after three years of this, basically bankrupting Michael Flynn, after three years of him being in danger of having to go to jail for violation of fibbing to the FBI, and I say fibbing as opposed to lying because it's sort of a fib when you lie about something non-material, right?
00:03:09.000 It's a lie when you lie about something material, like there's an underlying crime.
00:03:12.000 Did you do the drug deal?
00:03:13.000 Like, nope, didn't do the drug deal.
00:03:14.000 Turns out you did the drug deal, right?
00:03:15.000 That's lying to the FBI in pursuit of a crime.
00:03:18.000 If they ask you, did you eat ice cream yesterday?
00:03:20.000 And you're like, nope, didn't eat ice cream yesterday.
00:03:22.000 Eating ice cream was not a crime.
00:03:23.000 That's why I'm using the term fibbing as opposed to lying.
00:03:26.000 I am deliberately downplaying the extent of the lie because I do not think that this was a material lie and neither did the DOJ.
00:03:32.000 According to National Review, the Justice Department yesterday moved to withdraw its case against the former Trump National Security Advisor, citing newly discovered and disclosed information according to a new court filing.
00:03:41.000 The move was first reported by the Associated Press.
00:03:43.000 It came less than an hour after the top prosecutor on the case, a guy named Brandon Van Graak, submitted his withdrawal from the case.
00:03:49.000 It's pretty obvious he knew what was coming down the pike, and he decided he was going to withdraw as a sign of protest.
00:03:53.000 The decision said that the White House interview Flynn gave to the FBI, which ultimately led to his guilty plea, was conducted without any legitimate investigative basis.
00:04:00.000 In other words, even before the FBI went and talked with Flynn, there had been recommendations to shut down any investigation of Flynn.
00:04:06.000 And then they reopened it specifically because they thought that perhaps they could sort of bully Flynn into either lying or into turning on people inside the Trump administration.
00:04:14.000 We'll get to more of this in just one second because this is leading to accusations of politicization of the DOJ.
00:04:20.000 The only thing I can say to that is, have you heard of Janet Reno?
00:04:23.000 A former Attorney General under Bill Clinton.
00:04:24.000 Have you heard of Eric Holder?
00:04:26.000 Have you heard of Loretta Lynch?
00:04:27.000 That's not whataboutism.
00:04:28.000 It's just to point out that if this DOJ is politicized, which I think, frankly, this is a less politicized DOJ than anything coming out of the Obama administration.
00:04:36.000 If you're talking about the dangers of a politicized DOJ, you might want to start a little bit earlier than the last five minutes.
00:04:42.000 Anyway, we'll get to all that in just one second.
00:04:44.000 First, let us talk about the fact that now, with this level of economic uncertainty, You need to be on top of your business.
00:04:49.000 You just cannot afford to not approach your business in granular fashion, particularly when it comes to your data.
00:04:54.000 You need to know everything there is to know about your business.
00:04:57.000 This is why you need NetSuite by Oracle.
00:04:58.000 It's the world's number one cloud business system.
00:05:00.000 With NetSuite, we give you financials, cash flow, payroll, inventory, and more, all in one place, so you have clear visibility and total control of your business.
00:05:07.000 NetSuite customers have the flexibility to work from anywhere with immediate clarity on critical information directly at their fingertips.
00:05:13.000 No more waiting.
00:05:13.000 No more guessing.
00:05:14.000 Make smarter decisions with confidence because you know everything there is to know about your business.
00:05:18.000 Join over 20,000 companies who trust NetSuite to stay in control.
00:05:20.000 Here at The Daily Wire, we are focused in extraordinary fashion on our data, but we also don't have a hairball of systems.
00:05:26.000 If you've got a hairball of systems, you're doing 10 different systems to keep track of your data.
00:05:29.000 You're making a mistake.
00:05:30.000 Head on over to NetSuite right now.
00:05:31.000 Receive your free guide, Managing Business Uncertainty.
00:05:34.000 Schedule your free product tour right now at NetSuite.com slash Shapiro.
00:05:38.000 Don't wait to get that free guide.
00:05:39.000 Schedule your free product tour.
00:05:40.000 NetSuite.com slash Shapiro.
00:05:42.000 N-E-T-S-U-I-T-E dot com slash Shapiro.
00:05:45.000 NetSuite.com slash Shapiro.
00:05:47.000 Get that free guide, Managing Business Uncertainty.
00:05:49.000 Schedule that free product tour right now.
00:05:50.000 NetSuite.com slash Shapiro.
00:05:52.000 Stay on top of the content that you need about your own business over at NetSuite.
00:05:56.000 Okay.
00:05:58.000 The DOJ puts out a decision letter, and the decision letter says that Flynn entered a guilty plea, which he has since sought to withdraw, to a single count of making false statements, in a January 24, 2017 interview with investigators of the FBI.
00:06:12.000 This crime, however, requires the statement to not be simply false, but materially false, with respect to a matter under investigation.
00:06:17.000 That is the law.
00:06:19.000 Again, it has to be false with respect to a matter under investigation.
00:06:22.000 The government has determined, pursuant to the principles of federal prosecution based on extensive review, that continued prosecution of this case would not serve the interests of justice.
00:06:30.000 Materiality, said the DOJ, is an essential element of the offense.
00:06:34.000 Materiality, moreover, requires more than mere relevance or relatedness to the matter being investigated.
00:06:38.000 It requires probative weight, whereby the statement is reasonably likely to influence the tribunal in making a determination required to be made.
00:06:46.000 And they're saying that this is not something that happened.
00:06:48.000 They say, after a considered review of all the facts and circumstances of this case, including newly discovered and disclosed information appended to the defendant's supplemental pleadings, and basically it was only in the last couple of weeks that the government finally turned over to the defense all of these relevant documents, the government has concluded that the interview of Flynn was untethered to and unjustified by the FBI's counterintelligence investigation into Mr. Flynn, a no longer justifiably predicated investigation that the FBI had, in the Bureau's own words, prepared to close.
00:07:15.000 Because it had yielded in absence of any derogatory information.
00:07:20.000 In early January, the FBI had said, we're going to close this thing.
00:07:22.000 The government is not persuaded that the January 24th, 2017 interview was conducted with a legitimate investigative basis and therefore does not believe Mr. Flynn's statements were material, even if untrue.
00:07:31.000 Moreover, we do not believe that the government can prove either the relevant false statements or their materiality beyond a reasonable doubt.
00:07:39.000 So here is the background as the DOJ lays it out.
00:07:43.000 The FBI opened a counterintelligence investigation into Flynn on August 16th, 2016, as part of the larger Crossfire Hurricane Umbrella investigation into the presidential campaign of President Trump and its coordination with Russian officials.
00:07:54.000 Codenamed Crossfire Razor, the investigation's stated goal was to determine whether Flynn was directed and controlled by and or coordinated activities with the Russian Federation in a manner which is a threat to the national security or possible violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act.
00:08:07.000 In addition to the predication for opening Crossfire Hurricane, which didn't identify Flynn, The FBI predicated the counterintelligence investigation of him on an articulable factual basis that consisted of three facts.
00:08:18.000 Flynn's service as a foreign policy advisor to the Trump campaign, his publicly documented connection to state-affiliated Russian entities, and the fact that he traveled to Russia in December 2015.
00:08:26.000 Now, after four months of investigation, the FBI came up with nothing.
00:08:29.000 And they found that he was no longer a viable candidate as part of the larger crossfire hurricane umbrella case they prepared to close the investigation.
00:08:36.000 At some point prior to January 4th, 2017, the FBI even crafted a closing communication to affect the termination of the case.
00:08:44.000 The document noted the specific goal and predication for the investigation.
00:08:47.000 It laid out the numerous searches of holdings and investigative steps that yielded no derogatory information on Flynn.
00:08:52.000 It stated that the investigation had failed to produce any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts.
00:08:58.000 It noted no interview of Flynn was required as part of the case closing procedure.
00:09:02.000 And then they said the FBI is closing the investigation.
00:09:05.000 Before the intended case closing actually took effect, the FBI learned that Flynn had talked to Kislyak in December 2016.
00:09:11.000 By this time, of course, Flynn had already been named by Trump the incoming National Security Advisor.
00:09:16.000 The FBI had the transcripts of the relevant calls.
00:09:19.000 Believing that the counterintelligence of Flynn was to be closed, the FBI leadership determined to continue its investigation of Flynn on the basis of the calls and considered opening a new criminal investigation based solely on the Logan Act.
00:09:30.000 And this is where you get into complete BS.
00:09:31.000 Again, the Logan Act has not been prosecuted successfully in a hundred years.
00:09:35.000 Like really, it's never been prosecuted successfully, not once.
00:09:38.000 On January 4th, 2017, FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok learned that the closure had not been timely executed, the counterintelligence investigation into Flynn was formally still open.
00:09:49.000 Strzok immediately relayed the serendipitously good news to Lisa Page, the special counsel to FBI Director Andrew McCabe, remarking, Page reacted with surprise and relief.
00:09:59.000 Strzok instructed agents to keep it open for now at the behest of the seventh floor.
00:10:03.000 Strzok indicated there was a need to decide what to do with him.
00:10:05.000 Other internal FBI messages from that afternoon reflect apparently related conversations about a potential interview.
00:10:11.000 As of January 4th, the FBI kept its counterintelligence investigation into Flynn open, based solely on his calls with Kislyak.
00:10:19.000 On January 12th, the Washington Post reported those communications between Flynn and Kislyak.
00:10:24.000 The next day, Sean Spicer, spokesperson for the Trump transition, clarified the communications had involved only logistics that seemed to contradict the nature of the calls.
00:10:31.000 And then VP Pence stated in a news interview that Flynn had suggested his conversation with Kislyak did not relate to sanctions.
00:10:37.000 Around that time, FBI Director Comey advised DOJ leadership of its investigation into Flynn, and senior officials at the FBI and DOJ had concerns that the incumbent White House official's descriptions of Flynn's calls with Kislyak were not accurate.
00:10:48.000 Comey took the position the FBI would not notify the incoming Trump administration of the Flynn-Kislyak communications.
00:10:54.000 Okay, so now what we have is they think that Flynn lied to members of the administration, but they have the transcripts of the calls.
00:11:00.000 They know that he didn't do anything that actually violated the Logan Act or broke the law, but they're seeing daylight between the Trump administration and Flynn.
00:11:06.000 And this is when you get into, do we want to get Flynn fired so that we can get him to testify against other members of the Trump administration?
00:11:11.000 Or do we want to catch him in a lie so that he's consistent with what he has told other members of the Trump administration?
00:11:17.000 And then we can catch him in a lie and we can threaten him so that he'll turn on members of the Trump administration.
00:11:21.000 That seems to be the logic here.
00:11:22.000 Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates and other DOJ officials believed that the incoming administration should be notified, but Comey said no.
00:11:31.000 Yates and another senior DOJ official became frustrated when Comey's justification for withholding the information from the Trump administration repeatedly morphed, vacillating from a potential compromise of a counterintelligence investigation to the protection of a purported criminal investigation.
00:11:45.000 The Deputy Attorney General, DNI, and Director of Central Intelligence Agency all agreed the FBI should notify the incoming Trump administration of what had actually been said on the calls.
00:11:53.000 Comey refused to brief the White House.
00:11:55.000 Because Comey apparently was just thoroughly convinced that the Russians were playing the Trump administration and he didn't want to tip them off to the fact that an investigation was going on.
00:12:04.000 Comey should have been fired like forthwith.
00:12:07.000 This is ridiculous stuff from James Comey, who's busy posturing presumably in the woods right now.
00:12:11.000 Matters came to a head January 24, 2017.
00:12:13.000 This is all the DOJ letter.
00:12:15.000 That morning, Yates contacted Director Comey to demand the FBI notify the White House of the communication.
00:12:19.000 So, Yates has been sort of dragged through the mud by the Trump administration to a certain extent.
00:12:23.000 Yates actually wanted the FBI to notify the White House.
00:12:26.000 Director Comey didn't return the call.
00:12:28.000 When Comey called her back later that day, he advised her FBI agents were already on their way to the White House to interview Flynn.
00:12:33.000 Yates was flabbergasted and dumbfounded.
00:12:35.000 Other senior DOJ officials hit the roof upon learning of that development, saying an interview of Flynn should have been coordinated with the DOJ.
00:12:41.000 In fact, senior officials at the FBI had been engaged in discussions of how to approach Flynn and whom to notify.
00:12:47.000 On January 21st, 2017, Strzok proposed to Bill Priestap, the FBI's counterintelligence chief, that Flynn should be given a defensive briefing about an investigation under the Crossfire Hurricane umbrella, or alternatively, an interview under light defensive briefing pretext.
00:13:00.000 Strzok noted that the DOJ might direct us to inform the Vice President or somebody else, and they didn't want to do that.
00:13:05.000 And they wouldn't explain why they didn't want to tell the Trump administration.
00:13:08.000 On January 22nd, an FBI attorney emailed Strzok and Page that if we usually tell the White House, I think we ought to do what we normally do.
00:13:15.000 Though the official noted that they could be told not to debrief or interview Flynn.
00:13:20.000 In advance of the interview, Comey determined they would go interview Flynn the following day without notifying either the DOJ or the White House.
00:13:25.000 In a December 2018 interview, he said that this was something I probably wouldn't have done or gotten away with in a more organized administration.
00:13:33.000 Okay, then messages between Strzok and Page indicated that Prestep had conducted several conversations with Andy McCabe because he wanted to know why we had to go aggressively doing these things openly.
00:13:42.000 On the morning of January 24th, follow-up messages between Strzok and Page indicated that Prestep brought it up again in front of Comey, and McCabe was frustrated and cut him off.
00:13:50.000 In any event, McCabe called Flynn to arrange the interview.
00:13:53.000 He explained that recent media statements about his contacts with Kislyak merited a sit-down, and they said that they wanted to do this quickly, quietly, discreetly as possible.
00:14:02.000 Flynn was unguarded in the interview.
00:14:04.000 He viewed the agents as allies.
00:14:05.000 When interviewing Flynn, Strzok and the other agents didn't show him the transcripts of the calls, nor did the agents give at any point warnings that making false statements would be a crime.
00:14:12.000 Now normally, in these sorts of situations, you want to give the person fair warning that they're about to lie, specifically because you already know that they have lied in the past, so you sort of want to put all that out there.
00:14:23.000 They didn't want to do that.
00:14:23.000 The basic idea here was that they were going to essentially catch Flynn out, and then they were going to use him.
00:14:29.000 According to the FBI agent's recollections, when asked if Flynn recalled any conversation in which he encouraged Kislyak not to escalate the situation in response to American sanctions, Flynn responded uncertainly, stating, not really, I don't remember, it wasn't don't do anything.
00:14:42.000 Flynn also stated, although it was possible, he didn't recall any conversation in which the ambassador stated that Russia would moderate its response due to Flynn's request.
00:14:50.000 Meanwhile, when asked if he recalled asking countries to take certain actions on that UN vote on Israeli settlements, Flynn explained the conversations were along the lines of where do you stand and what's your position.
00:14:58.000 After the interview, the FBI agents expressed uncertainty as to whether Flynn had actually lied.
00:15:03.000 FBI agents reported to their leadership that Flynn exhibited a very sure demeanor and didn't give any indicators of deception.
00:15:08.000 Both of the agents had the impression Flynn wasn't lying or didn't think he was lying.
00:15:11.000 When Comey was asked, do you believe Flynn lied?
00:15:13.000 Comey said, I don't know.
00:15:15.000 I think there's an argument he maybe lied.
00:15:16.000 It's a close one.
00:15:18.000 On November 30th, 2017, the special counsel's office filed a criminal information against Flynn, charging him with that single count of making false statements Flynn pled guilty to the offense.
00:15:28.000 Okay, so the question as to the law is whether there is materiality here.
00:15:32.000 They say that it is not just that you have to tell a lie, you have to show that there is materiality to the underlying investigation.
00:15:39.000 In the case of Mr. Flynn, says the DOJ, the evidence shows his statements were not material to any viable counterintelligence investigation, or any investigation for that matter, initiated by the FBI.
00:15:47.000 The FBI had recognized it lacked sufficient basis to sustain its initial counterintelligence investigation.
00:15:52.000 They found no derogatory information on Flynn.
00:15:55.000 The communications between Flynn and Kislyak did not warrant either continuing that existing counterintelligence investigation or opening a new criminal investigation.
00:16:03.000 The calls were entirely appropriate on their face.
00:16:05.000 Flynn never disputed the calls were made.
00:16:07.000 Indeed, Flynn, as former DIA, because he was director of Defense Intelligence Agency, would have readily expected the FBI had known of the calls.
00:16:14.000 In the words of one senior DOJ official, it seemed logical there may be some communication between an incoming administration and their foreign partners.
00:16:20.000 And there was nothing said on the calls to indicate anything inappropriate going on.
00:16:24.000 Also, the FBI knew the content of the calls.
00:16:27.000 With no dispute as to what was said, there was no factual basis for the predication of a new counterintelligence investigation.
00:16:33.000 And they didn't open a criminal investigation based on Flynn's calls with Kislyak predicated on the Logan Act.
00:16:37.000 In fact, they never attempted to open a Logan Act investigation on these grounds.
00:16:41.000 Flynn's communications implicated no crime.
00:16:43.000 So they decide that they're going to let this thing go.
00:16:46.000 And the reason they're going to let this thing go is because, again, there was really no criminal activity here.
00:16:50.000 This has set off an absolute firestorm.
00:16:52.000 The idea here is that Flynn presumably should have been prosecuted because it's unusual for the DOJ, after a guilty plea, to actually just release the person.
00:17:00.000 We'll get to that in just one second.
00:17:02.000 First, let us talk about the fact that if you are not actively protecting your data online right now, you are doing something wrong.
00:17:07.000 The fact is that You're used to working at work and you have IT departments that help you protect your data when you're at work, but now you're working from home and you're online 24 hours a day.
00:17:15.000 And you know who else is online?
00:17:16.000 Hackers.
00:17:17.000 People who want that information.
00:17:18.000 They want to steal your credit card information, they want to steal information about you, and they want to use it against you.
00:17:23.000 That's why, even at home, I never go online without using ExpressVPN.
00:17:27.000 ExpressVPN makes sure your ISP cannot see what sites you visit.
00:17:30.000 Instead, your internet connection is rerouted through ExpressVPN's secure servers.
00:17:36.000 Each ExpressVPN server has an IP address that's shared among thousands of users, which means everything you do is anonymized.
00:17:41.000 It can't be traced back to you.
00:17:43.000 ExpressVPN also encrypts 100% of your data with best-in-class encryption so your information is always protected.
00:17:48.000 Use the internet with confidence from your computer, tablet, or smartphone.
00:17:51.000 ExpressVPN has you covered on every device.
00:17:53.000 You simply tap one button and you are now protected.
00:17:55.000 Protect your online activity today with VPNitrust to secure my privacy.
00:17:59.000 Visit my special link expressvpn.com slash ben.
00:18:01.000 You're doing something dumb if you don't.
00:18:03.000 And when you use my special link expressvpn.com slash ben, you get an extra three months free on a one-year package.
00:18:08.000 That's expressvpn.com slash ben.
00:18:11.000 expressvpn.com/ben to learn more.
00:18:14.000 Go check them out right now, expressvpn.com/ben.
00:18:16.000 Okay, so the Flynn release has basically set off a firestorm.
00:18:20.000 The idea here is that Bill Barr, the Attorney General, is doing something deeply, deeply terrible because he's going back on the DOJ's initial prosecution of Flynn or threat of prosecution of Flynn to get him to bargain to a plea deal.
00:18:34.000 He originally pled guilty back in 2017, and now they're abdicating basically that They're just getting rid of the case.
00:18:42.000 And so people are mad about it.
00:18:43.000 Julio Sullivan, former federal prosecutor who teaches criminal law, says, I've been practicing for more time than I care to admit.
00:18:48.000 I've never seen anything like this.
00:18:50.000 The case against Flynn was originally brought about by the office of the former special counsel, Robert Mueller.
00:18:55.000 It had become a political cause for Trump and his supporters.
00:18:58.000 Barr instead short-circuited the case.
00:19:00.000 On Thursday, Timothy Shea, the interim U.S.
00:19:02.000 attorney in the District of Columbia, told the judge overseeing the case the prosecutors were withdrawing it.
00:19:07.000 That's because the department could not prove to a jury that Flynn's admitted lies to the FBI were material.
00:19:12.000 The move essentially erases Flynn's guilty plea because he was never sentenced and the government is not willing to pursue the matter further.
00:19:17.000 The prosecution is virtually certain to end, although the judge could still decide whether to grant the department's request to dismiss it with prejudice.
00:19:24.000 It could theoretically be refiled in the future if the judge decides differently.
00:19:28.000 A pardon would have been a lot more honest had Samuel Buell, a former federal prosecutor who now teaches criminal law at Duke University, Bill says the law regarding what counts as material is extremely forgiving to the government.
00:19:38.000 The idea is that law enforcement is permitted to pursue criminal theories of criminality and to interview people without having firmly established there was a crime first.
00:19:45.000 Yeah, but if you just like five seconds ago said you were dismissing the entire investigation against somebody and then you are just relieved that it's still technically open so you can try to... I mean, basically they're trying to flip...
00:19:56.000 Flynn against other people in the Trump administration.
00:19:59.000 Because here's the bottom line.
00:20:00.000 It looks like there were people, including Comey, inside the DOJ and the FBI at the time, who were firmly convinced that Trump-Russia collusion had happened.
00:20:08.000 And now it's just a matter of raising the evidence so as to go get Trump.
00:20:13.000 And so Flynn was just a tool in that.
00:20:14.000 He was just a way of going after Trump and or removing Flynn from the process because as the national security advisor, he would be overseeing the investigation itself in some ways that would be able to protect Trump against some of the investigation.
00:20:28.000 That's the theory of Andrew McCarthy over at National Review.
00:20:32.000 So, the DOJ saying, listen, we're not going forward with this.
00:20:35.000 Yes, it's unusual for the DOJ to do this.
00:20:37.000 You know what else is really unusual?
00:20:39.000 Prosecuting the National Security Advisor on the basis of a Logan Act fib.
00:20:44.000 Okay, the Logan Act is not a thing.
00:20:46.000 It's not a thing.
00:20:48.000 And the idea that the Logan Act was supposedly the predicate for going and getting him to lie so that you could go after him and get him out of the chain of command is really incredible.
00:20:58.000 It does undermine faith in the institution in the first place.
00:21:00.000 I mean, the fact that they went forward with something like this on the basis of your incoming national security advisor talked with the Russians and then didn't tell everything in the call to Vice President Pence, and that this is a material lie in a criminal case.
00:21:13.000 Good luck with that in court, number one.
00:21:15.000 But beyond that, The fact that this was being carried out by holdovers from the Obama administration does not exactly create a level of trust.
00:21:24.000 And this is particularly true when we find out from Fox News that President Obama was aware of the details of then-incoming National Security Advisor Michael Flynn's intercepted December 2016 phone calls with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, apparently surprising Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, according to documents released on Thursday.
00:21:40.000 Apparently, Obama had an intimate knowledge of the details of Flynn's call.
00:21:44.000 Obama personally had warned the Trump administration against hiring Flynn, made clear he was not a fan.
00:21:48.000 Obama had fired Flynn as head of the DIA in 2014.
00:21:52.000 Obama cited insubordination.
00:21:53.000 Flynn said that he was pushed out because of his aggressive stance on combating Islamic extremism.
00:21:58.000 On January 5th, 2017, Yates attended an Oval Office meeting with Comey and Biden and Brennan and DNI James Clapper.
00:22:06.000 They were discussing Russian election interference.
00:22:08.000 After the briefing, Obama asked Yates and Comey to stay behind.
00:22:11.000 He said he had learned the information about Flynn and his conversation with Russia's ambassador about sanctions.
00:22:15.000 This would have been the day after the request to end the case, right?
00:22:18.000 Obama specified he did not want any additional information on the matter, but was seeking information on whether the White House should be treating Flynn any differently, given the information.
00:22:26.000 So there are two ways of reading that.
00:22:27.000 One is, should the White House be shutting Flynn off to information because you guys think he's a criminal?
00:22:30.000 And that's an honest question.
00:22:31.000 The other is, so I've been hearing through the grapevine that basically this case is coming to an end, but I see that there's this call out there.
00:22:36.000 Maybe you shouldn't let this case come to an end.
00:22:38.000 We don't exactly know what was said.
00:22:41.000 Apparently, Yates had no idea what the president was talking about.
00:22:44.000 Apparently, Yates was being gone.
00:22:45.000 She's the deputy attorney general, and they were going directly around her.
00:22:48.000 Yates recalled Comey mentioning the Logan Act.
00:22:50.000 I can't recall if he specified there was an investigation.
00:22:52.000 Comey did not talk about prosecution in the meeting.
00:22:56.000 I mean, it's pretty amazing.
00:22:57.000 The FBI suggests, by the way, why exactly Flynn was originally prosecuted.
00:23:02.000 Basically, because he was on Trump's team, because he had been on Russia Today, and because he went to Russia in December 2015.
00:23:07.000 That's like the whole thing.
00:23:10.000 So this whole case was thinly predicated in the very first place, and all the objections that somehow this is really a destruction of the legitimacy of the DOJ to drop a case that was thin to begin with, and that really was dedicated to removing all obstacles between the Mueller investigation and Trump in a case that was poorly predicated itself, that's a mistake.
00:23:31.000 All right, coming up, we're going to get to everything coronavirus-related.
00:23:35.000 We'll get to that in just one second.
00:23:36.000 First, let us talk about your sleep quality.
00:23:38.000 So I will admit to you that this is a very stressful time for everybody.
00:23:42.000 And also, when you are home with your kids, that means that you just are not getting enough hours of sleep.
00:23:45.000 My kids are going to bed too late.
00:23:46.000 They're waking up too early.
00:23:47.000 When I'm on the Helix Sleep mattress, however, those are moments of heaven.
00:23:51.000 Helix Sleep.
00:23:52.000 A mattress made just for me.
00:23:53.000 Helix Sleep has a quiz.
00:23:54.000 It takes just two minutes to complete, matches your body type and sleep preferences to the perfect mattress for you.
00:23:59.000 Whether you are a side sleeper or a hot sleeper, whether you like a plush or a firm bed with Helix, there's no more confusion and no more compromising.
00:24:04.000 Helix Sleep is rated the number one mattress by GQ and Wired Magazine.
00:24:08.000 CNN calls it the most comfortable mattress they've ever slept on.
00:24:10.000 Just head on over to HelixSleep.com slash Ben.
00:24:12.000 Take their two-minute sleep quiz.
00:24:14.000 They will match you to a customized mattress that will give you the best sleep of your life.
00:24:17.000 They've got a 10-year warranty.
00:24:18.000 You have to try it out for 100 nights risk-free.
00:24:20.000 They'll even pick it up for you if you don't love it, but you will.
00:24:23.000 Helix is offering up to $200 off all mattress orders right now for my listeners.
00:24:27.000 Again, 200 bucks off at HelixSleep.com slash Ben.
00:24:30.000 That is HelixSleep.com slash Ben.
00:24:32.000 Go check them out right now.
00:24:33.000 10-year warranty.
00:24:34.000 Try it out for 100 nights risk-free.
00:24:35.000 200 bucks off.
00:24:36.000 I mean, does it get better than that?
00:24:37.000 HelixSleep.com slash Ben for a mattress personalized To you.
00:24:40.000 Really is an amazing mattress.
00:24:41.000 Helixsleep.com slash Ben.
00:24:43.000 Alrighty, so.
00:24:45.000 Meanwhile, the coronavirus situation continues to develop in incredibly, incredibly foolish ways.
00:24:53.000 And when I say that it's developing in incredibly foolish ways, what I mean is, it is now clear that we have flattened the curve as much as we are going to flatten the curve with these lockdowns.
00:25:01.000 So you've been hearing all sorts of basically media lies about the elevation of cases.
00:25:09.000 Oh, we're not locking this thing down.
00:25:10.000 New York's starting to decline, but everywhere else is not starting to decline.
00:25:14.000 You can't do it the way the media is doing it.
00:25:15.000 They're doing an absolute number of cases rising outside of New York.
00:25:18.000 Here's an actual chart showing the number of daily positives declining as a percentage of the actual test.
00:25:24.000 That is the question.
00:25:27.000 If you take a look at the daily positives declining chart from Scott Gottlieb, that's the one I want.
00:25:33.000 Daily positivity rate over time is declining.
00:25:35.000 So what you see here is that there was a sharp rise between basically March 13th and April 10th or so.
00:25:43.000 Which makes sense because those are the two weeks following lockdown.
00:25:46.000 So the infection is still running rampant and you're starting to see the testing increases and you're starting to see people testing positive more often.
00:25:52.000 And now you're starting to see a fairly sharp decline to the point where we are now in terms of daily positivity test rate.
00:25:58.000 We're now down around 10%.
00:25:59.000 We're up at about 20%.
00:26:01.000 So it's been halved.
00:26:02.000 So it's a pretty solid flattening of the curve that has happened right there.
00:26:07.000 And then, so what this raises the question of is what exactly are we attempting to do now, right?
00:26:14.000 We've locked it down, right?
00:26:15.000 We had the lockdown, we flattened the curve.
00:26:17.000 And in flattening the curve, we completely flattened the economy.
00:26:19.000 The economy has completely flatlined.
00:26:21.000 Layoffs have now topped 33 million in the United States, 33 million.
00:26:25.000 The unemployment rate in the United States is now 14.7%.
00:26:27.000 These are Great Depression levels of unemployment.
00:26:31.000 JP Morgan is suggesting it will take 10 years For the economy to recover the jobs that it lost just in the last month and a half alone.
00:26:38.000 Are we allowed to discuss risks and trade-offs anymore?
00:26:40.000 Are we allowed to do that now?
00:26:41.000 Or are we going to continue to do this routine where if we talk about opening up at all, then we're killing grandma?
00:26:49.000 So, for the folks who are pushing lockdown, it is obvious this is a political ploy.
00:26:53.000 Andrew Cuomo continues to play this game.
00:26:55.000 Really, he's a terrible governor, Andrew Cuomo.
00:26:57.000 It's incredible.
00:26:57.000 The man has an approval rating in the 80s.
00:26:59.000 He has mishandled this worse than any governor in America.
00:27:03.000 Worse than Gavin Newsom.
00:27:04.000 Worse than any of the Republicans who are brought under scrutiny.
00:27:08.000 Ron DeSantis is riding in the mid-50s right now.
00:27:10.000 Ron DeSantis handled this way better than anybody else.
00:27:13.000 Okay, Ron DeSantis basically said, listen, we're only going to shut down when we feel the necessity to shut down.
00:27:17.000 Every place else stays open.
00:27:19.000 And yes, we'll do social distancing.
00:27:20.000 But I'm not going to treat the panhandle of Florida the same way that I'm going to treat Miami and South Beach.
00:27:25.000 DeSantis yesterday, for example, he said, listen, people should be outdoors.
00:27:28.000 They should be on beaches.
00:27:30.000 As long as they're staying away from each other, there's no evidence of outdoor transmission.
00:27:33.000 We have virtually no evidence of any outdoor transmissions leading to outbreaks, be it a beach, be it a golf course, be it fishing, anything that Florida is known for.
00:27:44.000 The transmission has typically occurred in enclosed environments when you have repeated contact with someone, such as in the home.
00:27:52.000 And so our policy was never to try to drive people indoors.
00:27:57.000 It does show the incredible power of the media that DeSantis is down in the mid-fifties while dumbass Governor Andrew Cuomo, who's been awful, awful.
00:28:03.000 I mean, the fact that he gets on TV and he tells you the bad news, he only has the luxury of telling you the bad news because he can blame Trump at the top of the government.
00:28:10.000 But I mean, when he says stuff like, he's such a demagogue, when he says stuff like, you know, every life is priceless, again, every life is priceless in terms of its moral worth.
00:28:19.000 When it comes to actually calculating public policy, nobody suggests that we have to mitigate all risks down to zero.
00:28:25.000 And this seems to be the newfangled thought here is that we're going to mitigate all risks down to zero.
00:28:29.000 You can't come out of your homes.
00:28:30.000 You can't start to go back to work with social distancing.
00:28:32.000 We can't protect that.
00:28:33.000 We're going to just stay locked down forever until the risks go back to zero.
00:28:36.000 We're going to abolish death.
00:28:37.000 Joe Biden tweeted out that it's not worth one life.
00:28:40.000 It's not worth one life to raise the Dow Jones Industrial Average one point.
00:28:43.000 Okay, well then I suppose that we should probably just all abandon our jobs and then we can sit in our homes and we can farm dirt in our backyard.
00:28:49.000 Sound good?
00:28:49.000 We can go back to pre-civilization era when everybody's life expectancy was 35.
00:28:53.000 I mean, I guess that's a good alternative if you're a moron.
00:28:56.000 So here's Andrew Cuomo suggesting yesterday, you know, we're not going to choose between the health and the economy.
00:29:00.000 There's no choice.
00:29:01.000 It's a false choice.
00:29:02.000 Whenever people suggest in politics that a choice is a false choice, typically they mean that it's just a choice they don't actually want to talk about.
00:29:09.000 Here's Andrew Cuomo avoiding responsibility for making choices that he's going to have to make.
00:29:13.000 If it's about money, we'll figure it out.
00:29:15.000 But you have to have your health.
00:29:18.000 That's why public health versus the economy.
00:29:20.000 I don't see the trade-off.
00:29:21.000 We have to have our health.
00:29:24.000 We should protect human life.
00:29:26.000 I don't care if a person is old.
00:29:28.000 You know, I'm old by your definition.
00:29:32.000 I still think I have a value, right?
00:29:34.000 My mother's old.
00:29:36.000 You know, she's the most precious person to me.
00:29:39.000 So, protect every life.
00:29:41.000 And I'm not going to trade off public health.
00:29:46.000 And we'll figure out the dollars and we'll figure out the economic impact.
00:29:51.000 What a cheap and lazy political point of view.
00:29:53.000 I mean, that is just cheap, lazy demagoguery.
00:29:56.000 Of course, every life has value.
00:29:57.000 Of course, I've got parents who are in their 60s.
00:29:58.000 You think I want them to plot?
00:29:59.000 Nobody wants them.
00:30:00.000 I have grandmothers who are in their 90s.
00:30:02.000 Do you think I want them to plot?
00:30:03.000 Of course, I don't want them to plot.
00:30:05.000 Nobody wants anybody to die.
00:30:06.000 The question is, what are the risks that we as a society are willing to undertake to allow an economy to function?
00:30:12.000 This is complete idiocy, the way that this is being discussed.
00:30:14.000 Complete idiocy.
00:30:15.000 And by the way, I don't want to hear from Andrew Cuomo about how dedicated he is to protecting the elderly when he wouldn't even protect the damn nursing homes.
00:30:21.000 Let me show you some stats from these nursing homes, because they're insane.
00:30:25.000 Let me tell you some stats from the nursing homes.
00:30:27.000 So, by country, here are the percentage of COVID-19 deaths taking place in nursing homes.
00:30:32.000 This is across the world, okay?
00:30:34.000 25% of all deaths in Australia were in nursing homes.
00:30:37.000 62% in Canada, 33% in Denmark, 51% in France, 36% in Germany, 60% in Ireland, 32% in Israel, 40% in Portugal, 45% in Sweden.
00:30:48.000 Okay, and then, if you look at the United States, what you're going to see is similar statistics.
00:30:53.000 In the United States, by state, 58% of deaths, nursing homes.
00:30:56.000 Connecticut, 55%.
00:30:57.000 Delaware, 65%.
00:30:58.000 Florida, 38%.
00:30:58.000 Georgia, 48%.
00:30:59.000 Kentucky, 57%.
00:30:59.000 Indiana, 35%.
00:30:59.000 Louisiana, 37%.
00:31:00.000 Mississippi, 44%.
00:31:00.000 Minnesota, 81%.
00:31:00.000 New Hampshire, 77%.
00:31:01.000 Oklahoma, 43%.
00:31:01.000 Rhode Island, 76%.
00:31:02.000 Wisconsin, 42%.
00:31:02.000 Tennessee, 25%.
00:31:02.000 Georgia, 48%. Indiana, 35%. Kentucky, 57%. Louisiana, 37%. Minnesota, 81%. Mississippi, 44%. New Hampshire, 77%. Oklahoma, 43%.
00:31:13.000 Rhode Island, 76%. Tennessee, 25%. Wisconsin, 42%.
00:31:17.000 New Jersey is reporting that their death share is actually now 50%.
00:31:23.000 Pennsylvania is up to 68%.
00:31:26.000 Virginia is 59% nursing homes.
00:31:30.000 New York, we don't know, because New York refuses to report these statistics.
00:31:34.000 Why does New York refuse to report the statistics?
00:31:36.000 Because then Andrew Cuomo might be forced to recognize that his dumbass policy of, we are going to force nursing homes to take back in people with COVID-19, killed a lot of people.
00:31:46.000 Here was Andrew Cuomo being asked about his state handling of the nursing homes and completely, you know, just botching it.
00:31:51.000 We knew the nursing homes were going to be a target.
00:31:54.000 And whatever we do, they will be a target.
00:31:57.000 Our people are doing everything they can do.
00:32:00.000 We have the equipment, we have the staff.
00:32:02.000 They're doing everything they can do.
00:32:05.000 Okay, they're doing everything they can do.
00:32:06.000 Well, they're doing everything they can do in light of the fact that your regulations are garbage.
00:32:10.000 But here's the bottom line.
00:32:11.000 Would you actually like to protect the people who are dying from COVID-19?
00:32:14.000 Protect the nursing homes.
00:32:15.000 That is task number one, is protect the nursing homes.
00:32:18.000 And then we need to tranche people back into work and we need to do it forthwith.
00:32:22.000 And there's nothing more lazy than this idea that if you loosen lockdown, if you let people go back to work, That it's going to be like 9-11 every day.
00:32:29.000 That's what Al Gore was saying.
00:32:30.000 Al Gore was out there yesterday saying it'll be just like 9-11 every day.
00:32:33.000 Provide me an alternative.
00:32:35.000 I've not yet heard an alternative from any of you.
00:32:37.000 From any of you.
00:32:38.000 Like what?
00:32:38.000 When the cases get to zero, it ain't happening.
00:32:41.000 With 80% asymptomatic transmission.
00:32:43.000 What, we're doing 50 million tests a day?
00:32:45.000 When we have contact tracing for 50 million people in the United States?
00:32:49.000 The hell are you talking about?
00:32:50.000 Here's Al Gore being a demagogue.
00:32:52.000 When the University of Washington made these adjustments, they said within a month we're going to see 3,000 deaths per day, 200,000 new infections each day.
00:33:05.000 That's a 9-11 every single day.
00:33:10.000 And ignoring that, thinking that somehow magically that's not going to happen, this is a botched reopening.
00:33:22.000 It's a botched reopening.
00:33:23.000 We haven't even reopened yet.
00:33:24.000 The hell are you talking about?
00:33:26.000 And how do you know it's a botchery when you haven't even seen the stats coming out of Georgia?
00:33:29.000 My favorite thing is when the members of the media start citing increased testing statistics to cite the increased number of positives.
00:33:37.000 They've been doing this routine.
00:33:38.000 Oh, look at how many positives are coming out in Texas and Florida.
00:33:40.000 Yes, because they're increasing their testing.
00:33:42.000 They're increasing their testing, you idiots.
00:33:44.000 In just a second, we're going to get to actually, you know, the measures that are now being taken because they're absurd.
00:33:49.000 I'm sorry.
00:33:49.000 They're absurd.
00:33:50.000 They're just absurd.
00:33:51.000 And the attitude that's being taken with regard to relieving lockdown.
00:33:53.000 We have to discuss the fact that 33 million Americans are out of jobs.
00:33:57.000 And if you refuse to recognize this thing, you are abandoning those 33 million Americans.
00:34:01.000 And don't tell me you can fill them in with a government check.
00:34:03.000 You can't.
00:34:03.000 These are people who are losing their livelihoods.
00:34:05.000 They're losing their dreams.
00:34:06.000 They're losing their ability to feed their children.
00:34:08.000 And you're telling me you're the compassionate one because you won't even condemn a governor for refusing to protect the nursing homes?
00:34:14.000 Go to hell.
00:34:15.000 Seriously.
00:34:16.000 It's ridiculous at this point.
00:34:17.000 We're going to get to how people won't even discuss the policy in just one second.
00:34:20.000 First, let's talk about the simple fact that you're spending a lot of time at home right now.
00:34:24.000 You need to be comfortable, but you would also like to be stylish.
00:34:26.000 Tommy John has something for everyone.
00:34:28.000 No matter what you are working from home situation is, no matter what that situation is from super soft and breathable underwear for answering emails in bed, To loungewear for when you're running to get takeout, Tommy John is here to keep you comfortable.
00:34:39.000 Right now, Tommy John is offering all customers 25% off site-wide.
00:34:43.000 Treat yourself and upgrade to a few pairs of Tommy John underwear in the softest, most breathable fabrics you have ever worn.
00:34:48.000 All of their loungewear leggings are built for next level comfort.
00:34:51.000 Whether you're in the hunt for lounge pants, sleep shorts, or lazing around joggers, Tommy John has got you covered.
00:34:55.000 They also make great Mother's Day gifts.
00:34:56.000 My wife loves Tommy John products.
00:34:58.000 I mean, their female products are just fantastic.
00:35:00.000 Tommy John is so confident in their products.
00:35:02.000 If you don't love your first pair of underwear, you get a full refund.
00:35:05.000 With their best pair you'll ever wear, or it's free, guaranteed.
00:35:07.000 Tommy John, no adjustment needed.
00:35:08.000 There's a reason my wife is only allowing me to get her Tommy John from now on.
00:35:12.000 Hurry to TommyJohn.com slash Ben for 25% off your order.
00:35:15.000 That's TommyJohn.com slash Ben for 25% off orders.
00:35:19.000 TommyJohn.com slash Ben.
00:35:20.000 See site for details.
00:35:21.000 It's a great deal for the best pair of underwear on the market and all the rest of their loungewear.
00:35:26.000 Which is also fantastic stuff.
00:35:27.000 Go check out tommyjohn.com slash ben right now.
00:35:31.000 All right, we're gonna get back into the politics of lockdown in just one second because it is fairly obvious that there are a lot of people who are basically comfortable with lockdown because what they would like more than anything else is to completely recraft American life.
00:35:44.000 You're starting to see this from members of the Democratic Party.
00:35:48.000 Ayanna Pressley and Rashad Robinson have a piece over at USA Today basically suggesting just this.
00:35:52.000 San Francisco has a few measures of its own.
00:35:54.000 All of this is craziness.
00:35:55.000 We'll get to it in a second.
00:35:56.000 First, it is that glorious time of the week when I give a shout out to a Daily Wire member.
00:36:00.000 Today, it is Linda Morgan on Twitter.
00:36:02.000 She's doing quarantine schooling right.
00:36:03.000 In this picture, Linda's husband is diligently helping their happy son with his schoolwork while holding the world's greatest beverage vessel in one hand and a second glorious Tumblr resting on the computer desk.
00:36:12.000 That is the way to do it.
00:36:13.000 The caption reads, Real Daily Wire, when both your parents are teachers, there is no relief from home learning.
00:36:17.000 Thank goodness for the refreshing taste of leftist tears.
00:36:19.000 Hashtag leftist tears Tumblr.
00:36:20.000 Hashtag Daily Wire.
00:36:21.000 Hashtag it's got electrolytes.
00:36:23.000 True, true.
00:36:24.000 Fantastic.
00:36:25.000 His test scores will improve two-fold with two times the tumblers.
00:36:28.000 Thanks for the pick, Linda.
00:36:29.000 Keep up the good work.
00:36:30.000 Now is also a good time to tell you about The Daily Wire's newest, most exclusive membership tier, the All Access Insider.
00:36:36.000 The All Access Insider membership tier is our premium level of membership.
00:36:38.000 All Access members get all the benefits of our other membership tiers.
00:36:41.000 You get that ad-free website experience, all of our live broadcasts, our show library, including the mailbags, the full three hours of The Ben Shapiro Show with the dedicated editorials from me.
00:36:49.000 But you also get other amazing benefits, including We left this to your stumbler.
00:36:53.000 You also get to join the live exclusive online Q and A's, our daily wire new discussion feature available on both the website and the app.
00:36:59.000 Also, you get to participate in our extraordinarily popular all access live.
00:37:04.000 That is our brand new show that we've been doing every single day.
00:37:06.000 One of our hosts every single day.
00:37:07.000 We'll hang out with you 8 p.m.
00:37:08.000 Eastern, 5 p.m.
00:37:09.000 Pacific.
00:37:10.000 I'm on tonight.
00:37:11.000 Who knows what craziness will ensue?
00:37:13.000 Will I play tunes on my face?
00:37:15.000 Will I whistle for you?
00:37:17.000 Will I flex my- Who knows?
00:37:19.000 It could get crazy, guys.
00:37:20.000 Will I dress up as Darth Vader?
00:37:21.000 Who knows what insanity will ensue?
00:37:23.000 Head on over to dailywire.com slash subscribe to join Daily Wire's all-access club with a new membership or an upgrade.
00:37:28.000 Get 10% off with coupon code SHAPIRO.
00:37:30.000 That is dailywire.com slash subscribe.
00:37:32.000 See you there.
00:37:33.000 You're listening to the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast and radio show in the nation.
00:37:36.000 So these lockdowns, of course, come along with the disadvantage of having to enforce the lockdowns.
00:37:46.000 And the general rule is, if you don't want to enforce a rule, then don't put the rule in place in the first place.
00:37:51.000 If you want to hand people a ticket for a fine, hand people a ticket for a fine.
00:37:53.000 But if you don't feel like tackling people in the middle of New York, or tackling people on the streets of New Jersey, well then probably you shouldn't tell people in the police force that they need to do exactly that.
00:38:03.000 Also, other bad ideas.
00:38:05.000 Policing the ice cream man.
00:38:06.000 This is a thing that happened yesterday.
00:38:07.000 There was a local news affiliate that was broadcasting out the face of an ice cream truck driver who was not practicing social distancing.
00:38:15.000 He was driving around in his ice cream truck.
00:38:15.000 He was not.
00:38:17.000 He was not wearing a mask.
00:38:19.000 And he was handing children, the least vulnerable members of our population, pre-packaged frozen treats.
00:38:25.000 I mean, unbelievable, the level of viciousness of this human being.
00:38:29.000 Clearly, he should be featured on local media, and we should make him an outlaw.
00:38:31.000 Probably, we should put him on the FBI 10 Most Wanted.
00:38:34.000 Because when I think of, like, severe dangers, handing people ice cream outside with, you know, distance between you, that's naturally created by, you know, being inside a truck and handling stuff to people outside.
00:38:45.000 Clearly, this guy is just, what a terrible person.
00:38:47.000 Here was the local CBS Chicago report on this.
00:38:51.000 You think it's a good idea to be doing this with the stay-at-home order?
00:38:54.000 With COVID-19?
00:38:55.000 Eventually, our Greg got a bit closer.
00:38:58.000 Tried to get an answer from Mr. Freeze.
00:39:00.000 Again, not his name.
00:39:02.000 Why aren't you wearing a mask, sir?
00:39:05.000 Why are you selling ice cream to children without wearing a mask?
00:39:10.000 Are you sick?
00:39:12.000 Am I sick?
00:39:12.000 No, and I want to say that.
00:39:13.000 I'm not sick either.
00:39:14.000 So why are they quarantining healthy people?
00:39:17.000 The village manager tells us if you see that ice cream man, call 911.
00:39:23.000 Call 9-1-1.
00:39:24.000 Mr. Freeze, he's on the loose again.
00:39:27.000 Meanwhile, over in Texas, Shelly Luther, who is the salon owner, who was engaged in, you know, social distancing and responsibly opening her business like a few days early, and a judge tried to throw her in jail for a week and fine her $7,000.
00:39:38.000 She walked out of jail to loud applause yesterday, which is good news.
00:39:42.000 But here's the thing, the pedal is gonna, the rubber meat is gonna meet the road here.
00:39:45.000 Okay, there is just no way for you to enforce these sorts of things without actual, without actual Police enforcement.
00:39:54.000 Are you willing to do that?
00:39:55.000 And are you willing to throw people in jail for not wearing a mask in public areas while providing cannabis to the homeless in San Francisco?
00:40:02.000 This is a thing they're actually doing.
00:40:04.000 According to the San Francisco Chronicle, San Francisco's health department confirmed on Wednesday that the city was administering alcohol, tobacco, medical cannabis, and other substances in an effort to prevent a handful of people quarantined or isolating in city-leased hotels from going outside to get the substances themselves.
00:40:19.000 So it's great.
00:40:19.000 Now we have home delivery by the government of illegal medications.
00:40:24.000 Two homeless people who are living in hotels at the expense of the government.
00:40:27.000 Great policy.
00:40:28.000 Excellent, excellent policy.
00:40:29.000 I mean, I'm sorry.
00:40:31.000 This is insanity.
00:40:32.000 Especially if you were going to say that, sure, we have to be harsh on this because it's really flattening the curve.
00:40:37.000 We are really making sure that we are stopping this thing.
00:40:39.000 If you got a plan, then let's hear the plan.
00:40:42.000 But I haven't heard a plan yet.
00:40:44.000 So yesterday, I briefly discussed the fact that there is no actual plan here.
00:40:47.000 That we were told to go into lockdown, and don't worry guys, there would be a plan.
00:40:50.000 And then it turns out, the plan doesn't exist.
00:40:53.000 And the reason the plan doesn't exist is because we don't actually know what's going to happen over the course of the next year.
00:40:58.000 We have a series of models and they tell us what's going to happen one month out, but this is basically irrelevant.
00:41:03.000 It's basically irrelevant what's going to happen one month out because we know that if people leave lockdown, there will be an additional number of infections.
00:41:09.000 That is just the thing that is going to happen.
00:41:11.000 So yesterday, I actually put together in colorful fashion the chart of what I'm talking about so you can see exactly to what I am referring.
00:41:18.000 Okay, so here's the chart.
00:41:21.000 The basic idea here is that there are three curves for folks who cannot see.
00:41:24.000 There's a pink curve, there is a blue curve, and there is a green curve.
00:41:29.000 Okay, and then there is a red line across the middle of the page that shows medical capacity.
00:41:35.000 The three curves represent three different strategies of how to handle this thing.
00:41:39.000 The pink curve was uncontrolled spread, right?
00:41:41.000 The uncontrolled spread was basically just let everybody go about willy-nilly.
00:41:46.000 There's gonna be huge spike in cases, and everybody's gonna get infected, and then a lot of people are going to die because you're going to rise above the medical capacity, right?
00:41:53.000 And you don't want that because all the people above the medical capacity might have been able to survive if you had not overwhelmed the medical capacity.
00:42:00.000 We flattened the curve.
00:42:00.000 And that's what we did.
00:42:01.000 So now we're arguing about which curve we want.
00:42:03.000 Do we want this blue curve or do we want the green curve?
00:42:05.000 The blue curve rises faster and declines faster.
00:42:08.000 It doesn't overwhelm medical capacity.
00:42:10.000 It rises faster and it declines faster.
00:42:12.000 And then there's the green curve, which rises slower and declines slower over time.
00:42:16.000 The number of infections, and thus the number of deaths, under both the blue curve and the green curve, because they do not overwhelm medical capacity, the number of infections, and as a percentage of the infections, the number of deaths, should be the same.
00:42:28.000 Over time.
00:42:29.000 So here's what the media are doing so they can lie to you about how lockdowns are the only available solution, and if you don't lock down, you want to kill grandma.
00:42:37.000 What they're doing is they're showing you models that cut off in June 2020.
00:42:40.000 It is the vertical line that you see on the left-hand side of the screen.
00:42:43.000 And that vertical line says June 2020.
00:42:45.000 Now, if you cut off the screen in June 2020, what you would see is a huge number of cases and therefore deaths under the blue strategy, right?
00:42:53.000 Which is make sure that people in nursing homes are taken care of.
00:42:56.000 Make sure that elderly people stay home.
00:42:58.000 Make sure that there is some form of social distancing specifically for people who are most vulnerable, but everybody else.
00:43:05.000 You know, if you want to go to a ball game with a bunch of 20-year-olds and then there some infections, in all likelihood, you will be fine because the odds of you getting really sick are really low, right?
00:43:12.000 That is pursuing herd immunity in faster fashion.
00:43:14.000 It's front-loading the herd immunity.
00:43:16.000 So if you front-load the herd immunity, you're also front-loading the infections.
00:43:19.000 So if you cut off the model at June 2020, what you see is that there would be a lot fewer people infected and a lot fewer people dead by the beginning of June 2020 under the Heavy lockdown, heavy social distancing model than under the controlled avalanche model.
00:43:32.000 But now, move forward to June 2021.
00:43:34.000 So move forward a year.
00:43:35.000 And what do you see?
00:43:36.000 What you see is that the number of infections and the number of dead are basically the same in the blue model and the green model.
00:43:43.000 It's just that it was spread out longer over the green model, right?
00:43:45.000 The area under the two curves is the same, meaning the number of infections and the number of dead is basically the same, so long as you don't overwhelm the medical capacity.
00:43:53.000 The difference between the blue model and the green model is that the blue model involves reopening the economy in heavier fashion, right?
00:43:59.000 Not destroying the entire world economy.
00:44:01.000 And the green model involves continuing to destroy the entire world economy.
00:44:04.000 So here are your choices.
00:44:05.000 Same number of people dead over the course of the next year.
00:44:08.000 You may save a few months for people, but essentially same number of people infected and same number of people dead over the course of the next year, but front loaded.
00:44:14.000 So the pain is now versus Spread out over time so that instead of 2,000 deaths today, you get 1,000 deaths today.
00:44:21.000 And then six months from now, you're still getting 1,000 deaths today.
00:44:24.000 And in the other model, you're now getting 200 deaths today because you went up and then you went down.
00:44:28.000 And in one case, you didn't kill the economy.
00:44:30.000 And in one case, you did kill the economy.
00:44:32.000 These are the sorts of choices that have to be made right now.
00:44:34.000 Now, what the left will say is that the blue curve does not actually exist.
00:44:38.000 That it is only a choice between full lockdown and full release.
00:44:40.000 And that is not true.
00:44:42.000 It is just not true.
00:44:44.000 Now the other counter argument that I've seen here is that it's very difficult to do anything like the sort of controlled avalanche strategy that I've been talking about because you get what you call epidemic overshoot.
00:44:55.000 What that means is that, let's say that herd immunity happens at 60%, but let's say that the thing spreads faster, then you can actually control it.
00:45:03.000 So you may end up with 80% of the population infected when you only needed 60% of the population infected to achieve herd immunity.
00:45:09.000 So if you did it slowly, you'd gradually ease up to 60%, herd immunity would be achieved, and then the other 40% of people are protected.
00:45:15.000 But if you allow people to go out willy-nilly, then you might achieve herd immunity, but because the thing is spreading so fast, you get people who are infected who wouldn't have been infected if you had done this slowly.
00:45:24.000 That's true, but if you involve yourself in social distancing the way that Sweden has, and you approach it more slowly, then you're probably not going to get tremendous levels of epidemic overshoot.
00:45:33.000 The key is, how do you get to herd immunity without that tremendous epidemic overshoot?
00:45:37.000 Now, it is possible.
00:45:39.000 And this is sort of the unspoken assumption that the green curve is better than the blue curve if there's a therapeutic or a vaccine developed.
00:45:46.000 Now, people are way too sanguine about the possibility of a very effective vaccine here.
00:45:50.000 Even Bill Gates, who's been pushing vaccination, he says that the chances of developing a super effective vaccine over the course of the next 12 months are not supremely high.
00:45:58.000 The flu vaccine is used by about half of Americans.
00:46:00.000 It's only 45% effective for those who use it.
00:46:03.000 Even well-known vaccines, like Pertussis vaccine, Those create a certain level of herd immunity, and that's important, but they're only about 80% effective for people who actually take the vaccine.
00:46:12.000 They are not, in fact, a cure-all.
00:46:14.000 So you're assuming that there will be a therapeutic treatment or that there will be a vaccine that fix everything.
00:46:19.000 If you're not assuming that, then you have to start thinking about what you can do to get past the pain of the health situation in order to ensure that we have a functioning economy.
00:46:30.000 Because guess what?
00:46:31.000 Not only are you going to get deaths of despair, you're going to get enormous numbers of people in poverty.
00:46:35.000 You're going to have ruined lives in the tens of millions, if not hundreds of millions.
00:46:38.000 Within six weeks, basically every small business in America will fail.
00:46:42.000 And you can't just keep signing checks for this sort of stuff forever.
00:46:45.000 So what is the alternative?
00:46:46.000 I keep hearing people like, well, you're saying lockdown needs to end too early.
00:46:49.000 Okay, you tell me, when do you think it's safe for lockdown to end?
00:46:52.000 And nobody will give you an answer.
00:46:53.000 Instead it's, okay, well, when we flatten the curve, we flatten the curve.
00:46:56.000 Okay, it'll be when there's a testing and tracing procedure in place that's capable of what?
00:47:00.000 Of what?
00:47:01.000 Testing and tracing procedure capable of doing what?
00:47:04.000 And nobody will explain that.
00:47:05.000 Because the testing and tracing procedures are supposed to prevent the overwhelming of the healthcare system, which again, was the presupposition of the blue curve in the chart that I just showed you.
00:47:14.000 The presupposition of the blue curve is that it doesn't overwhelm medical capacity.
00:47:19.000 So that's what you need the testing and tracing for.
00:47:21.000 You don't need it to get the rate down to zero.
00:47:23.000 There is no world in which we get the rate down to zero.
00:47:26.000 So, how about this?
00:47:28.000 How about we recognize the cost of what we are doing?
00:47:30.000 I'm sick of hearing there are no costs to what we are doing when there are clearly costs.
00:47:33.000 In reality, there are a certain number of people who are deeply, deeply comfortable with all of this.
00:47:39.000 They're deeply comfortable.
00:47:41.000 And I'm talking about people like Ayanna Pressley, apparently, from Massachusetts.
00:47:44.000 She has a piece in USA Today called, Congresswoman, called, In Post-Coronavirus World Politics Has to Change.
00:47:51.000 She says the question is how we'll respond.
00:47:53.000 Will we once again let fear and worry take over and drive us toward choices that take us backward?
00:47:57.000 Or will we rise to the calling of this moment?
00:47:59.000 Demand that we replace the principles that define our society today like inequality with the principles of humanity and justice that will help us all succeed.
00:48:05.000 In other words, if we continue the lockdown, guess what?
00:48:08.000 There's going to be inordinate pressure for massive government interventionism, universal basic income, government subsidization of everybody at extraordinary levels.
00:48:16.000 There are some people who are very comfortable with lockdown because they actually like the consequences of the full-scale lockdown.
00:48:22.000 That is not something that is acceptable.
00:48:23.000 That is not acceptable to me.
00:48:24.000 And I'm not going to stay in lockdown just so that you can pursue your socialist utopia.
00:48:28.000 And guess what?
00:48:29.000 Neither are most Americans.
00:48:30.000 It is one thing to stay in lockdown based on expert advice as to how many lives this is going to save over the course of the next year, not over the course of the next two weeks.
00:48:38.000 But I want to hear those estimates.
00:48:40.000 And I want to hear your plan for reopening in a responsible fashion.
00:48:43.000 Because so far, all I hear is people shrieking like banshees every time somebody actually tries to make a calculation.
00:48:49.000 This is hanging up with headlines like this from David Axelrod, Donald Trump's cold, hard political calculation.
00:48:55.000 Weird, because I don't hear any calculation from folks on the Democratic side.
00:48:58.000 I just hear demagoguery.
00:49:00.000 Our plan is that no one dies ever again in human history.
00:49:03.000 And all you have to do is give up all of your freedoms forever.
00:49:05.000 And we'll tell you when you can be free again.
00:49:08.000 I'm sorry, the answer is no.
00:49:08.000 No.
00:49:10.000 No, nobody is offering a solution.
00:49:11.000 Nobody.
00:49:13.000 It's just a bunch of demagogic nonsense.
00:49:15.000 Alrighty, time for some things that I hate.
00:49:18.000 We'll start with things I hate today.
00:49:19.000 I've been advised by my producer Colton that people like things I hate better than they like things I like.
00:49:23.000 So we'll do things I hate today first.
00:49:26.000 Okay, so things that I hate.
00:49:28.000 I have to acknowledge.
00:49:32.000 That Joe Biden, his campaign is just, it's an awful campaign.
00:49:37.000 A truly awful campaign.
00:49:38.000 So yesterday, Joe Biden had a virtual town hall.
00:49:41.000 It was not good.
00:49:42.000 It was not a good town hall.
00:49:44.000 Basically, it failed technically on every single level.
00:49:47.000 It involved Joe Biden trying to work a computer, which is never a good idea.
00:49:50.000 Here was Joe Biden trying to determine whether he was answering a virtual rally in Tampa, Florida.
00:49:55.000 Here was Joe Biden being confused as to what computers are and why they didn't exist when he was a child.
00:50:01.000 Please welcome Vice President Joe Biden.
00:50:03.000 That's...
00:50:10.000 That's...
00:50:13.000 Okay, guys.
00:50:16.000 That is not us.
00:50:18.000 Those cutouts there, that's not our technical fault.
00:50:20.000 That is his technical fault, and the thing was glitching, and he didn't know whether he was on, and he's somehow like sitting in the back of the room, and then he sort of randomly approaches the camera.
00:50:29.000 Yeah, good luck right there.
00:50:31.000 I will admit, I did appreciate the squawking bird interrupting Biden and giving the most authoritative commentary of the day.
00:50:37.000 Here's actually what it sounded like when a squawking bird just started sounding off in the middle of this.
00:50:42.000 You know, we should be designing our economic response to avoid these desperate outcomes.
00:50:47.000 And they're not only desperate, they affect people in so many different ways.
00:50:52.000 So the funds can actually reach people in communities and small businesses, you know, that they're supposed to be helping.
00:51:01.000 Okay, good job, Biden campaign.
00:51:03.000 Other things that the Biden campaign is handling just top-notch, the Tara Reade allegations.
00:51:08.000 So Tara Reade did a sit-down with Megyn Kelly yesterday after the rest of the media basically said they wouldn't have her on for weeks.
00:51:15.000 And then finally, they said they wanted to have her on.
00:51:16.000 And she was like, you know what?
00:51:17.000 After you rejected me for weeks, I'm going to go no on that.
00:51:19.000 And maybe I'll go over to somebody who at least is going to be somewhat more sympathetic to allegations of sexual assault.
00:51:24.000 So here was Tara Reade yesterday calling for Joe Biden to drop out of the race.
00:51:29.000 If he's watching this, what do you want to say to him?
00:51:33.000 I want to say, you and I were there, Joe Biden.
00:51:39.000 Please step forward and be held accountable.
00:51:42.000 You should not be running on character for the president of the United States.
00:51:45.000 You want him to withdraw?
00:51:46.000 I wish he would, but he won't, but I wish he would.
00:51:50.000 That's how I feel emotionally.
00:51:51.000 Do you want an apology?
00:51:52.000 I think it's a little late.
00:51:56.000 Okay, and then Megyn Kelly asked Sarah Reid if she'll take a polygraph, and here was Sarah Reid's answer.
00:52:01.000 They also point out that she took a polygraph controlled by someone on her team.
00:52:08.000 Is that something you want to do?
00:52:09.000 I'm not a criminal.
00:52:11.000 Joe Biden should take the polygraph.
00:52:13.000 What kind of precedent does that set for survivors of violence?
00:52:16.000 Does that mean we're presumed guilty and we all have to take polygraphs?
00:52:21.000 So I will take one if Joe Biden takes one.
00:52:24.000 But I'm not a criminal.
00:52:26.000 Okay, so the reality is she should say, sure, I'm happy to take a polygraph, right?
00:52:30.000 I have serious doubts as to Tara Reade's credibility here.
00:52:33.000 I've been saying this for a while, but I had serious doubts as to Christine Blasey Ford's credibility.
00:52:37.000 Like, I think serious questions should be asked of anybody who alleges something as serious as a full-on sexual assault.
00:52:42.000 The difference is Democrats don't feel the same way.
00:52:43.000 There is certainly more contemporaneous evidence that Tara Reade actually even worked for Joe Biden and made complaints about Joe Biden than there was with Christine Blasey Ford.
00:52:52.000 According to the Merced Sun-Star, Taking this apparently from the Washington Post.
00:52:59.000 A court document from 1996 shows former Senate staffer Tara Reade told her ex-husband she was sexually harassed while working for Joe Biden in 1993.
00:53:05.000 The declaration, I guess it was exclusively obtained by the Tribune in San Luis Obispo, California, does not say that Biden committed the harassment.
00:53:13.000 It doesn't mention Reade's more recent allegations of sexual assault.
00:53:16.000 But the divorce records do say that there was a, quote, problem she was having at work regarding sexual harassment in U.S.
00:53:22.000 Senator Joe Biden's office.
00:53:24.000 So obviously she was making allegations of something having happened in Joe Biden's office way back when.
00:53:31.000 Now what's hilarious is the reaction by Democrats to all of this totally hypocritical and absurd.
00:53:36.000 Dianne Feinstein, the senator who five seconds ago was saying that Brett Kavanaugh should withdraw his nomination because of questions from Christine Blasey Ford.
00:53:44.000 Now she says that the Kavanaugh situation is totally different.
00:53:47.000 She says Kavanaugh is under the harshest inspection we give people over a substantial period of time.
00:53:52.000 What?
00:53:52.000 You mean he's... I mean, one wants to be president.
00:53:56.000 That seems like that might require an investigation.
00:53:58.000 She says, I don't know this person at all who's made these allegations.
00:54:01.000 She came out of nowhere.
00:54:02.000 Where's she been all these years?
00:54:03.000 He was vice president.
00:54:04.000 To attack him this way to me is utterly ridiculous.
00:54:06.000 That's unbelievable.
00:54:07.000 That's unbelievable from Dianne Feinstein.
00:54:09.000 Remember, during the Kavanaugh hearings, if you so much as mentioned that Brett Kavanaugh had been on the D.C.
00:54:13.000 Circuit Court of Appeals, that he'd been a very prominent person in public life for a long time, and that these allegations were four decades old, so where was Christine Blasey for all this time?
00:54:21.000 Then you were considered not to be taking women seriously.
00:54:23.000 Dianne Feinstein says the exact same stuff about Tara Reade, and it's, well, she's taking women seriously.
00:54:29.000 She says, why didn't she say something, you know, when he was chairman of the Judiciary Committee, or after that?
00:54:33.000 She said this is incomparable to Kavanaugh.
00:54:36.000 And then meanwhile, Senator Amy Klobuchar was asked about this.
00:54:38.000 She says about Biden, he's been forthright.
00:54:40.000 He's answered the questions respectfully.
00:54:41.000 I'm proud to support him.
00:54:43.000 Asked if she believes Reid.
00:54:44.000 She said, I think he's answered all the questions.
00:54:45.000 He's made clear he supports her right to come forward.
00:54:48.000 Asked about criticism Democrats to have a double standard.
00:54:50.000 Klobuchar didn't answer and walked into an awaiting car, which of course is exactly what you would expect from the Democratic Party.
00:54:57.000 I mean, just astonishing, astonishing stuff.
00:54:59.000 So the Biden campaign has problems of its own.
00:55:02.000 Which is why the Democrats are basically pinning their hopes on the notion that Trump completely botched the handling of coronavirus.
00:55:10.000 They're hoping that the economy does not, the economy isn't going to recover very fast.
00:55:14.000 Do they have a, I'm not going to say they hope for people to lose their jobs, because I don't think that all Democrats want people to lose their jobs.
00:55:20.000 What I will say is that they're in a very comfortable political situation where if the economy continues to tank, they can just point to Trump.
00:55:26.000 It's very comfortable politically to be in a position where you can say, if you release us from lockdown, then if one life is lost, it's on you.
00:55:32.000 And also lockdown is killing the economy, that's Trump's fault.
00:55:35.000 And the same exact people who are saying that this new Great Depression is brought on by Trump are saying that if we relieve the depression by letting people go back to work, then Trump will be killing people.
00:55:43.000 So they've set up an absolute catch-22 for anybody who actually wants to mitigate risk to life while also ensuring that the economy doesn't full-on die.
00:55:52.000 That's gonna have to be the tent peg upon which they build their entire superstructure here, because Joe Biden does not have a campaign that is worthy of note.
00:56:00.000 I mean, it's just a terrible, terrible campaign.
00:56:02.000 Okay, time for a quick thing that I like.
00:56:05.000 So, things that I like today.
00:56:08.000 There is a good book that I recommended on yesterday's radio show by Brad Meltzer.
00:56:12.000 It's called The Lincoln Conspiracy.
00:56:13.000 It's basically a historical thriller about the secret plot to kill Abraham Lincoln the first time.
00:56:19.000 There's a pretty sophisticated plot to kill President Lincoln right after he'd been elected.
00:56:24.000 And not the one where he actually died.
00:56:26.000 There was one way before that.
00:56:27.000 The book is really good.
00:56:28.000 Brad Meltzer is terrific.
00:56:29.000 I've recommended a bunch of his books on the program before.
00:56:31.000 I really recommend this one.
00:56:32.000 It's a great kind of interesting and uplifting read at a time that is Neither interesting nor uplifting.
00:56:38.000 So go check out Brad Meltzer with Josh Mench, The Lincoln Conspiracy, The Secret Plot to Kill America's 16th President, and Why It Failed.
00:56:45.000 Okay, other things that I like today.
00:56:47.000 So it is good news that the two Georgia men who killed Ahmaud Arbery, Ahmaud, I'm not sure how to pronounce his name, unfortunately.
00:56:54.000 Ahmaud Arbery?
00:56:56.000 They were arrested Thursday night on charges of murder.
00:56:58.000 That was two months after the killing took place on February 23rd.
00:57:00.000 They should have their day in court.
00:57:01.000 You should see all the evidence.
00:57:03.000 The fact that for two months, no arrest was made is an indictment of the criminal justice system in Georgia, which seems to me, people are saying it's based on race.
00:57:10.000 I think it's just quite as possible it was based on chumminess between the people who committed the shooting, Gregory McMichael and Travis McMichael, and local law enforcement.
00:57:21.000 The the this, of course, has has generated all sorts of national in intensity.
00:57:27.000 It should generate national intensity.
00:57:28.000 And it's a good thing that this is going to go before a grand jury.
00:57:31.000 It should have gone before a grand jury long ago.
00:57:34.000 All righty.
00:57:34.000 So we'll be back here later today with two additional hours of content.
00:57:37.000 Otherwise, have yourself try to have a relaxing weekend as one day bleeds into the next endlessly as weekdays and weekends become one long period of miasmatic waiting.
00:57:46.000 Otherwise, we'll see you here on Monday.
00:57:48.000 Try to relax.
00:57:49.000 Get on that Helix Sleep Mattress.
00:57:50.000 Try to get yourself a few moments of relaxation with those Bull and Branch Sheets.
00:57:53.000 Go check it out and enjoy yourself.
00:57:56.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:58:01.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Colton Haas.
00:58:03.000 Directed by Mike Joyner.
00:58:04.000 Executive producer Jeremy Boring.
00:58:06.000 Supervising producer Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling.
00:58:09.000 Assistant director Pavel Lydowsky.
00:58:11.000 Technical producer Austin Stevens.
00:58:13.000 Playback and media operated by Nick Sheehan.
00:58:15.000 Associate producer Katie Swinnerton.
00:58:17.000 Edited by Adam Sajovic.
00:58:18.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Koromina.
00:58:20.000 Hair and makeup is by Nika Geneva.
00:58:22.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire production.
00:58:24.000 Copyright Daily Wire 2020.
00:58:26.000 You know, the Matt Wall Show, it's not just another show about politics.
00:58:30.000 I think there are enough of those already out there.
00:58:32.000 We talk about culture, because culture drives politics, and it drives everything else.
00:58:36.000 So my main focuses are life, family, faith.
00:58:41.000 Those are fundamental, and that's what this show is about.