The Ben Shapiro Show - March 02, 2018


Governance By Chaos | Ep. 487


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 1 minute

Words per Minute

206.80608

Word Count

12,691

Sentence Count

874

Misogynist Sentences

5

Hate Speech Sentences

17


Summary

Trump tweets about trade, the stock market tanks, and we should give drug dealers the death penalty. It's a rough 48 hours for the President of the United States and we'll cover it all in this episode of The Ben Shapiro Show. Links From This Episode: Free Masterclass on Bitcoin and Gold from the Bitcoin Masterclass All Previous Podcast Episodes Leave Us a Review On Apple Podcasts Subscribe To Our YouTube Channel Learn more about your ad choices. Rate, review, and subscribe to our other podcasting platforms! The opinions stated here are our own, not those of our companies, and are not related to those of any of our corporations, banks, hedge funds, or other organizations. If you like what you hear, please consider becoming a supporter of our show by becoming a patron. We do not endorse, promote, or endorse any product or service discussed in this podcast. We are not affiliated with any of the products discussed here. This podcast is not intended to be a substitute for professional financial advice, recommendation, diagnosis, or consultation, advice, or recommendation for financial advice. The views expressed here is not that of any person, product or product recommendation, whether it's a professional, financial advice or not. Ben Shapiro is not a professional financial adviser, recommendation or recommendation, and does not represent any of that would be appropriate for that matter. Thank you for considering such matters. - Ben Shapiro's work is not professional advice, unless otherwise stated here. If you are looking for professional support, please contact Ben Shapiro, Ben Shapiro s rep or any other person, or you are considering seeking professional support from a professional professional, including a professional adviser. . Ben's website is linked here: bit.ee/BenShapersonal.org/ben@benshapersona.co/benshareepr@benhecox.org? Thanks for listening to the Ben Shapiro show? Ben is a friend of Ben's work, Ben's bio is and Ben is an employee of Ben Shapiro thank you for listening and reviewing this podcast, if you would like to support the show and reviewing Ben's content is appreciated? - Thank you Ben's words are appreciated - thank you, Ben s work is appreciated, Ben s words are greatly appreciated - tweet me in the Ben's review of this podcast is ?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 President Trump endures staffing problems, announces tariffs and tanks the markets, and says we should give drug dealers the death penalty.
00:00:06.000 So things are going awesome.
00:00:07.000 Ben Shapiro, this is the Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:14.000 It's been a rough 48 hours for the President of the United States.
00:00:16.000 It has not been solid.
00:00:19.000 And we'll go through all of the non-solidity in just a second.
00:00:21.000 There are some real staffing issues over at the White House, some chaos in terms of the internal dynamics at the White House.
00:00:27.000 Plus the President of the United States unleashed
00:00:30.000 The most ignorant tweet storm I have ever seen from him, and that is saying a lot.
00:00:33.000 This one was on trade policy, and it is just freaking egregious.
00:00:38.000 I mean, really.
00:00:39.000 My four-year-old daughter can probably do a better explanation of trade.
00:00:42.000 And if it sounds like I'm being too harsh, I'm being not harsh enough.
00:00:45.000 It's that bad.
00:00:46.000 So, I will explain all of that.
00:00:48.000 Again, guys, don't take it as though Trump's never done anything good.
00:00:51.000 He's done lots of good stuff, but his trade— I'll get to it.
00:00:54.000 Okay, so before I get to any of that, first, I want to say thank you to our sponsors over at Birch Gold.
00:00:59.000 So, right now you may have noticed the stock market is quite volatile.
00:01:02.000 It just got more volatile because the president's had a bunch of stupid crap on trade.
00:01:05.000 So,
00:01:05.000 Now would be a good time for you to take some of that money you got in the stock market and maybe invest it in some precious metals that aren't going to be touched by the stupidity of American trade policy and or inflationary policy.
00:01:15.000 So check it out over at Birch Gold Group.
00:01:17.000 They have a long-standing track record of continued success with thousands of satisfied clients, countless five-star reviews, an A-plus rating with the Better Business Bureau.
00:01:23.000 If you contact them right now, you get a free information kit on physical precious metals.
00:01:27.000 This comprehensive 16-page kit shows how gold and silver can protect your savings
00:01:31.000 As well as how you can legally move your IRA or 401k out of stocks and bonds and into a precious metals IRA.
00:01:37.000 To get that no cost and obligation kit, again, go to birchgold.com slash ben.
00:01:40.000 That is birchgold.com slash ben.
00:01:42.000 Suffice it to say that as of January 28, the stock market was 26,400.
00:01:45.000 Today is at 24,300.
00:01:46.000 That's a 2,000 point drop in about five weeks.
00:01:52.000 Not wonderful.
00:01:53.000 So now would be a good time for you to take a look at maybe investing in some gold.
00:01:57.000 So go to birchgold.com slash Ben.
00:01:59.000 Use that slash Ben so you get the free comprehensive kit.
00:02:01.000 And so that you also let them know that we sent you.
00:02:04.000 Okay.
00:02:05.000 So as I mentioned, the market's not having a couple of good days.
00:02:08.000 They're down five straight days.
00:02:10.000 And they've dropped in the last five days approximately a thousand points.
00:02:13.000 Now, is that the end of the world?
00:02:15.000 No, it's not the end of the world.
00:02:16.000 Except they dropped a thousand points the month before.
00:02:18.000 So, one of the reasons they continue to drop is because the President of the United States does not know what the hell he is talking about on trade.
00:02:25.000 And I say this advisedly.
00:02:27.000 The President, I don't know if he got his degree from Wharton Business School on trade from turning in Cracker Jack.
00:02:33.000 Box tops?
00:02:35.000 Honestly, I don't know if he got like a decoder ring in the mail.
00:02:37.000 I don't know where he learned his economics, but it is awful.
00:02:41.000 It is just awful.
00:02:42.000 And he's actually implementing it.
00:02:44.000 So, as I said yesterday, he said a bunch of stupid crap on guns, and then he's not going to implement any of it because Congress is going to stop him.
00:02:49.000 On trade, the president has plenary power essentially on trade because Congress has abdicated its duty over the past 50 years and given the president the ability to raise and lower tariffs essentially on his own for virtually any purpose.
00:03:00.000 Here is what Trump tweeted out today.
00:03:02.000 It's really, really dumb.
00:03:04.000 Okay, this is six hours ago.
00:03:06.000 When a country, USA, thank you, Mr. President, is losing many billions of dollars on trade with virtually every country it does business with, trade wars are good and easy to win.
00:03:16.000 Example, when we are down 100 billion with a certain country and they get cute, don't trade anymore.
00:03:21.000 We win big.
00:03:22.000 It's easy.
00:03:24.000 The levels of stupidity are like a Russian nesting doll here.
00:03:27.000 You open up the top level of stupidity and there's another level of stupidity beneath it, except it's an infinite regress of nesting dolls because there is no tiniest nesting doll of stupidity in this tweet.
00:03:36.000 Okay, so we'll go through this sentence by sentence.
00:03:39.000 When he says that we are losing many billions of dollars on trade, you don't lose money on trade.
00:03:44.000 When you go to Amazon.com and you buy yourself a used book, did you lose money on the trade?
00:03:49.000 No, you voluntarily opted to buy a product.
00:03:52.000 When you go to a grocery store,
00:03:54.000 And they give you an apple, and you give them 50 cents.
00:03:57.000 Did you lose money on the trade?
00:03:59.000 No, you bought an apple for 50 cents.
00:04:01.000 This is the necessity of how trade works.
00:04:03.000 It is a two-sided exchange, a voluntary consensual exchange, demonstrating both that you have consented to the exchange and that you have
00:04:11.000 Free will over your own labor and can trade your own labor and the products of it for something else.
00:04:15.000 This is the magic of free trade.
00:04:17.000 It's not just that free trade is more efficient, though it is, it's also that it is more moral because you get to determine how much your labor is worth and how much your money is worth.
00:04:24.000 And if you don't like paying 50 cents for an apple here, you can go down the street and you can pay 40 cents for an apple somewhere else because of competition in free trade.
00:04:32.000 When he says that trade deficits necessitate trade wars, and when he says trade wars are good and easy to win, name one.
00:04:39.000 Name a trade war that was good and easy to win.
00:04:42.000 You can't win a trade war.
00:04:43.000 Let me take my example a little bit further.
00:04:45.000 So, you went to the grocery store, and you bought $100 worth of groceries.
00:04:49.000 But the grocery store does not contract with you.
00:04:52.000 The grocery store doesn't buy anything from you.
00:04:54.000 The grocery store doesn't use your services.
00:04:56.000 Because, after all, you're a garbage man, and the grocery store doesn't need you.
00:04:59.000 So,
00:05:00.000 Do you?
00:05:00.000 How do you retaliate against the grocery store?
00:05:02.000 Are you angry at the grocery store because they didn't use your services?
00:05:06.000 And do you decide that what the best possible solution would be is to not go to Ralph's but instead to go to Gelson's where everything is twice as much and go over to Gelson's and pay twice the amount because Ralph's isn't using you and Gelson's might?
00:05:17.000 Is this what you're going to do?
00:05:19.000 Or forget about whether Gelson's is using you.
00:05:21.000 Right?
00:05:21.000 Gelson's may not use you either.
00:05:23.000 But you decide that you're going to penalize Ralph's because Ralph's used to use you and now they're no longer using you so you decide to pay twice as much for your groceries.
00:05:29.000 Does this make any sense?
00:05:30.000 If Amazon.com is not hiring you as a contractor, do you stop shopping at Amazon and instead go over to the local bookstore and pay twice as much money?
00:05:37.000 Of course you don't because that would be stupid.
00:05:39.000 Your trade deficit with Amazon is
00:05:42.000 Whatever it is that you paid for the product, when you buy from the grocery store, you now have a trade deficit of $100 if you spent $100 on your groceries because the grocery store didn't buy anything from you.
00:05:51.000 Does that mean you should go to a more expensive grocery store?
00:05:53.000 And that if you boycott the grocery store, you have somehow won?
00:05:57.000 No, it means that you just chopped your own leg off because you're stupid.
00:06:00.000 Okay, that's what trade wars are.
00:06:02.000 This has been known since the days of Ricardo, David Ricardo.
00:06:05.000 This has been known for 300 years.
00:06:08.000 This is 16th century mercantilism he's talking about here, and it's a giant fail.
00:06:13.000 When he says, when we're down $100 billion with a certain country and they get cute, don't trade anymore, we win big.
00:06:18.000 There are many countries in the world that have trade surpluses, overall trade surpluses.
00:06:21.000 Let me name one of those countries that has a trade surplus for you.
00:06:24.000 Venezuela.
00:06:25.000 Venezuela has a trade surplus.
00:06:27.000 You know why?
00:06:29.000 Because no one in Venezuela has the ability to buy anything foreign.
00:06:33.000 They put up enormous tariffs.
00:06:35.000 And so Venezuela has a trade surplus.
00:06:36.000 And people are eating dogs.
00:06:38.000 People are literally eating dogs in the street.
00:06:41.000 Trade surplus, trade deficit mean nothing.
00:06:43.000 Because all a trade surplus or trade deficit recognizes is that you are paying another country for a product.
00:06:48.000 You are voluntarily participating in an exchange.
00:06:51.000 And then that money is not being paid back by that country to you.
00:06:54.000 But here's the magic of trade also.
00:06:56.000 When you pay a dollar for a Chinese product and it ends up in China, what do you think happens to that dollar?
00:07:01.000 Do you think they just take it and store it somewhere?
00:07:03.000 Do you think that it magically turns into yen?
00:07:06.000 Yuan?
00:07:06.000 So they can now turn around and use it in China?
00:07:08.000 No, they have to use it in the United States because we have a different currency than they do.
00:07:12.000 So they turn around and they invest it back in the United States, in our stock market, in our bonds.
00:07:16.000 This is how the economy works.
00:07:18.000 You have to be so economically ignorant to tweet something like this.
00:07:22.000 It is truly amazing.
00:07:23.000 But Trump didn't stop there.
00:07:24.000 Here's some other stuff that he tweeted.
00:07:25.000 He tweeted, quote,
00:07:33.000 What?
00:07:34.000 Now?
00:07:36.000 Again, this is very stupid.
00:07:40.000 Our steel industry is not in bad shape.
00:07:41.000 Our steel industry, as I told you yesterday, was up 5% in production last year, and all of our steel companies have had stock increases over the last 10 to 15 years.
00:07:49.000 Nucor, which is the top steel producer in the United States, its stock price is at $12 in 2000.
00:07:52.000 It is now at $65.
00:07:55.000 You're telling me that the steel industry is dying in the United States?
00:07:57.000 It's doing just fine.
00:07:59.000 72.5% of all steel consumed in the United States is also produced in the United States.
00:08:03.000 Our steel industry is not dying.
00:08:05.000 Also, somebody should inform Switzerland that they're not a country anymore, because Switzerland does not produce its own steel.
00:08:10.000 In fact, many countries don't produce their own steel.
00:08:13.000 They don't produce their own steel because sometimes they don't have the actual materials available to produce their own steel.
00:08:18.000 Does this mean the country doesn't exist anymore?
00:08:20.000 I'm not aware that Israel produces lots of its own steel.
00:08:22.000 I don't think Israel has great steel deposits or deposits.
00:08:25.000 They import most of their steel.
00:08:27.000 Is Israel not a country anymore?
00:08:28.000 And not a powerful country anymore?
00:08:30.000 Of course not, because that's stupid.
00:08:32.000 And then he says, he explains further, Professor Trump,
00:08:36.000 He explains, Again, this is dumb.
00:08:37.000 Let's say that China taxes our products, 50% coming in.
00:08:39.000 Right?
00:08:39.000 They tax every product that we send them, 50% coming in.
00:09:01.000 Which means presumably we're not selling as many products there.
00:09:04.000 You know what else is happening?
00:09:05.000 Chinese citizens are paying at least 50% more for the same product.
00:09:08.000 They're impoverishing their own citizens.
00:09:10.000 They're just making their own citizens pay more for a product they could have gotten more cheaply elsewhere.
00:09:14.000 So is the solution for the United States to jack up its own prices?
00:09:17.000 Remember, everyone in the United States is both a producer and a consumer.
00:09:20.000 In the steel industry, there are going to be a lot of people who are very happy with the tariffs because now they don't have to compete with foreign sources.
00:09:25.000 But for every steel job, there are 45 jobs in this country that use steel inputs whose prices just went up.
00:09:33.000 So Wilbur Ross, the Commerce Secretary who's most famous for falling asleep in cabinet meetings and drooling.
00:09:38.000 I'm serious.
00:09:39.000 Okay, this is not a joke.
00:09:40.000 That was reported by the New York Times.
00:09:41.000 Apparently Trump got pissed at it because he would legitimately fall asleep in cabinet meetings.
00:09:46.000 Top men.
00:09:47.000 Okay, and Wilbur Ross goes on television today and he says, you know, there's a ton of steel in American cars and that means that if you raise the tariff by 25%, it's only raising the amount of the car by like half of 1%.
00:10:00.000 Trump change.
00:10:01.000 Number one, not necessarily chump change to the guy who's paying for the car.
00:10:04.000 An extra $175 on a $35,000 car is not necessarily chump change to everybody.
00:10:08.000 Okay, that's number one.
00:10:09.000 Number two, you're assuming that you can just make the calculation by the amount of steel in a car.
00:10:14.000 That's not correct.
00:10:15.000 There are lots of contractors between the ore and between the car.
00:10:19.000 Okay, and at every step of the way, there is markup.
00:10:21.000 So, if there is a steel product that is used in the making of an engine, that is very often outsourced to another company.
00:10:27.000 That means that that company now has to pay more for the steel, which means that they manufacture the product, and they don't just pass the amount of the cost on, they pass the amount plus the labor plus the profit.
00:10:38.000 Right?
00:10:38.000 So that means now they're charging more for that input.
00:10:40.000 And let's say it's a piece of an engine.
00:10:41.000 Now somebody has to put that engine together.
00:10:43.000 And so they have to buy that product, which is already marked up,
00:10:45.000 So they mark it up even more.
00:10:47.000 And this is how tariffs snowball.
00:10:48.000 When the President of the United States, Barack Obama, raised tariffs on Chinese tires, we lost 12,000 jobs in the auto industry because Barack Obama raised the prices of tires.
00:10:59.000 Okay, and tires are a lot cheaper to manufacture and make and sell than cars are.
00:11:04.000 Hey, this is all stupid.
00:11:05.000 It doesn't make any sense.
00:11:06.000 It's economically illiterate.
00:11:07.000 And it's so funny.
00:11:08.000 There are all these people today who are, oh, well, this is what Trump ran on.
00:11:11.000 He ran on this.
00:11:12.000 So obviously he's going to do it.
00:11:14.000 Yeah, I didn't hear you saying the same thing about Barack Obama.
00:11:16.000 He ran a lot of garbage, too.
00:11:17.000 And then he did a lot of that garbage.
00:11:18.000 And we were all kind of pissed about it, I recall.
00:11:20.000 I was angry when Trump said this stuff during the campaign.
00:11:22.000 This is not me new to the game here.
00:11:24.000 I was writing full pieces in March 2016 about why Trump's trade policy was idiotic.
00:11:29.000 He and Bernie Sanders basically have the same trade policy.
00:11:32.000 Note to everyone, if you have the same policy on anything as Bernie Sanders, you're stupid.
00:11:37.000 You should not have the same policy as Bernie Sanders on things.
00:11:40.000 Bernie Sanders' policy is awful, awful, awful.
00:11:43.000 So, in just a second, I'm going to explain to you all of the reasons why tariffs are bad.
00:11:47.000 We're going to go back to economic rudiments.
00:11:49.000 We're going to go back to the very beginning, and I'll speak in short words and phrases so that people can understand.
00:11:54.000 Because it seems like there are a lot of people who don't understand.
00:11:56.000 If it seems like I'm angry about this, it's because I am.
00:11:58.000 This is legitimately Econ 101.
00:12:01.000 This is not complex.
00:12:02.000 This is not difficult.
00:12:03.000 It really is not.
00:12:05.000 Just take it down to your normal, everyday interaction with other people, and you see how dumb this argument is.
00:12:09.000 The other reason I'm angry is if you want the president to have a successful term, then you would like for the economy to be good.
00:12:14.000 There are a lot of people saying today, well, don't worry about everything he says.
00:12:16.000 Don't worry that 57% of the American public by polls think the president's a racist.
00:12:19.000 If the economy is good, everything will be fine.
00:12:22.000 And the president says, hold my beer, I'm starting a trade war.
00:12:25.000 OK, great.
00:12:26.000 Great.
00:12:28.000 All right.
00:12:28.000 Well, we'll explain all of this a little bit more in just a second.
00:12:31.000 First.
00:12:32.000 I want to say thank you to our sponsors over at My Patriot Supply.
00:12:35.000 So, right now, there's natural disasters going on all around the world.
00:12:39.000 In Puerto Rico, they're still trying to recover from natural disasters.
00:12:42.000 Imagine there's a natural disaster in your area, and the government can't get to you, and all the grocery store shelves have been emptied because the chain of supply has been disrupted by a stupid trade war.
00:12:51.000 And imagine that you now have to figure out how to live.
00:12:54.000 Well, the best way to do that is going to be by talking to my friends over at My Patriot Supply.
00:13:01.000 OK, you heard that right.
00:13:21.000 This is one year's worth of food for under $1,000.
00:13:24.000 Normally, you know, you're talking about getting, like, enough for just a little while, but again, in Puerto Rico, it is months past natural disaster.
00:13:31.000 Months past natural disaster, and people still don't have the food that they need.
00:13:34.000 This kit normally sells for over $2,000, but this week, for $999, you get a one-year emergency food supply.
00:13:40.000 Call 888-803-1413 and ask for the Ben Shapiro one-year food kit special price.
00:13:46.000 $999 when you use my name, you get that special price.
00:13:47.000 Otherwise, you're gonna be paying a couple grand for it.
00:13:49.000 Or order online at preparewithben.com.
00:13:51.000 We're good to go.
00:14:22.000 The president's tariff policy is full-on ridiculunk.
00:14:25.000 Okay?
00:14:26.000 It is not good.
00:14:27.000 And here is why.
00:14:28.000 Number one, tariffs are an unfair tax.
00:14:30.000 You are taxing one industry on behalf of another industry.
00:14:33.000 You are taxing people who buy cars on behalf of the steel industry.
00:14:36.000 And jobs will be lost in the car industry because you are attempting to save jobs in the steel industry.
00:14:41.000 As I said yesterday, there were 200,000 jobs that were lost in the United States between 2001 and 2003 because of George W. Bush's far less stringent steel tariffs.
00:14:51.000 And Trump isn't just talking steel tariffs anymore.
00:14:53.000 He's talking about full-scale trade war with everybody who has tariffs on our products.
00:14:57.000 Which is just brilliant.
00:14:58.000 If all of these countries wish to charge their own citizens more for products to protect their domestic industries, then fine, we should take advantage of that.
00:15:06.000 You get richer when you buy cheaper products.
00:15:09.000 If you don't have to pay as much for stuff, you're getting richer.
00:15:11.000 And we're not all reliant on foreign trade.
00:15:13.000 The United States is a massive market economy.
00:15:16.000 We generate most of what we produce.
00:15:17.000 I mean, most of what we produce, we consume here in the United States in most businesses.
00:15:22.000 So if everybody else decides that they are going to try to destroy our ability to import into their country, to export into their country, then why exactly would we cut off our nose to spite our face by making our own consumers pay more?
00:15:34.000 It just doesn't make any more sense.
00:15:35.000 As I say, tariffs also destroy jobs.
00:15:38.000 When you remove money from profitable industries, people who don't need tariffs and subsidies to survive, and you give it to those who are inefficient, it keeps jobs in industries that are less efficient.
00:15:47.000 And if competition is never allowed, then product quality actually declines over time.
00:15:51.000 So you're buying worse cars over time if you tariff foreign cars.
00:15:54.000 And then when you open up the market, because people are tired of buying crappy American cars, for example, this is what happened in the 1970s, then we're flooded with a bunch of Japanese cars and suddenly the American market share goes down dramatically.
00:16:04.000 This is exactly what happened in the 1960s and 1970s in the American auto industry.
00:16:09.000 Tariffs actually create zombie industries.
00:16:11.000 Okay, America is not, as I say, damaged by unfair trade practices of other countries in the sense that they put a tariff on us and therefore we are greatly hurt.
00:16:19.000 Currency is an exchange unit.
00:16:20.000 So all of the talk about how China also is manipulating its currency.
00:16:24.000 Okay, if manipulating currency were that easy and that profitable, if that were really the big issue in America, then we would just print a bunch of money and we'd walk around with wheelbarrows like Weimar Germany.
00:16:34.000 And the people in Weimar Germany or in Venezuela today or in Zimbabwe where inflation was at one point at 1000% a day.
00:16:40.000 Those people were not immensely wealthy.
00:16:42.000 They were immensely poor.
00:16:43.000 Inflation, inflating your currency is a sign that you don't have a strong underlying fundamental economy.
00:16:49.000 Trade is not a zero-sum game.
00:16:51.000 This is from Thomas Sowell.
00:17:12.000 Thanks for having me.
00:17:27.000 Thomas Sowell points out that if Japanese sold us a lot of cars and we send them lots of dollars, they're going to use those dollars to buy American assets.
00:17:33.000 Scott Lincecum, who is a trade lawyer at Cato, he says, In other words, we buy goods and services from foreigners, they buy an equal amount of our exports, plus our financial assets, aka foreign investment, in the United States.
00:17:54.000 And here's the key, okay?
00:17:55.000 If trade were really about just beating the other guy to prevent them from importing stuff, why not just sink all the Chinese ships bringing products into the country?
00:18:01.000 Does anyone think that'd be good for the economy?
00:18:02.000 No, because this is stupid.
00:18:04.000 S-T-O-O-P-I-D.
00:18:06.000 Stupid.
00:18:07.000 Okay, so.
00:18:08.000 In a second, we're going to move on from Trump steel tariffs.
00:18:12.000 Apparently, virtually every country in the world is now threatening countermeasures for steep new tariffs.
00:18:16.000 And remember how President Trump put on a bunch of tariffs on Canadian lumber?
00:18:20.000 We now have a shortage of lumber in the United States.
00:18:23.000 That's been working out fantastically well for people in the United States.
00:18:26.000 OK, we're going to get to other things that are happening in the White House.
00:18:30.000 Again, it's been a rough 48 hours for the White House.
00:18:32.000 It's not a pylon.
00:18:32.000 It's just the truth.
00:18:34.000 We're going to get to that in just one second.
00:18:35.000 OK, so.
00:18:36.000 Here is the latest on the chaos inside the White House.
00:18:40.000 So, right now, here is where things stand.
00:18:43.000 Hope Hicks, the president's top aide, is stepping down.
00:18:46.000 Jared Kushner, one of the people the president is closest to, just lost his top-level security clearance.
00:18:50.000 Gary Cohn, who was discussed as chief of staff to replace John Kelly about a week and a half ago and is the head of Trump's economic program, is now threatening to quit.
00:18:58.000 And National Security Advisor H.R.
00:18:59.000 McMaster is apparently on the ropes, as well.
00:19:02.000 So, basically, every top-level administrator, except for John Kelly, is on the ropes.
00:19:06.000 That is not the sign of a healthy administration.
00:19:09.000 Even John Kelly doesn't sound super enthused about all of this.
00:19:11.000 Here is the White House Chief of Staff yesterday talking about taking the job as White House Chief of Staff and moving on from Homeland Security.
00:19:19.000 Truly, at six months, the last thing I wanted to do was walk away from one of the great honors of my life, being the Secretary of Homeland Security.
00:19:28.000 But I did something wrong and God punished me, I guess.
00:19:32.000 Now there's an enthusiastic guy about his new job of keeping the president under control.
00:19:35.000 God punished him by moving on to the White House.
00:19:37.000 He talked about how he's happy to be helping the president push the agenda.
00:19:40.000 I'm sure he is, but it is not an easy job.
00:19:42.000 The reason the turnover at the White House is so high is because everything is variable over there.
00:19:46.000 Now, let it be known, this does not mean that everything that Trump is doing is bad.
00:19:50.000 The president of the United States, by the time he has finished his first term, will have replaced almost half of all of the judges on circuit course across the country.
00:19:57.000 That's a wonderful thing.
00:19:58.000 He's doing a great job on that because he's delegated it out.
00:20:01.000 But when Trump is bored and he gets his hands on the gears of power, when he grabs those levers and he starts playing video games, all that comes out is bad stuff.
00:20:09.000 The president needs to be disciplined.
00:20:11.000 This is not because I want him to lose, it's because I would like for him to be a good president.
00:20:15.000 And I would like for the country to win with him.
00:20:17.000 I like winning.
00:20:18.000 The president supposedly likes winning, too.
00:20:20.000 I'll tell you what is not winning.
00:20:21.000 What is not winning is putting forward gun proposals to seize weapons from a huge variety of citizens.
00:20:26.000 What is not winning is suggesting a massive trade war across the board.
00:20:30.000 As I said earlier, the EU is now threatening massive retaliatory tariffs on the United States, which is just wonderful.
00:20:36.000 It's a great way to tank the economy.
00:20:39.000 We've tried this before, by the way.
00:20:40.000 The Smoot-Hawley tariffs of 1930 are widely perceived to have led to the Great Depression and helped exacerbate it into a 10-year Great Depression as opposed to a relatively insignificant recession.
00:20:51.000 None of this makes any sense.
00:20:53.000 One of the reasons that Trump is doing all this stuff now is because when Trump is isolated, when he feels like he doesn't have all the people around him he likes to have around him, when Hope Hicks is gone and Jared and Ivanka have been marginalized, and it's just a bunch of people he doesn't know, like John Kelly, sitting around him, he feels like he has to go back to his gut.
00:21:09.000 And his gut on certain issues is not bad, and on other issues, it is sheerly terrible.
00:21:13.000 And on trade, it is sheerly terrible.
00:21:16.000 The New York Times is reporting on the situation in the White House.
00:21:19.000 Apparently, people in the White House did not even know that Trump was going to announce the steel tariffs and aluminum tariffs yesterday.
00:21:24.000 By the way, the price of beer is going to go up, too.
00:21:26.000 Every beer can in America is used—is made with aluminum, which means that if you like your beer, you're not going to get to keep your beer.
00:21:33.000 The price on it is going to go up, which is—I think most Americans are not going to be super happy with that.
00:21:38.000 The previous day, according to The New York Times, Mr. Trump's chief economic adviser, Gary Cohn, warned the chief of staff, John Kelly, he might resign if the president went ahead with the plan.
00:21:46.000 According to people briefed on the discussion, Cohn had lobbied fiercely against the measures.
00:21:51.000 We'll see if he quits next week, if Trump actually implements this stuff.
00:21:54.000 As I said, the stock market today has taken a dump.
00:21:57.000 Yesterday it also took a dump.
00:21:58.000 It's down about 200 points right now.
00:22:00.000 That is better than it was earlier this morning when it was down about 380 points.
00:22:04.000 So we will see.
00:22:05.000 Usually it's around 3 o'clock in the afternoon that you finally find out what exactly the market's going to do today.
00:22:10.000 But as I say, the five-day forecast on the market has been pretty garbage.
00:22:14.000 The high was 25,761.
00:22:17.000 Today it is now at 24,400.
00:22:19.000 So that means that we've lost well over 1,000 points in the last five days on the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
00:22:25.000 The reason we haven't lost more than that is because people don't know if Trump's actually going to do what he says he's going to do.
00:22:29.000 People are pricing uncertainty into the market.
00:22:31.000 Well, anyway, White House aides arrived at work on Thursday.
00:22:34.000 They had no clear idea of what Trump would say about trade.
00:22:36.000 He had summoned steel and aluminum executives to a meeting.
00:22:38.000 When the White House said only that he would listen to their concerns, it seemed to signal that Cohen had held on.
00:22:42.000 But at the end of the photo session, a reporter asked Trump about the measures, and he confirmed that the U.S.
00:22:46.000 would announce next week it is imposing long-term tariffs of 25 percent on steel and 10 percent on aluminum.
00:22:52.000 Now, how can you tell this is not the effect of Trump's massive expertise on trade?
00:22:56.000 Even his guy on trade, a guy named Peter Navarro, who is not good on trade, Peter Navarro had recommended a 24% tariff on steel.
00:23:04.000 He went to Trump, he said, 24% tariff on steel.
00:23:06.000 What did Trump do?
00:23:07.000 He said, no, 25, because it's a round number.
00:23:10.000 If we are going to be setting tariffs based on multiples of five, let me suggest this is not an outgrowth of economic expertise, it is rather an outgrowth of economic foolishness.
00:23:22.000 Obviously, there's been tremendous turnover in the White House, and the discomfort that Trump is feeling is obvious to everyone.
00:23:28.000 Again, when he says things like the WTO has been a disaster for this country, and it's been great for China and terrible for the United States and great for other countries, why is it the United States still has the most powerful economy in world history?
00:23:38.000 And why is it that we generate virtually all of the economic growth on planet Earth?
00:23:43.000 Why is that?
00:23:44.000 So there's that as well.
00:23:46.000 So all of this is just wonderful.
00:23:48.000 And another piece of bad news coming down for the White House.
00:23:50.000 I'm sorry to give all this bad news today.
00:23:52.000 Another piece of bad news coming down for the White House that I will discuss in just one second.
00:23:56.000 First, I want to say thank you to our sponsors over at ZipRecruiter.
00:23:59.000 So, every business needs great people and a better way to find them.
00:24:02.000 We at The Daily Wire are constantly hiring and firing, and hopefully everybody in this room will remain employed.
00:24:08.000 I can't guarantee it, guys.
00:24:09.000 I can't.
00:24:10.000 But if you are fired, the good news is we'll use ZipRecruiter to replace you.
00:24:12.000 So, ZipRecruiter is the best place to get great employees.
00:24:16.000 ZipRecruiter learns what you're looking for, identifies people with the right experience, and invites them to apply to your job.
00:24:21.000 In fact, 80% of employers who post a job on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate through the site in just one day.
00:24:27.000 And ZipRecruiter does not stop there.
00:24:29.000 They even spotlight the strongest applications you receive, so you never miss a great match.
00:24:33.000 The right candidates are out there.
00:24:34.000 ZipRecruiter is how you can find them.
00:24:36.000 My listeners get to try ZipRecruiter for free.
00:24:38.000 So go to ZipRecruiter.com slash DailyWire.
00:24:41.000 That's ZipRecruiter.com slash DailyWire.
00:24:43.000 And again, when you use ZipRecruiter.com slash DailyWire, my listeners can try ZipRecruiter for free, can post your jobs for free.
00:24:49.000 ZipRecruiter.com slash DailyWire.
00:24:51.000 It is the smartest way to hire.
00:24:53.000 You are going to get the best employees through this service.
00:24:55.000 Again, ZipRecruiter.com slash DailyWire.
00:24:57.000 That also lets them know that we sent you.
00:25:00.000 Another piece of unfortunate news for the White House.
00:25:02.000 So, President Trump has been on a tear against Andrew McCabe, the ex-deputy director of the FBI.
00:25:09.000 And the reason that he's been on a tear against Andrew McCabe is because his supposition is that McCabe and Comey and the rest of the FBI were out to get him during the last election cycle and in the post-election period.
00:25:19.000 Well, now it turns out that a Justice Department review is actually expected to criticize Andrew McCabe, the former FBI deputy director under Comey.
00:25:28.000 It's expected to criticize McCabe
00:25:30.000 Why?
00:25:31.000 Because he was too mean to Hillary Clinton.
00:25:35.000 So Trump's own Justice Department is about to find that Andrew McCabe, the guy that Trump has been ripping on, it wasn't that he was too hard on Trump, it's that he was too hard on Hillary Clinton.
00:25:45.000 They're going to condemn him for authorizing the disclosure of information about a continuing investigation to journalists, according to four people familiar with the inquiry.
00:25:52.000 Such a damning report would give Trump new ammunition to criticize McCabe, who's at the center of Trump's theory that deep state actors inside the FBI have been working to sabotage his presidency.
00:26:00.000 But Mr. McCabe's disclosures to the news media do not fit neatly into that assumption.
00:26:04.000 They contributed to a negative article about Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration's DOJ, not Mr. Trump.
00:26:11.000 The Department's Inspector General, Michael Horowitz, has zeroed in on disclosures to The Wall Street Journal as part of a wide-ranging investigation into, among other things, how the FBI approached the 2016 inquiry into Mrs. Clinton's handling of classified information.
00:26:23.000 Mr. Horowitz said he expects to release a report this month or next.
00:26:27.000 So, McCabe already said he was going to step down.
00:26:30.000 He stepped down as deputy director in late January.
00:26:33.000 So, all of this is fodder for Trump, that the FBI is corrupt, but unfortunately, the corruption doesn't seem to run toward Trump.
00:26:39.000 It seems to run toward there are a bunch of people in the FBI who are deeply discomfited with Hillary Clinton's corruption, and we're releasing information to the press, which cuts against Trump's argument.
00:26:49.000 That is not good for Trump.
00:26:50.000 Trump's whole argument is the FBI is out to get him.
00:26:52.000 I've been skeptical of the story that the FBI was out to get Trump.
00:26:56.000 I still think there are open questions about how the FISA warrants were used against Carter Page, whether the FISA courts in general take bad information and turn them into warrants.
00:27:04.000 But I've been unconvinced by the evidence produced so far that the FBI was out to target Trump, out to destroy Trump, out to destroy his administration.
00:27:12.000 I think there are bad people inside the FBI like Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.
00:27:15.000 Those people should have been fired and Mueller did fire them.
00:27:17.000 I think the FBI's current investigation into Trump-Russia collusion is going to come up with nothing.
00:27:22.000 I think that what the FBI is doing right now is overblown.
00:27:26.000 But I don't think that during the transition period, the evidence is there yet.
00:27:30.000 Maybe it'll be shown.
00:27:31.000 Maybe it will.
00:27:31.000 I don't think the evidence is there yet that the FBI was quote-unquote out to get Trump, as opposed to they're overzealous on virtually everything, and this is just another thing that they are overzealous on.
00:27:40.000 OK, so in other bad news for Trump, again, it's been a bad Trump day.
00:27:44.000 And I hope that by the time we get to Monday, he's turned it around and things are going great again.
00:27:47.000 But, OK, this is not a great indicator.
00:27:50.000 Yesterday, the president did a hearing, an open forum on the opioid crisis.
00:27:56.000 And it was very moving.
00:27:57.000 Eric Bolling did a video message about his son who died of an opioid addiction, died of an opioid overdose.
00:28:02.000 And Trump showed up.
00:28:04.000 And in the process, he said that we should execute drug dealers in the United States.
00:28:08.000 And we have drug dealers that don't
00:28:10.000 I mean, they kill hundreds and hundreds of people, and most of them don't even go to jail.
00:28:16.000 You know, if you shoot one person, they give you life, they give you the death penalty.
00:28:22.000 These people can kill 2,000, 3,000 people, and nothing happens to them.
00:28:27.000 And we need strength with respect to the pushers and to the drug dealers.
00:28:32.000 And if we don't do that, you're never going to solve the problem.
00:28:34.000 If you want to be weak and you want to talk about
00:28:37.000 Just blue-ribbon committees.
00:28:39.000 That's not the answer.
00:28:40.000 The answer is you have to have strength and you have to have toughness.
00:28:43.000 The drug dealers, the drug pushers, are... They're really doing damage.
00:28:49.000 They're really doing damage.
00:28:51.000 Some countries have a very, very tough penalty.
00:28:54.000 The ultimate penalty.
00:28:56.000 OK, when he says some countries have the very toughest penalty, the ultimate penalty, he's talking about the Philippines, where they legitimately execute drug dealers.
00:29:04.000 So there are already laws on the books that if you're a drug kingpin and your drugs result in death, that you can actually get the death penalty in the United States.
00:29:10.000 But if we're going to extend this to all drug dealers across the country, that if you're dealing pot, that we're now going to execute you, I think this might be a little bit over the top.
00:29:18.000 So in the last 48 hours, the president of the United States has suggested, number one, removing guns from people without due process.
00:29:26.000 We're good to go.
00:29:50.000 And even I think Trump's feeling some heat from his right, which is good.
00:29:53.000 You know, one of my great fears before Trump was elected was the soul sucking of the Republican Party, the soul sucking of the conservative movement, that a lot of people were just going to follow Trump wherever he goes because the president is the president and he has a lot of public sway.
00:30:05.000 And I do think that we've seen a couple of areas where the where the conservative commentariat is not willing to go, even a lot of Trump supporters.
00:30:12.000 So Tucker Carlson is a good example of this.
00:30:14.000 So, Tucker, yesterday I had this to say about the president's talk, his loose talk about guns.
00:30:20.000 At one point, the president said the government should, quote, take the guns first, go through due process second.
00:30:27.000 Now, I mean, how honest do you want to be?
00:30:29.000 Imagine if Barack Obama had said that.
00:30:32.000 Just ignore due process and start confiscating guns.
00:30:35.000 Obama would have been denounced as a dictator.
00:30:37.000 We would have denounced him first, trust me.
00:30:39.000 Congress would be talking impeachment right now.
00:30:41.000 Someone would be muttering about secession.
00:30:43.000 Well, the media agreed with what the president said yesterday, so they've underplayed it, or they presented it as just a little battle between the president and the NRA.
00:30:51.000 Okay, so there's Tucker Carlson ripping into Trump.
00:30:53.000 Pretty rare thing when you see Tucker ripping into Trump.
00:30:56.000 But, again, Trump's not had a good 48 hours.
00:30:59.000 Good for Tucker and good for conservatives who are saying when things are wrong, they're wrong, whether it's Trump saying it or whether it's Obama saying it.
00:31:05.000 Okay, so we'll continue with this and also a poll that shows that Democrats really do want to grab guns.
00:31:10.000 I don't just mean some Democrats.
00:31:12.000 I mean a majority of Democrats.
00:31:13.000 It's an amazing poll.
00:31:14.000 I'm going to tell you about that in just a second.
00:31:16.000 You're going to have to go over to Facebook for that.
00:31:17.000 So you're going to have to go over to Daily Wire for that and subscribe.
00:31:21.000 So $9.99 a month gets you a subscription to our Daily Wire account.
00:31:25.000 That means that you can see the rest of our show live.
00:31:27.000 It means the rest of the Michael Knowles show live.
00:31:28.000 It means the rest of the Andrew Klavan show live.
00:31:30.000 It means that today we have the mailbag.
00:31:32.000 We're good to go.
00:31:49.000 Quality beverage vessel.
00:31:50.000 I found out yesterday what this cost at wholesale and let me tell you it ain't cheap, okay?
00:31:54.000 These things are awesome.
00:31:55.000 Okay, this is the leftist tears hot or cold tumbler and you get that with your annual subscription for just $99 the whole shebang and that means that you get all of the aforementioned glories and this which will grant you life and wonder.
00:32:07.000 So check that out.
00:32:08.000 Also, you want to listen later?
00:32:09.000 Go over to iTunes, SoundCloud, YouTube.
00:32:12.000 Please subscribe.
00:32:12.000 Please leave us a review.
00:32:13.000 It always helps.
00:32:14.000 We are the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast in the nation.
00:32:22.000 So Democrats are jumping on board with what Trump was suggesting.
00:32:26.000 And this is why I said yesterday, I'm not super worried about what Trump had to say yesterday, because right now Republicans are in charge of the Congress.
00:32:31.000 What happens if Democrats win control of the Congress?
00:32:33.000 Well, I have a good hint for you as to what happens.
00:32:36.000 They listen to what Trump says, they go and they talk with Trump, and then Trump says this sort of stuff and they draw up
00:32:41.000 Legislation specifically to his specs.
00:32:44.000 They draw it up for him, and they pass it through the House, and then it's up to Mitch McConnell to stand between you and doom.
00:32:49.000 And everybody who's ripping on Mitch McConnell is the weakling who had to be defeated by the Trumpists that Mitch McConnell was the guy who had to be stood up to because he was too weak in caving to the left.
00:32:57.000 If the Democrats win the House, things are going to get real nasty, and Mitch McConnell could be the guy standing between conservatism and disaster.
00:33:04.000 And we will see how that goes.
00:33:06.000 OK, but here is what the Washington Examiner reported this yesterday.
00:33:08.000 Senate Democrats said they will introduce a gun control bill that would expand background checks, ban certain weapons, and give the courts the power to temporarily take guns away from people who are deemed to be a threat to themselves and others after President Trump offered support for these goals in a White House discussion on Wednesday.
00:33:24.000 Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said the only way to advance the measure in the GOP-led Senate is with the endorsement and help from President Trump.
00:33:30.000 He described a scenario in which the Senate could pass Schumer's proposal with mostly Democratic support and a few Republicans encouraged by Trump.
00:33:36.000 And Schumer then reached out to Trump directly and said that the president should endorse the Schumer plan.
00:33:42.000 He said the president is the first step.
00:33:44.000 He said that McConnell would not bring up the bill without the president's persuasion.
00:33:47.000 So, as I say, Trump had the NRA in the room, everything was hunky-dory, but House Democrats, Senate Democrats, they've put together basically a gun ban bill, and they're asking Trump to take the lead on it.
00:33:59.000 If they were to take control of the House and the Senate, you can't rely on their good graces to maintain gun rights.
00:34:03.000 Hey, here is a poll.
00:34:05.000 A poll from YouGov.
00:34:06.000 It asks people whether they favor or oppose banning semiautomatic weapons.
00:34:09.000 Not semiautomatic rifles.
00:34:11.000 All semiautomatic weapons.
00:34:12.000 That means all semiautomatic pistols, semiautomatic handguns, semiautomatic rifles.
00:34:17.000 Here are the poll numbers.
00:34:19.000 Are you ready for this?
00:34:20.000 Okay, 55% of Americans say they support, they favor strongly, or favor somewhat, banning all semi-automatic weapons in the United States.
00:34:30.000 Okay, that is the removal of 300 million guns from people in the United States.
00:34:34.000 Okay, and by party ID, 82% of Democrats, 82% of Democrats are in favor of removing all semi-automatic weapons from the citizens of the United States, banning them.
00:34:47.000 OK, that is the question.
00:34:48.000 The question was banning them.
00:34:49.000 OK, now here's where it gets totally crazy.
00:34:52.000 OK, then they followed up by asking people how they feel about banning all handguns, which would include revolvers.
00:34:57.000 So now we're not talking just semi-automatic weapons.
00:34:59.000 We're talking all semi-autos and all
00:35:02.000 Well, revolvers.
00:35:02.000 The difference between a revolver and a semi-automatic weapon is that when you shoot a revolver, then the cylinder moves, and it re-chambers by moving the cylinder, and when you shoot a semi-automatic handgun, one bullet pops up into the chamber automatically every time you fire a bullet until the magazine is empty.
00:35:17.000 Okay, here are the numbers on people who would ban all guns.
00:35:20.000 All of them.
00:35:21.000 Okay, you ready?
00:35:22.000 So, favor strongly, favor somewhat.
00:35:24.000 Only 26% of Americans favor strongly or favor somewhat banning all guns, banning all handguns.
00:35:31.000 Hey, among Democrats, among Democrats, you ready for this?
00:35:36.000 40, let's see, this is 44% of Democrats, 44% of Democrats say they favor it.
00:35:45.000 46% of Democrats say they do not.
00:35:47.000 Okay, so that means that they are basically split 50-50 on repealing the Second Amendment, like taking away all guns in the United States.
00:35:55.000 They're split 50-50 on whether to remove all guns in the United States.
00:35:58.000 In other words, they are exactly what you thought they were.
00:36:01.000 Hey, Democrats are people who want to remove as many guns as possible in the United States, and then they have the gall to tell people like us that they don't actually want to remove the Second Amendment from folks.
00:36:08.000 No, they're all good-hearted.
00:36:10.000 No, they don't want to take away your gun.
00:36:12.000 They want to take away your gun.
00:36:13.000 It's obvious they want to take away your gun.
00:36:15.000 And this is why it matters when the President of the United States endorses their program and why it is imperative that Republicans keep the House and keep the Senate in next year's election cycle.
00:36:23.000 Now, there are a couple of obstacles to keeping the House.
00:36:25.000 The latest polls are one obstacle.
00:36:27.000 The second obstacle is if the economy doesn't particularly do well.
00:36:31.000 Then that's going to hurt them.
00:36:32.000 And the third obstacle is a lot of the gerrymandering, a lot of the redistricting that's happened over the past several years actually has not been particularly good, as good for Republicans as they thought that it was going to be.
00:36:42.000 So, G. Eliot Morris, who is a data journalist at The Economist, he says,
00:37:01.000 So, in other words, Republicans were trying to gerrymander so that there was, you know, 2 percent more Republicans than Democrats in a particular district.
00:37:07.000 But off your election, those people don't show up.
00:37:09.000 And so, they actually created fewer hard red districts and hard blue districts than created a lot of purple districts in the hopes that they would win.
00:37:16.000 That means a lot of seats are vulnerable.
00:37:18.000 That means there are a lot of seats that are vulnerable.
00:37:20.000 So, if you look at the R-plus district, if you look at the Republican voter share districts,
00:37:27.000 There are, at last count, let's say the R plus, so first of all, I'm just counting the numbers here.
00:37:33.000 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21.
00:37:33.000 There are 22 seats.
00:37:34.000 There are 22 seats in which Democrats hold a majority of the vote and in which Republicans hold seats.
00:37:47.000 Republicans have a 23-seat majority now, okay?
00:37:50.000 So, that means they're one seat away from taking it.
00:37:53.000 Here's the problem.
00:37:54.000 There are also another, there are also another hundreds, legitimately, there are another several dozen seats.
00:38:01.000 There are several dozen seats that are R plus 10 or less.
00:38:05.000 There are another dozens of seats.
00:38:07.000 I mean, I'm just looking at in the R plus 1 category.
00:38:11.000 Okay, in the R plus 1 category,
00:38:14.000 In districts, by the way, that are dead even, there are another two districts there.
00:38:16.000 So that's 24 seats that are either dead even or Democratic plus in a midterm election.
00:38:20.000 If you add in areas where it's slightly R plus, there are another 10 seats that are R plus three or so, within R plus three.
00:38:30.000 Okay, so that means if Democrats have a wave, they could easily take 50 seats in this election cycle.
00:38:34.000 If there's a wave, Democrats could easily take 50 seats in the House.
00:38:37.000 Okay, this is dangerous, dangerous stuff, and it is not good news.
00:38:41.000 So, this is why it is imperative the President govern well, it's why it's imperative that the President be popular, and it's why it's imperative that the Presidents of the United States not do stupid things and sink the trade
00:38:54.000 I don't know.
00:39:18.000 He's tweeted out today that he wants to commit Twitter to help increase the collective health, openness, and civility of public conversation and hold ourselves publicly accountable toward progress.
00:39:27.000 That means shutting down more accounts, presumably.
00:39:29.000 It means banning more language.
00:39:31.000 It means that Twitter is sick of the blowback it's getting from the left, and they're going to start banning right-wing accounts.
00:39:35.000 And you can see that this is happening on a broader level.
00:39:38.000 There's a case that was brought before the Supreme Court about whether you could wear certain types of t-shirts into polling places.
00:39:42.000 In this case,
00:39:43.000 was pretty amazing.
00:39:44.000 The state of Minnesota was trying to ban people from wearing shirts that said the text of the Second Amendment to the polls.
00:39:50.000 They're saying, oh, that's electioneering.
00:39:53.000 So Justice Alito asked, he went through a bunch of different permutations of this.
00:40:01.000 Could you wear this shirt?
00:40:01.000 Could you wear that shirt?
00:40:02.000 So he said, could you wear a shirt that said, I love abortion?
00:40:04.000 And the people in Minnesota, the Minnesota lawyers said, sure, that's no problem.
00:40:07.000 He said, well, could you wear a shirt that said, I love guns?
00:40:09.000 And they said, no, you can't wear that shirt.
00:40:12.000 Okay, so in other words, there are lawyers in all of these states who are now attempting to ban free speech from people on the right.
00:40:17.000 It's not a shock.
00:40:19.000 It is not a coincidence.
00:40:20.000 This is a severe movement on the part of the left in order to prevent anybody from having an open and honest conversation.
00:40:26.000 Listen, is there nastiness that happens on Twitter?
00:40:28.000 Yes, I was the number one recipient of it in 2016.
00:40:31.000 Is there nastiness that happens in public discourse?
00:40:33.000 I'm the guy who gets banned from campuses.
00:40:35.000 Yes, there is.
00:40:37.000 I try to be civil.
00:40:38.000 I like being civil.
00:40:39.000 I think it's worthwhile to be civil.
00:40:40.000 But I don't want an enforcement body sitting above anyone, either on Twitter or Facebook or in the government, saying that we are going to pass rules about civility and then ban people for it.
00:40:50.000 I'd much rather have a raucous, nasty exchange of opinions than have no exchange of opinions at all or an approved exchange of opinions by our masters.
00:40:57.000 That's really gross.
00:40:58.000 Okay.
00:40:59.000 So, in just a second, we're going to do some things I like and some things I hate, and then we'll get to the fabled mailbag.
00:41:05.000 So, let's jump in with some things that I like.
00:41:08.000 So, the new Star Wars movies have left me cold, as you may have noticed.
00:41:12.000 So I thought that The Force Awakens was wildly overrated.
00:41:14.000 I also thought that the sequel, The Last Jedi, was better than The Force Awakens.
00:41:20.000 I'm the only person who believes this, apparently.
00:41:22.000 I think the Last Jedi was significantly superior to The Force Awakens, which I thought was derivative, and destroyed my childhood by turning Han Solo into a loser single dad who gets murdered by his son.
00:41:31.000 So that, yuck.
00:41:33.000 But, if you actually want to read Star Wars-related stuff that's good, Timothy Zahn is a very, very good science fiction writer.
00:41:39.000 And I remember reading these when I was a kid.
00:41:42.000 And he wrote a three-part series
00:41:44.000 That starts, picks up right after the destruction of the second Death Star, and it starts with the book Heir to the Empire, and it tells a whole different story than what's told in The Force Awakens, and it's way better.
00:41:54.000 They should have just adapted these.
00:41:56.000 Honestly, they should have just gone back and adapted these, because the books are much, much better.
00:42:00.000 It's about the rise of a particular admiral, who's a brilliant admiral who's sort of on the outskirts of the galaxy, and how he manipulates things so that the Empire actually has a comeback.
00:42:08.000 It's not just fast-forward 40 years and the First Order is back, and we don't know how they got here or why they're here.
00:42:13.000 The book is well-written, it's clever, and also all of your favorite characters actually appear, so we don't have to deal with all of the new characters that nobody cares about, right?
00:42:21.000 And is hoping die as soon as humanly possible, right?
00:42:23.000 It doesn't cannibalize the characters that you love in order to preserve characters who you don't give a damn about.
00:42:30.000 So check that out.
00:42:31.000 Heir to the Empire by Timothy Zahn.
00:42:32.000 Okay, other things that I like.
00:42:33.000 So good for Kandi, Rise Kandi.
00:42:35.000 When I came out and she said that we need gun rights because there are victimized people who still require guns.
00:42:41.000 She said, guns helped my father protect our family during segregation.
00:42:44.000 She said this on The View.
00:42:45.000 Let me tell you why I'm a defender of the Second Amendment.
00:42:48.000 I was a little girl growing up in Birmingham, Alabama, in the late 50s, early 60s.
00:42:53.000 There was no way that Bull Connor and the Birmingham police were going to protect you.
00:42:57.000 And so when white night riders would come through our neighborhood, my father and his friends would take their guns and they'd go to the head of the neighborhood, it was a little cul-de-sac, and they would fire in the air if anybody came through.
00:43:08.000 I don't think they actually ever hit anybody.
00:43:10.000 But they protected the neighborhood.
00:43:12.000 I'm sure if Bull Connor had known where those guns were, he would have rounded them up.
00:43:16.000 And so I don't favor some things like gun registration.
00:43:20.000 Okay, good for Condi.
00:43:21.000 This is exactly right.
00:43:22.000 I wish Condi were the spokesperson for the Republican Party, not Trump, on guns.
00:43:26.000 I mean, she's doing a much better job there.
00:43:28.000 Okay, now, time for a couple of things that I hate, and then we'll get to the mailbag.
00:43:36.000 Okay, things I hate this entire week.
00:43:38.000 Other than that, things that—at least on policy—things that I hate.
00:43:42.000 So the Oscars are coming up on Sunday.
00:43:45.000 No!
00:43:47.000 So we're all going to sit around and pretend to watch a three-hour show full of obnoxious people who made movies no one saw this year.
00:43:54.000 No one saw any of these movies.
00:43:56.000 There were like two of these movies that anybody saw.
00:43:58.000 One was Get Out and the other was Dunkirk.
00:44:00.000 No one has ever seen any of these other movies.
00:44:02.000 Okay, the one that's going to win is, so here's what I'm going to do.
00:44:06.000 I'm going to describe who I think is going to win, but I'm going to do it in terms that you're going to understand, because I'm going to use projects that you've actually seen.
00:44:12.000 Okay, so here's who's going to win.
00:44:14.000 Everything.
00:44:14.000 Okay, first of all, the movie that's going to win is Grinding Nemo.
00:44:17.000 Okay, that's The Shape of Water.
00:44:18.000 About a woman who has sex with a fish, basically.
00:44:22.000 It's overrated leftist splash.
00:44:24.000 So check out, so that's what's going to win, Grinding Nemo.
00:44:26.000 Okay, the best director is the guy from Hellboy.
00:44:30.000 That's Guillermo del Toro.
00:44:31.000 The best actor is Commissioner Gordon.
00:44:33.000 The best actress is the lady from Fargo.
00:44:35.000 The best supporting actor is that weird guy from Iron Man 2.
00:44:38.000 And the best supporting actress is the lady from Roseanne.
00:44:41.000 There, now you know.
00:44:42.000 You haven't seen any of these movies, but that's how you're going to know who these people are.
00:44:46.000 You know there was a long period in America where at the Oscars, every picture that won had been a box office top 20 film?
00:44:55.000 That's because it used to be that the critics respected the American public enough that if the American public actually liked to go watch something, they gave it a little bit of respect at the box office.
00:45:02.000 But it just shows you, anything that the American people actually like to watch, the critics are going to denigrate as
00:45:09.000 Crap for the masses.
00:45:10.000 Unless, of course, it fulfills certain intersectional checkboxes.
00:45:13.000 That means that we can already write in Black Panther for Best Picture next year.
00:45:16.000 I'm really looking forward to that.
00:45:17.000 In fact, they should give it all the Oscars, I think.
00:45:19.000 First of all, I actually do think that Michael B. Jordan should probably be nominated for Best Supporting Actor for Killmonger, because he's actually pretty great in the film.
00:45:27.000 But I think we should just write it in for a sweep, because it's very important.
00:45:30.000 Honestly, the only big shock this year is that Wonder Woman didn't win everything, because it was the greatest movie ever made, according to the critics, because women.
00:45:36.000 OK, so time—you know what?
00:45:38.000 I have to show you Alex Jones, just because Alex Jones, man.
00:45:40.000 So Alex Jones, yesterday, he was fighting back against accusations of anti-Semitism.
00:45:45.000 The way he fought back was not the strongest way in the world.
00:45:47.000 Here's Alex Jones, fresh off his supplement, talking about why he's not anti-Semitic.
00:45:53.000 And, oh my God.
00:45:55.000 Wow.
00:45:56.000 My new wife, her pedigree's German, three quarters German, from Omaha, and a quarter Irish, and I'm proud of that background.
00:46:05.000 And any Semites call her Jewish and everything else, and if she was, I'd be proud of it, but no, she's got a noble nose, but she's not Jewish.
00:46:15.000 So, you know, that's what all this comes down to, ladies and gentlemen.
00:46:20.000 So, I am not anti-Semitic, but my wife has a giant nose and people think she's a Jew.
00:46:27.000 Yeah.
00:46:27.000 Strong defense there, Alex.
00:46:30.000 I got handed to the man.
00:46:34.000 Power move.
00:46:34.000 Power move, Alex Jones, right there.
00:46:36.000 My wife's not a Jew, but she has a big nose.
00:46:38.000 So people think she's a Jew, but I'm not interested.
00:46:42.000 All right.
00:46:43.000 Time for the mailbag.
00:46:43.000 Let's just do it.
00:46:44.000 There are no more words to be said.
00:46:45.000 Thomas writes, Hi, Mr. Shapiro.
00:46:47.000 My name is Thomas.
00:46:48.000 I'm a really big fan of the show.
00:46:49.000 I'm a freshman at the University of Southern Mississippi, and I just got out of high school.
00:46:52.000 I firmly believe the reason for school shootings is social outcasting.
00:46:55.000 The issue is not about easy access to guns, like the left believes, but an issue of values within those students.
00:46:59.000 Teenagers today are not being taught good values such as humility, amiability, and self-discipline from their parents.
00:47:04.000 How should public schools go about teaching good values and prevent kids from becoming anti-social outcasts?
00:47:08.000 So I think it's very difficult for public schools to actually do that.
00:47:10.000 I think that there can be lessons in virtue.
00:47:13.000 I think personal responsibility starts at home.
00:47:16.000 Kids who lack that are going to have trouble learning it at school.
00:47:19.000 I don't think schools can necessarily fill that gap.
00:47:21.000 But a school that treats everybody as a victim is not going to succeed either.
00:47:29.000 Schools used to generate a better feeling of community when communities were stronger themselves.
00:47:33.000 Again, I'm not going to put it on the schools to teach virtue to kids.
00:47:37.000 I just don't think that's how it works.
00:47:38.000 I think that the vast majority of children are taught virtue by their parents.
00:47:41.000 This is a parental problem.
00:47:42.000 There's a reason a disproportionate number of these school shooters don't have a biological father living in the home.
00:47:46.000 Thank you, Liz.
00:47:46.000 So, there are a couple of good books.
00:47:47.000 I believe Gordon Wood talks about the history of the Second Amendment.
00:47:55.000 And some of his books on the foundation of the Constitution.
00:47:58.000 There's I believe Paul Johnson may talk about a little bit in history of the American people.
00:48:05.000 There's also a bunch of actually his name escapes me right now.
00:48:13.000 It's right on the tip of my tongue.
00:48:14.000 There's a professor at Yale who's actually on the left who does an excellent analysis of sort of originalist doctrine on the Second Amendment.
00:48:21.000 And when I remember his name, I will bring it up.
00:48:23.000 But it's a lot of con law stuff, so there's some good con law books on it.
00:48:27.000 Justice Bork has a couple of books in which he discusses the Second Amendment.
00:48:30.000 Dean says, Hi, Ben.
00:48:31.000 My name is Dean.
00:48:32.000 I'm a 17-year-old junior in high school, and I'm a firm believer in the Second Amendment and a member of the NRA.
00:48:36.000 At the moment, myself and others in my school are being threatened by the leftist narrative that we are a heartless coward for defending our rights.
00:48:41.000 My school will allow students to do a walkout.
00:48:42.000 I and others will not participate because it is obviously all about gun control.
00:48:46.000 Ben, how should my friends and I exhibit our First Amendment during the walkout?
00:48:48.000 It's obvious that myself and other conservative high schoolers are being threatened.
00:48:51.000 Do you have any advice for us?
00:48:53.000 Thanks for all you do.
00:48:53.000 God bless.
00:48:54.000 Shapiro 2020.
00:48:54.000 Okay, so here is my advice.
00:48:57.000 I think that you should walk out with all the other kids, and I think you should bring a sign that says, here to save lives, I love the Second Amendment.
00:49:05.000 I think that you should say both of those things.
00:49:08.000 I think that you should make it clear that you are there to help save lives and prevent school shootings, and that these two things are connected.
00:49:14.000 The reason that you like the Second Amendment is so good people can stop bad people.
00:49:26.000 Well, it's hard to predict a pandemic.
00:49:28.000 I would say that, you know, the chances of a pandemic have grown because of the resistance to antibiotics and some strains of disease.
00:49:37.000 So that's always a solid bet because pandemics do happen.
00:49:41.000 As far as global economic collapse, I don't think that's going to happen anytime in the near future unless we actually start—if by global economic collapse you mean a severe economic recession or depression, I think that you could see that, but I don't think it's going to last, you know, inevitably or interminably.
00:49:55.000 World War III?
00:49:56.000 I think the possibility exists, but it's not super high.
00:50:00.000 I actually don't think that we are on the verge of a global catastrophe.
00:50:03.000 I think the greatest catastrophe that could happen right now is America falling more and more into the trap of European-style thinking because we've abandoned American founding principle and a slow slide, I would say, into global degradation
00:50:17.000 On the economic and moral scale.
00:50:18.000 I think that's probably the worst thing that could happen.
00:50:20.000 But I don't think it's going to be like a big flashpoint World War III.
00:50:23.000 Everybody's too afraid of nukes at this point for that to really happen.
00:50:27.000 Well, the reason it's so attractive to intellectuals is because intellectuals like to think that they are smarter than the common man.
00:50:38.000 And that the reason that the society has not worked is because they're not in charge.
00:50:42.000 Commands and control economies are very attractive to people who think they are much smarter than everybody else.
00:50:47.000 Capitalism, free market economics, laissez-faire, these assume that Joe Schmoe Plummer knows better to do with his money than you know what to do with his money.
00:50:55.000 And intellectuals don't like that very much.
00:50:57.000 Intellectuals like to think that they know better what to do with your money than you know what to do with your money.
00:51:01.000 They think that everybody is ruled by passion except for them.
00:51:03.000 They're the reasonable people at the top who can construct society in such a way so that everyone is happy.
00:51:08.000 Hence the drive toward that.
00:51:10.000 Hence the drive toward progressivism and bureaucracy and the notion of expertise ruling the roost.
00:51:14.000 The thing is that collective expertise is always better than individual expertise.
00:51:18.000 This is why command and control economies always fail, because when you have somebody at the top who supposedly knows about trade, that person knows way less about trade than the collective intelligence of the American people, for example, who trade with each other on a daily basis.
00:51:30.000 Spencer says, So I am writing a book on this right now.
00:51:38.000 I'm about halfway through that book.
00:51:39.000 I think it's going to require a renewed teaching of values that spring from Judeo-Christian culture as well as Greek reason.
00:51:45.000 So, the Greek style Enlightenment, the Lockean philosophy that combined these two forces, we're going to have to reinculcate a sense of community based on a value system that is Judeo-Christian in origin, and also based on a Greek teleology that suggests that you can discover morality by using logic and reason and the nature of the universe around you.
00:52:05.000 You can't just come up with moral systems in your head that have no relation to the nature of things and the nature of being.
00:52:09.000 But you can, by investigating the nature of the universe, see what the underlying cause of things is, and therefore come up with certain aspects of virtue.
00:52:17.000 In order to boil that down into practical practice, you usually need some form of religion, Judeo-Christian religion being the most prominent.
00:52:24.000 Matthew says, Dear Ben, with YouTube being as large as it is today, do you think there's an issue with the way they're handling their business?
00:52:29.000 Should we just attempt to take our business elsewhere if we do not agree with their practice, or is it possible that outlets like YouTube and Twitter need to potentially have regulations?
00:52:36.000 So, this is a serious question.
00:52:37.000 I know that PragerU has been suing YouTube over exactly this issue.
00:52:42.000 So, they're a private business.
00:52:43.000 I think they should do what they want, but they are violating their own terms of service, and they're lying about it.
00:52:47.000 This is my problem with Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook.
00:52:49.000 It's not that they're private businesses and they say, listen, we're going to crack down on conservative websites.
00:52:53.000 You do that?
00:52:53.000 Fine.
00:52:53.000 We all go form our own business.
00:52:54.000 The problem is they're lying.
00:52:56.000 They're saying, we're free speech outlets.
00:52:57.000 We're not penalizing specific people.
00:52:59.000 We're not setting up our algorithms to penalize, say, daily wire content while boosting TYT content.
00:53:04.000 And then that's exactly what they do.
00:53:05.000 They set up their algorithms that way.
00:53:07.000 When you lie, now you're talking about defrauding people.
00:53:09.000 And there you may have a legal case.
00:53:11.000 So I think that's the bit like Facebook right now is screwing
00:53:13.000 I think?
00:53:35.000 Hi, Ben.
00:53:35.000 Have you talked previously on homelessness, how homeless people do not have a right to the streets and that they should seek community support?
00:53:40.000 My question is, what do you think we should do specifically?
00:53:42.000 There's a large homeless population, many of whom don't have a community to fall back on.
00:53:45.000 I agree that people should set themselves up in a community.
00:53:47.000 That's not the reality in many cases.
00:53:49.000 What should be done now to fix the problem?
00:53:50.000 Well, the answer is that if you're living on the street, you should be arrested.
00:53:53.000 Okay, really.
00:53:53.000 If you are living on the street, you should be arrested.
00:53:55.000 And then, you are one of a few types of people.
00:53:58.000 Either you are mentally ill, you're one of the mentally ill who's on the street, in which case, we should be looking at commitment, and we should be looking at mental health treatment for you.
00:54:06.000 And if it has to be involuntary, because otherwise you're a schizophrenic and you're out wandering the streets as a danger to yourself, then that's the way it's got to be.
00:54:14.000 If you're a drug user, then drug use is still a crime in the United States, or at least living on the street is.
00:54:21.000 So if you're living on the street, we'll either arrest you or, you know, if you're using—we'll try to detox you.
00:54:27.000 We'll do our best to help you, put you in a community center.
00:54:29.000 But if you're back on the street again, we'll arrest you again.
00:54:31.000 Very little of this is economically driven, is the point that I'm making here.
00:54:35.000 Because if it were just a matter of economics, and therefore there are a lot of homeless people, then the answer would presumably be that there's not much you can do unless you generate more jobs.
00:54:43.000 But that's really not the biggest problem with homelessness.
00:54:46.000 Okay, let's see.
00:54:47.000 Zachary says, Ben, a couple of weeks ago in your mailbag you said the Federal Reserve wasn't a necessary component of the central bank.
00:54:51.000 Well, I agree that the Fed is mostly dead weight.
00:54:53.000 What are the consequences of allowing the inflation rate to rise or fall out of the constraints set by the Fed?
00:54:58.000 Who would adjust interest rates?
00:54:59.000 Thanks, Zach.
00:55:00.000 Well, I'm in favor of going back to a gold system.
00:55:01.000 I know that this is considered heresy now.
00:55:04.000 Or at least I'm in favor of pegging the price of the dollar to the price of gold.
00:55:08.000 So the gold system suggested you could actually physically turn in your dollar for a certain amount of gold, but I don't know that you actually have to do that.
00:55:14.000 What you could do instead is simply peg the price of the dollar to the price of gold, which was the Bretton Woods system up until it was revoked in the 1970s.
00:55:22.000 So I don't see a reason we couldn't go back to something like that, and it would be automatic.
00:55:25.000 Tyler says, Ben, can you give your opinion on capital punishment and how to argue for it, but still hold the belief that killing is sin?
00:55:31.000 So, the answer is, well, on the biblical level, the word that is used in the Bible is do not murder.
00:55:38.000 There's a different word in Hebrew for murder than for killing.
00:55:39.000 The word in Hebrew is lo tirtzach.
00:55:41.000 Lo means no.
00:55:42.000 Tirtzach means you shouldn't murder.
00:55:44.000 So, you should not murder.
00:55:46.000 Is that rule?
00:55:48.000 Okay, on just a secular moral level, there are certain crimes that are so egregious that if you were to keep people in jail for them,
00:56:06.000 You would be doing a disservice to the society at large.
00:56:09.000 So, I'm not even talking about it on a deterrent level.
00:56:12.000 There are two types of things you're trying to deter.
00:56:13.000 One is you're trying to deter people from committing the crime, because they know they'll get the death penalty.
00:56:17.000 And the second thing is you're trying to deter tribal vengeance.
00:56:20.000 And one of the reasons that the government has a monopoly on the legal use of force, except in self-defense, is because what we don't want is tribal warfare.
00:56:27.000 Tribal warfare usually happens when you have one tribe, and they kill somebody from the other tribe.
00:56:31.000 And then the second tribe says, you know, in revenge, we're going to go kill somebody from the first tribe.
00:56:34.000 And the first tribe says, oh my God, you killed that guy.
00:56:36.000 Let's go kill that guy from the second tribe.
00:56:37.000 This is how wars start.
00:56:38.000 This is how intra-tribal conflicts start.
00:56:40.000 It's why gang violence, which is basically just tribal conflict in the inner cities, is so awful.
00:56:45.000 That's why you actually need a system where people feel like the problem is being taken care of by a third party, and that problem does involve the execution of people who kill other people.
00:56:54.000 Jesse says, hi Ben, huge fan.
00:56:55.000 We're having elections for our city council and mayor this year, and campaign finance reform is a huge topic.
00:56:59.000 As I'm doing the research for myself, I'm curious as to what your opinion is on campaign finance regulation on a federal, state, and local level.
00:57:05.000 I do not think that the government ought to be involved in campaign finance regulation on any level.
00:57:11.000 I think they should be involved in bribery.
00:57:14.000 If you are bribing somebody to vote a certain way, that is a crime.
00:57:16.000 But if I decide to spend my money, and my friends and I decide to spend my money on an election,
00:57:22.000 I don't see the problem with that, and I think it's an aspect of free speech.
00:57:25.000 It's my money.
00:57:25.000 I should be able to do with it what I want.
00:57:26.000 I should be able to say what I want.
00:57:27.000 I should be able to buy the free speech that I'm capable of having.
00:57:31.000 It is none of the government's business, because once the government butts in, it's pretty rare that it's not going to have some sort of impact that is politically motivated.
00:57:37.000 Campaign finance reform is being pushed by Democrats, not because Democrats actually care about corruption in the election system, because they're perfectly happy with watching unions spend millions of dollars—billions of dollars, actually—on politicians they like.
00:57:51.000 It's because they think that they're going to be ruling out the rich, fat cats on Wall Street while allowing the unions to do what they want.
00:57:56.000 Hal says, So, I'm sure this is true.
00:57:58.000 I mean, there are percentages of the population that can't have a normal job.
00:58:00.000 I don't know if it's 15%, but there's certainly a certain percent.
00:58:02.000 And the answer is that community is supposed to pick up the slack.
00:58:15.000 I don't know.
00:58:15.000 That's not a good question.
00:58:39.000 I don't know the answer to that because I don't know cheeses well enough to have a solid answer to that.
00:58:45.000 Off the top of my head, mozzarella, maybe?
00:58:50.000 Mild but completes every dish.
00:58:52.000 That's not right.
00:58:53.000 No, I'm getting booed in the studio by my own people.
00:58:57.000 Yeah, I don't know.
00:58:58.000 I pass.
00:58:59.000 What did you say?
00:59:01.000 Sharp cheddar?
00:59:02.000 Okay, maybe that's fair.
00:59:03.000 Jessica says, Hey Ben, I want to tell you that I love your show and no BS approach to politics and the many topics that come with it.
00:59:08.000 My question to you today is what brought you to be a diehard White Sox fan?
00:59:12.000 I'm a diehard Cubs fan.
00:59:12.000 I've been born and raised in Chicago, Northwest Indiana area.
00:59:15.000 The rivalry between the two teams is great.
00:59:17.000 So why the Sox?
00:59:17.000 Because my dad is a Sox fan.
00:59:18.000 You grew up a Sox fan?
00:59:19.000 We wrote an entire book called Say It's So about the 2005 White Sox championship season.
00:59:23.000 You can get that over at Amazon.
00:59:25.000 So we are huge Sox fans, because—and I will pass it down to my son, because suffering is just in our nature.
00:59:30.000 I need to pass it down to my son, rooting for a team that nobody else roots for, and that has only won one World Series in the past hundred years.
00:59:38.000 Let's see, one more question.
00:59:39.000 Chelsea says, Well, number one,
00:59:49.000 Cohabiting parents who do not separate, there's still the possibility they're going to separate.
00:59:53.000 There's a burden to overcome.
00:59:54.000 When people get married, what you're really doing is you're setting up an obstacle to you getting out.
00:59:58.000 You're locking the door behind you.
01:00:00.000 When you're just cohabiting, there's always the feeling that one person has at least one foot on the threshold because there's no loss of income, there's no community property, there's no notion that you actually lose anything by walking out the door.
01:00:13.000 So every day is a re-evaluation as to whether this ought to happen.
01:00:16.000 Once you've pre-committed,
01:00:17.000 It's sort of like a game of chicken when you put a brick on the accelerator and you show everybody that you've done so.
01:00:22.000 Once you've done that, you've pre-committed to everybody else that you are not walking out that door.
01:00:26.000 And children need to feel that sense of security.
01:00:28.000 I think it's very important that children feel secure in their upbringing, secure that mommy and daddy are still going to be there to help them.
01:00:33.000 And cohabitation, by the way, is a really bad indicator.
01:00:36.000 Cohabitation before marriage
01:00:38.000 Okay, so, we'll be back here next week.
01:00:39.000 We can all hope and pray that policy gets better in the meantime, because the last 48 hours have been garbaggio.
01:00:43.000 So, Mr. President, do better, and I'll be happy to talk about that.
01:00:44.000 I hope you do.
01:00:45.000 Ben Shapiro, this is The Ben Shapiro Show.
01:01:06.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Mathis Glover.
01:01:08.000 Executive producer, Jeremy Boring.
01:01:10.000 Senior producer, Jonathan Hay.
01:01:11.000 Our technical producer is Austin Stevens.
01:01:13.000 Edited by Alex Zingaro.
01:01:15.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Carmina.
01:01:16.000 Hair and makeup is by Jesua Alvera.
01:01:18.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire Forward Publishing production.
01:01:21.000 Copyright Forward Publishing 2018.