The Ben Shapiro Show - October 31, 2017


Happy Halloween! | Ep. 407


Episode Stats

Length

47 minutes

Words per Minute

203.06224

Word Count

9,571

Sentence Count

604

Misogynist Sentences

9

Hate Speech Sentences

8


Summary

On today's show, Ben Shapiro and Keith Olbermann discuss the Mueller indictments, the plea deal with George Papadopoulos, and whether Trump will be tempted to fire Robert Mueller, the special counsel investigating the Trump administration. Plus, Ben and Keith discuss an insane campaign ad from a Latino victory caucus in Virginia, and a new book by Keith's new book, "Fucking Crazy." Subscribe to The Ben Shapiro Show on Apple Podcasts and leave us a rating and review. Rate, review, and subscribe to our new podcast CRITIQUE, wherever you get your podcasts. Use the promo code "ELISSA" to receive $50 off your first set of bedsheets when you sign up for a BullandBranch discount. You'll get $50 worth of free shipping when you use promo code BLONDEFLOARD when you purchase a set of four or more sheets. That's a risk-free $50 plus free shipping, plus a full refund. That's $30 worth of shipping. If you don't like them, then you can always get them for free at BullandBranch. Plus, you can get a $50 discount when you order them for your own family when you go to bullandbranch.co.nz/that-scoop. We're not using promo code CRYPTLANKEYService to get 10% off your entire order when you place your first purchase. They're not good for shipping, they're $50 + free shipping! Plus a free full refund when you redeem your first order of sheets, plus an additional $5 shipping, you'll get an extra $50 free shipping. That'll get a total of $50, plus that's $5, plus $10, plus you get a chance to get a whole bunch of shipping and a freebie, plus they'll get it for free shipping plus a $25 shipping discount, plus shipping, that's a total discount, and you get it all free. that's all a whole lot more than $50. Thank you for helping me make it all the world's best bed and a FREEbie. . I'm not just one sheet set, I can't thank you enough. - Ben Shapiro - Thank you so much, I really appreciate you, I love you, Ben & I really really appreciate it, really really really, really appreciate your support.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 I'm Keith Olbermann, and this is The Resistance.
00:00:03.000 Yesterday, we received a magnificent present, a present so large, so impressive, so monumental, as to boggle the mind and set the heart aflutter.
00:00:12.000 Yes, my friends, we are well on our way to seeing the usurper Trump brought low, to seeing the restoration of this republic, to seeing, I think, the greatest collapse
00:00:22.000 Because, you see, Special Counsel Robert Mueller has uncovered a scandal the likes of which make Watergate seem like child's play.
00:00:30.000 This evidence shows that Donald J. Trump is more dangerous than Hitler, more dangerous than Stalin, more dangerous than that mobile pet spa that somehow used the wrong shampoo on my cat Fluffy, leaving her less cuddly than usual and reducing me to a quivering ball of humanity lying prone in my own tears and urine.
00:00:49.000 Now, you may say that Mueller's indictment of Paul Manafort, Trump's former campaign manager, says nothing about Trump or his campaign, but you do not have the depth of intellect that earned me entrance to the prestigious Cornell College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.
00:01:03.000 You do not have the nuance to understand that Mueller just put the final nail into Trump's political grave.
00:01:09.000 No one does.
00:01:10.000 No one did it ESPN.
00:01:12.000 No one did it MSNBC.
00:01:13.000 No one did it Fox Sports Net.
00:01:15.000 No one did it ESPN2.
00:01:16.000 No one did it Current TV.
00:01:18.000 It took me a lifetime to find the political geniuses at GQ, but they understand me and love me as I deserve to be loved.
00:01:26.000 As I deserve to be loved.
00:01:29.000 Donald J. Trump, you, sir, are a liar.
00:01:33.000 You, sir, are a buffoon.
00:01:35.000 You, sir, are the kind of human being for whom decency means nothing and for whom the world is merely a whorehouse of refuse and trash that somehow turns me on and yet simultaneously repulses me.
00:01:48.000 Suffice it to say, Donald J. Trump is on his way out.
00:01:52.000 To the big house.
00:01:53.000 To the slammer.
00:01:54.000 To the hooscow.
00:01:56.000 To the calaboose.
00:01:57.000 To the pokey.
00:01:58.000 To Sing Sing.
00:01:59.000 And Robert Mueller, with my help and God's will, will put him there.
00:02:04.000 If you wish to purchase my new book, Keith is effing crazy.
00:02:08.000 This is not a joke.
00:02:09.000 Go on over to Amazon.
00:02:11.000 Now, I know there have been some criticizing me for mocking Tommy Lahren.
00:02:16.000 I said that Tommy Lahren misused the flag.
00:02:18.000 And some look at my book cover and say, well, Keith, you also misused the flag.
00:02:22.000 I am the flag.
00:02:25.000 The flag, me, the same.
00:02:28.000 Amazing.
00:02:29.000 Resist.
00:02:30.000 Remove.
00:02:32.000 Peace.
00:02:34.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:02:35.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:02:41.000 Okay, so I couldn't get through that whole thing without laughing.
00:02:44.000 Sorry about that, folks.
00:02:45.000 But there is your Keith Olbermann impersonation for a Halloween.
00:02:49.000 Hope you enjoyed it as much as I did, writing it and reading it.
00:02:52.000 Probably not, but tough.
00:02:53.000 It's my show.
00:02:54.000 So, we have a lot to get to today.
00:02:56.000 We are going to be discussing the fallout from the Manafort indictment and from the George Papadopoulos indictment.
00:03:02.000 And he actually made a plea bargain.
00:03:04.000 I'm going to talk about whether Trump is going to be tempted into firing Robert Mueller, the special counsel.
00:03:09.000 I think that would be a very large mistake.
00:03:11.000 We're going to get to all of that.
00:03:12.000 Plus, I want to talk a little bit at length about this insane ad that I mentioned yesterday from a Latino victory caucus in Virginia against Ed Gillespie, the Republican candidate for Virginia governor.
00:03:24.000 But first, I want to say thank you to our sponsors over at Bull and Branch.
00:03:28.000 One of the things that you actually should spend some money on is the sheet set that you use to sleep.
00:03:33.000 Because you're going to spend an inordinate number of hours tonight trying to sleep and tossing and turning around in those uncomfortable old bedsheets.
00:03:39.000 That's where Bowl & Branch comes in.
00:03:41.000 Bowl & Branch makes the most affordable and high quality sheets that you can buy.
00:03:46.000 They are made from 100% organic cotton.
00:03:48.000 That means Bowl & Branch sheets not only feel incredible, they also look amazing.
00:03:51.000 And they sell exclusively online.
00:03:53.000 So that means you're not paying the expensive retail markup.
00:03:55.000 Half the price for twice the quality.
00:03:57.000 You will love the sheets.
00:03:57.000 Try them for 30 nights and see for yourself how much you like them.
00:04:00.000 If you don't like them, then you can always return them for a full refund.
00:04:03.000 So it's a risk-free proposition.
00:04:04.000 Go to bullandbranch.com today.
00:04:06.000 You'll get $50 off your first set of sheets, plus free shipping when you use promo code Ben.
00:04:10.000 Again, these sheets are so good that I will not buy any other type of sheets except for Bull & Branch for my own family.
00:04:15.000 That's $50 off, plus free shipping right now at bullandbranch.com.
00:04:18.000 That's B-O-L-L.
00:04:20.000 We're good to go.
00:04:40.000 Where LBJ essentially accused Barry Goldwater of wanting to get the United States nuked.
00:04:44.000 It makes that ad look like nothing.
00:04:45.000 I mean, this is really an egregious ad.
00:04:47.000 So, for those who can't see, you're about to see a bunch of minority children who are running away from a truck that has on it a Confederate flag, a Don't Tread on Me license plate, and an Ed Gillespie bumper sticker because the truck is going to run them over because it's a white supremacist seeking to kill minority children.
00:05:19.000 So a Latino kid stops, and then he sees an Asian kid, and then both of them start running because here comes that truck again.
00:05:24.000 He's got an Ed Gillespie bumper sticker on it.
00:05:33.000 And every racially diverse child in Virginia is on this block.
00:05:38.000 And here they're all running away from the truck.
00:05:42.000 And oh no, they've run into a dead end.
00:05:47.000 And here comes the truck.
00:05:48.000 Suddenly it's night, and the headlights come up, and all the kids wake up from their terrible dream.
00:05:54.000 Is this what Donald Trump and Ed Gillespie mean?
00:05:56.000 And then it's a picture of the parents watching the Charlottesville hate rally, and it says, reject hate vote November 7th.
00:06:05.000 And it's paid for by the Latino Victory Fund.
00:06:08.000 It's not authorized by the candidate, but obviously the candidate did not condemn it.
00:06:11.000 The reason that I'm playing this ad again is because it really does speak to the insanity that has now engulfed huge parts of the left.
00:06:17.000 You know, the great conflicts in American history have largely been driven not just by political differences, but by the feeling that those political differences are not
00:06:28.000 We are unable to overcome those political differences, that we hate each other, right?
00:06:31.000 The actual hate in this ad is not from Ed Gillespie, right?
00:06:34.000 The actual hate in this ad is from this Latino Victory Fund.
00:06:37.000 It's from the campaign for Ralph Northam, who actually, you know, if he didn't give the go-ahead to the ad, which would have been illegal, he obviously hasn't condemned the ad.
00:06:44.000 And there was another mailer that actually went out from the Northam campaign, endorsed by the Northam campaign, linking again Ed Gillespie to what happened in Charlottesville, Virginia.
00:06:53.000 It's really pretty horrific stuff.
00:06:55.000 When I read Federalist One yesterday, and I talked about how Alexander Hamilton had specifically cited the idea that in politics, you have to assume the best intentions on the part of your opponent if you want to convince them.
00:07:06.000 We're no longer in the age of convincing.
00:07:08.000 We're now in the age of getting out your base.
00:07:10.000 And I think that that's a political truism.
00:07:12.000 I think that people missed that in 2012.
00:07:14.000 But in 2016, I think people got that.
00:07:16.000 That it was all about getting out the base.
00:07:18.000 No one was trying to appeal to the median voter.
00:07:20.000 Now it's just about getting out the people who already like you.
00:07:22.000 And the best way to get them out
00:07:24.000 is to essentially say that your opponent is evil and horrible and nasty and terrible.
00:07:29.000 But if you do this too much, if you rely on this tactic too much, you actually end up telling Americans that the people that they live with in their same community are evil, horrible, nasty, brutish people.
00:07:38.000 And if you do that, it's very hard to put the country back together again.
00:07:42.000 Because I can have conversations with people with whom I disagree.
00:07:44.000 I do it all the time for a living.
00:07:46.000 I do it all the time casually.
00:07:47.000 I live in LA.
00:07:47.000 I mean, this stuff happens.
00:07:49.000 But I don't actually think the people I live with in L.A.
00:07:51.000 and the individuals with whom I speak are nasty, horrible people.
00:07:54.000 I think they may believe things that are bad, but I don't believe they're nasty, evil people.
00:07:58.000 This ad essentially suggests that people who disagree with you are nasty, evil people.
00:08:02.000 Again, it falls into the intersectional politics.
00:08:03.000 You want an example of intersectional politics at its finest?
00:08:07.000 This is the example of intersectional politics at its finest, right?
00:08:10.000 This idea that
00:08:12.000 You're going to have all of these various minority groups and they're all running away from the evil white majority that is chasing them down on streets.
00:08:19.000 It's really a horrific ad.
00:08:20.000 And that's not the only evidence that we have of that over the last 24 hours.
00:08:24.000 Elliot Hamilton, reporter for Daily Wire, he got a hold of an email that was issued by a woman apparently named Madelaine Leader.
00:08:31.000 She is the head of data services for the technology department at the DNC, and she wrote this letter.
00:08:37.000 She was trying to search people out for jobs.
00:08:39.000 She said, And then she listed a bunch of positions.
00:08:47.000 And then she says, as you may have heard, we are rebuilding the technology team into a robust, well-oiled machine that can tackle all elections, from the presidential down to dog catcher and school board.
00:08:56.000 What's more important is that we are focused on hiring and maintaining a staff of diverse voices and life experiences, something that we desperately need if we hope to secure the future of our country.
00:09:04.000 So they're not just trying to hire a data science lead, or a full stack engineer, or a product designer.
00:09:10.000 They're trying to hire a staff of diverse voices and life experiences, because you know when your computer crashes, what you really need is somebody coming in
00:09:17.000 And explaining to you how they grew up poor in inner city.
00:09:20.000 That's really, really important.
00:09:21.000 I know when my computer crashes, the first thing I do when I call our IT guy is I say to him, please tell me the story of your life and how your diverse experiences have led you to the point where you can fix my Mac.
00:09:32.000 No, that's not how any of this works, but that's not even the bad part.
00:09:34.000 Here's what the email apparently says, according to Madeleine Leder, again, the Democratic National Committee data service manager, who gave a no comment to Daily Wire when we asked her about it.
00:09:43.000 She said, Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns and feel free to forward on to your contact.
00:09:48.000 I personally would prefer that you not forward to cisgender straight white males since they're already in the majority.
00:09:55.000 She says straight out in the email that she doesn't want this email forwarded to people who happen to be straight and white because they're already in the majority.
00:10:03.000 It's that same sort of intersectional logic that leads to the idea that we can gauge your value as a human being.
00:10:08.000 We can gauge your worthiness in the workplace by your color, by your life experiences, as opposed to by the quality of work you do or by the kind of activity in which you take place.
00:10:17.000 Again, the slander in that Latino victory ad, the slander that everyone who flies a Confederate flag is trying to run down black children.
00:10:24.000 Which is insane.
00:10:24.000 I mean, there are legitimately hundreds of thousands of Americans who are not doing that and have Confederate flags.
00:10:29.000 The idea that everyone who's voting for Ed Gillespie sides with the Charlottesville hate protesters.
00:10:33.000 The idea that anyone who has a don't tread on me on the front of their car, that that person is trying to run down some poor Muslim child on the streets of Alexandria.
00:10:42.000 It's just insane.
00:10:43.000 But again, it comes from the same intersectional place that this white majority is inevitably imbued with a nasty, horrible racism that cannot be fixed.
00:10:51.000 And as long as we think that, as long as the left keeps doing that, they're going to get pushback from the other side.
00:10:56.000 Trump was a symptom of this.
00:10:57.000 You want to know one of the reasons why Trump won?
00:10:59.000 One of the reasons why Trump won is because Americans got sick and tired of being told that they were the types of people who are trying to drive people down.
00:11:06.000 And Hillary's deplorable lines was the worst thing she could have said during that campaign, because when she said deplorables, she may have been referring to the alt-right, but instead she painted with a broad brush that half of all Trump supporters were members of the alt-right.
00:11:17.000 That, of course, was untrue.
00:11:18.000 Well, what this leads to
00:11:20.000 is an insane amount of doubt in our institutions.
00:11:25.000 Because we no longer trust the institutions.
00:11:27.000 We no longer trust the people who staff our institutions.
00:11:29.000 Now, we look at the motivations of the people who staff our institutions and we say, are these people well-motivated or not?
00:11:35.000 Or is everything a partisan battle?
00:11:37.000 And that's why I think what happens in the Manafort indictment or the Papadopoulos situation, all of that is going to have bearing on how Trump thinks.
00:11:44.000 Trump is an oppositional thinker.
00:11:46.000 He tends to think that people are out to get him by nature.
00:11:48.000 And in many cases, he is right.
00:11:50.000 Right now, I don't think that Mueller actually has him in the crosshairs.
00:11:53.000 I'll explain why in a second.
00:11:54.000 I actually don't think that Mueller is going to be able to make a case against President Trump.
00:11:59.000 I think the worst case scenario for President Trump is this ends up looking a lot like a Ron Contra, where the guy at the top is basically let off the hook and some underlings go down.
00:12:06.000 But with all of that said, Trump could be convinced to fire Robert Mueller and really create a political firestorm for himself by people whispering into his ear that everyone is out to get him.
00:12:16.000 I'm going to explain all of that in just a second, plus what
00:12:19.000 Tony Podesta and Hillary Clinton and everybody else have to do with this.
00:12:23.000 Why is DC so darn corrupt?
00:12:25.000 I'll explain in just a second.
00:12:26.000 First, I want to say thank you to our sponsors over at the USCCA.
00:12:30.000 So you would do whatever it takes to protect your family.
00:12:32.000 Somebody would try to break into your house in the middle of the night, you'd go to your gun safe, you'd take out your shotgun, and if somebody tried to break in you would blow them away.
00:12:38.000 But owning a gun for protection should not be intimidating, overwhelming, or confusing
00:12:44.000 Even in light of the fact that one mistake could land you with a mountain of legal fees, a lifetime behind bars, or worse.
00:12:49.000 It's your right to own a gun.
00:12:50.000 It's your right to use it properly.
00:12:52.000 That's why I work with the USCCA to give my listeners their complete concealed carry and family defense guide, 100% free.
00:12:57.000 It is 164 pages of life-saving information you can't find anywhere else.
00:13:01.000 It'll help you understand confusing gun laws, responsibly own and store a gun, particularly if you have small kids, train for real-life scenarios, survive the murky waters of the legal system, and a lot more.
00:13:10.000 We're good to go.
00:13:33.000 To recap, in very brief terms, yesterday's news, there are basically two big pieces of news.
00:13:37.000 First was Trump former campaign chair, Paul Manafort, who was in charge of the campaign for something like five months.
00:13:42.000 Paul Manafort was indicted on 12 counts.
00:13:45.000 Virtually all of them had nothing to do, well, all of them had nothing to do with Trump.
00:13:48.000 And the vast majority of them had nothing to do with even the period in which Manafort was working for Trump.
00:13:53.000 And the White House essentially said as much.
00:13:55.000 Here's Sarah Huckabee Sanders saying that yesterday.
00:13:58.000 But look, today's announcement has nothing to do with the president, has nothing to do with the president's campaign or campaign activity.
00:14:05.000 The real collusion scandal, as we've said several times before, has everything to do with the Clinton campaign, Fusion GPS and Russia.
00:14:12.000 Okay, and she, of course, is at least partially correct.
00:14:15.000 The idea that the only scandal here is Fusion GPS and Russia is not true.
00:14:19.000 Okay, the fact is that there is some other material, the Donald Trump Jr.
00:14:22.000 letters, the George Papadopoulos stuff, that is troubling.
00:14:25.000 So the Trump campaign, and the Trump White House more specifically, is doing what they're supposed to do, right?
00:14:30.000 They're saying George Papadopoulos was a low-level staffer who had nothing to do with anything.
00:14:33.000 He was really not in charge of anything in the campaign.
00:14:36.000 And so they're now minimizing his presence in the campaign, just as they did with Carter Page, who's also a former policy advisor with connections to the Russians.
00:14:44.000 It was extremely limited.
00:14:45.000 It was a volunteer position.
00:14:47.000 And again, no activity was ever done in an official capacity on behalf of the campaign in that regard.
00:14:55.000 What about the outreach that he was making to campaign officials to try to
00:14:59.000 How can you describe Mr. Papadopoulos as having a limited role when there's a photograph of Mr. Papadopoulos sitting at a table with then candidate Trump at a national security meeting?
00:15:19.000 Okay, and she's not wrong about this.
00:15:21.000 Again, the idea that Trump was sitting there trying to direct from the top George Papadopoulos seems kind of ridiculous.
00:15:26.000 Here's the problem with regard to Papadopoulos.
00:15:28.000 So basically, to recap, Papadopoulos was making some sort of entrees to the professor, right?
00:15:35.000 Not the guy from Gilligan's Island, a professor who's located in London who apparently had connections with the Russian government and was trying to fix up the Trump campaign with the Russians.
00:15:43.000 And Papadopoulos was trying to make this happen.
00:15:45.000 The Russians also told him they had access to thousands of Hillary emails, or thousands of emails more specifically, and they said also that they had dirt on Hillary Clinton.
00:15:53.000 Papadopoulos apparently tried to pass this up the chain and this was shut down.
00:15:56.000 It's now coming out that some of the people he talked to included Paul Manafort.
00:16:00.000 He was
00:16:01.000 Basically, he was going to be indicted on charges of lying to the FBI about the extent to which he had been working with the Trump campaign while he was making these connections.
00:16:10.000 And instead, he pled guilty in order so that he could basically get out of it.
00:16:15.000 There's some rumors today that Papadopoulos may have been wearing a wire, that the federal government turned him, and that he was wearing a wire in context of all the other Trump officials.
00:16:24.000 We're going to have to find that out.
00:16:26.000 But having read the Papadopoulos statement of the offense,
00:16:29.000 I can say with certainty that there is nothing in there that is significantly more damning, for example, than the Donald Trump Jr.
00:16:34.000 letters that Trump Jr.
00:16:36.000 released himself on Twitter, where he basically said that he was willing to hear the Russians out about their own Hillary.
00:16:41.000 And again, Huckabee Sanders and the rest of the Trump team, they're not wrong to say that Hillary Clinton was willing to do the same thing in that Fusion GPS dossier.
00:16:49.000 So, in the end, I don't think any of this really touches Trump.
00:16:53.000 I don't think this reaches all the way to the top.
00:16:56.000 Manafort's lawyer is saying also there's no evidence of collusion, and he's right.
00:17:00.000 I mean, the indictment doesn't contain any evidence of collusion between Manafort and the Russians with regards to the campaign specifically.
00:17:05.000 There's no evidence that Mr. Manafort or the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government.
00:17:12.000 Mr. Manafort represented pro-European Union campaigns for the Ukrainian.
00:17:22.000 And in that, he was seeking to further democracy and to help the Ukraine come closer to the United States and the EU.
00:17:30.000 Okay, so, you know, again, I think there's a bit of a benevolent spin on what Manafort was doing, but the evidence simply is not there.
00:17:37.000 Trump's own lawyer, Ray J. Sekulow, he's saying that Trump is not interested in firing Mueller.
00:17:41.000 The only thing that can damage Trump, in my opinion, here.
00:17:44.000 The only thing that will really hurt him is if he fires Mueller.
00:17:47.000 There are two things that Trump can do that will start a political firestorm in the midst of all of this.
00:17:51.000 One of them I think would be justifiable, one I think would be unjustifiable.
00:17:54.000 The thing that he could do that would be justifiable is to tell his Attorney General to open up a special counsel investigation into Hillary Clinton and Fusion GPS to see if there was actual collusion taking place.
00:18:05.000 Eli Lake has a really good piece over at Bloomberg View in which he talks about the fact that because Hillary basically used lawyers as go-betweens, and she has both plausible deniability as well as a chain of payment, and it wasn't like a gift from the Russian government, because of that, there may not be any laws violated, but certainly an investigation would be a worthwhile thing.
00:18:24.000 Trump could do that.
00:18:24.000 It would start a firestorm.
00:18:25.000 It would look like he's trying to misdirect from the Mueller episode.
00:18:28.000 I'm not sure it'd be politically smart, even though it'd rev his base up, for sure.
00:18:32.000 On the other hand, one he could do that could really hurt him is firing Mueller.
00:18:35.000 If he fires Mueller, based on suspicion that Mueller is going to do something, it will look more like a cover-up than like a legitimate exercise of presidential power, even though he does have the power as President of the United States to fire the special counsel.
00:18:47.000 Thank you.
00:19:03.000 So they let that law expire.
00:19:05.000 Now special counsels can be fired by the president.
00:19:07.000 But, if Trump were to fire the special counsel, and if he were to do so on the basis that the special counsel was looking at his family finances, for example, which he has said he doesn't want Mueller to do, or if he were to fire Mueller on the basis that Mueller is going too far into his investigations of Trump personally, it would look like a cover-up, and it would create not a constitutional crisis, because it would be constitutional, but it would create a political crisis for Trump,
00:19:30.000 It'll create the appearance that he's firing Mueller in order to avoid being convicted of something.
00:19:35.000 In order to avoid being investigated, in order to protect his family members.
00:19:39.000 And there are people encouraging him to do this.
00:19:40.000 So Trump's lawyer, Jay Sekulow, is doing the right thing here.
00:19:42.000 He's saying, I don't think Trump is going to fire Mueller and he has no intention of doing so.
00:19:46.000 No, you know, I saw a couple people talking about that this morning and the answer to that is no.
00:19:52.000 The president is not interfering with the special counsel Mueller's position.
00:19:57.000 He's not firing the special counsel.
00:19:59.000 He's said that before.
00:20:02.000 I don't think that anybody is surprised that an indictment came down today or that there was this plea because we expected this indictment.
00:20:10.000 I mean, I think I've been on your broadcast talking about this a couple months back.
00:20:13.000 Now, all of that that he says there is exactly correct.
00:20:15.000 John Kelly, Trump's chief of staff, he says the same thing.
00:20:18.000 He says, let the indictments work, let's see where the legal system works, and let the system do what it's supposed to do.
00:20:23.000 All of the activities, as I understand it, that they were indicted for were long before they ever met Donald Trump or had any association with the campaign.
00:20:32.000 But I think the reaction of the administration is, let the legal justice system work.
00:20:37.000 Everyone's innocent until—resumed innocent, and we'll see where it goes.
00:20:41.000 Okay, and that exactly would be the right thing to do, right?
00:20:43.000 You should just let this thing roll out.
00:20:45.000 Unfortunately, I think that there are forces on the left and forces on the right that are basically trying to troll Trump into firing Mueller.
00:20:51.000 Because once he fires Mueller, then there is going to be an accusation that he fired him for the same reason that he supposedly fired Comey, because Comey was getting too close.
00:20:58.000 Now, as I said all along, I think the real reason that Trump fired Comey is he wanted Comey to come out publicly and exonerate Trump.
00:21:04.000 Comey wasn't willing to do that because Comey said, if I exonerate you now and then you come under investigation later, then I'm gonna have to say so.
00:21:10.000 And Trump didn't like that, so he fired Comey.
00:21:12.000 Well, the same thing could easily happen with Mueller, where he goes to Mueller and he says, listen, I want you to exonerate me.
00:21:18.000 And Mueller says, well, I can't yet.
00:21:20.000 And Trump says, you're fired.
00:21:21.000 If that happens, it will look like a cover-up of epic proportions, and it will lead the Democrats not only to try and impeach him if they gain control of the House in 2018, but it'll put Republicans in a tough spot, too, because it will look a lot more like the Saturday Night Massacre under Richard Nixon than it'll look like him just firing somebody who deserves to be fired.
00:21:38.000 As I said, there are people on both right and left who are trying to troll him into this.
00:21:41.000 Steve Bannon apparently is trying to troll Trump into firing Robert Mueller.
00:21:46.000 That's because Bannon has more balls than brains.
00:21:47.000 I'll explain that in just a second.
00:21:49.000 But first, I want to say thank you to our sponsors over at stamps.com.
00:21:53.000 Stamps, you know, are the only way that you can send your mail, but you don't want to wait in line at the post office.
00:21:59.000 Well, I don't like waiting in line at the post office because I don't like wasting time.
00:22:03.000 As much as I enjoy the wonderful smells and sights of the post office, I would much rather not go and simply be able to print my postage off onto my mail directly and then put it in the mail slot and be done.
00:22:13.000 Well, that's what stamps.com allows you to do.
00:22:15.000 I can mail any letter, any package, using just my computer and printer, and the mailman picks it right up.
00:22:20.000 Stamps.com
00:22:39.000 I think so.
00:23:00.000 We're good.
00:23:23.000 Okay, so as I say, there are some folks on the right who are trying to tell Trump to fire Mueller, and there are some folks on the left who are trying to tell Trump to fire Mueller.
00:23:30.000 I think that some people on the right who are trying to tell Trump to fire Mueller are trying to get in good with Trump.
00:23:35.000 They understand that the easiest way to earn Trump's respect and his good grace is to suggest to Trump that he has ultimate power, right, like Jafar at the end of Aladdin.
00:23:45.000 The ultimate power in the universe.
00:23:47.000 Itty bitty living space.
00:23:48.000 The problem is that people like Bannon who are telling Trump, obstruct Mueller, don't give him any documents, try to stop him because he's out of control.
00:23:55.000 You do that, it's going to come out, it's going to look like you're trying to obstruct, and then you have a political problem on your hands.
00:24:00.000 Whereas you just say, listen, my doors are wide open.
00:24:03.000 I have nothing to hide.
00:24:04.000 It makes it very difficult for the left to claim that this Trump-Russia collusion stuff is a reality.
00:24:08.000 Folks on the left are desperately hoping against hope that Mueller has the evidence to go against Trump.
00:24:13.000 But again, I don't think he does.
00:24:15.000 You know, Laura Ingraham said this last night.
00:24:16.000 She said that if Mueller had anything on Trump, he would have hit with that first.
00:24:20.000 I think that that may or may not be true, but I don't see, based on the Manafort indictment, unless it's just an attempt to get Manafort to flip,
00:24:27.000 I have this reflex on Trump.
00:24:28.000 I have always thought that if there was any sort of collusion inside the Trump campaign, it wasn't because Trump was sitting atop the campaign directing it.
00:24:35.000 It was because Trump had said, I want to be closer to the Russians.
00:24:38.000 I like Putin.
00:24:39.000 I hate Hillary.
00:24:40.000 And so some low-level staffer says, OK, he likes Putin.
00:24:43.000 He doesn't like Hillary.
00:24:44.000 What if we just go to Putin and help Trump take out Hillary?
00:24:47.000 It seems to me that this could very easily be a case of Henry II, well, no one rid me of this meddlesome priest.
00:24:53.000 And that would be the easiest answer here, but that would not necessarily be the actually, that wouldn't actually be Trump directing this from above.
00:25:01.000 Again, I think both the right and the left, though, are trying to kind of push Trump into using that gun that's over the mantelpiece.
00:25:07.000 You know, there's this old rule in drama.
00:25:08.000 It's a rule from Chekhov, the playwright Chekhov, that when you put a gun over the mantelpiece in the first act, it must be used by the end of the second act.
00:25:15.000 Well, the gun over the mantelpiece is firing Mueller, and I have a feeling that Trump is going to be tempted to do it just because that's what Trump has been tempted to do.
00:25:23.000 Again, the only audacious move he's made as president, really, is firing Comey, which blew back on him, which should be a good example not to do this.
00:25:29.000 Leon Panetta, obviously a man of the left, he says that more indictments are coming.
00:25:32.000 Again, Democrats are going to keep saying this and keep saying this, hoping they can trip Trump into firing Mueller so that then they can go after him on that basis, as opposed to the actual underlying supposed crime.
00:25:42.000 What these indictments may indicate is that as a result of it, there will be other trails of evidence that will be followed by Bob Mueller.
00:25:55.000 And I think there's probably a very good bet that additional indictments will be forthcoming and could involve members of both parties.
00:26:03.000 Okay, well, I think that that last point is the really important one.
00:26:08.000 One of the people who was basically called on the carpet, or is going to be called on the carpet, is Tony Podesta.
00:26:13.000 Tony Podesta is the brother of John Podesta.
00:26:14.000 Very, very close to the Clintons.
00:26:16.000 The Podesta Group was founded by the Podesta brothers.
00:26:18.000 It's a lobbying group inside Washington, D.C.
00:26:20.000 They worked very closely with Paul Manafort in his sort of pro-Ukrainian dealings from 2006 to 2014.
00:26:26.000 And in doing so, Podesta got himself into some hot water.
00:26:29.000 The same day that the Manafort indictment came down, Tony Podesta has now resigned from the Podesta group.
00:26:34.000 He's resigned because he's got to imagine that something is coming down the pike for him.
00:26:38.000 Well, this should tempt Trump to basically hold his fire.
00:26:40.000 Because if people from both sides get indicted, it's going to look like what it is.
00:26:44.000 This is the swamp.
00:26:45.000 It's not going to look like Trump.
00:26:46.000 It's going to look like the swamp.
00:26:47.000 Trump's best move here is to hold his fire.
00:26:49.000 Unfortunately, Steve Bannon, being more balls than brains, is telling him not to do that.
00:26:52.000 Bannon apparently, according to the Daily Beast, spoke on the phone with Trump on Monday, offered a message, get yourself some new lawyers.
00:26:57.000 Now listen, I know Bannon pretty well.
00:26:59.000 I was on a phone call with him twice a day, for an hour a day, for an hour a call, for two years.
00:27:04.000 So I know Bannon's tendencies.
00:27:06.000 Bannon's tendencies is always honey badger, right?
00:27:09.000 Honey badger this, honey badger that.
00:27:10.000 This is not a situation where the honey badger is going to be successful, because the fact is, the more you dig in here, the more the Democrats actually have something to play with.
00:27:18.000 According to the Daily Beast, the former White House chief strategist has grown increasingly concerned the president's legal team is falling down on the job, proving too accommodating to Robert Mueller, leaving Trump vulnerable as former campaign aides are handed indictments.
00:27:30.000 In
00:27:45.000 Apparently two sources inside and outside the White House with knowledge of a conversation between Trump and Bannon told the Daily Beast Bannon advised Trump not to demote Dowd and Cobb but to bring in new lawyers to work over them in the hopes that fresh blood would bring an order and ruthlessness to Trump's legal team that Bannon sees as desperately incompetent.
00:28:02.000 Doubt and Cobb have both said that they should cooperate with the Mueller investigation, and both Cobb and Doubt have had their problems.
00:28:09.000 But the idea that you're going to fix this by basically stonewalling is the biggest mistake that you can make.
00:28:13.000 Stonewalling here, again, if Trump is really innocent, I think that stonewalling is probably the worst thing that he can do.
00:28:21.000 And I'll give you an example of this, right?
00:28:22.000 Tony Podesta
00:28:24.000 Steps down from the Podesta group.
00:28:26.000 And he is talked about by Tucker Carlson on Fox News.
00:28:29.000 Well, Venable, which is a very, very good national law firm, they sent a letter to Tucker Carlson and they basically threatened Tucker Carlson to stop talking about this.
00:28:37.000 Is it going to help Tony Podesta to do this?
00:28:39.000 And the answer is no.
00:28:40.000 Here's Carlson talking about it.
00:28:41.000 We got a letter from Jeff Garenther.
00:28:44.000 He's a lawyer with Venable LLP, a big law firm here in D.C.
00:28:48.000 The letter demands that this show, quote, immediately cease and desist disseminating false and misleading reports about Mr. Podesta and the Podesta Group.
00:28:57.000 It demands we retract and delete all our prior reporting on the Podesta Group and warns that if we don't do this, quote, Mr. Podesta may pursue legal action, including for damages, in order to fully protect his rights.
00:29:10.000 The letter doesn't stop there, though.
00:29:11.000 It also warns us that we will face legal action under the Copyright Act merely for quoting from this letter publicly, as we just did.
00:29:20.000 The most amusing line, though, is this one.
00:29:22.000 Quote, Paul Manafort did not work with the Podesta Group in its representation of the European Center for a Modern Ukraine.
00:29:29.000 That's what the lawyer's letters told us.
00:29:31.000 Apparently that lawyer hasn't read the Manafort indictment yet.
00:29:34.000 In paragraph 22 of that indictment, we read this, quote, at the direction of Manafort and Gates, companies A and B engaged in extensive lobbying on Ukraine.
00:29:45.000 The indictment also says that the Podesta Group and Mercury were selected personally by Paul Manafort to lobby on behalf of Ukrainian interests.
00:29:54.000 So stonewalling, in other words, is the worst thing that you can do here because if you stonewall, it's just going to lead to more information being disseminated like Tucker Carlson did correctly last night on his program.
00:30:03.000 So this is a mistake.
00:30:05.000 The way that Trump should play this, the way that Trump should play this, first of all, let me just say this.
00:30:09.000 The person who is most in agreement with me on this is Alan Dershowitz, the Harvard Law professor, who I actually had at Harvard Law, and he says that he doesn't think that Mueller is going to quote-unquote get Trump.
00:30:18.000 I think this is correct.
00:30:19.000 His indictment has everything to do with Trump.
00:30:22.000 They never would have indicted him for money laundering or tax evasion if he weren't somebody who they thought could turn on Trump, could provide information and evidence.
00:30:31.000 If not Trump, somebody higher up in the chain between Manafort and Trump.
00:30:36.000 This is dominoes.
00:30:38.000 You knock down the first domino, that knocks down the second domino.
00:30:41.000 Ultimately, what Mueller is aiming for is the big domino in the Oval Office.
00:30:45.000 I don't think they're going to get him.
00:30:47.000 I don't think they have anything because collusion, even if it were to be established, isn't a crime.
00:30:52.000 This is correct.
00:30:53.000 As I've said before, collusion is not, in fact, a crime.
00:30:56.000 You actually have to engage in conspiracy in order for you to achieve a crime.
00:31:01.000 None of that is real.
00:31:02.000 And so the best thing that Trump can do is sort of open his arms and say, bring it at me, you know, come at me, bro.
00:31:06.000 Right.
00:31:06.000 That's that's sort of the best thing he can do, especially because, as I'm about to explain,
00:31:11.000 The Trump can actually turn this whole thing to his advantage.
00:31:13.000 I'm gonna explain how Trump can turn this whole thing to his advantage.
00:31:16.000 But for that, you're gonna have to subscribe to the podcast if you want to watch me talk about it live.
00:31:20.000 So for $9.99 a month, you can get the rest of this show live on video.
00:31:23.000 You can always listen to us later, of course, and you can always watch
00:31:26.000 Uh, our Facebook free and YouTube free section of the video later, but if you want us to have the whole show on video, then you have to download it and stream it by subscribing at $9.99 a month to Daily Wire.
00:31:38.000 You get my show, you get Knowles' show, you get Clavin's show, you get all of those things.
00:31:41.000 Clavin's not dressing up today, I believe that Knowles is, and it should be pretty horrific if Knowles holds true to form, so check that out.
00:31:49.000 Also, if you want the annual subscription, $99 a year gets you the annual subscription, which comes complete with this Leftist Tears hot or cold tumbler, the greatest of all vessels holding beverages.
00:31:59.000 It holds the brew that is true, as they say in the court jester.
00:32:02.000 So, Leftist Tears hot or cold mug, you get that when you subscribe annually.
00:32:06.000 Please subscribe to our YouTube channel as well because we always have cool new kind of cultural content coming out.
00:32:11.000 And if you want to subscribe just to the audio, go to SoundCloud or iTunes or Spotify or any of the various downloading apps and subscribe and leave us a comment and review.
00:32:21.000 We always appreciate it.
00:32:22.000 We are the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast in the nation.
00:32:30.000 So here's where I think that President Trump can turn all of this to his advantage.
00:32:33.000 I think the way he can turn this to his advantage is by pointing out what he's always been pointing out, which is the swamp.
00:32:38.000 Now the problem is that the swamp also encompasses a lot of his lower downs.
00:32:41.000 And what Trump should do, and this is where Trump fans are going to have to swallow hard here and accept the reality.
00:32:48.000 Donald Trump is not playing 40 chess.
00:32:50.000 Donald Trump is not playing underwater, MAGA, MAGA, MAGA, upside-down, hungry, hungry hippos.
00:32:54.000 He's not doing any of those things.
00:32:56.000 Donald Trump, even if you like him, even if you think he's a well-motivated man, he is not a sophisticated player in this space.
00:33:02.000 The lie that he was going to come in and clean everything up because he was just so sophisticated business player, knew the ins and outs, had bribed people, all this, it's just not true.
00:33:09.000 The best case you can make for President Trump, if you are a Trump supporter right now, is saying that Trump came in here
00:33:15.000 And it turns out that even during his campaign, the swamp was basically trying to infiltrate his campaign and trying to infect his campaign with swampiness, right?
00:33:23.000 Manafort was a Republican insider long before, long before President Trump had ever been on the political horizon.
00:33:29.000 Again, I told you, I was made aware of Manafort being kind of a swamp creature.
00:33:34.000 Back in, like, 2012, 2013.
00:33:35.000 And he was working deeply with the RNC at the time.
00:33:39.000 He was close with the Bushes.
00:33:41.000 The idea that Manafort was some sort of Trump-specific pick who was personally close to Trump is not true.
00:33:45.000 Probably what happened is that people at the RNC said, you know who you could use?
00:33:49.000 You could use Paul Manafort.
00:33:50.000 And he said, OK, sure, Manafort, why not?
00:33:52.000 What he should be saying is, listen, all these people who were recommended to me by the RNC, all these people who were recommended to me by the Republican insiders, these are the people who are involved in the swamp.
00:34:00.000 You want to know how I know?
00:34:01.000 Because look how Manafort was working with Podesta, right?
00:34:03.000 Podesta is a part of the swamp, too.
00:34:05.000 These are all part of the swamp.
00:34:07.000 Now, the one thing about this that I like particularly is that it is true, okay?
00:34:11.000 It is true that Washington, D.C.
00:34:13.000 is filled with swamp creatures.
00:34:14.000 Now the reason that Washington, D.C., however, is filled with swamp creatures is not because we just elected the worst people, invariably.
00:34:21.000 Very often the people we elect are good people.
00:34:22.000 The problem is that the swamp eats people because the swamp is in and of itself just a swamp of money.
00:34:27.000 When we say the swamp, people think, oh, well, look at all that corruption, all these corrupt people.
00:34:31.000 If we just elected the right people, then that would fix everything.
00:34:34.000 I'm a believer in the Milton Friedman line.
00:34:35.000 It's not about electing the right people.
00:34:37.000 It's about getting the wrong people to do the right thing.
00:34:39.000 And that means you have to minimize the power in Washington, D.C.
00:34:42.000 All of this swampiness,
00:34:44.000 And it does.
00:34:44.000 It engulfs both parties.
00:34:46.000 It involves people in both campaigns.
00:34:48.000 All of this is because Washington, D.C.
00:34:50.000 is so powerful, because Washington, D.C.
00:34:52.000 has so much money in it, because there are so many people who are seeking to take advantage of that wealth and power in Washington, D.C.
00:34:58.000 I'm going to give you a list of names of people who have basically been implicated in all of this.
00:35:05.000 Manafort, Hillary Clinton, Tony Podesta,
00:35:10.000 Donald Trump Jr., Christopher Steele, James Comey, George Papadopoulos, Jeff Sessions, Rod Rosenstein.
00:35:17.000 Right?
00:35:17.000 There's like everyone.
00:35:18.000 Everyone has been implicated in something here that is not good and is swampy in some way.
00:35:23.000 And the reason for that is not because all these people are bad.
00:35:25.000 It's not because all these people are evil people.
00:35:27.000 It's not because they all have bad intent.
00:35:28.000 It's because the people who are drawn to Washington D.C., the people who are drawn to power, tend to be the people who most want to take advantage of the money and power.
00:35:36.000 The only way to stop this swampiness is to cut Washington D.C.
00:35:39.000 down to the bone.
00:35:40.000 Now, I don't know that President Trump is willing to do that, but if he were, this would be the perfect time to say this.
00:35:45.000 The perfect time to say this would be right now.
00:35:47.000 Look at all this corruption.
00:35:49.000 Manafort, I had no idea who the guy was.
00:35:51.000 He came in, he ran my campaign for a while.
00:35:53.000 I really brought him on for delegate stuff, which is probably true.
00:35:56.000 When I found out about all the Russia stuff, then I fired him, which is also true.
00:36:00.000 I'm not here to participate in the swamp, but I have to admit that being an ignoramus about this sort of stuff, it was pretty easy to infiltrate my campaign, and this is one of the problems that we need to solve by minimizing the power of Washington, D.C.
00:36:10.000 That would require Trump to say that he's made mistakes before.
00:36:13.000 It would require Trump fans to say that he's made mistakes before, but it seems to me that's the best tactic and can actually be used as a positive for President Trump going forward.
00:36:21.000 Okay, time for some things I like, things I hate, and then we'll deconstruct the culture for a moment.
00:36:25.000 Okay, so things I like.
00:36:27.000 I've been doing books for parents because I was asked about it last week.
00:36:30.000 So this book is called The Happiest Baby on the Block by Harvey Karp.
00:36:34.000 So yesterday I gave you sort of a guide to dealing with toddlers because I have a three-and-a-half-year-old and, you know, disciplining toddlers is a difficult thing.
00:36:41.000 This one is about how to get some sleep when you're a parent.
00:36:44.000 The Happiest Baby on the Block is basically about very, very small babies, right?
00:36:47.000 Newborns.
00:36:48.000 How do you calm crying and help your newborn baby sleep longer?
00:36:52.000 It's become basically the holy writ when it comes to calming newborn babies.
00:36:58.000 They call them the five S's and I won't get them all off the top of my head, but it's swaddling and shushing and swinging.
00:37:04.000 And this is what you do to a baby that won't stop crying.
00:37:07.000 Karp's theory is that there's no such thing as colic.
00:37:09.000 The idea that there's a colicky baby who's just crying and crying and crying because they won't stop crying.
00:37:13.000 He thinks that if you use these methods, it calms the baby pretty quickly.
00:37:16.000 I've used it on both my children.
00:37:17.000 It definitely works.
00:37:18.000 Check out The Happiest Baby on the Block by Harvey Karp.
00:37:21.000 There's also a little documentary that you can view online where Karp actually shows you how to do these techniques to get your baby to stop crying so you can finally get some sleep, so check that out.
00:37:28.000 Okay, other things that I like.
00:37:29.000 So this is pretty incredible.
00:37:30.000 Hillary Clinton was asked what she's gonna dress as for Halloween, and she said she would, quote, go as the president.
00:37:36.000 Really, that's what she said.
00:37:37.000 She said that she would go as the president, which led me to ask, well, why would she dress as Donald Trump?
00:37:43.000 That's weird.
00:37:45.000 First of all, that would be a great thing if Hillary Clinton were to dress as Donald Trump.
00:37:49.000 I don't think she's actually going to do it.
00:37:51.000 Hillary Clinton at this point has basically become Miss Havisham from Dickens.
00:37:55.000 She was jilted at the altar 30 years ago and now she still walks around wearing her wedding dress and that's her shtick now.
00:38:00.000 So here she was doing that yesterday.
00:38:03.000 She was asked about these indictments and Hillary says, well guys, I have a great chapter on indictments in my book.
00:38:08.000 Please buy my book.
00:38:08.000 Please, please keep me relevant.
00:38:10.000 I have a great chapter about Russia in here.
00:38:32.000 She's still trying to shill her books here.
00:38:34.000 There's one thing she will never be and that of course is president of the United States.
00:38:37.000 What a charmer she is.
00:38:38.000 I can't believe she's not president.
00:38:40.000 Okay, other things that I like.
00:38:41.000 So Bryan Cranston is very rare to run across actors who are not so eaten by the Hollywood machine that they don't feel the necessity to go out there and just rip Trump up and down every five minutes.
00:38:50.000 Brian Cranston is one of these.
00:39:07.000 That, you know, Trump should fail.
00:39:08.000 Here's what he said, let me get the direct quote.
00:39:10.000 According to the Hollywood Reporter, he said, Now, this harkens back to right after Obama was elected and
00:39:32.000 Rush Limbaugh said he wanted Obama to fail.
00:39:34.000 What he meant by that is he wanted Obama's policies to fail.
00:39:36.000 He wanted Obama to... He didn't want Obama's... He didn't want bad outcomes for the country.
00:39:40.000 He wanted Obama to fail in implementing his policies.
00:39:42.000 But I think that Cranston's comments here go to something deeper, which is people have a personal investment in Donald Trump personally failing, and that's a problem.
00:39:50.000 I agree with him, and good for Cranston for saying it.
00:39:52.000 Okay, time for a quick thing I hate.
00:39:59.000 Okay, so today's thing I hate, John Kelly, the Chief of Staff, has become more and more sort of openly political.
00:40:04.000 I think there's a mistake by John Kelly.
00:40:06.000 I think John Kelly had the love and respect of a vast majority of Americans, the Chief of Staff, because of his military service, his great career, the fact that he's a gold star father.
00:40:16.000 And now it seems like he's getting more and more political, and when he does so, he's mirroring the Trump line on a lot of topics.
00:40:22.000 Sometimes that's good, and sometimes what he's doing is true, but he's getting himself in trouble.
00:40:26.000 I'm not sure this is his best use to the President of the United States, is going out there and speaking on things like removal of Confederate monuments.
00:40:33.000 Not because I disagree with him about the Confederate monument removal, but because his job is to act as a shield for President Trump, not to act as a sword for Trump's rhetoric.
00:40:42.000 In any case, he was on with Laura Ingraham last night, launching her new show.
00:40:47.000 It shows you how much of a lack of appreciation of history and what history is.
00:40:53.000 I would tell you that Robert E. Lee was an honorable man.
00:40:56.000 He was a man that gave up his country.
00:41:03.000 for his state, which in 150 years ago was more important than country.
00:41:07.000 It was always loyalty to state first back in those days.
00:41:10.000 Now it's different today.
00:41:13.000 But the lack of an ability to compromise led to the Civil War.
00:41:20.000 And men and women of good faith on both sides made their stand where their conscience had them make their stand.
00:41:28.000 So people are basically ripping him up and down for that last comment about the Civil War, that Robert E. Lee was an honorable man, that people made stands of conscience on both sides, and they're trying to suggest that he's a racist because of this.
00:41:38.000 Watch Ken Burns' documentary, and Ken Burns basically says a lot of these same things.
00:41:41.000 This was, until the last five to ten years, sort of the way that the Civil War history was taught.
00:41:45.000 When I was in middle school, this was the way the Civil War was taught.
00:41:48.000 Not just that it was about slavery, but there were people who were arguing on behalf of states' rights disconnected from slavery, and didn't hold slaves, and didn't even particularly like slavery.
00:41:57.000 This was sort of commonplace teaching.
00:41:59.000 That may be wrong, right?
00:42:00.000 It may be that the revisionist history is correct, that this was all about slavery, that Lee was not an honorable guy, that he was fighting on behalf of a treasonous cause, and that the entire thing was about slavery from beginning to end.
00:42:10.000 That seems to me, in many ways, more historically accurate than the traditional way this has been taught, but to suggest that Kelly's a racist because of this is to be ignorant of how the Civil War has largely been taught in American schools for the last 150 years.
00:42:23.000 Now, again, I think his last line there that the Civil War happened because failure to compromise.
00:42:27.000 I'm not sure how you compromise with slavery, exactly.
00:42:29.000 Obviously, Lincoln tried, actually.
00:42:31.000 Lincoln wanted to try and cut some sort of deal.
00:42:34.000 Republicans had been trying to cut some sort of deal, even though they were abolitionists, but that failed because the South basically could not accept the results of the 1860 election.
00:42:41.000 Okay, time to deconstruct the culture a little bit.
00:42:43.000 So, in deconstructing the culture, what we like to do is we like to take a piece of culture that maybe you are listening to, your kids are listening to, your friends are listening to, and talk about what exactly the message is in the culture.
00:42:54.000 This one is kind of subtle.
00:42:56.000 There's a very, very catchy song out by a group called Portugal the Man.
00:43:00.000 I guess that it's... the name of the group is...
00:43:04.000 Based on some obscure thing about how they felt like more than one person, so they're one man and also a country.
00:43:10.000 But they picked Portugal at random.
00:43:11.000 In any case, band names are basically come out... Band names are basically just segments from a James Joyce novel.
00:43:17.000 It's like Finnegan's Wake.
00:43:18.000 They just pick a phrase and then that becomes the name of the band.
00:43:20.000 In any case, the song is called Feel It Still.
00:43:23.000 It's a very catchy song, but there's something going on in the music video that if you didn't know about it, you're not going to catch.
00:43:40.000 Keep my hands to myself.
00:43:43.000 We go dust them off, put them back up on the shelf.
00:43:47.000 Guess my little baby girl isn't me.
00:43:51.000 Am I coming out of left field?
00:43:53.000 Ooh, I'm a rebel just for kicks, yeah.
00:43:56.000 I've been feeling it since 1966, yeah.
00:43:59.000 Might be over now, but I feel it still.
00:44:04.000 Okay, so what's weird about this particular music video, aside from the fact that it's a weird music video, is the fact that they actually embedded Easter eggs throughout this music video.
00:44:14.000 So you'd have to watch it online, but you can actually click in the middle of the music video and it puts out messages.
00:44:18.000 So the people who designed it, right, the band, actually said they wanted it to be a rallying cry for politics.
00:44:23.000 They said that they wanted this to be a song for the resistance.
00:44:25.000 So you can listen to it and not get that it's a song for the resistance.
00:44:29.000 Right, basically they're saying that, you know, you feel the lyric is all about how
00:44:34.000 They're supposedly apathetic, but they can still feel the resistance of 66.
00:44:38.000 They say, I'm a rebel just for kicks now.
00:44:41.000 I've been feeling it since 1966 now.
00:44:43.000 The idea is they're still part of this Woodstock generation.
00:44:45.000 That's why the album is called Woodstock.
00:44:47.000 So the left has never gotten over this idea.
00:44:49.000 Stop it right there.
00:44:50.000 Actually, if you go back to that particular freeze screen of the people making out in the car, if you were to click on the freeze screen of the people making out in the car, an Easter egg actually pops up when you click on it.
00:45:02.000 And it's a direction to Planned Parenthood.
00:45:04.000 Uh, so that's an example.
00:45:05.000 There's also a direction to give money to the ACLU, or to help refugees, and so they've embedded all these political messages.
00:45:11.000 So, right, there's a sort of random shot of people making out in a car.
00:45:13.000 If you click on this, then it gives you the direct contact information for the, it gives you the direct contact information for Planned Parenthood.
00:45:20.000 So this is the way that Hollywood sees it's making a difference.
00:45:24.000 And this is why when people in Hollywood say, we're just out there to make money, we're just appealing to the population.
00:45:28.000 No, they feel the necessity to actually push a particular message.
00:45:31.000 And everybody's living in this afterglow from the 1960s.
00:45:34.000 The 1960s happened literally 50 years ago now, folks.
00:45:37.000 50 years ago, okay?
00:45:38.000 The 1960s ended 14 years before I was born.
00:45:42.000 It's been a long time, and you've got all these young people who have this glorified version of what happened at Woodstock, which was basically a bunch of hippies smoking dope and screwing each other in the mud.
00:45:50.000 And this is supposed to be some sort of great and glorious point in American history, but now we're gonna revitalize that.
00:45:56.000 We're gonna make all of that come back through our hippiness.
00:46:00.000 I don't think that's the case, and I think that this constant search for a cause is not good, particularly when you don't even know what the causes are that you are talking about.
00:46:08.000 The song itself is super catchy, but you should always know what it is that you are watching and listening to, or at least the messages that they are trying to portray.
00:46:14.000 I mean, there's a more obvious one, right?
00:46:16.000 You see a Hindu guy burning a copy of InfoWars.
00:46:18.000 The idea being everyone on the right is an InfoWars Alex Jones reader.
00:46:22.000 So, I assume this guy is a Sikh.
00:46:24.000 In any case,
00:46:26.000 The embedded messages in a lot of these songs are a little bit hard to spot, but this one was very purposefully put in there.
00:46:33.000 The creative director, a guy named Jason Kreeher, he said,
00:46:48.000 So just understand that the pop culture is trying to push a particular point of view.
00:46:51.000 The reason they're trying to hide it is because if you know they're trying to push a particular point of view, they're not good at doing it.
00:46:55.000 Katy Perry pushing a particular point of view in I Kissed a Girl and I Liked It is much more effective than Katy Perry on stage at the DNC speaking on behalf of Hillary Clinton.
00:47:04.000 Okay, we'll be back here tomorrow with all of the latest breaking news.
00:47:06.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:47:07.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.