The Ben Shapiro Show - January 24, 2020


Hunting For Hunter | Ep. 939


Episode Stats

Length

56 minutes

Words per Minute

218.74963

Word Count

12,363

Sentence Count

824

Misogynist Sentences

11

Hate Speech Sentences

16


Summary

In this episode, Ben Shapiro reacts to Adam Schiff's emotional testimony in support of Joe Biden during his testimony before the House Intelligence Committee on Thursday. He says it's time for the Democrats to get more emotion and more props in order to make their case against President Trump and Russia, and he suggests an idea that could do just that: a Muppets episode featuring Kermit the Frog, Miss Piggy, and Kermit himself! Ben Shapiro is the host of The Ben Shapiro Show on Fox News Radio and host of the conservative podcast The Weekly Standard. He's also a regular contributor to Fox News and the Weekly Standard, and is a frequent contributor to the New York Times, CNN, and other media outlets. His new book, is out now, and it's available for pre-order on Amazon Prime and Vimeo worldwide. If you don't already own an Amazon Prime membership, you can get 20% off for as little as $99.99, and get 7 days free when you sign up for Prime membership starting July 1st. You'll get 7 months of unlimited access to all of the latest and greatest Prime Video streaming services, including Vimeo and other major podcasting platforms, including the Huffington Post, Comedy Central, NPR, NPR and NPR, and the BBC. Subscribe to his new podcast, The FiveThirtyEight, where he'll be giving you access to his full-length documentary series on all things politics, politics, economics, and culture, politics and culture. and much more. Ben's next book is out soon! He'll also be giving out a limited-edition limited edition hardcover edition of his new novel, The Devil's Advocate, out soon. The Devil Next Door, out in paperback, available for only $99, plus a limited edition paperback edition, out on Audible and Audible, which will be out in hardcover, on May 1st, too! Subscribe now! Learn more about Ben Shapiro's new book: "Ben Shapiro's Testimony" is available for purchase starting July 27th. Watch this entire series on the Four Seasons, starting July 9th, 2020. Listen to Ben's newest book, "The Devil's Workday." Watch the full video version of the show on his new book "The Man Who Couldn't Do It? coming soon, coming out July 9, 2020, coming out on July 18th, 2019.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Democrats unwittingly opened the door for a Hunter Biden's testimony while targeting Donald Trump.
00:00:04.000 Bernie gained ground in New Hampshire and Bernie comes under fire for touting a Joe Rogan endorsement.
00:00:10.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:11.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:12.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is sponsored by ExpressVPN YouTube.
00:00:20.000 Your data is your business.
00:00:22.000 Protect it at expressvpn.com slash ben.
00:00:25.000 Well, I know you're yawning because, after all, we're still covering impeachment.
00:00:28.000 Why the hell are we covering impeachment?
00:00:30.000 I know it's supposed to be super duper important, but here is the reality.
00:00:33.000 People are bored.
00:00:34.000 Now, I know the media is going to tell you that this is a figment of the right-wing imagination, that actually people are on tenterhooks, but the ratings do not lie.
00:00:40.000 The ratings continue to be abysmal for what is supposed to be one of the great historic moments in American history, the moment when Adam Schiff saved the republic.
00:00:48.000 I do not think that the American people are tuned into this thing.
00:00:51.000 I don't think the American people care deeply.
00:00:53.000 I think all of this is baked into the cake at this point.
00:00:56.000 So, the fact that the Democrats keep trying to sell this thing, like the entertainment press is trying to sell female Ghostbusters, is entertaining to me.
00:01:04.000 It's also entertaining to me how the Democrats have decided to ramp up the theatrics.
00:01:08.000 So, in the end, the case that they are making about President Trump is not completely implausible, right?
00:01:13.000 They're making the case that Trump tried to pressure The president of Ukraine into going after Joe Biden to benefit Trump in 2020 solely.
00:01:20.000 That is their case.
00:01:21.000 Now, is that a plausible read?
00:01:23.000 It's not totally implausible, but is it evidentiarily based?
00:01:28.000 No, it is not.
00:01:28.000 And when you're trying to prove a case, you actually have to provide the entire chain of evidence.
00:01:32.000 The Democrats have not done that.
00:01:33.000 And so instead, what they're doing is Al Pacino in An Justice for All, banging the table, yelling at the moon.
00:01:39.000 This whole court is out of order!
00:01:41.000 So you have Adam Schiff, who is just a partisan hack.
00:01:44.000 I mean, a real partisan hack.
00:01:45.000 A man who, as I've said before, went on television for two years claiming he had secret information that was going to damn President Trump to impeachment for collusion with Russia.
00:01:55.000 You have Adam Schiff pretending to be a leader of the moral hierarchy in the United States.
00:02:00.000 You have Adam Schiff, the same fellow who within the last week has openly lied about content he knew he was lying about.
00:02:07.000 Notes from Lev Parnas to Rudy Giuliani concerning a meeting with the head of Burisma.
00:02:12.000 He portrayed it as a meeting with the head of Ukraine.
00:02:14.000 Adam Schiff, the same guy who was pretty much openly cooperating, his office was, with the whistleblower and then pretending he had no idea who the whistleblower was and all of this, which I don't believe for half a second.
00:02:24.000 Adam Schiff, a deeply dishonest human being.
00:02:27.000 He was out there making his closing argument last night and it was as dishonest as you would suspect, but it was also as emotional as you would suspect.
00:02:35.000 He took CNN's Dana Bash's, Dana Bash had a suggestion yesterday.
00:02:38.000 She said, the American people, they don't seem all that invested in this.
00:02:40.000 What we need is we need more props and more emotion.
00:02:44.000 We need the Democrats to get up there and do an episode of The Muppet Show.
00:02:47.000 We actually need Kermit the Frog talking about Donald Trump and Ukraine.
00:02:51.000 Miss Piggy!
00:02:52.000 Oh, Kermit!
00:02:53.000 And then in the background, you could have the two old guys up on the balcony going, this show is terrible!
00:02:57.000 Ah!
00:02:57.000 And then the American people would actually be interested in this thing.
00:03:00.000 So Adam Schiff put on his own Muppet eyes and decided that he would go for it, that he was going to really up the emotion.
00:03:06.000 Here is Adam Schiff choking up.
00:03:08.000 Now, do you believe that Adam Schiff is actually getting choked up here?
00:03:12.000 Do you believe that Adam Schiff, a former prosecutor, longtime congressperson, that he is actually getting emotional here?
00:03:20.000 That Adam Schiff is just, he was overwhelmed with the moment.
00:03:23.000 That he was so overcome with the moment that he was getting choked up because morality matters and right matters.
00:03:32.000 Okay, if you believe this, you're an idiot.
00:03:33.000 Seriously, if you believe in the emotion of politicians generally, you're an idiot.
00:03:37.000 The only time I've ever seen politicians get truly emotional and I thought, okay, this is pretty real.
00:03:41.000 is when George W. Bush after 9-11, because everybody was so shaken up by 9-11, or you might say like Edmund Muskie in 1972 when his actual family is being attacked.
00:03:50.000 Like I believe it when Joe Biden gets pissed about Hunter Biden or Beau Biden.
00:03:53.000 I totally get it, right?
00:03:54.000 Somebody attacks your family, that is a place where you are going to get...
00:03:59.000 upset.
00:03:59.000 But do I believe it when politicians on the grand stage in their closing argument suddenly turn into Jimmy Stewart from Mr. Smith Goes to Washington?
00:04:08.000 No, I don't believe that for a second because Jimmy Stewart was an actor.
00:04:10.000 And you know what?
00:04:11.000 This is what we call acting.
00:04:12.000 John Lovett's acting.
00:04:13.000 Here we go.
00:04:14.000 Adam Schiff acting.
00:04:15.000 Here, right is supposed to matter.
00:04:19.000 It's what's made us the greatest nation on earth.
00:04:26.000 No constitution can protect us. - Yes.
00:04:29.000 Right doesn't matter anymore.
00:04:32.000 And you know, you can't trust this president to do what's right for this country.
00:04:39.000 If you find him guilty, you must find that he should be removed.
00:04:45.000 Because right matters.
00:04:48.000 Because right matters.
00:04:51.000 And the truth matters.
00:04:54.000 Otherwise we are lost.
00:04:56.000 Oh my god.
00:04:57.000 Yes.
00:04:59.000 And people were going gaga for this.
00:05:00.000 This trended.
00:05:02.000 Right Matters trended.
00:05:03.000 Because, oh, it was not scripted.
00:05:05.000 It was just a spontaneous moment.
00:05:07.000 It was just a moment.
00:05:08.000 Mr. Smith goes to wash and Claude Rains in the back room shooting himself.
00:05:13.000 Or alternatively, this was highly produced and really silly and quite ridiculous.
00:05:18.000 And again, the whole argument is quite ridiculous and self-contradictory.
00:05:21.000 Because when you actually look at what Adam Schiff said yesterday, so many of the things that he said were just not true.
00:05:26.000 So here was Adam Schiff, for example, talking about Barack Obama's Ukraine policy.
00:05:29.000 So one of the points that the Trump team has made is that you keep complaining about the Trump team's treatment of Ukraine.
00:05:35.000 You keep complaining that Team Trump is really, really mean to Ukraine.
00:05:39.000 Well, Team Trump provided actual killing aid to Ukraine, like military aid to Ukraine that included weaponry capable of protecting them against the Russians, which is something the Obama administration did not do.
00:05:49.000 And yet you had Adam Schiff saying, no, no, no, you don't understand.
00:05:52.000 Obama rallied the world against Russia invading Ukraine.
00:05:55.000 Really?
00:05:56.000 Did he?
00:05:56.000 Because it seems to me that Russia is still in Crimea.
00:05:58.000 Like now.
00:05:59.000 Today.
00:06:00.000 And that rallying the world involved President Trump basically doing nothing for months on end, and then every so often saying that it was very, very bad, that Russia was doing a very bad thing.
00:06:08.000 Which is exactly what he did in Syria also.
00:06:10.000 So here is Adam Schiff just lying about Barack Obama's record.
00:06:14.000 President Obama used his calls with foreign leaders to contain the fallout from the global economic crisis, assemble an international coalition to fight the Islamic State, and of course to rally support for Ukraine following Russia's invasion of Crimea.
00:06:31.000 No matter what you think of the policy views or priorities of these prior presidents, there is no question that they are examples of the normal diplomacy that happens during presidential telephone calls.
00:06:44.000 And then there's the normal diplomacy that happens when you're on the stage with Dimitri Medvedev and telling him that you'll offer his country flexibility after the election so long as they back off before the election.
00:06:52.000 That was the part that Adam Schiff didn't play on tape.
00:06:55.000 But he's a deeply honest man.
00:06:56.000 Right matters.
00:06:57.000 Right matters.
00:06:59.000 We're going to get to more of Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler and the rest of the Democrats.
00:07:04.000 Also, I've got to tell you about this amazing controversy that has now broken out over my friend Joe Rogan.
00:07:09.000 Apparently Joe Rogan is now cancelled, which you knew was coming, but cancelled for the most bizarre reason.
00:07:14.000 It's pretty incredible.
00:07:14.000 We'll get to that in just one second.
00:07:17.000 Let's be real about this.
00:07:17.000 If you have a medical issue, sitting around and waiting on a medical issue is a stupid idea.
00:07:21.000 You should go get a medical issue solved, even if that issue happens to be embarrassing to you.
00:07:25.000 Now, listen, guys don't want to talk about erectile dysfunction.
00:07:27.000 Why would you want to?
00:07:28.000 You don't want to talk about that with people.
00:07:29.000 You know, maybe it's hard to even talk about that with a doctor.
00:07:32.000 Well, good news for you, you can head on over to GetRoman.com right now and you can get it done really fast and really quickly and confidentially.
00:07:40.000 As well.
00:07:40.000 Also, right now, people in the United States are waiting to see a doctor for weeks at a time, sometimes.
00:07:46.000 A month, sometimes.
00:07:47.000 Well, if you're dealing with a condition like ED, you want treatment ASAP, which is why our friends at Roman have spent years building a digital platform that can connect you with a doctor licensed in your state, all from the comfort of home.
00:07:57.000 Roman makes it convenient to get the treatment you need on your schedule.
00:07:59.000 Just grab your phone or computer, complete a free online visit, you'll hear back from a U.S.
00:08:03.000 licensed physician within 24 hours.
00:08:06.000 If the doctor decides the treatment is right for you, Roman's Pharmacy can ship your medication to you with free two-day shipping.
00:08:11.000 You also get free unlimited follow-ups with your doctor anytime you have questions or want to adjust your treatment plan with Roman.
00:08:16.000 There are no commitments and you can cancel anytime.
00:08:19.000 Again, medical issues, get them solved.
00:08:21.000 So, if you're struggling with ED, hair loss, cold sores, even other issues, Go to GetRoman.com slash Ben for a free online visit.
00:08:27.000 Again, that's GetRoman.com slash Ben.
00:08:29.000 Get this done quickly, get it done easily, and get it taken care of.
00:08:32.000 Why exactly would you be sitting around waiting on it?
00:08:34.000 Okay, speaking of Adam Schiff pushing silliness.
00:08:37.000 So Adam Schiff also made the case that President Trump was pushing Russian propaganda about Ukrainian interference in the election.
00:08:42.000 Now, I think that President Trump buys into confirmation bias in an extraordinary way.
00:08:48.000 I think that President Trump bought into a bunch of stories about all the stuff that was happening in Ukraine.
00:08:53.000 And a lot of those stories were not true.
00:08:54.000 The conspiracy theory that CrowdStrike was a Ukrainian-operated business that was hiding the reality that Ukraine had hacked Hillary Clinton's server, that Hillary Clinton's actual server was buried in a forest outside Kiev or some such nonsense.
00:09:06.000 I agree that that's nonsense, but the Democrats really overplayed their hand here when they suggest that there was no Ukrainian interference in the election.
00:09:13.000 We know that there was Ukrainian interference in the election.
00:09:15.000 Politico reported there was Ukrainian interference in the election.
00:09:18.000 The two are not mutually exclusive.
00:09:20.000 And that's not to say that the Ukrainian interference was anything like on the magnitude of the Russian interference.
00:09:25.000 It was not.
00:09:26.000 But for the Democrats to overplay this thing and then say there was no interference, which is what they now have to claim in order so that they can say that it was really about Donald Trump trying to manufacture information about Joe Biden for 2020, they have to fib.
00:09:38.000 So here's Adam Schiff fibbing a little bit.
00:09:42.000 What the president is talking about here is a very specific conspiracy theory.
00:09:47.000 Going to the server itself.
00:09:50.000 Meaning that it was Ukraine that hacked the Democratic server, not the Russians.
00:09:56.000 This theory was brought to you by the Kremlin.
00:10:01.000 Okay?
00:10:02.000 So we're not talking about generic interference, we're talking about the server.
00:10:05.000 We're talking about CrowdStrike, at least that's what Donald Trump wanted investigated.
00:10:11.000 Or announced.
00:10:13.000 This completely bogus Kremlin pushed conspiracy theory.
00:10:18.000 And so again, the reason that he is saying this is because if he acknowledges that maybe there could be legit interest in what Ukraine did and maybe what Trump was doing, even if it was based on wrong information, was not badly motivated.
00:10:29.000 And the problem is the Democrats have to assume motive in order to get where they want to go right here.
00:10:34.000 Meanwhile, the Democrats are opening the door to testimony by Hunter Biden.
00:10:38.000 So Sylvia Garcia, Representative Garcia, she's one of the other impeachment managers in the House.
00:10:43.000 And she, like Adam Schiff, they do not want Hunter Biden to testify.
00:10:47.000 So they want to have it both ways.
00:10:48.000 They want to have Lev Parnas testify.
00:10:50.000 They want to have Mick Mulvaney, as we'll get to, testify.
00:10:53.000 They want everybody to testify except for Hunter Biden.
00:10:55.000 They do not want Hunter Biden to testify.
00:10:58.000 And so they've been making the argument that Hunter Biden should not testify because they're trying to protect Joe Biden.
00:11:03.000 Sheryl Gay Stolberg reporting for the New York Times, House Democrats sought on Thursday to preemptively dismantle President Trump's core defenses in his impeachment trial, invoking his own words to argue that his pressure campaign on Ukraine was an abuse of power that warranted his removal.
00:11:16.000 Democrats sought to make the case that Trump's actions were an affront to the Constitution, and they worked to disprove his lawyer's claim that he was acting only in the nation's interest when he sought to enlist Ukraine to investigate political rivals.
00:11:26.000 In doing so, they took a calculated risk in talking at length about President Trump's targets, including former VP Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden, and underscored the political backdrop of a trial unfolding only 10 months before the election and likely to reverberate long after the verdict.
00:11:42.000 Even if the president wanted an investigation of Hunter Biden, there is no basis for that either.
00:11:46.000 about Hunter Biden, no reason to be concerned about Hunter Biden.
00:11:48.000 The Democrats are playing a dangerous game here because once they say we want additional witnesses and then they say we don't want Hunter Biden, people are going to say, OK, why why is the central issue here not being addressed?
00:11:59.000 Here's Sylvia Garcia opening the door wide.
00:12:00.000 Even if the president wanted an investigation of Hunter Biden, there is no basis for that either.
00:12:08.000 Now, how do you know?
00:12:11.000 Well, Ukraine's former prosecutor general admitted that the allegation against Vice President Biden's son was plainly false.
00:12:24.000 Even the Ukrainians believe that Biden's son did nothing wrong.
00:12:30.000 We've got a couple problems here.
00:12:31.000 One, some Ukrainians say that Hunter Biden did nothing wrong and Joe Biden did nothing wrong.
00:12:35.000 Then you have other prosecutors like Victor Shokin, the one that Biden went after, who is actually apparently selling the information that Biden did do something wrong.
00:12:43.000 Also, if your line is that Ukrainians said that Hunter Biden and Joe Biden did nothing wrong, you know who has said that Donald Trump did nothing wrong?
00:12:50.000 All of the Ukrainian leadership.
00:12:51.000 So if you're going to cite the Ukrainian leadership to the effect that Hunter Biden and Joe Biden are off the hook, the same people have also said that Donald Trump is off the hook, but you don't cite them in support of one proposition, but you cite them in support of the other proposition.
00:13:02.000 So all of this is a bit of a mess for the Democrats.
00:13:05.000 We're going to get to More of this in just one second.
00:13:08.000 First, let us talk about why cybersecurity should be an issue for you.
00:13:12.000 Why you should really pay attention to your own cybersecurity.
00:13:14.000 So we here at The Daily Wire, we spend tons of money and tons of time protecting our cybersecurity because we're a major company and we come under attack on a fairly regular basis.
00:13:22.000 But why should you worry about that?
00:13:23.000 You're not a major company.
00:13:24.000 Well, here is the answer.
00:13:25.000 There are a lot of hackers who want your personal information.
00:13:27.000 In fact, there are a lot of people who will make more money off of stealing your personal information off of your computer than they will trying to hack a big company.
00:13:34.000 It takes a lot of resources to hack a big company.
00:13:36.000 It takes no resources to hack you.
00:13:38.000 They can do it very easily on public Wi-Fi.
00:13:40.000 They can do it using backdoors.
00:13:42.000 There are all sorts of ways they can get your information.
00:13:44.000 This is why you need to be using a VPN.
00:13:46.000 And not just for hackers, because why would you want all the social media companies gathering data from you and then monetizing it?
00:13:52.000 Why would you want the government keeping track of everything that you do online?
00:13:55.000 Instead, check out ExpressVPN.
00:13:57.000 It's the software I and thousands of my fans use every day to protect our data online.
00:14:01.000 In the time since I started using ExpressVPN, hacking methods keep growing more and more sophisticated.
00:14:06.000 ExpressVPN keeps working to keep the hackers out.
00:14:08.000 I've been talking about ExpressVPN on the show for a really long time.
00:14:11.000 You should be using it.
00:14:12.000 I use it all the time, literally every time I go online.
00:14:15.000 My only question is, why haven't you done this yet?
00:14:17.000 Visit my special link right now at expressvpn.com slash ben.
00:14:20.000 Get an extra three months of ExpressVPN for free.
00:14:22.000 It works really quickly on your computer.
00:14:23.000 It's not gonna slow down your computer.
00:14:25.000 It works easily.
00:14:25.000 You click one button and you're now protected.
00:14:27.000 Protect your internet today with the VPN I trust to keep my data safe.
00:14:30.000 Go to expressvpn.com slash ben.
00:14:33.000 Get an extra three months for free.
00:14:35.000 That is expressvpn.com slash ben.
00:14:38.000 I talk about them all the time.
00:14:39.000 Just do it.
00:14:39.000 Expressvpn.com slash ben.
00:14:41.000 Now the Democrats, again, are trying to manipulate the process more than a little bit here.
00:14:46.000 The way that they are doing this is they are targeting people deliberately, whom they know have executive privilege, specifically so that they can claim that obstruction is going on.
00:14:54.000 This is the argument being made by Senator Tom Cotton.
00:14:56.000 This is obviously true.
00:14:58.000 They did this in the House.
00:14:59.000 They would say that they wanted a particular witness.
00:15:01.000 The witness would say, well, I'm going to appeal that to a court.
00:15:03.000 And then the Democrats would say, we don't want you to appeal it to a court.
00:15:06.000 And now you're obstructing.
00:15:07.000 We're not going to go through the process and also you're obstructing.
00:15:10.000 Well now, it looks like what the Democrats want to do is call people like Mick Mulvaney, the chief of staff.
00:15:15.000 Or John Bolton.
00:15:16.000 People who are subject to executive privilege.
00:15:18.000 Particularly on foreign policy, executive privilege does run pretty wide.
00:15:23.000 Tom Cotton says what Democrats are doing right here is they're attempting to call people who will cite executive privilege so they can then claim that obstruction is taking place.
00:15:32.000 The Democrats have not sought the testimony of Rudy Giuliani, a private citizen, or say, Secretary Rick Perry or Secretary Mike Pompeo, who regularly testify in front of Congress.
00:15:44.000 Why are they going after the President's closest advisors, those most likely subject to executive privilege?
00:15:49.000 It's because they care more about trying to create a campaign issue against Republican senators than they care about getting relevant testimony.
00:15:59.000 Okay, and again, that is underscored by the fact that they keep saying that Hunter Biden should not testify.
00:16:03.000 Lindsey Graham, who is fairly close with Joe Biden, right?
00:16:06.000 I mean, they're pretty friendly.
00:16:07.000 He says, listen, I don't think Joe Biden is corrupt, but we sort of have to ask the question at this point, and let's be straight about this.
00:16:13.000 If Hunter Biden was named Donald Trump Jr., and he was doing all this stuff right now, wouldn't the Democrats be taking precisely the opposite position?
00:16:21.000 Here's Senator Graham.
00:16:24.000 From the time they raided the president's home, Joe Biden called the president of Ukraine four times, got on a plane, and said, if you don't fire this guy, you don't get the billion dollars.
00:16:34.000 I love Joe Biden.
00:16:36.000 But I can tell you, if the name was Trump, there'd be a lot of questions asked.
00:16:40.000 I don't think Joe Biden's corrupt, but I don't think he's beyond being looked at.
00:16:45.000 Here's what I would say.
00:16:46.000 How many members of the body's children are on foreign boards Receiving this kind of money.
00:16:56.000 Okay, again, these are legit questions.
00:16:57.000 Senator Ted Cruz saying the same thing.
00:16:59.000 And the Democrats keep saying, we're not going to allow Hunter Biden to testify.
00:17:02.000 It's irrelevant.
00:17:02.000 He's not going to testify.
00:17:04.000 Senator Cruz keeps saying, okay, well, that is the president's defense.
00:17:06.000 And now you're trying to deny him his main defense, which is that he was legitimately interested in corruption in Ukraine, including Hunter Biden's corruption.
00:17:13.000 Here is Senator Cruz.
00:17:16.000 Adam Schiff's arguments to open the day-to-day directly drew into question Hunter Biden and made not only his testimony relevant, which it already was, but it is now critical because the House Democrats have built their entire case on the proposition that any investigation into Baris and corruption was a sham, that it was completely debunked.
00:17:38.000 The problem is, there is very significant prima facie evidence of corruption.
00:17:44.000 Okay, well, we'll find out.
00:17:46.000 Because again, if we call additional witnesses, I think there's very little doubt Hunter Biden ends up on the stand.
00:17:51.000 And at the very least, that's not gonna look great for Joe Biden.
00:17:53.000 No matter whether Joe Biden did something wrong or whether he didn't do something wrong, it doesn't look great when you're squiring your son around and he's using your last name to pick up bags of cash.
00:18:01.000 In foreign countries.
00:18:02.000 Meanwhile, the other big news from impeachment gate is that CBS Evening News is reporting that apparently somebody, and it's unclear who, somebody, either a Republican in the Senate or a Republican in the White House is telling people in the Senate that their head will be on a pike, that their head will be on a pike if they oppose President Trump in this impeachment effort.
00:18:24.000 Now, why that exactly is newsworthy is beyond me, honestly.
00:18:27.000 Like, I understand that the language is very colorful, but do you think that those sorts of threats do not happen literally every single day in the legislature?
00:18:34.000 Why do you think that people back down before Nancy Pelosi?
00:18:35.000 Do you think it's because she wheedles them?
00:18:37.000 Or do you think that she says, guess what, I'm not going to fundraise for you, and the guillotine is prepared in the back room?
00:18:42.000 You can say what you want.
00:18:43.000 All I'm saying is that your head may not be connected to your body.
00:18:47.000 You can't portray her as the Queen of Dragons without there being a little bit of a threat involved, which is exactly the way the Democrats have portrayed Nancy Pelosi for years.
00:18:56.000 But apparently it's very, very bad for the White House to employ its leverage over Republicans.
00:19:00.000 Now listen, would it be better, would we live in a better world if nobody ever applied leverage to their own congresspeople and everybody just voted their conscience?
00:19:07.000 Of course.
00:19:08.000 Has that ever been the way that American politics works or any other politics for that matter?
00:19:12.000 Not in the slightest.
00:19:13.000 I'm treating this as a shock that the White House or that Mitch McConnell's office is trying to apply leverage to its own members.
00:19:20.000 Why exactly is that shocking?
00:19:22.000 They literally do this on every bill.
00:19:23.000 On every bill you attempt to apply leverage.
00:19:25.000 It's just a question of degree.
00:19:27.000 Nonetheless, CBS News reported that senators were warned.
00:19:31.000 They don't say by whom.
00:19:32.000 An unnamed source close to the president.
00:19:34.000 Which could be anybody, right?
00:19:36.000 Really anybody.
00:19:37.000 It could be somebody who is a staffer for the president.
00:19:39.000 It could be George Conway because he's close to the president by proxy.
00:19:42.000 It could be anybody telling CBS News that apparently senators were warned, quote, vote against the president and your head will be on a pike.
00:19:49.000 And then the Daily Mail reports, it's unclear from the report whether the warning was issued by the White House or Republican leadership in the Senate.
00:19:55.000 So we don't even know who issued the warning.
00:19:56.000 It could have been just some guy on a street corner going, your head will be on a pike!
00:19:59.000 And CBS News is like, well, that's a threat.
00:20:02.000 That's a threat.
00:20:03.000 What does that mean?
00:20:04.000 Does anybody actually believe that President Trump is going to stomp on over to the Senate?
00:20:08.000 And he's going to take out a broad axe?
00:20:10.000 And he's going to start going to town if somebody votes against him on impeachment?
00:20:13.000 No, it means that he's applying political pressure, which again, if you think political pressure was not applied on Democrats during the Clinton impeachment, you're out of your mind.
00:20:20.000 Political pressure is always applied.
00:20:21.000 That's the nature of politics.
00:20:23.000 But this is now being used as a case in point of Trumpian intimidation, when in reality, that's just the nature of politics.
00:20:32.000 What's more interesting than that report, and this one is not getting any play, is the fact that Democrats are not approaching any of the moderate Republicans.
00:20:38.000 The Washington Post reports That the most closely watched senators of President Trump's impeachment trial are oddly isolated.
00:20:46.000 They say that President Trump is keeping his distance because White House advisors are telling him that outreach wouldn't help his cause, which is obviously true.
00:20:51.000 If Trump calls up Susan Collins, she's going to say that he is trying to intimidate her and she's going to stand up to him, right?
00:20:57.000 If he calls up Mitt Romney, that's not going to go great for him.
00:20:59.000 But meanwhile, Democrats say there is no serious effort to privately lobby the Republicans, with the party instead relying on public opinion and the House prosecutors to squeeze them into breaking ranks.
00:21:09.000 What does that go to show?
00:21:09.000 It shows that they know that they're not going to get those Republican senators on their side.
00:21:12.000 They're just trying to gin up public sentiment in advance of the 2020 elections.
00:21:15.000 That's really what that is about, right?
00:21:17.000 If the Democrats truly cared about trying to win this impeachment vote, they'd be out there lobbying the Republican senators like day in and day out.
00:21:23.000 But they're not doing any of that.
00:21:25.000 Instead, they are pushing a different idea, which is public opinion, right?
00:21:29.000 They're trying to push public opinion to push the senators, which really suggests that this isn't about winning the impeachment battle at all.
00:21:35.000 Really, what this is about, in effect, is trying to undercut those senators for purposes of 2020, which, of course, is what this entire thing is about in the first place.
00:21:43.000 In just one second, I'm going to get to the 2020 race because frankly, all of this is about the 2020 race and there is a fascinating example of the left shooting itself directly in the foot because they cannot help themselves.
00:21:54.000 Truly cannot help themselves.
00:21:55.000 It's amazing.
00:21:57.000 We'll get to that in just one second.
00:21:59.000 First, we're three days into this impeachment trial.
00:22:01.000 It is clear that the Democrats are going to manipulate this thing with everything they've got.
00:22:04.000 The media are going to help them out.
00:22:05.000 If you'd like to know the real truth and get a behind-the-scenes look into everything happening, check out the newly released podcast, Verdict, with Ted Cruz.
00:22:11.000 Senator Cruz and The Daily Wire's own useless Michael Knowles take you behind the scenes of the Capitol, give you exclusive conservative insight on the most important political stories of the day.
00:22:21.000 Finally, we made Knowles useful.
00:22:22.000 Here's a little bit of the trailer.
00:22:24.000 Join Senator Ted Cruz as he breaks down the most important political stories of the day on his new podcast, Verdict.
00:22:33.000 If you get to the heart of the problem with the House Democrats' case here, it's that they have an alleged treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors.
00:22:42.000 And let's actually talk about what the constitutional standard is.
00:22:45.000 Subscribe today and leave a five-star review for Verdict with Ted Cruz, co-hosted by me, Michael Knowles.
00:22:51.000 On Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and everywhere else you get your podcasts.
00:22:57.000 I know that that podcast is soaring up the charts.
00:22:59.000 Be sure to go check it out on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite streaming service.
00:23:02.000 Again, it's called Verdict with Ted Cruz, and it really is a good inside look at what exactly is going on on a day to day level in the Senate.
00:23:09.000 Meanwhile, in the 2020 race, I am amused by the radical left.
00:23:13.000 I'm amused by them.
00:23:14.000 So yesterday, Joe Rogan, who's a friend of mine, right?
00:23:17.000 Full disclosure, I'm friends with Joe.
00:23:18.000 I think Joe's a good dude.
00:23:19.000 We disagree on a wide variety of topics, but what's fun about Joe is that Joe is really open-minded.
00:23:25.000 He's willing to discuss with anybody.
00:23:26.000 Like, he'll have anybody on his show.
00:23:27.000 He'll have tons of people from a variety of different viewpoints.
00:23:29.000 He's had me, he's had Bernie Sanders.
00:23:31.000 He's had Barry Weiss, and he's had people who I think are wildly not Barry Weiss, right?
00:23:38.000 I mean, he's had people from virtually every area of life.
00:23:42.000 Well, Joe Rogan was asked by Barry Weiss on his show I think I'll probably vote for Bernie.
00:23:53.000 Him as a human being, when I was hanging out with him, I believe in him, I like him, I like him a lot.
00:23:59.000 What Bernie stands for is a guy who, look, you could dig up dirt on every single human being that's ever existed if you catch them in their worst moment and you magnify those moments and you cut out everything else and you only display those worst moments.
00:24:13.000 That said, You can't find very many with Bernie.
00:24:17.000 He's been insanely consistent his entire life.
00:24:20.000 Okay, so Rogan is saying, what really is Bernie's appeal?
00:24:24.000 Which is that Bernie has been this old commie for his entire life.
00:24:27.000 Now, I don't find that appealing, right?
00:24:28.000 I think that his ideas have been bad since, basically, he emerged from his mother's womb at age 82.
00:24:33.000 But, like, he's like the high school principal in Back to the Future.
00:24:36.000 The man never had hair, right?
00:24:37.000 I mean, he was always like this.
00:24:38.000 But, That is his appeal, right?
00:24:41.000 The appeal of Bernie is the authenticity.
00:24:42.000 It's the reason why people have not turned to Elizabeth Warren.
00:24:44.000 They feel she's inauthentic.
00:24:45.000 People who like Bernie believe that he is authentic, and so they're like, okay, at least he believes what he believes, and that goes a long way with Joe.
00:24:51.000 Now, again, I disagree with Joe on this.
00:24:52.000 I think Bernie Sanders is a trash heap.
00:24:54.000 I think he's awful.
00:24:55.000 I think he associates with the worst people.
00:24:57.000 I think that he champions the worst people.
00:24:59.000 But what's hilarious is the left, which has no problem whatsoever with Bernie Sanders hanging out with Linda Sarsour, no problem with him being endorsed by Sean King, no problem with Bernie Sanders touting the endorsements of some of the most radical people in American life.
00:25:11.000 Joe Rogan said that, right?
00:25:12.000 He said, I'd be likely to vote for Bernie Sanders.
00:25:14.000 And Bernie Sanders had the temerity to put that up on his Twitter page.
00:25:18.000 And now, that is trending number one on Twitter.
00:25:21.000 Number one.
00:25:22.000 Not because Rogan said that he'd be likely to vote for Sanders.
00:25:24.000 That's not actually a huge surprise, right?
00:25:26.000 Joe is an out-of-the-box dude.
00:25:27.000 That's not, it really is not super shocking.
00:25:30.000 And authenticity matters an awful lot to Joe.
00:25:32.000 The reason people are mad is because Joe Rogan has had people like me on his show.
00:25:36.000 And the fact that Joe Rogan has had people like me on his show means that Joe Rogan is a very bad man who's very bad and very bad.
00:25:41.000 And that means that Bernie Sanders touting his endorsement is really awful.
00:25:45.000 Because Joe Rogan believes things like sometimes he says that men are men and women are women and that men should not fight women in MMA.
00:25:52.000 That's a thing he has said, and that is quite terrible.
00:25:54.000 And also, Joe Rogan is a comedian, which means he has said very politically correct and offensive things in the past, and that is very bad.
00:25:59.000 And so now, Bernie Sanders is being attacked by the woke left for the sin of touting the fact that the most popular podcaster in America, right?
00:26:07.000 I mean, Joe is huge.
00:26:08.000 That Joe came out and said that he would vote for Bernie in a primary, or is likely to vote in a primary.
00:26:13.000 The left is so self-defeating, and Bernie deserves every bit of this, of course, because Bernie has courted this.
00:26:18.000 For all the talk about Bernie's authenticity, here's where Joe, I think, is wrong.
00:26:21.000 Bernie is authentic until the point where he is challenged, at which point he backs down like a little pansy.
00:26:26.000 He is absolutely authentic until the point where he's attacked on it and then he runs screaming from the room.
00:26:33.000 To give an example, he was endorsed by Cenk Iger.
00:26:36.000 So Cenk and I have our disagreements, to put it mildly.
00:26:39.000 You can find a debate with me and Cenk online.
00:26:40.000 It's a pretty fun debate.
00:26:42.000 Hey, Cenk is running for Congress out here in California.
00:26:44.000 He also has a big show called The Young Turks, which is weird since for a long time he didn't believe in the Armenian genocide.
00:26:50.000 But in any case, Cenk has a long history of saying pretty wild things.
00:26:54.000 Hey, but Cenk was always a Sanders supporter, right?
00:26:56.000 He always supported Sanders.
00:26:59.000 Right?
00:26:59.000 It's like he's always supported him.
00:27:03.000 And So Cenk endorsed Sanders.
00:27:05.000 Sanders said thank you.
00:27:07.000 And then people started filling up Sanders' feed with all the things that Cenk has said over the years, and Sanders basically withdrew his endorsement of the endorsement.
00:27:16.000 He basically disassociated from Cenk, which is the most gutless move in the entire world.
00:27:20.000 I mean, super duper gutless.
00:27:22.000 It's not like Cenk was hiding the ball.
00:27:23.000 Cenk has been Cenk forever.
00:27:24.000 Yeah, the same thing with Rogan.
00:27:25.000 I would not be surprised if Bernie Sanders backs off of this.
00:27:28.000 I would not be surprised if Bernie Sanders pulls down the tweet and says, while I'm grateful for Joe Rogan's support, I don't agree with everything that Joe Rogan says, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
00:27:36.000 That would not be surprising to me at all.
00:27:38.000 This is, and he deserves that.
00:27:40.000 I mean, that's what he, he has, he has facilitated the rise of this woke left.
00:27:44.000 He has.
00:27:45.000 He didn't have to.
00:27:46.000 He could have been the guy standing up to it, but he has facilitated that rise.
00:27:49.000 He has catered to that rise.
00:27:50.000 And now he's feeling the blowback from it.
00:27:52.000 So fine.
00:27:54.000 But it is amazing that the world the left wants to create.
00:27:56.000 It really is an incredible world.
00:27:58.000 I mean, Rogan has had on a variety of Democratic candidates, and many of the candidates have asked to come on, and he has said, I don't really want you to come on, right?
00:28:06.000 But, Andrew, I'll give you another example of how the woke left is ruining America.
00:28:10.000 So Andrew Yang, right?
00:28:11.000 Andrew Yang is, according to the Emerson poll, now running fourth, right?
00:28:14.000 He has like 8% in national polls, according to some polls, which is amazing for a dude who has been completely shut out of the media.
00:28:19.000 Andrew Yang had the temerity to appear with me on a Sunday special where he had an hour-long discussion of universal basic income that was completely cordial and interesting and fun and informative.
00:28:28.000 It has millions of views online.
00:28:30.000 He was blasted for the sin of that.
00:28:32.000 Blasted for it.
00:28:34.000 One of the reasons Andrew Yang is popular is because Andrew Yang is willing to have conversations with people who disagree without demonizing them.
00:28:39.000 Meanwhile, you get Pete Buttigieg.
00:28:41.000 Pete Buttigieg has catered to the woke left every step of the way, very early on in the campaign when he first announced, I invited Pete Buttigieg to come on the Sunday special.
00:28:48.000 And his campaign manager said he'd love to come on the Sunday special, because at that point he had no attention.
00:28:52.000 And then, they got so much blowback that he just ghosted, right?
00:28:55.000 Then it was like, nope, don't exist anymore, not interested in coming on, not even going to respond to emails.
00:29:00.000 That is not how you build a coalition, obviously.
00:29:03.000 But the Democrats are not interested in building a coalition.
00:29:05.000 The woke Democrats, at least, are not interested in building a coalition.
00:29:08.000 And let's be frank about this.
00:29:10.000 I hate giving advice to Democrats.
00:29:12.000 Let's be frank about this, Democrats.
00:29:13.000 If you are going to force Joe Rogan out of your circle, if you're going to tell you that Joe Rogan cannot, you cannot tout an endorsement from Joe Rogan because he said some bad things about how men are men and women are women.
00:29:24.000 Good luck to you.
00:29:26.000 Good luck to you.
00:29:27.000 You're going to have to win some people like Joe Rogan if you hope to win an election.
00:29:30.000 And you want to push Joe Rogan over to my side of the aisle?
00:29:33.000 Keep doing this kind of stuff.
00:29:34.000 Seriously.
00:29:35.000 You want to push people like Joe Rogan, people like Andrew Yang over to my All you have to do is keep being vicious jackasses all the time and dredging up old comments and then suggesting, well, this person is very bad.
00:29:46.000 This is a very bad person.
00:29:48.000 And it's incredible how the media not only go along with this, but facilitate all of this.
00:29:52.000 So Sam Stein, who is a quote unquote reporter with the Daily Beast, which is to say that he is an activist with the Daily Beast.
00:30:00.000 It's pretty incredible.
00:30:01.000 Sam Stein had an exchange with Glenn Greenwald.
00:30:03.000 Okay, Glenn Greenwald is hardly a person with a sterling record when it comes to controversy at the very least, right?
00:30:10.000 He's a very controversial figure, Glenn Greenwald.
00:30:12.000 This is a guy who helped Edward Snowden release documents at the behest of the Russian government, allegedly, right?
00:30:18.000 I mean, Glenn Greenwald I think he does some good work.
00:30:21.000 I think he does some work that I disapprove of.
00:30:23.000 I don't particularly like his point of view at all.
00:30:26.000 I will note here, by the way, that right now he's being prosecuted in Brazil.
00:30:28.000 That's completely inappropriate.
00:30:29.000 I don't see any evidence that he's violated the law in Brazil.
00:30:32.000 Here I am defending somebody I completely disagree with and I think has vicious views on a variety of topics.
00:30:35.000 But Glenn Greenwald, he has an exchange with Sam Stein.
00:30:40.000 Sam Stein's a reporter for the Daily Beast.
00:30:43.000 And Sam Stein starts criticizing Bernie for the Rogan stuff.
00:30:50.000 Right, he tweets out, I totally see the merits in Bernie touting the Joe Rogan endorsement, but I'm also deeply cognizant that I'm not from a community of people that he has attacked and ridiculed, and I have to imagine this is very hard for them.
00:31:00.000 Very hard for them.
00:31:02.000 Just terrible, terrible.
00:31:05.000 Okay, and then Glenn Greenwald responded, quite appropriately, well, you know, it makes kind of sense that he is touting the endorsement from Rogan, because if you actually want to win a coalition, then one of the things that you're going to have to do is Appeal to people who may disagree with you on a variety of other topics.
00:31:22.000 And Sam Stein then responds, Right?
00:31:28.000 I mean, this is how far they've gone.
00:31:31.000 The way that they've gone is, first of all, I would never endorse Bernie Sanders, but the thought experiment goes something like this.
00:31:36.000 If Joe Rogan, who has said bad, mean things, is endorsed by Bernie Sanders, or at least his endorsement is endorsed by Bernie Sanders, that's very bad.
00:31:44.000 Where are you going to stop?
00:31:45.000 Where's the line?
00:31:46.000 Is the line that you're going to say that it's okay to tout an endorsement from Ben Shapiro?
00:31:51.000 Sam Stein, alleged reporter for the Daily Beast.
00:31:56.000 This is what the left wants.
00:31:57.000 What the left wants is to circle the wagons, shut that Overton window so tight that anybody who's outside that Overton window cannot ever be acknowledged as a human being.
00:32:07.000 And to make it so that if somebody endorses you, you have to agree with every one of their views in order for you to accept the endorsement.
00:32:13.000 Now listen, it would be perfectly appropriate if neo-Nazis endorsed Bernie Sanders for Bernie to say, I don't want their endorsement, right?
00:32:20.000 That's perfectly appropriate.
00:32:21.000 There are certain views that obviously are outside the bounds of, shall we say, the mainstream in American society.
00:32:27.000 Men are men and women are women is not outside the bounds of mainstream in American society.
00:32:31.000 Joe Rogan is the most popular podcaster in America.
00:32:33.000 The fact that the Democrats see fit to go after Bernie Sanders for the great sin of acknowledging that people who disagree on transgender issues might support him.
00:32:42.000 Have at it, guys.
00:32:43.000 Really, enjoy.
00:32:44.000 Enjoy.
00:32:44.000 This is the world you want.
00:32:45.000 This is the world you're gonna get.
00:32:46.000 And Bernie Sanders will lose running away if he caters to you guys.
00:32:50.000 At some point here, Bernie's actually gonna have to stand on his hind legs.
00:32:52.000 It's amazing.
00:32:53.000 For a guy who is considered so courageous, when's the last time he actually stood up on his hind legs and said no to anybody who wasn't the capitalist?
00:32:59.000 It's the only issue where he won't back down is when he's ripping on capitalism.
00:33:03.000 When it comes to the woke left, there's been no point anywhere along the line here where he has just said, nope, this is a bunch of crap.
00:33:09.000 Not one point.
00:33:10.000 Anywhere along the line.
00:33:11.000 Instead, he just caters and caters and caters.
00:33:13.000 We'll see.
00:33:13.000 I have my doubts that he's going to stick by the Joe Rogan tweet.
00:33:16.000 I have a feeling that he's probably going to back down.
00:33:18.000 Now, maybe he doesn't.
00:33:19.000 He'd be a fool to.
00:33:20.000 He's kind of stuck between a rock and a hard place now.
00:33:22.000 But good luck.
00:33:23.000 Good luck to Bernie Sanders.
00:33:25.000 Meanwhile, Team Obama is going after Bernie Sanders, too.
00:33:27.000 So, an ex-Obama campaign manager basically said that Bernie is the worst candidate in the field.
00:33:32.000 The war on Bernie has begun.
00:33:34.000 And that war will not stop until Joe Biden is the nominee.
00:33:37.000 Here is one of Obama's ex-campaign managers explaining that Bernie is a terrible candidate.
00:33:43.000 Bernie, a lot of what he says, the message is basically, you can live your life for free.
00:33:49.000 We'll have free college tuition.
00:33:50.000 We'll have free this.
00:33:51.000 We'll forgive you student debts.
00:33:53.000 It's a powerful message.
00:33:55.000 It is, but in the general election, it's a message that I think is going to get him killed.
00:33:58.000 Yeah.
00:33:59.000 I mean, I think he's the worst candidate in a general election for exactly that reason.
00:34:04.000 You think Bernie's the worst candidate?
00:34:05.000 Oh, I don't think there's a question about it.
00:34:08.000 Okay, so the guns have opened up from Team Obama on Team Bernie, and that is not particularly surprising, but this is the time for Bernie to fight back.
00:34:16.000 This is his last stand.
00:34:17.000 This is the Alamo for Bernie.
00:34:19.000 This is where Bernie has to stand.
00:34:20.000 This is Stalingrad, to use a better analogy, because Bernie is indeed a Stalinist.
00:34:25.000 The people who are attacking him are not Nazis, though, so I guess I'll have to think of another analogy.
00:34:30.000 All right, in any case, the fact that the Democrats are going after Bernie and that they're going after him for the great sin of unwokeness is amusing to me.
00:34:38.000 I am enjoying it, and enjoy, really, enjoy yourselves, guys.
00:34:41.000 Okay, in just a second, we're actually gonna do the mailbag.
00:34:43.000 We haven't done that in a few weeks, so I would love to take your questions in the mailbag, and we are gonna do that momentarily.
00:34:49.000 First, Let me talk about the fact that you will have a better life when your teeth are straighter.
00:34:52.000 You know, it's funny.
00:34:52.000 We all we all are very angry that we live in a society where people judge each other based on appearance.
00:34:57.000 This is called all of human society forever and always will be.
00:35:01.000 Well, one of the things that you judge people based on is the beauty of their smile.
00:35:04.000 Science proves this is so.
00:35:05.000 Well, if you have teeth that have fallen out of place since you were younger or you never got braces, the best way to get those teeth straight looking real good again is to check out Candid.
00:35:14.000 I know because I'm using Candid aligners right now.
00:35:16.000 I had braces when I was younger.
00:35:17.000 My teeth are pretty straight, but They slip out of place over the years, and sometimes you need the aligners to put things back where they should be.
00:35:23.000 Well, right now, go to candidco.com.
00:35:25.000 That's candidco.com.
00:35:28.000 and use slash Shapiro.
00:35:29.000 So canico.com slash Shapiro and you can get 75 bucks off those clear aligners.
00:35:33.000 They straighten your teeth for 65% less than braces.
00:35:36.000 They're really easy.
00:35:37.000 It's much better than going to a doctor's office.
00:35:38.000 You can do all of it basically from the comfort of your own home.
00:35:41.000 Unlike other companies, Candid only works with orthodontists, never general dentists.
00:35:45.000 That means your treatment will be designed by an expert in tooth movement with 20 years of experience on average.
00:35:49.000 If you're looking ahead to a special event this season, now would be the time for you You can do this in just a few months.
00:35:54.000 Learn more about Candid's process.
00:35:55.000 Get a complimentary 3D scan of your teeth at a Candid studio near you, which is the simplest, freest way to get started.
00:36:01.000 Go to CandidCO.com slash Shapiro and use code Shapiro for $75 off.
00:36:05.000 That is CandidCO.com slash Shapiro.
00:36:07.000 Use code Shapiro for that $75 off.
00:36:09.000 Really solid deal on doing something you should be doing anyway.
00:36:11.000 Go get your teeth straightened at CandidCO.com slash Shapiro.
00:36:14.000 Use code Shapiro for $75 off.
00:36:17.000 Is it you?
00:36:17.000 Is it you?
00:36:18.000 Well, unless you're Joe Gottschall, it's not you.
00:36:19.000 super easy.
00:36:19.000 They are very user-friendly.
00:36:21.000 Go check them out right now at candidco.com slash Shapiro and use that code Shapiro for 75 bucks off.
00:36:26.000 Okay, we're going to get to the mailbag in just a second.
00:36:28.000 First, it is that glorious time of the week when I give a shout out to a Daily Wear subscriber.
00:36:32.000 Is it you?
00:36:32.000 Is it you?
00:36:32.000 Well, unless you're Joe Gottschall, it's not you.
00:36:34.000 But if you are Joe Gottschall, today is the day.
00:36:37.000 Joe Gottschall knows there's only one thing that can help sustain you through the insanely long lines at theme parks.
00:36:42.000 It's the day.
00:36:42.000 In this picture, Joe and his son are wearing matching blue Lion King t-shirts, standing out in the hot sun, proudly carrying our glorious tumbler.
00:36:49.000 The caption reads, I don't always do Disney, but when I do, I stay hydrated with the greatest in all beverage vessels, the Leftist Tears Hot or Cold Tumbler.
00:36:56.000 At Ben Shapiro, hashtag Leftist Tears Tumbler, hashtag always full.
00:37:00.000 Fantastic.
00:37:00.000 Good on you, Joe.
00:37:02.000 Hope you and your family had a great time on your vacation.
00:37:04.000 If you're at Disneyland, I hope you had a good time at Galaxy's Edge.
00:37:06.000 It's a fun place.
00:37:07.000 Thank you for the picture.
00:37:09.000 If you know anything about this show, also, just while we're at this, right now we have a special deal, okay?
00:37:14.000 We are a pro-life show.
00:37:15.000 You know that we're a pro-life show.
00:37:16.000 If you've ever listened to the show, you know this.
00:37:17.000 We broadcast live from March for Life last year.
00:37:20.000 What you may not know is that because we did that, the leftist activists, the same people going after Joe Rogan today because this is what they do, they decided to go after our advertisers.
00:37:28.000 And we actually lost some revenue.
00:37:29.000 That's not the first time.
00:37:30.000 It won't be the last time that the left attempts to shut down pro-life voices.
00:37:33.000 We're not the only targets.
00:37:34.000 Live Action is a great pro-life group run by my friend Lila Rose.
00:37:37.000 Live Action is terrific.
00:37:38.000 They work on education on the abortion issue.
00:37:41.000 They make undercover videos that expose Planned Parenthood and other abortion clinics for horrific human rights abuses.
00:37:46.000 And they're cracked down routinely by social media.
00:37:49.000 So Twitter is cracked down on them.
00:37:50.000 Pinterest is cracked down on them.
00:37:52.000 If you want to help them out, there's a great way to do it.
00:37:54.000 And help us out too.
00:37:54.000 You can go to dailywire.com right now.
00:37:56.000 And right now when you subscribe at dailywire.com and you use promo code LIVEACTION, a portion of your subscription membership is donated to LIVEACTION from now until January 31st in expectation of the March for Life.
00:38:07.000 So that's a pretty great deal.
00:38:08.000 Use promo code LIVEACTION and you can get our subscription and give money to a great cause when you go to dailywire.com and make your pro-life voice heard.
00:38:15.000 We are the largest, fastest-growing conservative podcast and radio show in the nation.
00:38:18.000 Okay, so Chelsea writes, we're going to do some mailbag.
00:38:26.000 So Chelsea writes, hey Ben, yesterday you talked about how you think Elizabeth Warren would be able to push through universal childcare.
00:38:31.000 With increasing frequency, Republicans are warming up to this idea, even if they understand it would be just another step of the government interfering with and replacing the family.
00:38:38.000 What are the best arguments against universal childcare?
00:38:41.000 Thank you.
00:38:41.000 Well, actually Elizabeth Warren, back in 2003, wrote a book called The Two Income Trap, in which she discussed the problem with universal childcare.
00:38:47.000 One of the problems with universal childcare is it now assumes that both members of a family have to work.
00:38:52.000 That is the basic premise of universal childcare.
00:38:54.000 The problem with that is that once you have both members of the family working, she makes this point in the two-income trap, is that it actually drives up real estate prices.
00:39:02.000 It drives up prices.
00:39:03.000 It requires you to earn more in the market in order to get what you could have gotten for cheaper before when there was only one worker in the household.
00:39:10.000 And so what you end up with is a broader labor pool, which does drive down wages.
00:39:14.000 Not only does it do that, it requires both members of the family to be working.
00:39:17.000 And then in order to buy that house in the suburbs that you want, you need both members of the household working.
00:39:21.000 And if you are a stay-at-home mom, you are disadvantaged.
00:39:23.000 So it does disadvantage stay-at-home moms.
00:39:25.000 It basically subsidizes working moms at the expense of stay-at-home moms, is the idea.
00:39:30.000 Also, it subsidizes single moms at the expense of married moms.
00:39:35.000 Beyond that, there's a basic premise to universal childcare, which is that all women find fulfillment in working.
00:39:41.000 So, the best that you could do, maybe, if you're really concerned about this, here's a great idea, just lower taxes.
00:39:47.000 And then if people want to pay for childcare, they can pay for childcare.
00:39:50.000 And by the way, there are plenty of workplaces right now that are offering childcare for kids.
00:39:54.000 Like seriously, they have childcare downstairs and mom can drop off the kids for the day after school.
00:39:59.000 I'll take care of it.
00:40:00.000 But the idea that universal childcare is an inherent good because mom has to work is an assumption being made about what mothers should be doing that I think cuts against the very grain of female choice in a lot of cases.
00:40:13.000 And beyond that, it also creates a weird economic structure whereby everybody is expected to work, including women.
00:40:19.000 So it actually removes the choice from women to work or not work in many cases because Now, the idea is that you are expected to work because, after all, universal childcare is available to you.
00:40:29.000 I mean, this is the case that Elizabeth Warren, again, herself made while she's pushing universal childcare now.
00:40:34.000 So she's reversed herself on that in some pretty dramatic ways.
00:40:37.000 Then there is the general libertarian argument, which is, it's none of my business what you do with your kids.
00:40:41.000 It is your job to take care of your kids as a general rule.
00:40:44.000 Now, I'm all for charity.
00:40:45.000 I'm all for making sure that those kids are taken care of.
00:40:47.000 And if you're in economic straits, I'm all for giving you direct charity.
00:40:50.000 But the idea that it is society's job to make sure that you are working a 10-hour day, and that your child is in childcare.
00:40:57.000 Also, there's an assumption that childcare is better for kids than being at home with mom, which again, I think is not backed by social science.
00:41:03.000 The notion that A family is better off when mom is dumping the kid in child care all day.
00:41:07.000 That has some significant drawbacks as well.
00:41:10.000 Now, again, local communities can do this, but the idea of a federally mandated universal child care, in which we are all supposed to pay in and that's going to cover everybody, it does incentivize, it creates a perverse incentive.
00:41:20.000 It creates a perverse incentive for people to take advantage of the universal child care, and again, makes the government into mommy, which is not a good idea.
00:41:29.000 Michael says, hey Ben, If the Chief Justice is presiding over the impeachment trial, why can't he be the deciding factor in calling witnesses?
00:41:35.000 Love the show, thanks.
00:41:36.000 Well, the way that these procedures usually work is that the Senate actually has to vote for the procedures.
00:41:42.000 It's not up to the Chief Justice to vote for the procedures.
00:41:44.000 He just gavels in whether the procedures Uh, have been applied or not, right?
00:41:49.000 He makes sure that the procedures are actually followed, but he's not the one who makes the rules.
00:41:52.000 The Senate makes the rules, so it's not up to the Chief Justice to do that.
00:41:54.000 Tim says, I hear the terms communism, socialism, and Marxism often used seemingly interchangeably.
00:41:59.000 Could you briefly explain the differences between them, or is it all one thing that in the future we could call Bernieism?
00:42:04.000 Well, the problem is that folks on the left like to distinguish between these things based on whether they think it's successful or not.
00:42:09.000 So what you'll hear from Marxists is that there are very, there are many types of Marxism.
00:42:12.000 That there is guild Marxism.
00:42:14.000 That there is Sort of Trotskyite Marxism, and there is Stalin Marxism, that there is Cuban Marxism, and there's Norwegian Marxism.
00:42:22.000 These are all different forms of Marxism.
00:42:25.000 That's a way of hiding the ball.
00:42:26.000 That's so that you don't actually have to be pegged down when Marxism is actually tried in a country like Cuba or the USSR.
00:42:32.000 You can just say, well, that's not true Marxism.
00:42:33.000 True Marxism has never been tried.
00:42:35.000 And the same thing holds true with communism.
00:42:37.000 So communism, it's hard for the Democrats or anybody on the left who is a Marxist to run away from the communist label anymore because communist countries, ones that have self-declared communists have been complete failures every time it's tried.
00:42:48.000 So instead what they try to do is distinguish socialism from communism.
00:42:51.000 The reality is that if you're calling for public ownership of the means of production, then what you are really talking about is communism.
00:42:57.000 What you're talking about is socialism, communism, Marxism, they're all equivalent in this way.
00:43:02.000 This has been a longstanding sort of confused debate Von Mises writes about it in his book Socialism from 1920.
00:43:08.000 He suggests that really, if you're going to define Marxism, Marxism in the end is not even about the principle from each according to his abilities to each according to his needs.
00:43:15.000 It really is about the public ownership of the means of production.
00:43:18.000 And there are a lot of aspects to Marxism.
00:43:21.000 And different aspects can be analyzed on their own or in combination.
00:43:25.000 But the root of economic Marxism is the idea that we cannot have private industry because private industry is profit driven.
00:43:31.000 Profits are bad because they are excess and because you are stealing from the workers.
00:43:34.000 And the only way to remove those excess profits is to have the workers own the business, but not in a private market.
00:43:40.000 Instead, you have to have the government run everything to make sure that workers could be just as capitalist as anybody else.
00:43:45.000 Instead, the government has to decide supply demand.
00:43:47.000 The government has to decide pricing.
00:43:49.000 The government has to create a pricing mechanism.
00:43:52.000 All of this is utterly unworkable on a practical level.
00:43:54.000 So what you see is aspects of like kind of kind of food coloring of Marxism dropped into a capitalist that and then called Marxism.
00:44:02.000 So what you'll see is people on the left say, well, democratic socialism is Marxism.
00:44:07.000 It is not.
00:44:08.000 A capitalist system with socialist welfare benefits is a capitalist system with socialist welfare benefits.
00:44:14.000 And then we can determine whether the socialist welfare benefits actually achieve what they are seeking to achieve.
00:44:19.000 So a nationalized healthcare system is, in fact, socialism.
00:44:21.000 That is a socialist system.
00:44:23.000 But if it exists in the context of a free market for drugs, for doctors, if it exists in a free market In general, that is drawing from taxpayer revenue, then you have to distinguish between the socialist aspect and the not socialist aspect.
00:44:35.000 Socialism is basically the idea that the entire capitalist system should be overthrown.
00:44:41.000 I mean, that is the basis of Marxism.
00:44:43.000 Now again, you can have welfare benefits.
00:44:44.000 Welfare benefits are socialist in orientation, but if the system is not itself socialist, then it's not a socialist system.
00:44:52.000 Ryan says, Hey Ben, I'm 17 years old from Massachusetts.
00:44:54.000 I listen to all three hours of your show every day.
00:44:56.000 Unlike Greta Thunberg, I do not hold global warming as one of my highest priorities.
00:44:59.000 It honestly doesn't worry me all that much.
00:45:00.000 However, I've researched nuclear power as a possible energy source.
00:45:03.000 It appears to be the best solution I've come across.
00:45:05.000 What are your thoughts on nuclear power?
00:45:06.000 Do you think any further steps need to be taken to stop global warming?
00:45:09.000 Sure.
00:45:09.000 I mean, global warming by best available evidence is occurring.
00:45:14.000 It is largely man-caused by best available evidence, even people who are sort of lukewarmers like Roy Spencer, who you've heard on Rush Limbaugh's program, for example.
00:45:23.000 Even he will say he believes that over 50% of global warming is being caused by man-made activities and carbon emissions.
00:45:29.000 So I don't believe the sort of full-on denial case at all.
00:45:33.000 What should we do about that?
00:45:35.000 Well, the best answer, honestly, is not going to be a global carbon tax, which is never going to take place.
00:45:39.000 China and India will never sign on to that, and it won't be effective without China and India signing on to it.
00:45:43.000 Instead, what will be effective is actual economic development.
00:45:49.000 The substitution of natural gas for oil in the United States has been responsible for the United States actually dropping its carbon emissions, its rate of carbon emissions, over the last several years.
00:45:59.000 Nuclear power is an excellent solution.
00:46:01.000 There are new, smaller nuclear plants that can be built using newer technology that's basically been stymied by the environmentalists.
00:46:08.000 If you want to know if an environmentalist is serious or not about climate change, just ask if they're trying to ban nuclear power.
00:46:12.000 If the answer is they're trying to ban nuclear power, they're not serious about climate change.
00:46:15.000 Most of the people who say they're serious about climate change are not, in fact, serious about climate change.
00:46:19.000 They don't want to talk about adaptation.
00:46:21.000 They don't want to talk about building seawalls.
00:46:23.000 They don't want to talk about the possibility of carbon capture.
00:46:27.000 They don't want to talk about any of those things.
00:46:29.000 They just want to rail against the moon.
00:46:30.000 And that's why they love Greta Thunberg, because she will say things openly like, we should just get rid of all carbon-based fossil fuels on planet Earth and not use them anymore, which would reduce pretty much everybody back to the level of our homo erectus ancestors in terms of living standards.
00:46:45.000 It would not be wonderful.
00:46:47.000 Is this beneficial?
00:46:48.000 What do you think of the notion that the Electoral College should move away from a winner-take-all system and instead proportionally allocate electoral votes?
00:46:53.000 It seems like this would make candidates focus on states that are not swing states.
00:46:56.000 Is this beneficial?
00:46:57.000 Well, the whole purpose of the Electoral College originally was to balance out the needs of states and the needs of the population generally.
00:47:05.000 And it's sort of the same balance that you see in terms of the United States Congress.
00:47:09.000 And we ourselves today very often don't even understand why the states ought to matter, because we've lost the concept of federalism and localism entirely.
00:47:16.000 So you see Democrats militating against the United States Senate, saying the United States Senate is not representative.
00:47:22.000 After all, Montana has as many votes in the Senate as California, and Montana has nine people and California has 50 million.
00:47:27.000 So what exactly, why are we doing that?
00:47:29.000 The answer is the proportional representation Makes states irrelevant and states never would have signed on to the Constitution if they had known that they were going to become adjuncts to basically, there were going to be barnacles on the whales of California and New York and Massachusetts and New Jersey and all the big population states.
00:47:46.000 So the Electoral College, I do not think it should be proportionally allocated.
00:47:49.000 I think if you want to do that, just go to a popular vote.
00:47:51.000 It doesn't seem to actually mean anything to be proportionally allocated beyond just a reflection of the popular vote.
00:47:57.000 Alrighty, time for a quick thing that I like and then a quick thing that I hate.
00:48:02.000 So, things that I like today.
00:48:04.000 There's a good movie that was really undercovered.
00:48:08.000 I think that it was really well made.
00:48:08.000 I enjoyed it.
00:48:09.000 I'm a sucker for Westerns.
00:48:10.000 So I really like Westerns.
00:48:11.000 This is a pretty good Western.
00:48:14.000 It was not greatly covered by the media.
00:48:16.000 The media didn't seem to like it very much.
00:48:18.000 I'm not sure why.
00:48:19.000 Honestly, it's a pretty good Western.
00:48:22.000 It's a really interesting take on Billy the Kid.
00:48:24.000 So if you don't know anything about Billy the Kid, shot to death at age 21.
00:48:30.000 But his record of killing was a lot more checkered than most of the sort of criminals of American history.
00:48:36.000 He never robbed a bank.
00:48:38.000 He never robbed a train.
00:48:39.000 He was not, in fact, there's real controversy as to just how much of a criminal Billy the Kid was because he was really involved more in sort of farming disputes and neighbor disputes.
00:48:48.000 And then there were some disputed circumstances where he was killing other bad men.
00:48:51.000 In any case, the basic premise of the film is that there's a kid who he and his sister Are present when his father is beating his mother and the kid shoots the father and then tries to escape, run away with his sister.
00:49:03.000 They're sort of taken under wing by Billy the Kid.
00:49:06.000 Pat Garrett is chasing Billy the Kid at the time.
00:49:10.000 And so all of this takes place in the context of that very, very famous pursuit.
00:49:16.000 Here's a little bit of the trailer.
00:49:17.000 One, two, three, and four!
00:49:21.000 The devil's knocking at your door!
00:49:25.000 Did you think you could run from me?
00:49:28.000 No one has to die today.
00:49:29.000 Well ain't that one of life's harsh realities?
00:49:33.000 Now hold on one more step and it will be your last!
00:49:36.000 So Chris Pratt shows up in the movie for like five seconds.
00:49:38.000 And they sort of pitched him as one of the stars of the film.
00:49:40.000 He's only in it for maybe ten minutes.
00:49:42.000 But the real bad guy, there is no real bad guy in the film.
00:49:45.000 He's the only true baddie in the film is Chris Pratt.
00:49:48.000 And he's unrecognizable.
00:49:49.000 Like if you didn't know that was Chris Pratt, you'd be surprised that's Chris Pratt.
00:49:52.000 I happen to be a big Ethan Hawke fan.
00:49:53.000 You have to be a fan of sort of mannered acting to like Ethan Hawke, but I like Ethan Hawke a lot, and he's very good in this film.
00:49:58.000 So, it is, it's worthy of the watch, The Kid.
00:50:01.000 Also, my good friend Adam Baldwin is in this movie, so any movie with Adam is worth watching.
00:50:05.000 So go check it out, The Kid, with Ethan Hawke.
00:50:08.000 Kind of a fun thing.
00:50:09.000 Alrighty, time for, you know, instead of a thing I hate, let's do a little bit of Bible talk.
00:50:12.000 I've missed it the last several weeks.
00:50:13.000 So, every week, the Jews read a portion of the Bible.
00:50:18.000 And this week, the Jews read from the Book of Exodus.
00:50:21.000 This is the portion of the Bible in which the Jews are basically preparing to leave Egypt, and Moses goes and he's threatening Pharaoh, and he's telling him that if you don't let the Jews go, things are gonna get real bad for you, real quick, right quick, here.
00:50:38.000 So, there's a really interesting part of this week's Parsha, right?
00:50:42.000 There's this particular Torah portion.
00:50:44.000 That is the bizarre statement that God says he's going to harden Pharaoh's heart.
00:50:49.000 He says that Pharaoh is going to be willing to let you go, and then I'm going to harden his heart.
00:50:51.000 And people, all the commentators in Jewish lore, and Christian lore too, they go, like, how is that a thing?
00:50:56.000 God is not supposed to interfere with your free will.
00:50:58.000 Why is God getting involved in hardening Pharaoh's heart to make him do a bad thing, right?
00:51:01.000 Why is it that God is telling Pharaoh, like, Pharaoh's willing to let the Jews go, and then this whole thing comes to a sort of Natural denouement.
00:51:09.000 Instead, why is God hardening Pharaoh's heart?
00:51:11.000 It's very bizarre.
00:51:13.000 And God says, I shall harden Pharaoh's heart, and I shall put my hand upon Egypt, and I shall take out my legions, the children of Israel, from the land of Egypt.
00:51:21.000 So, how can you harden Pharaoh's heart and then hold him responsible for what he's doing?
00:51:24.000 Because that's what happens, right?
00:51:26.000 Pharaoh is held responsible, his army dies in the sea, things go real bad.
00:51:30.000 So, why would God do that?
00:51:33.000 Well, God acknowledges in the Torah, so this brings up questions of free will generally.
00:51:37.000 How much free will do human beings actually have?
00:51:38.000 This is a pretty live question, right?
00:51:39.000 In the scientific community it's a live question.
00:51:41.000 How much do we actually have the ability to control our own actions?
00:51:44.000 How much of that is environmental?
00:51:46.000 Marxist materialists say it's all environmental.
00:51:48.000 It's all environment and biology that determines everything.
00:51:50.000 And then they say we can magically change our own system using free will, right?
00:51:53.000 We can supplant Capitalism with communism, that will change the social system and then we will all be better people.
00:51:59.000 So they contradict their own philosophy in the middle of their philosophy, but the sort of materialist point of view generally is that we don't have any free will.
00:52:05.000 This has led to some really interesting debates between me and Sam Harris, another person who is no longer welcome in the hard left for having conversations with people.
00:52:13.000 Sam takes the materialist position that we don't have any free will.
00:52:16.000 I take the position that we do have free will and that we have the ability to overcome, to at least a certain extent, our own biological drives in order to make better decisions.
00:52:26.000 Sam takes the position that basically you're screwed, right?
00:52:27.000 I mean, whatever you are, you are.
00:52:29.000 Whatever decisions you think you're making, you're not making those decisions.
00:52:31.000 That is your biology in conjunction with your environment.
00:52:34.000 So how much free will do we actually have?
00:52:36.000 Well, the Torah suggests that man is a biological creature, but then also suggests that biology does not determine man's fate.
00:52:44.000 Right?
00:52:44.000 That you actually do have the capacity to make decisions beyond your own biological imperatives.
00:52:50.000 So, the question is, when God hardens Pharaoh's heart, Does God actually, is he actually making the decision for Pharaoh?
00:52:59.000 Or is he making it easier for Pharaoh to make a decision?
00:53:02.000 Because there's another way to read Hardin's Pharaoh's Heart.
00:53:04.000 One way is to read it as God is making it so that Pharaoh says no.
00:53:08.000 The other way is to read it that God is stealing Pharaoh for what is to come.
00:53:12.000 That God is saying, okay, I understand that you're afraid.
00:53:15.000 I understand that you are living in fear of the next plague.
00:53:19.000 But this is actually making it harder for you to make the decision that you want to make.
00:53:22.000 And I know what kind of decision you actually want to make.
00:53:24.000 So instead, I'm making you braver.
00:53:26.000 Right?
00:53:26.000 If you'd heard that somebody in battle hardened their heart, you would figure, okay, this guy just got wrecked.
00:53:29.000 He had it.
00:53:30.000 He was brave now.
00:53:30.000 Now he had put aside his fear, and he was more brave.
00:53:33.000 So when the Bible says that God hardens Pharaoh's heart, what he's actually doing is he's giving Pharaoh the capacity to choose more broadly.
00:53:39.000 He is saying, I know what you want to do, and I'm giving you the capacity to choose more broadly.
00:53:43.000 So God is actually changing Pharaoh in order to allow him more freedom of choice.
00:53:47.000 So in that same way, this is basically what psychologists do every day when they engage in cognitive behavioral therapy or exposure therapy.
00:53:54.000 They're helping you get over Whatever fear you have so that you have more freedom of choice available to you.
00:54:01.000 So this is how God gives us free will, right?
00:54:04.000 He limits his own control.
00:54:06.000 It's not that he is telling Pharaoh what to do.
00:54:07.000 He is limiting his own control by giving Pharaoh a greater capacity for free will.
00:54:14.000 So what exactly is free will and why should it matter?
00:54:16.000 Well, in politics it matters an awful lot.
00:54:17.000 You cannot build a system on anything other than free will.
00:54:19.000 We assume in our politics that free will is the be-all end-all.
00:54:23.000 That's why we feel that personal responsibility is a thing.
00:54:25.000 And if you want people to have a better life, you have to give them credit for their own free will.
00:54:29.000 You cannot tell them they're environmentally driven.
00:54:32.000 You try to steal them for that.
00:54:33.000 You say, don't be afraid, make your own decisions.
00:54:35.000 In this case, Pharaoh makes the wrong decision.
00:54:38.000 In this case, he feels stronger to make the decision and he makes a bad decision.
00:54:42.000 But what we should be doing in our normal lives is giving people the capacity to make decisions for which they end up taking responsibility.
00:54:49.000 Social psychologist Roy Baumeister, he explains what scientists mean by free will.
00:54:52.000 He says, self-control counts as a kind of freedom because it begins with not acting on every impulse.
00:54:56.000 The use of abstract ideas such as moral principles to guide action takes us far beyond anything you will find in a physics or chemistry textbook.
00:55:03.000 And so we are free, in the sense of emergence, of going beyond simpler forms of causality.
00:55:07.000 Again, we cannot break the laws of physics, but we can act in ways that add new causes that go far beyond physical causation.
00:55:14.000 Now, when I talk about free will, I don't mean that every decision is subject to it, right?
00:55:17.000 You can't decide right now whether your heart should beat or not, right?
00:55:19.000 I mean, that part is a naturalistic part of your brain.
00:55:22.000 But, it does mean that when we make plans, that when we think things through, we are capable of changing our own behavior.
00:55:27.000 This is why Pharaoh still bears responsibility for his actions.
00:55:30.000 So what we should be doing as a society is granting people the capacity to make freer decisions, telling them that they have the strength to make their own decisions, and then holding them responsible for their decisions.
00:55:40.000 If it's good enough for God and Pharaoh, it should be good enough for us as well.
00:55:43.000 Okay, we'll be back here later today with a couple additional hours of content, all your updates on impeachment and all the rest.
00:55:49.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:55:49.000 Shapiro, this is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:55:50.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Colton Haas.
00:55:59.000 Directed by Mike Joyner.
00:56:00.000 Executive producer Jeremy Boring.
00:56:02.000 Senior producer Jonathan Hay.
00:56:03.000 Supervising producer Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling.
00:56:06.000 Assistant director Pavel Lydowsky.
00:56:08.000 Technical producer Austin Stevens.
00:56:10.000 Playback and media operated by Nick Sheehan.
00:56:12.000 Associate producer Katie Swinnerton.
00:56:14.000 Edited by Adam Siovitz.
00:56:15.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Koromina.
00:56:17.000 Hair and makeup is by Nika Geneva.
00:56:19.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire production.
00:56:21.000 Copyright Daily Wire 2020.
00:56:24.000 On The Matt Walsh Show, we're not just discussing politics.
00:56:27.000 We're talking culture, faith, family, all of the things that are really important to you.