The Ben Shapiro Show - January 16, 2018


Is #MeToo Falling Apart? | Ep. 454


Episode Stats

Length

50 minutes

Words per Minute

211.88977

Word Count

10,764

Sentence Count

685

Misogynist Sentences

27

Hate Speech Sentences

15


Summary

As sexual allegations become more vague, are we reaching the end of the Me Too moment? Plus, President Trump s comments on immigration are polarizing the country, but are Republicans and Democrats painting themselves into opposite corners? Today on The Ben Shapiro Show, Ben talks about all of that and much more, including the latest in the scandal surrounding comedian Aziz Ansari, who has been accused of sexual assault by a woman named Grace, who says she went back to his apartment to have sex with him after they had sex and felt uncomfortable and wronged. Plus, Ben explains why feminists are coming out in droves in support of Harvey Weinstein, and why that s actually undermines the entire idea of feminism itself, which is that women have sexual agency. And, as always, thank you for tuning in to The Ben Show! Ben Shapiro is a writer, comedian, podcaster, and podcaster. He is the host of the podcast and co-host of the radio show , and is a regular contributor to the New York Times Magazine, The Daily Beast, and the Atlantic. and The Huffington Post. Subscribe to his new podcast, where he also hosts a podcast called , where he talks about sex, drugs, and pop culture, and other things that aren t related to pop culture. Also, check out his new book, The Handmaid s Tale out on Amazon Prime, out now! and other places he is also on the pod is out on the road! If you like what you hear, you can find him on the internet, listen to him on his podcast on the podcast on if you re looking for him, he s also on the or on his podcast is , and more like that s on on The podcast, here s his podcast is his , here s the link is linked here: v= , he s in the . and here s a tweet about it on , right can do it, right here is the link it s and his video on it is right here at , if you like it? and he s on it on my profile on the social media story , or also , can he s all that s also on it, and so on it , etc. etc


Transcript

00:00:00.000 As sexual allegations become more and more vague, are we reaching the end of the Me Too moment?
00:00:04.000 Plus, President Trump's comments on immigration are polarizing the country.
00:00:08.000 But are Republicans and Democrats both painting themselves into different corners?
00:00:12.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:12.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:18.000 So I have a lot to get to today.
00:00:19.000 Apparently, writing the Handmaid's Tale is not enough to get you off the hook with the feminists.
00:00:23.000 You actually have to be a full-fledged crazy person in order to earn the love of the feminist movement.
00:00:28.000 We'll talk about that in just a second.
00:00:29.000 First, I want to say thank you to our sponsors over at Dollar Shave Club.
00:00:32.000 So, you've heard me talk before of the amazing shave that I get using my Dollar Shave Club razor.
00:00:37.000 I use it right here.
00:00:38.000 I think so.
00:00:53.000 I don't
00:01:11.000 Let's do it!
00:01:32.000 Replacement cartridges ship for just a few bucks a month when you subscribe.
00:01:35.000 You never have to worry about it again.
00:01:36.000 It's the DSC Starter Set.
00:01:37.000 Get yours for just $5 exclusively at DollarShaveClub.com slash Ben.
00:01:42.000 That's DollarShaveClub.com slash Ben.
00:01:44.000 Again, when you use that slash Ben, then you get their first month of their travel size version of everything plus the razor for $5.
00:01:52.000 So check it out right now, dollarshaveclub.com.
00:01:55.000 Use the slash Ben so they know what we say and get the best shave possible and get the rest of their great products as well.
00:02:00.000 And I'll say butt wipes one more time just because it's hilarious.
00:02:03.000 Okay, so now let's begin with the collapse of the Me Too movement.
00:02:08.000 So the Me Too movement is going to continue because it should.
00:02:13.000 Nobody is in favor of rape or sexual assault.
00:02:15.000 I have yet to see all the people out there marching in the streets in defense of Harvey Weinstein, which demonstrates once again that the idea that we live in a rape culture that is fine with rape is
00:02:24.000 I would say wildly overstated.
00:02:26.000 What we are concerned with, and what we should be concerned with, is this feeling that more and more people are now being dragged into a dragnet of exaggeration and awkwardness and uncomfortableness.
00:02:40.000 The idea being that if a woman is uncomfortable or awkward about sex, and afterward she feels bad about it because maybe she shouldn't have been there in the first place, then we are supposed to believe that she was raped or wronged in some way.
00:02:51.000 Now, I believe she was wrong by her, right?
00:02:53.000 If you put yourself in a bad situation and then you go forward with something without any indicator to the person that you are having sex with, that you don't want to do this and then you feel bad later, you have been wrong.
00:03:01.000 By you.
00:03:02.000 Okay?
00:03:02.000 That is your fault.
00:03:04.000 Okay?
00:03:04.000 And I know it's not victim blaming because you're not the victim except you're your own victim.
00:03:08.000 Okay?
00:03:09.000 If you say to a guy, I'm gonna come back to your apartment, I'm gonna have sex with you, you go through the whole thing, and then the next morning you feel bad because it was awkward or it turns out the guy was a jerk and halfway through the sex you felt like you didn't like it,
00:03:18.000 We're good to go.
00:03:35.000 It's so funny, we're talking constantly about mansplaining things.
00:03:38.000 Like if I explain something to a woman, I'm mansplaining.
00:03:40.000 Feminist-splaining is where you explain to me I was supposed to read your mind based on outward indicators that make no sense.
00:03:46.000 The reason this is coming up now is because, as we discussed yesterday, there's a long article in babe.com about Aziz Ansari, this comedian who plays Tom Haverford on Parks and Recreation.
00:03:56.000 And there's this long 3,000-word piece about this woman named Grace who went back to Aziz Ansari's apartment, engaged in multiple rounds of sexual activity with him, and then as she was leaving said she felt uncomfortable and wronged, and then he said, well, I'm sorry you felt that way, and that was the end of the story.
00:04:11.000 But this was treated by a bunch of feminists as actual evidence that Aziz Ansari should have his career ended, that he should be finished by this.
00:04:18.000 Now, I'm glad to report that I'm not the only one who's saying this story is ridiculous.
00:04:22.000 Barry Weiss over at the New York Times wrote a very good piece on this.
00:04:24.000 Over at the Atlantic there was a very good piece on this.
00:04:26.000 But there are feminists who are coming out nonetheless and suggesting that Aziz Ansari should basically be put away and his career should somehow take a ding because he, a famous celebrity, invited a girl back to his apartment where she proceeded to get naked with him and then engage in several rounds of sexual activity.
00:04:42.000 This is insipid.
00:04:43.000 What's particularly insipid about this is it actually undermines the foundations of feminism itself.
00:04:47.000 The entire idea of feminism is that women have sexual agency.
00:04:51.000 That women are supposed to be able to make their own choices.
00:04:53.000 But now we're learning that a lot of feminists think that women should not be able to make their own choices.
00:04:57.000 That men should be able to make the choice for the woman saying, well, you know what?
00:05:00.000 I don't think it's in your best interest to have sex with me right now.
00:05:02.000 So it's not just on men as to whether women have sex.
00:05:05.000 It's on men as to whether women have a good sexual experience all the way through beginning to end.
00:05:11.000 Which leads to bizarre stories like this one.
00:05:14.000 So there's a new app.
00:05:15.000 I'm not kidding.
00:05:16.000 It's called Legal Fling.
00:05:18.000 This is from Daily Wire.
00:05:20.000 Emily Zanotti reporting.
00:05:21.000 Well, now there's an app for that.
00:05:28.000 The new program Legal Fling claims to provide couples who hook up on the fly with an easy way to avoid being later accused of taking advantage of one another, an app that couples can use to create a legally binding contract saying that both of them consent to their casual union.
00:05:40.000 See, we used to have something like this called a marriage contract, but it actually came along with obligations.
00:05:45.000 Where you actually were supposed to do things for one another beyond getting your rocks off.
00:05:49.000 But now, we have to have legal consent forms for you to have a one night stand.
00:05:53.000 After downloading LegalFling, you can send requests to potential partners who then have the option of checking off certain boxes like, use a condom, photo and video, and BDSM.
00:06:01.000 How convenient.
00:06:03.000 And I mean, does this say love?
00:06:05.000 I mean, it says love to me.
00:06:06.000 I know that when I'm thinking romance, nothing says romance to me like a legal app, like an actual form that you fill out with boxes to check.
00:06:14.000 Every time I decide to get romantic with my wife, this is what I do.
00:06:16.000 I walk in the room, I drop a quick contract because I'm a lawyer, and then I say, please sign and date on the dotted line and initial at these particular paragraphs if you're into this.
00:06:24.000 It works great.
00:06:25.000 She loves it.
00:06:26.000 If you later decide you want to revoke your consent, you grab your phone and electronically end the hookup.
00:06:30.000 You can also, according to the app's website, use the app to write notes about your experience.
00:06:34.000 All of these notes and contracts are then maintained securely and privately using blockchain.
00:06:38.000 The app's creators believe they are solving the problem of consent issues, but legal fling still hasn't passed either Apple or Google's approval process.
00:06:44.000 It's also questionable as to whether the contracts are in fact legally binding.
00:06:47.000 They are not, of course, because according to the left, consent is a continuous issue, meaning that in the middle of the sex, if the woman says,
00:06:54.000 I'm done, then the consent has been ended.
00:06:57.000 So unless you grab the app in the middle of the actual coitus, then you are going to presumably be accused of violating the woman's consent, even if she signed the contract beforehand.
00:07:07.000 Now, what's funny is that the left used to recognize how prudish and silly all of this was.
00:07:12.000 There's a show called New Girl.
00:07:14.000 What's the name of the woman who stars in New Girl?
00:07:16.000 Thank you.
00:07:17.000 Zooey Deschanel, who's famous for her bangs.
00:07:20.000 And the show, the first couple seasons was actually pretty funny.
00:07:24.000 There's one episode of the show, which is a flashback to Zoe's prom night, when she's looking forward to having sex for the first time.
00:07:30.000 Because this is America, where this is now the big thing, is that on your prom night, you're supposed to have sex for the first time.
00:07:34.000 Not on your wedding night, on your prom night, with some rando from high school who has pimples and is ugly.
00:07:39.000 That's typically how prom night is supposed to go.
00:07:41.000 Very exciting here in America, where traditional sexual mores have been thrown away.
00:07:46.000 In any case,
00:07:47.000 This is a very funny scene in which Zooey Deschanel basically is with a guy, and it demonstrates the disconnect between what feminists think they want out of sexual experiences and what they actually want out of sexual experiences.
00:07:59.000 Because Zooey Deschanel's character on the show is a feminist.
00:08:01.000 She is a single woman who's living with a bunch of dudes in an apartment.
00:08:05.000 But this is a flashback to her prom night, and it demonstrates the stupidity of apps like LegalFling.
00:08:08.000 I'm going to take off your dress.
00:08:10.000 Do I have your permission?
00:08:12.000 Yep.
00:08:14.000 Yep.
00:08:15.000 I can't find the zipper.
00:08:17.000 Oh, there is no zipper.
00:08:18.000 Um, I made this dress and my mom sewed it in.
00:08:21.000 Um, maybe I could try, you know, abdominal area here.
00:08:24.000 Is that okay?
00:08:25.000 Do I have permission?
00:08:26.000 Yes, you have my permission.
00:08:27.000 Just, um, you know, maybe, um, you know, um, cause maybe you could just rip it.
00:08:31.000 I just want to make sure you're feeling safe.
00:08:35.000 No, no, no.
00:08:36.000 I feel like so safe and like I've never felt like more safe.
00:08:39.000 Well, do I have your permission?
00:08:41.000 Just be a man and rip it off.
00:08:45.000 Now I'm feeling very unsafe.
00:08:52.000 Okay, the reason that's funny is because this is stupid, people.
00:08:55.000 Okay, if this is how you think sexual encounters are supposed to go, or that any sexual encounter in history has gone this way, you're out of your mind.
00:09:01.000 That's why Hollywood used to be able to joke about this stuff, but now Hollywood can't even joke about it because they think that this is the ideal sexual scenario.
00:09:07.000 The ideal sexual scenario is where you're asking every step of the way for permission.
00:09:12.000 There's not a woman alive who feels like this is sexy.
00:09:15.000 Not one.
00:09:16.000 If you can name this woman to me, who thinks that this scene is really hot, then you're going to have to show her to me.
00:09:22.000 Because I don't believe you.
00:09:23.000 I think you're lying.
00:09:24.000 The reality is that women want men to act like men.
00:09:26.000 That involves a certain amount of aggressive activity.
00:09:29.000 Not rape, obviously.
00:09:30.000 Not doing things that women don't want.
00:09:32.000 But if a man is acting like a passive do-nothing in the bedroom, women are not interested.
00:09:38.000 And it's just, it's just a lie.
00:09:39.000 I'm sorry.
00:09:40.000 It's just a lie.
00:09:40.000 If you're acting like the, like the Jeff Goldblum, like the, uh, not the Jeff Goldblum, the lawyer character in Jurassic Park.
00:09:47.000 Okay?
00:09:47.000 And that's, that's your, that's your sexual come on strategy.
00:09:51.000 It's not going anywhere.
00:09:52.000 This is all fictional nonsense that was created by a culture that has refused to make any rules and now is backtracking and making new rules to fill in the rules that should have been there in the first place.
00:10:00.000 Absolute stupidity.
00:10:01.000 OK, before we go any further, I want to talk about President Trump and bleepholes, because that's all we can talk about now.
00:10:08.000 Using our Dollar Shave Club wipes, we can wipe up this bleephole situation.
00:10:11.000 We'll get to all of that in just a second.
00:10:12.000 But first, I want to say thank you to our sponsors over at Tripping.com.
00:10:15.000 Do you need to get away?
00:10:16.000 I do.
00:10:18.000 Okay, that's why we need to go to Tripping.com.
00:10:20.000 So Tripping.com is the place to go for your vacation rental.
00:10:23.000 So I'm in a unique situation when I go on vacations.
00:10:26.000 I can't really stay in hotels because they don't have a kitchen, right?
00:10:29.000 I keep kosher.
00:10:30.000 That means that I need a kitchen.
00:10:31.000 Also, I have small children, which means I need a washing machine because they get everything insanely dirty all the time.
00:10:37.000 Well, that's why I need Tripping.com, because if I were staying in the local Hyatt, it might be nice, but it's smaller, doesn't have any of these amenities.
00:10:44.000 Tripping.com makes sure that I can go any place that I want, basically, and they have vacation rentals there for you.
00:10:50.000 With Tripping.com, one search lets you filter,
00:10:53.000 Compare, sort over 10 million available properties on trusted sites like VRBO, TripAdvisor, Booking.com, and more.
00:10:58.000 And you don't have to worry about getting the best deal because you're saving an average of 18% per night by booking your vacation with Tripping.com.
00:11:04.000 As I say, I only use Tripping.com.
00:11:06.000 I can't because when I'm booking a vacation, I'm not gonna stay in a hotel.
00:11:09.000 Don't forget, if you wanna save time and money, go to Tripping.com slash Shapiro today.
00:11:14.000 Tripping.com slash Shapiro.
00:11:16.000 Tripping.com slash Shapiro.
00:11:17.000 Go and do that right now when you use that slash Shapiro.
00:11:19.000 That lets them know that we sent you.
00:11:21.000 As I say,
00:11:22.000 You know, you think the vacation's good because you're staying at a hotel.
00:11:24.000 The truth is, it's much better when you have more room to spread out.
00:11:26.000 It's like home away from home.
00:11:28.000 It's just fantastic to stay at one of these nice vacation rentals.
00:11:30.000 My wife and I do it every time we go on vacation now, and Tripping.com makes that possible and makes it less expensive.
00:11:35.000 Again, Tripping.com slash Shapiro.
00:11:37.000 Use the slash Shapiro so they know that we sent you.
00:11:39.000 Okay.
00:11:40.000 So, meanwhile, in other news,
00:11:43.000 The Democrats are grilling on the Hill today the Department of Homeland Security Secretary, a woman named Kirstjen Nielsen, about President Trump's alleged statements regarding immigrants from bleephole countries.
00:11:53.000 And they're grilling her.
00:11:54.000 Did he really say bleephole countries?
00:11:56.000 Did he really say he wants fewer people from bleephole countries?
00:11:58.000 OK, we are now in, what, day six of this controversy?
00:12:01.000 This interminable controversy where we're supposed to discuss ad nauseum whether the president is racist or whether he was just making comments that were about which countries we ought to prioritize, and we're just going to go around in circles on this thing and everybody's going to make each other crazy.
00:12:16.000 One thing I will say, when Democrats suggest that they are deeply concerned about the president's racism for saying that he wants immigrants from Norway over Haiti,
00:12:24.000 And they refused to acknowledge, by the way, that the day before, the ambassador from Norway was at the—or the prime minister of Norway was at the White House, which is probably why Trump was saying Norway.
00:12:33.000 And they refused to acknowledge that Trump said in that same report, the Washington Post report, that he wants more immigrants from South Korea, which is not exactly indicative of racism, because South Koreans are not white, it turns out.
00:12:44.000 Maybe it's just possible Trump was talking about a merit-based immigration system.
00:12:47.000 Now, maybe he wasn't.
00:12:47.000 Maybe he was saying something racist.
00:12:49.000 Maybe he was saying, I want fewer black people in the United States.
00:12:51.000 Or maybe he was saying that you have created a system by which we are supposed to judge a hierarchy of countries that we are supposed to take immigrants from.
00:12:59.000 And I'd prefer to take immigrants from countries where the countries are closer to the Western way of life than countries that are less close to the Western way of life.
00:13:07.000 Which, again, that's not racist.
00:13:09.000 And it may be wrong, because the fact is what I would like is a merit-based system where we judge individuals instead of judging the country of origin.
00:13:17.000 But if you're going to judge solely based on country of origin, of course you're going to value South Korea over Russia, for example.
00:13:22.000 Because South Korea is a more westernized country than Russia is.
00:13:26.000 I've used Russia as the example because there are a lot of Russian immigrants to the United States who do really well.
00:13:30.000 I mean, my great-grandparents were Russian immigrants to the United States.
00:13:34.000 Russia is also a place that's governed in a very different way, has a different culture and a different language.
00:13:39.000 Right?
00:13:39.000 In South Korea, everybody virtually knows English.
00:13:42.000 It's taught in schools, I believe.
00:13:43.000 And South Koreans come to the United States and have a history of doing incredibly well here.
00:13:48.000 So is it wrong to talk about prioritization of countries if we are going to talk about prioritization of countries?
00:13:53.000 And here's how you know the Democrats are fibbing about all of this.
00:13:55.000 So Chuck Schumer was on CBS's Late Show last night because
00:13:59.000 We have to have our comedy shows be replete with politics.
00:14:02.000 And here is what he said.
00:14:03.000 He said, Trump's comments over and over and over again can be described as nothing but racist and obnoxious.
00:14:07.000 He says he's not a racist.
00:14:08.000 Well, I have a challenge for Donald Trump.
00:14:10.000 Okay, actions speak louder than words.
00:14:12.000 If you want to begin, just begin that long road back to proving you're not a racist, you're not bigoted, support the bipartisan compromise that three Republicans and three Democrats have put on the floor, everyone gave, and get the dreamer safety here in America.
00:14:23.000 That's what he should do.
00:14:24.000 In other words, embrace the policy that Chuck Schumer likes, and that's how you can prove that you're not a racist.
00:14:28.000 And that's what I was saying yesterday, is that it seems to me that a lot of what Democrats are doing here is using the racism club in order to beat Trump into a corner on policy.
00:14:37.000 And there's a certain irony to this, right?
00:14:39.000 Chuck Schumer is saying that Trump is a racist for saying that people from certain countries are going to assimilate better than people from other countries, or that we should prioritize certain countries over other countries, and that's racist, right?
00:14:49.000 But Chuck Schumer is proposing a legal regime that prioritizes certain countries over other countries.
00:14:54.000 If Chuck Schumer really wanted us not to judge people based on their place of origin, he should be in favor of getting rid of the diversity visa lottery.
00:15:01.000 He should be in favor of getting rid of country-based, origin-based immigration systems.
00:15:06.000 He should be in favor of an individual merit-based system, which, I am told, President Trump wants.
00:15:10.000 And President Trump says that he wants.
00:15:12.000 So if we were really all on the same page, and we were all anti-racism, or anti-bigotry, or anti-discrimination based on birthplace, then we'd have a system that didn't take into account birthplace, wouldn't we?
00:15:21.000 We'd have a system that looks purely at whether somebody ought to come into the United States or not on an individual level.
00:15:27.000 But Democrats don't want that.
00:15:28.000 And that's how you can prove that what they're talking about, this deep caring about Trump's a racist, Trump's not a racist, it's all a lie.
00:15:34.000 They don't care about that.
00:15:35.000 They want their policy priorities.
00:15:36.000 If they really cared about racism and immigration, they would be trying to wipe out any semblance of country of origin being the adjudicative factor when it comes to immigration itself.
00:15:49.000 But I think that there's something else going on here, too.
00:15:51.000 And I think the Democrats are painting themselves into a corner.
00:15:53.000 So I think they're doing this on shutdown talk.
00:15:55.000 So right now, there's talk of a government shutdown.
00:15:59.000 So Republicans obviously control Congress.
00:16:02.000 President Trump, the immigration deal is basically dead.
00:16:05.000 It's going to be unlikely that
00:16:07.000 There's any sort of immigration deal cut with Democrats.
00:16:09.000 Democrats have no interest in giving Trump any sort of win here.
00:16:12.000 But you could have a government shutdown if the Democrats do not go forward with the Republican budget.
00:16:19.000 Now I highly doubt the Democrats will do that.
00:16:20.000 I think Democrats will probably go forward with the budget.
00:16:23.000 Trump will sign into law some big budget just like he did last year with very few cuts attached.
00:16:27.000 It won't include border funding.
00:16:28.000 It'll basically be a clean government funding program the same way it was last year, because I don't think that Trump actually has the intestinal fortitude to have a government shutdown fight with Democrats over border wall funding.
00:16:39.000 I think he should, but I don't think he will.
00:16:41.000 All that said, Democrats have painted themselves into a bit of a corner.
00:16:45.000 Like Claire McCaskill says,
00:16:47.000 Welcome to our world.
00:16:48.000 We've got people running for president all trying to find their base, and then you've got people from Trump states that are trying to continue to legislate that we always have by negotiation, and never the twain shall meet.
00:16:56.000 In other words, she is saying that there's not a lot of interest in actually coming to an agreement here, but nobody else wants to be blamed for an actual government shutdown.
00:17:05.000 So there's a lot of hubbub.
00:17:06.000 Obviously, a lot of the senators are fighting with one another, but the chances that we shut down the government over all of this, I think, are incredibly low.
00:17:12.000 There's another way, though, in which Democrats are painting themselves into a corner, and here is how.
00:17:16.000 Hillary Clinton got herself in all sorts of trouble.
00:17:18.000 Hillary Clinton lost the election in large part on the basis of suggesting that the vast majority of Americans, or at least a large swath of Americans, were deplorables, racists, bigots, alt-righters.
00:17:30.000 That anyone who supported Trump was a member of this group.
00:17:32.000 That anybody who was sanguine about Trump as president was ignoring his bigotry in order to vote for him.
00:17:38.000 That all of these people had to believe that bigotry and racism didn't matter, making them racists and bigots.
00:17:43.000 And there are a lot of people who felt like, you know what, Hillary's a jerk, I'm going to vote against her just because she disdains ordinary Americans.
00:17:48.000 Democrats are verging on that.
00:17:50.000 When they say that Trump is a racist,
00:17:52.000 They're not just saying Trump is a racist, usually.
00:17:55.000 What Democrats are usually saying is that all the things that Trump has done are racist.
00:17:59.000 This is the Chuck Schumer point.
00:18:00.000 That if you want to prove you're not a racist, you have to agree with me.
00:18:02.000 But there are a lot of people who don't agree with Chuck Schumer and who are not racist.
00:18:05.000 I don't agree with Chuck Schumer.
00:18:06.000 I'm not a racist.
00:18:07.000 I don't agree with Chuck Schumer.
00:18:09.000 In fact, I think Chuck Schumer's policies with regard to immigration are kind of bigoted because he wants to benefit certain countries over other countries as opposed to using a merit-based system.
00:18:18.000 But Democrats, when they suggest that Trump's policies and his rhetoric are all of a piece, that everyone who agrees with Trump on policy must be a racist, what they are doing is driving away large segments of the American population.
00:18:30.000 They're making you choose.
00:18:31.000 You can either choose Trump's policies and his racism, or you can choose Democratic policies and their non-racism.
00:18:38.000 Well, what if I neglect to make that choice?
00:18:40.000 What if I say I like a lot of Trump's policies, but I don't like a lot of the things Trump says?
00:18:44.000 Well, Democrats say I'm not allowed to make that choice.
00:18:45.000 They've created this false dichotomy, this false binary.
00:18:49.000 And I'm now supposed to fall into that trap.
00:18:52.000 The problem is, that alienates voters.
00:18:54.000 If you're a Democrat and you're saying that, you should think twice about saying that.
00:18:57.000 You should think twice about saying that Trump is a racist, not just because it's questionable as to whether Trump is actually a Richard Spencer-type racist, but also because if you are going to say Trump is a racist, you need to say his comments are what make him a racist, not his policies.
00:19:10.000 But Democrats aren't doing that.
00:19:12.000 They're just saying that Trump is a racist bully and the implication, and I think that all Trump voters are reading into that, I think a lot of people who are not even Trump voters, I didn't vote for Trump and I'm reading into that, I think what they're reading that when people say Trump is a racist, what they're really saying is anyone who agrees with his immigration policy is a racist.
00:19:27.000 That they're using Trump as a proxy for anyone who agrees with Trump policies.
00:19:31.000 So when Elizabeth Warren says Trump is a racist bully, she's actually, I think, painting Democrats into a dangerous corner, ripping the American population by proxy.
00:19:39.000 Donald Trump is a racist bully, and we know how to deal with bullies.
00:19:46.000 We do not back down.
00:19:48.000 We do not shut up.
00:19:49.000 We fight back.
00:19:51.000 And no matter what they throw at us, nevertheless, we persist.
00:19:56.000 Nevertheless, we persist.
00:19:57.000 Of course, there's her slogan because she wants to run for president.
00:19:59.000 Again, the idea that Elizabeth Warren is going to lead the fight against bigotry after using false Native American heritage
00:20:06.000 allegedly to gain her job at Harvard Law School is beyond insane.
00:20:09.000 She's not the only person Democrats are trotting out.
00:20:11.000 Again, if you're going to go out and call Trump a racist, you have to use non-racist to call Trump a racist.
00:20:15.000 You can't trot out Al Sharpton.
00:20:17.000 They trot out Al Sharpton, a guy who is legitimately responsible for at least helping to incite riots in Crown Heights in 1991 against Orthodox Jews, and then again against Freddie's Fashion Mart in New York City that ended with the burning down of the store and the death of many people who are minorities.
00:20:32.000 Al Sharpton is one of the worst racists of the last 35 years, and here's Al Sharpton ripping Trump as a racist.
00:20:38.000 You don't have to spray paint the N-word over the Oval Office and sleep with a KKK hood to be a racist.
00:20:46.000 If you have racist policies, say racist things, operate in a racist manner, you are a racist.
00:20:53.000 Period.
00:20:54.000 End of story.
00:20:55.000 Okay, so it's that part where he says racist policies that's fascinating, right?
00:20:58.000 When he says racist policies, that's the part where Democrats are going to lose everybody.
00:21:02.000 If they just said Trump's a bad character, I think a lot of people agree.
00:21:05.000 If they said Trump might be borderline racist in terms of his statements, I think a lot of people would probably agree or at least give Democrats the benefit of the doubt.
00:21:12.000 When they say you must agree with us or you are a racist just like Trump, you're going to lose the entire population.
00:21:16.000 And now they're trotting out celebrities to make this case.
00:21:18.000 So, in just a second, I'm going to explain to you which celebrities
00:21:21.000 are actually making this case.
00:21:23.000 Apparently, it's everybody in the NBA, essentially.
00:21:25.000 And they're not being they're not being coy about this.
00:21:28.000 They don't just believe that Trump is a racist.
00:21:29.000 They believe that anyone who agrees with Donald Trump on policy is a racist.
00:21:32.000 The Democrats, I think this is such a major political mistake they're making right now.
00:21:36.000 So let's start here with LeBron James.
00:21:39.000 So LeBron, who, again, I don't know why the one of the best powerful words in the history of the NBA has amazing things to say on matters of immigration.
00:21:48.000 I wasn't aware that penetrating the paint has anything to do with making border policy.
00:21:53.000 But in any case, here's LeBron James saying that Trump has given racism an opportunity to be out.
00:21:57.000 Again, what he's really saying here is that because of Donald Trump, everybody in Donald Trump's base, they're secret racists, but now they're coming out.
00:22:08.000 People in racism, negative racism, an opportunity to be out and outspoken without fear.
00:22:19.000 And that's the fearful thing for us.
00:22:22.000 Because it's with you and it's around every day, but he's allowed people to come out and just feel confident about doing negative things.
00:22:30.000 OK, so this idea that Trump has emboldened racists, what he is really suggesting, listen, I said this during the campaign when he was actively appealing to the alt-right, is that Trump should have done more to tamp down racism.
00:22:41.000 But what LeBron is actually saying here, LeBron James, when he says that Trump has given racism an opportunity to be out of the closet, and then he says, I like when he says negative racism as opposed to presumably positive racism.
00:22:52.000 The idea that racism begins and ends with Donald Trump, I think, is an exaggeration.
00:22:56.000 Now, what LeBron says is not all that awful.
00:22:59.000 You know, I think that you can make the case that Trump did that during the campaign.
00:23:03.000 But what Greg Popovich does really is awful.
00:23:07.000 And this is where he says that Trump can't even prove to me that he's not a racist.
00:23:10.000 There's no way Trump can prove to me he's not a racist, other than by presumably agreeing with Greg Popovich, the coach of the San Antonio Spurs.
00:23:17.000 It's insidious.
00:23:18.000 It's still our national sin that we have to work on.
00:23:23.000 And every time I hear somebody say they're not a racist, you know they are.
00:23:31.000 Okay, this is the logic of the left, okay?
00:23:32.000 And Greg Popovich, I mean, this is so obnoxious.
00:23:34.000 I like Popovich as a coach, but he should really shut up about politics because this is an obnoxious, ridiculous statement.
00:23:40.000 That if somebody says they're not a racist, every time I hear somebody say they're not a racist, you know they are?
00:23:44.000 Okay, Greg, I'll say you're a racist.
00:23:45.000 How's that?
00:23:46.000 You're a racist.
00:23:47.000 Now, how do you respond?
00:23:49.000 Presumably you respond by saying, no, I'm not a racist.
00:23:51.000 But according to your logic, this now means you're a racist.
00:23:54.000 So we're now caught in a Knight-to-Knaves logic problem, where the minute somebody's accused of being a racist, there's no way to get out of it, right?
00:24:00.000 Because if you deny that you're a racist, then that means you're a racist.
00:24:03.000 And if you say that you're a racist, then you're obviously a racist.
00:24:05.000 So there's no way to avoid being a racist.
00:24:07.000 As soon as somebody throws the charge racist at you, we're all supposed to run for the hills and just assume that that person is a racist.
00:24:14.000 And then you wonder why Trump won?
00:24:15.000 You wonder why Trump still has a solid base?
00:24:17.000 It's because everyone's attempt to lump together Trump's base with Trump.
00:24:21.000 Everyone's attempt to lump Trump's policies together with Trump's rhetoric.
00:24:24.000 Everyone's attempt to take Trump's individual statements and then suggest that it is indicative of a broader worldview.
00:24:31.000 I don't know that Trump has a worldview about anything.
00:24:33.000 I mean, I'm not even sure that Donald Trump has a worldview about Starburst.
00:24:37.000 There's a story yesterday, by the way, it's pretty great, that staffers at one of the Senate offices were being tasked with going through boxes of Starbursts and picking out the pink and red Starbursts as a gift to President Trump, which is just astonishing.
00:24:49.000 I hope if I were ever president one day, I would force everybody, I wouldn't just buy the sour packs of jelly beans, I would force Senate staffers to go through entire bags of jelly beans and try to determine which one were the sour jelly bellies, and then make them give them to me.
00:25:02.000 It'd be like Willy Wonka's factory, I'd make them all into my Oompa Loompas.
00:25:05.000 In any case,
00:25:06.000 It's not just NBA stars and coaches who are doing this silly nonsense.
00:25:10.000 Bill Press, the famous lefty, he suggests that Trump's base is filled with extreme wacko racists.
00:25:16.000 This is where the left is going.
00:25:17.000 Good luck with this one, gang.
00:25:19.000 Good luck with this one.
00:25:19.000 Remember last week, Stephen Colbert suggested that America was the real bleephole.
00:25:24.000 That all these other countries were not bleepholes.
00:25:25.000 America was a bleephole because Trump was president.
00:25:27.000 The disdain for Americans who disagree with the left is really coming out now because they're using disdain for Trump as the proxy.
00:25:35.000 And I think that this is what so many Trump supporters and Trump voters are basing their support for Trump on.
00:25:41.000 I think wrongly in some ways, but I think that this is what they're basing their support on, is every time they read an attack on Trump, they read an attack on them.
00:25:47.000 Because every time there's an attack on them, it's an attack on Trump.
00:25:50.000 And what Bill Press here says is so indicative of a worldview and mentality that comes from the left that everyone can read into the verbiage.
00:25:58.000 Listen to what Bill Press says and then you'll see that people make the connection between what Bill Press said and what Hillary Clinton said and what Elizabeth Warren is saying today about Trump.
00:26:07.000 I am sick and tired of talking about Donald Trump's face.
00:26:10.000 So he's got 35% of the most extreme, wacko, racist, I don't know, rednecks in the country.
00:26:19.000 Paso de Wacko.
00:26:20.000 I'm gonna speak for the deplorable.
00:26:23.000 Let me speak for the...
00:26:27.000 Now I've said before that I think there is some truth to the idea that Donald Trump's base is too attached to Donald Trump, but
00:26:51.000 I also think that it is true that one of the reasons that they're so attached to Trump is because they see Trump and the slings and arrows that he takes as a proxy for the slings and arrows that they would take if he were not there.
00:27:00.000 That how the left feels about Donald Trump is exactly how the left feels about Donald Trump's base, and they felt that way about Donald Trump's base when Donald Trump wasn't there.
00:27:09.000 This is why I think, I've said this before, I think in many ways 2012 broke the country.
00:27:12.000 I think that the attempt to paint Mitt Romney and his supporters in the same exact way as the left now attempts to paint Donald Trump and his supporters is demonstrative of why Donald Trump won.
00:27:22.000 You can only call people racist, sexist, bigot, homophobes for so long before they finally say, listen, whoever they call a racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe must not be one and everybody's full of crap and whoever stands up to that nonsense is going to be the guy that I back.
00:27:34.000 I think it is almost as simple as that.
00:27:36.000 I think that Trump's presidency is a backlash.
00:27:38.000 I think it's a backlash against the entire left, which suggested that everyone on the right was a deplorable, not just when they were voting for Trump, but long before that.
00:27:46.000 I've spent my entire life being called a racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe by the left.
00:27:50.000 I am not any of those things, and my entire career is proof positive that I am not those things.
00:27:56.000 The left has suggested that anyway, about somebody like me, the guy who did not support Trump.
00:28:00.000 But the idea that now they're going to attack Trump, I think this is what's happened.
00:28:03.000 I think that people are making a mistake of logic, but it's an understandable mistake of logic.
00:28:08.000 The mistake of logic that they are making is they are buying into the idea that any attack on Trump is an attack on them.
00:28:14.000 It isn't.
00:28:15.000 But it is true that the leftists attack on Trump.
00:28:18.000 Very often, it is sort of an attack on them.
00:28:21.000 Bill Press' attack on Trump is really not an attack on Trump.
00:28:23.000 It's an attack on everybody on the right.
00:28:25.000 Elizabeth Warren's attacks on Trump are not just an attack on Trump.
00:28:28.000 They're an attack on everyone on the right, including people like me who did not vote for Trump.
00:28:31.000 This is why you see this grand and ridiculous disconnect in the leftist media on how they approach people like me, who back Trump's policies, but don't necessarily think Trump is a great president or good for the country in a lot of other ways.
00:28:45.000 The way they approach that is they say, listen, if you really don't like what Trump is saying, you shouldn't support any of his policies.
00:28:51.000 Which suggests to me an ulterior motive.
00:28:53.000 You're painting yourselves into a corner.
00:28:54.000 Democrats, you want to keep doing this?
00:28:55.000 You want to keep on with the deplorable stuff?
00:28:57.000 All you have to do is keep saying Trump is a racist and that his base is racist for supporting his policies, not just his rhetoric.
00:29:04.000 In just a second,
00:29:06.000 I want to discuss how I think Republicans on the other side are actually painting themselves into a corner as well.
00:29:10.000 I think everybody is painting themselves into a corner because they're using Trump as the prism for politics.
00:29:14.000 But first, you're going to have to go over to dailywire.com and subscribe.
00:29:16.000 So for $9.99 a month, you get a subscription to dailywire.com.
00:29:20.000 That means you get the rest of this show live.
00:29:21.000 You get the rest of the deplorable Michael Knowles show live.
00:29:24.000 You get the rest of Andrew Klavan's show live.
00:29:25.000 When I say Knowles is deplorable, I don't just mean he supports Trump.
00:29:28.000 I mean he's actually a deplorable human being.
00:29:29.000 But you get the rest of his show live.
00:29:31.000 Also, you will get to be part of today, right?
00:29:34.000 Later today, Andrew Klavan is going to be doing one of our world-famous conversations.
00:29:39.000 Today, January 16th, 5 p.m.
00:29:41.000 Eastern, 2 p.m.
00:29:41.000 Pacific.
00:29:42.000 It's our fifth episode of the conversation featuring Andrew Klavan, moderated by host Alicia Krauss.
00:29:46.000 Subscribe today to be part of the conversation.
00:29:48.000 You can ask Drew live questions, which you will answer for everyone to hear.
00:29:51.000 Drew's conversation streams live on the Daily Wire Facebook page and the Daily Wire YouTube channel.
00:29:56.000 It's free for everyone to watch, but only subscribers can ask the questions.
00:29:59.000 To ask questions as a subscriber, log in to our website, dailywire.com, head over to the conversation page, watch the live stream after that, just start typing into that Daily Wire chat box, and then Alicia will funnel those questions to Drew and he'll answer them for an entire hour.
00:30:11.000 Once again, subscribe and get your questions answered.
00:30:13.000 Bye, Clavin.
00:30:14.000 Today, 5 p.m.
00:30:14.000 Eastern, 2 p.m.
00:30:15.000 Pacific, join the conversation.
00:30:17.000 Or if you want the annual subscription, you get all of those things, plus the leftist tiers, hot or cold Tumblr.
00:30:23.000 Magnificent.
00:30:23.000 I'm going to wet my whistle with it.
00:30:27.000 Ah, I'm revitalized.
00:30:28.000 Just incredible.
00:30:29.000 So check that out for $99 a year, which is cheaper than the monthly subscription.
00:30:33.000 Or later, you just want to listen to the rest of the show, go over to iTunes, SoundCloud, YouTube.
00:30:36.000 Please subscribe to our YouTube channel.
00:30:38.000 We have lots of great videos that come out there on a regular basis.
00:30:40.000 We are the largest, fastest-growing conservative podcast in the nation.
00:30:48.000 Alrighty, so it's not just Democrats painting themselves into a corner.
00:30:51.000 Because Trump has become the prism through which everyone views politics, I think things have gotten skewed.
00:30:56.000 We're basically living in a funhouse mirror.
00:30:58.000 We're looking at a funhouse mirror, and none of it makes a whole hell of a lot of sense.
00:31:02.000 So Democrats, on the one hand, are seeing in everyone who supports Trump's policy a mirror of Trump.
00:31:09.000 Everyone who supports Trump's policies on immigration, for example,
00:31:13.000 All of those people must be the tiny little Trump racist dolls, like these little bobbleheads that have funny hair.
00:31:20.000 That's how the left sees everybody on the right.
00:31:22.000 And the right, meanwhile, sees themselves as forced to defend everything that Trump says because they feel like it's an attack on them.
00:31:29.000 They feel like if Trump is our shield, then we must be his sword.
00:31:34.000 If Trump is the guy who's taking all the slings and arrows, it's our job to go out there and defend everything that Trump says.
00:31:39.000 I know there are people who believe this because they're in our office.
00:31:42.000 I have this conversation pretty much every day with Andrew Klavan and Michael Mullins, both of whom have suggested that I'm not doing enough to fight back against the slurs against President Trump.
00:31:50.000 What I say is, when I think it's a slur, I'll fight back against it.
00:31:53.000 I've actually been
00:31:54.000 Pretty strong on suggesting there are two possibilities on the bleed poll comments, for example.
00:31:58.000 But when he does something that I think is wrong and or stupid, I'm going to call it out because my job is not to defend Trump.
00:32:04.000 My job is to defend conservative principles, and that includes defending conservative principles and the future victory of those principles.
00:32:10.000 From President Trump, if Trump toxifies himself, right?
00:32:12.000 What I'm scared of, and I think with good reason when you look at the polls, is the possibility that I like a lot of Trump's policies, and that if Trump's toxicity smears those policies, Republicans lose the House in 2018, they lose the Senate in 2020, and they lose the White House in 2020, and then you have an era of Democratic dominance brought about because nobody on our side had the guts to say, I like a lot of what Trump is doing, but I don't like a lot of what Trump is saying, and I think it's polarizing and problematic.
00:32:35.000 That's, I think, the fundamental disconnect here.
00:32:38.000 And this is where I think Republicans are painting themselves into a corner, too.
00:32:40.000 So if Democrats have painted themselves into a corner by alienating 40 to 45 percent of the country by suggesting that if you agree with Trump's policies, then you are therefore a racist, just like Trump's a racist.
00:32:50.000 If that's the Democratic problem, and they've alienated a huge percentage of the population, the problem on the right is that by defending everything Trump says, you're also alienating a huge percentage of the population.
00:33:00.000 What I've said is that Trump deserves, and every president deserves, the ability of the commentariat to judge each individual action or comment on its own merit.
00:33:12.000 Obviously, we take character into account.
00:33:14.000 I said during the last administration, I thought the Obama administration was a Jew-hating administration, at least in terms of their policies toward Israel.
00:33:21.000 And that's very much like the left suggesting that Trump is a racist.
00:33:24.000 The difference is that if somebody on the right, I think, is a Jew-hating person, like Pat Buchanan, then I will say so and have said so for many, many years.
00:33:31.000 People on the left won't do that with regard to their own.
00:33:33.000 But with regard to President Trump and labeling him a racist, you can take your view of Trump and his racism and separate that off from a particular policy and determine whether the policy is motivated by animus or whether a lot of people who support the policy are not motivated by animus.
00:33:48.000 That's, I think, my critique for people on the left.
00:33:50.000 It's also my critique for people on the right.
00:33:52.000 Just because Trump says something doesn't mean that we have to defend it.
00:33:55.000 In fact, sometimes it's better for Trump if you're trying to convince him to stop doing these things.
00:34:00.000 If you want Trump to do better, then what you would really like from President Trump is to continue with the policies that you like, but not to have to fight a week-long battle over whether he means that people from Haiti should not be allowed to immigrate to the country because, quote-unquote, all Haitians have AIDS.
00:34:14.000 It's not a battle that you want to fight.
00:34:15.000 Because, let's be real, I've spent my entire career fighting for a conservatism that believes in certain principles about immigration, merit-based immigration, that have nothing to do with those sorts of nasty comments, or alleged nasty comments.
00:34:27.000 And here's the trap Republicans fall into.
00:34:30.000 They think that every defense of Trump is a defense of Trump's policies.
00:34:33.000 It is not.
00:34:34.000 Even Trump doesn't believe that.
00:34:35.000 So, Anthony Scaramucci, right?
00:34:37.000 The mooch!
00:34:38.000 He's back on TV and he was grilled by Katie Tur on MSNBC, asked about the bleephole comments.
00:34:43.000 I think the reason the media likes doing this, by the way, is because
00:34:46.000 The media just enjoys saying bleephole on television.
00:34:49.000 Let's be true about this.
00:34:51.000 Again, I mentioned last week that the folks in the media had no problem bleeping out President Obama or Joe Biden.
00:34:57.000 There was another instance, by the way, that came to mind.
00:34:59.000 There was a story by Jeffrey Goldberg in The Atlantic talking about Barack Obama's comments about Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, and Obama called Netanyahu in that article a chicken bleep.
00:35:10.000 And it's the exact same bleep as the bleephole, right?
00:35:12.000 Okay?
00:35:13.000 It's poop, right?
00:35:14.000 It's the S-word.
00:35:15.000 They called him a chickensh.
00:35:17.000 That's what he did.
00:35:19.000 Was that reported?
00:35:19.000 Did they report it just by saying, like, you know, if you say that about an ally of the United States, the prime minister of an ally of the United States, then maybe that's newsworthy, so we'll just say it 195 times in a day as CNN did.
00:35:30.000 No, of course not.
00:35:32.000 Look, they just want to drop the idea that Trump is vulgar in a way that Obama is not.
00:35:35.000 I don't think that that's actually true, at least when it comes to the language used.
00:35:39.000 Anyway, the Mooch is on MSNBC, and Katie Turd grills him, and you'll see the Mooch doesn't have a lot of really good defenses.
00:35:45.000 He did say it, according to multiple people, and Lindsey Graham, who's a Republican and on his side a lot, has not denied it.
00:35:51.000 Let's stipulate for this conversation that he said it, so we don't have to argue about whether he said it or not.
00:35:56.000 I don't know if he said it, but just for this conversation, because I want to make a broader point.
00:36:00.000 If you are in a private conversation in the White House with a group of people that you're trying to get a deal done, and you are prone to New York-style rhetorical flourishes, which unfortunately I also happen to be prone to.
00:36:16.000 Why do that to the guy?
00:36:18.000 He's there... That's neither here nor there.
00:36:20.000 We're both assuming that he said it, as you just said.
00:36:23.000 Why do people from Norway, why do they have more merit to come here than people from Africa, according to what the President said?
00:36:29.000 Having known the President for a long period of time, I don't really think that's what he meant.
00:36:33.000 I'm not going to interpret what he meant because I don't understand his mind entirely.
00:36:37.000 OK, so this is the problem.
00:36:38.000 If Republicans are going to do, I'll defend Trump, but I don't know his mind.
00:36:42.000 I think Jonah Goldberg got this right.
00:36:43.000 He said that if you're spending all of your time saying, here's what the president meant, the president needs to do better.
00:36:48.000 How's that?
00:36:50.000 If I have to explain everything the president is saying, if I have to be the Trump translator, if it's my job to be his magical Star Trek-like translator where suddenly I understand alien languages,
00:36:59.000 Then he's not doing his job correctly.
00:37:01.000 Especially for a guy who's supposed to be this grand communicator and great brander.
00:37:05.000 Shouldn't he know better than this?
00:37:07.000 And when you do this, it allows the Democrats to play this game where they get to label you a racist, particularly if you're a person in a position of prominence or power.
00:37:16.000 And that does alienate, again, another group.
00:37:18.000 So I think there are two groups in America, and they're alienating each other.
00:37:21.000 And the question is, who's alienating more people in the middle?
00:37:24.000 And I think that that's an open question.
00:37:25.000 But here's the thing.
00:37:26.000 One of these things can be solved very easily.
00:37:28.000 And in fact, solving one of these things sort of solves both of these things.
00:37:31.000 If President Trump doesn't make controversial and silly comments, if he doesn't make comments that could be interpreted as racist, then Republicans don't have to defend him and Democrats don't have the opportunity to attack him or his base.
00:37:43.000 Right?
00:37:43.000 So in the end, the president shouldn't say this stuff.
00:37:46.000 But the various interpretations, by the right to defend everything and by the left to attack him and all of his supporters on policy, both of these things are deeply polarizing.
00:37:56.000 They pre-existed Trump, by the way.
00:37:57.000 I think it happened during the Obama administration, too.
00:37:59.000 The best approach here is what Ben Carson, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, had to say.
00:38:03.000 He was asked about what the president said on this, and here's what he said.
00:38:08.000 And you know, I'm a member of this administration.
00:38:12.000 And I don't agree with the president about everything that he said.
00:38:19.000 Or of how it's said.
00:38:25.000 If the way you say things is so inflammatory that people can't hear your message, it's not helpful.
00:38:33.000 And that's why I don't do that anymore.
00:38:35.000 Okay, and good for Ben Carson, right?
00:38:37.000 This is what needs to happen.
00:38:38.000 Nikki Haley, I know, has done some of the same stuff.
00:38:40.000 It doesn't hurt Trump, by the way, to do this.
00:38:42.000 I think there are a lot of people on the right who believe, oh, it hurts Trump.
00:38:44.000 It just, it really hurts Trump.
00:38:46.000 If you say you disagree with his rhetoric, you're undermining Trump.
00:38:49.000 Trump is not on the ballot until 2020.
00:38:53.000 He's not on the ballot.
00:38:54.000 Republicans are.
00:38:56.000 This year.
00:38:57.000 Okay, there's an election.
00:38:58.000 This year.
00:38:59.000 There's an election in 2020 as well.
00:39:01.000 But Trump can take it, man.
00:39:03.000 I mean, I've never seen anybody take as much abuse as Trump took during the last election cycle.
00:39:07.000 Some fair, some unfair.
00:39:08.000 He didn't just weather it, he won.
00:39:10.000 To this idea that Trump is this delicate snowflake that we all have to protect from the ramifications of his own verbiage, that every time he says something we all have to rally around him and we must defend the leader, must defend the flag.
00:39:22.000 Trump's perfectly capable of defending himself.
00:39:24.000 I mean, this is why he won't get off Twitter, supposedly.
00:39:27.000 It's because he's fully capable of protecting himself.
00:39:29.000 And again, do I think this will do any long-term damage to Trump?
00:39:31.000 I think you'd be a fool to believe that these comments will do any long-term damage to Trump.
00:39:35.000 Nothing else has.
00:39:37.000 I mean, they hit him with a brick during the last election.
00:39:39.000 They've been hitting him with bricks ever since.
00:39:41.000 The Democrats haven't stopped talking about a Russia collusion scandal that has yet to materialize based on which he has supposedly stole the election with the help of Vladimir Putin.
00:39:50.000 But all of that said, I'll tell you what can't take it.
00:39:55.000 What cannot take it, and what I mean by it is critiques of racism and suggestions that you're bad people.
00:40:02.000 The people who can't take it are not Trump.
00:40:04.000 The people that are going to pay the price for that are people in the Republican Party.
00:40:07.000 Trump is Trump.
00:40:08.000 He stands on his own.
00:40:10.000 against a lot of the Republican Party itself, against the Republican establishment, and he won.
00:40:14.000 He's a very powerful figure.
00:40:16.000 And not only is he a very powerful figure, in many ways he's kind of Teflon.
00:40:20.000 That doesn't mean that he can't lose.
00:40:22.000 It doesn't mean that he won't be down at 35%.
00:40:24.000 But Trump has a way, as we saw in the last election cycle, of dragging people down in the mud.
00:40:28.000 Here's what I don't understand.
00:40:29.000 You can't have it both ways if you are a big Trump supporter, a MAGA, MAGA, MAGA 4D genius guy.
00:40:33.000 You can't suggest that he's such a genius that he requires my help to help him out of these situations, and also that he dug himself this bleep hole, stuck himself in it, and now requires me to pull him out with a rope.
00:40:44.000 Either he's such a genius that he put himself there knowing that it was a win for him, or he needs my help.
00:40:48.000 But not both.
00:40:50.000 Not both.
00:40:51.000 And by the way, I think there's actually a third possibility, which is that he's not a super genius who put himself there on purpose.
00:40:57.000 He ended up there, and he also doesn't need my help.
00:40:58.000 He's fully capable of crawling out of that hole himself.
00:41:02.000 Again, the man can take an inordinate amount of abuse, and his administration will survive.
00:41:06.000 He's not going anywhere.
00:41:08.000 And when we get to 2020, we'll get to 2020.
00:41:11.000 It's not like this didn't come up during the last election cycle, for God's sake.
00:41:13.000 I mean, the man said during the last election cycle he didn't know who David Duke was in the middle of an election cycle.
00:41:19.000 The guy said that a Mexican judge was incapable of judging his fraud case in the middle of the election cycle, and then he won.
00:41:25.000 So the idea that he needs our defense, I don't think is right.
00:41:28.000 But I'll tell you what can't happen.
00:41:29.000 If the entire Republican Party rushes to the defense of bad comments, that does have ramifications not only in the now, but down the line for how young people think of the Republican Party.
00:41:38.000 Let's put it this way.
00:41:42.000 Who makes you feel warmer toward the Republican Party?
00:41:44.000 The Mooch or Ben Carson?
00:41:46.000 In those two contrasting clips.
00:41:48.000 What makes you feel warmer toward the Republican brand?
00:41:50.000 Toward conservatism?
00:41:51.000 The Mooch or Ben Carson?
00:41:53.000 I think it's a good Rorschach test.
00:41:54.000 I think it's a good Rorschach test.
00:41:56.000 Now, there may be some Trump supporters who see the entire political scene as a reflection of Trump, who think that the mooch is better for the Republican Party than Ben Carson in those two contrasting clips.
00:42:05.000 I would argue ultimately the opposite, that what you need are more people doing what Ben Carson does, saying, I like the policy, I don't always like what's being said, and fewer people doing what the mooch did there, which is, you know, I know it's hard, he just talks like a New Yorker, and even if it sounds super bad, that means that I just have to defend it all the more.
00:42:21.000 Again, things that are defensible are worth defending, and I'll do that.
00:42:25.000 But I think it's a mistake for everybody on the right to paint themselves into a corner by defending everything Trump does on the basis that Trump did it.
00:42:31.000 Okay, time for some things I like, and then some things that I hate.
00:42:34.000 So, let's jump right into things I like.
00:42:36.000 So, over the weekend, it was indeed my birthday, and my wife and I went and had a delicious dinner.
00:42:42.000 We're good to go.
00:42:58.000 There's no question that he should win Best Actor Oscar.
00:43:00.000 It is a phenomenal performance.
00:43:02.000 It's a different Churchill than I think most people see.
00:43:04.000 A lot of people are upset with it because it kind of portrays Churchill as sort of a colorful bumbler and fumbler a little bit, whereas Churchill actually was a genius.
00:43:13.000 I mean, if you read anything that Churchill ever wrote, the man was a genius, no question.
00:43:17.000 But it does point out something.
00:43:18.000 A lot of people on the right who love Winston Churchill and think of Winston Churchill as the constant in a world of political vacillations.
00:43:26.000 The fact is that if you had to sort of liken Churchill to any personality on the American scene, Churchill was actually, I would say, less like Ronald Reagan and more like John McCain.
00:43:37.000 The reason I say that is because Churchill started off in the conservative party, then he moved to the liberal party, then he moved back to the conservative party.
00:43:43.000 He'd been responsible for a number of disasters, including Gallipoli, which comes up in the movie.
00:43:48.000 During World War I, he wanted to do an operation through Turkey to try and defeat the Germans by creating another front.
00:43:55.000 By going through Turkey, it ended with the death of 25,000 British soldiers in Gallipoli.
00:43:59.000 He was the Lord Admiral of the Navy.
00:44:00.000 First Lord of the Navy, sorry.
00:44:04.000 I can't remember the official title.
00:44:08.000 In any case, the movie itself is quite good.
00:44:11.000 Now, the problems that I have with the movie are the same problems everybody has.
00:44:13.000 It's historically inaccurate.
00:44:15.000 Once Churchill took over, there was very little consideration of actual negotiation with the Hun, as he liked to call them.
00:44:20.000 Very little talk of negotiation with Adolf Hitler.
00:44:23.000 From May 24th to May 28th of 1940, there was some talk of negotiation, but it ended by the time June 4th came around, by the time Dunkirk was essentially launched.
00:44:34.000 And the idea that Churchill himself was divided on this, like he had any moral considerations about whether to negotiate with the Germans, is largely exaggerated.
00:44:43.000 There's also one scene in here that is pure Hollywood cheese.
00:44:46.000 The suggestion being that Churchill sort of had to have his spine reinforced by the British people.
00:44:51.000 The British people were like, oh, let's fight the Germans.
00:44:53.000 We don't want negotiations.
00:44:54.000 That's not true.
00:44:55.000 Churchill had long been the guy saying, you cannot negotiate with Hitler.
00:44:57.000 He was continuously the one saying, you cannot negotiate with Hitler.
00:45:00.000 But it does show, I think, less about Churchill than about the fate of the British and what the mood of Britain was at the time.
00:45:09.000 The idea of, what do you do when your entire country is under attack?
00:45:12.000 Do you negotiate and try to buy off the bad guys in the hope of a little temporary security?
00:45:16.000 Or do you stand tall, even at the risk of losing thousands and thousands of men?
00:45:20.000 And it does go into the minds of somebody who's having to make those difficult decisions.
00:45:24.000 Here's a little bit of the preview.
00:45:25.000 It's really worth watching.
00:45:27.000 The cast is universally tremendous.
00:45:29.000 And Oldman, I don't know how they did the prosthetics, because you watch this movie and you're like, where is Gary Oldman?
00:45:34.000 And that's Gary Oldman.
00:45:35.000 He's just amazing.
00:45:36.000 Here's a little bit of the preview.
00:45:38.000 We must now select my successor.
00:45:40.000 And it's only one man the opposition will accept.
00:45:44.000 He stands for one thing and one thing only, himself.
00:45:50.000 Why have I been forced to send for Churchill?
00:45:52.000 This record is a catastrophe.
00:45:56.000 Let me see your true qualities.
00:45:58.000 Your lack of vanity.
00:45:59.000 Here, my lion will.
00:46:00.000 Your sense of humour.
00:46:01.000 Ho, ho, ho.
00:46:04.000 Your Majesty.
00:46:06.000 It is my duty to invite you to take up the position of Prime Minister of this United Kingdom.
00:46:15.000 I speak to you for the first time as Prime Minister.
00:46:21.000 I mean, it's an incredible performance by Oldman.
00:46:23.000 It really is great.
00:46:24.000 And the truth is that Churchill was kind of a hammy character.
00:46:27.000 Like, the idea that Churchill was this kind of stalwart, non-camera-friendly guy.
00:46:31.000 The guy wanted to be prime minister, and they say this in the movie, and it's right, since The Cradle.
00:46:35.000 I mean, he thought his father should have been prime minister.
00:46:38.000 His father obviously ended up having mental illness.
00:46:41.000 A lot of people thought it was because of syphilis.
00:46:43.000 But he spends his entire life trying to live up to his dad.
00:46:45.000 And there's a lot to that with regard to Churchill.
00:46:49.000 But one of the things that's really cool about this, by the way, is that if you ever go to London, you can actually go to the Churchill Museum.
00:46:54.000 And when you go to the Churchill Museum, they take you down into the war bunkers.
00:46:57.000 So, my wife and I have been there, so it's kind of neat to see a movie that's basically made in a replica of the bunkers.
00:47:04.000 The two people who get a little bit of a raw deal in this movie are Neville Chamberlain and Lord Halifax, who is the foreign secretary.
00:47:10.000 But the main points, I think, are... I think it's a very good movie.
00:47:14.000 I do.
00:47:15.000 I know that that's controversial in conservative circles.
00:47:17.000 I think that the movie is quite good.
00:47:18.000 Okay, time for a couple quick things that I hate.
00:47:25.000 Okay, so the first thing that I hate is there's a speech that the Palestinian quasi-dictator Mahmoud Abbas gave.
00:47:31.000 He's a terrorist.
00:47:32.000 He's a Holocaust-denying terrorist who signs checks to other terrorists to murder Jews.
00:47:36.000 He gave a speech over the weekend in which he ripped into President Trump.
00:47:39.000 He said, And then he said, Shame on you, this is about Trump.
00:47:41.000 He said,
00:47:51.000 about President Trump.
00:47:52.000 So this is Israel's peace partner and the supposed person we're supposed to be signing hundreds of millions of dollars in checks to.
00:47:58.000 He also suggested, quote, In other words, there will be no peace talks.
00:48:03.000 Instead, it'll just be us committing acts of terror.
00:48:06.000 And then he suggested that anyone who criticized him could go to hell.
00:48:09.000 He said about Nikki Haley, quote,
00:48:15.000 And then he denied that there is any connection between the Jewish people and the land of Israel, which is just historically inaccurate and asinine.
00:48:22.000 Jewish connection to the land of Israel predates Islam, like the foundation of Islam, by a solid thousand and a half years.
00:48:28.000 It's absurd.
00:48:29.000 But he said, quote, they wanted to bring Jews here from Europe to maintain European interests in the region.
00:48:33.000 They asked Holland, which had the largest navy in the world, to transfer the Jews.
00:48:37.000 Israel is a colonialist project that had nothing to do with the Jews.
00:48:40.000 OK, these are Israel's peace partners?
00:48:42.000 OK, don't tell me that Israel is intransigent and won't make concessions to people who refuse to acknowledge any Jewish claim to Israel at all, suggest that Trump's house should basically be destroyed, and then threaten Nikki Haley.
00:48:54.000 Give me a freaking break.
00:48:57.000 The soft bigotry of low expectations is pretty astonishing.
00:48:59.000 OK, one more thing that I hate.
00:49:01.000 So there's an Iowa lawsuit.
00:49:02.000 Well, the
00:49:17.000 The group says its membership is open to everyone, but leaders must affirm a statement of faith that rejects homosexuality.
00:49:23.000 The university says it respects the rights of students, faculty, and staff to practice religion, but does not tolerate discrimination of any kind, so they're trying to shut down the group.
00:49:30.000 This demonstrates, full scale, once again, that the tolerance of the left does not extend to people who do not agree with the left.
00:49:36.000 Imagine if this were a Muslim group and they said, listen, we're not going to allow anybody to take a leadership position in our Muslim group who doesn't profess allegiance to Allah.
00:49:45.000 Do you think that the University of Iowa would shut them down?
00:49:47.000 Say this is discrimination?
00:49:49.000 That this is discrimination based on religion?
00:49:52.000 I highly, highly doubt it.
00:49:53.000 This is anti-Christian discrimination pretty clearly and openly and if the government rules against the student group and suggests that the university gets to make the rules for the student group on the basis of
00:50:04.000 You know, their anti-discrimination policy, that anti-discrimination policy trumps right to association and freedom of religion, then we really have reached the end of the road for both freedom of association and freedom of religion in the United States.
00:50:14.000 And that seems to be the direction, unfortunately, that everything is moving.
00:50:17.000 All right, well, we'll be back here tomorrow.
00:50:19.000 We'll have a recap of everything that's happening on the Hill, where the Secretary of Homeland Security is being grilled by Democrats about bleep holes, because that's our new world.
00:50:27.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:50:27.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:50:32.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Mathis Glover.
00:50:35.000 Executive producer, Jeremy Boring.
00:50:36.000 Senior producer, Jonathan Hay.
00:50:38.000 Our technical producer is Austin Stevens.
00:50:40.000 Edited by Alex Zingaro.
00:50:41.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Carmina.
00:50:43.000 Hair and makeup is by Jesua Alvera.
00:50:44.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire Forward Publishing production.
00:50:47.000 Copyright Forward Publishing 2018.