The Ben Shapiro Show - August 16, 2019


Israel Boycotts Anti-Semites | Ep. 841


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 9 minutes

Words per Minute

212.26225

Word Count

14,731

Sentence Count

1,015

Misogynist Sentences

19

Hate Speech Sentences

34


Summary

Israel Boycotts the Boycotters. The New York Times Goes Full Woke. And We Check The Mailbag. - Ben Shapiro, Senior Editor, Anti-Semitism and Middle East Editor-in-Chief at The Daily Wire, joins me to talk about the fallout from Israel rejecting the request to visit by Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar, two anti-Semitic members of Congress from Michigan and Maryland respectively. We also talk about how the media misrepresents the situation, and why Israel should have been much more forthcoming with their request to go to Israel in the first place. And we answer your questions! Thanks to our sponsor, Caff Monster, for sponsoring this episode. Caff is a high-end frappuccino company that makes great lattes and other beverages. They can be found at Caff. Monster.co.nz/TheBenShapiroShow/OurAdvertisers. Subscribe to our new weekly newsletter, The Ben Shapiro Show, where Ben Shapiro answers your questions and provides the answers to your most pressing political and cultural news questions. Send your questions to ben@thebenchrishoward.co and we'll get them on the show. Thanks again for listening, again and again, again, for supporting the show! - Your continued support is so appreciated! Thank you, Ben Shapiro and Mentioned: The Israel Project, The Forward, and The Forward's new ad campaign by The Forward. - Thank you for listening to Ben Shapiro's new music by The Benny Project? - The Benny Show? And Good Morning, My Thoughts by The Good Morning Show by Ben Shapiro? Thank You, Ben Shave & The Good Day Project by The Bad Day by The Jewish Thought Project by Mr. Good Day, by Ms. Sarah Goodday, and The Good Thing, and Good Day by Good Day Day by Sarah Goodness, and So Much More? & So Much So Much Thanks, Good Day & Good Day By So Much Out, Good Night, and Thank You Day, Good Bless You, Good Effie, by So Much Blessings, Blessings & Good Night & Good Bless, Good Review, & Good Evening, & More, etc., etc., etc., & Good Eff Effence, etc. -- Good Day Truly, Bless, Bye, Good G Nights, Good Morning Bless, -


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Israel boycotts the boycotters.
00:00:02.000 The New York Times goes fully woke.
00:00:03.000 And we check the mailbag.
00:00:04.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:05.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:06.000 Oh, man, we have a lot to get to today.
00:00:13.000 Let's just jump right in.
00:00:15.000 So the big story of the day continues to be the reverberations, the fallout from Israel rejecting the request to visit by Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar, two anti-Semitic members of Congress.
00:00:25.000 Now, this is being completely misportrayed by the media.
00:00:27.000 Shock of shocks.
00:00:28.000 I mean, the same media that pretends that every time Hamas organizes a terrorist attempt on the Israeli border, and then Israel has to shoot people attempting to invade its country, that Israel is the aggressor.
00:00:38.000 That same media that routinely defends the Palestinian Authority, which is a terrorist entity, which funds terrorists, which names streets after terrorists.
00:00:45.000 That same media that champions those folks, that they are actually championing Ilhan Omar and Rashida's leadership.
00:00:50.000 I can't believe it.
00:00:51.000 I just can't believe it.
00:00:52.000 Listen, the media bias against Israel goes back 30, 40 years.
00:00:57.000 I'm old enough to remember back in the 1990s when my parents cancelled their membership to the L.A.
00:01:00.000 Times because the L.A.
00:01:01.000 Times had run a photo on the front page suggesting that a picture of an Israeli member of the IDF protecting a Jew from being beaten by Arab Muslims in Israel was actually a picture of an Israeli member of the military beating an Arab Muslim in Israel.
00:01:17.000 They cancelled their membership to the L.A.
00:01:18.000 Times over this.
00:01:20.000 The media bias against Israel is longstanding, and it has not abated in any way, shape, or form.
00:01:26.000 So the media coverage, naturally, of the Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib fake visit to Israel is similarly egregious.
00:01:33.000 All the headlines are, Israel rejects American congresspeople.
00:01:36.000 And the members of the media are also buying the line put out there by Tlaib and Omar that Israel is rejecting them because they are Muslim.
00:01:43.000 Which is eminently untrue and insane to boot.
00:01:47.000 20% of Israel's population is Muslim.
00:01:49.000 There are Arab Muslim parties sitting in the Knesset right now.
00:01:52.000 Members of those parties have called for the destruction of the state of Israel, but because those members of the party happen to be Israeli Arab citizens, they are free to say whatever they want.
00:02:00.000 There are Israeli Arab members of the, not only of the Knesset, but of the Israeli Supreme Court.
00:02:05.000 So all of this talk about Israel is wildly discriminatory against Muslims.
00:02:09.000 Arabic is an official language in Israel.
00:02:12.000 Israel has ruled off-limits for Jews.
00:02:14.000 Prayer on the Temple Mount, the holiest site in Judaism.
00:02:17.000 You have to have a special armed guard to go up on the holiest site in Judaism, controlled by Israel, in order to pray up there out of respect for the Islamic Waqf.
00:02:26.000 When there are riots up there every year or so, the Israelis basically protect the right of the Muslim population on top of the Temple Mount to riot.
00:02:35.000 The Islamic Waqf has been destroying historic artifacts up there, and the Israeli government is doing nothing about it.
00:02:42.000 The notion that Israel doesn't tolerate dissent is obviously insane.
00:02:45.000 The only people who could believe that are people who have never been to Israel or watched Israeli media coverage.
00:02:50.000 Haaretz, which is a major Israeli newspaper, is not even comparable to the New York Times.
00:02:55.000 Haaretz's coverage of Israel is more akin to Al Jazeera than it is to the New York Times.
00:02:59.000 And that is a major Israeli newspaper.
00:03:01.000 So this notion that Israel can't tolerate criticism or that Israel is discriminating against Muslims is sheer absolute nonsense.
00:03:07.000 And yet, that is the way the media is portraying Israel's rejection of Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar.
00:03:13.000 In reality, the reason they are rejecting Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar is it is against Israeli law for Israel to allow people into the country who seek to destroy the country through boycott, divestment, and sanctions.
00:03:22.000 That is a movement that was started by terrorist sympathizers who openly wish to see Israel wiped from the map.
00:03:28.000 Their idea is that if they can get the world community to leverage economic sanctions against Israel, then Israel will be greatly weakened.
00:03:36.000 And they've made no secret of this.
00:03:38.000 The leaders of the BDS movement have made no secret of the fact that they are not interested in forcing Israel to a negotiated peace with terrorists.
00:03:44.000 Instead, what they are interested in is Israel not being on the map.
00:03:48.000 And Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar are part of that movement.
00:03:51.000 Both of them are anti-Semitic.
00:03:53.000 Rashida Tlaib has used publicly the dual loyalty smear.
00:03:56.000 Rashida Tlaib has hung out with Hamas sympathizers, with Hezbollah sympathizers, with terrorist sympathizers for large swaths of her career.
00:04:04.000 I mean, going back to January, there was a report in the Times of Israel about Tlaib posing with a Hezbollah-backing anti-Israel activist named Abbas Hamideh, who actually painted a picture of her in front of the Capitol building wearing the Palestinian scarf, the Palestinian pride scarf.
00:04:21.000 According to the Times of Israel back in January, an anti-Israel extremist who heads a right-to-return advocacy group, which would call for the importation of every Palestinian into Israel as citizens, which would of course destroy the Jewish nature of the state and destroy the democracy, attended a Detroit swearing-in reception and dinner party for freshman Rashida Tlaib, where he posed with her for a photograph that he tweeted.
00:04:44.000 He said, I was honored to be a Congresswoman Tlaib swearing in ceremony in Detroit and private dinner afterward with the entire family, friends and activists across the country.
00:04:53.000 In the picture, Hamida is holding a painting of Tlaib in front of the U.S.
00:04:56.000 Capitol while she is wearing a thobe, a traditional Palestinian gown that she wore during her swearing in on Capitol Hill.
00:05:03.000 Hamida's social media presence is noteworthy for its virulent attacks on the Jewish state.
00:05:08.000 He has tweeted things like criminal Zionism will eventually die, just like Nazism.
00:05:12.000 No racist and supremacist political ideology should maintain itself.
00:05:16.000 Israel does not have a right to exist.
00:05:17.000 This is a person posing with Rashida Tlaib at her inauguration, at her swearing-in.
00:05:23.000 And then she also posed with a second terrorist supporter.
00:05:26.000 This is according to Stephen Emerson, IPT News.
00:05:30.000 Two months after that, in March, she posed with Nader Jalajal, a Palestinian activist who last year mourned the death of a terrorist who led a shooting attack that murdered a rabbi.
00:05:40.000 So, Rashida Tlaib has not been particularly shy about her associations, neither has Ilhan Omar.
00:05:45.000 And they weren't being very shy about their associations on this particular trip either.
00:05:49.000 Because as it turns out, the Israeli government, and I've spoken with members of the Israeli government, members of the Trump administration about all this, the Israeli government was fully prepared to let Omar and Tlaib visit.
00:05:57.000 And then they saw their itinerary.
00:05:59.000 And the Israeli government said, no.
00:06:01.000 This is not a thing that's going to happen.
00:06:02.000 Why?
00:06:03.000 Because the itinerary, first of all, said nothing about even visiting Israel.
00:06:06.000 It wasn't about visiting Israel.
00:06:07.000 It was about visiting quote-unquote Palestine.
00:06:10.000 OK, and when they said visiting Palestine, they didn't mean visiting Ramallah.
00:06:13.000 The first day is in Jerusalem.
00:06:15.000 So Jerusalem, according to Omar and Tlaib, is Palestinian territory.
00:06:20.000 You think Israel would stand for that?
00:06:22.000 Why should they stand for that?
00:06:23.000 Not only that, the groups that Omar and Tlaib were going on this trip with are openly anti-Semitic terror supporting groups.
00:06:32.000 So why would Israel let these people in?
00:06:34.000 I mean, it's the fault of their constituents in the United States.
00:06:36.000 They're in Congress.
00:06:37.000 That's not Israel's fault.
00:06:39.000 And as we will see, the United States actually has a record of barring Israeli legislators from entering the United States if they feel they have terrorized.
00:06:45.000 This happened back in 2012.
00:06:48.000 So let's talk a little bit about this trip.
00:06:50.000 Okay, because all of this is just a giant PR setup for Omar and Tlaib.
00:06:54.000 That's all this is.
00:06:55.000 The whole thing is manipulative garbage on the part of both Omar and Tlaib, which became absolutely clear today when Rashida Tlaib made it clear that she hates the Jews more than she loves her own grandmother.
00:07:06.000 That is pretty obvious from her behavior today.
00:07:08.000 We'll get to that in just one second.
00:07:10.000 First, let's talk about how you do business.
00:07:12.000 So, it is somewhat important when you are doing business to be able to hand somebody your business card.
00:07:17.000 How many situations are you in where you reach into your pocket and you don't have the business card you want, or it turns out that you went down to the local Kinko's and printed off some cheap business cards, they don't look particularly good?
00:07:27.000 Well, you actually need a nice business card if you want to impress somebody right off the bat.
00:07:30.000 Your next big opportunity is coming right now.
00:07:32.000 All it takes to feel like you're ready to own the now is 10 bucks.
00:07:35.000 For just $10, Vistaprint gives you 500 personalized cards with exactly the look that you want.
00:07:41.000 That is a low price to make a lasting impression.
00:07:43.000 And because you can choose the colors, fonts, designs, images, that means you can create something as unique and compelling as your business.
00:07:50.000 You don't really need more reasons to choose Vistaprint than that, right?
00:07:53.000 I mean, it's inexpensive and you're getting the business cards that you want, but you can also feel good knowing that Vistaprint uses only carefully selected inks and responsibly sourced paper stocks, and your satisfaction is 100% guaranteed or your money back, and they will make it right if there's any sort of mistake.
00:08:06.000 Vistaprint.
00:08:07.000 They want you to be able to own the now in any situation, and that's why listeners to The Ben Shapiro Show get 500 high-quality custom business cards starting at $9.99.
00:08:16.000 Just go to vistaprint.com slash Shapiro for that awesome deal.
00:08:19.000 That's vistaprint.com slash Shapiro to get 500 custom business cards.
00:08:23.000 Own the now.
00:08:24.000 vistaprint.com slash Shapiro.
00:08:27.000 Alrighty, so.
00:08:28.000 What exactly were these illustrious Congresswomen, these anti-Semitic Congresswomen?
00:08:33.000 And notice, by the way, media bias in its purest form.
00:08:37.000 When Donald Trump says something that is racially insensitive or xenophobic, the media rush to call it racist, which is an editorial judgment.
00:08:43.000 They say this is a racist comment.
00:08:45.000 And in fact, when the New York Times prints a headline after the El Paso shooting, Trump urges unity versus racism, people lose their minds because you're not even allowed to suggest the truth, which is that he was urging unity against racism.
00:08:56.000 In other words, newspapers will characterize what Trump says.
00:09:00.000 The way they see it, right?
00:09:02.000 They'll call him a racist because they feel the duty to do so.
00:09:04.000 When Rashida Tlaib or Ilhan Omar say something anti-Semitic, the first move of the media is to ignore that and pretend they are not saying anything anti-Semitic.
00:09:12.000 And the New York Times will print headlines about how they've opened a conversation about Israeli money on Capitol Hill or some such, which is what they did after Ilhan Omar suggested that American support for Israel is all about the Benjamins.
00:09:25.000 In any case, so what were Omar and Tlaib actually going to do in Israel?
00:09:27.000 As I say, their itinerary was labeled a trip to Palestine, which in and of itself eliminates the Jewish state.
00:09:34.000 There is no actual territory called Palestine.
00:09:36.000 It does not legally exist.
00:09:37.000 There are Palestinian-administered territories that are disputed under international law and that Israel claims ownership of, both historically as well as in terms of winning a war, which they did in 1967 as well as 1973.
00:09:48.000 they did in 1967 as well as 1973.
00:09:50.000 Both wars initiated by Israel's enemies.
00:09:52.000 Well, what exactly was on their itinerary?
00:09:57.000 Well, apparently, the office of the Prime Minister of Israel has revealed that Omar and Tlaib had plans on meeting with organizations during their visit that have expressed support for terrorism against the nation.
00:10:07.000 The office of Prime Minister Netanyahu tweeted, quote, the itinerary of the two congresswomen reveals that the sole purpose of their visit is to harm Israel and increase incitement against it.
00:10:17.000 In addition, the organization that is funding their trip is MIFTA, which is an avid supporter of BDS and among whose members are those who have expressed support for terrorism against Israel.
00:10:27.000 OK, so what is this MIFTA group?
00:10:30.000 That's a non-governmental organization that is extremely anti-Semitic.
00:10:34.000 They have ties to terrorist sympathizers.
00:10:36.000 They have falsely accused Jews of using the blood of Christians in the Jewish Passover.
00:10:40.000 Mifda, this group that these women were traveling with, has also reportedly praised suicide bombers and deems terrorists as being national heroes.
00:10:48.000 One of the most stunning findings on the group, according to Ryan Saavedra at Daily Wire, is that they have on their website promoted content from a neo-Nazi organization which itself promotes anti-Semitic conspiracy theories that Jews control the media.
00:11:00.000 The author of the article in question that was promoted on the MIFTA website is the research staff of National Vanguard Books, which is a neo-Nazi organization according to the Southern Poverty Law Center.
00:11:11.000 They actually put out a piece on their website talking about the evils of miscegenation.
00:11:18.000 I mean, it's unbelievable.
00:11:20.000 A closer look at the travel itinerary for Omar and Talib shows they also plan on meeting with additional extremist organizations, including the Defense for Children International Palestine, which has ties to terrorism.
00:11:31.000 NGO Monitor reports that DCIP leads the campaign exploiting children to promote demonization of Israel and is linked to the PFLP terror group.
00:11:39.000 Many of its allegations are false and part of attempts to smear Israel with allegations of war crimes and promote BDS.
00:11:45.000 Several past and current DCIP board members and employees have apparent ties to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which is a designated terror organization by the US, EU, Canada, as well as Israel, and they support BDS, which Nancy Pelosi called, like, two months ago, anti-Semitic.
00:12:01.000 Seth Mandel of Washington Examiner Magazine, he tweeted, One reason you won't see coverage of the organization funding Tlaib and Omar's trip is that it would undermine the narrative this is about criticism of Israeli policy.
00:12:12.000 It shows the true face of BDS, blood libels, Nazi screeds, celebration of terrorists.
00:12:17.000 And naturally he's right, the media have completely ignored all of this.
00:12:21.000 Okay, so, President Trump had suggested that Israel bar them.
00:12:26.000 And Trump is doing this for his own political reasons.
00:12:29.000 One of those reasons is that President Trump would like to make Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib the faces of the Democratic Party.
00:12:35.000 He wants to force Pelosi and Steny Hoyer and Chuck Schumer to all get behind the most radical members of the Democratic Party so that he can run against them.
00:12:43.000 And it's not a bad domestic political strategy.
00:12:45.000 So there is some strategy to it.
00:12:47.000 It's also true that Trump happens to be morally right when he says that Israel shouldn't let these people in.
00:12:52.000 OK, so I'll talk a little bit about the strategy here in a second, whether it benefits Israel, whether Israel did the politically right thing in barring these women.
00:13:00.000 I think that the case is getting stronger that they did actually, as these women exposed their own agenda.
00:13:05.000 But President Trump had made the very strong case that Israel shouldn't let these people and people are now in the United States.
00:13:11.000 How dare he say something like really?
00:13:13.000 Really?
00:13:14.000 Okay, if you're a Democrat and you went out there and suggested that Mexico shouldn't let Trump in, do you think there'd be any hubbub at all about that?
00:13:21.000 Like, really, on the part of the media?
00:13:22.000 Would that be considered unpatriotic?
00:13:25.000 If some Democrat suggested that Steve King should be barred from entry to, for example, an African nation, do you think that anybody in media or government would think that this was an element of treason?
00:13:38.000 Here's Trump saying Israel shouldn't have to let in people who want to destroy it.
00:13:42.000 If you look at their language, if you look at what they've said, if I ever said it, it would be a horrible month, to put it mildly.
00:13:52.000 So the things that they've said, Omar, Khalid, what they've said is disgraceful.
00:13:59.000 So I can't imagine why Israel would let them in.
00:14:02.000 But if they want to let them in, they can, but I can't imagine why they would do it.
00:14:06.000 Okay, and then he continued along those lines.
00:14:08.000 He said they've said some of the worst things about Israel.
00:14:10.000 Of course, everything he is saying here is 100% true.
00:14:13.000 I think that if Israel allowed them to come in for the normal reasons, other than those reasons, I really believe that it would be a terrible thing for Israel.
00:14:23.000 I think it would show a terrible sign.
00:14:26.000 They want to do boycotts.
00:14:27.000 They said horrible things about Jewish people.
00:14:30.000 They said horrible things about Israel and Israelis.
00:14:33.000 I think it would be a terrible thing, frankly, for Israel to let these two people, who speak so badly about Israel, come in.
00:14:42.000 And the media's response to how dare Trump again, if this were Barack Obama as president talking about Steve King visiting Africa, no one would think that that was a bad thing.
00:14:51.000 Right.
00:14:52.000 Or if he had said that about Donald Trump visiting Mexico, right, then nobody would think that that was a bad thing, particularly in the media.
00:14:58.000 In one second, I'm going to get to what the Prime Minister of Israel has to say about all of this.
00:15:01.000 It is obvious what the agenda was from the start.
00:15:03.000 Today, Rashida Tlaib totally exposed the agenda because she is not only a terrible person who believes terrible things, she's also a fool.
00:15:10.000 We'll get to that in just one second.
00:15:12.000 First, let's talk about how hard it is to make your staff great.
00:15:16.000 I mean, you have a business, and you maybe hired some people off the street, you hired people by recommendation, and now maybe you're unsatisfied with their work.
00:15:23.000 Or maybe you just want to expand your business and find some new great people.
00:15:26.000 Well, the best way to do that is to go to ZipRecruiter.
00:15:29.000 We use ZipRecruiter here at The Daily Wire.
00:15:30.000 It's how we found all of our producers except for Nick.
00:15:32.000 Go check out ZipRecruiter.com slash DailyWire and you too can find great employees except for Nick.
00:15:39.000 ZipRecruiter sends your job posting to over 100 of the web's leading job boards, but they don't stop there.
00:15:44.000 As applications come in, ZipRecruiter analyzes each one, spotlights the top candidates, so you never miss a great match.
00:15:50.000 ZipRecruiter is so effective that four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate through the site within the very first day.
00:15:56.000 Right now, my listeners can try ZipRecruiter for free at this exclusive web address, ZipRecruiter.com slash Daily Wire.
00:16:03.000 That is ZipRecruiter.com slash D-A-I-L-Y-W-I-R-E, ZipRecruiter.com slash Daily Wire.
00:16:09.000 ZipRecruiter is indeed the smartest way to hire.
00:16:11.000 Make sure that your staff is the best that it can be and get great new employees at ZipRecruiter.com slash Daily Wire.
00:16:17.000 They make it super simple, ZipRecruiter.com slash Daily Wire.
00:16:19.000 Okay, so Prime Minister Netanyahu put out this statement.
00:16:22.000 No country in the world respects America and the American Congress more than the state of Israel.
00:16:26.000 As a free and vibrant democracy, Israel is open to critics and criticism, with one exception.
00:16:31.000 Israeli law prohibits the entry into Israel of those who call for and work to impose boycotts on Israel, as do other democracies that prohibit the entry of people who seek to harm the country.
00:16:41.000 In fact, in the past, the U.S.
00:16:43.000 did this to an Israeli member of Knesset, as well as to other public figures from around the world.
00:16:47.000 This is true.
00:16:48.000 In 2012, the Obama administration barred a member of Knesset named Ben-Ari.
00:16:52.000 And they did so because he was associated with the Kahanei Chai party, which is considered a terrorist organization in the United States, the Koch party.
00:16:59.000 He was no longer in the Koch party, but his past with the Koch party led the United States to bar him from entry.
00:17:04.000 An entire Israeli delegation then canceled its trip.
00:17:07.000 This was not considered a big deal at the time because countries have rules.
00:17:12.000 Prime Minister of Israel continues, Congresswomen Tlaib and Omar are leading activists in promoting the legislation of boycotts against Israel in the American Congress.
00:17:19.000 Only a few days ago, we received their itinerary for their visit in Israel, which revealed that they plan to visit whose sole objective is to strengthen the boycott against us and deny Israel's legitimacy.
00:17:28.000 For instance, they listed the destination of their trip as Palestine and not Israel.
00:17:32.000 And unlike all Democratic and Republican members of Congress who have visited Israel, they did not request to meet any Israeli officials, either from the government or the opposition.
00:17:41.000 A week ago, Israel warmly welcomed some 70 Democratic and Republican members of Congress who expressed broad bipartisan support for Israel, which was also demonstrated a month ago in a resounding bipartisan vote against BDS in Congress.
00:17:53.000 However, the itinerary of the two Congresswomen reveals the sole purpose of their visit is to harm Israel and increase incitement against it.
00:18:01.000 In addition, the organization funding their trip is MIFTA, which is an avid supporter of BDS and among whose members are those who have expressed support for terrorism against Israel.
00:18:09.000 Therefore, the Minister of Interior has decided not to allow their visit, and I, as Prime Minister, support his decision.
00:18:15.000 Nonetheless, if Congresswoman Tlaib submits a humanitarian request to visit her relatives, the Minister of Interior has announced that he will consider her request on the condition that she pledges not to act to promote boycotts against Israel during her visit.
00:18:28.000 All of that is reasonable.
00:18:29.000 The U.S.
00:18:29.000 ambassador to Israel is David Friedman, and he released his own statement supporting Israel.
00:18:34.000 The statement says, The United States supports and respects the decision of the government of Israel to deny entry to the Tlaib Omar delegation.
00:18:39.000 The BDS movement against Israel is not free speech.
00:18:42.000 It is no less than economic warfare designed to delegitimize and ultimately destroy the Jewish state.
00:18:47.000 Israel properly has enacted laws to bar entry of BDS activists under those circumstances present here.
00:18:52.000 And it has every right to protect its borders against those activists in the same manner as it would bar entrance with more conventional weapons.
00:18:59.000 Initially, Israel had indicated it would accept the Tlaib Omar delegation and use their visit as an opportunity to engage with and educate the delegation members with regard to Israel's vibrant and robust democracy, its religious tolerance, and its ethnic diversity.
00:19:11.000 Unfortunately, the itinerary of the Tlaib-Omar delegation leaves no room for that opportunity.
00:19:17.000 This trip, pure and simple, is nothing more than an effort to fuel the BDS engine that Congresswomen Tlaib and Omar so vigorously support.
00:19:23.000 Like the United States, Israel is a nation of laws.
00:19:25.000 We support Israel's application of its laws in this case.
00:19:29.000 That statement is entirely just and proper.
00:19:31.000 Okay, so Ilhan Omar then responds with a completely dishonest statement, which is a giant shock knowing Ilhan Omar's history as a Congress person and before.
00:19:41.000 Quote, It is an affront that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, under pressure from President Trump, would deny entry to representatives of the U.S.
00:19:48.000 government.
00:19:49.000 Trump's Muslim ban is what Israel is implementing.
00:19:52.000 There's such sheer nonsense built into this line.
00:19:55.000 It's pretty incredible.
00:19:56.000 Trump's Muslim ban.
00:19:57.000 No Muslim ban has ever been enforced in the United States, nor should it.
00:20:01.000 The travel ban involves seven countries, only five of which are majority Muslim.
00:20:05.000 There are 50-plus majority Muslim countries on planet Earth.
00:20:08.000 Most of them, the vast majority, nearly all of them, are not covered by the travel ban.
00:20:13.000 Israel is not implementing a Muslim ban.
00:20:14.000 They're implementing a U-ban.
00:20:17.000 They are banning Omar and Tlaib, not because of their Muslim heritage, not because of their religion, but because they want to destroy the state of Israel.
00:20:24.000 But Ilhan Omar's a liar, so she lies.
00:20:26.000 Trump's Muslim ban is what Israel is implementing, this time against two duly elected members of Congress.
00:20:31.000 Denying entry into Israel not only limits our ability to learn from Israelis, but also to enter the Palestinian territories.
00:20:37.000 Okay, um, you had no intention of learning from Israelis.
00:20:39.000 We saw your itinerary, so you're a liar.
00:20:41.000 Sadly, she says, this is not a surprise given the public positions of Prime Minister Netanyahu, who has consistently resisted peace efforts.
00:20:48.000 Two years ago, he offered to come to the table with Mahmoud Abbas and negotiate without preconditions.
00:20:53.000 It turns out it's very difficult to negotiate with people who want to murder you.
00:20:56.000 Restricted freedom of movement of Palestinians.
00:20:58.000 That's true, because every time the security fence is opened up, people try to commit acts of terrorism.
00:21:03.000 Limited public knowledge of the brutal realities of the occupation.
00:21:06.000 Yeah, why don't you read Haaretz once in a while?
00:21:08.000 And aligned himself with Islamophobes like Donald Trump.
00:21:10.000 That's of course his great sin.
00:21:12.000 As a member of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, it is my job to conduct oversight of foreign aid from the United States of America.
00:21:17.000 This does bring up a point.
00:21:19.000 Nancy Pelosi, by putting this This ideologically radical, nasty human being on the House Committee on Foreign Affairs committed a great sin against the American people.
00:21:30.000 Because this lady should not be anywhere near the levers of power when it comes to the delegation of foreign aid.
00:21:35.000 There can be good arguments to be made about foreign aid.
00:21:37.000 She is not going to make them.
00:21:39.000 This is not an honest person trying to push the priorities of the United States abroad in terms of human rights, because this is the same person who says we shouldn't sanction Venezuela or Russia or China or Iran, but we should sanction Israel.
00:21:53.000 This is not a good faith human being.
00:21:56.000 By the way, this is on Nancy Pelosi and it's also on Ted Deutch, two members of Congress for the Democrats who had to sign off on this congressional delegation visiting using an NGO.
00:22:05.000 That has to be signed off on by party leadership.
00:22:08.000 Okay.
00:22:09.000 That is her statement.
00:22:10.000 And her statement is a bunch of crap.
00:22:10.000 Okay?
00:22:12.000 How do we know that her statement is a bunch of crap?
00:22:14.000 Well, one of the ways that we know that her statement is a bunch of crap is because Rashida Tlaib then decided that she was going to fulfill that request.
00:22:21.000 She put out a bunch of tweets about how she really, really wanted to visit her city.
00:22:25.000 No one knows what that means.
00:22:27.000 I don't know what that term means, but apparently that refers to her grandmother.
00:22:30.000 How she really, really wanted to visit her grandmother, who lives in Judea and Samaria, lives in the West Bank.
00:22:34.000 And it is very important for her to visit her dying grandmother.
00:22:38.000 And in fact, she issued a letter.
00:22:40.000 She issued a letter to Aryeh Derry, who's Minister of the Interior in Israel.
00:22:46.000 And here is her letter.
00:22:46.000 Quote, Minister Derry, I would like to request admittance to Israel in order to visit my relatives, and specifically my grandmother who is in her 90s and lives in Beit Ur al-Fuqa.
00:22:55.000 This could be my last opportunity to see her.
00:22:57.000 I will respect any restrictions and will not promote boycotts against Israel during my visit.
00:23:02.000 So, that was granted.
00:23:03.000 Israel said, okay, you want to visit your grandmother?
00:23:05.000 That's fine.
00:23:06.000 You just don't get to propagandize on behalf of our destruction, but you want to visit grandma, all you, go for it.
00:23:12.000 And then Rashida Tlaib turned around and said, you know what?
00:23:15.000 Screw it.
00:23:16.000 Grandma, I know she's old.
00:23:17.000 If I don't see her before she dies, whatever.
00:23:19.000 If I don't get to go there and crap on the Israelis and the Jews while I'm there, I'm not going to visit grandma.
00:23:24.000 This is really what she said, right?
00:23:25.000 So she tweets out, My city wanted to pick figs with me.
00:23:28.000 I broke down reading this and worry every single day after I won for my family's safety.
00:23:32.000 My cousin was texting me which photo of Ilhan Omar and I they should put on a welcoming poster when I heard the news.
00:23:37.000 I couldn't tell her.
00:23:39.000 Okay, and then the Israeli government came back and they said, Sure, you want to come?
00:23:42.000 You can come.
00:23:43.000 You just can't be a propagandist on behalf of terrorism.
00:23:46.000 And Rashida Tlaib was like, No!
00:23:48.000 No, I don't want to come.
00:23:49.000 My city can go Can go do whatever she wants.
00:23:53.000 Take my city and do it.
00:23:55.000 My grandma.
00:23:56.000 You know what?
00:23:57.000 I guess I don't need to see her that much.
00:23:59.000 She tweeted out, when I won, it gave the Palestinian people hope that someone will finally speak the truth about the inhumane conditions.
00:24:05.000 I can't allow the state of Israel to take away that light by humiliating me and use my love for my city to bow down to their oppressive and racist policies.
00:24:14.000 So now the agenda is exposed, right?
00:24:15.000 This was never about visiting Grandma Ma.
00:24:17.000 This was never about going and visiting my relatives in the West Bank.
00:24:21.000 This was never about any of that.
00:24:22.000 It was about propagandizing.
00:24:24.000 That's what this is all about, which is why Israel rejected her application to enter in the first place.
00:24:29.000 It is truly amazing.
00:24:31.000 It is truly amazing that Rashida Tlaib would expose herself this way, but again, You give these folks on the left enough rope and they will hang themselves.
00:24:39.000 She followed that up with another tweet.
00:24:41.000 Silencing me and treating me like a criminal is not what she wants for me.
00:24:45.000 You've not been silenced, lady.
00:24:46.000 It seems like you get to talk however much you want.
00:24:48.000 You just don't get to go to Israel and use it as backdrop for your propaganda.
00:24:51.000 She said it would kill a piece of me.
00:24:54.000 Which piece would that be, exactly?
00:24:56.000 Like your toe?
00:24:58.000 It seems like you're getting a lot of media attention.
00:24:59.000 She says, I've decided that visiting my grandmother under these oppressive conditions stands against everything I believe in, fighting against racism, oppression, and injustice.
00:25:07.000 Also, let's be real, grandma's kind of boring.
00:25:11.000 It's unbelievable.
00:25:12.000 And the media is treating this like Israel has barred her from visiting her grandma.
00:25:16.000 No, Israel said you can visit grandma.
00:25:18.000 You're just not allowed to hang out with terrorists while you do it.
00:25:20.000 And she's like, nope, grandma's on her own.
00:25:22.000 What a delight.
00:25:23.000 What a delight these folks are.
00:25:25.000 Now, in a second, we'll get to the Democratic response to all of this.
00:25:28.000 What will they say?
00:25:28.000 What should they have said?
00:25:29.000 Was this a good strategy by Israel?
00:25:30.000 We'll get to that in one second.
00:25:31.000 First, you know, when you're on the road, you look around, lots of different kinds of cars, and you think to yourself, okay, well, if a car in my part breaks down, what, if a part in my car breaks down, what exactly What can I do about that?
00:25:43.000 If I go to an auto parts store, what are the chances they're gonna have the exact part that I need for this exact make and model of car?
00:25:49.000 And the chances, honestly, they're not all that good.
00:25:51.000 You're gonna have to get an off-brand, not great piece, or something that is generic.
00:25:56.000 Instead, what you need to do is go to rockauto.com.
00:25:58.000 They're a family business, serving auto parts customers online for 20 years.
00:26:02.000 Go to rockauto.com and shop for auto and body parts from hundreds of manufacturers.
00:26:06.000 They have everything from engine control modules and brake parts, to tail lamps, motor oil, even new carpet.
00:26:11.000 Whether it's for your classic or daily driver, get everything you need in a few easy clicks delivered directly to your door.
00:26:16.000 The rockauto.com catalog is super easy to navigate.
00:26:19.000 Quickly see all the parts available for your vehicle and filter by brands, specifications, and prices.
00:26:24.000 Best of all, prices at rockauto.com are always reliably low and the same for professionals and do-it-yourselfers.
00:26:30.000 They've got amazing selection, reliably low prices, all the parts your car is ever going to need, rockauto.com.
00:26:36.000 Go to rockauto.com right now.
00:26:37.000 You see all the parts available to you for your car or truck?
00:26:40.000 Write Shapiro in their how-did-you-hear-about-us box so they know that we sent you.
00:26:43.000 Again, that's Shapiro in their how-did-you-hear-about-us box so they know that we sent you.
00:26:46.000 Okay, so, as we have now found out, Rashida Tlaib cares much more about slandering Israel than about visiting Siti, than about visiting her grandmother.
00:26:55.000 It was all a bad faith effort from the beginning.
00:26:57.000 It was all a bad faith effort.
00:26:59.000 Now, the Democrats have responded, of course, by defending Omar and Tlaib.
00:27:03.000 And maybe that was the intent for President Trump.
00:27:04.000 Maybe the intent for President Trump was Get the Democrats to defend Omar and Tlaib so we can point to them and show how radical they are.
00:27:10.000 Now, I don't think they needed to do this, frankly.
00:27:13.000 I think that if Trump wanted to label the squad, the leadership of the House, that's already on the board, right?
00:27:20.000 I mean, I think people already kind of get that.
00:27:22.000 Especially because the squad is extraordinarily loud.
00:27:25.000 I mean, AOC, again, being a liar, she tweeted out, Members of Congress are frequently asked to visit Israel to see things for ourselves.
00:27:32.000 But Netanyahu choosing to ban the only two Muslim women in Congress from entering tells the U.S.
00:27:36.000 that only some Americans are welcome to Israel.
00:27:39.000 Again, this is a lie.
00:27:39.000 Not all.
00:27:40.000 They're not banning them because they're Muslim.
00:27:41.000 They're banning them because they're hanging out with terror activists.
00:27:44.000 That would be it.
00:27:46.000 Trump is exporting his bigotry, says AOC, and making matters worse.
00:27:49.000 What a pillar of genius she is.
00:27:49.000 Oh, what strength.
00:27:52.000 Now, as I say, I think that Trump's strategy here is to make the squad the face of the Democratic Party.
00:27:59.000 That does come with some dangers.
00:28:01.000 Danger number one is that the Democratic Party could then win and then the squad is in charge.
00:28:05.000 That's actually a scary thought.
00:28:07.000 You don't actually want the Democratic Party to rally around the nasty, discriminatory, gross ideology of the squad, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib in particular.
00:28:17.000 So it's a dangerous game to elevate those people to a position of prominence rather than trying to force Democrats to separate off of them, which probably is what would have happened, by the way.
00:28:26.000 Omar and Tlaib probably would have gone.
00:28:28.000 They would have propagandized.
00:28:29.000 That propaganda would have become a serious subject of controversy among the intelligentsia.
00:28:35.000 But it would be obvious that it was propaganda, and then Trump could go to all the Democrats and say, guys, you really okay with this sort of propagandizing on behalf of terror?
00:28:42.000 Everything I told you before about the terror-supporting groups with whom Omar and Tlaib are associated, that could have been made front-page news by President Trump.
00:28:50.000 He could have done that after they went there.
00:28:53.000 The preemptive bar forces a lot of Democrats to back Omar and Tlaib when they might not necessarily otherwise have done so.
00:29:00.000 Anyway, this is what the Democrats do.
00:29:01.000 Now, what the Democrats should do here Right.
00:29:04.000 Is they should say, listen, Israel has rules.
00:29:05.000 They're applying their rules.
00:29:07.000 Omar and Tlaib have have beliefs that are way out of the Democratic mainstream, which is why we voted against those beliefs instead.
00:29:13.000 But and by the way, I think that Republicans would do that with Steve King, for example.
00:29:17.000 Right.
00:29:18.000 If Steve King had wanted to plan a trip to Mexico and the Mexican government said, no, not interested, I think a lot of Republicans would have gone.
00:29:25.000 All right.
00:29:26.000 All right.
00:29:27.000 Fair enough.
00:29:28.000 But the Democrats are always going to defend their own.
00:29:31.000 So Joe Biden tweets out something truly disingenuous.
00:29:34.000 Quote, I've always been a stalwart supporter of Israel.
00:29:37.000 Not so much.
00:29:38.000 A vital partner that shares our democratic values.
00:29:41.000 No democracy should deny entry to visitors based on the content of their ideas.
00:29:45.000 Even ideas they strongly object to.
00:29:47.000 And no leader of the free world should encourage them to do so.
00:29:50.000 Okay, that is a bunch of horse manure.
00:29:53.000 And the United States bars entry to a wide variety of people based on the beliefs that they hold.
00:29:58.000 Based on the content of their ideas.
00:29:59.000 Like, if you come here and you want to destroy the country, then you are not allowed in.
00:30:04.000 In fact, even if you don't want to destroy the country, you may not be allowed in.
00:30:07.000 In 2012, the Obama administration banned a delegation.
00:30:13.000 Banned a delegation from Israel.
00:30:15.000 Why?
00:30:15.000 Because there was a member named Ben Ari, And Michael Ben-Ari of the National Union Party.
00:30:23.000 They said that he had ties to terror group called Kach.
00:30:27.000 And the U.S.
00:30:28.000 refused entry to him.
00:30:30.000 So Ruven Rivlin, who is the speaker of the Knesset, announced that he would ban the entire delegation of members of Knesset from attending a women's conference in Washington in retaliation.
00:30:38.000 Guess who was vice president when the Obama administration barred entry to the United States for a sitting member of the Israeli parliament based on that person's viewpoint and associations?
00:30:48.000 Who was the vice president?
00:30:49.000 Oh yeah, that was Joe Biden.
00:30:50.000 So when he says, no democracy should deny entry to visitors based on the content of their ideas, yeah, you did.
00:30:57.000 You did that, right?
00:30:59.000 The administration you served under did that.
00:31:02.000 And then you get Chuck Schumer's response.
00:31:04.000 So Chuck Schumer similarly suggested denying entry to members of the US Congress is a sign of weakness, not strength.
00:31:10.000 It will only hurt the US-Israel relationship and support for Israel in America.
00:31:14.000 Well, he said no democratic society should fear an open debate.
00:31:17.000 Israel does not fear an open debate.
00:31:18.000 They are not going to import people to hang out with terror supporting groups.
00:31:21.000 Many strong supporters of Israel will be deeply disappointed in this decision, which the Israeli government should reverse.
00:31:27.000 The question is whether Omar and Tlaib should receive special dispensation because they're members of Congress, when if they were not members of Congress, they would certainly be barred.
00:31:34.000 Ariel Gold is a Jewish woman who works for Code Pink, and she was barred from entry to Israel specifically because of her support for boycott, divestment and sanctions.
00:31:43.000 So if she were a member of Congress, should she be allowed in now?
00:31:45.000 Is that how this works?
00:31:46.000 Again, the Democrats are wrong here, but it is true that the strategy here by the Israelis Was probably destined to do this.
00:31:55.000 Steini Hoyer does the same thing.
00:31:57.000 Steini Hoyer is the House Majority Whip and he similarly put out a statement talking about how this was bad.
00:32:03.000 He said the decision of the Israeli government to deny entry to Israel by two members of Congress is outrageous regardless of their itinerary or their views.
00:32:10.000 Really?
00:32:10.000 So if they went there and just said we're meeting with Hamas and we want to blow up the state of Israel, could Israel deny entry?
00:32:15.000 According to Steini Hoyer, the answer is no.
00:32:18.000 Ted Lieu, one of the dumber members of the Democratic delegation, he went even further.
00:32:22.000 He accused the U.S.
00:32:23.000 ambassador to Israel of dual loyalty.
00:32:25.000 He suggested that David Friedman, who is the U.S.
00:32:28.000 ambassador to Israel, is actually loyal to Israel, not to the United States.
00:32:32.000 Ambassador Friedman, the U.S.
00:32:34.000 Ambassador to Israel, actually I think he should resign because he doesn't seem to understand that his allegiance is to America, not to a foreign power.
00:32:41.000 He should be defending the rights of Americans to travel to other countries.
00:32:44.000 But the ambassador was basically saying what the President of the United States, his boss, was saying.
00:32:50.000 Well, I wish President Trump would resign.
00:32:52.000 I don't think he's going to do that, but certainly I can call on Ambassador Friedman to resign.
00:32:56.000 His allegiance, again, is to America, not to a foreign power, and it's to the Constitution of the United States, not to the President.
00:33:04.000 Okay, so the fact is that his allegiance is not really in question.
00:33:10.000 You can have allegiance to the United States and also believe that Israel has no duty to import terror supporters onto its shores.
00:33:17.000 Okay, Ted Luthen, he tweeted the same thing, and then he tweeted out, it has been brought to my attention, my prior tweet to the U.S.
00:33:23.000 ambassador in Israel raises dual loyalty allegations that have historically caused harm to the Jewish community.
00:33:28.000 That's a legitimate concern.
00:33:29.000 I'm therefore deleting the tweet.
00:33:30.000 Yeah, it's a little late, dude.
00:33:31.000 I mean, it's pretty obvious.
00:33:32.000 You said it twice on CNN.
00:33:33.000 Like, we all know what you meant.
00:33:35.000 So, in terms of strategy, here's the problem.
00:33:38.000 There is something beneficial to Israel in having Democrats, who are weak supporters of Israel, still be titular supporters of Israel.
00:33:45.000 Forcing them to back Omar and Tlaib, or putting them in a position that makes it easy for them to back Omar and Tlaib, may bear some negative fruit down the line when Omar and Tlaib gain more and more power inside the Democratic caucus, and when Democrats make clear that they're going to continue kowtowing to them.
00:34:00.000 It is opening a rift that doesn't necessarily need to be open.
00:34:04.000 Now, maybe that rift already exists.
00:34:05.000 It's been my belief that since the Obama administration, the Democratic Party has been moving radically anti-Israel, and they continue to do so.
00:34:12.000 And that extends all the way to Chuck Schumer and his Democratic Party backing the Iran nuclear deal.
00:34:17.000 With that said, is it a good strategic move?
00:34:21.000 I'm not sure it's a good strategic move by Israel to bar Omar and Tlaib.
00:34:24.000 I think there are other ways of demonstrating what Omar and Tlaib were doing.
00:34:28.000 On a moral level, is there any question that Israel has the right to do this?
00:34:31.000 No.
00:34:32.000 Should they do this on a moral level?
00:34:34.000 Absolutely.
00:34:35.000 Absolutely.
00:34:36.000 The only question is logistics.
00:34:37.000 Is it smart for Israel to do it?
00:34:39.000 Is it good PR for Israel to do it?
00:34:41.000 Again, I think that the case is now moving in Israel's direction, given the fact that Rashida Tlaib has basically come out and explained that she doesn't care about visiting her grandma at all.
00:34:49.000 All she cares about is slandering the state of Israel.
00:34:52.000 Alrighty, in just a second, we're gonna get to a coverage shift over at the New York Times that demonstrates full-scale the insanity of our mainstream media, and how it seems that editorial is now in the control of a bunch of woke interns from Wesleyan.
00:35:04.000 We'll get to that in just a second.
00:35:05.000 First, there are only a few days left to purchase tickets to our backstage live show.
00:35:09.000 It's a special one-night-only event, next Wednesday, August 21st, at the Fantastic Terrace Theater in Long Beach, California.
00:35:15.000 I'll be there.
00:35:15.000 DailyWire God King Jeremy Boren will be there.
00:35:17.000 Andrew Clavin will be there.
00:35:18.000 Michael Knowles will be there.
00:35:19.000 We'll all be there live, right?
00:35:21.000 We won't be dead.
00:35:21.000 We'll get into politics, pop culture, and answering your questions from the audience, which is always the best part.
00:35:27.000 Tickets are available at dailywire.com slash backstage, including our limited VIP packages that guarantee premium seating, photos, meet and greets with each of us, a gift from me.
00:35:35.000 I'm shopping for it for you right now.
00:35:37.000 And more.
00:35:38.000 They are selling fast.
00:35:39.000 So head on over to dailywire.com slash backstage.
00:35:42.000 Get yours today.
00:35:43.000 It should be a blast.
00:35:44.000 I hope to see you there next week.
00:35:45.000 Also, good news, gang.
00:35:47.000 The Daily Wire has somehow managed to turn four years old.
00:35:49.000 That's right.
00:35:49.000 We've survived.
00:35:51.000 I'm just as surprised and thrilled as you are.
00:35:53.000 So are our employees who continue to be paid incredibly.
00:35:55.000 You've spent almost 72 million hours listening to our podcast.
00:36:00.000 Not you, individually, because you're not gonna live that long.
00:36:03.000 But, collectively, you've spent 72 million hours listening to our podcast, which, for me, feels just like listening to one episode of Michael Knowles' show.
00:36:11.000 As a thank you to our fans, we are giving away one month of our premium monthly subscription to anyone who uses the code, BIRTHDAY.
00:36:18.000 That's right, the code is BIRTHDAY.
00:36:20.000 Go check it out right now, you get one month free of the premium monthly, which is pretty awesome.
00:36:24.000 That's right, for this entire month, all of August, as we celebrate this magical milestone, We are giving away a free first month for new premium monthly subscribers, which is a great deal.
00:36:35.000 Again, just use the code BIRTHDAY and come join the fun.
00:36:38.000 It's 13 months for the price of 12.
00:36:40.000 Yay, good stuff.
00:36:41.000 Also, our Sunday special this week is fantastic.
00:36:44.000 Okay, so I've been waiting to break the news to you, but our Sunday special this week, which is available to subscribers tomorrow early, is with Wait for it.
00:36:52.000 Piers Morgan.
00:36:53.000 Who, as it turns out, is a really nice dude.
00:36:54.000 He and I get along great.
00:36:56.000 So Piers Morgan and I had a great conversation.
00:36:58.000 Yeah, we did cover some gun control stuff.
00:36:58.000 It ranged on everything.
00:37:00.000 In this particular conversation, I really wanted to let Piers kind of spill out his own ideas on the subject, since he let me do the same on his show.
00:37:07.000 And you should check it out.
00:37:09.000 It really is great.
00:37:10.000 Here's a little bit of what it sounded like.
00:37:13.000 At what point does the safety and the health of a lot of people get dictated to by a group of other people?
00:37:21.000 It's a fundamental question for the public health of the country.
00:37:24.000 And treating guns like a public health issue would be a really smart move for America right now.
00:37:31.000 The conversation is really fantastic.
00:37:33.000 It is not just on gun control.
00:37:34.000 The vast majority of the conversation actually is on other stuff.
00:37:37.000 It's on media, it's on the nature of celebrity, it's on President Trump.
00:37:41.000 He's good friends with President Trump, so there's a lot of insight, and I think you'll find it fascinating.
00:37:46.000 And Pierre's a good dude.
00:37:47.000 I mean, one of the beautiful things that I love about doing the Sunday Special is I really do get to hang out with people on the other side of various aisles.
00:37:54.000 Right.
00:37:55.000 People with whom I disagree about a wide variety of topics.
00:37:57.000 And it turns out when you're trying to have a discussion with them, you can actually learn something from them.
00:38:00.000 Maybe they learn something from you.
00:38:02.000 That's what's great about America.
00:38:03.000 I feel like it's dying right now, but that's... I really enjoyed the Sunday special.
00:38:06.000 I think you will too.
00:38:07.000 Also, it is that glorious time of the week when I give a shout out to a Daily Wire subscriber.
00:38:11.000 Today, it's a Twitter user named Dustin, who clearly understands the reality of a hard working life.
00:38:16.000 In this pic, Dustin's glorious Leftist Tears Tumblr takes a breather while sitting on a busy waterway with huge commercial ships in the background.
00:38:23.000 The caption reads, out here working hard on a Sunday.
00:38:26.000 Someone has to pay the taxes for liberal policies.
00:38:27.000 Hashtag commercial diver.
00:38:29.000 Hashtag salvage driving.
00:38:30.000 Hashtag Leftist Tears Tumblr.
00:38:32.000 That is more of a man than I will ever be right there, this guy.
00:38:34.000 Yeah, that about sums it up.
00:38:35.000 Thanks for the pic, Dustin.
00:38:37.000 Stay safe down there.
00:38:38.000 Keep up the good work.
00:38:39.000 See, this is what America's about, making those choices to make your life better, make your family stronger.
00:38:43.000 This is good stuff right here.
00:38:45.000 Thank you, Dustin.
00:38:46.000 Also, I hope that you are not actually a Russian bot, because your actual screen name is RussianBot0331 at Twitter.
00:38:52.000 So, if you're a Russian bot, sorry everybody, but if you're not, I hope you're not a diver for the Russian government.
00:38:59.000 Okay, so, we will get to more in just a second.
00:39:02.000 As I say, please go subscribe.
00:39:03.000 We're the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast and radio show in the nation.
00:39:06.000 So meanwhile, I have some brief bad news.
00:39:15.000 Apparently, Greenland is not for sale.
00:39:17.000 This is very disappointing.
00:39:18.000 President Trump apparently was super interested in buying Greenland.
00:39:21.000 This is according to the Wall Street Journal.
00:39:23.000 And I was, like, totally on board with this.
00:39:25.000 Honestly, if you didn't want America to buy Greenland, I think you hate them.
00:39:29.000 I mean, if we're gonna, let's just buy places, right?
00:39:32.000 I mean, we're rich.
00:39:33.000 We got some, we got, I mean, sure, we have like 21 trillion dollars in debt, but we're rich.
00:39:36.000 We can afford like a giant iceberg.
00:39:38.000 That seems kind of fun.
00:39:40.000 Plus, eventually, a lot of those icebergs will melt.
00:39:42.000 That will be a, that'll be a waterway, like a northern passage.
00:39:45.000 It'll be, it'll be really, really important.
00:39:47.000 So why not just buy Greenland?
00:39:49.000 I think that was Trump's law.
00:39:50.000 Also, you could build a beautiful, unbelievable hotel.
00:39:53.000 Make a golf course right on the glacier.
00:39:55.000 Unbelievable.
00:39:57.000 It was a great idea, buying Greenland.
00:39:59.000 Sadly, this has now been quashed by the government of Greenland.
00:40:01.000 They say we are not for sale.
00:40:03.000 So it's war then!
00:40:05.000 Alright.
00:40:06.000 We will be sending over ten of our finest.
00:40:11.000 Honestly, we should just buy Hong Kong.
00:40:12.000 It seems like the return on investment is better and the people are very interested in getting the hell away from Chinese governance.
00:40:18.000 So maybe we can make that deal.
00:40:19.000 Maybe as part of the closing of the tariff deal with China we just buy Hong Kong.
00:40:23.000 That seems like a good idea.
00:40:25.000 I felt I needed to give you that update because I was so enthusiastic yesterday on my radio show about buying Greenland that I'd feel bad if you went into the weekend thinking that was still a possibility.
00:40:33.000 Meanwhile, over at the New York Times, the woke have taken over.
00:40:37.000 It is amazing, very often, these sorts of ridiculous, censorious decisions that are made, I mean, at these organizations, like the Atlantic, to go after Kevin Williamson, or Business Insider, to go after Daniella Greenbaum.
00:40:53.000 Those decisions are usually not made by the editors.
00:40:55.000 Those decisions are being made by the interns who get the coffee.
00:40:58.000 Because, very often, the editors Out of a feeling of, I need to care what my employees think, and if they're offended by somebody, then we need to change our editorial policy.
00:41:08.000 That's had a major impact on how organizations run, up to and including the New York Times.
00:41:12.000 According to the Washington Examiner, Dean Beckett, the executive editor of the New York Times, said recently that after the Mueller report, the paper has to shift the focus of its coverage from the Trump-Russia affair to the president's alleged racism.
00:41:24.000 He says, we built our newsroom to cover one story, and we did it truly well.
00:41:28.000 Now we have to regroup and shift resources and emphasis to take on a different story.
00:41:34.000 So in other words, the editorial coverage at the New York Times, the news coverage, is being dictated by narratives that the New York Times left wants to push.
00:41:41.000 So it went from Russia, which was a giant fail for them, to Trump's a racist in no time flat, and they're going to shift how the paper is constituted in order to push that.
00:41:51.000 Baquette made the remarks at an employee town hall on Monday.
00:41:53.000 Her recording was leaked to Slate, which published a transcript on Thursday.
00:41:57.000 Baquette explained, That was a really hard story, by the way.
00:42:07.000 Let's not forget that.
00:42:08.000 We set ourselves up to cover that story.
00:42:10.000 I'm gonna say it.
00:42:11.000 We won two Pulitzer Prize covering that story.
00:42:13.000 And I think we covered that story better than anybody else.
00:42:15.000 But then the Mueller report came out, and it turns out that none of it ended up being a thing.
00:42:20.000 And then he says that we have to shift.
00:42:23.000 He says, I think we've got to change.
00:42:25.000 The Times must now write more deeply about the country, race and other divisions.
00:42:28.000 He says, I mean, the vision for the coverage for the next two years is what I talked about earlier.
00:42:32.000 How do we cover a guy who makes these kinds of remarks?
00:42:34.000 How do we cover the world's reaction to him?
00:42:36.000 How do we do that while continuing to cover his policies?
00:42:38.000 How do we cover America?
00:42:40.000 It's been become so divided by Donald Trump.
00:42:43.000 No, guys, there's no such thing as media bias.
00:42:44.000 That's just the executive editor of the nation's foremost newspaper talking about shifting his coverage from Donald Trump's a Russian spy to Donald Trump is a vicious KKK-like racist dividing the country.
00:42:54.000 Why do you think there's media bias again?
00:42:56.000 Are you suggesting there's media bias, madam?
00:42:59.000 How dare you?
00:43:01.000 Now, why does this happen?
00:43:02.000 This happens because the staffers inside The New York Times would like to pressure the people at the top.
00:43:08.000 How do you know this?
00:43:09.000 Because the transcript has been released.
00:43:11.000 So the staffers were asking Baquette why they don't just call Trump racist every day.
00:43:15.000 And Baquette was like, yeah, you know, maybe we should.
00:43:18.000 He says, you know, we shouldn't use racially tinged or racially charged.
00:43:22.000 He says, if you're going to do what I said, you got to put your money where your mouth is and just describe it.
00:43:26.000 And then a staffer said, quote, I have another question about racism.
00:43:30.000 I'm wondering to what extent you think that the fact of racism and white supremacy being sort of the foundation of this country should play into our reporting.
00:43:38.000 Just because it feels to me like it should be a starting point, you know, like these conversations about what is racist, what isn't racist.
00:43:44.000 I just feel like racism is in everything.
00:43:46.000 It should be considered in our science reporting, in our culture reporting, in our national reporting.
00:43:51.000 And so to me, it's less about the individual instances of racism and sort of how we're thinking about racism and white supremacy as the foundation of all the systems in the country.
00:44:00.000 And I think particularly as we are launching a 1619 project, I feel like it's going to open us up to even more criticism from people who are like, OK, well, you're saying this and you're producing this big project about it.
00:44:09.000 But are you guys actually considering this in your daily reporting?
00:44:12.000 So in other words, the foundation of every story written by The New York Times, according to this unnamed staffer, is that white supremacy lies at the root of America, not the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution of the United States, not broader principles, but racism.
00:44:24.000 The story of America is the story of racism and how racism infects everything.
00:44:29.000 And Baquette says, pretty much, that he agrees with this.
00:44:31.000 He says, maybe we shouldn't use the word racist, because everything is racist.
00:44:36.000 He quotes a guy named Keith Woods, who's ombudsman for NPR, and he says, his argument boils down to this.
00:44:41.000 Pretty much everything is racist.
00:44:43.000 His view is that a huge percentage of American conversation is racist, so why isolate one comment from Donald Trump?
00:44:50.000 I do think that race has always played a huge part in the American story, and I do think that race and understanding of race should be part of how we cover the American story.
00:44:57.000 Sometimes news organizations sort of forget that in the moment, but of course it should be.
00:45:01.000 I mean, one reason we all signed off on the 1619 Project and made it so ambitious and expansive was to teach our readers to think a little bit more like that.
00:45:08.000 Because that's the job of a newspaper, is to indoctrinate you in a particular political point of view using their news coverage.
00:45:14.000 Man, oh man.
00:45:15.000 I mean, that is astonishing stuff from the New York Times, but only astonishing if you've never actually watched the coverage from the New York Times.
00:45:23.000 Alrighty, time for some mailbagging, so let's do it.
00:45:26.000 Carlo says, hey Ben, I'm a free market guy, but recently I've been doubting the validity of the claim that wages reflect a person's productivity.
00:45:33.000 I'm 23, I have a pretty high salary for my age.
00:45:35.000 I have a bachelor's in economics, I'm proficient in two programming languages.
00:45:38.000 The thing is, I don't really do anything.
00:45:40.000 I work in an office and watch videos on YouTube most of the day.
00:45:43.000 I have a friend that nurses in intensive care that makes $20,000 less than I do.
00:45:47.000 My question is, is the free market really that good at determining wages?
00:45:50.000 If it were true, shouldn't all the people I know that have real jobs make more than I do?
00:45:53.000 No, Carlos, here's the problem.
00:45:55.000 You're mixing up the value of your labor with the effort of the labor.
00:46:02.000 You're sort of using a model of the Marxist labor theory of value, meaning that how hard you work should be reflected in your wages as opposed to the value of your work reflected in your wages.
00:46:12.000 So presumably the reason that you are earning more than your friends who are nurses who work in intensive care is because you have a very specialized skill set that you have spent a lot of time cultivating, and there's a demand for that skill set.
00:46:25.000 And so you're getting paid more, meaning that somebody needs to do that job.
00:46:28.000 There are not that many people who can do that job.
00:46:30.000 You are one of the people who can do that job.
00:46:33.000 And so what determines wages is not how hard you work.
00:46:36.000 There are people who are working, digging ditches every day, who work a lot harder than I do, and I'm sure I get paid more than most of those people.
00:46:43.000 Okay, but that isn't because I have a specialized skill set that people want to hear from.
00:46:48.000 Now, does that mean that my work is quote-unquote more valuable on a moral level?
00:46:52.000 No, of course not.
00:46:52.000 Of course not.
00:46:53.000 My wife's work is much more important than mine on a moral level.
00:46:55.000 My wife is a doctor, she takes care of people, she makes a lot less money than I do.
00:46:59.000 Right?
00:46:59.000 And she's doing much more valuable work in terms of societal influence.
00:47:03.000 She's doing much more valuable work in terms of helping people.
00:47:06.000 But that's a moral judgment, not a judgment as to What the value of her work on an economic level is.
00:47:13.000 Now, the reason that people mix these two things up is they think, OK, well, that's not fair.
00:47:16.000 Your wife is helping people and you're not helping as many people on a direct level.
00:47:21.000 Right.
00:47:22.000 But the answer is that if you want more people who are doing what my wife does, then you actually need to incentivize them to do it.
00:47:30.000 And also, that is determined by how many people can do what my wife does.
00:47:33.000 Right?
00:47:33.000 This is the problem with teaching, for example.
00:47:35.000 So people say, teachers don't get paid enough.
00:47:37.000 And the answer is, teachers very often are not getting paid enough.
00:47:40.000 And in many cases, they're getting paid too much because it's not a free market system.
00:47:44.000 The question is, how many people can fill that slot?
00:47:46.000 How many people can do that job?
00:47:47.000 The question is not, what is the inherent moral value of the job?
00:47:50.000 Because there is no way to determine what somebody should be paid based on the inherent moral value of the job.
00:47:54.000 My wife should be paid infinity based on the fact that she saves lives.
00:47:58.000 But infinity is not an option.
00:48:00.000 The question is, how do you create a system where a lot of people are going into medicine to help people while also recognizing that not everybody should go into medicine because at a certain point you're gonna have a surplus of doctors or a surplus of nurses.
00:48:13.000 The way that markets determine how much labor is necessary is through the pricing mechanism.
00:48:17.000 That is what the pricing mechanism is designed to do.
00:48:19.000 And this is just as true in labor and services as it is in product.
00:48:23.000 I think just on a pure level, stethoscopes more important than pencils.
00:48:27.000 Stethoscopes are more important than pencils.
00:48:29.000 But the question as to how many stethoscopes should be produced and how many pencils should be produced, that's a question of how many people want to buy stethoscopes and how many people want to buy pencils.
00:48:39.000 That's how we allocate the amount of labor that should be designated for a particular task.
00:48:44.000 This is why baseball players get paid lots and lots of money, because they have a very specialized task, and a lot of us want to see the best baseball players, but there are very few people who can play baseball at that high a level, and so they're paid a lot of money.
00:48:55.000 That's not a problem with the market.
00:48:57.000 Maybe that's a problem with our priorities.
00:48:58.000 Maybe we ought to make a case that our priorities ought to be different, but that's a case for individual human beings, and forcing people to quote-unquote have different priorities is a mistake, because people's priorities are what they are.
00:49:09.000 Hey, Tori says, do you have any favorite documentaries?
00:49:14.000 First of all, Ken Burns' Civil War documentaries are really, really good.
00:49:19.000 Grizzly Man, which is a documentary about a guy named Timothy Treadwell who got eaten by a bear by Werner Herzog, is really good also.
00:49:25.000 And not only is it good, also it has Werner Herzog narrating, which is always somewhat hilarious.
00:49:31.000 Ah, when nature is man's enemy.
00:49:34.000 Nature, he goes out to see the bears, but the bears do not see him the same way.
00:49:39.000 They see him as food.
00:49:40.000 He saw them as friends.
00:49:43.000 It's pretty fantastic.
00:49:45.000 Other documentaries, there's one that just came out on HBO called The Cold Blue that is very good about flyers during World War II.
00:49:51.000 Peter Jackson just came out with a fantastic documentary where he went back and recolorized and put sound into a lot of the old footage from World War I called They Shall Never Grow Old.
00:50:00.000 And it's fantastic?
00:50:02.000 Yeah, there are a bunch of great documentaries out there.
00:50:04.000 Well, thank you.
00:50:05.000 Hello, Almoing Shapiro.
00:50:06.000 Well, thank you.
00:50:07.000 I had a question I'd like to ask.
00:50:08.000 I'm 20 years old and in college.
00:50:09.000 I'm wanting to dive deeper and know more about the current issues going on today, but wanting to get multiple viewpoints on those issues so I can hear what both sides think.
00:50:17.000 What are some ways you would recommend going about finding info on issues from both sides while still trying to get accurate details?
00:50:21.000 Thank you, Justin.
00:50:23.000 Well, I've always said that you should think of news coverage as a series of intersecting lines.
00:50:28.000 So if you listen to this podcast and then you listen to the leftist podcast, Pod Save America, for example, you'll hear two wildly different perspectives on the politics of the day.
00:50:37.000 See, this is also the difference between this podcast and Pod Save America.
00:50:40.000 Pod Save America will never recommend that you listen to my podcast.
00:50:43.000 I'll recommend that you listen to their podcast.
00:50:44.000 I don't care.
00:50:44.000 I think you should.
00:50:45.000 I think you should listen to lots of different podcasts.
00:50:47.000 Okay, so Pod Save America, you listen to their podcast, you listen to my podcast, and then what we are saying that is the same, which is usually the basis of fact, that is the intersection point.
00:50:56.000 Everything else is viewpoint.
00:50:57.000 And that's how you can tell, right?
00:50:58.000 You actually have to look at two different news, look at Daily Wire, and then look at Huffington Post, and where they cross over, that would be the core of fact, and then everything else is opinion.
00:51:07.000 I've been recommending this for years, because I think people should think for themselves and be fair-minded in how they approach subjects.
00:51:13.000 Just because something is printed in the New York Times doesn't make it false.
00:51:16.000 It may be biased in its coverage, but you have to look at how the New York Times covers something and National Review and what they have in common.
00:51:21.000 That's probably the core effect.
00:51:23.000 And then everything else is the opinion drawn from that core effect.
00:51:26.000 Brian says, Hey, Ben.
00:51:27.000 Not really a question, but want to thank you on speaking on working hard and not complaining.
00:51:31.000 It is personal and cannot be solved by the government.
00:51:33.000 I have cerebral palsy and my parents always taught me to work hard.
00:51:36.000 My first job was at McDonald's and a regional manager said I was too slow.
00:51:39.000 Things worked out.
00:51:40.000 Through hard work, my brother and I were the first to go to college in our family.
00:51:43.000 I got my PhD from a top medical research university.
00:51:45.000 I'm now an assistant professor.
00:51:47.000 Yes, there are some conservatives in the crazy world of academia with a great salary doing clinical work and research with over 20 publications.
00:51:53.000 Anyone can achieve their dreams through hard work.
00:51:55.000 Brian, I really... What a fantastic, fantastic story, and it is 100% true.
00:51:55.000 Blessings, Brian.
00:52:00.000 The decisions you make in your life are going to impact your life way more than anything else you do.
00:52:04.000 I can't tell you the number of letters I've received this week.
00:52:06.000 I mean, probably hundreds of letters this week in my mailbag.
00:52:11.000 Specifically about the podcast the last couple of days and the radio show the last couple of days in which I talked extensively about how it is that the personal decisions that you make determine the course of your life.
00:52:20.000 How it is not impersonal forces that politicians blame that determine the course of your life.
00:52:25.000 That usually, in a free country, the decisions you make are the ones that are important.
00:52:29.000 How you problems have you solutions.
00:52:31.000 How when I say that you having two jobs to pay for a roof over your head, that's a you problem.
00:52:35.000 What I mean by that is that it is a problem for you to solve.
00:52:38.000 That is not a problem that can be solved by Kamala Harris riding it on a white horse.
00:52:41.000 I've gotten so many letters from people saying, yeah, I work two jobs, and I'm glad I do, because it's my decision, and this is a free country.
00:52:47.000 And a ton of letters from people who say, yeah, I used to work two jobs, and now I don't have to work two jobs, because I've worked hard, and I've developed a skill set, and I've made decisions, and I've moved to different parts of the country.
00:52:58.000 Life isn't all you're guaranteed in the United States.
00:52:59.000 I've said this before.
00:53:00.000 All you are guaranteed in the United States is the adventure.
00:53:04.000 But that's a freaking fantastic guarantee, isn't it?
00:53:06.000 Isn't that an unbelievably great guarantee?
00:53:08.000 Your grandparents from another country?
00:53:10.000 Maybe they weren't guaranteed that adventure.
00:53:11.000 That's why they came here.
00:53:14.000 The people who crossed the continent in covered wagons and taking months and their kids dying of dysentery like an Oregon trail, okay?
00:53:22.000 Those people weren't guaranteed anything but the adventure.
00:53:26.000 My great-grandparents coming to the United States in 1907 weren't guaranteed anything but the adventure.
00:53:31.000 And the adventure was, that was the point.
00:53:33.000 That was the point.
00:53:34.000 Seeing an American life as an adventure in which you are the hero of your own story, making those decisions, it will make your life so much better than sitting around whining to Kamala Harris that the economy is rough right now.
00:53:45.000 That ain't gonna change anything, because Kamala Harris ain't saving you.
00:53:48.000 And if you think that welfare benefits are going to save you either, we are spending $30,000 plus per capita on welfare in this country for poor families.
00:53:56.000 And that is not guaranteeing a ladder out of poverty for people.
00:54:00.000 The best way for you to make your way in the world is to make a series of smart decisions.
00:54:05.000 Make those decisions over and over and over.
00:54:07.000 Learn to become the kind of person who makes those smart decisions.
00:54:10.000 You will be so much more successful and happier in life because you'll have taken control of your own life.
00:54:14.000 And I've gotten, I promise you, dozens to hundreds of letters in the mailbag this week proving it.
00:54:19.000 People saying that they actually appreciate this perspective because there's nothing more enervating than being told by a politician you can't do it.
00:54:26.000 And the Obama line, the si se puede line, yes we can, routine?
00:54:32.000 The answer is not yes we can, the answer is yes you can.
00:54:35.000 It's a free country.
00:54:35.000 Yes you can.
00:54:36.000 Yes you can.
00:54:38.000 And if you need help, then reach out to a local charity.
00:54:41.000 Reach out to people who want to help you, to give you opportunity.
00:54:44.000 I get letters every single day from people asking for opportunities.
00:54:48.000 Many of them I can't handle.
00:54:49.000 Some of them I can.
00:54:50.000 Some of them we've hired.
00:54:52.000 We've hired people based on this sort of stuff.
00:54:54.000 If you are constantly seeking opportunity and taking advantage of opportunity, your life will be so much better and so much happier.
00:54:59.000 And Brian, that's an amazing story and thank you for that story.
00:55:01.000 As I say, I wish I could read all the letters I've gotten this week.
00:55:03.000 They're fantastic.
00:55:04.000 I was showing them to my wife last night and she was crying.
00:55:06.000 I mean, it's amazing.
00:55:07.000 There's so many people who...
00:55:09.000 Who are inspiring stories of how America still works.
00:55:12.000 Zach says, Ben, I'm trying to study the ancient Greek philosophers.
00:55:15.000 I'm wondering if there are any introductory books you could recommend that help explain Plato and Aristotle's ideas.
00:55:20.000 Well, I mean, first of all, there are some very good translations.
00:55:24.000 There's an excellent, what is his name, Harvey Mansfield translation of Plato's Republic that is really, really first-rate.
00:55:32.000 There's also an excellent translation available of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics.
00:55:41.000 All these translations are available.
00:55:42.000 But if you're just looking for sort of a brief overview, then there is a book by Will Durand called The Story of Philosophy that's great.
00:55:49.000 It gives you like 15 to 20 page introductions to each of the great philosophers.
00:55:52.000 There's also a great compendium called History of Political Philosophy edited by Leo Strauss that gives you 20 to 30 page summaries of philosophy.
00:56:01.000 There's also a great book called The Passion of the Western Mind that really spends some heavy time going through Plato and Aristotle.
00:56:07.000 It's really good.
00:56:07.000 If you want like a very, very brief intro, then my book, The Right Side of History, does cover some Plato and Aristotle right at the very beginning, talking about the foundations of Greek thought.
00:56:16.000 So, those are a few recommendations.
00:56:17.000 Maureen says, how do you think you'd fare on Jeopardy?
00:56:20.000 Don't be modest.
00:56:20.000 So, the answer is, I would not fare great on Jeopardy because all the categories in which I know a lot of things are the categories they don't quiz on Jeopardy.
00:56:27.000 So, it depends on how, how, okay, so great story.
00:56:30.000 Okay, so here's the thing.
00:56:31.000 My dad was on Jeopardy.
00:56:32.000 So, many, many years ago, like 30 years ago, my father was on Jeopardy.
00:56:37.000 And he made a mistake.
00:56:38.000 So the way that they do the seeding, they actually seed Jeopardy.
00:56:40.000 So sometimes you're watching Jeopardy.
00:56:42.000 And when you watch Jeopardy, you are saying to yourself, I could answer every single one of these questions.
00:56:47.000 These people seem like dullards.
00:56:48.000 I could answer every one of these questions.
00:56:50.000 And sometimes you're watching like, oh my God, who are these people?
00:56:53.000 How do they know the answers to this?
00:56:55.000 That's deliberate.
00:56:57.000 So what they do is there's first an entry test to Jeopardy, at least this is the way it worked 30 years ago.
00:57:01.000 Then there's a secondary test in which they test you again.
00:57:05.000 And they don't tell you what the test is for.
00:57:07.000 What the test is for is to seed you, like in the NCAA rankings.
00:57:11.000 So if you are really, really smart, then they put you with all the other smart people in that pool.
00:57:15.000 So my dad passed the entry level, and then on the second level, he did the secondary kind of quiz.
00:57:22.000 And he came out, and he said to somebody, the person said, how did you do?
00:57:25.000 He said, I blew it out.
00:57:25.000 He said, oh, you're an idiot.
00:57:26.000 You're stupid.
00:57:28.000 Why would you do that?
00:57:29.000 Naturally, they proceeded to seed my father against the three-time champion of Jeopardy and a professor from Princeton or something.
00:57:35.000 And my dad actually performed pretty well.
00:57:38.000 My dad's a smart dude.
00:57:39.000 And he performed pretty well.
00:57:41.000 He was in second place going into final Jeopardy.
00:57:45.000 And second place on Jeopardy was a trip to Mexico City.
00:57:49.000 And third place was a refrigerator.
00:57:52.000 And my mom was sitting in the audience, rooting for my dad to lose.
00:57:55.000 Because they needed a refrigerator!
00:57:56.000 Who the hell needs a trip to Mexico City in 1982?
00:58:00.000 So, my dad gets the final question, he blows it, and my mom is super excited because now she has a refri- that refrigerator was in our house for a solid 15 years.
00:58:09.000 How would I do on Jeopardy?
00:58:10.000 So, it depends on the category.
00:58:12.000 So, if it's a classical music category, I'd do fairly well.
00:58:14.000 If it's a baseball category, I would do pretty well.
00:58:17.000 If it were any sports category, I would do pretty well.
00:58:19.000 If it's a pop culture category, that's not movies, if it's like modern music or something, I'm dead in the water.
00:58:26.000 I got nothing.
00:58:27.000 I got nothing for you beyond like 1925 in modern music.
00:58:31.000 Maybe Gershwin, that's it.
00:58:32.000 So, it really depends on the category.
00:58:35.000 Also, there's a mechanism on Jeopardy that locks you out.
00:58:37.000 So a lot of it's about the timing.
00:58:38.000 This is why you see people who are returning champions who do really well.
00:58:41.000 Because if you buzz in too soon, you have to wait for the question to finish before you hit the buzzer.
00:58:45.000 If you buzz in too soon, they lock you out.
00:58:47.000 So that kept happening to my father.
00:58:48.000 So a little bit of Jeopardy insiderism.
00:58:53.000 I don't think I would do great on Jeopardy, I'll be honest.
00:58:55.000 Theodore, I know a lot of the answers, but again, really depends on the seating, really depends on the categories.
00:59:00.000 Theodore says, Hey Ben, I'm a long time fan and a new subscriber.
00:59:04.000 I've heard you make a few Mean Girls references along with a few other pop culture references that sound a bit surprising coming out of your refined mouth.
00:59:10.000 What are your other guilty pleasure comedy movies?
00:59:12.000 Keep up the good work.
00:59:13.000 I think I've answered this before, but Tommy Boy is one of the great comedies of all time.
00:59:17.000 Okay, I'm gonna let you finish, but Tommy Boy is fantastic.
00:59:21.000 So the first time I told that to my parents, they were like, oh, let's watch it.
00:59:25.000 And then they thought I was an idiot.
00:59:26.000 Because Tommy Boy is an incredibly stupid movie.
00:59:29.000 And yet, and yet, it is also a fantastically wonderful movie with Chris Farley and David Spade.
00:59:34.000 It's just, it's glorious.
00:59:36.000 Oh, I'm laughing just thinking about Tommy Boy.
00:59:39.000 Fantastic.
00:59:39.000 Other guilty pleasure comedy movies.
00:59:42.000 Rat Race is really underrated.
00:59:44.000 Rat Race is hysterically funny.
00:59:46.000 I have three younger sisters.
00:59:49.000 The one who's the oldest, this was her favorite movie growing up.
00:59:53.000 She loves physical comedy and Rat Race is full of it.
00:59:55.000 Okay, Ashira says, do you think it's irresponsible for a young couple to get married before they can be financially responsible for themselves?
01:00:01.000 No, I don't.
01:00:02.000 I think that getting married is a smart thing to do because what you don't want is to not get married and then get pregnant.
01:00:08.000 So when you're saying a young couple to get married, it depends.
01:00:10.000 What is the alternative?
01:00:11.000 Is the alternative that you are sleeping together and living together and then getting pregnant without being married?
01:00:15.000 Because this seems a lot more irresponsible to me.
01:00:18.000 If the alternative is that you don't get married and you're not sleeping together until you are financially prepared, then that seems fairly responsible to me that you should be able to have money, but I also, if you have any level of income, if you're living on your own and your potential spouse is living on their own and you both have jobs, it's cheaper to live together than it is to live separately.
01:00:36.000 You're saving on rent.
01:00:38.000 So I've never really understood the argument that it is expensive to get married.
01:00:41.000 Not unless you have a big wedding, it ain't.
01:00:43.000 My wife and I spent less money after we were married than before we were married.
01:00:46.000 So I'm not sure that I buy the argument.
01:00:49.000 That marriage is some sort of financial burden unless one person intends on not working.
01:00:54.000 And if one person intends on not working, then maybe you should wait to have kids until you can financially afford it.
01:00:59.000 Joel says, Hey Ben, I really love the show and value your insights.
01:01:02.000 If you had to guess, how probable do you think it is we could have a crash of the US dollar at some point over the next 10 years or so?
01:01:08.000 If this happened, what do you think things would be like considering that world markets are so much more connected now than they were before the Great Depression?
01:01:14.000 Thanks.
01:01:15.000 Well, I think it's unlikely that the U.S.
01:01:16.000 dollar is going to crash over the next 10 years.
01:01:18.000 I think over the next 30 years, the chances are fairly good.
01:01:20.000 But the fact is that over the next 10 years, I do not see an economic power that is capable of rivaling the United States.
01:01:26.000 The faith in the U.S.
01:01:27.000 dollar and in the full faith and credit of the United States, which is what the dollar is backed by, that faith is going to remain extremely high because there is no near competitor.
01:01:34.000 China is not a competitor to the U.S.
01:01:36.000 dollar in terms of a backup currency.
01:01:38.000 The euro has been falling apart.
01:01:39.000 That is not a competitor to the U.S.
01:01:41.000 as a backup currency.
01:01:43.000 In fact, the greatest challenge to the dollar as a global currency is probably crypto.
01:01:49.000 If that starts to gain a foothold, then you could see faith in the U.S.
01:01:52.000 dollar start to wane.
01:01:53.000 But over the next 10 years, the answer is no.
01:01:55.000 Over the next 10 years, the U.S.
01:01:55.000 dollar will remain the global basis of commerce.
01:01:59.000 Well, yeah, I mean, I'm always concerned when a Republican president doesn't win the popular vote, when a Republican candidate doesn't win the popular vote.
01:02:14.000 Why is this the case?
01:02:14.000 Because Democrats can easily run up big numbers in cities.
01:02:17.000 That's the answer.
01:02:18.000 And Donald Trump is very likely to lose the popular vote in 2020.
01:02:23.000 He lost it by nearly three million votes in 2016.
01:02:26.000 I think there's a good shot that he loses the popular vote in 2020, simply because I think Democrats in California and New York are vastly concerned with him being elected and are going to show up in massive numbers.
01:02:37.000 In fact, I think there could be a wider popular vote gap and electoral college gap than there was last time.
01:02:41.000 I think it's quite possible that Trump wins the same states that he did last time, but loses by more popular votes because people in big cities on the coast show up to vote.
01:02:48.000 But Trump already lost those states.
01:02:49.000 He doesn't care.
01:02:50.000 Electoral College is not a popular vote system.
01:02:53.000 I think that as the gap grows between the popular vote and the Electoral College, there will be a lot more kickback against the Electoral College, just practically speaking.
01:03:01.000 But it's more concerning that the Republicans seem not to be able to make inroads.
01:03:06.000 In big cities, especially, because population seems to be moving more and more from rural areas to urban areas.
01:03:11.000 Randolph says, hey, Ben, what is your take on hormonal birth controls, which don't prevent fertilization, but do prevent the egg from embedding in the uterine wall?
01:03:17.000 Do you take the stance that this is the same as abortion?
01:03:19.000 Well, it is a form of abortion.
01:03:20.000 And so if there is a pill that does not stop fertilization, this is the argument that I have with Newt Gingrichson.
01:03:28.000 So, Newt Gingrich says that life begins essentially at implantation.
01:03:32.000 That fertilization is not when life begins.
01:03:34.000 Implantation is that when the egg implants in the wall of the uterus, that is when life begins.
01:03:40.000 So, that would allow some types of Plan B, for example, because that just stops the egg from being able to implant.
01:03:47.000 I don't hold that view.
01:03:48.000 I don't see how you could hold that view, scientifically speaking.
01:03:50.000 Life doesn't begin with the location of the life.
01:03:52.000 It begins with the life.
01:03:54.000 So, yes, I think that Plan B is a problem, morally speaking.
01:03:59.000 So, that's that.
01:04:01.000 Alrighty.
01:04:02.000 Let's do some things I like, and then we'll do some things that I hate.
01:04:06.000 You know what?
01:04:06.000 Let's skip things I like today.
01:04:07.000 No more things I like.
01:04:08.000 Time for a quick thing that I hate.
01:04:13.000 All right, so I am less than enthused about Stephen Colbert, as you may have noticed from every show ever.
01:04:19.000 So Stephen Colbert used to be a funny human.
01:04:21.000 And then he decided that he was going to be, he was going to rival Jimmy Kimmel as woke pope.
01:04:26.000 And now we have a pope battle like they did in like 13th century, in 13th century Catholicism.
01:04:31.000 We have like a pope and an anti-pope.
01:04:33.000 So Stephen Colbert is the anti-pope.
01:04:35.000 So he is also completely and wildly unfunny in terms of his politics and completely non-self-aware.
01:04:43.000 So let me give you an example.
01:04:44.000 Stephen Colbert said on his show the other night that President Trump would look great if our next president were a single-celled organism, meaning that Donald Trump is terrible.
01:04:53.000 He will always be terrible.
01:04:54.000 He actually said this on Anderson Cooper.
01:04:56.000 President leaves, he's not popular, and then, you know, George W. Bush left with low ratings, I guess you would say, or opinion polls, and now is viewed much more differently, you know, at least differently.
01:05:08.000 I question your research on that one.
01:05:10.000 I don't think George W. Bush is actually compared to Trump.
01:05:12.000 Compared to Trump?
01:05:13.000 Yes.
01:05:13.000 Well, sure.
01:05:14.000 Well, sure.
01:05:16.000 I mean, if our next president is a single-celled organism, then Trump's going to look great.
01:05:22.000 You know?
01:05:23.000 Some sort of slime mold.
01:05:25.000 Oh, yeah, so obviously, Donald Trump, he's only great compared to slime mold or single-celled organisms.
01:05:31.000 Why do I point this out?
01:05:32.000 I mean, it's typical nonsense from Colbert.
01:05:34.000 Because then Colbert seems perturbed that there are people who want the president to be a complete jerk.
01:05:40.000 There's a large group of Americans, and I don't even think it's necessarily Democrat or Republican, there's a large group of Americans who think the president should be a complete jerk.
01:05:50.000 He shouldn't be somebody that you necessarily admire.
01:05:53.000 It should be like, look, a guy who's willing to work on the dark side and get things done.
01:05:57.000 Well, I also think there's people who just like the fact that he's... that you're upset about him and that, you know, that we're covering him and... Sure, I'm familiar with the term drinking liberals' tears, but that seems like a huge price to pay to get to see guys like he's upset.
01:06:17.000 It's drinking leftist tears, not liberal tears, by the way.
01:06:20.000 Like, we have a whole Tumblr just for it.
01:06:22.000 But let me explain, Stephen Colbert.
01:06:24.000 Yes, there are a lot of people who have a gut-level reaction to jerks like you being jerks.
01:06:28.000 And their answer is, we should also be jerks to you.
01:06:30.000 Right?
01:06:31.000 And it's not something of which I approve politically.
01:06:33.000 I don't think that people should elect a president just to drink leftist tears.
01:06:38.000 I think it is.
01:06:38.000 It is the job of conservatives to make leftists cry with good arguments and good policy.
01:06:43.000 I don't think it's the job of the of the right to make the left cry simply by trolling them.
01:06:47.000 However, do I understand the the The emotional response to Stephen Colbert, you bet your ass I do.
01:06:56.000 The fact that Stephen Colbert says the kind of stuff he says on a nightly basis, is excused for it by the media, is brought on Anderson Cooper to laugh about it, the fact that he does that sort of stuff, and then he is perturbed when people react to him, is supremely disingenuous.
01:07:11.000 Because this is what Stephen Colbert is.
01:07:13.000 Let's be real about this.
01:07:14.000 Donald Trump was elected to be a late night host.
01:07:16.000 Okay, that's exactly what happened.
01:07:17.000 Donald Trump, we can talk about policy all day long, and yes, some people voted based on judges, and some people voted based on pro-life positions, and a lot of that is true.
01:07:25.000 But the chief appeal of Donald Trump, as opposed to any other Republican, was that he is a late night host who is going to slap Stephen Colbert.
01:07:32.000 That was the feature, not the bug.
01:07:34.000 And that is because when you crap from great height upon a huge majority of the American people, It turns out some of those people are not going to like it very much and they're going to want someone who slaps at you on a regular basis.
01:07:46.000 You cannot simultaneously suggest that Donald Trump is comparable to a single-celled organism or slime mold and then be like, well, why are people so angry at me all the time?
01:07:57.000 Why do people constantly want to comment?
01:07:59.000 Why do they care if Trump rips at me?
01:08:02.000 Because you're featured in the media.
01:08:03.000 Because you are, in fact, a person who gets an awful lot of media attention.
01:08:07.000 It's amazing to me that the left has no self-awareness about this.
01:08:09.000 Like, none.
01:08:10.000 Maybe you're part of the problem, guys.
01:08:12.000 Maybe you're part of the problem.
01:08:14.000 Did it ever occur to you that after spending eight years trolling Republicans as racist, sexist, bigot, homophobes, and calling Mitt Romney the most boring person who has ever lived, a racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe, that the right might say, you know what?
01:08:25.000 Screw those guys.
01:08:25.000 Elect the middle finger.
01:08:28.000 That's exactly what happened here, and the fact that Colbert doesn't even understand this is part of the continuing problem.
01:08:32.000 Okay, we'll be back here later today with two additional hours.
01:08:35.000 Otherwise, have yourself a wonderful, relaxed, nice weekend, and then we'll be back here on Monday to go over whatever the hell happens this week, and I'm sure it'll be great, given the last few news cycles.
01:08:43.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
01:08:44.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
01:08:45.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Robert Sterling.
01:08:54.000 Directed by Mike Joyner.
01:08:55.000 Executive producer, Jeremy Boring.
01:08:57.000 Senior producer, Jonathan Hay.
01:08:59.000 Our supervising producer is Mathis Glover.
01:09:02.000 And our technical producer is Austin Stevens.
01:09:04.000 Edited by Adam Sajovitz.
01:09:06.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Coromina.
01:09:08.000 Hair and makeup is by Jesua Olvera.
01:09:10.000 Production assistant, Nick Sheehan.
01:09:11.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire production.
01:09:14.000 Copyright Daily Wire 2019.
01:09:16.000 On The Matt Walsh Show, we're not just discussing politics.
01:09:19.000 We're talking culture, faith, family, all of the things that are really important to you.