The Ben Shapiro Show - July 25, 2019


Mueller: Endgame | Ep. 825


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 10 minutes

Words per Minute

208.03221

Word Count

14,642

Sentence Count

1,145

Misogynist Sentences

24

Hate Speech Sentences

20


Summary

The Mueller saga finally ends, but will it ever really end? Plus, the wild story of a Harvard Law professor, a lesbian con artist, and a transgender roommate it s not really a joke. Welcome to The Ben Shapiro Show, where we talk about everything you need to know about what s going on in Washington, D.C. and the people who are making it happen, including Jeffrey Epstein, Robert Mueller, Hillary Clinton, and the Krasinski Brothers, and much, much more! Ben Shapiro is the host of the podcast and is a regular contributor to the New York Times, CNN, CBS, NPR, and other media outlets. He is also a frequent contributor to The Daily Beast, and has been featured on CBS Radio's Hard Knocks and CNN's Morning Joe. He is the author of several books, including "The Devil Next Door" and "The Dark Side of Watergate: The Inside Story," and has written for The Daily Wire, The Hill, The New York Post, and The New Republic. His latest book is out now, "The People's Guide to the Trump Era." which is out in paperback. If you haven't already checked it out, you can get a copy of the book on Amazon Prime, wherever you get your copy of The Devil Wears a White House. or wherever else you get his or her copy of his work, you ll be able to find him on the internet, too. . Subscribe to his new book, "Trump s Not Really a Badass: How to Be Badass, He's Not Badass. , wherever he is Badass Is Good, Good, Badass But He's Good. The Devil Is Good: It's Not Good, He s Good, But He Sells It, Too Bad But He Ain t Badass And He s Not Bad, Too Good, and He Ain't Bad, He Sucks At It, too Bad, by by Puff and Other Things That Don t Care About That by Peezy, by John Grisham, Jr., and his new novel, Too Effing About It by Jay Sheer, too, and he s Good At That by Michael Bloomberg, who also has a podcast, too! by , and , too, is out on Amazon, and so much so that you ll get a free copy of both of them.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 The Mueller saga finally ends, but will it ever really end?
00:00:04.000 Plus, the wild story of a Harvard Law professor, a lesbian con artist, and a transgender roommate.
00:00:09.000 It's not really a joke.
00:00:10.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:10.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:12.000 A lot to get to today.
00:00:19.000 So let's jump right in before we get to the aftermath of the Robert Mueller hearing yesterday, which was basically a disaster for Democrats.
00:00:26.000 And the way you could tell it was a disaster for Democrats is folks in the media insisting that it definitely was not a disaster for Democrats.
00:00:32.000 They weren't suggesting it was a win, but it definitely wasn't as big a disaster as everybody's saying.
00:00:37.000 Yeah, it kind of was.
00:00:38.000 We'll get to that in just a second.
00:00:39.000 First, Jeffrey Epstein is now on suicide watch after he was found with neck injuries in jail.
00:00:45.000 This, of course, sends Clinton body count trending on Twitter, because that's always how this works.
00:00:50.000 Whenever somebody close to the Clintons dies, everybody on the right immediately assumes the Clintons did it because everyone is a little crazy.
00:00:57.000 In any case, the New York Post reports convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein has been placed on suicide watch after being found sprawled out and injured in his federal jail cell, law enforcement sources said Thursday.
00:01:07.000 Epstein was nearly unconscious in his cell Tuesday at Manhattan's Metropolitan Correctional Center with injuries to his neck.
00:01:13.000 He is, of course, being held at the jail without bail pending trial on child sex trafficking charges.
00:01:18.000 He was rushed to a nearby hospital.
00:01:20.000 By Thursday, he was back at the jail and on suicide watch, according to sources.
00:01:24.000 Investigators say that they don't think that this was him being attacked.
00:01:27.000 They instead think that he may have injured himself on purpose or as a ploy so that he'd get transferred out of jail because he doesn't like the conditions.
00:01:34.000 Over there.
00:01:35.000 Of course, he is facing up to 45 years in prison.
00:01:38.000 We will look for more information as it comes out, but so far, all we know is that Jeffrey Epstein is one of the world's worst human beings.
00:01:44.000 And because we know that he is one of the world's worst human beings, it is highly doubtful that he was actually attempting to commit suicide, and given the conditions of the jail, it's pretty doubtful that somebody tried to injure him while he was in the jail.
00:01:55.000 I mean, he is one of the most highly publicized people in American public life at this point.
00:02:00.000 Okay, now, to the fallout from the Mueller hearing yesterday.
00:02:03.000 Well, if you missed the Mueller hearing yesterday, There were no fireworks.
00:02:06.000 It was a fizzle.
00:02:07.000 It was a lot of buildup and no payoff.
00:02:10.000 A lot of foreplay and no payoff.
00:02:12.000 It was really not good for Democrats because the whole thing was built up as an optic routine.
00:02:17.000 It was not built up as a content.
00:02:20.000 It was not all about the content that Mueller was going to provide.
00:02:23.000 Instead, it was just going to be, solid man of the law sits there and tells you all the ways that Donald Trump is bad.
00:02:30.000 That's not how it turned out.
00:02:31.000 It turned out that Mueller looked uncertain.
00:02:33.000 It turned out he didn't know his own report particularly well.
00:02:35.000 It turned out that every time he gave the Democrats a win with one of his lines, he immediately pulled back from that win.
00:02:42.000 And this was a mistake for Democrats.
00:02:44.000 It was a big mistake for Democrats.
00:02:45.000 There was a lot of talk early on.
00:02:47.000 Jerry Nadler, I remember, very early after the Mueller report was released.
00:02:50.000 448 page report.
00:02:51.000 You can read the whole thing.
00:02:52.000 It's not non-public.
00:02:54.000 After that came out, Jerry Nadler suggested maybe we won't call Mueller to testify.
00:02:58.000 And I was wondering out loud at the time, why would he not?
00:03:01.000 Maybe it's because Mueller just wouldn't be that good a witness.
00:03:03.000 Maybe it's because Mueller is not going to say anything more than he already said in the report.
00:03:07.000 But due to external pressure, due to the fact that there were so many people dreaming of the day when Donald Trump would be frogmarched out of the White House by Robert Mueller and his 73-year-old six-pack, All the Krasenstein brothers who were patting themselves on the back, getting the massage oils ready.
00:03:24.000 None of this was real.
00:03:25.000 But Democrats decided to go for it anyway, and it really backfired on them in a fairly significant way.
00:03:30.000 If they wanted to push forward with impeachment, they should not have had Mueller testify.
00:03:33.000 They should have just taken his report.
00:03:35.000 They should have said, listen, the report provides us the evidence that we need to begin impeachment proceedings.
00:03:39.000 The president can't be prosecuted because of the OLC, the Office of Legal Counsel.
00:03:44.000 Ruling that sitting presidents can't be prosecuted, but we are here to make sure that no one is above the law.
00:03:50.000 Democrats could have done that.
00:03:51.000 Nancy Pelosi didn't want to because it's pretty unpopular.
00:03:53.000 And most Democrats weren't going to vote for it.
00:03:55.000 In fact, they held an impeachment vote basically a week ago, and only 95 Democrats voted in favor.
00:04:00.000 A majority of Democrats voted again.
00:04:02.000 So impeachment is basically DOA.
00:04:05.000 They were hoping to breathe some life back into it with the Mueller hearing.
00:04:07.000 That is not what happened.
00:04:08.000 We'll go through it in just one second.
00:04:10.000 And then we'll get to the insane fallout from the Mueller hearing and the spin the media are trying to put upon it.
00:04:15.000 First, I am always concerned about cybersecurity.
00:04:18.000 I'm a public figure.
00:04:18.000 I'm on the internet nearly 24 hours a day.
00:04:21.000 Whether I'm at home or abroad.
00:04:22.000 But when you're abroad, you also have to worry about not being able to visit the sites that you want because there may be crackdowns on those sites.
00:04:27.000 When you're at home, you have people who are trying to steal your data.
00:04:29.000 Well, there is one app that's going to keep you safe and secure online whether you're home or away.
00:04:33.000 That is ExpressVPN.
00:04:35.000 ExpressVPN runs in the background of your computer or phone.
00:04:37.000 Then you just use the internet the way you normally would.
00:04:40.000 You download the app, you click to connect, and voila!
00:04:42.000 You are now protected.
00:04:43.000 I never go online while traveling without ExpressVPN.
00:04:46.000 Also, I won't do it even when I'm in the United States.
00:04:48.000 You shouldn't either.
00:04:49.000 ExpressVPN is the fastest VPN I've tried.
00:04:52.000 It costs less than $7 per month.
00:04:53.000 It comes with a 30-day money-back guarantee.
00:04:56.000 ExpressVPN uses new cutting-edge technology called Trusted Server to make sure there are no logs of what you actually do online.
00:05:02.000 So no matter what you're trying to browse online, ExpressVPN gives you instant access all over the world and protects you from people trying to take your data from you without your permission.
00:05:09.000 Protect your online activity today.
00:05:11.000 Find out how you can get three months for free at expressvpn.com slash ben.
00:05:15.000 That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S-V-P-N dot com slash ben for three months free with a one-year package.
00:05:20.000 That's expressvpn.com slash ben to learn more.
00:05:23.000 Okay, so let's recap what exactly Robert Mueller said yesterday.
00:05:27.000 So Robert Mueller gave a couple of moments to the Democrats, but none of them were particularly telling.
00:05:34.000 So moment number one, he said that he did not totally exonerate Trump.
00:05:37.000 Now, no one who actually read the report or followed the media coverage thought Trump was totally exonerated on the question of obstruction.
00:05:43.000 Nobody thought that.
00:05:44.000 In fact, there were polls of Americans and Americans were asked, do you think Trump is exonerated?
00:05:48.000 And a majority of Americans said no.
00:05:50.000 So Mueller is rebutting a point that nobody actually believed in the first place.
00:05:55.000 Democrats were touting this.
00:05:56.000 Well, look at that.
00:05:57.000 It's a stinging rebuke to Trump.
00:06:00.000 Wait a second.
00:06:00.000 You're telling me that President Trump mischaracterizes what other people say sometimes?
00:06:06.000 No, no, that can't be true.
00:06:09.000 Am I supposed to be shocked by this?
00:06:11.000 Here's Representative Jerry Nadler, who is spilling out this question as though it's a revelation.
00:06:16.000 The president has repeatedly claimed That your report found there was no obstruction and that it completely and totally exonerated him.
00:06:25.000 But that is not what your report said, is it?
00:06:28.000 Correct.
00:06:28.000 That is not what the report said.
00:06:30.000 So the report did not conclude that he did not commit obstruction of justice.
00:06:36.000 Is that correct?
00:06:37.000 That is correct.
00:06:38.000 And what about total exoneration?
00:06:40.000 Did you actually totally exonerate the president?
00:06:42.000 No.
00:06:43.000 Now, in fact, Your report expressly states that it does not exonerate the president.
00:06:49.000 It does.
00:06:50.000 Wow, and then Trump said he was exonerated.
00:06:52.000 Boom!
00:06:52.000 Done!
00:06:53.000 Impeach!
00:06:54.000 Yeah, we all know.
00:06:55.000 We all know.
00:06:56.000 Donald Trump says stuff that's not true a lot.
00:06:59.000 You know, like, ever since he's been in American public life for the last 70-odd years.
00:07:03.000 So, yeah, that's not going to do it.
00:07:06.000 OK, how about this approach?
00:07:07.000 How about Trump could be charged with obstruction after he leaves office?
00:07:11.000 So now you hear Democrats trying to trot out the argument that Donald Trump would be prosecuted by Robert Mueller after he leaves office.
00:07:18.000 So this is them hoping against hope and then them saying, OK, well, if he can't be prosecuted while he's in office, at least he can be impeached.
00:07:24.000 But that's not what Mueller is saying.
00:07:25.000 Mueller is making a basic statement of law, which is true.
00:07:29.000 Trump could be prosecuted after he leaves office.
00:07:31.000 He cannot be prosecuted while he is in office.
00:07:34.000 That does not mean he should be prosecuted.
00:07:36.000 It's just a statement of the law.
00:07:38.000 The Democrats were treating this as, again, another revelation, but it's not a revelation.
00:07:42.000 Could you charge the president with a crime after he left office?
00:07:46.000 Yes.
00:07:47.000 You believe that he committed, you could charge the president of the United States with obstruction of justice after he left office?
00:07:52.000 Yes.
00:07:54.000 Well, well, I mean, case closed, except for the question is not whether you can charge the president after he leaves office.
00:08:00.000 The question is, should you charge the president after he leaves office?
00:08:03.000 OK, then there was an actual seeming bombshell at the time.
00:08:06.000 Ted Lieu was questioning Robert Mueller and he asked him, Basically, the reason that you didn't prosecute Trump is because of the OLC opinion, right?
00:08:13.000 There's an Office of Legal Counsel opinion from the Department of Justice that says you cannot prosecute a sitting president federally because he's the head of the federal executive branch.
00:08:21.000 And Mueller seems to say that the only reason he wouldn't prosecute Trump is because of the OLC opinion, right?
00:08:28.000 This is the moment, the big moment.
00:08:31.000 And Democrats were over the moon about this.
00:08:32.000 This was the headline at all the major websites, at least for about five minutes, as we'll see.
00:08:36.000 So here is Robert Mueller actually giving Democrats a win.
00:08:39.000 Was there sufficient evidence to convict President Trump or anyone else with obstruction of justice?
00:08:47.000 We did not make that calculation.
00:08:49.000 How could you not have made the calculation with the regulations?
00:08:51.000 Because the OLC opinion, the OLC opinion, Office of Legal Counsel, indicates that we cannot indict a sitting president.
00:08:57.000 So one of the tools that a prosecutor would use is not there.
00:09:01.000 You were actually unable to conclude the president did not commit obstruction of justice.
00:09:06.000 Is that correct?
00:09:09.000 Okay, so Democrats jumped on this.
00:09:10.000 This means that if it weren't for the OLC opinion, then Mueller would have got him.
00:09:15.000 See, they keep trying to make excuses as to why Mueller didn't actually do it.
00:09:18.000 Mueller has told you why he didn't do it.
00:09:20.000 that a president, a sitting president, cannot be indicted.
00:09:25.000 Okay, so Democrats jumped on this.
00:09:27.000 This means that if it weren't for the OLC opinion, then Mueller would have got him.
00:09:31.000 See, they keep trying to make excuses as to why Mueller didn't actually do it.
00:09:34.000 Mueller has told you why he didn't do it.
00:09:35.000 He said he did not even reach the borderline question of whether Trump should be prosecuted because the OLC opinion said, and said he couldn't be prosecuted.
00:09:43.000 So he just didn't even answer the question.
00:09:44.000 So here is Mueller walking back that talking point now.
00:09:47.000 He comes back for his testimony, second half of the day, and he then walks back the one win Democrats have, which is the OLC opinion question.
00:09:55.000 Now, before we go to questions, I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning.
00:10:01.000 I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Liu, who said, and I quote, you didn't charge the president because of the OLC opinion.
00:10:11.000 and That is not the correct way to say it.
00:10:15.000 As we say in the report, and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.
00:10:23.000 Okay, so he walks that back, too.
00:10:25.000 So now Democrats have nothing.
00:10:26.000 And every time they try to push Mueller into saying that he would have indicted Trump if it weren't for the OLC opinion, they fail, as you'll see in just one second.
00:10:33.000 First, let's talk about credit card debt.
00:10:35.000 So if you really want to make sure that you're behind the eight ball for life, rack up some credit card debt, and then just let it keep accruing.
00:10:40.000 Just let that interest keep accruing, because As you know, maybe you didn't realize when you signed up for a credit card, if you don't pay off that credit card, like right away, they start charging you like 20% a month.
00:10:49.000 And you can immediately be in serious, serious trouble.
00:10:52.000 For decades, credit cards have been telling us to buy it now and then you pay for it later.
00:10:56.000 And they're hoping that you don't pay for it on time because that's how they make their money, with interest.
00:11:00.000 It's a bad path to follow.
00:11:01.000 With LendingClub, you can consolidate your debt or pay off credit cards with one fixed monthly payment.
00:11:06.000 Since 2007, LendingClub has helped millions of people regain control of their finances with affordable fixed rate personal loans.
00:11:12.000 No trips to a bank.
00:11:13.000 No high-interest credit cards.
00:11:14.000 Just go to LendingClub.com.
00:11:15.000 Tell them about yourself, how much you want to borrow.
00:11:17.000 Pick the terms that are right for you.
00:11:18.000 If you're approved, your loan is automatically deposited into your bank account in as little as a few days.
00:11:23.000 LendingClub is the number one peer-to-peer lending platform.
00:11:25.000 Over $35 billion in loans issued.
00:11:28.000 Go to LendingClub.com right now.
00:11:30.000 You can check your rate in minutes and borrow up to $40,000.
00:11:32.000 That's LendingClub.com.
00:11:34.000 All loans made by WebBank Member FDIC Equal housing lender.
00:11:39.000 It's pretty easy to get into debt, but it doesn't have to be hard to get out.
00:11:42.000 Go check out Lending Club right now.
00:11:43.000 Lendingclub.com slash Ben.
00:11:46.000 Use that slash Ben so that they know that we sent you.
00:11:48.000 Okay, so, another attempt by Democrats to go after Trump via Mueller, and Mueller shoots that one down.
00:11:55.000 So, Hakeem Jeffries.
00:11:57.000 Democratic congressperson from New York, widely considered the future of House leadership.
00:12:01.000 He tries to get Mueller to basically accede to his analysis that Trump committed obstruction of justice.
00:12:08.000 He puts up a chart and then he says, here are the elements of obstruction of justice.
00:12:11.000 And Trump fulfilled all of them.
00:12:12.000 Isn't that true, sir?
00:12:13.000 And Mueller is like, uh, not really.
00:12:16.000 I'm not going to say I like mystery.
00:12:21.000 The investigation found substantial evidence That when the president ordered Don McGahn to fire the special counsel and then lie about it, Donald Trump 1.
00:12:30.000 Committed an obstructive act.
00:12:32.000 2.
00:12:32.000 Connected to an official proceeding.
00:12:35.000 3.
00:12:35.000 Did so with corrupt intent.
00:12:38.000 Those are the elements of obstruction of justice.
00:12:42.000 This is the United States of America.
00:12:44.000 No one is above the law.
00:12:47.000 No one.
00:12:49.000 The president must be held accountable one way or the other.
00:12:53.000 Let me just say, if I might, I don't subscribe necessarily to the way you analyze that.
00:13:01.000 I'm not saying it's out of the ballpark, but I'm not supportive of that analytical charge.
00:13:05.000 Ouch.
00:13:06.000 Ouch.
00:13:06.000 So his green checkmarks avail him not, and suddenly there's Robert Mueller shooting him down.
00:13:11.000 And this was the story of the Democrats' day.
00:13:13.000 What they really wanted from Mueller, the only key headline they wanted from Mueller, is Mueller saying, listen, I think that he did criminal stuff, and I can't prosecute him, but you can.
00:13:22.000 Now the ball of honesty and truth is in your court, Democrats.
00:13:26.000 Take it up and run with it.
00:13:27.000 That's what they were hoping for.
00:13:29.000 And it didn't happen anyway, shape or form.
00:13:32.000 Not only that, Mueller actually provided some fodder for the other side.
00:13:35.000 So Republican goals, when it came to this particular hearing, were twofold.
00:13:39.000 Goal number one, show that Mueller was not actually in charge of his own investigation.
00:13:43.000 Because Mueller's an honest guy, but the idea from a lot of Republicans is that there was some motivation to how this thing was written.
00:13:48.000 It was written in biased and slanted fashion in order to provide a supposed roadmap to impeachment and that maybe Mueller wasn't actually in charge of his own report.
00:13:57.000 That was point number one that Republicans were trying to make.
00:13:59.000 Point number two that they were trying to make was that the report itself was fundamentally flawed because it came at it from the wrong angle.
00:14:06.000 The report did not attempt to convict Trump.
00:14:09.000 It basically said, we can't exonerate Trump.
00:14:11.000 Well, the job of the report was not to exonerate the person at issue.
00:14:15.000 The job of the report was to provide evidence for a possible prosecution if a prosecution was on the table.
00:14:20.000 But a prosecution apparently wasn't on the table.
00:14:22.000 So what the hell was this about in the first place?
00:14:24.000 So that was the twofold goal.
00:14:26.000 One, Mueller wasn't really in charge of the report.
00:14:28.000 Two, the report itself was fundamentally flawed.
00:14:31.000 And I think there might have been kind of a third point too, which is that all the talk about Trump obstructing justice, Mueller didn't get stopped anywhere in here, right?
00:14:38.000 Trump did not step in.
00:14:39.000 He did not curtail Mueller's investigation.
00:14:41.000 He did not fire Mueller.
00:14:42.000 He did not do anything to hinder or obstruct the investigation in any real or severe way.
00:14:47.000 He may have jabbered about it to aides, may have suggested to aides that it be done, but it never actually got done.
00:14:52.000 So maybe there were three points.
00:14:53.000 Those were the three, right?
00:14:53.000 Trump did not obstruct because he didn't stop you, Robert Mueller.
00:14:56.000 Two, you weren't even in charge of this thing.
00:14:57.000 It was all of your Democrat friends.
00:14:59.000 And three, The report itself was fundamentally flawed.
00:15:03.000 So, as we'll see in just a second, the Republicans were able to make basically all of these points.
00:15:08.000 So, on point number one.
00:15:09.000 Point number one was that the report itself did not establish what it sought to establish with regard to President Trump.
00:15:19.000 Namely, obstruction, because he didn't curtail or hinder the actual investigation.
00:15:24.000 And two, because the investigation didn't establish a conspiracy with Russia.
00:15:27.000 So, here's Robert Mueller being asked whether His investigation was curtailed or hindered?
00:15:33.000 At any time of the investigation, was your investigation curtailed or stopped?
00:15:38.000 Or hindered?
00:15:39.000 No.
00:15:41.000 That's a no.
00:15:42.000 End of story.
00:15:44.000 No.
00:15:44.000 Okay, and there's a lot of answers like that from Robert Mueller yesterday.
00:15:47.000 Very curt, very clipped.
00:15:48.000 And then he was asked, did your investigation establish conspiracy?
00:15:52.000 The answer again, nope.
00:15:54.000 The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign Conspired with the Russian government in its election interference activities.
00:16:04.000 Okay, so that again goes to the Republicans' point.
00:16:07.000 You didn't establish what you were trying to establish.
00:16:09.000 Then they get on to point number two, which is you weren't really in charge of this investigation, were you?
00:16:13.000 And Mueller appeared hesitant.
00:16:15.000 He appeared tentative.
00:16:16.000 He appeared as though he didn't know his own report.
00:16:18.000 As I said yesterday on the program, he appeared like the kid in your class in third grade who was supposed to have done a book report on Bridge to Terabithia and didn't actually do the book report, but a parent did.
00:16:28.000 And then they came in and the teacher was like, so what happened in Bridge to Terabithia?
00:16:31.000 And the kid was like, well, I know there was a bridge, And a place called Terabithia.
00:16:37.000 There's a lot of that from Robert Mueller.
00:16:38.000 So he was asked about Fusion GPS.
00:16:40.000 Now, anyone who has followed this entire unfolding scandal knows that Fusion GPS is a key player.
00:16:45.000 Fusion GPS was the group that went out there and compiled the Steele dossier, which may have been Russian disinformation that was then funneled upward to Hillary Clinton's law firm, and from there, it was funneled to the FBI.
00:16:56.000 And Robert Mueller is asked about Fusion GPS, and he says he has no clue what the hell anybody's talking about.
00:17:03.000 When you talk about the firm that produced the steel reporting, the name of the firm that produced that was Fusion GPS.
00:17:11.000 Is that correct?
00:17:12.000 I'm not familiar with that.
00:17:16.000 It was.
00:17:17.000 It's not a trick question.
00:17:18.000 It was Fusion GPS.
00:17:23.000 Now, Fusion GPS produced the opposition research document widely known as the Steele dossier, and the owner of Fusion GPA was someone named Glenn Simpson.
00:17:35.000 Are you familiar with him?
00:17:36.000 This is outside my purview.
00:17:38.000 Absolutely not, outside his purview.
00:17:40.000 He just doesn't know his own report.
00:17:41.000 And it's pretty clear he didn't know his own report.
00:17:43.000 Okay, then there was point number three the Republicans were trying to establish, which is that the entire angle of the report is wrong.
00:17:48.000 And when Democrats focus in on Trump being exonerated, the report is designed to provide evidence sufficient to prosecute or sufficient to impeach.
00:17:56.000 It's not Mueller's job to exonerate Trump.
00:17:58.000 It's his job to prosecute Trump.
00:18:00.000 It's not a prosecutor's job to ever exonerate somebody.
00:18:03.000 That'd be the defense attorney's job or the person's job themselves.
00:18:07.000 But it's really not anybody's job because in the United States you have to be proved to have committed a crime.
00:18:12.000 Proof of exoneration is not necessary.
00:18:15.000 So here's Mueller being asked that question and admitting he doesn't know of any other case where the DOJ has quote-unquote exonerated somebody.
00:18:23.000 Can you give me an example other than Donald Trump where the Justice Department determined that an investigated person was not exonerated because their innocence was not conclusively determined?
00:18:34.000 I cannot, but this is a unique situation.
00:18:35.000 Okay, well, you can't.
00:18:37.000 Time is short.
00:18:37.000 I've got five minutes.
00:18:38.000 Let's just leave it at you can't find it because I'll tell you why.
00:18:41.000 It doesn't exist.
00:18:42.000 It was not the special counsel's job to conclusively determine Donald Trump's innocence or to exonerate him.
00:18:48.000 Because the bedrock principle of our justice system is a presumption of innocence.
00:18:54.000 It exists for everyone.
00:18:55.000 Everyone is entitled to it, including sitting presidents.
00:18:59.000 Okay, so this is a bad day for Mueller.
00:19:01.000 He looked bad.
00:19:02.000 He looked like he was stumbling.
00:19:03.000 The optics were bad.
00:19:04.000 Now, a lot of people in the media are saying, why are you looking at the optics?
00:19:07.000 Because Democrats explicitly admitted in the run-up to this that this was all for optics.
00:19:12.000 The only reason to even have this hearing was that you could have that image of Clint Eastwood circa 1971 standing there growling down the president.
00:19:21.000 That's what they were hoping for from Mueller.
00:19:22.000 They didn't get any of that.
00:19:23.000 And now they're like, why are you looking at the optics, man?
00:19:24.000 Why don't you just look at the substance?
00:19:26.000 Well, we already have the substance.
00:19:27.000 That's why we're not looking at the substance anymore, because we all analyzed the substance.
00:19:31.000 I read large swaths of the report on air.
00:19:34.000 No, this was about the optics, and the optics did not cut in favor of the Democrats.
00:19:37.000 Well, President Trump knew that.
00:19:38.000 President Trump reacted to Mueller's testimony with glee and short-wing.
00:19:42.000 The Democrats lost so big today.
00:19:45.000 Their party is in shambles right now.
00:19:48.000 They've got the squad leading their party.
00:19:51.000 They are a mess.
00:19:53.000 This was a devastating day for the Democrats.
00:19:57.000 This whole thing has been Honestly, it's been collusion.
00:20:02.000 It's been collusion with the media.
00:20:04.000 It's been collusion with other countries.
00:20:07.000 This has been a disaster for the Democrats, and I think we're going to win bigger than ever.
00:20:13.000 OK, so, you know, that is not an unfair analysis by the president of what the effect will be.
00:20:18.000 Although, again, I don't know that there will be any effect.
00:20:20.000 I think most people have moved past this, but Democrats won't let go.
00:20:23.000 Democrats are not going to let go of this.
00:20:25.000 So you have Eric Swalwell, the congressperson from California, who is suggesting, guys, this is only the beginning.
00:20:31.000 It's only the beginning.
00:20:32.000 Now, Eric Swalwell, as we know, knows things about things that are supposed to begin and then end quickly, like his presidential campaign, which lasted approximately 37.2 seconds.
00:20:42.000 in which he proposed that we nuke all gun owners.
00:20:44.000 In any case, here is Eric Swalwell explaining this is only Act 1.
00:20:47.000 And this became the Democratic talking point.
00:20:48.000 We're not going to let go of this.
00:20:50.000 Meanwhile, Nancy Pelosi in the back room is saying, "Guys, we need to let go of this." Here's Eric Swalwell.
00:20:55.000 Where do we go from here, Congressman?
00:20:58.000 I think success is that the American people will view this as volume one.
00:21:02.000 I'm sorry, that the American people will view this as Act 1, not Act 3.
00:21:05.000 And as they heard names today like Manafort and Kalemnick and Gates, they will want to know, well, let's hear more about that.
00:21:14.000 And that those witnesses will start to come forward.
00:21:16.000 I think we should have an impeachment inquiry, and those are the next witnesses we need to hear from.
00:21:20.000 No, no, I'm pretty sure everybody's like, nah, dude, not interested.
00:21:24.000 And then Adam Schiff, pencil neck Schiff, according to President Trump, he gets up and he says, Mueller did live up to my expectations.
00:21:30.000 Again, this is a guy who suggested for two years that he had deep, nefarious intel suggesting that President Trump was was compromised.
00:21:36.000 Here's Adam Schiff trying to play this off as a win.
00:21:40.000 I do think that Robert Mueller lived up to expectations, at least mine.
00:21:45.000 He stuck to his report.
00:21:47.000 That's what he said he was going to do.
00:21:48.000 So I didn't go into the hearing expecting new facts.
00:21:51.000 The halting nature of his answers made questioning him a challenge.
00:21:55.000 You know, as a former prosecutor, it meant that, you know, you take each witness as they come, and it meant it wasn't easy to get him to tell a narrative.
00:22:04.000 But what's more important than the style we saw of the witnesses, the substance.
00:22:08.000 And the substance, I think, was just devastating.
00:22:10.000 Okay, this was a dog and pony show.
00:22:12.000 Everybody knew it was a dog and pony show.
00:22:14.000 The dog and pony show was bad.
00:22:15.000 And so it turns to, but don't you love dogs and ponies anyway?
00:22:19.000 Adam Schiff really trying to make a diamond out of a piece of coal here.
00:22:23.000 It's pretty wild.
00:22:24.000 We'll get to the rest of the Democratic response in just one second.
00:22:27.000 You can see that everybody is beside themselves.
00:22:29.000 When you spend two years building something up and then it turns out to be a dud, it's kind of disappointing.
00:22:33.000 It's like a Pirates of the Caribbean sequel.
00:22:36.000 We'll get to that in just one second first.
00:22:38.000 I am too busy to go to the post office.
00:22:40.000 Because, and also last time I went to the post office, let me tell you what happened.
00:22:42.000 I drove up to the post office, I stopped outside for five minutes, the city of Los Angeles sucks at everything.
00:22:47.000 At everything, okay?
00:22:48.000 This is a dirty, terrible city with horrible local governance, but they are fantastic at giving parking tickets.
00:22:53.000 So I walked inside.
00:22:54.000 Five minutes later, I walk out.
00:22:55.000 There's a $100 parking ticket on my windshield.
00:22:58.000 I am not going to the post office.
00:22:59.000 Again, even though I kind of like the post office.
00:23:01.000 But I can get all their services by just using stamps.com.
00:23:03.000 It is fast, and it is easy.
00:23:05.000 Stamps.com brings all the amazing services of the U.S.
00:23:07.000 Postal Service directly to your computer.
00:23:09.000 Whether you're a small office sending invoices, an online seller shipping out products, even a warehouse sending thousands of packages a day, stamps.com can handle it all with ease.
00:23:17.000 Simply use your computer to print official U.S.
00:23:19.000 postage 24-7 for any letter, any package, any class of mail, anywhere you want to send it.
00:23:23.000 Once your mail is ready, just hand it to your mail carrier or drop it in a mailbox.
00:23:26.000 It is indeed that simple.
00:23:28.000 With stamps.com, you get 5 cents off every first class stamp up to 40% off priority mail.
00:23:33.000 Not to mention, it is a fraction of the cost of those expensive postage meters.
00:23:36.000 Stamps.com.
00:23:37.000 Saves you time and money.
00:23:37.000 No-brainer.
00:23:38.000 Right now, my listeners have a special offer available.
00:23:40.000 It includes a four-week trial, plus free postage and digital skill.
00:23:44.000 No long-term commitments.
00:23:46.000 That's a pretty solid deal.
00:23:47.000 Go to Stamps.com.
00:23:48.000 Click on that mic at the top of the homepage.
00:23:50.000 Type in promo code Shapiro for the special deal.
00:23:52.000 That's Stamps.com.
00:23:53.000 Enter Shapiro.
00:23:54.000 Go check it out right now.
00:23:56.000 Okay, so the Democrats are sort of stuck between a rock and a hard place.
00:23:59.000 You spend two years telling your voters that President Trump will be ridden out of town on a rail because of Mueller.
00:24:04.000 Mueller shows up, and it turns out that he is Not solid.
00:24:07.000 It turns out that he is wavering.
00:24:08.000 It turns out that he doesn't know his own report.
00:24:11.000 Republicans were basically able to establish that he was not familiar with his own stuff, which means that it kind of felt like this was politically motivated.
00:24:18.000 And we're about to find out in the next month whether this investigation was properly initiated and conducted.
00:24:23.000 The Inspector General of the DOJ, Michael Horowitz, is about to bring out a report about the beginnings of the Trump-Russia investigation.
00:24:29.000 I'm sure that will be fascinating stuff.
00:24:31.000 His report, certainly, on the Hillary investigation was fascinating reading and pretty damning for a lot of the folks involved in all of this.
00:24:38.000 Well, Democrats are not going to let go of this, and that includes the people who are most closely tied to it.
00:24:42.000 So, Andrew McCabe, who was fired from the FBI for lying to the FBI.
00:24:47.000 He lost his pension over it.
00:24:49.000 And that was because he lied to the FBI about whether he had spoken to the press with the permission of James Comey about Hillary Clinton's investigation.
00:24:56.000 Well now, Andrew McCabe is back on television suggesting it's time for Congress to pursue impeachment.
00:25:01.000 Based on what?
00:25:02.000 He really can't explain.
00:25:03.000 Not based on anything Mueller said that we didn't already know for sure.
00:25:07.000 From my own experience at the very beginnings of this investigation, we confronted some very hard choices, choices that we knew would have negative repercussions on our organization and on us personally, and we made those choices anyway because it was our job and our duty to do so.
00:25:25.000 I feel strongly that that's the same position Congress is in now, and they should step up to the plate and do their job.
00:25:31.000 It doesn't mean that the president will be removed from office This has become the talking point.
00:25:36.000 from office or will be impeached, but it is absolutely clear to me that the time has come for Congress to pursue a dedicated impeachment inquiry. - Okay, this has become the talking point.
00:25:48.000 People who are very invested in this thing are not going to let it go.
00:25:51.000 And that's good for Trump, He can say, listen, you petty jerks.
00:25:55.000 There was a full investigation.
00:25:57.000 There was no recommendation of prosecution.
00:25:59.000 Mueller himself would not even answer whether he would prosecute me.
00:26:03.000 Why in the world are we still doing this routine?
00:26:05.000 If you don't like me so much, you can beat me at the ballot box.
00:26:07.000 By the way, Trump is beatable.
00:26:09.000 And for all the talk about the Democrats being in chaos, which is true, right now Trump is underwater in Ohio by four percentage points, according to various polls, including Morning Consult.
00:26:17.000 He's underwater in Iowa.
00:26:19.000 You know, he could still win those states.
00:26:21.000 He's expected to win those states, in fact, against a Democrat.
00:26:23.000 Those are just his popularity ratings.
00:26:25.000 Still, Trump is vulnerable, and yet Democrats don't seem to want to run against Trump.
00:26:28.000 They seem to want to impeach him, or at least talk about impeaching him, for the purposes of smearing him as a Russian cat's paw, even though that all fell apart.
00:26:36.000 The other folks who were invested in this, members of the media, deeply invested, CNN, every day, breaking news, Wolf Blitzer, we have a brand new piece of news.
00:26:44.000 I work out every day and unfortunately the gym that I attend very often has CNN on.
00:26:48.000 And so I am well aware of the chyrons that CNN runs every single day.
00:26:52.000 And the chyrons for two years were about breaking news, bombshell new report.
00:26:57.000 Trump's presidency over, the Russia scandal explodes, and then it turns out that the thing is a complete waste of time, pretty much.
00:27:05.000 And CNN ain't gonna let that go because it makes them look bad.
00:27:07.000 So here on CNN were folks yesterday trying to say, listen, listen, listen.
00:27:11.000 Just because Bob Mueller appeared to be old and dithering doesn't mean that the underlying content isn't important.
00:27:16.000 Guys, you were building this up because you thought that Bob Mueller was gonna walk in like Tom Cruise in the Top Gun 2 trailer and just own it.
00:27:22.000 And that is not the way this worked.
00:27:24.000 Here is CNN trying to reverse course quickly.
00:27:27.000 Back it up!
00:27:27.000 Back it up!
00:27:29.000 The idea that his written answers were not truthful is news, and having lived through the Clinton period where, you know, very much most of what they focused on was the fact that in a deposition, he wasn't completely honest, and that was enough to impeach him.
00:27:45.000 I think there's going to be, as the dust settles, the people who matter, as we talked about yesterday.
00:27:51.000 Partisans have made up their mind.
00:27:53.000 It's the people in the middle.
00:27:54.000 This was news to them yesterday.
00:27:56.000 And as it sinks in, I think the Trump people will be a little more sanguine.
00:28:02.000 I don't think the president will be.
00:28:03.000 But this was not a win yesterday.
00:28:06.000 No, it wasn't.
00:28:07.000 It wasn't.
00:28:07.000 It wasn't.
00:28:08.000 OK, morning, Joe.
00:28:09.000 They're doing the same routine.
00:28:10.000 Mueller gave Democrats everything that they could possibly need.
00:28:12.000 Now it's time for them to move forward.
00:28:14.000 It'll be amazing to see if the Democrats somehow push their legislators into trying an impeachment attempt over a report that did not give them what they wanted.
00:28:22.000 Good luck with that, guys.
00:28:23.000 If you think that's not going to backfire on you, that people aren't tired of this, I welcome you to try.
00:28:28.000 Really, go for it.
00:28:29.000 Do it.
00:28:30.000 Here is MSNBC also trying to play this off as a victory for Democrats.
00:28:36.000 Well, Miki, you know, some people will talk about optics.
00:28:39.000 Optics don't really matter here.
00:28:41.000 The Democrats get all the facts they needed.
00:28:44.000 But the president of the United States acted inappropriately.
00:28:44.000 Yeah.
00:28:47.000 They should either start an impeachment inquiry or they should leave it for good.
00:28:53.000 But you know what?
00:28:54.000 If they don't start an impeachment inquiry, given all we learned yesterday, then obviously nothing justifies an impeachment inquiry.
00:29:04.000 And the Democrats not starting that inquiry will be proving Donald Trump right.
00:29:09.000 OK, so Joe Scarborough, what he's saying there is not totally false, right?
00:29:12.000 He's been saying you guys need to put your money where your mouth is.
00:29:14.000 But anybody trying to play this off, you can see the disappointment on Mika's face.
00:29:18.000 There are a lot of folks in the media who are very, very disappointed, among them Jimmy Kimmel, the Pope of late night comedy, as Guy Benson calls him.
00:29:26.000 And here he is being thoroughly unfunny.
00:29:29.000 Well, Going after Republicans for doing what you would expect Republicans to do, namely call into question how exactly the report was done.
00:29:37.000 Because there were serious questions to be asked about the nature of the report.
00:29:40.000 Like, what was Robert Mueller doing if he knew he couldn't prosecute?
00:29:43.000 Why was this report not ended with a recommendation one way or the other?
00:29:48.000 Why didn't Robert Mueller know his own report?
00:29:49.000 Here's Jimmy Kimmel trying to make excuses.
00:29:52.000 It really was something watching them defend this.
00:29:54.000 Normally when people fall on their knees for Trump like that, he pays them a thousand, one hundred thirty thousand dollars afterwards in hush money.
00:30:01.000 Wow.
00:30:04.000 You know, again, you can try this all night long, but in the end, you're going to run up against the stark reality.
00:30:10.000 It was a bad day for Democrats.
00:30:11.000 And this is what Chris Wallace says.
00:30:12.000 So Chris Wallace somehow ended up on Stephen Colbert's show last night.
00:30:15.000 It didn't go great for Stephen Colbert.
00:30:17.000 So here's Chris Wallace explaining to Stephen Colbert that despite Colbert's best hopes and dreams, this thing did not go great.
00:30:25.000 This has been a disaster for the Democrats and a disaster for the reputation of Robert Mueller.
00:30:31.000 Now, you said that at 10.07 this morning, an hour and a half into a six-hour series of hearings.
00:30:40.000 So is Fox News' motto, we report and decide before the thing's over?
00:30:46.000 There was a break in the hearing.
00:30:47.000 Yes.
00:30:48.000 We were asked for our reaction.
00:30:49.000 And let me simply say, nothing in your monologue disproved that description.
00:30:55.000 In what way was it a disaster?
00:30:56.000 I don't understand.
00:30:58.000 Yes, you did.
00:31:01.000 Chris Wallace is the best.
00:31:03.000 You gotta love Chris Wallace.
00:31:03.000 Okay, come on.
00:31:04.000 That is fantastic stuff.
00:31:06.000 Owning, owning Stephen Colbert right there.
00:31:09.000 Ow, you can see Stephen Colbert feel the pain.
00:31:11.000 It goes directly to his small heart.
00:31:12.000 It's just fantastic.
00:31:17.000 Chris Wallace just provided more comedy on Colbert's show than Colbert has provided in years.
00:31:21.000 That was fantastic.
00:31:22.000 Fan-tastic.
00:31:23.000 Play it again.
00:31:23.000 You know what?
00:31:24.000 That was great.
00:31:24.000 I gotta watch it again.
00:31:25.000 Watch as Stephen Colbert collapses in on himself like a dying star.
00:31:28.000 Fantastic.
00:31:30.000 This has been a disaster for the Democrats and a disaster for the reputation of Robert Mueller.
00:31:36.000 Now, you said that at 10.07 this morning, an hour and a half into a six-hour series of hearings.
00:31:45.000 So as Fox News motto, we report and decide before the thing's over.
00:31:51.000 There was a break in the hearing.
00:31:52.000 Yes.
00:31:53.000 We were asked for our reaction.
00:31:54.000 And let me simply say, nothing in your monologue disproved that description.
00:32:00.000 In what way was it a disaster?
00:32:01.000 I don't understand.
00:32:02.000 Yes, you do.
00:32:07.000 Oh, glorious, because of course he does.
00:32:09.000 Of course he does.
00:32:09.000 You couldn't watch that thing yesterday without understanding exactly what Chris Wallace was saying.
00:32:14.000 Good for Chris Wallace for not taking that.
00:32:16.000 Let me explain to you, like a small child, why it was a disaster.
00:32:19.000 You watched it.
00:32:20.000 You knew.
00:32:21.000 And I love Stephen Colbert's routine there.
00:32:23.000 Well, you didn't wait until all the facts were in, sir.
00:32:25.000 Is that really newsy of you?
00:32:26.000 Is that really news?
00:32:28.000 Yeah, tell me about news, Stephen Colbert.
00:32:30.000 Tell me about how news should be done.
00:32:33.000 And if that's your best excuse, well, you said it early.
00:32:35.000 You said it early.
00:32:36.000 Yeah, did anything change?
00:32:37.000 No, it didn't.
00:32:38.000 Good for Chris Wallace, man.
00:32:39.000 That is solid, solid stuff.
00:32:40.000 We'll get to the Democratic presidential candidates reacting to this, and of course, saying what they have to say, which is impeach him.
00:32:45.000 In just one second.
00:32:46.000 First, let me tell you about this new app that I have been using to lose weight and feel better.
00:32:51.000 It really is.
00:32:51.000 It is fantastic.
00:32:52.000 I've been using it day after day now.
00:32:53.000 It's called Noom.
00:32:54.000 And it really is terrific because when you want to get in shape, it's not just about exercising or eating healthy.
00:33:00.000 It's about changing your daily habits because you might think, for example, that you're eating healthy and you're actually not.
00:33:05.000 You may be doing bad estimates of your portions.
00:33:07.000 You may, for example, think that your exercise is burning more calories than it is and you wonder why it is you're not losing the weight.
00:33:13.000 You might think, well, you know, if I do it for a week and then I'm off for a week, is it really that big a deal?
00:33:18.000 What Noom does is it systematizes your habits.
00:33:20.000 It uses psychology, really, to help guide you.
00:33:23.000 It provides you more information on a daily basis about what you can do to improve your health.
00:33:28.000 It even provides people who provide you real-time feedback, gives you partners who you can work with.
00:33:31.000 It is fantastic.
00:33:32.000 I really enjoy it.
00:33:33.000 Noom is a habit-changing solution.
00:33:35.000 It helps users learn to develop a new relationship with food through personalized courses.
00:33:39.000 It's based in psychology, and Noom teaches you why you do the things you do, and arms you with the tools to break the bad habits and replace them with better ones.
00:33:45.000 If you know why you're doing it, maybe you won't do it anymore.
00:33:48.000 You don't have to change it all in one day.
00:33:49.000 Small steps make big progress.
00:33:51.000 Sign up for your trial today at Noom.
00:33:53.000 N-O-O-M dot com slash Shapiro.
00:33:55.000 In fact, I just got this from my parents yesterday.
00:33:56.000 Noom dot com slash Shapiro.
00:33:59.000 N-O-O-M dot com slash Shapiro.
00:34:00.000 To try that trial today.
00:34:02.000 Start that trial right now.
00:34:03.000 That's Noom dot com slash Shapiro.
00:34:04.000 It's the last weight loss program you'll need.
00:34:06.000 It really is terrific.
00:34:08.000 Okay, we're gonna get to the more democratic response to Mueller, and then we have to get to The governor of Puerto Rico, who apparently is resigning.
00:34:15.000 I know we don't want to pay too much attention to Puerto Rico until there's big news.
00:34:18.000 There is big news out of Puerto Rico today.
00:34:20.000 We'll get to that.
00:34:21.000 We'll get to all of it in just one second.
00:34:22.000 First, I have to remind you, next month we're taking our backstage show on the road for a special one-night-only event.
00:34:27.000 It's August 21st at the beautiful Terrace Theater in Long Beach, California.
00:34:31.000 Me, DailyWire God King Jeremy Boring, Andrew Klave, and Michael Moles will all be there live.
00:34:35.000 I mean, it'll be unbelievable.
00:34:37.000 Can you imagine your dreams coming true right before your very eyes?
00:34:40.000 We'll be talking politics, pop culture, answering your questions from the audience.
00:34:44.000 Make them good.
00:34:45.000 Tickets are on sale right now at dailywire.com slash backstage, including our limited VIP packages.
00:34:50.000 Those guarantee premium seating, photos and meet and greets with each one of us, a gift from me.
00:34:54.000 I've been shopping for weeks for this thing.
00:34:56.000 You're going to love it.
00:34:57.000 So head on over to dailywire.com slash backstage.
00:34:57.000 And more.
00:35:00.000 Get your tickets today.
00:35:01.000 That's dailywire.com slash backstage.
00:35:03.000 Get those tickets right now.
00:35:04.000 It shall be epic.
00:35:05.000 It has been so declared.
00:35:06.000 And so it shall be!
00:35:08.000 Also, go subscribe over at dailywire.com.
00:35:10.000 All sorts of goodies for you there.
00:35:12.000 99 bucks a year gets you this.
00:35:13.000 The very greatest in all beverage vessels.
00:35:14.000 You know it.
00:35:14.000 You've heard me talk about it every day for years at this point.
00:35:17.000 Why have you not taken me up on this offer?
00:35:20.000 $99 a year gets you all the goodies behind the paywall.
00:35:22.000 Two additional hours of the show a day.
00:35:23.000 Part of the mailbag.
00:35:24.000 You know all that.
00:35:24.000 You know the spiel.
00:35:25.000 I don't have to repeat it.
00:35:26.000 And it gets you This particular beverage vessel, which is the greatest of all beverage vessels, and more importantly, helps you join the team and protect us and the content that you love from the nastiness of the left that seeks to deplatform and destroy all shows that it cannot control.
00:35:39.000 Go check us out at dailywire.com.
00:35:40.000 We are the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast and radio show in the nation.
00:35:44.000 So as I say, for Democrats, it's in for a penny, in for a pound.
00:35:54.000 So the media invested in the narrative that Bob Mueller got him.
00:35:58.000 Not true.
00:35:59.000 They did not.
00:36:00.000 And then you've got people who are members of the intel community who didn't like Trump and were in a running gun battle with Trump for years.
00:36:06.000 And they want Trump out.
00:36:07.000 And so it's Robert Mueller.
00:36:09.000 He wasn't as bad as you thought, guys.
00:36:10.000 Was he really that bad?
00:36:11.000 I mean, like, really?
00:36:12.000 They've all now become the stage mother whose child bombed in the second act.
00:36:17.000 This is what they've become.
00:36:18.000 Oh, there's my kid.
00:36:19.000 He's out there.
00:36:19.000 He's so cute.
00:36:20.000 Oh, that wasn't that wasn't.
00:36:21.000 Oh, that's you were OK, right?
00:36:23.000 Like that wasn't that bad.
00:36:25.000 That was the entire story of yesterday.
00:36:27.000 And then you've got the Democratic presidential candidates.
00:36:29.000 Now, Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren will not vote for impeachment because it's never coming up in the Senate.
00:36:33.000 It's never even coming up in the House.
00:36:35.000 They're never going to have to stand there and really fight for the impeachment of President Trump because Why would they have to?
00:36:41.000 They're in a Senate controlled by Republicans.
00:36:43.000 It's dead on arrival.
00:36:44.000 But they're going to go out there and because they're running against Trump, they're going to claim that he is impeachable, that he should be impeached, that he's committed impeachable offenses.
00:36:51.000 Here is Kamala Harris yesterday suggesting, don't worry, guys, there are outlined incidents of obstruction.
00:36:56.000 Really?
00:36:56.000 I mean, it's good.
00:36:57.000 We this is impeachable stuff.
00:36:59.000 Do you think Kamala Harris really believes this?
00:37:01.000 Do you think she believes anything she says?
00:37:03.000 I think there's a reason that she has regressed back to the mean.
00:37:05.000 And as we'll see in a second, Joe Biden may be starting to find his sea legs, but Kamala Harris regressing back to the mean in stylish fashion.
00:37:12.000 Here she is.
00:37:14.000 I am very clear that there are outlined incidents of obstruction of justice.
00:37:22.000 And no matter what this current attorney general and the president of the United States try to say, the American people are smart enough to know what is and what is not truth.
00:37:32.000 Okay, sure, go for it.
00:37:33.000 And then Elizabeth Warren does the same thing.
00:37:35.000 We should impeach!
00:37:36.000 We should impeach!
00:37:38.000 It is very weird, these presidential campaigns where everybody appears on the same set one after another.
00:37:42.000 It's kind of bizarre.
00:37:43.000 It's also bizarre to me that people find Elizabeth Warren charismatic.
00:37:47.000 She is deeply uncharismatic, as far as I am concerned.
00:37:51.000 She's not magnetic in any way.
00:37:53.000 She sort of seems like she's scolding you all the time.
00:37:55.000 I think Kamala Harris is significantly more magnetic a personality than Elizabeth Warren is.
00:38:00.000 And just in terms of sheer political skill, Pete Buttigieg has them both beat, although he's going nowhere in this race.
00:38:04.000 Anyway, here's Elizabeth Warren also calling for impeachment.
00:38:08.000 We have to make clear, no one is above the law, not even the President of the United States.
00:38:16.000 It is time to bring impeachment charges against him.
00:38:19.000 In my view, some things are above politics.
00:38:26.000 And one of them is our constitutional responsibilities to do what is right.
00:38:33.000 And the responsibility of the Congress of the United States of America, when a president breaks the law, is to bring impeachment charges against that president.
00:38:46.000 You know, one of the things I'm finding off-putting about Warren is that if you could deepfake Beto O'Rourke and Elizabeth Warren, they have the same mannerisms.
00:38:54.000 They've got the same arm motions, they have the same cadence.
00:38:56.000 It's kind of fascinating.
00:38:57.000 In any case, when she says that she believes that some things are above partisan politics, that is false.
00:39:02.000 Elizabeth Warren believes no things are above partisan politics.
00:39:06.000 That is just untrue.
00:39:08.000 So Democrats, you want to run on this?
00:39:10.000 But I don't think Americans are interested in this in any real way.
00:39:10.000 All you.
00:39:13.000 In fact, I know Americans are not interested in this because there's poll data.
00:39:16.000 Americans want you to move on.
00:39:17.000 Americans already believe what they're going to believe about Trump.
00:39:20.000 There is no great takeaway from this.
00:39:22.000 It's not as though this raised awareness about what Trump is.
00:39:25.000 Everybody sort of has an opinion on it already.
00:39:27.000 I'll tell you what does change minds is new information.
00:39:30.000 So no new information has been provided with regard to President Trump.
00:39:34.000 However, every day there seems to be new information about the leading lights of the Democratic Party.
00:39:38.000 So, to take an example, Ilhan Omar, who President Trump desperately wants to run against.
00:39:41.000 He wishes that Ilhan Omar were the Democratic nominee.
00:39:45.000 But it's okay, they're promoting her anyway.
00:39:46.000 There is a clip that has been circulating from 2018 in which Representative Ilhan Omar declares that Americans should be more fearful of white men than jihadist terrorists and that basically white men should be racially profiled.
00:39:59.000 She was appearing with Mehdi Hassan on Al Jazeera.
00:40:02.000 Al Jazeera, of course, is a Qatari front.
00:40:05.000 Qatar is a terror-supporting government.
00:40:06.000 In any case, here she is explaining.
00:40:09.000 I mean, if this is your Democratic Party, this is what Trump wants to run against.
00:40:12.000 You heard him say it earlier.
00:40:13.000 He said, this is the party of Ilhan Omar.
00:40:15.000 This is what he wants to run against.
00:40:16.000 If Democrats want to run on impeachment and Trump runs on Ilhan Omar as the face of the Democratic Party, enjoy yourselves, Democrats.
00:40:23.000 It's going to be a long another four years of Donald Trump.
00:40:25.000 Here is Ilhan Omar saying something silly.
00:40:28.000 A lot of conservatives in particular would say that the rise in Islamophobia is a result not of hate, but of fear, a legitimate fear they say, of quote-unquote jihadist terrorism, whether it's Fort Hood or San Bernardino or the recent truck attack in New York.
00:40:42.000 What do you say to them?
00:40:44.000 I would say our country should be more fearful of white men across our country because they are actually causing most of the deaths within this country.
00:40:59.000 We should be profiling, monitoring, and creating policies to fight the radicalization of white men.
00:41:08.000 Okay, good luck with this pitch.
00:41:10.000 Good luck with this particular pitch.
00:41:11.000 There are a couple of problems with that pitch.
00:41:12.000 Number one, if you go back to September 11th, there's no question that jihadists have caused more deaths than white supremacist terrorists.
00:41:18.000 I'll assume that's what she means.
00:41:19.000 If she's talking about sheer numbers of deaths, then white men certainly have not caused the sheer majority of deaths in the United States.
00:41:24.000 If she's talking about terrorism, which is giving her sort of the benefit of the doubt, but that's fine.
00:41:28.000 I think that's probably accurate.
00:41:30.000 If she's talking about white supremacist terrorism, yes, it has caused deaths.
00:41:33.000 It is controversial as to whether it has caused most of the deaths in the United States because that's a matter of classification.
00:41:38.000 Very often the classification systems take anybody who is white and who commits a terrorist act and then lumps them together as white supremacists, which is not fully accurate, but the point is taken that white supremacists cause a lot of deaths.
00:41:48.000 I mean, I know because they've targeted me, right?
00:41:51.000 They're really evil, but...
00:41:53.000 As a proportion of the U.S.
00:41:54.000 population, white supremacists compared to the white male population of the United States is a tiny, tiny, tiny, tiny, tiny fraction.
00:42:00.000 It is certainly a much smaller fraction than jihadists compared to, for example, the broader Islamic population of the United States.
00:42:07.000 Now, I don't think that you should label all Muslims because some radical Muslims are terrorists in the United States.
00:42:12.000 I don't think that's an excuse for labeling all Muslims.
00:42:15.000 But the point that she's making, that you should, that's what she should say, right?
00:42:17.000 She should say what I just said, which is, why would you paint all Muslims with broad strokes when it is a small minority of Muslims who are being radicalized?
00:42:24.000 Islamophobia is never justified.
00:42:26.000 It's an easy answer.
00:42:27.000 Instead, she goes to, we should profile white men because they're the real danger.
00:42:30.000 Good luck with that message, Democrats.
00:42:32.000 Enjoy yourselves.
00:42:33.000 Okay, meanwhile, in other news, the governor of Puerto Rico has announced that he is going to resign.
00:42:37.000 His name is Ricardo Rosselló, and he is resigning because he got caught up in a scandal Where a bunch of his text messages to other members of his government were revealed.
00:42:48.000 And they were pretty ugly.
00:42:49.000 They used all sorts of nasty language about other members of the government.
00:42:53.000 Particularly at the local level.
00:42:55.000 Now, the governor of Puerto Rico is a Democrat.
00:42:58.000 He's been at war with other members of the government who are also Democrats, also members of his party.
00:43:04.000 He's been accused of corruption before.
00:43:06.000 A couple members of his administration were just indicted a couple of weeks ago, and so now he is stepping down.
00:43:11.000 According to the New York Times, the people of Puerto Rico knew him first as Ricky, the handsome boy who moved into the governor's residence when he was just 13.
00:43:17.000 His father was the governor.
00:43:19.000 Ricardo Rosselló grew up as a child of privilege and historic La Fortezella, a palatial 16th century mansion with heavy drapes and thick wooden doors just steps from the Caribbean Sea.
00:43:27.000 Now the governor himself, Rossello lives in the same colonial fortress of his youth with a family of his own, but the estate has turned into a cage, guarded by police officers in riot gear and ringed by protesters who want him gone.
00:43:38.000 It took just two weeks for his administration to reach the point of collapse, undermined by a popular uprising that the governor initially thought he could withstand.
00:43:45.000 Yet Rosello misread the anger brewing among his people after years of economic stagnation and broken promises.
00:43:50.000 Well, the reason for the economic stagnation and broken promises is because Puerto Rico's economy has been incredibly weak.
00:43:56.000 They've spent much more money than they ever had.
00:43:58.000 According to CNN, Puerto Rico has about a $70 billion debt, about 40% of its residents live in poverty, and the median household income in 2017 was just under $20,000.
00:44:06.000 That's not the low-income households, it's the median household income.
00:44:10.000 In the United States, it's well above $50,000.
00:44:13.000 Part of the problem stems from a U.S.
00:44:15.000 law back in 1920.
00:44:16.000 According to CNN, the Jones Act requires all goods ferried between the U.S.
00:44:20.000 ports to be carried on ships built, owned, and operated by Americans.
00:44:22.000 By the way, I do oppose the Jones Act, but really what this is about is the wild overspending of the Puerto Rican government.
00:44:29.000 Things got really bad in 2015 when Puerto Rico defaulted on its monthly debt for the first time.
00:44:33.000 In 2017, Puerto Rico filed for bankruptcy.
00:44:37.000 Which is a vicious cycle because as the economy gets worse, more Puerto Ricans leave.
00:44:40.000 The government has less tax money, so they end up trying to raise taxes in order to grab money back and pay things off or take austerity measures, which are unpopular.
00:44:49.000 This is what happens when you get into an overspending cycle.
00:44:51.000 And then there's the hurricane that hit the island.
00:44:54.000 In 2017, killing somewhere between 3,000 and 5,000 people, also wiping out power for months.
00:45:00.000 There were serious allegations of mishandling of that by everybody from state to local authorities.
00:45:06.000 The hurricane cost an estimated $95 billion in total damage.
00:45:09.000 And then meanwhile, There are people in Rosello's administration who are being indicted for wasting taxpayer money on their friends, lavishing their friends with government contracts.
00:45:18.000 And then it turns out that a couple of weeks ago, about 900 pages of leaked chats from the governor's private telegram messenger group ended up on the Puerto Rico Center for Investigative Journalism.
00:45:27.000 Apparently, Rosello and 11 of his top aides and cabinet members exchanged profanity-laced, homophobic, misogynistic messages about fellow politicians.
00:45:35.000 Now, there's a Trump angle to all of this, which is that many of the people who are attacking Rosello are angry at him because they felt that he was bending over backwards to cater to Trump.
00:45:43.000 But what choice did he have?
00:45:45.000 His state is literally bankrupt.
00:45:46.000 Puerto Rico is literally bankrupt.
00:45:48.000 They went bankrupt in 2017.
00:45:49.000 And when a disaster hits, he has to beg the United States for help.
00:45:54.000 He has to beg the U.S.
00:45:54.000 federal government for help.
00:45:57.000 And so what are you gonna do?
00:45:58.000 Rip on him?
00:45:59.000 Because he's treating... I mean, it's like Chris Christie treating Barack Obama nicely.
00:46:03.000 Except that Chris Christie didn't need to treat him nicely to get what he wanted.
00:46:06.000 Well, Trump is the kind of guy who needs a little bit of flattering to get what he wants.
00:46:11.000 In one message, Puerto Rico's then-chief fiscal officer, Cristian Sobrino-Vega, wrote he was salivating to shoot San Juan mayor, Carmen Yulis Cruz, a frequent critic of the governor and of President Trump.
00:46:21.000 The governor responded, you'd be doing me a grand favor.
00:46:23.000 Of course, that's a joke, and everybody knows that's a joke.
00:46:25.000 Sobrino-Vega also made crude remarks about a Puerto Rican pop star, saying, nothing says patriarchal oppression like Ricky Martin.
00:46:31.000 Ricky Martin is such a male chauvinist that he bleeps men because women don't measure up.
00:46:34.000 Pure patriarchy.
00:46:36.000 And of course, this means brutality and terribleness.
00:46:39.000 Okay, well, all of these people Seems pretty terrible at their jobs.
00:46:43.000 But this is one of the consequences of a fiscal crisis.
00:46:46.000 The reason this has brought irrelevance is not merely because one of the reasons that Puerto Rico is having trouble becoming a United States, right?
00:46:53.000 Every year there's a proposal to incorporate Puerto Rico into the United States.
00:46:57.000 One of the problems is that means the federal government would have to inherit all of that debt.
00:47:01.000 But it does raise the question of what happens when this problem comes to the United States.
00:47:05.000 I don't mean Puerto Rico.
00:47:07.000 I mean the debt crisis.
00:47:08.000 Because the fact is that Puerto Rico declared bankruptcy on a municipal level.
00:47:13.000 The United States is running a 22 trillion dollar debt.
00:47:16.000 22 trillion dollars.
00:47:17.000 And today, President Trump endorsed another two year budget deal that blows out the budget to the tune of a trillion dollars in deficit for the next two years.
00:47:24.000 The Republican Study Committee came out, they said this is a bad deal, but Trump wants to get past the election.
00:47:29.000 When you keep kicking the can down the road, you end up with unworkable alternatives.
00:47:33.000 And Democrats want to raise the spending anyway, so they don't care about the national debt.
00:47:37.000 They don't care about the fact that debt eventually ends where Puerto Rico ended up, in a place where you now have to take austerity measures and cut benefits to your citizens, who don't like it, and then elect governments that don't have the power to do anything because they can't borrow anymore because they're bankrupt.
00:47:52.000 And then they have to take austerity measures, and then they don't like it, and then it creates enormous amounts of turmoil.
00:47:56.000 Now, we can keep kicking the can down the road federally.
00:47:59.000 Puerto Rico has not been able to keep kicking the can down the road, and so now they're eating their own.
00:48:04.000 Again, this is a Democratic politician in Puerto Rico who's being ousted by fellow Democrats, many of whom are further to the left.
00:48:11.000 And it's just going to get uglier over there.
00:48:13.000 So bad news for the sitting governor of Puerto Rico.
00:48:17.000 What he really should do at this point, were I him, were I he, if I were he, I would immediately release a yearbook photo of myself in blackface.
00:48:24.000 Because as we know, if you're a democratic governor in blackface, then you survive any scandal.
00:48:28.000 And we know that from Virginia.
00:48:29.000 So it's about time for Ricardo Rosselló to do all of that over in Puerto Rico.
00:48:33.000 But again, the wages of debt are political suicide.
00:48:37.000 That's where we are going.
00:48:38.000 And as a country, we ought to heed the warning that we see in Puerto Rico.
00:48:42.000 Okay, time for some things I like and then some things that I hate.
00:48:46.000 So, things that I like today.
00:48:49.000 So Boris Johnson has now taken over as Prime Minister of Great Britain.
00:48:53.000 And he is vowing that he is going to exit the EU come rain or shine in October.
00:48:57.000 So either there will be a deal or there will be no deal.
00:48:59.000 But if there's no deal, Brexit is happening anyway.
00:49:01.000 It's pretty clear at this point that Parliament doesn't actually have the power to stop that.
00:49:05.000 Theresa May didn't want Brexit to happen.
00:49:06.000 She wanted to avoid a no-deal Brexit.
00:49:08.000 Johnson is coming in with a mandate for no-deal Brexit.
00:49:10.000 So he's basically now got a lot of the power.
00:49:13.000 This is what he said yesterday.
00:49:16.000 The doubters, the doomsters, the gloomsters, they are going to get it wrong again.
00:49:22.000 The people who bet against Britain are going to lose their shirts because we're going to restore trust in our democracy.
00:49:32.000 And we're going to fulfil the repeated promises of Parliament to the people.
00:49:37.000 Okay, well, it's going to be very contentious for the next couple of months.
00:49:45.000 I was watching a question session with the Prime Minister today and it's a lot of shouting and a lot of yelling.
00:49:49.000 I will say the Brits have that part right.
00:49:50.000 That part's a lot more fun.
00:49:52.000 It's funny, when the United States began, there's a lot of question as to the decorum of the United States.
00:49:57.000 How would you title the president?
00:49:58.000 And John Adams had this long, flowing title he wanted for the presidency.
00:50:01.000 It was like his excellency, his majesty, the president of the United States.
00:50:05.000 And instead, it just became Mr. President.
00:50:06.000 Well, unfortunately, we formalized the presidency more than the Brits formalized their prime ministership.
00:50:11.000 I think that we could use a little less formality at this point.
00:50:14.000 Again, it lets off the steam.
00:50:17.000 Other things that I like today.
00:50:18.000 So, environmental activists decided that they were going to glue themselves, super glue themselves, to U.S.
00:50:24.000 Capitol walls in a call for action on climate change.
00:50:26.000 Now, what exactly is that action?
00:50:28.000 I talked at length yesterday on my radio show about the fact that there are not really a lot of great solutions for climate change.
00:50:34.000 The fact is China and India have no interest in really doing serious work on climate change.
00:50:38.000 If you're a third world country, You're mostly interested in making sure that your citizens aren't dying of starvation and that means the use of carbon-based fuels.
00:50:44.000 There are no alternative energies that are anywhere close to as efficient as carbon-based fuels.
00:50:49.000 Cap-and-trade has been an enormous failure in Europe.
00:50:52.000 There's talk about carbon taxes that would just be, it wouldn't be a cap-and-trade system, it would just be a system of taxation on each ton of carbon emissions and then you do what you're going to do.
00:51:03.000 But again, that Relies heavily on the development of an alternative energy source that is competitive with other countries in the world.
00:51:10.000 And the real question becomes how much are people willing to pay additionally for energy in a political arena where people feel their government doesn't have their own interests at heart.
00:51:19.000 In any case, it's much easier to go and just claim that nobody cares about the problem than to actually come up with some practical solutions for it.
00:51:25.000 Like for example, deregulating nuclear energy.
00:51:27.000 Yesterday, a group of environmental activists took a novel approach to calling for congressional action on climate change.
00:51:33.000 They superglued themselves to the wall of a Capitol tunnel.
00:51:36.000 Some of the protesters were draped in bright yellow police tape, others wearing placards reading, due to climate emergency, Congress is shut down until sufficient action is taken to address the crisis.
00:51:45.000 A group of activists had used gorilla glue to fasten their hands to the door jams of a tunnel connecting the Capitol Hill to the House office buildings.
00:51:52.000 According to a participant, about 15 other people were helping.
00:51:56.000 The video was posted online by Extinction Rebellion, a group that organized the demonstration.
00:52:02.000 Here is what it sounded like.
00:52:04.000 People are just going right underneath them.
00:52:13.000 So they're really not obstructing very much here.
00:52:16.000 Ow!
00:52:16.000 Ow!
00:52:21.000 I mean, like, you did superglue yourself there, dude.
00:52:23.000 I mean, it's not like you woke up and somebody had superglued you to the wall, and you put yourself in this particular position.
00:52:32.000 Ow!
00:52:32.000 Oh!
00:52:33.000 Because, can I tell you something?
00:52:35.000 Climate action on a global scale, with the help of China, India, and Russia, that's not gonna happen.
00:52:41.000 Just because you superglued yourself to a window.
00:52:44.000 You're just superglued to a window.
00:52:45.000 You're aware of that.
00:52:47.000 Are you not?
00:52:48.000 So, useless—OW!
00:52:48.000 Apparently not.
00:52:52.000 Useless action.
00:52:53.000 That's definitely going to get things done.
00:52:55.000 It was not immediately clear, according to the Washington Post, how the demonstrators were removed from the Capitol walls, and whether anyone was injured in the process.
00:53:03.000 One protester may have had her hand ripped from the wall by an unidentified person trying to get through the doorway.
00:53:07.000 Because people still have jobs to do.
00:53:10.000 Some members of the group were carrying acetone solution, which can dissolve glue.
00:53:14.000 So at least they came prepared to, you know, leave without any further problems.
00:53:17.000 Although the protesters attracted attention, they were less than successful in blocking the Capitol passageways, according to the Washington Post.
00:53:23.000 Staff members, reporters, police officers, and lawmakers could be seen ducking under the activists' outstretched arms to make their way past them.
00:53:29.000 If you respect the climate emergency, you will go around.
00:53:32.000 One of the super-glued protesters can be heard saying in the video, as a steady stream of seemingly unfazed Capitol denizens passed below his arm and through the tunnel.
00:53:40.000 I guess not, another protester replied.
00:53:44.000 Okay, well-deserved, well-deserved.
00:53:46.000 So, again, stupid protests are some of my favorite protests.
00:53:48.000 Whether it's PETA having themselves branded like cattle to do what?
00:53:52.000 Just like, now you have a brand on you.
00:53:56.000 Which is gross and weird.
00:53:58.000 Or whether it is people super-gluing themselves a la A Christmas Story.
00:54:03.000 Double dog dare.
00:54:06.000 That's a take right there.
00:54:07.000 It's a move.
00:54:08.000 I'm not going to say it's a smart move.
00:54:09.000 I'm not going to say it's going to achieve anything.
00:54:11.000 In fact, I'm going to say the opposite.
00:54:12.000 I'm going to say it's pretty stupid and it doesn't achieve anything and everybody's kind of annoyed and we laugh at you when people stretch your hand skin that is connected to the window that you put there yourself because you're an idiot.
00:54:22.000 How about this?
00:54:22.000 How about practical action, less moral posturing?
00:54:26.000 Unfortunately, this has become, when it comes to climate change, huge swaths to the left.
00:54:30.000 Just them sitting there and screaming in agony about climate change without anything remotely resembling a proper solution.
00:54:38.000 Well, well done.
00:54:39.000 Well done, protesters, for proving once and for all that you really have nothing to do here except yell and scream and pretend that you have ideas.
00:54:46.000 Okay, time for a quick thing that I hate.
00:54:51.000 So honestly, I don't know whether to put this in things I hate or things I love, because this story is just phenomenal.
00:54:56.000 So The Cut has a long piece today.
00:54:58.000 It's New York Magazine.
00:54:59.000 A piece called The Most Gullible Man in Cambridge.
00:55:01.000 A Harvard Law professor who teaches a class on judgment wouldn't seem like an obvious mark, would he?
00:55:05.000 The piece is by Kara Balinek.
00:55:07.000 What's wonderful about this is social justice warrior sensibilities coming back to eat alive a Harvard Law professor.
00:55:14.000 Now, I never took a class from Bruce Hay.
00:55:16.000 Bruce Hay was always perceived as one of the more bizarre professors at Harvard Law School.
00:55:21.000 He proved himself so in this story.
00:55:23.000 This story is both glorious and horrifying in virtually every way.
00:55:28.000 Quote, it was just supposed to have been a quick Saturday morning errand to buy picture hooks.
00:55:32.000 On March 7th, 2015, Harvard Law Professor Bruce Hay, then 52, was in Tags Hardware in Cambridge, Massachusetts, near his home, when a young woman with long reddish-brown hair approached him to ask where she could find batteries.
00:55:43.000 It was still very much winter, and once the woman got his attention, he saw that underneath her dark woolen coat and perfectly tied scarf, she was wearing a dress and a chic pair of boots, hardly typical weekend errand attire in the New England college town.
00:55:55.000 When he directed her to another part of the store, she changed the subject.
00:55:58.000 By the way, you're very attractive, he remembers her saying.
00:56:01.000 Okay, so first of all, dudes, note.
00:56:04.000 If you're out at a hardware store, and a hot lady comes up to you, and she just says to you, randomly, by the way, you're very attractive, look for your wallet.
00:56:13.000 This is not going to go well.
00:56:15.000 This has never happened in real life.
00:56:16.000 This only happens in, apparently, pornography movies, so I have been told.
00:56:20.000 Apparently, this professor did not know this, and so he immediately was like, I am attractive.
00:56:25.000 Wow.
00:56:26.000 Sorry, I'm married, he responded impulsively.
00:56:28.000 It wasn't exactly true.
00:56:29.000 Hay has been legally divorced since 1999, but he lives with his ex-wife, Jennifer Zaks, an assistant U.S.
00:56:34.000 attorney in Boston, and their two young children.
00:56:36.000 The woman quickly apologized, Hay recalls.
00:56:38.000 I didn't mean to bother you, she said.
00:56:39.000 I'm just here on business for a few days.
00:56:41.000 I don't really know anybody.
00:56:42.000 Okay, at this point, once somebody says that, like, still the radar's not going up.
00:56:47.000 The wisest and brightest and most elite among us, Bruce Hay, how does that not send your antennae spiraling?
00:56:51.000 Right?
00:56:52.000 How?
00:56:52.000 How?
00:56:53.000 How's your antennae not up?
00:56:54.000 She starts with, you're very attractive, and then she goes to, I'm alone in the city for a couple of days.
00:56:58.000 Hey, really?
00:56:59.000 This is not how real life works, man.
00:57:02.000 Hey, a Francophile noticed the woman had a French-sounding accent and asked if she spoke the language.
00:57:06.000 She told him her name was Maria Pia Schumann, that she was born in France, but her father was the American songwriter Mort Schumann, and that she was in town from Paris en route to New York.
00:57:14.000 Schumann gave Hey her email address.
00:57:16.000 The professor wasn't accustomed to picking up women in random places, let alone getting picked up by them.
00:57:20.000 That's because no man has ever been picked up alone in a random place by a woman.
00:57:25.000 Maybe it's happened, but it is a rare occasion.
00:57:27.000 Hey, he was intrigued.
00:57:29.000 No, kidding.
00:57:30.000 Since moving back in with his ex-wife in 2004, he says, their relationship had been mostly platonic, and the two had an understanding that if either of them wanted to see other people, they'd have to move out.
00:57:39.000 By casual flings, he believed, fell under a tacit don't ask, don't tell policy.
00:57:43.000 By email, Hay and Schumann arranged to have coffee that afternoon, where they bonded over losing parents too young.
00:57:49.000 She was now 32, an accountant with young children.
00:57:52.000 Hey told says she told him she had two toddlers she was co-parenting with an ex-wife who lived in London.
00:57:58.000 File under friendship, Hey thought, because she's a lesbian.
00:58:01.000 Schumann also told him about the friend she was staying with, Misha Hader, a brilliant trans woman pursuing a doctorate in physics at Harvard who was struggling with crippling depression.
00:58:09.000 Hey, who also battled depression, listened with particular interest.
00:58:12.000 After a couple of hours, Schumann said, I've really enjoyed this, but I have to leave town in a couple of days.
00:58:16.000 I hope we can see each other before then.
00:58:18.000 They went to dinner that night and again the next.
00:58:20.000 At the end of the second evening, Schumann asked him to join her for breakfast the following morning.
00:58:23.000 I was smitten, Hay says.
00:58:25.000 I wasn't sure what the Maria Pia thing was going to be.
00:58:27.000 That's the truthful answer because one of the first things out of her mouth was that she had just divorced a woman in England.
00:58:32.000 He didn't mind that a physical relationship was probably off the table.
00:58:35.000 He was taking antidepressants, which often hampered his ability to enjoy sex anyway.
00:58:39.000 Then, on the day Schumann told him she was leaving for New York on her way back to Europe, he says, she invited him to her room at the Taj Hotel in Boston, started kissing him, and led him to her bed.
00:58:50.000 Hay drove Schumann to the airport early that evening.
00:58:52.000 So again, at some point you might find this story suspicious, right?
00:58:56.000 She picks you up in a hardware store.
00:58:57.000 You have dinner a few times.
00:58:58.000 She says she's a lesbian and now she's having sex with you.
00:59:00.000 At some point you might be like, this is weird, but not if you're in Harvard, man.
00:59:05.000 Hay drove Schumann to the airport early that evening.
00:59:08.000 For the next few weeks, she traveled to London and Paris.
00:59:10.000 She called and texted him daily.
00:59:12.000 102 calls that month, according to phone records.
00:59:14.000 A few times, he asked if she would FaceTime or Skype with him.
00:59:16.000 She refused.
00:59:18.000 He found her resistance strange, but he didn't press the issue.
00:59:21.000 By this point, she had begun declaring her love for him.
00:59:23.000 She told me she never got involved with men and I was this big exception, he says.
00:59:27.000 Oh my goodness.
00:59:28.000 It seems odd she would express such feelings for him after a few days together, but while he dismissed her intensity as a folly of youth, there was a part of him that entertained the possibility she was serious.
00:59:37.000 Why not be open to it, he wondered.
00:59:38.000 It had been years since he'd felt such a profound connection.
00:59:41.000 So if you can sense that this story is going to go the wrong way, This is correct.
00:59:47.000 A few weeks later, she texted to say she was returning to Cambridge and wanted to see him.
00:59:50.000 They met the next day at the Sheraton Commander and had sex.
00:59:53.000 Almost as soon as it was over, Shuman's mood shifted.
00:59:55.000 She became dour than angry, telling him she couldn't abide his keeping their relationship a secret, nor what he says she referred to as his continued attachment to Zacks.
01:00:03.000 She demanded he leave her.
01:00:04.000 He was confounded.
01:00:05.000 He wasn't about to leave his partner of 28 years for a woman he'd slept with twice.
01:00:09.000 He got up, dressed, and left.
01:00:11.000 Later that day, Shuman contacted him to say she was open to discussing pursuing a relationship.
01:00:15.000 When Hay demurred, she told him she didn't see any point in staying in touch.
01:00:18.000 But they did stay in touch.
01:00:20.000 Over the next four years, the law professor would be drawn into a campaign of fraud, extortion, and false accusations.
01:00:25.000 At one point, Hay's family would be left suddenly homeless.
01:00:29.000 At another, owing to what his lawyer has described as the weaponization of the university's Title IX machinery against Hay, he would find himself indefinitely suspended from his job, accrue over $300,000 in legal bills, with no end to litigation in sight.
01:00:43.000 This is where the story goes from the weirdly pornographic to the merely politically delicious.
01:00:49.000 Whether Schumann knew it when she met him, she'd found the perfect mark in Brussais, an authority on civil procedure who'd spent much of his life in the ivory tower.
01:00:57.000 Though he leans left, he briefly clerked for Antonin Scalia, because Scalia always had a left-leaning clerk he could argue with.
01:01:03.000 He joined the Harvard Law faculty in 1992.
01:01:07.000 A close friend calls him the quintessential absent-minded professor who tends to lose things, phones, and laptops, and to miss social cues.
01:01:13.000 I have friends who took his classes.
01:01:14.000 They said he was pretty weird.
01:01:15.000 Hay has a tight-knit circle of friends, many of whom are women, and though their relationships are non-sexual, the intensity, he tells me, has been a continual source of conflict with Zacks.
01:01:23.000 Jennifer says my women friends have always had ulterior motives.
01:01:27.000 My response has been that my best friends have been women for my entire life.
01:01:31.000 He and Zacks first met at Harvard Law in 1987.
01:01:33.000 They married two years later.
01:01:34.000 They had a son together before separating.
01:01:37.000 Then he moved back in and they had two more children together.
01:01:41.000 And then things got weird.
01:01:43.000 Six weeks after they broke off contact, Schumann called Hay to tell him she was pregnant with his baby.
01:01:47.000 She hadn't had sex with another man in the past year, she said.
01:01:49.000 Hay was stunned.
01:01:51.000 He hadn't even ejaculated during either of their encounters, a side effect of his medication.
01:01:55.000 But he understood that pregnancy was possible, if rare, without orgasm.
01:01:58.000 Schumann said she was weighing whether to terminate the pregnancy, then quickly followed up by saying she'd made the decision to carry the term.
01:02:04.000 She was due in January.
01:02:06.000 Hayes says she didn't bring up money.
01:02:08.000 He was more surprised when he learned that Schumann would be relocating to Cambridge that summer.
01:02:12.000 She told him in June she had purchased a three-bedroom Mansard Victorian, now valued at $1.9 million, on a side street in the Radcliffe neighborhood less than a mile from his house, and had brought her children over from London.
01:02:23.000 Maria Pia made it sound as though she had scarcely ever been to Cambridge, she says.
01:02:27.000 She said she didn't know the area very well, didn't really know anybody.
01:02:30.000 Schumann explained she'd purchased the apartment as an investment and as a place for Hayter, that's her graduate student trans woman friend, to live while she finished her grad work.
01:02:38.000 She and Hayter, she told Hay, had been best friends since they met as physics students their first year at Imperial College in London.
01:02:45.000 Later in a conversation that summer, Schumann revealed that she and Hayter were raising the children together.
01:02:50.000 Good luck to those kids, man.
01:02:51.000 The unfolding revelations did little to put off Hay, who says he was determined to take full responsibility for my actions.
01:02:56.000 Throughout the summer, he and Schumann got together once or twice and discussed rekindling their romance, but she told him it was contingent on him telling Zaks about the affair and the baby, which he wasn't willing to do.
01:03:06.000 They hadn't been sexually involved since their encounter at the Sheridan Commander in April, but Schumann could be effusive.
01:03:12.000 Okay, to make a longer story short, it turns out this baby, probably not his, but he wasn't willing to say so because he thought, hey, she's a lesbian, and it's politically incorrect to suggest maybe she's had sex with other men.
01:03:23.000 Thank you.
01:03:24.000 Hayter, the trans woman, often loomed large in their conversations.
01:03:28.000 Even as Schumann demanded more of Hay's time, she was cagey about letting Hay meet the woman she called her soul sister.
01:03:33.000 When Hay asked about her, he says, Schumann responded that Hayter was depressed and wasn't up for meeting new people.
01:03:38.000 Finally, they met.
01:03:39.000 Schumann had told him, That hater was weary of her physics program and wanted to get more involved in trans activism and write about trans issues.
01:03:45.000 I thought maybe I could help her, calls Hay.
01:03:47.000 She'd been described to me as this very exceptional person, but downtrodden, treated unfairly by family and by the world, by her body.
01:03:53.000 By the time I met Misha, I had a protective feeling for her.
01:03:55.000 Their bond appeared instantaneous.
01:03:57.000 We had similar political views, he said.
01:03:59.000 She told me a lot about the trans world.
01:04:01.000 I'd known nothing about it.
01:04:02.000 Soon they were getting coffee almost daily, talking for hours, sometimes meeting at a coffee shop near Harvard.
01:04:07.000 Hayter regularly texted and emailed Hay articles and stats about trans women being brutalized and murdered by men.
01:04:12.000 Her communications were often punctuated with a kind of fixated anxiety about being persecuted for being trans.
01:04:18.000 Hay believed he'd identified a kindred spirit, so he was sensitive to her emotional state.
01:04:22.000 They confided in each other about their depression and suicidal thoughts.
01:04:26.000 Hay had been molested as a teenager.
01:04:27.000 He told Hayter about the experience.
01:04:28.000 Hay was struggling with drinking.
01:04:30.000 He insists his friendship was more familial than romantic.
01:04:33.000 A month after their first coffee, Hayter texted Hay to say, I'm so happy we met.
01:04:37.000 You're wonderful and stimulating company.
01:04:39.000 Behind his back, though, the women mocked Hay.
01:04:41.000 In a text message to Hayter that they provided, Schumann refers to him as effing desperado.
01:04:46.000 By then, Hayter rarely saw Schumann anymore.
01:04:49.000 Still, they began discussing the possibility that Hay would move in with them.
01:04:52.000 So then the family relationship would be Hay, Schumann, a lesbian, a trans woman, and Bruce Hay.
01:04:58.000 He said his relationship with the women could be intoxicating.
01:05:02.000 He said that they were nearly perfect people who were bright and kind and sweet and socially conscious.
01:05:08.000 It turns out that, um, no.
01:05:10.000 So Hay used his publishing connections to help Hayter pursue her writing.
01:05:14.000 He tried to get this person's, this man, I mean it's a biological man, this person's writing posted on the Guardian and the Huffington Post.
01:05:23.000 Hay accompanied Hayter to Phoenix to consult about gender affirmation surgery in the spring.
01:05:28.000 On January 14th, 2016, Hayter called Hay to tell him that Schumann had given birth to a baby boy.
01:05:33.000 Hay had asked to be present for the baby's birth, but Schumann refused.
01:05:36.000 Hay asked to meet the newborn, but again, Schumann refused.
01:05:39.000 The woman also told Hay, because he'd failed to separate from Zacks, they listed Hayter's name, not his, as the other parents on the little boy's birth certificate.
01:05:47.000 While he was in Paris, the woman's calls and texts intensified, taking on an increasingly combative tone.
01:05:53.000 At one point, Hayter told Hay she was going to get euthanasia, Hey, meanwhile, Zax had become suspicious, and Zax took all of this as an enormous betrayal.
01:06:04.000 Zax told Hay it was highly unlikely he got Schumann pregnant.
01:06:07.000 Jennifer suggested I was ignoring the evidence because I wanted to believe the child was mine.
01:06:11.000 Perhaps she was right.
01:06:12.000 Zacks pushed Hay to for a paternity test.
01:06:14.000 Hay wouldn't have it.
01:06:15.000 Here's the key.
01:06:16.000 Not only did he trust Schumann, he felt it would have been insulting for a heterosexual cisgender man to question a professed lesbian as to whether she had had sex with other men.
01:06:26.000 He believed her when she said her sexual relationship with him was an exception.
01:06:30.000 Hay met the baby for the first time.
01:06:32.000 He said, I never doubted he was my son.
01:06:34.000 Schumann told him she was being treated for recurrence of cancer.
01:06:37.000 Again, the diagnosis was fishy.
01:06:39.000 Hay began to entertain doubts about the woman.
01:06:42.000 It all got very weird, obviously, even weirder.
01:06:44.000 Throughout the summer, the women suggested that Hay disentangle from Zacks.
01:06:49.000 And then here's what ends up happening, because the story is really long, because it's The New Yorker.
01:06:53.000 Here's what ends up happening.
01:06:55.000 It turns out that they defraud him out of his house.
01:06:59.000 The women returned to his house before Christmas.
01:07:01.000 Zacks again called the cops.
01:07:02.000 She started calling the cops on them.
01:07:04.000 The next day, the women sent texts to Hay, calling him a rapist who needed to be reported to authorities.
01:07:08.000 He started receiving texts from an unknown number.
01:07:10.000 You will not get away with rape.
01:07:12.000 Still, he kept hanging out with them.
01:07:15.000 And then, they stopped by.
01:07:17.000 They asked him to sign a document.
01:07:19.000 He didn't read the document, and he ended up signing over the deed to his house.
01:07:25.000 He signed over the deed to his house, allegedly.
01:07:28.000 And not only that, he then got involved in a Title IX scandal, because he was accused by these women, or by a woman and a trans woman, of sexual harassment.
01:07:40.000 And he ended up losing his job.
01:07:42.000 Okay, it turns out that when you blind yourself to truths, because you're trying to be too politically incorrect, there are some bad effects of that.
01:07:49.000 Things tend to get rather hairy and awful.
01:07:54.000 Bruce Hayman, Well, blinded by reality.
01:08:00.000 My goodness.
01:08:01.000 That's some solid stuff, is it not?
01:08:03.000 Okay, I think we can all acknowledge at this point that if you get scammed by a lesbian and a transgender woman, into giving up your home, then you probably shouldn't be teaching law at Harvard.
01:08:18.000 Is that fair?
01:08:19.000 Is that fair?
01:08:20.000 You probably shouldn't be teaching justice and law.
01:08:22.000 You might not be like the best source for students.
01:08:25.000 The summary, according to National Review, is that Hay says she began making hysterical demands, got him to sign a sheaf of papers he didn't read.
01:08:31.000 He said that since she was an accountant, she knew best.
01:08:33.000 And on a thin pretext, gave him a check for $3,000, which he then cashed.
01:08:37.000 It turns out he had signed over his $3.5 million house to her and her trans buddy for lease at a nominal rate, the check framed as a security deposit.
01:08:45.000 The woman and trans friend first moved all the stuff out of the house, charged the expenses to his credit card, which he had given them access to.
01:08:53.000 His ex-wife saw a lot of this coming and had arranged to have the house put in her name only, so that made the lease invalid, but he incurred some $300,000 worth of legal bills, and then the woman who seduced him charged him with sexual abuse, and he was suspended automatically under the Title IX policy.
01:09:08.000 Well, Bruce Hay.
01:09:10.000 Yeah.
01:09:10.000 Sad story of Bruce Hay right there.
01:09:13.000 Suffice it to say, perhaps you should examine the realities about you instead of falling prey to two of the oldest tricks in the book.
01:09:20.000 Trick number one, you're a very attractive man at a hardware store.
01:09:23.000 Trick number two, here are me and all my social justice warrior friends who want to be your best friends and raise children with you.
01:09:30.000 And also, you're a rapist.
01:09:32.000 So.
01:09:34.000 We've been a fond farewell to that story.
01:09:35.000 My goodness, that's a wild story.
01:09:37.000 We'll see you here later today for two additional hours.
01:09:38.000 We have some great guests today on the program.
01:09:40.000 Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is stopping by.
01:09:43.000 We'll also be having on Representative Lee Zeldin of the House to talk about the Mueller hearing yesterday.
01:09:48.000 It's a lot of good stuff coming up.
01:09:49.000 Go subscribe so you can be part of it.
01:09:50.000 Otherwise, we'll see you here tomorrow.
01:09:51.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
01:09:52.000 You're listening to The Ben Shapiro Show.
01:09:54.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Robert Sterling.
01:10:02.000 Directed by Mike Joyner.
01:10:03.000 Executive Producer, Jeremy Boring.
01:10:05.000 Senior Producer, Jonathan Hay.
01:10:07.000 Our Supervising Producer is Mathis Glover.
01:10:10.000 And our Technical Producer is Austin Stevens.
01:10:12.000 Edited by Adam Sievitz.
01:10:14.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Koromina.
01:10:16.000 Hair and Makeup is by Jesua Olvera.
01:10:18.000 Production Assistant, Nick Sheehan.
01:10:19.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire production.
01:10:22.000 Copyright Daily Wire 2019.