The Ben Shapiro Show - May 28, 2018


Remember Our Soldiers | Ep. 547


Episode Stats

Length

48 minutes

Words per Minute

205.33241

Word Count

9,986

Sentence Count

609

Misogynist Sentences

14

Hate Speech Sentences

23


Summary

Memorial Day is a day on which we remember the valor of our service people all over the world. And I want to start the show today by talking a little bit about some things you may not know about Memorial Day. Plus, we discuss President Trump's pullout from the North Korean summit, and we talk some Memorial Day on The Ben Shapiro Show. Logo by Courtney DeKorte. Theme by Mavus White. Music by PSOVOD and tyops. All rights reserved. Used by permission. Rachel Dolezal gets in trouble again. Plus we discuss the President's decision to pull out of the North Korea summit. This episode was produced and edited by Ben Shapiro. Our theme song is Come Alone by Suneaters, courtesy of Lotuspool Records. The album art for the song was done by Micah Vellian and the music for this episode was written and performed by Mark Phillips. We do not own the rights to either of these songs or any other music used in this episode. If you enjoyed it please leave us a review and/or a rating and review on Apple Music or wherever else you get your music is appreciated. Thank you! Ben Shapiro and I are forever grateful for all the support and support we get through this work. -Ben Shapiro and all the hard work Ben Shapiro does on this podcast. It really does mean the work of everyone else does so much for us. Thank you so much so much more than that in the world can do it so much of it, it really does, too much of that ... -A very special thanks to you, really really does... Ben and the rest of the world really does it really needs it, really does and the whole world does it ... etc etc., etc. etc. -- etc., & finally finally did it... etc.. ) -- Thank you, etc., really really really truly does ... ) Thank you really really, really finally, really finally, etc, etc.) < , etc., finally, finally, truly, really, etc. really really finally Thank it, etc.. etc, finally finally, etc) And finally, a whole lot more ... Thank them, really truly, etc etc, really & finally, in fact, etc.... AND finally, and finally, & finally... ) etc,


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Rachel Dolezal gets herself in trouble again.
00:00:03.000 Plus, we discuss President Trump's pullout from the North Korean summit, and we talk some Memorial Day.
00:00:07.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:14.000 Well, it is a day on which we celebrate the valor of our soldiers, of our service people all over the world.
00:00:22.000 And I want to start the show today by talking a little bit about some things you may not know about Memorial Day.
00:00:25.000 Now, this is from history.com, so this information is, I think, really useful and relevant and pretty cool, actually, because most folks don't really know all that much about Memorial Day.
00:00:33.000 I will admit that I didn't until fairly recently.
00:00:36.000 Some of the stuff is really neat.
00:00:37.000 So, did you know that Memorial Day, one of the first commemorations of a Memorial Day, was organized by recently freed slaves?
00:00:45.000 So, according to History.com, as the Civil War neared its end, thousands of Union soldiers held as prisoners of war were herded into a series of hastily assembled camps in Charleston, South Carolina.
00:00:55.000 Conditions at one camp, a former racetrack near the city's citadel, were so bad that more than 250 prisoners died from disease or exposure and were buried in a mass grave behind the track's grandstand.
00:01:11.000 There's a very good book about one of those prison camps that was in the South that ended up with thousands of people dying in just horrific conditions, people being held outdoors without tents.
00:01:21.000 I mean, just horrendous stuff.
00:01:23.000 Three weeks after the Confederate surrender, an unusual procession entered the former camp.
00:01:27.000 On May 1st, 1865, more than 1,000 recently freed slaves
00:01:31.000 Accompanied by regiments of U.S.
00:01:32.000 colored troops, including the Massachusetts 54th Infantry, and a handful of white Charlestonians gathered in the camp to consecrate a new proper burial site for the Union dead.
00:01:41.000 The group sang hymns, gave readings, and distributed flowers around the cemetery, which they dedicated to the martyrs of the racecourse.
00:01:47.000 The racecourse, of course, being the place where they had held
00:01:50.000 This awful, awful prison camp.
00:01:51.000 The brutality of the Civil War really cannot be overstated, and this is why it's so frustrating when people overlook the legacy of the literally hundreds of thousands of American troops who gave their lives to end the evil of slavery within American borders.
00:02:04.000 It's an amazing thing, and to overlook that and to pretend that America's made no sacrifices on this score is just to be historically ignorant.
00:02:10.000 Now, it doesn't mean all the problems got solved, obviously, 1865, but America's soldiers
00:02:14.000 Obviously, we thank soldiers who are stationed around the globe right now.
00:02:17.000 I'm sure listening to the sound of my voice, we have lots of members of the military who listen to the show.
00:02:22.000 Thank God for them and thank them for listening.
00:02:45.000 1868 should become a nationwide day of commemoration for more than 620,000 soldiers killed in the recently ended Civil War.
00:02:52.000 On Decoration Day, as Logan dubbed it, Americans should lay flowers and decorate the graves of the war dead whose bodies now lie in almost every city, village, and hamlet churchyard in the land.
00:03:01.000 According to legend,
00:03:02.000 Logan chose May 30th because it was a rare day that didn't fall on the anniversary of a Civil War battle, because there were so many Civil War battles.
00:03:08.000 Some historians think that the date was selected to ensure that flowers across the country would be in full bloom, according to History.com.
00:03:15.000 After the war, Logan, who served as U.S.
00:03:17.000 Congressman before resigning to join the Army, returned to politics, and he eventually served in both the House and the Senate.
00:03:22.000 He ran for Vice President in 1884, unsuccessfully.
00:03:25.000 And his body was laid in state at the U.S.
00:03:28.000 Capitol.
00:03:28.000 He was just one of 33 people to have received the honor.
00:03:31.000 Apparently, he adapted the idea from earlier events in the South because in April 1886, the Ladies Memorial Association of Columbus, Georgia resolved to commemorate the fallen once a year, which is a decision that seemed to have influenced Logan to follow suit according to his own wife.
00:03:45.000 But commemorations were rarely held on one standard day.
00:03:46.000 They were sort of held on a variety of days.
00:03:48.000 It didn't actually become a federal holiday until 1971, because Decoration Day is what it was called.
00:03:53.000 The first year, more than 27 states held some sort of ceremony, with more than 5,000 people in attendance at a ceremony at Arlington National Cemetery.
00:04:01.000 By 1890, every former state of the Union had adopted it as an official holiday.
00:04:05.000 But for more than 50 years, the holiday was used to commemorate those killed just in the Civil War, not in any other American conflict.
00:04:10.000 And then after World War I, it was expanded out
00:04:13.000 to include those killed in all wars.
00:04:15.000 Memorial Day, obviously, as opposed to Veterans Day, which is about everybody who has served.
00:04:18.000 Memorial Day is specifically about people who gave their lives in order to preserve the freedom of the Union.
00:04:24.000 So, I find this stuff fascinating.
00:04:27.000 According to History.com,
00:04:29.000 Although the term Memorial Day was used beginning in the 1880s, the holiday was officially known as Decoration Day for more than a century, and then it was changed by federal law, as we mentioned.
00:04:36.000 Well, four years later, the Uniform Monday Holiday Act of 1968 finally went into effect, and it moved Memorial Day from its observance on May 30th, regardless of the day of the week, to set it for the last Monday in May.
00:04:47.000 A lot of veterans groups
00:04:48.000 We're concerned that a lot of people saw it as a long weekend as opposed to a day to pay tribute to our fallen soldiers.
00:04:55.000 For more than 20 years, their cause was championed by Senator Daniel Inouye who recently died in 2012.
00:05:00.000 He had reintroduced legislation to set it any day in the middle of the week.
00:05:03.000 It wouldn't have just been on a Monday.
00:05:05.000 It wouldn't have been another long weekend.
00:05:06.000 It would have been a time when we all stand
00:05:08.000 I'm in favor of that.
00:05:11.000 I think that we should move it to whatever day May 30th is.
00:05:13.000 We should move it back to its original date so that it doesn't just become another day that you have off and you take it off for a long weekend.
00:05:19.000 Yes, we can enjoy Memorial Day, but obviously we should have half our brain, more than half our brain, on the reason that we are spending that day barbecuing as opposed to working.
00:05:29.000 We're good to go.
00:05:43.000 And they play air raid sirens all across the country.
00:05:46.000 People literally stop their cars on the freeway, get out of their cars, and stand there until the air raid siren is over.
00:05:51.000 We should have something like that in the United States as well.
00:05:54.000 Despite the increasing celebration of the holidays as some rite of passage, there are still some formal rituals on the books.
00:05:59.000 The American flag is supposed to be hung at half-staff until noon on Memorial Day and then raised to the top of the staff.
00:06:04.000 And since 2000, when the U.S.
00:06:05.000 Congress passed legislation, all Americans are encouraged to pause for a national moment of remembrance at 3 p.m.
00:06:10.000 local time.
00:06:11.000 So that should actually be formalized.
00:06:13.000 We should have whatever noise it is, sirens, whatever it is, to ensure that at 3 p.m.
00:06:16.000 everybody stops what they are doing.
00:06:18.000 The federal government has also used the holiday to honor non-veterans.
00:06:21.000 The Lincoln Memorial was dedicated on Memorial Day in 1922.
00:06:25.000 The Indy 500 has become its own Memorial Day tradition, obviously.
00:06:28.000 The reason that I think it's important to remember all of this is because we live in a country when there are very few unifying symbols.
00:06:33.000 There are very few unifying
00:06:36.000 Things that bring us together.
00:06:38.000 We fight about everything with each other all the time.
00:06:40.000 We seem to really dislike each other in a lot of ways.
00:06:43.000 But this is one where we should all come together.
00:06:45.000 And it's unfortunate that during the 1960s, a lot of the patriotism surrounding our fallen soldiers was lost.
00:06:50.000 During the 1960s, soldiers who were coming back from Vietnam were treated really terribly.
00:06:55.000 Even now, there's this weird idea on the left that soldiers are either heroes or victims.
00:06:59.000 And that if a soldier goes off to serve in a foreign land and dies heroically,
00:07:04.000 That soldier was somehow a victim of the government that sent him over there in the first place.
00:07:08.000 We have a volunteer army now.
00:07:09.000 I've always found this idea really insulting.
00:07:11.000 These soldiers are making a sacrifice, and the sacrifice that they are making, they are doing with full knowledge of what it is they are getting into.
00:07:18.000 That's what makes the sacrifice worth making.
00:07:20.000 That's what makes the sacrifice so incredible.
00:07:21.000 They're making more of a sacrifice than I have.
00:07:23.000 They're making more of a sacrifice than virtually anyone in my generation has.
00:07:27.000 I mean, the number of people in my generation joining the military is still extraordinarily low.
00:07:31.000 They're doing something I did not do.
00:07:33.000 They're doing something I did not have the bravery and the courage and the decency to do.
00:07:37.000 That's an amazing thing.
00:07:38.000 And to rob them of the volition of that choice by suggesting that when American soldiers die, they die in vain.
00:07:44.000 Or that when American soldiers die, they are victims of the evil American corporate hierarchy.
00:07:48.000 It's also a great time to remember that for all of the leftist talk about how America has been a terrible force in the world, how America is responsible for slavery and imperialism and colonialism,
00:08:13.000 Wherever American troops have set their boots, the world is a better place.
00:08:17.000 Wherever American troops have kept their boots, the world is certainly a better place.
00:08:21.000 If you don't believe me, just look at Iraq.
00:08:23.000 There's a lot of talk about how Iraq is a worse place because we intervened.
00:08:26.000 No, Iraq is a worse place because we pulled out.
00:08:28.000 When American troops entered Iraq, Iraq was run by the Saddam Hussein dictatorship, where women were being forcibly imprisoned and raped and tortured by Saddam Hussein's son.
00:08:38.000 It was a hellhole.
00:08:39.000 He was gassing his own people, the Kurds.
00:08:41.000 And when we went in, we broke a lot of stuff, and a lot of people died, and that is awful.
00:08:45.000 But there is no question that the place got a lot worse when America pulled out.
00:08:49.000 Where American troops set their boots, things get better, which is why, still, the vast majority of oppressed people on planet Earth
00:08:56.000 If they could, would look to the arrival of the American flag in their land as an opportunity to cut back repression and to fight repression as opposed to imperialism, colonialism, look at these evil Americans and all the rest.
00:09:10.000 Again, the reality is that America has freed Europe not once but twice.
00:09:14.000 America has freed the world of the Soviet menace.
00:09:19.000 That is due to the sacrifice of American soldiers.
00:09:22.000 Our history is long and glorious with regards to our military interventions.
00:09:25.000 And that is certainly true, including wars like Vietnam, which was not a war fought for American imperial interests.
00:09:31.000 It was a war fought to preserve South Vietnam's independence.
00:09:35.000 It was a war fought to preserve the democracy of Vietnam and to move toward a better democracy in Vietnam and save them from the repression and evil of the Viet Cong administration, which resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people, including in Cambodia, just across the border.
00:09:48.000 Domino theory was correct.
00:09:49.000 Cambodia did fall and a million people were killed by Pol Pot.
00:09:52.000 When America precipitously pulls out, things get bad.
00:09:55.000 When America stays, Germany becomes nice Germany.
00:09:57.000 And nobody thinks of Germany as a threatening country anymore.
00:10:00.000 Why?
00:10:01.000 Because America overran Germany, along with her allies, and then proceeded to turn Germany into a thriving Western democracy.
00:10:09.000 And the same thing is true in Japan, which was a complete imperialist dictatorship.
00:10:13.000 And then America came in with our troops, and we occupied the place, and there are still troops in Japan.
00:10:18.000 South Korea is only free because of American troops, because of American materiel, and American men and women willing to sacrifice their lives in order to make South Koreans free.
00:10:27.000 The reason they're not all living under the gulag conditions of Kim Jong-un is because of the strength and power of America's military might.
00:10:33.000 This is why whenever there's an attempt by folks on the left to cut back
00:10:39.000 America's military, the case being that a strong, virile military scares people.
00:10:43.000 It makes the world a scarier, worse place.
00:10:46.000 The answer is every time we do that, that is immediately followed by some sort of terrorist attack or brutal attack on Americans, and then we have to build up our military again.
00:10:53.000 Bill Clinton spent years cutting back the American military, and then there was the attack of 9-11, and then we had to rebuild the American military.
00:10:59.000 The threat either is stopped there or it comes here.
00:11:01.000 The same was true in Pearl Harbor.
00:11:02.000 By 1941, by the time of America's entry into World War II and Pearl Harbor, the American military, the standing American military, was smaller than the standing military of the Philippines.
00:11:13.000 America had the 16th largest military on planet Earth in 1941.
00:11:16.000 Then we ramped back up.
00:11:18.000 If America had been a lot more muscular on the world stage and had attempted to prevent
00:11:23.000 The imperialism of the Japanese and the imperialism of the Germans.
00:11:27.000 Earlier than that, working with our allies, a lot of lives would have been saved.
00:11:30.000 A lot of lives would have been saved.
00:11:33.000 There's this weird idea that's risen in both isolationist circles and leftist circles.
00:11:37.000 This is sort of where a lot of Ron Paul foreign policy fans run directly into the arms of Bernie Sanders foreign policy fans.
00:11:44.000 That America's presence on the world stage is unnecessary, that if we withdraw nothing bad happens, that it's not in America's interest to be quote-unquote global policemen.
00:11:52.000 We don't have to be global policemen.
00:11:53.000 Nobody's suggesting that America has to be the world police and save everybody from themselves.
00:11:58.000 But we do have to assess what is in America's interests.
00:12:01.000 Where do the gravest threats lie?
00:12:02.000 And then we have to be active on those threats.
00:12:04.000 Because just like with policing, if you are not proactively policing a particular area, it goes to hell in a handbasket and soon those areas spread.
00:12:11.000 Broken windows theory doesn't just apply to domestic crime, it also applies to foreign policy.
00:12:16.000 Which again, does not mean that America has to compromise our own safety and security and the use of our military force for every small humanitarian mission.
00:12:25.000 It does mean that when we can, we should, and it also means that morality has a heavy part to play in America's foreign policy.
00:12:32.000 It has always had a heavy part to play in America's foreign policy.
00:12:35.000 There's this realist idea out there that morality doesn't play any role in what we do on foreign policy.
00:12:41.000 And obviously the American people do not disagree, do not agree with that.
00:12:44.000 The American people believe that there is still room for virtue in American foreign policy, which is why we have this really divided mind about foreign policy that I think we need to figure out because otherwise we're putting our own soldiers in unwinnable situations.
00:12:56.000 The divided mind goes like this.
00:12:57.000 Something terrible happens on a foreign front.
00:12:59.000 There's a slaughter in Syria.
00:13:01.000 There's a slaughter in Sudan.
00:13:02.000 There's a slaughter in Somalia.
00:13:04.000 And the American people say, see it on TV?
00:13:06.000 They say, that looks awful.
00:13:08.000 We need to do something about that.
00:13:10.000 That looks terrible.
00:13:11.000 And then whatever American administration is in power, Republican, Democrat, doesn't matter.
00:13:15.000 They say, okay, we'll respond to that by doing something.
00:13:18.000 And then within five weeks, the American people say, we really shouldn't be in there.
00:13:22.000 You know, there's no reason for us to be in there in the first place.
00:13:25.000 Foreign policy should be conducted along the lines of a long-range attempt to figure out exactly what is in America's interest.
00:13:33.000 If we can do that, then we can ensure that we are using our military in the best possible way and that our military members signed up for the right gig.
00:13:40.000 But on this Memorial Day, it's time to stop and say thank you to all of the members of the military who laid down their lives so that we could spend today having fun, and that I could do my podcast, and that I could spend time with my family, and that you could do whatever it is that you're doing today.
00:13:52.000 This is a free and wonderful country because of the power and might of the American military, the greatest force for freedom in the history of mankind.
00:14:01.000 Okay, meanwhile, speaking of foreign policy, there's a lot of hubbub over the weekend and today about President Trump and North Korea.
00:14:08.000 Obviously, last week, President Trump pulled out of the summit with North Korea.
00:14:10.000 Now there are rumors that the summit is going to be back on with North Korea.
00:14:14.000 This is a negotiation tactic by President Trump.
00:14:16.000 I don't think that President Trump should be giving us constant updates on whether there's going to be a summit with North Korea.
00:14:21.000 I think the reason for that is that if he continues to give us these constant updates about what's going on with North Korea, it makes it seem as though he is desperate to have this meeting with North Korea.
00:14:29.000 America should never be desperate to have a meeting with anybody.
00:14:32.000 We're the most powerful country on the face of the earth and in the history of the world.
00:14:35.000 There's no reason we should be desperate to meet with a tin pot dictator.
00:14:38.000 It is his job to come to us with something to give up so that we can reinstate him in the community of nations.
00:14:45.000 President Trump is saying that North Korea blew it on the summit and basically this is right.
00:14:50.000 Based on the recent statement of North Korea, I have decided to terminate the planned summit in Singapore on June 12th.
00:15:01.000 While many things can happen and a great opportunity lies ahead, potentially, I believe that this is a tremendous setback.
00:15:11.000 For North Korea, and indeed, a setback for the world.
00:15:15.000 Okay, well, this is a negotiation tactic by President Trump.
00:15:18.000 Democrats, however, are celebrating the fact that the summit fell apart.
00:15:21.000 So it's hilarious.
00:15:22.000 The Democrats who were saying he never should have held the summit in the first place are celebrating the fact that it fell apart.
00:15:26.000 Now, basically, whatever Trump does, they proceed to do the opposite.
00:15:29.000 So Nancy Pelosi comes out, she says, Kim Jong-un must be having a giggle fit over the canceled summit.
00:15:34.000 Well, really?
00:15:34.000 He's having a giggle fit?
00:15:35.000 Like, why?
00:15:36.000 So he can go back to his crappy, his crappily run country with its exploded nuclear mountain?
00:15:43.000 I think it's a good thing for Kim Jong-un.
00:15:48.000 Here you had a thug, a person who killed his own family members, a person who runs a police state, being legitimized by the President of the United States.
00:16:00.000 They were on a par with each other.
00:16:02.000 He got global recognition and regard.
00:16:06.000 He's the big winner.
00:16:07.000 And when he got this letter from the president saying, OK, never mind, he must be having a giggle fit right there.
00:16:14.000 There's no evidence whatsoever.
00:16:15.000 Kim Jong Un is happy about any of this.
00:16:17.000 That's not going to stop Democrats from claiming that Kim Jong-un is happy about all this because their opposition to Trump is much stronger than their opposition to Kim Jong-un.
00:16:24.000 You'd figure that with a nuclear-armed evil dictator, we might all be able to get at least a little bit on the same page as far as who's the bad guy in the narrative, but apparently Democrats are unable to do that.
00:16:33.000 Speaking of which, there was a lot of talk before the election about President Trump and Russia, Russia collusion, and President Trump is going to be
00:16:41.000 Giving up power over American foreign policy to the Russians and all of the rest of this.
00:16:45.000 Well, that obviously has not happened.
00:16:47.000 President Trump has been quite harsh with the Russians.
00:16:49.000 He's imposed a lot of sanctions that the Obama administration did not.
00:16:51.000 He has armed the Ukrainians.
00:16:53.000 The Ukrainian government was thanking President Trump just last week for arming them properly or more properly.
00:16:59.000 Well, now it has come up that Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, which was shot down over eastern Ukraine in 2014, that was shot down, indeed, by a group connected with Russia.
00:17:09.000 At the time, Russia denied any involvement in the crash that killed all those aboard.
00:17:12.000 A news conference in the Netherlands last week, Wilbert Polissen of the Dutch National Police announced that after investigators had scrutinized the images, it was determined that the missile originated from Russia's 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade from the city of Kursk in Western Russia.
00:17:26.000 The missile was part of the Russian Armed Forces.
00:17:28.000 Fred Westerbeke, who's chief prosecutor of the National Prosecutor's Office of the Netherlands, according to Mediaite, also noted that at the time the plane went down, the area was controlled by Russian separatists.
00:17:37.000 He said that this raises questions such as to whether the brigade was actively involved in downing MH17.
00:17:42.000 It's an important question, which the Joint Investigation Team are still investigating.
00:17:46.000 Russia continues to deny any involvement, of course.
00:17:48.000 The Russian Defense Ministry announced, quote, both in its first hours after the tragedy,
00:17:52.000 Vladimir Putin is an evil human being.
00:17:53.000 His regime is evil.
00:17:54.000 It has conducted acts of evil.
00:17:54.000 That was 300 dead for no reason other than Russian militarism.
00:17:56.000 President Trump has stood up to the Russians.
00:17:58.000 This is the part of the quid pro quo I don't understand.
00:18:15.000 If the idea was that the Russians were going to elect Trump so that they would get back something from Trump, I'm waiting for the thing that they are getting back from Trump.
00:18:22.000 I'm just not seeing the evidence of this.
00:18:25.000 I just don't see the evidence of this.
00:18:26.000 And all the Democrats who are complaining about Russian interference in the election, I'd like to see them be half as upset when Russia actually kills journalists or when Russia invades sovereign countries as they did to Crimea and President Obama did nothing, or when they took control of Syria and President Obama facilitated all of that.
00:18:42.000 In other words, it's Democrats playing politics with foreign policy.
00:18:45.000 And I just, I find it abhorrent that they are so attached to the idea that Republicans are the bad guys.
00:18:51.000 They can't even get together on some pretty obvious matters here.
00:18:54.000 Okay.
00:18:55.000 Meanwhile, President Obama made an amazing statement at the end of last week.
00:18:59.000 And this statement is worthy of discussion.
00:19:01.000 So the statement is that he did not have scandals as president.
00:19:04.000 The coverage of scandals by the media is completely disproportionate between Republicans and Democrats.
00:19:09.000 This is the real issue here.
00:19:10.000 So President Obama, according to Newsweek, took a light swing at his successor during a tech conference in Las Vegas on Wednesday.
00:19:16.000 He said his eight years in office were scandal-free.
00:19:18.000 He says, I didn't have scandals, which seems like it shouldn't be something you brag about.
00:19:22.000 And then he said, actually, if you look at the history of the modern presidency, coming out of the modern presidency without anybody going to jail is really good.
00:19:28.000 It's a big deal.
00:19:29.000 He said, no one in my White House ever got in trouble for screwing up, as long as there wasn't malicious intent behind it.
00:19:35.000 Okay, this, of course, is the point, right?
00:19:37.000 You see him elide the point right there at the very end, right?
00:19:40.000 He says, no one got in trouble because there was no malicious intent.
00:19:44.000 Does that ring a few bells?
00:19:45.000 Malicious intent?
00:19:46.000 That was the excuse used by James Comey and the FBI not to prosecute Hillary Clinton for maliciously setting up a private server to hide her emails and putting 33,000 emails on there and then destroying all of them.
00:19:57.000 And so that was not malicious intent, according to James Comey.
00:20:00.000 And so what Obama says is, maybe we had scandals.
00:20:03.000 I mean, maybe we did some scandalous stuff, but we never meant to do scandalous stuff.
00:20:06.000 Absolute hogwash, absolute nonsense.
00:20:09.000 His administration was certainly not scandal-free.
00:20:11.000 Benghazi was a major scandal, despite what Democrats would say.
00:20:14.000 Hey, this was a scandal in which the State Department repeatedly refused requests by Ambassador Chris Stevens for additional security in Benghazi.
00:20:21.000 No troops were forthcoming in the middle of a 17-hour attack.
00:20:25.000 In the middle of a huge attack in Benghazi, a 13-hour attack in Benghazi, and nothing came.
00:20:32.000 And then there was a cover-up by the Obama administration claiming it had nothing to do with lack of security or Libyan policy in the first place.
00:20:38.000 Instead, what it really had to do with was a video made by some anonymous YouTube guy nobody had ever heard of.
00:20:44.000 So that was a scandal.
00:20:45.000 There's Fast and Furious, in which the Obama administration greenlit the movement of killing weapons, as they would say, down to Mexican drug cartels, which were then used in the murder of U.S.
00:20:53.000 border agent Brian Terry.
00:20:55.000 You remember that the Obama administration was involved in the IRS scandal, in which Obama's IRS suspiciously started targeting only conservative 501c3 groups.
00:21:03.000 And they claimed, no, no, no, we never would do that.
00:21:05.000 Of course, that's exactly what happened.
00:21:07.000 The Obama administration was repeatedly involved in deep levels of corruption.
00:21:11.000 No one was prosecuted because the DOJ was run by Barack Obama's wingman, Eric Holder.
00:21:16.000 But here's the real point.
00:21:17.000 Barack Obama thinks that he was never involved in a scandal because he was not, according to the media.
00:21:23.000 According to the media, he was never involved in a scandal.
00:21:25.000 And this has been a repeat point of contention for folks on the right.
00:21:29.000 A lot of people on the left don't understand why so many folks on the right are so upset all the time about the media.
00:21:35.000 Why are we so upset about the media?
00:21:36.000 Aren't the media just trying to tell the truth?
00:21:38.000 Don't the media have a job to do?
00:21:40.000 Here's the problem.
00:21:41.000 Whenever a Democrat gets involved in a scandal, the coverage is less
00:21:45.000 Blanket, shall we say, than the coverage of a Republican when a Republican is involved in a similar scandal, right?
00:21:52.000 Do you even remember the name of that New York Attorney General who had to resign because he was calling girlfriends his slaves and then sexually abusing them?
00:22:01.000 Do you remember that guy allegedly sexually abusing them?
00:22:03.000 Remember that guy?
00:22:04.000 His name was Eric Schneiderman.
00:22:05.000 That lasted for five hours, right?
00:22:06.000 I mean, that sucker was over immediately.
00:22:09.000 That was over as fast as it began.
00:22:11.000 But think of Republicans for whom this has happened.
00:22:14.000 The David Vitter scandal went on for a long time.
00:22:16.000 That was a consensual affair with a call girl.
00:22:18.000 And that went on for a lot longer.
00:22:20.000 The Donald Trump scandals obviously have continued for a lot longer.
00:22:23.000 Now you may say, well, what about Republicans who resigned?
00:22:25.000 Did the scandals continue for them?
00:22:26.000 The answer is yes, the scandals does continue for Republicans who resigned from office.
00:22:30.000 Bob Packwood obviously is still synonymous with scandal.
00:22:34.000 So, I mean, you can go all the way back with this.
00:22:37.000 And the media have guarded Democrats with their pens for years.
00:22:41.000 Here's the latest story about this.
00:22:44.000 It's not played this way by the New York Post, but this is obviously the hidden story here.
00:22:51.000 In May 1961, an elderly woman in Paris heard a knock at the door of her six-story walk-up apartment.
00:22:57.000 It was only the most powerful man in the world.
00:23:00.000 The President of the United States was going door-to-door hoping to find the call girl he had discreetly arranged to meet.
00:23:05.000 John F. Kennedy, it turned out, used a fake excuse about a doctor's visit to attend a long-arranged dalliance while in Paris for a crucial summit, only to wind up in the wrong building, knocking on the doors of random Parisians who were left with the surprise of their lives.
00:23:16.000 The tale of this ill-advised but ultimately successful liaison is recorded in Madame Cloud, Her Secret World of Pleasure, Privilege, and Power by William Stadime.
00:23:25.000 Madame Cloud, born Fernand Grudet in 1923 in Angers, France, was one of the world's most successful madams.
00:23:31.000 Starting in 1957, she ran an exclusive
00:23:33.000 High class prostitution ring that offered a very specific type of woman.
00:23:37.000 Tall, supermodel, gorgeous, classy, and upscale, or at least trained to appear so, to the world's richest and most powerful men.
00:23:43.000 The young women who worked for her were known as Cloud Girls, which became a well-known and powerful brand.
00:23:47.000 She scouted them carefully, paid for plastic surgery if needed, and ultimately hoped to marry them off to aristocracy.
00:23:52.000 A date with a Cloud Girl was one of those pinnacle Paris experiences, right, Stadium?
00:23:56.000 Like staying at the Ritz, or a dinner at Maxime's, or wearing a Lanvin suit, an apotheosis of luxury that the French can do better than any other nationality.
00:24:03.000 According to Stadium, Madame Cloud's client list included the world's most successful men,
00:24:07.000 Kennedy, Frank Sinatra, Pablo Picasso, Marc Chagall, Sammy Davis Jr., former Vice President Nelson Rockefeller, three generations of Gettys, Marlon Brando, Groucho Marx.
00:24:16.000 If you're rich, famous, and male in the 20th century, Chancellor Madame Cloud knew what you liked in bed and provided exactly that for Kennedy.
00:24:22.000 His desired liaison required almost as much detailed preparation as an actual political summit.
00:24:27.000 After the Bay of Pigs fiasco in April 1961, Kennedy thought a meeting in Europe with French and Soviet leaders Charles de Gaulle and Nikita Khrushchev, respectively, could serve as a reset for his presidency.
00:24:37.000 He decided that he and First Lady Jackie Kennedy would embark on their first official European tour.
00:24:41.000 This would be the trip where Jackie so entranced the French, Kennedy famously introduced himself as the man who accompanied Jacqueline Kennedy to Paris.
00:24:48.000 But while Jackie was thrilled at the prospect of meeting novelist and newly appointed French culture minister André Malraux, one of her literary idols, her husband looked to fulfill a different sort of fantasy.
00:24:56.000 If JFK had a type, it was a wholesome, snooty, proper, preppy girl whose flaunted untouchability he could violate.
00:25:01.000 Girls like Jacqueline Beauvier, writes Stadium, who notes that Kennedy learned about Madam Cloud from Sinatra.
00:25:06.000 Here was a madam who specialized in exactly what JFK was after.
00:25:09.000 The liaison was apparently arranged between Madam Cloud and Pierre Salinger, Kennedy's press secretary.
00:25:15.000 When Salinger first proposed the arrangement, Cloud turned him down, fearing the many things that could go wrong if the president's visit to a prostitute went haywire.
00:25:22.000 But Salinger convinced Cloud that any problems could work in her favor, a scandal would make her a legend to the sex-comfortable French, and that a successful dalliance would bring her to the attention of the world's most powerful men.
00:25:31.000 So Salinger, who's, again, this is JFK's private secretary, exhorted the madam, quote, rise to the occasion.
00:25:38.000 Do it for your career.
00:25:39.000 Do it for your country.
00:25:40.000 He riffed, paraphrasing JFK's inaugural address.
00:25:44.000 Think big.
00:25:45.000 Weighing risks and rewards like the shrewd banker she might have otherwise been, Cloud decided to go for it.
00:25:50.000 So, Kennedy wanted to hook up with a French actress who looked like Jackie Kennedy, and apparently that didn't work, so instead he decided to go to a whore.
00:25:58.000 Now, here is the real question.
00:26:00.000 That was 1961.
00:26:00.000 It is now 2018.
00:26:02.000 It took 57 years for this to hit the press.
00:26:06.000 57 years for this to hit the press.
00:26:09.000 Do you really think the press weren't there in Paris?
00:26:10.000 At a meeting with Charles de Gaulle and Nikita Khrushchev?
00:26:13.000 Do you think the press really weren't around for any of this?
00:26:16.000 Do you think the press really didn't know about it?
00:26:18.000 The press knew about everything.
00:26:20.000 They knew about everything that was going on with JFK.
00:26:23.000 Hey, the plan was apparently for Malroux, this French culture minister, to play tour guide to the first lady while the president visited French historical sites.
00:26:32.000 But then Kennedy begged off, claiming a flare-up of his bad back and saying he needed to visit a French pain specialist.
00:26:38.000 But instead, he had brought his Dr. Feelgood, Max Jacobson, for cover, and they headed off to find his mystery lover, only to wind up at the wrong apartment.
00:26:46.000 So again, is it possible the press didn't know about this?
00:26:50.000 Unlikely.
00:26:51.000 Because JFK did this kind of crap all the time.
00:26:54.000 The Kennedys did this kind of stuff all the time.
00:26:56.000 The Camelot image the press plastered across the front pages, it was all a lie.
00:27:01.000 Now you might say that these lies were done for the sake of the American public.
00:27:04.000 They did this with Hollywood stars at the time, they did it with all presidents at the time, all politicians at the time.
00:27:09.000 But, that is clearly not true, because even today, the press treat JFK with this sort of glamour and sophistication.
00:27:15.000 JFK was a significantly worse person in many ways than Bill Clinton.
00:27:20.000 Okay, and Bill Clinton is nobody's idea of a saint.
00:27:23.000 And yet, JFK is treated as this wonderful guy, right?
00:27:25.000 Nobody talks about chipping Kennedy off the Kennedy Center.
00:27:28.000 Nobody talks about taking that chisel and just chipping that right off the Kennedy Center.
00:27:31.000 Talk about removing Woodrow Wilson's name from the Woodrow Wilson School over Princeton.
00:27:36.000 But they will never talk about removing JFK's name, even though Kennedy was indeed the worst kind of sexual scumbag.
00:27:42.000 None of that matters, right?
00:27:43.000 That's totally fine, because Kennedy was Kennedy.
00:27:45.000 And then you wonder why people on the right don't respect the press?
00:27:48.000 You wonder why people on the right have no respect for how it is that the press go about their business?
00:27:53.000 It's because of stuff like this.
00:27:54.000 Now, meanwhile, in apparently the least shocking news of the day,
00:27:59.000 Rachel Dolezal.
00:28:00.000 You remember her.
00:28:00.000 She's the white lady who said that she was black, and then she ended up working for the Spokane chapter of the NAACP, and then it turned out that she was actually just a white girl from Kansas.
00:28:08.000 Well, now it turns out that according to KHQ, which is a local station, Dolezal has legally changed her name to Nkechi Diallo in 2016 because she's a screwed-up human being, is accused of first-degree theft by welfare fraud, perjury in the second degree, and false verification for public assistance.
00:28:25.000 Her potential punishment under RCW 74.08.331 could include up to 15 years in prison.
00:28:32.000 Because Dolezal changed her name, we'll be referring to her as Nkechi Diallo.
00:28:35.000 According to court documents, Diallo illegally received almost $9,000 in food assistance and illegally received $100 in child care assistance.
00:28:43.000 Total restitution, according to documentation, is nearly $9,000, allegedly stolen from August 2015 through November 2017.
00:28:50.000 So what exactly happened?
00:28:52.000 Well,
00:28:53.000 The investigation into Diallo's alleged theft started in March 2017, when a DSHS Office of Fraud and Accountability investigator received information that Diallo had written a book that got published.
00:29:03.000 The investigator said he'd heard Diallo say she was getting public assistance, but also knew a typical public publishing contract included payments of $10,000 to $20,000.
00:29:09.000 The investigator conducted a review of Diallo's records and found she'd been reporting her income was usually less than $500 a month in child support payments.
00:29:17.000 At one point, when asked as to how she was paying her bills, she reported barely, with help from friends and gifts.
00:29:22.000 However, between August 2015 and September 2017, she had installed nearly $84,000 into her account, and she did not report this to the Department of Social and Health Services.
00:29:33.000 So, there's that.
00:29:35.000 Now, I feel bad for Rachel Dolezal.
00:29:36.000 She's obviously a mentally ill person, right?
00:29:38.000 That's not hard to see.
00:29:39.000 Rachel Dolezal is a mentally ill person.
00:29:41.000 She's a white girl who believes that she's black, and she has lived a really dissolute life.
00:29:45.000 I mean, her life has been just a mess.
00:29:48.000 Why is it that if I say that Rachel Dolezal is mentally ill, this is treated as common knowledge, but if I say that a man who believes he is a woman is mentally ill, this is treated as crazy?
00:29:56.000 Let me tell you something.
00:29:57.000 Believing you're a member of a different race is a lot less biologically suspect than believing that you are a member of a different sex.
00:30:03.000 Okay?
00:30:05.000 Just putting that out there.
00:30:06.000 But Rachel Dolezal, doing what everybody always knew she would, right?
00:30:09.000 It turns out that she is a fraud.
00:30:11.000 Shocking.
00:30:12.000 Who can believe it?
00:30:13.000 Who can believe it?
00:30:14.000 Now, in other news,
00:30:16.000 In just a second, I want to get to a shocking story out of Parkland, Florida.
00:30:21.000 But first, you're going to have to go over to dailywire.com.
00:30:23.000 So over at dailywire.com, for $9.99 a month, you can get a subscription to Daily Wire.
00:30:27.000 And this means that you get the rest of the show live.
00:30:29.000 You get to be part of our mailbag.
00:30:30.000 You get the rest of Michael Knowles' show live, the rest of Andrew Klavan's show live.
00:30:33.000 And when you get a subscription, you also get first access to our event tickets.
00:30:36.000 So we have events coming up in Dallas and Phoenix.
00:30:38.000 They're virtually sold out.
00:30:39.000 But if you had bought a subscription, you would have had first access to those tickets, especially those VIP tickets.
00:30:45.000 Which would have allowed you to meet me, and we could have hung out.
00:30:47.000 But we can't now, because you didn't spend a little bit of money and get a subscription.
00:30:50.000 So get a subscription, gang.
00:30:51.000 It ain't hard.
00:30:52.000 Get the annual subscription for $99 a year, and this will allow you all of those great benefits.
00:30:56.000 Plus, it's cheaper than the monthly, and you also get the Leftist Tears hot or cold tumbler.
00:31:01.000 I could not even bring it with me on this trip to New York, because to do so would have threatened its integrity.
00:31:06.000 I mean, would I really want to get it scratched up or something?
00:31:08.000 No, I keep it in a treasured place in my home.
00:31:10.000 And in my office.
00:31:11.000 I would never want to do anything like that.
00:31:12.000 If you want to listen later for free, go over to SoundCloud, go over to iTunes, go over to YouTube, Google Play, Stitcher, any of those places.
00:31:18.000 Subscribe, leave us a review.
00:31:19.000 We always appreciate it.
00:31:20.000 We are the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast in the nation.
00:31:27.000 So, in other news, over in Parkland, Texas, this is an amazing story.
00:31:31.000 According to thelocal10.com, several parents of victims at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School massacre said that if former Broward Sheriff's Office Deputy Scott Peterson, who stood outside the school for several minutes while bullets rang out, had done his job, their children might not have lost their lives.
00:31:57.000 This is amazing.
00:31:58.000 A report that recently surfaced has some victims' families calling for a nude investigation of Peterson for a case he handled four years to the day prior to the massacre.
00:32:06.000 The case involved two 17-year-old students bullying a 14-year-old freshman, with one holding down the younger boy by his ankles, while the other kicked the victim, grabbed his genitals, and then took the victim's own baseball bat and began shoving it against his buttocks, simulating rape through the boy's clothes.
00:32:19.000 One of those assailants, the boy who allegedly held down the victim, was Scott Israel's son, the sheriff of Broward County.
00:32:26.000 Brett, defense attorney Alex Ariza, who represents shooting victim Anthony Borges, who was shot five times in the Valentine's Day massacre but survived, said the case could have led to felony charges.
00:32:35.000 He could have been charged with a lewd and lascivious.
00:32:36.000 And I'm being conservative, said Ariza.
00:32:39.000 Peterson claimed in the report it was a simple battery under the board's discipline matrix, and he decided to give both of the boys attacks a three day suspension.
00:32:46.000 What is that?
00:32:46.000 It's like an alternative universe law, Ariza said?
00:32:49.000 Because what happens?
00:32:50.000 Because you're in the school, you don't have to obey regular laws?
00:32:52.000 In fact, the disciplinary matrix includes sexual misconduct and serious battery, both of which arguably applied in this case.
00:32:58.000 Ariaza said, quote,
00:33:05.000 Gutenberg said the facts of the incident infuriated him.
00:33:07.000 Scott Peterson failed to do his job again.
00:33:09.000 It's just another example of a bad crime and somebody not being held accountable.
00:33:13.000 It's kind of interesting, the intersection of the same people.
00:33:15.000 Well, it's more than interesting.
00:33:17.000 Obviously, it means that there was some sort of relationship between Scott Israel, the sheriff of Broward County, and Deputy Peterson.
00:33:24.000 One of the boy's father says, listen, if Deputy Peterson had been made to answer for this, maybe he would have been replaced by a more competent deputy.
00:33:31.000 If this wouldn't have been the sheriff's son, would his sexual assaults have been reduced to a simple battery?
00:33:35.000 Apparently, Peterson noted in his report, the victim's parents were notified of the discipline and did not request additional law enforcement action.
00:33:42.000 But who cares?
00:33:43.000 It's the job of the police to enforce the law.
00:33:44.000 It's not the job of the parents to enforce the law.
00:33:47.000 Just amazing, just amazing.
00:33:49.000 And Scott Israel, remember, has been defended by a bunch of the people in Parkland who wish to put blame on the NRA for what happened in Parkland.
00:33:56.000 The reality is this is a law enforcement screw-up in every possible way, and corruption in local law enforcement is not relegated to issues of race.
00:34:04.000 Very often it is relegated also to issues, it includes issues, of personal corruption, of relationships between people who then use those relationships in order to forward their own ambitions or to protect people who they know.
00:34:17.000 What a horrifying story.
00:34:18.000 I mean, really just bad.
00:34:19.000 Okay, meanwhile, ESPN continues to lose subscribers.
00:34:23.000 The reason I bring this up is because I think so much of our sports debate now, whether it's the NFL kneeling controversy, which, you know, I don't know why you would kneel for the flag.
00:34:30.000 I think there are better ways to protest.
00:34:32.000 The entire NFL kneeling controversy has been driven by media coverage.
00:34:35.000 If players were not getting media coverage for kneeling, then they wouldn't be doing it.
00:34:39.000 And part of that is the insane politicization that has taken place over at ESPN.
00:34:43.000 Now, I used to be a huge ESPN fan.
00:34:46.000 A huge ESPN fan.
00:34:48.000 For a while, I subscribed to ESPN the magazine.
00:34:50.000 I was a probably hour daily watcher.
00:34:53.000 I would get up at six.
00:34:53.000 When I was a kid, I would get up at six o'clock in the morning because before the internet was really great with clips.
00:34:58.000 is to get up at six o'clock in the morning every morning and run into the den and turn on ESPN and watch SportsCenter hoping to catch my White Sox highlights.
00:35:05.000 And now you can watch eight hours of ESPN without ever getting a sports highlight.
00:35:09.000 Instead, ESPN has become entirely talk radio combative back and forth between liberals and leftists.
00:35:15.000 There's no one on the right ever on ESPN.
00:35:17.000 ESPN is completely to the left.
00:35:19.000 Anybody who even expresses a mildly conservative opinion is immediately thrown out.
00:35:23.000 Well, there's a great article at the Wall Street Journal about the politicization at ESPN.
00:35:31.000 Here's what they say.
00:35:44.000 Mr. Skipper, then ESPN's president, lit into Ms.
00:35:46.000 Hill, according to people familiar with the meeting.
00:35:48.000 If I punish you, he told her, I'd open up to protest and come off as racist.
00:35:51.000 If I do nothing, that'll fuel a narrative among conservatives and a faction within ESPN that the network had become too liberal.
00:35:56.000 Mr. Skipper chose to spare Ms.
00:35:58.000 Hill.
00:35:58.000 Mr. Trump weighed in on Twitter.
00:35:59.000 ESPN is paying a really big price for its politics and bad programming.
00:36:02.000 People are dumping it in record numbers.
00:36:05.000 The president's tweet was hyperbolic, but it tapped into a real anxiety at ESPN.
00:36:09.000 What was the way forward for a company shaken to its foundations by the cord-cutting revolution?
00:36:14.000 And the answer is pretty obvious.
00:36:15.000 Cover sports, you idiots.
00:36:17.000 But they haven't covered sports.
00:36:18.000 Instead, they've decided to counter-program these discussion programs every half an hour, on the half hour, for the entire day.
00:36:26.000 Well, why would anybody subscribe to ESPN for that?
00:36:28.000 You can just listen to Bill Simmons' podcast and get better sports coverage.
00:36:31.000 And better sports... You can listen to The Ringer.
00:36:33.000 I listen to them.
00:36:34.000 They're great.
00:36:35.000 There's tons of great sports programming out there you can get on demand.
00:36:38.000 Why would you tune into sports television on ESPN to watch a couple people who don't know anything about politics jabber about politics?
00:36:45.000 Utterly useless.
00:36:47.000 So according to the Wall Street Journal, executives at the sports media giant wanted to seek out new audiences by spicing up shows with opinionated analysis and debate, including on SportsCenter, its struggling news and highlights franchise.
00:36:57.000 Except that the struggle at SportsCenter has largely been occasioned by the politics of SportsCenter.
00:37:03.000 Again, I can watch 45 minutes of SportsCenter without seeing a single baseball highlight.
00:37:07.000 They've decided which sports they want to cover, and it's usually the NFL and the NBA.
00:37:11.000 There's very little coverage of the MLB.
00:37:12.000 I've done full articles on this over at Daily Wire about the discrepancy in coverage, and that's because they're going after different demographics.
00:37:19.000 The reality is that demographically speaking, the disproportionate share of people who watch NBA and NFL are... NFL tends to be pretty proportionate across the spectrum.
00:37:28.000 NBA fans tend to be disproportionately African-American, and MLB fans tend to be disproportionately white.
00:37:34.000 ESPN has decided that because a lot of viewers of the NBA watch more sports program, it's not a stupid decision, they'll focus more on the NBA.
00:37:41.000 But in doing so, in completely cutting the MLB out and the hockey, for example, I mean, they've cut a lot of their baseball coverage.
00:37:46.000 Baseball Tonight is barely on anymore.
00:37:48.000 They've cut out a lot of the audience they used to have, like legacy subscribers.
00:38:10.000 And this, of course, is absolutely true.
00:38:12.000 Linda Cohn, who's one of the most prominent female anchors, in April 2017, she gave a radio interview and she said ESPN's politics were pushing away viewers and the network had overpaid for NBA rights.
00:38:21.000 So Skipper, of course, called her to yell at her.
00:38:24.000 Why ESPN found itself torn up by the nation's partisan politics traces back to its fundamental business challenge.
00:38:29.000 Its status as cable TV's most expensive channel had become a liability.
00:38:32.000 Consumers grew fed up with their monthly cable prices, big cable distributors began offering discounted packages that didn't include the network, and consumers started opting for these.
00:38:40.000 So there's obviously a cost-cutting problem.
00:38:42.000 A cord-cutting problem, rather.
00:38:44.000 But that doesn't answer the real question, which is, was the answer to that to completely counter-program along the lines of stuff that nobody wanted to see?
00:38:51.000 Here's the reality.
00:38:52.000 Sports is a politics-free zone for most people who watch it.
00:38:55.000 They're not interested in the politics.
00:38:56.000 And the more politics you ladle into our sports, the less we're going to watch you.
00:38:59.000 The NFL realized it, ESPN had better, or they're going to go the way of the dodo bird.
00:39:03.000 Okay, we'll be back here tomorrow.
00:39:04.000 First, actually, I have to do a couple of things.
00:39:07.000 So first, I want to do a couple Federalist Papers because we haven't had a chance to actually do the Federalist Papers in the recent past.
00:39:13.000 So I have to catch up on a couple of them and then we'll do some things I like and some things that I hate.
00:39:17.000 So let's begin.
00:39:19.000 With the Federalist Paper.
00:39:20.000 So, we're going to do Federalist Paper 29, which we didn't do last week, and we'll do Federalist Paper 30 for this week.
00:39:25.000 So, Federalist Paper 29 is by Alexander Hamilton, and this is the concluding Federalist Paper about whether there should be a standing army in the United States that is run by the federal government.
00:39:34.000 So, Alexander Hamilton says yes, and then he says that if the standing army starts to make trouble, the states will stand up to them.
00:39:40.000 So, for all the talk about you don't need militias, you don't need armed citizens,
00:39:44.000 Hamilton repeatedly and throughout the Federalist Papers claims that the best insurance against an overreaching federal government will be states that are able to call upon their citizens to defend themselves against federal overreach.
00:39:54.000 Critics, according to Hamilton, said the federal army would be chief law enforcement mechanism, and they said that there was no provision for posse comitatus.
00:40:00.000 So there are a lot of people who said, well, instead of the federal government having its own law enforcement body, why don't they just call on the states to help them enforce the law?
00:40:08.000 Now, ironically enough, there was a push by the states against Posse Comitatus after the Civil War, because they said, we're not going to be the levers of the federal government.
00:40:15.000 But at the time, there were a lot of people saying, we don't need the federal government to be quite so overreaching.
00:40:19.000 We'll just have the state enforce some of this law.
00:40:22.000 Well, Hamilton says that Congress could create such mechanisms, but in reality, a lot of these fears were justified.
00:40:28.000 Because as the federal government grew, there was a serious move to grow the federal law enforcement bodies.
00:40:34.000 Virtually every branch of the federal executive now has some sort of law enforcement agency attached to it with guns and with bulletproof vests and the whole deal.
00:40:44.000 And that's because in the end, the government is essentially a group of people with guns, okay?
00:40:48.000 The government is a body that is made for force.
00:40:52.000 As, as Nock would say.
00:40:54.000 And so here's what Hamilton says.
00:40:57.000 Here is his guarantee against federal tyranny.
00:40:59.000 He says, What shadow of danger can there be from men who are daily mingling with the rest of their countrymen and who participate with them in the same feelings, sentiments, habits, and interests?
00:41:07.000 What reasonable cause of apprehension can be inferred from a power in the Union to prescribe regulations for the militia and to command its services when necessary, while the particular states are to have the sole and exclusive appointment of the officers?
00:41:18.000 If it were possible, seriously, to indulge a jealousy of the militia upon any conceivable establishment under the federal government, the circumstance of the officers being in the appointment of the state ought at once to extinguish it.
00:41:28.000 So the idea was that there would be the state militia that would be called up by the federal government as supplementary forces.
00:41:34.000 There'd be this corps of experts at the federal government level, and they would be the expert military, and then the states would supplement that with the National Guard, for example.
00:41:41.000 In reality, obviously, the army has grown way beyond these bounds.
00:41:44.000 The military has grown way beyond these bounds for both good and for ill in some cases.
00:41:48.000 So Alexander, mostly for good, I think.
00:41:50.000 But in terms of threats to state rights that don't involve actual horrible racism and Jim Crow and slavery, it's not great the federal government has the capacity to override everybody.
00:42:00.000 Okay, so time for Federalist Paper number 30.
00:42:03.000 So Federalist 30, now Hamilton shifts topics.
00:42:06.000 And Hamilton, instead of talking about the standing military, he's going to talk about why the federal government should be able to levy taxes directly.
00:42:13.000 So under the Articles of Confederation, which preceded the formation of the Constitution of the United States, the federal government requested money from the state government.
00:42:21.000 So they would say, we need this much money from you, Connecticut, and Connecticut would have to turn in the money.
00:42:25.000 One problem.
00:42:26.000 Connecticut wouldn't turn in the money.
00:42:27.000 So Alexander Hamilton says, listen, we can't run a federal government along these bases.
00:42:32.000 He says national credit will be destroyed if we can't levy taxes to support issuance of bonds, for example, when we are in the middle of a war.
00:42:39.000 He says money is, with propriety, considered as the vital principle of the body politic, as that which sustains its life in motion and enables it to perform its most essential functions.
00:42:49.000 A complete power, therefore, to procure a regular and adequate supply of it, as far as the resources of the community will permit, may be regarded as an indispensable ingredient in every constitution.
00:42:59.000 From a deficiency in this particular, one of two evils must ensue.
00:43:02.000 Either the people must be subjected to continual plunder as a substitute for a more eligible motive supplying the public wants, or the government must sink into fatal atrophy.
00:43:09.000 So, either the government's going to come in and steal your money on an occasional basis, or they're going to collapse.
00:43:14.000 Or the federal government will collapse, as it seemed to be doing under the Articles of Confederation.
00:43:18.000 And then, he makes the argument that we need a system
00:43:22.000 That allows the federal government to tax directly the citizens of the United States.
00:43:26.000 Now, the income tax was not a thing.
00:43:29.000 The income tax was not constitutional until the 16th Amendment to the Constitution, which happened in the early 20th century.
00:43:35.000 Up until then, most taxes were through the form of property taxes on the state level, import taxes on the federal level, and the government was able to run on that basis.
00:43:48.000 The government was able to run on the basis of that
00:43:51.000 Now, I've advocated for a national sales tax.
00:43:53.000 I think Hamilton probably would have advocated for the same.
00:43:56.000 But that is not just because I think tariffs are generally bad policy, and using them as a way to garner revenue seems like a mistake.
00:44:02.000 But here is what Hamilton says.
00:44:04.000 If we don't have the power to tax, then we're going to fall into a national debt from which we'll never be able to recover.
00:44:09.000 Embedded in this message is a simple message for us.
00:44:12.000 We now have $20 trillion in national debt.
00:44:16.000 The only reason anyone is buying our bonds is because they expect us to pay that off.
00:44:20.000 The only reason they expect us to pay it off is at some point they assume that we will massively tax our own citizenry, which means we better get our debt under control, or as Hamilton says, we're going to have to tax the living bejesus out of the entire American public.
00:44:33.000 Hey, that is what's happening next.
00:44:34.000 That's what's coming next.
00:44:35.000 So just have that in mind.
00:44:36.000 Hamilton knew it, and so should everybody else.
00:44:40.000 Okay, time for a couple of things that I like, and then we'll do a couple of things that I hate.
00:44:46.000 So here is the thing I like.
00:44:48.000 Today, Van Jones has been talking about bipartisanship with the Trump administration.
00:44:53.000 Van Jones actually is working with the Trump administration on a number of issues, including... Van Jones is a communist, okay?
00:44:58.000 Van Jones is working with them on criminal justice reform.
00:45:01.000 This idea that no one in the Trump administration is willing to reach out to the other side of the aisle is nonsense.
00:45:05.000 Trump is much more willing to reach out to the other side of the aisle than Barack Obama ever was, and that is perfectly obvious.
00:45:09.000 Here's Van Jones talking about it.
00:45:11.000 We're good to go.
00:45:35.000 Okay, so Van Jones obviously making a good point here.
00:45:41.000 And bottom line is that this is true.
00:45:44.000 I mean, the Obama administration never reached out to Republicans.
00:45:47.000 There was no effort to reach out to Republicans.
00:45:48.000 Trump's at least trying.
00:45:49.000 He's just being refused.
00:45:51.000 It's one of the reasons his approval ratings are going up.
00:45:52.000 Okay, time for a quick thing that I hate.
00:45:58.000 Okay, so, Dr. David Hansen, who's created the eerily lifelike Sophia robot, has now revealed his vision for a future of androids in a new research paper.
00:46:07.000 So here is what he says.
00:46:08.000 He says that humans are already making love to sex robots in 2018, but soon they'll be able to marry their amorous androids as well.
00:46:16.000 So androids will get the same civil rights as humans by the year 2045, which includes the right to marry, own land, and vote in general elections.
00:46:23.000 Good luck with the voting in general elections, although they can't do worse than most people are doing with their votes.
00:46:28.000 So his new paper suggests that people will be marrying robots.
00:46:31.000 Here's my problem with the whole marrying of robots idea.
00:46:33.000 Presumably these robots will be unable to procreate.
00:46:35.000 Right?
00:46:36.000 You're not gonna have robot children.
00:46:38.000 And they don't actually have uteri.
00:46:39.000 They're not capable of making babies.
00:46:43.000 It shows the tremendous selfishness that has overtaken our vision of marriage when people are talking about marrying robots.
00:46:48.000 Obviously, because this is a lifeless thing, right?
00:46:51.000 This is a programmed thing.
00:46:52.000 Now, maybe AI develops to the point where robots have lifelike intelligence, but they certainly don't have the ability to procreate, and the notion that you're going to marry a piece of machinery because it pleases you.
00:47:05.000 This is not what marriage was for.
00:47:06.000 As soon as you said that marriage was between any two individuals who loved each other, as opposed to an institution about the bearing and rearing of children, you were immediately running down the path to people marrying whatever it was that they pleased.
00:47:17.000 Also, you do have to ask the question whether you can actually get proper consent from a sex robot.
00:47:21.000 Uh, you know, if we're going to be in the area of consent, it seems to me that, you know, animals can't give consent.
00:47:26.000 I guess the idea with the robot is the robot isn't alive, so who cares?
00:47:29.000 I mean, you're just, you know, presumably having sex with a chair, essentially.
00:47:32.000 But at a certain point, there will be serious moral issues with you having sex with an android if the android achieves a certain level of intelligence.
00:47:39.000 And this is something that people who are participating in this sort of activity ought to consider.
00:47:43.000 It's funny, actually.
00:47:44.000 Silicon Valley sort of dealt with some of these issues, actually, in the last season in a very funny way.
00:47:51.000 What it really goes to is that human beings have decided that all of the universe is about fulfilling our solipsistic desires.
00:47:56.000 This seems to me utterly untrue, particularly in the realm of marriage.
00:47:59.000 Any successful marriage is based on precisely the opposite notion.
00:48:02.000 So, maybe you will be pleased to marry a robot, but if so, what you really have is not a marriage, it's you pleasing yourself.
00:48:08.000 In every sense of the world.
00:48:10.000 In every sense of the word.
00:48:11.000 Okay, so, we'll be back here tomorrow with a lot more.
00:48:14.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:48:19.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Senya Villareal, executive producer Jeremy Boring, senior producer Jonathan Hay.
00:48:25.000 Our supervising producer is Mathis Glover, and our technical producer is Austin Stevens.
00:48:29.000 Edited by Alex Zingaro.
00:48:31.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Carmina.
00:48:33.000 Hair and makeup is by Jesua Alvera.
00:48:34.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire Ford Publishing production.
00:48:37.000 Copyright Ford Publishing 2018.