The Ben Shapiro Show - March 10, 2023


Selfish Jerk Kaepernick Attacks His “Problematic” White Parents


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour

Words per Minute

206.25311

Word Count

12,413

Sentence Count

857

Misogynist Sentences

17

Hate Speech Sentences

12


Summary

Colin Kaepernick, the former NFL Quarterback and current San Francisco 49ers Quarterback, decided to take matters into his own hands and publicly criticize his white adoptive parents for perpetuating racism in America. This is an act of insensitve disrespect for the people who brought you into the world, who made you successful, who gave you an opportunity to thrive, flourish, and who were instrumental in helping you become who you are today. And now, he s decided to turn on them, because they re racist, racist, white supremacist, bigoted, and bigoted. This is a direct attack on the very people who helped him become who he is today, and the ones who brought him to where he is now, and how he is able to do so in the first place. Colin Kaepernick is a symptom of a larger problem, which is that people that do not honor their ancestors are also people who have a future. And that's why people that don t honor their parents, as a traditional matter, tend not to have any future at all, and that is particularly true when you ve been given pretty much everything you ve ever been given by your adoptive parents. This comes after his recent appearance on CBS Chicago talking about how he had a problematic household, an upcoming novel he has written, and why he won t be picking someone like me up because he doesn t have a good enough to be considered a hero. Here s the link to the book I mentioned in this episode: by Ava DuVernay's new novel, The Game by Anna Duvernay, and the trailer for her new film, Change is out now on Netflix's The Handmaids of the Game. by Alyssa Mila Mays about her novel written about her new novel . is out in theaters now, and it's out on Amazon Prime Video and on Vimeo, and is out on Audible and Audible. and is available in Kindle, Audible, too. Thank you so much for listening to this episode of This American Idiot, and I hope you enjoy it! if you do! Tweet Meghan Markle and Meghan s tweet me or text me your thoughts on this episode on Insta? in the comments section, and tell me what you think of it. Timestamps: 4:00 - What do you think about this episode? 5:30 - What are your thoughts? 6:15 - Why do you agree with it? 7:50 - Why does it matter? 8:40 - Is it a good or bad?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 All right, so Colin Kaepernick, according to our mainstream legacy media, he's one of the great victims of our society.
00:00:05.000 Sure, he was a formerly successful quarterback who then started to not be very good.
00:00:09.000 And then he got benched.
00:00:10.000 And then he decided, after being benched, that America was a terrible racist place.
00:00:13.000 And he started kneeling on the sidelines in order to protest supposed police brutality.
00:00:17.000 And he became a cause celeb because he couldn't latch on with any other team, despite the NFL doing its very best to try and force another team to take him.
00:00:24.000 And then he ended up on the cover of Multiple Sports Illustrated, and he ended up with a giant deal from Nike talking about how you have to kneel for something so that you'll stand for something, and all the rest of this stuff.
00:00:33.000 And he made millions of dollars off of being a racial protester.
00:00:36.000 Well, now Colin Kaepernick has gone one step further, and it is emblematic of where we are in American society, what Colin Kaepernick has now done.
00:00:43.000 Essentially, all victimology turns into, at a certain point, being Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.
00:00:50.000 All victimology turns into it.
00:00:51.000 It turns into disrespect for your parents, disrespect for the past, an attempt to separate off from your parents, from the past, to rip everyone who came before you, to make yourself the only pure human being.
00:01:02.000 So the reason this is relevant is because yesterday Colin Kaepernick decided that he was going to just start crapping publicly on his white adoptive parents.
00:01:09.000 To understand how perverse this is, you have to understand that Colin Kaepernick was, again, adopted.
00:01:15.000 He was born of apparently a black American whose identity remains unknown to this day, that is his birth father, and a 19-year-old white woman from Milwaukee, Wisconsin named Heidi Russo.
00:01:29.000 And his mom, to her great credit, had the baby.
00:01:32.000 And then, also to her credit, put the baby up for adoption.
00:01:35.000 And he was adopted, was Colin Kaepernick, by a white couple named Rick and Teresa Kaepernick.
00:01:41.000 And the couple already had a couple of biological children.
00:01:43.000 And the reason they decided to adopt Colin is because they'd lost two other sons to heart defects, apparently.
00:01:49.000 And his parents guided him through youth.
00:01:51.000 He had a pretty nice background, pretty privileged background, economically speaking.
00:01:55.000 He ended up playing sports and, of course, all the rest.
00:01:58.000 Well, now Colin Kaepernick has decided that his parents are perpetuating racism.
00:02:01.000 His parents are bad.
00:02:03.000 The utter ingratitude and soul sickness that has to be attended on you, the child of an adoptive couple who made you successful, who gave you opportunity, who brought you into a new world where you were able to thrive, flourish, become an NFL player.
00:02:19.000 Which is, by the way, not an inexpensive thing.
00:02:22.000 To actually end up playing in the NFL, that usually requires that you go out and become part of a league.
00:02:28.000 It requires that your parents travel for you.
00:02:30.000 It requires all sorts of sacrifices that your parents made aside from the normal parenting sacrifices.
00:02:34.000 Which again, adoptive parents make heroic sacrifices to even take someone else's child and raise that child as their own.
00:02:41.000 Adoption is an act of tremendous charity.
00:02:44.000 To then turn around and crap on your own parents.
00:02:47.000 Publicly!
00:02:49.000 On CBS is one of the great acts of ingratitude, honestly, I've seen.
00:02:54.000 Except that it's mirrored by so many people in our society who basically say that all of the traditions of the past are bad, all of the wisdom of their grandparents, their parents are stupid, their grandparents are stupid, all of society is stupid, and they are the only good ones.
00:03:05.000 Which is an ungrateful, spoiled, rather disgusting generation that looks to its own parents and violates one of the fundamental bases of, I think, all human civilization, honor your father and mother.
00:03:18.000 The Ten Commandments says honor your father and mother for a very good reason.
00:03:20.000 Because peoples that tend to honor their ancestors are also people who have a future.
00:03:25.000 Peoples that do not honor their ancestors, as a traditional matter, tend not to have a future at all.
00:03:31.000 And that's particularly true, again, when you've been given pretty much everything by your adoptive parents.
00:03:37.000 So here is Colin Kaepernick, who's been out of the headlines for a while.
00:03:40.000 You remember that he was asked by the NFL to do a workout for a bunch of other teams and and he didn't even show up to the workout.
00:03:47.000 And then every so often he releases a video of himself throwing a football.
00:03:49.000 He's like, why won't someone pick me up?
00:03:51.000 Here he was on CBS Chicago talking about how he had a problematic household.
00:03:56.000 He has an upcoming graphic novel titled Change the Game.
00:03:59.000 This comes after his pathetic Anna DuVernay directed or produced documentary on Netflix in which he likened going to the NFL combine to an actual slave auction.
00:04:10.000 Because as we all know, during a slave auction, the slaves ended up being employed to the tune of millions of dollars and made international heroes, the slaves, right?
00:04:18.000 I mean, it's exactly the same.
00:04:19.000 The NFL combine slave auction.
00:04:20.000 I mean, if you actually watch the clip from Netflix, that's exactly what it is.
00:04:24.000 He literally morphs an image from the NFL Combine into an image from the slave auction.
00:04:29.000 That's who Colin Kaepernick is.
00:04:30.000 The most graceless, non-victimized victim of all time, except again for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, who are an actual prince and princess claiming victimhood.
00:04:39.000 So, he went on CBS Mornings to promote his crappy new graphic novel, and here's what he said.
00:04:46.000 Growing up I was a, I think still am a pretty introverted person.
00:04:51.000 I hope it's true to form and that's just kind of how I navigate the world.
00:04:55.000 It's his true high school coming of age story.
00:04:57.000 His journey embracing his blackness despite resistance from many including his white adoptive parents.
00:05:04.000 I know my parents loved me but there were still very problematic things that I went through.
00:05:10.000 I think it was important to show that, no, this can happen in your own home, and how we move forward collectively while addressing the racism that is being perpetuated.
00:05:20.000 He's getting what roles, his mom asked?
00:05:23.000 Oh, your hair's not professional.
00:05:24.000 Oh, you look like a little thug.
00:05:27.000 Your mom said that to you?
00:05:29.000 Yeah.
00:05:30.000 And those become spaces where it's like, OK, how do I navigate this situation now?
00:05:35.000 But it also has informed why I have my hair long today.
00:05:41.000 So, his mother is apparently a terrible person because she told him that he shouldn't wear his hair like Allen Iverson in the impression that people might have a bad impression of him.
00:05:51.000 So he's now writing graphic novels about how terrible his own parents are, and then he's going on national television to publicize how terrible his parents are.
00:05:56.000 And again, this is emblematic.
00:05:58.000 Colin Kaepernick is a stand-in for an entire generation of people who think this way about their parents.
00:06:02.000 An entire ideology that suggests that this is really what we should do, is we should dissociate from our own parents and we should rip our own parents publicly.
00:06:08.000 It's not unique to Colin Kaepernick, as we'll get to in a second.
00:06:10.000 It also happens to be an absolutely obvious profit-seeking move from Colin Kaepernick, as per usual arrangement.
00:06:15.000 It's social justice in the name of bucks for Colin Kaepernick.
00:06:18.000 We'll get to that in a moment.
00:06:19.000 Speaking of dollars and cents, you shouldn't be spending too much for your cell phone coverage.
00:06:22.000 It's just that simple.
00:06:23.000 If you're with Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, Simple fact of the matter is that you're spending too much money.
00:06:29.000 PeerTalk will save the average family over $900 a year when they switch from Verizon, AT&T, or T-Mobile.
00:06:34.000 That is correct.
00:06:34.000 You can save $900 a year on your wireless bill.
00:06:36.000 Still enjoy ultra-fast 5G service.
00:06:38.000 Get unlimited talk, text, plenty of data for just $30 a month.
00:06:41.000 PeerTalk is so sure you're going to love your service.
00:06:43.000 They're backing it up with 100% money-back guarantee.
00:06:46.000 Stop paying a fortune to Verizon, AT&T, or T-Mobile.
00:06:49.000 Cut your bill in half with PeerTalk.
00:06:50.000 They're a U.S.-based customer service team that makes the switch super simple.
00:06:53.000 Switch on over to Pure Talk in as little as 10 minutes while keeping your phone and your phone number.
00:06:57.000 Your first month is guaranteed risk-free.
00:06:59.000 Head on over to puretalk.com, enter promo code SHAPIRO to save 50% off your very first month of coverage.
00:07:04.000 That's puretalk.com, promo code SHAPIRO.
00:07:06.000 Pure Talk is indeed Simply Smarter Wireless.
00:07:08.000 I switched all of my business calls over to Pure Talk.
00:07:10.000 It's super simple to do.
00:07:11.000 It'll save you money.
00:07:12.000 It'll save you time.
00:07:13.000 Head on over to puretalk.com, enter promo code SHAPIRO, save 50% on your very first month of coverage.
00:07:18.000 Restrictions apply.
00:07:19.000 See site for details.
00:07:20.000 Okay, so.
00:07:22.000 Again, to understand what Colin Kaepernick is doing, I think what you first have to understand is that Colin Kaepernick's adoptive parents have basically stood behind him every step of the way, even when they disagreed with him.
00:07:30.000 So, there's pretty good evidence that his parents were not big on the kneeling protest.
00:07:34.000 But, it doesn't matter, because apparently, Teresa and Rick, his adoptive parents, wrote the following regarding the quarterback.
00:07:42.000 Quote, Colin is carrying a heavy load.
00:07:43.000 He's following a difficult path he truly believes in.
00:07:45.000 He's putting his entire future and possibly his life on the line for those beliefs.
00:07:49.000 As his parents, it pains us to read articles and tweets saying his family does not support him.
00:07:52.000 This could not be further from the truth.
00:07:53.000 We want people to know we are very proud of our son and admire his strength and courage in kneeling for the rights of others.
00:07:59.000 That's what they had to say when he was kneeling, even though there's fairly good evidence from sort of the inside that they were not in agreement with his generalized message.
00:08:06.000 Of course, they stood by their son because he is, in fact, their son.
00:08:10.000 And of course, here is Colin Kaepernick with his mom circa 2016, being very warm toward his mother.
00:08:16.000 You don't see this sort of stuff anymore very often.
00:08:19.000 You have a family that you love, but you know you don't look like.
00:08:23.000 And at a young age, you don't... I understood that was different.
00:08:30.000 I didn't understand what that meant.
00:08:33.000 So, as I got older, it was something that developed in as My identity developed and my place in society and my understanding of that developed.
00:08:46.000 My parents and my family had to develop as well.
00:08:50.000 And I think that's just been a constant journey for us.
00:08:53.000 But it's been one that we've worked through and we've always been very loving in the process.
00:09:00.000 And, you know, I wouldn't do it with anybody else.
00:09:05.000 Okay, those last few lines are the key, right?
00:09:07.000 Every teenager, every young adult experiences gaps with their parents.
00:09:11.000 This is a normal part of aging into adulthood.
00:09:14.000 But do you navigate that with love and with understanding?
00:09:16.000 Or do you write a graphic novel about how terrible your parents were because they once said something that you didn't like when you were 13 years old?
00:09:23.000 By the way, again, there's a far cry from Colin Kaepernick circa 2013 when he was putting out Instagram messages congratulating his parents and actually saying quite nice things about them.
00:09:30.000 That's when Colin Kaepernick was a good person.
00:09:31.000 That is before the activists took over Colin Kaepernick's life.
00:09:33.000 and married for 38 years now.
00:09:35.000 I didn't ask the Lord for a perfect example, but he gave it to me anyways.
00:09:37.000 I love you both with all my heart." That's when Colin Kaepernick was a good person.
00:09:41.000 That is before the activists took over Colin Kaepernick's life.
00:09:44.000 And again, there is something to this that is broader and deeper.
00:09:47.000 You'll recall when Barack Obama, when he was running for president in 2008, the Jeremiah Wright scandal came out.
00:09:53.000 The fact that the president of the United States, then senator from Illinois, that he sat in the pews of an overt racist and anti-Semite for literally 20 years and then names his book The Audacity of Hope after a speech given by Reverend Jeremiah Wright.
00:10:05.000 Jeremiah Wright is a kook and a nut and a wild-eyed conspiracy theorist.
00:10:09.000 And Barack Obama sat in his pews for literally two decades and apparently never noticed.
00:10:13.000 It was just it was all a surprise to him.
00:10:14.000 And then he had to give a major speech, you recall, talking about why he had sat in the pews.
00:10:19.000 And making some excuses quasi for Jeremiah, right?
00:10:22.000 And there was one part of the speech where he went out of his way to slap the people who raised him.
00:10:26.000 Because if you remember Barack Obama's story, it's quasi similar to Colin Kaepernick's in the sense that he had a father who did not raise him, black father did not raise him, and he had a white mother.
00:10:35.000 And then the people actually raised him were his maternal grandparents.
00:10:38.000 His maternal grandparents actually raised Barack Obama.
00:10:40.000 And you'll recall going all the way back to 2008 and 2008 race, Barack Obama made a statement in his speech where he said, I can no more disown Jeremiah Wright than I can my white grandmother, a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in the world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed her on the street and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.
00:11:01.000 And this basic notion that I am perfect and my parents are terrible and that's an excuse for me to have made the overt choice as an adult to sit in the pews of Jeremiah Wright is because my white grandmother, who spent all this time and effort on me, She actually, you know, she had some bad things about her.
00:11:15.000 And those bad things about her?
00:11:16.000 Now that kind of makes her the same as me as an adult making bad decisions to opt into sitting in the pews of an overt racist and anti-Semite.
00:11:23.000 That was Barack Obama's take in 2008.
00:11:24.000 And in the end, it's all self-justificatory.
00:11:26.000 That's all it is.
00:11:27.000 It is Colin Kaepernick deciding that he has a thing to push.
00:11:30.000 And the thing he has to push means that he can run roughshod over his parents.
00:11:34.000 There is something really disgustingly perverse, again, about a culture that urges people to throw their parents under the bus.
00:11:41.000 And when I say urges, I mean that this is like a real thing.
00:11:43.000 If you go on TikTok these days, if you go on the TikToks with the youths, what you will find on TikTok is a bunch of videos, for example, of LGBTQ educators telling small children, we will be your parents.
00:11:55.000 Dissociate from your parents.
00:11:56.000 Your parents want the worst for you.
00:11:58.000 Your parents are going to be upset with you.
00:11:59.000 Your parents don't like you.
00:12:02.000 Don't navigate problems with your parents.
00:12:03.000 Don't attempt to negotiate with your parents.
00:12:04.000 Don't maybe listen to the wisdom of your parents.
00:12:07.000 Maybe think that maybe they have something to teach you.
00:12:08.000 Instead, what you really should do You should rip on your parents.
00:12:12.000 That is the most important thing.
00:12:13.000 Just leave them.
00:12:14.000 Stay away from your parents.
00:12:15.000 Any movement that urges you to disrespect your parents and divide yourself off from your parents is a bad movement by definition.
00:12:24.000 Use that as a rubric.
00:12:25.000 Any movement that tells you that overt disrespect for your parents as your parents, not disagreement.
00:12:30.000 You're allowed to disagree with your parents, but overt disrespect attempts to humiliate your parents unless they are full on abusive.
00:12:37.000 That any attempts to do that are good, and that you have sort of an added credibility in doing that.
00:12:43.000 That is a bad movement that is essentially a cult.
00:12:46.000 We've become a very cultic country, and a very cultic civilization, in which you are taken away from your father and mother by perverse ideologies, and you are morphed into a widget on behalf of those new ideologies, and it really is a sickness.
00:12:58.000 And it is a great evil that has descended upon civilization when people take into their hearts the idea that your job as a human, part of your job, is to not only define yourself in contradistinction to your parents without taking any of their wisdom, but to overtly then attack the people who raised you.
00:13:14.000 Something really bad about that.
00:13:15.000 Okay.
00:13:16.000 In just a second, we'll get to a fantastic hearing on the Hill, in which Democrats kind of showed that democracy dies in darkness and all of that.
00:13:23.000 First, let's talk about spiritual values.
00:13:26.000 The fact is that, as I've been saying, I think that the West has lost a lot of the spirituality that made us great.
00:13:31.000 Well, if you wish to regain some of that spirituality, reconnect with something higher, then you should probably take a dose of Halo.
00:13:37.000 Just like physical exercise, daily spiritual exercise is critical to your well-being.
00:13:41.000 Hallow will help you maintain a daily prayer routine.
00:13:44.000 It's filled with studies, meditations, and reflections that are rooted in Judeo-Christian prayer practices.
00:13:49.000 You can pray alongside Mark Wahlberg or Jim Caviezel and even some world-class athletes.
00:13:53.000 You can also access the number one Christian podcast In the Land, The Bible in a Year with Father Mike Schmitz on Hallow.
00:13:58.000 I'm not somebody who obviously partakes in Lent, but it's a powerful spiritual time for a lot of Christians to abstain from luxuries and more deeply embrace their faith.
00:14:04.000 I've always encouraged Christians to more deeply engage with their faith.
00:14:08.000 I think that a faith-based society is going to be a lot more robust and healthy than a non-faith-based society.
00:14:13.000 I think you as a person are going to be a lot happier and more fulfilled if you engage with your faith.
00:14:17.000 Try Halo for three months free at Halo.com slash Shapiro.
00:14:21.000 Again, that's Halo.com slash Shapiro.
00:14:23.000 Go check them out right now.
00:14:24.000 Try it for three months for free.
00:14:25.000 Halo.com slash Shapiro.
00:14:27.000 Okay.
00:14:28.000 Meanwhile, Democrats on the Hill have decided that they are now going to attack the free press in order to get Elon Musk.
00:14:36.000 So the Republicans who just took over the House, they launched what was called a weaponization of the federal government subcommittee.
00:14:43.000 It was a House Judiciary Subcommittee, and the subcommittee is designed and aimed at uncovering the perversions that were pursued in the first years of the Biden administration, and also in the last years of the Trump administration, actually, by big tech being pressured by, for example, the FBI in order to shut down particular messages.
00:15:00.000 And we know about a lot of that stuff from the Twitter files, where it was very obvious that there was hand-in-glove movement between the FBI and places like Twitter.
00:15:07.000 We already know that the FBI was putting pressure on places like Facebook to take down particular material, including the Hunter Biden laptop story in October of 2020.
00:15:16.000 So, Republicans hosted, as a couple of the witnesses, Matt Taibbi and Michael Schellenberger.
00:15:21.000 Both of them have been guests on the program.
00:15:23.000 They're also the journalists who revealed some of the trenches of the Twitter files.
00:15:26.000 Representative Jim Jordan led off by charging that the government built a cozy relationship with Big Tech, and of course talked about the Hunter Biden story.
00:15:34.000 And this led the Democrats not to suggest in bipartisan fashion, well, yeah, we probably shouldn't have the militarization of Big Tech on behalf of the government.
00:15:44.000 Which is what you would have expected to hear from the left during, for example, the Patriot Act era.
00:15:48.000 If this hearing happens in 2006, probably the roles are reversed.
00:15:51.000 But here, you have the Democrats overtly attempting to violate basic rules of journalism, attack the journalists as enemies of the people.
00:15:59.000 It really was an astonishing sight.
00:16:01.000 So, for example, you had Texas Democrat Representative Sylvia Garcia demanding, demanding that these journalists, Haibi and Schellenberger, expose that it was Elon Musk as the direct source for the Twitter files.
00:16:11.000 Now, listen, obviously, Elon Musk had to be invested in revealing these tranches of files to these journalists because they got the files.
00:16:20.000 They're from Twitter, somebody from Musk's team or somebody around Musk.
00:16:23.000 But the idea here is that when they for the Democrats that if Elon Musk gave the files, as we will see, this is the line they pursue.
00:16:30.000 If Elon Musk made these files public, then Elon Musk is the villain. Now, this falls very much in line with the idea that Kevin McCarthy is the villain for revealing 41,000 hours of footage of January 6th to Tucker Carlson. The problem isn't the coverage. The problem isn't the lack of transparency in the first place. The problem is the revelation. So here you have Sylvia Garcia attempting to cudgel these journalists into revealing their sources. What was the first time that Mr. Musk approached you about writing the Twitter files?
00:16:57.000 Again, Congresswoman, that would be... I just need a date, sir.
00:17:03.000 But I can't give it to you, unfortunately, because this is a question of sourcing, and I don't give a... I'm a journalist, I don't reveal my source.
00:17:09.000 It's not a question of source, it's a question of chronology.
00:17:12.000 So you're not going to tell us when Musk first approached you?
00:17:17.000 Again, Congresswoman, you're asking a journalist to reveal a source... So then you consider Mr. Musk to be the direct source of all this?
00:17:25.000 No, now you're trying to get me to say that he is the source.
00:17:28.000 I just can't answer your question.
00:17:29.000 Well, either he is or he isn't.
00:17:31.000 If you're telling me you can't answer because it's your source, well then that only logical conclusion is that he is in fact your source.
00:17:38.000 Well, you're free to conclude that.
00:17:39.000 I mean, it's just, it's amazing.
00:17:43.000 Like, under no other circumstance, if a Republican were doing this to a Democratic witness, The media would be all over it, right?
00:17:49.000 The media would be telling you that this is a violation of First Amendment freedoms.
00:17:52.000 This is an attack on the freedom of the press.
00:17:53.000 But these attacks were nonstop yesterday during this hearing.
00:17:56.000 Really astonishing stuff.
00:17:57.000 Representative Stacey Plaskett, who's a ranking member there from, I believe, the Virgin Islands, referring to Taibbi and Schellenberger as quote unquote, so-called journalists, because real journalists are people who work for the Democrats, obviously.
00:18:08.000 This isn't just a matter of what data was given to these so-called Again, so-called journalists.
00:18:23.000 So, eventually, Taibbi had a chance to fire back.
00:18:25.000 It was amazing.
00:18:26.000 One of the things that's amazing about watching congressional hearings is watching how obnoxious and gross so many of our elected officials are.
00:18:33.000 As we'll see when we get to Debbie Wasserman Schultz in a second.
00:18:36.000 One of their favorite games is they say, I reclaim my time.
00:18:38.000 So they won't ask the witness a question.
00:18:40.000 They'll make an accusation.
00:18:41.000 And then if the witness starts talking, I'm talking, sir, I'm talking.
00:18:45.000 It's really terrible.
00:18:46.000 Here is Taibia for being called a so-called journalist.
00:18:50.000 Ranking member Plaskett, I'm not a so-called journalist.
00:18:54.000 I've won the National Magazine Award, the IF Stone Award for Independent Journalism, and I've written ten books, including four New York Times bestsellers.
00:19:05.000 And there she is, busily talking to her aide, of course.
00:19:08.000 Then, of course, Plaskett didn't stop there.
00:19:10.000 She accused these journalists of facilitating murder.
00:19:13.000 Not kidding.
00:19:15.000 And following the Daily Mail's decision to publish where I live, ultimately I had to leave my home and sell it.
00:19:22.000 Those are the consequences for this type of online harassment and speech.
00:19:26.000 Mr. Chairman, I'm not exaggerating when I say that you have called before you two witnesses who pose a direct threat to people who oppose them.
00:19:37.000 It's funny when people have to go through that.
00:19:40.000 Exactly.
00:19:41.000 This is unacceptable.
00:19:43.000 I'm ready for it.
00:19:44.000 I don't know if a lot of other people are.
00:19:46.000 But just as it was unacceptable for Kevin McCarthy to provide 41,000 hours of sensitive security footage to a biased talking head in an effort to rewrite what happened on January 6th.
00:19:59.000 This is a new Republican playbook, apparently.
00:20:02.000 Risk American safety and security to score political points.
00:20:08.000 Yeah, so apparently the New Republican playbook or conservative playbook is reveal things.
00:20:14.000 It's amazing how angry they are that a thing was revealed.
00:20:17.000 Why?
00:20:17.000 Because whenever the systems of power are threatened, they get very, very upset.
00:20:21.000 If the transparency threatens you, you're the problem.
00:20:24.000 If the transparency is the real threat to you, that is the real problem here.
00:20:29.000 If you're a governmental body, okay?
00:20:32.000 We're not talking about your privacy as an individual citizen.
00:20:34.000 We're not talking about somebody revealing your phone calls.
00:20:36.000 We're not talking about somebody reading your diary.
00:20:38.000 We're not talking about somebody going into your business files.
00:20:40.000 We are talking about actual governmental influence on how these things work.
00:20:45.000 And you, as a governmental member, are saying that the revelation to the public of Of information they are owed.
00:20:50.000 You're not owed the information about your neighbor.
00:20:51.000 You're not owed the information about your neighbor's business.
00:20:54.000 What you are owed is transparency into the things that you pay for.
00:20:57.000 If you tax me using the power of the federal government and then use that federal government taxpayer money in order to cram down a particular vision of the universe via big tech.
00:21:06.000 Yes, that is relevant to me.
00:21:07.000 Yes, it is relevant.
00:21:08.000 41,000 hours of footage that you would not reveal that yesterday Democratic Congress people said they were not even given access to.
00:21:14.000 Only their staffers hired from like ABC were given access to it.
00:21:17.000 It's an amazing, amazing thing.
00:21:19.000 And I'm old enough to remember when people attacking the press the way Democrats were, that was a Democracy Dies in Darkness moment.
00:21:24.000 That was Donald Trump threatening First Amendment freedoms.
00:21:26.000 That was the incipient authoritarianism and fascism.
00:21:28.000 The attacks on Schellenberger and Taibbi yesterday were astonishing, and they didn't stop there.
00:21:31.000 We'll get to more on that in a second.
00:21:32.000 First, if you run a small business, you do need to plan ahead.
00:21:35.000 One of the best ways to do that is by using stamps.com to mail and ship.
00:21:38.000 Stamps.com lets you print your own postage and shipping labels directly from your home or office.
00:21:42.000 It's ready to go in mere minutes, so you can get back to running your business sooner.
00:21:45.000 Stamps.com offers rates you can't find anywhere else, like up to 84% off USPS and UPS.
00:21:50.000 Plus, they automatically tell you your cheapest and fastest shipping options.
00:21:53.000 For 25 years, Stamps.com has been indispensable to over 1 million businesses.
00:21:57.000 Get access to the shipping services you need to run your business right from your computer.
00:22:00.000 No lines, no traffic, no waiting.
00:22:02.000 You can print postage wherever you do business.
00:22:04.000 They even send you a free scale, so you'll have everything you need to get started.
00:22:07.000 Here at Daily Wire, we don't like wasting our time, which is why we've been using Stamps.com since 2017.
00:22:10.000 They make it super simple.
00:22:11.000 I like the post office too, but I'm not going to stand for hours in line at the post office or schlep all the boxes the Daily Wire has to send to the post office.
00:22:18.000 That'd be a foolish move.
00:22:19.000 Instead, we use stamps.com.
00:22:21.000 Set your business up for success by getting started with stamps.com today.
00:22:24.000 Sign up with promo code Shapiro for a special offer.
00:22:26.000 It includes a four-week trial, free postage, free digital scale, no long-term commitments or contracts.
00:22:30.000 Great deal.
00:22:30.000 Go to stamps.com, click the microphone at the top of the page, enter code Shapiro.
00:22:35.000 Okay, so this hearing continued, this subcommittee hearing on the weaponization of government.
00:22:39.000 And just to prove that weaponization of government is not real, Democrats weaponized government against journalists.
00:22:45.000 It seems to be a pretty good way to put this.
00:22:46.000 The most egregious performer wasn't even Stacey Plaskett, who was awful yesterday.
00:22:50.000 It was Debbie Wasserman Schultz, former head of the Democratic National Committee and still representative from Florida.
00:22:57.000 She tried to claim yesterday that Matt Taibbi and Michael Schellenberger are bad journalists because they make a living.
00:23:02.000 Which raises the question as to don't journalists from other outlets make a living?
00:23:08.000 Are we now to believe that the way that we gauge a journalist is whether they operate in the non-profit space or whether they are poor?
00:23:15.000 I'm confused.
00:23:16.000 So if you run a story and people want to read the story, then apparently that's bad journalism.
00:23:19.000 If you run a story and nobody reads the story, then that's good journalism.
00:23:23.000 There's no logic to this.
00:23:23.000 This is just Wasserman Schultz trying to throw mud at a couple of journalists she doesn't like.
00:23:28.000 Elon Musk spoon-fed you his cherry-picked information, which you must have suspected promotes a slanted viewpoint or at the very least generates another right-wing conspiracy theory.
00:23:39.000 You violated your own standard and you appear to have benefited from it.
00:23:44.000 Before the release of the emails in August of last year, You had 661,000 Twitter followers.
00:23:51.000 After the Twitter files, your followers doubled, and now it's three times what it was last August.
00:23:57.000 I imagine your substack readership, which is a subscription, increased significantly because of the work that you did for Elon Musk.
00:24:03.000 Now, I'm not asking you to put a dollar figure on it, but it's quite obvious that you've profited from the Twitter files.
00:24:09.000 You hit the jackpot on that Vegas slot machine to which you referred.
00:24:14.000 This is so disgusting.
00:24:15.000 It's so disgusting.
00:24:16.000 So in other words, the New York Times, which won Pulitzer Prizes on the basis of a bunch of reports about a Russian collusion scandal that did not exist.
00:24:24.000 You think they gained subscribers based on that?
00:24:26.000 You think?
00:24:27.000 I think they probably did.
00:24:28.000 In fact, I know they did because they reveal their subscriber statistics every so often.
00:24:32.000 Do you think that when Democrats break a big story in the media about Republicans, that they make money off of that?
00:24:38.000 I think they probably do.
00:24:40.000 As it turns out, you know who's made an entire living off of like one story?
00:24:43.000 Bob Woodward, right?
00:24:44.000 Bob Woodward has made an entire living off of one story that ran in the 1970s.
00:24:48.000 Does that make him a bad journalist because he made money off of that story?
00:24:52.000 It turns out that when people want to pay you to do things, that's typically a reminder that the story is kind of important, actually.
00:24:58.000 It's a pretty good gauge of the market's interest in the things that you have to say.
00:25:02.000 But according to Debbie Wasserman Schultz, if Matt Taibbi and Michael Schellenberger are more famous now than they were before they revealed the story, this makes them bad, which is weird because it's been true of literally every journalist for literally all of human history.
00:25:12.000 That you make more prominent splashes when you break bigger stories.
00:25:18.000 Sound the alarm, guys.
00:25:21.000 We've stumbled upon a corrupt relationship wherein journalists who break big stories become more famous.
00:25:27.000 Somebody get Upton Sinclair on the phone.
00:25:30.000 Please.
00:25:32.000 We need Ida Tarbell on the phone.
00:25:34.000 Come on, this has been true forever.
00:25:36.000 But here she is.
00:25:37.000 They're bad.
00:25:38.000 They're bad.
00:25:39.000 I mean, one of my favorite things here is the fact that not only are the Democrats on this particular subcommittee really venal and attempting to attack the press in ways that, again, if Republicans did it, would be seen as full-scale attacks on the press.
00:25:51.000 They also just happen to be unbelievably ignorant.
00:25:53.000 So Sylvia Garcia, who we saw a moment ago being foolish.
00:25:56.000 Well, she is, um, her foolishness really knows very few bounds.
00:25:59.000 My favorite part, I'm not sure which clip I like better here.
00:26:01.000 We're gonna play two and then we're gonna decide which one we like better.
00:26:03.000 So the first one is where she is talking about how Matt Taibbi has a substack.
00:26:09.000 Now, for those who are not informed, a substack is basically like a paid newsletter that you can access online.
00:26:13.000 So if I have a substack, I write a piece, you pay for a subscription, and I can read the piece.
00:26:17.000 That's all a substack is.
00:26:18.000 She has no idea what it is.
00:26:20.000 She doesn't even know what a internet is.
00:26:22.000 What is a internet?
00:26:24.000 What is this thing that you type on?
00:26:28.000 Is it a computer?
00:26:29.000 How is it pronounced?
00:26:30.000 Here is an honest-to-God representative in the United States Congress.
00:26:34.000 Yet you yourself posted on your, your, um, I guess it's kind of like a webpage.
00:26:39.000 I don't quite understand what Substack is, but.
00:26:45.000 Well, I guess you can admit that out loud.
00:26:48.000 That wasn't, that wasn't her.
00:26:49.000 You know, honestly, this next, this next one's the best.
00:26:52.000 This is where she implies, uh, that Matt Taibbi, Michael Schellenberger, and Barry Weiss, who is a lesbian married woman, uh, are in a threesome.
00:27:03.000 Yep.
00:27:03.000 This is a thing that happened in Congress yesterday.
00:27:05.000 The best part of this clip is Taibbi and Schellenberger's reactions.
00:27:08.000 They're like, uh, what did you, what now?
00:27:12.000 In your discussion, in your answer, you also said that you were invited by a friend, Barry Weiss.
00:27:18.000 My friend, Barry Weiss.
00:27:19.000 So this friend works for Twitter, or what is, what is her?
00:27:23.000 She's a journalist.
00:27:24.000 Sir, I didn't ask you a question.
00:27:25.000 I'm now asking Mr. Schellenberger a question.
00:27:28.000 Yes, ma'am.
00:27:28.000 Barry Weiss is a journalist.
00:27:30.000 I'm sorry, sir?
00:27:31.000 She's a journalist.
00:27:31.000 She's a journalist.
00:27:32.000 So you work in concert with her?
00:27:35.000 Yeah.
00:27:37.000 Do you know when she first was contacted by Mr. Musk?
00:27:41.000 I don't know.
00:27:42.000 You don't know.
00:27:42.000 So you're in this as a threesome?
00:27:47.000 Um, there was many more people involved than that.
00:27:50.000 It was a journalistic orgy.
00:27:55.000 There were so many people involved.
00:27:57.000 It was like eyes wide shut of journalism.
00:28:00.000 Oh my gosh.
00:28:00.000 Good stuff there from our, from our elected Congress people.
00:28:03.000 They are the best and the brightest and probably we should not have any journalistic oversight of them.
00:28:06.000 Probably we should be giving them unfettered power because they are in fact the experts on policy.
00:28:10.000 Speaking of people.
00:28:11.000 who apparently should be trusted on policy. The Podesta family continues to rake it in from the Chinese. It is the corrupt relationship between the Biden administration and China continues to pace. So Hunter Biden obviously was picking up bags of Chinese cash while his vice president father was squiring him around on Air Force Two and all the rest.
00:28:32.000 And we're supposed to ignore that.
00:28:33.000 We're supposed to ignore the 10% for the big guy emails.
00:28:34.000 We're supposed to pretend none of that existed.
00:28:36.000 None of that implicates Joe in any way.
00:28:38.000 We're supposed to pretend that it means nothing, that the Penn-Biden Center for Chinese Grift was taking in a lot of money, as it turns out, from the Chinese government, allegedly.
00:28:46.000 Well, now we're supposed to ignore the fact that TikTok, which is a Chinese front organization, TikTok is an organization that is pretty obviously run by the Chinese government via a bunch of proxies, and they are gathering information on you, and every time they try to show they're not doing that, they tend to show that they are doing that.
00:29:03.000 Well, now, according to Politico, they have hired top Biden-connected consulting firm, SKDK, as it faces increasing scrutiny in Washington, according to two people, including one with direct knowledge of the hire.
00:29:14.000 The public affairs and political consulting firm is providing communications support to the company, which has come under government scrutiny, with senators recently introducing a bipartisan bill empowering Biden to restrict or potentially ban the service.
00:29:25.000 SKDK is seen as the most well-connected Democratic firm in Washington, with former top employees in senior and mid-level roles in the Biden administration.
00:29:33.000 So, for example, Anita Dunn is a founding partner.
00:29:35.000 She returned to the White House last May.
00:29:37.000 She is a senior advisor after a stint in the early part of the Biden administration.
00:29:40.000 Other former SKDK employees in the Biden administration include Deputy White House Communications Directors Kate Berner and Herbie Zeskind, Deputy Pentagon Press Secretary Sabrina Singh, Interior Department Press Secretary Tyler Cherry.
00:29:51.000 So that's weird.
00:29:53.000 I wonder why TikTok would be hiring people with deep-seated Democratic connections.
00:29:58.000 SKDK happens to be one of the most obviously Democratic lobbying firms in America.
00:30:02.000 That really shouldn't be a surprise, given the fact that, for example, it was Huawei that paid Tony Podesta, John Podesta's brother.
00:30:10.000 John Podesta served in the early days of the Biden administration as sort of their helicopter money guy on green projects.
00:30:18.000 Tony was paid half a million dollars to lobby the White House on behalf of Huawei, which is the Chinese tech giant that is on the U.S.
00:30:24.000 trade blacklist because they've been stealing American technology for the development of the next stage of the Internet, like Internet 3.0 or whatever it is.
00:30:32.000 So yeah, the Chinese connections to the Democratic Party and its most favored players runs incredibly, incredibly deep.
00:30:39.000 In just one second, we'll get to Joe Biden's newest budget proposal, speaking of spending money on things that are just absurd.
00:30:44.000 First, let's talk about how you can make your home look better.
00:30:46.000 So look around your house right now.
00:30:48.000 You got some nice furniture.
00:30:49.000 Everything's kind of the feng shui is fine.
00:30:51.000 But the way the light is flowing into the room, it's not the thing.
00:30:54.000 It's not working for you.
00:30:55.000 What you need is better window coverings.
00:30:56.000 You probably haven't thought about that in a while because who thinks about window coverings?
00:30:59.000 I don't spend my days like thinking about it.
00:31:01.000 But now that now that I'm saying it, you're looking around, I'm like, yeah, those those are really dingy curtains.
00:31:05.000 You need to head on over to Blinds.com.
00:31:07.000 Blinds.com is the number one online retailer of custom window coverings with over 40,000 five star reviews.
00:31:12.000 You can measure and install yourself or have Blinds.com take care of it with local professionals.
00:31:16.000 There's no showroom, no retail markets, no matter how many you order, installation is just one low cost.
00:31:20.000 If you don't have an eye for design, Blinds.com experts are always available to help choose the style and color that's right for you.
00:31:25.000 Everything they sell is covered by their perfect fit and 100% satisfaction guarantee.
00:31:29.000 With hundreds of styles and colors to choose from, Blinds.com is sure to have the perfect treatments for your windows.
00:31:34.000 Save up to 50% sitewide at Blinds.com's anniversary sale, now through March 15th.
00:31:39.000 It's up to 50% off at blinds.com, custom made, easy, since 1996.
00:31:42.000 That's blinds.com when you check out online.
00:31:44.000 Don't forget to tell them you heard about blinds.com from The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:31:47.000 That helps them and it helps us as well.
00:31:48.000 Rules and restrictions may apply also.
00:31:51.000 A lot of people, especially young people, are struggling right now because they don't actually have a plan for their lives.
00:31:55.000 They feel overwhelmed when they try to confront the future.
00:31:57.000 But you can't confront the future if you don't start with the present.
00:32:00.000 And you can't get a handle on the big picture if you don't start small.
00:32:03.000 Jordan Peterson goes into this in great detail in his brand new five-part series, Vision and Destiny on DailyWare+.
00:32:09.000 Here's a clip talking about starting small.
00:32:11.000 Hey, that's your life, man.
00:32:13.000 The things you do every day.
00:32:15.000 Get those things right.
00:32:17.000 And then you can worry about exceptions, vacations and so forth, adventures and all that, but man, you want to get what iterates right.
00:32:24.000 That stabilizes you and that's so helpful.
00:32:27.000 And you can really do it by concentrating.
00:32:30.000 You can say, well, you can go, go into your room, your bedroom and look, just sit on your bed and look around and you think, okay, what bugs me about this room?
00:32:41.000 And then you think, oh well, there's a pile of socks over there, and oh god, I haven't looked at those pieces of paper on that desk for like a year, and I don't know what's wrong with that corner, but there's spiderwebs everywhere.
00:32:52.000 No one's paid any attention to whatever the hell's over there for quite a while.
00:32:57.000 You know, there's some stain on the ceiling and the wallpaper's peeling there.
00:33:01.000 You can see.
00:33:02.000 It's like, well, what's wrong with this room?
00:33:03.000 Well, how is it not optimal?
00:33:04.000 And it's kind of ugly.
00:33:06.000 It's kind of outdated.
00:33:07.000 And it's kind of tasteless.
00:33:08.000 And it's in disarray.
00:33:09.000 It's like, that's your life, man, right there in your room.
00:33:12.000 It's like, well, fix one of those things.
00:33:15.000 And then you can ask yourself, well, if I had to leave this room, having fixed one of those things in some micro manner, what could I do that I would do?
00:33:24.000 And then do that in your whole life.
00:33:26.000 That is exactly right.
00:33:27.000 And Jordan is famous for trying to boil down very, very big ideas into small incremental steps to make your life better.
00:33:33.000 You can live that life if you view things like Vision and Destiny.
00:33:36.000 The fourth episode of Vision and Destiny is out right now.
00:33:39.000 New episodes are releasing every single week.
00:33:41.000 It's all exclusive for DailyWirePlus members.
00:33:43.000 Join right now at dailywire.com slash subscribe to watch Vision and Destiny.
00:33:46.000 Also, this Sunday, you're going to want to stay tuned for the Sunday special.
00:33:50.000 My friend and former adversary, Piers Morgan, joined me.
00:33:53.000 It's a fascinating conversation.
00:33:55.000 Here's a little bit of what it sounds like.
00:33:58.000 I had an editor of my first paper, The Sun in London, called Kelvin McKenzie.
00:34:02.000 And he said to me recently, the single most annoying thing about you was I used to scream at you when you got something badly wrong.
00:34:10.000 And he said, you just suck it up.
00:34:12.000 And then an hour later, you bounce into my office with a big grin on your face with a scoop that you got.
00:34:17.000 And that was how you always responded.
00:34:20.000 And he said, on one level I admired it, on another level I hated you because I couldn't break you.
00:34:25.000 And I was really pleased with that.
00:34:27.000 Of all the things anyone's ever said about me, I would say that is probably the best trait that I have, is the ability to bounce back.
00:34:39.000 It's a great Sunday special.
00:34:40.000 We go through everything from American politics to British politics to sort of what it is to be in the limelight on a constant basis.
00:34:47.000 So I think revelatory and really interesting.
00:34:49.000 You're going to want to listen to the Sunday special and go check it out.
00:34:52.000 It should be on our feed on Sunday.
00:34:53.000 It'll also be available in full over at Daily Wire Plus.
00:34:56.000 There's always a special member section of the Sunday special, so make sure that you become a Daily Wire Plus member so you can actually see that as well.
00:35:02.000 It's a great episode.
00:35:03.000 I look forward to sharing it with you.
00:35:04.000 Meanwhile, Joe Biden has now unleashed his latest budget blueprint.
00:35:07.000 It involves $6.9 trillion of spending.
00:35:10.000 $6.9 trillion of spending.
00:35:13.000 He says, by the way, that it's going to reduce the deficit.
00:35:16.000 The way he says it's going to reduce the deficit is he's going to radically increase taxes.
00:35:19.000 He would make The tax rate on wealthy Americans, the highest since the 1980s.
00:35:25.000 It raised the overall tax rate to about 44% on the people who earn the most income in the United States, which is an extraordinary amount of money, especially if you are living in a place like California or New York that also has a high state tax.
00:35:37.000 In California, the highest rate of state tax, which is 12, I think it's 12% now.
00:35:42.000 Add that on top and you could be theoretically paying 56% of your incremental income to the federal government.
00:35:48.000 Which for California and the federal government might mean any dollar you make over $400,000 in a place like California, that means that you make 44 cents on every one of those.
00:35:57.000 That can't hurt the economy at all.
00:35:58.000 That'll be fine.
00:35:59.000 That'll be fine.
00:35:59.000 We'll just siphon off all the money from the people who actually reinvest that money in goods and services at the highest rate.
00:36:05.000 That's exactly what we will do.
00:36:06.000 Genius level stuff here from the Biden administration.
00:36:09.000 So what exactly is in this budget blueprint?
00:36:12.000 Well, again, the budget outline calls for Congress to approve $1.7 trillion in discretionary federal spending next year, including $885 billion for defense and $809 billion for non-defense and veterans health programs.
00:36:24.000 The overall budget would cost $6.9 trillion as an increase over the roughly $6.4 trillion the administration expects the federal government to spend in 2023.
00:36:33.000 Then they say, don't worry because we're going to cut deficits by three trillion dollars over the next decade.
00:36:36.000 Now, understand when they say cut deficits, they don't mean cut the debt.
00:36:39.000 What they mean is that future growth of deficits will be slightly lower than it overall would be.
00:36:45.000 So, for example, this is a chart from the Washington Post showing what the budget deficit would look like under the current projection by the Biden administration and what it would look like with the president's budget.
00:36:57.000 As you will note, the budget deficit, this is year-on-year budget deficit, is still extraordinary with the president's budget.
00:37:04.000 So again, if you can't see this chart, what it shows you is year-on-year what the deficit would be.
00:37:10.000 And essentially, with the president's budget, it means that until 2033 or 2034, according to this particular outline, even including Joe Biden's budget, because he's just going to keep spending until the end of time, right?
00:37:22.000 That's what his budget assumes.
00:37:23.000 Unlimited spending forever.
00:37:25.000 The suggestion is that we are going to have a budget deficit of at least $1.5 trillion every year from now all the way until 2034, by which point the budget deficit will actually be $2 trillion.
00:37:37.000 And he's saying that that's reducing the deficit because the projected deficit before the president's budget would be like slightly higher.
00:37:45.000 Like somewhat slightly, a few hundred billion dollars higher per year.
00:37:48.000 But the president is going to tax the living crap out of all of you and spend unlimited amounts of money.
00:37:52.000 And then he's going to claim that he's a deficit reducer.
00:37:54.000 It's just the biggest lie in American politics.
00:37:56.000 This guy gives a damn about bringing together the amount of money we are spending and the amount of money that we are bringing into the federal government.
00:38:02.000 Nobody wants to balance the budget, not on the right, no one on the left.
00:38:06.000 The difference is that the left wants to spend unlimited and copious amounts of money while siphoning an incredible amount of money out of the American economy in order to pay for their Idiotic schemes, which is really what this is.
00:38:17.000 A lot of their schemes are lies.
00:38:20.000 The White House says the budget will outline a plan requiring insurance companies that run Medicaid-managed care programs pay back Medicaid if the companies charge more than the cost of patient care, which, of course, undermines the actual way that the healthcare system runs.
00:38:32.000 They're just trying to grab money out of that and pretend that that has no impact On anything, which of course is not how any of these programs actually work.
00:38:39.000 Also, Biden wants to empower Medicare to negotiate how much it pays for certain high-priced prescription drugs, which means that either R&D stops in the United States, or it means that everybody stops taking Medicare, or it means that the entire private industry now has to bear the burden of the high cost, which then is used by the federal government as an excuse for more government regulation.
00:39:01.000 Make things more expensive and more difficult.
00:39:02.000 And then the federal government says, now that we've made things more expensive and more difficult, we need to come in and fix the problem.
00:39:08.000 So this is their plan.
00:39:10.000 They also plan to expand spending on climate.
00:39:15.000 Great.
00:39:15.000 And that's definitely what we need.
00:39:18.000 Mitt Romney says this is not going to happen.
00:39:19.000 Obviously, he knows that.
00:39:20.000 Republicans are not going to sign up for raising taxes.
00:39:23.000 His budget would reprise a series of tax increases the administration couldn't get through the last Congress, which was controlled by Democrats.
00:39:31.000 So, you'll notice that he didn't propose a lot of these things when Democrats were actually in charge, because that would have meant that Democrats rejected it.
00:39:36.000 So he's putting this up there so Republicans will knock it down, and then he can claim that they're doing tax cuts for the wealthy, or whatever his nonsense pitch is.
00:39:44.000 Again, this budget is ridiculous.
00:39:47.000 Biden is proposing raising the top individual tax rate from 37% to 39.6%, raising the corporate tax rate to 28% from 21%, which is insane.
00:39:59.000 That's an insanely high corporate tax rate.
00:40:01.000 Because remember, that means that your corporation gets taxed at 28% before it pays you.
00:40:05.000 Then it pays you, and then you get taxed at a higher rate.
00:40:09.000 He also wants to tax top earners' capital gains at a higher rate and increase taxes on U.S.
00:40:13.000 companies' foreign profits to 21% from 10.5% because no one will take advantage of that.
00:40:18.000 He called to extend some of the Trump tax cuts.
00:40:19.000 Remember those Trump tax cuts that supposedly benefited only the wealthy?
00:40:22.000 He wants to now extend them.
00:40:23.000 So it shows that he was lying about that in the first place.
00:40:26.000 He also wants to raise existing taxes on wages, self-employment income, and investments to 5% from 3.8% and then expand those taxes to cover active business income.
00:40:36.000 And he wants a 15% budget increase to the IRS.
00:40:41.000 Okay, none of this stuff is going to pass.
00:40:42.000 And none of this is going to solve any of the underlying problems with the massive social spending that we have been doing, these huge mandatory spending programs that we've put in place and that will bankrupt the country.
00:40:52.000 He's not actually going to be able to get any of this through.
00:40:55.000 It's all about posturing.
00:40:57.000 That he is capable of providing you everything in the middle of a massive inflationary cycle that's about to collapse into a stagnation, an economic stagnation cycle.
00:41:05.000 Joe Biden yesterday talked about increasing his budget.
00:41:08.000 And the world's getting a hell of a lot more complicated.
00:41:10.000 Getting a hell of a lot more complicated.
00:41:13.000 So, I've increased my budget.
00:41:15.000 We increase it now, as I said, we're making a... we're paying another $820 to help people from families with low incomes.
00:41:26.000 Oh, so the world is getting more complicated, so we spend more money.
00:41:29.000 And then the world gets more complicated, so we spend more money.
00:41:32.000 And then it gets a little more complicated, so we spend more money.
00:41:35.000 So if the world got simpler, would you spend less money?
00:41:37.000 And what would you define as the world getting simpler at this point?
00:41:40.000 I mean, he himself is simple.
00:41:41.000 My favorite quote from Joe Biden yesterday is he admitted that he has been around for 400 years.
00:41:46.000 And I can honestly say I have never been more optimistic about America's future than I am today.
00:41:52.000 I mean that sincerely.
00:41:54.000 As you can tell, I've only been around a few years.
00:41:57.000 Like 400.
00:41:57.000 You know, honestly, that's the most charming thing Joe Biden has said.
00:42:04.000 Since at least 1812.
00:42:06.000 So that's good for him for acknowledging the simple fact of the matter.
00:42:10.000 Well, look, Joe Biden, also, he just has to lie on everything.
00:42:13.000 So yesterday, he also suggested that Republicans want to defund the police so he can run away from his own crime record.
00:42:19.000 It's all just a bag of garbage.
00:42:21.000 And that's why he's not running very well in the polls.
00:42:23.000 He's still at the low 40s.
00:42:25.000 MAGA Republicans are calling for defunding the police department and defunding the FBI now.
00:42:31.000 That's a good one.
00:42:32.000 I like that one.
00:42:34.000 Well guess what?
00:42:36.000 I refuse to provide funding that's going to keep communities safe and secure.
00:42:42.000 So now Republicans are the ones who are into defunding the police, which is weird because your DOJ literally is cramming consent decrees down on major American city police departments everywhere.
00:42:50.000 And you yourself had to allow the federal government to re-seize control over crime policy in the District of Columbia, which is run by Democrats.
00:42:58.000 Joe Biden is insanely vulnerable right now.
00:43:01.000 If you look at Joe Biden's approval ratings, his approval ratings remain absolutely stagnant.
00:43:05.000 They are not for all the talk about Joe Biden being just amazing and people loving Joe Biden.
00:43:10.000 This is not true.
00:43:11.000 There is no evidence whatsoever that people love Joe Biden.
00:43:14.000 It's just that there hasn't been an election lately.
00:43:17.000 So that means that Joe Biden continues to maintain the presidency.
00:43:21.000 But his approval ratings are like, according to the RealClearPolitics polling average, they're the highest they've been in about a year.
00:43:29.000 Two years, maybe?
00:43:31.000 Which means that they're at 44%.
00:43:32.000 This is not a dude who is riding particularly high and it's going to get a lot worse for him as time goes on because the economic consequences of his own bad policies have not yet come home to roost.
00:43:40.000 Which means that he's vulnerable.
00:43:42.000 Which raises the question of what's going to happen on the other side of the aisle.
00:43:45.000 So, we move over to the 2024 Republican candidates.
00:43:48.000 The big story that Democrats are glomming onto today.
00:43:51.000 Is this notion that Donald Trump is about to be criminally charged in Manhattan?
00:43:57.000 According to the New York Times, the Manhattan District Attorney's Office recently signaled to Trump's lawyers he could face criminal charges for his role in the payment of hush money to Stormy Daniels, the strongest indication yet that prosecutors are nearing an indictment of the former president, according to four people with knowledge of the matter.
00:44:09.000 Now, again, all of this sounds like Lucy with the football.
00:44:13.000 How many times have we heard before that they're just they're on the verge of getting Trump.
00:44:16.000 They're going to get him this time.
00:44:17.000 Now's the time they arrest him and they drag him off.
00:44:19.000 They're going to call the chief marshal of the Supreme Court.
00:44:22.000 He's going to drag him away and they're going to frog march that guy.
00:44:25.000 Mm hmm.
00:44:26.000 Mm hmm.
00:44:26.000 Sure.
00:44:27.000 Sure.
00:44:28.000 According to The New York Times, the prosecutors offered Trump the chance to testify next week before the grand jury that has been hearing evidence in the potential case.
00:44:34.000 Such offers almost always indicate an indictment is close.
00:44:38.000 In New York, potential defendants have the right to answer questions in the grand jury before indictment.
00:44:43.000 So, apparently, this particular case is about a $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels, who said she had an affair with Trump.
00:44:51.000 The payment was made in the final days of the 2016 presidential campaign by Michael Cohen, who is Trump's former fixer, who was later reimbursed by Trump from the White House.
00:45:00.000 Cohen, who has long said that Trump directed him to pay Daniels to keep her quiet, is expected to testify.
00:45:04.000 The basic idea here is that he violated campaign finance law.
00:45:09.000 So this is like an Al Capone thing.
00:45:11.000 Oh, we hate you for all these other reasons, but it's really that you violated the campaign finance law.
00:45:16.000 Sure.
00:45:16.000 You know, wake me when you actually do something, guys.
00:45:21.000 Your desperate attempts to prosecute the former president.
00:45:24.000 So far, they've come to know it.
00:45:25.000 And every time you suggest that you've got the guy, not even close, it turns out.
00:45:28.000 It turns out that you're fabricating stuff or you're exaggerating stuff or you're pretending that he's a grand threat to national security when he's not.
00:45:34.000 All of the Mar-a-Lago classified documents.
00:45:36.000 And then it turns out that Joe Biden has a bunch in his basement and his garage.
00:45:40.000 The media love this sort of stuff because it allows them to sell newspapers, but it ain't real until it's real.
00:45:46.000 Okay, meanwhile, other Republican candidates.
00:45:48.000 So there's a lot of talk about Ron DeSantis jumping in.
00:45:50.000 Well, until he jumps in, he hasn't jumped in.
00:45:52.000 He is, in fact, visiting Iowa right now.
00:45:54.000 I think that the generalized assumption is that he probably will jump in sometime in June.
00:45:59.000 The latest legislative session in Florida ends in May.
00:46:04.000 DeSantis' latest book, his new kind of memoir slash political manifesto, that thing has outsold both Obama's and Trump's in terms of their book right before they ran for president.
00:46:16.000 Those are very, very big numbers.
00:46:19.000 There's a pro-DeSantis pact announced its formation on Thursday.
00:46:22.000 It's led by Ken Cuccinelli, the former director of citizenship and immigration services during the Trump administration.
00:46:28.000 It's called Never Back Down.
00:46:29.000 Now, of course, DeSantis isn't allowed by law to actually coordinate with the PAC, so it's urging him to run.
00:46:34.000 But again, I think the generalized assumption that DeSantis is going to run is probably correct.
00:46:37.000 I'd be shocked if Ron DeSantis, the governor of Florida, does not run at this point.
00:46:41.000 And he's widely perceived to be the chief threat to Donald Trump for the Republican nomination.
00:46:44.000 One other candidate who has been discussed is Glenn Youngkin.
00:46:47.000 Glenn Youngkin is the man who won a surprise gubernatorial victory.
00:46:51.000 Over Terry McAuliffe, the former head of the DNC and former governor of Virginia.
00:46:55.000 That was a race that was very much affected by arguments over critical race theory and transgender bathrooms and the culture war issues the Democrats had basically decided to declare.
00:47:04.000 Terry McAuliffe famously dropped one of the worst gaffes in human history in the middle of that campaign when he said that parents should not have the right to control their children's education.
00:47:11.000 That was about the experts in the teachers unions doing it.
00:47:14.000 And so Youngkin sailed in.
00:47:15.000 And right now, Glenn Youngkin is doing a really good job.
00:47:17.000 He's got a mid-50s approval rating in the state of Virginia.
00:47:21.000 Yesterday, he made a big boo-boo.
00:47:22.000 His big boo-boo is do not do town halls on CNN.
00:47:24.000 So this is one area where, again, DeSantis is, I think, really disciplined.
00:47:30.000 He's got his team basically rejecting nearly all media requests from people he perceives to be Opposition media.
00:47:36.000 And what we mean by that is just media who are designed, who are out there to get him.
00:47:40.000 Why would I go on TV so that you can ask me some sort of gotcha question and not let me answer the question?
00:47:44.000 Glenn Youngkin is attempting to appear moderate.
00:47:46.000 And so he goes on CNN with Jay Tapper, and it ends precisely as you would think.
00:47:50.000 It ends with Glenn Youngkin being asked a bunch of extraordinarily biased questions designed to wrongfoot him.
00:47:56.000 That's what it was.
00:47:57.000 Now, you've never seen anything like this with a Democrat on CNN.
00:47:59.000 Whenever a Democrat goes on CNN, it's basically, how loving are you?
00:48:03.000 How wonderful are you?
00:48:04.000 Can you just tell us Do you make the sun shine or does it shine all by itself just with those rays upon your face?
00:48:10.000 That's usually how CNN treats a Democrat.
00:48:12.000 The way they treat Republicans is like, when did you last beat your wife?
00:48:15.000 So, more fool Glenn Youngkin for even bothering to go on a CNN town hall.
00:48:19.000 I've never seen a CNN town hall that did not end with the moderator of the CNN town hall basically attempting to stomp all over the Republican candidate that goes all the way back to the Parkland massacre when CNN did an egregious town hall accusing Republican politicians of being responsible for the Parkland massacre culminating in students from Parkland yelling at sitting United States senators on stage.
00:48:40.000 So, CNN, again, Fact, for Republican candidates, do not go to places that are designed to destroy you.
00:48:48.000 Don't do it unless you have an active plan as to how you're going to fight back.
00:48:51.000 You have to plan for these things.
00:48:53.000 And Republicans keep assuming that the media are going to act in good faith, and they aren't.
00:48:56.000 They're not interested in acting in good faith.
00:48:58.000 So here, for example, was Glenn Youngkin being asked about schools and education.
00:49:04.000 This is a chance to make sure that we're not pitting our children against one another based on race or religion or their sex, but teaching all history the good and the bad.
00:49:12.000 So let me just ask you one more follow-up on that, which is, what do you say to a teacher who wants to teach Anyone of any number of scholars who say that the condition of black Americans today can be traced all the way back to Fort Monroe in 1619.
00:49:30.000 That it's not as if every generation is just brought forth new.
00:49:37.000 That there were hundreds of years of slavery, a hundred years of Jim Crow, and today is part of that.
00:49:44.000 Yeah, well, first of all, we must step back and teach all of that.
00:49:49.000 And then we have to recognize where we are today.
00:49:53.000 Okay, so again, that question is straight from the mouth of Nicole Hannon-Hannon-Jones.
00:49:57.000 I mean, that's exactly what that is.
00:49:59.000 And it's also a conflation of two arguments, right?
00:50:02.000 It's a conflation of one argument, which is that the past has consequences, which is obviously true, with critical race theory, which teaches that the systems of the United States today are inherently perverse because they are rooted in exploitation and slavery.
00:50:13.000 That's the actual argument of the 1619 Project, is that the center of American history lies around exploitation.
00:50:18.000 It does not lie around freedom.
00:50:20.000 Glenn Youngkin didn't know how to answer that question because he hadn't prepped for that question in an appropriate way.
00:50:24.000 And the way the question was asked was incredibly biased.
00:50:26.000 And making that distinction is really important, but he couldn't do it because again, I think he was expecting sort of a good faith conversation that didn't, that never happens on, on CNN.
00:50:33.000 Here was Jake Tapper, who's promoting gun control with Glenn Youngkin in Virginia.
00:50:38.000 Think about individuals who say, there are laws that could help law enforcement keep guns out of the hands of people who would use them for harm.
00:50:48.000 You could strengthen the red flag laws in Virginia.
00:50:52.000 You could require, by law, parents to lock their guns, either in safes or with trigger locks, and that would keep a six-year-old from being able, much less two six-year-olds, from being able to get guns to bring them to school.
00:51:06.000 Would you ever contemplate anything like that?
00:51:07.000 Well, let me repeat.
00:51:09.000 As I said, Virginia has some of the toughest gun laws in the nation, and we have red flag laws, and we have requirements that parents keep guns out of the hands of young children.
00:51:19.000 You know, again, every question is designed to elicit a particular Democrat response because these are questions that are oriented from the left.
00:51:25.000 And I like Jake Tapper very often, but not here.
00:51:28.000 I mean, I think that the questions here are quite biased.
00:51:31.000 And then, of course, CNN, that's what they always do.
00:51:32.000 They go to the crowd.
00:51:33.000 And who's in the crowd but a trans-ute, a trans person, which is, in this particular case, a trans man, meaning a woman, I believe she's a man, saying that This person should be able to use the bathroom of their choosing and why are you so mean, Glenn Youngkin?
00:51:52.000 Uh, Governor Youngkin, your transgender model policies require that students play on the sports teams and use the restrooms that correspond with their sex assigned at birth.
00:52:01.000 Look at me.
00:52:03.000 I am a transgender man.
00:52:05.000 Do you really think that the girls in my high school would feel comfortable sharing a restroom with me?
00:52:10.000 Do I think the girls in my high school... So the idea is that now you care about the girls in your high school sharing a restroom?
00:52:15.000 Is that going to be the adjudicatory standard?
00:52:17.000 Seriously, is the adjudicatory standard going to be what the other people in the restroom are comfortable doing?
00:52:22.000 Because then every single trans woman is going to be banned from the female restroom.
00:52:27.000 Again, there's no logic to this, but the entire idea of the CNN town halls is, what if we confront you with a victim of your evil policies if you're a Republican?
00:52:35.000 And then if you're a Democrat, what if we confront you with a victim of Republicans' evil policies if you're a Democrat?
00:52:40.000 The same exact thing.
00:52:41.000 Like, why Glenn Youngkin would put himself out there for this is beyond me.
00:52:43.000 I don't understand it.
00:52:45.000 Treat the media the way they ought to be treated.
00:52:48.000 As partisan advocates of a particular point of view, and unless you've got a plan walking in, don't walk in in the first place.
00:52:54.000 Lesson to all Republican candidates moving forward.
00:52:56.000 Okay, time for some things I like and then some things that I hate.
00:52:59.000 So, Things that I like today.
00:53:01.000 So this is an actual scientific discovery, scientific progress.
00:53:04.000 We like it.
00:53:04.000 It's a good thing.
00:53:05.000 Apparently, according to the Wall Street Journal, scientists now say they've produced the first commercially accessible material that eliminates the loss of energy as electricity moves along a wire.
00:53:13.000 That is a massive breakthrough.
00:53:14.000 It could mean longer lasting batteries, more efficient power grids and improved high speed trains.
00:53:18.000 Materials that conduct electric currents without any loss, these are superconductors, have been wildly impractical because they need to be really, really cooled to around 320 degrees Fahrenheit.
00:53:26.000 And then subjected to extreme pressure to work because typically as electricity goes across the line, it loses some of its power.
00:53:31.000 A group of researchers at the University of Rochester report they have created a new superconductor that can operate at room temperature and much lower pressure than previously discovered superconducting materials.
00:53:42.000 The breakthrough has the potential to create lossless electrical grids, better and cheaper magnets for use in future nuclear fusion reactors, among other things.
00:53:50.000 Which is going to be, like, an amazingly powerful thing.
00:53:54.000 If you have better superconductors, it's going to make virtually all technologies more efficient.
00:54:00.000 Including, by the way, how much power has to be generated in order to go through the grid, because if it doesn't lose electricity going through the grid, then obviously you don't have to generate as much up front.
00:54:07.000 It's going to have environmental impact.
00:54:09.000 If you wish to make the environment better, what you need is more innovation.
00:54:13.000 Innovation is going to be the solution to virtually all human problems in terms of material lack.
00:54:18.000 The solution is not going to be government mandates and redistributionism.
00:54:22.000 Okay, time for some things that I hate.
00:54:23.000 And so, Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez yesterday, she had a hell of a quote.
00:54:33.000 So she was upset because the Republicans have been focusing in on the problem of wokeness.
00:54:39.000 And so she decided to play Face Tattoo Syndrome.
00:54:41.000 Ah, one of our favorite games, Face Tattoo Syndrome.
00:54:43.000 This is where a person who advocates for a policy that is deliberately provocative provokes attention.
00:54:48.000 And then the minute you pay attention to them, they're like, this face tattoo?
00:54:50.000 What are you even looking at?
00:54:51.000 What are you even looking at?
00:54:53.000 How dare you?
00:54:54.000 How dare you?
00:54:55.000 Treat me as a person.
00:54:56.000 Why are we focusing on this?
00:54:58.000 This thing right here, this giant face tattoo that goes right around my eye.
00:55:02.000 Why are you even looking at it?
00:55:03.000 This is what AOC does.
00:55:04.000 So AOC is a pure devotee of the woke catechism.
00:55:09.000 She loves wokeness like very few other things.
00:55:11.000 She is the wokest of the woke.
00:55:14.000 But the minute the Republicans focus in on wokeness, she's like, why aren't we talking about train derailments in Ohio?
00:55:18.000 Why?
00:55:19.000 Explain.
00:55:19.000 So first of all, I noticed that Republicans have been talking a lot about train derailments in Ohio.
00:55:25.000 Because it was Democrats, like Pete Buttigieg, who didn't visit for three weeks and Joe Biden, who still has not visited.
00:55:30.000 So I may have missed the part where Republicans are not talking about the train derailment in Ohio.
00:55:35.000 But AOC is like, stop talking about wokeness.
00:55:37.000 Stop it.
00:55:37.000 Why are you even talking?
00:55:38.000 It's not even relevant anymore.
00:55:40.000 Until tomorrow when she decides it's relevant again.
00:55:42.000 We're all supposed to play follow the bouncing ball here with AOC.
00:55:46.000 I have no qualms with this committee working hard.
00:55:50.000 I have no qualms with this committee doing everything that it can, but I think we need to have a conversation about priorities here.
00:56:00.000 We're having a hearing right now, and it's about that the federal government is too woke.
00:56:08.000 I can't help but communicate that I find frustrating is that there are actual crises happening in this country.
00:56:16.000 Couple weeks ago, there was a devastating, devastating derailment in East Palestine, Ohio.
00:56:26.000 Oh, now you guys are going to talk about it.
00:56:28.000 Weird.
00:56:29.000 Very weird.
00:56:31.000 So literally, the minute you guys get called on Joe Biden's crap equity policy, you're like, you know what?
00:56:34.000 We need to be talking about that train derailment.
00:56:37.000 Oh, now, now you want to talk about it?
00:56:41.000 Okay, I guess we can.
00:56:42.000 But I noticed that you were perfectly happy to push wokeness until somebody noticed.
00:56:46.000 At which point, we played the game of, it's not happening and it's good that it is.
00:56:51.000 And also, we shouldn't talk about it ever again.
00:56:53.000 No, we should probably talk about it.
00:56:55.000 It's probably important to talk about it.
00:56:56.000 She said, quote, There's no definition of what WOKE is.
00:56:58.000 But on paper, what's actually being criticized in this hearing is that the so-called WOKE policies are remote work for federal workers, especially those who live in rural areas and those who have disabilities.
00:57:07.000 Paying interns to the critical opportunities don't just go to privileged kids whose parents can afford to pay for their rent while they go on a free internship.
00:57:13.000 That is what is WOKE here.
00:57:14.000 That is what the other side is calling WOKE here.
00:57:16.000 No, that is not what the other side is calling WOKE.
00:57:17.000 What the other side is calling WOKE is the attempt to inject equity provisions Okay, meanwhile, one other thing that I hate.
00:57:21.000 federal government including employment via the office of personnel management.
00:57:25.000 That is what the other side is calling woke. But if you mischaracterize it and you lie about it, and then you say we should focus on trains, then maybe everybody will just be distracted for long enough. Okay, meanwhile, one other thing that I hate. So RuPaul, world's most important human, has now spoken out against legislation in states like Tennessee that ban drag shows for children.
00:57:45.000 Now, you might ask yourself, why is it important for children to see drag shows?
00:57:48.000 You might ask yourself that question because it's a good question.
00:57:51.000 Why is it important to see, for small children, to see men gallivanting around in skimpy outfits pretending to be women in the most stereotypically disgusting ways?
00:57:58.000 Why is that really super important?
00:58:00.000 Why?
00:58:01.000 You might ask yourself that.
00:58:02.000 Well, RuPaul is here to tell you, as a proud man who dresses as a woman, Hey, look over there!
00:58:09.000 A classic distraction technique.
00:58:11.000 Distracting us away from the real issues that they were voted into office to focus on.
00:58:17.000 Jobs, healthcare, keeping our children safe from harm at their own school.
00:58:22.000 But we know that bullies are incompetent at solving real issues.
00:58:27.000 They look for easy targets so they can give the impression of being effective.
00:58:32.000 They think our love, our light, our laughter, and our joy are signs of weakness.
00:58:37.000 But they're wrong.
00:58:39.000 Because that is our strength.
00:58:42.000 Drag queens are the marines of the queer movement.
00:58:45.000 Don't get it twisted and don't be distracted.
00:58:48.000 Register to vote so we can get these stunt queens out of office and put some smart people with real solutions into government.
00:58:57.000 Okay, so first of all, the bizarrely hypnotic quality of this video in which the American flag shrinks in the background and goes like that's what the entire video is.
00:59:04.000 If you can't actually see right now, RuPaul is sitting in front of an American flag that is bizarrely zooming in and out behind him.
00:59:12.000 It's very strange.
00:59:13.000 But I think you gave away the game when you said that drag queens are the marines of the queer movement.
00:59:16.000 I think you gave, you kind of said the quiet part out loud.
00:59:20.000 Why are you sending the marines of the queer movement to the children?
00:59:23.000 Why?
00:59:25.000 Real question.
00:59:26.000 Explain.
00:59:27.000 Explain.
00:59:27.000 And then, of course, same game.
00:59:28.000 Face tattoo syndrome.
00:59:29.000 It's a classic distraction to pay attention that you're sending the queer marines to the kids.
00:59:34.000 If you pay attention to us sending the, quote, marines of the queer movement to the small children, if you pay attention to that, well, that's a classic distraction technique, says RuPaul.
00:59:44.000 Amazing, amazing stuff.
00:59:46.000 Really amazing stuff.
00:59:48.000 But typical, fully typical.
00:59:49.000 You're not supposed to pay attention to what they're doing.
00:59:50.000 If you do pay attention to what they're doing, it's not happening.
00:59:53.000 It's a classic distraction technique to pay attention to the thing that they are doing.
00:59:57.000 And also, it's good that they're doing it, according to them.
00:59:59.000 Alrighty, guys.
00:59:59.000 The rest of the show is continuing right now.
01:00:00.000 You're not going to want to miss it.
01:00:01.000 We'll be getting into the mailbag.
01:00:02.000 If you want your questions answered in the Vaunted Ben Shapiro Show mailbag, then you must become a member.
01:00:08.000 Become a member.
01:00:08.000 Use code SHAPIRO at checkout.
01:00:10.000 Get two months free on all annual plans.