A massive debate breaks out about pornography among conservatives, impeachment plows ahead, and the Inspector General of the Justice Department shreds the FBI. Ben Shapiro explains why the government should not be involved in pornography, and why it should be limited to promoting the common good. The Ben Shapiro Show is sponsored by Express VPN. Your data is your business. Protect it at ExpressVpn.org/BenShapiroShow. To find a list of our sponsors and show-related promo codes, go to gimlet.fm/OurAdvertisers Use the promo code: "sponsors" to receive 10% off "Your Data Is Your Business" when you shop at ExpressVPN. Our sponsor is ExpressVPN, a leading provider of secure, on-demand VPN services. You can get a $10 credit when you book your first month with ExpressVPN by clicking here. We are a proud sponsor of the show, and we are committed to making quality, affordable and accessible travel and information travel and research tools that help you get the most out of your vacation and stay on the road, no matter where you go. If you're looking for a high quality, high-performance VPN membership, you can get one for as little as $99.99, no credit card, no fees, no minimum, no broker, no lifetime, and no drop-down plan, no spam, no less. Thanks for helping us make great listening experience. This episode is a must-listen episode! Subscribe to the show! Subscribe on Audible. Learn more about your ad choices. Become a supporter of The Daily Mail? Become one of my sponsorships? Get exclusive VIP access to my show recommendations and access all my best vids, I'm listening to my videos, I'll be giving you access to all my episodes throughout the world, and I'll get a chance to win a discount on my podcast, too much more, including VIP access, and more! I'm giving you'll get the best of the best deals on my social media perks and perks, including the world's best posts, I'll also get a discount code: VIP access and access to the world s best browsing and more, I get a whole lot more access, plus I'm winning all my ad choices, too gets that chance to promote my ad-free version of the podcast, and much more.
00:00:00.000A massive debate breaks out about pornography among conservatives, impeachment plows ahead, and the Inspector General of the Justice Department shreds the FBI.
00:00:35.000But there is this fascinating and I think important debate that's now happening among conservatives over pornography, which is weird, right?
00:00:42.000It's weird because pretty much all conservatives agree pornography bad, right?
00:00:46.000If you are a moral human being, I think that you agree.
00:00:48.000Pornography is not an inherent good for human beings.
00:00:51.000There are good scientific studies showing the effect of pornography on the human brain.
00:00:55.000It does have a drug-like effect on the human brain because there is a release of serotonin, because it does prompt certain brain activity that is addictive in nature.
00:01:04.000Pornography is indeed a major addiction problem, particularly for young men.
00:01:12.000I wrote an entire book on pornography.
00:01:13.000It's my second book, all the way back in 2005, about the evils of pornography in American society.
00:01:18.000So I am very much on board with the idea that pornography is an evil.
00:01:22.000And that consuming pornography is a moral bad.
00:01:25.000But there's a big debate that is broken out among conservatives about how involved the government should be in regulating pornography.
00:01:31.000And the debate isn't really over pornography.
00:01:34.000The debate is really over what the role of government ought to be generally.
00:01:37.000And it's turned into this broader debate, conservatives versus libertarians.
00:01:42.000In which conservatives basically argue now many conservatives are arguing that the government ought to be engaged in promoting what they call the common good and libertarians are arguing the government needs to completely stay out of this particular business.
00:01:54.000Now I've been saying for pretty much my entire career that when it comes to matters governmental I tend toward libertarianism.
00:02:00.000And when it comes to matters cultural, I'm very conservative because I believe that the founders predicated the notion of a small government, of a government that is there to protect your rights, on the idea of a moral and religious people, right?
00:02:11.000This is John Adams' famous line that this government was only constructed for moral and religious people, otherwise the dark side of human nature would tear through the bonds of the Constitution like a whale through the cords of a net.
00:02:22.000So the entire presupposition of the founders is that you would have a moral and religious people.
00:02:26.000And if you read Alexis de Tocqueville in Democracy in America, he talks about how that social framework already existed.
00:02:32.000That social framework long preceded the founding of the United States, how Americans were apt to join associations, how Americans were apt to be member of churches, how Americans were broadly religious and personally liberal in terms of how they approached economics and regulations on other people.
00:02:48.000Because when you have a baseline level of social fabric and trust in people, Then you don't feel the need to regulate them as much, right?
00:02:56.000In other words, you do need a moral and religious fabric in the United States in order to support a small government.
00:03:02.000Well, one of the things that has happened over the past 50 years is the complete fraying of that social fabric.
00:03:08.000The morality and the religiousness of the American people, obviously when it comes to matters sexual, but also in matters like drug use and matters like family formation.
00:03:16.000All of these things have declined pretty markedly.
00:03:18.000And so this has led to a really fascinating debate among conservatives.
00:03:23.000Do you restore the culture or do you simply do what the left would do and try and grab the commanding heights of government and then cram down from above?
00:03:30.000And I am firmly on the side of you have to grab the culture first.
00:03:33.000And if you want to work on the culture, you require the government to remain small.
00:03:37.000Because the fact is that you are not operating in a vacuum.
00:03:40.000You are not operating in a world where you can simply grab the auspices of government and teach the people the right thing to do.
00:03:46.000Nor, by the way, do I think that it is moral to use the force of government to teach people the right thing to do.
00:03:51.000Because I think that that completely overrules the idea of a representative government.
00:03:55.000If the people don't believe a thing and you're going to use the government in order to cram down the thing, that is inherently immoral, whether you're doing that on the left or whether you're doing that on the right.
00:04:03.000Now, even if the government is doing something I think is moral and they are cramming it down on the people, that is not what the government is designed to do.
00:04:11.000Because then the government is basically dictating to the people what a cadre of people at the top think is right.
00:04:16.000Now, I may believe that there is an objective moral good.
00:04:34.000So where exactly is the limiting principle when it comes to the involvement of government in promoting quote-unquote justice and the common good?
00:04:40.000And you're seeing a lot of folks, people who write for me, right?
00:04:42.000People who write over here at Daily Wire and this is why I think it's an interesting and fascinating and necessary debate that's breaking out among conservatives because it doesn't only have social implications and issues like pornography.
00:04:52.000I think the argument starts at pornography, but very quickly, it ends up in the realm of economics, where you have people like Tucker Carlson suggesting that it's the job of the government to promote the common good, economically speaking, which is starting to sound indistinguishable from Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren in a lot of ways.
00:05:06.000And once you get to a common good government, what you're really talking about is a select few people who know best for the rest of us how exactly we ought to live our lives.
00:05:15.000Now, that sounds good if the select few is you, but if it's anybody else, it doesn't sound so good.
00:05:20.000In other words, we're all fighting over one government gun.
00:05:22.000The bigger the government gun is, the more it matters who controls it.
00:05:25.000The smaller the government gun is, the less it matters who controls it.
00:05:28.000And so, what I have been promoting my entire career is that the government gun should be particularly small when you're talking at the federal level.
00:05:35.000I wanna get into the specifics of this, because again, I think that the argument is being made about pornography, but really the argument isn't about pornography, it's about economics, it's about the role of government in life generally, and it is an argument between conservatives with regard to government, meaning they wanna promote conservative goals using the government, and libertarians who say, no, no, no, you can't touch the government this way, even libertarians who have conservative moral values like me, who believe that you have to rebuild that social fabric outside of government, the sort of James Madison view, that if government gets involved with religion, it ends up actually hurting religion rather than helping religion.
00:06:05.000We'll get to all of that in just one moment.
00:06:07.000First, let us talk about how you are going to improve your smile for the holidays.
00:06:11.000So the holidays are fast approaching, and your teeth are out of place.
00:06:14.000Because when you were a teenager, one of the things that you did is you flushed your retainer down the toilet.
00:06:27.000And then three days later, you forgot them in your lunch at school, and they were gone forever, and you never wore them again, and now you have teeth like a World War I-era British soldier.
00:06:37.000And now, you're looking around, you're like, I gotta fix these teeth.
00:07:22.000Code Shapiro for $75 off CandidCO.com slash Shapiro and use that promo code Shapiro.
00:07:27.000Okay, so Jane Koston over at Vox actually has a pretty good article.
00:07:31.000on the debate that is broken out among conservatives over pornography and the regulation thereof today.
00:07:36.000She says social conservatives are ready to launch a new national war on pornography.
00:07:40.000It's been nearly 50 years since the Nixon administration's war on porn, more than two decades since the signing of the Communications Decency Act, the first major federal effort to regulate online pornography.
00:07:50.000But pornography continues to be a target of Republicans at the state level, In addition, the 2016 Republican Party platform stated that pornography with its harmful effects, especially on children, has become a public health crisis that is destroying the lives of millions.
00:08:04.000And by the way, I agree with every word of that.
00:08:06.000I do believe that pornography is a public health crisis that affects children in disproportionate ways.
00:08:11.000If you talk to teenage boys, it is really screwing them up in serious, serious ways, which is why I do believe in regulation of the distribution of pornography to people under 18.
00:08:21.000Hey, this fall, Republican members of Congress asked the Department of Justice to declare prosecution of obscene pornography a criminal justice priority.
00:08:28.000Conservative commentators also argue that government power can and should put a stop to pornography for the benefit of the so-called common good.
00:08:35.000By doing so, social conservatives argue that they can alter American culture itself.
00:08:40.000Okay, and this is the part where you start to shade over from the argument about pornography into the argument about the role of government generally.
00:08:46.000Is government there to quote-unquote promote the common good or is government there to protect rights that pre-existed government?
00:08:52.000This is particularly at the federal level.
00:08:54.000Is government there to protect rights that pre-exist government and it does not have the ability to step into other areas no matter how morally you think the government is acting?
00:09:15.000Once the federal government takes something over, then nobody has a choice anymore.
00:09:19.000This is why I famously suggested that if Beto O'Rourke got control of the auspices of government, of the federal government, and started to outlaw religious practice, basically, you'd have a civil war in the country.
00:09:30.000And if you go back and listen to the podcast where I talked about this, I said, okay, if it's outlawed in California, I move to Texas.
00:09:35.000If it's outlawed in Texas, I move to Idaho.
00:09:36.000And if it's outlawed across the United States, then you have a civil war.
00:09:40.000This is why there's a difference between the federal government and local governments.
00:09:43.000There's more homogeneity in local governments.
00:09:45.000There's more generalized agreement in local governments.
00:09:48.000And so you can more easily agree on how to regulate the public spaces.
00:09:53.000Okay, so, Terry Schilling, executive director of the American Principles Project, a conservative think tank, argued in October in the Catholic magazine First Things that efforts to regulate pornography are part of a broader phenomenon.
00:10:04.000He said, in our time, a new conservatism is being born, one less interested in managing our nation's decline than in using political power to promote virtue, public morality, and the common good.
00:10:13.000And these are the kinds of words that actually put a chill up my spine when you're talking about the federal government because the left uses exactly that same sort of language, of course, that the government is going to promote virtue.
00:10:31.000Excessive amounts of wealth from the system and then redistributing them or regulating business into the ground, right?
00:10:36.000As soon as the government is in the business of promoting the common good, the obvious question becomes, okay, and who defines the common good?
00:10:42.000Now, conservatives will say, well, the left's been doing this all along.
00:11:00.000The idea was that the Lockean idea behind the founding of the United States is that there were individual rights that pre-existed government.
00:11:08.000And government was enshrined at the federal level to protect those rights.
00:11:12.000And that's why the government was made weak.
00:11:14.000That's why the government has checks and balances.
00:11:16.000If it were just about promoting the quote-unquote common good, why not have a monarchy?
00:11:20.000Why not have an aristocracy that decides?
00:11:22.000Why not have the Supreme Court simply decide all social policy in the United States?
00:11:27.000Schilling says conservatives need to overcome their fear of governing the nation that elected them.
00:11:31.000Well, okay, so let's be clear about one thing.
00:11:34.000The same nation that quote-unquote elected conservatives also elected Barack Obama in an entirely Democratic Congress in 2008.
00:11:41.000So, would Barack Obama have been justified in using the government the way that he did?
00:11:47.000Because obviously, he's governing the way that they asked him to.
00:11:51.000And the answer, of course, is no, because the federal government was designed not to do these things.
00:11:56.000Jane Koston writes, So, here's the thing.
00:12:09.000The reason I keep saying that pornography is a weird place to make this stand is because I think that, on a libertarian ground, there are plenty of places you can regulate pornography.
00:12:16.000So let me take a couple of quick examples.
00:12:18.000It should be criminal to exploit women.
00:12:29.000It should be left to local principalities to determine how the public square works.
00:12:34.000If you live in a town, and your town decides that it's going to be a porn-free town, that's their prerogative.
00:12:39.000There's no fundamental right that is invaded there.
00:12:41.000Contra the hardcore libertarians who say that pornography is protected by the First Amendment, the founders would have been shocked to discover that wood carvings of naked ladies would have been protected by the First Amendment.
00:13:02.000Okay, so yes, certain types of criminality of pornography, totally acceptable on a libertarian basis, because again, libertarians do acknowledge that there are such things as externalities, right?
00:13:12.000I am not allowed to pour toxic sludge into a river upstream of you, and I shouldn't be allowed to post a giant billboard outside of my business in the public square that has a naked lady on it, right?
00:13:23.000Regulation of that, not at the federal level, again, I don't think the federal government has the power to do that, but the local government, not only am I fine with that, I agree with it, and I would prefer to live in a community that did that.
00:13:32.000Okay, but that's not what the argument is.
00:13:34.000What you're seeing is so-called conservatives, and they're conservative, but they're not conservative with regard to conserving the original founding purpose of government.
00:13:44.000They would consider themselves Burke-ian conservatives, preserving tradition through use of government.
00:13:48.000I think even that is a misread of Edmund Burke.
00:13:50.000But that's how they characterize themselves, this sort of Russell Kirk-ian We're preserving tradition by use of government and shying away from using the government to protect tradition is a betrayal of the purpose of government.
00:14:02.000That really is not in line with founding thought in very serious ways.
00:14:07.000But, with that said, conservatives who are making the case that the government ought to be promoting the common good by, for example, regulating the use of pornography inside your own house, or the production of pornography among consenting adults, Like there you start to get into the territory of the government doing what's best for you.
00:14:24.000And I am not in the business of the government doing what's best for you and reshaping you as an individual moral human being.
00:14:34.000And by the way, I feel this way consistently across the board.
00:14:36.000It's not for the government to do on an economic level.
00:14:38.000The government doesn't get to step into consensual economic exchanges.
00:14:41.000It's not for the government to do even with regard to things I don't like, right?
00:14:45.000I've said before that I think that the government's overreach In the Civil Rights Act is not with anything regarded to state action.
00:14:51.000I think the government had a perfect right and perfect ability and perfect moral duty to step in and stop states from enshrining segregation.
00:14:58.000But I have serious problems with the aspects of the Civil Rights Act that dictate that private businesses ought to be prosecuted for discrimination.
00:15:38.000All you have to do is head on over to PolicyGenius.com.
00:15:40.000PolicyGenius will find you the right life insurance at the best price and do all the work to help you get covered.
00:15:45.000You just need to get in touch with them.
00:15:47.000PolicyGenius makes finding the right life insurance a breeze.
00:15:49.000In minutes, you can compare quotes from the top insurers to find your best price.
00:15:53.000You could save $1,500 or more a year by using PolicyGenius to compare life insurance policies.
00:15:58.000Once you apply, the PolicyGenius team will handle all the paperwork and the red tape.
00:16:01.000And PolicyGenius doesn't just make life insurance easy, they can also help you find the right home and auto insurance, disability insurance.
00:16:07.000So, if you need life insurance, but you aren't sure where to start, start at PolicyGenius.com.
00:16:11.000It only takes a few minutes to find the right life insurance policy, apply, and cross another thing off that to-do list.
00:16:32.000There's a big debate now between quote-unquote common good conservatism and conservatism that protects fundamental rights.
00:16:39.000And that debate has serious consequences, as I say, for a wide variety of human activities.
00:16:44.000I am firmly on the side of government is not there to promote the quote-unquote common good other than regulating the public space, which, again, somebody is going to regulate the public space, but people who are trying to outlaw pornography are also trying to regulate the private space.
00:16:58.000And this is where you start to get into very, very dicey territory.
00:17:02.000And again, I don't even think you need to do this to regulate pornography, right?
00:17:04.000Again, I think that pornography is not a fundamental right, so it's not protected by the Constitution.
00:17:09.000But let's just talk about if it were, right?
00:17:13.000If it were a fundamental right to have pornography in your house, for example, well, then presumably the government would have no role in going in there and common good conservatives would say, no, no, no, they do.
00:17:24.000They have a role to go in there to teach the American people things.
00:17:28.000And so this is broken down into libertarian versus conservative lines.
00:17:31.000Reason Magazine editor-in-chief Catherine Mangu Ward told Jane Koston, what you're seeing now is this rise of a much more authoritarian and state-oriented variant of conservatism.
00:17:43.000This has long been a characteristic of the American left.
00:17:46.000Matt Walsh, who writes for us over at Daily Wire, he says, we say we're conservatives.
00:17:50.000What the hell are we trying to conserve?
00:17:52.000Maybe that question really is the central question of this whole debate.
00:17:55.000Okay, and this goes to a deeper question.
00:17:57.000And that is, if you're trying to conserve conservative principles, moral principles, free markets, all of these things, if you're trying to conserve all of this, what is the best way to conserve all of this?
00:18:07.000Is the best way with a big intrusive government that is able to overrule the will of the people on social issues where you don't like what people are doing, But then you can turn that gun over to the bad guys in terms of morality you don't like every four years or so and then they do it back to you.
00:18:24.000Or, is the government a blunt force instrument?
00:18:27.000Is the government incapable of separating these issues out?
00:18:33.000I'm of the belief that the government is not capable of separating these issues out.
00:18:37.000And furthermore, I don't think that the government is in the moral right when it crams down moral values that the American people have not accepted.
00:18:45.000This is why, again, localism is a great thing.
00:18:48.000Subsidiarity, localism, it's a wonderful, wonderful thing.
00:18:50.000Because you get local governments where more people agree.
00:18:54.000And there, you don't have to worry so much about cramming down on people who disagree because, of course, they are all local and they can leave.
00:19:01.000Okay, so this has become a big issue in the area of economics as well.
00:19:05.000What you're seeing is a crossover between the so-called common good conservatives on pornography and common good conservatives on economics who say that it's time to regulate the free market economy, make the market work for us.
00:19:16.000Make the market, the government has the ability and should have the strength to take the markets and put them under heel and make sure that they are working for the quote-unquote American people.
00:19:26.000Now that sort of language has long been the area of the left.
00:19:29.000So how do you separate off the role of government in promoting cultural conservatism from the government role in promoting economic conservatism?
00:19:38.000And the answer is it's very difficult to do so and I think frankly impossible in this day and age.
00:19:44.000So what exactly is the baseline argument underneath all of this?
00:20:04.000Now, the law can help accelerate cultural shifts that are already taking place, but the law cannot provide a final bulwark against a culture that has left it.
00:20:15.000If the law is promoting something that the people do not believe in, then the law eventually becomes non-enforced and then just dies.
00:20:20.000That's what happened, for example, with regard to sodomy laws, to take an example.
00:20:23.000So for hundreds of years in America, there were sodomy laws on the books, and then the American people were like, really, we're not gonna enforce this stuff.
00:20:29.000Like, this is none of our business, what people do behind closed doors.
00:20:32.000And then, the laws were non-enforced, but on the books, and there were cultural conservatives saying, well, you know, those laws, they're important, they should remain, just to show that we don't like this kind of activity.
00:20:42.000And the answer is, that's not the role of government.
00:20:43.000If you don't like that activity, good news, you got a church.
00:20:46.000You should go talk about that at church.
00:21:02.000What I mean is that the government is not your moral teacher.
00:21:04.000And as a religious person, if you believe that the government is your moral teacher, I wonder about the status of your actual religious belief.
00:21:11.000I don't trust the government to be my moral teacher.
00:21:13.000You think I want Barack Obama as my moral teacher?
00:21:15.000Shining rainbow lights on the White House?
00:22:16.000And if it is your last chance ever, then do you really believe that you promoting the quote-unquote common good, your version of the common good, that that's gonna last for five minutes beyond your term?
00:22:27.000The problem with eternal moral principle is that it has to remain eternal.
00:22:31.000And the problem is once you tie it, to running the government.
00:22:34.000In other words, only the government can instill moral principle.
00:22:38.000It's not in the cultural realm we should put our work, it's in the governmental realm.
00:22:41.000Once it's only government that can instill moral principle, well then, as soon as the bad guys take over government, your job here is done, right?
00:23:10.000Not only good luck with it, on a pragmatic level, it ain't gonna work.
00:23:13.000On a moral level, you're gonna end up with a federal government promoting policies that the vast majority of the American people don't like.
00:23:19.000And then back to the pragmatic level, you are also going to, and the moral level, you're gonna be expanding the ability of government to crack down on morality so that when people you don't like take over, they can now point that government gun at you.
00:23:30.000And they can do it not just in the realm of social policy.
00:23:32.000They can also do it in the realm of free speech.
00:23:35.000They can do it in the realm of economics as well.
00:23:40.000And in a second, I want to talk about the realms of free speech and economics.
00:23:42.000Because, again, I think that you're seeing conservatives take certain things they don't like and basically say there's no right to do that, not recognizing that, again, you're growing.
00:23:52.000There's only one gun and we're fighting over it.
00:23:53.000Okay, so if the gun is bigger and it can do more damage, just recognize that the bigger you grow that gun, it's going to be turned against you in the next moment, like really in one minute.
00:24:02.000We can get to that in just one second.
00:24:03.000First, let us talk about the greatest gift you can get your lady for Christmas or Hanukkah.
00:24:28.000Because the pearl source cuts out the middleman.
00:24:29.000They eliminate traditional five times markups by jewelry source.
00:24:32.000They sell directly to you, the consumer.
00:24:36.000If you need it quickly for the holidays, it is not too late.
00:24:38.000The Pearl Source offers free 2-day shipping on every order.
00:24:41.000Everything comes beautifully packaged in an elegant jewelry box, so it is ready to be given as a gift.
00:24:45.000And you will receive your beautiful pearls well before it is time to give them.
00:24:49.000The Pearl Source comes with a no-hassle 60-day money-back guarantee, so it is also risk-free.
00:24:54.000With more than 20 years in the pearl business and over 5,000 five star reviews, you can be sure that you are shopping from a trusted retailer.
00:25:00.000Also, you know, you're shopping from a great retailer because I know the people who run the place.
00:26:32.000The question is, how do you propose to achieve a regulation of things like Drag Queen Story Hour without giving power to the library to determine what is and is not allowed?
00:26:42.000And if you give that power to the library, What makes you think that the library is not going to first ban Bible Hour before they ban Drag Queen Story Hour?
00:26:49.000Given the prevailing winds of our culture, it is pretty obvious that the first people who are going to get banned from the library are cultural conservatives, not Drag Queen Story Hour.
00:26:59.000There was a big story yesterday out of Seattle where a feminist group that wanted to do an event on why women are different from men was nearly banned.
00:27:07.000It's right now under consideration being banned from the public library there.
00:27:11.000So once you give power to an institution, understand that that power can be used against you.
00:27:59.000What's amazing is that many of the same conservatives who argue that mobility means that you should be able to more heavily regulate at the local level, an argument with which I agree, will also say that people do not have the ability to move from their hometown when the factory shuts down.
00:28:13.000But, if you are making the argument that when it comes to free speech, for example, you have no right to do wrong, now you're in the realm of the hate speech left.
00:28:27.000So if you're saying that Drag Queen Story Hour should be banned because you believe that Drag Queen Story Hour is damaging to children, and you're not making the case, right?
00:28:35.000You're not bringing a sociological case, a secularly-based case.
00:28:37.000You're basically just saying, I don't like drag queens, and therefore, Drag Queen Story Hour is banned.
00:28:41.000Okay, and you're doing that at the federal level.
00:28:45.000Let's say that you promote that policy.
00:28:47.000Do you really believe that the government getting involved and cracking down on what is effectively political speech is going to end well for you?
00:29:30.000I can do things that are immoral, bad for myself.
00:29:33.000I can do things that damage me, but that's my prerogative in a regime of rights, because what is the other choice?
00:29:38.000The other choice is the idea of this high-handed government that is going to dictate to you what is best, changing the fundamental nature of man, changing his behavior from top down.
00:29:47.000Well, what monarchies have shown for several thousand years is that, let's say, best of all possible worlds, you get a King David, two generations later, you get a bunch of bad kings and things suck.
00:29:57.000The fact is that monarchy is a bad system.
00:30:05.000And at the same time, you don't want a full-on democracy because majorities are not great at protecting rights either.
00:30:12.000You can't have dictatorship of the mob.
00:30:14.000And that's why the founders constructed exactly this system, checks and balances, the prevention of dictators of the mob or dictators from above and encroaching on fundamental individual rights.
00:30:23.000But once you get to common good conservatism, you actually end up in the realm of French Revolution views of rights rather than American Revolution views of rights.
00:30:30.000The French Revolution view of rights is that yes, you have individual rights, but in the end, the common good trumps.
00:30:35.000In the end, the common good can run roughshod over those.
00:30:38.000The American view of individual rights is that those rights pre-exist government, and you have the right to do wrong, but they are also connected with a social fabric and a duty.
00:30:47.000So, we've done a fairly good job in America of quote-unquote retaining the rights, but increasingly, we've been using the rights to do wrong.
00:30:54.000Increasingly, we've been using the right to free speech to engage in pornography, right?
00:30:58.000We've been using the right to do wrong.
00:31:00.000Increasingly, we have been engaging in The right to personal activity, to engage in drug use.
00:31:08.000We've been engaging in the right to sexual freedom, to have kids out of wedlock, right?
00:31:13.000Increasingly, we've been using the right to do wrong.
00:31:16.000The answer is not to abolish the right.
00:31:18.000The answer is to abolish the wrong through the force of culture.
00:31:23.000This is where social fabric always mattered.
00:31:26.000So if you wish to retain economic freedom and freedom of speech, you have to recognize those things can be used to do wrong, but you also have to recognize that the greater evil is abolishing the right.
00:31:35.000And that using the government in order to re-instill a sense of duty by quashing the right itself is a very, very large-scale mistake.
00:31:43.000Because again, that government can be used against you just as easily as you wish to use the government against others.
00:31:50.000Okay, so I think it's a really fascinating debate.
00:31:52.000We'll get to impeachment now, get to the news of the day, but I think that this is, again, the consequences are very big for economics.
00:32:00.000They're very good for a lot of these things.
00:32:05.000And again, the idea of government as teacher, like the lines that are being used with regard to government as teacher, the law as moral teacher, a little scary.
00:32:15.000John Schwepp, the Director of Government Affairs at the American Principals Project says, quote, And one of the examples that people who say this cite is the Civil Rights Act.
00:32:25.000They say, well, the Civil Rights Act said racism was wrong until racism declined.
00:32:29.000No, there was a movement against racism that led to the rise of the Civil Rights Act.
00:32:34.000And this is one of the great lies of American government is that the Supreme Court dictates from above what morality is, even though Burge fell.
00:32:40.000You know, a decision that abolished the idea of traditional marriage in America as the sole form of marriage sponsored by government, even though Birchfield, which is an awful, awful decision, did not actually accelerate the process by very much.
00:32:54.000And it was the result of a broad cultural movement in American thought.
00:32:57.000It was not just the result of the Supreme Court declaring one day that they were going to do X, Y, or Z. That really is not.
00:33:03.000An honest take on what happened there.
00:33:05.000Culture does continue to precede politics.
00:33:45.000About speaking of pornography, have you seen, well I hope you have not, but there are all these stories about Scarlett Johansson, Demi Lovato, people's phones being hacked and nudie photos being spread online.
00:33:55.000So first rule, do not take a nude photo of yourself with your phone.
00:33:58.000Number two, it's super easy to be hacked and celebrities get hacked all the time.
00:34:02.000Hackers are constantly after your data, your credit card data, your personal data.
00:36:17.000So, the impeachment effort for the Democrats continues to move forward.
00:36:21.000It really is quite boring to talk about, honestly, because we all know where this is headed.
00:36:25.000We know that it's going to pass in the House.
00:36:26.000We know that it's not going to pass in the Senate.
00:36:28.000There is a little bit of kickback in the House.
00:36:29.000You've seen some House Democrats suggesting that they're going to defect.
00:36:34.000House Democrats are apparently bracing for the possibility of defections from moderates.
00:36:39.000This is according to Rachel Bade and Mike DeBonis over at the Washington Post.
00:36:43.000Predictions about some defections come as a core group of centrists from District Trump 1 in 2016 are apparently having second thoughts.
00:36:49.000While many new impeachment would never be popular in their GOP-leaning districts, some have been surprised their support hasn't increased despite negative testimony about Trump from a series of blockbuster hearings last month.
00:36:58.000Except they weren't blockbuster, and no one cares.
00:37:03.000The fact is that the ball has not moved anywhere in here.
00:37:06.000And because the ball has not moved anywhere in here, there are a bunch of moderates who are saying, well, I'm not going to put my name on that dotted line.
00:37:12.000That's not a thing that I'm going to do.
00:37:14.000And by the way, nobody also believes that the Democrats are doing this more in sadness than in anger.
00:38:13.000Senate Republicans are looking forward to a short trial.
00:38:15.000I think that in the end, that's probably the right move.
00:38:19.000The Senate Republicans are saying, why do we want to delay this or prolong this?
00:38:22.000It's not a big win for Trump to have a long hearing.
00:38:25.000Instead, let's just go where everybody knows this is going to go, move on to the 2020 elections and be done.
00:38:30.000And that is the direction that all of this is moving.
00:38:32.000Meanwhile, Democrats keep maintaining that if Trump is not impeached, That Trump is going to steal the 2020 election, which again, is an extraordinarily dangerous position.
00:38:41.000According to the Washington Post, lawyers for Congress, meaning the Democrats, urged the Supreme Court on Wednesday not to delay House Committee's access to President Trump's financial records, saying the information could be crucial to investigating foreign involvement in American politics and legislative protections for next year's elections.
00:38:55.000House General Counsel Douglas Letter said in a filing to the court, nothing is more urgent than efforts to guard against foreign influence in our systems for electing officials, particularly given the upcoming 2020 election.
00:39:05.000There's bipartisan agreement that such interference is an imminent threat.
00:39:09.000So the Democrats continue to maintain that if Trump is not impeached, then he might win.
00:39:13.000And if he wins, it's going to be illegitimate.
00:39:15.000So they're already saying that the election is illegitimate well in advance of the election.
00:39:21.000They don't think they can defeat Trump at the ballot box right now, or at least they are very scared that they cannot, and therefore they are pushing forward impeachment.
00:39:50.000There's no and there's no widespread conversation about anti-Semitism among black Hebrew Israelites or The sad fact that unfortunately anti-semitism is more common among black Americans than it is among general Americans.
00:40:02.000I mean, this has been true in ADL polls going back 20, 30 years.
00:40:06.000There is this serious strain of anti-semitism that does exist in certain parts of black America that ought to be talked about in the same way that white supremacism ought to be talked about.
00:40:16.000I mean, the fact is the Jews who are being beaten on the streets of Williamsburg are largely being beaten by people of minority origin.
00:40:23.000That is not connecting race to the hatred of Jews.
00:40:26.000It is saying there are subsections of culture in the Black community that really are rooted in anti-Semitism.
00:40:33.000And that includes people who are associating with Louis Farrakhan.
00:40:37.000It includes people who are associated with Jeremiah Wright, who was a blatant anti-Semite, said anti-Semitic things from the pulpit, and Barack Obama sat there for 20 years.
00:40:45.000Anti-Semitism is not foreign to many parts of Of black communities in places like Brooklyn, which again is why Jews are being beaten on the streets.
00:40:54.000Like let's say for example that I'm about to play you a video of some footage from right outside this kosher supermarket.
00:41:02.000Okay, this is video by a group called Americans Against Anti-Semitism.
00:41:06.000They took this video directly outside the supermarket where this hate crime took place, which was again performed by two black Hebrew Israelites, which is an anti-Jewish hate group that says that Jews are fake Jews and that because Jews are fake Jews, they are the real Jews.
00:41:39.000But that's not the video I'm talking about that's troubling.
00:41:42.000Okay, the video I'm talking about that's troubling, obviously, is a shooting video, so that's always troubling.
00:41:45.000But the video that's really troubling is people in the aftermath members of the local black community who are spouting open anti-Semitism directly as the shooting is taking place.
00:41:58.000And now let's say that there were a shooting at a historically black church by a white supremacist.
00:42:03.000And then there were a video that came out within a day of white members of the local community saying those black people deserved it.
00:42:10.000That would prompt a widespread national conversation about the extent of racism.
00:42:16.000I mean, shooting alone does, but if there had been an additional tape of people, white members of the local community, talking about that in glowing terms about how the people deserve to be shot, that would be used as an indicia of a serious racism problem in the United States.
00:42:38.000Well, because in the intersectional hierarchy, Jews do not rank.
00:42:41.000So the intersectional hierarchy suggests that if you are a member of a minority, you are victimized by mainstream American society.
00:42:48.000But Jews do not count, despite the fact that Jews are by leaps and bounds the group most likely to be targeted for hate crimes in the United States, like far more than blacks, far more than Muslims, but not close.
00:42:58.000Jews don't count in the intersectional hierarchy because they're disproportionately wealthy successful and educated and so they are considered part of the quote-unquote white community by the intersectional community and so it does not so if somebody who's lower down on the intersectional hierarchy if black people in Jersey City If there are some black people in Jersey City who are saying that Jews deserve to get shot, that is not newsworthy because that is a more victimized group talking about a less victimized group in the view of the intersectional hierarchy.
00:43:24.000Again, this video is quite disturbing and quite stunning and again has appeared nowhere in mainstream media because the mainstream media do not wish to acknowledge that there is a serious anti-Semitism problem in parts of the black community.
00:43:35.000Last November, November 1st, 2018, they had a piece where they said, well, there's been this big spike in anti-Semitism in New York, and it's largely coming from minority communities.
00:43:43.000But we're not going to talk about that.
00:43:44.000It openly says in the piece, we won't talk about it because there doesn't seem to be the common thread of white supremacy.
00:43:50.000The New York Times has an editorial today, by the way, that basically says the same thing.
00:43:53.000Only one type of anti-Semitism matters.
00:43:54.000Here is the tape that you won't see on the media.
00:43:56.000There's a black woman saying there was no shooting like this before they came.
00:44:37.000Because, obviously, this runs counter to leftist narratives that the only people victimized in America are victimized by white people in America.
00:44:51.000The New York Times doesn't care, though.
00:44:53.000The New York Times has an entire piece today in which they condemn not anti-Semitism with regard to the Jersey City shooting, but Trump's executive order that he just promulgated in order to crack down on anti-Semitism on campuses.
00:45:08.000They come out against the executive order, not on free speech grounds.
00:45:10.000You want to come out against the executive order on free speech grounds?
00:45:13.000First of all, the executive order itself says, where this conflicts with the First Amendment, it doesn't apply.
00:45:18.000But second of all, I don't see any of these people saying that Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which deals with college campuses having their federal funds withdrawn if there's discrimination on campus against protected groups.
00:45:29.000I don't see any of these people saying, well, isn't that violative of the First Amendment, the entire Title VI?
00:45:33.000You want to make that libertarian argument?
00:45:35.000I'm actually kind of sympathetic to that libertarian argument.
00:45:37.000But that's not the argument anybody's making.
00:45:39.000They're just saying it shouldn't apply to Jews.
00:45:40.000And the New York Times basically says the same thing.
00:45:43.000They have an entire editorial today, a long editorial, called Trump's Executive Order and the Rise of Antisemitism.
00:45:49.000The president's campus intervention ignores the bigger threat of antisemitism and threatened speech.
00:45:53.000So what, in fact, is the bigger threat of antisemitism than antisemitism on college campuses, or antisemitism in Jersey City, or Jews being beaten on the streets of New York?
00:46:01.000According to the New York Times, wait for it, wait.
00:46:11.000I've sat here, I've condemned it for full episodes.
00:46:13.000I've talked about the evils of the alt-right.
00:46:15.000I've talked about the evils of the white supremacist movement.
00:46:18.000I've talked about how they are growing.
00:46:20.000I've been personally threatened by the white supremacists.
00:46:22.000I have 24-7 security because of the white supremacists.
00:46:24.000But to pretend that anti-semitism is only coming from the side of the aisle where it is convenient for you, means that you don't give a damn about anti-semitism.
00:46:31.000And the New York Times does not give a damn.
00:46:34.000This New York Times editorial is an absurdity.
00:46:36.000They say, last year, anti-semitic attacks killed more Jews around the globe than in any year in decades.
00:46:42.000Okay, so first of all, when they say killed more Jews around the globe than any year in decades, They do not, at any point in this article, talk about Muslim anti-Semitism in Europe, which is one of the reasons why Jews are being murdered in Israel, one of the reasons why Jews are being murdered in Europe, probably the chief reason Jews are being murdered in both Israel and Europe.
00:46:59.000Okay, so in any case, the New York Times says, anti-Semitic attacks killed more Jews around the globe than any year in decades, and then they mention Tree of Life, and they talk about the German Jews being cautioned not to wear skull caps or Stars of David on the street, and attackers killing Jewish college students in California.
00:47:16.000And by the way, antisemitism remains rife.
00:47:17.000Like, I went to a kosher restaurant yesterday, and right outside on the curb, somebody had spray-painted antisemitic graffiti.
00:47:20.000for services at charlottesville's congregation beth israel they found men with semi-automatic rifles at the synagogue doors offering protection they didn't know that they'd need and by the way anti-semitism remains rife like i went to a kosher restaurant yesterday and right outside on the curb somebody had spray painted anti-semitic graffiti like it's it's a thing that happens okay but it happens to come from a variety of sources The New York Times only cares about one of those sources.
00:47:46.000On Tuesday, two gunmen, including one said to have published anti-Semitic posts and to have been a follower of the Black Hebrew Israelite movement, which is hostile to Jews, killed four people in a rampage in Jersey City that appears to have targeted a kosher market.
00:47:58.000The tides of antisemitism continue to rise higher, and more government action is sorely needed.
00:48:03.000The Department of Homeland Security's recent strategy shift to focus on the growing threat of white nationalist terrorism was an important step.
00:48:09.000On Wednesday, President Trump stepped in himself, but he did as much to stir the waters as he did to settle them.
00:48:15.000Because he added Jews to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 64, which, by the way, had been Department of Education policy under Barack Obama as well.
00:48:22.000The New York Times recognizes similar congressional legislation has had bipartisan support.
00:48:26.000Previous administrations have taken similar actions to prevent hate and discrimination.
00:48:31.000But, while Mr. Trump's action might seem like a gesture of real concern, it does little to target the larger source of violent antisemitism.
00:48:38.000Okay, and then they say that BDS on campus is not antisemitism.
00:48:43.000BDS is that Muslim anti-Semitism on campus, which is extremely rife.
00:48:47.000When I was attending UCLA, the Muslim Student Association had a publication called Al-Talib, in which they joked about making Osama bin Laden editor-in-chief.
00:48:54.000And the MSA would hand out publications openly fundraising for front groups for terrorist groups.
00:49:35.000If you're only taking anti-semitism seriously so you can bash one side of the political aisle and falsely lump in conservatives with the white supremacists, by the way, then you are doing decency wrong.
00:49:44.000And the New York Times is famously doing decency wrong these days.
00:49:47.000Okay, time for a quick thing that I like and then a quick thing that I hate.
00:50:06.000I mean, the entire movie is basically following these two soldiers who are designated to try to move through German held territory.
00:50:16.000In World War I, up to a British position where the British commander thinks he's going to charge the German lines, he's under the mistaken impression that the Germans have actually withdrawn, and the Germans have not withdrawn, and so these two guys are tasked with telling them that they shouldn't attack.
00:51:28.000You should go see it in theaters when it comes out.
00:51:29.000And I have to say, it feels like the quality of filmmaking has really improved this year.
00:51:33.000There are a few really good movies that came out.
00:51:34.000Ford vs. Ferrari, which you've heard me recommend on the show, is really first rate, and so is this film, 1917.
00:51:42.000Looking forward to seeing a few more of these sort of Oscar-rated flicks, even if I didn't like The Irishman or A Marriage Story.
00:51:47.000Okay, time for a quick thing that I hate.
00:51:54.000So apparently the New York Times editorial page, when it's not defending anti-semitism coming from particular sources, is also a place for people to spill their feelings about their childhood struggles with sexuality.
00:52:06.000Half of editorial pages on the left wing are now dedicated to people telling their personal stories about coming to grips with their own orientation.
00:52:19.000Jennifer Finney Boylan, who is a transgender woman, meaning a man who believes that he is a woman, has a piece in the New York Times called Rudolph the Queerest Holiday Special.
00:52:31.000So now we are to believe that a holiday special constructed in 1964 is actually a secret decoded message about being gay in America.
00:52:42.000And so we have a long piece about why Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer is an inspiration to gay kids the world over.
00:52:51.000I'm sure the conservatives who love this old holiday chestnut will be infuriated by this suggestion that it is the queerest holiday special ever.
00:52:58.000Not infuriated, just puzzled why you would think that a holiday special constructed in 1964 is about gay rights.
00:53:06.000And also why I would care how you interpret Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer.
00:53:11.000I mean, this is like a trite entry from your journal diary in your intersectional theory class.
00:53:20.000But Jennifer Finney Boylan says, Well, I don't know what show you're watching.
00:53:28.000Well, what if that's just a general message that applies to anyone who's ever been bullied?
00:53:31.000I was viciously bullied in high school.
00:53:34.000That had nothing to do with sexual orientation.
00:53:37.000But apparently everything is now about sexual orientation.
00:53:40.000Conservatives seem to miss the point of a lot of things having to do with Christmas, actually.
00:53:43.000Is it really possible that anyone can watch or read Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol without understanding its fundamental critique of capitalism?
00:53:53.000That, like, A Christmas Carol is not really about capitalism so much as it is about the idea that capitalism doesn't solve the problem of the need for charity.
00:54:02.000Again, this goes back to the fundamental point of the show, which is that free markets and liberty are wondrous, wondrous things, but you also have to have an underlying social fabric in order to promote those things.
00:54:14.000As for Rudolph, the whole movie feels as LGBTQ friendly to me, says Jennifer Finney Boylan, as any episode of Queer Eye or Steven Universe or The L Word.
00:54:23.000Well, except for the fact that Rudolph doesn't, you know, like, have sex with any of the other male reindeer.
00:54:27.000So, aside from that, and the fact that it's a children's special, I'm particularly tired of the hijacking of children's literature and children's special in order to promote...
00:54:36.000political viewpoints on sexual matters.
00:54:38.000Like, it's a piece of children's literature.
00:54:42.000The left likes to play this game a lot when it comes to TV.
00:54:44.000So what they will do is, for example, some members of the LGBTQ community will start saying that Spongebob Squarepants is like a gay metaphor.
00:54:51.000And then people are like, what are you talking about?
00:55:07.000I remember this was a big controversy in the early 90s when some members of the LGBTQ community were suggesting that some of the Teletubbies were gay.
00:55:14.000And so Jerry Falwell made a comment about, well, the Teletubbies aren't gay and it's silly to try and hijack children's characters unless it's like, aha!
00:55:23.000How about you just leave the children's literature alone?
00:55:25.000Especially because you have a whole wing of children's literature, we've talked about it on the show, that is specifically designed to promote these sexualized viewpoints for children.
00:56:35.000Hey everybody, it's Andrew Klavan, host of The Andrew Klavan Show.
00:56:38.000You know, some people are depressed because the American Republic is collapsing, the end of days is approaching, and the moon has turned to blood.
00:56:44.000But on The Andrew Klavan Show, that's where the fun just gets started.