The Ben Shapiro Show - June 05, 2018


Sit, Eagle, Sit | Ep. 553


Episode Stats

Length

50 minutes

Words per Minute

218.42296

Word Count

11,034

Sentence Count

744

Misogynist Sentences

16

Hate Speech Sentences

8


Summary

The White House cancels the Philadelphia Eagles, Paul Managans gets caught in a witness tampering scandal, and President Trump talks about pardoning himself. We ll talk about all of it on today s episode of The Ben Shapiro Show. Today s episode features: - President Trump's decision to cancel the Eagles' visit to the White House. - Miss America 2.0 is better than ever, except for how it's worse than ever in every possible way. - A special Father's Day Live Stream on Tuesday, June 12, 7 PM ET. - A roundtable discussion with me, Ben Shapiro, Andrew Clavin, and Michael Knowles to discuss Fatherhood and Fatherhood in the 21st century, and why it matters more than ever than it does in the past. And, of course, a special Father s Day live stream to honor Fatherhood Day on June 12th. You can watch it live on Dailywire, and subscribe to the DailyWire Podcast on your favorite streaming platform so you don't miss it! You'll get access to all the latest news and updates, plus access to special Fatherhood events happening around the country! You get two months of Skillshare for just 99 cents. That's right, you get 2 months of skillshare for 99 cents! You can get unlimited access to over 20,000 courses and a bunch of other awesome courses for 99% 99% of what you need to be learning and thriving! Want to upgrade your skills and grow your resume better? That's $99, you can get a 2-month free trial with Skillshare? You can go to Skillshare. That s right, they've got it. You get TWO months of skills and you get it, you're gonna be learning, you'll get it for 99, 99 cents, and you'll be getting it, right there, right now! And you can ask questions, you won't have to be better than that, right? - That s not just learning, they're gonna make it, they'll be able to help you, right here, right to keep it, I'm gonna help you learn and you can do it, and they'll get a whole bunch of stuff like that, you have it, too, right, I'll even better, right you'll learn, right they'll have to make it...you'll get that, she's got it, she'll be helping me, right she'll say it, y'all?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 The White House cancels the Philadelphia Eagles, Paul Manafort allegedly gets caught witness tampering, and President Trump talks about pardoning himself.
00:00:07.000 We'll talk about all of it.
00:00:07.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:08.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:14.000 All right, so we have a lot to get to today.
00:00:16.000 We will be talking about President Trump disinviting the Philadelphia Eagles and why that is a silly move.
00:00:20.000 We will also be talking about Miss America 2.0.
00:00:24.000 Better than ever, except for how it's worse in every possible way.
00:00:28.000 I'll explain what I mean by that in just a second.
00:00:30.000 First, I want to make a couple announcements.
00:00:31.000 We've decided to honor Father's Day this year with a special live stream on Tuesday, June 12th, 7 p.m.
00:00:36.000 Eastern.
00:00:36.000 DailyWire God King Jeremy Boren will host a roundtable discussion with me,
00:00:39.000 Ben Shapiro, Andrew Clavin, and Michael Knowles.
00:00:42.000 We'll discuss what fatherhood means, why fathers matter, how fatherhood will stand up against an increasingly anti-males culture, and we'll smoke cigars and ignore the fact that we have wives and children.
00:00:49.000 Subscribers will be able to answer, well, send and write in live questions, okay?
00:00:54.000 Just send in questions, we'll answer them.
00:00:56.000 And that is Tuesday, June 12th, 7 p.m.
00:00:58.000 Eastern, 4 p.m.
00:00:58.000 Pacific.
00:00:59.000 You can find our special live stream on Facebook and YouTube, so do not miss it.
00:01:03.000 Alrighty, so.
00:01:05.000 In just a second, I want to get to the president and football and all the rest of it.
00:01:08.000 First, I want to say thanks to our sponsors over at Skillshare.
00:01:10.000 So, you need to make your resume better.
00:01:12.000 Okay, your resume's fine.
00:01:13.000 I'm just telling you it's okay.
00:01:15.000 Like, it's nothing special.
00:01:16.000 Make it better, okay?
00:01:17.000 Make it better by adding a bunch of skills that you need to put on your resume, get paid more, change jobs if you're looking to.
00:01:22.000 Or just get better at something you've always wanted to do.
00:01:23.000 That's what Skillshare is for.
00:01:25.000 Skillshare is an online learning platform with over 20,000 classes in business, design, technology, and more.
00:01:30.000 You can take classes in social media marketing.
00:01:32.000 That's the one that I've been taking.
00:01:33.000 Illustration, data science, mobile photography, creative writing, you name it, they've got it.
00:01:37.000 And these are experts teaching them.
00:01:38.000 These are 45-minute classes.
00:01:40.000 You can ask questions.
00:01:40.000 It's really great.
00:01:41.000 Whether you're trying to deepen your professional skill set, start a side hustle, or just explore a new passion,
00:01:45.000 Skillshare is there to keep you learning and thriving.
00:01:47.000 Again, I know the people who watch my show, listen to my show, are devotees of information, and that's what Skillshare is.
00:01:53.000 It's a firehose of information.
00:01:55.000 You can get all new skills just by going to Skillshare.
00:01:57.000 Again, get two months of Skillshare for just 99 cents right now.
00:02:00.000 Join the millions of students already learning there, and you get two months of Skillshare for just 99 cents.
00:02:05.000 For my listeners, two months of unlimited access to over 20,000 classes.
00:02:08.000 All you have to do is go to Skillshare.com
00:02:13.000 Okay, we begin today with a controversy of the day, the President of the United States disinviting the Philadelphia Eagles.
00:02:25.000 So here is sort of the back story.
00:02:27.000 The Philadelphia Eagles win the Super Bowl in shocking fashion over the New England Patriots, and then a bunch of the players say they don't want to come to the White House.
00:02:34.000 I have said for a long time, and I know there's been an issue since Trump became president, and there are a lot of sports teams where people don't want to show up whenever they're invited to the White House.
00:02:44.000 What I've said for a long time is I think White House invitations to sports teams are stupid.
00:02:47.000 I don't like the ceremonial aspect of the White House all that much.
00:02:50.000 I think that it smacks of monarchism.
00:02:51.000 I don't like the idea of some king-like figure who sits around and gives out magical awards to people as though
00:02:57.000 He is the great leader of the United States, as opposed to a constitutional official elected to do a particular job.
00:03:02.000 So I'm not a big fan of sports teams visiting the White House in the first place, but it's been a thing since Ronald Reagan.
00:03:08.000 And Donald Trump invites the Philadelphia Eagles to show up.
00:03:11.000 And a bunch of them decide, you know what, not a big fan of President Trump, don't want to show up.
00:03:14.000 This is not the first time this has happened.
00:03:16.000 I remember Tim Thomas, who was on the NHL Stanley Cup winning Boston Bruins back during the Obama administration, decided that he didn't want to go to the White House and the left made a huge deal out of it.
00:03:25.000 How could he do such a thing?
00:03:26.000 And I was on Tim Thomas's side.
00:03:28.000 If I don't feel like showing up to the White House to receive an award from Jimmy Carter or something, I'm not going to show up to the White House to receive an award from Jimmy Carter or Barack Obama.
00:03:36.000 Then I don't see a problem with that.
00:03:37.000 Well, a lot of the Eagles are not fans of President Trump, which is not particularly shocking, given the political breakdown of the NFL.
00:03:42.000 Most of the players in the NFL vote Democrat.
00:03:45.000 Most of the players in the NFL are not big fans of President Trump.
00:03:47.000 So apparently a bunch of them didn't want to show up.
00:03:49.000 There are, you know, dozens and dozens of NFL players on the Philadelphia Eagles.
00:03:53.000 And that list had been whittled down to about 10 who actually wanted to show up.
00:03:56.000 And there was a report that it was all the way down to like three and a mascot.
00:03:59.000 That was embarrassing for the president.
00:04:01.000 So the president then canceled.
00:04:02.000 But the president didn't just cancel the event.
00:04:04.000 The president then put out a statement about canceling the event.
00:04:06.000 And here is what he said.
00:04:08.000 He said, quote, the Philadelphia Eagles are unable to come to the White House with their full team to be celebrated tomorrow.
00:04:13.000 They disagree with their president because he insists that they proudly stand for the national anthem hand on heart in honor of the great men and women of our military and the people of our country.
00:04:23.000 The Eagles wanted to send a smaller delegation, but the 1,000 fans planning to attend the event deserve better.
00:04:28.000 These fans are still invited to the White House to be part of a different type of ceremony, one that will honor our great country, pay tribute to the heroes who fight to protect it, and loudly and proudly play the national anthem.
00:04:38.000 I will be there at 3 p.m.
00:04:40.000 with the United States Marine Band and the United States Army Chorus to celebrate America.
00:04:45.000 OK, so there are a bunch of things that are wrong with this statement.
00:04:48.000 So first of all, I love the self-centeredness of the statement is really quite astonishing.
00:04:53.000 They disagree with their president because he insists that they probably stand for the national anthem.
00:04:58.000 I love the speaking of himself in third person that he because Donald Trump is their president.
00:05:02.000 He also tweeted out about this as well.
00:05:05.000 And here's what President Trump tweeted, same sort of message.
00:05:07.000 Okay, well, here's the problem.
00:05:22.000 Nobody on the Eagles kneels for the National Anthem.
00:05:24.000 No one on the Philadelphia Eagles that entire season knelt for the National Anthem.
00:05:27.000 There was one player who didn't preseason, he was cut.
00:05:30.000 No one on the Philadelphia Eagles actually knelt for the National Anthem or attempted to dishonor the National Anthem.
00:05:35.000 But the President of the United States is attempting to jump on this culture war again, this kneeling for the National Anthem routine, again and again, because he thinks he's going to get a political win out of it when, in effect,
00:05:45.000 All that happened here is that a bunch of eagles didn't want to show up and President Trump decided to respond essentially by slandering the Philadelphia Eagles.
00:05:51.000 This is one of the drawbacks of having President Trump be who he is character-wise.
00:05:55.000 Listen, I said yesterday on Fox News, and I stand by this, President Trump, in terms of governance,
00:06:01.000 Has governed more conservatively than any president of my lifetime through his first 500 days.
00:06:05.000 The President of the United States has given us all sorts of wins if you are a conservative.
00:06:08.000 He's given us Justice Gorsuch who's turned out to be a great justice.
00:06:11.000 He has given us a bunch of appellate court appointees who have been just terrific.
00:06:14.000 He's given us regulatory reform.
00:06:16.000 He's given us tax cuts.
00:06:17.000 He's given us a move of the embassy to Jerusalem.
00:06:19.000 He's given us a lot of wins as the President of the United States.
00:06:21.000 But one area where the president continues to befuddle is his approach to these issues.
00:06:26.000 Now, I know that there are a lot of folks in the Trump base who will be angry at me for saying that the president is blowing it on issues like this.
00:06:32.000 They think that every time the president mentions the national anthem, it's a big win for him.
00:06:36.000 But here is the problem.
00:06:37.000 If you actually like the National Anthem, if you like the idea of unifying American symbols, what you can't do is slander people with regard to how they approach the National Anthem by telling lies about them for your own personal grandisement.
00:06:49.000 If you really do respect the National Anthem, then you can't say people aren't standing who are standing.
00:06:55.000 You can't do that just out of a fit of personal pique.
00:06:57.000 It's worthless.
00:06:58.000 Not only is it worthless, it's counterproductive.
00:07:00.000 And it shows that the president isn't really all that upset about the National Anthem stuff.
00:07:03.000 He's more upset about the fact that the Eagles wouldn't visit the White House and come and see him and pay homage to him.
00:07:09.000 That's a big problem for me.
00:07:10.000 If you truly care about the symbolism of unifying American symbols like the American flag or the National Anthem, you shouldn't be using them as wedge issues.
00:07:17.000 Now, I objected when NFL players did it.
00:07:19.000 I object to NFL players kneeling.
00:07:21.000 I think it's stupid that so many on the left are fine with NFL players kneeling for the National Anthem.
00:07:25.000 I think that is a cultural totem to which we all should pay a certain amount of respect.
00:07:31.000 But the president is doing no better when he decides that he's going to take players out of context.
00:07:36.000 Unfortunately,
00:07:38.000 This actually ended up being an issue on Fox News.
00:07:40.000 So Fox News actually did a segment last night talking about all of this, and the producers cut a bunch of pictures.
00:07:46.000 So Shannon Bream was doing the segment, and a bunch of people who were producing decided they would put a bunch of pictures of the Philadelphia Eagles kneeling.
00:07:55.000 There's only one problem.
00:07:56.000 All the pictures of them kneeling are them praying.
00:07:58.000 It's not actually for the national anthem.
00:08:00.000 So here's what it looked like on Fox News.
00:08:02.000 New tonight, the president announcing the Philadelphia Eagles will not be visiting the White House tomorrow to celebrate their Super Bowl victory due to the national anthem controversy.
00:08:11.000 The Eagles, who won Super Bowl 52, apparently wanted to send a smaller group of players.
00:08:17.000 A handful did not plan to attend, but it appears the president said no thanks.
00:08:21.000 Now, the president says he's still going to host a different event.
00:08:23.000 Okay, so in any case, you can see, actually, when you watch this thing and don't just hear it, you can actually see that Fox is flashing a bunch of pictures of people kneeling for the National Anthem.
00:08:32.000 That, of course, is not true, and Fox had to retract that today, which is what they should do.
00:08:36.000 They got it wrong, and they acknowledged that they got it wrong, that it was wrong to slander these players, saying that they knelt for the National Anthem.
00:08:41.000 All of this drove Zach Ertz, who's a player on the Philadelphia Eagles, to tweet out about it.
00:08:45.000 He tweeted, quote,
00:08:54.000 I think exactly correctly that Fox News apologized for all of this.
00:08:57.000 Torrey Smith, who's a wide receiver on the Philadelphia Eagle, also came out and bashed President Trump.
00:09:03.000 He responded by saying,
00:09:08.000 I think so.
00:09:29.000 And we feel joy when we see the underdogs finally win.
00:09:31.000 I'm equally proud of the Eagles' activism off the field.
00:09:34.000 These are players who stand up for the causes they believe in and who contribute in meaningful ways to their community.
00:09:38.000 They represent the diversity of our nation, a nation in which we are free to express our opinions.
00:09:42.000 Disinviting them from the White House only proves that our president is not a true patriot, but a fragile egomaniac obsessed with crowd size and afraid of the embarrassment of throwing a party to which no one wants to attend.
00:09:50.000 City Hall is always open for celebration.
00:09:52.000 The Philadelphia Eagles.
00:09:54.000 So what should President Trump have done here?
00:09:55.000 He should have just swallowed hard and had the players who wanted to come.
00:10:11.000 He should have said, listen, I wish that more people were going to come to the People's House to experience the glory of our democracy and come see the White House in person, which is a really cool experience, no matter who the president is.
00:10:20.000 I wish more of them were doing that.
00:10:21.000 I feel bad that so many people feel polarized by our politics.
00:10:24.000 And my invitation stands.
00:10:25.000 They're free to come whenever they want to come.
00:10:27.000 It would've been fine.
00:10:27.000 It would've been fine.
00:10:28.000 But the president reacted in thin-skinned fashion, and it made him look foolish.
00:10:32.000 He shouldn't have done this, and he certainly shouldn't have lied about the members of the Philadelphia Eagles kneeling for all of this.
00:10:38.000 In other news, I will say the NFL Players Association responded the stupidest way available also, and this is the reactionary time in which we live.
00:10:45.000 Trump reacts to NFL players by doing something dumb, then NFL players react to President Trump doing something dumb by doing something even more dumb.
00:10:51.000 So the NFL Players Association put out a statement, they said,
00:10:54.000 Our union is disappointed in the decision by the White House to disinvite players from the Philadelphia Eagles from being recognized and celebrated by all Americans for their accomplishment.
00:11:02.000 This decision by the White House has led to the cancellation of several player-led community service events for young people in the Washington, D.C.
00:11:08.000 area.
00:11:08.000 NFL players love their country, support our troops, give back to their communities, and strive to make America a better place.
00:11:14.000 Well, I don't understand why you had to cancel the player-led community service events.
00:11:18.000 The Players Association's got some money in its coffers.
00:11:20.000 If they really want to help out a bunch of community members in the Washington, D.C.
00:11:23.000 area, those players can still go and do this.
00:11:25.000 And in fact, if they wanted to show up the president, that's exactly what they would do.
00:11:28.000 They would say, the president disinvited us from the White House.
00:11:30.000 We weren't going to go to the White House anyway, but we still want to help out the community members in Washington, D.C.
00:11:35.000 But because the world of politics revolves purely and simply around President Trump, that means that everything Trump does is the black hole around which the entire universe of politics revolves.
00:11:46.000 And that's really stupid.
00:11:47.000 It also means the president should be more careful about the stuff that he says.
00:11:50.000 Because this sort of stuff does have an impact on how Americans think about President Trump.
00:11:54.000 I have a column up in National Review today all about why Democrats are losing, why Democrats are unable to get it together.
00:11:59.000 And one of the reasons is because Democrats have been fighting culture wars that they are losing.
00:12:03.000 Well, when the president decides to go too far in the culture wars, it doesn't help him, it only hurts him, and it only hurts the causes that he is pushing.
00:12:10.000 Again, if you believe in the National Anthem, believe people should stand for it, you cannot lie about people who are standing for the National Anthem, kneeling for the National Anthem, for your own personal political gain.
00:12:19.000 Okay, I have a little more to say on this, but first, I want to say thanks to our sponsors over at My Patriot Supply.
00:12:23.000 So,
00:12:25.000 FEMA now estimates that most Americans have no plan for an emergency.
00:12:28.000 And the truth is that if an emergency happens, I live in California, there's an earthquake, FEMA may not be able to get to you for at least 48, 72 hours.
00:12:35.000 Well, that is why the best time to prepare is now.
00:12:38.000 Hurricane season is already active.
00:12:39.000 Earthquakes are rumbling out here.
00:12:40.000 Don't wait.
00:12:41.000 Most emergencies or a power grid attack will give you zero warning.
00:12:44.000 So act by securing dependable food storage right now.
00:12:47.000 MyPatriotSupply has the perfect food kit to get you started.
00:12:49.000 They've helped millions of people for a decade now.
00:12:51.000 This week, you can get their four-week emergency food supply for just 99 bucks.
00:12:55.000 That is a low price for security.
00:12:56.000 Again, you spend 99 bucks, you stick it in the closet, you don't have to worry about it, it lasts for 25 years in storage, and that means you're no longer gonna have to worry if there's a natural disaster, there's a riot outside, you just gotta hunker down for a little while, then you just have the food in the closet and you're the person who is smart enough to think of it years ago.
00:13:10.000 And the stuff does taste good.
00:13:11.000 I mean, I've noticed that people around the office are legitimately, we have to actually get another emergency food supply because
00:13:16.000 We don't starve the people here, but apparently they've been going through the pantry and taking out the cans of emergency food supply and eating them now.
00:13:22.000 There's no emergency.
00:13:23.000 Don't do that, guys.
00:13:24.000 But you can get the four-week emergency food supply right now for $99.
00:13:29.000 888-803-1413.
00:13:29.000 That's 888-803-1413.
00:13:30.000 Or preparewithben.com.
00:13:33.000 Preparewithben.com.
00:13:35.000 Check it out at preparewithben.com for that special deal.
00:13:37.000 Again, $99 for a four-week emergency food supply.
00:13:39.000 888-803-1413.
00:13:39.000 Okay, so.
00:13:44.000 What should the president do with regard to the fact that so many cultural figures dislike him?
00:13:48.000 The president should simply point out that cultural figures dislike him.
00:13:51.000 Here is the nice thing about where the president sits in the pop culture sphere.
00:13:54.000 I've made this point over the past couple of weeks with regard to Samantha Bee and the rest of the culture.
00:13:59.000 And the fact that the media are insane over President Trump to the point where they're speculating about missing Melania Trump.
00:14:06.000 Honestly, Melania Trump had a kidney surgery like three weeks ago.
00:14:09.000 And the entire media since then has been speculating about where Melania Trump went.
00:14:12.000 There's a theory she'd been abducted by aliens.
00:14:14.000 There's a theory that President Trump was secretly beating her in the basement of the White House or some such nonsense.
00:14:20.000 Everyone on the left has lost their mind to the extent that Trump could simply sit back and point at them and laugh.
00:14:25.000 So if the Philadelphia Eagles decide not to come, again, the president could have said, listen, that makes me sad, I wish they would come, but they're not coming, and it would have been a good unifying moment for the country, but I guess that's on them.
00:14:34.000 And the president could have done that.
00:14:35.000 Instead, he decided to play right in their hands, because President Trump is a counterpuncher.
00:14:39.000 It's a pathological thing with the president.
00:14:41.000 This is just his personality, and he cannot avoid the feeling that he needs to hit somebody back if he feels hit.
00:14:47.000 The president is thin-skinned, and he likes to hit back.
00:14:49.000 That hitting back is a good thing when it comes to some issues, but when it comes to issues like this, where we really should be getting together and having a communal feeling together around things like football, it is not a particularly useful thing.
00:15:01.000 Again, I went to the Super Bowl last year, and when I went to the Super Bowl, I have to say, the feeling of community in the building was astonishing.
00:15:06.000 It was astonishing.
00:15:08.000 I can honestly say the only time I felt something like it is when you go to a synagogue or a church event.
00:15:12.000 The feeling that everybody is there for one common purpose, to watch football, to enjoy each other's company, to be in out of the cold, honestly, whereas in Minnesota, waving the American flag, enjoying the patriotic aspects of the national anthem and the Blue Angels flyover and all the rest of it.
00:15:27.000 And all of that stuff should be unifying.
00:15:29.000 The president should have gone forward with the event.
00:15:31.000 He should have said to the NFL players, I'm sorry that you guys didn't come.
00:15:33.000 You really would have enjoyed it.
00:15:34.000 I think it would have been good for the country for you to show up and we could have talked about some issues that you guys are having.
00:15:40.000 You know, reaching out with an open hand is not a sign of weakness, Mr. President.
00:15:42.000 Reaching out with an open hand to people who are disdaining you sometimes looks like strength.
00:15:47.000 Sometimes it looks like you're going above and beyond the call of duty.
00:15:49.000 And I think that President Trump could stand to do that a little bit more.
00:15:53.000 And I hope that he does.
00:15:53.000 I hope that in the future the President of the United States decides that he is going to reach out to people on the other side of the aisle who have a pathological dislike for him.
00:16:01.000 And in doing so, maybe open some hearts and open some minds rather than lying about the members of the Philadelphia Eagles, which I just think is a huge mistake.
00:16:09.000 OK, so meanwhile, speaking of other stupid news, the Miss America competition has now decided that they are no longer going to be having a swimsuit competition.
00:16:17.000 So Gretchen Carlson, who's on the board over there, she's a former Miss America herself, I believe.
00:16:21.000 And she, of course, was the subject of a Me Too scandal because Roger Ailes had allegedly sexually harassed her.
00:16:27.000 Well, Gretchen Carlson comes forward and she says,
00:16:30.000 We are now going to do a Miss America 2.0 makeover.
00:16:33.000 Oh yeah!
00:16:34.000 So we are no longer a pageant.
00:16:36.000 We are a competition.
00:16:37.000 We will no longer judge our candidates on their outward physical appearance.
00:16:43.000 That's huge.
00:16:44.000 That's huge.
00:16:44.000 And that means that we will no longer have a swimsuit competition.
00:16:47.000 And so we're no longer judging women when they come out in their chosen attire, their evening wear.
00:16:53.000 Whatever they choose to do, it's going to be what comes out of their mouth that we're interested in when they talk about their social impact initiatives.
00:16:59.000 Oh, that's really what it's going to be about.
00:17:01.000 So Miss America 2.0 is actually going to be like the Kennedy Center honors.
00:17:05.000 And Madeleine Albright will be your Miss America 2018 because we're no longer taking physical appearance into account.
00:17:09.000 Hillary Clinton finally has a shot at being beloved by America.
00:17:12.000 She can be Miss America 2018 if she so chooses.
00:17:15.000 She can walk out wearing a giant trench coat and she can be awarded this because physical appearance no longer counts.
00:17:20.000 Okay, so here's why this is so dumb.
00:17:22.000 Am I upset about this, by the way?
00:17:23.000 No, I'm not upset about this.
00:17:24.000 In fact,
00:17:25.000 I think the Miss America competition was always stupid, right?
00:17:27.000 I'm the guy who, when I was a teenager, used to unsubscribe from the swimsuit edition of Sports Illustrated because I thought it was basically softcore pornography, right?
00:17:34.000 I mean, the fact is that when you are looking at the Victoria's Secret catalog, when they have these Victoria's Secret models on the runway, people are not watching the Victoria's Secret fashion show for the fashion.
00:17:43.000 Okay, if those were 400 pound women walking down the runway with Victoria's Secret fashion on, the ratings would be nil.
00:17:48.000 It's an excuse for dudes to watch scantily clad, beautiful women walk around, and then they can always say to their wives, well, I was just watching because I really love the fashion aspect.
00:17:56.000 By the way, women, if you are taken in by this, your boy's lying to you, okay?
00:17:59.000 He's not watching the Victoria's Secret fashion show because he's mostly interested in the new styles of bra and panties that are coming out.
00:18:06.000 He's thinking about what happens when those bra and panties are not part of the show at all, okay?
00:18:09.000 That's just the way that men work.
00:18:11.000 Note to women all over the world.
00:18:13.000 The same thing was true of the Miss America pageant.
00:18:14.000 So, as a religious person and an advocate of modesty for both men and women, I'm perfectly happy with there being no swimsuit competition in the Miss America pageant.
00:18:23.000 I also will acknowledge that the Miss America competition was always about the swimsuit competition, okay?
00:18:27.000 There's a reason that Miss America features a bunch of beautiful women and not a bunch of plus-size models.
00:18:35.000 It's not because she wasn't a charitable human being.
00:18:41.000 It's because the Miss America pageant was not about that.
00:18:44.000 And here's the part that I find puzzling.
00:18:46.000 So, I understand my own perspective on this.
00:18:47.000 I'm a religious person.
00:18:48.000 I think it's stupid to judge women by their bodies.
00:18:52.000 That doesn't mean that when you're entering a relationship, sexual attraction isn't important.
00:18:55.000 It's deeply important.
00:18:56.000 It's not to say that I don't think that people of all sexes should stay in shape.
00:18:59.000 I think that they should, to the best of their ability.
00:19:01.000 It is to say, however, that I've always been an advocate for modesty, because I think that if you want, if women want to be treated as more than pieces of meat by men, then it behooves them to understand how men think, and men tend to see scantily clad women in sexual ways.
00:19:14.000 That's just the way that men think, that is nature, that is the way it works.
00:19:17.000 So, that means that if you put on a little bit more clothing, men are more likely to see you as a proper businesswoman, as opposed to if you walk into the office wearing a bra and panties, just telling you.
00:19:25.000 Okay, men are not thinking about your capacity for social media marketing at that point.
00:19:30.000 But here's where I find the argument to the left kind of weird.
00:19:34.000 So I've heard from the left that a woman wearing a bathing suit is actually empowering, that scantily clad women are empowering, that in fact Stormy Daniels is an example of female empowerment because she chooses to be a porn star and have sex with randos on camera.
00:19:45.000 I've heard that this is the essence of female empowerment and that if you say that acting immodestly is not female empowerment, it actually is degradation and it is catering to the worst instincts of men.
00:19:56.000 And the most lewd instincts of men.
00:19:58.000 If you say that, then you are anti-feminist.
00:20:00.000 You're anti-female.
00:20:00.000 But now I'm hearing that it's anti-feminist to allow the swimsuit competition to go forward.
00:20:05.000 But I was under the impression that all these women consented to be part of the swimsuit competition.
00:20:08.000 That this was something they wanted to do.
00:20:11.000 That the leadership of the Miss America pageant wasn't down in the dressing room whipping the girls to get in their bathing suits.
00:20:17.000 That the girls all chose to be part of this.
00:20:20.000 You can't have it both ways, ladies.
00:20:22.000 If you are going to suggest that it is female empowerment to get unclad whenever you please, then you can't then claim that you have done something feminist by telling women that they should no longer wear bathing suits and there shouldn't be a competition for bathing suits or anything like that.
00:20:35.000 Maybe what they should have done is they should have said, listen, this is a consensual competition.
00:20:39.000 We can go for it however we want.
00:20:41.000 Just in the future, we're gonna do evening gowns instead of bathing suits.
00:20:44.000 By the way, it's a lie.
00:20:45.000 The idea that they're going to award this to Madeleine Albright or Janet Napolitano or anybody else who is not of the most beautiful ilk is just silly.
00:20:53.000 It's ridiculous.
00:20:53.000 Rosie O'Donnell ain't winning the Miss America 2.0.
00:20:56.000 It's not happening.
00:20:56.000 It's gonna be a beautiful woman from California
00:20:58.000 Who would look good in a bathing suit, or an evening gown, or in anything else.
00:21:02.000 And anything else they say to you about this is a lie, but it's all just silliness.
00:21:06.000 It's all just silliness and demonstrates the internal contradictions inside the radical feminist movement.
00:21:10.000 Okay, meanwhile, in other news...
00:21:14.000 We're good to go.
00:21:29.000 Are you paying attention to the news?
00:21:30.000 Do you pay attention to the news?
00:21:31.000 Do you love information?
00:21:32.000 I do, and that's why some of the best journalism that's been happening over the last couple of years has been happening in magazines.
00:21:37.000 The New Yorker has done wonderful work in exposing the MeToo scandal.
00:21:40.000 Ronan Farrow doing amazing work over there.
00:21:42.000 There are a lot of good articles over at The Atlantic, even though I'm not a big fan of how Jeffrey Goldberg has run the place.
00:21:46.000 There are a lot of worthwhile, interesting articles over at The Atlantic.
00:21:49.000 People, Cosmo, Entertainment Weekly, there's a lot of interesting, good, interesting, just fascinating stuff happening in the magazine space right now, which is why you need texture.
00:21:57.000 Texture is the magazine app.
00:21:59.000 It's got all of these magazines, more than 200 top magazines, all in one place.
00:22:03.000 It's a must-have app for people looking to read up on what's going on.
00:22:06.000 They've got quality journalism and, of course, the best photos and interviews and perspectives.
00:22:09.000 And you can stay connected today.
00:22:11.000 Instead of you having to spend $4.99 a month for each one of these magazines and spend hundreds of dollars to subscribe to 200 of them, you get full subscriptions to all of them with just one low price.
00:22:21.000 Start your seven-day free trial right now at texture.com slash ben.
00:22:25.000 That's texture.com slash ben.
00:22:26.000 And you get the back issues as well.
00:22:28.000 Texture.com slash ben.
00:22:29.000 You can try Texture for free today for seven days.
00:22:31.000 See how much you like it.
00:22:32.000 You will really enjoy it.
00:22:33.000 My wife loves it as well.
00:22:35.000 Don't wait to start reading the latest issues.
00:22:36.000 It's texture.com slash ben.
00:22:38.000 Texture.com slash ben to start that free trial.
00:22:40.000 Okay, so the latest news in the Mueller-gate situation is that Robert Mueller, the special investigator, is now accusing Paul Manafort, Trump's former campaign manager, of attempted witness tampering.
00:22:51.000 So, here is the story from ABC News.
00:22:53.000 Special counsel Robert Mueller is seeking to revoke the bail of President Donald Trump's former campaign chairman Paul Manafort for allegedly tampering with witnesses in the year-long probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, according to a court filing on Monday night.
00:23:06.000 Attorneys with the special counsel have accused Manafort of, quote, attempting to tamper with potential witnesses while awaiting his trial, which thereby, quote, has violated the conditions of his release.
00:23:14.000 So, in other words,
00:23:16.000 Paul Manafort has on an ankle bracelet, and he's under constant surveillance, and he's trying to tamper with witnesses anyway.
00:23:21.000 Gotta admire the dude's commitment to criminality.
00:23:24.000 My goodness.
00:23:25.000 In February, within days of Mueller's filing a 32-count superseding indictment against Manafort, the former Trump campaign chairman allegedly contacted two individuals who worked with him on a lobbying scheme to aid his Kremlin-backed Ukrainian clients.
00:23:36.000 The two individuals were a member of the Habsburg Group, described by Mueller in February's superseding indictment of Manafort as a group of former senior European politicians
00:23:44.000 We're good to go!
00:24:07.000 With no obvious reason to do so.
00:24:09.000 He tweeted out, quote, Okay, well to be fair,
00:24:32.000 Everyone on the right who knew who Paul Manafort was, was warning President Trump not to hire him as his campaign manager at about the time that he was hired.
00:24:39.000 Now, I guess the idea here is that the DOJ or the FBI should have told Trump about Manafort.
00:24:43.000 But remember, the DOJ and the FBI were suspicious that members of the Trump campaign, other members of the Trump campaign, were participating in Russian collusion.
00:24:50.000 And it doesn't seem completely out of bounds to me for the FBI or the DOJ to simply say, well, why would we tell President Trump about all of this?
00:24:58.000 We suspect that President Trump might be more of a window than a wall when it comes to stopping information that could help us capture these guys.
00:25:06.000 Which brings us to some big questions that I still have about the Spygate scandal.
00:25:09.000 So, yesterday, a guy whose show I really enjoy, Dan Bongino, he responded to a show that I did on Thursday all about Spygate 2018.
00:25:16.000 These, of course, are the allegations that the Trump campaign was spied on by the FBI at the behest of the Obama DOJ and the Hillary campaign in order to take down Trump's campaign somehow during the election.
00:25:26.000 And I expressed three questions during the show on Thursday.
00:25:29.000 Question number one was why didn't Hillary or the FBI or the DOJ release the most damaging information about the Trump campaign if this was in fact a setup and a hit?
00:25:37.000 The most damaging information that happened during the Trump campaign was the Donald Trump Jr.
00:25:41.000 meeting at Trump Tower with Natalia Veselnitskaya and the emails that were sent by Donald Trump Jr.
00:25:47.000 to a Russian-connected
00:25:50.000 We're good to go.
00:26:12.000 The only thing that we heard is that there was an investigation going on.
00:26:15.000 We heard that in the late stages of the campaign, but the actual headline from the New York Times was, investigation took place and nothing was found, basically.
00:26:21.000 This is late October.
00:26:22.000 I think it was October 30th was the New York Times story.
00:26:24.000 So that was question number one.
00:26:25.000 Why didn't Hillary and the FBI release the most damaging information?
00:26:29.000 During the campaign.
00:26:31.000 So we already knew about Paul Manafort for years.
00:26:32.000 The idea that there were leaks about Paul Manafort, I find utterly unconvincing.
00:26:36.000 Paul Manafort, again, for years had been suspected of being a Kremlin agent.
00:26:40.000 That had been going back long before the 2016 elections.
00:26:43.000 That was question number one.
00:26:44.000 Question number two is why didn't the FBI target other members of Team Trump?
00:26:48.000 So if Spygate is a thing, if the FBI was in fact targeting the entire Trump team, if they suspected the entire Trump team of collusion to the extent that they were wiretapping Trump, as Trump claimed in Trump Tower in that tweet from January 2017, if that was the case, then why were the only people who were targeted inside the Trump campaign people who actually had pretty solid ties with the Kremlin?
00:27:10.000 OK, those people would be the people that I mentioned before, Robert Gates and Paul Manafort and Carter Page and George Papadopoulos, several of whom have already pled guilty to lying to the FBI or to other charges related to this particular investigation.
00:27:25.000 So Dan Bongino responded that when I asked this question, I was ignoring that Trump Jr.
00:27:30.000 and Trump had actually been targeted.
00:27:32.000 The Trump Jr.
00:27:32.000 targeting, he suggests, was the Natalia Veselnitskaya meeting was being run by Fusion GPS, which had been hired by Hillary to gather dirt on the Trump campaign.
00:27:40.000 And therefore, this was some sort of set up by Hillary Clinton.
00:27:43.000 I think Dan admits, rightly, that there is not evidence to suggest that Hillary Clinton was behind the setup of the Trump Tower meeting.
00:27:51.000 Again, there is no evidence to suggest that.
00:27:52.000 There's certainly no evidence to suggest the FBI was behind the setup of the Trump Tower meeting.
00:27:56.000 Now, is it suspicious that Fusion GPS was involved with the Trump Tower meeting?
00:27:59.000 Yes, it is suspicious.
00:28:00.000 Is that enough for me to go all the way and say that Trump Jr.
00:28:03.000 is being targeted?
00:28:04.000 Not really.
00:28:05.000 Not really.
00:28:06.000 It's hard for me to go all the way without that evidence.
00:28:07.000 I'm happy to hear more evidence, but I'm not willing to go all the way with all of that.
00:28:12.000 There's no evidence the FBI, particularly, or the DOJ used this meeting to target Trump Jr.
00:28:16.000 Now, Bongino's claimed that all of this was designed in order so that they could use the two hop rules so that they could get information on Donald Trump.
00:28:23.000 I haven't seen the information they got on Trump, if that's the case at this point, so maybe when the evidence comes out, that's what they were doing, then we can talk about it.
00:28:30.000 Bongino also claims that Donald Trump was targeted by the Steele dossier.
00:28:33.000 So the Steele dossier obviously is originally funded by the Washington Free Beacon.
00:28:40.000 That's a misstatement.
00:28:42.000 The Steele dossier was not funded by the Washington Free Beacon.
00:28:44.000 An OPPO research file was started, funded by the Washington Free Beacon.
00:28:48.000 Later on, the Hillary campaign picked up the OPPO research file from Fusion GPS and then went out and hired Christopher Steele, Fusion GPS did, using the Hillary Clinton camp as sort of the funders, and Steele put together this dossier.
00:28:59.000 It is false to say that we know that everything in the dossier is false.
00:29:02.000 Okay, we do not know everything in the dossier is false.
00:29:04.000 We know a lot of things in the dossier are BS.
00:29:06.000 I've said for a long time, I think a lot of the stuff there is BS.
00:29:08.000 We don't know that everything in the dossier is false.
00:29:10.000 Steele has been a source that was used by the FBI multiple times to suggest that the FBI was targeting President Trump because they used Christopher Steele as a source.
00:29:18.000 You'd then have to rule out every investigation Christopher Steele ever did.
00:29:22.000 Also, that would bring us to our third question, right?
00:29:25.000 And our third question here, well, I want to get to that in just one second.
00:29:28.000 First, I want to say thank you to our sponsors.
00:29:30.000 Over at ManCrate.
00:29:32.000 So, Father's Day is coming up, guys.
00:29:34.000 Like, you.
00:29:34.000 It is up to you.
00:29:35.000 Men, women, you all have dads.
00:29:37.000 And it's time for you to get something nice for your dad.
00:29:39.000 Because your dad's done so much stuff for you.
00:29:41.000 I mean, your dad used to drive you to school and listen to you whine about your friends and all that stuff.
00:29:44.000 Well, get him something nice on this Father's Day.
00:29:46.000 And the best thing you can get him is a ManCrate.
00:29:49.000 They have all these wonderful kits.
00:29:50.000 They have the Whiskey Appreciation Crate.
00:29:52.000 For when your father doesn't feel like listening to you anymore.
00:29:54.000 They have the knife-making kit for the hands-on dads.
00:29:56.000 And all of their kits come in awesome packaging.
00:30:00.000 So I have a bunch of poker chips that came in an ammo box, which is pretty awesome.
00:30:04.000 And as I've said before, once I get friends, I will definitely, definitely use it.
00:30:08.000 Also, most of these come in actual crates.
00:30:09.000 So they come in like a wooden crate with a crowbar.
00:30:11.000 And you have to prise it open, demonstrating what a man he is with his man crate.
00:30:16.000 It's just, it's an awesome gift.
00:30:19.000 You're really going to enjoy it.
00:30:19.000 Plus, every ManCrate comes with a 100% satisfaction guarantee.
00:30:22.000 It's a gift experience.
00:30:24.000 Get your special Father's Day discount today at mancrates.com slash ben.
00:30:29.000 That's mancrates.com slash ben.
00:30:32.000 It's a limited time offer.
00:30:34.000 For Father's Day, go today, right now.
00:30:36.000 Mancrates.com slash ben.
00:30:38.000 Let them know that we sent you by using that slash ben.
00:30:40.000 And there's a special Father's Day discount for you when you use that slash ben.
00:30:43.000 Mancrates.com slash ben.
00:30:46.000 So go check it out.
00:30:47.000 Right now.
00:30:47.000 Okay, so I have a little bit more on Spygate and the associated issues, but first you're gonna have to go over to dailywire.com.
00:30:53.000 So for $9.99 a month, you get the rest of this show live, the rest of Clayton's show live, the rest of Noel's show live.
00:30:57.000 You also get to be part of our mailbag on Fridays, which is super awesome.
00:31:01.000 And, by the way, there is more great news for podcast listeners.
00:31:04.000 The Ben Shapiro Show, along with our other Daily Wire podcasts, is now available on Amazon Alexa and the Google Home device, so your home can be filled with the rich, supple tones of my voice with a simple voice command.
00:31:13.000 Ah, the mellifluous joy of this voice.
00:31:16.000 Emanating from your Alexa device.
00:31:18.000 With Alexa, you have to enable the skill.
00:31:19.000 It's like adding an app.
00:31:20.000 You go, Alexa, enable the Ben Shapiro Show skill.
00:31:22.000 And then you can tell her to play or open.
00:31:24.000 Alexa, play the Ben Shapiro Show.
00:31:26.000 Google doesn't need to be added by a user, but you have to speak very clearly for her to understand, as though you are in a foreign country and you are an American.
00:31:32.000 And if you speak louder, then suddenly they will understand what you're talking about.
00:31:35.000 You have to say, OK Google, talk to Ben Shapiro Show.
00:31:39.000 And then it will actually work.
00:31:40.000 So check it out.
00:31:41.000 Then your device should be able to play the podcast, and your quality of life will be immeasurably improved.
00:31:46.000 So if you need to review those directions, just go to the pinned post at DailyWire Twitter or DailyWire Facebook for all the information.
00:31:51.000 If you want the annual subscription, that's $99 a year, and it brings you this.
00:31:54.000 The very greatest in all beverage vessels, the leftist's tears, hot or cold tumbler.
00:31:58.000 Ah, view the glory before you.
00:32:01.000 Look at this.
00:32:02.000 It's just magnificent.
00:32:04.000 I mean, just gaze upon it and weep.
00:32:06.000 It's it's it's incredible.
00:32:08.000 Also, when you get the membership, it also helps us bring you great shows like we had Joe Rogan on our Sunday special last week.
00:32:14.000 Go check that out.
00:32:15.000 It's already the hottest thing on YouTube.
00:32:16.000 It was awesome.
00:32:17.000 And next Sunday, I believe, is Jonah Goldberg.
00:32:19.000 So Jonah Goldberg is coming up on our Sunday special as well.
00:32:22.000 So check that out.
00:32:23.000 We are the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast in the nation.
00:32:30.000 So as I say, I had three questions about Spygate.
00:32:33.000 Question number one was, why didn't the worst stuff come out during the campaign?
00:32:36.000 Question number two is, why didn't the FBI target other members of Team Trump?
00:32:39.000 Dan Bongino had been upset with my analysis of this issue, or at least he had challenged my analysis of this issue.
00:32:45.000 And I enjoyed Dan's show, so I felt like it was worthwhile responding to some of his responses.
00:32:50.000 One of the things that he claims and what Spygate is all about is that there was a spy targeting Team Trump.
00:32:54.000 The guy's name is Stephen Halper.
00:32:56.000 Stephen Halper has worked with a bunch of Republican administrations in the past.
00:32:59.000 He was apparently asked by the FBI to meet with Carter Page and George Papadopoulos after Papadopoulos bragged to the Australian High Commissioner to Great Britain Alexander Alexander Downer about Hillary's emails and after Carter Page organized a visit to Moscow that was greenlit by
00:33:12.000 By the Trump campaign.
00:33:13.000 The fact that he was asked to do so before there was a formal opening of an investigation into Trump-Russia collusion doesn't mean an awful lot.
00:33:19.000 And to claim that he's a spy?
00:33:20.000 Okay, you want to call it a spy?
00:33:21.000 You want to call it an informant?
00:33:22.000 I don't really care about the language.
00:33:23.000 It's what he did that counts.
00:33:24.000 What he did is he approached Carter Page and he offered him like a couple of thousand bucks to write an essay.
00:33:28.000 And that was pretty much the extent of it from what I can tell.
00:33:31.000 That doesn't sound to me like a mole inside the Trump campaign in the way that is being made out.
00:33:35.000 Okay, finally, third question.
00:33:36.000 Why doesn't Trump just declassify all this material?
00:33:38.000 And this is the big one.
00:33:39.000 Why doesn't President Trump, if the Carter Page FISA warrant was badly gotten, as Devin Nunes has claimed, why doesn't Trump just declassify it?
00:33:47.000 If, in fact, the FBI was spying on Trump in nefarious fashion, there'd be documentation to show that.
00:33:52.000 Why doesn't Trump just reveal all that stuff?
00:33:54.000 So Dan has a theory, and Dan's theory is that Trump doesn't do this because this would somehow interfere with or prejudice ongoing leak investigations.
00:34:01.000 But these two issues are unrelated.
00:34:02.000 As a lawyer, illegal leaks are still illegal even if the president makes the underlying material unclassified post hoc.
00:34:09.000 So if I leak classified material and it's classified today, and five years from now the president declassifies that material, I was still breaking the law when I leaked the classified material, so declassifying it doesn't change anything.
00:34:20.000 Trump could easily declassify the Carter Page FISA warrant, for example, without disrupting any ongoing investigation.
00:34:25.000 He hasn't, and he should.
00:34:26.000 We've heard so much about it.
00:34:28.000 At some point, why don't we just hear the rest of it?
00:34:30.000 We keep hearing the DOJ isn't being forthcoming with the House Intelligence Committee.
00:34:34.000 That is true, and that is fair.
00:34:35.000 And that's why I think Trump should just go over their head and declassify this stuff.
00:34:38.000 Like, as someone who wants to get to the truth, if the DOJ is in fact stonewalling, and that's Trump's complaint, not mine, right?
00:34:43.000 Trump is saying the DOJ is stonewalling.
00:34:45.000 Well, if he's stonewalling, then why not just go over their head and declassify?
00:34:49.000 This doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
00:34:50.000 And the idea that there is some sort of, you know, ongoing investigation.
00:34:53.000 That's why Trump doesn't declassify.
00:34:56.000 I'd have to see, again, more evidence.
00:34:57.000 Maybe that's true, but I'd have to see more evidence of it.
00:34:59.000 I don't think it's as crystal clear as Dan is suggesting.
00:35:02.000 Finally, there were two other issues that have been surrounding Spygate that are worth pointing out.
00:35:06.000 First, Trey Gowdy said last week he didn't believe the Spygate narrative.
00:35:10.000 He said, quote, This was, in fact, the line that the Trump administration was using for months.
00:35:26.000 Then they flipped and they said that the Trump campaign itself was targeted.
00:35:29.000 What they originally said is, we're not guilty.
00:35:30.000 Originally, this was a counterintelligence investigation that was aimed at the Russians.
00:35:34.000 And the fact is that President Trump is not a target.
00:35:36.000 In fact, that's why Trump probably fired James Comey.
00:35:39.000 As he went to Comey, he said, let's just say I'm not a target.
00:35:41.000 And Comey wouldn't.
00:35:42.000 And Trump rightly said, well, why won't you?
00:35:44.000 And Comey said, well, because I think it would be a bad idea.
00:35:46.000 And Trump fired him out of frustration.
00:35:48.000 And now they're saying that Trump was targeted by the FBI and that he really was the target of the investigation.
00:35:53.000 Well, you can't have it both ways.
00:35:54.000 Either he was the target of the investigation or he was not the target of the investigation.
00:35:58.000 I guess the happy medium would be he was the target of the investigation and the evidence just didn't arrive to indict him.
00:36:03.000 But again, I'd have to see more evidence that he was the target, Trump specifically, as opposed to particular members of the Trump campaign amid the broad suspicion of Russian collusion with the Trump campaign.
00:36:13.000 Which, again, wouldn't end with the indictment of particular officials.
00:36:16.000 There's no Trump campaign to indict.
00:36:18.000 You can't actually do a criminal indictment against the quote-unquote Trump campaign.
00:36:21.000 You can only indict people who knew about things and committed crimes.
00:36:24.000 Okay, finally, when Bongino said that I got it wrong when I said Trump had openly stated, or literally stated, that he had fired James Comey over Russia, here is what Donald Trump said about firing James Comey.
00:36:34.000 And in fact, when I decided to just do it, i.e.
00:36:36.000 fire Comey, I said to myself, I said, you know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story.
00:36:41.000 I never claimed that Trump fired Comey to obstruct the Russia investigation.
00:36:45.000 In fact, I've been saying since the day Comey was fired that he did not do that.
00:36:48.000 I wrote an article that day saying that Comey was fired because he refused to clear Trump in the Russia investigation when Trump obviously wasn't under investigation.
00:36:56.000 But for Trump to claim that Comey's firing had nothing to do with the Russia case, which is what he claimed on Twitter, that is just not true.
00:37:02.000 That's just not, no.
00:37:03.000 With all of that said, there are serious questions to be asked about the Mueller investigation.
00:37:07.000 What's the scope of the investigation?
00:37:08.000 Why hasn't it been restricted to the issues at hand, i.e.
00:37:11.000 Trump-Russia collusion?
00:37:12.000 Why were members of the Obama holdover team leaking like sieves criminally after the election?
00:37:16.000 Why hasn't the DOJ turned over documentation to the House Intelligence Committee?
00:37:20.000 Why did the DOJ struggle so hard to avoid turning over information that really could have been declassified?
00:37:24.000 Why did James Comey keep contemporaneous notes about Trump but not Obama?
00:37:27.000 Why did he leak information to his friends outside the government?
00:37:30.000 I'm not saying that it's impossible that the FBI and DOJ combined to target Trump during the election cycle as quote-unquote insurance against Trump winning, although I'm still wondering how that insurance was supposed to work if they never revealed the information.
00:37:43.000 But I'm open to the argument.
00:37:44.000 I just need to see more information.
00:37:46.000 And I haven't seen the evidence quite yet.
00:37:47.000 So when the evidence presents itself, I am happy to change my mind on all of this.
00:37:52.000 Well, this has led to a real break sort of inside the conservative movement.
00:37:56.000 Rudy Giuliani has been ripping up and down Trey Gowdy over the last couple of days.
00:38:00.000 Here's Rudy Giuliani, the president's lawyer on these matters, talking to Chris Cuomo on CNN about it.
00:38:05.000 And they said there was no wrongdoing.
00:38:22.000 So don't tell me Gowdy and Nunes.
00:38:25.000 I've got like more experience than the two of them by 10.
00:38:29.000 Okay, so he's angry at both Gowdy and Nunes, right?
00:38:32.000 Not just Trey Gowdy.
00:38:33.000 He's also angry at Devin Nunes because Devin Nunes has suggested that Trey Gowdy may not be entirely wrong.
00:38:40.000 So if the idea here is that
00:38:42.000 That Rudy Giuliani has the most experience and therefore he knows what's buying.
00:38:44.000 Looks like Trey Gowdy was a prosecutor.
00:38:46.000 He was a federal prosecutor.
00:38:47.000 And Trey Gowdy does know what he is talking about.
00:38:49.000 There's a rumor, not a rumor, there was a report going around from Molly Hemingway over at the Federalist saying, well, Trey Gowdy hasn't seen the underlying documents, so how can he clear the FBI?
00:38:58.000 Trey Gowdy has seen precisely the same documents that Devin Nunes has, and he's come to some opposite conclusions, which suggests an honest difference of opinion.
00:39:05.000 Not that Trey Gowdy has been somehow picked up by the deep state and turned
00:39:09.000 Remember, just months ago, he was ripping on James Comey with the same alacrity as President Trump.
00:39:14.000 Okay.
00:39:14.000 Meanwhile, President Trump has been talking about pardoning himself again.
00:39:17.000 I want to talk about that.
00:39:19.000 So, President Trump, he came out the other day and he said, I have the power to pardon myself.
00:39:25.000 This is, at best, unclear.
00:39:26.000 So, the constitutional pardon power is laid forth in Article 2 of the Constitution of the United States.
00:39:36.000 There's Article 2, Section 2, Clause 1.
00:39:38.000 So the president shall have the power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.
00:39:43.000 In other words, the president can't pardon himself after he's impeached and convicted in the Senate.
00:39:47.000 So you can't pardon somebody who has been convicted in the Senate.
00:39:50.000 You can pardon somebody who was about to be impeached.
00:39:52.000 That's what happened to Richard Nixon with Gerald Ford.
00:39:55.000 According to the Heritage Foundation, the power to pardon is one of the least limited powers granted to the president in the Constitution.
00:40:00.000 The only limits mentioned in the Constitution are the pardons that are limited to offenses against the United States, and they cannot affect an impeachment process.
00:40:06.000 This is why I don't like the pardon power all that much.
00:40:22.000 Pardons have been used for broader public policy purposes of ensuring peace and tranquility in the case of uprisings, which is what happened after the Shays Rebellion and the Whiskey Rebellion, for example.
00:40:31.000 And the scope of the pardon power, according to Heritage, remains quite broad, almost plenary.
00:40:34.000 Justice Stephen Field wrote in 1867,
00:40:42.000 From attaching thereto.
00:40:44.000 It says, the possibility of a president pardoning himself for a crime is not precluded by the explicit language of the Constitution, but a broader reading of the Constitution and the general principles of the traditions of the United States might lead to the conclusion that a self-pardon is constitutionally impermissible.
00:40:57.000 It would seem to violate the principle that a man should not be a judge in his own case, that the rule of law is supreme, and the United States is a nation of laws, not men, and that the president is not above the law.
00:41:05.000 This is Courtney James Pfiffner, professor of public policy at George Mason University, writing for Heritage.
00:41:10.000 That's probably my reason.
00:41:11.000 The president doesn't have the constitutional power to pardon himself because it puts him above checks and balances that are inherent.
00:41:17.000 Now, you could make the counter-argument.
00:41:18.000 You could say the president can pardon himself, but he could still be impeached.
00:41:22.000 So, in reality, the checks and balances still exist.
00:41:24.000 I think it's a dicey case at best.
00:41:26.000 Alan Dershowitz, who's been very warm toward the Trump administration legally, he says he doesn't think that President Trump has the power to pardon himself.
00:41:32.000 Look, I disagree with a great deal of what has gone on today from the White House.
00:41:36.000 I don't think that a president necessarily has the power to pardon himself.
00:41:39.000 I wrote a column today in The Hill, I wrote one a year ago, in which I said nobody knows the answer to that question.
00:41:46.000 It's clearly on a blank slate.
00:41:48.000 Nobody should be saying either that a president clearly has the power to pardon himself or a president doesn't have the power.
00:41:54.000 We just don't know the answer to that question.
00:41:56.000 We will probably never find it out.
00:41:59.000 And that's exactly right.
00:42:00.000 This is the real question, is why Trump is even talking about this in the first place.
00:42:03.000 He doesn't need to pardon himself.
00:42:05.000 It's stupid to talk about pardoning yourself if you're not going to do it, particularly because it just makes you look suspicious.
00:42:10.000 Now, I know that President Trump likes to mouth off on Twitter.
00:42:12.000 That's his thing.
00:42:14.000 But I'm not sure why this is useful to him.
00:42:16.000 Chuck Grassley, who, again, has supported President Trump pretty heavily in the Senate, he says maybe Trump needs a new lawyer if he's being told this stuff.
00:42:23.000 If I were President of the United States, and I had a lawyer that told me I could pardon myself, I think I'd hire a new lawyer.
00:42:31.000 And this is part of the problem for President Trump, is that he's so inconsistent in his public face on this stuff.
00:42:36.000 If he just presented a public face, which is, I'm innocent, do your worst, there's really not a problem here, see what you're gonna see.
00:42:42.000 And then he said, but I gotta say, the scope of this investigation is beyond any sort of limitation at this point.
00:42:48.000 And we need investigations into leaking.
00:42:51.000 I'd be with him 100% of the way here, but it's all the confused language coming out from the White House that is really not useful.
00:42:56.000 So, for example, the White House has given a bunch of different stories, all of them conflicting, about who drafted the statement in the aftermath of the Trump Jr.
00:43:04.000 Trump Tower story.
00:43:05.000 There's a statement that was put out by Trump Jr.
00:43:08.000 At the time, talking about how the meeting really was about Russian adoptions.
00:43:12.000 And there was originally a denial from the White House that President Trump had anything to do with that statement.
00:43:17.000 Then it was admitted that President Trump in fact essentially drafted the statement.
00:43:20.000 Here's Rudy Giuliani being asked about it on CNN.
00:43:23.000 You think Jay Sekulow lied?
00:43:25.000 Maybe he just got it wrong like I've gotten.
00:43:28.000 I got a few things wrong at the beginning of the investigation.
00:43:32.000 Meaning my knowledge.
00:43:33.000 This is a complex investigation.
00:43:35.000 First week or so I got a few things wrong.
00:43:38.000 And then it was clarified in a letter.
00:43:40.000 And that's the final position.
00:43:41.000 You can make a mistake.
00:43:43.000 And then if you don't, if you don't, if you want to, you can say it's a lie.
00:43:47.000 But it was a mistake.
00:43:49.000 I swear to God, it was a mistake.
00:44:05.000 I don't think any of this ends up being anything.
00:44:06.000 I don't think Trump is indicted.
00:44:07.000 I don't think anybody whose key around him is indicted other than the people we've already heard.
00:44:11.000 I haven't seen the evidence of any of that stuff.
00:44:13.000 The point I'm making here is that the president ought to be focusing on bigger things and the distractions of the Mueller investigation are not particularly helpful to his administration.
00:44:21.000 He should be avoiding them himself and blowing them up bigger than they are.
00:44:24.000 Okay, time for some things I like and then some things I hate.
00:44:26.000 So, thing I like.
00:44:27.000 So, Bill Bryson is a very popular writer.
00:44:29.000 I picked up one of his books.
00:44:30.000 I've never read any of his stuff.
00:44:31.000 He wrote a series of columns called I'm a Stranger, Hear Myself, all about how he had been in Britain for 20 years and then he came back and lived in New Hampshire.
00:44:38.000 And it's a very charming, funny book all about sort of experiencing life in America anew.
00:44:43.000 Bryson leans to the left on a bunch of issues, but that really shouldn't inhibit your enjoyment of the book at all.
00:44:49.000 America's an amazing place.
00:44:50.000 It's an amazing place.
00:44:52.000 A lot of people who are in America and don't appreciate how great America is have spent very little time in other countries.
00:44:57.000 They're talking about countries in which they've spent not a lot of time.
00:44:59.000 There's a reason everybody is clamoring to get into the United States.
00:45:02.000 It's because America is the dream.
00:45:04.000 New Hampshire, where Bill Bryson lives, that is the dream.
00:45:07.000 And he basically acknowledges as much, even though he tends toward the left side of the aisle on a lot of key issues.
00:45:12.000 So check that out.
00:45:12.000 I'm a Stranger Here by Bill Bryson.
00:45:14.000 Really worth the read and a lot of fun to read.
00:45:16.000 Okay, time for some quick things that I hate.
00:45:22.000 As we discussed yesterday, Bill Clinton has been making the rounds, and the fact that Bill Clinton is still considered a respected voice in left-wing circles is just insane.
00:45:29.000 So you remember during the last campaign, Kirsten Gillibrand, who's the senator from New York, originally she said that she thinks that President Clinton should have resigned after the Lewinsky scandal and after he was caught in a perjury trap.
00:45:39.000 Well, Clinton has now responded to Kirsten Gillibrand, and he says, well, you know, not really.
00:45:44.000 I shouldn't resign.
00:45:45.000 She's living in a different context.
00:45:47.000 Well, I just disagree with her.
00:45:48.000 I mean, I think, you know, just you have to really ignore what the context was.
00:45:57.000 But, you know, she's living in a different context and she did it for different reasons.
00:46:05.000 But I just disagree with her.
00:46:07.000 He's so gross.
00:46:07.000 What is the different context?
00:46:09.000 It's exactly the same context.
00:46:11.000 It is bad to sexually harass the help.
00:46:13.000 It's bad to use your leverage as President of the United States to shtoop 19-year-old girls working for you.
00:46:18.000 It's a bad idea.
00:46:19.000 It makes you a bad person.
00:46:20.000 When you're married, particularly, it makes you a bad person.
00:46:23.000 So, no.
00:46:24.000 Bill Clinton still doing this routine.
00:46:26.000 The hilarious part about this is the media's sudden awareness, their sudden awakening to the fact that Bill Clinton is despicable.
00:46:32.000 Here's Mika Brzezinski on MSNBC talking about Bill Clinton.
00:46:35.000 It has been for decades an unbelievable double standard that the Clintons have used and abused, where nobody is allowed to go there on this issue.
00:46:45.000 And in the age of Me Too, women are supposed to go there.
00:46:49.000 And men, by the way.
00:46:50.000 We're supposed to be able to say what the difference is between right and wrong.
00:46:53.000 And when you have done something wrong, you are supposed to own it and not talk about facts, distorted facts and obstructed facts.
00:47:02.000 My God, he sounded like Trump.
00:47:05.000 I love that this just hit them.
00:47:06.000 I love that this just hit them.
00:47:07.000 Like, it just hit Mika and Joe, who pumped Trump during the primaries.
00:47:10.000 It just hit them that Trump is kind of like Clinton.
00:47:14.000 Right!
00:47:14.000 Yeah, we knew that, guys.
00:47:16.000 We're pretty much aware of that, like the whole campaign.
00:47:18.000 We're pretty much aware that Trump and Clinton used to be buddy-buddy.
00:47:21.000 And we've been on top of this thing for, I don't know, 20 years?
00:47:24.000 And now you're claiming that, oh my God, I'm just so shocked by Bill Clinton.
00:47:27.000 My goodness.
00:47:27.000 My goodness.
00:47:28.000 It's like Claude Rains in Casablanca.
00:47:29.000 I'm shocked, shocked to find there's gambling going on here.
00:47:32.000 Hero winning, sir.
00:47:32.000 Thank you very much.
00:47:33.000 Right?
00:47:33.000 I mean, it's that feel.
00:47:35.000 It's just absurd.
00:47:36.000 But, you know, this is why the left can't get a grip on anything.
00:47:39.000 Suddenly their eyes have been awakened.
00:47:40.000 They've been opened by Trump.
00:47:41.000 Until, of course, the next Democrat is up for election, and it turns out that Democrat was stepping in turns and lying about it.
00:47:46.000 Then we'll just go right back to, why are Republicans so snooty?
00:47:49.000 Why can't Republicans just accept that we have new social standards in the United States?
00:47:53.000 That's the way the left operates, unfortunately, and Democrats have operated.
00:47:56.000 I hate this kind of partisanship.
00:47:57.000 Okay.
00:47:57.000 Time for a quick Federalist paper.
00:47:58.000 We didn't do one yesterday.
00:47:59.000 So Federalist 31, Alexander Hamilton writing.
00:48:02.000 He's still defending general taxation by the federal government and talking about the argument that we should not be just trying to go to the states and asking them for money.
00:48:09.000 That instead the states should actually, we can go over the head of the state governments and we can tax citizens directly.
00:48:14.000 So he says, as theory and practice conspire to prove that the power of procuring revenue is unavailable when exercised over the states in their collective capacities, the federal government must of necessity be invested with an unqualified power of taxation in the ordinary modes.
00:48:27.000 What he's saying here is that under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government gained money simply by going to the states and asking for levies.
00:48:34.000 And the states basically said, go screw yourself.
00:48:36.000 And then they didn't have any money.
00:48:37.000 So he said, well, if the states are going to be a burden here, then we just have to go around the states.
00:48:41.000 Otherwise, we can't have a functional federal government.
00:48:43.000 And then he says, in the end, this is an important line, he says, we have to rely on the people in the end to maintain the balance between the states and the federal government.
00:48:49.000 He says, the moment we launch into conjectures about the usurpations of the federal government,
00:48:53.000 We get into an unfathomable abyss and fairly put ourselves out of the reach of all reasoning.
00:48:57.000 So what he's saying here is everybody is complaining that the federal government might usurp all tax money and leave the states bereft, but if we imagine worst-case scenario, we're never gonna be able to do anything here.
00:49:07.000 His imagination may range at pleasure till it gets bewildered amidst the labyrinths of an enchanted castle and knows not on which side to turn to extricate itself from the perplexities into which it has so rashly adventured.
00:49:17.000 Whatever may be the limits or modifications of the powers of the Union, it is easy to imagine an endless train of possible dangers, and by indulging in excess of jealousy and timidity, we may bring ourselves to a state of absolute skepticism and irresolution.
00:49:28.000 He says, listen, we have to make a call here, and we're going to have to determine exactly how the checks and balances work.
00:49:32.000 Now...
00:49:33.000 The truth is that the federal taxation power was just fine up until the 16th Amendment to the Constitution, which allowed the income tax.
00:49:41.000 Up until then, the federal government was not an overweening institution that was dedicated to sucking as much money as possible out of your pockets.
00:49:48.000 It was really at the beginning of the 20th century that all of that changed.
00:49:51.000 So Hamilton's critique of the Anti-Federalists was right.
00:49:54.000 The anti-federalist critique of Hamilton ended up being right in the long run because the reality is the federal government did usurp an enormous amount of revenue and they continue to do so on a daily basis all across the country.
00:50:04.000 Okay, so we'll be back here tomorrow with all of the latest.
00:50:06.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:50:07.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:50:11.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Senya Villareal, executive producer Jeremy Boring, senior producer Jonathan Hay.
00:50:17.000 Our supervising producer is Mathis Glover, and our technical producer is Austin Stevens.
00:50:22.000 Edited by Alex Zingaro.
00:50:23.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Carmina.
00:50:25.000 Hair and makeup is by Jesua Alvera.
00:50:27.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire Ford Publishing production.
00:50:29.000 Copyright Ford Publishing 2018.