The Ben Shapiro Show - November 17, 2020


The Attack on Masculinity | Ep. 1139


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 7 minutes

Words per Minute

222.07463

Word Count

14,879

Sentence Count

1,075

Misogynist Sentences

34

Hate Speech Sentences

23


Summary

Ben Shapiro is back with all the news you need to know about the mid-term elections, including a big win for Rep. Burgess Owens in the Utah 4th congressional primary, a huge win for the Republican challenger to Rep. Ben McAdams in the primary, and a huge loss for Democrats in the Georgia primary. Plus, a special offer on Ring Doorbells, and much, much more. The Ben Shapiro Show is sponsored by Express VPN. Protect your online privacy today at ExpressVPN.org/ProtectYourOnline Privacy. To find a list of our sponsors and show-related promo codes, go to gimlet.fm/OurAdvertisers and use the promo code: PODCAST at checkout to receive 10% off your first month with discount code PODCODE10 at checkout. Our sponsor is ExpressVPN, and we are working on a new feature called Protect Your Online Privacy: Protect Your Privacy, Protect Your Data. It s a tool that helps protect your online data and keep your data secure, secure, and secure. We are working with ExpressVPN to make it easier for you to do your online banking, banking, and financial transactions. Thanks to ExpressVPN for making it easier to be secure, faster, cheaper, and more secure! Protect your data and your privacy online. Thank you for listening and sharing it with the world. Ben Shapiro's Family, and Happy New Year, and God bless you, God bless! - Blessings, Blessings and Happy Holidays. - Yours Truly - The Best, Ben Shapiro, Jake, Sarah, Kristy, Amy, and Joe Biden, and Kristy and Sarah, and Chelsie, and the Crew at The Daily Wire Sarah, Caity, and David, and so much more! and much more... and so on and so Much More! . -- THE RUSSIA! -- is a special thanks to: -- The Root's Picks -- Thank you, Sarah's Besties -- And so much -- and more! -- and , & much more, Thank You, and Thank You for listening to this episode of The Weekly Scoop, and Good Morning Joe, and all the rest of the World's Best Podcasts and Good Luck, and Much More. -- Thanks for listening, etc., and Good Night, Thank You!


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Candace Owens and I trended on Twitter for pointing out that Harry Styles wearing a dress isn't acting all that masculine.
00:00:05.000 Georgia finds 2,600 more votes, most of them for President Trump, and Democrats put more lockdowns on the table.
00:00:11.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:11.000 This is the Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:13.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is sponsored by ExpressVPN.
00:00:21.000 Protect your online privacy today at expressvpn.com slash Ben.
00:00:25.000 Okay, we'll get to everything newsy in one moment.
00:00:27.000 But first, there are a thousand reasons why protecting your home matters to you.
00:00:30.000 For me, I want to keep an eye on my kids.
00:00:32.000 I have three under seven.
00:00:33.000 And that means it's hard for me to keep an eye on all of them at once.
00:00:36.000 This is why I love my Ring devices.
00:00:37.000 I also want to know who is at my front door at all times.
00:00:39.000 When somebody rings the doorbell, I can pick up from anywhere and tell who exactly is outside my house.
00:00:44.000 Ring has security products for every corner of your home, inside and out.
00:00:46.000 Best of all, you can see it all in one simple app with Ring.
00:00:49.000 You can keep an eye on your home no matter where you are, right from your phone.
00:00:52.000 If somebody stops by or something is going on, Ring will let you know.
00:00:54.000 It's peace of mind anytime knowing your home is protected.
00:00:58.000 Whatever you call home, Ring has everything you need to protect it.
00:01:00.000 There's a reason why.
00:01:02.000 When my wife and I moved homes, the first thing she did was request that we get our Ring devices put in place.
00:01:06.000 We got a special offer on the Ring Welcome Kit today at Ring.com slash Ben.
00:01:10.000 That is Ring.com slash Ben.
00:01:12.000 It comes with that Ring Video Doorbell 3 and the Chime Pro.
00:01:14.000 It's the perfect way to start your Ring experience.
00:01:16.000 Go to Ring.com slash Ben.
00:01:18.000 Again, that is Ring.com slash Ben.
00:01:20.000 Go check them out right now.
00:01:21.000 And you get the special deal on the Ring Welcome Kit, that Ring Video Doorbell 3 and the Chime Pro.
00:01:25.000 It is the perfect way to start that Ring experience.
00:01:27.000 Ring.com slash Ben.
00:01:29.000 We begin at this hour with a piece of good electoral news.
00:01:32.000 Our friend Burgess Owens, NFL veteran and Republican, has defeated Representative Ben McAdams, who is the only Democrat in Utah's congressional delegation.
00:01:40.000 He conceded his race to Burgess Owens on Monday.
00:01:42.000 That makes Owens the 12th GOP challenger to unseat his incumbent Democratic opponent during the 2020 election, as the Republican Party continues to cut into the Democrats' House majority.
00:01:50.000 This is Tim Pearce at Daily Wire reporting.
00:01:53.000 Owens announced that McAdams had conceded the race in a tweet on Monday evening.
00:01:56.000 He said, That is a big pickup.
00:01:57.000 call from McAdams, he expressed appreciation for the opportunity to serve the Utah 4th District and his commitment to a smooth transition.
00:02:03.000 My sincere thanks to him for both.
00:02:04.000 Thanks to my fellow Utahns, I am committed to have an open ear to serve you.
00:02:08.000 Thank you for the opportunity.
00:02:09.000 That is a big pickup.
00:02:11.000 That was supposed to be a race that was fairly easily won by McAdams and in the late polling, Burgess was down and he ended up winning the race, demonstrating once more that the Republican Party wildly outperformed expectations in this particular election.
00:02:25.000 Nancy Pelosi wildly underperformed.
00:02:26.000 The Democratic Party has a real problem on its hands, regardless of what happens in the presidential race, which again, there's still legal cases outstanding.
00:02:33.000 Whatever happens there, Democrats have a real problem.
00:02:35.000 They have a real problem so long as Republicans actually go out and vote in Georgia.
00:02:40.000 So I'm going to remind you right now, if you are a Republican, you need to give money to David Perdue in Georgia and to Kelly Loeffler in Georgia, because the last thing that you want is the specter of a 50-50 Senate.
00:02:49.000 With presumably Kamala Harris presiding as Joe Biden's vice president and breaking ties.
00:02:53.000 That is the last thing you could possibly want.
00:02:55.000 Checking the ambitions of the Democratic Party is a must at this point.
00:02:58.000 So, you need to, like, there's no time to rest on your laurels.
00:03:02.000 There is no time to fulminate about stuff that has already happened.
00:03:05.000 Instead, you need to focus on what's coming up January 5th.
00:03:07.000 There is a double election in Georgia.
00:03:10.000 David Perdue, Kelly Loeffler, they deserve your support.
00:03:12.000 They deserve your money.
00:03:13.000 They deserve your time.
00:03:15.000 The Democrats must be defeated in those Senate races.
00:03:18.000 Okay, meanwhile, speaking of Georgia, yesterday, 2,600 votes were discovered in Floyd County.
00:03:23.000 They had not originally been tallied, and they did reduce the deficit that Trump has to Joe Biden in the state.
00:03:29.000 According to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Trump could gain nearly 800 net votes from the discovered ballots.
00:03:34.000 There were 1,643 new votes for Trump and 865 for Biden.
00:03:38.000 According to the Atlantic Journal-Constitution, the problem occurred because county election officials did not upload votes from a memory card in a ballot scanning machine.
00:03:46.000 As according to Gabriel Sterling, the state's voting system manager, he called it an amazing blunder.
00:03:50.000 He said the county's election director should resign.
00:03:53.000 He said it's not an equipment issue.
00:03:54.000 It's a person not executing their job properly.
00:03:57.000 This is the kind of situation that requires a change at the top of their management side.
00:04:00.000 Over half of the 5,000 printed out ballots cast on an optical scanner were not initially recorded.
00:04:04.000 Martin said, it's very concerning.
00:04:05.000 This doesn't appear to be a widespread issue.
00:04:06.000 I'm glad the audit revealed it.
00:04:07.000 Martin, chairman of the Floyd County Republican Party.
00:04:10.000 Over half of the 5,000 printed out ballots cast on an optical scanner were not initially recorded.
00:04:15.000 Martin said, it's very concerning.
00:04:16.000 This doesn't appear to be a widespread issue.
00:04:17.000 I'm glad the audit revealed it.
00:04:19.000 It's important that all votes are counted.
00:04:21.000 The ballots will be re-scanned and tabulated before the results are finalized on Friday, director Chris Harvey. He said you want every vote counted right the first time.
00:04:27.000 That is one of the goals of the audit to identify problems.
00:04:30.000 All the votes will be uploaded. The results will be what they are. So the the state is insisting that the audit is exactly what found it anyway. That it wasn't Trump putting pressure that found these additional votes. Eric Erickson tweeted out about this.
00:04:45.000 He said this was a scanner malfunction.
00:04:46.000 It wasn't a machine error per se, a human error in scanning ballots, but most counties still align identically with the machine count at this point.
00:04:53.000 He has an entire thread about Dominion voting systems in Georgia, and he says that he talked with the Georgia Secretary of State about signature issue.
00:05:02.000 He says that Georgia verified signatures for absentee ballot applications, not just the ballots themselves.
00:05:07.000 The applications were matched with both the voter's driver's license and their voter registration card.
00:05:11.000 So Georgia's actually been attempting to verify that people requested the ballots legally.
00:05:15.000 It's not just that they filled out the ballots legally, but that they requested the ballots legally.
00:05:19.000 Apparently, Lindsey Graham asked specifically about this.
00:05:21.000 This pissed off the Georgia Secretary of State, who then suggested openly that Lindsey Graham wanted to exclude legal ballots.
00:05:27.000 It turns out that that's not true.
00:05:28.000 But according to the guy's name is Raffensperger, this was reported by Mediaite.
00:05:33.000 In their conversation, Graham questioned Raffensperger about the state's signature matching law and whether political bias could have prompted poll workers to accept ballots with non-matching signatures, according to Raffensperger.
00:05:42.000 Graham also asked whether Raffensperger had the power to toss all mail ballots in counties found to have higher rates of non-matching signatures, according to Raffensperger.
00:05:49.000 Raffensperger said he was stunned that Graham appeared to suggest that he find a way to toss legally cast ballots.
00:05:54.000 That is not what Graham says.
00:05:54.000 Graham says, no, no, no, I was just asking if there is a way to toss ballots that are not legally requested or in which there is no way to verify the matching signature in any case.
00:06:04.000 The process is working, as the process should work.
00:06:07.000 Eric Erickson points out that all claims of dead people voting in Georgia have thus far been debunked.
00:06:11.000 He says no dead person has actually voted in Georgia.
00:06:13.000 He says contrary to claims about Dominion voting systems, the hand counts in Georgia align perfectly with the machine counts.
00:06:18.000 There could not have been hacked machines in Georgia altering votes for Joe Biden.
00:06:21.000 That's according to Eric Erickson, who does a show down there on WSB, obviously.
00:06:26.000 The Biden camp, meanwhile, is demonstrating full scale what the real corruption in this election was.
00:06:32.000 And it has very little to do with the voting systems.
00:06:34.000 Again, we have legal cases that are proceeding.
00:06:36.000 We have allegations.
00:06:37.000 Sidney Powell, the lawyer for President Trump, she has suggested that she is about to release the Kraken, which, of course, is a very colorful phrase.
00:06:43.000 And here's my view of this.
00:06:44.000 Go ahead and release it.
00:06:45.000 Seriously, like, we're all waiting.
00:06:47.000 Like, Republican, Democrat, everybody's waiting.
00:06:48.000 The Democrats are waiting because they want to say that you're lying.
00:06:51.000 And Republicans are waiting because the evidence would actually be really great at this point.
00:06:54.000 You can make big allegations like that.
00:06:56.000 Then it's time to actually release all the evidence that you've got.
00:06:58.000 Not do interviews about it.
00:06:59.000 Release it.
00:06:59.000 I mean, it's not like we have a huge timeline here.
00:07:02.000 I mean, we're gonna get states certifying their election results as early as the end of this week or early next week.
00:07:07.000 So, like, now would be the time to release the Kraken if you are going to do this.
00:07:10.000 But the real corruption in the election is perfectly obvious.
00:07:13.000 As I've said from the beginning, the real corruption in this election is the media.
00:07:16.000 The media simply refused to cover anything they did not want to cover.
00:07:21.000 They just didn't cover it.
00:07:22.000 According to Sam Stein, Reporting about the Daily Beast.
00:07:26.000 The Daily Beast had a piece all about Joe Biden online.
00:07:29.000 Sam Stein, who reports for the Daily Beast now, he says, According to Biden campaign metrics, online chatter about the Hunter Biden story during the elections last week was greater than it was around Hillary's emails during the last month of 2016.
00:07:39.000 The difference?
00:07:41.000 It never spilled over into mainstream outlets.
00:07:44.000 Oh, you think?
00:07:45.000 Oh, you think?
00:07:46.000 So the fact is that you are now bragging.
00:07:48.000 The Biden campaign is now bragging that they were able to suppress information That was bad for Joe Biden.
00:07:54.000 That mainstream media decided to do the dirty work of the Biden campaign by not allowing well-reported and factual stories to emerge into the public view because mainstream media never jumped on it.
00:08:04.000 Mainstream media just decided it was more important to defeat Trump than to report truly reported stories.
00:08:08.000 I mean, we all knew this was the case.
00:08:12.000 The fact is that the Biden campaign and the media are one and the same.
00:08:15.000 You can see it.
00:08:16.000 Joe Biden is now doing these press conferences, and every question in the press conference is, how wonderful are you, Joe Biden?
00:08:20.000 We are back to the Obama era.
00:08:22.000 In the Obama era, the press walked around holding drool cups for Barack Obama.
00:08:25.000 Now we are back there, and they're walking around holding drool cups for Joe Biden, in which both of them are drooling Biden because he's falling apart, and the media because they're drooling over Joe Biden, and then trying, straining, to get themselves enthusiastic about Kamala Harris, which is good luck with that, gang.
00:08:39.000 According to the Daily Beast, fearing a redux of the disastrous end-of-campaign implosion of Hillary Clinton, the team dove further into the research.
00:08:45.000 What they found was more assuring.
00:08:47.000 While the Hunter Biden story had taken off on Facebook, YouTube, and various right-wing sites, it had not crossed over into mainstream outlets.
00:08:52.000 The campaign's internal polling, meanwhile, showed that voters largely weren't persuaded by it.
00:08:56.000 The wildfire ended up being mostly smoke, but even so, it provided the Biden campaign with yet another reminder about the perils that social media platforms present to Democrats as they traverse the modern political landscape.
00:09:06.000 Let it be known.
00:09:07.000 This is why Democrats are attempting to quash the social media companies.
00:09:12.000 Democrats would love nothing better than for social media companies to act as their suppressive wing, stopping stories from trending, preventing people from disseminating information they do not like.
00:09:23.000 That is the future of battle.
00:09:24.000 That is the informational battle that we are going to be about to wage in this country.
00:09:27.000 The platforms are now being perverted by Democrats.
00:09:29.000 They're being threatened by Democrats that if they do not suppress information Democrats don't like, then Democrats themselves will go in and break up these major corporations or regulate those corporations.
00:09:37.000 And these corporations, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, they are responding predictably by catering to the left and hoping for the goodwill of the right.
00:09:44.000 They're responding by suppressing exactly the information the left wants and hoping that the right's focus in on free markets and free speech will prevent the right from siding with the left in regulating these companies.
00:09:54.000 They can only count on the kindness of people who you are batting, who you are clubbing about the ears for so long.
00:09:59.000 And there will be a breaking point here with the right.
00:10:02.000 There's going to come a point where the right says to these social media companies, Listen, like Batman, at the end of Batman Begins, we're not gonna kill you, but we don't have to save you.
00:10:12.000 And that is the direction in which all of this is moving.
00:10:14.000 Okay, in just a minute.
00:10:15.000 We are getting to the healing of the Democratic Party, and we have been told that this is a healing time.
00:10:19.000 Lots of healing going on.
00:10:20.000 Cultural healing.
00:10:21.000 We'll get to that healing in just one second.
00:10:23.000 It does not appear that a lot of healing is going on.
00:10:25.000 First, let us talk about your sleep quality.
00:10:27.000 So, I will admit, my baby woke me up at 5.30 this morning.
00:10:29.000 It was not fantastic, but between the time I went to bed and the time that my child awoke me, I did sleep well.
00:10:34.000 Why?
00:10:35.000 Because I was on a Helix Sleep mattress.
00:10:37.000 Helix Sleep.
00:10:38.000 They make a mattress just for you.
00:10:39.000 It is personalized to you.
00:10:40.000 They have a quiz.
00:10:41.000 It takes just two minutes to complete, and they match your body type and sleep preferences to the perfect mattress for you.
00:10:45.000 Whether you're a side sleeper or a hot sleeper, whether you like a plush or a firm bed, with Helix, there's no more confusion and no more compromising.
00:10:51.000 It's rated the number one mattress by GQ and Wired Magazine.
00:10:51.000 Helix Sleep.
00:10:54.000 CNN has called it the most comfortable mattress they've ever slept on.
00:10:57.000 Just head on over to HelixSleep.com slash Ben.
00:10:59.000 Take their two-minute sleep quiz.
00:11:00.000 They will match you to a customized mattress that'll give you the best sleep of your life.
00:11:04.000 They've got a 10-year warranty.
00:11:05.000 You get to try it out for 100 nights risk-free.
00:11:07.000 They'll even pick it up for you if you don't love it, but you absolutely will.
00:11:10.000 Helix is offering up to 200 bucks off all mattress orders for our listeners.
00:11:13.000 Get up to 200 bucks off at HelixSleep.com slash Ben.
00:11:16.000 Again, that is HelixSleep.com slash Ben.
00:11:18.000 Go check them out right now.
00:11:19.000 You need a high-quality mattress so your sleep quality is better.
00:11:22.000 Why not have it personalized to you just like everything else in your life?
00:11:25.000 We live in a time of personalization.
00:11:26.000 Personalize the mattress that you are sleeping on eight hours a night.
00:11:29.000 Go check them out right now.
00:11:30.000 HelixSleep.com slash Ben and get up to 200 bucks off when you use that code HelixSleep.com slash Ben.
00:11:36.000 One final note.
00:11:38.000 When it comes to voting in Georgia and media bias.
00:11:40.000 So the media have been trotting out this narrative ever since the election that Stacey Abrams won the state of Georgia for Joe Biden.
00:11:47.000 Nope.
00:11:48.000 Nope.
00:11:49.000 They just keep trying to make Fetch happen.
00:11:51.000 And Fetch is not happening, guys.
00:11:52.000 You can keep saying this over and over and over, but Fetch is not a thing.
00:11:57.000 According to Nate Cohn at the New York Times, Georgia is the first state where they now have a fully updated vote history.
00:12:02.000 It shows the black share of the electorate falling to its lowest levels since 2006.
00:12:07.000 So the black share of the electorate, black share of all voters, actually dropped precipitously from 2018 to 2020.
00:12:14.000 The black share of the electorate in Georgia, it was about 29%.
00:12:18.000 It dropped all the way down to 27% this time around.
00:12:22.000 Okay, but we keep hearing that it was Stacey Abrams registering black voters all over the state that drove Joe Biden to victory.
00:12:27.000 No, it was not.
00:12:28.000 It was the suburbs.
00:12:29.000 It was white suburban women did not vote for Donald Trump.
00:12:31.000 And so Georgia went the wrong way for Donald Trump in the current vote count.
00:12:35.000 Okay, but it's amusing to watch the media continue to prop up Stacey Abrams as a thing.
00:12:39.000 She's not a thing.
00:12:40.000 She never was a thing.
00:12:41.000 She lost her gubernatorial race by 50,000 votes in that state.
00:12:45.000 And then she went around claiming she was governor of Georgia.
00:12:47.000 The DNC touted her as the elected governor of Georgia after losing by 50,000 votes.
00:12:52.000 And then if you say to the media, by the way, you know, you guys keep feeding Stacey Abrams, like F-E-T-I-N-G, you keep feeding Stacey Abrams, you keep praising her, even though she continues to maintain that she was ripped off and deprived of her gubernatorial seat in Georgia.
00:13:06.000 At the same time that she's going on TV claiming that Donald Trump is a whiner?
00:13:10.000 This is you guys.
00:13:10.000 You guys keep doing this?
00:13:11.000 Like, no, no, no.
00:13:12.000 You're not allowed to talk about that.
00:13:13.000 So just a data point there.
00:13:15.000 Stacey Abrams was not, in fact, the person who drove Georgia out of the Republican lane in the presidential race.
00:13:21.000 So please stop trying to make Stacey Abrams happen.
00:13:23.000 It's not a thing.
00:13:24.000 Meanwhile, the Democrats have proclaimed it's a new era of healing and unity, right?
00:13:27.000 This is Joe Biden's line.
00:13:28.000 Joe Biden, after he gave his quasi-victory address, obviously precipitously, because not a single state has yet been declared, Joe Biden came out and he said that he's all for unity.
00:13:37.000 It's time for America to come together and it's time to heal.
00:13:40.000 So I have a question.
00:13:41.000 At what point is he going to say to his own party, guys, you need to stop being jackasses?
00:13:45.000 Hey, seriously, that'd be good.
00:13:46.000 We talked about this yesterday.
00:13:47.000 We had rioting and we had people beating each other up.
00:13:50.000 BLM, Antifa in Washington, D.C.
00:13:53.000 during this Trump rally over the weekend.
00:13:55.000 And members of Joe Biden's own party are going around basically suggesting that everybody who disagrees with them is a member of the KKK.
00:14:02.000 So at some point, is Joe Biden going to calm the waters on his own side?
00:14:05.000 See, there used to be a thing called a sister soldier moment.
00:14:08.000 Back during the 1992 campaign, there was a little-known rapper named Sister Soldier.
00:14:12.000 And she made some rather racially charged comments.
00:14:15.000 And Bill Clinton kind of picked her out of a hat because he wanted to make this move.
00:14:19.000 And he proceeded to make her famous by saying that this sort of rhetoric is not acceptable and not okay.
00:14:24.000 That was his move to the moderate lane.
00:14:26.000 Bill Clinton's.
00:14:27.000 Okay, well, when does Joe Biden actually move to the moderate lane by chiding people on his own side for castigating everybody who disagrees with them as a Klan member?
00:14:33.000 So Ilhan Omar, truly a terrible human being.
00:14:37.000 Ilhan Omar is a rabid anti-Semite.
00:14:40.000 There are credible allegations that she has repeatedly funneled a bevy of money to her boyfriend, or at least her boyfriend's firm.
00:14:48.000 In violation of campaign finance law.
00:14:50.000 We'll check out those allegations, but those allegations have been floating around for quite a while and seem to be mounting.
00:14:54.000 In any case, Ilhan Omar, the person who poses on the cover of magazines with Nancy Pelosi before declaring that for the Jews, it's all about the Benjamins.
00:15:01.000 She says that Donald Trump rallies are like Klan rallies.
00:15:04.000 I can feel all the peace and healing, can't you?
00:15:05.000 So much peace and healing happening.
00:15:07.000 To speak about me at every single rally didn't really matter where he was.
00:15:14.000 Sometimes multiple times in a day.
00:15:17.000 Um, as he held his Klan rallies throughout the country.
00:15:22.000 Oh, they're Klan rallies now?
00:15:23.000 You see, when tens of thousands of people show up for rallies for Donald Trump, those are Klan rallies.
00:15:28.000 Which is strange, because there are a lot of people of color at those particular supposed Klan rallies, which don't actually seem a lot like Klan rallies.
00:15:34.000 Okay, but it's not just Ilhan Omar.
00:15:36.000 The media obviously believe this deeply as well.
00:15:39.000 Brian Williams suggests that Trump voters are tyranny curious.
00:15:42.000 Brian Williams on MSNBC.
00:15:44.000 It's Trump voters who are interested in tyranny, which is weird because I keep hearing from the Democratic Party that they want to run nearly every aspect of my life, but it's Trump voters who are tyranny curious.
00:15:52.000 Here's Brian Williams, fake journalist.
00:15:55.000 As you look at home from there, and when you come home on your next visit, do you view it as a changed country because millions of people decided, maybe over time, like the frog boiling experiment, to become at least tyranny curious?
00:16:16.000 So now we know from Ilhan Omar that they are Klan members.
00:16:19.000 We know from Brian Williams that Trump voters are tyranny curious.
00:16:22.000 And we also know from Whoopi Goldberg that Republicans literally don't care if you die.
00:16:25.000 They don't care at all.
00:16:26.000 They want you to die.
00:16:27.000 Now, this has been a line Democrats have been using ever since Paul Ryan.
00:16:30.000 They literally cut an ad, I believe it was back in 2010, in which Paul Ryan was like throwing an old lady off a cliff or something.
00:16:37.000 In any case, here's Whoopi Goldberg suggesting that Republicans don't care if you die.
00:16:40.000 I can feel the healing.
00:16:41.000 Can you feel the healing power of love happening right now?
00:16:44.000 I feel it.
00:16:45.000 It's all warm and cuddly, and here's Whoopi Goldberg saying that the Republicans just want people to die.
00:16:50.000 That's what all of this is.
00:16:52.000 And when you go in to vote in Georgia, remember, this is the party that doesn't care if you drop dead because you can't breathe.
00:16:59.000 Clearly, they know what has to happen, and they're not doing it.
00:17:03.000 Weird, because I'm reliably informed that half of the Democratic legislature of California just traveled over to Maui for a conference, then traveled back and didn't quarantine.
00:17:12.000 So yeah, by the way, a lot of people died in New York and New Jersey, but it's the Republicans.
00:17:18.000 It's always the Republicans.
00:17:19.000 OK, in just a second, we're going to get to the gaslighting of the American people, because at root, so much of what's going on is the gaslighting of the American people.
00:17:25.000 It's an attempt to get you to shut up.
00:17:27.000 There is a process that is used to get you to shut up, particularly if you are culturally conservative, that we need to talk about.
00:17:33.000 OK, we'll get to that in just one second.
00:17:35.000 First, Let's talk about the fact that, right now, guns are flying off the shelves.
00:17:38.000 They have been flying off the shelves for a while.
00:17:40.000 I wonder why.
00:17:41.000 Might it be the fostering of chaos in America's major cities?
00:17:44.000 Might it be the fact that the media and the Democratic Party are fully willing to overlook violence so long as it is violence that aligns with their political worldview?
00:17:52.000 Well, whatever your reason, you might be looking for a gun.
00:17:55.000 And when the Framers wrote the Constitution, the first thing they did was to make sacred your right to keep and bear arms.
00:18:00.000 This is the thing that they were focused on at heart.
00:18:03.000 They knew that all your other rights are protected by that particular right.
00:18:06.000 Owning a rifle is a heavy responsibility.
00:18:08.000 Building rifles is no different.
00:18:09.000 Bravo Company Manufacturing builds a professional-grade product which is built to combat standards.
00:18:13.000 That's because BCM believes the same level of protection should be provided to every American, regardless if they're a private citizen or a professional.
00:18:19.000 The people at BCM assume when a rifle leaves their shop, it can be used in a life or death situation by a responsible citizen, law enforcement officer, or soldier overseas.
00:18:27.000 So every component of a BCM rifle is hand-assembled and tested by Americans.
00:18:31.000 They understand that you're not buying a gun because you really want to go target shooting.
00:18:34.000 You need it in case, God forbid, you need it.
00:18:36.000 So this is why you should check out Bravo Company Manufacturing.
00:18:38.000 Head on over to bravocompanymfg.com.
00:18:41.000 You can discover more about their products, special offers, and upcoming news.
00:18:44.000 That is bravocompanymfg.com.
00:18:46.000 If you need more convincing, find out even more about BCM and the awesome folks who make their products at youtube.com slash bravocompanyusa.
00:18:53.000 Okay, so...
00:18:55.000 There's a gaslighting project that is happening in real time.
00:18:58.000 The gaslighting project is designed to shut you up.
00:19:01.000 You.
00:19:01.000 Yes, you.
00:19:02.000 Whether it is Abigail Schreier writing a book on why it is bad to transition young children from male to female through hormone therapy.
00:19:09.000 Or whether it is Matt Iglesias, who's just a mainstream left guy, basically leaving his own publication.
00:19:16.000 There's an attempt to shut down debate.
00:19:17.000 There's an attempt to shut you up.
00:19:19.000 It is particularly directed at conservatives.
00:19:22.000 There is a process that the left has been using for quite a while, and it is quite effective process.
00:19:26.000 So let me describe the process of getting you personally to shut up, because I know that you felt this in your regular life.
00:19:31.000 You felt this from your peers.
00:19:32.000 You feel this from your bosses.
00:19:33.000 You feel this from the media.
00:19:35.000 So here is the process.
00:19:36.000 The process goes like this.
00:19:37.000 It's basically a three-step process.
00:19:40.000 The first move is for people to tell you that if you voice your opinion, you're being not nice.
00:19:45.000 See, what the left understands about conservatives is that conservatives generally value decency.
00:19:50.000 They generally value politeness.
00:19:52.000 Conservatives tend to believe that decency and niceness and politeness, these are virtues.
00:19:56.000 These are good qualities.
00:19:57.000 Now, it's very easy to shift from being nice and being polite and being decent into a belief that this means being inoffensive.
00:20:04.000 Because if you're nice, typically, that means that you're not offending anybody, right?
00:20:07.000 You're being a nice person, that means that you're not offending anybody.
00:20:10.000 But there is a difference between being decent and being inoffensive.
00:20:14.000 There's a wide difference.
00:20:15.000 In conservative philosophy, sometimes you actually have to chide people when they do the wrong thing.
00:20:19.000 It's actually a biblical maxim.
00:20:20.000 It's that you're not supposed to ignore it when your friend sins.
00:20:24.000 You're supposed to chide him and correct him.
00:20:26.000 But it is very easy to fall into the trap, because it's seductive, of basically saying that I'm a nice guy and so I'm never going to say anything offensive.
00:20:34.000 And so what the left does is they simply deem anything that you are saying offensive.
00:20:38.000 And thus, you have now violated the niceness principle.
00:20:41.000 You're no longer nice.
00:20:43.000 You're no longer decent.
00:20:44.000 You're no longer kind.
00:20:45.000 They understand that you want to be kind and you want to be nice.
00:20:47.000 And so if they act offended, that's a way of shutting you up.
00:20:51.000 It's a way of saying, your principles are offensive to me, so you should be quiet.
00:20:54.000 Then they push even further.
00:20:56.000 Because you might say, well, yes, you're offended, but your offense is really not the main thing.
00:21:01.000 The question is, is what I'm saying true or is it not?
00:21:03.000 You might say like I do, facts don't care about your feelings.
00:21:06.000 And it's not.
00:21:07.000 Mean to simply state a fact.
00:21:09.000 So what the left instead does is they conflate offense and harm.
00:21:13.000 This is the second step of shutting you up.
00:21:15.000 The first step is you're not being nice.
00:21:17.000 You say, well, it's not about niceness or not niceness.
00:21:20.000 There's nothing mean about saying something true.
00:21:22.000 They say, no, no, no.
00:21:23.000 It's not just that you're being offensive.
00:21:25.000 And that you should be inoffensive.
00:21:26.000 It is that you are harming me.
00:21:28.000 That conflate offense with harm.
00:21:28.000 Right?
00:21:30.000 Right?
00:21:30.000 You are now harming me.
00:21:31.000 You're saying something that harms me and therefore you should shut up.
00:21:34.000 Because it's one thing for you to be not nice.
00:21:36.000 It's another thing for you to be harmful and cruel.
00:21:38.000 And this is why the left spins up every offense into a deep-seated harm.
00:21:41.000 This is where you get the language of microaggressions on college campus.
00:21:44.000 Right?
00:21:44.000 I say something that is factual and now you get very offended.
00:21:47.000 And you don't just say that you are offended.
00:21:49.000 You say that I have harmed you.
00:21:50.000 I've aggressed you.
00:21:51.000 I've done something that infringes on your ability to see yourself the way you want to see yourself.
00:21:56.000 And this is an actual harm to you.
00:21:58.000 It's an emotional harm to you.
00:21:59.000 And therefore, I should shut up.
00:22:00.000 I violated the non-harm J.S.
00:22:02.000 Mill principle.
00:22:03.000 So, step one was you're not being nice.
00:22:05.000 Step two is you're actively harming me.
00:22:07.000 So you need to be quiet.
00:22:09.000 Okay, and that brings us to step three.
00:22:11.000 Step three is silence is violence.
00:22:13.000 Step three, so we went from you should be quiet to be nice, to you should be quiet because you're harming me, to you being quiet is the problem.
00:22:20.000 Now, when folks on the left say silence is violence, what they don't mean is we want you to speak freely.
00:22:25.000 What they mean is we want you to speak and repeat exactly what we are about to tell you.
00:22:29.000 And if you do not mirror our preference, if you do not celebrate our preference, if you do not celebrate our political point of view, this means that you are a bad person.
00:22:37.000 And now you're being not nice.
00:22:39.000 You're being harmful.
00:22:40.000 Silence is violence.
00:22:41.000 You are actually acting in a violent way by refusing to go along with what we are saying.
00:22:46.000 It's the Seinfeld AIDS ribbon episode.
00:22:48.000 If you just refuse to wear the ribbon, that in and of itself is the crime because you're not repeating.
00:22:53.000 You're not joining the cause.
00:22:54.000 It is the Ibram X. Kendi routine where it's not enough to not be racist.
00:22:57.000 You have to be anti-racist.
00:22:58.000 You have to repeat all of the bull crap that Ibram X. Kendi spews in order for you to be considered anti-racist.
00:23:04.000 So, we went all the way from, we don't want you to express your viewpoint to, we want you to positively express our viewpoint.
00:23:11.000 So that is the process.
00:23:13.000 And the process always begins with, you're not being nice.
00:23:15.000 Okay, so, you're not being nice, that first step.
00:23:20.000 usually is implicated when the left does something controversial.
00:23:23.000 So the left has this gaslighting thing.
00:23:24.000 Okay, gaslighting is this phenomenon.
00:23:26.000 It comes from an old movie from the 1940s with Charles Boyer and Ingrid Bergman.
00:23:31.000 The movie is about a woman who is being driven crazy by her husband.
00:23:35.000 He wants her to commit suicide so he can take her inheritance.
00:23:37.000 And so he changes the light on the gaslight every night and then tells her he has not done so, right, to drive her nuts.
00:23:43.000 That's what gaslighting means.
00:23:44.000 Gaslighting is where you know something is going on, but people around you are telling you that it's not going on, right?
00:23:49.000 That's what gaslighting is.
00:23:50.000 So the left engages in this gaslighting.
00:23:52.000 The way that they engage in the gaslighting is they do something controversial.
00:23:55.000 They say something controversial.
00:23:57.000 They push a controversial point of view.
00:23:58.000 They celebrate this controversial point of view.
00:24:00.000 And then, if you say, no, I disagree, they say, ah, you're not being nice.
00:24:05.000 You're being offensive.
00:24:06.000 You're causing harm.
00:24:09.000 You're a bad person.
00:24:10.000 How could you?
00:24:11.000 How could you?
00:24:12.000 You get this phenomenon a lot in, for example, Los Angeles.
00:24:16.000 The kind of attention-seeking behavior that you see very often.
00:24:18.000 And then if you pay attention to the behavior, they go, why are you paying attention?
00:24:21.000 Because you asked me to pay attention.
00:24:24.000 This is all leading up to a discussion of Harry Styles, by the way, if you were not aware where this was going.
00:24:30.000 There's a thing that happens very often in places like LA where you walk into a coffee bean and the barista has pink hair and a ring on the nose and a ring on the ear and a chain connecting both, connecting all the way to the other ear.
00:24:42.000 And then you kind of look for a moment too long and the person looks at you and says, what are you looking at?
00:24:48.000 Well, it feels like you were seeking attention when you decided to connect a chain from your ear to your nose to your other ear.
00:24:53.000 That's an actual overt sign that you might want to... Like, your hair is shockingly bright pink.
00:24:57.000 I feel like you might want some attention there.
00:24:58.000 And then it's like, well, why are you paying attention?
00:25:00.000 Why are you paying attention?
00:25:01.000 That's why we're paying attention.
00:25:03.000 The paying attention is not the sin.
00:25:05.000 If you want to act that way, it's a free country.
00:25:07.000 But us paying attention to having opinions is not, in fact, a violation of the niceness principle, nor is it an excuse to silence other people.
00:25:07.000 You can act that way.
00:25:13.000 OK, this brings us to the Harry Styles issue.
00:25:15.000 We'll get to that in just one moment.
00:25:17.000 But first, let's talk about the fact that as dudes, a lot of your identity might be wrapped up in your hair, not your pink hair.
00:25:23.000 It might be wrapped up in like actually having hair.
00:25:25.000 And as men age, they tend to bald.
00:25:27.000 OK, this is just one of the realities of life.
00:25:31.000 Male pattern baldness is a genetic thing, and most men start losing hair in their in their 20s and in their early 30s.
00:25:37.000 Well, now there's Keeps.
00:25:38.000 Two out of three dudes are going to experience some form of male pattern baldness by the time they're 35.
00:25:42.000 The best way to prevent hair loss is to do something about it while you still have hair left.
00:25:45.000 You used to have to go to the doctor's office for your hair loss prescription.
00:25:47.000 Now, thanks to Keeps, you can visit a doctor online and get hair loss medication delivered directly to your home.
00:25:52.000 They make it easy.
00:25:53.000 They deliver your medication every three months so you can say goodbye to pharmacy checkout lines and awkward doctor visits.
00:25:58.000 Keeps offers generic versions of the only two FDA-approved hair loss products out there.
00:26:01.000 You might have tried them before, probably never for this price.
00:26:03.000 Keeps treatments typically take between four to six months to see results.
00:26:06.000 It's important to act fast.
00:26:07.000 The sooner you start using Keeps, the more hair you will save.
00:26:09.000 Find out why Keeps has more five-star reviews than any of its competitors and more than 100,000 men trust Keeps for their hair loss prevention medication.
00:26:16.000 Keeps treatments start at just $10 a month plus.
00:26:18.000 For a limited time, you can get your first month for free.
00:26:21.000 It is quick, it is easy, it saves you a lot of money, and it can save your hair, which is a very, very useful thing.
00:26:24.000 If you're ready to take action and prevent hair loss, go to Keeps.com slash Ben to receive your first month of treatment for free.
00:26:29.000 That is K-E-E-P-S dot com slash Ben.
00:26:32.000 K-E-E-P-S dot com slash Ben.
00:26:34.000 Okay, so.
00:26:35.000 This brings us to the Vogue photoshoot with Harry Styles.
00:26:39.000 So this first hit my attention yesterday when Candace Owens tweeted about it.
00:26:42.000 Vogue magazine featured Harry Styles.
00:26:44.000 The only reason I know Harry Styles, honestly, is because he was in Dunkirk.
00:26:47.000 I've never heard his music.
00:26:49.000 I don't care about him.
00:26:50.000 Honestly, as I say, my only experience knowing who he is is that he was in a Christopher Nolan film.
00:26:56.000 But he did this photoshoot with Vogue in which he dressed garishly in a bunch of women's clothing.
00:27:00.000 And he looks like an idiot.
00:27:02.000 Let's just put that out there straight up front.
00:27:04.000 He looks like a moron.
00:27:05.000 OK, because men wearing women's dresses, typically that's like there's a reason that Bugs Bunny plays it for comic effect when he puts on a dress to fool Elmer Fudd.
00:27:14.000 It's inherently funny.
00:27:14.000 Right.
00:27:15.000 We're not talking here about a guy who's identifying as transgender and has gender dysphoria or something.
00:27:19.000 This is a this is just a regular dude putting on a dress.
00:27:23.000 OK, and can we use like a bit of common sense here that that's at least strange?
00:27:27.000 It's something different.
00:27:28.000 And by the way, Vogue knows that it's strange and something different.
00:27:31.000 See, here's where the gaslighting comes in.
00:27:32.000 Vogue treats this as groundbreaking and wonderful.
00:27:35.000 Now, in your regular life, if somebody, let's say that you're a married woman and your husband comes through the door wearing one of your gowns.
00:27:43.000 Would your first reaction be, I love how you're bending gender norms, honey.
00:27:47.000 Fabiola, I asked our hair and makeup person, Fabiola, about this.
00:27:52.000 And her reaction, I thought, was on the mark.
00:27:55.000 She said, if my husband walked through the door wearing one of my dresses, I would punch him.
00:28:00.000 Okay, fair enough.
00:28:02.000 Fair enough.
00:28:03.000 But in any case, I'm not saying that anybody who wears a dress should be punched.
00:28:05.000 I'm just saying what Fabiola said.
00:28:07.000 Okay, I'm just reporting to you the facts.
00:28:09.000 In any case, Harry Styles is wearing these bizarre garish outfits, and we are told this is very brave.
00:28:15.000 Incredibly brave.
00:28:16.000 It's not just that he put on these outfits.
00:28:18.000 By the way, we know that this is playing with stereotypes and redefining masculinity, right?
00:28:22.000 That is the goal here.
00:28:23.000 It is the overt goal.
00:28:24.000 Because if this were just about, you know, I like to wear creative clothing, he'd put on like a panda bear suit or something.
00:28:30.000 There's him walking around in, like, a Finding Nemo costume.
00:28:32.000 But he's not!
00:28:33.000 He's wearing a dress.
00:28:34.000 And the reason he's wearing a dress is because he's trying to violate preconceived notions about masculinity.
00:28:39.000 Okay, and Vogue makes this perfectly clear.
00:28:41.000 So, we are told by various interview subjects that Stiles' cross-dressing represents, quote, the image of a new era, of the way that a man can look.
00:28:47.000 Okay.
00:28:51.000 And that the pop star is, quote, redefining what it can mean to be a man with confidence.
00:28:55.000 Ah, you see, the most confident men are the ones who wear dresses.
00:28:58.000 The more confident you are in your masculinity, the more you can afford to be not masculine.
00:29:03.000 In fact, the highest form of masculinity is to completely castrate yourself.
00:29:06.000 That would actually be the highest form of masculinity, because if you do that, that shows how masculine you are, because you had to have balls to take them off, right?
00:29:12.000 I mean, that really is the highest form of masculinity, is to do things that make you as little masculine as humanly possible.
00:29:18.000 That's the mark of manhood.
00:29:20.000 Okay, the actress Olivia Wilde says, quote, Okay, so first of all, it's not just devoid of toxic masculinity, it's devoid of any masculinity.
00:29:25.000 of toxic masculinity is indicative of his generation and therefore the future of the world.
00:29:31.000 I think he's in many ways championing that, spearheading that.
00:29:33.000 It's pretty powerful, kind of extraordinary to see someone in his position, redefining what it can mean to be a man with confidence.
00:29:39.000 Oh, that's, okay, so first of all, it's not just a word of toxic masculinity, is devoid of any masculinity.
00:29:44.000 Okay, this is not, there's nothing masculine about this.
00:29:47.000 In fact, the whole point here is to rob masculinity of its masculine side, right?
00:29:51.000 That is the entire point.
00:29:52.000 The point is to redefine masculinity to now include doing feminine things.
00:29:56.000 If it were just about a man being confident to wear what he wants to wear, then he'd be out there like Borat in a banana hammock or something, right?
00:30:01.000 But that's not what he's doing, right?
00:30:03.000 What he's doing instead is he's putting on a dress because he's trying to mix up the stereotypes of male and female.
00:30:08.000 So this is an attention-seeking behavior, right?
00:30:10.000 This is Harry Styles with the pink hair and the nose ring and the chain going from ear to ear, right?
00:30:15.000 That's what this is.
00:30:16.000 And it is overtly a political attempt to shift the definition of masculinity.
00:30:20.000 I'm not making this up.
00:30:21.000 Don't be gaslit.
00:30:22.000 By the left, it says, well, why are you making a big?
00:30:24.000 Because you made a big deal out of it.
00:30:25.000 You don't get to crash a car.
00:30:27.000 And then when I look at the car crash, say, hey, look, there's a car crash.
00:30:29.000 You go, there is no car crash.
00:30:30.000 What are you even looking at?
00:30:32.000 You guys are the ones making a political point out of a dude wearing a dress, and I am saying I think that your political point is stupid.
00:30:37.000 Because it is stupid.
00:30:38.000 Okay, so that gaslighting attempt is really irritating.
00:30:43.000 So.
00:30:44.000 We'll get to what Candace had to say and then what I had to say about this in just a moment because there is a broader point to be made.
00:30:49.000 If the left is now going to claim that being a man wearing a dress is the highest form of masculinity because you have shed toxic masculinity, and then I say, I think that this is a perversion of masculinity because feminizing males is not the goal of being masculine.
00:31:05.000 Masculine and feminine have definitions.
00:31:07.000 It is good for men to be masculine.
00:31:09.000 It is a good thing to train boys to be masculine.
00:31:13.000 And then, for masculinity to be tempered by civilization.
00:31:18.000 For all of human history, masculinity unbound has had very, very negative effects.
00:31:23.000 Masculinity unbound from anything like responsibility, the aggressive instinct that is inherent in males, generally speaking, Unbound from civilization and civilizing influences and traditional Judeo-Christian morality has had dire, dire effects.
00:31:37.000 Okay, but masculinity has also done incredibly great things for the world.
00:31:41.000 Assertiveness has meant progress.
00:31:43.000 Assertiveness has meant growth.
00:31:45.000 Assertiveness has meant defense of family and hearth and home.
00:31:51.000 And has meant prosperity, right?
00:31:52.000 Masculinity is a good thing for civilizations.
00:31:54.000 And civilizations that decide to essentially defenestrate masculinity are going to bear some pretty ill effects.
00:32:00.000 Now if you make that point, the left says you have to shut up, you're not being nice, right?
00:32:02.000 Now you're being offensive.
00:32:04.000 So do something outrageous.
00:32:05.000 Somebody else comments on the outrageous thing, you should shut up.
00:32:08.000 Don't comment on the outrageous thing.
00:32:10.000 Celebrate the outrageous thing, or silence is violence.
00:32:13.000 Okay, we're gonna get to the actual analysis of this particular issue in a second, because masculinity is important.
00:32:18.000 What the left wants to do is rewrite masculinity.
00:32:20.000 They do not want to fight toxic masculinity, they want to fight masculinity itself.
00:32:26.000 Being a man is a bad thing, unless you are treating manhood as actually acting in feminine ways, because feminine and masculine have definitions.
00:32:34.000 We'll get to that in one second.
00:32:35.000 Confusion is the goal here, because if they were to make this argument straight up, that men should act like women, that men should don dresses and act just like women, everybody would realize how stupid this is.
00:32:43.000 So instead, they've decided to deliberately confuse the terminology.
00:32:46.000 First, they say masculine and feminine are categories.
00:32:49.000 And then they say feminine and masculine are not categories.
00:32:49.000 True.
00:32:51.000 And if you point out their categories, then it's because you're some sort of bigot.
00:32:55.000 So it's all self-contradictory crap.
00:32:57.000 We'll get to that in just one second.
00:32:59.000 First, let us talk about the fact that if you are looking for a great sleep quality, it's not just enough to have your Helix Sleep Mattress.
00:33:05.000 You also need to have an excellent set of sheets.
00:33:08.000 What do millions of Americans and three former US presidents have in common?
00:33:11.000 They all agree that Boll and Brand sheets are the softest, most comfortable, pure organic cotton sheets on earth.
00:33:16.000 Bull and branch cotton is rain-fed, pesticide-free, and carries the highest organic certification, which is why it is so soft.
00:33:21.000 Because they work with family-owned mills all over the world to expertly weave every set of bull and branch sheets with the highest levels of craftsmanship, it is quality.
00:33:28.000 You can feel the moment you open the box.
00:33:30.000 I love my bull and branch sheets.
00:33:31.000 In fact, I love them so much that we had other sheets.
00:33:33.000 We took all of them and threw them out.
00:33:35.000 Bull and Branch Sheets literally ruined all of the other sheets for my family.
00:33:38.000 We had to get Bull and Branch Sheets for everybody because they are just that good.
00:33:40.000 Since they sell direct to you, Bull and Branch Sheets start at just $160.
00:33:43.000 They are $1,000 quality sheets for a fraction of the price.
00:33:47.000 Plus, you can sleep on them for a month risk-free.
00:33:49.000 Right now, you'll get $50 off any set of sheets at bullandbranch.com with promo code BENSHAPIRO.
00:33:54.000 Spelled B-O-L-L and branch.com.
00:33:56.000 Promo code BENSHAPIRO for $50 off bullandbranch.com.
00:33:59.000 Promo code BENSHAPIRO.
00:34:00.000 Restrictions may apply.
00:34:01.000 Okay, we're going to get to more of this in a second.
00:34:06.000 The gaslighting, which does have, again, broader ramifications for our public discussions.
00:34:11.000 We'll get to that in just a second.
00:34:12.000 First, if you were not already disgusted by the mainstream media, you absolutely should be.
00:34:15.000 It is obvious that they were worth 10 points to Joe Biden in that election cycle.
00:34:18.000 They lied about every single narrative.
00:34:20.000 They continue to lie about every single narrative.
00:34:22.000 Just because CNN, MSNBC, even Fox News declare something that doesn't necessarily make the narrative true, it means that media outlets push a narrative that very often they find beneficial.
00:34:31.000 Not only that, the media has already shifted from demonizing Trump and his supporters to flattering Joe Biden and Kamala Harris before they've even taken office.
00:34:37.000 If you watched Joe Biden's presser yesterday, the media basically just acted as sycophantic lapdogs.
00:34:42.000 So we are back to the Obama era.
00:34:45.000 If you're sick of the media feeding you a narrative, replace your cable and your new subscriptions with The Daily Wire.
00:34:50.000 We have big plans for the next four years.
00:34:51.000 It starts today.
00:34:53.000 Candace Owens, New York Times bestselling author, founder of the Blexit Foundation, is joining The Daily Wire, where she'll be launching a brand new show with us early next year.
00:35:00.000 We'll also be launching an entertainment channel, like with actual movies and TV, a new investigative journalism team, building partnerships with like-minded content creators like PragerU, Their entire show library will be available to dailywire.com members by the end of the year.
00:35:12.000 We're building up an alternative to the mainstream media, a replacement for the mainstream media.
00:35:17.000 Join us, because not only are you helping us, you're also helping to destroy the legacy media that have crafted this entire narrative around the idea that you're a bad person.
00:35:25.000 Right now, just to show you we're serious, we're offering 25% off all memberships with code election over at dailywire.com slash subscribe.
00:35:32.000 Members get our articles ad-free.
00:35:33.000 Access to all of our live broadcast and show library, the full three hours of The Ben Shapiro Show, exclusive Reader's Pass content available only to DailyWire members.
00:35:40.000 If you're considering an All Access membership, you get to join us on All Access Live every night for live stream discussions with our hosts and an amazing online community.
00:35:47.000 You also get not one, but two Leftist Tears tumblers with your membership as well as early, sometimes exclusive access to new DailyWire products.
00:35:52.000 So remember, that's 25% off all memberships with code ELECTION over at dailywire.com slash subscribe.
00:35:58.000 Replace the legacy media with DailyWire.
00:35:59.000 You are not going to regret it.
00:36:00.000 You're listening to the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast and radio show in the nation.
00:36:03.000 Okay, so a couple of obvious stipulations up front.
00:36:11.000 Men have always done cross-dressing.
00:36:13.000 There have always been some segment of men who cross-dress.
00:36:15.000 Very often, it was played for comedy.
00:36:17.000 And the entire premise of Some Like It Hot is that it is funny when men cross-dress.
00:36:21.000 That is not what the Harry Styles photo shoot is about.
00:36:23.000 Right?
00:36:24.000 There have been pop stars who have done this before.
00:36:25.000 David Bowie wearing a dress.
00:36:26.000 They always look like idiots, by the way.
00:36:27.000 They always look ridiculous.
00:36:28.000 But the whole point is to be transgressive.
00:36:30.000 Right, but what we are seeing with the Vogue article is not just an attempt to be transgressive, obviously.
00:36:34.000 It's an attempt to redefine masculinity itself.
00:36:36.000 I mean, this is overt in the article.
00:36:38.000 I'm not making it up.
00:36:39.000 I already read you the segments from the Vogue magazine article.
00:36:41.000 Okay, so my friend Candace Owens tweets out, quote, there is no society that can survive without strong men.
00:36:46.000 The East knows this.
00:36:47.000 In the West, the steady feminization of our men at the same time that Marxism is being taught to our children is not a coincidence.
00:36:52.000 It is an outright attack.
00:36:54.000 Bring back manly men.
00:36:55.000 Okay, I'm not sure what exactly is controversial about this, that masculinity is a good and important thing when channeled properly.
00:37:03.000 family.
00:37:05.000 It requires men to defend family.
00:37:07.000 It requires men to provide.
00:37:08.000 It requires men to channel their aggressive instincts towards defense of values and civilization.
00:37:13.000 It requires assertiveness.
00:37:15.000 Aristotle talks about masculinity in exactly these sorts of terms.
00:37:18.000 Harvey Mansfield has an excellent book called Manliness, all about masculinity and what distinguishes it from femininity.
00:37:24.000 Now, it's not that the left doesn't acknowledge these are qualities.
00:37:26.000 The left fully acknowledges the qualities of masculinity and femininity, right?
00:37:30.000 Which is why they suggest that there are a wide variety of genders because they suggest that a man can be very feminine and this actually makes him a woman, right?
00:37:37.000 So they agree that this means that there is such a thing as masculinity and femininity.
00:37:43.000 They then just suggest that men should act like women, that masculinity should be made more feminine.
00:37:48.000 And Candace disagrees.
00:37:49.000 She says that when you make men more feminine, when you suggest that men need to be like women, they need to wear dresses, that this undermines some fundamentally good thing about men.
00:38:00.000 In the same way that if you said that women ought to act like men, it's funny, if you say that women ought to act more like men, this is considered sexist, because it actually is sexist.
00:38:07.000 But if you say that men ought to act more like women, this is considered progressive and forward-thinking.
00:38:11.000 The attempt to feminize men is ongoing on the left.
00:38:14.000 Okay, so this prompted me to defend Candace's comment.
00:38:17.000 And I said, this is perfectly obvious.
00:38:19.000 Anyone who pretends it is not a referendum on masculinity for men to don floofy dresses and then be celebrated by magazines like Vogue is gaslighting you.
00:38:27.000 Masculinity and femininity are categories.
00:38:29.000 They exist.
00:38:30.000 Some behavior is more masculine, like punching people in the face.
00:38:33.000 Some behavior is more feminine, like wearing floofy dresses.
00:38:36.000 There are many different forms of masculinity and femininity.
00:38:39.000 The most important form of femininity is bearing and rearing children.
00:38:42.000 That is something that is endemic biologically to Female mammals of all species is bearing and rearing their young, right?
00:38:50.000 And it is endemic for men and males of all mammalian species to be more aggressive, right?
00:38:53.000 These are just biological realities.
00:38:55.000 To pretend that they are social constructs entirely is completely idiotic and anti-scientific and anti-evidentiary.
00:39:00.000 Masculinity and femininity do exist.
00:39:03.000 And not only that, how does this tie into the whole dress conversation?
00:39:07.000 Outward indicators of masculinity and femininity exist in nearly every human culture, right?
00:39:11.000 We train little boys to be masculine and we train little girls to be more feminine.
00:39:14.000 We try to breed out of them the toxicity of masculinity or the toxicity of femininity.
00:39:19.000 We try to use civilization to civilize children.
00:39:22.000 But boys are boys and girls are girls, right?
00:39:24.000 And these are important things.
00:39:26.000 Boys ought to be allowed to act like boys.
00:39:28.000 Girls ought to be allowed to act like girls.
00:39:31.000 Boys are taught to be more masculine in virtually every human culture.
00:39:34.000 This is not a Western-centered thing.
00:39:36.000 Boys are taught to be more masculine in virtually every human culture because the role of men is not, in fact, always the same as the role of women.
00:39:42.000 There can be crossover.
00:39:43.000 Men and women can do very many of the same jobs.
00:39:45.000 But to suggest that men and women are identical and they are widgets created by social conditioning is just bullcrap.
00:39:50.000 It is not true.
00:39:50.000 It is not scientifically true.
00:39:52.000 It is a violation of actual scientific biology.
00:39:55.000 There are differences between men and women on the broad range.
00:39:58.000 That does not mean that there's not, again, men who act more like women or women who act more like men.
00:40:03.000 There are not more effeminate men and more masculine women, right?
00:40:05.000 All of that exists.
00:40:06.000 But the fact that there is a spectrum of human biology does not mean there are not poles.
00:40:10.000 There are indeed poles.
00:40:11.000 Right, as in P-O-L-E-S, there are poles, masculine and feminine.
00:40:15.000 The left knows this.
00:40:17.000 In fact, the point of the Harry Styles photo shoot is to violate those poles, right, is to feminize masculinity.
00:40:24.000 Olivia Wilde says it herself.
00:40:25.000 The idea is to rethink masculinity as femininity, to feminize men, to get rid of toxic masculinity by suggesting that men should act like women.
00:40:34.000 Otherwise, it would not be headline worthy for Harry Styles to put on a dress.
00:40:37.000 If it were just about Harry Styles, again, playing with dress the way he says that it is, then he would have dressed up as a giant baby in a diaper with a pacifier, right?
00:40:44.000 He's not doing that.
00:40:45.000 He's dressing up in a woman's gown because he's attempting to make a point, which is that men should be more like women.
00:40:51.000 And the left knows this.
00:40:52.000 They know this.
00:40:53.000 They openly say that gender is both important and socially constructed.
00:40:58.000 They say that gender is actually inborn, but also socially constructed.
00:41:01.000 They want it both ways.
00:41:02.000 They say that gender is a social construction, and that femininity is just men Cramming down the patriarchy on women.
00:41:10.000 But they will also say that gender, which is the manifestation of biology, right?
00:41:15.000 But they don't think so.
00:41:16.000 They think the gender is just your femininity or masculinity, is actually inborn and inherent to you.
00:41:21.000 So they say that a man can be a woman, even though there's no biological underpinning.
00:41:24.000 So gender is real, but also it's socially constructed.
00:41:26.000 It's all self-contradictory.
00:41:28.000 Let's assume for a second the honesty of some folks on the left who at least acknowledge that femininity and masculinity exist.
00:41:35.000 They also have indicators, outward indicators.
00:41:37.000 Dress has been, for virtually all time and in virtually all cultures, an outward indicator, which is why the Bible explicitly says that it is against cross-dressing, for example.
00:41:45.000 Okay, but in virtually every culture, men and women dress differently.
00:41:48.000 This does not mean that all men dress the same and all women in all cultures dress the same.
00:41:52.000 It means that in every culture there is a distinction between how men dress and how women dress.
00:41:56.000 The stupidest form of the argument that I saw yesterday online was, well in Scotland they wear kilts.
00:42:01.000 That means that a man in America wearing a skirt, a floofy skirt, is the same as a man in Scotland wearing a kilt.
00:42:01.000 Hmm?
00:42:07.000 No, because they also distinguish between how men wear clothes and women wear clothes in Scotland too.
00:42:12.000 It's just that men wear different clothes than men in America.
00:42:15.000 It's the most idiotic thing.
00:42:16.000 People are like, well, yeah, back in Roman times, men wore togas.
00:42:19.000 You understand?
00:42:19.000 Those were basically just dresses.
00:42:20.000 Yes.
00:42:21.000 And women wore a different form of clothing.
00:42:23.000 At the time, women and men were distinguishable by dress.
00:42:26.000 They have always been distinguishable by dress in virtually every human culture.
00:42:29.000 And noting that men wore floofier stuff in the 16th century in Britain does not change the fact that women wore completely different clothing in the 16th century in Britain.
00:42:37.000 This is a category error, you morons, to suggest that because men wore something like a kilt in Scotland, that if you transferred over to America would look more feminine.
00:42:47.000 Therefore, a man wearing a skirt in America in 2020 is just the same in the male-female paradigm as a man wearing a kilt in Scotland in 1590 is insane and idiotic and ridiculous on its face, and we all know that.
00:43:01.000 Pretending that men dressing like women is not about feminizing men is ridiculous.
00:43:04.000 Because they are overtly celebrating the fact that Styles is feminizing masculinity.
00:43:11.000 So this is all a big gaslighting effect, right?
00:43:13.000 The left's routine is this.
00:43:15.000 Look how important and magical it is that Harry Styles is wearing a dress.
00:43:17.000 He's subversively undermining masculinity by bringing the effect of femininity to the masculine.
00:43:23.000 And that's real masculinity, isn't it?
00:43:25.000 Dude wearing a dress.
00:43:26.000 And then people on the right are like, yes, men wearing dresses does undermine masculinity by making it more feminine.
00:43:31.000 And that is a bad thing.
00:43:33.000 And then folks on the left don't respond by saying, well, why is it a bad thing to feminize masculinity?
00:43:37.000 Because then they would lose the argument because masculinity has very many good things and ought to be upheld.
00:43:41.000 Instead, what the left does is this weird gaslighting shut up routine where they say, how dare you say that men wearing dresses undermines masculinity?
00:43:48.000 You said, you on the left, you said that wearing a dress undermines masculinity.
00:43:52.000 That is the whole point of putting people on the cover of magazines who are men wearing dresses.
00:43:58.000 Okay, so here's the bottom line.
00:43:59.000 There are a lot of conservatives, I know, who listen to this sort of stuff and they go, whoa, why aren't we talking about political races?
00:44:05.000 Why aren't we talking about, why aren't we talking about tax rates?
00:44:07.000 Why aren't we talking about policy?
00:44:09.000 This stuff matters.
00:44:10.000 It matters because these are fundamental ideas to the preservation of a civilization.
00:44:14.000 Boys and girls are different.
00:44:15.000 Boys and girls are different.
00:44:17.000 It is important to inculcate in your children that boys and girls are different.
00:44:20.000 And any parent who fails to inculcate in a boy that manliness is a good thing and that responsible manliness helps build civilization.
00:44:27.000 Any person, any parent does not teach their girls that femininity, meaning the protection of hearth and home in a different way than masculinity is a good thing.
00:44:37.000 Any person who doesn't teach their girls that is not doing their kid any favors.
00:44:40.000 And they're undermining the civilizational compact between men and women that exists based on biology in virtually every human culture.
00:44:47.000 And the left knows that they can't win this argument because biology cuts directly against them.
00:44:50.000 Science cuts directly against them.
00:44:52.000 So instead, they just confuse it.
00:44:53.000 Instead, they just play these stupid semantic little games where they say that masculinity and femininity are interchangeable.
00:44:58.000 And if you say no, they say, how dare you?
00:45:00.000 How dare you?
00:45:03.000 It's absurd and it's ridiculous.
00:45:04.000 And we shouldn't be shy about discussing these issues because the left certainly isn't shy about discussing these issues.
00:45:07.000 The left will put these in public schools, right?
00:45:09.000 The left will tell your kindergartner that real men wear dresses.
00:45:13.000 And then you'll be explaining to a five-year-old why real men do not wear dresses.
00:45:17.000 And I don't feel that that is an acceptable ramification of our cultural discussion, is that you're supposed to shut up because it's offensive and rude for you to say that boys and girls are different.
00:45:26.000 But it is inoffensive and groundbreaking to treat as completely without debate that men and women are exactly the same in every respect, except that men suffer from toxic masculinity that must be bred out of them by wearing 17th century floofy dresses on the cover of Vogue.
00:45:42.000 The answer to that is no.
00:45:43.000 And I'm glad all y'all really enjoy your Harry Styles music.
00:45:46.000 And Harry Styles is a free man living in a Western country.
00:45:49.000 And by the way, a West defended by quite masculine men as a general rule.
00:45:53.000 Okay, that is...
00:45:55.000 Congratulations to Harry Styles.
00:45:57.000 You can enjoy his music.
00:45:58.000 I'm not saying don't pick up his CDs.
00:45:59.000 I'm not saying don't listen to his music.
00:46:01.000 I'm not saying don't watch the movies he's in.
00:46:02.000 All I'm saying is that when you put out there an argument that men ought to act like women, and that this is a good thing, you are doing something that undermines and tears at the fabric of not only civilization, but of families.
00:46:13.000 It tears at the fabric of child-rearing and child-raising, and everybody with half a brain knows this.
00:46:18.000 And don't be silenced by people who just tell you that it's rude to talk about it while simultaneously demanding that you put on the Kramer AIDS ribbon or they're going to club you about the head for not celebrating that which you don't find worthy of celebration.
00:46:32.000 Okay, so, meanwhile, in actual news, COVID continues to blight the land and the responses of various political figures continues to not be particularly useful.
00:46:43.000 So, Bill de Blasio announced yesterday that they are closing the schools in New York, despite evidence.
00:46:47.000 It is perfectly obvious at this point that schools are not chief vectors of transmission.
00:46:50.000 Does not matter.
00:46:51.000 They're shutting down the schools anyway, because all of the political incentives are aligned to shut things down, even if there's no actual evidence suggesting that things ought to be shut down.
00:46:59.000 We said we would make health and safety the priority.
00:47:03.000 We said we would hold this standard.
00:47:05.000 That was part of how we convinced everyone that it would be safe to come into the schools.
00:47:11.000 Now, we did expect our schools to be safe.
00:47:13.000 The only way I differ with you is to say it is not unexpected that our schools are safe.
00:47:17.000 We expected them to be safe.
00:47:19.000 We've been very, very impressed by the work everyone's done.
00:47:23.000 They're extraordinarily safe.
00:47:26.000 But that said, we set a standard.
00:47:29.000 We asked everyone to trust it and believe in it.
00:47:32.000 It's important to keep consistency with that.
00:47:34.000 Okay, first of all, I love Bill de Blasio talking about consistency.
00:47:37.000 His consistency standard has been yell at the Jews while suggesting systemic racism is responsible for upticks of COVID in every other racial minority.
00:47:44.000 So Captain Consistency over here has been like, let's have giant riots and looting in the middle of Fifth Avenue.
00:47:49.000 That's totally fine with COVID.
00:47:50.000 But also you can't have a family gathering.
00:47:52.000 Captain Consistency over here.
00:47:54.000 I love when he says that we set a standard.
00:47:56.000 Our standard makes no sense, but we have to hold to our standard now.
00:47:59.000 Shutting down the schools.
00:48:00.000 Good luck to parents, by the way.
00:48:01.000 I hope that you've enjoyed that two weeks of schooling in New York that you got.
00:48:04.000 I hope that it went really, really well for you.
00:48:07.000 Meanwhile, Joe Biden is out there still maintaining that he has a plan.
00:48:11.000 It must be wonderful being Joe Biden at this point, not having to have a plan, but getting to blame Trump for every bad thing that is happening.
00:48:16.000 He said some very bizarre things yesterday in front of his cardboard His cardboard display saying Office of the President-Elect.
00:48:22.000 There is no Office of the President-Elect, as we have noted going all the way back to 2008, when Barack Obama actually created a placard that said Office of the President-Elect.
00:48:30.000 That is not the way that works.
00:48:31.000 In any case, Joe Biden said that the vaccine is coming, and I trust the vaccine because Fauci says the vaccine is good.
00:48:36.000 He says people only question the vaccine because of Trump, which is a weird take considering your vice president, your vice presidential candidate, Kamala Harris, openly said that she would not take the vaccine if Trump said to take it.
00:48:47.000 So I feel like the undermining of vaccines and taking vaccines, that's actually been your party, Joe.
00:48:53.000 But I'm glad that now you're on board.
00:48:55.000 That's exciting news.
00:48:56.000 Funny how you switched from, I'm a little wary about vaccines, your vice president saying that, to vaccines are the most wonderful thing and Trump is the only person obstructing them when he's the one who created the program to develop them in the first place.
00:49:06.000 Here's Joe Biden being a tool.
00:49:08.000 The only reason people question the vaccine now is because of Donald Trump.
00:49:13.000 That's the reason why people are questioning the vaccine, because all the things he says and doesn't say, whether it's truthful, is it not truthful, the exaggerations.
00:49:21.000 I think we're on a clear path now.
00:49:23.000 We're on a clear path with the international community and national leaders and the scientific community have focused on these two vaccines.
00:49:31.000 They appear to be ready for prime time, ready to be used.
00:49:36.000 And if that continues along those roads, I would take the vaccine.
00:49:40.000 Okay.
00:49:40.000 So that old codger is going to be curing COVID.
00:49:42.000 So that's, that's exciting stuff.
00:49:44.000 And then of course he saved some more blame for Trump, right?
00:49:46.000 That Trump is refusing to coordinate and it's going to get a lot of people killed.
00:49:49.000 Uh, no, it, no, sorry.
00:49:51.000 Not true.
00:49:52.000 Okay.
00:49:53.000 The fact is that apparently Biden is receiving some sort of national security briefing today.
00:49:56.000 So, um, yeah, here's Biden trying to blame everything on Trump as per our usual arrangement.
00:50:02.000 What do you see as the biggest threat to your transition right now, given President Trump's unprecedented attempt to obstruct and delay a smooth transfer of power?
00:50:11.000 More people may die if we don't coordinate.
00:50:14.000 If we have to wait until January 20th to start that planning, it puts us behind over a month, month and a half.
00:50:22.000 And so it's important that it be done, that there be coordination now.
00:50:28.000 Now or as rapidly as we can get that done.
00:50:31.000 Okay, so again, everything is Trump's fault.
00:50:33.000 Meanwhile, the media pushing the idea that if you're a Republican, you're more likely to get COVID because you're an idiot.
00:50:37.000 So it is very odd how the virus pretty much affects everybody.
00:50:42.000 And that if you are more careful, there's a lower likelihood that you're going to get a severe strain of the virus and if you are or a severe case of the virus.
00:50:50.000 And if you are less careful, then you are probably going to have a higher chance of getting it.
00:50:54.000 Nonetheless, here is CNN declaring that President Trump and every Republican, those people are responsible for their own COVID cases.
00:51:00.000 They hosted a South Dakota nurse who then proceeded to explain that people are dying in South Dakota while declaring that COVID is not real. And this is, of course, because of President Trump, as opposed to the huge number of people who died in New York who who thought presumably COVID was real and also died.
00:51:13.000 It turns out the virus doesn't care what you think because the virus is not in fact a woke mind reading tool.
00:51:19.000 I think the hardest thing to watch is that people are still looking for something else and they want a magic answer and they don't want to believe that COVID is real.
00:51:28.000 And the reason I tweeted what I did is it wasn't one particular patient.
00:51:31.000 It's just a culmination of so many people and their last dying words are, um, this can't be happening.
00:51:39.000 It's not real.
00:51:40.000 And when they should be spending time FaceTiming their families, They're filled with anger and hatred and it just made me really sad the other night.
00:51:49.000 And I just can't believe that those are going to be their last thoughts and words.
00:51:53.000 I'm glad this is CNN's narrative.
00:51:55.000 I mean, by the way, we also heard stories a little bit earlier before the election about people whose last dying words were things like, I hope Trump loses or something.
00:52:01.000 It turns out people have all sorts of weird.
00:52:03.000 Okay, meanwhile, Joe Biden is laying forth his economic plans.
00:52:06.000 So, in the final days of President Trump's first term, depending on what happens here, Joe Biden is laying forth his economic plans.
00:52:13.000 So in the final days of President Trump's first term, you know, depending on what happens here, Joe Biden is laying forth his economic plans.
00:52:21.000 His economic plans suck.
00:52:23.000 Now, let's be frank about this.
00:52:25.000 If Joe Biden ends up as the president-elect of the United States, if he ends up taking office in January, then Joe Biden might be the luckiest cat on planet Earth.
00:52:34.000 Not just because he presumably would have been declared the winner, but also because if the Republicans win the Senate, Joe Biden is going to get the benefit of Operation Warp Speed.
00:52:43.000 He's going to be handed a vaccine that will be widely available by March and April, which means that the economy is going to boom.
00:52:48.000 It means that the V-shaped recovery that started under President Trump will continue.
00:52:52.000 It means the economy is going to spike.
00:52:54.000 And because he will have a Republican Senate, Joe Biden will have no way of stopping the economy from growing, right?
00:52:59.000 He'll have wanted to put forth all of these crappy proposals, raising taxes and increasing regulations and all of this, and he'll have very little ability to actually implement that.
00:53:06.000 You want to know why the stock market jumped on election night.
00:53:08.000 The reason the stock market jumped after election night is because there was an assumption that Republicans were going to keep the Senate, which is why those Georgia Senate races are really important.
00:53:15.000 But this does put Joe Biden in particularly rich In a particularly rich political area, meaning that for Joe Biden, all he has to do is continue to sit in the basement and just reap the rewards of Trump's economic plan and Trump's vaccines, and then the media will credit him.
00:53:32.000 So that's a wonderful thing, but he's at least going to pay lip service to all of his party's most idiotic economic plans.
00:53:38.000 So yesterday he gave a speech on the economy, which basically amounted to Trump as a big, bad, mean, orange man.
00:53:42.000 At some point, you would figure the specter of Trump will suddenly just dissipate, but never.
00:53:48.000 Barack Obama is still blaming George W. Bush seven years into his term.
00:53:51.000 So you can imagine that that's exactly what Joe Biden will be doing as well.
00:53:54.000 So Joe Biden says he wants to restructure the tax structure.
00:53:57.000 We need a fairer tax structure where people at the top pay more, which is insane considering the people at the top pay literally all net taxes in the United States.
00:54:03.000 That means taxes.
00:54:05.000 that are paid after you receive government benefits.
00:54:08.000 People in the top 1% are paying the vast bulk of those taxes.
00:54:11.000 People in the top 1% are paying a highly disproportionate share of the taxes.
00:54:14.000 It's funny.
00:54:15.000 The same people who will suggest that America's rich are not paying their fair share and also say that Norway is wonderful, neglect the fact that Norway and Denmark and Sweden, all these places, have incredibly regressive tax systems compared to the United States.
00:54:26.000 America has an incredibly progressive graduated tax system where people at the top get absolutely shellacked And if you're not earning all that much money, or if you're middle class, you're not paying very high taxes.
00:54:35.000 If you go over to Europe, everybody is paying high taxes.
00:54:37.000 In any case, here's Joe Biden just lying and saying we don't have a fair tax system, which is code for, I want to seize more money from people who earn a lot.
00:54:44.000 It's time to reward work, not just wealth in America.
00:54:48.000 We're going to have a fair tax structure that makes sure the wealthiest among us in corporations pay their fair share.
00:54:55.000 Our plan will create millions of good-paying union jobs in manufacturing, building the vehicles, products, technologies that we're going to need for the future to compete with the rest of the world.
00:55:08.000 From autos to our stockpiles, we're going to buy American.
00:55:13.000 Okay, so let's just be real about this.
00:55:15.000 When he talks about how work must be rewarded, family income grew under Donald Trump in the first three years of his administration faster and more completely in total than under eight years of Barack Obama.
00:55:27.000 And the people who are mostly making that money are people in the middle and the bottom end of the spectrum.
00:55:31.000 There's actually faster income growth among people who are at the lower end of the spectrum than in people at the top end of the spectrum.
00:55:37.000 It doesn't matter.
00:55:38.000 Joe Biden is gonna continue to push these crappy plans.
00:55:40.000 Meanwhile, Joe Biden has another plan.
00:55:42.000 And this one, again, is incredibly regressive.
00:55:44.000 So, first of all, it's hilarious that Joe Biden continues to suggest that America's tax system is regressive when it is actually quite progressive.
00:55:51.000 Also, he wants to push what sounds like the most regressive policy prescription that I can think of.
00:55:58.000 He wants to simply cancel student loan debt.
00:56:01.000 Now, this is idiotic in all respects.
00:56:02.000 We'll get to this in just one... I'll explain in just one second.
00:56:04.000 Here is Joe Biden saying this yesterday.
00:56:05.000 Does student loan forgiveness figure in your plan?
00:56:09.000 Would you take executive action to achieve it?
00:56:11.000 It does figure in my plan.
00:56:12.000 I've laid out in detail.
00:56:14.000 For example, the legislation passed by the Democratic House calls for immediate $10,000 forgiveness of student loans.
00:56:22.000 It's holding people up.
00:56:24.000 They're in real trouble.
00:56:25.000 They're having to make choices between paying their student loan and paying their rent.
00:56:28.000 Those kinds of decisions.
00:56:29.000 It should be done immediately.
00:56:31.000 Okay, so he wants to just come in and relieve student loan debt.
00:56:33.000 So, a few points here.
00:56:35.000 One, if you paid your bills, you're a sucker.
00:56:37.000 I paid my wife's medical school bills.
00:56:39.000 I paid my law school bills.
00:56:40.000 My parents helped me out with college.
00:56:41.000 We all took on debt and we all paid off that debt in order to pay off our debts.
00:56:45.000 And we did so in the assumption that that was going to be a way of investing in the future.
00:56:50.000 And here comes Joe Biden saying basically you're suckers because not only did you pay off your debt, Now the taxpayer is going to assume everybody else's debt, which means that you're going to have to pay for some jackass Antifa student's degree in queer studies.
00:57:03.000 So I'm a sucker.
00:57:04.000 You're a sucker.
00:57:05.000 If you're a taxpayer, you're a sucker.
00:57:06.000 If you're a high school student, if you're a high school grad and you didn't go to college, you're a serious sucker because you could have gone for free and then just had Joe Biden alleviate the debt.
00:57:14.000 Not only that, you're not going to have to pay because the taxes are going to come.
00:57:17.000 You're going to have to pay for that college student to get that ridiculous degree.
00:57:21.000 What this really is is a subsidy to a university system that indoctrinates kids in stupidity.
00:57:26.000 There are two types of degrees that come out of college systems.
00:57:29.000 There's the type of degree where you actually learn something.
00:57:30.000 My wife was pre-med, so she was in psychobiology.
00:57:33.000 That is a hard science.
00:57:34.000 If you look at the hard sciences, science, tech, engineering, math, the STEM fields, those are actual degrees with actual skill sets.
00:57:41.000 Then, there are what we at UCLA used to call the North Campus degrees.
00:57:44.000 They're the English majors and the poli-sci majors.
00:57:46.000 I'll speak about poli-sci because I was a poli-sci major.
00:57:48.000 It was useless crap.
00:57:49.000 The only reason that you got a poli-sci major was so that you could go to law school or brag that you got a poli-sci degree from UCLA without any concomitant skill set.
00:57:56.000 It was a scam designed to give you a degree.
00:57:59.000 These are degree mills.
00:58:00.000 That is what these colleges are.
00:58:02.000 They are designed as sorting mechanisms, as feeder mechanisms.
00:58:06.000 The idea is that employers are, I believe, banned by federal law from giving things like IQ tests in order to determine whether or not you are smart enough to be hired.
00:58:14.000 So instead, we have an entire Ridiculous and backwards and convoluted system where you're supposed to incur tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt to basically take an IQ test, which is all that that a degree from a college basically is, right?
00:58:26.000 Because you take an SAT, which is a low level IQ test or an ACT, same sort of thing.
00:58:30.000 And then you get funneled into a college, and then the college weeds out people who are not particularly hardworking, and then you get the degree, and all an employer learns from that is not that you have a marketable skill set, they learn that you are quote-unquote smart, right?
00:58:41.000 This is why if you have Harvard on your diploma, even if you majored in something really stupid, you're probably more likely to get a job than if you have junior college on your diploma and you majored in something not particularly stupid.
00:58:51.000 Because everybody sort of understands that unless you're majoring in science, technology, engineering, math, then you are basically learning not much of anything.
00:58:58.000 You're just going there to get the degree, and then that sorting mechanism can be used to get you into a job somewhere.
00:59:03.000 We'd be much better off pushing apprenticeship programs.
00:59:05.000 So I have an alternative proposal.
00:59:07.000 Instead of rewarding these colleges with taxpayer money, because again, when you wipe out the debt, taxpayers pick it up.
00:59:12.000 That's all that means.
00:59:13.000 There's no such thing as free college.
00:59:14.000 There's just taxpayers paying for your crappy major.
00:59:18.000 One of the reasons that I like the idea of private institutions providing the loans for colleges, as opposed to the federal government backing them, is because private institutions sometimes take a look at your degree and determine whether they think you're going to pay back.
00:59:29.000 See, the thing about a degree is that it is not foreclosable.
00:59:32.000 When a bank gives you a mortgage on a house, they make an assessment.
00:59:36.000 One, are you going to pay back the debt?
00:59:37.000 Two, if you don't pay back the debt, can they seize the property?
00:59:40.000 It's secured.
00:59:41.000 It's a secured loan.
00:59:42.000 Education is an unsecured loan.
00:59:44.000 There is no collateral they can seize if you stop paying back your debt.
00:59:47.000 So what banks typically do is they look at what you are getting a degree in.
00:59:50.000 If you are getting a degree from Harvard Law, then they can assume that you're going to pay back the debt because you're probably going to get a high-flying law job that makes you a couple hundred grand a year start.
00:59:58.000 That's a better bet than if you are getting a theater major at Wesleyan.
01:00:03.000 That might be harder to get a loan for in the private sector, which is right.
01:00:06.000 The federal government comes in and guarantees all of these loans, which is idiotic because now they are subsidizing a bunch of crappy majors at a bunch of colleges that are just there to indoctrinate you into wokeism.
01:00:15.000 Okay, so this should all be privatized in the first place, but I have another idea.
01:00:19.000 If we are going to actually forgive these debts, how about this?
01:00:22.000 How about instead of having the taxpayers forgive the debts, how about if you have a useless major and you're not earning a lot of money and you actually have serious loan debt because you took out a bunch of loans to do that theater major in lesbian dance theory over at Wesleyan?
01:00:35.000 How about this?
01:00:36.000 How about Wesleyan has to eat the cost?
01:00:38.000 Because Wesleyan was in on the scam.
01:00:39.000 Wesleyan knew you weren't going to get a job in lesbian dance after you got your degree.
01:00:44.000 How about they, who helped perpetuate the scam, they have to eat the cost?
01:00:48.000 That would end this scam, this grift, right quick, wouldn't it?
01:00:51.000 But Joe Biden has no intention of doing that because, of course, these colleges are churning out Democratic voters.
01:00:55.000 They're a way of indoctrinating people into ideologies that Joe Biden favors.
01:01:00.000 This is an anti-blue-collar program.
01:01:01.000 It doesn't help high school grads.
01:01:03.000 It does not care for people who don't feel like wasting four years of their lives and hundreds of thousands of dollars at a college to earn a degree in crap.
01:01:11.000 It doesn't help people who have already paid their debts.
01:01:13.000 And it subsidizes people who are in the least profitable and least useful majors.
01:01:18.000 This is a very regressive program that Joe Biden is pushing.
01:01:22.000 Naturally, but this is the left.
01:01:24.000 I mean, the left-wing Democratic Party is now basically a coalition of the intersectionally aggrieved and the woke white people.
01:01:34.000 That's what the Democratic Party coalition is.
01:01:35.000 Well, good luck with that in the future.
01:01:37.000 Okay, meanwhile, the media are trying to pave the ground Going forward for a Biden administration, they're trying to somehow create the narrative that Biden ought to get back in the Iran deal.
01:01:46.000 So one of the signal achievements of the Trump administration was getting out of the Iran deal, which put the Iranian mullahs behind the eight ball economically.
01:01:52.000 It put them in a very difficult situation because all of their ability to access world markets basically collapsed.
01:01:57.000 They've been in a state of economic collapse for years.
01:01:59.000 It has prevented them from achieving the kind of So now the media have to come up with some excuse why Joe Biden should be able to cut a new deal with the Iranian government, which is on the ropes.
01:02:10.000 in Syria. So that was very successful. And it also happened to result in an anti-Iranian alliance between Israel and the UAE and de facto Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan. All of that was very good.
01:02:22.000 So now the media have to come up with some excuse why Joe Biden should be able to cut a new deal with the Iranian government, which is on the ropes. So the way that they are now crafting this narrative is that Donald Trump is going to nuke Iran, right?
01:02:35.000 That Donald Trump is creating danger in Iran.
01:02:38.000 And Iran has created new nuclear facilities that Trump wants to pursue militants.
01:02:43.000 And the only alternative is for Joe Biden to come in and sign an agreement with the Iranians.
01:02:47.000 So they are pushing a headline suggesting that Trump sought options for attacking Iran to stop its growing nuclear program.
01:02:52.000 This is the article from the New York Times.
01:02:55.000 OK, now here's what the article says, and you'll see how it doesn't agree with the headline.
01:02:58.000 President Trump asked senior advisors in an Oval Office meeting on Thursday whether he had options to take action against Iran's main nuclear site in the coming weeks.
01:03:04.000 The meeting occurred a day after international inspectors reported a significant increase in the country's stockpile of nuclear material, four current and former U.S.
01:03:11.000 officials said on Monday.
01:03:12.000 A range of senior advisors dissuaded the president from moving ahead with the military strike.
01:03:16.000 The advisors, including Vice President Pence, Secretary of State Pompeo, Christopher Miller, the acting defense secretary, and General Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, warned a strike against Iran's facilities could easily escalate into a broader conflict in the last weeks of Trump's presidency.
01:03:29.000 Trump asked his top national security officials what options were available and how to respond.
01:03:34.000 After Pompeo and Milley described the potential risks, officials left the meeting believing a missile attack inside Iran was off the table.
01:03:40.000 So in other words, Trump said, what are our options on nuclear facilities?
01:03:43.000 They said, well, we shouldn't do anything military.
01:03:45.000 And Trump said, OK.
01:03:46.000 The headline is Trump considered military attack because the media are now attempting to craft a narrative where the only alternative to Joe Biden making concessions to a terrorist regime is war.
01:03:55.000 We did this already, right?
01:03:56.000 We did this back in 2009, 2010, when the Obama administration crafted a narrative and then threw it out there for stenographers to push.
01:04:04.000 Jeffrey Goldberg to push.
01:04:05.000 Ben Rhodes bragged openly that this is what they were doing.
01:04:07.000 Ben Rhodes, who was then Deputy National Security Advisor, bragged openly that the Obama administration had crafted a lie around Iran, which is that there were only two alternatives, full-fledged war with Iran and submitting to Iran's will.
01:04:18.000 And it turned out that was crap because Trump came in and did a third way and was very successful in containing Iran.
01:04:23.000 He killed off their terrorist leader, Qasem Soleimani.
01:04:26.000 He created an alliance against them that checked their power.
01:04:29.000 He drove their economy into the ground.
01:04:30.000 All of that was very good.
01:04:31.000 So now the media are trying to revive the same narrative Obama pushed the first time.
01:04:35.000 That the only alternatives are open warfare with the Iranian government or making concessions to the Iranian government.
01:04:40.000 Don't fall for it.
01:04:41.000 It is a media crafted narrative and it is garbage.
01:04:44.000 But the media will shift on a dime when it comes to foreign policy anyway.
01:04:47.000 There is a certain humor in the fact that the media are very upset that Trump is now talking about a troop drawdown in Iraq and Afghanistan, and this prompted CNN's Breonna Keillor to rip Trump for this, say this is very bad.
01:04:57.000 Now, I'm old enough to remember when Barack Obama pledged a troop drawdown in Iraq, did it, and created ISIS.
01:05:02.000 I'm old enough to remember when he pledged a troop drawdown in Afghanistan and was negotiating with the Taliban.
01:05:06.000 And you know what the media said then?
01:05:07.000 What a forward-thinking foreign policy leader.
01:05:09.000 Now, CNN's like, how dare Trump do this exact same thing Joe Biden and Barack Obama pushed?
01:05:15.000 Who does this?
01:05:17.000 Who drops something like this in the lap of an incoming president?
01:05:22.000 No one, other than Donald Trump.
01:05:24.000 I think what he's trying to do is go through his bucket list, quite honestly, and saying, you know, he promised to get out of these wars, and he was going to do it.
01:05:33.000 And Jake Tapper was... But Gloria, can we just be clear on that?
01:05:36.000 He's not getting out of these wars.
01:05:38.000 That's right.
01:05:38.000 That's right.
01:05:39.000 It's not like he's ending it.
01:05:40.000 That's right.
01:05:41.000 He's just handicapping the next guy who has to deal with it.
01:05:44.000 I mean, who would do something like this?
01:05:46.000 Who would say, for example, in the last month of an administration, push forward a U.N.
01:05:50.000 resolution completely upending all previous conventional wisdom about Israeli claims to, for example, Jerusalem?
01:05:56.000 Who would do that by abstaining from a U.N.
01:05:57.000 Oh wait, Barack Obama did that.
01:05:57.000 resolution?
01:05:59.000 In the last month.
01:06:00.000 Just as a parting shot at Bibi Netanyahu and the Jews.
01:06:04.000 So yeah, spare me.
01:06:05.000 Spare me.
01:06:06.000 God, these media folks, they gotta be replaced.
01:06:09.000 Go over to dailywire.com, get A True Narrative, join a bunch of other services.
01:06:14.000 Stop, cut your cable.
01:06:15.000 Enough of this.
01:06:16.000 All right, we'll be back here later today with two additional hours of content.
01:06:18.000 Otherwise, we'll see you here tomorrow.
01:06:19.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
01:06:19.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
01:06:21.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Colton Haas.
01:06:28.000 Executive Producer Jeremy Boring.
01:06:30.000 Our Supervising Producers are Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling.
01:06:33.000 Production Manager Paweł Lajdowski.
01:06:35.000 Our Associate Producers are Nick Sheehan and Rebecca Doyle.
01:06:38.000 The show is edited by Adam Siovitz.
01:06:40.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Koromina.
01:06:42.000 Hair and Makeup is by Nika Geneva.
01:06:44.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire production.
01:06:46.000 Copyright Daily Wire 2020.
01:06:49.000 Georgia discovers 2,600 missing votes from a pro-Trump county.
01:06:53.000 Experts tell Biden to cancel Thanksgiving.
01:06:55.000 And Dr. Fauci tells President Trump to concede for public health.