The Ben Shapiro Show - August 28, 2018


The Democratic Platform | Ep. 612


Episode Stats

Length

53 minutes

Words per Minute

196.4399

Word Count

10,539

Sentence Count

733

Misogynist Sentences

34

Hate Speech Sentences

20


Summary

Trump tweets that the mainstream media are "fake news" and then goes on to say that he doesn't even use a computer to get the information he gets from them. Is this a true story or is it just what the left has been telling us all along with a bunch of other nonsense? Ben Shapiro breaks it all down and explains why this is a very bad idea. He also talks about Mint Mobile's new plan to cut your wireless bill down to 15 bucks a month and how you can save thousands of dollars without sacrificing quality of service. And finally, he explains why CNN is obsessed with proving that Donald Trump is the scariest person who ever was and why it's a bad idea to have a secret meeting with a Russian lawyer in the White House. Ben Shapiro is a columnist for The Daily Wire and host of the podcast "The Ben Shapiro Show" and is a regular contributor to the New York Times and CNN. His work has been featured on CNN, NPR, CBS and other media outlets. He is an avid reader and supporter of the NFL and other sports teams. He is also a frequent contributor to The Weekly Standard and has been named one of the 50 Most Influential People in the World by Newsweek. His profile can be found at The Daily Beast, and he is on The Huffington Post, The Hill, and The New Republic, and is widely read by The Daily Caller, among other publications, including The New York Magazine, The Atlantic and The Globe and Mail, among many other prestigious publications. Ben's bio is listed in The Atlantic, The Economist, The New Yorker, and Harvard Law Review, The Globe, The Harvard Crimson, and the Harvard Spectacle, The Telegraph, The Daily Telegraph, and Newsweek, The National Post, and Playboy, and many other publications. He's on the cover of Time Magazine, and has a blog with a list of the most influential people in the internet, including Playboy, The Hollywood Reporter, and could be found on the streets of New York, and so much more! - Ben Shapiro's latest book is out now! Subscribe to Ben Shapiro s newest novel, The Dark Side of the Mind, by Ben Shapiro, Outtrope, out now, out on Amazon, out in paperback, and on Podchronicity, is out on the pod, too! and you can get a copy of his new novel, Outtro, out soon! out on Vimeo, too.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Nancy Pelosi talks race.
00:00:01.000 Paul Krugman talks fascism.
00:00:03.000 And President Trump talks NAFTA.
00:00:04.000 So, a lot of talking.
00:00:06.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:06.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:12.000 I have a lot to get to today.
00:00:13.000 I have a crazy story out of Brown University that really is indicative of where the left is intellectually, and it is not a good place.
00:00:20.000 But first, I want to talk to you about your wireless provider.
00:00:24.000 The big in big wireless provider stands for a lot of things.
00:00:26.000 Big contracts, big bills, big fees.
00:00:28.000 AT&T has a new $800 million administrative fee increase.
00:00:32.000 What big wireless doesn't actually want you to know is that there's a way to cut your wireless bill all the way down to 15 bucks a month.
00:00:38.000 Which is where Mint Mobile comes in.
00:00:39.000 They're the game-changing company that's taken everything wrong with big wireless and they've made it right.
00:00:43.000 You can save probably a thousand dollars a year with Mint Mobile without sacrificing quality of service.
00:00:48.000 They work with other companies to ensure that your coverage is the best there is.
00:00:52.000 It's just terrific.
00:00:53.000 Mint Mobile makes it really easy to cut your wireless bill down to just 15 bucks a month.
00:00:56.000 Use your own phone with any Mint Mobile plan.
00:00:58.000 You can keep your old number along with all your existing contacts.
00:01:01.000 You can choose between two, five, or ten gigabyte 4G LTE plans.
00:01:04.000 No more paying for unlimited data that you're never going to use.
00:01:07.000 Every plan comes with unlimited text and talk.
00:01:10.000 And if you're not 100% satisfied, Mint Mobile has you covered with their seven-day money-back guarantee.
00:01:14.000 They save you money by cutting out the middleman and also they're not going to sell you data packages you're never going to use.
00:01:19.000 Ditch your old wireless bill.
00:01:20.000 Start saving with Mint Mobile to get your new Mint wireless plan for just 15 bucks a month plus free shipping on your Mint Mobile SIM card.
00:01:26.000 Go to mintmobile.com slash ben.
00:01:28.000 That's M-I-N-T mobile dot com slash ben.
00:01:31.000 Mintmobile.com slash ben.
00:01:32.000 Cut your wireless bill down to 15 bucks a month.
00:01:34.000 Get free shipping on that SIM card at mintmobile.com slash ben.
00:01:38.000 Use that slash ben to let them know that we sent you.
00:01:40.000 Okay, so.
00:01:41.000 Well, the media keep proclaiming that Donald Trump is the scariest person who ever was.
00:01:46.000 President Trump continues to bash the mainstream media, continues to suggest that they are indeed fake news.
00:01:52.000 He continued that this morning when he woke up at 5.30 in the morning and decided to re-watch Lou Dobbs.
00:01:56.000 Yes, that's actually what happened.
00:01:57.000 He woke up at 5.30 in the morning, and he TiVos a lot of the shows on Fox News and Fox Business, and he decided to watch Lou Dobbs' show.
00:02:04.000 Lou Dobbs is talking about the search results over in Google, and President Trump decided to tweet this out.
00:02:10.000 This is 14.
00:02:11.000 Let's figure it out.
00:02:31.000 Results on Trump news are from national left-wing media.
00:02:35.000 Very dangerous.
00:02:36.000 Google and others are suppressing voices of conservatives and hiding information and news that is good.
00:02:41.000 They're controlling what we can and cannot see.
00:02:43.000 This is a very serious situation.
00:02:46.000 Will be addressed.
00:02:48.000 Well, I don't think the president actually Googles things.
00:02:50.000 He apparently doesn't use a computer, really.
00:02:52.000 So where he got this information is that Lou Dobbs was talking about search results when it comes to Google News.
00:02:58.000 And it's true that the Google News bias in favor of large media organizations is pretty severe.
00:03:03.000 And that does have an actual impact on the kind of news that people consume.
00:03:07.000 And it does mean that they actually consume a fair bit of misinformation that is put out by the mainstream media.
00:03:11.000 Now, it's important to remember that when President Trump says things like fake news and means just any news he doesn't like,
00:03:17.000 He was not the originator of the phrase fake news.
00:03:19.000 The originator of the phrase fake news, Trump says that he made it up.
00:03:21.000 He didn't make it up.
00:03:22.000 It was made up by the left.
00:03:23.000 The left suggested that Hillary Clinton had lost the election, if you recall, due to fake news.
00:03:28.000 There were a bunch of false stories put out on Facebook.
00:03:31.000 People believed those false stories.
00:03:32.000 And then they voted for Donald Trump instead of Hillary Clinton.
00:03:35.000 President Trump said the actual fake news are the members of the mainstream media.
00:03:39.000 And unfortunately, members of the mainstream media seem intent on proving his point
00:03:43.000 Almost every day, the latest example comes courtesy of CNN.
00:03:46.000 So, President Trump has focused on CNN incessantly, and there's a reason for that.
00:03:51.000 Here's the latest example.
00:03:52.000 CNN absolutely botched a story.
00:03:55.000 ...claiming that President Trump knew in advance about the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting between members of the Trump campaign and a Russian-backed lawyer supposedly offering dirt on Hillary Clinton.
00:04:04.000 You know there's been a lot of focus on this particular meeting, obviously, because in the run-up to the meeting, Donald Trump Jr.
00:04:09.000 was emailing with an associate of his from Russia, who's basically saying that the Russian government wants to supply the Trump campaign with dirt on Hillary, so why don't you meet with this lawyer?
00:04:17.000 And Trump Jr.
00:04:18.000 was like, sounds great.
00:04:20.000 And then they had the meeting.
00:04:21.000 Well, one of the big questions has been, did Trump know in advance about the meeting?
00:04:24.000 Well, CNN reported July 26, 2018, claiming that Trump did know in advance about the meeting.
00:04:30.000 Well, it turns out the person who supplied that information was Lanny Davis, who is the Clinton Associated Lawyer for Michael Cohen, who at the time was attempting to show the Mueller investigation that Michael Cohen had something valuable to offer.
00:04:42.000 CNN says it stands by the story, but Davis told the Washington Post this week, quote, I should have been more clear, including with you, that I could not independently confirm what happened.
00:04:50.000 I regret my error.
00:04:52.000 Davis also told Anderson Cooper of CNN, I think the reporting of the story got mixed up in the course of a criminal investigation.
00:04:57.000 We were not the source of the story.
00:05:00.000 The CNN story originally said Davis offered no comment.
00:05:03.000 It turns out that on background, he'd actually provided virtually all of the story.
00:05:07.000 CNN said, quote, we stand by our story.
00:05:08.000 We are confident in our reporting of it.
00:05:11.000 That story rocketed around the media.
00:05:12.000 It was echoed by NBC News and the Washington Post.
00:05:15.000 According to BuzzFeed News, Davis was the confirming source for all of that.
00:05:19.000 Those admissions follow another admission from Lanny Davis, Michael Cohen's lawyer, regarding a claim that President Trump knew beforehand about the hacking of Democratic emails by the Russians.
00:05:27.000 Now Davis says, quote, I am not sure.
00:05:30.000 There's a possibility that is the case, but I am not sure.
00:05:32.000 So the source for half of the media's news regarding Russian collusion and Trump Tower and all the rest of it is Lanny Davis, the lawyer for Michael Cohen, who has now gone on record admitting that he doesn't know what the hell he's talking about.
00:05:44.000 CNN stands by the story anyway.
00:05:45.000 According to Buzzfeed News, quote, In other words, the story reports claim that Cohen had said he was willing to make, not the underlying truth of those claims.
00:05:52.000 In other words, CNN says, listen, we didn't report that Cohen knew that Trump
00:06:06.000 had known about the Trump Tower meeting in advance.
00:06:08.000 No, the CNN story reported that Cohen was willing to tell prosecutors that he might have known about that stuff.
00:06:14.000 So we had carefully caveated this.
00:06:15.000 The decision from CNN to continue to stand by the story suggests it believes the strength of its other sources outweighs any waffling from Davis, according to BuzzFeed, or that the network believes Davis was telling the truth then and not now.
00:06:26.000 But Davis' new statement that he was the source for a story he now refutes raised questions about what action, if any, the network might take.
00:06:36.000 Now, I have some personal experience with stories like this.
00:06:43.000 I remember back in 2013, Chuck Hagel was nominated for Secretary of Defense by the Obama administration.
00:06:49.000 Chuck Hagel was, in my opinion, radically anti-Israel.
00:06:53.000 He was a
00:06:55.000 An isolationist on foreign policy.
00:06:58.000 And there was a big push from the right to stop Chuck Hagel's nomination.
00:07:01.000 Well, I was supplied information by top sources in the Senate that Chuck Hagel had spoken to some group called Friends of Hamas.
00:07:07.000 It was just a rumor.
00:07:08.000 And we reported it on Breitbart News as a rumor.
00:07:10.000 The actual title of the piece said, we called up the White House, the White House basically hung up on us.
00:07:15.000 And the title of the piece was something like, White House spokesperson hangs up based on rumors of Friends of Hamas, something like that.
00:07:22.000 It was pretty clear in the piece that it was a rumor.
00:07:24.000 Now, that was a correctly reported rumor because it turns out that the rumor was not true.
00:07:27.000 But, should we have reported it in the first place?
00:07:29.000 The answer is no, and I've said this multiple times since.
00:07:31.000 It was a mistake not to retract the story.
00:07:33.000 It was a mistake to report the story in the first place.
00:07:35.000 CNN basically did the same thing here, but they're not backing off the story.
00:07:39.000 The same mainstream media that suggested that story was bad, and was largely right, is now suggesting that this story by CNN is kind of okay.
00:07:47.000 And then President Trump complaining about fake news is labeled crazy.
00:07:49.000 You have folks in the media claiming that the news media are the reliable sources in all of this.
00:07:55.000 It's hard to give a lot of credibility to news sources that hold a double standard when it comes to people on the right.
00:08:01.000 They would never hold for people on the left.
00:08:03.000 And the levels to which the media will go in order to disparage and slander the Trump administration are pretty astonishing.
00:08:08.000 It's mostly astonishing because if they would just be accurate about the Trump administration, it's not like they would have nothing to report.
00:08:13.000 But the opinions of the left are so out of the realm of normalcy that it's almost impossible to defend.
00:08:20.000 Take, for example, this column from Jill Filipovich.
00:08:23.000 This is not an objective news piece.
00:08:25.000 This is a column.
00:08:26.000 But Jill Filipovich is a feminist author, and she is the author of a book called The H-Spot, The Feminist Pursuit of Happiness.
00:08:35.000 The book is completely blank.
00:08:35.000 There is no feminist pursuit of happiness.
00:08:37.000 It's just like Michael Knowles' book.
00:08:39.000 So Jill Filipovich writes a piece called Stormy Daniels' Feminist Hero.
00:08:43.000 This is how far the left is willing to go.
00:08:45.000 Stormy Daniels, a porn star who spends her entire career legitimately catering to the worst in men, is now a feminist hero for having sex with a married man once in order to get on The Apprentice, and then taking money to shut up about it, and then reneging on the taking of the money to shut up about it to make a big deal about it.
00:09:04.000 She's a feminist hero.
00:09:05.000 Here's Jill Filipovich, quote,
00:09:25.000 It's an extraordinary admission and an extraordinary political moment, not just because of what it means for Mr. Trump.
00:09:31.000 It marks an unanticipated feminist turning point.
00:09:34.000 Ms.
00:09:34.000 Daniels is an adult film star and, like the president, an unapologetic self-promoter.
00:09:38.000 Hers is not a female archetype that has historically garnered much respect, trust, or sympathy.
00:09:42.000 Well, yeah, because she legitimately gets paid to have sex on film so that other men can masturbate to it.
00:09:48.000 That is legitimately her career.
00:09:50.000 So, yeah, I wouldn't go with feminist archetype there.
00:09:52.000 Yet here she is, an imperfect, entirely self-possessed woman, telling her story with clarity and without shame.
00:09:59.000 And here we are actually listening to her.
00:10:01.000 And let's be clear, the only reason anybody's listening to her is because, one, prurient interest, and two, she's saying crap about a president that the left hates.
00:10:09.000 This is why there's so much power in the fact that Ms.
00:10:11.000 Daniels does not believe her job or her involvement with Mr. Trump or the payoff is her shame to carry.
00:10:15.000 She wants him held accountable and the justice system is actually stepping in.
00:10:19.000 She's refusing to slink away despite being paid to do exactly that in a pattern we've seen too many times from influential men seeking to maintain their dominance and avoid responsibility.
00:10:29.000 Did I miss something here?
00:10:29.000 I thought Stormy Daniels was paid to voluntarily go away and signed a contract to that effect.
00:10:34.000 Was she forced into anything here?
00:10:36.000 I missed that part.
00:10:37.000 So, just to be clear, when you violate a contract, that's good and feminist, so long as it hurts Donald Trump.
00:10:45.000 Jill Philip-Hovich writes, Ms.
00:10:46.000 Daniels is a sex worker, making her the kind of bad woman scorned for her work, who is often not believed when she indicts a powerful man.
00:10:54.000 Well, her work is garbage.
00:10:56.000 And when she, quote, indicts a powerful man, we sort of have to decide whether or not she is credible.
00:11:02.000 Her credibility is not really called into question by the fact that she's a porn star.
00:11:05.000 She's not even claiming she was sexually assaulted or harassed.
00:11:08.000 She's claiming that she had sex with a guy once and then won't shut up about it before an election, right?
00:11:13.000 That's legitimately her entire claim.
00:11:14.000 But this makes her a feminist hero.
00:11:17.000 In a second, we will talk about the feminist heroism of a woman who does girl-on-girl scenes for pay.
00:11:23.000 But first, let's talk about life insurance.
00:11:26.000 So if all of this makes you want to kill yourself, then probably you should get some life insurance because, well, life insurance isn't going to cover suicide.
00:11:32.000 But in any case.
00:11:33.000 A better transition would probably be you should need life insurance because if you die, your family's gonna want money, right?
00:11:37.000 I mean, let's be real about this.
00:11:38.000 We're all gonna plot, and when we do, it would be a mistake for you not to have life insurance.
00:11:42.000 Life insurance is really important.
00:11:43.000 It's also really confusing, which is why 4 out of 10 people don't have it.
00:11:47.000 Maybe you're one of those folks.
00:11:47.000 Maybe you've been holding off because you're procrastinating, but now is the time to get life insurance because the rates are the lowest they've been in 20 years.
00:11:53.000 The best time to buy is now.
00:11:55.000 The best place to buy is policygenius.com.
00:11:57.000 PolicyGenius is the easy way to compare life insurance online in just five minutes.
00:12:01.000 You can compare quotes from the top insurers to find the best policy for you.
00:12:05.000 And when you compare quotes, you save money.
00:12:07.000 It is indeed that simple.
00:12:08.000 PolicyGenius has helped over 4 million people shop for insurance, placed over $20 billion in coverage.
00:12:13.000 They don't just make life insurance easy.
00:12:14.000 They also compare disability insurance and renter's insurance and health insurance.
00:12:18.000 If you care about it, they can cover it.
00:12:19.000 So if you've been putting off getting life insurance, there's no reason to put it off any longer.
00:12:22.000 Go to PolicyGenius.com.
00:12:24.000 Get quotes, apply in minutes.
00:12:25.000 It's that easy.
00:12:26.000 Rates are the lowest in 20 years.
00:12:27.000 Policygenius.com, the easy way to compare and buy life insurance.
00:12:30.000 Go check out Policygenius right now.
00:12:32.000 So, as Joe Filipovich says, the left is celebrating Stormy Daniels as a hero.
00:12:36.000 And the reason that I cite this is because, while the opinion pages in the New York Times objective news pages are separate,
00:12:42.000 The reality is that they're not quite all that separate.
00:12:46.000 The same media sensibility that informs an editorial page that thinks Jill Filipovich has relevant things to say about Stormy Daniels being a feminist hero, they're the same folks who are pushing bad news over at CNN.
00:12:58.000 The hard distinction between opinion and journalism doesn't really exist.
00:13:03.000 It's why we over at The Daily Wire admit what our biases are.
00:13:05.000 But the objective news media at places like CNN will not admit that bias.
00:13:08.000 Instead, they claim they're objective truth-tellers, when in reality, most of them feel like Joe Filippovich does.
00:13:13.000 Anyway, Filippovich continues.
00:13:15.000 She says, Ms.
00:13:16.000 Daniels' lack of shame about her line of work has led to a right-wing escalation, with conservative media outlets hounding her as a prostitute once they realized she would meet Pornstar with a shrug.
00:13:25.000 Well, I mean, no.
00:13:26.000 People were calling her kind of a prostitute because she was kind of a prostitute.
00:13:29.000 Like, I mean, just...
00:13:31.000 Like, having sex on film for pay is not markedly better than having sex not on film for pay.
00:13:37.000 Rudy Giuliani, one of Mr. Trump's lawyers, said in June, although he respects all human beings, Ms.
00:13:41.000 Daniels is apparently one exception.
00:13:42.000 He said,
00:14:01.000 How is a feminist equating a woman who has sex for money on film for the pleasure of men with a rape victim?
00:14:08.000 How is that even a possibility?
00:14:10.000 You want to know the most anti-feminist thing that I've heard today?
00:14:12.000 It is this, okay?
00:14:13.000 It is not anything that Rudy Giuliani said.
00:14:15.000 It's something I'm saying right now.
00:14:16.000 The most anti-feminist thing you can say is that Stormy Daniels is akin to a rape victim in any way.
00:14:21.000 She is not a rape victim.
00:14:22.000 She's a woman who voluntarily has sex for money.
00:14:25.000 Again, none of this is to let President Trump off the hook for stooping women who have sex for money, which he does apparently on a fairly regular basis.
00:14:31.000 But the left attempts to paint everyone who is anti-Trump as some sort of great hero in the struggle.
00:14:37.000 I don't think it's going to redound to their benefit in the long run.
00:14:41.000 Well, no.
00:14:41.000 Women can be flawed.
00:14:42.000 But if you choose to do what Stormy Daniels does, that comes along with some character consequences.
00:15:02.000 It's pretty insane that this article was considered brilliant enough to make the pages of the New York Times.
00:15:07.000 But this is where we are.
00:15:10.000 This is where we are.
00:15:10.000 So this is just great stuff.
00:15:12.000 Stormy Daniels, heroin.
00:15:13.000 That's not the only element of stupidity in the pages of the New York Times.
00:15:17.000 The New York Times also features today a piece by Paul Krugman.
00:15:21.000 Who is one of the one of the appointed idiots over at the New York Times.
00:15:24.000 Krugman knows something about international currency.
00:15:26.000 He knows nothing about virtually anything else.
00:15:28.000 He has a piece today in the New York Times talking about how Donald Trump is ushering in the era of fascism.
00:15:34.000 He says, why it can happen here.
00:15:35.000 We are very close to becoming another Poland or Hungary.
00:15:38.000 He says, As of 2018, it hardly seems like a joke at all.
00:15:39.000 What Freedom House calls illiberalism is on the rise across Eastern Europe.
00:15:56.000 This includes Poland and Hungary, both still members of the EU, in which democracy as we normally understand it is already dead.
00:16:01.000 In both countries, the ruling parties, Law and Justice in Poland, Fidesz in Hungary, have established regimes that maintain the forms of popular elections, but have destroyed the independence of the judiciary, suppressed freedom of the press, institutionalized large-scale corruption, and effectively delegitimized dissent.
00:16:16.000 The result seems likely to be one-party rule for the foreseeable future.
00:16:20.000 This is correct, by the way.
00:16:21.000 The situation in Hungary and Poland is not a good one.
00:16:24.000 A lot of the moves toward liberalism in the aftermath of the communist collapse has been replaced by a move toward one-party rule in quasi-fascist mode.
00:16:32.000 Jamie Kerchick has a great book on this called The End of Europe that I've recommended on the show before, and he talks specifically about the situations in places like Poland and Hungary.
00:16:40.000 But here's where Krugman goes wrong.
00:16:41.000 He says,
00:17:03.000 OK, this column is going to look really stupid when and if the Democrats win back the House in 2018, the Senate in 2020 and the presidency in 2020.
00:17:10.000 This idea that one party rule is on the horizon here, that that's the next thing that's happening, is just utterly baseless.
00:17:16.000 There is no evidence for it whatsoever.
00:17:18.000 And Krugman tries to cite a few
00:17:21.000 A few situations in which Republicans have moved to strip particular public officials of power.
00:17:28.000 For example, North Carolina, where after a Democrat won the governorship, Republicans passed legislation stripping the governor's office of power.
00:17:34.000 Okay, that's why they still have a legislature in North Carolina.
00:17:37.000 But in any case,
00:17:38.000 He suggests that what's happened is that the Republicans have moved toward fascism.
00:17:43.000 They've moved toward the Hungary-Poland model.
00:17:45.000 Now, I will acknowledge that the populism of Donald Trump is a lot more akin to right-wing nationalist parties in Europe than it is to traditional Republican principles in many ways.
00:17:53.000 In terms of his actual governance, however, his actual governance has been small government conservatism, except when it comes to a lot of spending proposals.
00:17:59.000 So Trump talks like a right-wing European nationalist.
00:18:02.000 There's no question about that.
00:18:03.000 When it comes to policy, that's not quite the same thing.
00:18:05.000 We have a system of checks and balances in the United States that directly cuts against this sort of assumption of power.
00:18:11.000 Also, Krugman
00:18:13.000 goes out of his way to ignore a lot of the conditions that led to the rise of those right-wing parties in Europe.
00:18:19.000 Kerchik talks about, in that book, End of Europe, why it is that all these right-wing parties have risen.
00:18:23.000 And there are a couple of reasons.
00:18:24.000 One of those reasons is the politically correct attempt to rewrite history in certain ways that led to a severe backlash in a lot of these countries.
00:18:32.000 And the second is a forcible attempt to impose bars on discussion about things like immigration.
00:18:37.000 So one of the reasons that you've seen, for example, the Swedish Democrats, which is a more right-wing party in Sweden, start to gain all sorts of power is because there was a forcible attempt in Sweden to quash any serious discussion about the influx of immigrants from the Middle East into Sweden.
00:18:52.000 That led to a serious backlash and small fringe parties suddenly gaining a lot of prominence.
00:18:56.000 You've seen that happen across Europe.
00:18:58.000 In other words, the left-wing attempt to stifle discussion has actually led
00:19:01.000 to a move toward a more authoritarian form of government in various areas of Europe.
00:19:06.000 And yet that's exactly what the left seeks to do on a routine basis here in the United States.
00:19:11.000 Krugman says that all the principles of the Republican Party are gone, and it's just because they lost their principles.
00:19:17.000 He says, why is America the birthplace of democracy so close to following the lead of other countries that have recently destroyed it?
00:19:23.000 Don't tell me about economic anxiety.
00:19:24.000 That's not what happened in Poland, which grew steadily through the financial crisis and its aftermath.
00:19:28.000 And it's not what happened here in 2016.
00:19:30.000 Study after study has found that racial resentment, not economic distress, drove Trump voters.
00:19:34.000 No, what those studies actually found is that resentment at a left that castigated people on the right as cultural outsiders is what drove Trump to victory.
00:19:42.000 This idea that it was purely issues of race is nonsense.
00:19:45.000 What it really was
00:19:47.000 Was cultural anxiety about a left that was championing the idea that America was changing for the better because all of the people in the middle of the country were being marginalized.
00:19:55.000 The white blue collar workers in Ohio were being marginalized and the press was cheering that on as a grand victory of the leftist vision.
00:20:02.000 That has driven a lot of people into the arms of a sort of toxic populism that is quite bad in rhetoric.
00:20:09.000 But the United States is a lot more robust in its defenses against those sort of things than Europe is, number one.
00:20:14.000 And number two, the left refuses to acknowledge its own culpability in helping to bring about the rise of exactly that sort of populism, which, by the way, is mirrored by a populism on the left from people like Bernie Sanders.
00:20:24.000 I'll give you an example of the sort of political correctness that is taking over the left.
00:20:28.000 This is an amazing example.
00:20:30.000 Over at Brown University, there was a study.
00:20:34.000 There's a news story about a study, rather.
00:20:35.000 And that study focused in on what we'll talk about.
00:20:39.000 Sorry, hold on.
00:20:40.000 We'll talk about the study in just one second.
00:20:42.000 First, we need to talk about you upgrading your business.
00:20:45.000 Okay, so if you need to upgrade your business, you need better employees.
00:20:47.000 Let's be real about this.
00:20:48.000 The people you have working for you, they're mediocre at best.
00:20:51.000 You need to get some new people in there.
00:20:52.000 New blood, fresh blood.
00:20:53.000 ZipRecruiter is for you.
00:20:54.000 ZipRecruiter sends your job to over 100 of the web's leading job boards.
00:20:58.000 They don't stop there.
00:20:59.000 With their powerful matching technology, ZipRecruiter scans thousands of resumes to find people with the right experience and invite them to apply to your job.
00:21:06.000 As applications come in, ZipRecruiter analyzes everyone in a spotlight, the top candidates, so you never miss a great match.
00:21:12.000 ZipRecruiter is so effective that 80% of employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate through the site within the first day.
00:21:19.000 With results like that, it is no wonder that ZipRecruiter is the highest rated hiring site in the United States.
00:21:24.000 And right now, my listeners can try ZipRecruiter for free at this exclusive web address, ZipRecruiter.com slash dailywire.
00:21:31.000 That's ZipRecruiter.com slash dailywire.
00:21:34.000 D-A-I-L-Y-W-I-R-E.
00:21:36.000 ZipRecruiter.com slash dailywire.
00:21:38.000 We use it here at the Daily Wire offices.
00:21:40.000 It's great.
00:21:41.000 ZipRecruiter is indeed the smartest way to hire.
00:21:42.000 And again, you can try it out for free at ziprecruiter.com slash dailywire.
00:21:46.000 Okay, so I'm arguing here that political correctness has helped drive a populist backlash that is not good for the country.
00:21:53.000 I don't think the populist backlash is great for the country, but I think the political correctness is even worse for the country.
00:21:58.000 And so what we've seen is a toxicity in politics that is led by an attempt to quash debate, not just about
00:22:04.000 Terrible, horrible, no good, very bad ideas.
00:22:06.000 But about mainstream ideas.
00:22:08.000 I'm talking about mainstream scientific investigation is being forcibly quashed by the forces of political correctness on the left.
00:22:15.000 Today's example is particularly insane.
00:22:18.000 It comes courtesy of Brown University.
00:22:20.000 So Brown University has now pulled down a news story on a study conducted by one of its own researchers.
00:22:25.000 The study focused on what it described as rapid-onset gender dysphoria.
00:22:29.000 Gender dysphoria, gender identity disorder, transgenderism, that was not present in early youth.
00:22:34.000 This wasn't a kid who was three and said, I'm a little boy when I was a little girl.
00:22:37.000 Instead, it was gender dysphoria that manifested within days or weeks in teens and young adults.
00:22:41.000 In other words, it's become trendy in some areas of the world.
00:22:44.000 For people to declare themselves transgender.
00:22:46.000 And you've seen this in the statistics.
00:22:48.000 The number of people in Britain who have reported themselves to, basically, institutes that help deal with transgenderism has doubled in the course of one year.
00:22:56.000 Don't tell me that evolution radically shifted in the course of one year, or that there were this many people who are transgender who just realized it in the last year.
00:23:04.000 That they'd felt this way since they were three, but now that they watched it on TV, they finally, finally realized that this was happening.
00:23:09.000 As I say, when it comes to human behavior, a large component of human behavior is indeed biological, and a huge component of human behavior is biological responses to environment.
00:23:19.000 Environment does matter when it comes to all sorts of behavior.
00:23:22.000 It's so funny, the left will acknowledge this when it comes to things like IQ.
00:23:26.000 That IQ is indeed responsive, to a certain extent, to environment.
00:23:30.000 They'll deny that IQ even exists with regard to biology, which is bizarre.
00:23:33.000 Or at least they'll make the case that biological studies with regard to IQ should not be done, because we can't look at the biology of IQ, but we certainly should pretend that all sexual behavior is innately biological, and therefore, if you have a drive toward a sexual behavior, this means that you were born this way, right?
00:23:47.000 This is the Lady Gaga case about biology.
00:23:50.000 The reality is that human behavior is quite malleable, particularly in the sexual arena.
00:23:56.000 And one of the things that has happened with regard to transgenderism is as it becomes more prominent in the media, there are more and more people who are being confused.
00:24:03.000 There are more and more people who believe that because they feel like outsiders, this must mean that they actually are outsiders in their own body.
00:24:09.000 And that's essentially what this study was positing.
00:24:12.000 The study author is a woman named Lisa Littman.
00:24:15.000 I assume that she's on the left because she works at Brown.
00:24:16.000 I can't imagine that she's not.
00:24:18.000 She's an assistant professor of the practice of behavioral and social sciences at Brown's School of Public Health.
00:24:23.000 And she stated, quote, One of the main conclusions is that more research needs to be done.
00:24:32.000 You can tell, by the way, that she doesn't like the conclusions of her own study when she keeps saying more research needs to be done.
00:24:37.000 Just descriptive studies.
00:24:39.000 Aren't randomized controlled trials.
00:24:40.000 You can't tell cause and effect.
00:24:41.000 You can't tell prevalence.
00:24:42.000 It's going to take more studies to bring in more information, but this is a start.
00:24:45.000 So what exactly was the study?
00:24:47.000 Here's what the study found.
00:24:48.000 Lipman talked to 250 parents of children who suffered from rapid onset gender dysphoria.
00:24:53.000 According to Science Daily, among the noteworthy patterns, Lipman found in the survey data,
00:24:58.000 21% of parents reported their child had one or more friends become transgender identified at around the same time.
00:25:03.000 20% reported an increase in their child's social media use around the same time as experiencing gender dysphoria symptoms.
00:25:11.000 45% reported both.
00:25:13.000 So in other words, a large, large minority of parents who were surveyed
00:25:18.000 I don't know.
00:25:37.000 Revelling, presumably, in transgender media coverage.
00:25:41.000 The pattern of clusters of teens in friend groups becoming transgender-identified, the group dynamics of these friend groups, and the types of advice viewed online led Littman to the hypothesis that friends and online sources could spread certain beliefs, which is common sense, and which is something that folks on the right have been saying, that when you have a society that pushes certain messages about sexuality, it actually has an impact on how people behave sexually.
00:26:03.000 Which we have known forever.
00:26:04.000 Okay, it's true with regard to porn habits.
00:26:06.000 It is true with regard to homosexuality.
00:26:08.000 It is true with regard to transgenderism.
00:26:10.000 It is true with regard to every sort of type of sexual experimentation.
00:26:13.000 The more exposure a certain practice gets in the media, the more people are going to try it out.
00:26:17.000 And that's not saying there's not a biological component to transgenderism.
00:26:20.000 Perhaps there is.
00:26:22.000 I assume that there probably is, particularly in young kids.
00:26:25.000 It's not, even assuming there's not a biological component to, it's certainly not assuming there's not a biological component to homosexuality.
00:26:31.000 Particularly when it comes to twin studies, it shows there is a biological component, although the idea that it's completely biological is belied by the fact that even in twin studies, about 50% of twins are disparate, meaning if you have genetically identical twins, only about 50% of them are both gay.
00:26:47.000 Right, if one's gay and the other one half the time is straight, which would suggest it's not completely biological since they have the same DNA.
00:26:52.000 Examples, so what are these beliefs that are being promulgated by media?
00:26:55.000 Examples include the belief that non-specific symptoms such as feeling uncomfortable in their own skins or feeling like they don't fit in
00:27:02.000 Which could be part of normal puberty or associated with trauma should be perceived as gender dysphoria.
00:27:08.000 In other words, the media and friends constantly saying you feel uncomfortable in your own skin or you are, God forbid, raped, something terrible happened to you, and now you feel uncomfortable sexually.
00:27:17.000 Maybe it's because you're actually a member of the opposite gender.
00:27:20.000 What other beliefs?
00:27:21.000 The belief that the only path to happiness is transition, which is something that the media push non-stop.
00:27:27.000 Non-stop the media push this idea that if you are uncomfortable in your own skin, the only possible solution is hormone treatment and to mutilate your genitals.
00:27:33.000 The belief that anyone who disagrees with the teen is transphobic and should be cut out of their life.
00:27:38.000 This is another one of the areas that if you are a teen and you go to your parents and you say, Mom, I'm actually a boy and you're a girl.
00:27:45.000 And your parents say, No, sweetheart, you know, I know that you're having a tough time right now.
00:27:48.000 Let's go talk to a psychologist.
00:27:49.000 That this means your parents is transphobic and hates you.
00:27:52.000 And it's something that's being pushed also.
00:27:53.000 This is what the study says.
00:27:55.000 Of the parents who provided information about their child's friendship group, about a third responded and more than half of the kids in the friendship group became transgender identified.
00:28:03.000 More than half the kids in a particular transgender group became transgender identified.
00:28:08.000 In other words, there's a certain psychological contagion that pertains to sexual experimentation and gender experimentation.
00:28:15.000 Which is exactly what you would figure, because cliques have existed in schools for a very long time.
00:28:21.000 Any trend, any trend that exists in a public school, in any school setting, is going to bring people within that clique.
00:28:28.000 Hey, how is it that you get kids to dress like idiot goths?
00:28:31.000 All you have to do is get a couple of kids to dress like idiot goths and then all the friends dress like idiot goths.
00:28:35.000 The same thing holds true when you have a media that is glorifying Caitlyn Jenner as Woman of the Year.
00:28:40.000 A group with 50% of its members becoming transgender-identified represents a rate that is 70 times the expected prevalence for young adults.
00:28:48.000 70 times, according to Litman.
00:28:50.000 This is the Brown University researcher.
00:28:53.000 Additionally, 62% of parents reported their teen or young adults had one or more diagnoses of a psychiatric disorder or neurodevelopmental disability before the onset of gender dysphoria.
00:29:03.000 So in other words, we already know about comorbidity between depression and gender dysphoria.
00:29:07.000 The idea here is that it's possible that other mental conditions are translating themselves over to gender dysphoria, thanks to peers in the group who are suggesting that this is probably the solution to whatever difficulty that you're having in life.
00:29:20.000 48% reported their child had experienced a traumatic or stressful event prior to the onset of gender dysphoria, including being bullied, sexually assaulted, or having their parents get divorced.
00:29:28.000 So, in other words, when you have troubled kids, they are more likely to experience what this researcher calls rapid-onset gender dysphoria.
00:29:35.000 So what did the left do with this study?
00:29:36.000 Did they say, okay, well let's look at the data, maybe we should drill down, maybe we should go ahead and do further research on this, maybe we should take a look at the fact that rates of gender dysphoria are rapidly multiplying across the West.
00:29:47.000 Australia, Great Britain, Canada, the United States, it's happening everywhere.
00:29:51.000 Why is this happening?
00:29:51.000 Is it because there's a sudden biological shift in human genomes?
00:29:56.000 Or is it possible that environmental and social conditions actually make a difference with regard to sexual behavior and identification?
00:30:02.000 Instead of doing that, Brown University had a different solution.
00:30:05.000 A different solution.
00:30:06.000 I'm going to tell you about that solution in just one second.
00:30:07.000 First, you're going to have to go over to Daily Wire.
00:30:09.000 So, Daily Wire, you get $9.99 a month.
00:30:12.000 You get the rest of the show.
00:30:14.000 You get the rest of Andrew Klavan's show.
00:30:15.000 You get the rest of Michael Moll's show.
00:30:16.000 You get all of those things for $9.99 a month.
00:30:19.000 You also get the wonderful mug, right?
00:30:21.000 This here mug right here.
00:30:23.000 This leftist here is hot or cold tumbler for $99 a year.
00:30:26.000 That's with the annual subscription.
00:30:27.000 Also, please go and subscribe over at YouTube or iTunes.
00:30:30.000 That means that you will get
00:30:31.000 Our Sunday special.
00:30:32.000 This Sunday we have on a fantastic guest who I don't know who it is yet, but it will be fantastic because they're all great.
00:30:37.000 We only have on good guests.
00:30:38.000 So go check that out as well.
00:30:40.000 We are the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast in the nation.
00:30:47.000 OK, so what did Brown University do with all of this?
00:30:51.000 What did Brown do with all this?
00:30:53.000 Well, what Brown did with all of this is they buried the study.
00:30:57.000 They buried the study.
00:30:58.000 And they decided that the study had to be pulled down.
00:31:01.000 So Brown University couldn't stand the actual study.
00:31:03.000 They caved.
00:31:04.000 The university pulled down a news article about the study.
00:31:06.000 Realistically, Brown and the journal in which the original comment was published, PLOS One, turned against the study because it offended politically correct sensibilities about transgenderism.
00:31:15.000 Brown School of Public Health Dean Bess Marcus even issued a letter to the entire community.
00:31:19.000 Here is what the letter said, quote,
00:31:21.000 Independent of the university's removal of the article because of concerns about research methodology, the School of Public Health has heard from Brown community members expressing concerns that the conclusions of the study could be used to discredit efforts to support transgender youth and invalidate the perspectives of members of the transgender community.
00:31:40.000 You reading me here?
00:31:41.000 Brown University, a research university, pulled down one of its own studies because they said that it could hurt people they don't want to hurt.
00:31:52.000 How insane is that?
00:31:53.000 Okay, basically they're saying that science is now taking, they're openly saying this, right?
00:31:57.000 They are saying that science is taking a backseat.
00:32:00.000 That science is taking a backseat to the realities of political correctness.
00:32:05.000 I'm gonna read that sentence again because this is insane.
00:32:07.000 The School of Public Health has heard from the Brown community members expressing concerns that the conclusions of the study could be used to discredit efforts to support transgender youth and invalidate the perspectives of members of the transgender community.
00:32:20.000 Could be used, not is being used, is not, is not,
00:32:24.000 Not is used, could be used.
00:32:27.000 Okay, so if the scientific data doesn't back your preferred political position, we're just going to pull down the study.
00:32:33.000 And then Brown just dissembles.
00:32:35.000 They say, The merits of all research should be debated vigorously because that is the process by which knowledge ultimately advances, often through tentative findings that are often overridden or corrected in subsequent higher quality research.
00:32:51.000 This is them saying,
00:32:52.000 We really, really hope this study isn't true.
00:32:54.000 It would be really bad if this study were true.
00:32:56.000 Because it might suggest that not everybody who identifies as transgender is suffering from a biological disorder like gender identity disorder.
00:33:03.000 It's possible that they're just mistaking their own feelings.
00:33:07.000 We can't say that.
00:33:08.000 So let's hope that this study is debunked.
00:33:10.000 In the meantime, we'll pull down the study because we're a bunch of cowards.
00:33:13.000 They say the spirit of free inquiry and scholarly debate is central to academic excellence.
00:33:17.000 At the same time.
00:33:18.000 Mm-hmm.
00:33:19.000 Here it is.
00:33:19.000 At the same time, we believe firmly it is incumbent on public health researchers to listen to multiple perspectives and to recognize and articulate the limitations of their work.
00:33:28.000 And by the way, as I say, the author of the study specifically said this is a descriptive study requiring further research.
00:33:34.000 But that wasn't good enough.
00:33:35.000 Brown pulled it down.
00:33:36.000 This process includes acknowledging and considering the perspectives of those who criticize our research methods and conclusions and working to improve future research to address these limitations and better serve public health.
00:33:47.000 And then I love this.
00:33:47.000 This is the best part.
00:33:48.000 There's an added obligation for vigilance in research design and analysis anytime there are implications for the health of the communities at the center of research and study.
00:33:57.000 So in other words, we need to be rigorous, but we need to be super duper rigorous if we are talking about stuff the left doesn't like.
00:34:04.000 Well, no, that's actually not the requirement of science.
00:34:06.000 The requirement of science is that you are supposed to be super duper rigorous all the way through.
00:34:11.000 The requirement of science is not dependent on whether the left likes the result.
00:34:14.000 And then you wonder why folks on the right don't trust a lot of the scientific results that seem to be pushed by the left.
00:34:21.000 Honestly, I think that global warming is taking place because the data suggests that global warming is taking place.
00:34:27.000 I accept the reality that a certain percentage of that global warming is created by man-driven activities.
00:34:33.000 But for folks on the right who look at the way that the left punishes people for straying from the established consensus,
00:34:40.000 And sometimes, how left punishes people for straying from a consensus that is not even scientifically established, that is politically established.
00:34:46.000 Do you wonder why folks on the right don't trust folks on the left when it comes to their scientific research?
00:34:51.000 That's not an excuse for people ignoring science.
00:34:54.000 And there are people on right and left who ignore science about vaccines, for example, because it benefits their own position.
00:35:00.000 It creates a confirmation bias.
00:35:01.000 But that's not what this is.
00:35:02.000 What we are watching here is a reverse confirmation bias.
00:35:05.000 You don't like the results of a study, so Brown will pull it down because it might offend people.
00:35:09.000 It's just insane.
00:35:11.000 The commitment of the school to diversity and inclusion is central to our mission, says Brown, and we pride ourselves on building a community that fully recognizes and affirms the full diversity of gender and sexual identity in its members.
00:35:21.000 These commitments are an unshakable part of our core values as a community.
00:35:26.000 So here's what they're going to do.
00:35:27.000 In an effort to support robust research and constructive dialogue on gender identity in adolescents and youth, the school will be organizing a panel of experts
00:35:35.000 Ah, panel of experts.
00:35:37.000 We can't actually just present the study and then have critiques of the methodology of the study.
00:35:41.000 We will present a panel of experts, namely a bunch of people who agree with the prevailing politically correct view of gender identity disorder, and then we will silence everybody else and we will get Lisa Lippman, a non-tenured professor, fired.
00:35:52.000 That's what's going to happen to her, okay?
00:35:53.000 Lisa Lippman will never work again at a major research university.
00:35:56.000 That's what's going to happen to Lisa Lippman.
00:35:58.000 She's going to go exactly the same way as Brett Weinstein, who is a biologist over at a socialist over at Evergreen University.
00:36:05.000 Heather Hying, who is his wife.
00:36:08.000 They will go after anyone.
00:36:11.000 They will go after anyone who does not follow the basic leftist consensus on politics.
00:36:16.000 They will destroy science in order to do so, and they will censor people.
00:36:20.000 This is what creates the anti-political correctness backlash on the right.
00:36:25.000 Jesse Singel of New York Magazine, who is no right-winger, he says, He says,
00:36:42.000 And that is exactly right.
00:36:43.000 But that is what the left is dedicated to.
00:36:45.000 Because the left is dedicated to one way of thinking, and it is the only way of thinking, and there will be no other ways of thinking.
00:36:51.000 Speaking of which, the left is also cracking down on Catholic charity, so that's awesome.
00:36:56.000 So it's not just important to screw up kids when it comes to issues like transgenderism by failing to acknowledge there is an environmental component to how kids feel about their own gender and sexuality, and instead pushing forward with a leftist social agenda.
00:37:08.000 It's deeply, deeply important that they shut down Catholic charities that are involved in adoption.
00:37:13.000 In the latest blow against religious Americans, the Catholic charities Buffalo were forced to shut down their adoption and foster services thanks to state rules that prohibit any adoption or foster agency from refusing to send kids to same-sex partners.
00:37:25.000 So, let's say I'm a single mom and I give up my kid to a Catholic charity because I'm also Catholic and I'd like my kid to be raised Catholic.
00:37:32.000 The state of New York says that that Catholic charity cannot participate in foster care or adoption services anymore.
00:37:38.000 They have to shut down because the Catholic charity will not hand the kid over to a gay couple.
00:37:43.000 Instead, they want to give preference to straight couples.
00:37:45.000 Not allowed to do that under New York state law.
00:37:47.000 And so Catholic Charities, instead, will send those kids, presumably, back into the state system.
00:37:52.000 So well done left.
00:37:53.000 Well done left.
00:37:53.000 We'll make sure that those kids get stuck in some sort of foster home, as opposed to with straight parents, because we have to make sure that gay parents are privileged in the same way that straight parents are, even though a child needs a mother and a father.
00:38:04.000 That's not a religious argument, by the way.
00:38:05.000 That is a natural law, reason-based argument.
00:38:08.000 Mommies and daddies are different.
00:38:09.000 Anyone who tells you different is a liar.
00:38:12.000 Mommies and daddies are different.
00:38:13.000 And if you don't believe me, think about your own mommy and daddy, and ask which one of them you would replace with a member of the opposite sex, and how much that would change your life.
00:38:20.000 To pretend otherwise is idiotic.
00:38:22.000 The same left that talks about the value of diversity when it comes to race, and talks about the special value of women when it comes to feminism, and considers people like Stormy Daniels evidence of feminism, says that motherhood
00:38:31.000 Is that right?
00:38:48.000 It also happened in Illinois in 2011, but it doesn't matter because the left gets what it wants, which is the ability to preside over a hard left move in all of social areas.
00:38:58.000 Zach Ford, who's an exorable, exorable human being, over at ThinkProgress, he writes,
00:39:06.000 No, the kids lost.
00:39:07.000 The kids lost because these kids might have been able to get a home through a Catholic charity and be raised in the way that their parents wanted them to be raised.
00:39:12.000 And instead, they're going to be shunted back into whatever state system the left wants them shunted into.
00:39:19.000 And you wonder why people are not
00:39:21.000 Dumping Trump?
00:39:22.000 The reason why people aren't dumping Trump is because the left is so insane.
00:39:25.000 Because this is the agenda the left is pushing.
00:39:27.000 The agenda the left is pushing is Stormy Daniels is a heroine, and Stormy Daniels is a hero, and sex work is exactly the same as a woman working as a partner at a law firm.
00:39:36.000 Or that Stormy Daniels is equivalent, that talking badly about Stormy Daniels is equivalent to making her a rape victim.
00:39:41.000 This is Jill Filipovic's perspective.
00:39:43.000 The left is suggesting that scientific research studies be shut down if they don't reach the proper conclusions.
00:39:48.000 And they're suggesting that Catholic charities be shut down because we have to make sure that kids can be adopted by gay couples at the same rate as straight couples because mommies and daddies are unnecessary.
00:39:56.000 You can have two mommies or two daddies.
00:39:57.000 They're exactly the same thing.
00:39:59.000 You think that this is just a case that I'm exaggerating here?
00:40:02.000 Here's Nancy Pelosi, the once and probably future Speaker of the House of Representatives, saying that the 2018 campaign is going to be about fear.
00:40:12.000 We're going to have so many women, and that's why Republicans are so afraid, and that's why President Trump is so afraid.
00:40:17.000 He's afraid of all the women, people of color, LGBTQ numbers that will be added to the ranks.
00:40:24.000 And the Democratic coalition is based on this, right?
00:40:34.000 The Democratic coalition is not based on fundamental principles about freedom.
00:40:38.000 It is based on which interest groups can we cater to and allow dominance in American politics to dominate other interest groups in American politics.
00:40:44.000 That is what the left is about.
00:40:46.000 The same left that will declare Mike Pence a theocrat.
00:40:49.000 is in its soul, theocratic about government itself.
00:40:53.000 Government is God.
00:40:54.000 They are the great moral arbiters of the planet, and therefore they get to determine what sort of science we pursue, what sort of adoption strategies are pursued by religious people, and by people of good faith around the country.
00:41:05.000 They're the ones who get to determine our social lives, and then they turn around and suggest that we're the fascists.
00:41:10.000 And then they wonder why people are resonating to a populist rhetoric that says that the left needs to be stopped.
00:41:14.000 They're wondering why conservatives are moving anti-left.
00:41:17.000 I don't think there's an excuse for conservatives to abandon their own fundamental principles about morality, decency, and limited government in order to slap the left.
00:41:23.000 I don't think anti-left is the same thing as conservative.
00:41:26.000 But to ignore the temptation that is being presented toward moving toward a populist right-wing anti-leftism because the left has decided that they want to challenge the
00:41:37.000 Okay, time for some things that I like and then we'll do some things that I hate.
00:41:40.000 So, this week I'm doing some Neil Simon stuff because Neil Simon passed away over the weekend.
00:41:54.000 Neil Simon is an incredibly talented writer.
00:41:56.000 This is one of my favorite comedies.
00:41:57.000 It's called The Goodbye Girl.
00:41:58.000 I think I've recommended it on the show before, but we'll go back to it.
00:42:00.000 It was probably two years ago or three years ago.
00:42:02.000 In any case, Neil Simon's Goodbye Girl with Richard Dreyfuss and Marsha Mason.
00:42:08.000 Richard Dreyfuss turns in, I think, a career-best performance in The Goodbye Girl.
00:42:10.000 He's really funny.
00:42:11.000 The basic plot is that this woman and her young son
00:42:16.000 Say hello to the Goodbye Girl.
00:42:36.000 Make it fast.
00:42:36.000 Hi, I think there's been some kind of mistake.
00:42:38.000 I sublet this apartment from this friend of mine.
00:42:41.000 Technically, that apartment belongs to me.
00:42:43.000 Now, kid, do I come up there now, we discuss this amicably, or do I storm the place in the morning?
00:42:49.000 Five minutes.
00:42:50.000 The only practical solution is that we share the apartment.
00:42:53.000 I'll bet.
00:42:54.000 You win.
00:42:55.000 Get your bags.
00:42:55.000 You get the small bedroom.
00:42:57.000 We're in trouble, right?
00:42:58.000 Say hello to Richard Dreyfuss.
00:43:03.000 The best part of this is that they do a production of Richard III, and the Richard III production is hysterically funny because the director of the production, being a leftist, suggests that Richard III should be played as a homosexual, that Richard III is latently homosexual, but he also insists that Richard Dreyfuss play it as openly
00:43:25.000 As possible in the production is extraordinarily funny.
00:43:28.000 So go check out the Goodbye Girl.
00:43:29.000 It's well worth the watch.
00:43:30.000 It's it's quite enjoyable.
00:43:32.000 OK, other things that I like.
00:43:34.000 So finally, President Trump came out and issued a statement about John McCain that was fitting and useful.
00:43:39.000 It only took him a day and a bunch of pressure.
00:43:41.000 He issued a statement saying, Despite our differences on policy and politics, I respect Senator John McCain's service to our country, and in his honor, I have signed a proclamation to fly the flag of the United States at half mast until the day of his internment, which is sort of normal policy.
00:43:54.000 I have asked Vice President Pence to offer an address at the ceremony honoring Senator McCain at the U.S.
00:43:58.000 Capitol this Friday.
00:43:59.000 At the request of the McCain family, I have also authorized military transportation of Senator McCain's remains from Arizona to Washington, D.C.
00:44:05.000 Okay, other things that I like.
00:44:06.000 So the president...
00:44:23.000 Trump is cutting a trade deal that he suggests is really a bilateral trade deal between the United States and Mexico.
00:44:28.000 It is not.
00:44:29.000 It's mostly a revision of NAFTA.
00:44:30.000 He wants to retitle it because Trump enjoys retitling things.
00:44:33.000 He likes rebranding.
00:44:34.000 That's fine.
00:44:35.000 The actual trade deal may be better.
00:44:37.000 We have to see the details fully hashed out.
00:44:39.000 It may not be better.
00:44:40.000 But Trump's rhetoric is sort of disconnected from what's actually going on.
00:44:43.000 He's suggesting that he's scrapping NAFTA altogether and renegotiating from scratch.
00:44:47.000 That's not true.
00:44:48.000 It's really he's negotiating changes with Mexico and Canada.
00:44:51.000 And that's basically all that's happening.
00:44:53.000 But if those changes are good, then fine, right?
00:44:56.000 Here's what CNN reports.
00:44:57.000 This is actually true.
00:44:58.000 This is actually real CNN reporting.
00:45:00.000 There's no formal free trade deal between the U.S.
00:45:01.000 and Mexico, only an agreement between the two countries on how to resolve key issues in their trade relationship as part of the NAFTA talks.
00:45:08.000 But this led the president to triumphantly state that he had fixed all of our trade problems by scrapping NAFTA.
00:45:14.000 Again, that may not be true, but it led to this kind of funny moment when he called up Enrique Peña Nieto, who's still the president of Mexico, and tried to use a speakerphone in a moment directly from Veep.
00:45:25.000 The president is on the phone.
00:45:29.000 Enrique?
00:45:32.000 Yeah, you can hook him up.
00:45:42.000 Do you want to put that on this phone, please?
00:45:46.000 Hello?
00:45:49.000 So, yeah, solid stuff there from the president and somebody on his team probably got a chewing out for a little bit of that.
00:45:55.000 Okay, other things that I like.
00:45:56.000 So, I have to acknowledge that I think the bad lip-reading folks are extraordinarily hilarious.
00:46:01.000 They're really, really funny.
00:46:03.000 And they did a bad lip-reading of Sarah Huckabee Sanders and members of the media at a White House press conference.
00:46:08.000 We'll show a couple seconds of it.
00:46:09.000 It's pretty funny.
00:46:12.000 I need a drink.
00:46:16.000 Okay, idiots, are you ready?
00:46:18.000 I just can't stand the faces of you people.
00:46:22.000 Those dead, questioning eyes.
00:46:25.000 You dummies don't matter.
00:46:26.000 Greedo?
00:46:28.000 What happens when I scratch a horseradish all over my face?
00:46:32.000 Now, why would you do this?
00:46:33.000 Well, I'm definitely gonna scrape it somewhere.
00:46:36.000 Yeah, you don't matter.
00:46:37.000 Angie?
00:46:38.000 My beard itches pretty bad.
00:46:40.000 Is this because of my bugs?
00:46:42.000 You have literal bugs?
00:46:44.000 Uh-huh.
00:46:45.000 I think it's mainly bed bugs.
00:46:46.000 Okay, you gotta go.
00:46:47.000 Wait, is this about the bugs?
00:46:49.000 Yeah, it is.
00:46:50.000 Stank?
00:46:54.000 No, all their videos are really funny.
00:46:55.000 You can go check out the Bad Lip Reading folks.
00:46:57.000 They do a pretty spectacular job.
00:46:59.000 Okay, time for a couple of quick things that I hate.
00:47:05.000 I don't know why she's investing herself so much in politics lately.
00:47:10.000 She has every right to do so.
00:47:12.000 I always say that because people take it, when I criticize a celebrity for speaking, they take it as though I'm criticizing the celebrity for speaking as opposed to what the celebrity is saying.
00:47:21.000 Alyssa Milano did this little video for NowThis, which is just one of the dumbest sites on the internet, NowThis.
00:47:26.000 They basically make these videos about fringe folks and then suggest they're mainstream.
00:47:30.000 And she did a video about stopping Brett Kavanaugh, who's President Trump's nominee to the Supreme Court, who will be confirmed.
00:47:36.000 And she decided that she was going to read out supposed accounts from supposed victims as though she was the victim.
00:47:42.000 And it got real weird.
00:47:44.000 We have the power to stop Brett Kavanaugh.
00:47:46.000 I know we do.
00:47:47.000 But we have to call our senators.
00:47:49.000 It's not yet a done deal, so we have to bang down their doors and share our stories because we are all Jane Doe.
00:47:57.000 We are all Joaquin Oliver.
00:47:59.000 We are all Laura Packard.
00:48:01.000 And so many more of us are vulnerable if Brett Kavanaugh is in the majority on the highest court of the land.
00:48:08.000 Oh, the crisis mentality.
00:48:10.000 Oh no, we can't have an originalist on the court.
00:48:13.000 Do it!
00:48:15.000 I just, the level of drama that Democrats bring to politics, pretty astonishing.
00:48:20.000 Let's admit this, okay?
00:48:21.000 We're all prone to this.
00:48:22.000 When Obama was president, I'd get overdramatic from time to time.
00:48:26.000 But, you know, the level of panic about somebody like Brett Kavanaugh is pretty insipid, given the fact that it is the left that has used the court as a club against legislatures across the country.
00:48:35.000 It is the left that has used the Constitution as a weapon to wield against traditional American values over and over and over again, from Roe v. Wade to Obergefell.
00:48:45.000 And the idea that Brett Kavanaugh, for reading the Constitution in its properly appointed judicial role, that he's the threat.
00:48:52.000 Pretty wild.
00:48:52.000 Okay, other things that I hate.
00:48:54.000 So, ESPN is dying in the ratings.
00:48:56.000 I can't imagine why.
00:48:57.000 Actually, I can imagine why.
00:48:58.000 It's because they won't shut up about politics and just cover sports.
00:49:01.000 So I can't get a damn baseball highlight on SportsCenter anymore, but I can certainly get half of the ESPN staff yelling at Tiger Woods, an actual black person, over his supposed racism for not ripping President Trump.
00:49:11.000 We can have Max Kellerman, who's as white as I am, talking about the evils of Tiger Woods.
00:49:17.000 It really bothers me.
00:49:19.000 I'm angry at what Tiger Woods said.
00:49:21.000 Because it is a thoughtless statement dressed up as a thoughtful statement.
00:49:26.000 And it either holds in contempt the intelligence of the people who hear it, or else it's just a stupid thing to say.
00:49:32.000 Oh, it's him saying, we have to respect the office of the president.
00:49:34.000 I don't want to get into politics.
00:49:35.000 It's a stupid thing to say.
00:49:36.000 And Max Kellerman would know because he is actually the king of stupid things to say.
00:49:39.000 He once was the Duke, but he's now been elevated to actual royalty, which is impressive.
00:49:43.000 He was second in line.
00:49:44.000 He was once a prince.
00:49:45.000 And then the father of stupidity died at some point and made him the king.
00:49:48.000 So the king of saying stupid things, Max Kellerman, who is just
00:49:52.000 Bad at his job.
00:49:53.000 He thinks Tiger Woods is bad.
00:49:55.000 But he's not the only one.
00:49:56.000 There was an entire ESPN segment about Tiger Woods in which Tiger Woods was labeled not really black, which was just excellent.
00:50:04.000 Well, first of all, we don't know what Tiger Woods believe.
00:50:06.000 He's Campbellanation.
00:50:07.000 He's not black.
00:50:08.000 When he got arrested, he was black.
00:50:10.000 He was listed as black on the report.
00:50:11.000 So let's understand that.
00:50:12.000 Tiger Woods, that's the issue that the African-American community has always had because, obviously, from a historical perspective, you know, if one-third of you has a darker hue, a darker pigmentation, you know, the bottom line is you are black and it is that simple.
00:50:25.000 And he ain't even one-third.
00:50:27.000 I'm just throwing that out there.
00:50:28.000 Um, so what?
00:50:30.000 So Tiger's not black anymore?
00:50:32.000 Weird, because it seemed to me that the entire media was very focused on his color when he was winning majors because it was actually a breakthrough for black golfers.
00:50:39.000 I mean, I was there for that entire time.
00:50:41.000 And that was fine.
00:50:42.000 That's a good thing.
00:50:43.000 But now he's not black anymore because he didn't want to say anything bad about Trump.
00:50:45.000 So Stephen A. Smith really sounding off in the most intelligent possible way.
00:50:49.000 I think the dumbest story of the week, however, with regard to sports wasn't even the Tiger Woods stuff.
00:50:53.000 It was the
00:50:54.000 Serena Williams' body suit.
00:50:55.000 So she wanted to wear a catsuit, basically, at the French Open.
00:50:59.000 And the French Open banned the catsuit because it was not in keeping with their fashion requirements.
00:51:03.000 Their actual fashion requirements at these various places.
00:51:05.000 That's why you don't see the players wearing, basically, like, sweatsuits out there.
00:51:10.000 Or tracksuits.
00:51:10.000 Anyway, Michelle Beadle says that it is racist to ban Serena Williams' catsuit because of the new dress code.
00:51:17.000 And so she explains that racism, racism, everywhere racism... It doesn't matter, by the way, that Serena Williams is by far the most praised female tennis player of all time.
00:51:26.000 And the best female tennis player of all time.
00:51:29.000 And that the last thing the French Open wants to do is offend Serena Williams.
00:51:32.000 No, it must be racism, because everybody is a racist, racist, everybody racist.
00:51:36.000 This is not a good look for the French Open, or the French, and specifically the gentleman who said you must respect the game.
00:51:42.000 I think there's a racial card being played here, because it is Serena Williams, the bootylicious comment.
00:51:48.000 He sounds like the beginning of the Outnight God, like he's just offended.
00:51:52.000 There's no reason to ban the outfit, because you're right.
00:51:55.000 There are many other uniforms that show so much skin, and that doesn't seem to be a problem whatsoever.
00:52:00.000 So I think she has been
00:52:03.000 Marks for this, and I think the entire thing is just a bad look for all of them.
00:52:07.000 Okay, so one of the cases that's being made for this is that she needed help with her blood clots and this helped create circulation.
00:52:13.000 But the French tennis federation president, Bernard Giudicelli, he said, I think sometimes we've gone too far.
00:52:20.000 He said it will no longer be accepted.
00:52:22.000 One must respect the game and the plays.
00:52:24.000 Well, I mean, it is a skin-tight bodysuit, and let's remember that this is not the first time that a person has been banned from wearing a skin-tight bodysuit at a major.
00:52:34.000 There is a woman named Anne White.
00:52:36.000 Her name might betray her color as well.
00:52:38.000 A white woman.
00:52:39.000 In 1985, she tried to wear a white bodysuit over to Wimbledon, and Wimbledon banned it.
00:52:45.000 And she was wearing a white one-piece lycra bodysuit.
00:52:47.000 It attracted a lot of attention, and the crowd, and the photographers.
00:52:50.000 And then play was stopped for the day.
00:52:51.000 And Ellen Mills, the umpire, told her to wear more appropriate clothing the next day.
00:52:55.000 She did so, and she lost the third set.
00:52:57.000 And she said she didn't know why it was controversial, but like 30 years ago, they were saying that this was an issue.
00:53:03.000 So I guess it's not racist, but it's racist because racism, racism, and that's all ESPN cares about.
00:53:07.000 I wonder why nobody wants to watch sports on ESPN.
00:53:10.000 Oh, maybe it's because they don't even do sports on ESPN anymore.
00:53:12.000 OK, we'll be back here tomorrow with all of the latest.
00:53:15.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:53:15.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:53:20.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Senya Villareal, executive producer Jeremy Boring, senior producer Jonathan Hay.
00:53:26.000 Our supervising producer is Mathis Glover, and our technical producer is Austin Stevens.
00:53:30.000 Edited by Alex Zingaro.
00:53:32.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Carmina.
00:53:34.000 Hair and makeup is by Jesua Alvera.
00:53:35.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire Ford Publishing production.
00:53:38.000 Copyright Ford Publishing 2018.