The Ben Shapiro Show - June 07, 2018


The Kim Kardashian Pardon | Ep. 555


Episode Stats

Length

55 minutes

Words per Minute

220.78783

Word Count

12,331

Sentence Count

869

Misogynist Sentences

48

Hate Speech Sentences

23


Summary

Samantha Bee does not apologize. President Trump pardons a drug trafficker at Kim Kardashian s behest. And the Mueller probe befuddles and unfolds. Today's After Show Was Hosted By: Ben Shapiro, Andrew Klavan, Michael Nollis, and Jeremy Boring Special Guest: Samantha Bee Blinds is a company that makes some of the most beautiful things you'll ever see in your home, and they'll make them for you for free. BlindS is also offering a Father's Day Livestream that you can watch on Tuesday, June 12th, at 7 PM ET. You can find our special live stream on Facebook and YouTube here. We'll discuss Fatherhood, immigration, and why fathers matter, even though Michael isn't a father, and we'll discuss why fatherhood will stand up against an increasingly male culture. And if you're a subscriber, you can write questions to us at Dailywire.com/AskBenShapiro and ask them at ben.shapiro@dailywire.co.uk. Ben Shapiro is a writer, comedian, podcaster, and podcaster. His work can be found on all social medias, if you search for him. He is a regular contributor to The Weekly Standard, The Daily Wire, and The New York Times, and has been featured on CNN, NPR, and the New York Post. The New Yorker. and many other publications. His music is also available on SoundCloud. If you like what you hear, please leave us a rating and review us a review on Apple Podcasts, and tell us what you think of our music is up to date. We'll be listening to Ben Shapiro's music is great and what you're listening to in the future. Thank you, Ben Shapiro and I'll be looking out for you in the next episode of The Ben Shapiro Show! Thanks for listening and sharing your thoughts on the Ben Shapiro show! Music: "Goodbye" by Jeff Perla, "Good Morning America" by The Good Morning America, "Outro by Squeals, "Solo, Good Morning, Good Life" by Scentless, Bad Girl (feat. by Fergie) by Jeffree Star, "Thank You, Ben & I'll See You, My Girl" by Eddy, and "I'll See Me Soon" by Cairo Braga


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Samantha Bee does not apologize.
00:00:02.000 President Trump pardons a drug trafficker at Kim Kardashian's behest.
00:00:05.000 And the Mueller probe befuddles and unfolds.
00:00:07.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:00:08.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:00:13.000 Well, we have a lot to get to today.
00:00:14.000 I have a bunch of announcements that I need to make right here up top.
00:00:17.000 First of all, our events are happening in August.
00:00:20.000 They're happening in Dallas, and they're happening in Phoenix.
00:00:22.000 And you should go check out the tickets right now in Dallas and Phoenix over at dailywired.com slash events.
00:00:29.000 The tickets are going fast.
00:00:30.000 We are almost sold out, I believe, in Dallas.
00:00:32.000 And we are approaching almost sold out in Phoenix.
00:00:34.000 So check that out right now at dailywired.com slash events.
00:00:37.000 Again, the tickets are available at dailywired.com slash events.
00:00:41.000 We are doing a Father's Day livestream, so we're doing that Tuesday, June 12th, 7 p.m.
00:00:45.000 Eastern.
00:00:45.000 Jeremy Boring, the Daily Wire God King, will host a roundtable discussion with me, Andrew Klavan, and Michael Nollis.
00:00:50.000 We'll sit there and say nothing the whole time but be paid handsomely for it.
00:00:53.000 We'll discuss what fatherhood means, even though Michael isn't a father, and we'll discuss why fathers matter, how fatherhood will stand up against an increasingly male culture,
00:01:00.000 And if you're a subscriber, you can write questions to us at dailywire.com.
00:01:03.000 You go in, you follow, you type it into the chat window, and we'll pick up those questions.
00:01:06.000 Again, that is Tuesday, June 12th, 7 p.m.
00:01:08.000 Eastern, 4 p.m.
00:01:09.000 Pacific.
00:01:09.000 You can find our special live stream on Facebook and YouTube, so make sure that you do not miss it.
00:01:15.000 Okay, before we get to the news, first I want to say thanks to our sponsors over at blinds.com.
00:01:19.000 So, there's one part of your house that you probably haven't thought very much about, but it makes a huge difference in terms of what your home actually looks like.
00:01:26.000 And that, of course, is the stuff that's covering your windows.
00:01:28.000 It's just the old garbage that the person three owners ago had or the apartment owner who is renting to you has.
00:01:34.000 Instead of that stuff, you should have really nice stuff on your windows.
00:01:36.000 It really upgrades the look of your apartment or of your home.
00:01:39.000 And picking out this stuff is actually kind of difficult, which is why you need to go over to my friends at blinds.com.
00:01:43.000 They make it really easy for you.
00:01:44.000 If you're not sure what you want,
00:01:46.000 Or even where to start.
00:01:47.000 Go to blinds.com and you get a free online design consultation.
00:01:50.000 You can send them pictures of your home and they send back custom recommendations from a professional for what will work with your color scheme, furniture, and specific grooms.
00:01:56.000 And they'll even send you free samples to make sure everything looks as good in person as it does online.
00:02:01.000 Every order gets free shipping.
00:02:02.000 Here's the best part.
00:02:02.000 If you screw it up, you mismeasure, you do something wrong, okay, if you mess it up, blinds.com makes it right for free.
00:02:08.000 They remake your blinds for free and they made it really easy for you.
00:02:11.000 So go
00:02:12.000 Right now to blinds.com and use promo code Ben and for a limited time you get 20% off everything.
00:02:17.000 Again, that's blinds.com promo code Ben for 20% off everything.
00:02:19.000 The faux wood blinds, the cellular shades, the roller shades, and more.
00:02:22.000 We've used it at the Shapiro household and blinds.com.
00:02:24.000 Its first rate and the customer service is just top-notch.
00:02:27.000 20% off everything at blinds.com when you use promo code Ben.
00:02:30.000 Again, blinds.com promo code Ben.
00:02:32.000 Rules and restrictions do apply.
00:02:34.000 Okay, so we begin today with Samantha Bee.
00:02:36.000 Samantha Bee, you'll recall, just about a week ago,
00:02:38.000 Well, she got herself in hot water because she suggested that Ivanka Trump, the president's daughter, the daughter of the president of the United States, was a feckless C-word.
00:02:46.000 Why?
00:02:47.000 Because Ivanka Trump had the temerity, the utter gall, the unmitigated sort of audacity to put up a picture of herself with her kid.
00:02:57.000 And in doing so, she then had somehow offended the left because the left was all concerned about children being separated from their parents at the border, which is an operation of law as ruled by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
00:03:09.000 So, Samantha Bee goes on national TV and she calls Ivanka Trump a feckless seaward, and then she suggests that Ivanka Trump should actually go try to have sex with her father in order to get him to change immigration policy, which is just wonderful.
00:03:19.000 Excellent stuff.
00:03:20.000 Well, Samantha Bee was off for the rest of the week after that.
00:03:23.000 Well, she was back last night and she was going to give her apology.
00:03:26.000 Now, here's the wonderful thing about apologies from the left.
00:03:28.000 If you're on the left, you know, there's that old that old movie love story where the slogan was being in love means never having to say you're sorry.
00:03:36.000 Love means never having to say you're sorry.
00:03:38.000 OK, well, being on the left means never having to say you're sorry.
00:03:41.000 Laura Ingraham had to put out like a full apology for saying that David Hogg, a Parkland survivor, was whiny about his college admissions and she got boycotted for that.
00:03:48.000 Samantha Bee called the daughter of the President of the United States a feckless C-word and suggested she should try to dress sexy to seduce her own dad.
00:03:55.000 And then she goes on TV and does a, like, seven-minute quasi-apology that is not apology in the slightest.
00:04:00.000 And, of course, the media are letting her off the hook.
00:04:02.000 And they're saying that she is just an emissary of genius.
00:04:06.000 She's just an emissary of goodness.
00:04:08.000 She's an emissary of rightness.
00:04:10.000 So here's Samantha Bee, who, it will be noted, has not said a funny thing in years.
00:04:14.000 Right?
00:04:14.000 And the last time she was funny was when she was actually just the sidekick on The Daily Show.
00:04:18.000 Now she's not funny at all.
00:04:19.000 Now she goes for what we like to call clapped-er in the business.
00:04:21.000 It's not laughter.
00:04:22.000 It's where everybody goes... Right?
00:04:24.000 And then there's kind of like a couple of laughs.
00:04:26.000 And they're not really laughing.
00:04:27.000 It's more like smiles and clapping because you agree with the person.
00:04:30.000 You know, just like you're doing right now at this show.
00:04:32.000 It's like that.
00:04:33.000 Except I'm not a comedian.
00:04:34.000 Samantha Bee's a professional comedian.
00:04:35.000 Okay, so here's Samantha Bee.
00:04:37.000 Here's her quasi-apology that is not an apology at all last night on TBS.
00:04:40.000 And of course, she'll just go right back to business because that's the way it works.
00:04:43.000 If you're on the left,
00:04:44.000 Then you get some claptor and people pretend that you didn't do anything wrong.
00:04:47.000 If you're on the right, then we cancel your show or we boycott you.
00:04:50.000 And even if you apologize, we say that is insufficient.
00:04:52.000 Even if you are clearly mentally ill, as Roseanne Barr is, obviously.
00:04:56.000 Samantha Bee gets to go on with her life like nothing happened and lecture us in the process.
00:04:59.000 This is my favorite part.
00:05:00.000 Is Samantha Bee lecturing me?
00:05:03.000 I'm not the one who went on national television and called someone a feckless c-word and suggested they have incest with their own father.
00:05:08.000 That wasn't me.
00:05:09.000 That was Samantha Bee.
00:05:09.000 But she's gonna lecture me and she's gonna lecture Republicans.
00:05:12.000 Because Republicans were really bad.
00:05:14.000 How do we know that?
00:05:14.000 Well, because they're Republicans.
00:05:16.000 That's how we know they're bad.
00:05:17.000 Okay, so here is the exorable Samantha Bee who has, I will say, walked away.
00:05:22.000 I've been saying for more than a year now that there is a running gun battle between a series of leftist comedians.
00:05:27.000 To be the least funny comedian on the left, and that included Amy Schumer, and that included Lena Dunham, and that included Trevor Noah, and it included Samantha Bee, but Samantha Bee, I mean, she is now Secretary.
00:05:37.000 She's just busting out of the pack.
00:05:38.000 She is eight lengths ahead.
00:05:40.000 Nobody else is even in camera view.
00:05:41.000 Here's Samantha Bee doing her apology last night.
00:05:44.000 You know, a lot of people were offended and angry that I used an epithet to describe the president's daughter and advisor last week.
00:05:52.000 It is a word I have used on the show many times, hoping to reclaim it.
00:05:56.000 This time, I used it as an insult.
00:05:58.000 I crossed the line.
00:05:59.000 I regret it.
00:06:00.000 And I do apologize for that.
00:06:01.000 The problem is that many women have heard that word at the worst moments of their lives.
00:06:08.000 A lot of them don't want that word reclaimed.
00:06:11.000 They want it gone.
00:06:12.000 And I don't blame them.
00:06:14.000 I don't want to inflict more pain on them.
00:06:17.000 I want this show to be challenging, and I want it to be honest, but I never intended it to hurt anyone.
00:06:22.000 Okay, can we pause it for a second?
00:06:24.000 You never intended it to hurt anyone?
00:06:25.000 Every day on this show, she calls someone an awful name.
00:06:28.000 Like, an awful name that I would never use.
00:06:30.000 She does it every single night on her show.
00:06:33.000 Like, all the time.
00:06:34.000 And when she suggests that she's trying to reclaim the c-word, this is the same sort of stupid logic that I hear with regard to people who use the n-word.
00:06:41.000 I'm trying to reclaim the n-word, make it a term of empowerment.
00:06:44.000 Why?
00:06:45.000 Why don't you say it's a bad word and people shouldn't use it?
00:06:47.000 Right?
00:06:47.000 The n-word is such a bad word that we're not even allowed to say the full n-word.
00:06:50.000 Which seems to me appropriate.
00:06:52.000 I feel like the C-word is the same sort of thing.
00:06:54.000 I've never tried to reclaim the K-word.
00:06:56.000 I don't go around at Shoal, at my synagogue, saying the K-word to people.
00:06:59.000 You know, let's reclaim this slur that's been used against Jews for a century.
00:07:04.000 Instead, let's say it to each other, man.
00:07:06.000 I mean, let's reclaim that thing publicly.
00:07:08.000 What's up, my K-word?
00:07:09.000 Like, I wouldn't do that because that's idiotic.
00:07:11.000 As I mentioned last week, I wouldn't do that.
00:07:13.000 Like, Jess, is this something you do in your community?
00:07:15.000 Jess is Hispanic.
00:07:16.000 So, Jess, do you run around your community calling each other the S-word?
00:07:19.000 I assume not.
00:07:20.000 That's probably not a thing, right?
00:07:22.000 Like, people don't do this on a regular basis because it's idiotic, okay?
00:07:25.000 This is just an excuse that she's making for being a nasty person who likes to use the C-word publicly, and then she gets to claim it's all about empowerment.
00:07:31.000 She continues along these lines.
00:07:33.000 Samantha Bee, oh boy.
00:07:35.000 Many men were also offended by my use of the word.
00:07:39.000 I do not care about that.
00:07:42.000 That's hilarious!
00:07:43.000 I hate that this distracted from more important issues.
00:07:46.000 I hate that I did something to contribute to the nightmare of 24-hour news cycles that were all white-knuckling.
00:07:54.000 I should have known that a potty-mouthed insult would be inherently more interesting to them than juvenile immigration policy.
00:08:02.000 I would do anything to help those kids.
00:08:03.000 I hate that this distracted from them, so to them, I am also sorry.
00:08:07.000 Okay, stop right there.
00:08:08.000 Okay, so her real apology is that she did something that distracted from the underlying issue.
00:08:12.000 That was the whole point of her making the joke.
00:08:14.000 Okay, she's a smart lady, Samantha Bee.
00:08:16.000 She knows exactly what she was doing when she went on national TV and suggested that Ivanka Trump was a feckless c-word.
00:08:20.000 She knew exactly what was going to happen.
00:08:22.000 This went through writers.
00:08:23.000 It went through producers.
00:08:24.000 It was on the teleprompter.
00:08:25.000 She's reading from a teleprompter right now.
00:08:26.000 She doesn't have all the stuff memorized, obviously.
00:08:28.000 This is just silliness.
00:08:30.000 And when she says, I'm so sorry to distract.
00:08:32.000 I shouldn't have contributed to the 24-hour news cycle.
00:08:35.000 She wanted to make news, and so she said this.
00:08:38.000 It is that simple.
00:08:39.000 This is obviously more her attempting to make news than Roseanne Barr tweeting something out that was excorable at Valerie Jarrett.
00:08:44.000 Roseanne Barr on Twitter is a nut job.
00:08:47.000 This was scripted, right?
00:08:49.000 This was something that was produced.
00:08:50.000 So I don't buy this excuse making at all.
00:08:52.000 And also, by the way, this idea that I can't be offended for use of the c-word.
00:08:56.000 Why not?
00:08:56.000 I'm offended when somebody uses the n-word because vile, uncivil, disgusting behavior is vile, uncivil, disgusting behavior no matter at whom it is directed.
00:09:04.000 I thought that we're supposed to live in a society where if you see somebody use the c-word against somebody inappropriately, we're supposed to step in and say no.
00:09:10.000 I thought that was a good thing.
00:09:11.000 I thought I'm supposed to be offended on behalf of people who are being maligned.
00:09:16.000 I mean, isn't that what makes for a better society?
00:09:18.000 I guess now the idea is that if I'm a man, I can't object if a woman uses the c-word, even if she's calling another woman the c-word.
00:09:23.000 I just, I don't buy that at all.
00:09:25.000 I think it's idiotic logic.
00:09:27.000 But she continues with her non-apology apology, which the media will label brave, obviously.
00:09:32.000 If you are worried about the death of civility, don't sweat it.
00:09:36.000 I'm a comedian.
00:09:37.000 People who hone their voices in basement bars while yelling back at drunk hecklers are definitely not paragons of civility.
00:09:45.000 I am.
00:09:45.000 I'm really sorry that I said that word, but you know what?
00:09:48.000 Civility is just nice words.
00:09:51.000 Maybe we should all worry a little bit more about the niceness of our actions.
00:09:56.000 Okay, just one point.
00:09:57.000 You just want to point this out for one second.
00:09:58.000 So she says that we should worry about the niceness of our actions rather than the content of our words.
00:10:04.000 Okay.
00:10:04.000 Well, let's say that that's the case.
00:10:06.000 Why are you so pissed about everything Trump says all the time then?
00:10:08.000 Right?
00:10:09.000 This is obviously not true.
00:10:10.000 Why are you so angry about what Roseanne Barr says?
00:10:13.000 It turns out that words are kind of actions sometimes.
00:10:16.000 That doesn't mean they're violence.
00:10:17.000 It does mean that they are a kind of thing that has an impact in the world.
00:10:19.000 And pretend that words are all created equal or that whatever we say has no impact is silly.
00:10:24.000 That doesn't mean they should be restricted.
00:10:25.000 It doesn't mean that every word should be met with any sort of action.
00:10:29.000 It doesn't mean any of those things.
00:10:30.000 But to suggest that you are going to make a hard divide between stuff we say and stuff we do,
00:10:35.000 Well, I think that applies in certain contexts.
00:10:37.000 That certainly doesn't apply to Samantha Bee's job, whose entire job is to stand in front of a camera and say words.
00:10:41.000 It's not like she's going out there, you know, handing out teddy bears at the border.
00:10:44.000 Samantha Bee's entire job is to say words into a camera that are written for her on a screen that moves before her, right?
00:10:49.000 I mean, that is her entire job.
00:10:51.000 And she obviously doesn't apply this logic to anybody on the right.
00:10:54.000 If I were to say the same thing Samantha Bee did, she'd be calling for my firing tomorrow, because that's what people on the left do.
00:10:59.000 So this sort of double standard is really quite absurd in every way.
00:11:03.000 She concludes with a little bit more of this non-apology apology, which the media cheered all the way.
00:11:11.000 Listen, I wanted to introduce you to some exciting new additions to our show.
00:11:16.000 These are our new mandatory censors, who will be with us from now on.
00:11:20.000 Don't be jittery, guys.
00:11:21.000 I talk fast, but you'll be fine.
00:11:23.000 That's right.
00:11:23.000 They're the best Montana farming censors in the entire business.
00:11:27.000 Unfortunately, this is what we have to do from now on.
00:11:29.000 I know.
00:11:29.000 I know.
00:11:30.000 It's some pretty foot-mopping stuff.
00:11:32.000 Okay, so this is the new thing, is that she's going to pretend that she's being censored in some way.
00:11:36.000 She hasn't been censored in any way.
00:11:37.000 TBS is allowing her to go on there, and if she wants to say feckless c-word tomorrow, they'll do that too.
00:11:41.000 It is worth noting, by the way, that her ratings stink.
00:11:43.000 Samantha Bee's ratings stink, as well they should, because she is not good at this job.
00:11:47.000 If you look at the posters all around town.
00:11:49.000 So I live in LA, which means that you see Emmy posters everywhere all the time, right?
00:11:52.000 You're driving around, you see on the bus stop, there's an Emmy poster for Samantha Bee.
00:11:55.000 And there is this hilarious thing that's going on right now where Trevor Noah has a bunch of his Emmy posters that are up and it features a quote from Samantha Bee.
00:12:02.000 And then Samantha Bee will put her Emmy poster up and it will feature a quote from Trevor Noah.
00:12:05.000 And then Jimmy Kimmel will put one up and it features quotes from Samantha Bee and Trevor Noah.
00:12:09.000 And they all have quotes about each other because they're all part of this ideological bubble where saying stuff like Samantha Bee says is not offensive in any way.
00:12:17.000 The only people who would be offended, of course, are these rubes out in the middle of the country who still think it's bad to say the C-word about people.
00:12:23.000 Now again, I'm not gonna do the whataboutism thing and point out here that there are people who said the C-word about Hillary Clinton, which I thought was wrong at the time, on its face.
00:12:31.000 But Samantha Bee is a thought leader, and that ought to make some sort of difference.
00:12:35.000 It won't, according to the left-wing media.
00:12:37.000 Okay, so.
00:12:38.000 I want to talk a little bit about Ben Rhodes, who is out there making some insane claims about how your control of information should be, about how your information that you see can be controlled.
00:12:48.000 First, I want to say thanks to our sponsors over at Indochino.
00:12:50.000 So, you're never going to look better, dudes, than you do in a nice suit.
00:12:53.000 There's a reason James Bond is always well-dressed, and it's because suits look great.
00:12:57.000 Well, Indochino is the world's largest made-to-measure menswear company, and they've been featured in major publications, including GQ, Forbes, and Fast Company.
00:13:05.000 They make suits and shirts made to your exact measurements for a great fit.
00:13:07.000 Guys love the wide selection of high quality fabrics and the option to personalize all the details, including your lapel, lining, and monogram.
00:13:14.000 So here's how it works.
00:13:14.000 You visit a showroom and you shop online at Indochino.com.
00:13:17.000 You pick your fabric.
00:13:18.000 You choose your customizations.
00:13:19.000 You submit your measurements.
00:13:20.000 You wait for your custom suit to arrive in just a few weeks.
00:13:22.000 It actually is really fun if you go to the showroom.
00:13:24.000 We have one in Beverly Hills out here.
00:13:25.000 I went out there and they measured me and I got to look at all the various types of fabrics.
00:13:29.000 It really feels like you're on, like you're Seville Row.
00:13:32.000 I mean, it's really, really cool.
00:13:34.000 And this week, my listeners get any premium Indochino suit for just $379 at Indochino.com when you enter promo code SHAPIRO at checkout.
00:13:41.000 That's $379 at Indochino.com when you enter promo code SHAPIRO at checkout.
00:13:45.000 That's any premium Indochino suit.
00:13:47.000 50% off the regular price for a made-to-measure premium suit.
00:13:49.000 Shipping is free.
00:13:50.000 Indochino.com.
00:13:51.000 Okay, so, meanwhile, while Samantha Bee is out there setting the world ablaze with her bravery, Ben Rhodes,
00:14:14.000 It's amazing.
00:14:14.000 We get so much of our information from the media.
00:14:16.000 We get so much of what we see from the media.
00:14:19.000 And that means that what we see is automatically filtered.
00:14:23.000 And Ben Rhodes wants that filter to be even higher.
00:14:26.000 So in the aftermath of 2016, when the Democrats were utterly stunned by the victory of President Trump, they suggested that what needs to change is the way that information gets to us.
00:14:35.000 The big problem is that we had information that was not filtered by the proper sources.
00:14:39.000 So Ben Rhodes, a man who, as the National Security Advisor to the President of the United States, Barack Obama, openly said that he had created an echo chamber for information in which he put out false information about the Iranian regime.
00:14:51.000 This guy says the government should ensure that Facebook feeds should be controlled by the government.
00:14:56.000 I mean, this is an amazing thing, what Ben Rhodes is about to say.
00:14:58.000 Here's what he said on MSNBC.
00:15:00.000 And frankly, the government also didn't have a lot of capacity to deal with this.
00:15:04.000 You know, we can't edit people's Facebook feeds and say, that's fake news and that's not.
00:15:08.000 And what worries me today, Andrea, is that we still don't have a lot of capacity.
00:15:12.000 And frankly, our government's probably not doing anything to prevent this.
00:15:15.000 And so the likelihood that the Russians are going to do this again in the midterm elections and the next presidential election is very high.
00:15:20.000 Okay, so he thinks that the government should now have more control over what it is that we can see.
00:15:25.000 This guy who used the power of government to crack down on what the American people could see and lied about it to the effect that now Iran, a terror sponsor, the greatest terror sponsor on planet Earth, has billions of extra dollars to pass around in pursuit of that terrorism, he thinks the government should be in charge of what we see.
00:15:42.000 The same people who find Samantha Bee funny want to control what you see.
00:15:45.000 That's the bottom line.
00:15:46.000 The same people who think that Samantha Bee is some sort of halcyon of feminism,
00:15:50.000 That she has some sort of apex of free speech being utilized for truth?
00:15:55.000 These same people think that you ought to not be able to see my show, for example, on Facebook.
00:15:59.000 That Samantha Bee's show should be featured.
00:16:01.000 In fact, Facebook is starting, this is a new thing, they're starting their new watch feed.
00:16:06.000 Their watch feed is a bunch of shows that Facebook helps produce, and they're all from mainstream media outlets.
00:16:11.000 Facebook is not coordinating with a bunch of right-wing outlets.
00:16:13.000 They're not coordinating with Daily Wire to put out a various and sundry show with diverse points of view.
00:16:19.000 They're not doing that.
00:16:20.000 Instead, they're picking a few mainstream outlets and they're going to promote those mainstream outlets because Democrats have said that they should do so.
00:16:25.000 And then they wonder why we, on the right, are worried about the distribution of information.
00:16:30.000 We have a reason to be worried about the distribution of information.
00:16:33.000 Now, speaking of the distribution of information, there's a story that's trending on Twitter that I want to talk about briefly.
00:16:37.000 So there's a story that was going around today
00:16:40.000 And it was it says no gays allowed, right?
00:16:42.000 This is what's trending on Twitter is no gays allowed.
00:16:45.000 So what's the story?
00:16:46.000 The story is that there was a guy in Tennessee who apparently put up a sign, right?
00:16:50.000 He put up a sign that said no gays allowed in his store.
00:16:54.000 And he put up this sign after there was the Supreme Court ruling that said that religious bakers no longer have to cater to same sex weddings.
00:17:01.000 Or at least this particular religious baker does not have to cater to a same-sex wedding.
00:17:05.000 And it was reported by USA Today as though this had just happened.
00:17:08.000 The owner of the store is a guy named Jeff Amex, and he said,
00:17:21.000 And everybody on the left went off on this.
00:17:23.000 First of all, it's not that Jesus was a homophobe per se, but it's not that the New Testament is super pro-homosexuality.
00:17:28.000 I mean, Romans is not particularly pro-homosexuality.
00:17:40.000 There are various places in the New Testament that demonstrate that they are not pro-homosexuality.
00:17:44.000 Peter Dow, who used to work for Hillary Clinton, he says, And then there's another story that came out, right?
00:17:48.000 And then he tweeted out the story.
00:17:58.000 And then there was various tweets coming out from people on the left.
00:18:01.000 Charles Blow, who's appropriately named over the New York Times, and he tweeted out the same story.
00:18:05.000 He said,
00:18:14.000 Okay, there's only one problem with the story that all these people are tweeting out.
00:18:16.000 It's from 2015.
00:18:18.000 Okay, this guy put up his sign again, apparently this week, but the original sign was put up in 2015.
00:18:24.000 So the whole story here is that there's a nutcase in Tennessee who put up a no-gays-allowed sign in 2015 and then took it down within one day, and now he's put it up again, and we're supposed to believe there's a broad swath of Christians across the country who are no longer going to serve gay customers because of all of this.
00:18:39.000 Now, I'll be honest with you, I don't know one Christian who owns a store who's not going to serve a gay customer.
00:18:44.000 I know a lot of Christians who aren't interested in catering a same-sex wedding or being involved with something they perceive to be a sin, but I don't know any Christians who operate a normal business who do a sex orientation check, a sexual orientation check at the counter.
00:18:56.000 I've never seen that ever.
00:18:58.000 But the media are going to focus in on that, because the media want to push a particular narrative, and that narrative is that in the absence of government compulsion, Christians everywhere are going to be putting up no-gays-allowed signs in their stores.
00:19:08.000 Again, this story originated three years ago, and it's the same guy doing the same thing, but we're now going to pretend that it's something brand new and shocking, because the media have something to push.
00:19:18.000 Because the media have something that they need to show.
00:19:22.000 Now, I'll be honest with this.
00:19:23.000 Originally, when we reported the story, we only reported the part about 2015.
00:19:26.000 That was a mistake on my behalf over at Daily Wire.
00:19:28.000 It's a mistake I made while I was reporting the story.
00:19:30.000 We updated the story to correct it and to demonstrate the guy who had put back up the sign.
00:19:34.000 But it doesn't undermine the original critique, which is that if you're going to claim that this is happening all over the country, you can't pick the same guy who does this every three years and then say, oh my God, something brand new is happening.
00:19:43.000 We see this sort of media coverage, unfortunately, across the board in California.
00:19:47.000 There's a guy who's running out here for, I believe it was a state senate seat or the governor's seat, and he was a fellow who was a neo-Nazi, essentially, and there was one outlying poll that showed him at double digits in the outlying polls, and it turned out that he won 1.8% of the total vote.
00:20:05.000 But for weeks, all we had was nonstop coverage about how this was the new upswing inside the Republican Party, how this person presented a serious, dire threat to the state of America.
00:20:13.000 Now, listen, I think bad people are bad people, and they ought to be called out when they're bad people.
00:20:16.000 That's fine with me.
00:20:17.000 But to pretend that there is some broad conspiracy, some broad swath of people who are jumping on board here,
00:20:23.000 And that all of America's Christians are going to put up No Gays Allowed signs, so that all of America's Republicans are actual secret Nazis.
00:20:30.000 There's an agenda that is happening, and that's why when Ben Rhodes says things like, the government ought to control your informational feed, the same people who are fibbing about this stuff, the same people who are exaggerating these cases to make them into a big deal, those same people
00:20:43.000 That I find utterly and completely disturbing.
00:20:49.000 Now, speaking of things that I find utterly and completely disturbing, in just a second I want to talk about the Kim Kardashian pardon.
00:20:56.000 Because I know there are a lot of people on the right who are very fond of this Kim Kardashian pardon.
00:20:59.000 It wasn't Kim Kardashian who was pardoned, she didn't commit a crime.
00:21:01.000 But, she was involved with a pardon, and I want to explain why I find this somewhat troubling in just a second.
00:21:06.000 First, I want to say thanks to our sponsors over at Helix Sleep.
00:21:09.000 So, there's nobody on the planet just like you.
00:21:11.000 Thank God, because who needs two of you?
00:21:12.000 But, you should have a mattress that is built just for you.
00:21:15.000 And working with the world's leading sleep experts, Helix Sleep has developed a mattress that's customized to your specific height, weight, and sleep preferences, so you can have the best sleep of your life at an unbeatable price.
00:21:24.000 Here's how it works.
00:21:24.000 You go to HelixSleep.com.
00:21:26.000 You fill out their two-minute sleep quiz, and they'll design your custom mattress.
00:21:28.000 They can even customize each side for you and a partner.
00:21:31.000 In 2018, HelixSleep has taken customized sleep to the next level with the Helix Pillow.
00:21:35.000 And they're all new pillows.
00:21:36.000 They're fully adjustable, so you can achieve perfect comfort regardless of sleep position or body type.
00:21:40.000 They use these proprietary algorithms, and they bring you the best mattress possible.
00:21:44.000 It really is awesome.
00:21:45.000 You know, we did this.
00:21:46.000 We took the Helix Sleep quiz, essentially.
00:21:48.000 And then they sent us the mattress in the mail.
00:21:50.000 We unwrapped it.
00:21:51.000 We just put it on the bed because it inflates right in front of you.
00:21:53.000 And then we have been using it ever since.
00:21:55.000 It is just fantastic.
00:21:56.000 Helix Sleep has thousands of five-star reviews.
00:21:59.000 I think so.
00:22:19.000 Off your mattress order and let them know that we say, OK, so a lot of people are very, very excited because yesterday President Trump commuted the sentence for a woman named Alice Johnson.
00:22:26.000 So Alice Johnson is a 63 year old grandmother.
00:22:29.000 This is what you will hear in all the headlines.
00:22:30.000 She's a 63 year old grandmother and as a 63 year old grandmother, she ought to have been let out of prison.
00:22:36.000 Here is my problem.
00:22:38.000 So President Trump has been rather inconsistent on the drug war.
00:22:42.000 I am somebody who is pretty libertarian on drugs.
00:22:44.000 I think that marijuana particularly ought to be decriminalized.
00:22:47.000 I don't think you should go to jail for for smoking marijuana or dealing marijuana.
00:22:52.000 I am not quite as certain about opioids because opioids actually rob people of their capacity to think in a pretty spectacular way that undermines the very basis of the Republic.
00:23:02.000 So I'm a little more torn on harder drugs like opioids or for example cocaine.
00:23:06.000 Trump has not been torn on any of this, right?
00:23:08.000 Trump has actually said in the past that he wants the death penalty for drug dealers.
00:23:11.000 Here's him at a rally like a month and a half ago talking about how he wants the death penalty for drug dealers.
00:23:16.000 But if we don't get tough on the drug dealers, we're wasting our time.
00:23:21.000 Just remember that.
00:23:22.000 We're wasting our time.
00:23:24.000 And that toughness includes the death penalty.
00:23:31.000 So I'm going to point out here is the inconsistency.
00:23:33.000 If you want to actually say that the drug war needs to be taken off the table, we need to change our laws, drug dealers should not go to jail for quite as long.
00:23:39.000 Once you hit the age of 60, we should think about releasing, whatever it is.
00:23:42.000 If you want to actually make a substantive policy change, that is one thing.
00:23:45.000 What actually happened yesterday is that President Trump decided to release a drug dealer, a drug trafficker.
00:23:50.000 Her name is Alice Johnson.
00:23:51.000 And Kim Kardashian was, of course, extraordinarily happy about this.
00:23:54.000 She tweeted out a bunch of stuff about Alice Johnson, so grateful to Donald Trump.
00:23:58.000 Jared Kushner and to everyone who has showed compassion and contributed countless hours to this important moment for Miss Alice Marie Johnson.
00:24:03.000 Her commutation is inspirational and gives hope to so many others who are also deserving of a second chance.
00:24:09.000 And she continued along these lines.
00:24:10.000 She said, And then she concluded,
00:24:19.000 The phone call I just had with Alice will forever be one of my best memories.
00:24:21.000 Telling her for the first time and hearing her screams while crying together is a moment I will never forget.
00:24:25.000 Okay, and then there's this video going around yesterday of Alice Johnson being released from prison and here is what it sounded like.
00:24:32.000 Alright, so we are going to hear from Dan.
00:24:33.000 You see there Miss Johnson being reunited with her friends and her family.
00:24:38.000 They made that trip to meet her earlier this afternoon.
00:24:41.000 We heard this was going to happen.
00:24:42.000 It took a couple of hours or so for some of the logistics to be worked out, but then she was released just in time.
00:24:48.000 Okay, so then Alice Johnson came out and praised President Trump, said thank you to President Trump.
00:24:52.000 I'm going to give you the rest of the story in just a second.
00:24:54.000 I want to say to President Trump,
00:24:57.000 I am going to make you proud that you gave me this second chance in life.
00:25:01.000 And I will not disappoint the American public or the world who has so much faith in me.
00:25:08.000 All I can say is thank you, President Trump.
00:25:10.000 And I love you, President Trump.
00:25:12.000 Thank you.
00:25:13.000 Okay, so here is the issue that I have with this.
00:25:16.000 The issue that I have with this is if you had said when President Trump was elected that he was going to go around pardoning drug dealers based on visits from Kim Kardashian, I think a lot of his base would have been unhappy because he was the tough on crime guy.
00:25:26.000 Now again, if you want to change overall policy with regard to the drug war, I think that's probably a very good idea.
00:25:30.000 The drug war has been a giant fail that has sucked trillions of dollars from the American economy.
00:25:34.000 I'm fine with that.
00:25:35.000 But the notion that President Trump is now going to be granting pardons
00:25:39.000 Like he would on The Apprentice, that now we're gonna have the pardon show.
00:25:41.000 And that's basically what it's become some nights on Fox, where you have George Papadopoulos' wife going on Fox News and begging President Trump for a pardon, and you have Rod Blagojevich's wife going on Fox News and begging President Trump for a pardon, and now it becomes The Apprentice, where Trump just sits there at the end of a table, and instead of firing people, he pardons people.
00:25:58.000 I'm not a big fan of this.
00:25:59.000 I don't like celebrity mergers with politics.
00:26:02.000 Here's the problem.
00:26:03.000 Alice Johnson, maybe she's a good candidate for release, but I'm not sure why she is a specifically good candidate for release.
00:26:08.000 She's a 63-year-old woman.
00:26:09.000 Okay, she aged.
00:26:10.000 They say she's a grandmother.
00:26:12.000 Right, that tends to happen when you have kids when you go to jail.
00:26:14.000 You become a grandmother.
00:26:16.000 Being a grandmother is not a status you control.
00:26:18.000 Being old is not a status you control.
00:26:20.000 Now, she's been on good behavior.
00:26:21.000 Maybe she should be paroled.
00:26:22.000 There's no parole in the federal system.
00:26:24.000 Maybe that needs to change.
00:26:25.000 Maybe there should be changes to the actual criminal justice system.
00:26:28.000 Maybe there should be criminal justice reform.
00:26:30.000 But that's not
00:26:30.000 Not the same thing as President Trump basically saying on the one hand let's strengthen the drug war and on the other hand saying let's let a drug trafficker out of prison.
00:26:37.000 By the way, this idea that she was uniquely innocent or something is just insane.
00:26:41.000 She was sentenced in 1996 to life in prison.
00:26:43.000 Why?
00:26:44.000 Because she was leading a multi-million dollar cocaine ring trafficking in 2,000 to 3,000 kilograms in involvement with the deadly Colombian Cali drug cartel.
00:26:53.000 The judge in that case, who now, by the way, sits on the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals and was confirmed to that seat by a 95 to nothing vote in the Senate, called Johnson, quote, cocaine trafficking ends with dead people on both ends of the business.
00:27:04.000 So we don't know how many people died because this woman trafficked in 2000 to 3000 kilograms of cocaine.
00:27:09.000 But here's how all of this started.
00:27:10.000 Mike Dotcom made a video about her and they said, does this grandmother deserve a life sentence?
00:27:15.000 And then they didn't really talk about her crime.
00:27:16.000 And Johnson told her story to CNN.
00:27:18.000 She said, after almost two decades together in a tumultuous relationship, my husband and I divorced in 1989.
00:27:23.000 Well, she didn't get involved with people selling drugs.
00:27:25.000 She was the quintessential entrepreneur running the drugs.
00:27:48.000 It wasn't like some sort of accident.
00:27:50.000 So all this talk about she's accepted her guilt and all the rest of it, again, maybe you let her out because she's old and she writes plays and she's not likely to go back to drug dealing after all of this.
00:27:58.000 But if you're going to make the case that you need to be harsher on drug penalties, then I'm not sure how you make that case simultaneous with, oh, she was a victim.
00:28:05.000 She wasn't the victim.
00:28:06.000 She got involved in drug dealing herself.
00:28:09.000 That was it.
00:28:09.000 She's a sentient human being.
00:28:11.000 And if you want to change the standard, change the standard.
00:28:13.000 But don't change it just because Kim Kardashian showed up.
00:28:15.000 And this is a bigger issue, okay?
00:28:16.000 I think right now, we're in the midst of something that I think is deeply stupid.
00:28:20.000 And that is treating our celebrities like politicians.
00:28:23.000 You know, in some cases, maybe that's ended up as a good thing, right?
00:28:26.000 President Trump has done some good things as president of the United States.
00:28:30.000 But right now we are ignoring actual necessity for expertise in politics on behalf of people who are famous.
00:28:37.000 So it's not that President Trump met with a bunch of criminal justice reform advocates.
00:28:41.000 And then decided, based on the weight of the evidence, that it was time to release Alice Johnson and restructure criminal justice reform.
00:28:46.000 Instead, it was Kim Kardashian came to the White House, he'd seen Kim Kardashian maybe in a sex tape or something, and then he decided, you know what would be great?
00:28:54.000 I will let her pick the next person that I pardon.
00:28:57.000 So there was that.
00:28:57.000 And then we also had this week the whole hubbub with the Philadelphia Eagles and Steph Curry and LeBron James talking about politics.
00:29:03.000 And then we had that story that I discussed a couple of days ago that Medicare and Social Security are going to be bankrupt in the next 15 years.
00:29:10.000 Which one of those stories got the least attention?
00:29:11.000 Obviously, it's the one about Social Security.
00:29:13.000 But there's a reason for that.
00:29:15.000 It's because human beings are pre-programmed to have an addiction to celebrity.
00:29:19.000 We care about what celebrities think.
00:29:20.000 This is how we work.
00:29:21.000 I'll explain in a second the science behind all of this and why we as rational human beings need to buck our addiction to celebrity
00:29:27.000 Because it's going to have some real ramifications for our politics.
00:29:29.000 First, I just want to say thank you to our sponsors over at Legacy Box.
00:29:32.000 So, the best Father's Day gift that you can give someone, I really believe this, is to preserve their memories.
00:29:38.000 I mean, if you want to make your parents happy, if you want to make yourself happy, preserving your memories is the way to do this.
00:29:43.000 And the best way to do this is you need to go into the garage, you need to look at all those films that you got out there, all the VHS tapes and the old audio tapes and all the little camcorder tapes.
00:29:51.000 They're just rotting out there.
00:29:52.000 Okay, and the bugs are going to get to them, or there's going to be a flood, you're going to have to run, you're not going to take those with you, and the memories are gone.
00:29:58.000 This is why you need LegacyBox.
00:29:59.000 LegacyBox is a simple, affordable way to get your recorded moments digitally preserved on DVD or thumb drive.
00:30:03.000 So here's how it works.
00:30:04.000 You go to LegacyBox.com, and then they send you a box, and you load the LegacyBox with your old tapes, your films, your pictures, your audio recordings, and you send it back to them.
00:30:12.000 And then you get them back in a couple of weeks on DVD or a convenient thumb drive.
00:30:15.000 They're ready to watch, share, and relive.
00:30:17.000 Legacy Box takes care of everything, and they provide updates at every step of the process.
00:30:22.000 So I've done Legacy Box with my parents' films, and everything comes back on that thumb drive or that DVD.
00:30:26.000 And finally, you're going to watch that stuff.
00:30:28.000 All that stuff you thought was going to be imperative for you to watch, you know, back when you filmed it, you can actually see it now.
00:30:33.000 Right?
00:30:34.000 And Legacy Box takes care of all of it for you.
00:30:35.000 Go to LegacyBox.com slash Ben.
00:30:37.000 Enter my promo code Ben and get a 40% discount on your order.
00:30:40.000 That's LegacyBox.com slash Ben.
00:30:42.000 Again, LegacyBox.com slash Ben.
00:30:44.000 I can't think of a more important gift that you can give to somebody.
00:30:46.000 LegacyBox.com slash Ben.
00:30:48.000 Use that slash Ben and you get 40% discount on your order.
00:30:51.000 And that's, it's already affordable price.
00:30:53.000 So go to LegacyBox.com slash Ben and check it out.
00:30:56.000 Okay, so in just a second, I'm gonna give you all the science on why we worship celebrities.
00:30:59.000 First, you're gonna have to go over to DailyWire.com.
00:31:00.000 For $9.99 a month, you can get the rest of this show live, the rest of Clayton's show live, the rest of Michael Knowles' show live, and be part of our mailbag tomorrow.
00:31:06.000 When we do our Father's Day event, which we're going to be doing next week, and you want to ask questions, your subscriptions mean that you actually get to see, you actually get to ask us those questions.
00:31:15.000 And if you want the annual subscription, then you get this.
00:31:17.000 The very finest in all beverage vessels.
00:31:18.000 It's $99 a year, so it's cheaper than the monthly.
00:31:21.000 And you get this Leftist Tears Hot or Cold Tumblr, which is just beloved by all who gaze upon it.
00:31:25.000 So go check that out.
00:31:27.000 Also,
00:31:28.000 Breaking news.
00:31:29.000 You probably heard by now that The Ben Shapiro Show is available on Amazon Alexa and Google Home.
00:31:33.000 So if you have a virtual assistant, you can listen to my podcast with a simple voice command after you enable the skill on Alexa or ask Google to talk to the show.
00:31:40.000 So for more information, just go check out our pinned tweets on Facebook and Twitter.
00:31:43.000 All of this is available if you subscribe at Daily Wire.
00:31:46.000 And if you just want to listen to the show later, go over to iTunes or YouTube.
00:31:48.000 We have a great Sunday special coming out this Sunday with Jonah Goldberg.
00:31:51.000 We have those coming out every Sunday now, and they are just, I think, a lot of fun.
00:31:55.000 We've had on Joe Rogan.
00:31:57.000 We've had on Jordan Peterson.
00:31:58.000 We've had on Dr. Drew.
00:32:00.000 And now, obviously, we're about to have on Jonah Goldberg.
00:32:02.000 So we have just a great lineup of folks who have been on the show.
00:32:05.000 You're going to want to go check Dave Rubin.
00:32:06.000 You're going to go want to check it out.
00:32:08.000 So subscribe to YouTube or iTunes.
00:32:09.000 You won't regret it.
00:32:10.000 We have the largest, fastest growing conservative podcast in the nation.
00:32:18.000 So what makes us better human beings, what makes us better citizens, is overcoming our own inherent biases.
00:32:22.000 We are born with certain biases.
00:32:23.000 Our brains are not completely plastic.
00:32:25.000 We are born with certain biases.
00:32:28.000 Babies already discriminate against outgroups.
00:32:31.000 Babies tend to be violent.
00:32:33.000 We have to, as we become older and more rational, use our rational capacity to overcome those instinctive biases that we have.
00:32:39.000 One of those instincts that we've not paid a lot of attention to, but we really ought to pay attention to, is our worship of celebrity.
00:32:44.000 It makes sense, right?
00:32:45.000 If you're in a small group, there are dominance hierarchies, as Jordan Peterson would put it, dominance hierarchies in smaller groups.
00:32:50.000 Dominance hierarchies just means somebody's the winner and somebody's the loser.
00:32:53.000 It's true in the animal kingdom.
00:32:54.000 It's true among human beings.
00:32:56.000 There's always somebody at the top of the food chain.
00:32:58.000 And because we were evolved to live in these small groups, that means that we look at the person at the top of the dominance hierarchy, and we pay special attention to them.
00:33:07.000 Because when they give cues, then that may allow us more survival mechanisms.
00:33:11.000 If we are nice to the person at the top of the dominance hierarchy, if we imitate the person at the top of the dominance hierarchy, if we pay attention to the person at the top of the dominance hierarchy, well now, take that small-scale social group and expand that out to 300 million people, the dominance hierarchy still exists, but the way that we judge dominance is fame and fortune, right?
00:33:29.000 Wealth,
00:33:29.000 And being famous.
00:33:31.000 That's how we judge who's at the top of the dominance hierarchy.
00:33:33.000 And so without us even really understanding it, we have essentially this vestigial evolutionary overhang, where we still care what people at the top of the so-called dominance hierarchy think and wear, and all of these things, because we were evolved to do that at small group level, and now we do it at large group level, even though Kim Kardashian has no actual impact on our lives, even though LeBron James and Steph Curry have no actual impact on our lives.
00:33:56.000 I mean, this is not me suggesting this.
00:33:58.000 This is an evolutionary psychologist, Daniel Kruger, at the University of Michigan.
00:34:01.000 Well, now that addiction to celebrity has infected our politics because there's another bias that human beings suffer from.
00:34:07.000 So we suffer from a bias toward celebrity, a bias toward the person at the top of the dominance hierarchy, and then there's something called the halo effect.
00:34:13.000 The halo effect is if I see somebody beautiful, I also tend to think that person is smart.
00:34:16.000 If I see somebody beautiful, I think that person is nice.
00:34:19.000 If I see somebody rich, that person must be nice and also better looking.
00:34:22.000 This is just the way the human brain works.
00:34:24.000 We tend to attribute all good qualities to one person to whom we have attributed one good quality.
00:34:29.000 So when we look at celebrities, we think, oh, they must know things.
00:34:32.000 The line from Fiddler on the Roof is, when you're rich, they think you really know.
00:34:35.000 Well, that's basically correct.
00:34:37.000 When people are very wealthy or when people are very famous, we tend to think they know what they're talking about.
00:34:41.000 And that holds true even when it's pretty obvious they don't actually know what they're talking about.
00:34:45.000 So we take Samantha Bee seriously, even though she doesn't know what she's talking about.
00:34:49.000 And we treat Roseanne Barr as though she's a political tribal leader, even though Roseanne Barr doesn't know anything about politics and is extraordinarily volatile with a history of mental illness.
00:34:57.000 Well, President Trump is sort of a beneficiary of our worship of celebrity, and maybe that's had some good impacts in terms of policy, but it is not good policymaking.
00:35:06.000 The reason being that in the end, when you're making policy for 330 million people, when you're trying to determine the best policy with the fewest trade-offs, what you actually need are people who have studied these issues.
00:35:16.000 And when you're talking about crucial issues, like bankruptcy of Social Security or Medicare or Medicaid, going to Kim Kardashian for this stuff is not the right way to do it.
00:35:23.000 And the same thing holds true on criminal justice reform.
00:35:26.000 I'm very interested to hear what people who have studied criminal justice reform from right and left have said about this stuff.
00:35:31.000 I'm interested to hear what Heather McDonald has had to say about this sort of issue.
00:35:34.000 I'm interested to hear what some of the experts who have been put forward by the Trump administration in favor of criminal justice reform have to say about the issue.
00:35:41.000 I think there are good debates to be had about these issues.
00:35:43.000 I don't think that those debates can be had at the level of Kim Kardashian said we ought to let a drug trafficker out of prison.
00:35:49.000 I don't think that's the way that politics ought to be done.
00:35:52.000 But if we pay attention to experts, that's more boring.
00:35:54.000 It's more unfulfilling.
00:35:56.000 Here's what's really interesting about the way our government works right now.
00:35:59.000 On the one level, it is a celebrity government where we care about the president inviting the Philadelphia Eagles to the White House.
00:36:04.000 And on another level, we pay no attention to the actual experts.
00:36:06.000 The actual experts are the quote-unquote bureaucrats who are inside the executive branch who we don't elect or diselect.
00:36:11.000 That was not the way the founders envisioned this stuff.
00:36:13.000 The way the founders envisioned this stuff is the experts were the legislators that we elect.
00:36:17.000 We elected the experts.
00:36:18.000 Those were the people
00:36:20.000 Those were the people who are supposed to be answerable to us.
00:36:23.000 So now we've got the worst of both worlds.
00:36:25.000 We've got celebrities who we don't elect, who are influencing people that we do elect, who aren't paying attention to the experts, and we have experts that we don't elect that we're not engaging in debate with.
00:36:35.000 So what we have is experts completely disconnected from the public, celebrities completely disconnected from the public, and the only people who are connected to the public are then kicking the ball over to either the celebrities or the experts.
00:36:45.000 None of this is good for the way that the country works.
00:36:47.000 Now, you may like the Alice Johnson pardon.
00:36:50.000 That's fine.
00:36:50.000 I'm not, like, freaking out.
00:36:52.000 It's not a pardon.
00:36:52.000 It's a commutation.
00:36:54.000 I'm not freaking out about it.
00:36:55.000 I don't think it's the worst thing that ever happened.
00:36:56.000 I don't think it's the end of the world by any stretch of the imagination.
00:36:59.000 But I do not like the basic notion here
00:37:05.000 That we should spend all of our time paying attention to what celebrities think, I think it just makes for bad policy.
00:37:11.000 Now, speaking of that, the U.S.
00:37:13.000 Senate is considering right now the possibility of scaling back the White House's capacity to put tariffs on foreign products.
00:37:20.000 I think that this is about time.
00:37:21.000 I think it's beyond time.
00:37:21.000 Senator Bob Corker, who really is not a fan of the president, and the president is not a fan of his, he's put forward a bill to curtail presidential power
00:37:29.000 I don't
00:37:44.000 Unilaterally decide misusing federal statutory law when we ought to be putting taxes on our own citizens.
00:37:50.000 Tariffs are a tax.
00:37:51.000 If you tax products coming from China, you are forcing Americans to pay more for that product.
00:37:55.000 Doesn't hurt China that much.
00:37:56.000 It hurts the United States a lot.
00:37:58.000 The fact is that it hurts China in the sense China can't ship products to us.
00:38:02.000 But it hurts the American consumer, too.
00:38:05.000 It's a tax on the American consumer.
00:38:06.000 Now, if you're using tariffs in order to ratchet down Chinese tariffs on American products, that's one thing.
00:38:11.000 If you're doing it just because you like tariffs and you think it makes America more competitive and trade wars are easy to win, as the president has suggested, that is another thing entirely.
00:38:20.000 Again, just because President Trump is the president doesn't mean he knows what he's talking about when it comes to trade policy.
00:38:26.000 This should be kicked back to the Senate.
00:38:28.000 The fact that Republican senators are shying away from this shows their absolute cowardice on these issues.
00:38:33.000 This was a senatorial prerogative.
00:38:34.000 This is not a presidential prerogative.
00:38:35.000 I would be saying this no matter who was president of the United States in any circumstance.
00:38:39.000 Okay, so in just a second, I want to give you the update on the Mueller probe because there are a couple of updates that are worth noting here.
00:38:45.000 So let's begin with an update on James Comey.
00:38:49.000 So James Comey, who is just a self-serving, self-aggrandizing human being.
00:38:52.000 I've been very critical of James Comey.
00:38:54.000 I think he ought to have been fired by Obama.
00:38:55.000 I thought he ought to have been fired by Trump before Trump even came into office.
00:38:58.000 I said so at the time.
00:38:59.000 Well now, according to ABC News, the Justice Department's internal watchdog has concluded that James Comey defied authority at times during his tenure as FBI director, according to sources familiar with the draft report on the matter.
00:39:10.000 Shock.
00:39:11.000 And one source told ABC News that the draft report explicitly used the word insubordinate
00:39:16.000 To describe Comey's behavior.
00:39:17.000 Another source agreed with that characterization, but could not confirm the use of the term.
00:39:21.000 In the draft report, Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who is an apolitical body, like the IG's portion of the DOJ is not supposed to be political, also rebuked former Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
00:39:32.000 For her handling of the federal investigation into Hillary Clinton's personal email server, according to sources.
00:39:37.000 On Tuesday morning, President Trump complained of numerous delays in the release of Horowitz's final report, which is expected to run several hundred pages long and be released in the coming days.
00:39:45.000 The sources who spoke to ABC News were willing or able to address only a portion of the draft report's complete findings.
00:39:50.000 What is taking so long with the inspector general's report on Crooked Hillary and Slippery James Comey, Trump said on Twitter, hope report is not being changed and made weaker.
00:39:57.000 Well, there's no indication that the president has seen or will see a draft of the report before it's released, but Horwitz could theoretically revise the report before it is released.
00:40:05.000 I'll be obviously very curious to see what the IG report says.
00:40:09.000 I'm of the opinion that Comey was a terrible, terrible head of the FBI.
00:40:12.000 I don't find any of this particularly shocking.
00:40:14.000 You know, with all of that said, the fact is that
00:40:19.000 You know, the facts will come out.
00:40:20.000 I want the facts to come out.
00:40:21.000 Now, meanwhile, President Trump is very angry, so is a lot of the right wing, over Robert Mueller because Robert Mueller apparently wants to view encrypted messages.
00:40:28.000 So, according to CNBC.com, special counsel Robert Mueller's team is requesting that witnesses turn in their personal phones to inspect their encrypted messaging programs and potentially view conversations between associates linked to President Donald Trump.
00:40:40.000 These witnesses are cooperating because Mueller does in fact have the subpoena power.
00:41:10.000 Sean says, why don't you just bash your phones with a hammer?
00:41:12.000 Hillary got away with it.
00:41:13.000 I don't know.
00:41:14.000 If I advised them to follow Hillary Clinton's lead, delete all your emails, and then acid wash the emails and hard drives on the phones, then take your phones and bash them with a hammer into little itsy bitsy pieces, use bleach bit, remove the SIM cards, and then take the pieces and hand it over to Robert Mueller and say, Hillary Rodham Clinton, this is equal justice under the law.
00:41:38.000 Okay, so, you know, people are saying, well, Sean should now be indicted because he's encouraging people to destroy evidence.
00:41:43.000 Obviously, Sean is being sarcastic.
00:41:45.000 He's pointing out the double standard that exists between the Mueller investigation and the Hillary investigation.
00:41:49.000 I agree with that double standard, by the way.
00:41:50.000 I think that the Hillary investigation was absolutely botched.
00:41:53.000 I think that it was purposefully botched by the FBI.
00:41:56.000 I think if you want to talk corruption in the FBI, we should worry a lot less about Spygate until more evidence comes out.
00:42:00.000 We should worry a lot more about Hillary Clinton.
00:42:03.000 We should worry a lot more about the fact that the FBI was acting to essentially cover for Hillary Clinton
00:42:07.000 When she was destroying emails knowing that they were classified, right?
00:42:11.000 I don't think Sean is wrong about all of that, but I do not appreciate the double standard.
00:42:16.000 I don't think just because Hillary was corrupt, that means that other people should be corrupt also.
00:42:21.000 Also, right now, the Spygate is running into some serious resistance from people who've actually seen the documents.
00:42:26.000 Now, one of the things that's been really funny about this is a lot of people in the media who are most exercised about so-called Spygate are people who also have not seen the documents, right?
00:42:33.000 They've seen the same number of documents that I have.
00:42:35.000 Meaning everything that's been publicly revealed.
00:42:36.000 But there's an open debate, and isn't much of a debate actually, inside Republican Congress over how much of Spygate is real.
00:42:42.000 President Trump thinks Spygate is real, but we now have Devin Nunes who suggested that at best maybe it's real, but he hasn't seen all the documents yet so he doesn't really know.
00:42:50.000 We've seen, we've seen, um, Trey Gowdy say that Spygate may not, in fact, be real.
00:42:54.000 And we've seen Speaker Ryan say that Spygate may not, in fact, be real.
00:42:57.000 So all I've said about Spygate remains.
00:43:00.000 As soon as the evidence comes out, happy to jump on board.
00:43:01.000 Until the evidence comes out, not gonna jump on board.
00:43:04.000 With that said, I would like to see somebody exercise, like, will somebody explain to Robert Mueller what the scope of this investigation is?
00:43:10.000 Or can we at least publicly find out what the scope of the investigation is?
00:43:13.000 I think that would be helpful because, like everybody else, I'm getting kind of tired of this nonsense.
00:43:17.000 Okay, so time for some stuff I like and then some things that I hate.
00:43:20.000 So, things that I like.
00:43:22.000 As I mentioned a couple of weeks ago, I watched the series from Stars of the White Queen, which is really entertaining, all about the War of the Roses, the very end of the War of the Roses.
00:43:29.000 And there's a good book on everything leading up to the War of the Roses for several centuries by Dan Jones called The Plantagenets.
00:43:36.000 So if you're interested in British history and you really like this stuff, Dan Jones' book The Plantagenets is well worth reading.
00:43:40.000 The warrior kings and queens who made England.
00:43:42.000 He also wrote a book on the War of the Roses.
00:43:44.000 Dan Jones, very interesting, very good writer.
00:43:46.000 So you should check that out if you're into reading history.
00:43:48.000 So that's worth seeing.
00:43:50.000 Okay, time for a couple of things that I hate.
00:43:55.000 Okay, so we begin with Ocean's 8.
00:43:58.000 So Ocean's 8 is going to come out soon, is the assumption.
00:44:02.000 And the reviews are coming in, and it is amazing to see the political bias in the reviews.
00:44:08.000 The political bias in the reviews is astonishing.
00:44:10.000 Because when you actually read what people are saying about it, they are trying so hard not to say this is a bad movie.
00:44:16.000 It's exactly the same as Lady Ghostbusters.
00:44:18.000 Instead of them just saying, yeah, the movie kind of stunk,
00:44:20.000 It's gotta be feminist, because it's filled with women, and they're women who are now doing it.
00:44:24.000 It's not Ocean's 11, which is men.
00:44:25.000 Now it's Ocean's 8, which is women.
00:44:27.000 And so that means that it has to be good, even if it's bad.
00:44:29.000 So here are some of the reviews.
00:44:30.000 Leah Greenblatt in Entertainment Weekly writes,
00:44:43.000 So what she's really saying at the end there is it's kind of bad and it's kind of fluffy.
00:44:47.000 But, you know, the girls just want to have grand larceny and conceit.
00:44:50.000 It's what movies were made for.
00:44:52.000 So the idea of the movie is really good.
00:44:53.000 The movie may kind of suck, but the idea of the movie is really, really good.
00:44:57.000 Here's the Guardians, Benjamin Lee.
00:44:58.000 Remember, all these people are on the left.
00:44:59.000 While great care has been taken in populating the film with infinitely talented performers, there's been less attention paid to the pros behind the scenes.
00:45:05.000 While Ocean's Eleven glided through its many sharp set pieces, Ocean 8's inelegantly plods.
00:45:09.000 The smoothness of Soderbergh's concoction, often smug yet mostly rather charming, has been replaced with a bland impersonality and the work of a disinterested hired hand.
00:45:16.000 Snappy, playful camera work and a deaf David Holmes score are sorely missed as Ross fills his film with plainly shot montages of superficial luxury that fail to feel quite as sumptuous as they should.
00:45:25.000 So that's a nice way of saying this movie is deathly boring and poorly shot.
00:45:28.000 And then there's Manohla Dargis of the New York Times.
00:45:30.000 So she credits the ensemble cast with keeping the picture afloat.
00:45:33.000 She says that Anne Hathaway is comedy gold, and she has fizz and delectable timing.
00:45:40.000 But she says the movie kind of sucks.
00:45:42.000 So this is the thing.
00:45:43.000 All of these reviews are basically the same.
00:45:45.000 They're all basically the same.
00:45:46.000 And all of the views...
00:45:48.000 Like, here's variety.
00:45:49.000 So in other words, because it's women, it's important, right?
00:45:51.000 It's more important than Ocean's Eleven was.
00:45:52.000 Ocean's Eleven wasn't very important because it had men.
00:45:54.000 Ocean's Eight is very important because women can be robbers, too.
00:46:10.000 Now, you may think to yourself, well, haven't there been movies made about female thieves in the past?
00:46:14.000 Wasn't there a movie called Clute about a female thief with Jane Fonda, like, all the way back in the 1970s, in which I believe she was nominated for a Best Supporting Actress Oscar?
00:46:21.000 I think she won, actually.
00:46:23.000 Haven't there been films featuring, like, Anne Hathaway as a criminal, like, in Dark Knight Rises, where she actually plays Catwoman?
00:46:29.000 Haven't there been films with women who play robbers?
00:46:33.000 The answer is yes.
00:46:34.000 There have been lots of them.
00:46:35.000 Thelma and Louise.
00:46:36.000 I mean, there have been lots of movies about this.
00:46:38.000 But no, it's very important.
00:46:41.000 In just the same way that Black Panther was very important.
00:46:43.000 I'm not saying Black Panther I thought was a good movie.
00:46:44.000 I enjoyed the movie.
00:46:45.000 But there's this sort of clarion call that went out from the tops of Hollywood that this is now an important movie.
00:46:51.000 Capital I. Important movie.
00:46:53.000 And that means that if the movie's good, it's fantastic.
00:46:56.000 It's the best movie that ever was made.
00:46:57.000 And if the movie is mediocre, then it's good.
00:46:59.000 And if the movie sucked, then it was mediocre.
00:47:01.000 It's an affirmative action for important movies.
00:47:04.000 I love this.
00:47:04.000 So basically, this is really boring.
00:47:05.000 All of these reviews are exactly the same.
00:47:06.000 They're blandly the same.
00:47:22.000 It is really, really funny.
00:47:23.000 This is Justin Chang of the Los Angeles Times.
00:47:47.000 Again, they're working so hard not to say the movie sucks.
00:47:51.000 I've never seen critics work so hard not to say a movie sucks before.
00:47:54.000 Usually critics revel in writing bad reviews.
00:47:57.000 Really, like, if you're a movie critic and you get to write a bad review, it's juicy.
00:48:00.000 You get to sink your teeth into how bad the movie is.
00:48:02.000 You get to, like, pull out all the stops and be as mean as you want to be.
00:48:05.000 You get to triumph the insult comic dog.
00:48:07.000 Here, you can have comedy gold with the biggest Hollywood actresses on planet Earth.
00:48:12.000 I mean, these, like, universally.
00:48:13.000 It's like Cate Blanchett and Anne Hathaway.
00:48:15.000 Every major actress of the modern era is in this movie, and the movie stinks anyway.
00:48:20.000 I mean, if you can't make fun of that, I don't know what you can make fun of.
00:48:22.000 It's like making fun of the Los Angeles Lakers back in the early 2000s, when they got Gary Payton, Karl Malone, Shaq, and Kobe, and they somehow lost to the Detroit Pistons.
00:48:29.000 Right?
00:48:30.000 Like, there's no way to not make fun of that.
00:48:32.000 There just isn't.
00:48:33.000 Okay.
00:48:33.000 Other things that I hate.
00:48:34.000 So, Google has decided it's important to change its emojis.
00:48:36.000 So, this is a real thing.
00:48:38.000 So, there's big talk about inclusion and diversity at Google.
00:48:40.000 So, if you need any evidence of Google making this a priority, may I direct your attention to the salad emoji?
00:48:45.000 We've removed the egg in Android P Beta 2, making this a more inclusive vegan salad.
00:48:50.000 The egg was too insulting for vegans, so they removed the egg in the salad emoji.
00:48:55.000 This is how you got Trump.
00:48:58.000 This is how you got Trump, you idiots.
00:49:01.000 My goodness.
00:49:01.000 You know what, I'm insulted by salad in general.
00:49:04.000 I'm insulted by people who say salad tastes good.
00:49:05.000 They're full of it.
00:49:06.000 They're liars.
00:49:07.000 Okay, anyone who says salad tastes good, and then they say, oh yeah, no, I'm gonna forego the bread.
00:49:11.000 I'm gonna go for a salad.
00:49:12.000 Yeah, you're a liar.
00:49:13.000 Okay, I'm talking to you.
00:49:15.000 Right now, you.
00:49:16.000 If you say, oh no, I love salad.
00:49:18.000 Lies.
00:49:18.000 OK, you prefer salad because you don't want to get fat.
00:49:21.000 Got it.
00:49:21.000 That's totally fine.
00:49:22.000 But can we stop with the gaslighting, please?
00:49:24.000 OK, the salad, what makes a salad good is the dressing or the cheese or the meat or the stuff on top of the salad.
00:49:30.000 Nobody, nobody ever has said, you know what?
00:49:32.000 I need a real treat tonight.
00:49:34.000 Give me some lettuce with a tomato on it.
00:49:36.000 No one has ever said that.
00:49:37.000 So I'm insulted by this emoji just because it's salad.
00:49:40.000 It should be immediately removed.
00:49:41.000 And instead, they should put, like, if you want to be nice to the vegans, put, like, vegan ice cream.
00:49:45.000 Okay?
00:49:45.000 Like, make it taste somewhat decent.
00:49:47.000 Like, stack some sugar on top.
00:49:48.000 How about just, like, a sugar cane?
00:49:49.000 How about that?
00:49:50.000 That's vegan, right?
00:49:52.000 Okay, salads.
00:49:52.000 Okay, so I guess I went off track here.
00:49:54.000 Salad's stupid, I guess, is the point that I'm making here.
00:49:56.000 Salad's gross.
00:49:57.000 And anyone who says differently is lying to you.
00:49:59.000 Okay, final thing that I hate today.
00:50:00.000 So, a Maryland Democrat decided that it was necessary to cut an ad insulting the President of the United States.
00:50:06.000 Why?
00:50:07.000 Because this Maryland Democrat happens to be pro-LGBT, and here is what the ad looks like.
00:50:12.000 I'm Rich Mattelino.
00:50:13.000 I'm running for governor to deliver progressive results and to stand up to Donald Trump.
00:50:17.000 Here are a few of the things I've done that already infuriate him.
00:50:21.000 I protected Planned Parenthood from the Republicans in Congress.
00:50:24.000 Take that, Trump!
00:50:25.000 I helped ban assault weapons in Maryland.
00:50:27.000 Take that, NRA!
00:50:29.000 I believe in public schools, not vouchers.
00:50:31.000 Take that, Trump!
00:50:32.000 And Betsy DeVos!
00:50:33.000 Yeah!
00:50:34.000 And what's the number one way I piss off Donald Trump and the Republicans?
00:50:40.000 Take that, Trump!
00:51:00.000 Like, you really think Donald Trump, you think really Donald Trump cares about that, like, deeply?
00:51:05.000 Donald Trump held up a rainbow flag at one of his rallies in 2016.
00:51:09.000 Do you think that Donald Trump, take that, Trump, like, really, if you think that part of the resistance is you effing your husband, like, I just, I'm so confused by this.
00:51:17.000 Like, if this is, really, like, do what you want to do, it's a free country, and, like, what?
00:51:22.000 Like, wow, you're gay, okay, that changes everything, somehow, but no one explains why, okay, but, what?
00:51:29.000 Like, I don't find this, like, who finds this, like, deeply offensive?
00:51:33.000 Who's like, ooh, take that, Trump.
00:51:35.000 I know every time, like, when I'm in the mood with my wife, I'm not like, take that, Obama.
00:51:41.000 Like, what in the world?
00:51:43.000 This is the stupidest thing I've ever seen.
00:51:45.000 And I love that they're throwing that out there, like, you know, okay, I guess.
00:51:50.000 You know, having sex with your boyfriend or your husband to own the cons, I guess that's a thing you can do.
00:51:56.000 I'm just confused as to why you think Donald Trump would possibly in a million years care about this and be insulted by it.
00:52:01.000 Like, even Mike Pence would not be insulted or care about this.
00:52:05.000 The insulting thing, honestly, about this ad is the insult that they think that I care about this.
00:52:09.000 They're like, oh my god, my life is broken now because you're gay.
00:52:12.000 Ooh, everything has changed.
00:52:14.000 You've totally devastated me.
00:52:16.000 Ooh.
00:52:20.000 I remember, there is a situation.
00:52:21.000 When I was interviewing, quick story, and then we will part.
00:52:24.000 So when I was interviewing for a law firm job in my Harvard Law School days.
00:52:29.000 So I graduated cum laude from Harvard Law School, which means that you're going to get a job in law.
00:52:33.000 I had the worst interview record of anyone in the history of Harvard Law School, so far as I'm aware.
00:52:37.000 One for 32 in my interviews for Harvard Law School, because I had the titles of my book on my resume.
00:52:42.000 That's really not speculation.
00:52:43.000 The Office of Career Services told me to take it off my resume.
00:52:45.000 As soon as I did, I got two offers within a couple of weeks.
00:52:48.000 But, in any case, there was one situation in which I was interviewing at a major American law firm, a major law firm that had an outlet in Los Angeles.
00:52:55.000 And they do this thing when they bring you out to interview for your follow-up interview, and that is they fix you up with somebody who they think you'll get along with because they're trying to sell the firm.
00:53:03.000 They're trying to show you that the firm's a wonderful place to work, and that when you're working 2,200 billable hours reviewing pagination, that it's just going to be the best time you ever had, right?
00:53:10.000 Which is complete nonsense.
00:53:11.000 Anyway, so they decide, you know what would be great?
00:53:14.000 Ben Shapiro, right?
00:53:14.000 It's a Jewish name.
00:53:15.000 And he went to Harvard Law School.
00:53:16.000 Let's get a couple of Jews from Harvard Law School to take him out to lunch.
00:53:19.000 Okay, well, first of all, chances are it ain't gonna go that well because, first of all, I'm Orthodox.
00:53:24.000 Second of all, I'm conservative.
00:53:25.000 So, if you say Jews from Harvard Law School, that usually means, like, 98% of the time, radical left.
00:53:30.000 So,
00:53:31.000 The couple of these Jews from Harvard Law School take me out to lunch, and this is supposed to be welcoming you into the intersectional clique that will be this law firm.
00:53:38.000 And it already started off weird because I said I wanted to, I could only eat kosher, so I'm happy to go to a not-kosher restaurant and have like a Coke or something.
00:53:45.000 And they're like, no, we have to go to a kosher place.
00:53:47.000 So, like, okay, that's nice of you.
00:53:49.000 There's only one kosher place at that point in downtown Los Angeles, and it is a falafel shop in like a hole in the wall.
00:53:54.000 So we're sitting there in our expensive suits, and we're eating falafel at this hole in the wall that is not air-conditioned in the middle of the summer.
00:54:00.000 And it's a guy and it's a girl.
00:54:03.000 And the guy is a radical environmentalist, and the girl is in a girl band, right?
00:54:08.000 She's also an environmentalist, but she puts on her resume that she is in a girl band.
00:54:11.000 It's like on her profile and everything.
00:54:13.000 So we're sitting there, and this guy reaches into his breast pocket, and he pulls out a column, and he starts reading from it to me.
00:54:19.000 And it's about gay marriage.
00:54:20.000 And it's about why I think that gay marriage and straight marriage are not societally equivalent, because I don't think they are.
00:54:25.000 And he starts reading this to me.
00:54:26.000 And he says, do you agree with this?
00:54:28.000 And I said, well, yeah, I wrote it.
00:54:30.000 So yeah.
00:54:31.000 And then and the girl then turns to me and she goes, well, I'm a lesbian.
00:54:36.000 And I said, so?
00:54:37.000 And she was, like, shocked by this.
00:54:39.000 Like, she actually thought I was gonna go, Oh my God, you're a lesbian?
00:54:41.000 That's changed everything!
00:54:42.000 What?
00:54:43.000 What?
00:54:43.000 You like chicks?
00:54:44.000 No!
00:54:44.000 No!
00:54:45.000 Oh!
00:54:45.000 You exist?
00:54:46.000 You're a real person?
00:54:48.000 No!
00:54:48.000 You know what?
00:54:48.000 I've changed everything.
00:54:50.000 I've decided I am now pro same-sex marriage.
00:54:51.000 I've decided that my entire biblical worldview is false.
00:54:54.000 Now that I've met someone who actually is homosexual, it's changed my entire life.
00:54:58.000 Okay, that didn't happen, obviously, because that's stupid!
00:55:01.000 That's stupid!
00:55:01.000 Do whatever you want!
00:55:02.000 It's a free country!
00:55:03.000 No one cares.
00:55:04.000 But the fact that people on the left think that they're, like, owning the cons by being gay?
00:55:10.000 All right.
00:55:11.000 All right.
00:55:11.000 If that's what floats your boat, if that's what gets you going at night, I guess that's a weird pickup line, but sure.
00:55:16.000 I mean, make your night better by owning Trump.
00:55:22.000 All right.
00:55:23.000 All right.
00:55:23.000 We'll be back here tomorrow with much, much more and hopefully less stupid news.
00:55:26.000 I'm Ben Shapiro.
00:55:27.000 This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
00:55:32.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is produced by Senya Villareal, executive producer Jeremy Boring, senior producer Jonathan Hay.
00:55:38.000 Our supervising producer is Mathis Glover, and our technical producer is Austin Stevens.
00:55:42.000 Edited by Alex Zingaro.
00:55:44.000 Audio is mixed by Mike Carmina.
00:55:45.000 Hair and makeup is by Jesua Alvera.
00:55:47.000 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Daily Wire Ford Publishing production.
00:55:50.000 Copyright Ford Publishing 2018.